Noted. Perked up reading that since I'll try anything for good sleep. Thx.

Apparently, large pricks were associated with being unthinking, and more in touch with an animalistic nature. A smaller piece symbolized a man in control of himself. That's also why you see villains, demons, etc.... sometimes depicted with huge eyes, long tongues, fat, etc.... The Greek ideal was a man in control of himself.

Just a guess but an ideal for the Greeks and also by the later artists like Michelangelo and Leonardo (balance, beauty, symmetry, everything together, nothing standing out alone). The Romans took it to where our generations might understand it more: gigantic muscles, maybe bigger meat too (Priapus).

And some Roman brides took a ride on a Priapus type instrument ahead of their wedding night to get themselves ready.

But I do have a leg curl extension machine at home. You are just making shit up and wrong as always.

I don't believe you did any "research," much less 30 minutes.  That's laughable.  And, as usual, you are completely full of it.  You bank on people not actually following up on the things you say.  Every time I'm bored enough to actually try confirm what you say, it turns out to be false or misleading. 

So I clicked on the link and read the story.  It essentially just quotes investigative reporter Julie Kelly.  She goes through and quotes the redacted and unredacted portions of the documents.  Her comments are verified by the documents themselves.  In other words, there is nothing "bogus" about the story.  Anyone actually looking at Julie Kelly's feed and comments can see that.   

Why do you lie so much?