Author Topic: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)  (Read 4559 times)

WeightPSHR

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
  • _____________
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2010, 09:09:47 PM »


"Massive off-the books settlement"....Please quote source. There was no settlement period.

If you are going to argue please stop making shit up....It really is pointless.

WeightPSHR

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
  • _____________
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2010, 09:18:14 PM »


Once again....you back down and make shit up. I called you out earlier on what Rampage was charged/convicted of.

Keep posting B.S. Why are all your posts deleted? Stick up for yourself....

WeightPSHR

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
  • _____________
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2010, 10:05:24 PM »
Stick up for what, you stupid fuck? I have no problem defending myself on here nor can I stop Yemeni from deleting my posts. Seriously, you had ZERO idea that this event had even happened a few hours ago. Don't go acting like you have any idea what you're talking about now. Fact of the matter is that Rampage was charged with a laundry list of crimes and plea bargained his way out of it, having gotten quite the lenient bargain because of his celebrity status. The woman also filed suit and settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

I guess it's "BS" because a fanboy like yourself who just started watching MMA didn't know about it. How you can call yourself a knowledgeable MMA fan and not have heard of this is beyond me.

Do some reading before you come in here acting like you're in the know. You're just embarrassing yourself now.  

You sound upset. Please cool down a bit. It's not worth it. ;D

You always seem to know everything and you never prove anything. Trust me....I follow MMA. Have been for years and years. But if you want to think I am a newb that is fine.

All I ask if that you prove some of your statements. You always tell me to 'read up'. Prove yourself.

big L dawg

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5729
  • i always tell the truth even when i lie...
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2010, 05:11:01 AM »
Cops Say Jackson Went On Rampage

Originally posted Jul 15th 2008 3:48 PM PDT by TMZ Staff

Former UFC light heavyweight champ Quinton "Rampage" Jackson got busted just minutes ago, and is currently in custody on the way to the clink -- but not before he was ordered to the ground, cops nearby with guns drawn.

Law enforcement sources tell us, Rampage was in a car crash near Newport Beach (that's near Laguna Beach in the O.C.) and then split the scene. Cops gave chase and eventually caught up and charged him with felony hit and run and felony evading arrest.

Here's the deal about the dumbest hit and run ever. Notice the truck he tried evading police in -- the one with the giant picture of him plastered on the side!

We're told there could be additional charges. No word yet on whether Rampage resisted arrest.

A pregnant woman who was injured when Ultimate Fighting Championship fighter Quinton "Rampage" Jackson sideswiped her SUV last month has had a miscarriage.

The woman, Holli Griggs, suffered what were believed to be minor injuries in the July 15 crash, after which Jackson led police on a chase. It is not clear whether the crash directly led to the miscarriage, but her fiance, Bill Krebs, said doctors were immediately concerned when they noticed a significant loss of fluid in Griggs' womb after the accident, The Daily Pilot reports.

Ultimate Fighter, Former Light Heavyweight World Champion, Quinton “Rampage” Jackson, pleaded guilty on Thursday, January 8, 2009, to reduced charges from a July 15 road rage outburst that caused two car accidents.

The chase began after Jackson was in a hit and run automobile accident in Laguna Beach, California.  You will remember Jackson led police on a chaotic chase towards Newport Beach, California.  He certainly lived up to his nickname, “Rampage,” by having an obvious anger management car accident due to road rage.

Our auto accident attorneys have experience in handling case of crashes and accidents that could have been prevented if motorists’ road rage was kept under control.  Instead, people let their emotions get the best of them and send someone to the hospital for medical treatment for an injury that could have been avoided.

“Based on the negotiated plea agreement, (Jackson) could receive up to six months in jail and probation at his sentencing,” read the press release by the Orange County District Attorney’s Office.  “Prior to sentencing, Jackson is required to complete 200 hours of community service, attend mental health therapy, pay restitution and comply with other terms and conditions.”

The District Attorney said that additional restrictions on alcohol use and mandatory, court-ordered drug testing might also be included in the judgment. If Jackson complies with the above conditions, he may be able avoid jail time and just serve his probation.  Jackson will be sentenced on January 7, 2010.

It seems as though Jackson may get off extremely lightly after his July 15th road rage on California roads that caused two automobile accidents. 

The auto accident attorneys at our firm believe that there is no place on the road for the type of behavior Jackson displayed on roadways.  In our opinion, Jackson made a decision that his well-being, not being caught by the police, was more important than anyone else.  For example, he could have injured or killed innocent pedestrians as well.

How can it be possible that despite causing a pair of accidents, evading police, driving on the wrong side of the street, talking on a cell phone while driving and ultimately endangering the safety of anyone unfortunate enough to be on the road with him that Jackson could possibly still be allowed to remain on the roadways and not behind bars?
DAWG

*ChuteBoxe*

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #29 on: April 21, 2010, 06:11:45 AM »
Rampage was not convicted of what you stated. Get it right.

No wonder why your dumb, because you don't know how to read.  I clearly said charged, and youre reading convicted.
Predictions
 40/61

WeightPSHR

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
  • _____________
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #30 on: April 21, 2010, 07:04:52 AM »
I agree, Rampage can get trashed and then go for a drive and kill a baby, then run from the police, but there is no place in the UFC for guys like King Mo.  He'll be there one day, him and Page hate each other.  There is a video of them talking shit to each other in a van.  King Mo is outspoken and a showman, plus he's got actual skill and he shows improvement in every fight.  He really hasn't done anything that bad, other than show he has a personality.  

This is what you posted. This is what I orginally called you out on. He was never charged or convicted of either of these.

God this is too easy! ::)

I thought you had more respect for you "reputation" around here then to be called out on something like this.

*ChuteBoxe*

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #31 on: April 21, 2010, 08:47:49 AM »
This is what you posted. This is what I orginally called you out on. He was never charged or convicted of either of these.

So when did I say convicted?  I take it you think OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife either just because he wasn't convicted?
Predictions
 40/61

WeightPSHR

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
  • _____________
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #32 on: April 21, 2010, 09:51:17 AM »
So when did I say convicted?  I take it you think OJ Simpson didn't kill his wife either just because he wasn't convicted?

OJ was accused and charged with Murder. Went to trial too. :o
He was later aquitted. Big difference here.

Legally OJ is innocent and it can not ever be held against him.

Here is what you said:

I agree, Rampage can get trashed and then go for a drive and kill a baby, then run from the police

Seems to me you are bashing a fighter with untrue statements to try and gain some ground on me. Similar to your friend BF.
What exactly did you mean by that?



*ChuteBoxe*

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #33 on: April 21, 2010, 10:14:05 AM »
I agree, Rampage can get trashed and then go for a drive and kill a baby, then run from the police

Seems to me you are bashing a fighter with untrue statements to try and gain some ground on me. Similar to your friend BF.
What exactly did you mean by that?

I never said anything about a DUI, I said "trashed".  He told Dana he had been up all night drinking energy drinks and playing Playstation and had some kinda breakdown.  It's a fact a baby died, he was charged with felony hit and run and evading arrest (felony also).  He over indulged on energy drinks and was sleep deprived, those 2 things combined can leave you pretty "trashed".
Predictions
 40/61

WeightPSHR

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
  • _____________
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #34 on: April 21, 2010, 11:33:12 AM »
I never said anything about a DUI, I said "trashed".  He told Dana he had been up all night drinking energy drinks and playing Playstation and had some kinda breakdown.  It's a fact a baby died, he was charged with felony hit and run and evading arrest (felony also).  He over indulged on energy drinks and was sleep deprived, those 2 things combined can leave you pretty "trashed".

I will give you the "gray area" on the trashed statement..but now you are saying a baby died. Why did you not say that originally?

Killing is an act of taking someone's life. Based on your statement, who killed the baby if Rampage didn't,?

Not trying to be petty here, but if you are going to bash what I say, don't write stuff that isn't true. It really is pointless debating that way.

How you coming along proving your other statement that Rampage settled or was successfully sued?

big L dawg

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5729
  • i always tell the truth even when i lie...
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #35 on: April 21, 2010, 05:02:06 PM »
Grieving Mom Sues UFC Fighter Rampage Jackson After Miscarriage
Sunday June 28, 2009

An Orange County website reports that UFC star "Rampage" Jackson is being sued on the grounds that an auto accident he caused may have resulted in a 16-week miscarriage.

According to the mom, Holli Griggs of Huntington Beach, Jackson crashed into her car during a high speed chase. She was 16 weeks pregnant, and she says the crash ruptured her amniotic sac and led to the death of her baby. Jackson was later convicted of evading police and reckless driving, but there were no formal charges related to Griggs' miscarriage and the district attorneys claimed it was not related.

It is hard to know exactly what the circumstances of any specific case are, but it is definitely true that auto accidents and other such trauma can be dangerous during pregnancy, especially in the second and third trimester. My condolences to Griggs for her loss.
DAWG

WeightPSHR

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2971
  • _____________
Re: Gergard vs. King Mo (spoiler)
« Reply #36 on: April 21, 2010, 05:08:22 PM »
Grieving Mom Sues UFC Fighter Rampage Jackson After Miscarriage
Sunday June 28, 2009

An Orange County website reports that UFC star "Rampage" Jackson is being sued on the grounds that an auto accident he caused may have resulted in a 16-week miscarriage.

According to the mom, Holli Griggs of Huntington Beach, Jackson crashed into her car during a high speed chase. She was 16 weeks pregnant, and she says the crash ruptured her amniotic sac and led to the death of her baby. Jackson was later convicted of evading police and reckless driving, but there were no formal charges related to Griggs' miscarriage and the district attorneys claimed it was not related.

It is hard to know exactly what the circumstances of any specific case are, but it is definitely true that auto accidents and other such trauma can be dangerous during pregnancy, especially in the second and third trimester. My condolences to Griggs for her loss.

Bezerk and Chute both stated that Rampage was successfullysued and/or settled out of court.
Placing a lawsuit on someone is much different then being successfully sued or settling out of court.

Besides, even a successful lawsuit (which is not the case here) doesn't mean anything legally about guilt. Many times it is cheaper to settle then to fight. (Again not the case here)

Thanks for trying though. ::)