LOL i agree with you but me and you my friend are SANE!!!!!!! the ppl commiting these heinious actions are NOT!!!!!!! a person who is INSANE could be driven to action by slappers words....just like you say they were by oreilly and operation rescue ppl...A SANE person understands the difference so its not the "inflametory" or "inciting" speech thats to blame its the fuking NUT JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My point was not to prove that slappers posts where inciting violence it was to show the plain idiocy of trying to pawn someones elses actions off on another persons words.....i assume you get my point now....
In your first post in this thread, you claimed that this post was the same kind of "hate speech that libs have been yelling about".In light of this post, it looks like you're admitting that's bullshit.
A few point of clarification, though:
I was not arguing the link between "hate speech" and violence. The point of my argument was that the level of anger was inarguably more intense coming from the right. Looking at the lame quotes you pulled as a counter-argument, I would have to assume you agree. Though, if I was to frame my argument in the context of recent events, I would point out that the anger emanating from the right is so repetitive, so deafening, and so irrational that it's easy to understand why someone with extremist views and violent tendencies would feel comfortable in the movements mainstream. This is not to be confused with blaming GOP mouthpieces with the actions of others, and this wasn't necessarily the case with the holocaust museum shooter.
