Wiggs,
This shit is getting REALLY old, dude.
And when I say old, I mean long past stringy cadaver beef-jerkiness old. I mean older than mummified Pharaoh dust, which would date back to ...
Oh, wait: I forgot how you cherry-pick "evidence" to support your claims :LOL: One minute, the scientific community hits the nail on the head but, at the same time, you won't have any part of their "faulty carbon dating" -- a rather pathetic stolen concept predicated in a massive Begging the Question fallacy.
... and all of
that supposed vitriol is coming from someone who gets a kick out of your posts and actually likes you (yes, in spite of the fact I think perhaps 95% of what you say is among the silliest shit I've ever read -- and believe me, that's saying something!).
I don't know what kind of shit you're smoking, but I recommend you back off it at the very least; claims like "blacks ruled Europe 'til the cusp of the 19th century" are so far off the reservation, I can't help but to wonder if you're crazy in addition to being stoned, trolling like you've got entirely too much time on your hands or, perhaps, a combination of both. Doesn't it take a kind of craziness to piss away hour after hour trolling a place like, of all places, a bodybuilding/it's "only gay if you want it to be" place like Getbig?
One of my undergrad degrees was in literature. My favorite literature professor, Dr. Fred Smith, asked us to study and analyze Hogarth paintings in conjunction with various other things from his period (e.g., did his work exaggerate the dire state of affairs in England at the time; if so, what did he hope to accomplish with his body of work? Etc., etc., etc. multiplied by hundreds of permutations on similar and even wildly disparate themes).
For those who don't know William Hogarth's work, he died in the mid to late 1700s. I want to say 1760ish. (I just checked Google. He died in 1764.)
I encourage folks to search "Hogarth" on Google images. I don't see any black people, yet you claim Europe was ruled by blacks until a generation
after Bill's collective work.
So ... was he so stupid as to publically posit a society in which your "black rulers" were impotent and that black people essentially didn't exist? Again, look at his paintings. Not a negroid in sight.
The whole premise of black people doing this and that before recorded time is a big fucking CROCK. Yeah, sure, they accomplished so many things ...
but said things were all before anyone wrote them down in any kind of enduring record (hmm ... wonder why?), so we're essentially supposed to accept the premise of Mighty Blackie as an article of faith.
Nah, sorry: Darwinism does a far better job of explaining, well, just about EVERYTHING
And for the religious folk among us, I've said it before and I'll say it again: faith is belief in the absence of proof, the absence of reason. Even Augustus Caesar, who rejected the pantheon of Roman gods, still reckoned there was some kind of "prime mover."
So say I. The Big Bang really had no tangible impetus. For that unfathomably-large amount of matter and energy to spread across the universe
ex nihilo ... well.
I tend to believe as Caesar Augustus did: there is a prime mover, but beyond creating/setting into motion our universe, eh ... it's impossible to say.
On the one hand, I abhor judgmental religious types who, more or less, say, "Believe as I do or you'll go to Hell."
WOOOO!
At the same time, I also despise self-absorbed atheists who act like they're the first people to realize that religious faith is, indeed, illogical. That reminds me of retarded kids who tell older people, like smokers or hot dog-eaters, "Hurr durr, dat is not so gud fer you!"
Who is the bigger fool: the one who continues to follow a self-destructive but pleasurable path, or some half-wit who thinks he's being profound when he points out the bloody fucking obvious?
~
