the mags (FLEX)
love to flood articles about Arnold chest...etc. all his great front shots, and they are great. But just because they ignore the back, doesnt mean you should forget about it...and if you do take a look at the back...it's NOT as good as the front.
All in all, both have similarities, and both have flaws.
It's almost like saying do you like the 70's Mustang? or the 2002 Edition?
They're both good, I just tend to stay away from the Arnold nuthuggers.
People tend to forget that ACTING made ARNOLD, not bodybuilding. People tend confuse his popularity, with his physique. (they're 2 different things)
I just think as a consequence of his acting shedding light on the bodybuilding world in the late 70's, the Weiders saw a great opportunity and started to put arnold left and right in the mags. issue after issue, even to this day he has some article related to him each month.
Just alot of well-thought marketing, so when you think of Arnold as a bodybuilder, figure out how much he really amounts to if he didnt become a hollywood star?
anyways, just my 2-cents....oh yeah, I pick Arnold, because McGrath has yet to start his career in the pro's (figuratively speaking)