Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on March 04, 2014, 09:42:30 PM
-
Why do you still support Obama and his agenda?
-
Coach whatever happened to you in those other threads you started? You just disappeared.
-
Coach whatever happened to you in those other threads you started? You just disappeared.
Have no idea what you're talking about. What threads?
-
Why do you still support Obama and his agenda?
Hey Coach, we're waiting for you to respond in that other thread you just left.
-
Have no idea what you're talking about. What threads?
Living in denial or do you have dementia?
-
Hey Coach, we're waiting for you to respond in that other thread you just left.
Which thread. I'm not on here for anymore than about 5-10min a day.
-
So no one is going to answer or are you just going to answer the question with a question?
-
Support how?
-
Why do you still support Obama and his agenda?
And what "agenda" are you specifically referring to?
(Sorry if it's a PITA, but gotta define terms first to make sure we're speaking the same language, ya know.)
-
And what "agenda" are you specifically referring to?
(Sorry if it's a PITA, but gotta define terms first to make sure we're speaking the same language, ya know.)
Why does the left spin. Just answer the question and quit avoiding it.
-
Why does the left spin. Just answer the question and quit avoiding it.
Spin this, inarticulate one: You have recently confused the word "except" with "accept" and I'm supposed to assume that we both agree on the meanings of words like "support" and "agenda"?
I ain't avoiding shit (unlike you on your thread "And to think the left made fun of her...") so give me definitions of those terms that you agree with and I'll answer. Or run away like a little whatever.
All animosity aside, I get that this probably seems like a chore for a guy who's not that great with language but ferfucksake, it's an "open book" test. Use google. It's easy.
-
Spin this, inarticulate one: You have recently confused the word "except" with "accept" and I'm supposed to assume that we both agree on the meanings of words like "support" and "agenda"?
I ain't avoiding shit (unlike you on your thread "And to think the left made fun of her...") so give me definitions of those terms that you agree with and I'll answer. Or run away like a little whatever.
All animosity aside, I get that this probably seems like a chore for a guy who's not that great with language but ferfucksake, it's an "open book" test. Use google. It's easy.
Thanks for that Mr. Clinton "depends on what the definition of "is", is.
On to the next poster who wants to give this Question a shot.
-
Why do you still support Obama and his agenda?
Why not?
-
Thanks for that Mr. Clinton "depends on what the definition of "is", is.
On to the next poster who wants to give this Question a shot.
LOL. You're implying that I'm being evasive when it's you that won't define just 2 words in your question?
That's pretty funny but I really don't get why you won't just say what you mean so I can answer your questions.
Seriously Coach, "support" can mean many things. So why can't you just tell me what you consider support? (Shee-it, just copy and paste the definition from dictionary.com as long as you agree with it --- How hard is that?)
Also, why would you have a problem saying what you think Obama's agenda is before asking others what they think of it? It makes no sense: Why on earth would you assume that your idea of his agenda is the same as what a progressive lib thinks?:
For instance, if I'm not mistaken, you think that part of Obama's agenda is to keep Americans in the dark about his birth in Kenya, don't you?
Do you feel you understand what I'm saying?
(Because if you don't, I'm happy to provide definitions of any of the terms I've used here, lol.)
-
Coach whatever happened to you in those other threads you started? You just disappeared.
Typical tactic. He gets his teeth kicked in and then runs off as if it never happened.
-
Support how?
Let me translate what JoeLoco means by support
support = not turning into a hard right wing brain dead idiot who opposes anything and everything that Obama does even if it's policies that Republicans have supported and even championed in the past or even legislation that they supported until Obama got on board
-
Holy thread backfire batman
-
lol pretty much.
I would assume that coach's definition of OB's agenda would be:
- Systematic destruction of the upper middle class and wealthy
- converting the US from a free enterprise system to socialism and then communism
- Making Islam the dominant religion in the USA
-
Holy thread backfire batman
HAHAHA
-
lol pretty much.
I would assume that coach's definition of OB's agenda would be:
- Systematic destruction of the upper middle class and wealthy
- converting the US from a free enterprise system to socialism and then communism
- Making Islam the dominant religion in the USA
I would agree that this far right belief is a product of sensationalized media babies.
However, if the left leaning posters so strongly believe in Barack Obama's agenda and weren't just ideologues, there would have been a concise answer to this question about what the Obama administration has accomplished since 2008 and the steps in the right direction the Obama administration has taken to solve the debt crisis.
I still don't see one yet. all I see are people frantically hurling insults at Coach because they have zero talking points on the subject. for instance, the next post won't be an answer to the question. it will most probably be an insult towards myself......for pointing out the obvious.
-
I would agree that this far right belief is a product of sensationalized media babies.
However, if the left leaning posters so strongly believe in Barack Obama's agenda and weren't just ideologues, there would have been a concise answer to this question about what the Obama administration has accomplished since 2008 and the steps in the right direction the Obama administration has taken to solve the debt crisis.
I still don't see one yet. all I see are people frantically hurling insults at Coach because they have zero talking points on the subject. for instance, the next post won't be an answer to the question. it will most probably be an insult towards myself......for pointing out the obvious.
Most of that I.got from get big lol
But I.agree, An answer can defiantly be provided. The problem is the question suggests that both agree and define "OB agenda" the same. For example: what if Coach believes what I posted is OBs agenda and the people answering don't? How can they really answer it?
Coach should first define it. And we will probably see most disagreeing with his definition. So then it's a dead end.
-
I would agree that this far right belief is a product of sensationalized media babies.
However, if the left leaning posters so strongly believe in Barack Obama's agenda and weren't just ideologues, there would have been a concise answer to this question about what the Obama administration has accomplished since 2008 and the steps in the right direction the Obama administration has taken to solve the debt crisis.
I still don't see one yet. all I see are people frantically hurling insults at Coach because they have zero talking points on the subject. for instance, the next post won't be an answer to the question. it will most probably be an insult towards myself......for pointing out the obvious.
Bears, I'm not going to insult you but I will explain by way of saying that Coach has likely just been trolling from the get-go. It's highly unlikely that his question was an effort to learn something. No, he just wants to try to rip on the left in his clumsy and uninformed way.
I considered writing a serious response to his question but do you know what stopped me? You know what made me want to try to make sure he wasn't trolling by asking him to clarify exactly what his question meant?
What stopped me is that I tried to imagine how he would respond. And, based on his regular "contributions" to this board, how do YOU think he'd respond? (lol) No matter how that question was answered, I honestly can't conceive of a universe where it's within the realm of possibility that he'd say anything even as fair-minded as, "Ok, fair enough, I can see why some libs might still support Obama's agenda now even though I don't." Hell no, lol, he's just gonna make some halfway irrelevant quip about "spin" or whatever.
So there was no freakin' way that I was going to take the time to write out a literate and accurate reply to his short-ass question only to have him not spend even 15 seconds considering my answer before replying with his customary unlettered ignorance.
The least he could do, in my mind, is to spend a little more time by clarifying his question so that, after I spend all the time it would take to properly answer his question and he responds like a dumbass, I won't be made to feel like Charlie Brown when Lucy inevitably pulls away the football I'm trying to kick.
This is way too long already but I'll add that some folks on this board are here just to sling arrows. Coach is one of those people. Others, like me, sometimes like to sling arrows too (Hi, BB!) or just joke around but often we are honestly interested in learning about and sharing different viewpoints in a serious way for the benefit of all.
Personally, my opinion is that Coach would need to show he's serious about wanting to engage others (especially others with differing viewpoints) before I'll take him seriously enough to answer any of his questions without first making sure he's sincere.
Aaaaand I'm out. (Wife needs attention, lol.)
-
This is CLASSIC Coach.
His next response would be; 'You just don't understand'
And then you'll never hear from him in his thread again
-
This is CLASSIC Coach.
His next response would be; 'You just don't understand'
And then you'll never hear from him in his thread again
You just don't get it do you?
-
Holy thread backfire batman
What thread backfire? In 23 responses NOT ONE person has answered the question. If I ask a question (a simple one at that) why can't anyone answer it?
When a liberal asks whats his agenda, you know what that means. Is all of this so called education a waste if you can't answer a simple question?
Let try this again in term the left MIGHT understand. Mind you, I don't know how to make stick figures and drawings on a computer or I would.
Here goes...
Are...you...happy...with ...what....Obama.....has .....done.....so.....far ?
You know his agenda, (not just you, but everyone else who can't answer a simple question on here) if you didn't know what he stood for (basically his agenda of having people dependent on Government, his foreign policies, his cover-ups, his lying, etc) then why did you or anyone else vote for him? Is this what you expected?
-
Progressive = Communist
-
His "agenda" and what OB "has done so far" are 2 different things.
Just to help you out there Coach i bolded some of the words.
agenda
[uh-jen-duh]
noun formally a plural of, agendum but usually used as a singular with plural, agendas or agenda.
a list, plan, outline, or the like, of things to be done, matters to be acted or voted upon, etc.: The chairman says we have a lengthy agenda this afternoon.
Maybe you should start a different thread titled:
Honest question for the progressives: Are you happy with what Obama has done so far?
I know its tough having to to use exact words and their proper meanings.
-
His "agenda" and what OB "has done so far" are 2 different things.
Just to help you out there Coach i bolded some of the words.
agenda
[uh-jen-duh]
noun formally a plural of, agendum but usually used as a singular with plural, agendas or agenda.
a list, plan, outline, or the like, of things to be done, matters to be acted or voted upon, etc.: The chairman says we have a lengthy agenda this afternoon.
Maybe you should start a different thread titled:
Honest question for the progressives: Are you happy with what Obama has done so far?
I know its tough having to to use exact words and their proper meanings.
Yeah, thanks for that ::)
Bottom line is, I could ask the question 50 different ways and it still wouldn't be answered as proof in this thread. The question basically got answered with another question. You knew what the question meant and still does mean. If you can't answer the question honestly, then just say so instead of skating the question. Why can't anyone from the left answer this? You know what Obama's agenda was otherwise you wouldn't have voted for him. Whether he accomplished them just might be a matter of opinion. I personally think he's a total and utter failure while he and the left might think he was successful. So, I'll try this once again.
-
Yeah, thanks for that ::)
Bottom line is, I could ask the question 50 different ways and it still wouldn't be answered as proof in this thread. The question basically got answered with another question. You knew what the question meant and still does mean. If you can't answer the question honestly, then just say so instead of skating the question. Why can't anyone from the left answer this? You know what Obama's agenda was otherwise you wouldn't have voted for him. Whether he accomplished them just might be a matter of opinion. I personally think he's a total and utter failure while he and the left might think he was successful. So, I'll try this once again.
Judging from your response here i still don't think you understand why your question was difficult to answer.
both sides have to agree on "what" OB agenda is before you can expect the other side to answer it. Simple logic, Coach.
Like i said, there is a better way to ask your question.
Why are you still wasting time arguing this? Stop eating so much red rice, start a new thread and ask a CLEAR question.
-
Obama's Agenda :
Sponsor with gov't funding pinko-communist flag-burners who wants to tax churches and use the money to fund abortions so they can use the fetal stem cells to create pot-smoking lesbian ATF agents who will steal all the guns and invite the UN to take over America.
(P.S. - To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~Thomas Paine)
-
We'll just leave it as though you're pleading the 5th. Lol.
-
The only one remaining silent is you. Obviously you can't even articulate what you are attempting to whine about. No surprise.
-
The only one remaining silent is you. Obviously you can't even articulate what you are attempting to whine about. No surprise.
Or maybe you're just to damn dumb to figure it out or just flat out won't answer the question.
-
yep, instead of just rephrasing the question............... ::)
-
yep, instead of just rephrasing the question............... ::)
How about just answering it?
-
Or maybe you're just to damn dumb to figure it out or just flat out won't answer the question.
I am unable to think along the levels of dumb that you dwell upon. Not my fault you can't articulate and explain your own damn question.
-
I am unable to think along the levels of dumb that you dwell upon. Not my fault you can't articulate and explain your own damn question.
Don't sell yourself short. You're a liberal, of course you can.
-
You are considered the dumbest person to post on this board. Not by just myself, but by others as well. Someone else has asked you to explain your question. Instead of doing so, you deflect and try to get them to ask the question for you.
Stupid is as stupid does. No surprise when it comes to you.
-
How about just answering it?
You have to define what his "agenda" is for us to give you an answer.
I'm not a progressive but I will try to answer. Progressives doesn't like him. He campaigns with progressive ideas because they are popular, but rules as a 90's establishment republican. He basically just sucks up to his donors as all other politicians.
Coach, just because you voted for him don't equal that you like him or supports him. It's just that we have a two party system and the alternative is sooooooo fucking awful.
I know that you are simple minded and have a hard time understanding complex things but I did my best.
-
You are considered the dumbest person to post on this board. Not by just myself, but by others as well. Someone else has asked you to explain your question. Instead of doing so, you deflect and try to get them to ask the question for you.
Stupid is as stupid does. No surprise when it comes to you.
Why do you waste so much time on coach? Do you think he will teach you something or even understand your arguments? It's hilarious how much of your time you and 240 waste on him. Just do what everyone does with Soul Chruser, ignore him and he will disappear.
-
Obama's Agenda :
Sponsor with gov't funding pinko-communist flag-burners who wants to tax churches and use the money to fund abortions so they can use the fetal stem cells to create pot-smoking lesbian ATF agents who will steal all the guns and invite the UN to take over America.
(P.S. - To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~Thomas Paine)
Obama's agenda according to the 2 brain cells in Coach's head. (1 cell devoted strictly to Rush)
-
It's so funny. Everyone is telling him why his question can't be answered and he STILL just will not change the question. Pathetic.
-
It's so funny. Everyone is telling him why his question can't be answered and he STILL just will not change the question. Pathetic.
Whats even more pathetic, is even after a full day of the libs bullshit on skating this question, there is still no answer.
-
I'll make this easier. Why do you still support Obama?
-
It's so funny. Everyone is telling him why his question can't be answered and he STILL just will not change the question. Pathetic.
HAHAHA! Mouth breather logic right there.
-
HAHAHA! Mouth breather logic right there.
Still won't answer.
-
People support a political party like they support their favorite sports team.
-
Still won't answer.
Still won't ask...
Don't you get that you original question is a loaded question? ....Obviously not.
I'm not surprised.
-
Still won't ask...
Don't you get that you original question is a loaded question? ....Obviously not.
I'm not surprised.
If you're that stupid to ask a question with a question when know the meaning of the original question, you're skating and WON'T answer it. "Please define what "is, is".
But this two pages of bullshit doesn't surprise me since left show complete dishonesty when it comes to being confronted.
-
I'll make this easier. Why do you still support Obama?
BTW, junior...I did rephrase the question and it still didn't get answered.
-
complete dishonesty.
"They have weapons of mass destruction in Iraq!"
That kind of dishonesty?
-
If you're that stupid to ask a question with a question when know the meaning of the original question, you're skating and WON'T answer it. "Please define what "is, is".
But this two pages of bullshit doesn't surprise me since left show complete dishonesty when it comes to being confronted.
You are a BIG part of the Bull Shit.
You asked a loaded question. It's been explained to you nicely and exactly, yet you still are screwing around.
Ask it, or maybe we need to move this thread to the V-board because its useless here.
PS: why is it so hard to understand that if you "ask" a legit question, not a loaded one, it puts the ball in their court and then its on them to answer it? Wait, you are Coach, nuff said.
-
Ok coach. Its like this. No one is all one thing... if you are... you're a fuckin idiot.
There are guys we vote for because we like him better than the other guy. That doesn't mean people are going to agree with everything he does. Again, anyone that does that is a fuckin moron.
And a bad decision doesn't totally discount the good decisions and progress
That's the only way I can explain it with out insulting you.
-
"They have weapons of mass destruction in Iraq!"
That kind of dishonesty?
No, the "you can keep your doctor' dishonesty. The when confronted with a legit question and then avoid it like the plague kind of dishonesty. The Obama kind of dishonesty. The "this won't effect the middle class" kind of dishonesty.
So why do you still support him again?
-
No, the "you can keep your doctor' dishonesty. The when confronted with a legit question and then avoid it like the plague kind of dishonesty. The Obama kind of dishonesty. The "this won't effect the middle class" kind of dishonesty.
So why do you still support him again?
Its not a legit question.
All you are doing now is trolling
Rephrase the question, define what you think OB's agenda is, or i am moving it.
-
Ok coach. Its like this. No one is all one thing... if you are... you're a fuckin idiot.
There are guys we vote for because we like him better than the other guy. That doesn't mean people are going to agree with everything he does. Again, anyone that does that is a fuckin moron.
And a bad decision doesn't totally discount the good decisions and progress
That's the only way I can explain it with out insulting you.
I understand that. But the question is WHY do you STILL support him? I can say I don't support the majority of republicans right now.
-
I understand that. But the question is WHY do you STILL support him? I can say I don't support the majority of republicans right now.
Bump for Lurker, Option D, Work, RRKOre, alabama ftw etc....
-
You have to define what his "agenda" is for us to give you an answer.
I'm not a progressive but I will try to answer. Progressives doesn't like him. He campaigns with progressive ideas because they are popular, but rules as a 90's establishment republican. He basically just sucks up to his donors as all other politicians.
Coach, just because you voted for him don't equal that you like him or supports him. It's just that we have a two party system and the alternative is sooooooo fucking awful.
I know that you are simple minded and have a hard time understanding complex things but I did my best.
This. My answer is this.
-
Ok...I'm not sure how this guy wants me to answer this shit.
Bro...I "support" (which isn't even a real thing) all the good initiatives like trying to increase Min wage, killing terrorists, and legalizing weed.
Don't support the healthcare bill, or the fact that wall street guys still have their dicks in the mouth of Americans
So there is no singular "agenda" bro....
And what form of "support" are you talking about....
Like the horse shit "support our troop" dumb ass yellow magnet ribbon on a car?
-
I support OB because.....
I don't support OB because....
I do and don't support OB because.....
This. My answer is this.
Ok...I'm not sure how this guy wants me to answer this shit.
Bro...I "support" (which isn't even a real thing) all the good initiatives like trying to increase Min wage, killing terrorists, and legalizing weed.
Don't support the healthcare bill, or the fact that wall street guys still have their dicks in the mouth of Americans
So there is no singular "agenda" bro....
And what form of "support" are you talking about....
Like the horse shit "support our troop" dumb ass yellow magnet ribbon on a car?
Both have answered the question. :)
-
Bump for Lurker, Option D, Work, RRKOre, alabama ftw etc....
It wasn't that I voted for him, it was that I voted against what the GOP were trotting out as their picks. Had they presented a better candidate then I would have voted for them as opposed to Obama. They didn't. Twice. And it cost them.
-
It wasn't that I voted for him, it was that I voted against what the GOP were trotting out as their picks. Had they presented a better candidate then I would have voted for them as opposed to Obama. They didn't. Twice. And it cost them.
I'm in the same boat.
-
If you're that stupid to ask a question with a question when know the meaning of the original question, you're skating and WON'T answer it. "Please define what "is, is".
But this two pages of bullshit doesn't surprise me since left show complete dishonesty when it comes to being confronted.
"If you're that stupid to ask a question with a question when know the meaning of the original question,..."
Coach, is English your first language?
-
It wasn't that I voted for him, it was that I voted against what the GOP were trotting out as their picks. Had they presented a better candidate then I would have voted for them as opposed to Obama. They didn't. Twice. And it cost them.
I'm in the same boat.
4 in a row!!
lol :-X
-
"If you're that stupid to ask a question with a question when know the meaning of the original question,..."
Coach, is English your first language?
I type faster than I think sometimes. But thanks for pointing that out instead of staying on point.
-
It wasn't that I voted for him, it was that I voted against what the GOP were trotting out as their picks. Had they presented a better candidate then I would have voted for them as opposed to Obama. They didn't. Twice. And it cost them.
So in retrospect, do you regret your pick?
-
You are a BIG part of the Bull Shit.
You asked a loaded question. It's been explained to you nicely and exactly, yet you still are screwing around.
Ask it, or maybe we need to move this thread to the V-board because its useless here.
PS: why is it so hard to understand that if you "ask" a legit question, not a loaded one, it puts the ball in their court and then its on them to answer it? Wait, you are Coach, nuff said.
It wasn't my intention in anyway for this be a loaded question. I just want to know what the mentality is of people when they support a candidate when the candidate has a poor history from his previous term.
The question was asked because no matter what Obama has done, lied, failed policy, etc. They seem to support him no matter the circumstances in light of everything that has been brought against him.
It would seem to that these people would vote for him again if a third term was allowed.
-
It wasn't my intention in anyway for this be a loaded question. I just want to know what the mentality is of people when they support a candidate when the candidate has a poor history from his previous term.
The question was asked because no matter what Obama has done, lied, failed policy, etc. They seem to support him no matter the circumstances in light of everything that has been brought against him.
It would seem to that these people would vote for him again if a third term was allowed.
That's why i was trying to get you to rephrase the question. Notice that once you did, you started getting answers.
I am thinking they weren't answers that you expected. It seems:
Lurker and SS4U: Voted against GOP not For OB
Option D, Hates the healthcare bill, agrees with other stuff OB has done
RRKore, progressive don't like him, i am not a progessive
________________________ _
I am sure you can come up with some more follow up questions as you already did with Lurker
-
So in retrospect, do you regret your pick?
NO. And if the GOP runs another set of idiots on their tickets I will be voting against them as well.
-
NO. And if the GOP runs another set of idiots on their tickets I will be voting against them as well.
Hence why this country is in the disastrous shape it is. Good job.
-
I was hoping Obama would be more moderate than he is. The ACA is a disaster, his foreign policy is naive and inept and the attorney general he appointed, Holder, is a deslusional race baiting fool who doesn't try to hide his disdain for white people. Not to mention is policy on immigration
I was out of the country in 2012 and didn't bother to vote.
-
Hence why this country is in the disastrous shape it is. Good job.
Yeah, cause the GOP can't field a good candidate......hell, a mediocre one even being that they were running against OB and his first term
-
Yeah, cause the GOP can't field a good candidate......hell, a mediocre one even being that they were running against OB and his first term
How was not Romney a more responsible choice than Obama in 2012. Give me anything considering the ruinous and disastrous first term of Obama
-
I support OB because.....
I don't support OB because....
I do and don't support OB because.....
Both have answered the question. :)
i was talking about coaches question... its a silly question
-
How was not Romney a more responsible choice than Obama in 2012. Give me anything considering the ruinous and disastrous first term of Obama
You and I both agree he was a better choice. But he wasn't a better choice to win the election. he was turd plain and simple and the left feasted on him and the people that needed to get swayed didn't voted for him.
GOP needs to look in the mirror and stop whining about like sissy bitches. They lost an election that should have been a landslide, stop pointing fingers an own up to it.
-
It wasn't my intention in anyway for this be a loaded question. I just want to know what the mentality is of people when they support a candidate when the candidate has a poor history from his previous term.
The question was asked because no matter what Obama has done, lied, failed policy, etc. They seem to support him no matter the circumstances in light of everything that has been brought against him.
It would seem to that these people would vote for him again if a third term was allowed.
Ok....why did you continue to support Bush?
-
i was talking about coaches question... its a silly question
Not when you answer it by saying:
I do and don't support OB because.....
which is what you did.
Now the original question at the start of the thread wasn't because it was loaded, in that each person definition of OB agenda is sure to be different
-
Yeah, cause the GOP can't field a good candidate......hell, a mediocre one even being that they were running against OB and his first term
ANY candidate they GOP puts forth can do better. No such thing as a perfect candidate.
-
NO. And if the GOP runs another set of idiots on their tickets I will be voting against them as well.
In other words, you're happy what Obama has done so far?
-
NO. And if the GOP runs another set of idiots on their tickets I will be voting against them as well.
I would rather not vote at all. I will not vote for Clinton, Paul or Jeb.
-
ANY candidate they GOP puts forth can do better. No such thing as a perfect candidate.
Not asking for perfect candidate. Asking for one that can win. Romney was a turd.
-
Not asking for perfect candidate. Asking for one that can win. Romney was a turd.
But he was right, wasn't he? Obama didn't nor could he run on issues. He got slammed. Romney runs on issues and unlike Obama didn't demonize his way into the White House. I stand by what I said when he was elected and it holds true to this day. (People who voted for him didn't understand the consequences of their actions.
-
But he was right, wasn't he? Obama didn't nor could he run on issues. He got slammed. Romney runs on issues and unlike Obama didn't demonize his way into the White House. I stand by what I said when he was elected and it holds true to this day. (People who voted for him didn't understand the consequences of their actions.
You didn't build MPF Training Systems...
-
But he was right, wasn't he? Obama didn't nor could he run on issues. He got slammed. Romney runs on issues and unlike Obama didn't demonize his way into the White House. I stand by what I said when he was elected and it holds true to this day. (People who voted for him didn't understand the consequences of their actions.
Doesn't matter who was right when the wrong person was elected. History is full better qualified candidates. It's about winning the election so the right-wing person gets in. Romney was turd soup served by the GOP diner.
Taking about who was more right or wrong is something election losers do to sleep better at night. Fuck that. The GOP fucked up big time and lost a landslide election. Now we have Obama care.