-if our fathers pussied out of "rivalry", we wouldn't be here.
I personally don't give a shit about that.
But, many haven't been taught right. So, the thinking, "why created more for the rivalry?", well that's just wimping out. Why try for the team, when someone else may get it? Why talk to the girl, she'll never pick me---my rival over there is better? Why ask my boss for a promotion, I'll only be seen as a rival to others?
One cannot go on with that type of thinking. I stand "in" life...but, I heed warnings, and see what others to do to "not" replicate them, and hopefully pass that down...
My question was - what's so UNselfish about creating rivalry and more mouths for this place? You'd be UNselfish by NOT doing it.
It's good to have a generally positive lifestyle...but it always seems that the people so adamant about not having kids, always have a damn bug up their ass about something---and that's not positive.
What's not positive? Not positive to travel the world, learn new things, meet new people, strive for perfection in a certain area (like science for ex._, or maybe even contribute to community in other positive/beneficial ways? What are you talking about? seems like you're the one with the "bug" tbh. As you want to convince me or anyone else that "kids are a must", but you can't really explain why, aside that "nature works like that" (does that mean it's automatically "positive"? I doubt it. It may not be negative, but it's not necesarrily a "must" or "only truth"). We've transcended our biological roots to quite an extent already, and it's not going anywhere, but only speeds up.
Just wait till ' hmans live for at least 200years - having kids will drop to a very very low numbers (it's apparent already actually).
Having kids is only a desperate way of a genetic code to "not die", nothing else, nothing more.
And it gets worse as you get older...I've seen 50-60 yr olds who have no kids talking about "I don't want to die alone", or "I wish I had kids", "you are lucky, cherish those who are around you, especially the young", I wonder why and how did they come to that conclusion...
That's most fuckin selfish reason to have kids I can think of. I mean - to be able to be "entertained" as you get older (and trust me - if your IQ is high and you have a progressive mind - that aspect of life will be of no worries. Plenty of old and interesting people around. Oh, and technology, as always - will take care of a huge portion of that "problem", one way or another..). Young people doesn't want to be around old farts just to cheer them up. At least I'm not interested in that, and I wouldn't like my kids to do that if I'd manage to have some.
-you are too smart to know that their are no absolutes, and it's dangerous to clutch onto dogmas.
I got an impression that it's what you were doing on some of these points.
Hell, one could adopt a kid and he may turn out to be like Dexter, or not. But, ultimately...most would want to have their own kids, for the most selfish reason of all...their your blood, your genes, your kin...not someone elses.
Exactly. Having kids was, is and will allways be SELFISH, not the other way around. But on the other hand - selfish is not always a "negative".