Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Marty Champions on October 02, 2017, 06:11:32 PM
-
just ban all guns its like cheating to win in a fight. i hate cheaters
they will never pass the right laws to taper down gun use so just ban them
but if theyre outlawed by civilians police and military a complete outlaw then our country would be much safer
-
they will never pass the right laws to taper down gun use so just ban them
but if theyre outlawed by civilians police and military a complete outlaw then our country would be much safer
how's that working for the countries that grabbed all law abiding civilians guns?
-
they will never pass the right laws to taper down gun use so just ban them
but if theyre outlawed by civilians police and military a complete outlaw then our country would be much safer
Criminals will still have guns, since they don't follow the law.
Then the law-abiding citizens are really in deep trouble with no way to defend themselves at all.
-
they will never pass the right laws to taper down gun use so just ban them
but if theyre outlawed by civilians police and military a complete outlaw then our country would be much safer
No thanks.
More countries need guns.
Esp euro ones. That way civilians could take care of immigrant filth themselves
-
If we banned guns then ad guys would just start using more bombs like they do in Europe. We are screwed either way.
-
banning guns will stop alot of common murders
u will still have the mass shooting and chemical attack here or there
you dont need guns u need good food n yung poosies
-
banning guns will stop alot of common murders
u will still have the mass shooting and chemical attack here or there
you dont need guns u need good food n yung poosies
Bring back falcon bc this Marty guy is a fucking idiot
-
the only guns you need are bi's and tri's.
people that want guns are insecure people with little to no muscle mass who do not know how to defend themselves and that are just scared all the time for no reason.
-
http://www.smh.com.au/world/heres-why-australia-will-never-understand-the-us-obsession-with-guns-20171003-gyt7ys.html (http://www.smh.com.au/world/heres-why-australia-will-never-understand-the-us-obsession-with-guns-20171003-gyt7ys.html)
-
guns AND bullets are illegal in Mexico. see how well that's working for them?
if you DISARM the population, only the 'bad guys' will have firearms.
think about it. who wants the average citizen to NOT have guns?
CRIMINALS.
if you're a CRIMINAL, OF COURSE you don't want anybody else to have guns. because YOU have all the guns, and they CANNOT defend themselves.
who else doesn't want you to have guns? The Gov't... specifically the liberals. see a connection?
-
you disarm the criminals too. problem solved.
-
guns AND bullets are illegal in Mexico. see how well that's working for them?
if you DISARM the population, only the 'bad guys' will have firearms.
think about it. who wants the average citizen to NOT have guns?
CRIMINALS.
if you're a CRIMINAL, OF COURSE you don't want anybody else to have guns. because YOU have all the guns, and they CANNOT defend themselves.
who else doesn't want you to have guns? The Gov't... specifically the liberals. see a connection?
You're a criminal, you have a gun, so by your above rationale you want to ban guns..
Would that be true?
-
you disarm the criminals too. problem solved.
Criminals will always be able to get guns.
A gun carry society is a polite society.
-
1) Wasted debate as America will never bring in a ban
2) Las Vegas Shooter used a banned machine gun anyway so ....
-
you disarm the criminals too. problem solved.
wrong. doesn't work that way. how you gonna do that anyway? forcibly disarm the U.S. population? lol
you disarm law-abiding citizens who turn in their guns? (and for what compensation? lol again)
how many criminals are gonna turn in their guns? lol again, again.
then, if previously law-abiding citizens don't turn in their guns, they're automatically made criminals.
-
wrong. doesn't work that way. how you gonna do that anyway? forcibly disarm the U.S. population? lol
you disarm law-abiding citizens who turn in their guns? (and for what compensation? lol again)
how many criminals are gonna turn in their guns? lol again, again.
then, if previously law-abiding citizens don't turn in their guns, they're automatically made criminals.
Caught with a gun = life without parole....?
would that have some benefit?
-
Caught with a gun = life without parole....?
would that have some benefit?
They would not care. And in fact, that would make importing guns (if there was an all out gun ban) from other places more lucrative. Like Mexico. Many gun manufacturers are Euro as well. So, what will be created is a very lucrative illegal market for guns. So an outlaw will risk whatever sentence that would be on the books for that offense.
Also, a person can 3D print guns now. There are plenty of machinists who can make a gun for you, and there are plenty of diagrams, blue prints for guns.
-
Caught with a gun = life without parole....?
would that have some benefit?
and tripple the u.s. prison population? troll off to another website and start over again.
-
Ban all guns...and the criminals will have them anyway.
-
and tripple the u.s. prison population? troll off to another website and start over again.
Not only that, going after people who had guns in rural areas to fend off an attack or burglary. Or people who hunt. Or the person with the replica gun collection or guns that have ornament engravings and are only used for collections. This would severely get out of hand.
-
Firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year
Zimbabwe 0.39
Costa Rica 7.50
Mexico 7.64
Paraguay 7.76
Montenegro 8.91
United States 10.54
Uruguay 11.52
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income per capita indicators
#10 usa
#48 montenegro
#54 uruguay
#66 costa rica
#77 mexico
#110 paraguay
#154 zimbabwe
so even in an absolute shithole like zimbabwe, who are 144 (!) places behind usa in development they know better than kill eachother with fire arms.
-
http://www.smh.com.au/world/heres-why-australia-will-never-understand-the-us-obsession-with-guns-20171003-gyt7ys.html (http://www.smh.com.au/world/heres-why-australia-will-never-understand-the-us-obsession-with-guns-20171003-gyt7ys.html)
"Look at me, I'm Sandra Dee! Lousy with virginity."
-
guns AND bullets are illegal in Mexico. see how well that's working for them?
if you DISARM the population, only the 'bad guys' will have firearms.
think about it. who wants the average citizen to NOT have guns?
CRIMINALS.
if you're a CRIMINAL, OF COURSE you don't want anybody else to have guns. because YOU have all the guns, and they CANNOT defend themselves.
who else doesn't want you to have guns? The Gov't... specifically the liberals. see a connection?
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
-
Firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year
Zimbabwe 0.39
Costa Rica 7.50
Mexico 7.64
Paraguay 7.76
Montenegro 8.91
United States 10.54
Uruguay 11.52
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income per capita indicators
#10 usa
#48 montenegro
#54 uruguay
#66 costa rica
#77 mexico
#110 paraguay
#154 zimbabwe
so even in an absolute shithole like zimbabwe, who are 144 (!) places behind usa in development they know better than kill eachother with fire arms.
The u.s. has mass shootings though, which would throw off the numbers against countries that don't have the same phenomena. Are there mass shootings at schools and workplaces and everywhere else in places like Montenegro or Uruguay? Or even Mexico? An educated guess would be no. Which would mean our "single victim" one-on-one crime isn't as high as those numbers would lead you to believe
-
Firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year
Zimbabwe 0.39
Costa Rica 7.50
Mexico 7.64
Paraguay 7.76
Montenegro 8.91
United States 10.54
Uruguay 11.52
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income per capita indicators
#10 usa
#48 montenegro
#54 uruguay
#66 costa rica
#77 mexico
#110 paraguay
#154 zimbabwe
so even in an absolute shithole like zimbabwe, who are 144 (!) places behind usa in development they know better than kill eachother with fire arms.
Maybe you should dig a little deeper into the numbers:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/year_end_2015_enforcement_report.pdf
The race/ethnicity of known Robbery suspects is primarily Black (69.2%). Hispanic suspects account for an additional (24.9%) of the suspect population. White suspects account for (4.0%) of all Robbery suspects while Asian /Pacific Islanders accounted for (1.8%) of known Robbery suspects
http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/year-end-2016-enforcement-report.pdf
The race/ethnicity of known Shooting suspects is most frequently Black (70.7%). Hispanic suspects accounted for an additional (26.9%) of all suspects. White suspects (1.9%) and Asian/Pacific Islander suspects (0.6%) accounted for the remaining portion of known Shooting suspects
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/08/10/african-american-homicide-rate-nearly-quadruple-national-average-11680
The CDC confirms that, following an extended period of general decline, the overall homicide rate -- as well as the homicide rate within each racial group -- has increased from 2014 to 2015. In 2015, the homicide rates were (per 100,000 population):
20.9 for blacks (non-Hispanic)
4.9 for Hispanics
2.6 for whites (non-Hispanic)
5.7 for all races
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
Bikers, LOL:
Funny how you guys who want to get guns off the street don’t want to actually go after the people who are doing the shooting. This is who you’re going to have to target:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/newsone.com/3747824/st-louis-protest-black-murders-2017/amp/
Amid Protests, Black People Account For All St. Louis Murder Suspects In 2017
Written By Bruce C.T. Wright
6 days ago
Black people are being murdered at an alarming rate across the country, and St. Louis is all but Ground Zero for those killings. But in the wake of the this weekend’s violent St. Louis demonstrations following the acquittal of a White police officer who shot and killed a Black motorist in 2011, there was another key piece of relevant data that hasn’t evoked nearly as much outrage as Friday’s verdict: Every single murder suspect in St. Louis this year is Black, with nearly 90 percent of the city’s murder victims also being Black.
-
and tripple the u.s. prison population? troll off to another website and start over again.
use the money instead of building the Mexico wall.
more worthless pieces of shit behind bars the better, some people would think nothing of walking into a store and sticking a gun under the owners nose, any piece of shit like that should never walk the streets again.
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
So, send the US military to disarm their own people? Are you crazy? And then you set up the McCarthy Hotline for people to say, "this person has a gun"?
Those are fantasy land ideas which would lead to fast forwarding the US into an all out civil war?
And pray tell, who is protecting the rural citizen from criminals? Will hunting with rifles be banned?
-
Firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year
Zimbabwe 0.39
Costa Rica 7.50
Mexico 7.64
Paraguay 7.76
Montenegro 8.91
United States 10.54
Uruguay 11.52
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income per capita indicators
#10 usa
#48 montenegro
#54 uruguay
#66 costa rica
#77 mexico
#110 paraguay
#154 zimbabwe
so even in an absolute shithole like zimbabwe, who are 144 (!) places behind usa in development they know better than kill eachother with fire arms.
ok so they just machete each other or do the flaming tire thing
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
You sound like a fucking communist dictator.
-
how's that working for the countries that grabbed all law abiding civilians guns?
I was stationed in japan and I noticed after about 6 months there cops didn't carry guns; when I asked why its because well 1st off there
fuckin bad asses 2nd gun laws.... they don't have the same shit going on there that you do here sure theres fights and crap but id rather swing fists better than being shot down.....
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
"We"?
F U you libtard idiot.
-
if you get rid of crime you get rid of criminals and then you dont have to worry about criminals with guns.
japan dont have the problem with crime us does, looks like theyre doing something right over there. they have no guns either.
-
if you get rid of crime you get rid of criminals and then you dont have to worry about criminals with guns.
japan dont have the problem with crime us does, looks like theyre doing something right over there. they have no guns either.
The US, actually the whole New World has a different culture. Full of violence, blood, and passion. That is the way the west was won (or lost). There is also the individualistic aspect as well. The New World is not a place that was founded with a collectivist culture or mentality.
-
"We"?
F U you libtard idiot.
bottom line if we have gun control meaning only military,cops can own a fire arms yes I know like drugs people will find a way to get there hands on them but at least fewer people will have them, when a cop shoots someone he cant claim oh he had a gun they will accually have to use the other options like rubber bullet guns maybe use hand to hand on someone instead of always reaching for there guns..
there is never an easy answer and this can be debated for years and it has but unless you've lost someone to an idiot with a gun you will never see the opposing persons side .........
-
if you get rid of crime you get rid of criminals and then you dont have to worry about criminals with guns.
japan dont have the problem with crime us does, looks like theyre doing something right over there. they have no guns either.
just mentioned that one post above yours
-
just mentioned that one post above yours
yes
one thing thats interesting with japan is that it isnt a small country, a lot of times people compare with switzerland and other european countries that have 5-10 million population where as japan has 127 million, thats nearly as many as russia! (144 million)
-
yes
one thing thats interesting with japan is that it isnt a small country, a lot of times people compare with switzerland and other european countries that have 5-10 million population where as japan has 127 million, thats nearly as many as russia! (144 million)
let me tell ya ive seen those cops in action they carry batons not like our night sticks. they are not to be fucked with..never seen a fat out shape cop in the bunch ...our cops could learn from them
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
fuck off moron leftist
your amygdala is atrophied
-
Firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year
Zimbabwe 0.39
Costa Rica 7.50
Mexico 7.64
Paraguay 7.76
Montenegro 8.91
United States 10.54
Uruguay 11.52
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income per capita indicators
#10 usa
#48 montenegro
#54 uruguay
#66 costa rica
#77 mexico
#110 paraguay
#154 zimbabwe
so even in an absolute shithole like zimbabwe, who are 144 (!) places behind usa in development they know better than kill eachother with fire arms.
i cannot tell if you are trolling here or truly a moron
-
yes
one thing thats interesting with japan is that it isnt a small country, a lot of times people compare with switzerland and other european countries that have 5-10 million population where as japan has 127 million, thats nearly as many as russia! (144 million)
But no nig-nogs. That's why there is order there.
-
But no nig-nogs. That's why there is order there.
IT'S ALMOST AS IF YOU CAN DISCOVER DIFFERENCES IN RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS AT A META-LEVEL !!!??!!?!!?!!!?!?!
-
But no nig-nogs. That's why there is order there.
are you saying that instead of a ban on guns there should be a ban of niggors?
-
just ban all guns its like cheating to win in a fight. i hate cheaters
they will never pass the right laws to taper down gun use so just ban them
but if theyre outlawed by civilians police and military a complete outlaw then our country would be much safer
(https://media.giphy.com/media/3ohhwH6yMO7ED5xc7S/giphy.gif)
-
are you saying that instead of a ban on guns there should be a ban of niggors?
I’m saying that clueless people outside the United States who talk about gun violence here act like the country is a monolith when it’s obviously not:
America’s Top Cities for Homicides Are on Track for Historic Rates in 2017
https://www.thetrace.org/2017/07/gun-homicide-rates-baltimore-st-lous-detroit/
Midyear data for fatal shootings show no relief for St. Louis and Detroit, and an acutely alarming trend in Baltimore
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/politics/wp/2017/09/06/2017-is-on-pace-to-have-the-second-lowest-crime-rate-since-1990-and-near-record-low-murders/
2017 is on pace for the second-lowest crime rate since 1990 — and near-record low murders
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
Sending the military? LOL. You think those within the military would want to enforce a law that most of them would be against?
-
Firearm-related death rate per 100,000 population per year
Zimbabwe 0.39
Costa Rica 7.50
Mexico 7.64
Paraguay 7.76
Montenegro 8.91
United States 10.54
Uruguay 11.52
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income per capita indicators
#10 usa
#48 montenegro
#54 uruguay
#66 costa rica
#77 mexico
#110 paraguay
#154 zimbabwe
so even in an absolute shithole like zimbabwe, who are 144 (!) places behind usa in development they know better than kill eachother with fire arms.
Zimbaboonwe
-
Glad she was armed, but poor innocent Laavion Obama is now dead...
https://abc13.com/woman-with-concealed-carry-license-kills-would-be-robber/5039531/
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
(https://media.giphy.com/media/l4q8mouEMLgZ8xaXS/giphy.gif)
Best post I've ever seen here.
-
You don't ban constitutional rights. You don't vote on them. They are God given, natural rights.
I will not comply.
-
Wrong. You disarm properly sending the military to do it properly. Target bikers, drug dealers, crims, people with prior convictions. You start imposing massive fines and sentences for possession. You set up anonymous reporting hotlines and make payments to tipsters. You take just a small percentage of what was going to be spent on Trumps Great Wall and put it towards removing weapons. Any resistance from "tough guys with their guns"? Kill them if needed. We can do this. We have a huge domestic terrorism problem. And we need to end it now.
And criminals will STILL get weapons and be armed.
How's the war on drugs going? Cocaine gets into the USA easily.
In Thailand they have the death penalty, and drugs are still relatively easy to get.
Why? Because criminal cartels exist who are specialists in smuggling, there are huge land borders and if there weren't there are coastlines.
-
And criminals will STILL get weapons and be armed.
How's the war on drugs going? Cocaine gets into the USA easily.
In Thailand they have the death penalty, and drugs are still relatively easy to get.
Why? Because criminal cartels exist who are specialists in smuggling, there are huge land borders and if there weren't their are coastlines.
And those cartels operate with the full knowledge of the governments in many cases. The real gangsters and criminals operate with impunity.
It's only the common man that pays the prices for whatever petty crimes they are accused of committing.
-
just ban all guns its like cheating to win in a fight. i hate cheaters
they will never pass the right laws to taper down gun use so just ban them
but if theyre outlawed by civilians police and military a complete outlaw then our country would be much safer
Stupidity of this libtard gun ban agenda is clear: By the legislation you can rule the gun rights of the people who already are a law abiding citizens. Guns of the law abiding citizens has never been a problem, because these people uses their gun merely to uphold the laws, so what would you benefit from the ban? You just increase amount of defenceless people in the country, where 98% of mass murders has been done in gun free zones. So what is the point?
USA needs a gun laws, but it need them something like 200 years ago, and now it is too late to do anything but increase amount of guns for the law abiding citizens.There is nothing you can do, because problem is the guns in the hands of criminals, morons and imbeciles, and no matter what kind of law you make, they doesn't give their guns away. There isn't politically correct way to fix this, you have to either kill everybody who uses gun in crime, or rule the mandatory self defence gun for every tax paying citizen.
There is no truth in that agenda what so ever, it is all based on bullshit and wishful thinking. For example, while net amount of (imported and domestic manufactured) guns in the USA has multiplied time after time since Vietnam war, crime statistic has been decreasing year after year. If more guns = more crime, how this can be truth? More guns in the hands of the law abiding citizens = less crime, and that is a fact which makes libtards shit themselves..
-
Anyone who thinks that banning guns would prevent criminals from acquiring them is just downright stupid....
-
Why the fagget bumping old thread
-
Why the fagget bumping old thread
(https://forums.windowscentral.com/attachments/ask-question/107153d1432833939t-zombie-thread.jpg)
-
Anyone who thinks that banning guns would prevent criminals from acquiring them is just downright stupid....
You spelled liberal wrong
-
As a guy that has legally carried a gun for over 35 years, gun control is the ability to hit what you are aiming at.
-
As a guy that has legally carried a gun for over 35 years, gun control is the ability to hit what you are aiming at.
Cap and ball? :D
-
Cap and ball? :D
A musket.
-
A musket.
I see you as a revolver guy. 8)
-
Guns don't kill people, idiots kill people
With a ban of guns, the lawabiding citizens would be defenceless against those that do not care about the law.
-
Guns don't kill people, idiots kill people
With a ban of guns, the lawabiding citizens would be defenceless against those that do not care about the law.
Guns don't kill people, idiots kill people
With a ban of guns, the lawabiding citizens would be defenceless against those that do not care about the law.
-
Guns don't kill people, idiots kill people
With a ban of guns, the lawabiding citizens would be defenceless against those that do not care about the law.
Criminals will still have and still be able to get guns.
-
Criminals will still have and still be able to get guns.
What if every gun was eliminated from the world, then there would not be any guns to kill people. :o :o :o
-
And criminals will STILL get weapons and be armed.
How's the war on drugs going? Cocaine gets into the USA easily.
In Thailand they have the death penalty, and drugs are still relatively easy to get.
Why? Because criminal cartels exist who are specialists in smuggling, there are huge land borders and if there weren't there are coastlines.
The war on drugs isn't working, and if a policy hasn't worked in say over 4 decades....it probably will not work in the fifth decade....
Legalising most drugs will be much more efficient. Banning alcohol a long time ago also wasn't a succes....
-
What if every gun was eliminated from the world, then there would not be any guns to kill people. :o :o :o
Then criminals would use axes like that tranny did :o :o :o
-
What if every gun was eliminated from the world, then there would not be any guns to kill people. :o :o :o
Yes, there was so much peace in the world before the existence of guns.
-
Yes, there was so much peace in the world before the existence of guns.
Agreed.
-
Yes, there was so much peace in the world before the existence of guns.
(https://i.gifer.com/CFI5.gif)
-
Guns don't kill people
BULLETS kill people.
hope this helps :)
-
Guns make it easier for the reatrds, if no guns, they would find other ways. Not going to stop the killing, sorry.
Think Tim McVeigh. Ban vans. Ban ammonia and house-hold materials...
-
...
-
Guns make it easier for the reatrds, if no guns, they would find other ways. Not going to stop the killing, sorry.
Think Tim McVeigh. Ban vans. Ban ammonia and house-hold materials...
True, but yo be fair, I think people that want to ban guns want to stop mass shooting. Which is pointless, because yes a bomb is more deadly.