aa, another day in getbiglandia
So we have this situiation , for civilians:
1. The cars are amde for trasnportation of people and merchandise, but , unfortunately, the cars also kill arround 33000/100k of good people (because u said that aint no agressors with cars)
2. The guns are made for self defense/killing bad people, but , unfortunately, the guns also kill arround 33000/100k of good people and bad people.
If i agree with u to ban guns because they kill a great number of good people why wouldnt u agree with me at baning cars because they kill just good people? (more than guns)
U respond that without cars we go back in time and millions are dead, but would be false because public trasnportation and merchandise transport made by professional will rest functional (we only ban civilian /family cars, not profesional ones= guns only for military/ police. trained personal)
So it woul be a debate between the importance of personal confort (family car) vs personal safety (gun against thiefs/ agressors).. Initially i thought e knut was only a trol, but after i heard he s from australia all was clear crystal- he s just a dumb as sin inbreed inmate descendent of perfid albion scum- WITHOUT GUNS HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOUR GRANDPA KILL ALL THE NON GUN OWNERS CALLED ABORIGENS? WOULD BE FAIR THAT THOSE INOCENT NATIVE HAD GUNS TO STOP SOME FILTH FOR TAKING OVER THEIR HOMES? o ,no, it was better that they didnt had guns, ho convenient u filth