Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Tre on November 30, 2008, 01:36:06 PM

Title: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Tre on November 30, 2008, 01:36:06 PM

Oklahoma and Missouri are playing for the Big 12 title and Texas beat them both.

Fuck this shit.   >:(

Signed,
Pissed off Longhorn Fan
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 01:40:08 PM
Oklahoma and Missouri are playing for the Big 12 title and Texas beat them both.

Fuck this shit.   >:(

Signed,
Pissed off Longhorn Fan

Don't worry Tre.  It just saved your Longhorns from getting the shit kicked out of them by Florida.  ;D
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Tre on November 30, 2008, 01:44:52 PM
Don't worry Tre.  It just saved your Longhorns from getting the shit kicked out of them by Florida.  ;D

I know, I know...although the Big 12 made a bigtime comeback this season, there's still no way Texas can compete with an Alabama or Florida, although I think UT-Florida would be a fun game to watch. 

I think America wants OU-Alabama, though.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: ironneck on November 30, 2008, 01:45:41 PM
not bb related
mods move this shit
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 02:42:32 PM
not bb related
mods move this shit

Eat shit, queef.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 02:43:49 PM
I know, I know...although the Big 12 made a bigtime comeback this season, there's still no way Texas can compete with an Alabama or Florida, although I think UT-Florida would be a fun game to watch. 

I think America wants OU-Alabama, though.

I think Texas or Oklahoma would give Bama or Fla a decent game.  I just don't think they play enough defense to beat either of them.  Big12 was a lot of fun to watch this year.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Tre on November 30, 2008, 02:50:45 PM
not bb related
mods move this shit

Bodybuilders love real sports, too.

So shut up, your queerness.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: ironneck on November 30, 2008, 02:51:19 PM
Eat shit, queef.

i think new york is pretty good this year but washington is even better
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 02:52:15 PM
i think new york is pretty good this year but washington is even better

I think todays score would say otherwise... 8)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 02:53:26 PM
Oklahoma and Missouri are playing for the Big 12 title and Texas beat them both.

Fuck this shit.   >:(

Signed,
Pissed off Longhorn Fan
unfortunately Mizzou is the best the Big 12 north has to offer and i truly believe OU is teh best team in the big 12, the only reason Texas beat them in Dallas earlier this year is because Shipley got lucky on that runback, OU would demolish texas if they played today.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on November 30, 2008, 02:58:40 PM
I know, I know...although the Big 12 made a bigtime comeback this season, there's still no way Texas can compete with an Alabama or Florida, although I think UT-Florida would be a fun game to watch. 

I think America wants OU-Alabama, though.

actually...it would be a terrible matchup.  who's the african dude for RB at TX?  FL or AL would keep TX in 3rd and long all night.  He couldnt run those traps/draws against those quick defenses.  On the other hand OK has a serious AllAmer at HB who can run split or I and is dangerous on short passes.  could give FL or Bama fits if he is on and they control the line.  Bama can be had.  As noted...their Off can go cold easy.  Pay no attention to the Auburn game.  A good team, mid level SEC can hold them to under 20 in which if OK coach could find his brain during the game OK could beat Bama, would get just killed by FL.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:00:54 PM
actually...it would be a terrible matchup.  who's the african dude for RB at TX?  FL or AL would keep TX in 3rd and long all night.  He couldnt run those traps/draws against those quick defenses.  On the other hand OK has a serious AllAmer at HB.  could give FL or Bama fits if he is on and they control the line.  Bama can be had.  As noted...their Off can go cold easy.  Pay no attention to the Auburn game.  A good team, mid level SEC can hold them to under 20 in which if OK coach could find his brain during the game OK could beat Bama, would get just killed by FL.
Ogbannaya is the Texas RB, they've got some other guys on that offesne too, Quan Cosby, Jordan Shipley, Colt McCoy, Vondrell McGee and a decent defense but i agree with the statement that they couldn't hang with Florida, OU is the only team in the Big 12 who could hang with Florida.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:01:53 PM
I think Texas or Oklahoma would give Bama or Fla a decent game.  I just don't think they play enough defense to beat either of them.  Big12 was a lot of fun to watch this year.

I think OU, Texas, Florida, Bama and USC are all in the conversation as teams that could contend for the national title.  In the end, I think the SEC champion will emerge as the national champion.  Too much speed!
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:02:36 PM
Ogbannaya is the Texas RB, they've got some other guys on that offesne too, Quan Cosby, Jordan Shipley, Colt McCoy, Vondrell McGee and a decent defense but i agree with the statement that they couldn't hang with Florida, OU is the only team in the Big 12 who could hang with Florida.

And Texas beat OU on a neutral field.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 03:03:40 PM
I think OU, Texas, Florida, Bama and USC are all in the conversation as teams that could contend for the national title.  In the end, I think the SEC champion will emerge as the national champion.  Too much speed!
 

I agree.  Crazy that if USC hadn't stumbled, they would most likely be playing the winner of the SEC championship and all the Big12 teams would be left out...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:03:46 PM
And Texas beat OU on a neutral field.
that was a fluke, if OU and Texas played again OU would DESTROY Texas, especially in Norman.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:05:05 PM
I agree.  Crazy that if USC hadn't stumbled, they would most likely be playing the winner of the SEC championship and all the Big12 teams would be left out...

Just proves what a load of BS the BcS is!
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:05:50 PM
that was a fluke, if OU and Texas played again OU would DESTROY Texas, especially in Norman.

Pure speculation, there's no way to know for sure.  Texas won when it mattered.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:06:10 PM
Just proves what a load of BS the BcS is!
how do you explain USC losing to Oregon State and then Oregon State losing to a piss ant Big 10 team like Penn State then?
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:06:59 PM
Pure speculation, there's no way to know for sure.  Texas won when it mattered.
yeah and the BCS saw through that "win" and awarded OU the Big 12 championship game, the BCS is the fairest method to do it right now.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on November 30, 2008, 03:09:40 PM
 

I agree.  Crazy that if USC hadn't stumbled, they would most likely be playing the winner of the SEC championship and all the Big12 teams would be left out...

ill match with USC vs SEC champ....just think Sanchez can be had with pressure, had some bad games against weak Baby 10 teams plus USC defense hasnt had to deal w/guys hitting the corners on them and going all the way ala FL teams.  Think USC has more pure talent...but FL has speed all over the board.  OK is the best bet if FL trips against Bama.  

Upset Special

OK 30 Bama 21 if FL gets stupid.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Tre on November 30, 2008, 03:10:52 PM
yeah and the BCS saw through that "win" and awarded OU the Big 12 championship game, the BCS is the fairest method to do it right now.

Crack baby!  >:(

Texas beat both the teams that are playing for the league title.  How is that fair, mate?
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:11:07 PM
ill match with USC vs SEC champ....just think Sanchez can be had with pressure, had some bad games against weak Baby 10 teams plus USC defense hasnt had to deal w/guys hitting the corners on them and going all the way ala FL teams.  Think USC has more pure talent...but FL has speed all over the board.  OK is the best bet if FL trips against Bama.  

Upset Special

OK 30 Bama 21 if FL gets stupid.
Bama won't beat Florida no way, no how, they don't have anywhere near enough offense, it will be Florida/Oklahoma for the nat. championship.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:12:02 PM
yeah and the BCS saw through that "win" and awarded OU the Big 12 championship game, the BCS is the fairest method to do it right now.

You're a tireless dunce.  Texas lost one game on the last play of that game...an away game to boot.  OU got beat in Dallas by 10 points by Texas.  

This situation just shows how FLAWED the system truly is.  There should be a seeding process in setting conference title games...or there's really no point in having a conference title game when the BIG 10 and the PAC 10 do not.  Mizzou should not be in any BCS conversation.  
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:13:19 PM
Crack baby!  >:(

Texas beat both the teams that are playing for the league title.  How is that fair, mate?
it comes down to THE WAY Texas won vs. the way OU won this year, Texas got lucky and beat OU by 10 but OU hung with them for the majority of the game, Texas Tech beat Texas and OU FUCCKING OBLITERATED Texas Tech, OU destroyed OK State last night and Texas barely beat them, that's why.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:13:50 PM
Bama won't beat Florida no way, no how, they don't have anywhere near enough offense, it will be Florida/Oklahoma for the nat. championship.

You don't have the brains nor the credentials to be making any predictions.  

We'll see what happens when they play each other next weekend.  I do happen to agree that Florida is very capable of beating 'Bama.  But to say no way, no how?  The tide just shut out Auburn and scored nearly FORTY points in the process.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:14:47 PM
You don't have the brains nor the credentials to be making any predictions.  

We'll see what happens when they play each other next weekend.  I do happen to agree that Florida is very capable of beating 'Bama.  But to say no way, no how?  The tide just shut out Auburn and scored nearly FORTY points in the process.
what gives you the "credentials" to be making any predictions, Lee Corso?
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: what: on November 30, 2008, 03:14:52 PM
The National Championship game should be Florida vs. USC anyway.  I'm still looking for a team from the Little 12 that plays a lick of defense.  
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:15:41 PM
what gives you the "credentials" to be making any predictions, Lee Corso?

I didn't make any predictions.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:15:57 PM
You don't have the brains nor the credentials to be making any predictions.  

We'll see what happens when they play each other next weekend.  I do happen to agree that Florida is very capable of beating 'Bama.  But to say no way, no how?  The tide just shut out Auburn and scored nearly FORTY points in the process.
hahahahhaha, Auburn is fuccking terrible this year, shows how much you know about college ball. ::)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:17:17 PM
The National Championship game should be Florida vs. USC anyway.  I'm still looking for a team from the Little 12 that plays a lick of defense.  

USC does have a great defense, but they are in a weaker conference.  The Big 12 was a beast this year.  Losing to lowly Oregon State was unfortunate...otherwise they would be right there in the mix.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 03:19:04 PM
I'd like to see a "final 4 teams" picked after all the bowls are played.  Never happen.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:19:30 PM
hahahahhaha, Auburn is fuccking terrible this year, shows how much you know about college ball. ::)

I would roast you alive in a live debate about college football.  You know as much about football as you do about bodybuilding.  You've been afflicted with a genetically low IQ score that impairs your world view significantly.  

In short, you're quite moronic.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:20:24 PM
I would roast you alive in a live debate about college football.  You know as much about football as you do about bodybuilding.  You've been afflicted with a genetically low IQ score that impairs your world view significantly.  

In short, you're quite moronic.
hahahaha, you're the one who thought Auburn was a good team this year and i'm the moron? pot meet kettle. :D
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:21:26 PM
I'd like to see a "final 4 teams" picked after all the bowls are played.  Never happen.

I agree - the revenues would be crazy too.  The NCAA certainly isn't going to REDUCE the amount of games that are played during the year; why not add a 4 team playoff after the bowl season?  

There's definitely a way to make this whole thing work...I wonder when it will actually happen though.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Relentless on November 30, 2008, 03:23:42 PM
hahahaha, you're the one who thought Auburn was a good team this year and i'm the moron? pot meet kettle. :D

Thing is, you're not capable of knowing when your ass is being handed to you.  I don't expect you to back down because you don't have the intellect to debate reasonably and rationally in the first place.  Thus, I will not continue to waste my time with gutter trash such as yourself. 

Please commence with your idiotic behavior.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on November 30, 2008, 03:25:04 PM
USC does have a great defense, but they are in a weaker conference.  The Big 12 was a beast this year.  Losing to lowly Oregon State was unfortunate...otherwise they would be right there in the mix.

Bama blinking Auburn (no clue about Off) or LSU (rotating FR QBs in a loaded SEC) this yr shouldnt be in the thread.
Agreed that FL isnt a given w/Bama.  Bama cant afford to fall behind 14 or 10 - o early.  Get up and fill FL w/HBs between the tackles.  Anyway...should be a good next 2 weeks to set this all up.  

As far as Bowls....I love them.  it's college ball so controversy is ok.  Some gets in somebody doesnt.  Keep the bowls.  I went to the 83 Sugar Bowl as a kid w/H Walker GA vs Marino Pitt.  Much better than any playoff system.  keep that for the NFL.  
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 03:25:08 PM
I agree - the revenues would be crazy too.  The NCAA certainly isn't going to REDUCE the amount of games that are played during the year; why not add a 4 team playoff after the bowl season?  

There's definitely a way to make this whole thing work...I wonder when it will actually happen though.

One concern that I heard was attendance because they were talking about the fanbase of the teams having to travel...I think that's an idiotic argument against it, but that was given as a stumbling block.  Crazy.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:26:02 PM
Thing is, you're not capable of knowing when your ass is being handed to you.  I don't expect you to back down because you don't have the intellect to debate reasonably and rationally in the first place.  Thus, I will not continue to waste my time with gutter trash such as yourself. 

Please commence with your idiotic behavior.
hahahahahaa, as usual no answer for what i said, why did you think that beating Auburn was such a huge thing for Bama.................BTW ........................ epic name calling meltdown. :D
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: thelamefalsehood on November 30, 2008, 03:26:58 PM
Oklahoma and Missouri are playing for the Big 12 title and Texas beat them both.

Fuck this shit.   >:(

Signed,
Pissed off Longhorn Fan


If Missouri pulls off the upset and beats OU in the Big 12 Championship, who's to say Texas won't play in the BCS Title game. Texas should be ranked higher than USC so that could actually happen.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Tre on November 30, 2008, 03:29:30 PM

If Missouri pulls off the upset and beats OU in the Big 12 Championship, who's to say Texas won't play in the BCS Title game. Texas should be ranked higher than USC so that could actually happen.

I'm ordering my Tiger gear tonite.

They'd better win that game!
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 03:39:37 PM
I'm ordering my Tiger gear tonite.

They'd better win that game!
i'm a Mizzou fan but they don't have a chance, can't believe they gave Pinkel all that money when he hasn't beaten anybody good yet.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: skillz on November 30, 2008, 04:06:09 PM
You have to win your conference to play in the bcs title game, so Texas is done.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: thelamefalsehood on November 30, 2008, 04:33:56 PM
You have to win your conference to play in the bcs title game, so Texas is done.


No you don't. The higher ranked team at the end of the Conference Championship games gets the nod. Meaning, if Fla. beats Bama, they automaticlly go. If Oklahome loses to Mizzou and Texas is higher ranked than USC, Texas goes( because they and USC are still only 1 loss teams, whereas Mizzou is a 3 loss team). Texas Tech is totally out of the equation even though they only lost 1 game, because they slipped to #7 in the BCS Poll.The Sportsreporters Program on ESPN were talking about this very situation this morning.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on November 30, 2008, 04:40:05 PM

No you don't. The higher ranked team at the end of the Conference Championship games gets the nod. Meaning, if Fla. beats Bama, they automaticlly go. If Oklahome loses to Mizzou and Texas is higher ranked than USC, Texas goes( because they and USC are still only 1 loss teams, whereas Mizzou is a 3 loss team). Texas Tech is totally out of the equation even though they only lost 1 game, because they slipped to #7 in the BCS Poll.The Sportsreporters Program on ESPN were talking about this very situation this morning.

what if FL only beats Bama by a point late or it takes over-time?  does Bama fall...just to #2?  their power and computer rating would still be better than OK beating at 3 lose Mizz team.  FL vs AL Part II for the NC game.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: koolie1 on November 30, 2008, 04:44:19 PM
College football fucking blows so who cares.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 04:44:40 PM
College football fucking blows so who cares.
::)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: thelamefalsehood on November 30, 2008, 04:46:10 PM
what if FL only beats Bama by a point late or it takes over-time?  does Bama fall...just to #2?  their power and computer rating would still be better than OK beating at 3 lose Mizz team.  FL vs AL Part II for the NC game.


That scenario almost happened 2 or 3 years ago, where Ohio State beat Michigan in a close game and alot of Big Ten people wanted Michigan and Ohio S. to meet again in the BCS Title game. Never happened though. The worst scenario I can think of (besides what happened today) is Mizzou beating OU and USC leapfrogging everyone and playing for the BCS Title against the SEC Champ. You know how the pollsters love USC.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Earl1972 on November 30, 2008, 04:48:12 PM
Oklahoma and Missouri are playing for the Big 12 title and Texas beat them both.

Fuck this shit.   >:(

Signed,
Pissed off Longhorn Fan

how long have you been a longhorn fan?

E
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Cavalier22 on November 30, 2008, 04:49:06 PM
at least we dont have to watch Ohio State or some other big 10 school get smoked by 40 pts in a championship game
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 30, 2008, 04:49:20 PM
College football fucking blows so who cares.

So does your dad, but you probably still care about him.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on November 30, 2008, 04:55:42 PM
Here's a question:  Has Pete Carroll ever scheduled a top 3 SEC team pre-conference?  Think he would have had an argument if he had beaten even Ole Miss or Georgia...a mid-range team on the road.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 05:09:16 PM
Here's a question:  Has Pete Carroll ever scheduled a top 3 SEC team pre-conference?  Think he would have had an argument if he had beaten even Ole Miss or Georgia...a mid-range team on the road.
no and he probably never will but it's not just him, 95 percent of schools schedule patsies for pre conference games.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on November 30, 2008, 05:14:51 PM
no and he probably never will but it's not just him, 95 percent of schools schedule patsies for pre conference games.

in his case he conf is full of patsies...and it doesnt get better next season.  thank god 1 team yrly finds away to beat them in conf.  road is too easy for them to even be in the NC picture even if they were undefeated this yr. no wear on this team at all except joe mcknight in and out this season.   
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on November 30, 2008, 05:17:07 PM
in his case he conf is full of patsies...and it doesnt get better next season.  thank god 1 team yrly finds away to beat them in conf.  road is too easy for them to even be in the NC picture even if they were undefeated this yr. no wear on this team at all except joe mcknight in and out this season.   
you don't think Maleuga, Cushing or Mays will go?
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: HDPhysiques on November 30, 2008, 11:10:37 PM
i'm a Mizzou fan but they don't have a chance, can't believe they gave Pinkel all that money when he hasn't beaten anybody good yet.

True, but keep in mind, the program is INFINITELY better than it was 8 years ago.  Local sports shows were talking about this tonight after the loss to KU yesterday (was paying Pinkel a mistake?).... and the conclusion was no.  OK and TX have literally a 100 year head start in football tradition and winning ways.  It will take a while longer to get MO to the point where they are a legitimate BCS threat every year, and being competitive with teams like TX and OK.  But many analysts believe MU to be in the right direction with pinkel and it will just take a bit more time to get a lot of those blue chippers from the south to make their way up North.  Having a strong Kansas team and good recruiting operations with mangino will only help Mizzou in that respect (legitimizing the whole Big 12 North in the eyes of players from TX and OK).
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: G o a t b o y on November 30, 2008, 11:19:28 PM
I know, I know...although the Big 12 made a bigtime comeback this season, there's still no way Texas can compete with an Alabama or Florida, although I think UT-Florida would be a fun game to watch. 

I think America wants OU-Alabama, though.


The Big 12 is every bit as good as the SEC...  I can't understand this love affair the media has with SEC teams.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 04:50:02 AM

The Big 12 is every bit as good as the SEC...  I can't understand this love affair the media has with SEC teams.

I really like watching the Big 12, but nobody in the conference plays any defense...none, zero, nada.  In the SEC Bama and Fla are much more balanced.  After those two the SEC is very average this year.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Tre on December 01, 2008, 06:18:48 AM
The Big 12 is every bit as good as the SEC...  I can't understand this love affair the media has with SEC teams.

When it comes to football, I've always been an SEC guy, because the brand of football they play is just that damned good.

What I don't understand is the continued love affair the media has with the Big Ten.  Talk about total fraud!  And it's been that way for a few years now. 

The Big 12 was down for a bit, but they admitted they were down and didn't try to pretend they were something other than what they were.  I started rooting for them as underdogs and they've really put on a great show for America this season. 

All that being said, it's ludicrous to suggest that the SEC is not far and away the best (football) conference in America. 

As for Mizzou, they're probably back in the cellar once Chase Daniels leaves.   ;)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 06:39:19 AM
When it comes to football, I've always been an SEC guy, because the brand of football they play is just that damned good.

What I don't understand is the continued love affair the media has with the Big Ten.  Talk about total fraud!  And it's been that way for a few years now. 

The Big 12 was down for a bit, but they admitted they were down and didn't try to pretend they were something other than what they were.  I started rooting for them as underdogs and they've really put on a great show for America this season. 

All that being said, it's ludicrous to suggest that the SEC is not far and away the best (football) conference in America. 

As for Mizzou, they're probably back in the cellar once Chase Daniels leaves.   ;)

maybe not, Blaine Gabbert is a very good recruit at QB, they should have given him a little more playing time in some of the blowout games.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: G o a t b o y on December 01, 2008, 12:51:20 PM
What I don't understand is the continued love affair the media has with the Big Ten.  Talk about total fraud!  And it's been that way for a few years now. 


Yep.  Big Ten is teh suck.



I still think Big12 is underrated and SEC is overrated, though.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 12:53:26 PM
Well the latest is that even if Florida beat Bama, they might not move up enough in the computer rankings and we could see a Texas vs Oklahoma natl championship game....
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: BM OUT on December 01, 2008, 01:02:18 PM
Crack baby!  >:(

Texas beat both the teams that are playing for the league title.  How is that fair, mate?

They got STOMPED by Tech.Why shouldnt Tech be in the game?
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: G o a t b o y on December 01, 2008, 02:23:13 PM
Well the latest is that even if Florida beat Bama, they might not move up enough in the computer rankings and we could see a Texas vs Oklahoma natl championship game....


Don't the teams have to be from different conferences?
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 02:24:50 PM

Don't the teams have to be from different conferences?

Not according the article...

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/BCS-Realpolitik-Oklahoma-it-is-but-a-new-route?urn=ncaaf,125550
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: G o a t b o y on December 01, 2008, 02:27:20 PM
They got STOMPED by Tech.Why shouldnt Tech be in the game?

Stomped?  They lost by 6 points on the last play of the game.  ::)    Tech lost to Oklahoma by 40 points.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Tre on December 01, 2008, 03:33:34 PM
Stomped?  They lost by 6 points on the last play of the game.  ::)    Tech lost to Oklahoma by 40 points.

I admit that Texas didn't deserve to win the game, but at the same time, even fans have to wonder why they couldn't make a play when they needed it most.

But, the tiebreaker used by the Big 12 is just one more reason why the SEC is the superior conference.  ;)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: koolie1 on December 01, 2008, 04:27:07 PM
Abolish college football.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 04:29:00 PM
Stomped?  They lost by 6 points on the last play of the game.  ::)    Tech lost to Oklahoma by 40 points.
he obviously didn't watch that game or any games this season.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 04:34:12 PM
I admit that Texas didn't deserve to win the game, but at the same time, even fans have to wonder why they couldn't make a play when they needed it most.

But, the tiebreaker used by the Big 12 is just one more reason why the SEC is the superior conference.  ;)
the ONLY reason i'd put Texas in the Big 12 title game is the 4 game run they had to get through and ALMOST won all of them, they came within 1 play of beating TT, OU, Mizzou and Oklahoma State, that being said OU is the superior team right now.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 01, 2008, 04:48:53 PM
(http://www.burntorangenation.com/images/admin/ogbonnaya.jpg)

OK will get it done against Bama or get nailed by FL.  TX would be dog meat in a NC game vs SEC Champ.  This guy would be lucky to get 10 yrds rushing.  3rd and 9 all night for TX.

(http://www.burntorangenation.com/images/admin/ogbonnaya.jpg)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 04:50:43 PM
(http://www.burntorangenation.com/images/admin/ogbonnaya.jpg)

OK will get it done against Bama or get nailed by FL.  TX would be dog meat in a NC game vs SEC Champ.  This guy would be lucky to get 10 yrds rushing.  3rd and 9 all night for TX.

(http://www.burntorangenation.com/images/admin/ogbonnaya.jpg)
yeah maybe not Ogbannaya but Demarco Murray and Chris Brown would be able to run the ball a little bit, not as much as theyve run on other teams but they'd be able to run it.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 04:53:49 PM
(http://images.quickblogcast.com/112237-104796/tebow.jpg)

BOOOOM !!!!
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 04:55:56 PM
(http://images.quickblogcast.com/112237-104796/tebow.jpg)

BOOOOM !!!!
Tebow is a beast.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: thelamefalsehood on December 01, 2008, 04:56:40 PM
Well the latest is that even if Florida beat Bama, they might not move up enough in the computer rankings and we could see a Texas vs Oklahoma natl championship game....


Thats probably just sports journalists just throwing out what if scenarios.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 04:57:04 PM
And his woman....


(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f141/chrismilleral/tebow2.jpg)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 04:57:37 PM
And his woman....


(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f141/chrismilleral/tebow2.jpg)
seriously? :o
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 04:58:31 PM
seriously? :o

Unless it's changed recently....never know with those college kids....it sure is.  Think he has it all ?!?  He is my new hero.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 04:59:30 PM
(http://www.yardbarker.com/m/4060/xl/tim-tebow-girl.jpg)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 05:00:05 PM
holy shit, he is one lucky bastard.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 01, 2008, 05:03:37 PM
yeah maybe not Ogbannaya but Demarco Murray and Chris Brown would be able to run the ball a little bit, not as much as theyve run on other teams but they'd be able to run it.

McGee and O are around 400 yds a piece this season.  The delayed traps they run wont work against the fast LBs of the SEC.  McCoy isnt going to complete 70% of his passes vs FL or AL w/ best pass rush they would have seen all season and good CBs making plays on his passes. OK has a horse at HB and he is healthy now. They got the best change if his A game is on.  Then again...Stoops could mess up and they lose to Miz.   
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 05:08:59 PM
McGee and O are around 400 yds a piece this season.  The delayed traps they run wont work against the fast LBs of the SEC.  McCoy isnt going to complete 70% of his passes vs FL or AL w/ best pass rush they would have seen all season and good CBs making plays on his passes. OK has a horse at HB and he is healthy now. They got the best change if his A game is on.  Then again...Stoops could mess up and they lose to Miz.   
i think the days of Stoops and the Sooners underestimating people and getting beat by the Kansas State's, Colorado's, Boise State's and West Virginia's of the world are over, Mizzou made that mistake this year and came in to the OK State and Texas games cocky and got beat, you're right about Demarco Murray, he's a horse and is showing what he's capable of healthy, whether it's Florida or Bama you can be sure that Bradford and that offense will have a much tougher time than they've had up to this point, Spikes, Haden, Wright and those guys on Florida's defense all have speed and get after the football relentlessly and don't even think of running the ball on that 400 pound 6'5" monster Terrance Cody on Bama's interior.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Jeffro on December 01, 2008, 05:09:19 PM
And his woman....
(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f141/chrismilleral/tebow2.jpg)
That's fucking outrageous..  :o
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 05:10:43 PM
That's fucking outrageous..  :o

To hell with Mike....I wanna be like Tim !!!
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: CalvinH on December 01, 2008, 05:12:57 PM
And his woman....


(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f141/chrismilleral/tebow2.jpg)





Isn't that Lucy Pinder ??? :o
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 01, 2008, 05:14:20 PM
how do you explain USC losing to Oregon State and then Oregon State losing to a piss ant Big 10 team like Penn State then?

because freakin usc always takes a fuckin game off...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 01, 2008, 05:15:49 PM
Here's a question:  Has Pete Carroll ever scheduled a top 3 SEC team pre-conference?  Think he would have had an argument if he had beaten even Ole Miss or Georgia...a mid-range team on the road.

auburn 2003 was the highest ranked sec school preseason...usc went there and won like 30-0
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 01, 2008, 05:16:24 PM
because freakin usc always takes a fuckin game off...
actually i think USC is an awesome team who in just about any other year would easily be playing for the national championship, their defense is the best in the nation.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 05:19:08 PM




Isn't that Lucy Pinder ??? :o

I think so.  Evidently, ole Timmy has dated quite a few...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 05:20:16 PM
auburn 2003 was the highest ranked sec school preseason...usc went there and won like 30-0

hahaha, USC?  Oregon St, pal...Oregon St.  And in a shitty conference year in and year out.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 01, 2008, 05:26:34 PM
actually i think USC is an awesome team who in just about any other year would easily be playing for the national championship, their defense is the best in the nation.
their d-line dissapointed me.. they have an awesome linebacking core...1 first rounder. cushing is a 2nd rounder and number 43 is a 3-4 rounder...Mays and ellison are dope too
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 01, 2008, 05:27:01 PM
(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f141/chrismilleral/tebow2.jpg)

do some of you guys have a girl or had one?  get real going whenyou see some guys girl.  nice rack but pretty common in S. FL on the beach.  looks are ok.  
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 01, 2008, 05:27:40 PM
hahaha, USC?  Oregon St, pal...Oregon St.  And in a shitty conference year in and year out.

usc=beat the shit out of anyone but OU...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 01, 2008, 05:28:46 PM
(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f141/chrismilleral/tebow2.jpg)

do some of you guys have a girl or had one?  get real going whenyou see some guys girl.  nice rack but pretty common in S. FL on the beach.  looks are ok.  


really...dude...you are kidding me. your girl must be fuckin smokin..she is hawt and im from LA...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 01, 2008, 05:30:06 PM
usc=beat the shit out of anyone but OU...

any real pressure on sanchez and he has one of those rotten egg games (2-3 ints) which he can get by with a win in the Pitiful 10.  
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 01, 2008, 05:32:17 PM

really...dude...you are kidding me. your girl must be fuckin smokin..she is hawt and im from LA...

my girl cuban/pan with a nice size rack.  family is all down in fl.  plenty of latin women that give her a run.  just a nice looking women fl style. 
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: CalvinH on December 01, 2008, 05:33:43 PM
I think so.  Evidently, ole Timmy has dated quite a few...


After extensive research the last 5 minutes and I have found out the girl with Tebow is a senior from Florida named Erin and that is Lucy Pinder in the bikini.



...and I like both :o
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 06:00:15 PM

After extensive research the last 5 minutes and I have found out the girl with Tebow is a senior from Florida named Erin and that is Lucy Pinder in the bikini.



...and I like both :o

Did you enjoy your research ?  ;D
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: 240 is Back on December 01, 2008, 06:02:17 PM
it really does illustrate the need for a 4-team playoff for #1.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: CalvinH on December 01, 2008, 06:05:48 PM
Did you enjoy your research ?  ;D


Haha,yup ;D
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on December 01, 2008, 06:10:37 PM
the 2 best coaches in the Nation face off Saturday in Atlanta. I absolutely loathe UF and don't really care much for Bama but they by far have the best coaches. Unfortunately, my team has a soft ass coach who will remain loyal to a horrible Defensive Coordinator. Our Defense is the most undisciplined D in the nation.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 01, 2008, 06:19:20 PM
the 2 best coaches in the Nation face off Saturday in Atlanta. I absolutely loathe UF and don't really care much for Bama but they by far have the best coaches. Unfortunately, my team has a soft ass coach who will remain loyal to a horrible Defensive Coordinator. Our Defense is the most undisciplined D in the nation.


Ga Tech has a pretty solid coach, too.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 01, 2008, 06:40:10 PM
it really does illustrate the need for a 4-team playoff for #1.

NO!  i was there with  my uncle. bowl game are meant for college.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gik9gVdzXPA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gik9gVdzXPA)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 08:42:28 AM
the 2 best coaches in the Nation face off Saturday in Atlanta. I absolutely loathe UF and don't really care much for Bama but they by far have the best coaches. Unfortunately, my team has a soft ass coach who will remain loyal to a horrible Defensive Coordinator. Our Defense is the most undisciplined D in the nation.
PETE CARROL = best coach in college football
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Brutal_1 on December 02, 2008, 06:07:01 PM
PETE CARROL = best coach in college football


Absolutely...the numbers don't lie!  ;)

"PETE CARROLL
USC HEAD FOOTBALL COACH

Energetic and charismatic eighth-year USC head football coach Pete Carroll has returned the Trojan football program to national prominence.

He is 76-14 (84.4%) in 7 years (2001-2007) as a college head coach (all at USC), the best winning percentage of any current Division I coach with at least 5 years of experience. He reached 50 career USC wins faster than any head coach in Trojan history. His losses have been by a total of 59 points (4.2 average) and only 1 was by more than a touchdown (it was by 11 points). After starting off his Trojan career 2-5, he has gone 74-9 (89.2%) with a pair of national championships (2003-04). He is 49-9 in Pac-10 games, giving him an 84.5% winning mark (a league record). "


(http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r257/tlutes01yahoocom/pg2.jpg)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on December 02, 2008, 06:22:20 PM
PETE CARROL = best coach in college football
I respectfully disagree. Pete doesn't coach in the strongest conference in the nation. It is  bit easier to look good in a pansy league.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Brutal_1 on December 02, 2008, 06:31:56 PM
I respectfully disagree. Pete doesn't coach in the strongest conference in the nation. It is  bit easier to look good in a pansy league.

I love how this is ALWAYS the argument against SC...that's fine, and that's why the BCS desperately needs a playoff system.

Look at the records, USC DOESN'T LOSE BIG GAMES (it's the little ones we have a problem with :) )
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: thelamefalsehood on December 02, 2008, 06:38:15 PM
I love how this is ALWAYS the argument against SC...that's fine, and that's why the BCS desperately needs a playoff system.

Look at the records, USC DOESN'T LOSE BIG GAMES (it's the little ones we have a problem with :) )

No, they only lose to teams like Oregan State who they should pummel.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 06:40:26 PM
No, they only lose to teams like Oregan State who they should pummel.

but we all know that was a oversight on USC's part. We all can name upset games. Its just a fucked up thing
What about when zook was the coach of UF and they lost To Miss state. Or the App State over michigan shit. the prob with USC is they get up for big out of conference games...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: thelamefalsehood on December 02, 2008, 06:46:41 PM
but we all know that was a oversight on USC's part. We all can name upset games. Its just a fucked up thing
What about when zook was the coach of UF and they lost To Miss state. Or the App State over michigan shit. the prob with USC is they get up for big out of conference games...

Yeah, I totally agree. But USC just has a habit of doing this, losing to teams they should beat. They are still a great team, but need to get over that hump. The Pac-10 does them no favors when they do lose a game. They pretty much have to go undefeated to get to the BCS Title Game.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Brutal_1 on December 02, 2008, 06:48:59 PM
Yeah, I totally agree. But USC just has a habit of doing this, losing to teams they should beat. They are still a great team, but need to get over that hump. The Pac-10 does them no favors when they do lose a game. They pretty much have to go undefeated to get to the BCS Title Game.

True...

SC always loses to the worst teams, we have Ohio st.'s exact opposite problem  ;D
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 06:52:37 PM
I respectfully disagree. Pete doesn't coach in the strongest conference in the nation. It is  bit easier to look good in a pansy league.


Out of Conference Games
2002
September 2 No. 22 Auburn     W 24-17 1-0 (0-0)
2003
August 30 at Auburn               W 23-0 1-0 (0-0) (Aub was Preseason number 5)
January 1 vs. No. 4 Michigan    W 28-14 12-1 (7-1)
2004
August 28 at Virginia Tech       W 24-13 1-0 (0-0)
January 4 vs. No. 3 Oklahoma   W 55-19 13-0 (8-0)
2005
September 17 Arkansas           W 70-17 2-0 (0-0)
January 4 vs. No. 1 Texas        L 41-38 12-1 (8-0)
2006
September 2 at Arkansas          W 50-14 1-0 (0-0)
September 16 No. 19 Nebraska  W 28-10 2-0 (0-0)
January 1 vs. No. 8 Michigan     W 32-18 11-2 (7-2)
2007
September 15 at No. 14 Nebraska  W 49-31 2-0 (0-0)
January 1 vs. No. 13 Illinois  W 49-17 11-2 (7-2)
2008
August 30 at Virginia  W 52-7 1-0 (0-0)
September 13 No. 5 Ohio State  W 35-3 2-0 (0-0)


Now someone say thats not impressive
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 02, 2008, 06:55:19 PM
I would probably toss out the Arkansas, Michigan 07 and Virginia from that list if you are trying to impress someone.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: G o a t b o y on December 02, 2008, 06:58:17 PM
Bottom line, Texas got hosed.  Maybe Mizzou will pull off a miracle over OU, and UT will still get a shot.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 06:59:40 PM
uga out of conference teams

2003
September 6 Middle Tennessee State   W 29-10 2-0 (0-0)
2004
September 18 Marshall                       W 13-3 3-0 (1-0)
2005
September 17 Louisiana-Monroe           W 44-7 3-0 (1-0)
2006
September 2 Western Kentucky           W 48-12 1-0 (0-0) (shittin me right)
September 16 UAB                             W 34-0 3-0 (1-0)
2007
September 15 Western Carolina            W 45-16 2-1 (0-1)
November 3 Troy                               W 44-34 7-2 (4-2)
2008
August 30 Georgia Southern                W 45-21 1-0 (0-0)
September 6 Central Michigan              W 56-17 2-0 (0-0)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: CalvinH on December 02, 2008, 07:00:23 PM
Bottom line, Texas got hosed.  Maybe Mizzou will pull off a miracle over OU, and UT will still get a shot.


Yeah I think Texas got hosed.lost 1 game on the last play of the game and beat Oklahoma on a neutral sight.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 07:00:35 PM
I would probably toss out the Arkansas, Michigan 07 and Virginia from that list if you are trying to impress someone.
.

that same ark team won sec west that year chief...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on December 02, 2008, 07:01:08 PM
Pac-10 fans just don't get it. Playing teams like WSU, Washington, Stanford, Arizona, Cal week in and week out is a bit different than playing teams like UF, Bama, LSU, UGA, SC week in and week out. 5 current SEC coaches have national championships.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 07:01:22 PM
Bottom line, Texas got hosed.  Maybe Mizzou will pull off a miracle over OU, and UT will still get a shot.

absolutley not..OU=best team in nation..
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 07:03:05 PM
Pac-10 fans just don't get it. Playing teams like WSU, Washington, Stanford, Arizona, Cal week in and week out is a bit different than playing teams like UF, Bama, LSU, UGA, SC week in and week out. 5 current SEC coaches have national championships.
Spurrier
Saban
Miles
Fulmer
Oh yeah dude from fla

Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: G o a t b o y on December 02, 2008, 07:04:58 PM
absolutley not..OU=best team in nation..


That lost to UT.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 07:05:56 PM

That lost to UT.

lol. yeah they sure did....Why the fuck couldnt have Colt McCoy went to usc..Fucker
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 02, 2008, 07:06:23 PM
.

that same ark team won sec west that year chief...

And they were 2-4 vs Top 25 teams...
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 02, 2008, 07:08:47 PM
And they were 2-4 vs Top 25 teams...

hey they were good enought to win a division of the Gauntlet  ::) otherwise known as the SEC  ::)
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Brutal_1 on December 02, 2008, 07:09:12 PM
Pac-10 fans just don't get it. Playing teams like WSU, Washington, Stanford, Arizona, Cal week in and week out is a bit different than playing teams like UF, Bama, LSU, UGA, SC week in and week out. 5 current SEC coaches have national championships.

i.e COLLEGE PLAYOFFS!  ::)




Trojan - yes
Pac 10 fan - no
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: thelamefalsehood on December 02, 2008, 07:18:06 PM
hey they were good enought to win a division of the Gauntlet  ::) otherwise known as the SEC  ::)

 Get over it Mal, USC is an awesome team. But don't act like the SEC isn't a better Conference than the Pac-10. The Big 12 is the best by far this year, and I'm an SEC guy.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on December 03, 2008, 04:41:43 AM
Get over it Mal, USC is an awesome team. But don't act like the SEC isn't a better Conference than the Pac-10. The Big 12 is the best by far this year, and I'm an SEC guy.
Big 12= amazing offense & weak to non-existenet defense
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 03, 2008, 06:35:26 AM
PETE CARROL = best coach in college football
no way, Stoops, Saban and Urban Meyer are better.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 03, 2008, 07:01:51 AM

PETE CARROL = best coach in college football


no way, Stoops, Saban and Urban Meyer are better.

Carrol is good at getting 5-star kids to sit on the bench when they could get major playing time at other schools because he's selling them s##t about getting in the nfl via the great usc practices and likes of bush (saints are better when he isnt on the field), that one in az which i cant remember his name and so on. 

really....for example...lsu has landry (wash), bowe (kc), qb (oakland), hb (new eng), and some other guys that where on the field and developed nicely.

i'd seen my kid to ucla where he'd at least be a 4 yr letter and probably get his degree before he get it at football factory usc
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 03, 2008, 09:13:47 AM
Carrol is good at getting 5-star kids to sit on the bench when they could get major playing time at other schools because he's selling them s##t about getting in the nfl via the great usc practices and likes of bush (saints are better when he isnt on the field), that one in az which i cant remember his name and so on. 

really....for example...lsu has landry (wash), bowe (kc), qb (oakland), hb (new eng), and some other guys that where on the field and developed nicely.

i'd seen my kid to ucla where he'd at least be a 4 yr letter and probably get his degree before he get it at football factory usc

Troy Palomalu (sp)...
so you conviently leave him out..he was voted to the steelers all time team...you fucktard
And get off that bullshit saying the saints are better with reggie on the bench. thats just retarded
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: QuakerOats on December 03, 2008, 09:17:00 AM
Troy Palomalu (sp)...
so you conviently leave him out..he was voted to the steelers all time team...you fucktard
And get off that bullshit saying the saints are better with reggie on the bench. thats just retarded
hahaha, exactly, this guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: CalvinH on December 03, 2008, 09:20:25 AM
Troy Palomalu (sp)...
so you conviently leave him out..he was voted to the steelers all time team...you fucktard
And get off that bullshit saying the saints are better with reggie on the bench. thats just retarded



Reggie's gonna get plenty of playing time now with Duece suspended.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Option D on December 03, 2008, 09:22:56 AM
Big 12= amazing offense & weak to non-existenet defense
i wonder why though..i wonder if its the DC's that dont do good jobs...What ever the reason...the big 12=best conference in football.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Cap on December 03, 2008, 09:24:23 AM
Carrol is good at getting 5-star kids to sit on the bench when they could get major playing time at other schools because he's selling them s##t about getting in the nfl via the great usc practices and likes of bush (saints are better when he isnt on the field), that one in az which i cant remember his name and so on. 

really....for example...lsu has landry (wash), bowe (kc), qb (oakland), hb (new eng), and some other guys that where on the field and developed nicely.

i'd seen my kid to ucla where he'd at least be a 4 yr letter and probably get his degree before he get it at football factory usc
Yeah Russel is a real great asset   ::).

USC is a good FB school, like them or not.  Usually they have a bit more competition than this season, maybe that will change.  I expected at least 3 teams to at least challenge them this year and they all did not.  That being said, I wouldn't laud a Utah or Boise St and diss USC.

As for Leinart, I guarantee had he gone to another team you would see a different player.  He's no HOF quarterback but I think he is capable in the pros.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: phemonmmill32 on December 03, 2008, 09:30:01 AM


Reggie's gonna get plenty of playing time now with Duece suspended.

i'm not gonna go as far as to say the saints are bettew w/o reggie, but he isn't even the best rb on the saints, pierre thomas is the better back b/w the tackles

i'll add the BCS got the 04 matchup wrong.. LSU and usc were the two best teams that year.. usc got hosed but it worked to LSU's favor
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 03, 2008, 09:48:20 AM
Troy Palomalu (sp)...
so you conviently leave him out..he was voted to the steelers all time team...you fucktard
And get off that bullshit saying the saints are better with reggie on the bench. thats just retarded

losing you mind over usc.  there are many analyst who say the saints are a better team w/out reggie on the field.  they become a gimmic off to a certain extent.  look at his rushing totals retard (youself).  he's a 500yd per yr  RB. dunn at 15lbs or less than him can give you a 1000yds.  reggie bush is a joe morris clone who fits with a john riggins type back (deuce or white at usc).  no way on this earth he is a $5M lead back for the saint.  my home city...so he can get the f##k out of dodge w/that fat butt whore.  sorry...she can stay.

pete carroll wins with 5-star guys.  good for him.  but he should be 11-0 every yr w/his conference schdule.  any knucklehead could see usc this yr would have problems with sanchez at qb if they had to go through a ga, fl, al, ole miss, lsu schedule.

losing your mind of usc
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 03, 2008, 09:56:56 AM
Let’s get this out of the way: Reggie Bush is nothing more than a glorified punt returner. And don’t get me wrong, he’s a fine, fine return man. But that’s about where it ends. He’s not a running back. He’s not a wide receiver. Yet -- when he’s actually healthy -- the Saints insist on trying to make him some combination of both of those positions and it’s to the team’s detriment.
It’s easy to understand why they try to gameplan to Bush’s strength, which is getting himself one-on-one (or even one-on-two) with defenders in the open field. After all, they did waste a No. 2 overall pick on the guy. But the Saints are a better team when Reggie isn’t participating.

New Orleans’ record with Bush this season: 3-4; without him: 3-1.

There's a reason why the HTexans passed on him.  trade joe morris II while they can get good value for him and put together a real superbowl team. 

continue to school me.  
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: 240 is Back on December 03, 2008, 09:58:33 AM
Look at the records, USC DOESN'T LOSE BIG GAMES

Hi, Vince Young Amnesia.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: divcom on December 03, 2008, 10:03:01 AM
Hi, Vince Young Amnesia.

people get Bandwagon Syndrome (ICD-9 code 9802) with teams like usc.
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Brutal_1 on December 03, 2008, 12:22:13 PM
Hi, Vince Young Amnesia.
;D

No need to have amnesia about that clown...we all know how he's doing now  ;D
Title: Re: Abolish the BCS - now
Post by: Brutal_1 on December 03, 2008, 05:50:38 PM
Hi, Vince Young Amnesia.

Me, still sore about that game...nah  ;D