Yea, barely visible Your arguments suffer from what I mentioned earlier in the thread about taking a good shot of X and comparing it to a bad shot of Y thus making you as bad as the Coleman nut huggers. If you ever wish for any credibility in this debate you would stick to comparing the best shots of each, instead you stoop to the level of those you are trying to prove wrong only compounding your monumental incompetence to have an intelligent debate and the continuance sabotage of your own efforts.
Well you couldn't be any more wrong , that wasn't a bad shot of Ronnie , I don't know what you're crying about , in fact that's an awesome shot of Ronnie and the point still stands at that weight Ronnie's lats aren't as visible or as sweeping or take up as much space as Dorians who ironically is around the same weight
I gave up on an ' intelligent debate ' the moment these guys claimed Dorian lost the 1993 Olympia to Flex and Ronnie had more detailed calves than Dorian . in fact there is NO debate , there is me and the rest of these guys correcting all the nonsense spewed from Trollman fans