Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: hipolito mejia on October 11, 2011, 08:50:22 AM

Title: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on October 11, 2011, 08:50:22 AM
Who would you rather look like (physique wise) him or Phil Heath?


Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: wild willie on October 11, 2011, 09:04:00 AM
Gunter!!!
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Schmoff on October 11, 2011, 09:06:00 AM
of course GS

whhy do you want to be black?

 ???
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: m8 on October 11, 2011, 09:11:08 AM
taller is better
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Tito24 on October 11, 2011, 09:16:18 AM
gunther is tall and white so the choice is easy.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Schmoff on October 11, 2011, 09:17:12 AM
(http://)
gunther is tall and white so the choice is easy.

(http://dafferianto.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/molveno-me.jpg)

 ???
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Tito24 on October 11, 2011, 09:19:56 AM
wheres your pic big guy?
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: RC Money on October 11, 2011, 09:32:45 AM
(http://)
(http://dafferianto.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/molveno-me.jpg)

 ???
Is this a real pic?
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: dyslexic on October 11, 2011, 09:35:10 AM
Gunther does NOT look like that anymore.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Tito24 on October 11, 2011, 09:46:39 AM
Is this a real pic?

yes its a real picture, its not painted.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: RC Money on October 11, 2011, 10:04:48 AM
yes its a real picture, its not painted.
You must be real smart. I meant real as in, is that actually you. It's a simple and natural inquiry, just curious if that is the picture of someone who post on a bb forum is all.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: io856 on October 11, 2011, 10:06:46 AM
Guys that pic was from three years ago was probably carb depleted beating the flu three days prior with bad lighting  ::)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Tito24 on October 11, 2011, 10:12:59 AM
its not me. result of a quick search on google ;D
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: jaejonna on October 11, 2011, 10:19:04 AM
The only person to beat Coleman during his reign as champion ....
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: jaejonna on October 11, 2011, 10:28:09 AM
In 2002 he should of placed 2nd....

Watch this video.... that physique would kill Heath..

Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Lord Chronos on October 11, 2011, 10:39:45 AM


 ???
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Stavios on October 11, 2011, 10:40:08 AM
Gunter is tall and white, so he is the better man
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Tito24 on October 11, 2011, 11:25:25 AM
Gunter is tall and white, so he is the better man

rofl ;D
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Pet shop boys on October 11, 2011, 12:16:28 PM
Any version of Gunter 2002-05 ..is better than Philsulin, Plus Gunter can do Arnold like poses.



WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Dr Dutch on October 11, 2011, 12:18:19 PM
Gunter could make Phil cry....
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Board_SHERIF on October 11, 2011, 12:23:04 PM
neither
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: m8 on October 11, 2011, 12:31:50 PM
In 2002 he should of placed 2nd....

Watch this video.... that physique would kill Heath..



"should have"; and he should have placed first like in the GNC that same year. Ronnie looked like dog shit in 2002.

BOOM.

(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/GNC_Pro/2002/GNC_Pro_021.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Bobby on October 11, 2011, 02:04:32 PM
is this a serious question??

Gunter 10 out of 10 times
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: GettingBig on October 11, 2011, 02:09:20 PM
no disrespect to Phil !

but MHO i would like to look lik Gunter, maybe because im 6'2 and always followed Gunter progress.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Bobby on October 11, 2011, 02:11:28 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_cp9IZjqg77Q/TSCRpop2CtI/AAAAAAAAAEU/ibEUfzsV42c/s1600/001+delts+G%25C3%25BCnter+Schlierkamp+SEATED+ONE-ARM+DUMBBELL+LATERAL+RAISE.jpg)

Look at the width and thickness :D
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: claymore on October 11, 2011, 02:36:06 PM
gunther is tall and white so the choice is easy.

This ^^
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: david94 on October 11, 2011, 02:40:12 PM
No arms, no legs, wide waist, poor back. One of the most overrated bodybuilder ever.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Kwon_2 on October 11, 2011, 02:44:01 PM
Is this a real pic?

Yes, it's a real picture, not manipulated at all.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Nirvana on October 11, 2011, 02:45:47 PM
but phil is Mr. O

Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: leadhead on October 11, 2011, 02:55:06 PM
but phil is Mr. O



In quite possibly the weakest field ever.

Gunter, no contest
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: hipolito mejia on October 19, 2011, 07:07:36 AM
Gunter at his prime  (wish i could find bigger pictures)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: hipolito mejia on October 19, 2011, 07:09:04 AM
Gunter a better BB than Philsulin from every angle.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: hipolito mejia on October 19, 2011, 07:10:12 AM
Gunter in a lineup where Philsulin wouldnt crack top 6.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: NotMrAverage on October 19, 2011, 07:24:21 AM
I thought Gunter looked pretty good before I met him after the 2003 Mr.O. He hardly had any abs, legs looked funky. He had mass though... Another guy that pulled of an amazing Heath kinda illusion was Troy Alves. He looked very average in clothes and backstage, to transform when going on stage... Gunter was the opposite.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Tito24 on October 19, 2011, 07:30:52 AM
you still had people that had ron ahead of gunther in the show of strength. i dont really understand that.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: DK II on October 19, 2011, 07:32:10 AM
(http://www.gunters.net/gunterhpfinal.gif)

(http://www.gunters.net/gunterhandtest.gif)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: BayGBM on October 19, 2011, 09:18:35 AM
Gunter looked good at his peak but it was all of five seconds.  Some guys like Ronni, Dorian, Haney, Cutler, Dexter, Rhul, etc. look good for years.  Gunter looked good for maybe 1-2 years.  Seriously, why is that?  Obviously, he was still training, supplementing etc.  Why was his window of looking good so short?  ???
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Gab on October 19, 2011, 09:54:15 AM
Gunter is cool as fuck. Met him at Fitness Festivalen in sweden last year.
His waist is the widest ever tho.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: local hero on October 19, 2011, 01:43:00 PM
gunter was hyped for years only because uncle joe had a huge hardon for his tall blonde german looks, was very average for years, probly had the widest waist in bodybuilidng...
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Dr Dutch on October 19, 2011, 01:45:05 PM
He's a nice guy, just not a very good BBer...
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: BayGBM on October 19, 2011, 01:53:32 PM
He's a nice guy, just not a very good BBer...


Ouch!
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: david94 on October 19, 2011, 01:56:24 PM

Ouch!

You think he looks good?
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: disco_stu on October 19, 2011, 02:00:32 PM
Gunter in a lineup where Philsulin wouldnt crack top 6.

dont think so. cormier was way over rated. he always looked sinewy and lacking mass in the legs, and his read poses werent great.

Gunther had Ronnie at least twice.

Great physique. His abs and thigh shot wasnt good, but neither was Jays and he won the O several times.

Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Stavios on October 19, 2011, 04:56:06 PM
dont think so. cormier was way over rated. he always looked sinewy and lacking mass in the legs, and his read poses werent great.

Gunther had Ronnie at least twice.

Great physique. His abs and thigh shot wasnt good, but neither was Jays and he won the O several times.


X2
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: aussiepro on October 19, 2011, 05:07:42 PM
Gunter looked good at his peak but it was all of five seconds.  Some guys like Ronni, Dorian, Haney, Cutler, Dexter, Rhul, etc. look good for years.  Gunter looked good for maybe 1-2 years.  Seriously, why is that?  Obviously, he was still training, supplementing etc.  Why was his window of looking good so short?  ???
i have also wondered that, it seems to happen to a few people they burst on the scence place really well and then nothing. gustavo was the same, all be it he was around a bit longer and won a show or 2 but he was only really relivant for about 4 years or so...
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: JBGRAY on October 19, 2011, 05:10:42 PM
Easily Gunter...any bodybuilder who is 6' and over are impressive, no matter what.  Gettin' tired of the compact midget train that is Branch, Cutler, Dexter and all the others.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 19, 2011, 05:22:11 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 19, 2011, 05:23:26 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: L.L on October 19, 2011, 05:33:25 PM
In 2002 he should of placed 2nd....

Watch this video.... that physique would kill Heath..





im not a phil's fan  but you guys gotta be kidding..Gunter's structure is plain ugly...he cant even carry Philsulina's gyn bag
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: BayGBM on October 19, 2011, 05:35:35 PM
i have also wondered that, it seems to happen to a few people they burst on the scence place really well and then nothing. gustavo was the same, all be it he was around a bit longer and won a show or 2 but he was only really relivant for about 4 years or so...

4 years of relevance is very respectable.  Gunter was relevant for six months... one year, tops.  Remember a young, beautiful Roland Cziurlock?  Relevant for all of six months.  :(
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: G_Thang on October 19, 2011, 06:23:46 PM
4 years of relevance is very respectable.  Gunter was relevant for six months... one year, tops.  Remember a young, beautiful Roland Cziurlock?  Relevant for all of six months.  :(

all these guys used bbing to become the next arnold, who was a fluke to a certain extent. 
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: quadzilla456 on October 19, 2011, 07:57:50 PM

Ouch!
Not sure why nobody advised him to do that shot different. His leg is all crooked and wide obliques. Yet he always would end up doing that pose. There had to be a different way for him to do it that would have looked better. Dorian's method was much better on that pose.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: unrageable on October 19, 2011, 07:58:45 PM
Gunter had like 3 good showings?  His midsection was always hideous.  Cool dude though.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: quadzilla456 on October 19, 2011, 07:59:20 PM
;)
Damn, Atwood was huge - look at those legs compared to mass monster Nasser!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: unrageable on October 19, 2011, 08:01:16 PM
Damn, Atwood was huge - look at those legs compared to mass monster Nasser!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)

Atwood is fucking gross.  What a horrid physique.  It's a shame they fake steroid picture wasn't real.  It makes him look 20x better.  It's funny comparing it to the pathetic original.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Stavios on October 19, 2011, 08:55:51 PM
i have also wondered that, it seems to happen to a few people they burst on the scence place really well and then nothing. gustavo was the same, all be it he was around a bit longer and won a show or 2 but he was only really relivant for about 4 years or so...

Gunter didn't "burst" on the scene, he competed for almost 10 years in the pros he was just placing poorly in the 90's
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: OTHstrong on October 19, 2011, 08:59:07 PM
4 years of relevance is very respectable.  Gunter was relevant for six months... one year, tops.  Remember a young, beautiful Roland Cziurlock?  Relevant for all of six months.  :(
Shit I remember the hype back in the early to mid 90's future mr. O and some where even saying best chest of all time
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Parker on October 19, 2011, 09:05:31 PM
Gunter had a wide waist, he looked better back in 97-98, turn him around at his best vs Phil, Gunter's lack of back detail was appalling. He was bigger, but not really better.

Advantage Phil,
Smile: Tie
Voice: Phil, Gunter sounds like Kermit the Frog
Winning over a current Mr. O: Tie, Gunter did it at the GNC, Phil did it at the Mr. O
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Jadethegladiator on October 19, 2011, 09:12:00 PM
Gunter is the s**t!  What a great looking guy!  ;)
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: deadz on October 19, 2011, 09:14:07 PM
Damn, Atwood was huge - look at those legs compared to mass monster Nasser!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)

Nassers bi's look full of oil. :o
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: MikMaq on October 19, 2011, 09:30:23 PM
Gunter had like 3 good showings?  His midsection was always hideous.  Cool dude though.
Meh is chest is worst. His waste ain't much worst than gutlers, and it's hard to have a narrow waist over six foot.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on October 19, 2011, 09:34:17 PM
He's a nice guy, just not a very good BBer...

X2.. imo he is one of the most overrated bbs.. his many weak points were clear in many poses!!..
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Matt C on October 19, 2011, 09:36:47 PM
Are we talking about professional bodybuilding or everyday life?  I don't think there should be much question as to whether or not Phil's physique surpasses Gunter's in terms of competitive bodybuilding.  He is Mr. Olympia after all and Phil may be shorter but that is not necessarily a bad thing on the pro stage.  Plus Phil is not exactly a midget - I would put him at a true 5'9.  I stood next to him in 2007 and if I was taller than him it was only because of my hair.  He might even be 5'9 and change.  I can see how some people wouldn't want to look like bodybuilders who are very short, but like I said, Phil isn't exactly short.

Yes, Gunter is wide and he's White.  ;D  But it's not like that wins bodybuilding shows...for real life it would be cool to look like Gunter but it would probably require a bigger caloric intake due to his weight.  Also, is Phil a Mulatto?  He looks rather light.  In any event he doesn't exactly look like SEAL.  Maybe I'm biased but I don't think being 5'9 is the shortcoming everyone is making it out to be [no pun intended].  Overall both Phil and Gunter seem comfortable with the size they carry [or carried].  Contrast that with some bodybuilders who can't walk from one side of the gym to the other without being short of breath.

No matter how you cut it both are freaks and both have done very well in the world of bodybuilding past and present.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: tbombz on October 19, 2011, 09:43:09 PM
gunter = no triceps, ugly midsection, ugly legs..   phil= perfection.. just too short
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: tbombz on October 19, 2011, 09:49:07 PM

Winning over a current Mr. O: Tie, Gunter did it at the GNC, Phil did it at the Mr. O
gunter didnt deserve to beat ronnie, they gave it to him to hype the olympia
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Stavios on October 19, 2011, 10:00:52 PM
gunter = no triceps, ugly midsection, ugly legs..   phil= perfection.. just too short

he looked fucking awesome off-season in a t-shirt

monster of a man
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: tbombz on October 19, 2011, 10:03:16 PM
he looked fucking awesome off-season in a t-shirt

monster of a man
true .. looked good on stage in the late 90's too... but comparing him as a bodybuilder to phil is just stupid..
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Jadethegladiator on October 19, 2011, 10:07:37 PM
gunter = no triceps, ugly midsection, ugly legs..   phil= perfection.. just too short

Look at that face! ;D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Schmoff on October 19, 2011, 10:12:16 PM
(http://www.bodyfreaks.com/photoplog/images/1/1_Gunter_Schlierkamp__124_.jpg)

gunter, at least he has foundation

 :D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: TrueGrit on October 19, 2011, 10:15:33 PM
Gunter is only popular because he's a genuinely nice guy and handsome. If you stuck Zack Khan's head on his body, he wouldn't be remembered ever.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: DK II on October 20, 2011, 12:55:21 AM
(http://topgym.ro/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/GunterSchlierkamp.www_.topgym.ro_.jpg)

(http://www.provitamin.in/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/gunter5.jpg)

(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/mrolympia2002f/2002mrof_schlierkamp01.jpg)

(http://forum.bodybuilding.gr/attachment.php?attachmentid=6094&stc=1&d=1256798989)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: DK II on October 20, 2011, 12:56:28 AM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_g93bcGvgWBo/TEhCCC99XAI/AAAAAAAAI3U/ONFXNrGzPr8/s1600/GunterSchlierkamp-M%26F-IanSpanier-685.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: apply85 on October 20, 2011, 01:03:32 AM
in bbing terms gunter is awful
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: aussiepro on October 20, 2011, 02:25:54 AM
gunter may look better in street clothes (except for that pic of phil at the O this year, FUCKING AMAZING) but as far as bbing is concerned phil shits all over gunter. the only thing everyone seems to think is that phil lacks width (he may not be the widdest but still isnt narrow). and phil is MR O and will be for the next couple of years thats unless jay brings something like 2009 to this years MR O
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Jaime on October 20, 2011, 02:58:09 AM
gunter = no triceps, ugly midsection, ugly legs..   phil= perfection.. just too short


Narrow as hell, also has ugly midsection, short man limbs. Nobody would choose to walk around looking like Phil over Gunter.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: m8 on October 20, 2011, 05:55:03 AM
(http://www.bodyfreaks.com/photoplog/images/1/1_Gunter_Schlierkamp__124_.jpg)

gunter, at least he has foundation

 :D

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nGoiIKIkRcU/S6K3G-n1_gI/AAAAAAAAAMA/FyrVsGfv2_4/s400/Rich_Gaspari_2.jpg)

like a tall and good looking (no homo) gaspari.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on December 26, 2011, 02:10:29 PM
The Widht Philsulin can only dream of.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on December 26, 2011, 02:11:46 PM
When a physique like Gunther's couldnt crack the top 3 ten years ago, that's how you know the bar's been lowered.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Kwon_2 on December 26, 2011, 02:53:47 PM
The Widht Philsulin can only dream of.

and height
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: JBGRAY on December 26, 2011, 03:03:42 PM
Bodybuilding should not be an aesthetic contest.

Size+conditioning >>>> Genetic Shape

That's just me though....always been a fan of the freaks, as "ugly" as their physiques may be.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: tbombz on December 26, 2011, 03:16:17 PM
on stage= phil

real life= gunter
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: yates fan on December 26, 2011, 03:22:43 PM
gunter though quite big never quite had the freek factor,he dialed it in a couple times and was almost there,just needed a little more to be a true freak!
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Reeves on December 26, 2011, 03:50:53 PM
In 2002 he should of placed 2nd....

Watch this video.... that physique would kill Heath..



I prefer Gunter and Levrone over that tub of butt grease Coleslaw.  Either one of the was the better man that day. 

And fuck the noise of Phul Health.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: QuakerOats on December 26, 2011, 03:56:27 PM
Gunter is tall and white, so he is the better man
how dare you say that on getbig where blacks are protected and babied?
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Stavios on December 26, 2011, 04:33:27 PM
how dare you say that on getbig where blacks are protected and babied?
;D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on November 01, 2012, 06:23:18 AM
Just Another league for Philsulin.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on November 01, 2012, 06:28:54 AM
That's  it ;D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on November 01, 2012, 06:29:29 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: affeman on November 01, 2012, 06:29:49 AM
Just Another league for Philsulin.

this

(http://www.power-on.tv/mr_olympia_2005_vorwahl/gross/Dpp_0014.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: affeman on November 01, 2012, 06:31:16 AM
Can you imagine how short and small Philsulin would look like next to this tall, handsome, white stud? :o

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/SwUn7Um-FTI/AAAAAAAACag/_NCUR8gXQGw/s1600/Vince+Taylor+and+Gunter+Schlierkamp+at+the+2001+Mr.+Olympia.JPG)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: affeman on November 01, 2012, 06:35:55 AM
At least Phil is lucky it's a body and not a facial contest :-X

(https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/2761841634/4e57064299514ca3e4b20385120bcad5.jpeg) (http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7r0q0bBAoXw/0.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: scottt on November 01, 2012, 06:51:17 AM
Gunter
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: irishdave on November 01, 2012, 08:42:40 AM
lol Gunter any day. The guy looks fucking awesome and he's tall and white (no 1more rep)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Danjo on November 01, 2012, 08:46:39 AM
Gunter!!
(http://i40.tinypic.com/oig306.gif)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Tito24 on November 01, 2012, 08:50:16 AM
best bber ever
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Mr Anabolic on November 01, 2012, 09:01:42 AM
Gunter all the way.  Poor guy was robbed at the 2002 Mr O.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: _bruce_ on November 01, 2012, 10:38:51 AM
...
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Knooger on November 01, 2012, 11:14:41 AM
Is Scoob training that kid?
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: whataname on November 01, 2012, 01:46:24 PM
I would have Mike Katz's face with Big Dan Hill's body.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: _bruce_ on November 01, 2012, 01:52:24 PM
Is Scoob training that kid?

Absolutely, it's a kid of bodybuilding.cum who's won an "open" workout weekend with scooby.
Pretty cool of him to give back to the upcoming generation of clean trainees.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: cephissus on November 01, 2012, 01:57:53 PM
phil has a very ugly face
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Parker on November 01, 2012, 02:15:11 PM
phil has a very ugly face
Women like it.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: _bruce_ on November 01, 2012, 02:36:25 PM
Women like it.

Most are into ugly dogs.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: pulling weight on November 01, 2012, 03:16:34 PM
Team 6 foot plus wins again!!!!
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Dr Dutch on November 01, 2012, 03:26:08 PM
"pulling weight", are you a gimmick for "pure natural strength" ?
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: arce1988 on November 01, 2012, 03:29:28 PM
 Neither.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Parker on November 01, 2012, 03:38:32 PM
Most are into ugly dogs.
To be fair, Phil's face has changed since he came on the scene, they were rwvig about Rich Jones, and he disappeared, then came Heath. Mr. Balla.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: a_ahmed on November 01, 2012, 05:30:06 PM
Who would you rather look like (physique wise) him or Phil Heath?


(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UNS07wrJ9aA/UIicJK-ZALI/AAAAAAAADAw/NQdApcjOKwI/s640/boom1.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: trapz101 on November 01, 2012, 05:32:33 PM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UNS07wrJ9aA/UIicJK-ZALI/AAAAAAAADAw/NQdApcjOKwI/s640/boom1.jpg)


that's not kevin james
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: emerald37 on November 01, 2012, 05:35:34 PM
 :D  ;)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: WOOO on November 01, 2012, 05:41:13 PM
Both look like drug filled shit sacks.

Hope this helps.

Reality of peace.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: pulling weight on November 01, 2012, 05:44:22 PM
I think in Gunter's case the drugs are just the finishing touch.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: bigkid on November 01, 2012, 06:07:57 PM
Gunter in 2002 is the epitome of what bodybuilding should be.  Tall, Shredded, tons of size, awesome presentation and looked healthy.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Roger Bacon on November 01, 2012, 08:39:51 PM
yes its a real picture, its not painted.

haha  ;D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: cephissus on November 01, 2012, 08:45:09 PM
Women like it.

you're telling me phil has been seen with a woman?
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: MCWAY on November 01, 2012, 08:49:13 PM
Gunter in a lineup where Philsulin wouldnt crack top 6.

Gunter couldn't even beat a smaller Jay Cutler or a much smaller Dexter Jackson. How does he stand up against Phil Heath?

And, unless it was '99 or 2000, I don't think Gunter has ever beaten Jay Cutler, particularly at the Olympia.


Jay has beaten Gunter 6 times at the Olympia.

Dex has beaten Gunter 6 times at the Olympia.

Dex and Jay both won the Olympia (each doing so, looking considerably better than the years that they beat Gunter at the Olympia).

And Phil has beaten both Dex and Jay to become Mr. Olympia.

Edit - After further review, it turns out, Gunter has NEVER BEATEN either Jay or Dex at the Olympia.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Schmoff on November 01, 2012, 08:59:12 PM
kim vs ?
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Slik on November 01, 2012, 09:41:45 PM

that's not kevin james
in this case...it actually is
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Tito24 on November 02, 2012, 03:59:04 AM
haha  ;D

 ;D
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: hipolito mejia on November 02, 2012, 07:11:54 AM
Gunter couldn't even beat a smaller Jay Cutler or a much smaller Dexter Jackson. How does he stand up against Phil Heath?

And, unless it was '99 or 2000, I don't think Gunter has ever beaten Jay Cutler, particularly at the Olympia.


Jay has beaten Gunter 6 times at the Olympia.

Dex has beaten Gunter 6 times at the Olympia.

Dex and Jay both won the Olympia (each doing so, looking considerably better than the years that they beat Gunter at the Olympia).

And Phil has beaten both Dex and Jay to become Mr. Olympia.Edit - After further review, it turns out, Gunter has NEVER BEATEN either Jay or Dex at the Olympia.


Phil has beaten both Jay and Dexter.....but not at their prime.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on November 02, 2012, 07:13:03 AM
Gunter in 2002 is the epitome of what bodybuilding should be.  Tall, Shredded, tons of size, awesome presentation and looked healthy.



QFT.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 02, 2012, 10:28:42 AM
Gunter in 2002 is the epitome of what bodybuilding should be.  Tall, Shredded, tons of size, awesome presentation and looked healthy.

but what about his naturally bad muscles shape and proportions..
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Kwon_2 on November 02, 2012, 10:32:34 AM
I'd rather look like Kevin James than Phil Heath
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: G_Thang on November 02, 2012, 12:03:37 PM
kim vs ?

phil's wife is hotter and more natural looking.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: chaos on November 02, 2012, 12:12:34 PM
phil's wife is hotter and more natural looking.
::)
Racist
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: MCWAY on November 02, 2012, 12:27:14 PM
Phil has beaten both Jay and Dexter.....but not at their prime.

But he has beaten them, when they each looked better than in the aughts, when each man defeated Schlierkamp.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on October 08, 2013, 07:14:26 AM
This is the exact opposite of Phil.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=434986;image)


WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: GraniteCityDon on October 08, 2013, 01:50:19 PM
 8)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: nicorulez on October 08, 2013, 06:22:27 PM
Stupid comparison. BB wise Phil smokes him every which way but clavicle width. Now, GS is a good looking dude and for pullng snatch he is the man. However, Phil shits on him BB wise.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: The Ugly on October 08, 2013, 06:23:14 PM
Much rather be Steve Reeves.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: cannon_fodder on October 08, 2013, 06:36:46 PM
(http://www.bodybuildingdungeon.com/forums/attachments/ifbb-pro/1581-gunter-schlierkamp-early.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: The Showstoppa on October 08, 2013, 06:37:44 PM
Gunther is white.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Sam on October 08, 2013, 06:58:43 PM
Damn, Atwood was huge - look at those legs compared to mass monster Nasser!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)


Two down..one to go...
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: The Ugly on October 08, 2013, 07:01:56 PM
Damn, Atwood was huge - look at those legs compared to mass monster Nasser!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)


Shit, two of those fuckers are dead.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Big N on October 08, 2013, 08:38:29 PM
(http://fakeposters.com.s3.amazonaws.com/results/2013/10/09/2c8jqrrnx0.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: AbrahamG on October 08, 2013, 08:40:16 PM
(http://fakeposters.com.s3.amazonaws.com/results/2013/10/09/2c8jqrrnx0.jpg)

This is good.  Very good.  Repped for truth.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: G_Thang on October 08, 2013, 09:54:55 PM
::)
Racist

I thought a bear would have mauled you by now, caveman. 
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Pet shop boys on October 10, 2013, 07:14:25 AM
Shit, two of those fuckers are dead.

Really? I knew about Nasser , when did the other dude passed?


WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Raymondo on October 10, 2013, 07:15:06 AM
Really? I knew about Nasser , when did the other dude passed?


WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Art Atwood, a couple of years ago.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Pet shop boys on October 10, 2013, 08:11:39 AM
Art Atwood, a couple of years ago.


Thanks.

That's sad and says a lot about pro BB.



WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: njflex on October 10, 2013, 11:46:51 AM
(http://www.bodybuildingdungeon.com/forums/attachments/ifbb-pro/1581-gunter-schlierkamp-early.jpg)
SIEGFRIED AND ROY HAIR OF PEACE....
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Tito24 on October 10, 2013, 11:59:19 AM
gunther: tall, wide, white, handsome.

phil: short, small, black, and ugly.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on October 10, 2013, 02:26:38 PM
Glad to see this thread is alive and kicking... I knew Gunther would kick Philsulin's ass in this site.

Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: The Ugly on October 10, 2013, 10:20:38 PM

Thanks.

That's sad and says a lot about pro BB.



WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Bb has a horrible mortality rate. They're dropping like flies.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: calfzilla on October 10, 2013, 10:30:43 PM
gunther: tall, wide, white, handsome.

phil: short, small, black, and ugly.

Plus Gunter had real muscle, not insulin bloof like Philsulina.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: The Ugly on October 10, 2013, 10:32:34 PM
gunther: tall, wide, white, handsome.

phil: short, small, black, and ugly.

Really, Phil is ugly? Now Kai is certainly ugly, I wouldn't argue that, but Phil?
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Tito24 on October 11, 2013, 11:48:52 AM
no not really but i cant stand him
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Shockwave on October 11, 2013, 11:49:39 AM
Gunther.

Ahhnooolllld over everyone else.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Parker on October 11, 2013, 12:01:10 PM
Really, Phil is ugly? Now Kai is certainly ugly, I wouldn't argue that, but Phil?
Quote from, "The Ugly".
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: The Ugly on October 11, 2013, 12:41:55 PM
Quote from, "The Ugly".

Touche.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on August 26, 2014, 06:22:47 AM
Phil could swim in a pool of insulina, he just doesn't have the genetics to reach this width .
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Europe on August 26, 2014, 07:05:09 AM
of course GS

whhy do you want to be black?

 ???
more important.. why would you want to be 1.0 heaths wide?  ??? ??? :-\
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: BigRo on August 26, 2014, 07:08:01 AM
In 2002 he should of placed 2nd....

Watch this video.... that physique would kill Heath..



I was there, crowd was nuts over Gunter, it was between him and Levrone imo.
Title: Re: Gunter S.
Post by: Howard on August 26, 2014, 07:51:06 AM
"should have"; and he should have placed first like in the GNC that same year. Ronnie looked like dog shit in 2002.

BOOM.

(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/GNC_Pro/2002/GNC_Pro_021.jpg)

I was at that GNC show and Gunter was the clear winner. The Olympia was a lot closer but GS should have been at least 2nd in 2002.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Royalty on August 26, 2014, 07:52:14 AM
Those arms are at least 23"

Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: affeman on August 26, 2014, 07:57:32 AM
Phil could swim in a pool of insulina, he just doesn't have the genetics to reach this width .

Gunter at 17 was wider than Heath today

(http://www.bodybuildingforums.com.au/attachments/bodybuilding-news/86d1239279462-ifbb-pro-s-when-they-were-young-gunter2.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: gracie bjj on August 26, 2014, 02:48:50 PM
gunter used to train at my old gym back in the early to mid 90,s,i remember seeing this huge dude n i actually thought it was arnold for a sec. i remember he had no home or anything n slept in his car awhile,the gym was in east newark,NJ called RED BRICK GYM, when he bacame a famous bodybuilder n i saw him in the mags i was like oh shit i remember him from my gym. he was a monster even back then,huge as hell
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Howard on August 26, 2014, 03:02:10 PM
gunter used to train at my old gym back in the early to mid 90,s,i remember seeing this huge dude n i actually thought it was arnold for a sec. i remember he had no home or anything n slept in his car awhile,the gym was in east newark,NJ called RED BRICK GYM, when he bacame a famous bodybuilder n i saw him in the mags i was like oh shit i remember him from my gym. he was a monster even back then,huge as hell

He lived in his car for awhile? Really?
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: gracie bjj on August 26, 2014, 03:13:33 PM
He lived in his car for awhile? Really?

yea
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: calfzilla on August 26, 2014, 04:45:09 PM
He lived in his car for awhile? Really?

Would love to be that car's back seat.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Mr.Mojo on August 28, 2014, 12:43:56 PM
Gunter in 2002 is the epitome of what bodybuilding should be.  Tall, Shredded, tons of size, awesome presentation and looked healthy.

Exactly
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Rami on August 28, 2014, 12:51:13 PM
Most are into ugly dogs.

true
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on September 02, 2014, 05:12:36 AM
Those arms are at least 23"



Indeed....  and about 6'2"  tall..... way better and maketable than Philsullin no doubt.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on September 03, 2014, 06:36:57 AM
Gunter has better genetics than Philsulin .....

Philsulin has Huge arms that over power the rest of him ...

I rather look like this, than any version of Phil,   but that's just me .




WoooSSHHHHHH  BE YE KE
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on December 29, 2014, 08:13:31 AM
Who would you rather look like (physique wise) him or Phil Heath?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=434985;image)




Would you?
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Papper on December 29, 2014, 09:17:40 AM
But but but...  Phil has large arms!!

 ::)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: ritch on December 29, 2014, 09:27:55 AM
Indeed....  and about 6'2"  tall..... way better and maketable than Philsullin no doubt.

Key word for sure. Good lookin' dude, tall and looked like a cool guy.
He looked epic on gear, just amazing.
But them calves now, yikes...
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: MikMaq on December 29, 2014, 09:49:08 AM
Lol this is sad, Gunter is a solid runner up. A guy that deserved a cult following, and would smoke phil or cutler any day of the weak.

But that's all the proof you need that this sport has gone to absolute dog shit.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on December 29, 2014, 11:59:17 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: bentone on December 29, 2014, 01:15:02 PM
BigRo I was also there in 2002 and the place erupted when Gunter was called in 5th. Nearly everyone there  thought it should have been Gunter in 1st with Levrone in 2nd. One of the poorest judged shows I have ever witnessed.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Munich679 on December 29, 2014, 02:04:01 PM
 :)

Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hench on December 29, 2014, 05:05:16 PM
big dude, all the way big dude
(http://musclemecca.com/imported-images/2008/10/ieeendexphpcc5-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: old-school-lifter on December 29, 2014, 08:36:00 PM
gunter had a terrible structure for BB
wide waist, child bearing wide hips
turnip thighs, arms too small for his torso
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Competitor 9 on December 29, 2014, 08:51:32 PM
I think a mix between the two would be an unbeatable phyquie. Gunters whiteness, width, structor and size mixed with Phil's roundness extreme conditioning and crazy detail. That would be a athletic monster 
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: io856 on February 03, 2015, 08:43:27 PM
gunter had a terrible structure for BB
wide waist, child bearing wide hips
turnip thighs, arms too small for his torso
you gotta be kidding me
you don't even step on stage at the Olympia with a "terrible structure for BB"
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hardgainerj on February 03, 2015, 09:21:02 PM
you gotta be kidding me
you don't even step on stage at the Olympia with a "terrible structure for BB"

branch warren
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on February 09, 2015, 04:39:40 PM
branch warren

Actually with today's top pro, Branch is a legit top 6 ...

Which makes me believe that Gunter form in 02 where he beat Ronnie (and what a lineup that era had ) would've  have taken Philsulin .



WooSSSHHH BE YE KE
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on April 27, 2015, 07:09:25 AM
[/youtube]

This is much more of a bodybuilder than Philsulin ...



Who in his right mind would chose Philsulin over Gunther looking likee this ?



Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: cart@@n on April 27, 2015, 12:09:11 PM
Gunter would win a beer drinking contest for sure.
(At 2:38)

Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Wiggs on April 27, 2015, 12:13:24 PM
This love affair with Branch Warren needs to end.  This is bullshit. Worst back of a top 2 Olympia guy.  Worst top 2 Olympia guy. Overrated as fuck. Stop this shit!
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: flinstones1 on April 27, 2015, 12:30:08 PM
When it comes to bodybuilding Phil has the much better physique. Regardless of being all drugs when it comes contest time you gotta admit that the   guy looks fucking insane. Obviously for every day life most would rather look like Gunter.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: BigRo on April 27, 2015, 12:42:42 PM
This love affair with Branch Warren needs to end.  This is bullshit. Worst back of a top 2 Olympia guy.  Worst top 2 Olympia guy. Overrated as fuck. Stop this shit!

did you hear the commentators on bodybuilding.com at Arnold, did not have one criticism to say about his physique. How much he paying out.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: OTHstrong on April 27, 2015, 12:45:20 PM
This love affair with Branch Warren needs to end.  This is bullshit. Worst back of a top 2 top 15 Olympia guy.  Worst top 2 Olympia guy. Overrated as fuck. Stop this shit!
fixed
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hench on April 28, 2015, 04:36:04 AM
are you saying contest ready gunter has a good everyday physique, easy to maintain without a ton of drugs?
When it comes to bodybuilding Phil has the much better physique. Regardless of being all drugs when it comes contest time you gotta admit that the   guy looks fucking insane. Obviously for every day life most would rather look like Gunter.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: G_Thang on April 28, 2015, 04:40:01 AM
 ::)

phil can dunk a basketball, touch his toes, wear regular clothes and clean his ass without assistance.  and what was the theme of this thread? 
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: SuperTed on April 28, 2015, 04:57:21 AM
Taller, wider and better looking. Flawless victory for Gunter. 8)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on April 28, 2015, 05:38:03 AM
Taller, wider and better looking. Flawless victory for Gunter. 8)


End of thread. Bodybuilding is about the whole body and structure in general



WoooSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Julio Ceasar on April 28, 2015, 06:52:59 AM
unter could have been a Mike Ohern if he wanted...moderate juicing and 220-240lbs lean! The last 60pound was just a wast of money and health!
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: goku on April 28, 2015, 09:53:04 AM
Phil in pre contest mode, especially from 2010-12 i think he looked his best. i would much rather have that physique even over a prime Gunter.
but off season Phil is one of the worst physiques to look at! turns into a walking donut!

completely transforms come contest time though, few years ago he looked his best.
Gunter had a really odd flow to his physique imo, wide waist and flat arms. density and condition miles ahead though.

(http://ilovebodybuilding.pl/images/philheath/5.jpg)

(http://tnation.t-nation.com/forum_images/auto/r/786x0/4/a//4a0c6-phil.jpg)

(http://tnation.t-nation.com/forum_images/1/5/15c98_ORIG-phaa.jpg)

(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=47433&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)

(http://petesteel.com/PRO'S/Gunter%20Schlierkamp.jpg)
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Al Doggity on April 28, 2015, 10:08:21 AM
Gunter has better genetics than Philsulin .....

Philsulin has Huge arms that over power the rest of him ...

I rather look like this, than any version of Phil,   but that's just me .




WoooSSHHHHHH  BE YE KE

That waist  :-X

I can appreciate that a lot of guys on this site would idolize a tall, white guy, but that is one hideous physique. Even aside from the wide waist, his abs are just ugly and oddly shaped. He has no good bodyparts. If you put a bag over his head and said "this guy is 5'10", most people would advise him to find a new line of work. The height give him a wow factor and the face gives him appeal, but physique-wise? He's just lacking in so many areas.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on December 08, 2016, 05:19:56 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=623137.0;attach=697782;image)

Smoking Levroneeeee too .


WooSHHHHHHHHHHHH  Levroneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on December 08, 2016, 05:20:38 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=434986;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)

Phil would dissapear in this group
  ;D

 :D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on September 26, 2017, 07:16:02 AM
WOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on September 26, 2017, 07:18:56 AM
How many Heaths wide ?


The Sandow has been devalued ....in recent years





WooSHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hipolito mejia on September 27, 2017, 04:41:03 AM
Those arms are at least 23"



Indeed.  Gunther was the epitome of what bodybuilders enthusiasts would like to look like.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: tres_taco_combo on September 27, 2017, 05:25:46 PM
bump for my fellow german  ;D
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Parker on September 27, 2017, 05:44:35 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=434986;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)

Phil would dissapear in this group
  ;D

 :D
No he wouldn't because two have already disappeared.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: tres_taco_combo on September 27, 2017, 05:46:26 PM


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=398303.0;attach=436832;image)

Phil would dissapear in this group
  ;D

 :D

2/3 are dead in this pic
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: hench on September 28, 2017, 02:09:48 AM
Atwood could win today based on heath, he had conditioning and structural flaws/ugly bodyparts
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Matt on September 28, 2017, 02:23:08 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=623137.0;attach=697782;image)

Smoking Levroneeeee too .


WooSHHHHHHHHHHHH  Levroneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

I think you meant smoking Levrone's POLE!!!  At the ice machine by Room 7!

WOOOOOOOSHHHH  EH RECK SHIN
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: _bruce_ on September 28, 2017, 02:48:48 AM
Günter by a landmile.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: jaejonna on September 28, 2017, 04:29:25 PM
Gunter beat Ronnie at the 2003 GNC show of Strength....who did Phil beat ? Some guy dressed like a gimp in red shiny leather ...yea gunter.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: SOMEPARTS on September 28, 2017, 10:06:44 PM
Atwood could win today based on heath, he had conditioning and structural flaws/ugly bodyparts


True, he sort of has the same weird rounded look that Fill Cheat has.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: ESFitness on September 28, 2017, 10:34:15 PM

True, he sort of has the same weird rounded look that Fill Cheat has.

Art had an enormous frame. Nothing At all like phil
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on September 29, 2017, 07:41:35 AM
Gunter beat Ronnie at the 2003 GNC show of Strength....who did Phil beat ? Some guy dressed like a gimp in red shiny leather ...yea gunter.


This.



WooSHHHHHH  TA NA KA
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Pet shop boys on July 20, 2021, 08:14:09 AM
Günter by a landmile.




WoooSHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: MCWAY on July 20, 2021, 08:57:33 AM
Gunter beat Ronnie at the 2003 GNC show of Strength....who did Phil beat ? Some guy dressed like a gimp in red shiny leather ...yea gunter.

Answer: Jay Cutler and Dexter Jackson, 5 Sandows between the two.

Heath would six more titles. Schlierkamp got lucky once, at the 2002 GNC, never came close to beating Ronnie ever again, especially at the Olympia.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: bhank on July 20, 2021, 09:31:57 AM
I mean are we talking development or development and height because obviously 6 foot 2 is better than 5 foot 9??? If we are talking their build at our height it becomes a very different question
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: MCWAY on July 20, 2021, 09:51:59 AM
I mean are we talking development or development and height because obviously 6 foot 2 is better than 5 foot 9??? If we are talking their build at our height it becomes a very different question

Says who? The lion's share of people complaining about height are those who WISH they were 6'2" but ain't. I'm 5'9" (5'10" when I had a high-top fade). And I'm cool with that.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Dave D on July 20, 2021, 10:40:55 AM
I mean are we talking development or development and height because obviously 6 foot 2 is better than 5 foot 9??? If we are talking their build at our height it becomes a very different question

No I think the question is who would you rather be based on their Instagram following.
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Kwon on July 21, 2021, 05:01:00 PM
I would pick the one who resembles bhank the most, so the choice is easy.

Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Hulkotron on July 21, 2021, 05:15:31 PM
Sevastes the Lion of Bucharest
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: Royalty on July 21, 2021, 05:35:33 PM
▫️
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: youandme on July 21, 2021, 07:08:34 PM
He lived in his car for awhile? Really?

Damn a few bodybuilders in the 90s did. Those that were trying to be pro and get there.

Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: MCWAY on July 21, 2021, 07:14:23 PM
branch warren

Didn't Warren win two ASCs and placed 2nd at the 2009 Olympia?
Title: Re: Gunter Schlierkamp or Phil Heath - Physique wise?
Post by: MCWAY on July 21, 2021, 07:17:52 PM
Actually with today's top pro, Branch is a legit top 6 ...

Which makes me believe that Gunter form in 02 where he beat Ronnie (and what a lineup that era had ) would've  have taken Philsulin .



WooSSSHHH BE YE KE

One, why is everyone acting as if Heath is the ONLY bodybuilder who has ever use insulin?

Two, Schilerkamp has been consistently beaten by guys that Heath has owned for years.

He got lucky once and caught Ronnie napping at that GNC show. Yet, I don't ever recall him beat Cutler, who sat out the 2002 Olympia and the subsequent post-O shows. Jackson has mopped up the floor with him.

Victor Martinez has eaten Schlierkamp's lunch. Even Gustavo Badell bested Gunter twice for his 3rd-place finishes in 2004 and 2005.