I can’t remember the last time I use that as a source. And if I did, it was probably to prove a point that even left wing rags are saying the same thing of whatever it was I used to link for just like yesterday when you thought that I was using bias sources I used yahoo to prove my point, Yahoo is left leaning
I'll give it another shot....
In THIS thread, your original post has a link to a news article claiming blah blah blah bad Biden administration.
I read it.. then did some checking. I found credible sources that said your article was wrong.
In an attempt to salvage your articles integrity, you posted IN THIS THREAD an article from Sac Bee. In that article which you obviously didn't read, it mimicked some of your original article but did have quotes from the DOJ that they never received any such request and have not billed anyone.
I then tried to explain to you how to avoid having a thread blow up in your face in the future by sharing my process of trying to find out what the actual facts are.
I then went back to the Sac Bee to see if they had updated their article with the new information that had come out. Yes, they had. I posted the update.
So while your point was valid, you used the left leaning paper to show it's not just far right rags like Breitbart or the Gateway Pundit ....As I predicted, and pointed out in the tutorial, time passes by and people look into the claims and people have a chance to respond, things sometimes change in 24 hrs. They did... The paper updated the article with new info.
At this point Coach, given all the information, do you still believe your original post title and article are true? I'm curious.