Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Tennisballz on December 07, 2017, 12:41:11 PM

Title: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Tennisballz on December 07, 2017, 12:41:11 PM
Why do people watch these fights?  The best 130 pound boxer on the planet?  That's basically saying the best fighter who weighs 50 pounds less than the average male.  This pound for pound garbage is nothing but a con to get suckers to buy these fights.  I always found it amusing that Mayweather walks around with body gaurds who could kill him easily with bare hands.  If I'm gonna spend time watching a fight I want to see the actual best in the world ie heavyweights.  Lomachenko would get swarmed and beaten into submission by a decently trained heavyweight that is 6'3 240 pounds.  A lot of the fans don't even question the con.  Such as there being 17 weight classes, so they can con you with 17 different fights.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Darren Avey on December 07, 2017, 12:45:18 PM
They d both kick your ASS!
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: polychronopolous on December 07, 2017, 12:45:39 PM
They have a right to earn a livin too
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: _bruce_ on December 07, 2017, 12:48:03 PM
All 6'7" 322lbs getbiggers need to step in and seperate these children in heat  :D
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Tennisballz on December 07, 2017, 12:55:53 PM
I'd rather watch fighters like Anthony Joshua.  He can beat any man on the planet in boxing.  There might be 5-10 boxers who could potentially beat him right now.  Those are the fights I would want to see. 
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Tennisballz on December 07, 2017, 12:59:36 PM
All 6'7" 322lbs getbiggers need to step in and seperate these children in heat  :D
6'7 322!  Id watch a guy like that fight!  No 130 pound man even has a punchers chance against someone that big.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: che on December 07, 2017, 03:05:36 PM
Why do people watch these fights? 


Maybe because they  are faster , have better cardio, better technique and usually they  put on a better show than the heavyweights , Loma and Rigo is not a fight for the casual boxing or MMA fan , if you don't know about boxing ,you won't get it.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Simple Simon on December 07, 2017, 03:08:15 PM

Maybe because they  are faster , have better cardio, better technique and usually they  put on a better show than the heavyweights , Loma and Rigo is not a fight for the casual boxing or MMA fan , if you don't know about boxing ,you won't get it.

some of the greatest fights of all time are up to middleweight, only a few really great heayweight fights....
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: che on December 07, 2017, 03:21:58 PM
some of the greatest fights of all time are up to middleweight,

I agree , the combination of  skill ,power and speed make  middleweight ,light middleweight and welterweight  the most exciting weight classes in boxing
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: AbrahamG on December 07, 2017, 03:52:58 PM
Why do people watch these fights?  The best 130 pound boxer on the planet?  That's basically saying the best fighter who weighs 50 pounds less than the average male.  This pound for pound garbage is nothing but a con to get suckers to buy these fights.  I always found it amusing that Mayweather walks around with body gaurds who could kill him easily with bare hands.  If I'm gonna spend time watching a fight I want to see the actual best in the world ie heavyweights.  Lomachenko would get swarmed and beaten into submission by a decently trained heavyweight that is 6'3 240 pounds.  A lot of the fans don't even question the con.  Such as there being 17 weight classes, so they can con you with 17 different fights.

Stick to what you know.  WWE sounds about right.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Tennisballz on December 07, 2017, 04:10:33 PM
Stick to what you know.  WWE sounds about right.
You gonna watch the big fight this weekend princess?  A couple guys who added together, still aren't as big as Ronnie Coleman on stage.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: QuietYou on December 07, 2017, 04:15:38 PM
6'7 322!  Id watch a guy like that fight!  No 130 pound man even has a punchers chance against someone that big.

You're crazy if you think that. Professional boxers can create thousands of pounds force in their punches doesn't matter if you're 230 or 370 you're going down if you get hit in your temple or jaw etc etc.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: AbrahamG on December 07, 2017, 05:24:28 PM
You gonna watch the big fight this weekend princess?  A couple guys who added together, still aren't as big as Ronnie Coleman on stage.

Yeah, any boxing fan should.  Possibly the two greatest Olympian boxers of all time fighting each other whilst undefeated as pro's both p4p calibre?
Go watch rasslin, you fucking rube.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: cephissus on December 07, 2017, 05:28:49 PM
How the hell do you even watch this shit. I wanted to watch GGG v Canelo but ended up streaming because this sport is stuck in the fucking stone age.

Let me click a link on YouTube and Google will send a bunch of my dollars to you. No I'm not signing up for HBO or showtime or some other dinosaur network.

Take a hint from the UFC.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Tennisballz on December 07, 2017, 07:43:34 PM
Yeah, any boxing fan should.  Possibly the two greatest Olympian boxers of all time fighting each other whilst undefeated as pro's both p4p calibre?
Go watch rasslin, you fucking rube.
p4p....lol.  tell me, how would these 130 pounders fair against any top 10 heavyweight? 
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Moontrane on December 07, 2017, 08:06:09 PM
Fight links, please?   ;)
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Darren Avey on December 08, 2017, 04:32:09 AM
some of the greatest fights of all time are up to middleweight, only a few really great heayweight fights....

Hagler Hearns,first fight I ever saw, I was about 5 years old . Just WOW  :o :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Rascal full on December 08, 2017, 08:58:08 AM
This is a magnificent fight and if you don't think so you don't have a clue about boxing. I personally can't wait for tomorrow night....
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Chidoman on December 08, 2017, 06:24:33 PM
This is a magnificent fight and if you don't think so you don't have a clue about boxing. I personally can't wait for tomorrow night....


Me three...This fight is a match made in Heaven for a True Boxing Fan...
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: seCrawler on December 08, 2017, 06:35:42 PM
At 124-126 arum only offers 500k.  1.5+ mil appears out of no where when arum can get the fight at 130 with maximum advantages.
Top Rank picks ring size, ref, judges and rigodeaux's glove ( little man breaks jaws, so i'm assuming he has to wear fmw' orthopedic gloves for the fight.)
a natural 132 same day weigh-in fighter vs a natural 118 fighter.

What's the difference between this fight and Crawford vs Gamboa, GGG vs Brook and Canelo vs Khan, all 2 weight jump fights?

If Rigo pulls this off he is an ATG, and Loma needs to send him his gold medals, so Rigo can finish off his grill. Loma gets ZERO credit for this bullshit.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: oldtimer1 on December 08, 2017, 06:42:59 PM
Why do people watch these fights?  The best 130 pound boxer on the planet?  That's basically saying the best fighter who weighs 50 pounds less than the average male.  This pound for pound garbage is nothing but a con to get suckers to buy these fights.  I always found it amusing that Mayweather walks around with body gaurds who could kill him easily with bare hands.  If I'm gonna spend time watching a fight I want to see the actual best in the world ie heavyweights.  Lomachenko would get swarmed and beaten into submission by a decently trained heavyweight that is 6'3 240 pounds.  A lot of the fans don't even question the con.  Such as there being 17 weight classes, so they can con you with 17 different fights.

Go to a real boxing gym. Ask to spar with a light weight fighter. I don't care if you are 210lbs. You will get your ass kicked.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Chidoman on December 08, 2017, 07:03:15 PM
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: AbrahamG on December 08, 2017, 07:10:06 PM


I'm a boxing junkie.  My knee jerk reaction to this fight even though I can't wait to see it is that it could be
a real dud.  But, Loma is possibly if not probably that one guy who can force Rigo into a fight.  Donaire, much
to his demise did and was beaten like a drum.  I think this fight will exceed expectations.  Big time.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: maxkane69 on December 08, 2017, 08:15:02 PM
some of the greatest fights of all time are up to middleweight, only a few really great heayweight fights....

THE GREATEST FIGHT OF ALL TIME !!! ;)
(2 men ready to die that night in order to win)

Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Moontrane on December 08, 2017, 08:30:05 PM
Go to a real boxing gym. Ask to spar with a light weight fighter. I don't care if you are 210lbs. You will get your ass kicked.

Si.   8)

Mike Quinn was part of Vinny Pazienza’s entourage for a Paz-Hagen bout.  There was a confrontation in the lead up to the bout, and Mike stepped between them.  Greg punched Mike in the gut once, and that was all she wrote. 

Oh, and Greg weighed 135 lbs.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Chidoman on December 08, 2017, 09:51:11 PM
THE GREATEST FIGHT OF ALL TIME !!! ;)
(2 men ready to die that night in order to win)



There's No Fight Like That One to this date!!...I watched it live back then and It still lingers in my head as One, if not The Greatest of All Time!!....No Fighters like That Anymore on this day and age!!...
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: maxkane69 on December 08, 2017, 10:34:35 PM
There's No Fight Like That One to this date!!...I watched it live back then and It still lingers in my head as One, if not The Greatest of All Time!!....No Fighters like That Anymore on this day and age!!...

Exactly Hagler vs Hearns will be remembered as the best fight of all time...but Arguello vs Pryor 1 rank as one of the best ever too !!! 8)
(the stare of Aaron Pryor at 12.27 mark was the one of a man ready to kill in order to keep his belt )


Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Chidoman on December 08, 2017, 10:52:28 PM
Exactly Hagler vs Hearns will be remembered as the best fight of all time...but Arguello vs Pryor 1 rank as one of the best ever too !!! 8)
(the stare of Aaron Pryor at 12.27 mark was the one of a man ready to kill in order to keep his belt )




I Thought That was Great too, but then This Other One emerged!!


Man, the 80's was so Great!!...Full of EVERYTHING...Balls, cocaine, Music,camaraderie,Manly Flicks, Etc.!!....Times were different! ;D
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: dj181 on December 09, 2017, 06:56:44 AM
'nuff said
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Slapper on December 09, 2017, 08:39:33 AM
Sounds like a law firm from Montreal.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Meta-physical on December 09, 2017, 08:39:24 PM
Very surprising. An ignominious defeat for an otherwise dignified boxing great, but Lomachenko's virtuosity is simply unrivalled. Perhaps the disparity in weight was an issue, or perhaps the alleged injury was genuine - but Lomachenko looked incredible tonight.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: che on December 09, 2017, 08:58:35 PM
Totally outclassed , quit like a bitch .
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: QuietYou on December 09, 2017, 09:52:46 PM

The fight was 100% for publicity to bring Lomachenko into the mainstream
They overhyped this Cuban girl bum just because he was 17-0. Guy is almost 40 years old, of corse he was going to lose.

This was their way of easing him into the mainstream. Time to stop fucking around and fight Terance Crawford.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: AbrahamG on December 09, 2017, 10:07:19 PM
The fight was 100% for publicity to bring Lomachenko into the mainstream
They overhyped this Cuban girl bum just because he was 17-0. Guy is almost 40 years old, of corse he was going to lose.

This was their way of easing him into the mainstream. Time to stop fucking around and fight Terance Crawford.

Not gonna happen.  Crawford is too big.  Jorge Linares would be a good fight for him at 135 and if he follows it up with Mikey Garcia
and wins, then he could go for 147.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: seCrawler on December 10, 2017, 06:48:09 AM
The fight was 100% for publicity to bring Lomachenko into the mainstream
They overhyped this Cuban girl bum just because he was 17-0. Guy is almost 40 years old, of corse he was going to lose.

This was their way of easing him into the mainstream. Time to stop fucking around and fight Terance Crawford.

Totally outclassed , quit like a bitch .

 ::)

maybe loma can make that 2 weight class jump and fight crawford. i see no issue since they have the same promoter.  the worst that can happen is, crawford beats the shit out of him and stops him. 
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: cephissus on December 11, 2017, 02:18:14 AM
::)

maybe loma can make that 2 weight class jump and fight crawford. i see no issue since they have the same promoter.  the worst that can happen is, crawford beats the shit out of him and stops him. 

what does weight class have to do with the fact loma was moving far faster, throwing more accurate punches, landing cleaner, evading almost everything rigo threw, etc. ???
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: polychronopolous on December 11, 2017, 06:35:43 AM
Very surprising. An ignominious defeat for an otherwise dignified boxing great, but Lomachenko's virtuosity is simply unrivalled. Perhaps the disparity in weight was an issue, or perhaps the alleged injury was genuine - but Lomachenko looked incredible tonight.

X2

Best boxer in the world. No question about it.

That footwork is just incredible.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: QuietYou on December 11, 2017, 06:38:35 AM
X2

Best boxer in the world. No question about it.

That footwork is just incredible.

Floyd at 30 years old at 130 would mop the floor with him lol
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: oldgolds on December 11, 2017, 07:25:29 AM
Si.   8)

Mike Quinn was part of Vinny Pazienza’s entourage for a Paz-Hagen bout.  There was a confrontation in the lead up to the bout, and Mike stepped between them.  Greg punched Mike in the gut once, and that was all she wrote. 

Oh, and Greg weighed 135 lbs.











Most guys don't realize that a small, trained boxer can easily whip a large Man....Bodybuilders included....They think that by cloaking themselves in large amounts of fake, drug produced muscle they will be 'tough guys'.
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: dj181 on December 11, 2017, 08:13:52 AM
Floyd at 30 years old at 130 would mop the floor with him lol

Yep turd wouldn't land 1 fucking punch
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: Darren Avey on December 11, 2017, 09:17:19 AM










Most guys don't realize that a small, trained boxer can easily whip a large Man....Bodybuilders included....They think that by cloaking themselves in large amounts of fake, drug produced muscle they will be 'tough guys'.

I thought the Mr Olympia contest was basically a contest to find the toughest man alive?
Title: Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux
Post by: polychronopolous on December 11, 2017, 09:28:31 AM
Sounds like a law firm from Montreal.

Just seen this one. LOL  ;D