Author Topic: Phil Heath or Frank McGrath - who has better arms?  (Read 33543 times)

Royal Lion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
Re: Phil Heath or Frank McGrath - who has better arms?
« Reply #175 on: May 08, 2009, 06:45:02 PM »
hahaha your either some 'pro' that he owns or your the guy sucking his di ck ...your an idiot , get your eyes checked
Lol...I agree.  He looks wider in the straight on pic I posted - so much for "inherent" narrowness...

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: Phil Heath or Frank McGrath - who has better arms?
« Reply #176 on: May 09, 2009, 06:29:42 AM »
Has McGrath made the Olympia top 3 yet?.......let me know when he does......hahhahahahahha ha

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19440
Re: Phil Heath or Frank McGrath - who has better arms?
« Reply #177 on: May 09, 2009, 06:45:15 AM »
Has McGrath made the Olympia top 3 yet?.......let me know when he does......hahhahahahahha ha

Ouch!  :'(

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Re: Phil Heath or Frank McGrath - who has better arms?
« Reply #178 on: May 10, 2009, 03:40:05 PM »
He doesn't match Coleman's arms on any criteria yet, but wins in the synthol domain, where i think he injects his tris. Not great detail, no hardness or muscle maturity, watery. I wouldn't put his arms in the all-time top 20. He has plenty of time to improve them in which case they could become great, not there yet.

coleman had the nasty peak.  phil has good overall size.  are his arm bigger than ronnie's?  or...put arms an inch smaller than ronnie on a guy phil's size. all this is worthless b/c ami makes the call for the 5-6yrs on this subject.
Oh...Monica!