Author Topic: The SUCKMYMUSCLE Nutrition Thread-also physiology,kinesiology,biomechanics,etc  (Read 23020 times)

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29124
  • Hold Fast
  Why don't you ask me? :) I know lots and lots and lots and lots about nutrition, and then some. Did I already mention that I know a lot about nutrition - and also physiology, kinesiology, biomechanics, etc?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ya got a lot of ground to cover here.  Lets start with kinesiology - can you bend spoons with your mind like Uri Gellar?
 ;D

How 'bout egg yolks - when I go back to drinking raw eggs, is the cholesterol a concern or is it less of a worry if the egg is raw (as opposed to cooked)?

Also, how much protein/ day do you vote for, and in what macro ratio (assuming it's a training day and a clean bulk)?

Dr. D

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
  • Vince and Derek: Match made in GetBig Heaven!
High Cholesterol is a made up disease...eat all the eggs you want!!

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
High Cholesterol is a made up disease...eat all the eggs you want!!

  And then die of a massive myocardial infarction! the link between high plasma cholesterol levels and heart disease has been well established in the literature. You are right that, during the Paleolithic Era, diets composed mostly of game. However, there are three key differences between the situation of caeman and ours:

 1. Game meat contains 3% bodyfat - the animals that the Paleolithic cavemen ate ran wild and ate grass, compared to the modern ones that are created in captivity and fed corn and have up to 40% bodyfat.

 2. Cavemen were physically active - A lot! They were always chasing prey or running from beasts that wanted to make them prey! You can't compare to the modern sedentary individuals.

 3. They diets lacked simple sugars - This is the key difference! Whatever fat the cavemen ate was burned for fule, whereas the fat modern men eats accumulates in the arteries becuase he eats too many carbs that are burned for fuel instead, thus making the fat accumulate in the arteries. This is made worse by the fact that modern man also eats large amounts of fructose which is added to many foods, and this specific sugar raises blood tryglycerides levels dramatically, besides incresing glycation, which hardens the arteries and decreases the ability of the cardiovascular system to clean itself from accumulated saturated fats.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Dr. D

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
  • Vince and Derek: Match made in GetBig Heaven!
   Before we can begin to talk about the real cause and effective treatment for heart and blood vessel disease, we must first look at what is known, or I should say what we think we know. The first thing that comes to mind when one hears about heart disease is almost always cholesterol. Cholesterol and heart disease has been almost synonymous for the last half-century. Cholesterol has been portrayed as the Darth Vader to our arteries and our heart.
     The latest recommendation given by a so-called panel of "experts" recommends that a person's cholesterol be as low as possible, in fact to a level so low they say it cannot be achieved by diet, exercise, or any known lifestyle modification. Therefore, they say cholesterol-lowering drugs; particularly the so-called "statins" need to be given to anyone at high risk of heart disease. Since heart disease is the number one killer in this country that would include most adults and even many children. The fact that this might add to the $26 billion in sales of statin drugs last year I'm sure played no role in their recommendations. Or did it?
  It was determined many years ago that the majority of cholesterol in your bloodstream comes from what your liver is manufacturing and distributing. The amount of cholesterol that one eats plays little role in determining your cholesterol levels. It is also known that HDL shuttles cholesterol away from tissues, and away from your arteries, back to your liver. That is why HDL is called the "good cholesterol;" because it is supposedly taking cholesterol away from your arteries. But let's think about that.

    * Why does your liver make sure that you have plenty of cholesterol?
    * Why is HDL taking cholesterol back to your liver?
    * Why not take it right to your kidneys, or your intestines to get rid of it?

    It is taking it back to your liver so that your liver can recycle it; put it back into other particles to be taken to tissues and cells that need it. Your body is trying to make and conserve the cholesterol for the precise reason that it is so important, indeed vital, for health.
One function of cholesterol is to keep your cell membranes from falling apart. As such, you might consider cholesterol your cells "superglue." It is a necessary ingredient in any sort of cellular repair. The coronary disease associated with heart attacks is now known to be caused from damage to the lining of those arteries. That damage causes inflammation. The coronary disease that causes heart attacks is now considered to be caused mostly from chronic inflammation.

     Consider the following points:

a.. It has been found that about 80-90% of all cholesterol in the body is
endogenous (meaning: it has been produced inside the body and does NOT come
from the foods we eat).

b.. Due to the many different climates different ethnicites of humans evolved
under, there is a phenomenon called "biochemical individuality" trying to
pin-point high cholesterol as being the same for everyone is absolutely
impossible, just as trying to assign the same diet to everyone is impossible,
hence the need of Metabolic Typing.

   Cholesterol raises due to any one of a number of causes such as:
a.. Inflammation most commonly in the form of "leaky gut syndrome" where the
tight gap junctions of the cells in the gut wall become lose allowing for
undigested food particles called "antigens" to be allowed to pass into the blood
stream triggering an immune response.

b.. Malnourishment by consumption of to many refined carbohydrates/sugars
(even the obese are malnourished!).

c.. Seasonal changes due to the fact that the body will raise its
cholesterol levels in order to lower the freezing point of cells in preparation
for winter!

d.. Excess stress by way of any of the primary 5 forms: PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL,
ELECTROMAGNETIC, PSYCHIC, NUTRITIONAL.
  Paralleled to the facts above, cholesterol then plays MANY vital roles in
the body such as:
  Precursor to sex hormones, vitamin D, and bile production
  Powerful antioxidant to control free radical damage
  Cell membrane integrity help maintain proper permeability
  Vital to child development in mother's milk
   and more.. ...

So, the question ultimately becomes: WHY is the cholesterol too high? (if indeed
is actually is); rather than: What can be taken to lower the cholesterol. If
your cholesterol is indeed too high (which again is very relative),
than the problem is not the cholesterol, as your body has raised its levels in
order to play some type of ESSENTIAL role(s) for your survival. The
problem(s) is the stressor(s) that originally caused the cholesterol to rise
abnormally in the first place. Your cholesterol may be high for a very
good reason(s), and this reason(s) may make it dangerous to tamper with
mechanically via drugs. The key is to rebalance the system(s) that are
operating under excessively stressful conditions to allow the body to lower its
cholesterol on its own. You need an assessment of your total stress
load.
   The cool thing about  our bodies it is made it so if we do have extra cholesterol, we'll convert it into bile in the liver and poop it out!


suckmymuscle

  • Guest
   Before we can begin to talk about the real cause and effective treatment for heart and blood vessel disease, we must first look at what is known, or I should say what we think we know. The first thing that comes to mind when one hears about heart disease is almost always cholesterol. Cholesterol and heart disease has been almost synonymous for the last half-century. Cholesterol has been portrayed as the Darth Vader to our arteries and our heart.
     The latest recommendation given by a so-called panel of "experts" recommends that a person's cholesterol be as low as possible, in fact to a level so low they say it cannot be achieved by diet, exercise, or any known lifestyle modification. Therefore, they say cholesterol-lowering drugs; particularly the so-called "statins" need to be given to anyone at high risk of heart disease. Since heart disease is the number one killer in this country that would include most adults and even many children. The fact that this might add to the $26 billion in sales of statin drugs last year I'm sure played no role in their recommendations. Or did it?
  It was determined many years ago that the majority of cholesterol in your bloodstream comes from what your liver is manufacturing and distributing. The amount of cholesterol that one eats plays little role in determining your cholesterol levels. It is also known that HDL shuttles cholesterol away from tissues, and away from your arteries, back to your liver. That is why HDL is called the "good cholesterol;" because it is supposedly taking cholesterol away from your arteries. But let's think about that.

    * Why does your liver make sure that you have plenty of cholesterol?
    * Why is HDL taking cholesterol back to your liver?
    * Why not take it right to your kidneys, or your intestines to get rid of it?

    It is taking it back to your liver so that your liver can recycle it; put it back into other particles to be taken to tissues and cells that need it. Your body is trying to make and conserve the cholesterol for the precise reason that it is so important, indeed vital, for health.
One function of cholesterol is to keep your cell membranes from falling apart. As such, you might consider cholesterol your cells "superglue." It is a necessary ingredient in any sort of cellular repair. The coronary disease associated with heart attacks is now known to be caused from damage to the lining of those arteries. That damage causes inflammation. The coronary disease that causes heart attacks is now considered to be caused mostly from chronic inflammation.

     Consider the following points:

a.. It has been found that about 80-90% of all cholesterol in the body is
endogenous (meaning: it has been produced inside the body and does NOT come
from the foods we eat).

b.. Due to the many different climates different ethnicites of humans evolved
under, there is a phenomenon called "biochemical individuality" trying to
pin-point high cholesterol as being the same for everyone is absolutely
impossible, just as trying to assign the same diet to everyone is impossible,
hence the need of Metabolic Typing.

   Cholesterol raises due to any one of a number of causes such as:
a.. Inflammation most commonly in the form of "leaky gut syndrome" where the
tight gap junctions of the cells in the gut wall become lose allowing for
undigested food particles called "antigens" to be allowed to pass into the blood
stream triggering an immune response.

b.. Malnourishment by consumption of to many refined carbohydrates/sugars
(even the obese are malnourished!).

c.. Seasonal changes due to the fact that the body will raise its
cholesterol levels in order to lower the freezing point of cells in preparation
for winter!

d.. Excess stress by way of any of the primary 5 forms: PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL,
ELECTROMAGNETIC, PSYCHIC, NUTRITIONAL.
  Paralleled to the facts above, cholesterol then plays MANY vital roles in
the body such as:
  Precursor to sex hormones, vitamin D, and bile production
  Powerful antioxidant to control free radical damage
  Cell membrane integrity help maintain proper permeability
  Vital to child development in mother's milk
   and more.. ...

So, the question ultimately becomes: WHY is the cholesterol too high? (if indeed
is actually is); rather than: What can be taken to lower the cholesterol. If
your cholesterol is indeed too high (which again is very relative),
than the problem is not the cholesterol, as your body has raised its levels in
order to play some type of ESSENTIAL role(s) for your survival. The
problem(s) is the stressor(s) that originally caused the cholesterol to rise
abnormally in the first place. Your cholesterol may be high for a very
good reason(s), and this reason(s) may make it dangerous to tamper with
mechanically via drugs. The key is to rebalance the system(s) that are
operating under excessively stressful conditions to allow the body to lower its
cholesterol on its own. You need an assessment of your total stress
load.
   The cool thing about  our bodies it is made it so if we do have extra cholesterol, we'll convert it into bile in the liver and poop it out!



  What a crock of shit. Everything you've written is made irrelevant by a very simple fact: cardiopathologies were rare to non-existent until the introduction of modern diets, which coincides with the introduction of first fatty meats - from confined animals - adn most recently by refined sugars. All this suggests that it is modern diets that is causing the recent dramatic rise in cardiovascular disease, because all other variables are not likely to have impacted it. You mention stress. I'm sorry, but I think that living in constant fer of being devoured by animals is a much greater stressor than having a 9 to 5 job. Nothing except the change in diet can acont for the massive increase in cardiovascular disease that occured in the last century.

  And you are wrong about metabolic variation. All Human Beings respond equally to diets across the range. All Human Beings, regardless of ethnicity, require protein for survival; they all have brains that use exclusively glucose as a source of nergy; they all require the exact same vitamins and minerals. There are a very small number of exceptions such as lactose tolerance, which is restricted to a small number of ethnicities, but a general rule Human Beings are remakably similar in their nutritional needs.

  And the body does make cholesterol, but the point is that Humans are ingesting far more than they need of it fro the diet. And you are deluded if you think that most cholesterol is made in the liver: that could have been true a thousand years ago, but nowadays people ingest hundreds of miligrams a day and then don't burn it, which leads the cholesterol to accumulate in the arteries.

  As for heart medications, the issue is more complex than what you present. No one is saying that you absolutely must take drugs to lower cholesterol; what happens is that certian drugs allow you to remove cholesterol from the arteries to a degre that is much greater than what is possible from diet and exercise alone. If you have a healthy heart and follow a healthy diet and exercise diet, than including a drug like pravastatin might decrease your risk even further. I am assuming that you have heard the term "preventive medicine" before, right? It basically entail getting something that is already good and making it even better by taking drugs/supplements etc. For instance, ascorbic acid is a marvellous substance, but no matter how much lemon juice you drink, you will only be getting a sub-optimal amount of it. As Nobel Laureate, Linus Pauling, pointed out, ingesting several grams a day from supplements prevents and in some cases even reverses several degenerative diseases. However, the doses necessary to obtain these results require supplementation. likewise, taking pravastatin even if you don't need it might have a protective effect in the hart that you wouldn't get otherwise. As an analogy, learning information and solving logical problems stimulate th formatio of dendrites in neurons and prevents dementia in octogenarians and nonagenarians. However, the same effect is observed by taking codergocrine and other ergoloid mesylates. Likewise, piracetam boosts dopamineric function, which tends to decline with age. Taking these two substances and keeping an active mind has shown a dramatic synergistic effect in preventing dementia in those of ver advanced age.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Dr. D

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
  • Vince and Derek: Match made in GetBig Heaven!
Dude, I feel sorry for you....you have no clue what you are talking about,.
Do you know what Cholesterol is? It's a Hormone that is produce from your own body.
Without it , we wouldn't be alive..
If you don't even believe that, than you are a long road to nowhere.



Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29124
  • Hold Fast
Damnit >:(  You'll be arguing about glutamine next!  Good discussion tho.

You guys really seem to know your shit, even if you don't agree.  Howzabout something every bb worries about:

Also, how much protein/ day do you vote for, and in what macro ratio (assuming it's a training day and a clean bulk)?

Dr. D

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
  • Vince and Derek: Match made in GetBig Heaven!
Damnit >:(  You'll be arguing about glutamine next! 


haha..I did that already with my boy, Usmokepole!   ;D

I might not agree with suckmymuscle but  at least I respect him because he is the only one who will make the effort to try to debate.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19095
  • loco like a fox
I respect both, Dr. D. and suckmymuscle.  I like how they present completely opposite views.  They both know their stuff and I enjoy reading their debates and I learn from them.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Dude, I feel sorry for you....you have no clue what you are talking about,.
Do you know what Cholesterol is? It's a Hormone that is produce from your own body.
Without it , we wouldn't be alive..
If you don't even believe that, than you are a long road to nowhere.

  Guess what? We need water too, but if we drink enough of it we wil drown! Did you understand this simple analogy? The liver also makes cholecalciferol, but if it made too much of it, our bones would calcify to the point where they would become brittle. Modern diets far overload the body with cholesterol that is stored in saturated fats, and this is made worse by the excess of simple carbohydrates which preclude the fats from being burned for fuel.

  You also mentioned stress as one of the reasons for modern high cholesterol levels, but there is no eividence that modern populations are subjected to any more stressors than people from the Medieval Era who lived in constant fear of being killed in battle. The only thing that was dramatically modified in the last century or so is diet and sedentarism. There are no other factors. Is it a mere coincidence that the scourge of heart disease, diabetes, high systolic blood pressure and cancer increased by several fold since processed sugars and high fat foods became common in the diet and physical activity decreased? I think not!

SUCKMYMUSCLE


suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Damnit >:(  You'll be arguing about glutamine next!  Good discussion tho.

You guys really seem to know your shit, even if you don't agree.  Howzabout something every bb worries about:

  Protein requirements are determined by bodyweight and the necessary to maintain proper nitrogen blalance. I want to make three things very clear about protein: it is a really lousy energy source, it is bad for health because the by-products of it's metabolisation are toxic and their systemic elimination is troublesome, and finally that you cannot force your body to utilize any more protein that it needs. The only way to stimulate an increase in muscle mass is by stimulating muscle protein synthesis and protein does not have the capacity to do that. Protein is merely one of the many raw materials that the body utilizes to synthesize muscle, but it does not increase this process. The only way to utilize excess protein is by increasing protein synthesis, something that only drugs like anabolic steroids can do. Testosterone and other anabolic androgenic steroids work so well because they go inside the muscle cells' mitochondria and stimulate your DNA to syntheisize more muscle tisssue by increasing inta-cellular levels of the enzyme RNA-transcryptase. RNA is essentially a copy of your DNA that orders amino acids to be arranged in specific ways to make new proteins. Steroids and other anabolic drugs do that; supplements, including extra protein, don't. believe me that the best supplements that you can take are ascorbic acid and DL-Alpha Tocoferol, which scavenge damage done by the infalmmation process after exercise, increase levels of prostaglandins and decrease plasma levels of corticosteroids. No supplement works at increasing anabolism, but a small numbers of supplements have a very mild anti-catabolic effect. Besides vitamins C and E, the amino acids glutamine and leucine does show some mild anti-catabolic actions at extremely high doses. Is it worth it? Again, considering that the effect is mild and that you need lots of either to get it, it is up to you and your budget.

  If you eat an excess of protein beyond what your body needs for protein synthesis, one of the two things will happen: it will get burned as fuel or stored as bodyfat. Now, it is unlikely that it will get stored as bodyfat, because the systemic metabolisation is so calorically costly that you would need huge amounts of protein to get it stored as bodyfat. If you eat an excess of protein, the amino acids will be broke down by protease and will be send to the liver. there, through and extremely complicated biochemical process called gluconogenesis, the Carbon atoms attached to the amino acids will be re-assembled into glucose molecules that wil be sent to your bloodstream. If the glucose is too much, it gets further converted into bodyfat and stored. The other by-products of the amino acid break down, such as ammonia, urea and Sulphur, are extremely toxic to the body and must be eliminated. This process of sytemic clearance puts further drain on the liver and also in the kidneys. In other words, eating  alot of protein will: not stimulate and increase in muscle massand put a huge amount of metabolic stress o your body, both to transform the amino acids in energy as well as to eliminate the toxic wastes of protein.

  As for how much protein you need, studies done with patients who suffer from severe muscle wasting disorders, like Duchenne's muscular atrophy, show that they require no more than 0.7 gram of protein per pound of bodyweight to maintain popoer nitrogen balance. And elt me tell you that wasting disorders, like AIDS, Duchenne, having third degree burns, etc, increase protein need far more than working out with weight do. I know that this is not what you want to hear, but the protein requirments of bodybuilders is not much highert than that of sedentary folks. Now, the caloric and carbohdrate needs of bodybuilders are greater because you need glycogen to fuel your workouts. However, the protein needs are only those necessary to maintain  nitrogen balance and to fuel the little extra that the body needs to build to build more muscle. Everything else is pseudo-science used to sell protein supplements. Ask yoursel: did including whey protein to your daily diet make you bigger? Probably not, because eating more protein does not increase protein synthesis. As to what break-down you need between proteins, fats and carbs, this is very simple to determine. First, multiply your weight in pounds by 0.7. If you weight 200 lbs, then that means 140 grams of protein a day. that gives you about 560 calories a day from protein. Now, assume that you need 2500 calories a day for maintanance, and you want to gain muscle. Well, then you will need to increase your caloric intake by 300 calories a day above maintenance, thus yielding 2800 calories a day. So you deduct 560 from 2800, yielding 2240. Now, you need to get 20% of your daily calories from fats, so that's another 560 calories. So you will be eating about 1680 calories a day from carbs - preferably those with low glycemic index -, or about 60% of your daily claories. Hope this helps.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29124
  • Hold Fast
believe me that the best supplements that you can take are ascorbic acid and DL-Alpha Tocoferol, which scavenge damage done by the infalmmation process after exercise, increase levels of prostaglandins and decrease plasma levels of corticosteroids.

I eat a reasonably balanced diet, take a multi, and take 500mg of C in the morning, but would you ingest C and E as pills right after a workout?




  If you eat an excess of protein beyond what your body needs for protein synthesis, one of the two things will happen: it will get burned as fuel or stored as bodyfat. Now, it is unlikely that it will get stored as bodyfat, because the systemic metabolisation is so calorically costly that you would need huge amounts of protein to get it stored as bodyfat. If you eat an excess of protein, the amino acids will be broke down by protease and will be send to the liver. there, through and extremely complicated biochemical process called gluconogenesis, the Carbon atoms attached to the amino acids will be re-assembled into glucose molecules that wil be sent to your bloodstream. If the glucose is too much, it gets further converted into bodyfat and stored. The other by-products of the amino acid break down, such as ammonia, urea and Sulphur, are extremely toxic to the body and must be eliminated. This process of sytemic clearance puts further drain on the liver and also in the kidneys. In other words, eating  alot of protein will: not stimulate and increase in muscle massand put a huge amount of metabolic stress o your body, both to transform the amino acids in energy as well as to eliminate the toxic wastes of protein.

What about when carb cycling for fat loss?  I tried it once with very limited success.  I found I couldn't sustain a good workout and I felt constantly overtrained... maybe I was just being a pussy.  Do you think there's a benefit to heavy protein consumption for fat loss and muscle preservation?  Or is it just insulin control and "thermic" food?





Now, you need to get 20% of your daily calories from fats


I've been getting 25-30% of cals from fats in hopes of keeping natural test maximized, since I'm 34.  Any harm or beneft in going over 20%?




Hope this helps.

Definitely.  Exactly the kind of answer I was looking for.  Thanks man!

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
I eat a reasonably balanced diet, take a multi, and take 500mg of C in the morning, but would you ingest C and E as pills right after a workout?

  Vitamin C is worhtless if you take the regular version because it is out of your system in one hour. Take 2 grams of time-released version in two doses - on in the morning and the other in the late afternoon. As for the tocopherol, one capsule of 400 I.U a day is enough. Too much vitamin E actually increases oxidative stress rather than impeding it.

Quote
What about when carb cycling for fat loss?  I tried it once with very limited success.  I found I couldn't sustain a good workout and I felt constantly overtrained... maybe I was just being a pussy.  Do you think there's a benefit to heavy protein consumption for fat loss and muscle preservation?  Or is it just insulin control and "thermic" food?

  Cycling is bullshit. What you get is an insulin spike in the day that you eat lots of the carbs in the cycle and have to start all over again. To lose bodyfat, decrease you caloric intake beneath maintenance level by 300 calories a day all from carbs, and eat only oatmeal and cream of rye as carbs to keep the insulin as low as possible.

Quote
I've been getting 25-30% of cals from fats in hopes of keeping natural test maximized, since I'm 34.  Any harm or beneft in going over 20%?

  Unfortunately, the Testosterone raising effect of fats only apply to saturated fats, and eating saturated fats as your fat source is problematic because it causes insulin resistance, which may stop fat loss even if you are eating only complex carbs. The ratio of fats, carbs and proteins is irrelevant as long as you have a caloric deficit. However, it is preferable to have this deficit from carbs to keep insulin down and so as to increase the protein to maintain as much muscle as possible. Otherwise, your body might chew up your muslce tissue for energy instead of the fat.

Quote
Definitely.  Exactly the kind of answer I was looking for.  Thanks man!

  No problemo.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29124
  • Hold Fast

  Unfortunately, the Testosterone raising effect of fats only apply to saturated fats, and eating saturated fats as your fat source is problematic because it causes insulin resistance, which may stop fat loss even if you are eating only complex carbs. The ratio of fats, carbs and proteins is irrelevant as long as you have a caloric deficit. However, it is preferable to have this deficit from carbs to keep insulin down and so as to increase the protein to maintain as much muscle as possible. Otherwise, your body might chew up your muslce tissue for energy instead of the fat.



When dieting, would you recommend cutting out sat fats as much as possible or is red meat a couple times a week a good thing for general health and muscle preservation?  With daily cardio, would insulin sensitivity be increased enough to offset the resistance caused by sat fats?  I love a thick medium rare steak...

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
When dieting, would you recommend cutting out sat fats as much as possible

  Completely eliminate it. The small boost of testosterone that it gives you does not compensate for the insulin resistance that it causes, which stops fat loss. Eat only two tablespoons of extra virgin olive oil a day over salad or a tea cup of almonds.

Quote
or is red meat a couple times a week a good thing for general health and muscle preservation?

  It is good for testosterone, but terrible for health. For health, the ideal is to not eat any meats at all. I am not advocating vegetarianism, but vegetarians do live an average o 15 years more thna meat eaters.

Quote
With daily cardio, would insulin sensitivity be increased enough to offset the resistance caused by sat fats?  I love a thick medium rare steak...

  Daily cardio burns fat, but it does not increase insulin sensitivity. As for the red meat, it will certainly decrease the effectiveness of cardio to burn bodyfat because it contains saturated fats. Is it impossible to lose bodyfat while eating red meat? No, as long as you have a caloric deficit, but it does make it harder.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

trab

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4950

When dieting, would you recommend cutting out sat fats as much as possible or is red meat a couple times a week a good thing for general health and muscle preservation?  With daily cardio, would insulin sensitivity be increased enough to offset the resistance caused by sat fats?  I love a thick medium rare steak...

Eat lots of red meat pal. EVERY Thick strong man ate lots. ANyone say diff is a rare cat (Bill Pearl is only one guy)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Eat lots of red meat pal. EVERY Thick strong man ate lots. ANyone say diff is a rare cat (Bill Pearl is only one guy)

  Not for fat loss. Read my thread. I know a lot more about nutrition than you do, so be a good humble student and don't give advice you're not entitled to give. :)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29124
  • Hold Fast
 :'(

Diet time is still several weeks away, so I'll enjoy the steaks while I can.  Thanks man.

trab

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4950
  Not for fat loss. Read my thread. I know a lot more about nutrition than you do, so be a good humble student and don't give advice you're not entitled to give. :)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

First Off Fuck You!
2nd off, unless he's ripping up in final weeks to contest, lean beef wont hurt him.
I recall hes asking about getting biger not so long ago...
Ive never seen too many thick male athletes that DONT like beef! Including fatty stuff like T-bones and Porterhouse
in the off season. Look at any farm community. MOST EVERY one of them boys is thick.  WHat do they Eat?
Beef, eggs, chicken, RAW 100% Fat milk...
Almost ALL vegitarians look like SHIT in short order.

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29124
  • Hold Fast
Ya trab, giving myself another couple months to gain before worrying about dieting.  Seems like so many guys fall down there and lose muscle and fat 1 to 1, lifts drop, etc, so I want to get it done right when the time comes.

Still waiting on results from my doc.  ::)  Going that way would dictate it's own schedual obviously.

trab

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4950
Ya trab, giving myself another couple months to gain before worrying about dieting.  Seems like so many guys fall down there and lose muscle and fat 1 to 1, lifts drop, etc, so I want to get it done right when the time comes.

Still waiting on results from my doc.  ::)  Going that way would dictate it's own schedual obviously.

Anabolics REALLY shine in the PRESERVATION  of muscle under starvation. Hell, they was 1st major used after
WW II on concentration camp survivors.
You wouldnt believe the SHIT some competitors eat and are still pretty ripped.
Walking pharmacy.

Plenty of big strong Natural guys can bulk up impressive beef, dieting it down is where it turns impossible.
Body treats fat like Gold at the expense of muscle.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
suckmydick, you are an idiot.

Thank you.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
First Off Fuck You!

  Typical response of someone who can't hold an argument. ::)

Quote
2nd off, unless he's ripping up in final weeks to contest, lean beef wont hurt him.

  That's exactly the thing, you dipshit: he did mention that he wanted to lose weight. Read before you post, dumbass. ::)

Quote
I recall hes asking about getting biger not so long ago...

  Irrelevant, since the question that he asked me was about whether he can lose fat while eating red. He didn't ask me if it is good for putting on muscle mass. Lol...moron. :o

Quote
Ive never seen too many thick male athletes that DONT like beef! Including fatty stuff like T-bones and Porterhouse

  Yawn...sophomoric argument. The issue is fat loss, not muscle gain. Red meat is good to put on mass during bulking phases, yes, but not for fat loss. And btw, no, you do not need red meat to put on muscle mass. ;)

Quote
in the off season.

  In the offseason means that they are not losing bodyfat, you incredible moron. :-X

Quote
Look at any farm community. MOST EVERY one of them boys is thick.  WHat do they Eat?

  Anectodal evidence. I can show you pictures of guys who only eat egg whites and turkey breasts who carry 30 lbs of muscle more than these farm boys(nice example, by the way. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ah...) without drugs. ;)

Quote
Beef, eggs, chicken, RAW 100% Fat milk...

  Yes, and they carry around 15-20% bodyfat. And they are in many cases smaller than guys who only eat lean meats. You're one dumb bunny, aren't you? :-\

Quote
Almost ALL vegitarians look like SHIT in short order.

  First of all, I don't advocate vegetarianism. Secondly, he asked if beef is good for health, and I replied that the ideal for health is to not eat meat at all. Vegetarians do live an average of 15 years more than meat eaters, so they must be doing something right. :)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
suckmydick, you are an idiot.

Thank you.

  Monkey I.Q meltdown! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

trab

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4950
  Typical response of someone who can't hold an argument. ::)

  That's exactly the thing, you dipshit: he did mention that he wanted to lose weight. Read before you post, dumbass. ::)

  Irrelevant, since the question that he asked me was about whether he can lose fat while eating red. He didn't ask me if it is good for putting on muscle mass. Lol...moron. :o

  Yawn...sophomoric argument. The issue is fat loss, not muscle gain. Red meat is good to put on mass during bulking phases, yes, but not for fat loss. And btw, no, you do not need red meat to put on muscle mass. ;)

  In the offseason means that they are not losing bodyfat, you incredible moron. :-X

  Anectodal evidence. I can show you pictures of guys who only eat egg whites and turkey breasts who carry 30 lbs of muscle more than these farm boys(nice example, by the way. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ah...) without drugs. ;)

  Yes, and they carry around 15-20% bodyfat. And they are in many cases smaller than guys who only eat lean meats. You're one dumb bunny, aren't you? :-\

  First of all, I don't advocate vegetarianism. Secondly, he asked if beef is good for health, and I replied that the ideal for health is to not eat meat at all. Vegetarians do live an average of 15 years more than meat eaters, so they must be doing something right. :)

SUCKMYMUSCLE


YOu are nothing but eye strain.

He was asking me about getting bigger a day ago.

Your overthinking all this nutrition. Ever see Lee priest eat a carton of dughnuts?

Want to get big? Eat Big. Go eat w/ some big strong dudes. Tip they love Beef.

You Know what research shows?  what the People paying for it want it to show.

Eat Lots of Beef and fat to the point you just start to lose abs in off season, till you big enough to cut it up.
Ripped looks like shit on small guys anyway. Get some nice puffy muscle w/ good deffinition.
Enough Swim team.