Liberalism Is A Disease

[The True Adonis]

LOL.
All your big red fonts and quotes won't convince anyone and/or prove anything.
Use your own words.
Personal experience and insight that's what has real weight.
And therefore Tedim is still far ahead of you.

All these useless quotes and big fonts make me think you are a troll.
And then quoting wikipedia is the icing on the cake.

So George Orwell penning an essay, "Why I Write" and explaining that everything he writes is in support of Socialism and then me linking to the essay is somehow not as good as if I were just to proclaim (without any proof) George Orwell was a Socialist?

Please help me understand how this works.  Belief without evidence?  What good is it and how does it carry more weight.  I REALLY want to know.

[shootfighter1]

Socialism would work better if everyone had equal abilities, equal effort and equal contributions.  That obviously isn't the real world.  Socialism disproportionally benefits people who are less than average.

[The True Adonis]

LOL.
All your big red fonts and quotes won't convince anyone and/or prove anything.
Use your own words.
Personal experience and insight that's what has real weight.
And therefore Tedim is still far ahead of you.

All these useless quotes and big fonts make me think you are a troll.
And then quoting wikipedia is the icing on the cake.

Here is the link to the Essay that GEORGE ORWELL wrote himself on why he wrote all his essays and books.

http://orwell.ru/library/essays/wiw/english/e_wiw


Spoiler Alert: Because of his support of Socialism


Don't believe me, click on the link and read it yourself.  (or don't since you would rather have me spoon feed you)


I believe THAT may be the problem.  You are so used to being spoon fed that whatever moron argument appeals to your shit brain is the one you will believe as truth.  Facts and evidence be damned.

You sir, are a moron.

[Tedim]

This one made me smile....

[Tedim]

I really don't have the time but I see the need.....

Socialism in Nazi Germany's economy.....1936 price and wage controls are initiated as a response to inflation of 1933, followed by collectivism and de facto control of all private enterprises (ownership remained in name only) with centralized government controls and planning for all production...essence of socialism.

I see you glossed right over this Adumbass

[The True Adonis]

I see you glossed right over this Adumbass

Glossed?

You provided no proof of any of that.  I am not opposed at all visiting these issues, but you can't just proclaim something without evidence to back it.

Start there and we can discuss it.  The bottom line is though that the NAZI party was not Socialist just as North Korea is not a Democratic Republic even though it says so in naming of the country.

[OB1]

So George Orwell penning an essay, "Why I Write" and explaining that everything he writes is in support of Socialism and then me linking to the essay is somehow not as good as if I were just to proclaim (without any proof) George Orwell was a Socialist?

Please help me understand how this works.  Belief without evidence?  What good is it and how does it carry more weight.  I REALLY want to know.

First explain how a big red 45pt font works?
Do you think we are almost blind or something?
Then explain why wikipedia is a reliable source.
Then why you need to quote me twice even using the same post?

If something you post is true it will "ring". Those sceptics can always try to find a fault or try to prove it is wrong but ultimately they must fail.
If you think you need to quote or proof it, it will make your own argument weaker.
So no real need for sources unless you can prove someone wrong.

Also this is a discussion and not something like "Here I have the truth everyone must follow it. Just read those big red letters."

I am not criticizing the "content" rather the "presentation."
Big red fonts are annoying and get ignored mostly.
Also it is equivalent to loud shouting in a online conversation context.
Meaning disrespect.

Wikipedia is not trustworthy.
You should know this.

And while you are at it stop projecting.
Thank You.

[Tedim]

Glossed?

You provided no proof of any of that.  I am not opposed at all visiting these issues, but you can't just proclaim something without evidence to back it.

Start there and we can discuss it.  The bottom line is though that the NAZI party was not Socialist just as North Korea is not a Democratic Republic even though it says so in naming of the country.

Ok everything I stated was factual none opinionated....was there wage and price control, yes

Was there seizure of private property for state use and collectivism, yes

Was planned production controlled by a centralized government, yes

Sounds like three pillars of socialism

[The True Adonis]

First explain how a big red 45pt font works?
Do you think we are almost blind or something?
Then explain why wikipedia is a reliable source.
Then why you need to quote me twice even using the same post?

If something you post is true it will "ring". Those sceptics can always try to find a fault or try to prove it is wrong but ultimately they must fail.
If you think you need to quote or proof it, it will make your own argument weaker.
So no real need for sources unless you can prove someone wrong.

Also this is a discussion and not something like "Here I have the truth everyone must follow it. Just read those big red letters."

I am not criticizing the "content" rather the "presentation."
Big red fonts are annoying and get ignored mostly.
Also it is equivalent to loud shouting in a online conversation context.
Meaning disrespect.

Wikipedia is not trustworthy.
You should know this.

And while you are at it stop projecting.
Thank You.

1.Bold Font calls attention to relevant information and leaves an impression in your brain.  Newspapers have been doing it for hundreds of years.
2.Wikipedia is as reliable as anything as there are sources contained at the bottom which can be clicked on to verify the source material.  Subsequent studies also show Wikipedia has an accuracy rate of 99.5 to 99.9 percent.  You can learn more about that here:  

http://www.zmescience.com/science/study-wikipedia-25092014/

3. I like sourced material and providing links so people can go see for themselves.  

4. Wikipedia is reliable see above post please.

[Tedim]

Ok everything I stated was factual none opinionated....was there wage and price control, yes

Was there seizure of private property for state use and collectivism, yes

Was planned production controlled by a centralized government, yes

Sounds like three pillars of socialism

Crickets

[The Scott]

Socialism doesn't work because those in favor of it don't want to.

[The True Adonis]

Crickets

Where is the source material I can read that supports your claims?

[Walter Sobchak]

The True Anus just wikipediaed Wikipedia

So today George Orwell is a staunch socialist, yet yesterday he was a classic liberal?

That's a lot of windsocking.

[Tedim]

Where is the source material I can read that supports your claims?

I'm done with you.....2+2=4 I'm sure you'd want the source. Everyone with your last post just saw how disingenuous you are!

Lol, bought you like a cheap suit.

[The True Adonis]

I'm done with you.....2+2=4 I'm sure you'd want the source. Everyone with your last post just saw how disingenuous you are!

Lol, bought you like a cheap suit.

I am disingenuous because I backed up everything with sources and facts, you know things you can verify?   

All I asked was for sources for your statements.  If you can't provide any just say so and then we can declare it bullshit and move on.

You want an easy way out of this it seems.  Its pathetic really.

[Walter Sobchak]

1.Bold Font calls attention to relevant information and leaves an impression in your brain.  Newspapers have been doing it for hundreds of years.
2.Wikipedia is as reliable as anything as there are sources contained at the bottom which can be clicked on to verify the source material.  Subsequent studies also show Wikipedia has an accuracy rate of 99.5 to 99.9 percent.  You can learn more about that here:  

http://www.zmescience.com/science/study-wikipedia-25092014/

3. I like sourced material and providing links so people can go see for themselves.  

4. Wikipedia is reliable see above post please.

Vince Goodrum is a business mogul.....Wikipedia said so!!!!!

[Tedim]

I am disingenuous because I backed up everything with sources and facts, you know things you can verify?   

All I asked was for sources for your statements.  If you can't provide any just say so and then we can declare it bullshit and move on.

You want an easy way out of this it seems.  Its pathetic really.

Only a complete moron would ask for source material for commonly known facts....when I decide to write my dissertation on Nazi socialist economic polices I'll source my notes, on GetBig you can look it up or lick the back of my ass....whichever you prefer.

If you place your ear to the screen, you can hear GetBig laugh at you.

[The True Adonis]

Only a complete moron would ask for source material for commonly known facts....when I decide to write my dissertation on Nazi socialist economic polices I'll source my notes, on GetBig you can look it up or lick the back of my ass....whichever you prefer.

If you place your ear to the screen, you can hear GetBig laugh at you.

The problem is you want to deal in lies and half-truths with no backing of data.

I don't.  Hard to have a conversation with someone who wants his own made up facts.

[OB1]

If you place your ear to the screen, you can hear GetBig laugh at you.

LOL!

[The True Adonis]

Only a complete moron would ask for source material for commonly known facts....when I decide to write my dissertation on Nazi socialist economic polices I'll source my notes, on GetBig you can look it up or lick the back of my ass....whichever you prefer.

If you place your ear to the screen, you can hear GetBig laugh at you.

Sounds more like a cow shitting to me.

[Tedim]

The problem is you want to deal in lies and half-truths with no backing of data.

I don't.  Hard to have a conversation with someone who wants his own facts.

the problem is youre a pretty weak troll, and not very educated making you easy prey. Savaging you has no sport in it.

I expected more from a Jew, really.

[The True Adonis]

the problem is your a pretty weak troll, and not very educated making you easy prey. Savaging you has no sport in it.

I expected more from a Jew, really.

Again, proclaiming a victory without having the ability to even back up your "argument" with any source-able data is just moronic.

The difference between you and I though is that I never expected much from you.  I was hoping you would surprise me, alas I was wrong. 

Why would you want to argue a point without data? 

[Tedim]

Again, proclaiming a victory without having the ability to even back up your "argument" with any source-able data is just moronic.

The difference between you and I though is that I never expected much from you.  I was hoping you would surprise me, alas I was wrong. 

Why would you want to argue a point without data? 

You'll just have to do your own legwork....I'm lazy. Proving those three statements wrong should only take you a lifetime....get cracking.

[The True Adonis]

You'll just have to do your own legwork....I'm lazy. Proving those three statements wrong should only take you a lifetime....get cracking.

If you don't even care enough to back your own argument, than I don't care enough to challenge your bullshit.

You want me to prove a negative.  Its the same tactic religious morons use when they say "You can't disprove that god exists".  Yeah and you can't disprove that talking vacuum cleaners on Mars exist either.

Same dumb premise used by the same dumb people.

[Tedim]

If you don't even care enough to back your own argument, than I don't care enough to challenge your bullshit.

You want me to prove a negative.  Its the same tactic religious morons use when they say "You can't disprove that god exists".  Yeah and you can't disprove that talking vacuum cleaners on Mars exist either.

Same dumb premise used by the same dumb people.

You got owned and just like a little bitch just keep crying source source source, it's quite entertaining in it desperation...

I'm sure the picture of you bumbling around to get a rise out of me is akin to a retard humping a doorknob....mildly funny mostly sad.