Author Topic: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!  (Read 8318 times)

BILL ANVIL

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3364
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #50 on: December 06, 2011, 08:31:14 PM »
Is getbig so numb now to this now?

I mean... is it REALLY necessary for us to see his ass???


I'm not gonna lie, I took a pic like that once... but would never have it published in a magazine!  was more for for personal reference, and contest prep pics!



Bodybuilding is weird!


X 2! !

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #51 on: December 06, 2011, 08:48:44 PM »
IF that pic was Photoshopped in any way, whoever did it sucked hard.


Way too many discrepancies. If you'd like, I can demonstrate a proper chop, but what's the point?

SomeKindofMonster

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
  • RC is SomeKindOfMonster
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #52 on: December 06, 2011, 08:48:53 PM »
Jay looked good until his waist
started getting wider. In his quest to
chase Coleman he prioritized his back work
which led to a much better back but a wider waist.
Look at 2009 when he looked really good. His waist
had come down and his shoulder to waist ratio looked
the best it had in years BUT: if you notice in 2009 his
back had come down in size also-(really noticeable
in the rear lat spread compared to 2004-2006 where
he was about as wide as Coleman)

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #53 on: December 06, 2011, 09:21:47 PM »
haha ... so much dignity

when a 40 yo man is "featured" with the undeis pulled below the ass cheeks and exposing his "ripped" ass we have finally hit a new all time low. This is one of the premier "athletes" in this "sport".

I am waiting for Bay to confirm the incredibly obvious gayness in the shot

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3532
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #54 on: December 06, 2011, 10:08:55 PM »
Jay looked good until his waist
started getting wider. In his quest to
chase Coleman he prioritized his back work
which led to a much better back but a wider waist.
Look at 2009 when he looked really good. His waist
had come down and his shoulder to waist ratio looked
the best it had in years BUT: if you notice in 2009 his
back had come down in size also-(really noticeable
in the rear lat spread compared to 2004-2006 where
he was about as wide as Coleman)

jay has always been wider than Coleman

SomeKindofMonster

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
  • RC is SomeKindOfMonster
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #55 on: December 06, 2011, 10:12:35 PM »
Jay really doesn't looked that shredded in these
pics either. He's big and full but his back lacks detail.
Glutes are not very striated. Pecs and shoulders have very little
striations and his intercostals should be more pronounced.
Not hating because I like Jay's persona, just calling it like it seems.

SomeKindofMonster

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
  • RC is SomeKindOfMonster
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #56 on: December 06, 2011, 10:18:33 PM »
jay has always been wider than Coleman


Don't know if that's correct. Here they are straight on (from youtube)
One at the beginning of 2001 Mr. O prejudging and then at the end.
Ronnie looks just as wide or wider.
Also 2005 from the back...

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
Re: For all the HATERS who claim JAY can't get shredded!
« Reply #57 on: December 06, 2011, 10:22:33 PM »
He can but not often when it counts like on-stage
Exactly onstage he looks NOTHING like this, and if you take into account all the air/paint/brushing/shoping thats Blanantly obvious in those shots you can see why he doesnt look like THAT onstage