The point is the judge's unconstitutional gag order on Trump, making his courtroom look like North Korea. It's a free speech issue.
I disagree. 'The government isn't prohibited from punishing someone for making intentional “true threats” of physical violence.
Nor is defamation protected by the First Amendment, even though it often comes in the form of literal—that is, spoken—speech.'
'The categories of unprotected speech include obscenity, child pornography, defamatory speech, false advertising, true threats, and fighting words.
Deciding what is and is not protected speech is reserved to courts of law. The First Amendment only prevents government restrictions on speech.'
But if Trump says it is a violation of free speech right as stated in the Constitution, there are some folks who will agree with him and even parrot his comments regardless of its invalidity.
