I wrote a reply on the other forum saying "We are all entitled to our opinions and my opinion is he is a complete liar and not a chance he is natural."
I got a couple of replies saying "Hes natural, trust me !" and "
Yannyboy you’re entitled to your opinion, as I am mine and I suppose it was inevitable that someone was bound to say Rob isn't natural. I for one have been around natural bodybuilding for around 7 years now, Robs probably one of the best bodybuilders I've ever seen or met, and I've been lucky enough to meet Dorian and Branch as well as multiple top British Amateurs. Now some people might call it jealousy and jump on your post turning this into a haters thread stating drug tests, and polygraphs are performed and so on, but instead I'll refer to my original point. Some people are just natural freaks end of and you have to accept it.
Branch Warren, Ronnie Coleman Jay Cutler all nature freaks who would never have become top pros without superior genetics, no matter how much AAS they abused. Which is why it's often said there is far more abuse going on in amateur ranks than pros. Although that's a different can of worms reserved for a different forum section.
I think Rob is only about 185lb's if that on stage, those numbers are hardly staggering and pretty common place in nature pro bodybuilding. His superior bone structure, muscle bellies, small joints, and excellent conditioning make him appear ten times bigger than he actually is. I bet if you took him in the lab and done a fibre type analysis on him you’d find he’s got a ridicules amounts of type 2 fibres and satellite cells.
Now I'm sure we can all recall countless incidences of guys looking huge only to find out they are twenty pounds lighter than you actually thought they were. Or huge 17, and 18 year olds making there way into professional rugby teams. Why should a natural freak suddenly be accused of being unnatural with all the tools modern medicine, sports and nutritional science at his disposal in the 21st century."
Absolutely rediculous.