Author Topic: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?  (Read 8519 times)

Kwon_2

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33809
  • Pretty sure he isn't in Ibiza getting the girls
Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« on: October 26, 2013, 05:39:20 PM »
McMahon is a Bodybuilding-fan as well... :D  ;D


King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34337
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2013, 05:44:16 PM »
McMahon is a Bodybuilding-fan as well... :D  ;D


I watch wrestling strictly because of AJ Lee.

I am hoping for a vagina slip.

AlphaMaleDawg

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2881
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2013, 05:46:41 PM »
Considering it's more popular than the NFL, I'd say no

Schmoff

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2013, 05:50:44 PM »
McMahon is a Bodybuilding-fan as well... :D  ;D



lol

good gif

NYSTATEOFMIND

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2156
  • Getbigs Reporter of perverse news
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2013, 08:27:56 PM »
getbig or getgot

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2013, 08:34:33 PM »

whitewidow

  • Guest
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2013, 04:29:32 AM »
I think if you watch WWE after 18 years old there are some issues going on with yourself. But They sell out shows everywhere so people do love watching the WWE. I just could not imagine ordering any kind of WWE pay per view. some of the wrestlers are impressive,some are so fucking big yet so fucking agile and have almost gymnast skills,def some of them def have serious talent.

AlphaMaleDawg

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2881
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2013, 06:39:42 AM »
I think if you watch WWE after 18 years old there are some issues going on with yourself. But They sell out shows everywhere so people do love watching the WWE. I just could not imagine ordering any kind of WWE pay per view. some of the wrestlers are impressive,some are so fucking big yet so fucking agile and have almost gymnast skills,def some of them def have serious talent.

The truth is, the actual wrestling is very repetitive and gets old. It's the story lines that draw people in.

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23509
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2013, 11:40:47 AM »
It's mainly for kids which are the ultimate schmoes as they are weak and not yet developed so they have to live their "unadulterated" fantasies through these behemoths.
After a certain age being a hardcore fan of sports may seem pretty "naive".

On a more positive note - wrestlers are skilled, hard working and tough.
.

Lord Chronos

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 924
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2013, 11:43:09 AM »


Is dancing with stars for schmoes? Also is X-factor for gays?

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2013, 11:59:19 AM »
not at all


_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23509
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2013, 12:31:25 PM »
not at all



Dang, that's an old looking kid  :D
.

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2013, 01:17:19 PM »
Dang, that's an old looking kid  :D

epic 'stick on' forearms tattoo  :D

makes me wonder why some choose to schmoe for wrestlers.. bodybuilders must just not do it for them...  ???

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2013, 01:19:23 PM »
McMahon is a Bodybuilding-fan as well... :D  ;D





all gay


not that there is anything wrong with that

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40894
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2013, 01:26:02 PM »
When my son was around 11 or 12 years old and later when grandson was a younger kid, I took them to see a couple of local wrestling matches. Not WWE caliber of course. But most of the audience was kids with their dads and then there were the old ladies. The old ladies were the most vocal. Portland wrestling is a thing of the past.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #15 on: October 27, 2013, 01:33:02 PM »
it's real to me, dammit

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #16 on: October 27, 2013, 03:27:56 PM »
When my son was around 11 or 12 years old and later when grandson was a younger kid, I took them to see a couple of local wrestling matches. Not WWE caliber of course. But most of the audience was kids with their dads and then there were the old ladies. The old ladies were the most vocal. Portland wrestling is a thing of the past.

Nah it's making a comeback. Roddy Piper is involved.

King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34337
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #17 on: October 27, 2013, 03:58:57 PM »
I tune into monday night raw. Its actually funny as shit to watch. I remember getting a kick out of guys like Val Venus and Gold dust.

Naturally I like to listen to the guys talk shit.  ;D

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #18 on: October 27, 2013, 04:02:32 PM »
I tune into monday night raw. Its actually funny as shit to watch. I remember getting a kick out of guys like Val Venus and Gold dust.

Naturally I like to listen to the guys talk shit.  ;D

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #19 on: October 27, 2013, 04:04:49 PM »

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40894
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #20 on: October 27, 2013, 05:25:47 PM »
Nah it's making a comeback. Roddy Piper is involved.

On September 18, 2013, Portland Wrestling Uncut lost their TV contract due to an inability to pay KPTV for the timeslot.

Have you heard anything different from this?

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2013, 05:26:24 PM »

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #22 on: October 27, 2013, 06:36:17 PM »
On September 18, 2013, Portland Wrestling Uncut lost their TV contract due to an inability to pay KPTV for the timeslot.

Have you heard anything different from this?

Oh snap that didnt last long.

I never been to Portland wrestling but remember watching in the early 90s when it was on tv and sponsored by Tom Peterson. My parents would go back in the days before I was born and they said it was the shit back then. Their favorites were Tony Borne and Lonnie Main.

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40894
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #23 on: October 27, 2013, 06:41:20 PM »
Oh snap that didnt last long.

I never been to Portland wrestling but remember watching in the early 90s when it was on tv and sponsored by Tom Peterson. My parents would go back in the days before I was born and they said it was the shit back then. Their favorites were Tony Borne and Lonnie Main.

Maybe the promoters just need time to regroup to get it going again. Everything is MMA these days. Wrestlers of old were showmen and women and wrestling was more about athleticism and showmanship. MMA is about actually hurting someone. -Not my thing.

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15852
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Wrestling for Schmoes?
« Reply #24 on: October 27, 2013, 06:56:52 PM »
Goo drum seems to enjoy wrestling.