Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Conspiracy Theories Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on March 03, 2010, 11:39:55 AM

Title: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 03, 2010, 11:39:55 AM
Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
The Obama File ^ | Feb 1, 2010 | The Obama File

________________________ ________________________ ___________________

Posted on Monday, February 01, 2010 5:35:11 PM by opentalk

Private investigator Neil Sankey, using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Barack Obama’s name.

However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as: "Barak Obama," "Batock Obama," "Barok Obama," and "Barrack Obama." There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name. In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name.

Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided. Needless to say, there are also a slew of address and social security numbers connected to addresses in states that Obama has no known connection to.

In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042, and one starting 364.

In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999, which are not valid SSNs.

There are no addresses listed in New York where he attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485.

In Massachusetts -- where Obama attended Harvard Law School -- we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one. Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as: 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office. This Social Security number began with 282 and was verified by the government in 2008.

This mystery grows even stranger as other addresses and Social Security numbers for Barack Obama appear in a dozen other states not known to be connected to him. Again, I am excluding those records names not spelled exactly like his name.

Tennessee, one address with a Social Security number beginning with 427

Colorado, one address, with a Social Security number beginning with 456.

Utah, two addresses, with two Social Security numbers beginning with 901 and 799.

Missouri has one address and one Social Security number beginning with 999.

Florida has two addresses listed for his him, three if you count one listed as "Barry Obama." One is connected to a Social Security number beginning with 762.

In Georgia there are three addresses listed for him, all with different Social Security numbers: 579, 420, and 423.

In Texas there are four different addresses listed for him, one is connected to Social Security number 675.

There are two addresses listed for Barack Obama in Oregon and one address listed for him in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled "Barack Obama." In some cases, the middle initial "H" is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as: "Barac," "Barak," and "Barrack" Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.

Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.

Extracted from an article by Steve Baldwin. Read the whole thing here . . .

Susan Daniels, a second investigator filed an affidavit, with true and correct copies here, in the Barnett v. Obama case. Susan Daniels is a private investigator, licensed by the State of Ohio.

In her affidavit, Daniels states that she has located Barack Obama's Social Security Number. She states it was issued between 1977 and 1979 in the State of Connecticut. She states that it is the only Social Security Number Barack Obama ever used.

The number assigned to Barack Obama "appears to be associated with someone born in the year 1890."
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: saopl on March 03, 2010, 11:45:42 AM
he's turning into a freak show, give it about 50 years and we'll know the truth
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: SAMSON123 on March 03, 2010, 11:47:27 AM
Holy Smokes...This guy could be a virtual Houdini with this many SS
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 03, 2010, 11:49:44 AM
he's turning into a freak show, give it about 50 years and we'll know the truth

This has always been out there, but I tyhink it has to do with his refusal to release any records whatsoever about his past. 

Look, is it all CT stuff?  OF COURSE!  But these are the records not released so far:

 Obama's records that are not released.
1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'not available'
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released (This list predated the present one but probably was not released due to his cocaine abuse)
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- 'not available'
8. Law practice client list -- Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published -- None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
13. Your Record of baptism-- Not released or 'not available'
14. Your Illinois State Senate records--'not available'
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: kcballer on March 03, 2010, 12:01:33 PM
Wow so he's a secret agent Kenyan who never attended university, was born in Kenya to muslim parents, is a racist radical who hates America and is just wanting to hook up with his other 'NWO' buddies so they can all destroy and dominate the world via a socialist regime.  Okay i think i got it.  Oh wait i forgot Al Gore and the green NWO are also involved.  Silly me.  Where does 9/11, rothschild, kennedy assassination, illuminati and reptillian blood suckers all fit into this 333? 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Kazan on March 03, 2010, 12:03:30 PM
Nice to see that he was vetted so well ::) How the fuck does somone who uses 16 differnet SS#'s get elected to dog catcher let alone the POTUS
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Option D on March 03, 2010, 12:03:54 PM
Wow so he's a secret agent Kenyan who never attended university, was born in Kenya to muslim parents, is a racist radical who hates America and is just wanting to hook up with his other 'NWO' buddies so they can all destroy and dominate the world via a socialist regime.  Okay i think i got it.  Oh wait i forgot Al Gore and the green NWO are also involved.  Silly me.  Where does 9/11, rothschild, kennedy assassination, illuminati and reptillian blood suckers all fit into this 333? 

he invented the inter-web thingy
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 03, 2010, 12:04:43 PM
Wow so he's a

secret agent - no, probably just a run of the mill NWO shill.

Kenyan who never attended university - Kenyan maybe but I do believe he went to columbia  

Born in Kenya to muslim parents - probably.

 is a racist radical who hates America - without any doubt in my mind.

and is just wanting to hook up with his other 'NWO' buddies so they can all destroy and dominate the world via a socialist regime. - 1000%


Okay i think i got it.  - not really.  


Oh wait i forgot Al Gore and the green NWO are also involved.  Silly me. - yes.  Silly you, wake the hell up dude and read Creature from Jekyll Island.  

Where does 9/11, rothschild, kennedy assassination, illuminati and reptillian blood suckers all fit into this 333 - Not sure yet.  ;D 

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: BodyProSite on March 03, 2010, 02:59:40 PM
could you imagine the shitstorm the libs would have made if gb had 16 diff ss numbers and didnt release the same documents that the bammer refuses to release?
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: blacken700 on March 03, 2010, 05:26:09 PM



 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Title: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 27, 2010, 05:33:30 PM
New Hawaii governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Hot Air ^ | December 27, 2010 | Allahpundit


Exceptionally stupid. Although, if he’s intent on digging up background on The One, I wouldn’t mind seeing what he comes up with by way of transcripts from Columbia.

“It’s an insult to his mother and to his father, and I knew his mother and father; they were my friends, and I have an emotional interest in that,” Governor Abercrombie said in a telephone interview late Thursday. “It’s an emotional insult. It is disrespectful to the president; it is disrespectful to the office.”

The governor, a Democrat and former congressman, said he has initiated conversations with the state’s attorney general and the chief of its Health Department about how he can release more explicit documentation of Mr. Obama’s birth on Aug. 4, 1961, at Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital. He said he has done so of his own accord, without consulting the White House, which declined to comment…

Mr. Abercrombie, 72, said that although he did not see the elder Obamas at the hospital with their newborn son, he did remember the couple bringing the baby to social events. He says the critics who suggest that Mr. Obama’s mother slipped off to Kenya to give birth are engaging in a “demonological fantasy.” And he is angry about legislation in several states that would require presidential candidates to document that they were born in this country. A similar bill died in Congress last year.

First, and apropos of nothing, my mind is blown by the fact that the governor of Hawaii remembers the president of the United States as an infant. But never mind that.

Why is this tool dredging up an issue that, mercifully, had begun to go away? Hawaii’s records department received only 16 requests for Obama’s birth certificate in November, down from 50 or so a month last year. Higher courts have waved away multiple Birther petitions, and the court-martial of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin ended with him pleading guilty to failing to report for duty. This subject has no traction, in other words, either legally or in mainstream media, and thus had probably never been fringier when Abercrombie spoke up and decided to treat it as a problem that needs solving. Even his personal testimony about having seen Obama as a baby in Hawaii won’t count for anything among true believers, since he admits that he wasn’t at the hospital for the delivery — which is too bad, since it would have been fun to watch them come up with theories to explain even that inconvenient fact away. (It was a changeling!)

This guy’s now placed himself in the following position. Either he inadvertently revives the Birther movement by crusading for a new law to make long-form birth certificates public without the approval of the individuals to whom they belong or he decides nothing can be done legally and backs off, which will itself inflame Birthers by inspiring dark theories about pressure on him from the White House to quiet down. And of course, since Abercrombie’s a liberal Democrat, if he does somehow manage to produce the long-form certificate and it confirms that Obama’s birth happened as alleged, skeptics will dismiss it as a forgery planted by an ideological ally to throw Birthers off the scent of the “real” birth certificate. He can’t win here. Why would he even try?

(VIDEO AT LINK)

Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 27, 2010, 05:35:38 PM
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Dos Equis on December 27, 2010, 05:36:45 PM
Not an Abercrombie fan, but he's doing the right thing. 
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 27, 2010, 05:38:12 PM
Can he release this on his own?
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Dos Equis on December 27, 2010, 05:39:41 PM
Can he release this on his own?

Not sure if he can release the original BC without Obama's consent.   
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 27, 2010, 05:40:30 PM
Not sure if he can release the original BC without Obama's consent.   

So again - WTF is problem releasing the long form BC?
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Dos Equis on December 27, 2010, 05:46:53 PM
So again - WTF is problem releasing the long form BC?

They cite privacy issues.  I think Obama should release it, but this is really not a good fight IMO. 
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 27, 2010, 06:00:19 PM
I think he is hiding something.  Why pay lawyers hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep this hidden?
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: doison on December 30, 2010, 05:41:52 AM
I think he is hiding something.  Why pay lawyers hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep this hidden?

His BC probably lists his and/or his parent's religion as "Muslim." 

I've always thought his "concern" is more likely to be something specific on his US birth certificate rather than the lack of one altogether.
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Dos Equis on December 30, 2010, 07:16:53 PM
His BC probably lists his and/or his parent's religion as "Muslim." 

I've always thought his "concern" is more likely to be something specific on his US birth certificate rather than the lack of one altogether.

Never thought about that, but makes sense.  I think he was born in the U.S., but the Muslim religion ID could explain why he doesn't just release it. 
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: 240 is Back on December 30, 2010, 11:59:26 PM
it's a legit question.
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Skip8282 on December 31, 2010, 08:08:04 AM
They cite privacy issues.  I think Obama should release it, but this is really not a good fight IMO. 



I disagree.  The only people who have any right to see that are those in personnel who need to make verifications.  Otherwise, it's nobody's business.
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 31, 2010, 08:12:37 AM
It looks fishy and it most likly is.   

Its not only the BC, its his SAT, LSAT, college records, an everything else.  Were it the BC alone, tats one thing, but in combo with everything else he is hiding, it just looks fishy. 
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Skip8282 on December 31, 2010, 08:24:50 AM
It looks fishy and it most likly is.   

Its not only the BC, its his SAT, LSAT, college records, an everything else.  Were it the BC alone, tats one thing, but in combo with everything else he is hiding, it just looks fishy. 


Yes, but just about everything you want to see is private, confidential information.  And the only people privy to that, or should be privy to that, is personnel dept.
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 31, 2010, 08:54:23 AM
if it's released and it shows Obama was born in Hawaii, I wonder if the birthers will voice any type of "oops, sorry, we were way off base and wrong" or will they just magically vanish without a word?
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 31, 2010, 08:57:25 AM
if it's released and it shows Obama was born in Hawaii, I wonder if the birthers will voice any type of "oops, sorry, we were way off base and wrong" or will they just magically vanish without a word?

Sure it will look stupid Hugo - but this is not happening in a vacuum.   Its along with Barry sealing everything else as well, his high scool records, college records, law school records, SAT, LSAT, etc tc.   

Check this out - in Barry's America - i am forced by jail and fine to show proof of health insurance on my income tax return but the POTUS does not have to reveal a damn thing about himself. 

What an upside down nation we have. 
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: boonasty on December 31, 2010, 09:10:42 AM
His BC probably lists his and/or his parent's religion as "Muslim." 


if that is the case, he ought to release it now.  he already is the president and it's widely held he's a muslim anyway
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: 240 is Back on December 31, 2010, 09:57:53 AM
if that is the case, he ought to release it now.  he already is the president and it's widely held he's a muslim anyway

It might cost him an add'l 1% of voters.  And that might be the difference in a close 2012 race.

Not that it'll be a close race in 2012... ;)
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 31, 2010, 10:37:38 AM
if it's released and it shows Obama was born in Hawaii, I wonder if the birthers will voice any type of "oops, sorry, we were way off base and wrong" or will they just magically vanish without a word?

Nope. It will just prove he is a "native" born citizen as stated on his own fightthesmears website (if he was indeed born in HI), which is a way different animal than a "natural born Citizen" as required by our Constitution for the Office of President.

The only thing that could be on a birth certificate that would make him a legitimate president would be a citizen father (Frank Marshall Davis, Malcolm X) - which of course would just prove he has lied (and what's one more lie to this guy?).

This is just more watch this hand not the other. This has always been about his "eligibility" not his "citizenship."
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 31, 2010, 10:46:26 AM
Can he release this on his own?

Yes. I've been following this since it surfaced in mid 2008, so I've done a lot of reading. I can't cite the appropriate HI laws, but it's in HI law that if information is released by HI officials, they MUST release the underlying documents the information came from. Fukino and Lingle both gave out info that could only have come from the BC, so therefore, by HI law, they MUST release it.

This law is totally separate from the vexatious requester bill recently passed solely for Obama's BC which Abercrombie refers to in his statements.
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: 240 is Back on December 31, 2010, 11:35:24 AM
Isn't there a place where birth religion would be listed?

With a muslim dad, his probably says muslim.

And there are people out there who will scream about it.  hannity will run coountless pieces on it.  Palin will murmur "to ME, there's nothing wrong with his birth religion, but to many people..."   

Face it, from a PR standpoint, it would hurt him.  So he'll never release it.  Incredibly... people who complained about the CHRISTIAN church where he spent 20 years, will somehow claim that doesn't cancel out what his dad put on a birth cert.  SIlly.
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Skip8282 on December 31, 2010, 11:48:38 AM
Isn't there a place where birth religion would be listed?

With a muslim dad, his probably says muslim.

And there are people out there who will scream about it.  hannity will run coountless pieces on it.  Palin will murmur "to ME, there's nothing wrong with his birth religion, but to many people..."   

Face it, from a PR standpoint, it would hurt him.  So he'll never release it.  Incredibly... people who complained about the CHRISTIAN church where he spent 20 years, will somehow claim that doesn't cancel out what his dad put on a birth cert.  SIlly.



Palin?  You actually managed to work Palin into this thread?

Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: 240 is Back on December 31, 2010, 11:56:41 AM
She is one of the top voices of the republican party, and a frontrunner for 2012.

And her "tweets" on the birth certificate would be something we'd expect, no?
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Skip8282 on December 31, 2010, 12:11:42 PM
She is one of the top voices of the republican party, and a frontrunner for 2012.

And her "tweets" on the birth certificate would be something we'd expect, no?



Top voice - yes.

Frontrunner 2012 - hahahahahahaha...not a chance in hell.

Never been on twitter, but how sad is it that you have to resort to making claims about her based on what you theorize she might say on a future "tweet".  SHE'S IN YOUR HEAD DEEEEEEP...
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: 240 is Back on December 31, 2010, 12:14:09 PM
Frontrunner 2012 - hahahahahahaha...not a chance in hell.

Polls have her in the top 3 usually.  Often right behind Mitt, and ahead of Huck. 

And she can raise a shitload more $ than any of them.

And she has a lock on the tea party/far right religious voters.



So yes, unfortunately, she is A frontrunner, if not THE frontrunner.  It's hard to think of another candidate with everything she has.  Romney is seen as a lib and Huck ain't all that exciting. 
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Skip8282 on December 31, 2010, 12:25:11 PM
Polls have her in the top 3 usually.  Often right behind Mitt, and ahead of Huck.  

Neither here nor there.


Quote
And she can raise a shitload more $ than any of them.


That's just pure speculation.  At one time the same could have been said about Mayor G and he completely flopped.


Quote
And she has a lock on the tea party/far right religious voters.


Even if we assumed this to be true it does not make her a frontrunner.



The very first step to being a frontrunner is having a desire to run.  You have no evidence that she has such a desire and most things that I read seem to indicate she has no such desire.  In fact, she appears to be perfectly content in a supportive role.


Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 31, 2010, 01:05:36 PM
How did palin get in to this? 
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Dos Equis on December 31, 2010, 07:13:22 PM


I disagree.  The only people who have any right to see that are those in personnel who need to make verifications.  Otherwise, it's nobody's business.

I don't think anyone has a right to see it.  I'm just talking about what he should do (not what he has to do).  He could put an end to the lawsuits, etc. that are probably unnecessarily clogging up the system.  He could shut a lot of people up.  
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Dos Equis on December 31, 2010, 07:14:52 PM


Palin?  You actually managed to work Palin into this thread?



lol.  As usual.   :)
Title: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 18, 2011, 08:09:04 PM
Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate
World Net Daily ^ | 01-18-2011 | Jerome R. Corsi




Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published today that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

Abercrombie told the Honolulu Star Advertiser he was searching within the Hawaii Department of Health to find definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii, because the continuing eligibility controversy could hurt the president's chances of re-election in 2012.

Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombie's spokeswoman in Honolulu, ignored again yesterday another in a series of repeated requests made by WND for an interview with the governor.

Toward the end of the interview, the newspaper asked Abercrombie: "You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama's birth certificate. How is that coming?"

In his response, Abercrombie acknowledged the birth certificate issue will have "political implications" for the next presidential election "that we simply cannot have."

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency

Suggesting he was still intent on producing more birth records on Obama from the Hawaii Department of Health vital records vault, Abercrombie told the newspaper there was a recording of the Obama birth in the state archives that he wants to make public.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 18, 2011, 08:24:51 PM
Abercrombie did not report to the newspaper that he or the Hawaii Department of Health had found Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. The governor only suggested his investigations to date had identified an unspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth that someone had made in the state archives.

"It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down," Abercrombie said.

For seemingly the first time, Abercrombie frankly acknowledge that presidential politics motivated his search for Obama birth records, implying that failure to resolve the questions that remain unanswered about the president's birth and early life may damage his chance for re-election.

"If there is a political agenda (regarding Obama's birth certificate), then there is nothing I can do about that, nor can the president," he said.

So far, the only birth document available on Obama is a Hawaii Certification of Live Birth that first appeared on the Internet during the 2008 presidential campaign. It was posted by two purportedly independent websites that have displayed a strong partisan bias for Obama – Snopes.com released the COLB in June 2008, and FactCheck.org published photographs of the document in August 2008.

WND previously reported the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to authenticate the COLB posted on the Internet by Snopes.com and FactCheck.org.

WND has reported that in 1961, Obama's grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, could have made an in-person report of a Hawaii birth even if the infant Barack Obama Jr. had been foreign-born.

Similarly, the newspaper announcements of Obama's birth do not prove he was born in Hawaii, since they could have been triggered by the grandparents registering the birth as Hawaiian, even if the baby was born elsewhere.

Moreover, WND has documented that the address reported in the newspaper birth announcements was the home of the grandparents.

WND also has reported that Barack Obama Sr. maintained his own separate apartment in Honolulu, even after he was supposedly married to Ann Dunham, Barack Obama's mother, and that Dunham left Hawaii within three weeks of the baby's birth to attend the University of Washington in Seattle.

Dunham did not return to Hawaii until after Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in June 1962 to attend graduate school at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass.

Conceivably, the yet undisclosed birth record in the state archives that Abercrombie has discovered may have come from the grandparents registering Obama's birth, an event that would have triggered both the newspaper birth announcements and availability of a Certification of Live Birth, even if no long-form birth certificate existed.

WND has also reported that Tim Adams, a former senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in 2008, has maintained that there is no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health and that neither Honolulu hospital – Queens Medical Center or Kapiolani Medical Center – has any record that Obama was born there.



Read more: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1BS514zoZ

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: whork25 on January 19, 2011, 02:04:38 AM
Who cares he could be from Mars for all i care its his politics that matters
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2011, 05:20:17 AM
Yes it does matter.    Its a requirement directly in the US Const.   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Kazan on January 19, 2011, 05:44:42 AM
Who cares he could be from Mars for all i care its his politics that matters

The village idiot speaks ::)
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 05:46:40 AM
who cares if its a long or short form of a BC..just provide it for heavens sake
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: whork25 on January 19, 2011, 05:51:41 AM
The village idiot speaks ::)

SO i guess you care more from where he is from than his politics?
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2011, 05:52:10 AM
who cares if its a long or short form of a BC..just provide it for heavens sake


Because the COLB is likely total bullshit as we said and a long form BC may not exist since he possibly was born in Kenya like the grandmother said.    
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2011, 05:52:47 AM
SO i guess you care more from where he is from than his politics?

Its a direct requirement in the US Const.   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Kazan on January 19, 2011, 05:56:32 AM
SO i guess you care more from where he is from than his politics?

What don't you understand? Is it that hard for you to comprehend that it is a CONSTITUTIONAL requirement that you be a natural born citizen to become the POTUS?  It would be ILLEGAL for Obama to hold the office if he is not, therefore any legislation he signed would be ILLEGAL. But why let little things like that get in the way ::)
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: whork25 on January 19, 2011, 05:56:52 AM
Its a direct requirement in the US Const.   

Fair enough

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: whork25 on January 19, 2011, 05:57:35 AM
What don't you understand? Is it that hard for you to comprehend that it is a CONSTITUTIONAL requirement that you be a natural born citizen to become the POTUS?  It would be ILLEGAL for Obama to hold the office if he is not, therefore any legislation he signed would be ILLEGAL. But why let little things like that get in the way ::)

So you want to remove him from office then?
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Kazan on January 19, 2011, 05:58:40 AM
So you want to remove him from office then?

If it can be proven that he is not a natural born citizen of the US then your damn right I want him removed
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 05:59:26 AM
So you want to remove him from office then?

if he refuses or cannot produce one HELL YEA
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: whork25 on January 19, 2011, 06:03:42 AM
If it can be proven that he is not a natural born citizen of the US then your damn right I want him removed

Ok cool
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2011, 06:10:07 AM
If it can be proven that he is not a natural born citizen of the US then your damn right I want him removed

And I want him jailed if that is the case for KNOWINGLY pulling this scam as well as everyone else who helped cover it up.

________________________ ____________-

   Obama's records that are not released.

1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'not available'
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- 'not available'
8. Law practice client list -- Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published -- None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
13. Your Record of baptism-- Not released or 'not available'
14. Your Illinois State Senate records--'not available'
 
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2011, 06:15:56 AM
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 19, 2011, 06:18:31 AM

Because the COLB is likely total bullshit as we said and a long form BC may not exist since he possibly was born in Kenya like the grandmother said.   

1) I agree with the birthers lol...

2)  However, to argue with you, as we do here...

You trust the word of an elderly foreigner (with potentially an ax to grind) over the word of a sane and stable governor of one of the United States? 

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2011, 06:23:08 AM
1) I agree with the birthers lol...

2)  However, to argue with you, as we do here...

You trust the word of an elderly foreigner (with potentially an ax to grind) over the word of a sane and stable governor of one of the United States? 


_______________________-

No, I am going based upon the totality of the available facts and circumstances.     

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2011, 06:26:03 AM
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: George Whorewell on January 19, 2011, 06:41:10 AM
I would send him to Guntanamo and have him waterboarded until he admitted being responsible for 911, Oklahoma City, the BP oil spill and the financial meltdown of 2008.

I suspect that Obama is a manchurian candidate who was brainwashed by the illuminati and inserted into the White House.

On an unrelated note, there's a late 60's interracial couple that comes by my job occasionally. I never knew they were married and found it quite amusing when yesterday the guy started shooting the breeze with me about politics. It turns out he's a republican who voted for McCain and his wife is an Obama cheerleader. I'll let you guess which one is black.

So anyway, the guy starts cracking jokes about Obama because his wife is there and she starts getting pissed off. He ends with this exchange-- Who owns the white house? I Dunno. The American people right? Yeah, that makes sense. Well, the American people= the public. So Obama's dream of living in public housing has been fulfilled. LOL - His black wife got so pissed off she left him there and refused to walk with him on the way home. I didn't really get the joke, but the whole situation was hysterical.

The guy is very intelligent, witty, an engineer by trade and a freemason ( he spent one morning explaining how he doesn't drink blood and why the conspiracy theories are ridiculous). His wife always seems to be pissed off, has a scowl on her face-- but is very polite.

Strange pair and a very American couple.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: whork25 on January 19, 2011, 06:43:47 AM
Who owns the white house? I Dunno. The American people right? Yeah, that makes sense. Well, the American people= the public. So Obama's dream of living in public housing has been fulfilled. LOL - His black wife got so pissed off she left him there and refused to walk with him on the way home. I didn't really get the joke, but the whole situation was hysterical.
 :D
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: loco on January 19, 2011, 06:57:00 AM
Cool!  I was born in Venezuela, and I can be president of the USA?    ;D
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 225for70 on January 19, 2011, 07:23:34 AM
Congress will probably pass a bill retroactively allowing foreigners to run for president. :'(

 
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 07:24:34 AM
Congress will probably pass a bill retroactively allowing foreigners to run for president. :'(

 

that wouldn't surprise me in the least
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 225for70 on January 19, 2011, 07:27:49 AM
that wouldn't surprise me in the least

Look at the brightside...We can have Arnold Schwarzenegger run in 2012..  :-\
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 07:29:48 AM
Look at the brightside...We can have Arnold Schwarzenegger run in 2012..  :-\


 :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: FarRightLooney on January 19, 2011, 09:58:34 AM
ObamaFact from www.theobamafile.com
AXJ-Action For Justice International Forum has a thread entitled, "Obama’s COLB was never accepted by the Hawaii Registrar!," that has some very interesting stuff related to the bogus Obama Certification of Live Birth (COLB) that was provided to the Daily Kos and others  by the Obama Campaign.

Obama’s COLB has only been "filed" but never "accepted."  AXJ contends that if it hasn’t been accepted, it’s not certified or official according to the State of Hawaii.

Notice the lower left hand corner for the wording "Filed" or "Accepted" in this side by side comparison of two officially certified "Accepted" Hawaiian COLB’s with Obama’s unofficial "Filed."

Here is the Hawaii statutes on the "FILED" and "ACCEPTED" on the COLB: -- see sections 11-1-4(d) and 11-1-28.

The statute specifically states that the date of filing is the date that a document is "RECEIVED" at the Department of Health office.  Obama’s information was received or "FILED" on Aug. 8, 1961, according to his COLB.  It has never been "ACCEPTED" by the Registrar.  Obama’s COLB is still being "MAINTAINED"  -- awaiting acceptance by the Hawaii State Registrar.
(http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/COLBNotAccepted.jpg)
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 21, 2011, 12:20:12 PM
Newly elected Hawaii Governor claims "glitch" in getting Obama birth certificate
KETK (nbc) Tyler, TX ^ | January 20, 2011 | Bob Brackeen - News Anchor Reporter




After vowing to provide proof Obama was born in Hawaii, newly elected Dem. Gov. Neil Abercrombie, beats around the bush in Honolulu newspaper article about a "long form" birth certificate.

East Texans talk-back...click link for the amazing "MUST SEE" video


(Excerpt) Read more at ketknbc.com ...
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 21, 2011, 01:05:29 PM
Hawaii governor claims record of Obama's birth 'exists in archives' but can't produce the vital document

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 3:32 PM on 20th January 2011

Comments (0) Add to My Stories .



 
Governor Neil Abercrombie is facing renewed pressure over Obama's Hawaiin origins

Pressure was mounting on Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie today amid increasing confusion over whether President Obama was born there.

Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.

He told Honolulu's Star-Advertiser: 'It actually exists in the archives, written down,' he said.

But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.

And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

He said efforts were still being made to track down definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii.

Abercrombie was asked: 'You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama's birth certificate. How is that coming?'

He acknowledged the birth certificate issue would  have 'political implications' for the next presidential election 'that we simply cannot have'.

 
President Obama on a visit to Hickam Air Force Base in Honolulu in December. The issue of trying to prove he was born in Hawaii rumbles on

'It's a matter of principle with me,' the 72-year-old said. 'I knew his mum and dad. I was here when he was born. Anybody who wants to ask a question honestly could have had their answer already.'

Birthers insist Obama, born in 1961, is not eligible to be commander in chief. The reasons often vary, and have changed and expanded in the two years since the Internet rumour began.

 
The beauty of Hawaii, but there is still a cloud hanging over Obama's birthright

Some believe his Certification of Live Birth is fake and he was really born in Kenya. Others argue that Obama is a citizen of the United Kingdom or Indonesia. Most theories have been dismissed by many in public office and the media, and have been found to be misleading or generally untrue.

However, the conspiracy theories still thrive, and according to Abercrombie, are likely to continue despite whatever evidence that shows him to be a proper U.S. citizen.

'You're not going to convince those people because they have a political agenda, or they have minds that go in that kind of direction,' he told CNN. 'Conspiratorial theorists are never going to be satisfied. This has gone into another area of political attack.'

And he again promised he would do 'what I can do' to publicly verify that records show Obama was born in Hawaii and is a citizen of the United States, making him eligible to be President.

 The Governor vowed when he took office in December that he would do his best to end the debate over Obama's birth, which began in 2008 during the presidential campaign.

'We'll do what we can as quickly as we can to make it inevitable that only those who wish the President ill, only the ones with a political agenda, will be the ones doing this kind of thing,' he said at the time. 'The President is entitled to the respect of his office and he's entitled to have his mother and father respected.'

During that interview, Abercrombie said his goal to combat birthers was a personal one.



________________________ _____________________



Ha ha ha ha-  BIRTHERS OF A NATION PROVEN CORRECT.   

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: The Showstoppa on January 21, 2011, 01:16:02 PM
What an assclown....perhaps he should have looked into this before saying he would provide it.....hahaha
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 21, 2011, 01:17:39 PM
What an assclown....perhaps he should have looked into this before saying he would provide it.....hahaha

He is helping he Birthers!
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: The Showstoppa on January 21, 2011, 01:20:54 PM
He is helping he Birthers!

haha, I know.....and you just know Obama would love to smack him.  If this lingers, which it most likely will, it will be great to see in 2012 for comedic relief.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 21, 2011, 01:25:01 PM
This fool is making the Birthers' main claim!   

the main clam is that there is no long form BC  - this has been the main claim from day 1 and all the fools screamed at the birthers.  now it turns out the birthers were right!   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 21, 2011, 01:28:55 PM
333386,

Are u a birther?.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 21, 2011, 01:31:20 PM
333386,

Are u a birther?.

Right now - Yes.   The only reservation I have is the newspaper announcement.       
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 21, 2011, 01:49:42 PM
Right now - Yes.   The only reservation I have is the newspaper announcement.       

have people come fwd with an actual hard copy of the paper?  or is it just some microfiche? Or something really cool made with publisher? 

OR did Barry Oreto just steal this barrack guy's name? 

What's the deal?  I'm trying to talk my parents into voting bachmann, but I need something solid here :)
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 21, 2011, 01:53:59 PM
have people come fwd with an actual hard copy of the paper?  or is it just some microfiche? Or something really cool made with publisher? 

OR did Barry Oreto just steal this barrack guy's name? 

What's the deal?  I'm trying to talk my parents into voting bachmann, but I need something solid here :)

Micofiche only so far.   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 21, 2011, 02:01:59 PM
Micofiche only so far.   

why do you think the repubs - even the tea party ones who agree with the birthers - are scared to enact legislation requiring a person to provide long-form in order to run for president?

I mean, if one simple bill like that could cripple his 2012 chances entirely - why are they dicking around with symbolic bills?

And I doubt it's because "the lamestream media will mock them".  That's weak.  They got elected bashing the mainstream media - and suddenly they bow to them?  Nope.




Why won't the far-right repubs enact legislation on this?
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: loco on January 22, 2011, 04:33:42 AM
You all need to give Obama a break already!

Obama was born in Egypt.[1]  He arrived at the shores of Hawaii as a baby, inside a floating papyrus basket coated with tar and pitch.[2]  Obama became the leader of the most powerful Western nation so that he can tell the West "White Devil, let my people go."  So in the end, Obama will leave the West with his people, the Muslims, and they will all return to the Middle East and Africa.[3]


Sources and References:

1. loco
2. loco
3. loco
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 06:32:17 AM
1st... 333, how the fuck do you get past the fact that his birth in Hawaii was announced in a Hawaiian newspaper for that time that anybody can do down and look up at the library? 

2nd... His birth certificate is confirmed valid by a Governor of the state...

3rd... WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HAS BEEN REQUIRED TO SHOW MORE THAN THE FUCKING GODDAMNED FUCKING GODDAMNED FUCKING FACT THAT HE WAS FUCKING BORN IN AMERICA?

END THIS TOPIC JACKASSES.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 06:36:08 AM
They only certified the COLB. 
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 06:36:56 AM
I've never banned a topic from being talked about here, but it's getting dang close with this one.  This is fucking retarded and I fucking hate Obama so it's not like I'm covering for him.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 06:38:12 AM
You know what, this is CT pure and simple....  You guys are proposing that there is some concerted effort to withhold info on Obama's birth cirt that would require several people to be involved... That's a major conspiracy.

moved...
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 22, 2011, 06:43:03 AM
LOL!

Even Fox news is in on it, hugo!

all the states, all the dems AND republicans.

Luckily, there was one brave getbigger named 333386 who was able to overcome so many questions, and take the word of an aging kenyan grandmother, over that of our entire US govt.

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 06:50:04 AM
WHY THE FUCK WAS THIS MOVED TO CT?   THIS IS NOT A CT - ITS AN ISSUE THE GOV OF HAWAII PUT HIMSELF IN T.   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 06:52:12 AM
LOL!

Even Fox news is in on it, hugo!

all the states, all the dems AND republicans.

Luckily, there was one brave getbigger named 333386 who was able to overcome so many questions, and take the word of an aging kenyan grandmother, over that of our entire US govt.



240 - eve you are a birther.   why is that? 
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 06:53:47 AM
LOL!

Even Fox news is in on it, hugo!

all the states, all the dems AND republicans.

Luckily, there was one brave getbigger named 333386 who was able to overcome so many questions, and take the word of an aging kenyan grandmother, over that of our entire US govt.


this shit just amazes me...  I would like 3333 to answer my last question: when was the last time a presidential candidate was required to show more than the fact that he was born here?  That's all that's required by the constitution, then by fucking all gods it's good enough for me...  

What these guys are trying to find is some stupid line on the long form that shows his father wrote his religion down as mulsim or some shit.  So they can use it in the election.

I don't want to see Obama make a second term.  I want him to lose.  But I will have nothing to do with gay ass retards that push this point.  SIMPLY PUT, THEY ARE ACTING AGAINST THE SPIRIT OF THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


PS. 240, did you see my thread about Bill Maher, kittens and glocks, I thought you might get a laugh out of it ;D
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 06:58:14 AM
Hawaii law bars release of Obama birth info (Abercrombie silenced by Barry)
ap ^ | 1/22/2011 | MARK NIESSE




________________________ ____________-

 


HONOLULU – A privacy law that shields birth certificates has prompted Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie to abandon efforts to dispel claims that President Barack Obama was born outside Hawaii, his office says.

State Attorney General David Louie told the governor that privacy laws bar him from disclosing an individual's birth documentation without the person's consent, Abercrombie spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz said Friday.




(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: andreisdaman on January 22, 2011, 07:09:11 AM
Yes it does matter.    Its a requirement directly in the US Const.   

DUDE!!!!..Don't u think the FBI and all these other agencies who investigate and vet EVERYONE who runs for president haven' t checked into Obama's background????..or are they in on the conspiracy as well????

YOU ARE CERTIFIABLY NUTS!!!!!
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 07:10:55 AM
worse than the moon landing hoax believers....  3333, BWHAHAHAHahahahahahahaha ha
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 07:11:39 AM
DUDE!!!!..Don't u think the FBI and all these other agencies who investigate and vet EVERYONE who runs for president haven' t checked into Obama's background????..or are they in on the conspiracy as well????

YOU ARE CERTIFIABLY NUTS!!!!!

Why?  Can you tell me where the Long form BC is like everyone else in that state has?  

And why has he spent over $1 million dollars keeping his records silent?    
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 07:13:55 AM
worse than the moon landing hoax believers....  3333, BWHAHAHAHahahahahahahaha ha

HUGO - CAN YOU EXPLAIN THIS?

________________________ _____________________

Obama's records that are not released.
1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'not available'
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- 'not available'
8. Law practice client list -- Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published -- None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
13. Your Record of baptism-- Not released or 'not available'
14. Your Illinois State Senate records--'not available'
 
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: andreisdaman on January 22, 2011, 07:16:18 AM
Why?  Can you tell me where the Long form BC is like everyone else in that state has?  

And why has he spent over $1 million dollars keeping his records silent?    
[/quoted



what difference does it really make to u???...if they found it you would just say it was fake or forged anyway...your mind just cannot accept that a black man is president, but you can't say that outright so you try to delegitimize him another way under the guise of being a patriot standing up for the constitution....
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 07:16:52 AM
BORN IN THE USA?


http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:SstYs_6unl0J:www.wnd.com/?pageId=105347%20obama%20long%20form%20birth%20certificate&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us



Unveiled! Hawaii's 1961 long-form birth certificates
Real documents include name of doctor, hospital

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: July 28, 2009
9:35 pm Eastern


By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily



Eleanor Nordyke displays photostats of her twin daughters' birth certificates (Courtesy Honolulu Advertiser)
Images of two 1961 Hawaii birth certificates similar to the one President Obama purportedly has on file have now been unveiled.

The Honolulu Advertiser published photostats of the original long-form birth certificates of twin daughters born to Eleanor Nordyke at Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital Aug. 5, 1961, one day after Obama was supposedly born at the same facility.

The Nordykes' certificates include information missing from the short-form document for Obama published online, including the name of the hospital, the name of the attending physician, name and address of the parents, the race of the parents and the race of the baby.

As WND reported yesterday, Hawaii's director of health responded to the growing controversy over the White House's refusal to release Obama's original long-form birth certificate by issuing a statement about the document in apparent contravention of Hawaiian law.

(Story continues below)

 
      


Dr. Chiyome Fukino declared she has seen the "original birth records" that verify Obama was born in Hawaii and is a "natural-born American citizen," the Honolulu Advertiser reported.

Join in WND's Fedex campaign and tell Obama you don't buy his state-run media coverup!

But in two separate telephone interviews with WND, Janice Okubo, the health department's public information officer, told WND that Hawaii law prohibited her from commenting on the birth records of any specific person.

WND also reported the Hawaii Department of Heath affirmed that no paper birth certificate records were destroyed when the department moved to electronic record-keeping in 2001.


Photostat of Susan Nordyke's 1961 Hawaii birth certificate (Courtesy Honolulu Advertiser)

The statement to WND by Janice Okubo, public information officer for state's health department, contradicted CNN U.S. President Jon Klein, who ordered host Lou Dobbs to quit discussing Obama's birth certificate on the air. Klein insisted the issue was "dead" because Obama's original long-form birth certificate had been destroyed by the Hawaii DOH in the conversion to electronic files.

A close examination of the birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins shows the registration number precedes the number given Obama, even though the future president was born a day earlier.

Susan Nordyke was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time and was given No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

Gretchen Nordyke followed at 2:17 p.m. and was given No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

According to a version of Obama's purported short-form certificate available from FactCheck.org, Obama was given a higher registration number than the Nordyke twins. The online image indicates the number is No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.

The middle figure in Obama's purported registration also is different than the Nordykes'. Obama's is 1961, indicating the year, while the Nordykes' is merely 61.

One explanation for the out-of-order serial numbers might be that several serialized stacks of birth certificates were made available at different hospitals.

Another possibility is that Obama's number is not a genuine registration number created in 1961 but was issued when the short-form document was generated during the 2008 presidential campaign.

Eleanor Nordyke told WND she thinks her twins got lower numbers because she went into the hospital Aug. 4, 1961, and was in labor for 20 hours before she delivered. She speculates that Ann Dunham came in after her and was given a later number, even though Dunham's baby was born earlier. Nordyke's twins were not born until the afternoon of the next day.

WND was unable to receive a response from Hawaii officials regarding the state's procedure for issuing registration numbers.

Meanwhile, an image of an apparently fraudulent Kenyan certificate of birth circulated on the Web today from an unknown source. It alleged Obama was born in Mombasa. But a contributor at FreeRepublic.com debunked it, declaring "Busted!"

He pointed out that the background text, in Dutch, explained, in a rough translation, "This is not a government document. This is political commentary."

It's not just Obama's original birth certificate at issue. WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

Note: Members of the news media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, Joseph Farah, Joe Kovacs, Chelsea Schilling, Les Kinsolving or Bob Unruh on this issue, please contact WND.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 07:18:45 AM
Why?  Can you tell me where the Long form BC is like everyone else in that state has?  

And why has he spent over $1 million dollars keeping his records silent?    
[/quoted

what difference does it really make to u???...if they found it you would just say it was fake or forged anyway...your mind just cannot accept that a black man is president, but you can't say that outright so you try to delegitimize him another way under the guise of being a patriot standing up for the constitution....


Ha haha - - I would prefer Mike Tomlin, Willie Randolph, George Jefferson, Fred Sanford, or even Beetlejuice as POTUS over Bama any day.   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 07:22:49 AM
HUGO - CAN YOU EXPLAIN THIS?
333, I fucking asked you first and didn't get an answer from you...  Why the fuck should I answer your questions when you ignore mine?  Fucking courtesy dude... Don't go demanding questions be answered when you are unwilling to answer yourself.  Back up a few posts and answer mine and I will answer yours.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 07:24:26 AM
333, I fucking asked you first and didn't get an answer from you...  Why the fuck should I answer your questions when you ignore mine?  Fucking courtesy dude... Don't go demanding questions be answered when you are unwilling to answer yourself.  Back up a few posts and answer mine and I will answer yours.


I said I'm a 51% birther - not a 99% birther.   The article in the paper is my only hestitation on the CT, otherwise, there are some crazythings surrounding this issue which you really should not just dismiss.   

 
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 07:26:56 AM
Corsi said he has gone to all the hospitals in Hawaii and not one has a damn thing.   


Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 07:27:02 AM

I said I'm a 51% birther - not a 99% birther.   The article in the paper is my only hestitation on the CT, otherwise, there are some crazythings surrounding this issue which you really should not just dismiss.   

 
bullshit, that doesn't remotely answer my questions.  Please answer these questions and I will address yours:

1st... 333, how the fuck do you get past the fact that his birth in Hawaii was announced in a Hawaiian newspaper for that time that anybody can do down and look up at the library? 

2nd... His birth certificate is confirmed valid by a Governor of the state...

3rd... WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HAS BEEN REQUIRED TO SHOW MORE THAN THE FUCKING GODDAMNED FUCKING GODDAMNED FUCKING FACT THAT HE WAS FUCKING BORN IN AMERICA?

END THIS TOPIC JACKASSES.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 07:37:33 AM
bullshit, that doesn't remotely answer my questions.  Please answer these questions and I will address yours:


1.   I agree that the article in the paper tends to undermine the CT.   

2.   BULLSHIT.   They certified a COLB with is complete nonsense.   They did not certify the Long Form BC.    posted what  real BC looks like from someone born the same day as Barry.   Where is his like this?   

3.   Because we have never had a person elected under such dubious circumstances.   

BTW  I personally think Obama was hatched anyway.   

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 08:09:15 AM
1.   I agree that the article in the paper tends to undermine the CT.   

2.   BULLSHIT.   They certified a COLB with is complete nonsense.   They did not certify the Long Form BC.    posted what  real BC looks like from someone born the same day as Barry.   Where is his like this?   

3.   Because we have never had a person elected under such dubious circumstances.   

BTW  I personally think Obama was hatched anyway.   


Ok, I have to stop at number 2 until we get this settled...  So you're telling me, when the last governor, a republican, certified that the birth cirt was real, she was full of shit?
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 08:31:06 AM
Ok, I have to stop at number 2 until we get this settled...  So you're telling me, when the last governor, a republican, certified that the birth cirt was real, she was full of shit?

All she certified was the COLB and what it says.

Basically she certified that the State of Hawaii says that the COLB states that Obama was born in Hawaii.   But look at that COLB - it says nothing at all.   Look at the long form BC I posted from the lady born the same day and compare to the COLB.         
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 08:49:38 AM
All she certified was the COLB and what it says.

Basically she certified that the State of Hawaii says that the COLB states that Obama was born in Hawaii.   But look at that COLB - it says nothing at all.   Look at the long form BC I posted from the lady born the same day and compare to the COLB.         
Here's your problem buddy... In Hawaii, in 1961, this is the way it went down.  The hospital took their new birth certs to vital records.  At the end of the week vital records provided that info to the newspaper.  That is how he ended up in the newspaper.  THE HOSPITAL PROVIDED INFO THAT HE WAS BORN THERE TO VITAL RECORDS WHO THEN PASSED IT ON TO THE NEWSPAPER AT THE END OF THE WEEK...

You have got to be kidding me if you're going to take this past this shit... For real?
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 08:57:12 AM
I read that tthe grand parents were the ones who put it in the newspaper.   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 09:10:57 AM
I read that tthe grand parents were the ones who put it in the newspaper.   
cockgobblins...  The only thing they could have done is request that it not be put in the paper and that might have been harder to do back then than it is now. If they didn't say anything about it, it would have been put in the paper.  The only effect mother or father or anybody related could have had is to prevent it from being in the paper.  They were all announced at that time.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 09:19:29 AM
cockgobblins...  The only thing they could have done is request that it not be put in the paper and that might have been harder to do back then than it is now. If they didn't say anything about it, it would have been put in the paper.  The only effect mother or father or anybody related could have had is to prevent it from being in the paper.  They were all announced at that time.

What about the relatives, Kenyan officials, etc who all say they witnessed Obama's kenyan birth?   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 10:01:00 AM
What about the relatives, Kenyan officials, etc who all say they witnessed Obama's kenyan birth?   
I think I'm going to take the facts we have over hopeful relatives that could and probably are embellishing the story.  From their perspective, they probably do want to claim him as being born there.  For them it's probably huge.  It's also probably embellishment.  Embellishment that some people in America are fully willing to latch onto for political purposes...

I was willing to dick around with the fact that McCain was born in Panama but I wouldn't have kept that up after he was elected.  In the end, both Obama and McCain were raised from youth in America.  I got no personal bitch past that.  Obama's mom was American.  I'm way way cool with that.  Now if we were talking about both parents being from another country, it might be an issue for me... But as I see the facts now, this birther crap is a fucking stupid endeavour.



Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 10:02:41 AM
I think I'm going to take the facts we have over hopeful relatives that could and probably are embellishing the story.  From their perspective, they probably do want to claim him as being born there.  For them it's probably huge.  It's also probably embellishment.  Embellishment that some people in America are fully willing to latch onto for political purposes...

I was willing to dick around with the fact that McCain was born in Panama but I wouldn't have kept that up after he was elected.  In the end, both Obama and McCain were raised from youth in America.  I got no personal bitch past that.  Obama's mom was American.  I'm way way cool with that.  Now if we were talking about both parents being from another country, it might be an issue for me... But as I see the facts now, this birther crap is a fucking stupid endeavour.






Birthers of a nation unite!     
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 10:26:10 AM

Birthers of a nation unite!     
well, at least you finally admit it... forever you tried to play it like you were not a birther and at the same time post shit about it.  I fucking hate deception and hypocrisy.  At least we know where you stand now.  No more denying you're a birther lol...
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 22, 2011, 10:33:18 AM
well, at least you finally admit it... forever you tried to play it like you were not a birther and at the same time post shit about it.  I fucking hate deception and hypocrisy.  At least we know where you stand now.  No more denying you're a birther lol...

yes, his claim I'm 51% birther" reeks of a lack of balls.  he posts dozens of birther articles each week and claims he doesn't subscribe to that belief.  Doesn't work like that.

glad to see he admits it.


me, i think it shuld be investigated - just like 9/11 and a few other things that people only want to look at if it matches their party preferense.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 10:36:32 AM
yes, his claim I'm 51% birther" reeks of a lack of balls.  he posts dozens of birther articles each week and claims he doesn't subscribe to that belief.  Doesn't work like that.

glad to see he admits it.


me, i think it shuld be investigated - just like 9/11 and a few other things that people only want to look at if it matches their party preferense.

1.   I think someone spending a 1 Million to cover up what can be released for $5 smells of shady shit.

2.  Hospital has no records of his birth.

3.   Kenyn releatives say he was african born.   MO even said so.   

4.  He is also hiding a lot of other shit.           
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: andreisdaman on January 22, 2011, 10:39:51 AM

Birthers of a nation unite!     

Dude, lost birth certificates or mistakes concerning birth certificates in this nation are more common than you think..especially from the days before computers.....I myself have whats called a "certificate of birth"..not a true "birth certificate"....my original was lost in a fire....NY State gave my mom a replacement "certificate of birth" stating that I was born in NY State, but could not give us a copy of the original...they didn't have it..

second....my father-in-law was born in the mountains in Puerto Rico in the 1920's.... and is a U.S. citizen by birth....but the records office was in a rural area and burned down many years ago,,,before the time of computers.....He could not prove for many years that he was a citizen though he lived in NY city for 40  a years....my wife had to go through a hell of a time writing all over the place to get proof..finally she had to travel to puerto rico to get someone to listen to her and finally get some kind of proof....

3333..stop this nonsense immediately!!!!!

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 10:43:32 AM
4.  He is also hiding a lot of other shit.          
Good gods I fucking hope so....  We probably all have a few fuckups to hide. Last thing I want in office is some clown that led a perfect life with no experience or hardship.  Maybe he has some shit to hide.  good...  I'll take that over the pampered bitch raised for office.

That being said, I still give his ass an F grade at this point.....
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 10:54:38 AM
I guess this is just obamanomicsat work again:    spend a million dollars in legal fees to over what up wh can be released for $5     
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: andreisdaman on January 22, 2011, 10:55:06 AM
Good gods I fucking hope so....  We probably all have a few fuckups to hide. Last thing I want in office is some clown that led a perfect life with no experience or hardship.  Maybe he has some shit to hide.  good...  I'll take that over the pampered bitch raised for office.

That being said, I still give his ass an F grade at this point.....

you were sounding rational until you gave O an F grade
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 11:53:30 AM
you were sounding rational until you gave O an F grade
Ok, I give him a "I wanna punch him in the face for being an idiot" grade  Is that better?  That's a step higher than, "I wanna stomp on Bush's head" lol....

It's just sarcasm for the NWO powertripping prison planet watchdogs.....  

Don't blackbag me bro..... :D
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2011, 11:57:52 AM
Obama X marks the spot

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-x-marks-spot.html




I'm going to whisper this, because I do not want Democrat Neil Abercrombie to figure this out nor Chris Matthews.........or even that Obamanazi Ann Coulter who investigated and certified Obama, before it is too late.

The too late part is Abercrombie has been digging around in Obama's records, and has let slip that there is no Certificate Of Live Birth or COLB, exactly as that Democratic kid who was on WND said there was not, and proving the point what Birthers stated all long that Obama is undocumented, in he could not enroll in grade school in Hawaii, because he has no legitimate nor legal birth certificate.

To repeat this point so even Sean Hannity gets it, THE BIRTHERS HAVE BEEN PROVEN CORRECT.

What this blog is going to expose though in exclusive is what I'm whispering about, and what Neil Abercrombie has no idea of in what he just exposed.

Only here was it exposed how the communists of America overthrew the Republican form of Government of Alaska for this Obama Marxism, in how they set upon a path of "darkening up" Hawaii from a prosperous white conglomerate state to a welfare fraud state which was registering and STILL IS REGISTERING hundreds of thousands of foreign babies as Americans.

This is what the birth of Obama has been hiding, and was covered up by Alaskans from the RINO GOP and the Democratic left. There was for a generation a wholesale treachery against America and everyone in government, hospitals and business was in on it.
Illegals brought in welfare revenues and brought in increased populations so Hawaii received more power in Congress. It was treacherousness wholesale and if Hawaii admits it, their leaders are going to prison or going to be hung.

That is what Abercrombie blundered into, in his Obama's birth was recorded statement.

See for a legal birth anywhere, just like in a legal death, a medical professional with a witness must certify the document is correct. That means in criminal court terms that people are putting their freedom and job security on the line, if they lie, they go to prison.

Doctors for these illegals were not about to certify that these babies were born in Hawaii when they were birthed elsewhere or in some pineapple patch, because doing so would have if this ring had ever been disclosed by an FBI investigation wholesale treason against these United States.

The alternative then therefore was for these "don't ask don't tell" registrations by family members or some union thugs in everyone knew that Sung Lee Wong was not an infant at 2 years old born in Hawaii, but was a 2 year old Cantonese border buster, but her name was recorded by the State of Hawaii as a citizen, because all that took was a clerk being told to look the other way by their higher ups, and the word of someone committing perjury and fraud about this baby.

That is waht Abercrombie revealed in the "recorded list". Hawaii has a separated list which this dupnik apparently was not aware of in order to bypass normal American registrations so doctors were not on the legal hook, and these foreign born infants could just be dumped into the system as Hawaii was not going to ask and no one there was going to tell in this corrupt intrastate system.

Barack Hussein Obama is ON THE SEPERATED LIST and not on the American born list.

I know there are dozens of officials in Hawaii whose eyes squeezed tightly shut, their guts tied up in knots and they groaned, "What the hell did Abercrombie say that for!", because the insiders in the system know what this dupnik has just exposed.

This blog exclusively laid out the scenario in which Barry II was most likely born in Canada on free health care in 1961 on a cross border baby dump by Ann Dunham. What the logic confirms now in what Abercrombie blurted out is Barack Hussein Obama jr. was not born in these United States in any shape or form.
As deduced originally, if Obama was born in Washington State where Mama Obama was recorded in 1961 of August, he would have been recorded as such as an American. There are not two birth recordings known of Barrry II in America, so therefore that mean that Obama was registered by Madelyn Dunham with Stanley Ann out of the country.............it is that or there is the original scenario that Madelyn was impregnated by Uncle Frank Davis, had the baby in a pineapple patch, registered the child on the sly and dumped him onto Barack sr. in exchange for sex rite and a financial settlement, which would explain how Barack sr. was affording his lifestyle.

That becomes more complicated than necessary as I really do not care who bedded who, as B. Hussein IS a fraudulent registration no matter what now, and the likely scenario as proven by Abercrombie is Barry II was born outside America due to his recorded on the undocumented list papers.

This was all public knowledge and I just am stunned that egg head Abercrombie the intellectual was not warned off on this as that fraud GOP skirt governor knew enough to cover this all up. So that brings up the questions of is Abercrombie a Clinton operative mixing the pot the way Rahm Emanuel is in Chicago as someone had to have told this dupnik what in the Obama was going on.

That is the exclusive though on this records list as it is seperate obviously from normal lists which have birth certificates and it is why Hawaii was coming up with the fraudulent statements that the records were destroyed. It was all a cover for their corrupt importing of illegals, as there never were records for these anchor babies who are not Americans, but the story was manufactured to keep people out of prison.
The problem though was Obama was installed into the White House after stealing the 2008 elections, and was too stupid to commit fraud and print up a counterfeit birth certificate.

Barry Obama just does not have any balls. He commits the biggest damned fraud in world history, has others perjure themselves, break piles of laws, and this dink would not go out and have his sister print up a birth certificate on a college printer.

That is about as wussy as it comes.

Thankfully though now Neil Abercrombie has gone on record in stating there is no COLB. Broken here, Obama is on a recorded list which would mean others are there of the same birth problems, and that means Hawaii has an entire record of every fraudulent border buster there.

Ann Coulter, you now not only look like you need to eat some steak, but you look like the absolute fool you are in backing Obama and smearing Birthers.

Sean Hannity, you care to finally address this reality as it is a real national security issue now, and you have just been certified wrong in Obama is not an American, but is a product of fraud.

For the real record, Barack Hussein Obama is a foreign secular Kenyan Indonesian Muslim, who knowingly committed espionage against America. This secular Muslim has looted the US Treasury of a known 13 plus trillion dollars, collapsed the economy, left Americans holding the bag on 100 trillion in insurance defaults...........and he been engaged in inter Muslim tribal warfare as he has his fingers on America's shrinking nuclear weapons stockpiles as he gives Russia and China the lead in nuclear warfare.

Chris Matthews and Ed Koch..........did you get all of that? Barack Obama just doesn't have a mental connection with Americans, but has a legal disconnect and that is why all his policies seem to reflect of something written in Peking.

The Governor of Hawaii, a Democrat, states there is no COLB for Obama and that Obama is on a separate list of other recorded names.

The Birthers have been absolutely right on this and have just been proven correct in Obama is undocumented and foreign born.
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 22, 2011, 03:56:24 PM
1.   I think someone spending a 1 Million to cover up what can be released for $5 smells of shady shit.
2.  Hospital has no records of his birth.
3.   Kenyn releatives say he was african born.   MO even said so.   
4.  He is also hiding a lot of other shit.           

Yet you don't want a 911 investigation - where 3000 folks died.

1. Bush gave them less than 14 mil to investigate the biggest crime in history.  but he gave them 60 mil to investigate steroids in baseball.

2. OBL isn't even wanted for 911.  One of the planes had no freakin' manifest!

3. People in other countries say it was an inside job.

4. Bush hid a lot of other shit.



Wow... applying the frail logic you applied... to 911... I guess you want to investigate that now too, huh?  ;)
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 22, 2011, 09:02:25 PM
Yet you don't want a 911 investigation - where 3000 folks died.

1. Bush gave them less than 14 mil to investigate the biggest crime in history.  but he gave them 60 mil to investigate steroids in baseball.

2. OBL isn't even wanted for 911.  One of the planes had no freakin' manifest!

3. People in other countries say it was an inside job.

4. Bush hid a lot of other shit.



Wow... applying the frail logic you applied... to 911... I guess you want to investigate that now too, huh?  ;)
"D'OH!!!"--3333
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 23, 2011, 06:49:53 AM
Hawaii Ground Report: ( Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Legally Barry Soetoro
The HillBuzz ^ | 1/23/2011 6:52:06 AM | Kevin DuJan



HAWAII GROUND REPORT: Could Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie not be as incompetent and foolish as he appears, but orchestrating a deliberate birth certificate recovery dead end to cover his own papakole? UPDATED: Mystery solved! Reason Obama will not release birth certificate is because his name is legally written “Barry Soetoro” on it


Here’s an interesting Ground Report from Hawaii that contains an ingenious theory about Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie’s bizarre backtrack on releasing Obama’s birth certificate.

Remember, Abercrombie promised that once he was elected Governor he would prove Obama’s birth certificate existed because he would march down to the Hall of Records and demand its production from the archives…and he would then hold it aloft in the gentle Hawaiian breeze, high above his balding pate, for all the world to see, thereby producing the document Obama has spent millions to keep hidden.


(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 23, 2011, 11:57:50 AM
O-CON DOCS: Hawaii Ballot Chief not Grandma, Called Obama To Hawaii In 2008
The Daily Pen ^ | 1/17/11 | by Pen Johannson




New analysis of Democrat Party's official 2008 Certification of Nominations for Obama reveals that reasons for his sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 were to visit more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian election laws, media accounts and post-dated documents reveal he may have attended a private hearing with the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer regarding his disqualification from the Hawaiian ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional eligibility.


(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: andreisdaman on January 23, 2011, 12:10:06 PM
O-CON DOCS: Hawaii Ballot Chief not Grandma, Called Obama To Hawaii In 2008
The Daily Pen ^ | 1/17/11 | by Pen Johannson




New analysis of Democrat Party's official 2008 Certification of Nominations for Obama reveals that reasons for his sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 were to visit more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian election laws, media accounts and post-dated documents reveal he may have attended a private hearing with the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer regarding his disqualification from the Hawaiian ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional eligibility.


(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...


please stop..you're making me laugh too hard
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 24, 2011, 09:01:41 AM
Hawaii Gov. Says Proof of Obama's Birth Certificate Exists but Hasn't Produced the Document
ABC News ^





Hawaii Gov. Says Proof of Obama's Birth Certificate Exists but Hasn't Produced the Document

'Birther' Says, 'If You Have It, Show It to Us'
 

By RUSSELL GOLDMAN and DEVIN DWYER Jan. 20,2011

Officials in Hawaii say they have located President Obama's birth certificate indicating that he was born in the state, but have yet to produce the document at the heart of a long-simmering conspiracy theory.

"Our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives written down," Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie told Honolulu's Star-Advertiser.

"What I can do, and all I have ever said, is that I am going to see to it as governor that I can verify to anyone who is honest about it that this is the case," he told the paper.

Abercrombie said the controversy over publicly producing the document "has a political implication for 2012 that we simply cannot have."

It remains unclear if the document found in the archives was Obama's actual long-form birth certificate, which "birther" activists have clamored for, or if it was simply a record that such a document exists.


(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 24, 2011, 12:42:19 PM
W.H.: 'Birthers' aren't 'rational'
Politico ^ | 1/24/2011 | MATT NEGRIN & MJ LEE




Here’s what you need to know from Monday’s (1/24/2011)White House briefing with press secretary Robert Gibbs:

-- Gibbs hinted that President Obama will talk about gun rights in his State of the Union address....

-- Gibbs snuck a jab at the so-called birthers who don’t believe Obama was born in Hawaii. “I think rational people have long ago, many when they first heard and saw the president, come to the conclusion of his citizenship,” he said.


(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


__________________


Where is the long form BC?   
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 24, 2011, 12:43:51 PM
Title: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: James on January 24, 2011, 03:40:57 PM
(From a radio interview) Mike Evans, of Hollywood Reporter, has been a friend of Gov. Abercrombie's for "decades". Evans spoke to him yesterday. "Neil and I spent a lot of time together during Obama's Inauguration. He promised me that he when he became Governor, he was going to cut thru all the BS and find absolute proof that "Barry" was born in Hawaii. Well, I spoke to him YESTERDAY and Abercrombie told me "He searched everywhere using his powers as governor, and... There is NO Barack Obama Birth Certificate in Hawaii ... absolutely no proof at all that Obama was born in Hawaii".



Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 24, 2011, 04:18:56 PM
The birthers aren't that crazy.  They want a legit investigation of a legal matter. 

There's a good chance the piece of paper says barry Oreto, or it says Muslim, or it has no dad listed, or something embarassing.

Or, there's a chance it doesn't exist.  At least that's what a gov is now telling us.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Dos Equis on January 24, 2011, 05:10:03 PM
Governor Abercrombie really made a fool of himself.  I was actually in favor of him putting an end to this stuff.  All he did was throw fuel on the fire for some CT. 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 24, 2011, 05:13:28 PM
Governor Abercrombie really made a fool of himself.  I was actually in favor of him putting an end to this stuff.  All he did was throw fuel on the fire for some CT. 

LOL at you not being a birther.

you're a total birther dude.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Dos Equis on January 24, 2011, 05:16:12 PM
LOL at you not being a birther.

you're a total birther dude.

 ::)
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 24, 2011, 06:31:00 PM
.

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate
World Net Daily ^ | Jan. 24, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi




Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.

Adams was employed at the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division from May 2008 through September 2008.

His position was senior elections clerk, overseeing a group of 50 to 60 employees responsible for verifying the identity of voters at the Absentee Ballot Office. It was in this capacity that Adams became aware of the search for Obama's birth-certificate records

SNIP

"My supervisor came and told me, 'Of course, there's no birth certificate. What? You stupid,'" Adams said. "She usually spoke well, but in saying this she reverted to a Hawaiian dialect. I really didn't know how to respond to that. She said it and just walked off. She was quite a powerful lady."


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Emmortal on January 24, 2011, 06:57:50 PM
Governor Abercrombie really made a fool of himself.  I was actually in favor of him putting an end to this stuff.  All he did was throw fuel on the fire for some CT. 

So instead of admitting that there is some relevance to the birthers claims you get angry at the guy who was going to put an end to it all?

Hahahaha, I never realized someone could be so damn retarded.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Fury on January 24, 2011, 07:04:17 PM
This is pretty interesting actually. Now whether or not anything comes of it is another question.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 24, 2011, 07:05:25 PM
That guy in the interview is pretty convincing.   Now lets see if the Gov denies it.   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Dos Equis on January 24, 2011, 07:39:34 PM
So instead of admitting that there is some relevance to the birthers claims you get angry at the guy who was going to put an end to it all?

Hahahaha, I never realized someone could be so damn retarded.

Not angry at all.  What he did was stupid.

And no, I don't need to admit there is any relevance to birthers claims.   ::)  This entire issue needs to go away.  It's silly. 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 24, 2011, 07:41:02 PM
BB - if it turns out that there is no BC, and that the COLB was created solely for the purpose of the 2008 election - you don't think that is serious?
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Dos Equis on January 24, 2011, 07:45:15 PM
BB - if it turns out that there is no BC, and that the COLB was created solely for the purpose of the 2008 election - you don't think that is serious?

No.  Unless he was born in Kenya.  I think he was born in Hawaii.  At this point, I think the only thing he's probably trying to hide is something on his BC like a Muslim religious affiliation. 

This birther stuff is nothing but rabbit trails.  I doubt we see any legitimate Republican presidential candidate raising this issue, because it would marginalize their candidacy.  This is a loser IMO.   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 24, 2011, 07:47:31 PM
Yeah but it makes great discussion.   Its like Clue. 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Dos Equis on January 24, 2011, 07:49:18 PM
Yeah but it makes great discussion.   Its like Clue. 

True.  It is good message board material.   :)
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: James on January 25, 2011, 07:04:47 AM
No.  Unless he was born in Kenya.  I think he was born in Hawaii.  At this point, I think the only thing he's probably trying to hide is something on his BC like a Muslim religious affiliation. 

This birther stuff is nothing but rabbit trails.  I doubt we see any legitimate Republican presidential candidate raising this issue, because it would marginalize their candidacy.  This is a loser IMO.   

Cant be that, as there is no space on the Birth Certificate asking (stating) for the child's religious affiliation, and or the parents religious affiliation.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 25, 2011, 07:06:18 AM
Cant be that, as there is no space on the Birth Certificate asking (stating) for the child's religious affiliation, and or the parents religious affiliation.


I really don't think he was born in a hospital.   Maybe he was born in the manger like Jesus of Nazareth?   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Kazan on January 25, 2011, 07:33:02 AM
How can there be no birth certificate? Seriously, I have needed my birth certificate on more than a few occasions.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: James on January 25, 2011, 07:38:22 AM
How can there be no birth certificate? Seriously, I have needed my birth certificate on more than a few occasions.

Good question, maybe this is the reason for all the $$ that is being spent, to keep all records related secret.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 25, 2011, 07:42:46 AM
How can there be no birth certificate? Seriously, I have needed my birth certificate on more than a few occasions.


Obama has 16 different SS Numbers attributed to him.     Look it up.    He has led a life of crime and deception from Day 1.     
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Parker on January 25, 2011, 07:48:17 AM
How can there be no birth certificate? Seriously, I have needed my birth certificate on more than a few occasions.
In order to have been registered for school, wouldn't he have needed his birth cert, and SSN?
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 25, 2011, 07:48:34 AM

Obama has 16 different SS Numbers attributed to him.     Look it up.    He has led a life of crime and deception from Day 1.    

the SS numbers are more disturbing than anything BC related, to be honest.

Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 25, 2011, 07:56:01 AM
In order to have been registered for school, wouldn't he have needed his birth cert, and SSN?

He has used many different names, SS numbers, alias, etc.   ,
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: James on January 25, 2011, 07:59:29 AM
the SS numbers are more disturbing than anything BC related, to be honest.



It is all distributing, including the fact that there seems to be a cover up taking place.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 25, 2011, 08:03:04 AM
Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
The Obama File ^ | Feb 1, 2010 | The Obama File





Private investigator Neil Sankey, using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Barack Obama’s name.

However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as: "Barak Obama," "Batock Obama," "Barok Obama," and "Barrack Obama." There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name. In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name.

Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided. Needless to say, there are also a slew of address and social security numbers connected to addresses in states that Obama has no known connection to.

In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042, and one starting 364.

In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999, which are not valid SSNs.

There are no addresses listed in New York where he attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485.

In Massachusetts -- where Obama attended Harvard Law School -- we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one. Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as: 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office. This Social Security number began with 282 and was verified by the government in 2008.

This mystery grows even stranger as other addresses and Social Security numbers for Barack Obama appear in a dozen other states not known to be connected to him. Again, I am excluding those records names not spelled exactly like his name.

Tennessee, one address with a Social Security number beginning with 427

Colorado, one address, with a Social Security number beginning with 456.

Utah, two addresses, with two Social Security numbers beginning with 901 and 799.

Missouri has one address and one Social Security number beginning with 999.

Florida has two addresses listed for his him, three if you count one listed as "Barry Obama." One is connected to a Social Security number beginning with 762.

In Georgia there are three addresses listed for him, all with different Social Security numbers: 579, 420, and 423.

In Texas there are four different addresses listed for him, one is connected to Social Security number 675.

There are two addresses listed for Barack Obama in Oregon and one address listed for him in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled "Barack Obama." In some cases, the middle initial "H" is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as: "Barac," "Barak," and "Barrack" Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.

Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.

Extracted from an article by Steve Baldwin. Read the whole thing here . . .

Susan Daniels, a second investigator filed an affidavit, with true and correct copies here, in the Barnett v. Obama case. Susan Daniels is a private investigator, licensed by the State of Ohio.

In her affidavit, Daniels states that she has located Barack Obama's Social Security Number. She states it was issued between 1977 and 1979 in the State of Connecticut. She states that it is the only Social Security Number Barack Obama ever used.

The number assigned to Barack Obama "appears to be associated with someone born in the year 1890."

Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Kazan on January 25, 2011, 08:06:09 AM
OK how does he manage  have 16 differnet SS#'s, no birth certificate that anyone has seen, and not only get through everyday life in the US but be elected to several different offices without anyone blinking an eye. I don't buy into the whole CT thing, but something isn't right here.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: James on January 25, 2011, 08:14:06 AM
OK how does he manage  have 16 differnet SS#'s, no birth certificate that anyone has seen, and not only get through everyday life in the US but be elected to several different offices without anyone blinking an eye. I don't buy into the whole CT thing, but something isn't right here.

It happens.

People are caught every year practicing as a Medical Doctor in the US, who not only don't have a License, but have never even gone to medical School.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 25, 2011, 08:15:28 AM
Team KP probably does not even know about the SS Number issue.   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 25, 2011, 08:25:39 AM
Obama's confusion extends to birth date
WND ^ | January 23, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi




A much-overlooked comment by Barack Obama is getting a closer examination now that Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie has come up short in his plan to take care of a pressing election 2012 concern for the Democrats by producing Obama's birth certificate from the state's archives.

It was the comment by Obama himself at a 2009 international meeting that he was born eight months earlier than when his official story has claimed all along.

Freudian slip, confusion or the truth leaking out?

It was in April 19, 2009, at a press conference Obama gave at the Port of Spain in Trinidad and Tobago, Obama commented on a 90-minute diatribe that had been delivered by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega at the meeting the day before, and Obama suggested he was born in January 1961, three months before the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Specifically, Obama rejected Ortega's attack on the United States for the attempted Bay of Pigs invasion during the Kennedy administration by explaining: "I'm grateful President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old."


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: loco on January 25, 2011, 08:43:48 AM
In order to have been registered for school, wouldn't he have needed his birth cert, and SSN?

No, just his green card.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 25, 2011, 09:01:26 PM
BORN IN THE USA?

Game-changer! Arizona to pass 2012 eligibility law
Obama will have to produce birth certificate to run again

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: January 25, 2011
7:42 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily


It could be a game-changer.

A plan in Arizona to require presidential candidates to prove their eligibility to occupy the Oval Office is approaching critical mass, even though it has just been introduced.

The proposal from state Rep. Judy Burges, who carried a similar plan that fell short last year only because of political maneuvering, was introduced yesterday with 16 members of the state Senate as co-sponsors.

It needs only 16 votes in the Senate to pass.

In the House, there are 25 co-sponsors, with the need for only 31 votes for passage, and Burges told WND that there were several chamber members who confirmed they support the plan and will vote for it, but simply didn't wish to be listed as co-sponsors.

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency

The proposal, which also is being taken up in a number of other states, is highly specific and directly addresses the questions that have been raised by Barack Obama's occupancy of the White House. It says:

(Story continues below)

     


Within ten days after submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the presidential candidate in which the presidential candidate states the candidate's citizenship and age and shall append to the affidavit documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate's age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States.
The critical phrases are "natural born citizen" and the requirements of "article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States," which imposes on the president a requirement not demanded of other state and federal officeholders.

At the time the Constitution was written, many analysts agree, a "natural born citizen" was considered to be a citizen born of two citizen parents. If that indeed is correct, Obama never would have been qualified to be president, as he himself has confirmed his father was a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, making Obama a dual citizen with Kenyan and American parentage at his birth.

Other definitions have called for a "natural born citizen" to be born of citizen parents inside the nation.

There have been dozens of lawsuits and challenges over the fact that Obama's "natural born citizen" status never has been documented. The "Certification of Live Birth" his campaign posted online is a document that Hawaii has made available to those not born in the state.

The controversy stems from the Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

The challenges to Obama's eligibility allege he does not qualify because he was not born in Hawaii in 1961 as he claims, or that he fails to qualify because he was a dual citizen, through his father, of the U.S. and the United Kingdom's Kenyan terroritory when he was born and the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens from eligibility.

There are several cases still pending before the courts over Obama's eligibility. Those cases, however, almost all have been facing hurdles created by the courts' interpretation of "standing," meaning someone who is being or could be harmed by the situation. The courts have decided almost unanimously that an individual taxpayer faces no damages different from other taxpayers, therefore doesn't have standing. Judges even have ruled that other presidential candidates are in that position.

The result is that none of the court cases to date has reached the level of discovery, through which Obama's birth documentation could be brought into court.

Obama even continued to withhold the information during a court-martial of a military officer, Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who challenged his deployment orders on the grounds Obama may not be a legitimate president. Lakin was convicted and sent to prison.

Burges told WND she's asked the proposal to be assigned to the Government Committee.

"I think every American should consider it of prime importance to ensure that all candidates for the highest elected position in our nation meet all constitutional requirements," she told WND. "We do not accept the federal government's unconstitutional treatment of states as one of their extended branches."

The Arizona bill also requires attachments, "which shall be sworn to under penalty of perjury," including "an original long form birth certificate that includes the date and place of birth, the names of the hospital and the attending physician and signatures of the witnesses in attendance."

It also requires testimony that the candidate "has not held dual or multiple citizenship and that the candidate's allegiance is solely to the United States of America."

"If both the candidate and the national political party committee for that candidate fail to submit and swear to the documents prescribed in this section, the secretary of state shall not place that presidential candidate's name on the ballot in this state," the state plan explains.

The governor's office is occupied by Republican Jan Brewer, who has had no difficulty in bringing direct challenges to Washington, such as a year ago when lawmakers adopted provisions that allowed state law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration law. The state's move prompted an immediate court challenge by Washington.

WND also has reported that similar efforts are under way in Montana, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Texas:

Montana

Under Montana's plan by Rep. Bob Wagner, candidates would have to document their eligibility and also provide for protection for state taxpayers to prevent them from being billed for "unnecessary expense and litigation" involving the failure of 'federal election officials' to do their duty.

"There should be no question after the fact as to the qualifications [of a president]," Wagner told WND. "The state of Montana needs to have [legal] grounds to sue for damages for the cost of litigation."

Wagner's legislation cites the Constitution's requirement that the president hold "natural born citizenship" and the fact that the "military sons and daughters of the people of Montana and all civil servants to the people of Montana are required by oath to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States and Montana against enemies foreign and domestic."

But there are estimates of up to $2 million being spent on Obama's defense against eligibility lawsuits. There have been dozens of them and some have been running for more than two years. So Wagner goes a step beyond.

"Whereas, it would seem only right and just to positively certify eligibility for presidential and congressional office at the federal level; and whereas, it is apparent that the federal authority is negligent in the matter; therefore, the responsibility falls upon the state; and whereas, this act would safeguard the people of Montana from unnecessary expense and litigation and the possibility that federal election officials fail in their duty and would ensure that the State of Montana remains true to the Constitution," says his proposed legislation.

Pennsylvania

In Pennsylvania, there was excitement over the GOP majority of both houses of the state legislature as well as the governor's office.

Assemblyman Daryl Metcalfe told WND he is working on a proposal that would demand documentation of constitutional eligibility.

He described it as a "problem" that there has been no established procedure for making sure that presidential candidates meet the Constitution's requirements for age, residency and being a "natural born citizen."

"We hope we would be able to pass this legislation and put it into law before the next session," he said.

He said any one of the states imposing such a requirement would be effective in solving his concerns.

"I think the public relations nightmare that would ensue if any candidate would thumb their noses at a single state would torpedo their campaign," he told WND.

Georgia

Rep. Mark Hatfield has confirmed to WND that he will have a similar proposal pending.

He had introduced the legislation at the end of last year's session to put fellow lawmakers on alert that the issue was coming.

"I do plan to reintroduce the bill," he told WND. "We'll move forward with trying to get it before a committee."

In Georgia, Republicans hold majorities in both houses of the legislature as well as "every constitutional statewide office," he noted.

"I would be optimistic that we can [adopt the legislation]," he said.

Hatfield said if only one or two states adopt such requirements, it readily will be apparent whether a candidate has issues with eligibility documentation or not. And while he noted a president could win a race without support from a specific state, a failure to qualify on the ballot "would give voters in other states pause, about whether or not a candidate is in fact qualified," he said.

"My goal is to make sure any person that aspires to be president meets the constitutional requirements," he said. "This is a first step in that direction."

Texas

WND reported on a bill prefiled for the Texas Legislature by Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, that would require such documentation.

Berman's legislation, House Bill 295, is brief and simple:

It would add to the state election code the provision: "The secretary of state may not certify the name of a candidate for president or vice-president unless the candidate has presented the candidate's original birth certificate indicating that the person is a natural-born United States citizen."

It includes an effective date of Sept. 1, 2011, in time for 2012 presidential campaigning.


State Rep. Leo Berman

Berman told WND he's seen neither evidence nor indication that Obama qualifies under the Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born citizen."

"If the federal government is not going to vet these people, like they vetted John McCain, we'll do it in our state," he said.

He noted the Senate's investigation into McCain because of the Republican senator's birth in Panama to military parents.

Berman also said there will be pressure on any lawmaker who opposes the bill, since voters would wonder why they wouldn't want such basic data about a president revealed. And he said even if one state adopts the requirement, there will be national implications, because other states would be alerted to a possible problem.

"If Obama is going to run for re-election in 2012, he'll have to show our secretary of state his birth certificate and prove he's a natural-born citizen," he said. "This is going to be significant."

Berman said he's convinced there are problems with Obama's eligibility, or else his handlers would not be so persistent in keeping the information concealed.

A year ago, polls indicated that roughly half of American voters were aware of a dispute over Obama's eligibility. Recent polls, however, by organizations including CNN, show that roughly six in 10 American voters hold serious doubts that Obama is eligible under the Constitution's demands.

Other state plans also might be in the works but unannounced yet. Officials with the Denver-based National Conference of State Legislatures said they were not tracking bills in development.

But Orly Taitz, the California lawyer who has worked on a number of the highest-profile legal challenges to Obama, said efforts are under way now in Missouri and Oklahoma, too.

She said the bill is expected to be successful in Missouri where there is a GOP majority in the legislature and a GOP governor's office, and in Oklahoma, where last year a similar plan failed by only one vote in the state Senate.

She encouraged residents of Tennessee, New Hampshire, South Dakota, California, Maine, New Mexico, South Carolina, Virginia, New Jersey and Iowa to contact their lawmakers, as there has been some interest expressed.

"We need eligibility bills filed in each and every state of the union … as it shows the regime that we are still the nation of law and the Constitution, that the Constitution matters and state representatives and senators are ready to fight for the rule of law. During the last election there were some 700 more Republican state assemblyman elected all over the country, as the nation is not willing to tolerate this assault on our rights and our Constitution any further," she said.

Last year, several other states listened to proposals that could have had an impact on eligibility documentation. In New Hampshire, officials wanted to require candidates to meet the "qualifications contained in the U.S. Constitution." In Oklahoma, lawmakers heard a plan to let voters decide the issue, and in South Carolina, the plan was to prevent candidates from being on the ballot unless "that person shows conclusive evidence that he is a legal citizen of the United States."

Further, several other states discussed requirements for candidates, but they did not specifically address the Article 2, Section 1 constitutional compliance, so it's unclear whether they would have addressed Obama's situation.

There also was, during the last Congress, Rep. Bill Posey's bill at the federal level.

Posey's H.R. 1503 stated:

"To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."
The bill also provided:

"Congress finds that under … the Constitution of the United States, in order to be eligible to serve as President, an individual must be a natural born citizen of the United States who has attained the age of 35 years and has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years."
It had more than a dozen sponsors, and while it died at the end of the last Congress, there are hopes the GOP majority in the House this year will move such a plan forward.

There also is a petition, already signed by tens of thousands, to state lawmakers asking them to make sure the next president of the United States qualifies under the Constitution's eligibility requirements.

"What we need are hundreds of thousands of Americans endorsing this strategy on the petition – encouraging more action by state officials before the 2012 election. Imagine if just one or two states adopt such measures before 2012. Obama will be forced to comply with those state regulations or forgo any effort to get on the ballot for re-election. Can Obama run and win without getting on all 50 state ballots? I don't think so," said Joseph Farah, CEO of WND, who is behind the idea of the petition.

An earlier petition had been directed at all controlling legal authorities at the federal level to address the concerns expressed by Americans, and it attracted more than half a million names.

For 18 months, Farah has been one of the few national figures who has steadfastly pushed the issue of eligibility, despite ridicule, name-calling and ostracism at the hands of most of his colleagues. To date, in addition to the earlier petition, he has:


erected billboards around the country demanding, "Where's the birth certificate?":


produced a 40-page special report on the subject;


produced a 60-minute documentary video primer on the issue;


manufactured yard and rally signs to bring attention to the topic;


pledged to donate at least $15,000 to any hospital in Hawaii or anywhere else that provides proof Obama was born there and given you an opportunity to raise the amount;


created a line of T-shirts you can wear to appearances by the president to raise visibility of the issue;


created a fund to which you can donate to further the kind of investigative reporting into this matter only this company has performed over the last two years;


launched a line of postcards you can use to keep the issue alive;


distributed thousands of bumper stickers asking, "Where's the birth certificate?"
Farah says all those campaigns are continuing.

"Obama may be able to continue showing contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law for the next two years, as he has demonstrated his willingness to do in his first year in office," he wrote in a column. "However, a day of reckoning is coming. Even if only one significant state, with a sizable Electoral College count, decides a candidate for election or re-election has failed to prove his or her eligibility, that makes it nearly impossible for the candidate to win. It doesn't take all 50 states complying with the law to be effective."

If you are a member of the media and would like to interview Joseph Farah about this campaign, e-mail WND.



Read more: Game-changer! Arizona to pass 2012 eligibility law http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=255489#ixzz1C79rs1dQ
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 26, 2011, 07:36:52 AM
WE'RE ALL BIRTHERS NOW: The Long-Form Obama Birth Certificate DOES NOT EXIST
Reaganite Republican ^ | January 26, 2011 | Reaganite Republican




Hawai'i election official's sworn affadavit:

"No Obama birth certificate exists"


ALL Americans who support our nation's Constitution and election laws must now ask: WHERE IS IT? As the Obama birth certificate controversy drags-on, any unbiased observer could tell you that events are strengthening the birthers' case by the day... not the other way around.


Oczam's razor theory dictates that if they can't find it... there must not be one. This would also provide the most viable explanation for why Obama has spent almost $2M fighting the claims in court. And to since it's a principle requirement for presidential eligibility... would someone please tell me WHY the burden of proof is on us? 

How'd this guy even get a passport without a long-form birth certificate, anyway...


"During the course of my employment," Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 and part 2), "I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate."


As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health. "Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health," Adams' affidavit reads, "and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government."


 
Tim Adams

Tim Adams, former senior elections clerk for Honolulu In a recorded telephone interview, Adams told WND that it was common knowledge among election officials where he worked that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate could be found at the Hawaii Department of Health. "My supervisor came and told me, 'Of course, there's no birth certificate. What? You stupid,'" Adams said. "She usually spoke well, but in saying this she reverted to a Hawaiian dialect. I really didn't know how to respond to that. She said it and just walked off. She was quite a powerful lady."


Moreover, Adams was told that neither Queens Memorial Hospital nor Kapi'olani Medical Center had any records of Obama's birth at their medical facilities: "Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division further told me on multiple occasions that Hawaii State government officials had made inquires about Sen. Obama's birth records to officials at Queens Medical Center and Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu and that neither hospital had any record of Senator Obama having been born there, even though Governor Abercrombie is now asserting and various Hawaii government officials continue to assert Barack Obama Jr. was born at Kapi'olani Medical Center on Aug. 4, 1961." 

"We called the two hospitals in Honolulu: Queens and Kapi'olani," Adams stressed. "Neither of them have any records that Barack Obama was born there."





The debate has been recently been amplified by Hawaii's weird hippy Governor Neil Abercrombie -a far-Left freak who was previously a member of the US House Progressive Caucus and a personal friend and college classmate of both of Obama's parents. Abercrombie  made an ill-advised claim during his 2010 gubernatorial campaign that he would soon put a rest to all this, stating he was on a  "mission" to "quell" the birthers- as the polemic has "implications for 2012 that we simply cannot have."


But there is no Obama birth certificate... there never was.  So now he's hiding behind Hawaii's state AG, who says there is a privacy law that prohibits Abercrombie from doing as he promised (unless Obama gave him permission, of course):


State Attorney General David Louie told the governor that privacy laws bar him from disclosing an individual’s birth documentation without the person’s consent, Abercrombie spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz said Friday.

“There is nothing more that Gov. Abercrombie can do within the law to produce a document,” said Dela Cruz.


“Unfortunately, there are conspirators who will continue to question the citizenship of our president.”


Conspirators! That's rich- but condescension and slander coming from nervous Dems does little to re-assure thinking persons that this man is acutally qualified to be US President: on the contrary, this defensive, diversionary behavior speaks volumes. Clearly those propping up this Trojan Horse of a president have nothing left but mocking the inquisitors- but as Margaret Thatcher once said: "... if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left." And indeed they do not-





Delving a little farther back, Obama even admitted himself that he wasn't qualified for the presidency in the 2004 Keyes-Obama Senate campaign debate, but the video of this was scrubbed from YouTube, according to Good Ole Boy at RealAmericanPolitics.

Keyes caught him off guard... and Obama spilled:


I watched the entire first and second debates.  I distinctly remember that I had never heard of Obama; my interest was in seeing what Keyes said about the pro-life issue and school vouchers.

At one point in the second debate, Keyes, accused Obama saying, “You are not even a natural born citizen!”
To which Obama immediately replied, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency.”

At the end of the airing of the second debate, the C-Span host noted, as he read from a single sheet of paper, placed before him, that the Obama Campaign had contacted them and requested them to point out to their viewers that Obama’s response here should not be understood as a denial that he is a natural born citizen, only that Keyes’ accusation had nothing to do with the qualifications of office of a U.S. Senator...

Today... with even Chris Matthews saying "why not just put it out?"- I unapologetically throw my hat in with the birthers... time to cough it up or step-down, Barry. Even is some obscure court ruling keeps Obama in office... this man must not be allowed to run for re-election in 2012.


And when the day comes when we remove this tumor from the neck of the American eagle... Obama and his accomplices must be punished harshly for not just violation of oath, but the myriad crimes committed in covering-up lack of qualification for US president, up to and including perjury. And that means the entire Obama campaign team, lawyers, and most of the DNC... you're all going to pay dearly for this one.

Get on the stick, GOP congressman...
where's the subpoenas? 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on January 26, 2011, 01:44:37 PM
hahahahahahahaa the birthers are back man give it a break  :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 26, 2011, 01:45:52 PM
hahahahahahahaa the birthers are back man give it a break  :D :D :D :D


Where is the long form BC?   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on January 26, 2011, 01:48:41 PM
i think he's from mars, i bet if rush or beck said so half these nuts would start repeating it ;D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Kazan on January 26, 2011, 01:50:02 PM
i think he's from mars, i bet if rush or beck said so half these nuts would start repeating it ;D

Could you produce your birth certificate if you had to?
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 26, 2011, 01:51:55 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on January 26, 2011, 01:53:59 PM
A celebrity journalist now claims he misspoke when he said last week that Hawaii’s governor told him he was unable to find President Barack Obama’s original birth certificate after a search of state and hospital archives.

Mike Evans told FoxNews.com on Wednesday he was remorseful and embarrassed that he appeared to have given the impression that he had discussed the search for Obama’s birth certificate with Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie.

Evans, who says he has been a close friend of Abercrombie since the 1980s, appeared on Minnesota’s KQRS radio last week and said he’d been told by the governor himself that Obama’s birth certificate was nowhere to be found. Evans told KQRS on Jan. 20:

"Yesterday, talking to Neil's office, Neil says that he searched everywhere using his powers as governor ..... there is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii.  Absolutely no proof at all that he was born in Hawaii."

But that’s no longer Evans’ story.

YOU MIGHT ALSO BE
INTERESTED IN
The Most Sued Companies in America 'Unusual' Bachmann Rebuttal Could Scramble GOP Message on Obama Address Playboy Says Penthouse Bid Tough to Value: Filing Italian Scientists Claim (Dubious) Cold Fusion Breakthrough Dow Barrels Toward 12000 as Techs, Materials Soar “Only this I can you tell you is 100 percent fact: that Neil never told me there was no birth certificate,” Evans told Fox News. “I never talked to him.”

Last week’s radio interview was part of Evans’ syndicated five-minute feature, “On the Road with Mike Evans,” which is broadcast on 34 stations across the country each morning.

On the morning of Jan. 20, Evans says he accidentally told one of those radio stations -- KQRS -- that he’d spoken directly with Gov. Abercrombie about the Obama birth certificate.

“I was on 34 radio stations that morning. That was the only station where I said, instead of saying ‘the hospital said there’s no birth certificate’ I misspoke and said Neil said that,” Evans said. “I misspoke and I apologize for that. I apologize to Neil.”

Abercrombie’s spokeswoman did not respond to Fox News e-mail and phone requests for comment.

Evans says he first noticed the story on Jan. 18, when he was reading an online article with the headline, “Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate.” The article cites an interview with a former Honolulu elections clerk who says records of Obama’s birth could not be found at either Honolulu hospital.

“Halfway down the story it said the long form certificate was not on file at the two hospitals,” Evans said. “It says the hospitals say there’s no birth certificate and says Neil says he couldn’t find it.”

Evans said he continued reading other reports online, including one that quotes a former Honolulu election official as saying no hospital has been able to find Obama’s original long form birth certificate.

Evans says he then placed a call to Abercrombie’s office in Hawaii to follow up on the reports.

“I called Neil, but Neil never called me back,” Evans told Fox News. “I haven’t talked to Neil since he’s been governor.”

In 2008, the Obama campaign provided a certification of live birth -- a shorter form document that bears the same legal weight as the more detailed original certificate of live birth -- to prove his eligibility to be president. That has not quelled calls by those who have asked for the president’s original, longer form birth certificate, which they maintain would more clearly prove his status as a natural-born American citizen.

The U.S. Constitution stipulates that only “a natural-born citizen,” or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President.”

  Print   Email   Share   Comments (238)   Text Size 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 26, 2011, 01:57:46 PM
“It says the hospitals say there’s no birth certificate and says Neil says he couldn’t find it.”


________________________ ________________


The COLB is a forgery as it is.   This story does not dispell anything.      Where is the long frm BC?   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on January 26, 2011, 02:07:50 PM
i don't think i have a long form bc maybe i'm from kenya ;D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 26, 2011, 02:09:06 PM
i don't think i have a long form bc maybe i'm from kenya ;D


LLLMMMFFFAAAOOO

Probably your best post ever.    ;D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 26, 2011, 06:05:02 PM
10 states now developing eligibility-proof demands (Obama)
wnd ^ | January 26, 2011 7:50 pm Eastern | Bob Unruh



107 Electoral College votes controlled by Arizona, Texas, Connecticut, others

Arizona may have the most advanced plan, but 10 of the United States – controlling 107 Electoral College votes – now are considering some type of legislation that would plug the hole in federal election procedures that in 2008 allowed Barack Obama to be nominated, elected and inaugurated without providing proof of his qualifications under the demands of the U.S. Constitution.

And they aren't all the simple legislation such as that adopted in New Hampshire a year ago that requires an affidavit from a candidate stating that the qualifications – age, residency and being a "natural born citizen" – have been met.

In Georgia, for example, HB37 by Rep. Bobby Franklin not only demands original birth certificate documentation, it provides a procedure for and declares that citizens have "standing" to challenge the documentation.

"Each political party shall provide for each candidate … original documentation that he meets the qualifications of Article, 2 Section 1, Paragraph 1, and Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution to serve as president of the United States if elected to such office," it states

"Any citizen of this state shall have the right to challenge the qualifications of any such candidate within two weeks following the publication of the names of such candidates,"


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: 240 is Back on January 26, 2011, 08:29:12 PM
the SS# is the real issue. 

Argue about the BC.  But the SS is the one there is no dodging - specially if one was 70 years old ;)
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 27, 2011, 06:26:44 PM
Hawaii lawmakers want release of Obama birth info
Associated Press ^ | Jan. 27, 2011 | MARK NIESSE



HONOLULU (AP) -- Five Hawaii Democratic representatives want to pass a law making President Barack Obama's birth records public and charge $100 to see them.


(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WOW!!!!   

Birthers are back! 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 27, 2011, 06:29:49 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 27, 2011, 06:44:29 PM
HI bill would give anyone Obama birth info for fee

By MARK NIESSE
Associated Press


AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
 

HONOLULU (AP) -- Anyone would be able to get a copy of President Barack Obama's birth records for a $100 fee under a bill introduced in the state Legislature that backers hope will finally dispel claims he was born elsewhere.

The bill would change a privacy law barring the release of birth records unless the requester is someone with a tangible interest, such as a close family member.

The measure was introduced by five Democrats but has not yet been scheduled for a public hearing, a required step before it can move forward. A decision on considering the bill will be made by the House's Democratic leadership and committee chairmen.

The idea behind the measure is to end skepticism over Obama's birthplace while raising a little money for a government with a projected budget deficit exceeding $800 million over the next two years.

"If it passes, it will calm the birthers down," said the bill's primary sponsor, Rep. Rida Cabanilla. "All these people are still doubting it because they don't want the birth certificate from Obama. They want it from our state office."

So-called "birthers" claim there's no proof Obama was born in the United States, and he is therefore ineligible to be president. Many of the skeptics question whether he was actually born in Kenya, his father's home country.

The Obama campaign issued a certification of live birth in 2008, an official document from the state showing the president's Aug. 4, 1961, birth date, his birth city and name, and his parents' names and races.

Hawaii's former health director also has said she verified Obama's original records. And notices were published in two local newspapers within days of his birth at a Honolulu hospital.

Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie, who was a friend of Obama's parents and knew him as a child, said last month he wanted to release more of the state's birth information about Obama. But he ended the effort last week when the state attorney general told him that privacy laws bar disclosure of an individual's birth documentation without the person's consent.

The new legislation to release records may run into similar legal problems because of Hawaii's strong constitutional privacy protections, said Rep. John Mizuno, a co-sponsor of the bill.

"If people really want to confirm Barack Obama is born in Hawaii, that's fine," Mizuno said. "I don't have a problem with looking at innovative ways to bring revenue to the state. The taxpayers deserve a break."

The $100 fee would help offset the extra work by state employees who handle frequent phone calls and e-mails from people who believe Obama was born elsewhere, Cabanilla said.

But the number of birther requests has been declining from the 10 to 20 weekly inquiries received early last year, according to the Department of Health.

"Requests have decreased significantly over the years. Currently we receive anywhere from zero to five per week," said department spokeswoman Janice Okubo.

The Health Department is still reviewing the bill, Okubo said.

House Health Committee Chairman Ryan Yamane didn't immediately return messages seeking comment on whether he would hold a hearing on the bill.

---

Online:

HB1116, http://capitol.hawaii.gov/

© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

________________________ ______________________--

Ha ha ha ha - I love it. 

Hey Bama - spend the $5 and release the damn thing already.   
 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: chadstallion on January 28, 2011, 05:05:14 AM
How can there be no birth certificate? Seriously, I have needed my birth certificate on more than a few occasions.

for what?
when you reach a certain age ( have a job, have a DI, have a passport, SSN ) I've never had to produce a BC since.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 28, 2011, 05:13:35 AM
for what?
when you reach a certain age ( have a job, have a DI, have a passport, SSN ) I've never had to produce a BC since.

1.   Bama has never held a real job.   

2.  He has used different passports,

3.   He has used 16 SS #   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Dos Equis on February 18, 2011, 09:09:14 AM
Birth-records bill dies after failing to advance
The legislation would have made Obama's information available to the public for $100
By Mark Niesse
Associated Press
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Feb 18, 2011
 
A proposal to sell copies of President Barack Obama's birth records to anyone for $100 is going nowhere in the Hawaii Legislature.

The bill died when it didn't get a hearing before today's deadline for bills to advance to their final committees.

House Health Committee Chairman Ryan Yamane said yesterday he will not consider the legislation because he does not think it is appropriate to sell private information to the public — even if it is the president's birth documentation.

"We shouldn't take knee-jerk reactions. Just because there are these people who want this information, that doesn't mean we should change our state statute so a private, personal record could be accessible for $100," said Yamane, a Democrat.

Hawaii's privacy laws bar the release of birth records unless the requester is someone with a tangible interest, such as a close family member.

So-called "birthers" claim there is no proof Obama was born in the United States, and he is therefore ineligible to be president. Many of the skeptics question whether he was actually born in Kenya, his father's home country.

Republican Rep. Kymberly Pine said efforts to reveal Obama's birth information fuel unfounded suspicions that he was not born in Honolulu.

"It's just opening a whole new can of worms again," said Pine, the minority floor leader. "We should just let this die. People have presented as many facts as we can."

Hawaii's former health director said in 2008 and 2009 she verified Obama's original rec-ords. Public notices were published in two local newspapers within days of Obama's birth at a Honolulu hospital.

The Obama campaign issued a certification of live birth in 2008, an official document from the state showing the president's Aug. 4, 1961, birth date, his birth city and name, and his parents' names and races.

Rep. Rida Cabanilla, who introduced the bill, said she will drop the issue after she learned that requests to the state for Obama's birth documents have declined to just a few per week.

"The demand is dying down," said Cabanilla, a Democrat. "If they still got a lot of requests, I could have pushed it more."

Only a handful of people contacted Yamane about the bill, he said. Three or four people from the mainland wrote they were skeptical that Obama was born in the U.S., and two people from Hawaii said the government should focus on the economy rather than birthers.

Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie, who was a friend of Obama's parents and knew him as a child, revived the issue in December when he said he wanted to release more of the state's birth information about Obama. But he ended the effort in January when the state attorney general told him that privacy laws bar disclosure of an individual's birth documentation without the person's consent.

The bill failed because it had to reach its final committee — the House Finance Committee — by today's deadline for all bills requiring more than one public hearing to advance. But it was not given a hearing in the House Health Committee, a required step before it could move forward.

It would have run into many obstacles from lawmakers even if it had cleared the House and moved to the Senate.

"Any plan to sell copies of the president's or anyone else's birth records is a nonstarter," said Senate Health Committee Chairman Josh Green, a Democrat. "Rights to privacy issues like this are too important to be taken lightly."

Lawmakers in several other states have introduced legislation aimed at making Obama prove his U.S. nationality by birth before he could be placed on those states' ballots. Those states include Arizona, Georgia, Missouri, Nebraska, Connecticut, Oklahoma and Texas.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20110218_Birth-records_bill_dies_after_failing_to_advance.html

And the picture that accompanied the story:
(http://media.staradvertiser.com/images/300*418/20110218_newsOBAMA1.jpg)

Real unbiased journalism there.   :)
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 18, 2011, 09:18:47 AM
You can't sell what does not exist!

   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 18, 2011, 09:25:28 AM




funny but true  :D :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 18, 2011, 09:29:25 AM




funny but true  :D :D :D :D :D :D


You are clueless on this issue.    The COLB is a forgery and is bogus.   There is no long form BC, or record of hs birth in any hospital in HA.   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 18, 2011, 09:45:09 AM
so what your saying is that when he was running for pres the repubs with all their money and the smartest people on the right could not prove this wrong but all the nutjobs after the election have proof. do you realise how fu#king dumb that sounds. if he is not a american they would have proofed it before the election period  ;D but the guys on getbig have the facts  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 18, 2011, 09:47:47 AM
so what your saying is that when he was running for pres the repubs with all their money and the smartest people on the right could not prove this wrong but all the nutjobs after the election have proof. do you realise how fu#king dumb that sounds. if he is not a american they would have proofed it before the election period  ;D but the guys on getbig have the facts  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

 ::)    ::)

They have tried many times - but obama has spent 2 million in legal fees to keep everything sealed under record.   

Shit - he has 16 SS numbers attributed to him already.  Thereis no record of his birth anywhere but the HA newspaper, which is not really official proof of anything, just that someone took an add out.   

Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 18, 2011, 09:48:34 AM


 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: 240 is Back on February 18, 2011, 09:51:49 AM
To be clear.........


The most anti-Obama voices on getbig aren't talking about the spending cuts.  They're not talking about the stalled wars.  They're not talking about fudged UE numbers.   They're not talking about the plummeting dollar.


Maybe Karl Rove was right!  This DOES benefit obama that everyone is arguing CT stuff while he does the realllly bad stuff right out in the open, and nobody talks about it!
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 18, 2011, 09:57:34 AM
To be clear.........


The most anti-Obama voices on getbig aren't talking about the spending cuts.  They're not talking about the stalled wars.  They're not talking about fudged UE numbers.   They're not talking about the plummeting dollar.


Maybe Karl Rove was right!  This DOES benefit obama that everyone is arguing CT stuff while he does the realllly bad stuff right out in the open, and nobody talks about it!


 ::)  ::)


Like who 240?      Have you seen my last 15 threads? 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 18, 2011, 09:58:28 AM
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 18, 2011, 10:02:05 AM


blacken - where is the long form BC and hospital records?   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Fury on February 18, 2011, 10:03:58 AM
To be clear.........


The most anti-Obama voices on getbig aren't talking about the spending cuts.  They're not talking about the stalled wars.  They're not talking about fudged UE numbers.   They're not talking about the plummeting dollar.


Maybe Karl Rove was right!  This DOES benefit obama that everyone is arguing CT stuff while he does the realllly bad stuff right out in the open, and nobody talks about it!

Look down the board, there is maybe one birther thread. And this irony in this is pretty ripe coming from you, the guy who has a stalkerish obsession with Palin. Creepy stalkerish obsession, that is.

(http://www.moviepostershop.com/fear-movie-poster-1020209188.jpg)

The funny thing is all the political savants like you and blacken would rather spend your time talking about Palin and linking youtube clips from comedy shows. :-X
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 18, 2011, 10:08:50 AM
Look down the board, there is maybe one birther thread. And this irony in this is pretty ripe coming from you, the guy who has a stalkerish obsession with Palin. Creepy stalkerish obsession, that is.

(http://www.moviepostershop.com/fear-movie-poster-1020209188.jpg)

The funny thing is all the political savants like you and blacken would rather spend your time talking about Palin and linking youtube clips from comedy shows. :-X




are you a birther
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Fury on February 18, 2011, 10:10:47 AM


are you a birther

Couldn't care less about it. But I have no problem with people believing it or not believing it. To each their own.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Dos Equis on February 26, 2011, 02:31:15 PM
Senator Slom is a very smart guy.  If he starts raising questions about the release of records (birth and educational records), it might gain a little traction here.  Doesn't help that he's the only Republican in the state senate. 

'No evidence' of problems with Hawaii health chief
Explanation sought for governor's removal of department director
Posted: February 26, 2011
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

There is no evidence that there were problems with the work of Dr. Neal Palafox, who had been chosen by Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie to replace Chiyome Fukino, the woman best known to the rest of the nation as the guardian of Barack Obama's birth certificate.

That's according to an attorney representing Palafox, Brook Hart.

WND reported earlier that the minority leader in Hawaii's state Senate accused Abercrombie of politicizing the health department by nominating, then apparently asking for the resignation, of Palafox.

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!

Sen. Sam Slom, the only Republican in the state Senate, said he is convinced Abercrombie asked Palafox to withdraw because the nominee dismissed two health agency workers who were politically connected.

Slom said he does not believe Palafox was dropped for refusing to allow Abercrombie to search for Obama's birth records, but he also said he's be happy to use the situation "as a shoehorn to get for the public any Obama birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has."

Today, Hart told WND that Palafox has no idea why Abercrombie asked him to withdraw. He said there is no evidence that would prove Abercrombie made his decision in response to the firing of the two employees.

Hart also said Abercrombie's decision has nothing to do with Abercrombie's search for Obama's birth records.

"Neal has no information on Obama's birth records," Hart said.

"There is no hard evidence why Abercrombie made the decision," Hart said. "Neal Palafox knows of no investigation proceeding against him. No subpoenas have been issued by any investigative body, no interviews have been conducted by investigators."

Hart said that at this point his office is not considering filing any litigation, but that he would do so if anyone made statements that defamed or were libelous in relation to Dr. Palafox's professional conduct.

He stressed that Palafox has had a long and distinguished medical career – he is the chairman of his department at the University of Hawaii and Palafox has a successful and highly respected medical practice in Hawaii.

"Neal is a highly competent professional," Hart said, "and his desire to accept the nomination to direct the Hawaii Department of Health was made not in an effort to enrich or aggrandize himself, but to help the people of Hawaii."

Hart said Palafox would like a reason for the governor's actions.

"Neal wants to know and he is waiting to find out," he said. "There has been a lot of speculation regarding Gov. Abercrombie's motives," Hart said, "but to date, we have no hard evidence to substantiate why the decision was made."

A report from KITV Channel 4 said Hart revealed Palafox was reducing a "controversial" state health department program at the governor's request when he was asked to leave.

That process involved the elimination of 22 positions, including two supervisors who were laid off, the report said.

It involved a mental health services billing process that ex-Gov. Linda Lingle apparently launched using some $16 million in state health department funding.

The report said the two employees laid off included Dewey Kim, the former executive director of the Honolulu Liquor Commission, and Joanne Hao, a contracting manager.

Hart said Palafox knew neither personally.

Palafox now has returned to his tenured position at the University of Hawaii Medical School, where he is chief of the Family Practice and Community Health division.

Fukino, who became the face of Hawaii's claim that Obama's original birth records remain on file in the state's archives, resigned in December.

Slom said there are questions to be answered.

"I don't understand why Obama has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep all his records from the public — not just his Hawaii birth records, but his passport records and his school records. All Obama's records should be public, including any Hawaii birth records that exist."

Slom said Abercrombie did conduct a search for Obama birth records – he wasn't sure if Abercrombie looked himself, or if he sent someone to search the records.


He said he believes Abercrombie thought he could come into office and do Obama a great favor by putting an end to Obama's birth controversy.

But the inability to produce any documents after vows to the New York Times and other news organizations only added fuel to the fire. The dismissal of Dr. Palafox has also stirred rumors about a possible connection to the birth certificate drama.

The latest development comes as well-connected sources in Hawaii are warning that certain government officials in the state have been contemplating releasing fraudulent birth records for Obama in the run-up to the 2012 election. At least 11 states are currently considering legislation that would require future presidential candidates to prove constitutional eligibility by proving they are "natural born citizens."

Some of the bills under review in legislatures across the U.S. would require candidates to provide a long-form birth certificate – a document Obama has steadfastly denied the public and the press. His 2008 campaign offered only a certification of live birth, a short-form digital document that skeptics insist could be generated without an actual Hawaiian birth taking place. But the generation of the short-form document, by a simple affidavit from a family member, would have triggered the newspaper birth announcements that have been used by some to corroborate Obama's birth story.

The blogosphere is rife with speculation that Abercrombie dispatched Palafox as health director because he was unable to produce evidence supporting Abercrombie's repeated claims Obama was born at Kapi'olani Medical Center.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=268305
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 26, 2011, 02:35:48 PM
Slom said there are questions to be answered.

"I don't understand why Obama has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep all his records from the public — not just his Hawaii birth records, but his passport records and his school records. All Obama's records should be public, including any Hawaii birth records that exist."

Slom said Abercrombie did conduct a search for Obama birth records – he wasn't sure if Abercrombie looked himself, or if he sent someone to search the records.



________________________ ________________________ _________-


How hard is this for you libs to grasp?   
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 26, 2011, 03:25:37 PM
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 26, 2011, 03:26:43 PM
Blacken - where is the long form BC? 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 26, 2011, 03:36:47 PM
i don't even know where mine is ;D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 26, 2011, 03:43:06 PM
i don't even know where mine is ;D

Yawn - you are clueless on this.   Obama is not a NBC so far as I can tell.   

 
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 26, 2011, 03:46:10 PM


 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D


 :D :D :D
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: blacken700 on February 26, 2011, 03:50:29 PM




funny but true  :D :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 06:55:48 AM
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Jack Cashill Tackles Barack Obama's Fraudulent Use of a Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants, Got Criminal!?
ObamaRelease YourRecords on 10:51 PM 

Another look at Obama's Social Security number
-Jack Cashill-



While out promoting my new book, "Deconstructing Obama," I have been asked a few times about Obama's mysterious Social Security number.

Not knowing enough to speak authoritatively, I chose to swim upstream through the data flood and head for the source.

Here I found a no-nonsense licensed investigator from Ohio named Susan Daniels. Widowed at 30 with seven children, Daniels went back to school and eventually emerged as a certified paralegal.

After several years working for others, Daniels got her own license as an investigator in 1995. Since then, she has specialized in litigation support for law firms. Her particular strength has been in researching assets.

By her own admission, Daniels is "good with public records." She knows her way around databases and has access to many that the public does not.

Jack Cashill's literary investigation uncovers revelations galore about Obama's alleged life narrative. Order the new book "Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America's First Post-Modern President"

"I did not like the way things were going," Daniels says of the country's drift circa 2009. And so in the best spirit of citizen journalism, she began to investigate Obama on her own.

What she and fellow investigator Neil Sankey unearthed was a nugget that could have ended the career of a George Bush or a Sarah Plain: Barack Obama had been using a Social Security number issued in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979, a state in which he never lived or even visited at that time in his life. [Daniels affidavit embedded below, Sankey's report can be viewed here]

This will not come as news to the readers of WorldNetDaily, whose thorough investigation climaxed last June when WND's veteran White House correspondent Les Kinsolving confronted Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs on the subject. [video embedded below]

Predictably, Gibbs laughed Kinsolving off and switched the subject to the birth certificate. Kinsolving had seen this kind of laugh and switch before. In 1982, for instance, he introduced the subject of AIDS to then-press secretary Larry Speakes.

"Over a third of [the victims] have died," said Kinsolving. "It's known as 'gay plague.'"

"I don't have it. Do you?" joked Speakes to a general round of laughter. But unlike Gibbs, Speakes simply did not know any better.

As much as Daniels appreciates the work of WND and other serious investigators who have helped clarify the picture, she is distressed by the few who have clouded it.

"There have been many playing junior investigator from the start," she jokes. "I don't know if they even have their decoder rings yet."

This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world's best-known Social Security number – 042-68-4425.

"All I can say," says Daniels of 042-68-4425, "is that it's phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980."

Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama's, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age 19, which is why his information is available.

Wood's Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn 16 in August of that year. Woods lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state from which all "042s" applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

True to form, the left-leaning media set out to undermine the Social Security controversy and ridicule the investigators. Revealing, however, is the weakness of the response.

"Numbers are assigned based on the return address on the request envelope, not residency," crowed Jason Linkins in the Huffington Post as though he had said something meaningful. Linkins suggested two possible explanations, both preposterous.

One is that Obama applied for his SSN as a little boy in Indonesia for no known reason, and the application just happened to be processed in Connecticut for no known reason either.

For the second, Linkins cited the argument of Carole Glibert, in the Yahoo-related "Associated Content." Said Gilbert, presumably with a straight face, "In fact, Barack Obama's dad attended college in Connecticut and in 1977, Obama was college aged; is it beyond reason to consider that he might have checked out his father's alma mater?"

Last time I checked, Harvard was in Massachusetts. The closest town to Harvard in Connecticut is about 90 minutes away, and there is no record that Obama Sr. lived there, let alone that Obama visited his imaginary alma mater and just happened to apply for a Social Security card while visiting.

Daniels also sent me a copy of Obama's Selective Service data. Obama appears to have registered on Sept. 4, 1980, a month after his 19th birthday. The form lists the telling last four digits of his "042" number, "4425."

This is the first use of the "042" number that Daniels could find. She is just not sure it is legitimate. Some have credibly argued that the Selective Service information was forged and backdated once Obama became a presidential candidate.

"They were stupid to use the CT number on the [Selective Service] card," Daniels adds, "because now there is no way for [Obama] to back out of that number."

Other than the 1980 Selective Service registration, the first time Daniels could find Obama using the "042" number was in 1986 in Chicago.

As to how Obama may have secured that number, it is possible that he turned to his radical friends for... ...Continued here.


It's No Longer Just a Theory
-TheObamaFile.com-

Linda Bentley says that on September 7, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama appeared on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos, and stated:

"I had to sign up for Selective Service when I graduated from high school … And I actually always thought of the military as an ennobling and, you know, honorable option. But keep in mind that I graduated in 1979. The Vietnam War had come to an end. We weren’t engaged in active military conflict at that point. And so, it’s not an option that I ever decided to pursue."

Some people did keep in mind that he graduated in 1979, and noted the registration requirement was suspended in April 1975 by President Gerald Ford, and wasn’t reinstituted until 1980 by President Jimmy Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

The Military Selective Service Act required men born in the calendar year 1961 to register on any of the six days beginning Monday, July 28, 1980.

On Oct. 13, 2008, J. Stephen Coffman, a retired federal agent, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Selective Service (SS) for a copy of Obama’s SS registration form.

Coffman's FOIA request was processed on Oct. 29, 2008, two days after the SS claimed it was received.

Coffman received a copy of Obama’s registration form along with a copy of the computer inquiry screen, which showed an access date of Sept. 9, 2008, several weeks prior to Coffman’s request.

It was accompanied by a letter from Richard S. Flahavan, associate director for public affairs and intergovernmental affairs, who stated, "Also, the enclosed computer inquiry screen indicates that his registration number is 61-1125539-1, as previously provided to you."

The computer printout shows a transaction date of Sept. 4, 1980 (the date Obama’s July 29, 1980 registration was entered into the system) with a last action date of Sept. 4, 1980, signifying nothing else had been received or entered since the original Sept. 4, 1980 registration form.

Coffman found it peculiar his request, according to the computer printout date, was processed on Sept. 9, 2008, several weeks prior to submitting his request.

Debbie Schlussel broke this story on Nov. 13, 2008, questioning myriad peculiarities about Obama’s registration form.

Read about the mistakes made to Obama's records after Coffman’s FOIA request here.

RECALL: Colonel Hollister: Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants Comes Back as "Fail" and “SSN Not in File (Never Issued)” -Details here.

Previous reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility;
[http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/03/jack-cashill-tackles-barack-obamas.html

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 07:03:20 AM
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: 240 is Back on March 17, 2011, 07:13:20 AM
I just can't understand why people like Beach Bum call this Obama SS# stuff nonsense.

it's a legit issue.  I wish people would quit being sheep. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 07:13:59 AM
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 07:21:06 AM
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 07:52:38 AM
November 13, 2008, - 1:56 am

EXCLUSIVE: Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama’s Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions
By Debbie Schlussel


**** Copyright 2008, Must Cite Debbie Schlussel and link to DebbieSchlussel.com ****


*** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES ***
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.
But the release of Obama’s draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama’s claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.




The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it’s proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law. By law, he was required to register and was legally able to do so until the age of 26.
But the Selective Service System registration (“SSS Form 1″) and accompanying computer print-out (“SSS Print-out), below, released by the Selective Service show the following oddities and irregularities, all of which indicate the document was created in 2008 and backdated:
* Document Location Number Indicates Obama Selective Service Form was Created in 2008
First, there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS Form 1, there is the standard Bates-stamped DLN, in this case “0897080632,” which I’ve labeled as “A” on both the SSS Form and the computer printout document. On the form, it reflects a 2008 creation, but on the printout, an extra eight was added in front of the number to make it look like it is from 1980, when it was actually created in 2008.
As the retired federal agent notes:

Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of the DLN representing the year of issue. That would mean that this DLN was issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout is the exact same number, except an 8 has been added to make it look like it is from 1980 and give it a 1980 DLN number. And 1980 is the year Senator/President Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, why does the machine-stamped DLN reflect this year (2008) and the DLN in the database (which was manually input) reflect a “corrected” DLN year of 1980? Were all the DLNs issued in 1980 erroneously marked with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different DLN system then the rest of the Federal Government? Or was the SSS Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 1980?

It’s quite a “coincidence” . . . that is, if you believe in coincidences, especially in this case.
Far more likely is that someone made up a fake Selective Service registration to cover Obama’s lack of having done so, and that the person stamping the form forgot (or was unable to) change the year to “80″ instead of the current “08″. They either forgot to fake the DLN number or couldn’t do so.
And guess where the Selective Service registrations are marked and recorded? Lucky for Obama, it’s his native Chicago. From an article entitled, “Post Office Registration Process”, on the Selective Service website:

When a young man reaches 18 he can go to any of the 35,000 post offices nationwide to register with Selective Service. There he completes a simple registration card and mails it to the Selective Service System. This begins a multi-step process which results in the man’s registration.
Each week approximately 6,000 completed registration cards are sent to the Selective Service System’s Data Management System (DMC) near Chicago, Ill. At the DMC these cards are grouped into manageable quantities. Each card is then microfilmed and stamped with a sequential document locator number. The processed microfilm is reviewed to account for all documents and to ensure that the film quality is within strict standards. After microfilming, the cards are keyed and then verified by a different data transcriber.

The Document Locator Number (DLN) is an automatic function (Selective Service record-keeping, specifically the DLN is described on pages 7-8 of this Federal Register document), with the first two digits comprising the year, and it was not changed to “08″ in error. So if the form was filed and processed in 1980, how did it get a 2008 DLN?!
* Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form
On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form, labeled as “B“. On this particular Form 1, it clearly shows the month as “FEB” (February), and the year is either “80″ or “90″. The retired federal agent investigated further:

Magnification of the form both physically (with a 10x glass) or with different image software does not reflect a clear cut result of either a “80″ or a “90″.

But, checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001#), it’s apparent that in February 1980, the Selective Service agency withdrew a “Request for a new OMB control number” for SSS Form 1 (see also, here)–meaning the agency canceled its previous request for a new form, and one was never issued in “FEB 1980″.
Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980), codified in part at Subchapter I of Chapter 35 of Title 44 a federal agency can not use a form not approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it’s nearly impossible for Senator/President-Elect Obama’s SSS Form 1 to be dated “Feb 1980.” And since that makes it almost certainly dated “Feb 1990,” then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp it almost ten (10) years before its issue?! Simply not possible.
The lower right hand corner reflects that the Obama SSS form 1 was approved by OMB with an approval number of 19??0002, labeled as “C“. The double question marks (??) reflect digits that are not completely clear.
* Barack Obama’s Signature is Dated After Postal Stamp Certifying His Signature
Barack H. Obama signed the SSS Form 1′s “Today’s date” as July 30, 1980, labeled “D“. But the Postal Stamp reflects the PREVIOUS day’s date of July 29, 1980, labeled “E“. Yes, Obama could have mistakenly written the wrong date, but it is rare and much more unlikely for someone to put a future date than a past date. (Also note how Barry made such a “cute” peace sign with the “b” inside the “O” of his signature. Touching.)
* Postal Stamp is Incorrect, Discontinued in 1970
Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. The “postmark” stamp–labeled “E“–is hard to read, but it is clear that at the bottom is “USPO” which stands typically for United States Post Office. However, current “postmark” validator, registry, or round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations Manual) shows “USPS” for United States Postal Service. The change from Post Office to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon signed into law the most comprehensive postal legislation since the founding of the Republic–Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service officially began operations on July 1, 1971.
Why was an old, obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten (10) years after the fact to validate a legal document . . . that just happened to be Barack Obama’s suspicious Selective Service registration form?
* Form Shows Barack Obama didn’t have ID
The SSS Form 1 states “NO ID”, labeled “F“. Since that’s the case, then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter was really Barack H. Obama, who may have been on summer break from attending Occidental College in California. How would they determine whether the registrant was truly registering and not a relative, friend, or other imposter?
* The Selective Service Data Mgt. Center Stonewalled for Almost a Year on Obama Registration, Until Right Before the Election.
The retired federal agent who FOIA’d Barack Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form notes:

Early this year, when I first started questioning whether Obama registered I was told:

Sir: There may be an error in his file or many other reasons why his registration cannot be confirmed on-line. However, I did confirm with our Data Management Center that he is, indeed, registered with the Selective Service System, in compliance with Federal law.
Sincerely,
Janice L. Hughes/SSS

Then, they suddenly found the record on September 9, 2008 (prior to my October 13, 2008 request), and stated that his record was filed on September 4, 1980. Did they temporarily change the date on the computer database?
On the previous FOIA response, they stated that it was filed on September 4, 1980. In my second request I mentioned that Obama could not have filed it in Hawaii on September 4, 1980 as he was attending Occidental College in California, the classes of which commenced August 24, 1980.

* Other Questions: Missing Selective Service Number, FOIA Response Dated Prior to FOIA Request, Missing Printout Page
Where is Obama’s Selective Service number (61-1125539-1) on the card?
And the retired federal agent notes that the Selective Service Data Management Center prepared its response to his FOIA request prior to the request having been made:

The last transaction date is 09/04/80 [DS: labeled "G"], but the date of the printout is 09/09/08 [DS: labeled "H"]. My FOIA was dated October 13 so why did they prepare the printout BEFORE I submitted my FOIA? I gave them no “heads up” that I was sending it. In fact it was not mailed until late October–around the 25th.
Also, notice the printout was page 1 of 2 [DS: labeled "I"].

Hmmm . . . where is the other page, and what’s on it?
A lot of questions here. And a lot of huge hints that this government-released, official Barack Obama Selective Service registration was faked. Either he signed the fake backdated document, or someone else faked his signature and he never registered for the draft (and lied about it).
Which is it?
It’s incredible that our impending Commander-in-Chief either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently.
The documents indicate it’s one or the other.
*** UPDATE: Here’s another irregularity that points to fraud, as spotted by reader Joyce:

My husband printed the information provided on your web site regarding Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration discrepancies. I noticed that the DLN number in upper right corner (labeled “A“) has only ten (10) digits with the first two being 08 , but the DLN number shown on the computer screen printout has eleven (11) digits with the first two being 80. It clearly indicates that the “8″ was added at the beginning of the DLN number, in order to appear that it was issued in 1980 and wasn’t simply a reversal of the first two digits as the retired federal agent noted. This in itself appears questionable. I would think there is a standard number of digits in all DLN numbers.

**** UPDATE #2, 11/14/08: Retired Federal Agent Source Reveals Himself:

The recently retired federal agent has requested that I disclose his identity so that there is no question as to the source of the information.
His name is Stephen Coffman. He retired last year from the position of the Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Galveston, Texas office. He has over 32 years of government service and has held a Secret or higher security clearance for the majority of those years.
He filed the FOIA with Selective Service and has the original letter and the attachments. He first notified the Selective Service of his findings and they ignored the questions.
He can be reached via email at retirediceagent@sbcglobal.net.

UPDATE #3, 11/17/08: Some Obamapologists are claiming this is a fake and want to see evidence that retired agent Coffman actually got these documents from the Selective Service System Data Management Center. Below are scans of the letter and envelope that accompanied Barack Obama’s fraudulent registration for the draft (I’ve cropped the blank white space):
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 07:53:50 AM
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/exclusive-did-next-commander-in-chief-falsify-selective-service-registration-never-actually-register-obamas-draft-registration-raises-serious-questions

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: blacken700 on March 17, 2011, 08:03:23 AM
all you post is shit by right wing hacks and call it  truth,your post are getting to be a joke.lets start using some credible news sources for a change. you would think you would know this your suppose to be a lawyer ???
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 08:05:29 AM
all you post is shit by right wing hacks and call it  truth,your post are getting to be a joke.lets start using some credible news sources for a change. you would think you would know this your suppose to be a lawyer ???

 ::) 

Even 240 agrees that the SS story obama is pushing is pure lies. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Kazan on March 17, 2011, 08:06:43 AM
::)  

Even 240 agrees that the SS story obama is pushing is pure lies.  

Why do you even respond? The guy that thinks Cenk what ever the fuck his name is, is a credible source ::) The document is in the article, atleast that is provided and you can come to your own conclusions
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: blacken700 on March 17, 2011, 08:07:49 AM
he also believes 9-11 was an inside job
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 08:09:13 AM
he also believes 9-11 was an inside job

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: blacken700 on March 17, 2011, 08:15:40 AM
thats right your a birther  :D that explans what's going on
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 08:18:49 AM
thats right your a birther  :D that explans what's going on

I am a birther until facts show otherwise.   The only pause I have is th HI newsaper.  Other than that I am full blown birther.   Too much shady shit going on.     
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: 240 is Back on March 17, 2011, 10:05:52 AM
he also believes 9-11 was an inside job

911 isn't fully explained by the 911 commission report, if that's what you mean.  The majority of americans agree, polls show.  So it's really the marginal, minority CT to believe the official story ;)



The birth cert issue is a valid one, no doubt about it. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 17, 2011, 03:02:15 PM
911 isn't fully explained by the 911 commission report, if that's what you mean.  The majority of americans agree, polls show.  So it's really the marginal, minority CT to believe the official story ;)



The birth cert issue is a valid one, no doubt about it. 

This is why I like Trump.    No one else can get away with this. 

http://nation.foxnews.com/donald-trump/2011/03/17/trump-says-he-has-doubts-about-obamas-birthplace

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2011, 06:47:59 AM
Does President Obama Have a Bogus Social Security Number?
Blogspot.com ^ | 03/17/2011 | Jack Cashill




"All I can say,” says Daniels of 042-68-4425, “is that it’s phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his selective service document in 1980.”

Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama’s, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age nineteen which is why his information is available.

Wood's Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn sixteen in August of that year. Woods lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Connecticut, the state from which all “042s” applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

True to form, the left-leaning media set out to undermine the Social Security controversy and ridicule the investigators. Revealing, however, is the weakness of the response."

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: 240 is Back on March 18, 2011, 08:09:49 AM
This is why I like Trump.    No one else can get away with this. 

http://nation.foxnews.com/donald-trump/2011/03/17/trump-says-he-has-doubts-about-obamas-birthplace

Who said he got away with it?  MSNBC's new description of Trump is "Birther Donald Trump, now on board with orally tate, seen here screaming at the top of her lungs at a tree..."


Have you seen trump's interview?  me, me, I I I.  I'm super rich, I'm super smart... sorry, people aren't going to respond to that.
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2011, 08:13:48 AM
Who said he got away with it?  MSNBC's new description of Trump is "Birther Donald Trump, now on board with orally tate, seen here screaming at the top of her lungs at a tree..."


Have you seen trump's interview?  me, me, I I I.  I'm super rich, I'm super smart... sorry, people aren't going to respond to that.

240 - come on - even you had to laugh at the birther comment by Trump. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 23, 2011, 01:13:35 PM
Another Look at Obama’s Social Security Number
Cashill.com ^ | 3-17-11 | Jack Cashill




While out promoting my new book, “Deconstructing Obama,” I have been asked a few times about Obama’s mysterious Social Security number.

Not knowing enough to speak authoritatively, I chose to swim upstream through the data flood and head for the source.

Here I found a no-nonsense licensed investigator from Ohio named Susan Daniels. Widowed at 30 with seven children, Daniels went back to school and eventually emerged as a certified paralegal.

After several years working for others, Daniels got her own license as an investigator in 1995. Since then, she has specialized in litigation support for law firms. Her particular strength has been in researching assets.

By her own admission, Daniels is “good with public records.” She knows her way around databases and has access to many that the public does not.

“I did not like the way things were going,” Daniels says of the country’s drift circa 2009. And so in the best spirit of citizen journalism, she began to investigate Obama on her own.

What she and fellow investigator Neil Sankey unearthed was a nugget that could have ended the career of a George Bush or a Sarah Plain: Barack Obama had been using a social security number issued in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979, a state in which he never lived or even visited at that time in his life.

This will not come as news to the readers of WorldNetDaily, whose thorough investigation climaxed last June when WND’s veteran White House correspondent Les Kinsolving confronted Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs on the subject.

Predictably, Gibbs laughed Kinsolving off and switched the subject to the birth certificate. Kinsolving had seen this kind of laugh and switch before. In 1982, for instance, he introduced the subject of AIDS to then press secretary Larry Speakes.

“Over a third of [the victims] have died,” said Kinsolving. “It’s known as ‘gay plague.’”

“I don’t have it. Do you?” joked Speakes to a general round of laughter. But unlike Gibbs, Speakes simply did not know any better.

As much as Daniels appreciates the work of WND and other serious investigators who have helped clarify the picture, she is distressed by the few who have clouded it.

“There have been many playing junior investigator from the start,” she jokes. “I don't know if they even have their decoder rings yet.”

This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world’s best-known social security number--042-68-4425.

“All I can say,” says Daniels of 042-68-4425, “is that it’s phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his selective service document in 1980.”

Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama’s, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age nineteen which is why his information is available.

Wood's Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn sixteen in August of that year. Woods lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Connecticut, the state from which all “042s” applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

True to form, the left-leaning media set out to undermine the Social Security controversy and ridicule the investigators. Revealing, however, is the weakness of the response.

“Numbers are assigned based on the return address on the request envelope, not residency,” crowed Jason Linkins in the Huffington Post as though he had said something meaningful. Linkins suggested two possible explanations, both preposterous.

One is that Obama applied for his SSN as a little boy in Indonesia for no known reason, and the application just happened to be processed in Connecticut for no known reason either.

For the second, Jinkins cited the argument of Carole Glibert, in the Yahoo-related “Associated Content.” Said Gilbert, presumably with a straight face, “In fact, Barack Obama's dad attended college in Connecticut and in 1977, Obama was college aged; is it beyond reason to consider that he might have checked out his father's alma mater?”

Last time I checked, Harvard was in Massachusetts. The closest town to Harvard in Connecticut is about 90 minutes away, and there is no record that Obama Sr. lived there, let alone that Obama visited his imaginary alma mater and just happened to apply for a Social Security card while visiting.

Daniels also sent me a copy of Obama’s Selective Service data. Obama appears to have registered on September 4, 1980, a month after his nineteenth birthday. The form lists the telling last four digits of his “042” number, “4425.”

This is the first use of the “042” number that Daniels could find. She is just not sure it is legitimate. Some have credibly argued that the Selective Service information was forged and backdated once Obama became a presidential candidate.

“They were stupid to use the CT number on the [Selective Service] card,” Daniels adds, “because now there is no way for [Obama] to back out of that number.”

Rest @ link

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Freeborn126 on March 24, 2011, 04:27:19 PM
Dude is a signature CIA manchurian candidate.  Groomed from childhood to be our president. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: 240 is Back on March 24, 2011, 04:52:21 PM
240 - come on - even you had to laugh at the birther comment by Trump. 

Nope.  All I could do is shake my head and say "How can so many educated people take Trump seriously?  he's an egomaniac - I dont think you can even deny that.  Can't stop talking about how rich and smart he is.   He took money from terrorists.  He is immature and just says these unrealistic things - "OPEC will lower oil prices because I'll tell them to!"

If it wasn't a TV star - if it was Joe the Welder from Pittsburgh telling you he will tell OPEC what to do, you'd laugh. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: tonymctones on March 24, 2011, 04:58:13 PM
the egomaniac comment is funny coming from someone who has his head so far up barracks ass you can taste his lunch
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: 240 is Back on March 24, 2011, 05:06:14 PM
the egomaniac comment is funny coming from someone who has his head so far up barracks ass you can taste his lunch

you've never asked me. 
obama is a total egomaniac.  he's so full of himself it's unbelievable.  Acts like kanye west.

what's your take on trump, tony?  egomaniac?
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: tonymctones on March 24, 2011, 05:12:24 PM
you've never asked me. 
obama is a total egomaniac.  he's so full of himself it's unbelievable.  Acts like kanye west.

what's your take on trump, tony?  egomaniac?
i think he is a complete moron...

its all an act if you ask me, trump has created a persona and he is playing to it if you ask me.
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: 240 is Back on March 24, 2011, 05:17:29 PM
its all an act if you ask me, trump has created a persona and he is playing to it if you ask me.


I'm with you on that.  He'll get 100 million people to tune in to his show's season finale, where he'll announce he's not running.

America will be OWNED.  period.  He's using this to pimp his show.  Just like he did with his divorce, his ongoing feuds with Whoopi, Rosie, etc.  He has used a series of publicity stunts with every show's season. 

that Trump Comedy Central Roast... I mean, we're hearing about how many cawks were ingested by Lisa Lameneli before lunchtime today... NO serious presidential contender would do that. 

Plus, he's a frigging liberal.  he supports universal healthcare!  He supports the assault weapons ban!  Like in 2008, where repubs like 33 voted romney cause "he's a businessman!" without looking at the positions/experience the candidate has...

it's the same thing again.  People are infatuated with a TV star and cheer him on.  They don't 'get' that a boring, experienced person will beat obama.  An immature, obnoxious media whore will not.
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 29, 2011, 08:17:08 PM
bump
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 30, 2011, 12:56:29 PM

Springs man's claim to have Obama records starts buzz
Comments 117
March 29, 2011 5:47 PM
MATT STEINER
THE GAZETTE



A Colorado Springs “birther,” retired Air Force Col. Gregory Hollister, has Internet blogs abuzz with what may be an illegal foray into an online Social Security data base and how he obtained a copy of President Barack Obama’s draft registration from 1980.

“Col. Greg Hollister, USAF (Ret.) contacted the Selective Service, falsely impersonated President Obama, improperly registered his own address as President Obama’s address, and by this false impersonation and identity theft he managed to obtain a duplicate registration acknowledgement card with President Obama’s Selective Service information on it,” a blogger posted on gratewire.com last week. “This may violate several federal criminal statutes, and apparently caused the federal record of President Obama’s address with the Selective Service to be altered to show that he lives in Colorado Springs, CO.”

Hollister said Tuesday a private investigator, Susan Daniels of Ohio, gave him what is purported to be the president’s Social Security number. He then accessed the Social Security Number Verification Service to find out to whom it was issued and to access Selective Service documents.

The site allows registered users to verify names and Social Security numbers for employment purposes and warns that using it under false pretenses is a violation of federal law.

“According to the Social Security Administration, that number was never issued,” said Hollister, who challenged whether the president is an American citizen in a lawsuit the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Jan. 18 without requiring a response from the White House.
However, that’s the Social Security number that appears on the Selective Service documents Hollister obtained.

Hollister and others in the birther movement claim Obama was born in either Kenya or Indonesia and that his birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu in 1961 is a forgery.

Being born outside the U.S. makes him ineligible to be president, they claim, because the Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen.

Hollister said the Social Security number on what he says is Obama’s draft registration begins with the numbers 042, which would be issued to someone born in Connecticut, not Hawaii.

Last week, California attorney Orly Taitz, who has led the legal challenges to Obama’s citizenship, filed an amended complaint in her latest lawsuit demanding Obama’s Social Security records, attaching as an exhibit the draft registration mailed to an address in Colorado Springs, according to the Reality Check Radio Blog.

It is unknown if the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Denver is investigating Hollister’s use of the data bases and obtaining Obama’s draft records.

Hollister denied breaking any laws.

“I was very meticulous and made sure everything I did was compliant with the law,” Hollister said, noting that he sent Obama an 1099 tax form.

A 1099 is an IRS income reporting form for independent contractors and free-lancers. Hollister did not explain how sending that to Obama complies with federal laws on the use of Social Security data.

Daniels said her doubts about Obama’s citizenship have only been reinforced by what Hollister found out.

Hollister said he started questioning Obama’s citizenship because as a retired Air Force officer he is subject to recall to active duty until he dies and he needs to be sure that Obama has the authority to give those orders.



Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/springs-115381-colorado-obama.html#ixzz1I761t2o3

Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: MB on March 30, 2011, 01:25:04 PM
He obviously has a shady past or all this would be public.  Either he used a false SSN to get out of any military obligation or he doesn't have a valid SSN. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 30, 2011, 01:28:14 PM
He obviously has a shady past or all this would be public.  Either he used a false SSN to get out of any military obligation or he doesn't have a valid SSN. 

From what i have gathered, its a SS number reserved for CT residents and was used to get him a phoney passport in order to travel to Indonensia.  Once there, they listed him as "Barry Soetoro" to sign him up for school as an indonesian resident.

I believe he also used this fake SS number to travel to Pakistan in the 80's for some bizarre reason still not explained.     
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: MB on March 30, 2011, 02:57:11 PM
From what i have gathered, its a SS number reserved for CT residents and was used to get him a phoney passport in order to travel to Indonensia.  Once there, they listed him as "Barry Soetoro" to sign him up for school as an indonesian resident.

I believe he also used this fake SS number to travel to Pakistan in the 80's for some bizarre reason still not explained.     

It's unbelievable that we have a President who registered with Selective Service using a phony SSN and it's treated as no big deal.  He is pulling the biggest con in history and is getting away with it. 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Option D on March 31, 2011, 02:18:53 PM
i think he is a complete moron...
its all an act if you ask me, trump has created a persona and he is playing to it if you ask me.

and 333 says he should be president..


ill say it again.. Ralph Nader for president.. Does he look depressing.. yes.. a little like droopy... but i think his economic ideas are good
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 31, 2011, 04:34:29 PM
Mal does anything in this thread disturb you besides its myself posting it? 
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: tu_holmes on March 31, 2011, 05:23:26 PM
There's a lot disturbing in this thread.
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 01, 2011, 05:28:52 AM
Title: Re: Obama's 16 Different Social Security Numbers
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 01, 2011, 05:52:11 AM
More proof of COLB fraud.   The race listed on Obama's COLB says his fathers' ace was "AFRICAN".   However, at the time, that was nt an option as the only designation was Negro, Caucasion, etc.   

This whole lie is coming undone by the day.   
Title: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:03:04 PM
Saturday, April 2, 2011
FINAL REPORT: Obama's Birth Announcements Fail To Indicate "Natural Born" Status




A new investigation of Obama’s birth announcements appearing in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a medically verified “Live" birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian hospital, per an officially defined "vital event" by the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.

By Penbrook Johannson
Editor of the Daily Pen

In August, 1961, two announcements allegedly showing a “native” birth for Barack Obama were published in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers, the Sunday Advertiser and the Honolulu Star. For more than three years since Obama engaged his unvetted candidacy for the presidency, many of his supporters have lauded these blurbish announcements as the "holy grail" of proof that he was born in the state of Hawaii.

However, a detailed investigation of the history and procedures used by Hawaii’s municipal health department, and its relationship with the newspapers, shows that not only was it a matter of official policy that Obama’s birth would have been announced in the paper regardless of where he was born, the information used to publish the announcements is not even confirmed through any eye-witness medical authority or hospital in the state.

Also, in 1961, the two newspapers shared the same address and facility which means they received only one copy of the same vital records information from the Department of Health. Therefore, the format and content of information used in public announcements were published identically by both papers, including any mistakes, omissions, order or context, and no investigation was carried out by the editors to determine if the information provided by the DOH was actually accurate. The two newspapers have long since collaborated into one organization.

Now, however, collaborative information from the archive of the U.S. Department of Health’s 1961 Report on Vital Statistics of the U.S – Volume 1: Natality, and Hawaii’s Administrative rules governing the creation of vital records finally reveals the truth about how these announcements were published and why they are mistakenly used by pundits to promote a misguided message about Obama.

The Daily Pen’s, Dan Crosby, engaged a two month long research project on location in Hawaii, to, once and for all, close the door on questions about the facts and bring the long-due invalidation of the authority of these fallow Hawaiian birth announcements in quaint newspapers to support Obama's eligibility to be president.

Recall, for more than two years, major media personalities, such as Bill O’reilly, Chris Matthews and recently fired, Keith Olbermann have enjoyed poking fun with the announcements essentially saying to their viewers that the very presence of these announcements means one of only two exclusive options: 1. They are a legitimate and accurate indication of Obama’s geographic birth in Hawaii, or 2. They are the result of some crazy 50-year-long conspiracy concocted by members of Obama’s family and newspaper editors at the time in order to enable Obama to use the announcements some time later as primary evidence that he was born in Hawaii in the event he might run for president some day.

In his investigation, Crosby found confirmed and easily accessible evidence that neither of these choices apply to Obama’s records. In fact, the explanation is far less sensational and simple that it reveals that Mr. Obama (Soetoro) simply benefitted from a commonly used practice in the state of Hawaii applied for thousands of births which were registered there, but which did not occur there.

“The birth announcements were printed from unconfirmed information provided to the Newspapers by the Department of Health without the DOH or newspaper editors confirming the actual location of the birth with any hospital in Hawaii,” says Crosby in a phone call from Oahu, “I found thousands of birth registration records of children born outside of Hawaii who have their announcements published in these two newspapers by cross referencing the announcements with the U.S. Department of Health Vital Records Report for Hawaii.”

Recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 allows the state Health Department to register the foreign birth of any child as a native Hawaiian birth if the parents of that child can be proven to the satisfaction and criteria of the Director of the Department of Health only, they were residence of Hawaii within one year of the birth, regardless of the location of the birth. This law then mandates that the vital records registrar must register the birth with the vital records office in coordination with an official, original Hawaiian birth record.

“They (newspaper editors) don’t confirm “native” birth status,” continued Crosby, “The newspaper doesn’t care if the birth occurred in the local hospital. They don’t even print that. They merely published information provided to them directly and exclusively from the Department of Health in 1961, which means that any birth meeting the criteria of this law can be registered, and therefore published in a newspaper announcement.”

“The birth location is mistakenly implied by people because it appears in this newspaper. I also found several birth records in Japan for birth's registered in Hawaii.” A review of all the birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 reveals other evidence suggesting a disconnect between the Department of Health and Hawaii’s hospitals.

First of all, as shown by Crosby, all the announcements show the parents as married and living at the same address.

“This is not merely a majority of the announcements, this is actually all of them. Every single one! Approximately 16,000 in all!” Crosby said.

He continued, “This is a significant indication that the newspapers actually do not investigate the information provided by the DOH (Department of Health). If they did, they would have seen that there are more than 1000 births recorded in Hawaii in 1961 in which the parents were not married and/or only the mother is recorded as the parent, yet the papers still publish Mr. and Mrs. ‘Whoever’ in the announcement because that is the information registered, not medically verified.”

If the DOH doesn’t include accurate information about the parents for birth announcements, in all cases, what makes people conclude a native birth even though the DOH also omits accurate information about the location of the birth, as well? Crosby also discovered that the announcements are in a tale-tell order which exposes a shocking fact about Obama’s birth announcements.

“Did anyone notice the announcements are not in any alphabetic order, or in order of birthdate? This is because, in 1961, birth registration numbers were issued based on the location of the local Vital Records office in which the registration was recorded. The hospital does not assign these numbers, the DOH does. It appears that Obama’s birth was registered in an office not used by any of the birth registrations offices who received birth certification from either Kapi-olani Medical Center, or Queens Medical Center which use two local offices near those facilities,” said Crosby.

He continued, “It appears Obama’s birth was registered with the satellite office near his grandparent’s home some distance from the offices nearest to and most used by the hospitals. This particular office was commonly used by indigenous people of Hawaii wanting to record births of children outside of the city. This is why the U.S. Department of Health created the Certificate of Live Birth template in 1959 with a check box indicating whether or not the child was born in the city limits and if the residence of the mother was a farm or not. It appears Obama’s birth at least did not occur in the city of Honolulu and, at most, did not even occur in the state of Hawaii.”

In 1956, the National Vital Statistics Division of the U.S. Department of Health issued a revised template version of the “Certificate of Live Birth” form to be used by state municipalities to record and medically verify births. Since Hawaii had not yet become a state, these revisions to the template would not be used in Hawaii until 1959. Therefore, birth records created after 1959 were subject to demographic clarifications and metrics prescribed by the federal authority of the U.S. Department of Health, not the state of Hawaii.

“This also explains why Obama’s birth announcements appear in the succession of announcements where and when they do. His alleged “Certification of Live Birth” is not approved by any federal authority as an official source of demographic data or medical verification of his birth. It is merely a record of birth registration. Therefore, the order of printing of announcements in the local papers comes directly from the list which is ordered based on the birth registration office location, not the chronological or alphabetical order of the medically verified birth.”

Crosby’s says the difference between “medically verified” and “registration” are significant. He interviewed former Vital Records Adminstration, Martin Hesch in order to gain understanding of the different procedures and authorities used to create vital records and public announcements in a medical verification process as opposed to merely registering a vital event with a municipal office.

“I think people simply want to believe a simple equation to this issue,” said Hesch, when asked why he thought so many people ignorantly believe what they are told about Obama’s records.

“That is why they think that a birth announcement in a local paper is somehow an automatic indication of a local birth. Unfortunately, they wrongly accept a locally appearing birth announcement as an indication of medically confirmed ‘local birth’ and that just simply is not the way it is in most cases in Hawaii in early part of its history. The media also wants Barack Obama’s natal circumstances and documentation to fit the traditional record model because it is too disturbing to them to think that they were so easily deceived… but we also now know they do not fit this model.”

Hesch went on to explain that there two primary authorities to consider when understanding vital records administration. First, you have the medical verification of a vital event, like a birth or death, and you have the administrative process which documents, records and files them.

“Birth events and deaths are unique because they require medical verification in the form of official original documentation attested by a medical authority, and, most importantly, the possession of that original documentation is maintained by the local authority,” says Hesch.

“However, an administrative process such as that used in birth registrations (not medical verifications), marriages, divorces or amendments to vital records are presided over by legislative rule, not medical standards. This means that they are not exclusive to some originating medical authority. That is not to say that a judge in a divorce case would not require a medical record in making legal decisions, it just means that the standards used to document administrative processes are different than those used to document a medically verifiable vital event in the U.S.”

Hesch explained this is why it is possible to publish a birth announcement for a non-native birth. The announcements in the newspapers are the result of the registration records held by the administrative authority, not the records created by the medical authority.

“The birth announcement is automatically triggered by the creation of the registration through administrative process, when the municipal record is provided to the newspaper, not the creation of a medical verification record by a medical doctor or hospital,” he said.

“The birth can actually occur anywhere and if the announcement does not disclose the location, there is no way to know from just the public announcement whether the vital event is a local occurrence or not.”

Hesch’s explanation brings clarity to Obama’s birth announcements. Conclusively, Obama’s birth was registered in the state of Hawaii, but the announcements were not an indication that it was medically verified as occurring there.

“So, let me get this straight. People who think that Obama's birth announcements mean that he was born in Hawaii actually believe that the newspaper editors of the 1960’s received thousands of different notices from thousands of different doctors from multiple hospitals and villages throughout Hawaii and then they organized them in some highly coordinated manner for publication in non-computerized publishing system?” asked Hesch, incredulously.

"That is utterly ridiculous," he continued, “that is why the DOH pools this information and provided it for public announcements and why the newspapers accepted the information from the DOH without verifying the facts. The verification process would have been staggering and so time intensive for the newspaper deadlines.”

“If people would turn off the T.V. and just investigate this stuff for five minutes, they would feel stupid when they realize how simple and unimpressive the reality is,” he said.

In fact, the evidence shows that the original medical verification, in the form of what would be a U.S. Certificate of Live Birth signed by an attending physician and attested by a hospital administrator, simply does not exist in a form or content which would promote Obama’s “natural born status”.

Hesch agreed that there is probably information in the original medical birth record which undermines Obama’s identity as a politician and that is the reason why Obama is refusing to disclose it.

“Oh, sure, he is hiding something,” he said, “that is a fact and that is the only reason NOT to disclose it. Because, if the original medical record supported his current identity, he would be stupid to keep it hidden. It would only support him in that case.”

When asked his opinion about Obama’s case, Hesch said that is a certainty in his mind that Obama’s birth documentation was subjected to administrative processes or amendments and that his medically verified natal records show information that the local vital records authority is able to protect under law under the guise of identity protection.

“Of course, it’s ridiculous,” said Hesch, “the Secret Service is not required here. This is natal information which occurred 50 years ago, not a public appearance where the president is under any threat. The only reason to hide the original record is to protect something Obama doesn’t want people to know about him and how that information adversely impacts his ability to be president. It’s plain and simple to me.”

In the medical verification process, a registered professional of a federal board must document the circumstances and metrics of a birth. However, the administrative process used to the document the event for municipal purposes is not bound by medical requirements to accurately express those same circumstances because the vital records data is applied under different authoritative functions. Census reports, vital records reports and demographic data serve a different purpose than health report data. Hesch explained that the reasons for this level of administrative complexity comes from Hawaii’s historically plural culture where you have indigenous, native Oceanic, Asian and, of course, American peoples mixing in the population. Since Hawaii is unique in this and that it was a remote, detached territory prior to becoming a part of the U.S., it was necessary to “customize” much of their vital records processes in order to include all those who would be eligible for U.S. citizenry after the island nation became a state. This meant that including non-native births was necessary because the islands of Hawaii were so permeable to migration.

Therefore, it has now been confirmed by authorities in Hawaii and abroad that Obama’s birth announcements appeared in two local Hawaiian newspapers without the birth having been medically verified as occurring in Hawaii. The announcements are automatically triggered from information provided by the Department of Health, not the hospital. Therefore, since we already know that Hawaii's Health Department registered foreign births, the announcements would include births for these registrations as well, along with local birth registrations.

As a final statement to Bill O’reilly, Chris Matthews and the remaining ignorant slew of media hacks, we would like to say this:

Your failure to investigate these facts has undermined your profession and made you look pathetically wanton as journalists. If you would have taken just two more steps in your shallow observations, just one more level down into the actual truth, you have come to the same facts about Obama’s natal history as the internet community has. Instead, you chose to glance at the drive-by message and believe what some deceitful political animal told you about the matter. Now, Obama has made you look like a fool.


http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcements.html


Posted by Penbrook One at 5:50 AM 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:16:36 PM
In fact, the evidence shows that the original medical verification, in the form of what would be a U.S. Certificate of Live Birth signed by an attending physician and attested by a hospital administrator, simply does not exist in a form or content which would promote Obama’s “natural born status”.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:18:28 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:21:54 PM
Isn't Bogus Info On Selective Service Forms a Crime? The Market Ticker ® - Commentary on The Capital Markets Posted 2011-03-31 13:36
by Karl Denninger


in Politics Isn't Bogus Info On Selective Service Forms a Crime?
 
 
I'm not going to get into the general "birther" thing, for a whole host of reasons.

But there is one piece of information that I do find curious - the apparent uncovering of President Obama's actual selective service (draft) registration.  I was required to file one of these when I reached 18, and I was born near the same time Obama was.  I didn't like it very much, but I told the truth, because right there on the form was a statement that if I didn't, I was committing a federal offense.

Well, have a look at this document - the last page of it in particular.

That Social Security number was issued from the Connecticut office, but Obama never lived there.  Nor, at the age it was applied for (obviously prior to his 18th birthday) would he have had Presidential (or other similar) aspirations, so there would have been no reason to play games.

Leaving aside the "birther" thing, what's going on here with Selective Service?  Problems with selective service registrations have derailed other candidates and office-holders in the past.  I'm sure everyone remembers all the howling about alleged special treatment that Bush received......

Well, if it's relevant for a Republican office-holder, why isn't it when the man in the office is a Democrat?

Incidentally, they're threatening to prosecute the guy who uncovered this... I thought "whistle-blowers" were generally thought of as good things?

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=2490825

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:26:29 PM
Confirmed: Stanley Ann Dunham began studies in September 1961, not August 66
Share 0diggs
digg   
REGISTRAR’S OFFICE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON CONFIRMS START DATE WAS IN SEPTEMBER 1961
by Sharon Rondeau



Stanley Ann Dunham's 1960 high school graduation photograph

(Aug. 22, 2010) — The Post & Email can confirm that the alleged mother of Barack Hussein Obama, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, began her course of study at the University of Washington in September 1961, not August 19, 1961, as has been widely reported.

One source of information whose work is widely disseminated on the internet does not mention her attendance at the University of Washington at all.  A Facebook page created for her the day after the 2008 presidential election also fails to include that detail of her life.

Following up on a tip received recently from a private researcher, The Post & Email obtained confirmation from the registrar’s office at the University of Washington that Dunham’s classes began in September 1961.

There has been much speculation as to how a young woman of 18 could have given birth to a child on August 4, 1961 and begun classes, albeit evening and/or correspondence classes, on August 19 of the same year.

August 19 was a Saturday.  The electronic version of the University of Washington 1961 General Archive shows that with the exception of legal holidays such as New Year’s Day, classes always began on a Monday.

A recent investigation of a researcher who looked into Stanley Ann Dunham’s whereabouts has confirmed that she was listed in the Polk’s Directory of 1961-62 as living in Seattle, WA, but the question of when she actually moved there  or from where is open.

After receiving the tip, The Post & Email sent the following email to the Registrar at the University of Washington:

From:  Sharon Rondeau
Sent: Thu 8/12/10 9:32 PM
To: vedwards@u.washington.edu
Subject: ATTENDANCE DATES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOR STANLEY ANN DUNHAM OBAMA

Hello, Ms. Edwards, I am inquiring about the records of the above deceased person who attended your university in the 1960s.  I have heard that there is some question as to whether or not Ms. Obama began her studies at U of W in August 1961 or September 1961.  Is there any way I can obtain a copy of her record with the correct attendance dates?

Thank you very much.

Sharon Rondeau

The following response was received on August 12, 2010:

From: Virjean Edwards (vedwards@u.washington.edu)
Sent: Thu 8/12/10 9:33 PM
To: Sharon Rondeau

I am away from the office August 13 and 16. I will respond when I return . If you need an immediate response, please send your email to registra@u.washington.edu. Thank you!

Virjean Hanson Edwards
Deputy University Registrar

An email was then sent to the alternate contact address:

From: Sharon Rondeau
Sent: Thu 8/12/10 9:37 PM
To: registra@u.washington.edu

Hello, I had sent an email to Ms. Virjean Edwards, whose automated response indicated that she will be out of the office until Aug. 17.

Would you be able to confirm the start date of Ms. Obama’s attendance at your institution?  Some reports say that she began extension and/or correspondence courses in August 1961; other reports say September 1961.  As Ms. Obama is deceased, could I obtain a copy of her transcript?

Thank you very much.

Sharon Rondeau

and the following response was received:

From: regoff@u.washington.edu
Sent: Fri 8/13/10 1:11 PM
To: Sharon Rondeau

Sharon,

We are unable to confirm that information. Approval to release that information needs to come from Virjean Edwards so you will need to go through her in order to obtain that information.

Sincerely,

Registration & Transcripts
University of Washington
225 Schmitz Hall

To which we responded:

From: Sharon Rondeau
Sent: Fri 8/13/10 4:10 PM
To: regoff@u.washington.edu

OK, thank you very much.  I will touch base with her next week.

Sharon Rondeau

Because of her time away from the office, The Post & Email waited a few days for Ms. Edwards to respond to our original inquiry.  When we didn’t hear, we followed up:

From: Sharon Rondeau
Sent: Fri 8/20/10 12:15 PM
To: vedwards@u.washington.edu
Subject: ATTENDANCE DATES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOR STANLEY ANN DUNHAM OBAMA

Hello, Ms. Edwards, were you able to ascertain whether or not Stanley Ann Dunham began her studies at the University of Washington in August or September 1961?

Thank you.

Sharon Rondeau

to which Ms. Edwards promptly replied:

From: Virjean H. Edwards (vedwards@u.washington.edu)
Sent: Sat 8/21/10 4:19 PM
To: ‘Sharon Rondeau’

Hello Ms. Rondeau

Yes, it was definitely September 1961.    We located the 1961 Time Schedule which shows the date all classes began.
________________________ ________________________ _____

Virjean Hanson Edwards
Interim University Registrar
University of Washington
206-685-2553
Fax # 206-685-3660
210 Schmitz Hall
Box 355850
Seattle, WA 98195

The following email was sent by Ms. Virjean Edwards to the original researcher on July 26, 2010:

This is to confirm that when Ms. Obama’s record was entered into the Student Data Base, an error had been made and the month was entered as August (8) and not September (9).  The staff person made an honest mistake since on the original record the 9 is typed on the line which makes the 9 look like an 8. Our office investigated this, found that the class did not begin until September so corrected the on-line transcript changing the month from August to September.

If you have any other questions about this please contact me.

________________________ ________________________ _____
Virjean Hanson Edwards
Interim University Registrar
University of Washington
206-543-3290
Fax # 206-221-4423
Schmitz Hall
Box 355850
Seattle, WA 98195


Grade record from Stanley Ann Dunham Obama's fall 1961 and spring 1962 semesters at the University of Washington

Detail from a registration form for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama for the University of Washington for the spring semester, 1962
The University of Hawaii has reported that Stanley Ann attended its Manoa campus in the fall of 1960 and did not return until spring 1963:



Letter from the Registrar at the University of Hawaii confirming Stanley Ann Dunham's attendance dates
Mr. Christopher Strunk and Mr. Kenneth Allen had sent in Freedom of Information Act requests in November 2008 and February 2009, respectively, regarding passport and other records from 1960 and later for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, who became Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro.  In both cases, the State Department refused to release the requested information until after the requesters filed lawsuits.  When information was finally released to both plaintiffs on July 29, 2010, no documents from the period 1960-64 were included.

In the case of Mr. Strunk, some documents were released which were responsive to his request, but the cover letter from the Bureau of Consular Affairs, Passport Services stated that “We did not locate a 1965 passport application referenced in an application for amendment of passport that is included in the released documents.  Many passport applications and other non-vital records from that period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from the General Services Administration.”

A previous letter to Mr. Strunk dated Februrary 3, 2009 incorrectly stated that “There are no entry/exit records available prior to 1982, either in electronic or paper format” (page 17 of exhibit).

Information requested on Obama’s travel records, birth registration documents, and possible adoption papers was denied by invoking the Privacy Act of 1974 (page 26).

If there is no record of Stanley Ann Dunham being in Hawaii during 1961, where was she?  Why are various government departments stonewalling citizens’ requests for documentation from that period? Is it possible she traveled to Kenya or Indonesia and gave birth there?  Many Africans seem to think so, as reported here, here, here, and here.

Earlier today this writer heard Fr. Jonathan Morris, Religion Contributor at Fox News Channel, state on “Fox & Friends” to anchor Alisyn Camerota while discussing Obama’s lack of public expression of his alleged Christian faith, that Obama “was born in a Muslim country,” to which Camerota replied, with the camera focused squarely on her, “No, he was born here” without further explanation or questioning of how Morris arrived at his statement.  Camerota did not offer any evidence to support her own statement and the conversation about Obama’s questionable Christianity continued.

An editorial from last summer at Fox News online raises the possibility that Obama was born in a foreign country and explains how Obama could put an end to the questions regarding his birthplace and other details of his life.

While the final letter to Strunk does not explicitly say that Dunham’s passport applications were destroyed, it implies such, referencing “guidance” from the General Services Administration.  However, does any evidence exist which would support that statement?  The Post & Email is investigating.

A video of the exchange between Fr. Morris and Camerota is here.



© 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/22/confirmed-stanley-ann-dunham-began-studies-in-september-1961-not-august

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:29:51 PM
Sunday, June 27, 2004
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.
   
Barrack Obama
 

"It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race," Ryan, 44, said in a statement. "What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play."

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was "truly outrageous" that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

"I feel for him actually," Obama told a Chicago TV station. "What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody."

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

"Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state," she said.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, "There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere."

 

—AP

 
 
 
http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:31:51 PM
Obama himself was putting out in 2004, that he was born in Kenya.


What most people know is that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services.  What most people don’t know that is in 2004, the AP was a “birther” news organization.

How so?  Because in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report, available at

 http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

 The AP reporter stated the following:

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.


This report explains the context of the oft cited debate, between Obama and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, and in which Obama, by his quick retort, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office.  Seeing that an AP reporter is too professional to submit a story which was not based on confirmed sources (ostensibly the Obama campaign in this case), the inference seems inescapable: Obama himself was putting out in 2004, that he was born in Kenya.

The difficulty in finding this gem of a story is hampered by Google, which is running flak for Obama:  because if you search for “Kenyan-born US Senate” you won’t find it, but if you search for the phrase without quotes you will find links which talk about it.

For those who believe what they see, here is the screen capture of the page from the Kenyan Sunday Standard, electronic edition, of June 27, 2004 — Just in case that page is scrubbed from the Web Archive:

http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

John Charlton
The Post & Email
October 16, 2009


 http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=8075

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 02, 2011, 08:38:57 PM
Difference between a long form BC and what bama put out.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: George Whorewell on April 03, 2011, 02:46:39 AM
Everything in this thread is false. Obama is black and can speak English without using repeated profanity. Therefore, if you question anything about his background you are a racist.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 04:16:57 AM
Lol.  This issue is not going away any time soon. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 05:19:31 AM

April 03, 2011
The Unified Theory of Obama
By Clarice Feldman




For as long as I can remember scientists have been trying to put together a Theory of Everything which would explain and connect all the knowledge we have of physical phenomena. So far they haven't been successful, but they keep trying.  I wondered if it would be possible to explain the many contradictions of Obama and the mystery of his origins and incomprehensible nature of his domestic and foreign policies to better understand him and predict why he seems to be steering the ship of state onto the shoals


I think I've finally got it, though a night of watching old movies  -- "The Man in the Iron Mask" and "The Prince and the Pauper" -- helped me along.


Barack is not one person.  The man we know as Barack Obama is really two people, identical (possibly conjoined at the head Janus-like but later separated) twins. Don't laugh. I'll explain.


The Mystery of His Birth


As Donald Trump is reminding everyone, we have no proof that Obama was born in the United States, where, when or to whom. People have offered up a variety of theories to explain why he has spent so much time and money trying to prevent us from seeing his birth certificate, something apparently only he can get released from the Hawaiian birth records sealed vaults. But I believe that the clue we need to unravel the mystery has been hiding in plain sight all along:

Why does he have this incredibly long scar that covers the  sides and back of his head?


We've never seen his medical records, to my knowledge, and he's given no explanation for this phenomenon that I can see, but see for yourself. Something most odd has caused a scar from one side of his head to another curving up over the crown:










Let's suppose that he was born a conjoined at the head twin and the surgery left its mark, that in fact one twin got the rhythm and cool -- let's call that one "Candidate Obama" -- and he was the one who so charmed people who should have known better like Peggy Noonan and David Brooks. The other was thicker witted and needed folks like Bill Ayers and his own smarter twin to pull him through. Let's call that one "President Obama."


His Intelligence


As is the case with most Democrat politicians, the press has repeatedly assured us that he's a genius of the first order, but like Jack Cashill, I have to wonder about that, particularly as he has not even mastered his native tongue nor learned basic geography. And yet we are told (we haven't seen proof) that he graduated from Columbia University, Harvard Law School and passed the Illinois bar and is listed as a best selling author of two books.


Assume as I do that the author thing is a lie, and that one book was written on the sly by Bill Ayers and the other by some far less gifted ghostwriter, we still have an academic mystery to consider.


But what if he were twins? One of them (Candidate Obama) could sit in an adjoining room writing up the answers from an open book while the other (President Obama) walked back and forth without arousing the proctors' suspicions.  Maybe they even took turns each semester, with one doping up and having fun while the other worked.  Perhaps that explains how he can claim he attended Columbia for two years when that school has records of him being there for only 9 months. One twin just forgot to sign in  the year when it was his turn.


Why Does He Rely Over Much on the Teleprompter?


Simple. Neither one of them can think and talk (or write) at the same time, so one types the words in on the teleprompter and the other reads them. Proof of this is that on those occasions when there's been a glitch in the teleprompting whichever Obama twin is speaking is struck immediately dumb.


Watch and see what I'm talking about:




or






 
Is He a Sociopathic Liar or A Hypocrite?


People who pay attention to what he says note that there is not a single promise he made as a candidate he hasn't broken.  Indeed, even his oldest and staunchest allies are complaining that he's turned his back on them.  If anyone can find Code Pink and Mother Sheehan it would be interesting to find out their views on Libya.



Maybe Candidate Obama is in the dungeon with his head in an iron mask and they are keeping him company there.  Surely the press who followed them about when Bush was President and they were treated like paragons on the issue of military actions has been looking for them to find out what they think.  No?


I for one have no notion what he had in mind when he announced we were doing whatever we are doing over there, but then I'm not alone.  It appears neither the Secretary of State nor the Secretary of Defense has any idea either, nor do our purported allies in this move, nor NATO. So why should it bother me that I'm lost?


It seems like just yesterday he was saying that  trying to force  out of power a murderous dictator was a "dumb war" and such a move should be  opposed.  But then again are we trying to force out Gaddafi?  Are we trying to help the rebels?  Who are the rebels and why should be help them?  What is the fighting force?  What are their orders and who is commanding them? I feel like the old man in "Moonstruck" wandering about  saying,  "I  am so confused."


And each day deepens my confusion.


The Libyans aren't confused; they're hightailing it out of that mess as fast as they can.   My friend Rick Ballard makes clear why:


The Italian press is reporting that only 40 recipients* of the UN R2P kinetic humanitarian aid were completely overcome by the experience. I'm sure that the President will be presenting the chart (prepared by l'École polytechnique) showing lives saved or created by his actions within just a few days and we all know that preparing delicious omelets must begin with cracking a few heads eggs.


*That's 40 for Tripoli only. No believable count for the rest of Libya is currently available due to minor disruptions caused by continuing delivery of kinetic humanitarian aid.


I suppose since the kinetic action was announced when one of the Obamas was on a gig in South America the dumb brother got us into this mess.


On the other hand maybe neither one of them has his head on exactly straight.


I mean look at his energy policy -- it's just as jumbled, as  another Just One Minute Poster, JMH notes:


Obama Energy Plan A:


As consumers are priced out of the gas market, force them to buy cars they can't pay for without government subsidies we can't afford which run on batteries that don't exist yet which our electrical grid can't accommodate.


Plan B:


Cut oil imports 1/3 by "investing" in Brazilian production, thus forming a "partnership" which allows us to buy oil from ourselves. And pay for it twice.


Plan C:


After successfully implementing Plan B, recycle Plan A.


Plan D:


Punish folks who won't relocate to densely populated urban areas with public transportation by imposing a gas mileage tax to pay for inter-city high speed rail -- with train stations they'll have to drive hundreds of miles to get to.


I mean on whom can we blame for this one? I think both of them . Sometimes two heads are definitely not better than one.

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/the_unified_theory_of_obama.html at April 03, 2011 - 07:17:11 AM CDT
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 03, 2011, 06:27:53 AM
33, it's hilarious.

you know something isn't right.  the facts show the 'official story' is absolutely impossible.

then you ask yourself, 'why would someone lie about school by FIVE YEARS' and work so hard to maintain that lie.

you know the official story isn't right, but since you don't have obama giving a confession on the rachel maddow show, you're labeled a loon.  you can't prove a negative, and everyone demands 100% of the answers.


And all you know - for certain - is that the official story is full of shit.  Absolutely.  but you're a CT loon for thinking so.  Pretty doggone funny, isn't it?  LOL
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 06:50:51 AM
It is hillarious.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 02:05:34 PM
Obama may have a criminal past...
Rick Perry's Blog ^ | 4/2011 | Rick Perry




This is an article written by an ex IRS investigator....very interesting.

Trump is correct, Barry Soetoro, AKA Obama is hiding something in his past that is very bad... and it may not be his citizenship. (Trump would not say this if he did not know something and he has the money to get the dirt...)

As an IRS tax examiner,one of many former federal jobs, I have seen what it appears Barry Soetoro has done, mostly by illegal aliens attempting to acquire a new identity in the U.S and/or criminals looking to acquire a new ID.

Barry, AKA Obama, was lawfully adopted by a foreign national, Lolo Soetoro, and Barry's name was legally changed to "Barry Soetoro". (Barry’s own admission) Barry Soetoro was also made an official legal Indonesian citizen. (again Barry’s own admission) The adoption would be noted in Barry's vital statistics record in Hawaii on his original birth certificate...

OR Lolo Soetoro may have always been Barry's legal birth farther. The public does not know for sure at this point who Barry's father really was and Barry himself may not know.

Barry was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia and attended a Catholic funded school that permitted all faiths to attend.

Barry's mother dropped him as a dependent for some reason, maybe even when Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. His mother's passport records dropped Barry as a dependent indicating Barry was no longer a legal dependent of his mothers. (The passport records of his mother have been produced showing Barry was no longer a dependent when Barry was permanently residing in Indonesia.) Barry went to Hawaii to live with his alleged grand parents after Lolo Soetoro and Barry's mother divorced.

A "certificate of live birth" can have names changed on it including a child's birth name, and birth parent’s names. Even a modified date of birth can be on a "certificate of live birth". This occurs frequently for adopted children where the birth parent does not want the child to know who they are. The public has no idea who Barry’s real birth father is or who Barry’s real birth mother is. (Barry could have been adopted by his mother) The original birth certificate is the only legal vital statistics record of a person’s birth parents, birth location, birth date, etc… I can get a “certificate of live birth” for a dead person; I cannot get a birth certificate of a dead person without “Deceased” on it. (I’ve tried)

There is no evidence Barry Soetoro ever lawfully changed his name to “Barrack Hussein Obama”. There is no proof Barry Soetoro was born with the name "Barrack Hussein Obama". I’m willing to bet the name “Barrack Hussein Obama” is not present on the real birth certificate as Barry’s birth name or as Barry’s birth father. I have pictures of me with my mother and Jimmy Buffet… that doesn’t make him my father even if I start using the name Jimmy Buffet.

The public knows Barry Soetoro finished high school in Hawaii as Barry Soetoro and attended Occidental as Barry Soetoro where he did drugs and flunked out of school. After dropping out of Occidental, Barry showed up in New York, homeless and on drugs. (Barry’s own admission) Barry then hooked up with a Pakistani to live with and traveled back to Indonesia on his new boyfriend’s dime to renew his Indonesian passport and traveled to Pakistan with him.

Ask any law enforcement officer in a large city or detective and they will tell you homeless young men on drugs in large cities usually end up as male prostitutes. Barry ended up as a world traveler with a degree… (Not likely)

Barry Soetoro returned to New York from Pakistan and began using the fictitious name “Obama” for some reason. (again Barry Soetoro’s own admission) One could only suspect that a person addicted to drugs returning from Pakistan to New York, the main route for Afghan heroin into the U.S., maybe Barry had a reason to start using a new name. There are literally over 1 million open warrants on file in New York… maybe Barry is one of them?....

After spending some time in New York allegedly working under the name “Obama”, It appears Barry used the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" for the first time to file his federal taxes in Connecticut at a Post Office Box for the purpose of evading paying taxes in New York and /or to establish a new identity. (This is a felony with no statute of limitation.)

When the IRS received Barry Soetoro’s federal tax filing, the IRS could not attach the name Barrack Hussein Obama to the SSI number provided or the address provided. So the IRS assigned the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" a tax ID number for a person from Connecticut (Where Barry unlawfully filed a federal tax form using a false name). Barry Soetoro began using the tax ID number as his SSI number when using the fictitious name Barrack Obama. This is why Barry Soetoro has a Connecticut SSI number. When I worked for the IRS, I saw this occur more than once and yes, it is a felony to knowingly file a fraudulent federal tax forms. Most of the politicians that cheat on their taxes claim it was an accident. That is how they get away with their tax cheat crimes. Using a fake name is no accident.

It appears Barry fled New York to Chicago using his new identity to get a job . He likely ordered a fake diploma to bolster his new identity as "Obama". Fake Diploma's were very big in the 80's and diploma mills were even being used by federal workers to get promotions. There is evidence his alleged attendance at Columbia was faked (Barry never attended Columbia) and Barry lied his way into Harvard (he had no transcripts to get in)... Including telling the Saudi royal family he was fighting in Afghanistan with the Muslim Jihad against the Russians, so they would help him get into a law school.

The Saudi's apparently loved Barry's story of Jihad in Pakistan/Afghanistan and paid for Barry to attend Harvard under the name "Obama". The Saudi family has admitted to paying for Obama to attend Harvard and gave Harvard a gift of $20 million dollars. Harvard in turn made their special attendy President of the law review a person that never wrote a single law review.... I guess that is what $20 million buys at Harvard.

It is unlikely Barry was a Jihadist and was most likely a drug mule if anything, maybe even a CIA street hire to haul Afghan heroin back to New York, so the Afghans could buy U.S. made stinger missiles with U.S. dollars to shoot down Russian helicopters?... I hired people over seas to do work below my pay grade all the time, even foreign nationals... I think this is the story Barry told the Saudi's, but he was most likely really just a drug mule/dealer and probably still wanted on an outstanding warrant in New York.

Barry’s selective service registration is not normal either…http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/exclusive-did-next-commander-in...

After I looked at Barry’s selective service filing I noticed it was most likely fraudulent too based on the name he used. Barry did not start using the name "Obama" until he returned from Pakistan (long after he flunked out of school in California) His selective service record (maintained in Chicago coincidentally) shows he registered at a Hawaiian post office as “Obama” in Sept 1980... Problem, Barry was getting high in California at Occidental in Sept 1980 (Barry's own admission) and was not using the fictitious name "Obama" at that time. Barry began using the fictitious name "Obama" only after he returned from Pakistan. The selective service filing is fraudulent.

NEW NOTE - On the the Selective Service Registration, Barry did not have the Connecticut Tax ID number he used on the Registration until after he began using the name "Obama" in New York. More evidence his Selective Service filing is fraudulent.

Barry returned to Chicago and attend a semi-christian radical black church with his first female love Michelle. Barry admits keeping in touch with Phil Boener, who traveled to New York from Occidental to be with Barry and was most likely Barry's first love.

Barry still could not get a real job, because he was still a fraud, even with his Harvard degree in hand he could lie and take the Bar exam, but he could not work as a lawyer for a major law firm without a back ground investigation and he would never pass one. So, Michelle got Barry a job at her law firm. Barry never filed a case alone and never filed a motion. He wrote lost of memos according to the law firm where Barry worked. (I think they know Barry is a fraud and don't want to be sued by previous clients) Barry rescinded his law licenses, so as not to be disbarred for fraud. The Bar knows Barry lied on his application. Michelle also had to turn over her law license for her involvement in corruption with the Chicago mayors office.

With time on his hands Barry, a well spoken black man, was able to get elected to a state office, oddly because he looked for fraud in his opponents voter registrations and got his opponent disqualified from running. Barry a well versed liar was a natural in state politics. He used his political influence to get himself a position as a lecturer at Chicago's law school. Barry embellished this position as a "professor of law" which everyone knows is completely false. Barry was not a professor or even a specialist at anything but lying.

On a whim Barry ran for United States Senate for the State of Illinois. Politicians do this all the time to make a name for themselves even if they can't win. At the time the Republican Ryan was a shoe in for the Senate seat, so no real Democrat contenders entered the race, but Barry did. On a fluke after the primary Ryan's wife Jeri Ryan (Seven of nine from Star Trek) went public that her husband was making her have sex with other people while he watched. Ryan dropped out and Alan Keys moved from Maryland to run against Barry Soetoro.

The election got all kinds of press because there was no blacks in the U.S. Senate and one of these black men was going to be a Senator. Alan Keys did his best to warn everyone Barry was not who he claimed to be, but the public saw him as a carpet bagger. Barry kept the lie going and presented himself as a clean black man that talked like a white man... Illinois elected Barry to U.S. Senate. The Democrats had already began scrubbing Barry's back ground when Ryan dropped out.

Phil, Barry's boy friend from Occidental, was found working in California as a communications specialist (receptionist) for a dental hygienist school and given a diploma from Columbia and cover story. The rest of Barry's drug friends were all given jobs or money by the Democrat machine to keep quiet.

Because Barry was such a news maker as the only Black in the Senate, and he could speak like a white man he was made key speaker for the Democrat convention. Barry then decided to run for President to keep the lie going. No one thought to question Barry's back ground in the Democrt party... They helped cover up the ugly back ground. The only person jumping up and down warning Barry was not who he claimed to be was Alan Keys and he was discarded as just an angry loser.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2699113/posts

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 02:10:59 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 04:01:07 PM
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Governor Abercrombie’s Bogus Quest to Prove Obama Was Born in Hawaii
By Mario Apuzzo
April 2, 2011

http://puzo1.blogspot.com



________________________ ________________________


Hollywood celebrity journalist/radio host, Mike Evans, has known now Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, for decades. He first met the Governor when the Governor was driving a cab in Honolulu, Hawaii. They became good friends. They spent a lot of time together in Washington during the time of Obama’s inauguration. Abercrombie told Evans then that he was going to run for Governor of Hawaii. He also told Evans that he remembered Obama as a child and that he used to call him Barry. He told him that once he became Governor, he was going to put an end to the story that Obama was not born in the United States by getting a copy of his birth certificate.

Abercrombie did become Governor and using his powers as Governor, he did look for the document. On January 19, 2011, Abercrombie told Evans during a telephone conversation that he searched everywhere for the birth certificate. He told him that he went to the only two hospitals that existed in Honolulu at the time at which a baby could be born, Kapi’olani Women’s and Children’s Hospital and Queen’s Hospital. Abercrombie told him that there is no Obama birth certificate in Hawaii and that there is absolutely no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. Abercrombie also told Evans that he remembered Obama playing in a tee-ball league when he was about 5 or 6 but not before that. A confirmation of this information can be heard on a recording of an interview on the radio 92 KQRS Morning Show done on January 20, 2011. During this radio show, Mike Evans, recounts the details of his conversation he had with Governor Abercrombie just the day before.

A story on this new revelation and the radio interview can be heard at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/hawaii-hollywood-reporter-mike-evans.html. A full bio on Mike Evans can be seen at http://www.evansradio.com/mikestory.html.

On January 20, 2011, former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams signed an affidavit in which he swears that his supervisors in Hawaii told him that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Obama. He swears that he was also told that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any medical record showing that Obama was born in either facility. Read more: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1C21WDdlc

Governor Abercrombie then announced that he could do not more to prove Obama was born in Hawaii because it is against state law to release private documents such as his birth certificate. See the story here
http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/114401004.html.

The question now is if Abercrombie has not been able to find any Obama Hawaii birth certificate, why did he tell the public that he was abandoning his search for it because privacy laws prohibit him from disclosing the document? Let’s grant to Abercrombie that his efforts were thwarted by privacy laws. But what I do not understand is why he did not simply obtain Obama’s consent for the release of the birth certificate. After all, Abercrombie said that he was a friend of Obama's parents and knew him as a child.

What I also do not understand is why Abercrombie, who was so concerned about honoring Obama’s parents and the 2012 presidential election would give up on his quest so easily just because he cannot get the birth certificate released. Is the birth certificate the only piece of evidence that could prove or disprove an Obama Hawaiian birth? What happened to talking to family and friends from 1961 about an Obama birth in Hawaii? Is there no doctor, nurse, family member, friend, or official who remembered the Obama birth in Hawaii and could give Abercrombie confirming evidence of a Hawaiian birth? Abercrombie said that he was a friend of Obama's parents and knew him as a child. Why could Abercrombie not find any other evidence of an Obama birth in Hawaii? With the resources of the Governor’s Office and the publicity generated by this story, how could the Governor not find one person on the whole island of Hawaii or even from the mainland who could confirm with any real evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii?

There is also another highly suspect part to Abercrombie’s story. And that has to do with medical records. Hawaii Health Department has publicly released incomplete and inconclusive information which Obama supporters claim shows that Obama was born in Honolulu. During the 2008 election, Hawaii's Director of Health, Chiyome Fukino, said:

"There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama's official birth certificate. State law (Hawaii Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai'i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures. No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawaii."

Months later, in July 2009, she added:

"I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago."

As we can see, Dr. Fukino, a medical doctor, did not mention anything about the most compelling and probative evidence of a birth event, to wit, medical evidence. As I have reported in my May 6, 2010 article entitled, A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Born in Hawaii , Section 338-5 of the Hawaiian statute provides: "§338-5 Compulsory registration of births. Within the time prescribed by the department of health, a certificate of every birth shall be substantially completed and filed with the local agent of the department in the district in which the birth occurred, by the administrator or designated representative of the birthing facility, or physician, or midwife, or other legally authorized person in attendance at the birth; or if not so attended, by one of the parents. The birth facility shall make available to the department appropriate medical records for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the provisions of this chapter. [L 1949, c 327, §9; RL 1955, §57-8; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-5; am L 1988, c 149, §1]."

Obama alleges he was born in Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital, now called Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children. At no time during the ongoing public debate about whether Obama was born in Hawaii has any official from Hawaii at least informed the pubic that Obama's alleged vital records show that his birth certificate from 1961 was "completed and filed" with the health department in Honolulu by some official of that hospital or a physician or midwife associated with that institution. If Obama was born in a hospital as he claims, we cannot reasonably believe that his birth certificate would have been completed and filed by one of his parents. Additionally, under this statute, Hawaii has the power and authority to obtain medical records from Kapi'olani Medical Center to confirm Obama's alleged Hawaiian birth. At no time did Hawaii inform the American public that it in fact confirmed with that hospital that Obama was in fact born there which it can do under the cited statute. Hawaii has withheld this underlying evidence from the public. This withholding of evidence is a grave matter given that there exists such reasonable doubt as to whether Obama, the putative President and Commander in Chief of our military might, was in fact born in Hawaii.

Under Section 338-5, any birth certificate has to be completed and filed by some institution (hospital) or person (doctor, midwife, or parent). This statute also shows that Hawaii has the authority to confirm any reported birth by examining medical records. While Hawaii pretends to have come clean with the American public, it did not even provide such basic information or conduct such due diligence regarding extant medical evidence which would give the public that needed assurance that Obama's birth record is genuine.

With the State of Hawaii having such authority under Section 338-5 to confirm through medical records that a birth in fact occurred in a Hawaiian hospital, why did Abercrombie not confirm for the American people that the Obama birth file in Hawaii in fact shows that his birth event is corroborated with medical evidence from Kapi’olani Medical Center as is required by Section 338-5?  Are we to reasonably believe that there exists no medical evidence confirming Obama's birth in Hawaii that Governor Abercrombie can share with the American people? 

We will know what the underlying evidence is about Obama's alleged birth in Hawaii only if we can examine Obama's contemporaneous birth certificate from 1961, the long-form, hospital generated birth certificate, which should be readily available since Obama claims he was born in Kapi'olani Medical Center in 1961. That root document will tell us the name of the hospital in which he was born and the name of the doctor or midwife who delivered him. Those pieces of information are highly corroborative of the place and time of birth, for they provide a whole other dimension of contemporaneous facts that would support Hawaii's or anybody else's bare statement as to the place and time of Obama's registered birth.

Governor Abercrombie, you really need to do better for the majority of American people who want and are entitled to see credible and convincing proof of where Obama was born. 

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 2, 2011
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####

Copyright © 2011
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
All Rights Reserved
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 04:02:54 PM
On January 20, 2011, former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams signed an affidavit in which he swears that his supervisors in Hawaii told him that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Obama. He swears that he was also told that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any medical record showing that Obama was born in either facility. Read more: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1C21WDdlc
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 03, 2011, 05:59:18 PM
Nothing will happen until election time.  If anything happens.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Freeborn126 on April 03, 2011, 06:41:28 PM
So... does that mean we get Joe Biden if Obama is proved to be a Kenyan manchurain candidate?  I hope the whole administration is declared void and a special presidential election is held.  Biden would be another disaster.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 07:48:49 PM
OK Candidate releases son’s 1981 Hawaiian Certification of Birth

DOCUMENT CONFIRMS INVESTIGATORS’ SUSPICIONS, EXPOSES DOH AS LYING
by John Charlton

Post and Mail

February 9, 2010




It certainly appears from the provided COLB below, that the certificate of live birth provided by Obama on his website is a total fraud as has been suggested in the past. It is indeed a sad state of affairs when the court system of the United States of America cannot be trusted.  To continually deny requests for Obama to provide requested documents, leads one to believe that there is something far worse than the Obama administration at stake!  Random thoughts while questioning the objectivity of our legal system, J.C.



The Hawaii 1981 Certificate of Live Birth for Alan Paliko Booth (full size image).
(Feb. 10, 2010) — Miki Booth, a native Hawaiian and candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives for the State of Oklahoma, shocked and awed Obama supporters during the recent Tea Party Nation convention in Memphis, TN, when she publicly disclosed the Certificate of Live Birth for her son, Alan Paliko Booth, born on Nov. 24, 1981, at 7:55 AM, at Kapiolani Children’s Medical Center, the same hospital that Obama has claimed to be his own place of birth,nearly 20 years before.

The actual document contains a wealth of information such as the signature of the attending physician or midwife, a field for evidence presented for an Amended Birth Filing, race of parents and child, and a signature and date stamp, certifying the copy as an authentic representation of the information on file with the Hawaii Department of Health.

Importantly, the actual document, which you can view through this link, contains the fields, “Date received by Local Registrar” and “Date accepted by the State” and the name of the Local Registrar.  In recent months, Miss Janice Okubo has insisted that the terms mean the same thing and that she has no knowledge of what terms were used previously to the alleged Obama COLB.

The now widely recognized, crude forgery which Obama claims to be his own Certification of Live Birth bearing the date of 2007 but without the seal and confirmatory signature of the State Registrar, does not contain information regarding the race of the child or the date accepted.

This has led private researchers to speculate that Obama’s original vital records, which Dr. Fukino claims to have seen and which she herself admits are several, might contain a delayed birth filing, an amended birth filing, adoption record, or other changes regarding the name of the child and parents and location or nation in which the child was purported to be born.

The details of this actual 1981 “long form” “birth certificate” indicate more precisely the possible motives Obama might have for refusing to disclose his own real certificate, that is, if he was in fact born in Hawaii in the first place.  Because the actual form might indicate:

1) Race of Child: Negro or White — in the former case, Obama’s racism might take offense; in the latter case his race politics might be undone;

2) Race of Parent: Father might be indicated as Negro rather than African, which would gut the prima facie evidentiary value of his own alleged BC.

3) Parents might not be who they are claimed to be — there has been a lot of speculation on that;

4) Place of birth might have originally been Mombassa, Kenya, as Obama’s Co-grandmother and he himself have in the past claimed; if so, Obama is perhaps not even a U.S. Citizen.

5) No father might have been indicated originally, because Obama’s mother might not have been sure who the father was at the precise moment of the original filing — which would reflect badly on his mother’s morals and cast doubt upon any evidentiary value of whomever was subsequently claimed to be the real father; because doubt in such cases is prima facie evidence that there was more than one man who could have been the father.

6) Name of child might not be Barack Hussein Obama II, which, in the absence of name changes, would make Obama’s usage of his current name unlawful. Source

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 08:05:58 PM
Immaculate Deception: Fraud in reporting Obama's birth
July 10, 2010 | None

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2550294/posts




Let’s forget for a moment about the allegations that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is not a naturalized U.S. citizen and examine the incontrovertible facts surrounding the reporting of his mysterious birth in 1961.


•Fact 1: Barack Obama Sr. (the President’s father) was married to another woman (Kezia Aoko) in Africa at the time of Barack Hussein Obama Jr’s birth to Stanley Ann Dunham Obama (the President’s mother).

•Fact 2: In the United States, being married to two women at the same time is illegal. It is the crime of bigamy.

•Fact 3: In 1961 someone placed a birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper declaring the birth of a son to “Mr. and Mrs.” Barack Obama (Sr).

•Fact 4: Stanley Ann Dunham (Barack Jr’s mother) claims to have been married to Barack Obama Sr. at that time. Barack Obama Jr. also claims that his parents were married and later divorced.

The facts raise several interesting questions:


•1. Did Barack Obama Sr. inform Stanley Ann Dunham of his concurrent marriage to the woman in Africa? (If not, he committed fraud as well as bigamy.)

•2. Did Stanley Ann Dunham marry Barack Obama Sr. knowing he was already married to another woman? (If so, they were both fraudulent.)

•3. Did Stanley Ann’s parents know about the first wife and approve of the marriage of their daughter to an already married man? (If so, they were involved in fraud too.)

•4. Were Barack Obama Sr and Stanley Ann Dunham really married? If not, the placement of the birth announcement of “their son” in the Honolulu Advertiser was fraudulent—unless, of course, the “Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama (Sr)” was referring to Mr. Obama and his first wife, in which case, Barack Obama Jr. is not really Stanley Ann Dunham’s child.

•5. Does Barack Hussein Obama Jr know about the circumstances surrounding the fraudulent reporting of his birth? If so, that may explain his reluctance to come forward with details about it and his propensity to hide the truth whenever anyone questions his background.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 08:12:43 PM
Original Certificate of Live Birth from Hawaii is different from Obama’s COLB   
DOCUMENT CONTAINS REGISTRAR’S NAME, ISSUE DATE AND RAISED SEAL
by Sharon Rondeau



http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/25/original-certificate-of-live-birth-from-hawaii-is-different-from-obamas-colb




John F. Sweeney produced this edge-detection image of the Certificate of Live Birth obtained by The Post & Email from a person who had requested it from the Hawaii Department of Health

(Apr. 25, 2010) — The Post & Email is in possession of an original paper “Certificate of Live Birth” recently issued from the Hawaii Department of Health to an American citizen born at Kapiolani Medical Center in Hawaii in 1981 as verified by his mother.

At first glance, the document appears similar to the image posted on Obama’s campaign website.  However, there are some differences:

■The document is titled “Certificate of Live Birth” as opposed to Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth.”
■There is more information about the parents on the right side of the document across from the spaces for “Mother’s Race” and “Father’s Race.”  Both the mother’s and father’s places of birth are printed there.  Obama’s purported “document” does not have that information.
■There is a visible certificate number at the top, while Obama’s is blacked out.
■On the back, there is a stamped date, presumably the date the document was issued from the Department of Health.
■Below the date there is a stamp which reads:  “I CERTIFY THIS IS A TRUE COPY OR ABSTRACT OF THE RECORD ON FILE IN THE HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.”  The signature of Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D., is also there, followed by the words “STATE REGISTRAR.”
■The document contains a raised seal which is visible from both sides, unlike Obama’s.
■There are no marks where it looks as if something has bled through from the back to the front as in Obama’s “document.”
The Post & Email had published an in-depth analysis by photographic expert John F. Sweeney of the document which Factcheck.org claimed to have photographed at its Chicago office in March 2008 but which Sweeney maintains was taken at the Obama campaign headquarters instead.

Factcheck.org claims that the document on their website has a raised seal.  However, the same edge-detection technique used with the image from Factcheck’s website shown below yields no such raised seal.  Mr. Sweeney stated in his earlier analysis:


Edge-detection of the document released by Factcheck.org shows no raised seal (John F. Sweeney)
“What else is in, or more importantly, not in this photo? There is absolutely no evidence of a raised seal in the lower right portion of the document where the supposed scans and other supposed photos show the raised, 3-D seal from the Department of Health machine. The seal should be located in the area that has the shadow of the arm. But it is not there. It is not visible to the naked eye; there is not a sign of it under any zooming of the original photo; no digital manipulation tools find any evidence of a raised seal in this picture. With 100% certainty, the raised seal is not there. So this is merely a picture of a printout. It is definitely not an official COLB from Hawaii…The photo is not that of an official Hawaiian issue COLB due to the lack of a raised seal.”

According to a WorldNetDaily report dated July 29, 2009, in 1961, there were four different ways to obtain birth documentation from the Hawaii Department of Health, including a mail-in registration requiring no in-person substantiation of the birth by an adult.  One website reports that there were six ways to do so, with one category, the Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, being eliminated in 1972.

The Hawaii Department of Health provides the following information on how to apply for a “late registration” of birth:

As provided by law (HRS §§338-15, 338-29.5), the following persons may apply for late registration:

■Any person born in Hawaii who is one year old or older and whose birth has not been previously registered in Hawaii, or that person’s parent, guardian, next of kin, or older person acting for that person and having knowledge of the facts of birth may request the registration of a late certificate of birth, except that an application will not be accepted for a deceased person.

■Registration of a late certificate of death, marriage, or divorce may be requested by the person in charge of the disposition of the body, marriage officiant or performer, or court clerk, respectively.

Factcheck.org claims that members of its staff examined Obama’s “birth certificate” at Obama headquarters and that “we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago. We can assure readers that the certificate does bear a raised seal, and that it’s stamped on the back by Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka (who uses a signature stamp rather than signing individual birth certificates).”  However, Factcheck displays a raised seal which cannot be conclusively determined to belong to Obama’s COLB, and the photo above of the Factcheck document using edge-detection shows no raised seal.

Likewise, Factcheck displays the stamp of Alvin T. Onaka’s signature in a close-up shot, but the background appears to be a darker shade of green than the full document.  Similarly, the “blowup” of the “City” field on the Factcheck document appears to be a different shade of green than the full-size document shown above it.  There is nothing to prove that an official registrar’s stamp, raised seal, or date stamp are present on the Factcheck document.




“Blowup” of a closeup from Obama’s purported “birth certificate” from Factcheck.org
In Factcheck’s “Analysis” of the purported Obama birth certificate, several links to news articles  which supposedly quoted Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health as saying that she had personally seen Obama’s birth certificate on file no longer work, although the cited news reports are readily available elsewhere, and Dr. Fukino’s official public statements can be found here and here.

The document which The Post &  Email has obtained shows the word “Certificate” at the top.  The person to whom it belongs was born in Hawaii.  Is the “Certification” document with Obama’s name on it an indication that he received a “delayed registration”? Is the word “Certification” used only in cases where a birth in Hawaii cannot be conclusively proven?

During a meeting of the Kenyan Parliament on March 25, 2010, Minister of Lands James Orengo stated that Obama was born in Kenya and not in the United States (p. 31).  A previous Parliament meeting on November 5, 2008 contains multiple references to what might be understood as his birth in Kenya.  The Kenyan ambassador to the U.S., Mr. Peter Ogego, stated that Obama’s birthplace is Kenya “is well-known,” and Obama’s wife has called Kenya his “home country.”

To date, no witnesses to Obama’s birth in Hawaii have come forward.  Questions about his original birth certificate have been avoided by both the Bush administration and Obama regime.

Could Obama himself have requested a document from the Hawaii Department of Health in 2007 in preparation for his run for President?  Did he file for a “delayed registration”?  If so, what documentation did he present to Dr. Fukino or someone else at the Health Department?  Could he have presented the birth announcements from the two Hawaii newspapers as proof of his birth there to obtain the “Certification of Live Birth”?

———————–

Editor’s Note: Many thanks to John F. Sweeney for his assistance in preparing this report.













© 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 03, 2011, 08:21:49 PM
Obama Birth Announcement Forged

By Jon Carlson

 


 

 

Investigator Jorge Baro reports (source):




 


The Linotype typesetting machince circa 1961 was a great advancement over the previous individual setting of type. Lines were set in lead alloy slugs that were pushed together in a frame to form columns.


 

 


This close-up of the Advertiser ad shows grossly different type font. Columns vary in width with laughable alignment:


 

 


This close-up from the Star-Bulletin ad shows similar faults:




 

This closeup shows the use of Senior (Sr.) to describe two fathers. Missing above and elsewhere is the Senior (Sr.) for Barack H. Obama in both ads.




 

This closeup emphasizes the gross misalignment in the Advertiser ad. The use of middle initial for all names and the insertion of ads within the Births lists is unusual.




 

This comparison of alleged Obama ads show SIMILAR TYPE FONT indicating that the same Linotype typesetting machine was used to forge both ads. Can you say C-I-A?



http://www.hoaxofthecentury.com/ForgedObama1.htm

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Freeborn126 on April 03, 2011, 08:39:07 PM
I wonder how many brainwashed Obama supporters actually know that his real name is Barry Soetoro.  I bet less than 10%
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 03, 2011, 10:15:00 PM


I listened to this clip.  The guy is making a lot of assumptions.  How does he know the grandparents or the mom placed a fake add in the paper after Obama was born?  

This is a loser.  Isn't it the State of Hawaii that determines whether or not someone was born there?  If the state officials have already confirmed they reviewed the "records," whatever those are, then even if a birth certificate doesn't exist, birthers can still prove nothing.  I'm not sure what the endgame is.  They can't unseal the records, and even if they could, they still lose.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 03, 2011, 10:20:04 PM
And when they lose Obama has an edge in 2012?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 03, 2011, 10:29:10 PM
And when they lose Obama has an edge in 2012?

Only if the Republican nominee tries to make this an issue. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 04, 2011, 05:06:12 AM
Funny:   Bama has the time to fill out paperwork to run for re-election but not give ambercromibe th permission to release the records.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 04, 2011, 06:02:06 AM
if his dad isn't the same guy.... you'll haev Rush calling him "that bastard" for the next 2 years.  Right?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: loco on April 04, 2011, 06:06:50 AM
Racist thread reported!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 04, 2011, 02:47:53 PM
Second thoughts about that birth certificate
Comments (0) Share Print By: Matt Patterson 04/03/11 8:05 PM
Special to the Examiner


.Like most people, I had discarded the issue about President Obama's birth certificate long ago as without merit. Recently, though, possible Republican presidential contender Donald Trump has renewed public interest in the matter, and so I decided to take a second look.
While Trump is mistaken in some particulars, to my surprise, the matter turns out to be more complicated than I originally thought.

Obama defenders say that the he did release his birth certificate, making the entire argument moot. That is true ... sort of. In June 2008, the Obama campaign released of a "certification of live birth," which was examined and photographed by factcheck.org.

The document lists the birth of Barack Hussein Obama II on Aug. 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii. However, critical information often contained in an original birth certificate, including physician and hospital of delivery, is missing. Factcheck.org explains why:

"The document is a 'certification of birth,' also known as a short-form birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The short form is printed by the state and draws from a database with fewer details. ... We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response."

This truncated document nevertheless seems acceptable to at least some government agencies as proof of birth and citizenship. Further, it seems inconceivable that this "short form" document could be generated if a corresponding original "long form" did not exist. Case closed, right?

Not so fast. Factcheck.org. bills itself as "a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania," with funding largely derived from "an endowment created in 1993 by the Annenberg Foundation ... and a 1995 grant by the Annenberg Foundation."

Obama was famously a founding board member of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, also a project of the Annenberg Foundation. The connection is strong enough, in my mind, to raise reasonable questions about the objectivity of factcheck.org in matters regarding Obama.

Then there is the stubborn issue of Hawaii's governor -- and Obama family friend -- Neil Abercrombie, who had vowed upon taking office to once and for all prove that Obama was indeed born in Hawaii, thereby neutralizing the issue in advance of the 2012 campaign.

Abercrombie claims to have found ... something. "It [the proof] was actually written I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down," he told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser.

Written down? What on earth does that mean? Did some anonymous government employee scribble on a napkin: "On this day, Barack Obama was born?" Either an original, hospital-generated, long-form birth certificate exists or it doesn't, and either the governor has founhttp://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/04/second-thoughts-about-birth-certificated it or he hasn't.

It seems from his vague answer that what he has been told was found is not that original birth document. The governor certainly has not released any additional information or documentation, despite his repeated promises to do so. In fact, he seems to have conveniently forgotten the subject altogether.

What does all of this mean? I'm not sure. Probably nothing. Yet it is amazing that unanswered questions continue to swirl around Obama's birthplace. Even more mysterious is why the president doesn't clear up the matter unequivocally, as surely only he can. I really wish he would, if only to remove an unnecessary distraction from the public debate.

It is no wonder that some opponents of the president are fixated on this issue: If (and it is a very big if) it could be proved that Obama was born outside the United States, then the legitimacy of any legislation he has signed into law would be instantly questionable.

So long Obamacare?

Matt Patterson is a columnist and commentator and a contributor to "Proud to Be Right: Voices of the Next Conservative Generation" (HarperCollins, 2010).





http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/04/second-thoughts-about-birth-certificate

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Skip8282 on April 04, 2011, 03:55:30 PM
Only if the Republican nominee tries to make this an issue. 


Exactly.  I wish this issue would die, die, die.

33, hold yourself to the same standard you hold the 9/11 loons believers to.  I know how bad you hate Barry, but hang tough...2012 is just around the bend.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 04, 2011, 04:07:06 PM
I Think it could cost them the election. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 04, 2011, 04:11:26 PM
Even the gov can't get to the bottom of this.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 10:38:24 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 10:50:27 AM
This should be called "all things stupid and believed by morons"

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 10:51:51 AM
Where is the long form BC signed by a doctor naming the hospital of birth? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 10:52:25 AM
where's the DNA test proving Obama is even human?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 10:54:45 AM
Where is the long form BC signed by a doctor naming the hospital of birth? 

Where is the LEGAL requirement that he proves he has it?

The State of Hawaii has PROVEN he was born there by producing a COLB.  Are you saying Hawaii state officials are lying?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 10:55:34 AM
Where is the LEGAL requirement that he proves he has it?

The State of Hawaii has PROVEN he was born there by producing a COLB.  Are you saying Hawaii state officials are lying?

Do you even read?   The colb is a fraud and I proved that already.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 10:58:54 AM
Do you even read?   The colb is a fraud and I proved that already.   

The State of Hawaii health officials are on record saying it is a legitimate document.  Are you saying they are lying?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:01:14 AM
I can provide quotes if need be.  Can you PROVE they are lying?  Can you PROVE the state of Hawaii is lying?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:05:53 AM
I can provide quotes if need be.  Can you PROVE they are lying?  Can you PROVE the state of Hawaii is lying?

Go ahead -  at the end of the conversation even you will be a birther - i promise.   The best you wll bwe able to come up with is that they say the cold comports with what they have "written down" and that is not even a long form bc or anything else.   Gov. ambercromie spficially set out to discredit the birthers and gave up saying he could not find a long form BC for obama.   


Additionally, the COLB offers completely bullshit informaton that was not around i 1961 proving it is not real.   In 1961 there was no such thing as "african" as being listed as the race of the father or mother.   

 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 05, 2011, 11:08:57 AM
Go ahead -  at the end of the conversation even you will be a birther - i promise.   The best you wll bwe able to come up with is that they say the cold comports with what they have "written down" and that is not even a long form bc or anything else.   Gov. ambercromie spficially set out to discredit the birthers and gave up saying he could not find a long form BC for obama.   


Additionally, the COLB offers completely bullshit informaton that was not around i 1961 proving it is not real.   In 1961 there was no such thing as "african" as being listed as the race of the father or mother.   

 
So basically you are saying he wasnt born in the US and you can prove it with out a shadow of a doubt?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:13:25 AM
Go ahead -  at the end of the conversation even you will be a birther - i promise.   The best you wll bwe able to come up with is that they say the cold comports with what they have "written down" and that is not even a long form bc or anything else.   Gov. ambercromie spficially set out to discredit the birthers and gave up saying he could not find a long form BC for obama.   


Additionally, the COLB offers completely bullshit informaton that was not around i 1961 proving it is not real.   In 1961 there was no such thing as "african" as being listed as the race of the father or mother.   

 

So you are saying that Hawaii, the state, is lying when it says Obama was born in Hawaii?  Because by issuing a COLB that is EXACTLY what they are saying.  They can not change or put anything on there that is not already in the Hawaii records. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:14:50 AM
If they did that would be fraud and easily found out but a search by ANY hawaiian state health official.  To date how many have come forward and said the COLB is a fraud?  How many Hawaiian officials have declared the records on file in Hawaii used to produce a certified COLB are false? 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:15:44 AM
So basically you are saying he wasnt born in the US and you can prove it with out a shadow of a doubt?

I believe he was most likley born in Kenya but listed in Hawaii as home born by the grandfather for residency purposes and other reasons.  I also believe obama Sr. is not his real father.    


There are no hospital records, no doctor records, no long form BC,  the number on the colb is 3 days later than other in the same number sequence, his SS number is that for someone in Connecticut, the colb contains bogus info and is a forgery, and the best the Gov of Hawaii could do is throw is hands up since he could not discredit the birthers.  


Laugh all you want at this issue, its NEVER going away as obamais hiding something serious he cant afford be made public.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 05, 2011, 11:16:10 AM
So you are saying that Hawaii, the state, is lying when it says Obama was born in Hawaii?  Because by issuing a COLB that is EXACTLY what they are saying.  They can not change or put anything on there that is not already in the Hawaii records. 

A) Rolley eyes  ::)
B) Sarcastic Remark that lends nothing to the conversation
C) Dumbass video, Article by RW hack, shopped pic
D) Want to fight.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 05, 2011, 11:17:30 AM
holy shit. a coherent response.. the world is going to end
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 11:20:02 AM
33,

how many people are involved in this cover-up?

his political opponents knew about it in 2008 and never 'went there'.
The CIA and FBI know, and never revealed it.
The media is playing along too - all the TV and print media.
And entire state govt in hawaii is maintaining the lie too.

So how many people do you think are 'in on it'?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:20:45 AM
Haha good one mal!

Apparently the State of Hawaii is committing mass fraud by producing official documents proving Obama was born there.  The courts happen to agree with Hawaii and no birther lawsuits have yet to be even taken seriously.  

"I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures"

Dr Chiyome Fukino

He is the head honcho of health in the State of Hawaii.  Is he lying?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:21:07 AM
If they did that would be fraud and easily found out but a search by ANY hawaiian state health official.  To date how many have come forward and said the COLB is a fraud?  How many Hawaiian officials have declared the records on file in Hawaii used to produce a certified COLB are false? 



BORN IN THE USA?

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate
Signs affidavit declaring long-form, hospital-generated document absent

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: January 24, 2011
8:48 pm Eastern


By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily


Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.


Notary seal on Timothy Adams' affidavit


Adams was employed at the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division from May 2008 through September 2008.

His position was senior elections clerk, overseeing a group of 50 to 60 employees responsible for verifying the identity of voters at the Absentee Ballot Office. It was in this capacity that Adams became aware of the search for Obama's birth-certificate records.

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!

"During the course of my employment," Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 and part 2), "I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate."

As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.

"Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health," Adams' affidavit reads, "and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government."


Tim Adams, former senior elections clerk for Honolulu

In a recorded telephone interview, Adams told WND that it was common knowledge among election officials where he worked that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate could be found at the Hawaii Department of Health.

"My supervisor came and told me, 'Of course, there's no birth certificate. What? You stupid,'" Adams said. "She usually spoke well, but in saying this she reverted to a Hawaiian dialect. I really didn't know how to respond to that. She said it and just walked off. She was quite a powerful lady."

Moreover, Adams was told that neither Queens Memorial Hospital nor Kapi'olani Medical Center had any records of Obama's birth at their medical facilities: "Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division further told me on multiple occasions that Hawaii State government officials had made inquires about Sen. Obama's birth records to officials at Queens Medical Center and Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu and that neither hospital had any record of Senator Obama having been born there, even though Governor Abercrombie is now asserting and various Hawaii government officials continue to assert Barack Obama Jr. was born at Kapi'olani Medical Center on Aug. 4, 1961."

"We called the two hospitals in Honolulu: Queens and Kapi'olani," Adams stressed. "Neither of them have any records that Barack Obama was born there."

(Story continues below)

     


In 2009, WND documented that Obama and his supporters had first claimed he was born at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, before the story changed to Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu.

After WND's report on the two conflicting hospitals, online news sites including the United Press International and Snopes.com scrubbed their websites to eliminate any reference to Queens Medical Center, substituting instead that Obama was born at Kapi'olani Medical Center without explaining the discrepancy or the correction.


Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie
 

In 2010, then-candidate for governor Neil Abercrombie was involved in an Obama birth controversy when he read a letter at a Kapi'olani Medical Center centennial dinner in Honolulu that supposedly was authored by President Obama, claiming Kapi'olani as his birth hospital.

As WND reported, the letter read by Abercrombie and initially displayed on the Kapi'olani website turned out to be a computer-created likeness of a letter using HTML code, the building blocks of Internet websites, not an actual paper letter.

The White House has still not confirmed it wrote or sent the letter.

Moreover, Adams claims, the Hawaii government was engaged in a cover-up designed to tell the American public through the Obama-supporting mainstream media that Obama was born in Hawaii, even though no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Obama could be found on record in the Hawaii Department of Health.

In the affidavit Adams swears, "During the course of my employment, I came to understand that for political reasons, various officials in the government of Hawaii, including then-Governor Linda Lingle and various officials of the Hawaii Department of Health, including Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the director of the Hawaii Department of Health, were making representations that Senator Obama was born in Hawaii, even though no government official in Hawaii could find a long-form birth certificate for Senator Obama that had been issued by a Hawaii hospital at the time of his birth."

Adams further swears his supervisors told him to quit asking about Obama's birth records.

"During the course of my employment," Adams states in the affidavit, "I was told by senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division to stop inquiring about Senator Obama's Hawaii birth records, even though it was common knowledge among my fellow employees that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama."

"I can go get my long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate," Adams told WND. "And so I don't understand, this whole controversy should have been settled three or four years ago in about five minutes."

Nor does Adams feel the short-form Certification of Live Birth is authoritative documentation proving that Obama was born in Hawaii.

"My basic assumption is that he wasn't born there," Adams said. "Certifications of Live Birth were given to people who were born at home, or to people who were born overseas and whose parents brought them back to the islands. If his parents were U.S. citizens, or if one parent was a U.S. citizen, as was the case with Obama, the family would apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate when the parents came back from overseas. That's normally how you would have gotten on [a Certification of Live Birth] in the 1960s."

WND has reported that in 1961, Obama's grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, could have made an in-person request at the Hawaii Department of Health for a registration of a Hawaii birth, even if the infant Barack Obama Jr. had been foreign-born.

In the past few days, Abercrombie has represented that there is a registration of Obama's birth in the state archives.

But the state registration of birth in 1961 theoretically could prove only that the grandparents had registered Obama's birth, even if Obama was not born in Hawaii.

Similarly, the newspaper announcements of baby Obama's birth do not prove he was born in Hawaii, since the newspaper announcements could have been triggered by the grandparents appearing in-person to register baby Obama as a Hawaiian birth, even if the baby was born elsewhere.

WND has documented that the address reported in the birth announcements published in the Hawaii newspapers at the time, 6085 Kalanianaole Highway, was the address where the grandparents lived.

WND has also reported that Barack Obama Sr. maintained his own separate apartment in Honolulu at an 11th Avenue address, even after he was supposedly married to Ann Dunham, Barack Obama's mother, and that Ann Dunham left Hawaii within three weeks of the baby's birth to attend the University of Washington in Seattle.

Dunham did not return to Hawaii until after Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in June 1962 to attend graduate school at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass.

It's possible the yet-undisclosed birth record in the state archives that Abercrombie has discovered may have come from the grandparents registering baby Obama's birth, an event that would have triggered both the newspaper birth announcements and availability of a Certification of Live Birth, even if no long-form record exists.

WND has confirmed with Glen Takahashi, elections administrator for the city and county of Honolulu, that Adams was indeed working in their elections offices during the last presidential election.

"We hire temporary workers, because we're seasonal," Takahashi told WND.

Adams told WND he supported Hillary Clinton during the 2008 presidential election campaign.

He described himself as a libertarian who wants less government spending, fewer laws that restrict personal freedoms, more adherences to the Constitution and an end to foreign wars.

"I'm interested in individual liberty and upholding the Constitution," he said. "I want to get American troops out from foreign countries, and I want to see the federal budget balanced."

He said he might be inclined to support former-Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee or former-Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney in 2012 to run against President Obama, but he has not yet made up his mind.

"It depends on how fiscally conservative Huckabee and Romney turn out to be on economics," he said. "But from what I know right now, they would probably be better than Obama."



Read more: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=254401#ixzz1Ifqxkv9C

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:22:39 AM
33,

how many people are involved in this cover-up?

his political opponents knew about it in 2008 and never 'went there'.
The CIA and FBI know, and never revealed it.
The media is playing along too - all the TV and print media.
And entire state govt in hawaii is maintaining the lie too.

So how many people do you think are 'in on it'?




Doesnt take many -   where is the long form BC signed by a doctor and listing the hospital ofbirth?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:22:48 AM
33,

how many people are involved in this cover-up?

his political opponents knew about it in 2008 and never 'went there'.
The CIA and FBI know, and never revealed it.
The media is playing along too - all the TV and print media.
And entire state govt in hawaii is maintaining the lie too.

So how many people do you think are 'in on it'?



The head of health is in on it too.  Apparently not one of his employees could access and prove him wrong, despite the temptation to do so.  

Apparently we can have high level US documents released by a rouge solider, but not ONE single hawaiian state employee with access to birth records can prove Obama wasn't born there.  

Weird.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 11:24:33 AM
33,

it's commonly said that 911 couldn't have been an inside job. Why?  Because (despite 2.3 trillion going missing the day before the attacks), there's no way you'd be able to bribe the 500 or 1000 key people involved to STFU.  Somebody would talk.  

Now, you're talking about a sitaution where MILLIONS of people are hiding this obama secret.  Multiple govt agencies.  The world media.  This goes beyond america - every govt in the world is keeping it a secret.  Maybe even BILLIONS of people can keep a secret here.


See how your bullshit logic on 911 works - 500 people coulnd't STFU for a buttload of $ - but somehow you have millions of govt employees staying quiet for free.

Sorry bro - the Birth cert issue stinks, but it's a ct and your own arguments against 9/11 make you look like shit on this one.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:25:38 AM
Donald Trump doesn't give a damn
Politico ^ | 4/5/11 | Joe Scarborough




I called Trump last Friday to see if he would back off his claim that the president of the United States might be constitutionally prohibited from holding his office.

“I’m not finished with that issue by any stretch of the imagination,” Trump told me. “You mock me for that, but his own grandmother says he was born in Kenya and says she was there.”

The New York real estate mogul didn’t stop with questions about the birth certificate. Trump also claimed the president’s first book was ghostwritten by a domestic terrorist.


(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:26:09 AM
So the Head of the State of Hawaii's health department is lying?   A clerk without any proof other than 'someone told me' is now more believable than the head of the State of Hawaii's heath department?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:29:25 AM
So the Head of the State of Hawaii's health department is lying?   A clerk without any proof other than 'someone told me' is now more believable than the head of the State of Hawaii's heath department?

No, - GARBAGE IN = GARBAGE OUT

They say they have "notes" showing obama was born there that were written down.  no records, no long form BC, no hospital records, the SS is a fake, the mother was seen in Seattle days after the alleged birth, the father was not around, ambercromibe said he cant find a long form BC, the ex worker said supervisors told him no long form BC exists, the colb contains bogus info not available in 1961, etc. 


 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:31:30 AM
No, - GARBAGE IN = GARBAGE OUT

They say they have "notes" showing obama was born there that were written down.  no records, no long form BC, no hospital records, the SS is a fake, the mother was seen in Seattle days after the alleged birth, the father was not around, ambercromibe said he cant find a long form BC, the ex worker said supervisors told him no long form BC exists, the colb contains bogus info not available in 1961, etc. 


 

Lies.  The Head of the State of Hawaii health said this - I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures"

Dr Chiyome Fukino

Is he lying?  Is the State of Hawaii committing fraud by issuing an official document saying Obama was born there?  Answer yes or no.  is Hawaii lying?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:33:39 AM
Yes!   He is not saying there is a long form BC.   where is it? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:34:22 AM
BORN IN THE USA?

Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate
Suggests controversy could hurt president's re-election chances


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: January 18, 2011
8:05 pm Eastern


By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily



Neil Abercrombie
 
Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published today that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

Abercrombie told the Honolulu Star Advertiser he was searching within the Hawaii Department of Health to find definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii, because the continuing eligibility controversy could hurt the president's chances of re-election in 2012.

Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombie's spokeswoman in Honolulu, ignored again today another in a series of repeated requests made by WND for an interview with the governor.

Toward the end of the interview, the newspaper asked Abercrombie: "You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama's birth certificate. How is that coming?"

In his response, Abercrombie acknowledged the birth certificate issue will have "political implications" for the next presidential election "that we simply cannot have."

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency

Suggesting he was still intent on producing more birth records on Obama from the Hawaii Department of Health vital records vault, Abercrombie told the newspaper there was a recording of the Obama birth in the state archives that he wants to make public.

(Story continues below)

     


Abercrombie did not report to the newspaper that he or the Hawaii Department of Health had found Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. The governor only suggested his investigations to date had identified an unspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth that someone had made in the state archives.

"It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down," Abercrombie said.

For seemingly the first time, Abercrombie frankly acknowledged that presidential politics motivated his search for Obama birth records, implying that failure to resolve the questions that remain unanswered about the president's birth and early life may damage his chance for re-election.


"If there is a political agenda (regarding Obama's birth certificate), then there is nothing I can do about that, nor can the president," he said.

So far, the only birth document available on Obama is a Hawaii Certification of Live Birth that first appeared on the Internet during the 2008 presidential campaign. It was posted by two purportedly independent websites that have displayed a strong partisan bias for Obama – Snopes.com released the COLB in June 2008, and FactCheck.org published photographs of the document in August 2008.

WND previously reported the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to authenticate the COLB posted on the Internet by Snopes.com and FactCheck.org.

WND has reported that in 1961, Obama's grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, could have made an in-person report of a Hawaii birth even if the infant Barack Obama Jr. had been foreign-born.

Similarly, the newspaper announcements of Obama's birth do not prove he was born in Hawaii, since they could have been triggered by the grandparents registering the birth as Hawaiian, even if the baby was born elsewhere.

Moreover, WND has documented that the address reported in the newspaper birth announcements was the home of the grandparents.

WND also has reported that Barack Obama Sr. maintained his own separate apartment in Honolulu, even after he was supposedly married to Ann Dunham, Barack Obama's mother, and that Dunham left Hawaii within three weeks of the baby's birth to attend the University of Washington in Seattle.

Dunham did not return to Hawaii until after Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in June 1962 to attend graduate school at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass.

Conceivably, the yet undisclosed birth record in the state archives that Abercrombie has discovered may have come from the grandparents registering Obama's birth, an event that would have triggered both the newspaper birth announcements and availability of a Certification of Live Birth, even if no long-form birth certificate existed.

WND has also reported that Tim Adams, a former senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in 2008, has maintained that there is no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health and that neither Honolulu hospital – Queens Medical Center or Kapiolani Medical Center – has any record that Obama was born there.



Read more: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1Ifu8TF7j

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:35:23 AM
Yes!   He is not saying there is a long form BC.   where is it? 

Hahahahahaha i'm quoting this for posterity.   ;D

Hawaii is lying hahahaha a clerk told me so!  ;D

You are now enshrined in stupidity forever on getbig.

Congrats 333!  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 05, 2011, 11:36:04 AM
Lies.  The Head of the State of Hawaii health said this - I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures"

Dr Chiyome Fukino

Is he lying?  Is the State of Hawaii committing fraud by issuing an official document saying Obama was born there?  Answer yes or no.  is Hawaii lying?

If he is referring to the same COLB posted online, then he may not be lying, but do you accept that document as proof?  It looks phony from the word go. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:36:57 AM
Hahahahahaha i'm quoting this for posterity.   ;D

Hawaii is lying hahahaha a clerk told me so!  ;D

You are now enshrined in stupidity forever on getbig.

Congrats 333!  

WHERE IS THE LONG FORM BC AD WHY HAS NOT OBAMA AUTHORIZED ITS RELEASE?   

________________________ _______________


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:37:38 AM
If he is referring to the same COLB posted online, then he may not be lying, but do you accept that document as proof?  It looks phony from the word go. 

Posted online?  The pictures were sure, but the certificate of live birth is a real document, produced by the state of Hawaii.  333 claims it's a fake, thereby saying the State of Hawaii and it's records department have committed fraud.  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 11:38:24 AM
WHERE IS THE LONG FORM BC AD WHY HAS NOT OBAMA AUTHORIZED ITS RELEASE?   

________________________ _______________




he doesn't have to.  He has a LEGAL document proving his birth COLB is a Legal document produced by the state of Hawaii.  Suck it b*tch you're a fool! and everyone knows it!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:38:34 AM
If he is referring to the same COLB posted online, then he may not be lying, but do you accept that document as proof?  It looks phony from the word go. 

This is what a real long form BC from 1961 in Hawaii looks like.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:40:09 AM
Posted online?  The pictures were sure, but the certificate of live birth is a real document, produced by the state of Hawaii.  333 claims it's a fake, thereby saying the State of Hawaii and it's records department have committed fraud.  



They only produced in 2007 after obama announced he was running and refused to say what they based the info on that they used to generate the COLB.   They listed the father as "AFRICAN" as for his race but in 1961 - that as not even an option!   

So what dd they base it on? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:41:23 AM
he doesn't have to.  He has a LEGAL document proving his birth COLB is a Legal document produced by the state of Hawaii.  Suck it b*tch you're a fool! and everyone knows it!

 ::)   ::)   ::)


Yeah along wth the 30 other series of docs he refuses to release.   Yeah, nothing to see here.    ::)  ::) 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 11:44:35 AM
millions of people are in on the cover up.  the entire state of hawaii.  it's so crazy.  fox news is in on it too - they see all this info and it should be the top story every night - an illigitimate president?

LOL.... 33, why do you think all these people are doing it?  Why would Bill O Reilly want to help illegal alien Obama stay in power?  Why does Glen beck want to see Obama stay in his job?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:46:13 AM
millions of people are in on the cover up.  the entire state of hawaii.  it's so crazy.  fox news is in on it too - they see all this info and it should be the top story every night - an illigitimate president?

LOL.... 33, why do you think all these people are doing it?  Why would Bill O Reilly want to help illegal alien Obama stay in power?  Why does Glen beck want to see Obama stay in his job?


For $10 this all goes away.   Yet obama spend over a m illion to keep his records quashed and you morons and obama dildos accept anything ad everything from the messiah.  Pathetic,     

Look at that 240. 



http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/attention-bill-oreilly-the-rest-of-the-story.pdf




Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 05, 2011, 11:48:43 AM
Posted online?  The pictures were sure, but the certificate of live birth is a real document, produced by the state of Hawaii.  333 claims it's a fake, thereby saying the State of Hawaii and it's records department have committed fraud.  

Has Dr. Fukino seen the long form BC?  She didn't specify, but my guess is that she saw the COLB without ever seeing a long form BC.  It looks suspicious at best.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 11:49:18 AM
For $10 this all goes away.   Yet obama spend over a m illion to keep his records quashed and you morons and obama dildos accept anything ad everything from the messiah.  Pathetic,    

Look at that 240.  
http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/attention-bill-oreilly-the-rest-of-the-story.pdf

Maybe it says something embarassing about his deceased parents' relationship.  Maybe his dad wasn't his real dad.

If it was you - both your parents were gone - and the left-wing media was dying to spend the next 2 straight years talking about the fact your mom stepped out or your dad wasn't in the picture - would you release your paper?

The documents are showing more and more that his daddy was with another woman when he was born - shit like that happens - his parents were young.

Why give a smug Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck the chance to spend the next 700 days bashing his deceased parents?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:52:24 AM
Because if he is subject to blackmail from gadaffi or King Abdoullah for sht like this we deserve to know.   The House of Saud paid for his education to begin to with, so this is bad enough.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 11:53:53 AM
Because if he is subject to blackmail from gadaffi or King Abdoullah for sht like this we deserve to know.   The House of Saud paid for his education to begin to with, so this is bad enough.   

the fbi and cia surely have files on him.

they're all "in on this grand conspiracy" too?

you can't just say "the BC is bogus" without telling us why all the agencies that keep records on you for your GB posts and rifle purchases aren't keeping one on him?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 11:55:42 AM
the fbi and cia surely have files on him.

they're all "in on this grand conspiracy" too?

you can't just say "the BC is bogus" without telling us why all the agencies that keep records on you for your GB posts and rifle purchases aren't keeping one on him?

240 - yes or no - do you know who Khalid Al Mansour & Percy Sutton are?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 05, 2011, 12:08:06 PM
240 - yes or no - do you know who Khalid Al Mansour & Percy Sutton are?   
OBAMAS DAD?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 12:09:20 PM
nope, i dont know.

i see youre going to answer my Q of "How did obama get millions of feds to keep quiet about this" with some CT personalities and their suppositive writings. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 12:13:40 PM
OBAMAS DAD?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 12:19:45 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 12:22:16 PM


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 12:34:01 PM
33,

You video clip of Alex jones...
AJ has been exposing govt lies, corruption, and criminal activity for 20 years.

Do you consider Alex Jones to be credible?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 12:48:54 PM
I posted that for the guest Berg wh ha been on this from day 1.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:13:18 PM
Yes!   He is not saying there is a long form BC.   where is it? 

Just wanted to requote this classic.  Hahaha Hawaii is lying! Obama is Kenyan!  They committed an act of forgery by issuing a legal document! Hahahaha

Mods - how is this even on the main board?  This is a CT dis proven 'officially' by the Hawaiian State health officials.  It's no more credible than moronic 9/11 CT's. 

Why else do we have a CT board?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:17:10 PM
CT thread.  Move mods.   ;D

Not even a good CT either.  It's a horrible CT.  Not even remotely believable. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:17:30 PM
Again - I posted a real long form BC from someone born in 1961 that looks nothing like the nonsense they came up with in 2007.   Where in the long form BC signed by a doctor and shows the hospital of birth?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:19:15 PM
Again - I posted a real long form BC from someone born in 1961 that looks nothing like the nonsense they came up with in 2007.   Where in the long form BC signed by a doctor and shows the hospital of birth?  

Again - Post the legal requirement Obama has to produce it?  The COLB is, according to the State of Hawaii, an official document. 

Even if he did produce it, which he doesn't have to, but if he did you'd claim it was a 'fake' and the State of Hawaii was yet again lying.

Poorly done CT.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:19:49 PM
CT thread.  Move mods.   ;D

Not even a good CT either.  It's a horrible CT.  Not even remotely believable. 

Why is that?  Have you seen the records he has refused to release?   Ambercrombie cant find the BC, the guy who worked there says the supervisors told him no BC exists?   The COLB bama presented is bogus.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:20:59 PM
Again - Post the legal requirement Obama has to produce it?  The COLB is, according to the State of Hawaii, an official document. 

Even if he did produce it, which he doesn't have to, but if he did you'd claim it was a 'fake' and the State of Hawaii was yet again lying.

Poorly done CT.

Yeah, because the POTUS needs to take the 5th.   nice what we expect from our leaders now.    ::)  ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:25:35 PM
Why is that?  Have you seen the records he has refused to release?   Ambercrombie cant find the BC, the guy who worked there says the supervisors told him no BC exists?   The COLB bama presented is bogus.  

Point by point refute -

He has released a LEGAL document CERTIFIED by the STATE OF HAWAII.  

Ambercrombie can not produce the document without Obama's consent- There is nothing more that Gov. Abercrombie can do within the law to produce a document.

A Clerk claimed he was told this.  One person in a team of how many?  And i would think the CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER who has certified Obama's document as official hold more weight than a Clerk don't you?  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 05, 2011, 01:26:27 PM
What is this talk about a long form?

Every state doesn't have one.

I got a birth certificate and my kids have them and it looks like this.

(http://johndenugent.org/images/ingrid-atzl-nugent-va-birth-certificate.jpg)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:27:12 PM
Yeah, because the POTUS needs to take the 5th.   nice what we expect from our leaders now.    ::)  ::)

He doesn't need to take the 5th.  He has produced a LEGAL document certifying his birth in the United States of America.  A document certified LEGAL by the HEALTH AUTHORITIES of Hawaii.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 05, 2011, 01:27:38 PM
This is ridiculous... How many times to BCs get lost and reprinted... about a million.

If someone has a BC reprinted today, you get the one like Hawaii provided.

This is the dumbest thing ever.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:29:03 PM
This is ridiculous... How many times to BCs get lost and reprinted... about a million.

If someone has a BC reprinted today, you get the one like Hawaii provided.

This is the dumbest thing ever.

EXACTLY! 

Apparently though Hawaiian State officials are lying.  According to 333 that is.

Ask him, he'll tell you they are lying because a former Clerk told WND so.  HAHAHA!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:31:16 PM
No!  He is certifing the COLB which is not nonsense and not backed by a long form BC.   Show me one document signed by any official in HA as to who delivered and obama and where and when like every one baby born?   Even one document will do.  


And why wont obama release it if it exists?  What is he hiding that he wont give ambercromibie permission?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:33:03 PM
This is ridiculous... How many times to BCs get lost and reprinted... about a million.

If someone has a BC reprinted today, you get the one like Hawaii provided.

This is the dumbest thing ever.

That is not true! 

Hawaii said they never lost any records and obama has never made that claim and said in his book before he ran that he has a BC.   This was before 2007 and the nonsense he put out in the COLB which is a fake.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:33:24 PM
No!  He is certifing the COLB which is not nonsense and not backed by a long form BC.   Show me one document signed by any official in HA as to who delivered and obama and where and when like every one baby born?   Even one document will do.  


And why wont obama release it if it exists?  What is he hiding that he wont give ambercromibie permission?  

So the COLB is made up?  Weird.  I guess the illegals should all go to Hawaii 'cause they are handing out official documents to anyone!!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:33:47 PM
EXACTLY! 

Apparently though Hawaiian State officials are lying.  According to 333 that is.

Ask him, he'll tell you they are lying because a former Clerk told WND so.  HAHAHA!

They certified the colb which was created in 2007.  What is that based on?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:35:05 PM
No!  He is certifing the COLB which is not nonsense and not backed by a long form BC.   Show me one document signed by any official in HA as to who delivered and obama and where and when like every one baby born?   Even one document will do.  


And why wont obama release it if it exists?  What is he hiding that he wont give ambercromibie permission?  

I don't have to produce anything.  The STATE OF HAWAII already did.  It's called a Certificate of Live Birth. 

UH perhaps he's hiding his right to privacy.  Just because you are a public figure doesn't mean everything you've ever done should be public information.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 05, 2011, 01:35:13 PM
He doesn't need to take the 5th.  He has produced a LEGAL document certifying his birth in the United States of America.  A document certified LEGAL by the HEALTH AUTHORITIES of Hawaii.

Not exactly true.  Obama wouldn't be able to even get a passport with his COLB.  It's essentially worthless in terms of legality.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:35:23 PM
So the COLB is made up?  Weird.  I guess the illegals should all go to Hawaii 'cause they are handing out official documents to anyone!!!

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:36:15 PM
They certified the colb which was created in 2007.  What is that based on?   

The records the State of Hawaii has certifying Obama's birth in Hawaii.  You think they just make stuff up?  That's fraud and would get anyone fired.  If that's the case we should question EVERY SINGLE hawaiian state document.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:37:09 PM
I don't have to produce anything.  The STATE OF HAWAII already did.  It's called a Certificate of Live Birth. 

UH perhaps he's hiding his right to privacy.  Just because you are a public figure doesn't mean everything you've ever done should be public information.

When you are POTUS - you dont get that liberty.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:37:16 PM
Not exactly true.  Obama wouldn't be able to even get a passport with his COLB.  It's essentially worthless in terms of legality.  

And he has a passport does he not?  End of CT  ;D

Thanks for ending it buddy!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:38:11 PM
When you are POTUS - you dont get that liberty.   

Says who?  You?  Eat sh*t fu*k face.  EVERYONE has that right to privacy on certain issues.  This is one of them. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:38:44 PM
And he has a passport does he not?  End of CT  ;D

Thanks for ending it buddy!

Guess what KC - he is using a phoney SS number for that and wont release the details on his different passports he has used in the past.

 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 05, 2011, 01:38:58 PM
And he has a passport does he not?  End of CT  ;D

Thanks for ending it buddy!

I don't know if he does?  Either do you.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:39:31 PM
Says who?  You?  Eat sh*t fu*k face.  EVERYONE has that right to privacy on certain issues.  This is one of them. 

Meltdown.   You clearly have no clue on this issue whatsoever.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:41:42 PM
I don't know if he does?  Either do you.

So he traveled to Kenya on what?  a birth certificate?  Hahaha
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:42:32 PM
Obama admits he traveled to Indonesia during his college yars.   What name did he use?   Barry Soetoro or Barack obama?   Where is a copy of that passport?   


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:42:43 PM
Meltdown.   You clearly have no clue on this issue whatsoever.   

Meltdown? Ha that would be your IQ melting down to the level of pond scum for believing this nonsense.  

This thread is one big joke, and it's all on you!  :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:43:18 PM
So he traveled to Kenya on what?  a birth certificate?  Hahaha

We don't know - most likely a foreign passport from indonesia.       
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 05, 2011, 01:49:14 PM
We don't know - most likely a foreign passport from indonesia.       

"Most likely"

Where the hell are you pulling this stuff from? Gotta be your ass man.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 05, 2011, 01:49:36 PM
We don't know - most likely a foreign passport from indonesia.       

based on what?  So let me get this right. Obama was born in Kenya, flew to hawaii, then to indonesia on a fake indonesian passport.  Then flew back to the US on a fake indonesian passport, then got a fake birth cert and fake ss numbers, then became friends with a terrorist and asked him to write his book, then became president and now has the state of hawaii lying for him to prove all this is false?  

Wow.  Dude you are fu*ked in the head hahaha  :o
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:53:30 PM
"Most likely"

Where the hell are you pulling this stuff from? Gotta be your ass man.

His stepdad Lolo Soetoro (Who Obama's mother married after Barack Sr. went off having an affair and 6 other out of wedlock kids) adopted him and he changed his name to "Barry Soetoro" when he went to Indonesia to register for the madrassa.  Indonesia does not allow dual citizens so Barryhad to have reigstered as a indonesian citizen in order to get accepted there.   I will post the  copy of the registration record later.


There is no record whatsoever of Obama ever legally changing his name back to Barack Obama or of the passports he traveled to indonesia or pakistan under.   
   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 05, 2011, 01:54:26 PM
"Most likely"

Where the hell are you pulling this stuff from? Gotta be your ass man.
lmao
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 05, 2011, 01:56:19 PM
All we know is that he has a COLB that looks like this and a penchant for using fake ss numbers.  All other records are just speculation.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 01:57:38 PM
All we know is that he has a COLB birth that looks like this and a penchant for using fake ss numbers.  All other records are just speculation.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 02:01:35 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 03:00:05 PM
weren't there FOUR different types of forms used for hawaii birth certs in 1961?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 03:08:48 PM
POLL: Trump's 'birther' strategy working in NH... (via Drudge)
www.politico.com ^ | 04/05/2011 | KASIE HUNT


________________________ ________________________ __________-



"A Donald Trump-Mitt Romney showdown in New Hampshire

Looks like Donald Trump's win-the-birthers strategy is working in New Hampshire — and that’s coming at the expense of front-runner Mitt Romney.

Romney leads the first-in-the-nation primary contest in a multitude of scenarios involving difference candidates, often by as much as a 2-1 margin, according to a survey out Tuesday from Public Policy Polling. But when Trump gets into the race, Romney’s edge shrinks to 6 points, 27 percent to 21 percent.

If Trump isn't included in the survey, Romney draws 32 percent of the vote, with Mike Huckabee a distant second at 15 percent.

The difference is the birthers: The Democratic polling shop found that Trump leads Romney among those who doubt President Barack Obama’s citizenship 22 percent to 21 percent. A previous PPP survey found that 42 percent of New Hampshire GOPers don't believe Obama was born in America.

The survey of 384 Republican primary voters in the state has a sampling error of plus or minus 5 percent."

From: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/52559.html


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 03:10:40 PM
" 42 percent of New Hampshire GOPers don't believe Obama was born in America. :"


That is frickin awesome!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 03:15:49 PM
" 42 percent of New Hampshire GOPers don't believe Obama was born in America. :"


That is frickin awesome!

Other than a bogus certification of a fake document, there is ZERO proof obama was born here.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 03:19:14 PM
Other than a bogus certification of a fake document, there is ZERO proof obama was born here.   

why won't the repub congress open an investigation?  Issa has that power now!

Unless..... wait.....

They're all in on it too!  Gasp!!!!!!!!

This conspiracy goes all the way to the top, man! 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 03:23:27 PM
why won't the repub congress open an investigation?  Issa has that power now!

Unless..... wait.....

They're all in on it too!  Gasp!!!!!!!!

This conspiracy goes all the way to the top, man! 



No, they dont want to go near it for fear of where it might lead.   Lets say the truth gets out and it is found that obama was kenyan born, do you realize what that will result in?     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 03:24:14 PM
you'd think they would be all over it if it is as plain and simple, cut and dry as 33333 makes it out to be................


but oh well, it is what it is........ :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 03:24:53 PM
No, they dont want to go near it for fear of where it might lead.   Lets say the truth gets out and it is found that obama was kenyan born, do you realize what that will result in?     

A natural born president of the USA?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 03:27:17 PM
you'd think they would be all over it if it is as plain and simple, cut and dry as 33333 makes it out to be................


but oh well, it is what it is........ :)

These are very simple questions you cant answer.  Where is the long form BC signed by a doctor showing where he was born?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 03:38:49 PM
Hawaii senator wonders what Obama's hiding
WND ^ | April 05, 2011 | Drew Zahn






The lone Republican in the Hawaii State Senate was interviewed on the radio this morning, explaining that while believes Barack Obama was born in the Aloha State, he questions what might be on the original, long-form birth certificate that would prompt the president to go to such lengths to conceal it.

"I'm not a 'birther,'" Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom told Jeff Katz of WXKS Radio in Boston, "and I followed this from the very beginning. At first I followed it with amusement, and then I got really concerned about it, because the question was if it was not just the birth certificate, but other records as well – school records, academic records, work records – why would anyone spend millions of dollars in legal fees, particularly someone in public office, particularly someone in the highest public office, to not make that information public?"

As WND has reported, besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the president has refused to release his Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, baptism records and his adoption records.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 03:47:56 PM
These are very simple questions you cant answer.  Where is the long form BC signed by a doctor showing where he was born?   

So then the GOP is in the scam too?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 03:49:21 PM
So then the GOP is in the scam too?

No, they are just pussies too afraid to attack his past and record for fear of what they will unearth.  Its not a CT at all.  They are just ignoring the issue.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 03:54:45 PM
No, they are just pussies too afraid to attack his past and record for fear of what they will unearth.  Its not a CT at all.  They are just ignoring the issue.   

Wow, so they are traders too?  They know the truth but will not pursue it?  So in essence they are on Obama's side?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 03:56:14 PM
Wow, so they are traders too?  They know the truth but will not pursue it?  So in essence they are on Obama's side?

On this issue?  Yes.   Definately.  its fucking simple - pay the damn $10 an release your records, all of them.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 03:58:44 PM
On this issue?  Yes.   Definately.  its fucking simple - pay the damn $10 an release your records, all of them.   

Do you really think its about paying the $10?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 04:04:22 PM
Its about him hiding something.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 04:07:33 PM
Then why do you keep bringing up the $10 thing?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 05, 2011, 04:12:23 PM
just give it up, nothing is going to come of this, just a big waste of fu@king time, makes you look like a retard like the rest of them
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 04:23:08 PM
No, they dont want to go near it for fear of where it might lead.   Lets say the truth gets out and it is found that obama was kenyan born, do you realize what that will result in?     

No.  Tell us.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 05, 2011, 04:24:20 PM
But to ignore the birther issue is to embrace obama - and his policies.

So you're saying they won't pursue it because "what it will lead to..."

Could you be any more cryptic?  And why doesn't trump care what it will lead to?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 04:26:45 PM
Trump does not give a rats ass like the other phonies. Ten dollars and this all goes away.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Freeborn126 on April 05, 2011, 04:27:39 PM
Most normal people have only one SSN their whole life.  Why did Obama have to have so many?  With so much controversy involved?  Something is not right here.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 05, 2011, 04:28:07 PM
Then why do you keep bringing up the $10 thing?

bump
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 07:24:19 PM
Why do African Newspapers call Obama Kenyan-Born??

Here are 6 African Newspaper articles calling Obama “Kenyan-Born”

**************************************************
Notice the first article was from Sunday, June 27, “2004”
*****************************************************************

Historical News Articles and FactCheck Agree: Obama is “Kenyan-Born”
Posted on October 18th, 2009 by David-Crockett

Sunday, June 27, “2004”

Kenya Sunday Standard headline-”Kenyan-born” Obama all set for US Senate
http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born04.htm

The Nigerian Observer-Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next President with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win. The “Kenyan-born” Senator will…”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born01.htm

USAfrica — “Kenyan-born” OBAMA makes history…wins presidential nomination of U. S. Democratic party; eyes on White House…
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/Born09.gif

AllAfrica.com — ” Little wonder then why “Kenyan-born” Barack Obama, America’s first Black President…”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_exhibits/Born02.htm

GraphicGhana.com — “For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever “African-American President” on this presidential visit to the “continent of his birth”. The same article, with the same quote, appeared in ModernGhana.com.
http://www.theobamafile.com/.../...5-ContinentOfBirth.htm

The Ghana Times — “So far, the odds favour the once underdog in American politics, Obama, the “African-American Senator” from Illinois state. A Congressional Quarterly (CQ) politics monitored on BBC put the “Kenyan born” American ahead of his rivel, John McCain.”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/Born07.bmp

Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 08:05:24 PM
BUMP - BB - can you merge this with the Birther Thread?
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 08:06:47 PM
Not an Abercrombie fan, but he's doing the right thing. 

Can you merge this thread with the Birther Thread? 
Title: Re: Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate: "Long Form BC May not exist"
Post by: Dos Equis on April 05, 2011, 08:09:14 PM
BUMP - BB - can you merge this with the Birther Thread?

Done.
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Dos Equis on April 05, 2011, 08:11:28 PM
Can you merge this thread with the Birther Thread? 

Going to be one long thread.   :)
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 08:12:43 PM
Going to be one long thread.   :)

The thing that I still can not get over is that for $10 this entire thing could be put to rest one way or the other.   
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: MB on April 05, 2011, 08:21:34 PM
The thing that I still can not get over is that for $10 this entire thing could be put to rest one way or the other.   

Even if he was born in HI, he knows that it would be a can of worms to let out his long form BC.  He still can't account for his ability to travel to foreign countries while in college, even though he didn't have a US passport.  Then there is his fraudulent SSN.  He knows that his best move is to laugh it off and not waste his time on those crazy "birthers".  So far the strategy is working, but if Trump keeps the issue in the spotlight, more truth will come out. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: George Whorewell on April 05, 2011, 08:44:17 PM
You guys are all racists. Obama promised to be the most transparent President in American history. He has lived up to his promise. Most Americans just aren't bright enough to understand his intellectual superiority and nuanced, complex, otherworldly nature.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 08:45:09 PM
$10 and this all goes away. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: George Whorewell on April 05, 2011, 08:48:58 PM
$10 and this all goes away. 

Racist post reported. He didn't land on Plymouth Rock. Plymouth Rock landed on him.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 05, 2011, 08:52:03 PM
Racist post reported. He didn't land on Plymouth Rock. Plymouth Rock landed on him.

Actually Obama does not have traditional slave blood.   If anything, his ancestors probably sold slaves to the dutch more than anything. 
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: andreisdaman on April 06, 2011, 07:55:05 AM
The thing that I still can not get over is that for $10 this entire thing could be put to rest one way or the other.   

no it wouldn't...you still wouldn't believe it.. >:(
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 06, 2011, 07:56:06 AM
Actually Obama does not have traditional slave blood.   If anything, his ancestors probably sold slaves to the dutch more than anything. 


sighhhhhh..the slander never ends with you huh???
Title: Re: Hawaii overnor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 07:56:20 AM
no it wouldn't...you still wouldn't believe it.. >:(

 ::)  ::)

Even Gov.Ambercrombie is pissed off he cant find a BC and bama wont release his records.  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 07:57:20 AM

sighhhhhh..the slander never ends with you huh???

Its the truth.  mobacca has slave blood but barry have mostly slave trader blood.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 06, 2011, 08:00:30 AM
Its the truth.  mobacca has slave blood but barry have mostly slave trader blood.   


and you are a petty low slimy piece of dogshit...its the truth
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 06, 2011, 08:03:00 AM
Its the truth.  mobacca has slave blood but barry have mostly slave trader blood.   

How much lower can you sink???....INCREDIBLE!!!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 08:05:13 AM

and you are a petty low slimy piece of dogshit...its the truth

The truth hurts - doesnt it - 95% er.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 06, 2011, 08:22:26 AM
The truth hurts - doesnt it - 95% er.   

truth.. are you shittin me.. dude i own you.. you want to keep that 95%er shit going.. but nothing backs it up.. you = lame.. nothing of substance and are the laughing stock of getbig. Even people you think are "on your side" have pmed me and said how retarded you are and how you cheapen their arguments. Just notice how you get further from reality, your other conservatives start to disappear...lol.. i bet you never noticed that.. hahahah you=glen beck of getbig.. sorry.. thats some truth for you
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 08:24:33 AM
Where is the long form BC signed by a doc naming the hospital?

Until you can produce that - STFU and go with your 95%er Hope & Change nonsense your stupid ass fell for like a dope last time and eat shit.   

 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 06, 2011, 08:45:45 AM
Where is the long form BC signed by a doc naming the hospital?

Until you can produce that - STFU and go with your 95%er Hope & Change nonsense your stupid ass fell for like a dope last time and eat shit.   

 

no i didnt.. i just didnt want to vote for Palin.. glad i didnt... she would have quit..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 08:48:52 AM
no i didnt.. i just didnt want to vote for Palin.. glad i didnt... she would have quit..

I guess you are assuming McCain would have died?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 09:52:02 AM
no i didnt.. i just didnt want to vote for Palin.. glad i didnt... she would have quit..

You think Palin would have quit as VP or are you just saying that sarcastically?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 06, 2011, 09:57:32 AM
You think Palin would have quit as VP or are you just saying that sarcastically?

shittin me right?.. well i didnt know at the time she would have quit because she hadnt quit as gov yet. But she quit because she had a lot of pressure on her.. well as leader of the free world.. dont you think thats a bit more pressure? She would have quit as Mayor of a major city..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 09:58:26 AM
shittin me right?.. well i didnt know at the time she would have quit because she hadnt quit as gov yet. But she quit because she had a lot of pressure on her.. well as leader of the free world.. dont you think thats a bit more pressure? She would have quit as Mayor of a major city..

So mcCain would have died?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 06, 2011, 09:58:46 AM
ya know, with palin, I could have even gotten past her lying about flying with broken water... her overconfidence.... her support of capping emissions and amnesty...

but she's just so fcccking whiny.  I mean seriously.  "I'm a victim of the media".  STFU.  if you think katie couric is brutal, wait til the G20 decides to drop the buck or China/Russia decide to pull some military shit.  If youre not tough enough to put katie couric on her ass, you aren't ready for world leaders, sorry...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 06, 2011, 10:00:31 AM
So mcCain would have died?   

im not sure.. i couldnt take that chance... palin is a nightmare..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 06, 2011, 10:03:20 AM
obama has aged terribly in 2 years already. 

mccain was 72, 4 bouts of cancer, some magic spot on his head where he 'kept bumping his head on that doggone limo door' or was getting treatment.

He showed moments of confusion, walking in front of cameras.  He was really easy to get really pissed during debates, frustrated way more than he was before.

He has an easy job as senator.  President is one stressful job.  I think actuaries put him at a 3 in 4 chance of making it thru his first term as president.  Scary. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 10:06:54 AM
shittin me right?.. well i didnt know at the time she would have quit because she hadnt quit as gov yet. But she quit because she had a lot of pressure on her.. well as leader of the free world.. dont you think thats a bit more pressure? She would have quit as Mayor of a major city..

Ehh, its a valid argument i suppose.  But the responsibility she had as governor versus VP might have been so different that she wouldn't have let herself quit. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 06, 2011, 01:06:37 PM
The truth hurts - doesnt it - 95% er.   

there's never ANY truth in ANYTHING you say..thats the problem
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 01:09:36 PM
there's never ANY truth in ANYTHING you say..thats the problem

Obama's lineage is not tradtional african american.  its arab and white.  You dopes who latched on to the fact that he has a shade of skin darker than than ofmccain are mostly gullible dupes for buying into the tailor made fraud that is obama. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 06, 2011, 01:27:18 PM
Obama's lineage is not tradtional african american.  its arab and white.  You dopes who latched on to the fact that he has a shade of skin darker than than ofmccain are mostly gullible dupes for buying into the tailor made fraud that is obama. 



MY GOD..NOW you're saying that Obama is part Arab....Now I am starting to really believe that you are a gimmick created to just stir people up....NO ONE COULD BE THAT DUMB...ITS SIMPLY NOT POSSIBLE!!!!! :o
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 01:29:55 PM
MY GOD..NOW you're saying that Obama is part Arab....Now I am starting to really believe that you are a gimmick created to just stir people up....NO ONE COULD BE THAT DUMB...ITS SIMPLY NOT POSSIBLE!!!!! :o

Yes he is! 

Do some fucking research on this jerkioff andre.   He is not who you think he is.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 06, 2011, 02:10:30 PM
Obama's lineage is not tradtional african american.  its arab and white. 


mccain told the cameras at a rally that obama was NOT an arab.

So Mccain was in on keeping this secret too?   ???
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 06, 2011, 02:20:03 PM

mccain told the cameras at a rally that obama was NOT an arab.

So Mccain was in on keeping this secret too?   ???

I'm sure McCain researched this. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 02:20:12 PM
This thread is unreal.  

33333, you are unraveling yourself.  


So now, Obama is a Kenyan born of Arab decent?  And the Hawaiian state government is covering for him along with so many others?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 06, 2011, 02:24:26 PM
This thread is unreal.  

33333, you are unraveling yourself.  


So now, Obama is a Kenyan born of Arab decent?  And the Hawaiian state government is covering for him along with so many others?
LOL.... IM LOVIN THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 06, 2011, 02:27:15 PM
I'm sure McCain researched this. 

getbig discussed this at great length.  mccain was asked about it.  All this birther stuff was out there.

Mccain and palin must be "in on it" too.

At this point, it might be easier to list the people in the world who ARENT in on the great scam, huh?  Trump, 333386, and a bunch of people screaming at tea party rallies.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 02:34:54 PM
LOL.... IM LOVIN THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

His father was a Kenyan muslim with arab blood.   BARACK HUESSIEN OBAMA (SOUND CHRISTIAN TO YOU?)   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 02:40:31 PM
This thread is a great example of why prominent republicans are staying away from this issue.  Until definitive evidence is brought to the surface there's nothing here but speculative arguments that can potentially ruin a politician.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 06, 2011, 02:52:28 PM
This thread is a great example of why prominent republicans are staying away from this issue.  Until definitive evidence is brought to the surface there's nothing here but speculative arguments that can potentially ruin a politician.   

You can approach it like Trump has.  He's not saying Obama is definitely not a US citizen, just that it seems strange that he won't release his birth certificate.  A lot of people agree with him, it is strange. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 02:53:02 PM
This thread is a great example of why prominent republicans are staying away from this issue.  Until definitive evidence is brought to the surface there's nothing here but speculative arguments that can potentially ruin a politician.   

Yeah, lets applaud a potus who hides his record and which would not allow him to get hired at so much as security at Burger King.  Fucking brilliant.   ::)  ::)

________________________ __________-

BTW - how does one get into Harvard law when they did not even get honors in college tobegin with?  

_______________________________

http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/

Obama's Years at Columbia Are a Mystery
He Graduated Without Honors
By ROSS GOLDBERG, Special to the Sun | September 2, 2008


http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/

 Print  Send  Comment  Share
Senator Obama's life story, from his humble roots, to his rise to Harvard Law School, to his passion as a community organizer in Chicago, has been at the center of his presidential campaign. But one chapter of the tale remains a blank — his education at Columbia College, a place he rarely speaks about and where few people seem to remember him.

Contributing to the mystery is the fact that nobody knows just how well Mr. Obama, unlike Senator McCain and most other major candidates for the past two elections, performed as a student.

The Obama campaign has refused to release his college transcript, despite an academic career that led him to Harvard Law School and, later, to a lecturing position at the University of Chicago. The shroud surrounding his experience at Columbia contrasts with that of other major party nominees since 2000, all whom have eventually released information about their college performance or seen it leaked to the public.

For better or worse, voters have taken an interest in candidates' grades since 1999, when the New Yorker published President Bush's transcript at Yale and disclosed that he was a C student. Mr. Bush had never portrayed himself as a brain, but many were surprised to learn the next year that his opponent, Vice President Gore, did not do much better at Harvard despite his intellectual image. When Senator Kerry's transcript surfaced, reporters found that he actually had a slightly lower average at Yale than Mr. Bush did.

Some political observers cite such disclosures as proof that candidates' intelligence cannot be judged solely by their political careers or the schools they attended. Grades provide a rare measure of intellect that is immune to political spin, proponents say.

"We like to pretend IQ doesn't matter, but it really does with a lot of jobs, including the presidency," a professor at Smith College who studies the effects of human intelligence on the economy, James Miller, said. "We can't trust the information that candidates give us, so it's important to look for objective data that they can't falsify or distort."

Mr. Miller acknowledged that Mr. Obama displayed academic achievement at Harvard, where he graduated magna cum laude and led the Harvard Law Review. Still, Mr. Miller said, he would like to see information about how Mr. Obama performed in various subjects at Columbia.

That view is not shared by other election observers, including some who have themselves indulged the public's interest in candidates' academic records. One of them is Geoffrey Kabaservice, a political historian who in 2000 published Senator Bradley's relatively low score of 485 on the verbal SAT. Mr. Bradley, a Rhodes Scholar who was a star basketball player at Princeton, was running for the Democratic presidential nomination.

"It's awfully hard to correlate anything, really, about a person on the basis of their grades," Mr. Kabaservice said, explaining that he published Mr. Bradley's score to highlight limitations in intelligence testing. He said he doubted that candidates' grades have affected the outcome of any recent presidential elections.

"For people who didn't like George W. Bush, for example, the grade aspect only confirmed what they thought about him," Mr. Kabaservice said. "And for everybody else, it made him more of a regular guy."

The Obama campaign declined to comment for this article and did not offer an explanation for why his transcript has not been released. But observers speculated that one reason might be the racially charged nature of the election. Mr. Obama has acknowledged benefiting from affirmative action in the past, and details about his academic performance might open him up to critics eager to accuse him, probably unfairly, of receiving a free ride, Mr. Kabaservice said.

"Anyone who is a minority and who's come up partially through the meritocracy — getting into good colleges, and subsequently good law schools — is going to come under suspicion that there was some kind of affirmative action boost," he said. "I suspect this is an area of discomfort for Obama."

In contrast with the rest of Mr. Obama's life story, little is known about his college experience. He attended Occidental College in Los Angeles for two years before transferring to Columbia in 1981. The move receives only a mention in Mr. Obama's 1995 memoir, "Dreams from My Father," which instead devotes that chapter to his impressions of race and class struggles in New York.

An article in a Columbia University publication, Columbia College Today, reported that Mr. Obama has portrayed Columbia as a period of buckling down following a troubled adolescence. He did not socialize much, he has said, instead spending a lot of time in the library, "like a monk." He has also stated that he was involved to some extent with the Black Students Organization.

Federal law limits the information that Columbia can release about Mr. Obama's time there. A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors, Mr. Connolly said, though specific information on his grades is sealed. A program from the 1983 graduation ceremony lists him as a graduate.

More is known about Mr. McCain's experience at the United States Naval Academy, where he was a self-described troublemaker and graduated in the bottom 1% of his class. The McCain campaign has declined to release his transcript, saying that his performance at the academy can only be viewed in the context of his larger military career.

"His record stands on its own," a McCain spokesman, Peter Feldman, said. "His time spent in college was part of the transformative years that made him who he was."



 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 02:54:42 PM
This thread is a great example of why prominent republicans are staying away from this issue.  Until definitive evidence is brought to the surface there's nothing here but speculative arguments that can potentially ruin a politician.   

Yeah, lets applaud a potus who hides his record and which would not allow him to get hired at so much as security at Burger King.  Fucking brilliant.   ::)  ::)

________________________ __________-

BTW - how does one get into Harvard law when they did not even get honors in college tobegin with?  

_______________________________

http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/

Obama's Years at Columbia Are a Mystery
He Graduated Without Honors
By ROSS GOLDBERG, Special to the Sun | September 2, 2008


http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/

 Print  Send  Comment  Share
Senator Obama's life story, from his humble roots, to his rise to Harvard Law School, to his passion as a community organizer in Chicago, has been at the center of his presidential campaign. But one chapter of the tale remains a blank — his education at Columbia College, a place he rarely speaks about and where few people seem to remember him.

Contributing to the mystery is the fact that nobody knows just how well Mr. Obama, unlike Senator McCain and most other major candidates for the past two elections, performed as a student.

The Obama campaign has refused to release his college transcript, despite an academic career that led him to Harvard Law School and, later, to a lecturing position at the University of Chicago. The shroud surrounding his experience at Columbia contrasts with that of other major party nominees since 2000, all whom have eventually released information about their college performance or seen it leaked to the public.

For better or worse, voters have taken an interest in candidates' grades since 1999, when the New Yorker published President Bush's transcript at Yale and disclosed that he was a C student. Mr. Bush had never portrayed himself as a brain, but many were surprised to learn the next year that his opponent, Vice President Gore, did not do much better at Harvard despite his intellectual image. When Senator Kerry's transcript surfaced, reporters found that he actually had a slightly lower average at Yale than Mr. Bush did.

Some political observers cite such disclosures as proof that candidates' intelligence cannot be judged solely by their political careers or the schools they attended. Grades provide a rare measure of intellect that is immune to political spin, proponents say.

"We like to pretend IQ doesn't matter, but it really does with a lot of jobs, including the presidency," a professor at Smith College who studies the effects of human intelligence on the economy, James Miller, said. "We can't trust the information that candidates give us, so it's important to look for objective data that they can't falsify or distort."

Mr. Miller acknowledged that Mr. Obama displayed academic achievement at Harvard, where he graduated magna cum laude and led the Harvard Law Review. Still, Mr. Miller said, he would like to see information about how Mr. Obama performed in various subjects at Columbia.

That view is not shared by other election observers, including some who have themselves indulged the public's interest in candidates' academic records. One of them is Geoffrey Kabaservice, a political historian who in 2000 published Senator Bradley's relatively low score of 485 on the verbal SAT. Mr. Bradley, a Rhodes Scholar who was a star basketball player at Princeton, was running for the Democratic presidential nomination.

"It's awfully hard to correlate anything, really, about a person on the basis of their grades," Mr. Kabaservice said, explaining that he published Mr. Bradley's score to highlight limitations in intelligence testing. He said he doubted that candidates' grades have affected the outcome of any recent presidential elections.

"For people who didn't like George W. Bush, for example, the grade aspect only confirmed what they thought about him," Mr. Kabaservice said. "And for everybody else, it made him more of a regular guy."

The Obama campaign declined to comment for this article and did not offer an explanation for why his transcript has not been released. But observers speculated that one reason might be the racially charged nature of the election. Mr. Obama has acknowledged benefiting from affirmative action in the past, and details about his academic performance might open him up to critics eager to accuse him, probably unfairly, of receiving a free ride, Mr. Kabaservice said.

"Anyone who is a minority and who's come up partially through the meritocracy — getting into good colleges, and subsequently good law schools — is going to come under suspicion that there was some kind of affirmative action boost," he said. "I suspect this is an area of discomfort for Obama."

In contrast with the rest of Mr. Obama's life story, little is known about his college experience. He attended Occidental College in Los Angeles for two years before transferring to Columbia in 1981. The move receives only a mention in Mr. Obama's 1995 memoir, "Dreams from My Father," which instead devotes that chapter to his impressions of race and class struggles in New York.

An article in a Columbia University publication, Columbia College Today, reported that Mr. Obama has portrayed Columbia as a period of buckling down following a troubled adolescence. He did not socialize much, he has said, instead spending a lot of time in the library, "like a monk." He has also stated that he was involved to some extent with the Black Students Organization.

Federal law limits the information that Columbia can release about Mr. Obama's time there. A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors, Mr. Connolly said, though specific information on his grades is sealed. A program from the 1983 graduation ceremony lists him as a graduate.

More is known about Mr. McCain's experience at the United States Naval Academy, where he was a self-described troublemaker and graduated in the bottom 1% of his class. The McCain campaign has declined to release his transcript, saying that his performance at the academy can only be viewed in the context of his larger military career.

"His record stands on its own," a McCain spokesman, Peter Feldman, said. "His time spent in college was part of the transformative years that made him who he was."



 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 06, 2011, 02:54:52 PM
why do you keep digging :o
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 02:55:11 PM
You can approach it like Trump has.  He's not saying Obama is definitely not a US citizen, just that it seems strange that he won't release his birth certificate.  A lot of people agree with him, it is strange. 

Trump is not a politician.  He's a bored business mogul who likes to dabble in TV and now his new thing is politics.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 02:58:08 PM
Trump is not a politician.  He's a bored business mogul who likes to dabble in TV and now his new thing is politics.


 ::)  ::)

More diversion.   

Where is the long form BC signed by a doctor naming the hospital?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 02:59:25 PM
Yeah, lets applaud a potus who hides his record and which would not allow him to get hired at so much as security at Burger King.  Fucking brilliant.   ::)  ::)

________________________ __________-

BTW - how does one get into Harvard law when they did not even get honors in college tobegin with?  

_______________________________

http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/




Yeah classic 33333 technique on the boards:

-  Don't directly respond to the post, instead deflect towards another issue or argument that has little to do with the post he was responding too.

-  Cut and paste some article.





Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:01:05 PM
Ozmo - again for the 50th time - where is the long form BC signed by a state official naming the hospital of birth and doctor who delivered him?   

If you cant answer that - S T F U on this as you are clueless.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:02:19 PM

 ::)  ::)

More diversion.   



More diversion?  pot, kettle.


and then you do your typical shit:

Quote
Where is the long form BC signed by a doctor naming the hospital?  


WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH MY POST ABOUT TRUMP?


Additionally:

Yeah, lets applaud a potus who hides his record and which would not allow him to get hired at so much as security at Burger King.  Fucking brilliant.   ::)  ::)


:


WHERE THE FUCK DO I APPLAUD OBAMA IN MY POST????????????




Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:02:59 PM
ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTIONS!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:05:29 PM
Ozmo - again for the 50th time - where is the long form BC signed by a state official naming the hospital of birth and doctor who delivered him?   

If you cant answer that - S T F U on this as you are clueless.   

does every single US citizen have this long form?    ::)


What you are asking is a stupid fucking question, because i don't have access to those records. 

The Hawaiian government does.

You should be asking them, (them who are obviously part of your CT), not me.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:05:35 PM
ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTIONS!

Like what?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:06:38 PM
Like what?  

the post above it!

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:06:52 PM
does every single US citizen have this long form?    ::)


What you are asking is a stupid fucking question, because i don't have access to those records. 

The Hawaiian government does.

You should be asking them, (them who are obviously part of your CT), not me.

People who were allegedly born the same day as him do.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:07:36 PM

Yeah classic 33333 technique on the boards:

-  Don't directly respond to the post, instead deflect towards another issue or argument that has little to do with the post he was responding too.

-  Cut and paste some article.



bump
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:08:23 PM
People who were allegedly born the same day as him do.    

every person born on the same day and year as Obama has a long form?


Prove it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:11:18 PM
every person born on the same day and year as Obama has a long form?


Prove it.

In Hawaii - FOR FUCKS SAKE I POSTED THE LONG FORM BC OF PEOPLE BORN THE SAME FUCKING DAY AS HE CLAIMS TO HAVE!   

Of course that is not enough for you.   Fucking joke.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:11:51 PM
every person born on the same day and year as Obama has a long form?


Prove it.

Here's the thing.  Apparently the State of Hawaii is committing fraud anyway because the COLB is created using the records they have detailing the birth of Obama.  Those, according to 333, are fake.  So why would a LFBC from the same STATE be legit?  If one is fake, the other must be fake too.  Right 333?  Yes or no?

He won't answer this.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:12:49 PM
In Hawaii - FOR FUCKS SAKE I POSTED THE LONG FORM BC OF PEOPLE BORN THE SAME FUCKING DAY AS HE CLAIMS TO HAVE!   

Of course that is not enough for you.   Fucking joke.   

Does every one born in Hawaii on that day have a long form????????????


prove it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:13:21 PM
More diversion?  pot, kettle.


and then you do your typical shit:


WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH MY POST ABOUT TRUMP?


Additionally:
:


WHERE THE FUCK DO I APPLAUD OBAMA IN MY POST????????????






Answer my questions!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:14:25 PM
Here's the thing.  Apparently the State of Hawaii is committing fraud anyway because the COLB is created using the records they have detailing the birth of Obama.  Those, according to 333, are fake.  So why would a LFBC from the same STATE be legit?  If one is fake, the other must be fake too.  Right 333?  Yes or no?

He won't answer this.  

No he won't answer it, what he'll do is this:


Yeah classic 33333 technique on the boards:

-  Don't directly respond to the post, instead deflect towards another issue or argument that has little to do with the post he was responding too.

-  Cut and paste some article.






Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:18:08 PM
Yeah ok Ozmo - whatever.  I only posted the long form BC  of the people born on the same day as Obama with the signed doc report naming the hospital etc, that are in almost next to exact sequence as his claimed number - yet he does not have a long form BC.   ::)  ::)

Hawaii claims they never lost any records, so where the fuck is it and why wont barry release it?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 06, 2011, 03:19:53 PM
there were 4 formats of that document.  they came in from diff places.  so it's understandable they wouldn't look the same.

this isn't a winning point - and i'm a birther too lol.......

focus on the SS, and the african newspaper articles saying he was kenyan born.  Surely he did an interview with them at some point?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:20:14 PM
yeah, just doing my 3333 imitation
  

Where's the long form, why can't he spend $10?

http://mises.org/daily/5189/Rebecca-Blacks-Friday-A-Libertarian-Allegory (http://mises.org/daily/5189/Rebecca-Blacks-Friday-A-Libertarian-Allegory)

The astonishing popularity of Rebecca Black's "Friday" video — which became the YouTube meme of all memes in the course of a wild six weeks — has mystified many critics.

Was it shared and watched so wildly because it was so bad? Certainly the overwhelming judgement on the part of viewers is that it is atrocious — and yet it is hard to know what that means, since 85 million people not only watched the video but also downloaded the song, bought the ring tone, and devoured every available bit of news about the singer and the song.

Using the principle of "demonstrated preference," this music video ranks as the most popular in human history.

Perhaps it is the digital-age version of Mel Brooks's smash Broadway play The Producers, a story about an attempt to write a play so bad that it flops on the first night. But, in Brooks's hilarious telling, the results were the opposite: the play was so bad that it was brilliant, and it became a smash success, however inadvertently.

Lovers of liberty are often drawn to such scenarios because they highlight the unknowability of the future, the unpredictability of human choice, and the way in which the intentions of the planners (in this case, the producers and writers) are easily upended by consumer choice, which is the driving force of economic progress.

The Producers-like irony is deepened in the case of Black's "Friday" video because it was not intended as a parody or an attempt to create a flop. That makes it all the more brilliant as a a piece of viral art. It somehow captured an archetype of bubblegum pop but with innocence and the absence of an edge.

Kids say it is awful and they hate it. They do not, despite what they say. Teens often claim to hate what they really love — as only a passing familiarity with teen romance patterns illustrates. The girl who can't stop talking about the guy she hates is surely protesting too much.

Musically, the song wouldn't seem to offer that much, but I would point out that its word play is not entirely conventional. The repeated placement of a three-syllable word "partying" into a duple metric creates some off-accent downbeats that are not entirely intuitive.

Far more significant is the underlying celebration of liberation that the day Friday represents. The kids featured in the video are of junior-high age, a time when adulthood is beginning to dawn and, with it, the realization of the captive state that the public school represents.

From the time that children are first institutionalized in these tax-funded cement structures, they are told the rules. Show up, obey the rules, accept the grades your are given, and never even think of escaping until you hear the bell. If you do escape, even peacefully of your own choice, you will be declared "truant," which is the intentional and unauthorized absence from compulsory school.

This prison-like environment runs from Monday through Friday, from 8 a.m. to late afternoon, for at least ten years of every child's life. It's been called the "twelve-year sentence" for good reason. At some point, every kid in public school gains consciousness of the strange reality. You can acquiesce as the civic order demands, or you can protest and be declared a bum and a loser by society.

"Friday" beautifully illustrates the sheer banality of a life spent in this prison-like system, and the prospect of liberation that the weekend means. Partying, in this case, is just another word for freedom from state authority.
"Partying, in this case, is just another word for freedom from state authority."

The largest segment of the video then deals with what this window of liberty, the weekend, means in the life of someone otherwise ensnared in a thicket of statism. Keep in mind here that the celebration of Friday in this context means more than it would for a worker in a factory, for example: for the worker is free to come and go, to apply for a job or quit, to negotiate terms of a contract, or whatever. All of this is denied to the kid in public school.

In the video, the rush to comply and conform with the system begins with the main character in the morning, when the drill begins with waking up and preparing to go. She eats cereal for breakfast — a bit of trivia that one would hardly expect in a pop song but a first sign that the topic is reality-based and not idyllic or romanticized.

And where is she headed? To catch the official, tax-funded school bus, which, though it is not shown, we know is painted yellow today just as it has been from time immemorial since there is never realy progress or change in the state-run system. The tax-fueled machine comes to your door to snatch you away from home, where you are loved and valued, in order to transport you to the cement structure that teaches you about the glory of fitting in and believing what you are supposed to believe.

But then the protagonist experiences a foreshadowing of the liberation at hand. Arriving before the school bus is a car with "my friends." They are smiling and inviting her to join them on the ride. And it is in this context that she confronts that glorious institution that is otherwise denied to her and every student in government school: human choice.

It might as first seem like a trivial choice: whether to sit in the front seat or the back seat. But the point is not the choice set; the point is the opportunity to exercise some degree of human volition, to use one's own brain to control one's own body ("gotta make my mind up") and live with the consequences of that choice. It is a similar situation to anyone who has found himself let out of prison. These people will report the sense of elation that they feel in even the smallest opportunity to make a choice on their own.

At this moment of choice, note that the melody departs from its single-note, drill-like recitation to suddenly rise up a fifth, musical interval that has traditionally be used as a trumpet-like announcement. And once surrounded by friends of her own choosing, the imaginings of Friday's end become more real, and thus does the melody become more complex and celebratory, exploring a great range of musical colors and rhythms.

The protagonist returns, again and again, to the profound meaning behind the seemingly trivial choice to sit in one seat or another. Again, it is not the choice set that matters here but the reality of choice itself that is otherwise denied to her and all her friends in the state-run system.

The remainder of the video features scenes of "partying," which turns out not to be about drugs or drinking but merely hanging around in yards and milling about with friends. There is no attempt here to manufacture a predetermined order, no standing in lines or obeying some central plan. Rather, the beauty is seen in the pure fact of voluntary human association, with kids milling around and joining this group or that, wearing clothes of their own choosing and talking with friends of their own choosing.

Even the recitation of the days of week — a portion of the video that has been most subjected to ridicule — underscores the theme of captivity and liberation. What is there to do in prison but count the days? In story and legend, the prisoner watches the light outside and make tick marks on the wall to mark the passage of time. So it is with this protagonist, who uses calendar pages to do the same.

When she finally announces, elatedly, that "I don't want the weekend to end," she is expressing more than just the desire to be permanently relieved of educational tasks; it is a cry for the civic order to recognize the human right of liberty itself. The video ends with that hope that there will be no return to the twelve-year sentence but rather that "partying" could become a permanent state of being, not just for her but for everyone.

$20 $18

To be sure, I'm not arguing that all of this was overtly intended by the songwriter or the singer. The point, rather, is that the plight, the hopes, and the dreams that are reflected in this video, however inadvertently, tap into a sensibility and a longing of a generation for a certain kind of freedom from a system that has ensnared them against their will. This might be the driving force of its popularity — and precisely why something that people claim not to like is evidently so loved.

A child-like dream of Friday and what it represents for kids trapped in public school, kids who are transported around on tax-funded buses and ordered around by tax-funded propagandists for the state, is a plausible allegory for the plight of all people imprisoned in state-controlled environments.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:21:44 PM
Yeah ok Ozmo - whatever.  I only posted the long form BC  of the people born on the same day as Obama with the signed doc report naming the hospital etc, that are in almost next to exact sequence as his claimed number - yet he does not have a long form BC.   ::)  ::)

Hawaii claims they never lost any records, so where the fuck is it and why wont barry release it?   

in his file under 'notes'   ;)

he released what the state of hawaii releases as a birth ceritificate.  Have you not been keeping up?  Any hawaiian gets a COLB and has done since 2001.  The reason it has changed from 1961 LFBC's is simple.  “The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and decades to conform to national standards and models,” she said.

So it's the same for EVERYONE not just Obama.  Wow mass conspiracy by the whole state!

So answer the questions...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:22:25 PM
Where is the long form BC signed by a doc showing thehispotal and date of birth like those in the exact sequene at to his COLB who have released a long form BC?  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:23:04 PM
yeah, just doing my 3333 imitation
  

Where's the long form, why can't he spend $10?

http://mises.org/daily/5189/Rebecca-Blacks-Friday-A-Libertarian-Allegory (http://mises.org/daily/5189/Rebecca-Blacks-Friday-A-Libertarian-Allegory)

The astonishing popularity of Rebecca Black's "Friday" video — which became the YouTube meme of all memes in the course of a wild six weeks — has mystified many critics.

Was it shared and watched so wildly because it was so bad? Certainly the overwhelming judgement on the part of viewers is that it is atrocious — and yet it is hard to know what that means, since 85 million people not only watched the video but also downloaded the song, bought the ring tone, and devoured every available bit of news about the singer and the song.

Using the principle of "demonstrated preference," this music video ranks as the most popular in human history.

Perhaps it is the digital-age version of Mel Brooks's smash Broadway play The Producers, a story about an attempt to write a play so bad that it flops on the first night. But, in Brooks's hilarious telling, the results were the opposite: the play was so bad that it was brilliant, and it became a smash success, however inadvertently.

Lovers of liberty are often drawn to such scenarios because they highlight the unknowability of the future, the unpredictability of human choice, and the way in which the intentions of the planners (in this case, the producers and writers) are easily upended by consumer choice, which is the driving force of economic progress.

The Producers-like irony is deepened in the case of Black's "Friday" video because it was not intended as a parody or an attempt to create a flop. That makes it all the more brilliant as a a piece of viral art. It somehow captured an archetype of bubblegum pop but with innocence and the absence of an edge.

Kids say it is awful and they hate it. They do not, despite what they say. Teens often claim to hate what they really love — as only a passing familiarity with teen romance patterns illustrates. The girl who can't stop talking about the guy she hates is surely protesting too much.

Musically, the song wouldn't seem to offer that much, but I would point out that its word play is not entirely conventional. The repeated placement of a three-syllable word "partying" into a duple metric creates some off-accent downbeats that are not entirely intuitive.

Far more significant is the underlying celebration of liberation that the day Friday represents. The kids featured in the video are of junior-high age, a time when adulthood is beginning to dawn and, with it, the realization of the captive state that the public school represents.

From the time that children are first institutionalized in these tax-funded cement structures, they are told the rules. Show up, obey the rules, accept the grades your are given, and never even think of escaping until you hear the bell. If you do escape, even peacefully of your own choice, you will be declared "truant," which is the intentional and unauthorized absence from compulsory school.

This prison-like environment runs from Monday through Friday, from 8 a.m. to late afternoon, for at least ten years of every child's life. It's been called the "twelve-year sentence" for good reason. At some point, every kid in public school gains consciousness of the strange reality. You can acquiesce as the civic order demands, or you can protest and be declared a bum and a loser by society.

"Friday" beautifully illustrates the sheer banality of a life spent in this prison-like system, and the prospect of liberation that the weekend means. Partying, in this case, is just another word for freedom from state authority.
"Partying, in this case, is just another word for freedom from state authority."

The largest segment of the video then deals with what this window of liberty, the weekend, means in the life of someone otherwise ensnared in a thicket of statism. Keep in mind here that the celebration of Friday in this context means more than it would for a worker in a factory, for example: for the worker is free to come and go, to apply for a job or quit, to negotiate terms of a contract, or whatever. All of this is denied to the kid in public school.

In the video, the rush to comply and conform with the system begins with the main character in the morning, when the drill begins with waking up and preparing to go. She eats cereal for breakfast — a bit of trivia that one would hardly expect in a pop song but a first sign that the topic is reality-based and not idyllic or romanticized.

And where is she headed? To catch the official, tax-funded school bus, which, though it is not shown, we know is painted yellow today just as it has been from time immemorial since there is never realy progress or change in the state-run system. The tax-fueled machine comes to your door to snatch you away from home, where you are loved and valued, in order to transport you to the cement structure that teaches you about the glory of fitting in and believing what you are supposed to believe.

But then the protagonist experiences a foreshadowing of the liberation at hand. Arriving before the school bus is a car with "my friends." They are smiling and inviting her to join them on the ride. And it is in this context that she confronts that glorious institution that is otherwise denied to her and every student in government school: human choice.

It might as first seem like a trivial choice: whether to sit in the front seat or the back seat. But the point is not the choice set; the point is the opportunity to exercise some degree of human volition, to use one's own brain to control one's own body ("gotta make my mind up") and live with the consequences of that choice. It is a similar situation to anyone who has found himself let out of prison. These people will report the sense of elation that they feel in even the smallest opportunity to make a choice on their own.

At this moment of choice, note that the melody departs from its single-note, drill-like recitation to suddenly rise up a fifth, musical interval that has traditionally be used as a trumpet-like announcement. And once surrounded by friends of her own choosing, the imaginings of Friday's end become more real, and thus does the melody become more complex and celebratory, exploring a great range of musical colors and rhythms.

The protagonist returns, again and again, to the profound meaning behind the seemingly trivial choice to sit in one seat or another. Again, it is not the choice set that matters here but the reality of choice itself that is otherwise denied to her and all her friends in the state-run system.

The remainder of the video features scenes of "partying," which turns out not to be about drugs or drinking but merely hanging around in yards and milling about with friends. There is no attempt here to manufacture a predetermined order, no standing in lines or obeying some central plan. Rather, the beauty is seen in the pure fact of voluntary human association, with kids milling around and joining this group or that, wearing clothes of their own choosing and talking with friends of their own choosing.

Even the recitation of the days of week — a portion of the video that has been most subjected to ridicule — underscores the theme of captivity and liberation. What is there to do in prison but count the days? In story and legend, the prisoner watches the light outside and make tick marks on the wall to mark the passage of time. So it is with this protagonist, who uses calendar pages to do the same.

When she finally announces, elatedly, that "I don't want the weekend to end," she is expressing more than just the desire to be permanently relieved of educational tasks; it is a cry for the civic order to recognize the human right of liberty itself. The video ends with that hope that there will be no return to the twelve-year sentence but rather that "partying" could become a permanent state of being, not just for her but for everyone.

$20 $18

To be sure, I'm not arguing that all of this was overtly intended by the songwriter or the singer. The point, rather, is that the plight, the hopes, and the dreams that are reflected in this video, however inadvertently, tap into a sensibility and a longing of a generation for a certain kind of freedom from a system that has ensnared them against their will. This might be the driving force of its popularity — and precisely why something that people claim not to like is evidently so loved.

A child-like dream of Friday and what it represents for kids trapped in public school, kids who are transported around on tax-funded buses and ordered around by tax-funded propagandists for the state, is a plausible allegory for the plight of all people imprisoned in state-controlled environments.

I would buy the latest song by maddoff/vandersloot over rebecca blacks she wasn't even born here!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:23:52 PM
Yeah ok Ozmo - whatever.  I only posted the long form BC  of the people born on the same day as Obama with the signed doc report naming the hospital etc, that are in almost next to exact sequence as his claimed number - yet he does not have a long form BC.   ::)  ::)

Hawaii claims they never lost any records, so where the fuck is it and why wont barry release it?   


doing more 3333, imitations......


Where is everyone's long form born in 1961???


Why are you applauding these people?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-sigman/in-wacky-gop-presidential_b_845492.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-sigman/in-wacky-gop-presidential_b_845492.html)

In Wacky GOP Presidential Field, the Donald Trumps the Shark

Donald Trump's transparently idiotic statements about President Obama's birth certificate and other matters haven't made Rupert Murdoch's New York Post shy about touting the billionaire's "suddenly surging presidential chances."

Others in the media are also taking Trump's presidential candidacy seriously, and the man whose contribution to the national discourse begins and ends with the words "You're fired" just finished second behind home-court fave Mitt Romney in a new New Hampshire poll. So it's worth asking if the presence of a knucklehead is simply necessary to the political process -- not because Americans are stupid, but because the media can't tolerate the gravitas of politics -- all that talk of foreign policy and budgets and the Constitution unleavened by pure insanity or the possibility of an upset.

Until recently, Sarah Palin was clearly the 2012 designated knucklehead. Despite her lack of even minimal qualifications, Chris Matthews was among the many Palin-watchers hyping her purported "path to the nomination."

Palin was hardly the first empty pantsuit to get up close and dangerous with the most powerful job in the world -- the 2000 Republican primary field included loopy magazine publisher Steve Forbes, activist/certifiable lunatic Alan Keyes and Dan "I deserve respect for the things I didn't do" Quayle, the proto-Palin.

As Palin's bonehead statements sent her numbers tumbling faster than her champion Bill Kristol could walk back his praise, commentators focused on Newt Gingrich. He's been working overtime contradicting himself on Libya and other issues with the skill of an unprepared high school debater.

No matter how lame Gingrich gets, commentators continue to praise him with faint blame. Newt is an "idea man," they say, without giving specific examples, leaving us on our own to mine the depths of such Gingrich-isms as, "The underlying thematics are beginning to be universalizable in a way that has taken years of work."

Michele Bachmann -- whose grasp of the rudiments of American history is tenuous at best -- may be as far as one can get from presidential timber, but the New Republic's Ed Kilgore, the Telegraph's Alex Spillius and MSNBC's Cenk Uygur are among the pundits talking up her chances in the Republican race.

And then there's Trump. Towering over the field in terms of pure self-aggrandizement, he's inevitably introduced as a "genius businessman" or a "brilliant negotiator." It came as no surprise, then, that in the first in a series of regular spots on Fox and Friends, the mogul praised his own three-night Trump-fest on last week's Fox show The O'Reilly Factor. Leaving content in the dust, meta-media website Mediaite -- which also found it newsworthy to feature the "story" that Bill Clinton has rejected "birther claims" -- noted that even Fox's own Gretchen Carlson "couldn't help but let out a chuckle at Trump's unabashed [self]-promotion."

The spectacle of Donald "Trumping the shark" is so post-ironic that mere irony doesn't stand a chance. When Bill Ayers joked that he, not Obama, wrote the actually brilliant book Dreams of My Father, Trump displayed the audacity of dope: he took the joke seriously.

"They say Dreams of My Father was genius and they give Obama full credit," he told conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham, "and now it's coming out that Bill Ayers wrote it -- that's what started him on his road where he became president."

With geniuses like Trump, who needs idiots?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:24:05 PM
in his file under 'notes'   ;)

he released what the state of hawaii releases as a birth ceritificate.  Have you not been keeping up?  Any hawaiian gets a COLB and has done since 2001.  The reason it has changed from 1961 LFBC's is simple.  “The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and decades to conform to national standards and models,” she said.

So it's the same for EVERYONE not just Obama.  Wow mass conspiracy by the whole state!

So answer the questions...

Funny - the people in direct sequence to him somehow released their long form BC.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:25:20 PM
I want to see every persons long form born in 1961 or they should deported!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:25:55 PM
Obama allegedly wrote Dreams in 1995 and in that book he caimed he had a BC.   Which was it?   Couldnt be the 2007 nonsense they created corect?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:26:28 PM
I want to see every persons long form born in 1961 or they should deported!

Perhaps 333 should post his to prove he is American.  For all we know he's an illegal.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:26:45 PM
I would buy the latest song by maddoff/vandersloot over rebecca blacks she wasn't even born here!

lol
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:27:34 PM
Obama allegedly wrote Dreams in 1995 and in that book he caimed he had a BC.   Which was it?   Couldnt be the 2007 nonsense they created corect?  

He probably does have a LFBC doesn't mean he has to show you it.  The state has it on file, they used it to create a COLB for him to prove his place of birth.  

Can you prove they don't have the LFBC in the file?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:28:43 PM
Obama allegedly wrote Dreams in 1995 and in that book he caimed he had a BC.   Which was it?   Couldnt be the 2007 nonsense they created corect?  

Why are you applauding the beheading of 8 UN workers?


Cut and paste article here.   ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:29:40 PM
He probably does have a LFBC doesn't mean he has to show you it.  The state has it on file, they used it to create a COLB for him to prove his place of birth.  

Can you prove they don't have the LFBC in the file?  


why doesn't he just spend 10 dollars for 3333 satisfaction?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:31:05 PM

why doesn't he just spend 10 dollars for 3333 satisfaction?

Because he lurks here and enjoys the meltdown.  ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:32:40 PM
Perhaps 333 should post his to prove he is American.  For all we know he's an illegal.

I can release a long form BC, prove only using one SS my whole life, release my assport, myLSAT, my records, client client, school transcripts, etc within afew hours if need be.  Funny Obama cant. 


Obama could not get a job with mall security with his record.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:33:58 PM
He probably does have a LFBC doesn't mean he has to show you it.  The state has it on file, they used it to create a COLB for him to prove his place of birth.  

Can you prove they don't have the LFBC in the file?  

Funny because the race of the father on the COLB is listed as "African" when that was not even an option or choice in 1961. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:34:48 PM
Funny because the race of the father on the COLB is listed as "African" when that was not even an option or choice in 1961. 

Funny because - “The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and decades to conform to national standards and models,” she said. Hawaiian State official.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:35:46 PM
you think is someone born in the south had 'negro' on their original certificate would have it on a newer requested copy?  Didn't think so. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:38:00 PM
you think is someone born in the south had 'negro' on their original certificate would have it on a newer requested copy?  Didn't think so. 

He wasnt born in the south.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:41:41 PM
He wasnt born in the south.   

It's an example.  Rules change, regulations change.  Already been explained.   8)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 06, 2011, 03:43:07 PM
It's an example.  Rules change, regulations change.  Already been explained.   8)

Where's the long form?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:44:01 PM
It's an example.  Rules change, regulations change.  Already been explained.   8)

Tha's funny because Obama's lawyers in court never offered that explaination for the discrepancy and Fukino never said that the race issue or classification was anexample of what you are saying.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:44:40 PM
Where's the long form?

Hahaha How long does it have to be?  12 inches?  I think 333 is looking for something else LFBC - Long Form Black Cock?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 06, 2011, 03:45:32 PM
Tha's funny because Obama's lawyers in court never offered that explaination for the discrepancy and Fukino never said that the race issue or classification was anexample of what you are saying.  

Didn't need to.  Times change, so do forms.  They modernize and streamline.  Welcome to the world of moving forward.  We can't all be stuck in 1961 for ever. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 03:48:57 PM
Didn't need to.  Times change, so do forms.  They modernize and streamline.  Welcome to the world of moving forward.  We can't all be stuck in 1961 for ever. 

 ::)  ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 06, 2011, 05:10:19 PM
Hahaha How long does it have to be?  12 inches?  I think 333 is looking for something else LFBC - Long Form Black Cock?  

I mentioned this to him already....I think this is the case..there's some black guy in his neighborhood that he is after but the guy won't give him the time of day...so he misdirects his aggression toward Obama
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 06:23:46 PM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/04/06/trump_expresses_real_doubts_about_obamas_birthplace.html

The Latest Politics, News & Election Videos

Trump Expresses "Real Doubts" About Obama's Birthplace
 
In an interview set to air on Thursday's "Today Show," Donald Trump now reveals he has "real doubts" if President Obama was born in the United States. Trump said "three weeks ago" he thought differently, now he has changed his mind.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 07:25:17 PM
Trump’s Hawaii Investigation Wednesday, April 6, 2011
« Previous Post
Oval Office Showdown
+

Tells “Today” he has people in the Aloha State conducting on-the-ground research into the president’s birthplace.


MEREDITH VIEIRA:
So, is the time right now for you?

DONALD TRUMP:
Well, the time certainly is right. We’re a laughing stock as a country throughout the world. We’re being taken advantage of by other countries

***

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
If you were President, would keep a military presence in Iraq indefinitely.

DONALD TRUMP:
Let me just say something. There’s nobody more militaristic than me, but it’s also called attack the right target. Iran is going to take over Iraq, because we have de-neutered Iraq, you know that, in terms of their military. They’re gonna take them over very quickly as soon as we leave. If that’s gonna happen, they’re gonna take over the oil fields. The second biggest oil fields in the world. And if that’s gonna happen, I say we take over the oil fields…I would take over the oil fields, because otherwise, Iran is gonna take over the second biggest oil fields in the world. I would absolutely, without question, not leave that section of that country. I would take the oil. To the victor belong the spoils. You know, in the old days, you’d have a war. And you’d be in there. And you’d win. And you’d take over the country. Whether it’s oil or gold or whatever. You take over the country.

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
Okay. Are you saying if you were President, you would take us out of Afghanistan?

DONALD TRUMP:

Well, nothing’s simple. Because I don’t believe in foot soldiers. They get blown up on streets. But I do believe in airplanes that are 50,000 feet up. And when we see through intelligence what’s going on, knock the hell out. Oh, by the way, I’m much more militaristic than Obama. He got the Nobel Peace Prize, but, you know, I think they’re probably rethinking that one, every time he seizes a country. The problem is he seizes countries, but he doesn’t win….I’m not gonna have soldiers walking down on the street and get blown up and get shot at by snipers and killed, so we have to call the parents and say, "Your son was just killed on a street in Afghanistan." But those people will have a lot more problems with me than they’re having right now. But I do it through the air and we’re not gonna have casualties.

***

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
Do you think given all the issues that this country is facing that this is something that resonates with the public? That they care about this?

DONALD TRUMP:
The Constitution of the United States…great document. And you agree with it?

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
Yeah, sure.

DONALD TRUMP:
It says you have to be born in this country. Essential. Have to be born in this country, okay? If he wasn’t born in this country, he has conned the whole world.

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
But you’re saying it’s a con. That’s what you’re saying.

DONALD TRUMP:
I’m not saying anything. I’m saying--

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
Sure you are.

DONALD TRUMP:
I am saying I want to see the birth certificate. It’s very simple. I want to see the birth certificate. How come his own family doesn’t know which hospital he was born in? How come-- forget about birth certificates. Let’s say there’s no birth certificate. How come in the hospital itself, okay? This is one of the…in the hospital itself, there’s no records of his birth. In other words, it doesn’t say how much they paid, where is the doctor, here’s your room bill. You know, all the

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
You’ve been privy to all of this to know this?

DONALD TRUMP:
Well, I have people that actually have been studying it and they cannot believe what they’re talking.

MEREDITH VIEIRA:
You have people now out there searching-- I mean, in Hawaii?

DONALD TRUMP:
Absolutely. And they cannot believe what they’re finding. And I’m serious--

***

MEREDITH VIERA:
You criticized Obama quite a bit in this interview and in the past. What do you think he has done well?

DONALD TRUMP:

I think the thing that he did best of all, is get elected. Get elected. He ran an unbelievable campaign although, in the end, Hillary was beating him in every state. It was pretty-- I mean, by the end, I think people were maybe getting wise. And, you have to understand, I want Obama to do well. I don't dislike him. I never met him….

If I had my choice of having Obama do great as a president, and do a really great job for this country, and not running, as opposed to running - I'd prefer that he did a great job. I love this country. But, this country is going to hell.

***

MEREDITH VIERA:
Among those potential Republican candidates, can you point to any of them and say, "That person would be a fine president"?

DONALD TRUMP:
Well, you know, it's funny. They've all treated me so nicely. They've been so great… I'm not gonna go on any individual, but I will tell you I understand them. I know many of them…

I know this. I will be better than anybody. I will do the best job. If I decide to run, I will do the best job. I will be best for this country. And, you may say, "Oh, gee, that doesn't sound like George Washington." Well, guess what? Before George Washington ran, he didn't sound like George Washington either. I will be and do a great job, if I run and if I win.


http://nation.foxnews.com/donald-trump/2011/04/06/trump-i-have-investigators-hawaiithey-cannot-believe-what-theyre-finding


________________________ __________________


Awesome!   Donald taking out the trash.  Getting to the bottom of bama's scam on the public. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 06, 2011, 07:42:19 PM
Didn't need to.  Times change, so do forms.  They modernize and streamline.  Welcome to the world of moving forward.  We can't all be stuck in 1961 for ever. 
Birth certificates don't change.  Why would you so easily accept that he has a long form birth certificate?  Have you seen it?  We're shown a phony looking COLB and know for a fact that he used multiple social security numbers.  Something smells rotten here. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 07:47:25 PM
Birth certificates don't change.  Why would you so easily accept that he has a long form birth certificate?  Have you seen it?  We're shown a phony looking COLB and know for a fact that he used multiple social security numbers.  Something smells rotten here. 

Not to Team Kneepad.   Its perfectly normal to hide everything from public, use 16 social security numbers, have a phoney Selective Service Registration ticket, use alias, have no record of name changes or adoptions.  etc.   Dont we all have relatives like that?   ::)  ::)  ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 06, 2011, 07:49:02 PM
Birth certificates don't change.  Why would you so easily accept that he has a long form birth certificate?  Have you seen it?  We're shown a phony looking COLB and know for a fact that he used multiple social security numbers.  Something smells rotten here. 

That's not true... Birth Certificates do change.

If I go get a birth certificate for myself from the commonwealth of virginia right now... It does not look like the birth certificate from 1950.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 07:55:01 PM
That's not true... Birth Certificates do change.

If I go get a birth certificate for myself from the commonwealth of virginia right now... It does not look like the birth certificate from 1950.

Yes, but the original is on file with raised seal and signed by a doc or govt officer certying it.  What bama presented is pure nonsense. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 06, 2011, 08:09:11 PM
Yes, but the original is on file with raised seal and signed by a doc or govt officer certying it.  What bama presented is pure nonsense. 

You know this for a fact?

You're admitting that there is a birth certificate then?

The Certificate of live birth is a valid form in regards to getting a social security card and a job... How is it "nonsense". That form and a SS card will allow you to fill out a W-4 form at a job.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 08:15:41 PM
You know this for a fact?

You're admitting that there is a birth certificate then?

The Certificate of live birth is a valid form in regards to getting a social security card and a job... How is it "nonsense". That form and a SS card will allow you to fill out a W-4 form at a job.

No, I was speaking of your BC. 

Bama said in Dreams From my Father, allegedly written in 1995 he had a BC.  However, he released a COLB that was created in 2007 for the campaign.  Where is the one he was referring to in dreams and why wont he release it? 


Personally I believe a long form does exist but it shoes a different father or none at all. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 08:18:03 PM

Donald Trump Giving Birther To Obama Secretiveness
Bayou Buzz News ^ | April 6, 2011 | Jeff Crouere




Billionaire businessman Donald Trump has been on a roll the past few weeks. While the mainstream news media has dismissed the Obama birth certificate issue, Trump has embraced it and questioned why Obama will not release his long form birth certificate. While most of the other GOP presidential candidates offer to work with China in a cooperative manner, Trump maintains the U.S. needs to get tough and slap a massive 25 percent tariff on their products. On the Fox News “O’Reilly” show, Trump promised to withdraw American troops from any Middle Eastern country that does not sell oil to the U.S. at discounted prices.

While he is considering the race, he is garnering more media attention than all of the other potential candidates combined. As a result, he is improving his standing in the polls. In the latest Public Policy poll of likely GOP voters in New Hampshire, Trumps runs a strong second to Mitt Romney. The result surprised the pollsters, but shows that Trump is striking a chord with the base of the Republican Party.

Although he is gaining traction with the voters, Trump’s bold ideas are not sitting well with the media elite. On the “O’Reilly” program, Fox News, analyst Brit Hume claimed that Trump was too controversial and that the GOP would be better suited to find a candidate that would keep the focus on Obama. Hume is a typical Republican insider who wants the party to nominate a “safe” candidate who will not bring up controversial issues like Obama’s birth certificate. In contrast, most GOP voters are ready for a non-traditional candidate who will take the fight directly to Obama.

In the 2012 election, Obama will have $1 billion to spend. The only candidate who can match him dollar for dollar is Donald Trump. Trump is also very comfortable on television and is a very good communicator. As a smart and successful businessman, he can easily debate Obama on the issues.

Unlike Obama, Trump has a very public track record. While much of his personal life has been controversial and he has been married several times, at least his background is available to anyone who wants to see it. In contrast, Obama is the real mystery man, even after 27 months in the Oval Office. According to World Net Daily, “besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the president has refused to release his Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, baptism records and his adoption records.”

It is shocking that the mainstream news media has been so lax in their background checks of Barack Obama. No GOP President would be allowed such kid glove media treatment. The media demands that Republican candidates release all of their personal information, claiming that it’s the “public’s right to know.” Of course, in the case of Obama, the mainstream news media has been strangely silent.

At least Trump is pushing an issue that is of interest to Americans who continue to question the official birth story of Barack Obama. By highlighting an issue that other GOP presidential contenders will not touch, Trump is displaying both courage and keen political instincts.

This issue has helped to separate Trump from many of his competitors and earned him high praise from conservative tea party activists. As each day passes, it seems more and more likely that Trump will not only run for President, but also that he will be a force to be reckoned with in the 2012 presidential race.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 06, 2011, 08:23:33 PM
No, I was speaking of your BC. 

Bama said in Dreams From my Father, allegedly written in 1995 he had a BC.  However, he released a COLB that was created in 2007 for the campaign.  Where is the one he was referring to in dreams and why wont he release it? 


Personally I believe a long form does exist but it shoes a different father or none at all. 

So no father makes him still a US naturalized citizen, which again, makes the whole point ridiculously stupid.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 08:32:25 PM
So no father makes him still a US naturalized citizen, which again, makes the whole point ridiculously stupid.

No, but there is an issue that he rejected hisd citizenship in order to enroll in school in indonesia since they only allow indonesian citizens to enroll in their schools at thew time.   Lolo Sotero allegeldy adopted obama in order to get him citizenship in indonesia.  So the issue might be that they changed the birtch certificate later.   

There is also an issue that there was a law requiring the parents to have been residents for 10 years or some shit before qualifiyng as a citizen.  FarRightLooney posted on this. 

I know everyone wants this to go away, but its not because there are serious issues not resolved and calling a lot into question.

16 SS numbers?  Come on, that is more than bizarre. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 06, 2011, 08:45:25 PM
No, but there is an issue that he rejected hisd citizenship in order to enroll in school in indonesia since they only allow indonesian citizens to enroll in their schools at thew time.   Lolo Sotero allegeldy adopted obama in order to get him citizenship in indonesia.  So the issue might be that they changed the birtch certificate later.   

There is also an issue that there was a law requiring the parents to have been residents for 10 years or some shit before qualifiyng as a citizen.  FarRightLooney posted on this. 

I know everyone wants this to go away, but its not because there are serious issues not resolved and calling a lot into question.

16 SS numbers?  Come on, that is more than bizarre. 

It is gonna go away because only the most CT people can be on board with this.

You're still alleging a HUGE conspiracy with zero proof of it... Just doesn't fly man.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 08:50:35 PM
It is gonna go away because only the most CT people can be on board with this.

You're still alleging a HUGE conspiracy with zero proof of it... Just doesn't fly man.

I'm not alleging a CT.  Obama refuses to release his records, any and all of them. 

________________________ _______________________-

Original, vault copy birth certificate: Not released (attorney's fees are estimated to be up to about $2 MILLION now, instead of HI birth certificate fee of under $20 bucks)

Certification of Live Birth: Released: Document Experts state it is a FORGERY
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/22/obamas_born_conspiracy_obamas_bogus_birth_certificate_exposed!.thtml

Obama/Dunham marriage license: Not released (if one exists)

Obama/Dunham divorce: Not released (discovered by independent investigators)

Kindergarten records: Not released; School claims records are"LOST" Records lost (this is a big one -- see here -- read two frames)

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license: Not released

Soetoro adoption records: Not released

Fransiskus Assisi School  School application: Not released (discovered by independent investigators) Click here for proof/details.

Punahou School records: Not released

Soetoro/Dunham divorce: Not released (discovered by independent investigators) http://orlytaitzesq.com/drorlytaitzesq/documentation/SOETORODIVORCE.pdf

Selective Service Registration: Not released (Obtained via Freedom of information act request; received FORGERY?)

Occidental College records: Not released

Passport: Not released, records scrubbed by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser.

Possible to have U.S. Passport without providing birth certificate, click here for more details.

Columbia College records: Not released

Columbia thesis; "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament"; Not released
But an anti-war plan to disarm America article written by Obama was found;
http://orlytaitzesq.com/drorlytaitzesq/documentation/obamaantimilitary.pdf

Harvard College records: Not released

Harvard Law Review articles: None

Illinois Bar Records: Not released

Illinois Driver's License Record: Not released (discovered by independent investigators) Click here for details.

Baptism certificate: None

Medical records: Not released

Illinois State Senate records: None

Illinois State Senate schedule: UH..., "LOST"

Law practice client list -- Not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles: None


The Day After being sworn in, Barrack Hussein Obama made his First Executive Order #13489, the order is to hide his records! The biased 'mainstream' Media did not report on it of course, but you can see it here> http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1712.pdf or look it up yourself. So much for that "transparency" he promised... now, Is this the act of a person who is hiding something? You decide.
 
 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 09:05:01 PM
Springs Man Claims To Have Obama's Draft Records
Col. Gregory Hollister Says He Has Obama's Draft Registration

POSTED: 11:28 am MDT March 30, 2011
UPDATED: 5:07 pm MDT March 30, 2011



COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- A Colorado Springs man who claims to have records that prove Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate was forged could face criminal charges because he is alleged to have illegally accessed an online Social Security database.

Retired Air Force Col. Gregory Hollister impersonated Obama with the Selective Service and managed to get a card with President Obama’s Selective Service information on it, a blogger posted on gratewire.com last week.

Hollister told the Colorado Springs Gazette that a private investigator gave him what is purported to be the president’s Social Security number and he then accessed the Social Security Number Verification Service to find out to whom it was issued and to access Selective Service documents.


The site allows registered users to verify names and Social Security numbers for employment purposes and warns that using it under false pretenses is a violation of federal law.

Hollister told the Gazette that according to the Social Security Administration, that number was never issued, but that's the same Social Security number that appears on Obama's Selective Service documents.

Hollister said the Social Security number on what he says is Obama’s draft registration begins with the numbers 042, which would be issued to someone born in Connecticut, not Hawaii.

Hollister and others birthers claim Obama was born in either Kenya or Indonesia and that his birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu in 1961 is a forgery. The Constitution requires that the president of the United States be a natural born citizen.

Hollister has challenged in a lawsuit that Obama is not an American citizen. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear that suit on Jan. 18.

Hollister could face charges of identity theft and fraud.


http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/27372400/detail.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 06, 2011, 09:21:57 PM
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/exclusive-did-next-commander-in-chief-falsify-selective-service-registration-never-actually-register-obamas-draft-registration-raises-serious-questions

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Freeborn126 on April 07, 2011, 05:27:11 AM


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 6, 2011


During an appearance before Al Sharpton’s shake down organization, the National Action Network, the comedian Obama said he was a gas station attendant before he decided to serve his country as a teleprompter reader. Barry Obama was a regular Joe with student loans to pay off and other hardships suffered daily by the boobeoisie.

Before pumping gas, Obama was the son of a goat herder. Others, however, dispute Obama’s claim that he is from humble origins and state he is instead the product of the CIA and intelligence services.

Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen has documented the connections between Barack Obama, Sr. and CIA-sponsored operations in Kenya. In addition, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, worked with the CIA in post-coup Indonesia. In fact, she worked for a number of CIA front organizations, including the East-West Center at the University of Hawaii, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Ford Foundation.

Obama’s stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, was recalled to Indonesia in 1965 to serve as a senior army officer and assist General Suharto and the CIA in the bloody overthrow of President Sukarno.

The coup death toll was between 500,000 and a million people. A former deputy CIA station chief in Indonesia, Joseph Lazarsky, and former diplomat Edward Masters, have confirmed that CIA agents contributed to drawing up death lists used by the Indonesian military. The CIA was successful in almost completely infiltrating the top of the Indonesian government and army prior to the coup.

Obama’s work in 1983 for Business International Corporation (BIC), a CIA front company that conducted seminars with the world’s most powerful leaders and used journalists as agents abroad, dovetails with CIA espionage activities conducted by his mother, according to Madsen.

In 1986, BIC was bought by the Economist Group in London and its operations were merged with the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). There have been a number of reports that the EIU works as closely with Britain’s MI-6 intelligence service as BIC once worked with or for the CIA.

“Throughout its entire history, the CIA has set up an elaborate shell game of ‘proprietaries’ (front companies), money-laundering operations and off-the-books projects so complex that no outsider — and few insiders — could ever keep track of them,” writes Mark Zepezauer.

The publishing company is a known CIA front, a fact admitted to by its co-founder. It is said BIC also funded the SDS, the infamous radical student group of the late 1960s that spun off the Weathermen and Obama confidant – and ghost writer – Bill Ayers.

Prior to working for the Agency, Obama was enrolled at Columbia University. An informed source told Madsen that Obama’s tuition debt at Columbia was paid off by BIC. In the Sharpton video, Obama tells us he had to pay off his tuition loans just like everybody else.

In 1981, the young Obama traveled to Pakistan and was hosted by the family of Muhammadmian Soomro, a Pakistani Sindhi who became acting President of Pakistan after the resignation of the dictator General Pervez Musharraf on August 18, 2008. Madsen writes that the Obama/Soetoro trip to Pakistan, ostensibly to go “partridge hunting” with the Soomros, was related to unknown CIA business. Obama also reportedly traveled to India on unknown business for U.S. intelligence, Madsen states.

Of course, most Americans know nothing about any of this and probably buy hook, line, and sinker into his quaint gas station attendant and college loan straddled middle class American nonsense.

Obama works for the CIA, that is to say Wall Street.

The agency was created at the end of the Second World War by Wall Street lawyer Frank Wisener, who worked with the former bank bond salesman and then Secretary of Defense under Truman James Forrestal to create the CIA and its Office of Special Projects in 1948.

As Ron Paul has noted, the CIA runs just about everything – certainly everything connected to the government, including and especially the presidency.



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 05:33:28 AM
I've got some good stuff on the columbia sham ill post later.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Freeborn126 on April 07, 2011, 05:37:06 AM
No other president has had such a sketchy background as him.  Nor has any president spent so much money to cover up his background as him.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 05:39:08 AM
I have proof he lied his ass off about his columbia recors.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 05:59:34 AM
BORN IN THE USA?

Did Obama 'miss' 1 year of Columbia classes?
Discrepancy appears in sparse records documenting attendance



http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=283965


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: April 06, 2011
8:54 pm Eastern

© 2011 WorldNetDaily


Barack Obama
What's this? Did Barack Obama only attend Columbia University for nine months?

That was the suggestion of a report obtained from the Student Clearinghouse by eligibility gadfly Orly Taitz, an attorney who has represented a number of clients in legal challenges pertaining to Obama's bona fides.

But according to information obtained by WND, it appears Obama did indeed attend Columbia for two years.

The concerns were raised in a document filed in court as part of an amended complaint in a case Taitz has assembled challenging the legitimacy of Obama's Social Security number. The case alleges Obama  has used multiple Social Security numbers and the number he reportedly uses today is a Connecticut number, even though Obama lacks links to the state at the time he would have gotten the number.

Help get TV commercials on the air to bust Obama's eligibility wide open!

In addition to the questions over the Social Security number, Taitz raises other questions.

"Further records from the Student Clearing House show even more shocking evidence. In his memoirs and multiple speeches Obama wrote that he studied for two years at Columbia University September 1981-May 1983. He admitted that in summer of 1981 he traveled to Pakistan to visit his friends, but repeatedly claimed that from September 1981 until May of 1983 he resided in New York and studied at Columbia," she wrote in the complaint.

(Story continues below)

     


But she explained she got information that suggested he wasn't there during that time.

"Columbia official records show him attending Columbia university only for nine months September 1982-till May 1983 (Exhibit 3)," she wrote.

The exhibit is an image of a clearinghouse document regarding Obama's Columbia attendance:


Clearinghouse document


The document states clearly that Obama attended "09/01/1982 to 05/31/1983."

A larger image has been included to clarify, because of the quality of the court filing:


Blowup of Clearinghouse document


But according to information provided by the clearinghouse to a WND source, Obama attended from "09/1981" to "05/1983" and finished with a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science.

School spokesman Robert Hornsby told WND that federal law prohibits the release of much of the information about a student, but he could confirm that "Barack Obama applied for and was granted admission to Columbia College as a transfer student in 1981. He enrolled for the fall term of that year as a political science major. With the conclusion of the spring semester of 1983, Obama completed the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science and graduated with his class."

He said the school had no other comment.

Taitz told WND that the school's statements were "nonsense."

She said he got her verification electronically, and it was part of a long list of attendance questions she submitted at the same time. She said she also requested information on Obama's attendance at Occidental College in California, and the service either could not or would not provide that information.

WND did inquire of Columbia for information about several other students, and found the office of alumni and development was able to confirm the attendance of a student, but declined to provide dates for that attendance.

"I was instructed not to give out too much personal information," the office clerk told WND.

The registrar's office referred WND to a clearinghouse or said inquiries could be made through the college's archivist, who did not respond to a message left by WND.

In response to the question about Obama, the office of alumni and development referred WND to the registrar's office, who declined to respond to questions, referring WND to the public affairs office for the law school. From there, WND was referred to the school's public affairs office, where Hornsby responded.

In "Dreams From My Father," Obama vaguely wrote about attending Columbia for two years, but didn't provide much in the way of specific dates.

But on the list of items also not released by Obama about his Columbia attendance were his grades, his associates, his thesis, his residential status, his support or funding for the school, his admission process, references and others.

Those records are on a long list of other unreleased documents, including his actual birth documentation, his Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, baptism records and his adoption records.

There are other discrepancies in the story Obama has presented, too. For example, a Hawaii newspaper reported Obama attended kindergarten on Oahu during the school year 1966-1967, about the time he reportedly was attending school in Indonesia where he and his mother moved when she married an Indonesian.

Further, Obama reported he was two years old when his father left the family, but actual details from his early life suggest his mother left Hawaii for school in Washington state within weeks of Obama's birth, and did not return until after Barack Obama Sr. departed the islands. The data makes it appear unlikely the family ever actually lived together as a family.

He also wrote about finding his birth certificate in a book, but then his campaign posted online a computer generated image of a "short form" certificate that apparently was released by the state but indicates little more than someone reported the birth to the state and stated that the child was born in Hawaii.

When lawyers bringing a challenge to Obama's eligibility to hold the office of president earlier subpoenaed Occidental College for records of Obama's attendance, attorneys for the president slapped the effort down in court immediately.

Such behavior bothers Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom, who told Jeff Katz of WXKS Radio in Boston.

"At first I followed [the issue] with amusement, and then I got really concerned about it, because the question was if it was not just the birth certificate, but other records as well – school records, academic records, work records – why would anyone spend millions of dollars in legal fees, particularly someone in public office, particularly someone in the highest public office, to not make that information public?"

He cited the suggestion that Barack Sr. might not, in fact, have been Barack Obama's father, and that information could be on the original long-form birth certificate that would prove embarrassing to the president.

Recently, potential presidential candidate Donald Trump has also questioned why Obama has kept his records under lock and key, stating, "There's something fishy about the whole thing," and, "There's something on that certificate that's very bad for him."

As WND reported, Slom brought up questions after Hawaii's Democrat Gov. Neil Abercrombie pledged to find and reveal Obama's birth documentation, then not only failed to follow through, but also asked for the resignation of the man he had chosen to serve as head of the Hawaii Department of Health, which reportedly holds the documentation.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored Link: Pulled from TV! A major TV network and cable provider pulled the plug on a new ad. Is this subject matter too controversial... or should it be seen by every American? Judge for yourself here...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 06:13:22 AM
Hawaii elections clerk: Obama 'caught fibbing'
But will president be 'frog-marched from office' over eligibility issue?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=283865



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: April 06, 2011
7:11 pm Eastern


By Joe Kovacs
© 2011 WorldNetDaily


The former Hawaii elections official who maintains there's no long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama in the Aloha State is now saying the president and his aides have been "caught fibbing" about Obama's background, and the "embarrassing" situation is making it difficult to fess up to the truth.


President Barack Obama in the Oval Office April 4, 2011 

Tim Adams, who was senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu during the 2008 campaign, made the statements in a two-hour interview with a group looking to disprove claims made by so-called birthers, those challenging Obama's legal qualification to be president.

"I think people believe there's been some kind of cover-up. And I don't think it's some big nefarious conspiracy. I think it's politics as usual," Adams said March 31 on Reality Check Radio, an Internet program on BlogTalkRadio.

"Barack Obama's official autobiography was put out to the public for the public's consumption and we all know politicians – they have a public persona, it's created for consumption by the electorate – and I think that they've been caught fibbing, and it's embarrassing."

Be the first to get the new eligibility book signed by Jerome Corsi and help get TV commercials on the air to bust this issue wide open!

But Adams, who described himself as "pretty much a liberal" who backed Hillary Clinton in the campaign, thinks the president should produce a long-form birth certificate if he has one, even if it contains information that does not go along with the narrative proffered so far by Obama and his surrogates.

"I think as much trauma as all this has caused," Adams said, "I think if Barack Obama has lied about where he was born or if there's something about his birth that he doesn't want people to publicly know, if he would come out and simply say something like that, I think most people would go, 'Oh, OK,' and they would go on about their business 'cause they've got a thousand more important things to do."

(Story continues below)

     


Adams burst onto the national scene last June after claiming his superiors at the elections office in Honolulu checked with the state health department and local hospitals, only to find out that none had Obama's long-form birth certificate, a document specifying the hospital where he was born and the attending physician.


Tim Adams, the former senior elections clerk for Honolulu in 2008
 

While not having access to Hawaii Department of Health birth records, Adams says his office had access to numerous databases to verify people's identities, including the Social Security database, driver's licenses, passports, tax and banking records, police files and the national crime computer.

He said elections officials themselves have been embarrassed by the disclosure about accessing criminal records, saying, "They were not happy about it when they found out about it."

He has since signed an affidavit swearing to his allegations.

As the controversy over eligibility has resurfaced recently with billionaire developer and potential Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump suggesting Obama's presidency could be illegal, Adams is not expecting the commander in chief to be removed from office.

"That gets into the extremist fantasies that somehow they're going to frog-march Barack Obama out of the White House – it's never going to happen," said Adams.

"Barack Obama was given permission to run for office. Barack Obama won the election. He is the president of the United States. The more extremist people out there try to, you know, bring up this issue that he's not legitimately president. It doesn't hold water. You can't say, once you give the man permission to run, and he wins the election, that he's not president. It's not going to happen."

At one point in the interview, one of the questioners, who ironically never provided his real name and only went by an alias, challenged Adams about the "short-form" birth certificate, also known as a certification of live birth, or COLB, that has been displayed on the Internet.


This short-form "certification of live birth" released by the Obama campaign in 2008 does not have the name of the hospital or an attending physician, which would be included on a long-form "certificate of live birth," which has never been produced by Obama.


It notes a birthplace of Honolulu, but does not specify a hospital or doctor.

The radio hosts suggested that Janice Okubo, the public information officer for the state health department had previously vouched for the authenticity of the COLB, though in reality she has refused to do so. But Adams maintained the online scanned image is fraudulent.

Adams was asked, "So you're calling Janice Okubo a liar?"

"Yes," Adams responded, "if she's saying that that document that is sitting out there on the Internet is an actual document because we can prove it's not in about 30 seconds. Because it's altered."

Long-form birth certificates from 1961 still exist, including one released by Susan Nordyke, who was born in Honolulu Aug. 5, 1961, the day after Obama's alleged birth.


Copy of original long-form birth certificate of Susan Nordyke, born in Honolulu the day after Obama's reported birthdate. Obama has never produced any document like this.


In response to a direct question from WND, Okubo refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form certification of live birth, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor images released by FactCheck.org.


FactCheck.org image of COLB released August 2008



Image of date stamp on rear of FactCheck.org document



Image of seal on FactCheck.org document




Close-up of FactCheck.org document


"I happen to be a trained document researcher, by the way," Adams continued, "and have worked with the Hawaii Historical Association and have worked in the state archives. So I do know what a document is."

Adams says he even offered the current Democratic governor of the state, Neil Abercrombie, his personal assistance to help verify any long-form birth certificate if it were ever produced.

"Governor Abercrombie said that he was afraid that even if they managed to bring out the original birth certificate or a copy of the original birth certificate, there would still be people who would say, 'Oh, it's a forgery, oh, it's a fake,' whatever. I told him that if he wanted help convincing people it was real, I would be happy to do so. If he actually had the birth certificate. I got nothing back from the man."

Abercrombie made national headlines earlier this year when he publicly sought to bring closure to the issue, and then explained he couldn't find Obama's long-form birth certificate, only some sort of written notation.

"It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down," Abercrombie told the Honolulu Star Advertiser.

Adams explained, "He found a registration, he found an archive notation. He did not find a birth certificate. You'll never see one from him."

Adams also commented on a mysterious letter purportedly sent by Obama to Honolulu's Kapi'olani Medical Center in January 2009 in which the president ostensibly declared the facility his place of birth. It was read aloud by Abercrombie at the hospital's centennial celebration.


A photograph taken by the Kapi'olani Medical Center for WND shows a letter allegedly written by President Obama on embossed White House stationery in which he declares the Honolulu hospital to be "the place of my birth," The hospital, after publicizing the letter then refusing to confirm it even existed, is now vouching for its authenticity, but not its content. The White House has yet to verify any aspect of the letter. 


"I know there was a letter that they refuse now to show to public scrutiny, that, as far as I can tell, didn't come from either President Obama – where it came from is a matter of conjecture. Some people think that somebody in Washington ... who's now a governor may have written it," Adams said. "Whether that letter is valid or not, all that letter proves is if President Obama wrote the Kapi'olani Hospital letter congratulating them on – I think it was their 100th anniversary."

As WND has reported, the White House has refused to confirm if it wrote or sent the letter, or if the information it contains is accurate.

Kapi'olani has used the letter for fundraising purposes, and the FBI has said there could be federal charges filed if the letter is not authentic.


Kapi'olani used a letter, allegedly written by President Obama in which he declares his birthplace to be at the facility, to solicit donations in its spring 2009 edition of its Inspire Magazine. The hospital, after refusing to confirm the letter even existed, is now vouching for its authenticity but not its content. The White House has refused to confirm both the letter and its content. The FBI and Secret Service have indicated criminal charges are possible if a fraudulent letter from the White House is being used to raise funds.
 


"It would be a charity-fraud scheme," said FBI spokesman Steve Kodak. "It would be investigated by us or the Secret Service. We both have jurisdiction over that."

Adams, who personally believes Obama is eligible for president simply because his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was an American citizen, is hoping laws are passed clarifying the meaning of "natural born citizen," which is what the U.S. Constitution specifies for presidents.

Adams thinks anyone born on U.S. soil, irrespective of their parents' heritage or citizenship, should be eligible. Still, he's urging the president to release his long-form birth certificate from wherever he was born to resolve the controversy.

"The fact is, we've had one person all along who could simply end this, who supposedly has the document in his possession, and that's President Obama," said Adams. "He could end this. I really wish he would."

Despite the fact major newspapers and broadcast networks have avoided interviewing Adams or probing his allegations, the former official who supervised about 50 people in Honolulu said he seriously considered leaving the United States because of the disruption to his life and threats against him after going public with his claims.

"When all this happened, it was nuts. It was a mess," he said. "I really got to the point [where] I thought, 'I'm going to have to leave the country.' I don't get nearly as much grief now, either professionally or otherwise. But it was really bad for a while. It got really violent. There are some really kind of dangerous people out there."

Note: To listen to Tim Adams' online radio interview, click here. The program may take a few moments to load. A transcript can be viewed here.

Sponsored Link: Pulled from TV! A major TV network and cable provider pulled the plug on a new ad. Is this subject matter too controversial... or should it be seen by every American? Judge for yourself here...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Freeborn126 on April 07, 2011, 06:21:48 AM
Hopefully Trump will be able to blow this issue wide open.  Now that he is behind it, the birther base will continue to grow. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 06:25:08 AM
Hopefully Trump will be able to blow this issue wide open.  Now that he is behind it, the birther base will continue to grow. 

Like i keep telling the ostriches on this site with their heads in the sand, its not going away any time soon because obama is hiding some seriously damaging info he knows if made public would sink his ass. 

   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 06:36:15 AM
He probably does have a LFBC doesn't mean he has to show you it.  The state has it on file, they used it to create a COLB for him to prove his place of birth.  

Can you prove they don't have the LFBC in the file?  

You may be easing over to the birther side.  He probably does, but just for real proof, let's see it. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 06:38:02 AM
see, this is that i don't get.

let's say it's true - let's say his family worked for our CIA, he worked for them, etc.

Doesn't that make him a truly awesome american?  kicking ass and killing bad guys worldwide for US interests?  Doesn't that mean he and his family risked their skin for the advancement of the US of A?  Never held a real job?  Sheeeit, he was capping bad guys to keep us safe.  Doesn't love America?  He was risking his skin to protect thsi gret nation.  IF obama was a CIA guy, then he deserves the job way more than some yale college punk whose daddy handed him the job!

You're saying obama is a HERO, 333386.  Thread backfire.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 06:42:08 AM
Bamas mother worked for geithners dad at the ford foundation. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 06:44:19 AM
Quote
As the controversy over eligibility has resurfaced recently with billionaire developer and potential Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump suggesting Obama's presidency could be illegal, Adams is not expecting the commander in chief to be removed from office.

"That gets into the extremist fantasies that somehow they're going to frog-march Barack Obama out of the White House – it's never going to happen," said Adams.

"Barack Obama was given permission to run for office. Barack Obama won the election. He is the president of the United States. The more extremist people out there try to, you know, bring up this issue that he's not legitimately president. It doesn't hold water. You can't say, once you give the man permission to run, and he wins the election, that he's not president. It's not going to happen."

That's an ignorant statement.  If Obama is not a NBC, he cannot serve as President no matter if he was given permission to run or not.  The rules are black and white. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 07, 2011, 06:53:42 AM
The rules are black and white. 

Racist post reported.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 07:59:55 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama's missing year



http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=283881

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: April 07, 2011
1:00 am Eastern

© 2011 

In his definitive 2010 biography of Barack Obama, "The Bridge," New Yorker editor David Remnick features a photograph of a dapper young Barack Obama sitting between his grandparents on a Central Park bench.

The bench is real. The grandparents are real. The wall behind them is real. Barack Obama is not. He has been conspicuously photoshopped in. Who did this and why remains as much a mystery as Obama's extended stay in New York.



In late October 2007, the New York Times ran a telling article on Barack Obama headlined, "Obama's Account of New York Years Often Differs From What Others Say."

Given that he was an announced candidate for president, and an underdog at that, the Times expected Obama to welcome the chance to reconcile his account in his memoir, "Dreams from My Father," with the accounts of those who knew him.

"Yet," lamented the newly neutered Times, "he declined repeated requests to talk about his New York years, release his Columbia transcript or identify even a single fellow student, co-worker, roommate or friend from those years."

A campaign spokesman, Ben LaBolt, offered a painfully lame explanation for Obama's reticence, "He doesn't remember the names of a lot of people in his life."

Lame or not, it worked, and it continues to work on a media that have spent more time in the dumpsters of Wasilla than they have investigating the preposterously unknown history of the world's best-known man.

When the media leave holes in a given narrative – in this case, the biography of a presidential candidate – bloggers individually, incrementally and indefatigably strive to fill them in, usually with mixed results.

One hole that remains strangely unfilled in that narrative is the academic year 1981-1982, a year Obama was reportedly a student at Columbia University.

Jack Cashill's literary investigation uncovers revelations galore about Obama's alleged life narrative. Order the new book "Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America's First Post-Modern President"

The irrepressible researcher Orly Taitz secured a document through the National Student Clearinghouse on Obama's Columbia attendance.

The document confirms Obama's graduation from Columbia with a political science degree in 1983, but it places him there only in the 1982-1983 academic year.

"As there is no record of Obama residing anywhere else in the United States from September 1981-September 1982, or attending any other university," Taitz infers, "by way of simple deduction it becomes clear that his visit to Pakistan lasted not a month or two, as he claims, but over a year."

Obama's deceptions and studied opaqueness invite such speculation, but Taitz is likely unaware of competing evidence. How valid that evidence is remains to be seen.

Going back, Occidental friend John Drew confirms seeing Obama at a party in Los Angeles in June 1981. "At that time," says Drew, "the future president was a doctrinaire Marxist revolutionary, although perhaps – for the first time – considering conventional politics as a more practical road to socialism."

In "Dreams," Obama gives no account of the following summer. He moves from Los Angeles to New York in August and allegedly lands roughly. No one was present at his Spanish Harlem sublease when he arrives, and Obama sleeps in an alleyway.

Desperate, Obama calls "Sadik," a Pakistani and his one friend in the city, who just happens to be a coke-head and an illegal alien.

When Obama gives up his apartment because of a lack of heat, he and Sadik – in real life, Sohale Siddiqi – move in together, the date unspecified.

Given that "Dreams" proposes to tell the story of Obama's coming to grips with the world around him, his failure to mention a trip to Pakistan that summer raises eyebrows. Nor did Obama mention it in his 2006 book, "Audacity of Hope."

By contrast, Obama devotes considerable attention to an alleged trip to Europe a few years later, his flimsy account of which seems to have been pulled from a Michelin Guide.

In fact, it was not until April 2008 at a San Francisco fundraiser that Obama casually let it be known that he had traveled to Pakistan at all, an admission that took his own spokesman by surprise.

There was likely a reason for this impromptu admission. Two weeks earlier, an employee of John Brennan, a former CIA operative then advising Obama, accessed Obama's passport on three occasions.

The CNN lead suggests a major story in the making, "The CEO of a company whose employee is accused of improperly looking at the passport files of presidential candidates is a consultant to the Barack Obama campaign, a source said Saturday."

The story predictably went nowhere despite the fact that Obama would later appoint Brennan Deputy national security adviser.

The most benign explanation is that Team Obama was doing oppositional research on its own candidate – and likely the other candidates as well – and that Obama outed himself on a questionable trip to a Muslim country before the real opposition did.

(Column continues below)

     


Remnick spends less than a page on the Pakistan trip, which he describes, as Obama has, as sort of a stop-over to see friends on the way to visit his mother and sister in Indonesia.

Securing a visa for this trip in 1981 was apparently possible for an American but not easy. Although Remnick interviews Obama's friends about the Pakistan leg, he gives no accounting of Obama's stay in Indonesia, if, in fact, there was one.

Writing in 2009, Remnick has to accommodate new information that surfaced post-election about Obama's life once he descended on New York after his Asian junket.

In "Dreams," Obama had chosen not to. To make the narrative of the brooding, father-seeking ascetic work, he had to scrub one person out of the record, Occidental friend Phil Boerner.

As Boerner tells it, he transferred with Obama to Columbia and roomed with him his first year in New York in that same Spanish Harlem apartment. There is no mention of a character anything like him in "Dreams."

A registered Democrat and Obama fan, Boerner conveniently laid low until well after the 2008 election. Wrote Boerner in January 2009:

"We enjoyed exploring museums such as the Guggenheim, the Met and the American Museum of Natural History, and browsing in bookstores such as the Strand and the Barnes & Noble opposite Columbia. We both liked taking long walks down Broadway on a Sunday afternoon, and listening to the silence of Central Park after a big snow."

What makes Boerner problematic for the Obama narrative is his very normality. This obliging middle-class guy from suburban D.C. makes Obama sound so thoroughly cheerful and white that he throws into question the alleged sturm und drang of Obama's New York years.

"Hanging out, we could get pretty emotional about sports, food and injustice," writes Boerner, who nicely captures liberal priorities then and now.

The Marxist dandy that John Drew had met at Occidental did not transform himself when he came to New York. The transformation to morally serious philosophe would come later, but only at the hands of Bill Ayers and largely in the pages of "Dreams."

"Like a tourist, I watched the range of human possibility on display," writes Obama of those years, "trying to trace out my future in the lives of the people I saw, looking for some opening through which I could re-enter."

Re-enter what? This seems more the reflection of a soon to be ex-fugitive than that of a metro-sexual happily browsing the Met. Ayers, by the way, uses the phrase "human possibility" twice in his memoir, "Fugitive Days."

Not surprisingly, Boerner has chosen not to return my phone call. As I said on his voice mail, all I wanted to do was clarify whether Obama actually attended class his first year in New York.

You would think we would know this by now.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue. His latest book is the blockbuster "Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America's First Post-Modern President."



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 07, 2011, 08:33:49 AM
That's not true... Birth Certificates do change.

If I go get a birth certificate for myself from the commonwealth of virginia right now... It does not look like the birth certificate from 1950.

I've already told him this..he doesn't want to get it.....but good post ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 07, 2011, 08:38:23 AM
I've already told him this..he doesn't want to get it.....but good post ;)

There were subsequent posts after his statement.  Do you have an answer for these?  Personally, I feel he is probably a citizen, but there is definitely something on the BC that he's trying to hide, most likely something religious.  If a $10 BC could refute all this, why not just produce the doc?

Yes, but the original is on file with raised seal and signed by a doc or govt officer certying it.  



Bama said in Dreams From my Father, allegedly written in 1995 he had a BC.  However, he released a COLB that was created in 2007 for the campaign.  Where is the one he was referring to in dreams and why wont he release it?  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 07, 2011, 08:41:07 AM
What about this?


I told 3333 that birth certificates have changed and they no longer give out the long form any more....for instance in New York State, they now give you a "Certificate of Birth" which is what they sent me when I requested my birth certificate because I lost it.....

Obama produced his "Certificate of Birth" as well..which is a legal legitimate document....long form BC's aren't given out much any more
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 07, 2011, 08:42:43 AM
I told 3333 that birth certificates have changed and they no longer give out the long form any more....for instance in New York State, they now give you a "Certificate of Birth" which is what they sent me when I requested my birth certificate because I lost it.....

Obama produced his "Certificate of Birth" as well..which is a legal legitimate document....long form BC's aren't given out much any more

That's not the point.  They DID give out the long form when Obama was born.  Where is it?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 08:46:59 AM
That's not the point.  They DID give out the long form when Obama was born.  Where is it?

Hawaii has said they never lost any records and have everythng.  Fact is that either 1) the long form BC lists a different father or some other bizarro world thing about obama; 2) none exists at all, 3) long form BC exists but obama is listed as someone else like Barry Dunham or Barry Soetoro, or 4) a long form bc exists dated after his alleged birth date to reflect someone else as the father since Lolo Soetoro allegedly adopted Barry to get him enrolled in school in indonesia.   

   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 07, 2011, 08:53:33 AM
Hawaii has said they never lost any records and have everythng.  Fact is that either 1) the long form BC lists a different father or some other bizarro world thing about obama; 2) none exists at all, 3) long form BC exists but obama is listed as someone else like Barry Dunham or Barry Soetoro, or 4) a long form bc exists dated after his alleged birth date to reflect someone else as the father since Lolo Soetoro allegedly adopted Barry to get him enrolled in school in indonesia.   

   

None if that is exactly outer-space-looney-CT type stuff.  Seems like he hid stuff he felt would hinder his election.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 07, 2011, 08:59:33 AM
Birth certificates don't change.  Why would you so easily accept that he has a long form birth certificate?  Have you seen it?  We're shown a phony looking COLB and know for a fact that he used multiple social security numbers.  Something smells rotten here. 

According to the State of Hawaii information is added and taken away depending. That is change. 

Why would you so easily accept that it doesn't exist?  Are you of the same thought that Hawaii, the state, are making up that he was born there?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 07, 2011, 09:02:56 AM
You may be easing over to the birther side.  He probably does, but just for real proof, let's see it. 

not at all.  Hawaii has it.  He may not have a copy himself.  It does exist however, in the file used to prepare the COLB.  Can you prove it's not in there?  No.  I don't need to prove it's there, what else would Hawaii use to print a COLB?  You think they make stuff up or use 'notes' as in cliffs notes of someone being born?  Like oh yeah Obama he was born here it says so on this post it in his file.   ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 07, 2011, 09:03:51 AM
Hawaii has said they never lost any records and have everythng.  Fact is that either 1) the long form BC lists a different father or some other bizarro world thing about obama; 2) none exists at all, 3) long form BC exists but obama is listed as someone else like Barry Dunham or Barry Soetoro, or 4) a long form bc exists dated after his alleged birth date to reflect someone else as the father since Lolo Soetoro allegedly adopted Barry to get him enrolled in school in indonesia.   

   

So if they never lost any records and you are now saying it is in the file.  Why do you say the COLB is a fraud?  It is written from the information they have on file, including the LFBC. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 09:04:30 AM
According to the State of Hawaii information is added and taken away depending. That is change. 

Why would you so easily accept that it doesn't exist?  Are you of the same thought that Hawaii, the state, are making up that he was born there?   

Show me where one of the changes they made to the BC was racial classifications to wher "AFRICAN" waslisted as a choice on their records.    It certainly wasnt in 1961.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 09:05:57 AM
not at all.  Hawaii has it.  He may not have a copy himself.  It does exist however, in the file used to prepare the COLB.  Can you prove it's not in there?  No.  I don't need to prove it's there, what else would Hawaii use to print a COLB?  You think they make stuff up or use 'notes' as in cliffs notes of someone being born?  Like oh yeah Obama he was born here it says so on this post it in his file.   ::)

Same bullshit as when illegals sign up for Drivers' licenses in states like NC.   Sometimes the states just accept whatever bullshit the person tells them.   

There are no hospital records whatsoever of Barrys' birth anywhere at any time.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 07, 2011, 09:09:44 AM
Same bullshit as when illegals sign up for Drivers' licenses in states like NC.   Sometimes the states just accept whatever bullshit the person tells them.   

There are no hospital records whatsoever of Barrys' birth anywhere at any time.   

So Hawaii is making it up?  I thought he had a LFBC before?  You said above Hawaii has it and he won't release it cause of the fathers name.  Now it doesn't exist?  Are you the same person?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 09:29:08 AM
That's not true... Birth Certificates do change.

If I go get a birth certificate for myself from the commonwealth of virginia right now... It does not look like the birth certificate from 1950.

If you receive a certified copy of your long form birth certificate, it will contain the same information as the original.  Only the short form certificate is abbreviated.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 10:33:09 AM
If you receive a certified copy of your long form birth certificate, it will contain the same information as the original.  Only the short form certificate is abbreviated.

What long form?

I have NEVER seen a long form in the Commonwealth of Virginia... Not mine, nor my kids... No Ex-Wives... Even my dad's.

Never EVER seen one... Nor is it a requirement to fill out a W-4 to have one... So if it's not required for employment paperwork... What's thebig deal.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 10:36:39 AM
What long form?

I have NEVER seen a long form in the Commonwealth of Virginia... Not mine, nor my kids... No Ex-Wives... Even my dad's.

Never EVER seen one... Nor is it a requirement to fill out a W-4 to have one... So if it's not required for employment paperwork... What's thebig deal.

Here is the copy that the person born allegedly right before obama's looked like.   Compare to the garbage obama released. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 10:41:26 AM
Here is the copy that the person born allegedly right before obama's looked like.   Compare to the garbage obama released. 



I don't know how many times I can say this... As far as I am concerned... this LONG FORM shit is just that... Shit.

If Obama were getting a job as a CEO making 10 times what he does as President, the one he produced would be good enough.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 10:44:23 AM
I don't know how many times I can say this... As far as I am concerned... this LONG FORM shit is just that... Shit.

If Obama were getting a job as a CEO making 10 times what he does as President, the one he produced would be good enough.





Problem is that its not a requirement under the US Const. for the CEO of a private corp. to be a NBC.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 10:46:13 AM


Problem is that its not a requirement under the US Const. for the CEO of a private corp. to be a NBC.

So in the US Constitution it says "long form Birth Certificate" somewhere?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 10:48:30 AM
So in the US Constitution it says "long form Birth Certificate" somewhere?

No, its says NBC, which has a legal definition that so far Barry has yet to really prove.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 10:53:07 AM
No, its says NBC, which has a legal definition that so far Barry has yet to really prove.   
What is the "legal definition" then?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 11:00:56 AM
 ;D  ;D  ;D

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 11:09:45 AM
What long form?

I have NEVER seen a long form in the Commonwealth of Virginia... Not mine, nor my kids... No Ex-Wives... Even my dad's.

Never EVER seen one... Nor is it a requirement to fill out a W-4 to have one... So if it's not required for employment paperwork... What's thebig deal.

The long form is a certified photocopy of the original birth certificate prepared by the hospital or physician.  It has parents' address, race, birth place, date of birth, doctor's name, doctor's signature, parents' signature, etc.  You're right, you can get use a short form or computer generated version for a lot of things, but it won't contain all the information as the original and you cannot use it to obtain a US passport.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 11:11:14 AM
I don't think the trump video answers the question.

I also don't think that any definition of Natural Born Citizen mentions some long form birth certificate.

As a matter of fact, the definition actually has no birth certificate mentioned at all.

The long form is a certified photocopy of the original birth certificate prepared by the hospital or physician.  It has parents' address, race, birth place, date of birth, doctor's name, doctor's signature, parents' signature, etc.  You're right, you can get use a short form or computer generated version for a lot of things, but it won't contain all the information as the original and you cannot use it to obtain a US passport. 

That's not true... I've got a passport and I've only used the only birth certificate I've got.

The long form that you speak of only exists in certain instances... Yes, there are some criteria... which you stated above, but this long form shit is ridiculous... a 2 page birth certificate does not exist for me.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 11:16:46 AM
I don't think the trump video answers the question.

I also don't think that any definition of Natural Born Citizen mentions some long form birth certificate.

As a matter of fact, the definition actually has no birth certificate mentioned at all.

That's not true... I've got a passport and I've only used the only birth certificate I've got.

The long form that you speak of only exists in certain instances... Yes, there are some criteria... which you stated above, but this long form shit is ridiculous... a 2 page birth certificate does not exist for me.
If you got a passport with your BC, it's a long form BC.  What Obama is showing online would not get him a passport. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 07, 2011, 11:25:30 AM
The long form is a certified photocopy of the original birth certificate prepared by the hospital or physician.  It has parents' address, race, birth place, date of birth, doctor's name, doctor's signature, parents' signature, etc.  You're right, you can get use a short form or computer generated version for a lot of things, but it won't contain all the information as the original and you cannot use it to obtain a US passport.  

Why do you keep lying?  "*A certified birth certificate has a registrar's raised, embossed, impressed or multicolored seal, registrar's signature, and the date the certificate was filed with the registrar's office, which must be within 1 year of your birth. Please note, some short (abstract) versions of birth certificates may not be acceptable for passport purposes.

A COLB is a Certificate of Live Birth, Certifying birth by said individual in said state at said time.    Hawaii i imagine would be a state that you can use a COLB as ID because that is what they issue when requesting a birth certificate.   They have an offical seal on it as proven by factcheck.org who say and photographed the actual version of it. 

Beginning April 1, 2011, all birth certificates must also include the full names of the applicant's parent(s).  So because he isn't a first time applicant his COLB is enough to get a passport before April 1 2011. 

SO please stop lying 


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 11:26:18 AM
Trump sends investigators to Hawaii to look into Obama
By: CNN Political Producer Alexander Mooney

Washington (CNN) – Self-proclaimed birther Donald Trump is now so doubtful of President Obama's birthplace that he's sent a team of his own investigators to Hawaii in hopes of getting to the bottom of the issue.

That's according to Trump himself, who, in an interview with NBC, warned his investigators just might uncover "one of the greatest cons in the history of politics and beyond."

"I have people that have been studying it and they cannot believe what they're finding," Trump said an interview that aired Thursday Morning.

Asked if he has assigned people specifically to search in Hawaii, Trump said, "Absolutely."

The business mogul, who in a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll is tied for second place among potential presidential candidates, also suggested the president is involved in an ongoing cover-up over the matter.

"He spent $2 million in legal fees trying on to get away from this issue, and if it weren't an issue, why wouldn't he just solve it?" he said. "I wish he would because if he doesn't, it's one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and in the history, period. You are not allowed to be a president if you're not born in this country. Right now, I have real doubts."

According to a recent CNN/Opinion Research Corporation national poll, 72 percent of Americans say that the president was definitely or probably born in the U.S., with one four saying that he was definitely or probably born outside the country. But the survey indicates a partisan divide, with 43 percent of Republicans but only 11 percent of Democrats saying that Obama was definitely or probably born outside the U.S.
In 2008, the Obama campaign produced a certification of live birth that reports his birthplace as Honolulu, Hawaii – a document the Hawaii government says is official evidence of his birth in the state. Among other evidence of Obama's birth there is the fact the hospital where he was born took out ads in two Hawaiian newspapers in 1961 announcing the birth, while current Gov. Neil Abercrombie says he knew Obama's family and remembers his birth.

In the broad interview, Trump also insisted he's more serious than ever about mounting a presidential bid, but said he can't make a final decision until this season of "Celebrity Apprentice" wraps up.

"I hate to say it. I have the No. 1 show on NBC. Is that the correct statement? The "Celebrity Apprentice" is doing great," said Trump. "You're not allowed to have a show on and be a candidate. It's a great show and it's got phenomenal ratings, and until that show is over I can't declare, otherwise NBC would have to take the show off the air and that would be very unfair."

The show is set to wrap up in mid-May.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/07/trump-sends-investigators-to-hawaii-to-look-into-obama/#more-153209
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 11:29:54 AM
"I have people that have been studying it and they cannot believe what they're finding," Trump said an interview that aired Thursday Morning.



________________________ ________________________

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 07, 2011, 11:30:02 AM
At PolitiFact.com, we're all about original sources. We don't take anyone at their word or take the reporting of other media organizations as proof. We go to the heart of the story, the source of the truth — original, corroborating documents.

When the official documents were questioned, we went looking for more answers. We circled back to the Department of Health, had a newsroom colleague bring in her own Hawaii birth certificate to see if it looks the same (it's identical). But every answer triggered more questions.

And soon enough, after going to every length possible to confirm the birth certificate's authenticity, you start asking, what is reasonable here?

Because if this document is forged, then they all are.

If this document is forged, a U.S. senator and his presidential campaign have perpetrated a vast, long-term fraud. They have done it with conspiring officials at the Hawaii Department of Health, the Cook County (Ill.) Bureau of Vital Statistics, the Illinois Secretary of State's office, the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois and many other government agencies.


The Hawaii Department of Health receives about a dozen e-mail inquiries a day about Obama's birth certificate, spokesman Okubo said.

"I guess the big issue that's being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature," Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. "Because they scanned the front … you wouldn't see those things."

Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.

And about the copy we e-mailed her for verification? "When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it."

SO according to 333 and MB EVERY COLB is fraudulent in the state of hawaii
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 11:32:41 AM
Why do you keep lying?  "*A certified birth certificate has a registrar's raised, embossed, impressed or multicolored seal, registrar's signature, and the date the certificate was filed with the registrar's office, which must be within 1 year of your birth. Please note, some short (abstract) versions of birth certificates may not be acceptable for passport purposes.

A COLB is a Certificate of Live Birth, Certifying birth by said individual in said state at said time.    Hawaii i imagine would be a state that you can use a COLB as ID because that is what they issue when requesting a birth certificate.   They have an offical seal on it as proven by factcheck.org who say and photographed the actual version of it. 

Beginning April 1, 2011, all birth certificates must also include the full names of the applicant's parent(s).  So because he isn't a first time applicant his COLB is enough to get a passport before April 1 2011. 

SO please stop lying 

What did I lie about? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 07, 2011, 11:35:08 AM
What did I lie about? 

You can't read?  Prove you can not use a COLB for a new US passport.  It says SOME may not be usable.  Doesn't say sh*t about hawaii and the fact hawaii issues COLB in place of other longer birth certs would pretty much guarantee you can use it for a passport.   Up to April 1 2011 that is. 

So yeah quit the bullsh*t lies.  You've been caught. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 11:39:02 AM
IMO, it won't be the birth cert that would nail obama.

It'll be trump paying a lot of money to someone in kenya or wherever, and those private eyes doing things that freeper bloggers cannot... it will be some birth pic, it'll be something... trump will find something.

I think the COLB issues has been obfuscated to such a degree by disinfo and supposition that arguing it is a moot point.  better to look at other things.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 01:09:50 PM
Trump: Grandma Says Obama Was Born in Kenya
Newsmax ^ | Thursday, 07 Apr 2011 08:38 AM | By Hiram Reisner




Billionaire real estate developer Donald Trump says that, if he were president he would get Congress to resolve this year’s budget and avoid a government shutdown, because much harder fiscal negotiations are yet to come.

. “The big thing is going to be next year, because next year you’re talking about trillions — so if you can’t talk about $30 billion, you’re going to have a real hard time talking about trillions.

.....................

Trump was asked why he continues to focus Obama’s birth certificate, as the main issue in America today is the fiscal crisis.

“The grandmother in Kenya is on record saying he was born in Kenya,” Trump said. “The hospital has, not only no birth certificate — or if they have it they should produce it, maybe there is something on it, who knows — but they have no records that he was there. The family is fighting over which hospital in Hawaii he was born in.

“There is not one record, in any hospital in Hawaii, that Barack Hussein Obama was born there,” he added.

Trump stressed, however, that the nation’s economic crisis — and the fact China “is ripping off the United States” and the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other foreign nations are taking advantage of America is “disgraceful” — are his main issues.

“What OPEC is doing to our country is unbelievable and disgraceful. There’s so much oil . . . there ships all over the sea with so much oil, and they don’t know where to dump it, ” Trump said, adding he is amazed he has heard analysts say they can’t understand why the price of oil is skyrocketing.


(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 07, 2011, 01:17:31 PM


The long form that you speak of only exists in certain instances... Yes, there are some criteria... which you stated above, but this long form shit is ridiculous... a 2 page birth certificate does not exist for me.



tu - isn't one of those "certain instances" the time/place Obama was born?  What happens to you is irrelevant.  You were not born in Hawaii at the time Obama was.

So, if Obama was born in a place and at the time a Long Form existed, why can't it be produced?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Skip8282 on April 07, 2011, 01:20:12 PM
What long form?

I have NEVER seen a long form in the Commonwealth of Virginia... Not mine, nor my kids... No Ex-Wives... Even my dad's.

Never EVER seen one... Nor is it a requirement to fill out a W-4 to have one... So if it's not required for employment paperwork... What's thebig deal.



I don't buy all this birther shit, but I was born in VA and I have a long form BC.  Looks similar to the long form 33 keeps using as an example.  Now I was born on a military base, but the certificate is still State of VA so I don't think that would make any difference.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 01:22:33 PM
Donald Trump To Meet With AZ Birther Bill Author In NYC
TMP ^ | 04/07/2011 | Evan McMorris-Santoro




Donald "The Donald" Trump is taking further steps to make himself the nation's birther-in-chief. On the heels of his promise to reveal the truth about Obama's birth in the next several weeks, TPM has learned Trump will be hosting an author of Arizona's birther legislation in New York City this week.

According to his office, State Rep. Carl Seel (R) is currently en route to New York City to powow with Trump over HB 2177, a bill which would require all candidates for office to prove their citizenship to the Secretary of State's office before they can appear of Arizona ballots.

Seel's bill is just one of two pieces of birther legislation currently sitting in the state legislature. A previous attempt to pass a birther law in the state died in the Senate after sponsors couldn't find the votes to pass it.

According to Seel's office, the trip to New York to meet with Trump about the Arizona bill was booked "last night." Seel will stay in the city through Sunday.


(Excerpt) Read more at tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo. com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 01:29:01 PM
TRENDING: Trump sends investigators to Hawaii to look into Obama
CNN ^ | April 07, 2011 | Alexander Mooney




Washington (CNN) – Self-proclaimed birther Donald Trump is now so doubtful of President Obama's birthplace that he's sent a team of his own investigators to Hawaii in hopes of getting to the bottom of the issue.

That's according to Trump himself, who, in an interview with NBC, warned his investigators just might uncover "one of the greatest cons in the history of politics and beyond."

"I have people that have been studying it and they cannot believe what they're finding," Trump said an interview that aired Thursday Morning.  


Asked if he has assigned people specifically to search in Hawaii, Trump said, "Absolutely." The business mogul, who in a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll is tied for second place among potential presidential candidates, also suggested the president is involved in an ongoing cover-up over the matter.

"He spent $2 million in legal fees trying on to get away from this issue, and if it weren't an issue, why wouldn't he just solve it?" he said. "I wish he would because if he doesn't, it's one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and in the history, period. You are not allowed to be a president if you're not born in this country. Right now, I have real doubts."


(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cn n.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 02:08:03 PM


I don't buy all this birther shit, but I was born in VA and I have a long form BC.  Looks similar to the long form 33 keeps using as an example.  Now I was born on a military base, but the certificate is still State of VA so I don't think that would make any difference.

You do? Can you delete the names and stuff and make an image?

I've never seen such a thing.

Every one I've seen looks like this... Including mine.:

(http://www.fdeus.com/us/images/Birth%20certificates/Virginia%20Birth%20Certificate.jpg)


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 02:15:07 PM
You can't read?  Prove you can not use a COLB for a new US passport.  It says SOME may not be usable.  Doesn't say sh*t about hawaii and the fact hawaii issues COLB in place of other longer birth certs would pretty much guarantee you can use it for a passport.   Up to April 1 2011 that is. 

So yeah quit the bullsh*t lies.  You've been caught. 

You are correct, HI certification of live birth can be used for a passport. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 02:47:38 PM
“Obama has sucked so badly as President, that even the Kenyans are now saying he was born in America...” - Jay Leno
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Skip8282 on April 07, 2011, 03:05:18 PM
You do? Can you delete the names and stuff and make an image?

I've never seen such a thing.

Every one I've seen looks like this... Including mine.:

(http://www.fdeus.com/us/images/Birth%20certificates/Virginia%20Birth%20Certificate.jpg)






Just took a black marker to a copy, scanned it, but when I expand it, you can see all the data through the marker, lol.

It has a similar fancy border to the one you posted, just in the middle are a bunch of boxes like regist. #, certificate#, whether it was single, twin, triplet (guess you're screwed if your octo mom), mom & dad info along with addresses.

Until this whole birther issue, I just assumed everybody's birth certificate had all this data.  But, I hold these clowns to the same standard as the 9/11 people and I've yet to see any evidence put forth.  Just unanswered questions - big whoop.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 03:06:33 PM


Just took a black marker to a copy, scanned it, but when I expand it, you can see all the data through the marker, lol.

It has a similar fancy border to the one you posted, just in the middle are a bunch of boxes like regist. #, certificate#, whether it was single, twin, triplet (guess you're screwed if your octo mom), mom & dad info along with addresses.

Until this whole birther issue, I just assumed everybody's birth certificate had all this data.  But, I hold these clowns to the same standard as the 9/11 people and I've yet to see any evidence put forth.  Just unanswered questions - big whoop.

I agree... I keep saying... If you don't like Obama and his policies, which is fine... I have a shitload of them I don't like. I say so... but this birther shit is ridiculous.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 07, 2011, 03:26:52 PM
I think this is a current issue that is worthy of being talked about, but i do not see birthers in the same way (33333 slimy antics aside)  as i do see 9/11 truthers, although the argument styles are essentially the same.

For Trump this could be potentially a suicide move before he even gets and steam rolling in his campaign.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 03:28:41 PM
I think this is a current issue that is worthy of being talked about, but i do not see birthers in the same way (33333 slimy antics aside)  as i do see 9/11 truthers, although the argument styles are essentially the same.

For Trump this could be potentially a suicide move before he even gets and steam rolling in his campaign.

I agree.  It's really nothing like the 9/11 nuts. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 03:29:39 PM
Appeals court rebuffs man seeking Obama birth certificate
By Star-Advertiser Staff

The state appeals court affirmed this morning the denial of a request to inspect and review President Barack Obama’s birth certificate.

In a 3-0 vote, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals upheld a 2009 ruling by then-state Circuit Judge Eden Elizabeth Hifo, who dismissed the lawsuit by a man identified as “Dr. Robert V. Justice,” who represented himself.

In his legal brief to the appeals court, Justice wrote the inspection of the birth certificate will “ensure the health and safety of all 300 million of us by making sure that our military and our nuclear and chemical arsenals are still under our control and not in the control of any one of our enemies.”

The appeals court said Justice sought the review under the state open-records law requiring the disclosure of documents based on a showing of “compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of any individual.”

But the court said the provision relates to access to records in “medical or safety emergency situations.”

Birth certificates are confidential under state law, except to certain people, such as relatives, who have a “direct and tangible interest” in the records.

Justice had written a letter dated Dec. 31, 2008 to the state Health Department seeking to inspect the birth certificate to “allow me and other fellow Americans to determine whether or not Mr. Obama is eligible to hold the Office of President,” the appeals court said.

After the department denied his request, Justice filed the lawsuit seeking a court order directing the department to disclose the brith certificate.

Chief Judge Craig Nakamura of the appeals court wrote the 17-page opinion. Appeals Judge Katherine Leonard wrote a concurring opinion.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/119429664.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 03:32:17 PM
The more you guys look in to this the more you will become birthers.  I'm betting at this point the listed father is different than bama claims.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 03:34:00 PM
What slimey tactics have I used? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Skip8282 on April 07, 2011, 03:35:19 PM
I agree.  It's really nothing like the 9/11 nuts. 



No, this isn't like 9/11, but I think we need to hold birthers to the same standard - evidence.  Show some freaking evidence.

240's crying that he can't "prove a negative".  Hell, he can't prove a positive. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 07, 2011, 03:39:25 PM
What slimey tactics have I used? 

Chronic deflection in this thread and a (infrequent but established) history of altering quotes and misinformation in other threads.  I haven't double checked all your of your claims in this thread.  Just getting into the birther thing more now.   :)

But i will tell you this, the more i look the farther away i get from birthers, and the more curious i get about what he may hiding.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 03:42:27 PM


No, this isn't like 9/11, but I think we need to hold birthers to the same standard - evidence.  Show some freaking evidence.

240's crying that he can't "prove a negative".  Hell, he can't prove a positive. 



Agree.  The 9/11 stuff is just plain stupid.  The birthers at least have some legitimate questions . . . but no evidence.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 03:46:02 PM
Problem is that obama has sealed literally his entire record from birth all the way through his state senate record.   There are tons of lies in his bullshit narrative that have come out that he refuses to explain.

Yeah this is all perfectly normal. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 07, 2011, 03:49:27 PM
I am really curious to see how much this will be relevant in 2012.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 07, 2011, 03:50:29 PM
I am really curious to see how much this will be relevant in 2012.



I really don't think it will be.

It appears (and I could be wrong) but it appears that the people who are screaming about this are the people who didn't like Obama anyway... It's that side that the Tea Party sits on and I don't "feel" like it will be relevant in 2012.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 07, 2011, 03:55:00 PM
33333,

why do you say the COLB is a fake?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 07, 2011, 03:57:16 PM
I really don't think it will be.

It appears (and I could be wrong) but it appears that the people who are screaming about this are the people who didn't like Obama anyway... It's that side that the Tea Party sits on and I don't "feel" like it will be relevant in 2012.




Maybe so, but when pools show 25% of people think Obama was either probably not or definitely not born in the USA it should be an issue.  And if Trump runs it should be. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 07, 2011, 03:58:34 PM
It would be fucking Awesome if Obama wasn't illegible to be president..A guy can dream right ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 04:11:43 PM
Agree.  The 9/11 stuff is just plain stupid.  The birthers at least have some legitimate questions . . . but no evidence. 

LOL~

I love it.  You wanna be a birther so bad, beachy!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 04:19:38 PM
LOL~

I love it.  You wanna be a birther so bad, beachy!

 ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 04:23:26 PM
::)


For real - your little comments like The birthers at least have some legitimate questions

It's what you always do - little cutesy ways of bumping and continuing CTs while not taking a position on it.  But everyone reading knows you are on board with the birthers.  You can't legitimize them by saying they have legit Qs. 

You're one of us, BB.  You don't have to admit it.  Everyone reading knows ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 04:36:21 PM
For real - your little comments like The birthers at least have some legitimate questions

It's what you always do - little cutesy ways of bumping and continuing CTs while not taking a position on it.  But everyone reading knows you are on board with the birthers.  You can't legitimize them by saying they have legit Qs. 

You're one of us, BB.  You don't have to admit it.  Everyone reading knows ;)

Nah.  You got the stupid covered all by your lonesome. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 04:48:57 PM
we know you, champ :)

You wait til a CT thread falls to the bottom, then conveniently bump it to say how silly it is.

you want it discussed... you know how it works ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 07, 2011, 04:52:43 PM
we know you, champ :)

You wait til a CT thread falls to the bottom, then conveniently bump it to say how silly it is.

you want it discussed... you know how it works ;)

What do you mean?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 04:57:11 PM
we know you, champ :)

You wait til a CT thread falls to the bottom, then conveniently bump it to say how silly it is.

you want it discussed... you know how it works ;)

 ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 05:00:37 PM
What do you mean?


Gibberish.   :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 05:01:34 PM
oz,

it's my belief that BB is very much a CTer on a lot of issues - by playing that devlis advocate role.

You know, "that's just silly, I don't think you could prove that..." so that there will be 100 posts trying to prove it.

it's cool.  Everyone has their style.  i've seen him bump just enough 3-day old CT threads to recognize his style haha :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 05:02:12 PM
Gibberish.   :)

The beacheth doth protest a bit much, I think?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 05:03:00 PM
The beacheth doth protest a bit much, I think?

 ::) ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 07, 2011, 05:04:38 PM
hey, it's jut a theory on my part.

however, i think you did legitimize the birther CT when you said, well, 'The birthers at least have some legitimate questions".

that's pretty much the definition of assigning legitimacy to it.   

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 07, 2011, 05:05:15 PM
240


I  don't know about that because since the CT board went up no CT threads are here and I don't see him on the CT board much.  And then this thread has been doing real well out any of his bumping it
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2011, 05:07:34 PM
hey, it's jut a theory on my part.

however, i think you did legitimize the birther CT when you said, well, 'The birthers at least have some legitimate questions".

that's pretty much the definition of assigning legitimacy to it.   



Yawn.  What actually happens on the board is you desperately trying to tie the birther stuff to your 9/11 nuttiness.  I feel sorry for you dude.  Do you hear voices in your head? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 07, 2011, 05:21:49 PM
The more you guys look in to this the more you will become birthers.  I'm betting at this point the listed father is different than bama claims.

I hope Trump is as aggressive with the SSN as the BC.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 07, 2011, 08:17:20 PM
Honolulu Advertiser re-examined: Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama's son, 1961
FreeRepublic.com | April 7, 2011 | None




According to the Honolulu Advertiser, a "son" was born to "Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama" (Sr.) on August 4, 1961. That's all it says. No more; no less.

See the birth announcement here.


Barack Obama Sr. was married at the time to Kezia Obama from Kenya.

America, here are the real "Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama," legally man and wife in 1961:

 

The Honolulu Advertiser birth announcement raises many more questions than it answers.

1. How does Stanley Ann Dunham fit into the picture?

2. Was 18-year old Ms. Dunham really married to Barack Obama Sr. as well?

3. If so, was Mr. Obama Sr. a bigamist, married to two women at the same time?

4. Did Ms. Dunham agree to "adopt" Barack Sr. and Kezia's child and claim it as her own in order to get the child into the country?

5. Since no name for the "son" is given, how can Barack Obama Jr. (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro), say that he is indeed the infant mentioned in the Honolulu Advertiser?

6. Where did the birth actually take place, i.e. at which hospital?

7. Who was the attending physician / midwife?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 03:23:24 AM
Ill try to find that.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 04:50:04 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 04:50:59 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 04:57:27 AM


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 04:59:31 AM
Q F T

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 05:52:44 AM
Trump’s disgusting, dangerous dance with birthers
The Washington Post's Post Partisan ^ | April 7, 2011 | Jonathan Capehart




Donald Trump (Birther-N.Y.) is at it again. In double-barrelled interviews on NBC’s “Today Show” and MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Trump continued his disgusting and dangerous dabbling in the disproved conspiracy theory that President Obama was not born in the United States. This might be good for the ratings of his television show. This might even be good for his business. But it is terrible for the nation and public discourse that someone who claims to be so smart is so willing to perpetuate a lie.

(VIDEO AT LINK)

Alex Koppelman snipped this strand of the conspiracy in Dec. 2008 and again in July 2009. And he’ll most likely have to do it again now that Trump has embraced the fallacy with both hands. This all stemmed from a interview of Sarah Obama, the second wife of the president’s grandfather, by Ron McRae, a street preacher, through a translator over the phone. As Koppelman reported in 2009, “Sarah Obama is not the president’s biological grandmother, but he calls her ‘Granny Sarah.’”

In a clear lost-in-translation moment (and over an international phone line), which you can listen to in full here, Mrs. Obama said she was there for her grandson’s birth. When McRae asks where in Mombassa the president was born, the translator, Vitalis Akech Ogombe, repeatedly corrected him....


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Freeborn126 on April 08, 2011, 06:07:13 AM
Q F T



I love this video.  Alan Keyes sums up Obama to the T.  Obama's endgame has always been to destroy the sovereignty of the U.S.  Just look how he goes to the U.N. for approval before going to his own elected congress. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 06:30:45 AM
THE BOTTOM LINE:

This report explains the context of the oft cited debate, between Obama and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, and in which Obama, by his quick retort, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office.

THAT would be the smoking gun, my friend.

33, where is this senate debate video?  it's from 2004, right?  Obama's own words would completely end his 2012 chances.

Why have you, and none of your fellow CTers, been able to find a simple national senate debate from just 7 years ago, which would prove he wasn't born here (in his own words)?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 06:33:20 AM
THE BOTTOM LINE:

THAT would be the smoking gun, my friend.

33, where is this senate debate video?  it's from 2004, right?  Obama's own words would completely end his 2012 chances.

Why have you, and none of your fellow CTers, been able to find a simple national senate debate from just 7 years ago, which would prove he wasn't born here (in his own words)?



i'm looking for it - apparently it was caught on film before or right after.      I'm tryig to dig it up. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 06:37:25 AM
Additionally, it should be a lot more than just the AP reporting on it.  A national debate for a senate job between two black candidates, following a huge jack Ryan scandal... Obama being an up-and-comer set for the keynote speech, and Keyes fresh off running for President and having his own MSNBC show...

I'd be shocked if you couldn't find that transcript, at the very least.  Hell, it might be on youtube.  I actually thought your article was BS, as it's just such a made-for-birthers quote.  I mean, obama's own smug repsonse being his own admission he can't have the job - it would be HUGE HUGE HUGE.

Why are people arguing about COLBs when obama's own words here would be plenty?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 07:41:54 AM
This one or one of these?
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/184058-1 (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/184058-1)

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 07:53:50 AM
Or this:
http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=367 (http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=367)

Or maybe here?
http://www.ontheissues.org/IL_2004_Senate_3rd.htm (http://www.ontheissues.org/IL_2004_Senate_3rd.htm)

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 09:05:56 AM
Oh great, this is NOT in the transcripts.


This report explains the context of the oft cited debate, between Obama and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, and in which Obama, by his quick retort, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office.


So it seems that alan keyes, the fiercest obama critic out there - is also "in on it".
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 09:28:05 AM
Oh great, this is NOT in the transcripts.


This report explains the context of the oft cited debate, between Obama and Keyes in the following Fall, in which Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, and in which Obama, by his quick retort, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the office.


So it seems that alan keyes, the fiercest obama critic out there - is also "in on it".

From what I understand is that the debate was edited and that part was taken out.  It became an issue when 2 witnesses came forward and said it happened.

This came out in 2009.  I think that because of this it may have been dismissed as hearsay and that's why it hasn't been a strong point for Birthers

Because you have to assume that if a video was available of Obama denying his NBC-ship the Birthers and 3333 would have been pimping that shit a while ago.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 09:28:49 AM
I read it was caught on camera right off the seor something. I'm trying to find it.  To be honest this was the first I ever heard of this.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 09:33:01 AM
I read it was caught on camera right off the seor something. I'm trying to find it.  To be honest this was the first I ever heard of this.



I'm am surprised about that considering all the research you been doing.  But if no actual clip can be shown its nothing but hearsay at the moment.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 09:39:53 AM
From what I understand is that the debate was edited and that part was taken out.  It became an issue when 2 witnesses came forward and said it happened.

The debate wasn't shown live?  Usually whenever I see a senate or gubernatorial debate on my TV, it is shown live.  

Smells weird they'd pull out such a memorable line, that nobody would have reported on it, and that nobody can find a copy of it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 09:41:43 AM
We should find out who the witnesses were. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 09:47:58 AM
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/15/obama-concedes-hes-not-a-nbc-in-obama-vs-keyes-2004-debate/ (http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/15/obama-concedes-hes-not-a-nbc-in-obama-vs-keyes-2004-debate/)

Obama concedes he's not a NBC, in Obama vs. Keyes 2004 Debate
   

WITNESS COMES FORWARD, HISTORY OF INTERNET “RUMOUR” DOCUMENTED UPDATE: Oct. 21, 2009 — Second Witness Comes forward, gives testimony to The Post & Email by John Charlton (October 15, 2009) — It was a moment little noticed and soon forgotten; the import of it was not at that time understood; but the evidence that it [...]
      
WITNESS COMES FORWARD, HISTORY OF INTERNET “RUMOUR” DOCUMENTED

UPDATE: Oct. 21, 2009 — Second Witness Comes forward, gives testimony to The Post & Email

by John Charlton

(October 15, 2009) — It was a moment little noticed and soon forgotten; the import of it was not at that time understood; but the evidence that it did in fact occur is compelling. It occurred during the Obama vs. Alan Keyes debate shoot, when the actual video tape was being recorded by ABC’s Chicago Affiliate in the Fall of 2004.  It was never aired in Chicago, because the affiliate only aired the final cut; the raw footage was, as far as The Post & Email knows, aired only twice by C-Span in April and May of 2005.

The content of the short exchange has become legendary.  In a quick jab Keyes asserted definitively that Obama was not a natural born citizen, and Obama, manifestly caught off guard, conceded the fact.

This article will first, document the evidence still on the net regarding those individuals who claim to have witnessed the C-Span rebroadcast, and then will publish an email from one such witness, who is willing to swear an affidavit to the effect.  Other witnesses, who wish to contact The Post & Email can do so, so that their testimony on these facts can be published also.
The Internet “Rumor” which turned out to be the truth

On Nov.17.2008 @ 3:11 pm, at Attorney Leo Donofrio’s Blogtext blog, entitled “Natural Born Citizen”, it was first mentioned that:

    Also, Somebody from Chicago just contacted her and stated that during the Senatorial campaign there was a debate between Barack Obama and Dr. Keyes. This debate was videotaped. During the debate Dr. Keyes has stated :”You are not even a Natural born citizen” to which Barack Obama replied: “That’s OK, I am not running for president, I am only running for Senate.”

This same commenter posted again at Chicagoans Against Obama blog at 7:40 PM the same day.

On Nov. 25, 2008, at 6:42 PM, it is mentioned again at Stormfront:

    In search of — Debate during the Senatorial Campaign between Dr. Keyes and Obama in which was stated : “You are not even a Natural born citizen” to which Obama replied:” That’s o’k, I am not running for President, I am only running for Senate” – If anyone knows where this tape is located, please e-mail thepowerhour@thepowerhour.com THANKS.

A thread on this was opened at Free Republic on Dec. 2, 6:12 PM:

    // I was looking for a video that I ran across recently from the 2004 Keyes/Obama Senate race debates where Keyes stated :”You are not even a Natural born citizen” to which Barack Obama replied: “That’s OK, I am not running for president, I am only running for Senate.”

News of this exchange has since spread across the internet and been reported throughout the last year.
A Witness Steps Forward

Here is where the “rumor” is dispelled, and where the facts become real.

First the facts surrounding the case.  This interested citizen began reading and researching about Obama the day after Obama’s 2008 Election win.  He soon began reading the blog of Attorney Leo Donofrio, participating at the web-form which is now known as RestoreTheConstitutional Republic.org, and listening in to Plains Radio, which was an internet radio program out of Texas.

This citizen read reports of others who had seen this exchange. And then remembered that he himself had seen it.  This witness has now contacted The Post & Email and given his testimony, which is as follows:

    First, let me say that I was not able to vote in the 2004 presidential elections, because I was overseas on work.  So when I returned stateside in March of 2005, I wanted to inform myself as to what had been happening.

    In mid April, finding myself with a lot of spare time, I started watching C-Span on cable tv, from my home in the mornings.  When they announced that they were going to rebroadcast the Alan Keyes vs. Barack Obama debates, unedited, I was delighted, because I am an Alan Keyes fan.

    In the introduction to the rebroadcast of the debates, the C-Span host noted that C-Span had decided to air them because of the growing interest in Washington, D.C., in Barack Obama.  He also pointed out that C-Span was not airing the version seen in Chicago the previous fall, and which Keyes was  to distribute in diverse media on his website; that C-Span had requested from the TV station in Chicago the unedited tapes of the debate, and that only on C-Span would they be aired.

    I watched the entire first and second debates.  I distinctly remember that I had never heard of Obama; my interest was in seeing what Keyes said about the pro-life issue and school vouchers.

    At one point in the second debate, Keyes, accused Obama saying, “You are not even a natural born citizen!”

    To which Obama immediately replied, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency.”

    At the end of the airing of the second debate, the C-Span host noted, as he read from a single sheet of paper, placed before him, that the Obama Campaign had contacted them and requested them to point out to their viewers that Obama’s response here should not be understood as a denial that he is a natural born citizen, only that Keyes’ accusation had nothing to do with the qualifications of office of a U.S. Senator.

    I distinctly remember my dismay at Obama’s response, at that time, concerned why he called the office he was running for “Illinois” senator, but did not call the U.S. Presidency with any distinctive adjective.

    I subsequently spoke with Alan Keyes, one evening, by phone, when he appeared on Plains Radio:, in January, I think. I asked him about this exchange; he said he did not remember it; but he did not deny it took place.

The Post & Email notes, that Obama’s response is more telling than it first appears; because you’d expect him to respond, affirming that he is a “natural born citizen”, or at least in saying, “I am running for U.S. Senator from Illinois, not the U.S. Presidency”. This seems to indicate that Obama was emotionally recoiling from this direct question; a question any natural born citizen ought never to have feared.  It certainly seems that Obama knows he is not a natural born citizen, which qualification requires that one be “born in the country of parents who are citizens” of the same (de Vattel, The Law of Nations).

The witness also informs The Post & Email that he is willing to sign and swear to an affidavit regarding what he has communicated above.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 09:54:24 AM
Wow! 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 09:57:59 AM
And I posted that!   ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 10:01:22 AM
Just so you know, I see a couple of problems here and it's probably why the Birther movement isn't pounding the drum as hard as they should.

1.  No actual video has surfaced yet
2.  With no video it's hearsay
3.  Obama doesn't  directly say it when taken in context.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 10:04:07 AM
Just so you know, I see a couple of problems here and it's probably why the Birther movement isn't pounding the drum as hard as they should.

1.  No actual video has surfaced yet
2.  With no video it's hearsay
3.  Obama doesn't  directly say it when taken in context.

Yeah but its just like the "My Muslim Faith"  moment.   Leaves a ton o questions.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 10:07:38 AM
Yeah but its just like the "My Muslim Faith"  moment.   Leaves a ton o questions.   

We also have to remember that with out a teleprompter Obama is lost.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 10:08:00 AM
" the raw footage was, as far as The Post & Email knows, aired only twice by C-Span in April and May of 2005."

The keyes team no doubt VCR'd it right from the C-Span showing.  I'm sure lots of reporters and pundits did too.  

There are copies of it floating around.  hell, CSPAN keeps copies of everything they air.  They have it too.




LOL... contact them, 33... offer to buy it.  :)

I bet you'll hear that same response the BBC said about their 911 footage.  You know, the most important day in news history?  After video emerged of a BBC reporter saying WTC7 had fallen (while it stood in the background), the BBC was contacted by many people for a copy of the footage that day.  Their answer - in this era of hard copy backups, computers, and everything else - was that THEY LOST IT.  They called it a 'cock up' and said they lost all the video from 9/11.

Reminds me of that.  I bet CSPAN had an 'accidental flooding' or 'electrical fire' which specifically destroyed the Keyes debate.  God, people are so fcking stupid :)

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 10:09:32 AM
" the raw footage was, as far as The Post & Email knows, aired only twice by C-Span in April and May of 2005."

The keyes team no doubt VCR'd it right from the C-Span showing.  I'm sure lots of reporters and pundits did too.  

There are copies of it floating around.  hell, CSPAN keeps copies of everything they air.  They have it too.




LOL... contact them, 33... offer to buy it.  :)

I bet you'll hear that same response the BBC said about their 911 footage.  You know, the most important day in news history?  After video emerged of a BBC reporter saying WTC7 had fallen (while it stood in the background), the BBC was contacted by many people for a copy of the footage that day.  Their answer - in this era of hard copy backups, computers, and everything else - was that THEY LOST IT.  They called it a 'cock up' and said they lost all the video from 9/11.

Reminds me of that.  I bet CNN had an 'accidental flooding' or 'electrical fire' which specifically destroyed the Keyes debate.  God, people are so fcking stupid :)



240 - what do you think of Ozmo's article on this?  I'm emailing it to Trump today.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 10:15:36 AM
i think it's 2 years old, and if Trump has people 'on the ground' doing detective work, he probably already had this info a week ago. 

and if there is any beef to this birth cert issue  (I think there is, but I don't trust people for shit and believe some other CTs that you dont), i'm guessing Trump has far better material already.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 10:18:02 AM
If he's holding a trump card then it may be a matter of timing for him to release it.  But i don't think he has.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 10:31:29 AM
If he's holding a trump card then it may be a matter of timing for him to release it.  But i don't think he has.

remember, this is Trump we're talking about.  He's the master of delivering material, keeping an audience, and biding his time.  he's done it marvelously in the past, and I doubt he'll be blowing his load making his case in a week if he can stretch it say, 13 weeks (the length of a tv season again?)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 10:38:22 AM
remember, this is Trump we're talking about.  He's the master of delivering material, keeping an audience, and biding his time.  he's done it marvelously in the past, and I doubt he'll be blowing his load making his case in a week if he can stretch it say, 13 weeks (the length of a tv season again?)

Plus, and this is just pure speculation on my part, it would be better to release "positive proof" in the middle of the republican primary a year from now so that he is seen as the candidate with foresight, patriotism and diligence.  if he releases it now, every Newt, Dick, and Mitt will just jump on it and make part of their campaign. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 08, 2011, 11:16:02 AM
I am a Birther. No if's, and's, or but's. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to the Office of President.

However, the exchange between Obama and Keyes did not happen.  For those who have followed this closely from the beginning (I have), this is a old rumor. Keyes has stated that he does not remember the exchange. Back when this rumor first surfaced a specific debate was cited. I have watched that debate from beginning to end (and all others with Keyes/Obama) - it is not there (no I didn't keep track if the video). The debate it was supposed to have occurred in focused on religion.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 11:20:54 AM
And I posted that!   ;D

lol.  Uh oh.  Watch it Ozmo.   :D

(http://fermentation.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/06/27/tinfoil.jpg)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 11:22:21 AM
lol.  Uh oh.  Watch it Ozmo.   :D

(http://fermentation.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/06/27/tinfoil.jpg)


Beach - do you agree that obama's refusal to release his BC and other records at least adds fuel to this fire?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 11:22:54 AM
Rubio to Trump: Lay off birther issue
By: CNN Political Producer Alexander Mooney

Washington (CNN) - Sen. Marco Rubio, considered to be a rising star in the GOP, has some advice for Donald Trump:
Quit talking about all this birther stuff.

In an interview with the website Daily Caller, the freshman Florida Republican suggested Trump could be a force in the primaries because of his name recognition, but added the business mogul should stick to more weighty issues.

"I would suggest – if he asked for my opinion – not to focus so much on that issue," Rubio said. "There are more important things facing our country. I believe Barack Obama was born in the United States of America …So why are we talking about this?"

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/08/rubio-to-trump-lay-off-birther-issue/
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 11:26:07 AM
Beach - do you agree that obama's refusal to release his BC and other records at least adds fuel to this fire?   

Sort of, but there isn't much of a fire.  He ought to just release it or confirm it doesn't exist.

But he could just be playing birthers to make them look silly.  Fast forward to summer 2012.  If the Republican nominee is talking about this, and it has already been established by the state that he was born in Hawaii, the nominee will look like a fool. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 11:30:49 AM
Sort of, but there isn't much of a fire.  He ought to just release it or confirm it doesn't exist.

But he could just be playing birthers to make them look silly.  Fast forward to summer 2012.  If the Republican nominee is talking about this, and it has already been established by the state that he was born in Hawaii, the nominee will look like a fool. 

I personally think at this point the SS issue is what he is petrified of.   The SS # issue seems like he is DOA on that which opens up a can of worms and he knows that will leads to a disaster for him.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 11:36:55 AM
I personally think at this point the SS issue is what he is petrified of.   The SS # issue seems like he is DOA on that which opens up a can of worms and he knows that will leads to a disaster for him.     

How so?  What would be the problem if he has a different SSN?  (assuming he doesn't redact the SSN if any documents are released)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 11:38:36 AM
How so?  What would be the problem if he has a different SSN?  (assuming he doesn't redact the SSN if any documents are released)

He has a SS # for people born in CT!   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 11:41:03 AM
He has a SS # for people born in CT!   

Who has proved this? 

Also, if he does have a different SSN, did he get it before turning 18?  If so, wouldn't his parents be the ones handling that? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 11:51:45 AM
Who has proved this? 

Also, if he does have a different SSN, did he get it before turning 18?  If so, wouldn't his parents be the ones handling that? 

Read trough this thread.  The SS issue is deadly to obama   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 11:56:14 AM
Read trough this thread.  The SS issue is deadly to obama   

can u summarize the Soc security number issue in 4 sentences, instead of telling people to spend 5 hours reading? lol
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 08, 2011, 12:00:51 PM
Read trough this thread.  The SS issue is deadly to obama   

waste of time, going no where, smart repubs will tell you to stick with the issues, 
crazy talk
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 12:02:09 PM
Who has proved this? 

Also, if he does have a different SSN, did he get it before turning 18?  If so, wouldn't his parents be the ones handling that? 

Look through this thread.  even Cashill has exposed this fraud   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 12:06:06 PM
waste of time, going no where, smart repubs will tell you to stick with the issues, 
crazy talk

Blacken are you a truther?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 12:11:45 PM
The Ss # issue is still beyod comprehension. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 12:26:19 PM
It's a 22 page thread,  you cant just post a summary?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 12:28:57 PM
It's a 22 page thread,  you cant just post a summary?


simple - only people born in Connecticut get a  "042" as the beginning of their SS #.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 12:33:32 PM
That's actually not true. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 12:34:07 PM
That's actually not true. 

source?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 12:42:34 PM
I could tell you to tell you to research it yourself   :D

but if i wasn't willing to go back and read through 22 pages of this thread i can't expect you to either. 

here ya go:

http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html)

SSA logo: link to Social Security Online home
Social Security Numbers
The SSN Numbering Scheme
     

Number Has Three Parts

The nine-digit SSN is composed of three parts:

    * The first set of three digits is called the Area Number
    * The second set of two digits is called the Group Number
    * The final set of four digits is the Serial Number

Area Number

The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.

Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 12:43:47 PM
Ha ha ha ha ha -  read the first post in this thread!   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 12:44:20 PM
I never go to the first post after posting and some 22 pages.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 12:45:11 PM
But here's a question for you, 33333:


When did Obama apply for that SSN you are talking about?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 12:45:53 PM
I never go to the first post after posting and some 22 pages.

Obama's SS is a fake.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 12:54:28 PM
Obama's SS is a fake.   

Explain to me why its a fake, because so far, you haven't said anything here but made a claim.

I, on the other hand, have shown that the numbering system you assume indicates which state is not true.


and please answer the question i asked.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 12:57:38 PM
Explain to me why its a fake, because so far, you haven't said anything here but made a claim.

I, on the other hand, have shown that the numbering system you assume indicates which state is not true.


and please answer the question i asked.

The SS number he has is for people who live in CT andin fact is sequenced with a guy named "Wood" with a birth in 1890.  There is no one living HA with a SS number starting with 042 - plus there are 16 other numbers traced to obama where he has traveled.   

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:00:18 PM
The SS number he has is for people who live in CT andin fact is sequenced with a guy named "Wood" with a birth in 1890.  There is no one living HA with a SS number starting with 042 - plus there are 16 other numbers traced to obama where he has traveled.   



thanks 3333, we will get to the "Wood" thing in a little bit.  First let's stay on this SSN thing starting with 042.

When did Obama apply for a SSN card that gave him that number?  Do you know?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:02:23 PM
thanks 3333, we will get to the "Wood" thing in a little bit.  First let's stay on this SSN thing starting with 042.

When did Obama apply for a SSN card that gave him that number?  Do you know?

I have no idea on that.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:06:23 PM
I have no idea on that.     

Well you should find out.  After all aren't you interested in the truth?  If you are really interested in the truth and not you political agenda which has been marinated in hate for Obama, you find that out wouldn't you?

Well today is your lucky day!

I found out for you!

He applied for it in 1977.

Do you know where he applied for the SSN from?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:08:20 PM
Well you should find out.  After all aren't you interested in the truth?  If you are really interested in the truth and not you political agenda which has been marinated in hate for Obama, you find that out wouldn't you?

Well today is your lucky day!

I found out for you!

He applied for it in 1977.

Do you know where he applied for the SSN from?

Why would someone apply for a SS 16 years after their birth if they were born in the USA?   That is ridiculous beyond explanation.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 01:11:32 PM
Well you should find out.  After all aren't you interested in the truth?  If you are really interested in the truth and not you political agenda which has been marinated in hate for Obama, you find that out wouldn't you?

33 seeks any truth which will boot obama out of office.

outside of that, i dunno...........
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:13:59 PM
33 seeks any truth which will boot obama out of office.

outside of that, i dunno...........

If Bama was born in 1961 as advertisied by his cultish lemmings, he would have a SS # from 1961 originating from HA in line with HA SS #.  sorry - even the most devoted obamadildo cant spin this.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:16:18 PM
Why would someone apply for a SS 16 years after their birth if they were born in the USA?   That is ridiculous beyond explanation.    

Not at all.

I was born in 1965.  I got my SSN when i was 15 or 16.  From what i understand, it wasn't something parents did until the tax code required dependents to have SSN which i do not know when that happened.  It had to happen sometime before 1988 because my daughter was issued one.

With some good research you should be able to find that out.  I'll will look too.


Now back to my question:

Do you know where he applied for the SSN from?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:17:22 PM
Just bear with me guys you'll love this, I promise.


where did Obama apply for his SSN from?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:18:27 PM
Not at all.

I was born in 1965.  I got my SSN when i was 15 or 16.  From what i understand, it wasn't something parents did until the tax code required dependents to have SSN which i do not know when that happened.  It had to happen sometime before 1988 because my daughter was issued one.

With some good research you be able to find that out.  I'll will look too.


Now back to my question:

Do you know where he applied for the SSN from?


Lets assume you are correct.  In 1977 he would be 16.   Why was he in CT at that time?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:21:27 PM

Lets assume you are correct.  In 1977 he would be 16.   Why was he in CT at that time?    

He wasn't there,  I have already shown that the 042 is not indicative of a state as per the US governemnt,

now,  

Do you know where he applied for his SSN from?

PS: I am correct about the SSN being issued that way beck then.




Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:23:01 PM
He wasn't there,  I have already shown that the 042 is not indicative of a state as per the US governemnt,

now, 

Do you know where he applied for his SSN from?



Yes it is!   042 is from people born in CT.   When I give my  "127" number everyone knows I am from the Bronx.    This is another Obama scam.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:25:57 PM
Update From Meeting At The Trump Tower Regarding Obama's Usurpation of the Presidency...
Obama Release Your Records ^ | April 08, 2011 | Obama Release Your Records





I just got word of the details from today's meeting with Donald Trump and several people involved in the "birther" movement. Gary from Give Us Liberty has provided a quick summary of what went on at the meeting...

We just heard from our fellow patriot who attended the Trump meeting. "IT COULD NOT HAVE GONE BETTER!" Trump was fully engaged and asked questions. On issues that he was unclear he asked the various members of the Arizona delegation to do get the information and documentation to him as soon as possible. The meeting lasted 30 minutes.

There were many media out in the hallway. The media were not allowed in the meeting which was attended by Trump and his Assistant Michael Cohen and the three members of the Arizona delegation. Trump indicated that he fully supports the Arizona eligibility legislation and he pledged a visit to Arizona very soon!

Trump gave every indication that he moving forward with his investigation re: "Obama".


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:27:53 PM
Yes it is!   042 is from people born in CT.   When I give my  "127" number everyone knows I am from the Bronx.    This is another Obama scam.   

So basically 33333, you don't know where he applied from.


Look buddy, just let go of your emotional hate for a few minutes. 

and remember this:

Area Number

The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:28:07 PM
Attendee at Trump Meeting: “It Couldn’t Have Gone Any Better” (re: Obama & natural born Citizen's)
www.thepostemail.com ^ | 4/8/2011 | Sharon Rondeau




"Attendee at Trump Meeting: “It Couldn’t Have Gone Any Better”

A citizen reporter for The Post & Email.. said that the source reported that “It couldn’t have gone any better.”

Reporter: Trump gave them > 30 minutes. WorldNetDaily had been patched in somehow and apparently had been privy to what was going on. Also, there were a lot of media outside ..



Reporter: Rep. Carl Seel, Jeff, & Kelly, who represented a tea party group. ..Trump didn’t seem to know about the “natural born Citizen” issue at all. He gave Jeff homework by saying, “I want to know everything about ‘natural born Citizen,’ and I want to know about these reports from Kenya when members of the Kenyan Parliament had talked about Obama having been born there.”



Reporter: .. He has made a pledge that he will to to Arizona in the summer. He fully supports the Arizona eligibility bill..I was told that the primary topics of the meeting were the Arizona eligibility bill and Obama’s eligibility.

There was no follow-up meeting scheduled. When they came out of the meeting, Rep. Carl Seel spoke to the press. However, Jeff was assured that some “good stuff” was shared with the press. As they were leaving, Theresa Cao said something to Jeff, who was trying to figure out who she was. He asked her, “Are you Theresa Cao?” and she said, “Yes, I am.”

The Post & Email: Did you say that Arizona Governor Jan Brewer was invited but was unable to go?

Reporter: .. We were informed and believe that Gov. Brewer was unable to attend.



Trump was engaged, asked questions and asked people to get information for him. He clearly showed that he wants to know more..."


(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:28:31 PM
so now are you ready to find out this happened or what?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:28:57 PM
So basically 33333, you don't know where he applied from.


Look buddy, just let go of your emotional hate for a few minutes.  

and remember this:

Area Number

The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.


 ::)   There is no one else in HA even with an 042 nomber!  Yeah - Barry is the one exception - got it.


His SS is a fake - everyone gets a SS at or near birth.  Mine starts with 127 and shows clearly I was born in the Bronx, NY.   Investigators have looke at this and it is clearly a sham by obama.             
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:29:11 PM
Or are you just back to your cut and paste cowardly bull shit?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:29:57 PM

 ::)

chill man,  its part of the story,  and that's from the US government
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:30:45 PM
I promise this is great stuff,  but you can't have a cut and paste meltdown, ok?


Do you know where he applied for his SSN number from?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 01:31:08 PM

Now back to my question:

Do you know where he applied for the SSN from?

O.K.  The suspense is killing me.   :)  Where did he apply from?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:32:09 PM
You love this BEach  I am telling you, you love it!

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:32:18 PM
Or are you just back to your cut and paste cowardly bull shit?

No - by his own statements he never stepped foot into the 48 states until he wa 18 y/o for college at occidental.  how could he have possibly applied for a SS from CT at 16 y/o?   This should be good.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:33:41 PM
Or are you just back to your cut and paste cowardly bull shit?

No - I will update this thread like I do others with articles s they appear.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:35:06 PM
No - by his own statements he never stepped foot into the 48 states until he wa 18 y/o for college at occidental.  how could he have possibly applied for a SS from CT at 16 y/o?   This should be good.    

i never said he applied from Conn.


He apply from:  Beretania Street where he lived in Hawaii prior to getting a job at basken robbins

do you know what zip code it was then?   96814
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:35:44 PM
No - I will update this thread like I do others with articles s they appear.   

Calm down 33333.   Look at my post and comment.... 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:36:19 PM
i never said he applied from Conn.


He apply from:  Beretania Street where he lived in Hawaii prior to getting a job at basken robbins

do you know what zip code it was then?   96814


ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!   and what SS # di he use in filling out the app for employment?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:36:53 PM

ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!   and what SS # di he use in filling out the app for employment?   

Key word here is "prior"
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:44:23 PM
Before I lower the boom, let's review and add:

1.  SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html) does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN: 

Quote
Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

2.  Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979.  http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html (http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html)

3.  He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814

5.  People applied via hand written mail back then.



Ready for number "6" or is it that it doesn't matter because you right and i am wrong and Obama is a Marxist devil destroying the country blah blah blah?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:44:32 PM
Key word here is "prior"

yeah  - and when he went to apply for a SS number at 16 y/o what docs did he present?   The unsigned, no doc, no hospital, no date, no time, 2007 Colb?   Ha ha ha ha ha Lol!!!!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:45:35 PM
Before I lower the boom, let's review and add:

1.  SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html) does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN: 

2.  Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979.  http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html (http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html)

3.  He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814

5.  People applied via hand written mail back then.



Ready for number "6" or is it that it doesn't matter because you right and i am wrong and Obama is a Marxist devil destroying the country blah blah blah?


Bump
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:46:07 PM
Before I lower the boom, let's review and add:

1.  SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html) does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN: 

2.  Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979.  http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html (http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html)

3.  He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814

5.  People applied via hand written mail back then.



Ready for number "6" or is it that it doesn't matter because you right and i am wrong and Obama is a Marxist devil destroying the country blah blah blah?


Utter bullshit because the overwhelming nuimber of people with 042 are from CT and there are no people from HA eith that number rom 1961.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 01:46:23 PM


4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814



Doh.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:48:15 PM
yeah  - and when he went to apply for a SS number at 16 y/o what docs did he present?   The unsigned, no doc, no hospital, no date, no time, 2007 Colb?   Ha ha ha ha ha Lol!!!!!

Its too bad.  You are a pretty smart guy, but your hatred has compromised your objectivity.  If we don't have that what do we have?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:49:38 PM
Utter bullshit because the overwhelming nuimber of people with 042 are from CT and there are no people from HA eith that number rom 1961.  

Not at all. 

But that's not all.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 08, 2011, 01:50:50 PM
Before I lower the boom, let's review and add:

1.  SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html) does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN:  

2.  Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979.  http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html (http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html)

3.  He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814

5.  People applied via hand written mail back then.



Ready for number "6" or is it that it doesn't matter because you right and i am wrong and Obama is a Marxist devil destroying the country blah blah blah?



NICE JOB HOW LONG DID THAT TAKE YOU
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:51:18 PM
Remember in 1977, people inputted info, they weren't scanned like today.


#6


The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:51:58 PM
Not at all. 

But that's not all.

Really?  Show me one person born in 1961 in HA given a 042 SS number?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:52:50 PM


1.  SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html) does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN: 

2.  Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979.  http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html (http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html)

3.  He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814

5.  People applied via hand written mail back then.

6.  The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:53:21 PM
Remember in 1977, people inputted info, they weren't scanned like today.


#6


The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814

Ok - and why was Obama in Danbury in 1977 to apply for his SS number considering he claims the first time he himself stepped foot in the lower 48 was when he was 18 y/o?    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:53:35 PM

1.  SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html) does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN: 

2.  Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979.  http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html (http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html)

3.  He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814

5.  People applied via hand written mail back then.

6.  The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814




Rub it flip it, throw it down  oh noooooooooooooooo!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 01:54:39 PM
Remember in 1977, people inputted info, they weren't scanned like today.


#6


The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814

So it could have just been simply mixing up a 0 and a 9 on the typewriter?

Sounds like a pinky finger slip.  And obama has been accused of being a commie pinko bastard.  The pieces are starting to fit...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:54:48 PM
Ok - and why was Obama in Danbury in 1977 to apply for his SS number considering he claims the first time he himself stepped foot in the lower 48 was when he was 18 y/o?    


Look at the numbers and sing that Sesame Street song.........
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:56:02 PM
Here's a follow up question:

On the typewriter  are the "0" and "9" located near each other and are they pressed with a pinky?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:56:15 PM
Rub it flip it, throw it down  oh noooooooooooooooo!


What does that prove at all?   Nothing at all.  
 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:57:39 PM
So it could have just been simply mixing up a 0 and a 9 on the typewriter?

Sounds like a pinky finger slip.  And obama has been accused of being a commie pinko bastard.  The pieces are starting to fit...


 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 01:59:41 PM
33, as a CTer, your best bet is NOT to roll eyes and change subject.

Rather, you should realize it's possible that point is a mistake on some secretary's part - concede that point to Oz - then move on to one other point which may prove obama wasn't born here.

Don't spend hours arguing something once you realize it's a lost point.  Remember, you don't have to prove every lie - just ONE.  If there's one official lie in the record, then you win.  You don't have to find 100 mistakes.

Start with the book mistake - the pic of grandparents with the photosho lines - get Oz to concede it's probably a photoshop.  Oz, you game?  From there, 33, you as him to surmise the motivation for such a faked pic.  Then you give your theory, and how it fits into the bigger lie.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 01:59:46 PM
Here's a follow up question:

On the typewriter  are the "0" and "9" located near each other and are they pressed with a pinky?

Ha ha ha ha ha hah a!!!!   So now its all a Typo when on his own bullshit COLB list the o42 number.  I have really heard it all now.  Especially considering the number he used on ih selective service registration.  

 


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:00:54 PM

What does that prove at all?   Nothing at all.  
 



It destroyed the SSN conpriacy theory.  Provided a reasonable explanation highlighted by an incredible valid coincident.

You have no choice now but to either just stubbornly dispute it to save face or just agree you got nothing.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 02:01:46 PM
or, 33, show a pattern of a dozen SS numbers - all off by 'one digit', and ask ozmo to compute the likelihood that 12 separate secretaries all made the 'pinky error' on them.

If it happened once, it's a poor mistake for a person to make, but it can happen.  If he was purposefully fudging a digit every time, that's some serious shit.

Which is it, cowboy?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 02:03:13 PM

What does that prove at all?   Nothing at all.  
 



That's a 40 minute clip.  Cliff's Notes? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:03:43 PM
33, as a CTer, your best bet is NOT to roll eyes and change subject.

Rather, you should realize it's possible that point is a mistake on some secretary's part - concede that point to Oz - then move on to one other point which may prove obama wasn't born here.

Don't spend hours arguing something once you realize it's a lost point.  Remember, you don't have to prove every lie - just ONE.  If there's one official lie in the record, then you win.  You don't have to find 100 mistakes.

Start with the book mistake - the pic of grandparents with the photosho lines - get Oz to concede it's probably a photoshop.  Oz, you game?  From there, 33, you as him to surmise the motivation for such a faked pic.  Then you give your theory, and how it fits into the bigger lie.



You know me 240, i am game, and have conceded and admitted being mistaken often.

On this one particular point of the 042 SSN i think it's a pretty reasonable explanation.

Now about all the others....  I guess we can get there in the next few days or whatever..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 02:03:58 PM
33, as a CTer, your best bet is NOT to roll eyes and change subject.

Rather, you should realize it's possible that point is a mistake on some secretary's part - concede that point to Oz - then move on to one other point which may prove obama wasn't born here.

Don't spend hours arguing something once you realize it's a lost point.  Remember, you don't have to prove every lie - just ONE.  If there's one official lie in the record, then you win.  You don't have to find 100 mistakes.

Start with the book mistake - the pic of grandparents with the photosho lines - get Oz to concede it's probably a photoshop.  Oz, you game?  From there, 33, you as him to surmise the motivation for such a faked pic.  Then you give your theory, and how it fits into the bigger lie.




Ha ha ha ha ha ha-  yeah - speculation is proof?  Funny, especially coming from OZ who champions himself as the board skeptic.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:05:12 PM
Another FYI,  for 33333,

I would love nothing better to get that ASS HAT out of office.  But I can't allow myself to fall into fantasy about stuff like this.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 02:05:48 PM
It destroyed the SSN conpriacy theory.  Provided a reasonable explanation highlighted by an incredible valid coincident.

You have no choice now but to either just stubbornly dispute it to save face or just agree you got nothing.  

You offered an alternative theory which so far have never been offered by even obama himself for the fact that heis using a CT SS# number.   So your alleged debunking now admits to speculating that the clerk made a typo mistake?  Am I correct in your assertion?  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:07:09 PM

Ha ha ha ha ha ha-  yeah - speculation is proof?  Funny, especially coming from OZ who champions himself as the board skeptic.  

I like being a skeptic,  but i wouldn't call myself that.  Others here are far more skeptic about things than me.  Hell,  i believe in UFO's and little green men.  In fact, i even moderate a CT board.   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 08, 2011, 02:08:52 PM
WOW that was awesome!  The SSN being blown up like that.  Epic work! 

333 why are you melting so badly?  Seriously dude get some objectivity already.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 02:09:43 PM
Especially considering the number he used on ih selective service registration.  

Tell us about that one - let's conceded the baskin robbins 9/0 typo.

What's this one about?  Another one-digit miss?  That would be a win for you, if he shows a pattern of minor fudging numbers.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 02:10:05 PM
I like being a skeptic,  but i wouldn't call myself that.  Others here are far more skeptic about things than me.  Hell,  i believe in UFO's and little green men.  In fact, i even moderate a CT board.   :D

No, I like debating with you since it ups my game.    I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this.   Additionally, like you you, we were both probabl given SS# at or near birth.   I really never heard of someone who was born in the USA never getting a SS until they were 17.  How did he register for HS?    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 08, 2011, 02:10:53 PM
I like being a skeptic,  but i wouldn't call myself that.  Others here are far more skeptic about things than me.  Hell,  i believe in UFO's and little green men.  In fact, i even moderate a CT board.   :D

Yeah.  I'm probably a bigger skeptic than you.  

You're in good company with the little green men.  Are you Kucinich supporter?   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 02:11:09 PM
is there a pattern of one-digit SS misses by obama?

that would be something interesting.  No way a series of secretaries all missed.

What is the comparison of the next actual/faked SS number zipcode?  the one for sel service.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 02:11:25 PM
Tell us about that one - let's conceded the baskin robbins 9/0 typo.

What's this one about?  Another one-digit miss?  That would be a win for you, if he shows a pattern of minor fudging numbers.

i'm not conceding anything.   Are you kidding?  So i am supposed to believe that Obama's refusal to release anything and all this nonsense is based on a clerical error by a clerk.   Yeah ok 240.    ::)  ::)  ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:13:49 PM
You offered an alternative theory which so far have never been offered by even obama himself for the fact that heis using a CT SS# number.   So your alleged debunking now admits to speculating that the clerk made a typo mistake?  Am I correct in your assertion?  


Do you know how many possibilities there are in 5 numbers with 10 variables each?  Isn't like 10 to the 5th power or something?  Isn't that like a million different numbers?  And those 2 are off by only 1 digit?  digit that are right next to each other.

On top of that, you have a lefty handwriting the address.   combined that with the other stuff i showed and it destroys your youtube and cut/patse blitz of over dramatic vids and over opinionated articles.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:15:50 PM
i'm not conceding anything.   Are you kidding?  So i am supposed to believe that Obama's refusal to release anything and all this nonsense is based on a clerical error by a clerk.   Yeah ok 240.    ::)  ::)  ::)

You are connecting to things that have nothing to do with each other except in the realms of a complete grand CT.

SSN is one issue

Birth records is another.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:16:50 PM
Yeah.  I'm probably a bigger skeptic than you.  

You're in good company with the little green men.  Are you Kucinich supporter?   :D

lol   i have never actually seen one. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 02:17:14 PM

Do you know how many possibilities there are in 5 numbers with 10 variables each?  Isn't like 10 to the 5th power or something?  Isn't that like a million different numbers?  And those 2 are off by only 1 digit?  digit that are right next to each other.

On top of that, you have a lefty handwriting the address.   combined that with the other stuff i showed and it destroys your youtube and cut/patse blitz of over dramatic vids and over opinionated articles.

Fucking nonsense.    99.9% of us were all given a SS# number at BIRTH that we all have and know and have used and can be traced to where we were born.  


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 02:17:29 PM
i'm not conceding anything.   Are you kidding?  So i am supposed to believe that Obama's refusal to release anything and all this nonsense is based on a clerical error by a clerk.   Yeah ok 240.    ::)  ::)  ::)

it could have been him changing the # by one digit for some reason.  
it could have been a secretary.

you're a doggone lawyer- find a pattern, inspector gadget!


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:20:35 PM
No, I like debating with you since it ups my game.    I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this.   Additionally, like you you, we were both probabl given SS# at or near birth.   I really never heard of someone who was born in the USA never getting a SS until they were 17.  How did he register for HS?    

i am too now trying to get to the bottom of this, thanks to you.   :)


Fucking nonsense.    99.9% of us were all given a SS# number at BIRTH that we all have and know and have used and can be traced to where we were born.  


That's incorrect.  Maybe now it is.  But not prior to 65.  i remember when my parents gave me my SSN card after it came in the mail.  They told me not lose it.   It was around when i was 15 or 16.  i knew i needed it to get a job.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 02:23:13 PM
i am too now trying to get to the bottom of this, thanks to you.   :)

That's incorrect.  Maybe now it is.  But not prior to 65.  i remember when my parents gave me my SSN card after it came in the mail.  They told me not lose it.   It was around when i was 15 or 16.  i knew i needed it to get a job.  

I was born in 1975.   What happened between 1961 and 1975 that that situation changed?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 02:31:22 PM
33,

on a lot of threads lately, you seem to let your emotion take over.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:41:22 PM
I was born in 1975.   What happened between 1961 and 1975 that that situation changed?   

well its not true you are issued a SSN at birth:

http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10023.html (http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10023.html)

   When you have a baby, one of the things that should be on your “to do” list is getting a Social Security number for your baby. The easiest time to do this is when you give information for your child’s birth certificate. If you wait to apply for a number at a Social Security office, there may be delays while we verify your child’s birth certificate.
     
 
   
Contents
Why should I get a number for my child?Skip content links
Must my child have a Social Security number?
How do I apply?
What if my child is adopted?
What does it cost?
What if I lose the card?
Social Security number misuse
Contacting Social Security
   
 
   
Why Should I Get A Number For My Baby?

You need a Social Security number to claim your child as a dependent on your income tax return. Your child also may need a number if you plan to:

    * Open a bank account for the child;
    * Buy savings bonds for the child;
    * Obtain medical coverage for the child; or
    * Apply for government services for the child.

[Back to top]
   
     
Must my child have a Social Security number?

No. Getting a Social Security number for your newborn is voluntary. But, it is  a good idea to get a number when your child is born. You can apply for a Social Security number for your baby when you apply for your baby’s birth certificate. The state agency that issues birth certificates will share your child’s information with us and we will mail the Social Security card to you.

If you wait to apply at a Social Security office, you must show us proof of your child’s U.S. citizenship, age and identity, as well as proof of your own identity. We must verify your child’s birth record, which can add up to 12 weeks to the time it takes to issue a card. To verify a birth certificate, Social Security will contact the office that issued it. We do this verification to prevent people from using fraudulent birth records to obtain Social Security numbers to establish false identities.






Side note:  So it would seem the BC was good enough for the SSA back then also.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:46:55 PM
Which my have likely been the long form you are talking about.

I remember mine.  It disintegrated about the time i turned 30.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 02:50:16 PM
Which my have likely been the long form you are talking about.

I remember mine.  It disintegrated about the time i turned 30.

Fine - but the state of Hawaii said they never lost any records from 1961 ans its all on microfiche.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:57:36 PM
Fine - but the state of Hawaii said they never lost any records from 1961 ans its all on microfiche.  

Yeah and Obama has spent millions blocking access to it.  I know.  He's likely hiding something.  I think its has to do with being a Muslim.

But when it comes to this Conn. SSN  there's nothing there.

When it comes to the BC, the fact that he was able to get a SSN in 1977 indicates he probably provided the a notarized copy of the long form as it was done back then.  Now its done differently.   This in its self supports among other things that he was born in the USA.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 03:02:03 PM
Yeah and Obama has spent millions blocking access to it.  I know.  He's likely hiding something.  I think its has to do with being a Muslim.

But when it comes to this Conn. SSN  there's nothing there.

When it comes to the BC, the fact that he was able to get a SSN in 1977 indicates he probably provided the a notarized copy of the long form as it was done back then.  Now its done differently.   This in its self supports among other things that he was born in the USA.

i'm not saying he was defniately born outside of the USA, but I believe his religion, named father, race, and other matters are still up for debate and speculaton as listed on the longform BC.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 08, 2011, 03:02:39 PM
i'm not saying he was defniately born outside of the USA, but I believe his religion, named father, race, and other matters are still up for debate and speculaton as listed on the longform BC.   

None of that shit makes it illegal to be President... Which is what this whole thing was supposed to be about.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 03:05:12 PM
None of that shit makes it illegal to be President... Which is what this whole thing was supposed to be about.

There is a poster on this board called Farright looney who posted more details on this.   

But there is an issue as far as NBC status goes in relation to the state of Hawaii and the fact that the parent had to be there for like 10 years to confer NBC status.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 03:05:41 PM
None of that shit makes it illegal to be President... Which is what this whole thing was supposed to be about.

BINGO.

Birther = obama's birth not legit to be president.

Birther does NOT = Obama's birth cert might say muslim.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 03:06:48 PM
i'm not saying he was defniately born outside of the USA, but I believe his religion, named father, race, and other matters are still up for debate and speculaton as listed on the longform BC.   

I agree,  but isn't the Birther issue really about Obama not  being a NBC and thus can not be president?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 03:08:34 PM
There is a poster on this board called Farright looney who posted more details on this.   

But there is an issue as far as NBC status goes in relation to the state of Hawaii and the fact that the parent had to be there for like 10 years to confer NBC status.   
Sorry. For the confusion. Is he saying Obama is a anchor baby?  Lol
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 03:08:34 PM
240 = true birther to see if obama has legit right to hold office.

33 = partisan birther wanting to see document for anything to undermine or embarass obama.  anything rush can use to call him a bastard, a muslim, or make fun of his deceased parents on a daily basis.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 03:08:42 PM
I agree,  but isn't the Birther issue really about Obama not  being a NBC and thus can not be president?

well - I guess its also about the whole media created image of obama as being false since he came out of nowhere and was sold to the public based on nothing and people trying to now figure out where everything was wrong and how far badly they were duped.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 03:09:30 PM
240 = true birther to see if obama has legit right to hold office.

33 = partisan birther wanting to see document for anything to undermine or embarass obama.  anything rush can use to call him a bastard, a muslim, or make fun of his deceased parents on a daily basis.

 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 03:10:46 PM
well - I guess its also about the whole media created image of obama as being false since he came out of nowhere and was sold to the public based on nothing and people trying to now figure out where everything was wrong and how far badly they were duped.  

this is sad, man.

you're not about protecting the presidency from foreign alien.

you're about doing whatever you can to embarass obama.

No wonder the 911 skeptics got so much hazing - many of them were just like you.  They bashed bush, they loved the 911 topic cause it made bush look bad.  Me, i was a 2x bush voter, and anyone who posted here from 2000 to 2005 KNOWS it.  The 911 stuff came from my desire to learn the truth, not smear a particular party.  My disgust for the neocons came later.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 03:11:21 PM
well - I guess its also about the whole media created image of obama as being false since he came out of nowhere and was sold to the public based on nothing and people trying to now figure out where everything was wrong and how far badly they were duped.  

You don't remember this guy opening the DNC in 2004?  They were talking about him being pres. some day.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 03:15:13 PM
You don't remember this guy opening the DNC in 2004?  They were talking about him being pres. some day.

Sorry - someone giving a 18 minute speech is total bullshit.   

Again - just we dont lose sight. 

________________________ ________________________ ________

OBAMA RECORDS NOT RELASED: 

Passport records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules(said to be lost), Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the long-form Certificate of Live Birth.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 03:18:53 PM
Yep. I know.

But as stated earlier there's nothing to the conn ssn thing and it only supports the BC thing.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 08, 2011, 03:27:25 PM
well - I guess its also about the whole media created image of obama as being false since he came out of nowhere and was sold to the public based on nothing and people trying to now figure out where everything was wrong and how far badly they were duped.  

Obama sold himself to the public due to his effectiive campaign and Hillary's inept campaign...the media had nothing to do with it..Hillary thought she had the nomination locked up after super tuesday and didn't go all out...Obama kept pressing on and won something like 13 primaries and caucauses in a row...thats why he won....give the guy credit for outworking Hillary..Geeeezzzzzz
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 03:30:12 PM
Obama sold himself to the public due to his effectiive campaign and Hillary's inept campaign...the media had nothing to do with it..Hillary thought she had the nomination locked up after super tuesday and didn't go all out...Obama kept pressing on and won something like 13 primaries and caucauses in a row...thats why he won....give the guy credit for outworking Hillary..Geeeezzzzzz

Absolutely not.   I will give him credit for being a great liar and guilting whites into votng for him.  ill give him that for sure.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 08, 2011, 04:01:45 PM
Obama's aunt furious Trump questions his birthplace
Sunbeam Television Corp - WHDH-TV ^ | April 8, 2011



BOSTON -- Donald Trump created controversy, questioning whether President Barack Obama was born in this country. Now the President's aunt is saying Trump is insulting her family.

“He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii,”” said Zeituni Onyango.


(Excerpt) Read more at 1.whdh.com ...


________________________ ________________________ __


She probaby is afraid of getting kicked off welfare and out of public housing. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 09, 2011, 01:52:04 PM
Absolutely not.   I will give him credit for being a great liar and guilting whites into votng for him.  ill give him that for sure.   

well..this shows that you are essentially crazy and like arguing with yourself..what else is new..you won't acknowledge reality
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 09, 2011, 02:45:02 PM
Obama was pretty slick with his campaign, he came out of nowhere and toppled Hillary with his community organizing skills.....  Wasn't you 333333 who compared him to Stalin because Stalin was a community Organizer too? Lol
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 09, 2011, 02:53:05 PM
Among many others I'm sure. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 10, 2011, 10:31:49 AM
Trump talks birthers, White House adviser predicts his failure
By: CNN Associate Producer Gabriella Schwarz

Washington (CNN) - Real estate mogul Donald Trump kept up his birther blasts Sunday, while one White House adviser hoped his stock continues to rise.

Appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Trump called the situation surrounding President Obama’s birth certificate “very strange,” lamenting the negative connotation attached to “birthers.”

“The fact is nobody has any information. And his people in the United States don’t even know which hospital. His relatives don’t even know which hospital he was born in,” Trump told CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley. “It’s a very strange situation, that’s all I can tell you. And you know, it’s a very sad thing because the people, the birthers, they got labeled and they got labeled so negatively and even the word birther is a negative word.”

In 2008, the Obama campaign released a copy of the certificate, saying the serial number was blacked out for concern over Hawaiian procedure. Since then, many news organizations and the Annenberg Fact Check Project saw the original with the serial number, an embossed seal and a stamped signature.

But that remains insufficient for the “Celebrity Apprentice” star who again said: “Why doesn’t he show is birth certificate,” before insisting he’d rather talk about other issues facing the United States.
“I don’t like to talk about this issue too much, because I really would rather talk about China, I would really rather talk about what OPEC is doing to destroy us, I would really rather talk about other things,” Trump said.

While the potential 2012 presidential contender continues to make the television rounds with his new mantra, White House senior adviser David Plouffe dismissed Trump’s rhetoric, saying it would not impact the overall 2012 race for the White House.

“There may be a small part of the country that believes these things, but mainstream America thinks it’s a sideshow,” Plouffe said on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday. “That’s not leadership, that’s a kind of a sideshow behavior.”

Plouffe also predicted a negative future for Trump in the presidential field.

“I saw Donald Trump kind of rising in the polls. Given his behavior, and the spectacle of the last couple weeks, I hope he keeps on rising,” Plouffe said. “There is zero chance that Donald Trump would ever be hired by the American people to do this job.”

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/10/trump-talks-birthers-white-house-adviser-predicts-his-failure/#more-153746
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 10, 2011, 11:51:50 AM
I think this Birther thing is going to fizzle out.  Just looking at it deeper myself, it's very unlikely he wasn't born here.  Especially considering that he applied for his SSN in 1977.  Begging the question:  What birth certificate was shown then? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2011, 12:19:20 PM
That won't make it fade at all.  That will make the story snowball.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 10, 2011, 12:22:50 PM
That won't make it fade at all.  That will make the story snowball.
I am just thinking it will fizzle out in relevance.  There will always be people who think he wasn't born here.  It's always that way with things like this.   I would like them to push it at the debates though, but as others have commented, it could be disastrous. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2011, 12:28:33 PM
Where he was born is but one isse.  There is also the fake ss numbers, the aliases, the passports he used, the phoney name changes, the missing years in new york no one can piece together, the enigma as to how he got into harvard law, etc.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 10, 2011, 12:43:28 PM
Where he was born is but one isse.  There is also the fake ss numbers, the aliases, the passports he used, the phoney name changes, the missing years in new york no one can piece together, the enigma as to how he got into harvard law, etc.

Don't you think the FBI would have been all over this???..get off it already...Obama was thoroughly screened before he could run for office....you act as if a guy could come here on a raft and register to run for office.....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2011, 12:55:28 PM
Yawn.  Even david poof is scared of this issue.  I have some good stuff on bamas fake ss numbers ill post later. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 10, 2011, 01:04:12 PM
Where he was born is but one isse.  There is also the fake ss numbers, the aliases, the passports he used, the phoney name changes, the missing years in new york no one can piece together, the enigma as to how he got into harvard law, etc.
It's the main issue.  With out it the movement would be dead.

Likely all those other things you just listed are probably reasonably explainable.  But I don't know I'd have to research them.  Just my assumption based on the 042 thing.

  I think maybe quite a lot of people who are in the movement haven't done Much real research.  I mean look at you for example:

You didn't know when Obama first applied for a SSN.

You didn't know where he applied from.

You didn't know that SSN numbers were NOT issued at birth

You didn't know that the "area number" on a SSN wasn't 100% indicative of which state he was born.

It's as if, you just got totally sucked in by the overly opinionated articles and over dramatic you tube vids and let your hate cloud your sensibilities.

I would have thought you'd at least have looked into those important facts before you launched your crusade.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2011, 01:55:59 PM
Ill post the stuff later on the ss number and you can then decide.  I'm on a blackberry.  Needless to say there is no one else on recors w an 042 ss number from hawaii.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 10, 2011, 02:34:31 PM
Palin gives Trump some verbal support on birther issue
By: CNN Associate Producer Gabriella Schwarz

(CNN) - Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin supported Donald Trump's decision to hire investigators to examine President Barack Obama's birth, but stopped short of embracing the birther wave.

"I appreciate that the Donald wants to spend his resources in getting to the bottom of something that so interests him and many Americans. You know, more power to him," Palin said Saturday on Fox News. "He's not just throwing stones from the sidelines, he's digging in, he's paying for researchers."

Trump's media rampage over the president's birthplace continued Sunday in an appearance on CNN's "State of the Union," where he once again implored the president to produce his birth certificate. Thursday on NBC, the real estate mogul said he sent a team of investigators to Hawaii.

In 2008, the Obama campaign released a copy of the certificate, saying the serial number was blacked out for concern over Hawaiian procedure. Since then, many news organizations and the Annenberg Fact Check Project saw the original with the serial number, an embossed seal and a stamped signature.

But when asked about her views on the issue, Palin said she thinks the president was born in Hawaii.

"Well, you know, I think that he was born in Hawaii because there was a birth announcement put in the newspaper," Palin said. "But obviously if there's something there that the president doesn't want people to see on that birth certificate that he's going to great lengths to make sure it isn't shown. And that's kind of perplexing for a lot of people."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/10/palin-gives-trump-some-verbal-support-on-birther-issue/#more-153766
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2011, 02:38:05 PM
Again - what hospital and what doctor? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Skip8282 on April 10, 2011, 02:49:28 PM
Don't you think the FBI would have been all over this???..get off it already...Obama was thoroughly screened before he could run for office....you act as if a guy could come here on a raft and register to run for office.....


No doubt, you should see the form you have to fill out for a clearance.  The government goes so far up your ass you may as well be married.  I'd imagine someone sneaks in from time to time, but it's highly unlikely...even more unlikely for the POTUS.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2011, 02:58:16 PM
For elective office you never have to go through the same gut wrenmching bio review.  Again - this whole issue would go away tommow if he simply released his records.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Skip8282 on April 10, 2011, 03:11:23 PM
For elective office you never have to go through the same gut wrenmching bio review.  Again - this whole issue would go away tommow if he simply released his records.


Never heard of that and I doubt it's true.


And it won't go away.  They'll claim it's a fake, argue the date and time are impossible, etc, etc.

I know it's your hatred of Obama that's driving this but it's time to just let it go or pony up some real evidence.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 10, 2011, 03:14:10 PM
Yawn.  Even david poof is scared of this issue.  I have some good stuff on bamas fake ss numbers ill post later. 

please...no more right wing blogger stuff..legitimate news organizations please
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2011, 03:24:29 PM
Yes I hate obama.  No doubt.  However there are tons of mysteries he is covering up for unknown reasons.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 10, 2011, 08:27:04 PM
Yes I hate obama.  No doubt.  However there are tons of mysteries he is covering up for unknown reasons.

the greatest mystery is whats going on in your mind :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 10, 2011, 10:04:52 PM
This is pretty much a knock out blow.  Trump better drop this if he wants to remain relevant.  (BTW, they are not "Hawaiian" officials.  "Hawaiian" is an ethnic group.) 

Ex-Hawaii official denounces 'ludicrous' birther claims
Comments follow statements by Donald Trump questioning legitimacy of president's birth record
By Michael Isikoff
National investigative correspondent
NBC News
updated 4/10/2011

The Hawaiian state health official who personally reviewed Barack Obama's original birth certificate has affirmed again that the document is "real" and denounced "conspiracy theorists" in the so-called "birther" movement for continuing to spread bogus claims about the issue.

"It’s kind of ludicrous at this point," Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the former director of Hawaii's Department of Health, said in a rare telephone interview with NBC.

Fukino, sounding both exasperated and amused, spoke to a reporter in the aftermath of Donald Trump's statements on the NBC Today show last week questioning whether Obama has a legitimate birth certificate.

Trump, who says he is considering a run for president, repeated his claims on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday, saying that "nobody has any information" about the president's birth and that "if he wasn't born in this country, he shouldn't be president of the United States."

No matter what state officials release on the issue, the "birthers" are going to question it, said Fukino. "They’re going to question the ink on which it was written or say it was fabricated," said Fukino. "The whole thing is silly."

Story: The Isikoff Files

As the top Hawaiian official in charge of state health records in 2008, when the issue of Obama's birth first arose, Fukino said she thought she had put the matter to rest. Contacted by NBC, Fukino expanded on previous public statements and made two key points when asked about Trump's recent comments.

The first is that the original so-called "long form" birth certificate — described by Hawaiian officials as a "record of live birth" — absolutely exists, located in a bound volume in a file cabinet on the first floor of the state Department of Health. Fukimo said she has personally inspected it — twice. The first time was in late October 2008, during the closing days of the presidential campaign, when the communications director for the state's then Republican governor, Linda Lingle (who appointed Fukino) asked if she could make a public statement in response to claims then circulating on the Internet that Obama was actually born in Kenya.

Before she would do so, Fukino said, she wanted to inspect the files — and did so, taking with her the state official in charge of vital records. She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files. She then put out a public statement asserting to the document's validity. She later put out another public statement in July 2009 — after reviewing the original birth record a second time.

"It is real, and no amount of saying it is not, is going to change that," Fukino said. Moreover, she added, her boss at the time, Lingle — who was backing John McCain for president — would presumably have to be in on any cover up since Fukino made her public comment at the governor's office's request. "Why would a Republican governor — who was stumping for the other guy — hold out on a big secret?" she asked.
Her second point — one she made repeatedly in the interview — is that the shorter, computer generated "certification of live birth" that was obtained by the Obama campaign in 2007 and has since been publicly released is the standard document that anybody requesting their birth certificate from the state of Hawaii would receive from the health department.

The document was distributed to the Obama campaign in 2007 after Obama, at the request of a campaign official, personally signed a Hawaii birth certificate request form downloaded on the Internet, according to a former campaign official who asked for anonymity. (Obama was "testy" when asked to sign the form but did so anyway to put the issue to rest, the former campaign official said. The White House has dismissed all questions about the president's birth as "fictional nonsense.")

The certification that the campaign received back —which shows that Obama was born in Honolulu at 7:24 p.m. on Aug. 4, 1961 — was based on the content of the original document in state files, Fukino said.
"What he got, everybody got," said Fukino. "He put out exactly what everybody gets when they ask for a birth certificate."

Hawaiian officials say that the certification is, in fact, only one piece of abundant evidence of Obama's birth in Hawaii. Joshua Wisch, a spokesman for the Hawaii attorney general's office, noted that a public index of vital records, available for inspection in a bound volume at the Health Department's Office of Health Status Monitoring, lists a male child named "Obama II, Barack Hussein" as having been born in the state.

In addition, as Factcheck.org and other media organizations have repeatedly pointed out, both of Honolulu's newspapers, the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 13, 1961, and the Honolulu Star Bulletin, on Aug. 14, 1961, both ran birth announcements listing Obama's birth on Aug. 4 of that year.

Even Fukino accepts that her comments are not likely to end the matter for the die-hard birthers. Trump and other skeptics have questioned why the original birth certificate has not been released.
But Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general's office, said state law does not in fact permit the release of "vital records," including an original "record of live birth" — even to the individual whose birth it records.

"It's a Department of Health record and it can't be released to anybody," he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that authorizes such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted to inspect his birth record, Wisch said.

But if he or anybody else wanted a copy of their birth records, they would be told to fill out the appropriate state form and receive back the same computer generated "certification of live birth" form that everybody else gets — which is exactly what Obama did four years ago.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/42518702
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 10, 2011, 10:58:42 PM
Absolutely crushing!

Even Obama can't request a copy of his own "long form" birth certificate.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 03:43:45 AM
This article contradicts itself at least twice. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 04:48:06 AM
The Curious Issue of Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate
The Lubbock Avalanche-Journal ^ | April 11, 2011 |





The news media is quickly moving to protect Barack Obama against Donald Trump’s pursuit of the truth about Barack Obama’s birth certificate and Obama’s place of birth.

Michael Isikoff of MSNBC has reported that Dr. Chiyome Fukino is now claiming that she has actually seen Barack Obama’s original birth certificate on file in Honolulu.

As the top Hawaiian official in charge of state health records in 2008, when the issue of Obama's birth first arose, Fukino said she thought she had put the matter to rest. Contacted by NBC, Fukino expanded on previous public statements and made two key points when asked about Trump's recent comments.

The first is that the original so-called "long form" birth certificate — described by Hawaiian officials as a "record of live birth" — absolutely exists, located in a bound volume in a file cabinet on the first floor of the state Department of Health. Fukimo [Fukino] said she has personally inspected it — twice. The first time was in late October 2008, during the closing days of the presidential campaign, when the communications director for the state's then Republican governor, Linda Lingle (who appointed Fukino) asked if she could make a public statement in response to claims then circulating on the Internet that Obama was actually born in Kenya.

This is all very curious. Back in January, Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie was unable to locate Obama’s birth certificate. The Daily Mail reported,

He [Governor Abercrombie] told Honolulu's Star-Advertiser: 'It actually exists in the archives, written down,' he said.

But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.

And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

One has to wonder why Governor Abercrombie did not ask Dr. Chiyome Fukino to show him Obama’s birth certificate?

Let us assume that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and has a duly registered birth certificate. Why does Obama not want us to see his birth certificate? Why have more than $2 million been spent in legal fees to keep this birth certificate from public view?

What is on Obama’s birth certificate that Obama does not want seen?

Donald Trump appeared on “The View” on Thursday morning 24 March. Dave Eberhart of Newsmax.com reported the next day,

On "The View," a morning chat program, Trump declared that he believed Obama has a birth certificate, but that he should produce it to the world, ending the speculation that seems to never go away. Trump added that he felt it strange that "nobody from [Obama's] early years remembers him."

There’s "something on that birth certificate that he doesn't like," Trump opined to the cast members, including Whoopi Goldberg and Barbara Walters, who berated him, accusing him of possibly racist thoughts on the issue.

Rush Limbaugh and others are coming to the support of Donald Trump.

On Limbaugh’s show Thursday, the radio talker Limbaugh sided with Trump’s beating of the birth certificate drum. "You and I have known all along that we're dealing with a man-child here who has, literally, no qualifications, no experience, and according to Donald Trump now, no birth certificate," Limbaugh declared.

"Trump is performing a valuable service here. He is attempting to help Obama out of a jam. You can't say Trump is a kook right-wing birther. Trump realized the problem that Obama faces here with credibility. He's giving him a chance here to establish some credibility by producing the birth certificate,” Limbaugh added.

Charging that elements of the major media were "covering it up" and "papering it over," he concluded: “Trump's not the kind of guy to comb over difficulties. If he's going to bring this up . . . you know that it's serious."

Either Obama’s birth certificate does not exist or it has something typed or written on it that Obama does not want to be revealed. What could it be?

It is also perplexing that Obama has sealed his college transcript from Columbia and his law school transcript from Harvard Law School. What is Obama hiding in his transcripts?

Why do Obama’s classmates from Columbia not remember seeing Obama in classes? It seems he was an invisible man during his time at Columbia?

There are two hospitals in Honolulu where it has been claimed that Obama was born. Why do both hospitals claim they have no record of Obama’s birth? Why has the doctor who delivered Obama not come forth to take credit? Why have no nurses who were present at the delivery of Obama, or took care of him and his mother following his birth, come forward?

It seems that there is a lot of Liberal smoke and mirrors taking place? If a Barack Obama birth certificate exists, it would be a simple matter for Obama to show it for all to see?

Why is so much ridicule being expended to discredit those who want answers? Why are lawyers working hard to keep Obama’s secrets hidden? Whatever happened to that transparent Administration of President Obama that we were promised?

Donald Trump’s courage is looking better all the time. We are in for some very interesting debates and battles over the Obama birth certificate unless Barack Obama can somehow silence Donald Trump.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 04:55:16 AM
Hawaii Official and Ex-Official Lie to Cover Their Tracks 100
  
DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN RAMPS UP IN RESPONSE TO DONALD TRUMP’S ASSERTIONS THAT OBAMA HAS NOT SHOWN A REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE

by Miki Booth



Dr. Chiyome Fukino lied on national TV when she said that the "Certification of Live Birth" is all a person can obtain from the Health Department. And what gave her the right to "inspect" Obama's records if they are closed by state law?
(Apr. 10, 2011) — Donald Trump is really turning the heat up on Obama’s missing birth certificate and far-left zealots have found it necessary to drag ex-Hawai’i official, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former director of Hawaii’s Department of Health, back to the podium to recite her tale of viewing the elusive document. This time, unlike her first obtuse and lawyered-up comments, Fukino has gotten bolder since Abercrombie slipped his Obama “born in Hawaii” sentence into the 50th anniversary commemorative bill.

But the latest attempt to put out the flames has backfired and exposed some naughty children huddled in a back room playing with matches. Michael Isikoff, MSNBC’s “so-called” national investigative correspondent, was caught with Joshua Wisch, former chairman of Howard Dean’s presidential campaign in Hawaii. Now spokesman for the Hawaii attorney general’s office, Wisch apparently colluded with Fukino to validate Obama’s alleged “Certification of Live Birth.”

“What he got, everybody got,” said Fukino. “He put out exactly what everybody gets when they ask for a birth certificate.”

Not true, Dr. Fukino. When my son, Alan, requested a copy of his birth certificate he got just that—a “Certificate of Live Birth,” not the same as Obama’s. Different titles and different information. Obama’s is sorely lacking information required for obtaining a passport—Mother’s State/Country of Birth and Father’s State/Country of Birth.

 


Short-Form Certificate of Live Birth obtained by Alan Booth, who was born in Hawaii. The document contains a raised seal, which Obama's Certification of Live Birth did not.

It appears specific people are lining up to take a bullet for Obama. Conspiracy to defraud the American people is a serious crime and MSNBC has become the epitome of yellow journalism, brashly covering-up for Obama and the entire anti-American agenda of the socialist left. This latest cover-up attempt is laughable and speaks volumes to the desperation of the Democrat Party.

Michael Isikoff writes, “But Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general’s office, said state law does not in fact permit the release of “vital records,” including an original “record of live birth” — even to the individual whose birth it records.

“It’s a Department of Health record and it can’t be released to anybody,” he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that authorized such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted to inspect his birth record, Wisch said.

But if he or anybody else wanted a copy of their birth records, they would be told to fill out the appropriate state form and receive back the same computer-generated “certification of live birth” form that everybody else gets — which is exactly what Obama did four years ago.”

Not true, Mr. Wisch. A friend of mine filled out the appropriate state form and received back a “certificate of live birth” as shown below:

 


Long-Form Certificate of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii received in March 2011 by the requester
Enough with the lies already. You will be held accountable.

As long as the debate over Obama’s birth records drag on, we will have that much more time to inform Americans that the birth certificate doesn’t even matter. We don’t care whether he has one or not; Obama is clearly illegally occupying the office of US President since he is not by any stretch of the imagination an Article II, Section I, clause 5 “natural born Citizen” born of two citizen parents on American soil. It becomes more evident every day that his allegiance is not to the United States of America.

Truth will out.

—————————-

Editor’s Note: The Post & Email will be calling Mr. Wisch tomorrow to confront him with his false statements about obtaining vital records in Hawaii.  We will also be contacting for the third time the Health Department, Governor Neil Abercrombie, and Lt. Gov. Brian Schatz, all of whom have spokespersons who have failed to return our calls or answer our letters regarding the many contradictions evident in Obama’s birth story and documentation, or lack thereof.  The Health Department registrar, Dr. Alvin Onaka, whose stamp appears on the long-form document above, is apparently squeamish about picking up the telephone and answering our questions.

How many people will be going to jail over this massive cover-up?  And what else, other than Obama’s “records,” are they hiding?  Perhaps 50 years of defrauding the federal government?

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 04:57:50 AM
NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE?   OBAMA'S FORGED COLB OMITS THE PLACE OF BIRTH OF THE PARENTS.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 11, 2011, 04:58:19 AM
Stupid thread. End of thread.
Title: Re: Interview of Gov Abercrombie long time friend "There is no birth certificate!"
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 05:07:46 AM
Beach - can you merge ths wi the Bither thread? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 05:17:29 AM

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2702617/posts



Incidentally, the 1950s picture here of Obama’s mother should remind us that his mother was no normal modest Midwestern girl of the times so his genetics are not the best either from his mother’s or his philandering father’s side. Snopes has done an unusually poor job (even for it) of saying the photo of Mrs Soetoro is in fact of someone else but have a look at the lady they think is in the photo. Most unconvincing. Genetics are a powerful determinant of behavior so, although scandalous, the suggestion about Obama’s sexuality below is not implausible

As an IRS tax examiner,one of many former federal jobs, I have seen what it appears Barry Soetoro has done, mostly by illegal aliens attempting to acquire a new identity in the U.S and/or criminals looking to acquire a new ID.

Barry, AKA Obama, was lawfully adopted by a foreign national, Lolo Soetoro, and Barry’s name was legally changed to “Barry Soetoro”. (Barry’s own admission) Barry Soetoro was also made an official legal Indonesian citizen. (again Barry’s own admission) The adoption would be noted in Barry’s vital statistics record in Hawaii on his original birth certificate…

OR Lolo Soetoro may have always been Barry’s legal birth father. The public does not know for sure at this point who Barry’s father really was and Barry himself may not know.

Barry was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia and attended a Catholic funded school that permitted all faiths to attend.

Barry’s mother dropped him as a dependant for some reason, maybe even when Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. His mother’s passport records dropped Barry as a dependent indicating Barry was no longer a legal dependent of his mothers. (The passport records of his mother have been produced showing Barry was no longer a dependent when Barry was permanently residing in Indonesia.) Barry went to Hawaii to live with his alleged grand parents after Lolo Soetoro and Barry’s mother divorced.

A “certificate of live birth” can have names changed on it including a child’s birth name, and birth parent’s names. Even a modified date of birth can be on a “certificate of live birth”. This occurs frequently for adopted children where the birth parent does not want the child to know who they are. The public has no idea who Barry’s real birth father is or who Barry’s real birth mother is. (Barry could have been adopted by his mother) The original birth certificate is the only legal vital statistics record of a person’s birth parents, birth location, birth date, etc… I can get a “certificate of live birth” for a dead person; I cannot get a birth certificate of a dead person without “Deceased” on it. (I’ve tried)

There is no evidence Barry Soetoro ever lawfully changed his name to “Barrack Hussein Obama”. There is no proof Barry Soetoro was born with the name “Barrack Hussein Obama”. I’m willing to bet the name “Barrack Hussein Obama” is not present on the real birth certificate as Barry’s birth name or as Barry’s birth father. I have pictures of me with my mother and Jimmy Buffet… that doesn’t make him my father even if I start using the name Jimmy Buffet.

The public knows Barry Soetoro finished high school in Hawaii as Barry Soetoro and attended Occidental as Barry Soetoro where he did drugs and flunked out of school. After dropping out of Occidental, Barry showed up in New York, homeless and on drugs. (Barry’s own admission) Barry then hooked up with a Pakistani to live with and traveled back to Indonesia on his new boyfriend’s dime to renew his Indonesian passport and traveled to Pakistan with him.

Ask any law enforcement officer in a large city or detective and they will tell you homeless young men on drugs in large cities usually end up as male prostitutes. Barry ended up as a world traveler with a degree… (Not likely)

Barry Soetoro returned to New York from Pakistan and began using the fictitious name “Obama” for some reason. (again Barry Soetoro’s own admission) One could only suspect that a person addicted to drugs returning from Pakistan to New York, the main route for Afghan heroin into the U.S., maybe Barry had a reason to start using a new name. There are literally over 1 million open warrants on file in New York… maybe Barry is one of them?….

After spending some time in New York allegedly working under the name “Obama”, It appears Barry used the fictitious name “Barrack Hussein Obama” for the first time to file his federal taxes in Connecticut at a Post Office Box for the purpose of evading paying taxes in New York and /or to establish a new identity. (This is a felony with no statute of limitation.)

When the IRS received Barry Soetoro’s federal tax filing, the IRS could not attach the name Barrack Hussein Obama to the SSI number provided or the address provided. So the IRS assigned the fictitious name “Barrack Hussein Obama” a tax ID number for a person from Connecticut (Where Barry unlawfully filed a federal tax form using a false name). Barry Soetoro began using the tax ID number as his SSI number when using the fictitious name Barrack Obama. This is why Barry Soetoro has a Connecticut SSI number. When I worked for the IRS, I saw this occur more than once and yes, it is a felony to knowingly file a fraudulent federal tax form. Most of the politicians that cheat on their taxes claim it was an accident. That is how they get away with their tax cheat crimes. Using a fake name is no accident.

It appears Barry fled New York to Chicago using his new identity to get a job . He likely ordered a fake diploma to bolster his new identity as “Obama”. Fake Diploma’s were very big in the 80’s and diploma mills were even being used by federal workers to get promotions. There is evidence his alleged attendance at Columbia was faked (Barry never attended Columbia) and Barry lied his way into Harvard (he had no transcripts to get in)… Including telling the Saudi royal family he was fighting in Afghanistan with the Muslim Jihad against the Russians, so they would help him get into a law school.

The Saudi’s apparently loved Barry’s story of Jihad in Pakistan/Afghanistan and paid for Barry to attend Harvard under the name “Obama”. The Saudi family has admitted to paying for Obama to attend Harvard and gave Harvard a gift of $20 million dollars. Harvard in turn made their special attendy President of the law review a person that never wrote a single law review…. I guess that is what $20 million buys at Harvard.

It is unlikely Barry was a Jihadist and was most likely a drug mule if anything, maybe even a CIA street hire to haul Afghan heroin back to New York, so the Afghans could buy U.S. made stinger missiles with U.S. dollars to shoot down Russian helicopters?… I hired people over seas to do work below my pay grade all the time, even foreign nationals… I think this is the story Barry told the Saudi’s, but he was most likely really just a drug mule/dealer and probably still wanted on an outstanding warrant in New York.

Barry’s selective service registration is not normal either.

After I looked at Barry’s selective service filing I noticed it was most likely fraudulent too based on the name he used. Barry did not start using the name “Obama” until he returned from Pakistan (long after he flunked out of school in California) His selective service record (maintained in Chicago coincidentally) shows he registered at a Hawaiian post office as “Obama” in Sept 1980… Problem, Barry was getting high in California at Occidental in Sept 1980 (Barry’s own admission) and was not using the fictitious name “Obama” at that time. Barry began using the fictitious name “Obama” only after he returned from Pakistan. The selective service filing is fraudulent.

Barry returned to Chicago and attended a semi-christian radical black church with his first female love Michelle. Barry admits keeping in touch with Phil Boener, who traveled to New York from Occidental to be with Barry and was most likely Barry’s first love.

Barry still could not get a real job, because he was still a fraud, even with his Harvard degree in hand he could lie and take the Bar exam, but he could not work as a lawyer for a major law firm without a back ground investigation and he would never pass one. So, Michelle got Barry a job at her law firm. Barry never filed a case alone and never filed a motion. He wrote lots of memos according to the law firm where Barry worked. (I think they know Barry is a fraud and don’t want to be sued by previous clients) Barry rescinded his law licenses, so as not to be disbarred for fraud. The Bar knows Barry lied on his application. Michelle also had to turn over her law license for her involvement in corruption with the Chicago mayors office.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:04:45 AM
333333.
 It seems you are just left with cutting and pasted big opt-Ed pieces. 
Have you even verified all the crap in those articles? 
Because as I showed before you didn't research all the other stuff in the SSN articles.


This thing is pretty much dead in the world of reality.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:05:55 AM
Hawaii Official and Ex-Official Lie to Cover Their Tracks 100
  
DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN RAMPS UP IN RESPONSE TO DONALD TRUMP’S ASSERTIONS THAT OBAMA HAS NOT SHOWN A REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE

by Miki Booth



Dr. Chiyome Fukino lied on national TV when she said that the "Certification of Live Birth" is all a person can obtain from the Health Department. And what gave her the right to "inspect" Obama's records if they are closed by state law?
(Apr. 10, 2011) — Donald Trump is really turning the heat up on Obama’s missing birth certificate and far-left zealots have found it necessary to drag ex-Hawai’i official, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former director of Hawaii’s Department of Health, back to the podium to recite her tale of viewing the elusive document. This time, unlike her first obtuse and lawyered-up comments, Fukino has gotten bolder since Abercrombie slipped his Obama “born in Hawaii” sentence into the 50th anniversary commemorative bill.

But the latest attempt to put out the flames has backfired and exposed some naughty children huddled in a back room playing with matches. Michael Isikoff, MSNBC’s “so-called” national investigative correspondent, was caught with Joshua Wisch, former chairman of Howard Dean’s presidential campaign in Hawaii. Now spokesman for the Hawaii attorney general’s office, Wisch apparently colluded with Fukino to validate Obama’s alleged “Certification of Live Birth.”

“What he got, everybody got,” said Fukino. “He put out exactly what everybody gets when they ask for a birth certificate.”

Not true, Dr. Fukino. When my son, Alan, requested a copy of his birth certificate he got just that—a “Certificate of Live Birth,” not the same as Obama’s. Different titles and different information. Obama’s is sorely lacking information required for obtaining a passport—Mother’s State/Country of Birth and Father’s State/Country of Birth.

 


Short-Form Certificate of Live Birth obtained by Alan Booth, who was born in Hawaii. The document contains a raised seal, which Obama's Certification of Live Birth did not.

It appears specific people are lining up to take a bullet for Obama. Conspiracy to defraud the American people is a serious crime and MSNBC has become the epitome of yellow journalism, brashly covering-up for Obama and the entire anti-American agenda of the socialist left. This latest cover-up attempt is laughable and speaks volumes to the desperation of the Democrat Party.

Michael Isikoff writes, “But Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general’s office, said state law does not in fact permit the release of “vital records,” including an original “record of live birth” — even to the individual whose birth it records.

“It’s a Department of Health record and it can’t be released to anybody,” he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that authorized such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted to inspect his birth record, Wisch said.

But if he or anybody else wanted a copy of their birth records, they would be told to fill out the appropriate state form and receive back the same computer-generated “certification of live birth” form that everybody else gets — which is exactly what Obama did four years ago.”

Not true, Mr. Wisch. A friend of mine filled out the appropriate state form and received back a “certificate of live birth” as shown below:

 


Long-Form Certificate of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii received in March 2011 by the requester
Enough with the lies already. You will be held accountable.

As long as the debate over Obama’s birth records drag on, we will have that much more time to inform Americans that the birth certificate doesn’t even matter. We don’t care whether he has one or not; Obama is clearly illegally occupying the office of US President since he is not by any stretch of the imagination an Article II, Section I, clause 5 “natural born Citizen” born of two citizen parents on American soil. It becomes more evident every day that his allegiance is not to the United States of America.

Truth will out.

—————————-

Editor’s Note: The Post & Email will be calling Mr. Wisch tomorrow to confront him with his false statements about obtaining vital records in Hawaii.  We will also be contacting for the third time the Health Department, Governor Neil Abercrombie, and Lt. Gov. Brian Schatz, all of whom have spokespersons who have failed to return our calls or answer our letters regarding the many contradictions evident in Obama’s birth story and documentation, or lack thereof.  The Health Department registrar, Dr. Alvin Onaka, whose stamp appears on the long-form document above, is apparently squeamish about picking up the telephone and answering our questions.

How many people will be going to jail over this massive cover-up?  And what else, other than Obama’s “records,” are they hiding?  Perhaps 50 years of defrauding the federal government?

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


BUMP for OZMO   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:16:41 AM
Why should I take anything in that article as legitimate?

You are just cutting and pasting again. 

Should I just go on a cutting and pasting frenzy too?  I am sure I can find hundreds of articles debunking Birthers.

What's that going to solve?

You don't bother to check the bull crap in your articles so why would anyone take them seriously?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:18:26 AM
Likely all those other things you just listed are probably reasonably explainable.  But I don't know I'd have to research them.  Just my assumption based on the 042 thing.
  I think maybe quite a lot of people who are in the movement haven't done Much real research.  I mean look at you for example:

You didn't know when Obama first applied for a SSN.
You didn't know where he applied from.
You didn't know that SSN numbers were NOT issued at birth
You didn't know that the "area number" on a SSN wasn't 100% indicative of which state he was born.

It's as if, you just got totally sucked in by the overly opinionated articles and over dramatic you tube vids and let your hate cloud your sensibilities.

I would have thought you'd at least have looked into those important facts before you launched your crusade.



Bump for 333333
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:18:35 AM
Why should I take anything in that article as legitimate?

You are just cutting and pasting again. 

Should I just go on a cutting and pasting frenzy too?  I am sure I can find hundreds of articles debunking Birthers.

What's that going to solve?

You don't bother to check the bull crap in your articles so why would anyone take them seriously?

The woman posted her owns kids' records.  Did you even look at that and compare it to the nonsense obama put out?   Of course not.  


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:20:02 AM
Bump for 333333

 ::)  ::)

Yawn - obama must be the first person Ihave ever heard of not having a SS until applying himself at 17 y/o on his own from a state he never had any reason to be in the first place and different from the state he was allegedly born in.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:22:50 AM
The woman posted her owns kids' records.  Did you even look at that and compare it to the nonsense obama put out?   Of course not.  



I just showed in detail how you yourself don't.

The one time I researched, I showed numerous things your were grossly incorrect about.  

So in my mind, everything you post on this is likely to be spun crap.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:25:07 AM
::)  ::)

Yawn - obama must be the first person Ihave ever heard of not having a SS until applying himself at 17 y/o on his own from a state he never had any reason to be in the first place and different from the state he was allegedly born in.   

Wow, you have just completely diggressed into 911 nut jobbery.  When presented with complete easy facts and reasoning you revert back to beliefs and assumptions.

What the fuck happened to you?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:27:27 AM
::)  ::)

Yawn - obama must be the first person Ihave ever heard of not having a SS until applying himself at 17 y/o on his own from a state he never had any reason to be in the first place and different from the state he was allegedly born in.   

And we been over this already in detail and you were left looking real ignorant on the matter.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:28:47 AM








Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:36:48 AM
Here we go a spamming of YouTube vids  


Never expected that response  ;D ::)


Too many people own final cut studio.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:37:00 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:38:04 AM
Here we go a spamming of YouTube vids 


Never expected that response  ;D ::)

 ::) ::)

I'm not spamming anything - they go point by point in the COLB nonsense - notice the difference?   YES or NO?   

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:40:55 AM
The one on the bottom is too blurry I cant fully read it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:48:36 AM
The one on the bottom is too blurry I cant fully read it.

Look on the right hand side from the middle on down - notice what is listed on that vs. what IS NOT listed on Bama's.   

also - look at the top - is there a difference between "CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH"   & "CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH"

Yes!   What obama presented is pure nonsense since a valid BC always has the inf on the place of birth of the parents.   The second mage I gave you was from a lady wh got one for her son in March 2011.         
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 07:53:27 AM
Look on the right hand side from the middle on down - notice what is listed on that vs. what IS NOT listed on Bama's.   

also - look at the top - is there a difference between "CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH"   & "CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH"

Yes!   What obama presented is pure nonsense since a valid BC always has the inf on the place of birth of the parents.   The second mage I gave you was from a lady wh got one for her son in March 2011.         

I cannot read every bit of text on the bottom document.  I even downloaded it and zoomed in.

Also, you using the word "always" in you arguments is very suspect now.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 07:56:08 AM
I cannot read every bit of text on the bottom document.  I even downloaded it and zoomed in.

Also, you using the word "always" in you arguments is very suspect now.


Te real BC lists the place of birth of the parents, both on the short form and the long form, bama's does not.  why? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 08:08:31 AM

Te real BC lists the place of birth of the parents, both on the short form and the long form, bama's does not.  why? 

I can't fully read the bottom one.  I must be able to read ALL the text printed on it to even comment on it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on April 11, 2011, 08:18:15 AM
I can't fully read the bottom one.  I must be able to read ALL the text printed on it to even comment on it.

No you don't.  Just speculate.  It's the thing to do obviously.

LOL
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 11, 2011, 08:20:25 AM
I cannot read every bit of text on the bottom document.  I even downloaded it and zoomed in.

It's because you've abandoned eyeball themed avatars.  Try switching back.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 08:23:35 AM
It's because you've abandoned eyeball themed avatars.  Try switching back.

 ;D  ok
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 08:25:35 AM
Just so you know, 333333.

Debunking the SSN things was pretty dam easy.  I am willing to bet the COLB forgery debunking won't be too much harder.



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 08:31:42 AM
Just so you know, 333333.

Debunking the SSN things was pretty dam easy.  I am willing to bet the COLB forgery debunking won't be too much harder.





How did you debunk anything?   Are you kidding?  Why was even even allegedly in CT in 1977 in the first place? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 08:35:25 AM
How did you debunk anything?   Are you kidding?  Why was even even allegedly in CT in 1977 in the first place? 

Sigh...........

Are you just being "ignorant" because you are in "Forum battle mode"?

Has your hate consumed you so much you have lost your ability to read and comprehend?

What is it 333333?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 08:41:49 AM
Sigh...........

Are you just being "ignorant" because you are in "Forum battle mode"?

Has your hate consumed you so much you have lost your ability to read and comprehend?

What is it 333333?

Absolutely not.   Please do tell.   This is the most bizarre nonsense I have ever heard.   I'm not kidding, I have never heard of smeone born in the USA not get a SS at birth or near birth and then wait till they are 17 Y/O to get one in a state they have no locaton to in any form whatsoever.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 08:48:29 AM
Absolutely not.   Please do tell.   This is the most bizarre nonsense I have ever heard.   I'm not kidding, I have never heard of smeone born in the USA not get a SS at birth or near birth and then wait till they are 17 Y/O to get one in a state they have no locaton to in any form whatsoever.   

You obviously don't get out much.

You also, weren't aware of how things worked in 1977.  You were 2.

He also didn't wait until he was 17, he waited until he was almost 16, in 1977.  Another one of your many inaccuracies.  

You also, i guess, think the Social Security administration is now in on this as i showed you on the site that SS#'s are not issued at birth.  

You also assume that  everyone gets a SSN number for their children at birth even though the SSA talks about poeple that don't.

You also assumed VERY incorrectly that the area number on the SSN where determined by state.

I could go on...  but what's the point?


Basically, 33333, (no disrespect intended) you are making yourself into a fool over this.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 08:50:51 AM
I could tell you to tell you to research it yourself   :D

but if i wasn't willing to go back and read through 22 pages of this thread i can't expect you to either. 

here ya go:

http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html)

SSA logo: link to Social Security Online home
Social Security Numbers
The SSN Numbering Scheme
     

Number Has Three Parts

The nine-digit SSN is composed of three parts:

    * The first set of three digits is called the Area Number
    * The second set of two digits is called the Group Number
    * The final set of four digits is the Serial Number

Area Number

The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.

Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.
  Bump
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 08:52:03 AM

1.  SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html (http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html) does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN: 

2.  Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979.  http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html (http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html)

3.  He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4.  The zip form the address he applied form was:  96814

5.  People applied via hand written mail back then.

6.  The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814




Bump
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 08:54:24 AM
Bump - fine- so you say he wated until he was 16 toapply for his SS number - from CT no less.  By his own admission the first time hecame to the lower 48 was when he came to college at Occidental where he claims he spent two years (records not released). 

So again - explain please. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 11, 2011, 08:54:50 AM
So Dr. Fukino is now in on the conspiracy?  This is gong to cause some major embarrassment for Trump.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 09:03:42 AM
Friday, April 2, 2010
Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in 1789



In defining an Article II “natural born Citizen,” it is important to find any authority from the Founding period who may inform us how the Founders and Framers themselves defined the clause. Who else but a highly respected historian from the Founding period itself would be highly persuasive in telling us how the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen. ” Such an important person is David Ramsay, who in 1789 wrote, A Dissertation on the Manners of Acquiring the Character and Privileges of a Citizen (1789), a very important and influential essay on defining a “natural born Citizen.”

David Ramsay (April 2, 1749 to May 8, 1815) was an American physician, patriot, and historian from South Carolina and a delegate from that state to the Continental Congress in 1782-1783 and 1785-1786. He was the Acting President of the United States in Congress Assembled. He was one of the American Revolution’s first major historians. A contemporary of Washington, Ramsay writes with the knowledge and insights one acquires only by being personally involved in the events of the Founding period. In 1785 he published History of the Revolution of South Carolina (two volumes), in 1789 History of the American Revolution (two volumes), in 1807 a Life of Washington, and in 1809 a History of South Carolina (two volumes). Ramsay “was a major intellectual figure in the early republic, known and respected in America and abroad for his medical and historical writings, especially for The History of the American Revolution (1789)…” Arthur H. Shaffer, Between Two Worlds: David Ramsay and the Politics of Slavery, J.S.Hist., Vol. L, No. 2 (May 1984). “During the progress of the Revolution, Doctor Ramsay collected materials for its history, and his great impartiality, his fine memory, and his acquaintance with many of the actors in the contest, eminently qualified him for the task….”
http://www.famousamericans.net/davidramsay.

In 1965 Professor Page Smith of the University of California at Los Angeles published an extensive study of Ramsay's History of the American Revolution in which he stressed the advantage that Ramsay had because of being involved in the events of which he wrote and the wisdom he exercised in taking advantage of this opportunity. “The generosity of mind and spirit which marks his pages, his critical sense, his balanced judgment and compassion,'' Professor Smith concluded, “are gifts that were uniquely his own and that clearly entitle him to an honorable position in the front rank of American historians.”

In his 1789 article, Ramsay first explained who the “original citizens” were and then defined the “natural born citizens” as the children born in the country to citizen parents. He said concerning the children born after the declaration of independence, “[c]itizenship is the inheritance of the children of those who have taken part in the late revolution; but this is confined exclusively to the children of those who were themselves citizens….” Id. at 6. He added that “citizenship by inheritance belongs to none but the children of those Americans, who, having survived the declaration of independence, acquired that adventitious character in their own right, and transmitted it to their offspring….” Id. at 7. He continued that citizenship “as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776….” Id. at 6.

Here we have direct and convincing evidence of how a very influential Founder defined a “natural born citizen.” Given his position of influence and especially given that he was a highly respected historian, Ramsay would have had the contacts with other influential Founders and Framers and would have known how they too defined “natural born Citizen.” Ramsay, being of the Founding generation and being intimately involved in the events of the time would have known how the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen” and he told us that definition was one where the child was born in the country of citizen parents. In giving us this definition, it is clear that Ramsay did not follow the English common law but rather natural law, the law of nations, and Emer de Vattel, who also defined a “natural-born citizen” the same as did Ramsay in his highly acclaimed and influential, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758 French) (1759 English). We can reasonably assume that the other Founders and Framers would have defined a “natural born Citizen” the same way the Ramsay did, for being a meticulous historian he would have gotten his definition from the general consensus that existed at the time.

Ramsay’s article and explication are further evidence of the influence that Vattel had on the Founders in how they defined the new national citizenship. This article by Ramsay is one of the most important pieces of evidence recently found (provided to us by an anonymous source) which provides direct evidence on how the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen” and that there is little doubt that they defined one as a child born in the country to citizen parents.

This time-honored definition of a "natural born Citizen" has been confirmed by subsequent United States Supreme Court and lower court cases such as:

1) The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 289 (1814) (Marshall, C.J., concurring and dissenting for other reasons, cites Vattel and provides his definition of natural born citizens); :
2) Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) (Justice Daniels concurring took out of Vattel’s definition the reference to “fathers” and “father” and replaced it with “parents” and “person,” respectively); :
3) Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (1830) (same definition without citing Vattel); Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 21 L.Ed. 394, 16 Wall. 36 (1872) (in explaining the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment clause, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” said that the clause “was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States;” :
4) Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) (“the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government, or the children born within the United States, of ambassadors or other public ministers of foreign nations” are not citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment because they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States); :
5) Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875) (same definition without citing Vattel); :
6) Ex parte Reynolds, 1879, 5 Dill., 394, 402 (same definition and cites Vattel); United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890) (same definition and cites Vattel); :
7) U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) (quoted from the same definition of “natural born Citizen” as did Minor v. Happersett); :
8) Rep. John Bingham (in the House on March 9, 1866, in commenting on the Civil Rights Act of 1866 which was the precursor to the Fourteenth Amendment: " find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen. . . . ” John A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, March 9, 1866 Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866), Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866)).

The two-citizen-parent requirement would have followed from the common law that provided that a woman upon marriage took the citizenship of her husband. In other words, the Framers required both (1) birth on United States soil (or its equivalent) and (2) birth to two United States citizen parents as necessary conditions of being granted that special status which under our Constitution only the President and Commander in Chief of the Military (and also the Vice President under the Twelfth Amendment) must have at the time of his or her birth. Given the necessary conditions that must be satisfied to be granted the status, all "natural born Citizens" are "Citizens of the United States" but not all "Citizens of the United States" are "natural born Citizens." It was only through both parents being citizens that the child was born with unity of citizenship and allegiance to the United States which the Framers required the President and Commander in Chief to have.

Obama fails to meet this “natural born Citizen” eligibility test because when he was born in 1961 (wherever that may be), he was not born to a United States citizen mother and father. At his birth, his mother was a United States citizen. But under the British Nationality Act 1948, his father, who was born in the British colony of Kenya, was born a Citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (CUKC) which by descent made Obama himself a CUKC. Prior to Obama’s birth, Obama’s father neither intended to nor did he become a United States citizen. Being temporarily in the United States only for purpose of study and with the intent to return to Kenya, his father did not intend to nor did he even become a legal resident or immigrant to the United States.

Obama may be a plain born “citizen of the United States” under the 14th Amendment or a Congressional Act (if he was born in Hawaii). But as we can see from David Ramsay’s clear presentation, citizenship “as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776….” Id. at 6. Hence, Obama is not an Article II "natural born Citizen," for upon Obama's birth his father was a British subject and Obama himself by descent was also the same. Hence, Obama was born subject to a foreign power. Obama lacks the birth status of natural sole and absolute allegiance and loyalty to the United States which only the President and Commander in Chief of the Military and Vice President must have at the time of birth. Being born subject to a foreign power, he lacks Unity of Citizenship and Allegiance to the United States from the time of birth which assures that required degree of natural sole and absolute birth allegiance and loyalty to the United States, a trait that is constitutionally indispensable in a President and Commander in Chief of the Military. Like a naturalized citizen, who despite taking an oath later in life to having sole allegiance to the United States cannot be President because of being born subject to a foreign power, Obama too cannot be President.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. :
April 2, 2010:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett. (Mario Apuzzo used Leo Donofrio's research.)

”The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 09:07:57 AM
Bump - fine- so you say he wated until he was 16 toapply for his SS number - from CT no less.  By his own admission the first time hecame to the lower 48 was when he came to college at Occidental where he claims he spent two years (records not released). 

So again - explain please. 

No, NOT from conn.  for the umteeneth time!

Did you eat a bowl of dumb fucks this morning?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 09:14:58 AM
No, NOT from conn.  for the umteeneth time!

Did you eat a bowl of dumb fucks this morning?




I was born in 1975 and my SS number is clear that I a from the Bronx NY, EVERYOE I KNOW HAS THE SAME FUCKING THING!

So while there might be an isolated incident of course - if he applied from Hawaii he would have a number for peopl born there 9/10 times. 

So again - the whole thing is beyond strange - and you offer nothing to support yur theory at all other than speculation as to what might have ocurred to explain these anolomies.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 09:26:58 AM

I was born in 1975 and my SS number is clear that I a from the Bronx NY, EVERYOE I KNOW HAS THE SAME FUCKING THING!

So while there might be an isolated incident of course - if he applied from Hawaii he would have a number for peopl born there 9/10 times. 

So again - the whole thing is beyond strange - and you offer nothing to support yur theory at all other than speculation as to what might have ocurred to explain these anolomies.   


Its not speculation at all.

What are the chances his zip code and a zip code in connected differ by 1 digit?  1 digit that when written can be mistaken for one another and 1 digit that sits rights next to each other on a typewriter?  All this done in an age where things were hand written and inputted by a person, not scanned.

You do need to get out more.  And i say that metaphorically meaning you need to research with a more objective mind.  You were exposed here not to do any real research.   All you do is cut and paste from you favorite "I hate Obama" sites.

I mean fuck man, you didn't even do basic research. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 09:32:05 AM
 ::)  ::)

The 042 # he is using in but one of 15 others traced to him.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 09:38:07 AM
::)  ::)

The 042 # he is using in but one of 15 others traced to him.  

Again,  i am willing to bet you didn't do any real research on these other SSN's too.

After your 042 debacle can you blame me for believing that?


PS:  Classic CT debate mentality:  When confronted with facts that soundly debunk one point, quickly bring up other points.  You did the same when we had the original discussion and you are doing that now.  911 nut jobs always do that.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 09:49:02 AM
You didnt debunk anything.   You offered a possible explanation for what appears another black hole of mystery surrounding obama.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 10:03:19 AM
You didnt debunk anything.   You offered a possible explanation for what appears another black hole of mystery surrounding obama.   

That's a black hole mystery?  I think what's more of a mystery is exactly when you traded your objectivity for hate.

Look at your approach:

-  Based on hate
-  No real research
-  Cut and paste spamming

What I posted overwhelmingly supports his SSN legitimacy as well as lending strong support to him being born here.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 10:11:42 AM
That's a black hole mystery?  I think what's more of a mystery is exactly when you traded your objectivity for hate.

Look at your approach:

-  Based on hate
-  No real research
-  Cut and paste spamming

What I posted overwhelmingly supports his SSN legitimacy as well as lending strong support to him being born here.




Yes, you offer an alternative theory.  Great - that is why we debate these things.  However - without a doctor/hospital signed BC, something verifiable its all a mystery. 


and Ozmo - when bama applied forhis SS in 1977 - what did he present?       
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 10:22:52 AM

Yes, you offer an alternative theory.  Great - that is why we debate these things.  However - without a doctor/hospital signed BC, something verifiable its all a mystery. 


and Ozmo - when bama applied forhis SS in 1977 - what did he present?       


Exactly!  What ever he presented was good enough for the Social Security department at the time.  It was likely a copy of his original. 

Also, what i offered wasn't an "alternative theory", it was facts that led to very likely conclusion that his SSN is correct and valid.  It was slam dunk.  I don't know what was more entertaining....  The zip code thing or exposing you for not doing even the most basic research. 

His birth is not a mystery.  It is only a mystery to those who are easy prey to CT's for what ever reason, yours being because of hate.  Which is probably the same thing that prevents you from doing real research.  Are you afraid about what you might find? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on April 11, 2011, 11:04:38 AM
That's a black hole mystery?  I think what's more of a mystery is exactly when you traded your objectivity for hate.

Look at your approach:



-  Based on hate
-  No real research
-  Cut and paste spamming


What I posted overwhelmingly supports his SSN legitimacy as well as lending strong support to him being born here.



Good observation.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 11, 2011, 11:13:32 AM
::) ::)

I'm not spamming anything - they go point by point in the COLB nonsense - notice the difference?   YES or NO?   



Interesting item on the certificate/certification. This new form is the first one I've seen that states "date filed by registrar" other than Obama's. The others have all said "date accepted by registrar." Much has been made of the language used on Obama's COLB - filed vs accepted. Don't get me wrong, I still believe BO ineligible to hold office.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 11, 2011, 12:03:34 PM
oz,

33 will be calling you a kneepadder shortly.  He'll surmise since you aren't accepting his CTs as fact, you are somehow defending obama.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 12:06:00 PM
oz,

33 will be calling you a kneepadder shortly.  He'll surmise since you aren't accepting his CTs as fact, you are somehow defending obama.



No -we are having a debate.   Ozmo is not a hack at all.   He presents good counter arguments, and hopefully your messah will clear this u by releasing his BC recods college records, law school records, etc.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 11, 2011, 01:07:56 PM
No -we are having a debate.   Ozmo is not a hack at all.   He presents good counter arguments, and hopefully your messah will clear this u by releasing his BC recods college records, law school records, etc.     


yo fag i only come with facts and ask you to do the same and i get called every name in the book.. and then i accused of being in line with EVERYTHING and thats just not true.. and i get that many many times..


so when we engage one another,, its facts from my end and hyperbole from your end
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 01:10:08 PM

yo fag i only come with facts and ask you to do the same and i get called every name in the book.. and then i accused of being in line with EVERYTHING and thats just not true.. and i get that many many times..


so when we engage one another,, its facts from my end and hyperbole from your end

Its all hope and change from your ass bro.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 11, 2011, 01:13:12 PM
Its all hope and change from your ass bro.   

right.. you have no viable comeback.. so you say shit like that..


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 01:15:33 PM
right.. you have no viable comeback.. so you say shit like that..



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 11, 2011, 02:20:47 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHA 333 OWNED so badly.  Nice post Beach. 

Time to either close the thread or move it to the CT board.

It's pretty obvious at this stage that any assumption of Obama being born outside of the USA is false and that this thread has become another 'cut and paste' birther sources. 

So please either move it or lock it, don't care which but really it's been done to death, the birthers have been proven wrong.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 11, 2011, 02:25:20 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHA 333 OWNED so badly.  Nice post Beach. 

Time to either close the thread or move it to the CT board.

It's pretty obvious at this stage that any assumption of Obama being born outside of the USA is false and that this thread has become another 'cut and paste' birther sources. 

So please either move it or lock it, don't care which but really it's been done to death, the birthers have been proven wrong.




MODS,

Top voices on BOTH sides of the aisle, as well as media and govt of both parties - they are ALL calling this a CT now.

It's not relevant - it's fodder for CT chat now.


WHY IS THIS BIRTHER THREAD STILL HERE?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 11, 2011, 02:26:31 PM
So Dr. Fukino is now in on the conspiracy?  This is gong to cause some major embarrassment for Trump.

yes... he is
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 02:33:05 PM
yes... he is

Its a she you moron.   Again - you = uninformed.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 11, 2011, 02:34:09 PM
And we been over this already in detail and you were left looking real ignorant on the matter.

youre getting too close to the truth.  Time for a personal attack!  :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 02:34:56 PM

The reason i think it shoiuld stay for now is because it's very relevant to politics.

Trumps statements and Birther based campaign have made it a current political issue that's in the news.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 02:36:46 PM
youre getting too close to the truth.  Time for a personal attack!  :)
;D
I still have an issue with that cell phone BS.  I wish aliens would visit and force state governments to abolish that law.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 11, 2011, 02:42:38 PM
Its a she you moron.   Again - you = uninformed.     

Says the idiot who didn't even know anything about Obama's SSN other than some CT from WND hahahahaha

What's it like to be wrong again?   ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 11, 2011, 02:47:22 PM
Loser bump hahaha  ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 11, 2011, 03:28:03 PM
Washington Times Ad: Whose Social Security Number is Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Using?
Obama Release Your Records ^ | A | obama Release Your Records




- For Immediate Release -- 11 April 2011 -

Whose Social Security Number is President Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Using? Wash Times National Weekly - 11 Apr 2011 - pg 5 - here, Ad also embedded at end of this post.

Federal lawsuit* accuses putative President Obama is fraudulently using a Social Security Number which is legally not his and which was issued only to residents of the State of Connecticut, a state where Obama never legally resided and certainly not during the time frame of circa 1977 when that SSN was issued!

042-XX-XXXX*

This Social Security Number is reserved for the people of Connecticut NOT Hawaii. Obama never lived in Connecticut, and he certainly wasn't living there when the number was issue in 1977, rather he was a 15 year old attending high school in Hawaii. This Connecticut geographic region SSN was used by Obama to register for the Selective Service System.

Obama was either in HI or in CA attending Occidental College during his late teens when he was required to file and register with the Selective Service System. Use of this SSN by Obama as recently as the year 2008 has been confirmed by two private investigators - Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 11, 2011, 03:30:07 PM
Hahaha you've lost so badly it's hilarious.  Are you sure you are even a lawyer?  Cause there isn't even reasonable doubt anymore. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 03:40:52 PM
Washington Times Ad: Whose Social Security Number is Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Using?
Obama Release Your Records ^ | A | obama Release Your Records




- For Immediate Release -- 11 April 2011 -

Whose Social Security Number is President Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Using? Wash Times National Weekly - 11 Apr 2011 - pg 5 - here, Ad also embedded at end of this post.

Federal lawsuit* accuses putative President Obama is fraudulently using a Social Security Number which is legally not his and which was issued only to residents of the State of Connecticut, a state where Obama never legally resided and certainly not during the time frame of circa 1977 when that SSN was issued!

042-XX-XXXX*

This Social Security Number is reserved for the people of Connecticut NOT Hawaii. Obama never lived in Connecticut, and he certainly wasn't living there when the number was issue in 1977, rather he was a 15 year old attending high school in Hawaii. This Connecticut geographic region SSN was used by Obama to register for the Selective Service System.

Obama was either in HI or in CA attending Occidental College during his late teens when he was required to file and register with the Selective Service System. Use of this SSN by Obama as recently as the year 2008 has been confirmed by two private investigators - Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...



Why are you posting an advertisement?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 11, 2011, 03:41:59 PM
The reason i think it shoiuld stay for now is because it's very relevant to politics.

Trumps statements and Birther based campaign have made it a current political issue that's in the news.



Agree.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 11, 2011, 03:50:37 PM
The reason i think it shoiuld stay for now is because it's very relevant to politics.
Trumps statements and Birther based campaign have made it a current political issue that's in the news.

I see.  I suppose if we could find some current potential candidate with unusual 911 viewpoints, it could be relevant here?

Ron Paul Says 9/11 Investigation "basically a cover-up"

Jesse Ventura: Former Governor of Minnesota, ex-Navy SEAL and retired pro-wrestler Jesse Ventura has renewed the call for a new investigation into the events of 9/11 in the face of dramatic new evidence that is coming to light every week.

Sarah Palin?
Asked by We Are Change Ohio, “Do you support the family members and first responders who are calling for a new 9/11 investigation?,” Palin responded, “I do.”

Mitt Romney Blames Obama for 9/11 Truthers


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 11, 2011, 04:00:58 PM
I see.  I suppose if we could find some current potential candidate with unusual 911 viewpoints, it could be relevant here?

Ron Paul Says 9/11 Investigation "basically a cover-up"

Jesse Ventura: Former Governor of Minnesota, ex-Navy SEAL and retired pro-wrestler Jesse Ventura has renewed the call for a new investigation into the events of 9/11 in the face of dramatic new evidence that is coming to light every week.

Sarah Palin?
Asked by We Are Change Ohio, “Do you support the family members and first responders who are calling for a new 9/11 investigation?,” Palin responded, “I do.”

Mitt Romney Blames Obama for 9/11 Truthers

No because its not being talked about much in the news right now.  Not even a little bit.  Nothing dramatic has come out other than sensationalized crap for a TV show.   

On top of that the truther movement is fading away.  I posted some info on it in the CT board. 

On the other hand, the Birther movement has recently been on the forefront of many news casts.

You just really like to stir the pot don't ya 240?   :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 12, 2011, 06:57:45 AM
Its a she you moron.   Again - you = uninformed.     
lol.. it was off the cuff. i take none of this as serious ass wipe.. and i have given absolute zero energy to this matter.. which is why i dont give a shit about "the gender of obamas birth doctor"...

what a retard you are..uh ohhhh. ya girl palin is gonna get me


hahahha tha fuck outta hea
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 12, 2011, 08:43:24 AM
http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1302622826&sr=8-1




THis book comes out soon.  It's written by Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers The Obama Nation and Unfit for Command.

This issue is getting a lot of press, and is making the Obama admin shit in there pants..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 12, 2011, 09:49:41 AM
No -we are having a debate.   Ozmo is not a hack at all.   He presents good counter arguments, and hopefully your messah will clear this u by releasing his BC recods college records, law school records, etc.     


again..you will just say they are faked documents.....you know that will never satisfy you
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 09:52:31 AM

again..you will just say they are faked documents.....you know that will never satisfy you

 ::)  ::)

Where are his SAT, Occidental, Columbia, LSAT, Harvard Law, records as well as the State Senate records?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 12, 2011, 09:55:04 AM
::)  ::)

Where are his SAT, Occidental, Columbia, LSAT, Harvard Law, records as well as the State Senate records?   

again if he gave those things to you personally in your hand tomorrow you would say the documents are fake or that the person who gave them to you is not the real Obama but a duplicate clone he manufactured with the gov't/s help to fool the public.....your conspiracy-laden mind will never accept the truth
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 10:00:37 AM
again if he gave those things to you personally in your hand tomorrow you would say the documents are fake or that the person who gave them to you is not the real Obama but a duplicate clone he manufactured with the gov't/s help to fool the public.....your conspiracy-laden mind will never accept the truth

If he is so brilliant and smart as you cum stained dolts tries to convince everyone of - wouldnt he be proud to relase his SATand LSAT scores? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 10:03:43 AM
::)  ::)

Where are his SAT, Occidental, Columbia, LSAT, Harvard Law, records as well as the State Senate records?   

What do those have to do with the BC?  You're defeated and reduced to what about arguments. 

(http://blogs.westword.com/showandtell/03%20your%20argument%20is%20invalid.jpg)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 10:07:38 AM
What do those have to do with the BC?  You're defeated and reduced to what about arguments. 

(http://blogs.westword.com/showandtell/03%20your%20argument%20is%20invalid.jpg)

The BC is but one record among many he refuses to release.  Again - if he was as smart, brilliant, and accomplished academically as you clowns say - would he be proud to release his college and law school records?     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 10:36:06 AM
The BC is but one record among many he refuses to release.  Again - if he was as smart, brilliant, and accomplished academically as you clowns say - would he be proud to release his college and law school records?     

(http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/000/110/670/original/154732_10150340450505301_514265300_15740249_7294777_n.jpg?1301698162)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 12, 2011, 11:01:29 AM
Kansas board rejects objection to Obama on ballot
By John Milburn
Associated Press
POSTED: 09:06 a.m. HST, Apr 11, 201

TOPEKA, Kan. >> A three-member panel on Monday rejected a Wichita engineer's request that President Barack Obama prove he's eligible to be on the 2012 Kansas ballot by showing a birth certificate.

Dave Shultz had asked the State Objections Board to compel Obama to produce a valid birth certificate to prove that he meets the citizenship requirements to run for president.

"I'm not accusing the man of anything," Shultz said. "Until now, the system seemed to suffice."

The board — Secretary of State Kris Kobach, Attorney General Derek Schmidt and Caleb Stegall representing the lieutenant governor — denied his request, saying that because Obama hasn't filed paperwork to be on the 2012 ballot the board lacks jurisdiction to question his eligibility.

No one from the Obama campaign attended Monday's hearing.

Kobach said the board could only rule on a case in three instances. The first, when papers are filed by a party indicating a candidate has been nominated for an office, if the candidate is to appear on a presidential preference primary, or if the candidate files by petition as an independent.

Kansas is likely to cancel its 2012 primary, meaning Obama would likely appear on the ballot after the September 2012 Democratic National Convention where he is expected to receive the party's nomination.

Once that occurs and the state is notified, residents would have three days to file an objection.

Kobach said proper notification of Obama's filing for office would be made with posting on the secretary of state's web site, as it is with state candidates.

"The task of this board is not to provide you with help for coming back later," Stegall said.

Shultz said he was a registered independent and "a reformer" with strong conservative views. He made his claim relying on his own investigations and information he gleaned from the Internet. He said he tried to "connect the dots" to prove that Obama was a citizen and born in Hawaii, but he was unable to find what he said was valid proof.

Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama's citizenship, and his Hawaiian birth certificates have been made public.

Shultz's claim is similar to concerns raised for the past three years regarding Obama's birth certificate. Critics maintain his birth certificate isn't authentic and raises questions if he is a U.S. citizen as the Constitution requires.

Shultz said Kansas wouldn't be the first state to take action on requiring proof of citizenship to run for president. Arizona and Nebraska are among at least 10 states that have introduced legislation that would change state election laws to require proof of citizenship as a prerequisite for getting a name placed on a ballot.

Shultz also noted Kansas residents will have to prove citizenship to register to vote under a new law Kobach pushed through the Legislature and is awaiting Republican Gov. Sam Brownback's signature.

"There's a groundswell of activity," Shultz said.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/119618039.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:05:11 PM
If he is so brilliant and smart as you cum stained dolts tries to convince everyone of - wouldnt he be proud to relase his SATand LSAT scores? 

Just a question, why should Obama show those things?   Because other people say he's a brilliant and smart guy?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 12:14:03 PM
Just a question, why should Obama show those things?   Because other people say he's a brilliant and smart guy?

Well, even Bob Woodward said in his personal dealings and witnessing obama iteract with others believes obama always try to portray himself as the smartest person in the room.   Usually if one wants to position themself inthat way it should be based upon something.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:15:50 PM
Well, even Bob Woodward said in his personal dealings and witnessing obama iteract with others believes obama always try to portray himself as the smartest person in the room.   Usually if one wants to position themself inthat way it should be based upon something.   

So because Bob Woodward thinks Obama is trying to be the smartest person in the room you feel Obama is obligated to release private information to prove it?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 12:16:09 PM
Well, even Bob Woodward said in his personal dealings and witnessing obama iteract with others believes obama always try to portray himself as the smartest person in the room.   Usually if one wants to position themself inthat way it should be based upon something.   

(http://cdn3.knowyourmeme.com/i/000/097/586/original/3UMRy.jpg?1297116826)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 12:21:39 PM
So because Bob Woodward thinks Obama is trying to be the smartest person in the room you feel Obama is obligated to release private information to prove it?

Private?   GMAFB.  I got a bad SAT score - 1070.   I got a 161 on my LSAT, graduated in 1997 from Manhattan College with a 3.94 GPA, and graduated Pace Law School in 2000 with a 3.35 GPA, scored in the top 5% of all bar exam takers on the Multi-State, was on te Environmental Law Review as a n editor and wrot my article about recreational activities being subjected to enviro lawsuits and how thy apply to activities protect by the BOR, etc.   

I wrote my college thesis on why the EU was likely to fail and have nothing to hide whatsoever.   What i so provate about an LSAT score unless you did terrible on it not worthy of admission to Harvard Law?     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 12:25:16 PM
Private?   GMAFB.  I got a bad SAT score - 1070.   I got a 161 on my LSAT, graduated in 1997 from Manhattan College with a 3.94 GPA, and graduated Pace Law School in 2000 with a 3.35 GPA, scored in the top 5% of all bar exam takers on the Multi-State, was on te Environmental Law Review as a n editor and wrot my article about recreational activities being subjected to enviro lawsuits and how thy apply to activities protect by the BOR, etc.   

I wrote my college thesis on why the EU was likely to fail and have nothing to hide whatsoever.   What i so provate about an LSAT score unless you did terrible on it not worthy of admission to Harvard Law?     

(http://cdn2.knowyourmeme.com/i/000/097/446/original/tumblr_lg5qv1sc161qa02x4o1_400.jpg?1297029978)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:26:57 PM
Private?   GMAFB.  I got a bad SAT score - 1070.   I got a 161 on my LSAT, graduated in 1997 from Manhattan College with a 3.94 GPA, and graduated Pace Law School in 2000 with a 3.35 GPA, scored in the top 5% of all bar exam takers on the Multi-State, was on te Environmental Law Review as a n editor and wrot my article about recreational activities being subjected to enviro lawsuits and how thy apply to activities protect by the BOR, etc.   

I wrote my college thesis on why the EU was likely to fail and have nothing to hide whatsoever.   What i so provate about an LSAT score unless you did terrible on it not worthy of admission to Harvard Law?     

So because Bob Woodward thinks Obama thinks he's the smartest man int eh room and because you are willing to show anyone your academic records Obama is obligated to?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 12, 2011, 12:30:36 PM
So because Bob Woodward thinks Obama thinks he's the smartest man int eh room and because you are willing to show anyone your academic records Obama is obligated to?

Well seeing as he is the POTUS and claiming to be the most transparent administration ever, don't you find it a little strange that we know virtually nothing about his past?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 12:31:32 PM
So because Bob Woodward thinks Obama thinks he's the smartest man int eh room and because you are willing to show anyone your academic records Obama is obligated to?

Whatever Ozmo - keep your head in the sand.   Even Kerry, Bush, Gore, etc are clean on teir records academically, but the messiah its all a mystery and everyone is like "but he is a con law scholar".  Yeah, ok.   I have met people at Nathan's Famous with more of a clue than Obama yet we ar all supposed to take it at face value that he is some brilliant guy when we really know absolutelynothing about him still!  

Its unreal - you would do more research on the plumber coming in to fix your toilet than you do this asshole.  Think about it.      
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 12, 2011, 12:32:50 PM
Private?   GMAFB.  I got a bad SAT score - 1070.   I got a 161 on my LSAT, graduated in 1997 from Manhattan College with a 3.94 GPA, and graduated Pace Law School in 2000 with a 3.35 GPA, scored in the top 5% of all bar exam takers on the Multi-State, was on te Environmental Law Review as a n editor and wrot my article about recreational activities being subjected to enviro lawsuits and how thy apply to activities protect by the BOR, etc.   

I wrote my college thesis on why the EU was likely to fail and have nothing to hide whatsoever.   What i so provate about an LSAT score unless you did terrible on it not worthy of admission to Harvard Law?     

i threw 4 touchdowns at polk high
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 12:34:24 PM
Whatever Ozmo - keep your head in the sand.   Even Kerry, Bush, Gore, etc are clean on teir records academically, but the messiah its all a mystery and everyone is like "but he is a con law scholar".  Yeah, ok.   I have met people at Nathan's Famous with more of a clue than Obama yet we ar all supposed to take it at face value that he is some brilliant guy when we really know absolutelynothing about him still!  

Its unreal - you would do more research on the plumber coming in to fix your toilet than you do this asshole.  Think about it.      

(http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/000/081/218/original/motivator4e984ee2155123d482a0cf3b1f68efeed6b6ce3b.jpg?1288981955)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:35:12 PM
Well seeing as he is the POTUS and claiming to be the most transparent administration ever, don't you find it a little strange that we know virtually nothing about his past?

There are things i'd like to know, such as what's on his long form, but how a person did on tests or in school doesn't mean much to me.  What's important is whether or not he can make the right decisions, have resolve, strong beliefs and get things done through other people.  His SAT score has nothing to do with that.  BTW, i think he's failing at all those things.

So,  i ask again, is Bob Wodwards opinion and 33333 willingness the reason Obama should show these things?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 12, 2011, 12:38:33 PM
There are things i'd like to know, such as what's on his long form, but how a person did on tests or in school doesn't mean much to me.  What's important is whether or not he can make the right decisions, have resolve, strong beliefs and get things done through other people.  His SAT score has nothing to do with that.  BTW, i think he's failing at all those things.

So,  i ask again, is Bob Wodwards opinion and 33333 willingness the reason Obama should show these things?

Since it is a constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen of the US, and his ability to hold office has been questioned, then I would say yes he is obligated to produce the long form BC. If nothing else than to put an end to this. As far as the rest it is at his discretion to do so.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 12:39:10 PM
There are things i'd like to know, such as what's on his long form, but how a person did on tests or in school doesn't mean much to me.  What's important is whether or not he can make the right decisions, have resolve, strong beliefs and get things done through other people.  His SAT score has nothing to do with that.  BTW, i think he's failing at all those things.

So,  i ask again, is Bob Wodwards opinion and 33333 willingness the reason Obama should show these things?

Its part of the entire narrative of this whole shit show that was put forward to the public in 2008 over Hillary in thepriary as well as McCain in 2008.

My contention is that if we knew te real truth about Obama and his record he would still be lucky to be a state senator in ILL.      
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 12:40:54 PM
Its part of the entire narrative of this whole shit show that was put forward to the public in 2008 over Hillary in thepriary as well as McCain in 2008.

My contention is that if we knew te real truth about Obama and his record he would still be lucky to be a state senator in ILL.      

(http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/000/069/657/original/Picture_1.jpg?1283498747)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:41:32 PM
Whatever Ozmo - keep your head in the sand.   Even Kerry, Bush, Gore, etc are clean on teir records academically, but the messiah its all a mystery and everyone is like "but he is a con law scholar".  Yeah, ok.   I have met people at Nathan's Famous with more of a clue than Obama yet we ar all supposed to take it at face value that he is some brilliant guy when we really know absolutelynothing about him still!  

Its unreal - you would do more research on the plumber coming in to fix your toilet than you do this asshole.  Think about it.      

After not even researching some of the basic information on Obama's SSN, you actually have the gall to accuse me of keeping my head int he sand?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA

You don't know anything about Obama because you choose too.  FFS

And now, your argument is changing from Bob Woodward and yourself to 1 x-president, 1 x-vp, and one former candidate willingness as the reason OBama should?

You are making very little sense.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:43:23 PM
Since it is a constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen of the US, and his ability to hold office has been questioned, then I would say yes he is obligated to produce the long form BC. If nothing else than to put an end to this. As far as the rest it is at his discretion to do so.

Fair enough.  But from what i understand he has met the legal requirements.   And it seems that any attempt to force him to do more has been turned down repeatedly.  Fro example:  BB's last post.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:44:26 PM
Its part of the entire narrative of this whole shit show that was put forward to the public in 2008 over Hillary in thepriary as well as McCain in 2008.

My contention is that if we knew te real truth about Obama and his record he would still be lucky to be a state senator in ILL.      

So now Obama should show his academic records based on your assumption? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:46:11 PM
So, it should go something like this:

OBAMA IS OBLIGATED TO SHOW HIS ACADEMIC RECORDS!

Source: 333333



Sound about right?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 12, 2011, 12:46:54 PM
Fair enough.  But from what i understand he has met the legal requirements.   And it seems that any attempt to force him to do more has been turned down repeatedly.  Fro example:  BB's last post.   

Well the article doesn't actually say that, it says Obama hasn't filed to be on the ballet so there is nothing for them to do at this point.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 12:47:11 PM
Why should we even have to have this fucking debate about the guy allowed to order people to war?

Think about that.  Its ok - he is a cool black guy in shades so its ok we know absolutely nothing about his background since toinsist on that is racist.   ::)  ::)

Fuck that - you guys wouldnt hire obama to fix a toilet in you house, yet hire him to be POTUS.   Nice.    

    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 12, 2011, 12:47:37 PM
this shit has me on the floor....


jet plane in the alley.. LMAO
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 12, 2011, 12:50:07 PM
So now Obama should show his academic records based on your assumption? 

Well I am from Illinois and I can tell you I had never heard of Obama before he managed to become the Jr Senator from Illinois. Then there is the whole Jack Ryan debacle, divorce records being unsealed and other shit that basically gave the election to Obama.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 12:51:57 PM
So now Obama should show his academic records based on your assumption? 

No - based on fucking reality.   People getting a job at Walmart or night security at a local bank face more scrutiny than obama did.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:53:47 PM
No - based on fucking reality.   People getting a job at Walmart or night security at a local bank face more scrutiny than obama did.     

I am sorry 333333,  when people apply at Walmart they are required to provide all their academic records?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:55:18 PM
Well I am from Illinois and I can tell you I had never heard of Obama before he managed to become the Jr Senator from Illinois. Then there is the whole Jack Ryan debacle, divorce records being unsealed and other shit that basically gave the election to Obama.

Sounds like that Eddie Murphy movie.  lol


I know this guy came out of nowhere and snagged a Senate seat, then got the presidency.  He can't be an idiot just based on that.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 12:55:25 PM
Why should we even have to have this fucking debate about the guy allowed to order people to war?

Think about that.  Its ok - he is a cool black guy in shades so its ok we know absolutely nothing about his background since toinsist on that is racist.   ::)  ::)

Fuck that - you guys wouldnt hire obama to fix a toilet in you house, yet hire him to be POTUS.   Nice.    

    

(http://cdn3.knowyourmeme.com/i/11424/original/i_am_the_president_of_asia.jpg?1251218316)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 12:57:19 PM
Why should we even have to have this fucking debate about the guy allowed to order people to war?

Think about that.  Its ok - he is a cool black guy in shades so its ok we know absolutely nothing about his background since toinsist on that is racist.   ::)  ::)

Fuck that - you guys wouldnt hire obama to fix a toilet in you house, yet hire him to be POTUS.   Nice.    

    

I'd want to make sure he was a licensed and bonded plummer.  I wouldn't care about his academic records.  As far meeting the requirements for POTUS, which ones did he fail to meet to the satisfaction of the US Government?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:01:45 PM
I'm just trying to find the reasoning as to why OBama is obligated to show his academic records.  So far here's what i've been told:


1.  Because Bob Woodward says Obama thinks he's the smartest guy in the room

2.  Because 333333 is willing to show his (Show me yours and I'll show you mine?  sounds like there's some curiosity in 33333's hatred for Obama)

3.  Because i wouldn't let Obama in my house if he was a plumber.




Yeah, 3333  lets file a law suit based on those 3 reasons!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 12, 2011, 01:05:32 PM
Sounds like that Eddie Murphy movie.  lol


I know this guy came out of nowhere and snagged a Senate seat, then got the presidency.  He can't be an idiot just based on that.   

Being an idiot is debatable, or he simply had the right handlers? Who knows
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 01:06:36 PM
I'd want to make sure he was a licensed and bonded plummer.  I wouldn't care about his academic records.  As far meeting the requirements for POTUS, which ones did he fail to meet to the satisfaction of the US Government?

Yeah - and most people ask for references from other satisified people and customers who dealt with that plumber before giving them the job.   Funny how Joe the Plumber went under more scrutiny than bama did now that we are discussing plumbers.  

Face it - you would not hire obama even to mow your lawn with his record yet because he was a cool black dude who could string together a sentence and say over and over he was not bush you voted for him.   You bought into a line of bullshit no different than a fat slob at 4 am in a bar being pursued by a slick taking player and went home and got date raped.  

As for his "record" there is NOTHING at all.   Please again tell mewhat you based your decision on to vote for him?

as for the BC issue - its another in  long ine of bizarre mysteries than any other normal person would have been forced to fadeinto obscuritiy over.    
          
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 01:13:51 PM
I'm just trying to find the reasoning as to why OBama is obligated to show his academic records.  So far here's what i've been told:


1.  Because Bob Woodward says Obama thinks he's the smartest guy in the room

2.  Because 333333 is willing to show his (Show me yours and I'll show you mine?  sounds like there's some curiosity in 33333's hatred for Obama)

3.  Because i wouldn't let Obama in my house if he was a plumber.




Yeah, 3333  lets file a law suit based on those 3 reasons!


 ::)  ::)

Yawn - we sholdnt need lawsuits to learn the most basic info about people capable of starting wars.  Jesus - WTF is wrong with you? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:16:10 PM
Being an idiot is debatable, or he simply had the right handlers? Who knows

That's what they said about Regan.  I don't care, I still loved him.  Obama is another story.  
Yeah - and most people ask for references from other satisified people and customers who dealt with that plumber before giving them the job.   Funny how Joe the Plumber went under more scrutiny than bama did now that we are discussing plumbers.  

Face it - you would not hire obama even to mow your lawn with his record yet because he was a cool black dude who could string together a sentence and say over and over he was not bush you voted for him.   You bought into a line of bullshit no different than a fat slob at 4 am in a bar being pursued by a slick taking player and went home and got date raped.  

As for his "record" there is NOTHING at all.   Please again tell mewhat you based your decision on to vote for him?

as for the BC issue - its another in  long ine of bizarre mysteries than any other normal person would have been forced to fadeinto obscuritiy over.    
          


He lost me when he was campaigning and said i should learn to speak Spanish instead of Spanish only people in this country having to learn English.

Also, I have hired guys to mow my lawn i know nothing about.  They are called day laborers.  Drive by your local Home Depot and ask them for their academic records.  (make sure to ask in Spanish)

So far, with a little research i haven't came across anything mysterious or bizarre yet.  Other than his policies and decisions.  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 01:16:22 PM

 ::)  ::)

Yawn - we sholdnt need lawsuits to learn the most basic info about people capable of starting wars.  Jesus - WTF is wrong with you? 

(http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/1572/original/shark.jpg?1240917714)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:17:20 PM

 ::)  ::)

Yawn - we sholdnt need lawsuits to learn the most basic info about people capable of starting wars.  Jesus - WTF is wrong with you? 

Then start a movement and make it a law.  


You should be rolling your eyes are yourself, using that crap for an argument.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 01:18:01 PM
Yawn - we know more about George Washington from 1776 and his background than bama but that is all fine with you guys.   Face it - you morons who voted for this shit show have nothingut excuses and obfuscations now to justify the mess your stupidity unleashed of the rest of us.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:18:08 PM
So 33333, are you saying there should be a academic requirement to be POTUS?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 01:18:59 PM

Then start a movement and make it a law.  


You should be rolling your eyes are yourself, using that crap for an argument.  

Yeah - a national movement is needed to learn even the most basic things about people e entrust with the ability to start a war.   ::)  ::) 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:19:10 PM
Yawn - we know more about George Washington from 1776 and his background than bama but that is all fine with you guys.   Face it - you morons who voted for this shit show have nothingut excuses and obfuscations now to justify the mess your stupidity unleashed of the rest of us.    

See, now you are a getting all ad hom.  chill out.  Go beat up an immigrant or something to cool off.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:20:07 PM
Yeah - a national movement is needed to learn even the most basic things about people e entrust with the ability to start a war.   ::)  ::) 

Yes, that's how it works in a republic. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 01:21:02 PM
Yawn - we know more about George Washington from 1776 and his background than bama but that is all fine with you guys.   Face it - you morons who voted for this shit show have nothingut excuses and obfuscations now to justify the mess your stupidity unleashed of the rest of us.    

(http://cdn1.knowyourmeme.com/i/000/052/093/original/ihaveacrabhatof5_1_.jpg?1275431096)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 01:21:20 PM
So 33333, are you saying there should be a academic requirement to be POTUS?


No - but if one claims to have went to occidential, columbia, and harvard law school, the least thing to expect would be that they release their records from said institutios to see if they are what they advertise themselves to be.

so far, your messiah has released nothig and has shown not a damn thing warranting the designation of him being some smart, brilliant, scholar.   So again - why did you vote for this and based on what?          
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:26:05 PM

No - but if one claims to have went to occidential, columbia, and harvard law school, the least thing to expect would be that they release their records from said institutios to see if they are what they advertise themselves to be.

so far, your messiah has released nothig and has shown not a damn thing warranting the designation of him being some smart, brilliant, scholar.   So again - why did you vote for this and based on what?          

Why do you that 33333?

When you are pressed you start accusing me of seeing Obama as a messiah.   When have i ever acted like he my messiah?  do you think i am a Benny gimmick or something?


Back to your faltering argument:

What has Obama advertised himself to be?

And did he not go to those schools?
 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 12, 2011, 01:32:00 PM

Why do you that 33333?

When you are pressed you start accusing me of seeing Obama as a messiah.   When have i ever acted like he my messiah?  do you think i am a Benny gimmick or something?


Back to your faltering argument:

What has Obama advertised himself to be?

And did he not go to those schools?
 

he likes doin that.. he says im lockstep with obama... when way before that ive told this assface that there like 5 things policy wise that i didnt like about obama.. i dont get into the obama is a communist shit.. so im a obamabot.. this fuckin guy
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 01:36:46 PM
Are you freaking kidding?   Seriously - Obama and his sycophantic lemmings positioned him as some con law scholar and perhaps the smartest potus since Lincoln.   Based on what?   Why he went to columbia and harvard and taught con law.  Yet - he wont release those records and people who worked with him said he never did a god damnned thing.  

At this point I believe obama was never qualified for columbia or harvard and was pushed along due to factors obviously unrelated to his performance.    

I believe nothing was required of him and never he accomplished a damn thing.   He was the cool black kid amongst guilt ridden white liberal leftists who cheered on his bullshit.  This same circus act got him to POTUS and where we are today.   I believe that 100%.  i deal with attorneys every day who make obama seem like a bathroom attendant at best.   

His refusal to release any records, at least to me, is an attempt to cover that up as well as other bizarre shit that he and most others know would resut in him never getting elected to anything.   I aso believe he applied to college as a foreign exchange student from indonesia for eitheraid or affirmative action reasons.               
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:37:41 PM
he likes doin that.. he says im lockstep with obama... when way before that ive told this assface that there like 5 things policy wise that i didnt like about obama.. i dont get into the obama is a communist shit.. so im a obamabot.. this fuckin guy

You either see it as 33333 does, half blind folded, or you are a kneepadder.  

there's no gray area.   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 12, 2011, 01:40:39 PM
Are you freaking kidding?   Seriously - Obama and his sycophantic lemmings positioned him as some con law scholar and perhaps the smartest potus since Lincoln.   Based on what?   Why he went to columbia and harvard and taught con law.  Yet - he wont release those records and people who worked with him said he never did a god damnned thing. 

At this point I believe obama was never qualified for columbia or harvard and was pushed along due to factors obviously unrelated to his performance.     

I believe nothing was required of him and never he accomplished a damn thing.   He was the cool black kid amongst guilt ridden white liberal leftists who cheered on his bullshit.  This same circus act got him to POTUS and where we are today.   I believe that 100%.  i deal with attorneys every day who make obama seem like a bathroom attendant at best.   

His refusal to release any records, at least to me, is an attempt to cover that up as well as other bizarre shit that he and most others know would resut in him never getting elected to anything.   I aso believe he applied to college as a foreign exchange student from indonesia for eitheraid or affirmative action reasons.               

If that's the case then Obama is the only cool kid in the country who gets that without having to play sports... Luckiest black kid on the planet.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 01:44:57 PM
Are you freaking kidding?   Seriously - Obama and his sycophantic lemmings positioned him as some con law scholar and perhaps the smartest potus since Lincoln.   Based on what?   Why he went to columbia and harvard and taught con law.  Yet - he wont release those records and people who worked with him said he never did a god damnned thing.  

So you're mad at his PR people?

Oh yeah i forgot you often make decisions and assumptions without researching or you only research the sources that back upi your assumptions.  I get it.
Quote
At this point I believe obama was never qualified for columbia or harvard and was pushed along due to factors obviously unrelated to his performance.    

And this is based on what facts?  Or is this just the same assumptions you had with the SSN?  You know where you didn't really check into anything.  You just shoved your nose up Mike Savage's ass or the likes of him and believed what ever you read with out checking?

Quote
I believe nothing was required of him and never he accomplished a damn thing. 
 

Yeah, he didn't have to campaign to be president, he didn't have to come from behind in the primaries, he didn't win the presidential election.  

what a loser Obama is.  

Quote
He was the cool black kid amongst guilt ridden white liberal leftists who cheered on his bullshit.  This same circus act got him to POTUS and where we are today.   I believe that 100%.  i deal with attorneys every day who make obama seem like a bathroom attendant at best. 
 

Well based on obscene lack of objectivity i believe you believe that.  

Quote
His refusal to release any records, at least to me, is an attempt to cover that up as well as other bizarre shit that he and most others know would resut in him never getting elected to anything.   I aso believe he applied to college as a foreign exchange student from indonesia for eitheraid or affirmative action reasons.   
     

At times, after reading this buffet of asinine assumptions, I am amazed you are not a 9/11 nut job also.        
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 01:51:23 PM
If that's the case then Obama is the only cool kid in the country who gets that without having to play sports... Luckiest black kid on the planet.

Its not like that in academia.   I was on law review myself and dealt with all of this shit.   I know people like obama and they are a fucking joke.   Its mostly infested with uber-leftist white guilt ridden panzies and pussies who never say a damn thing unless it composts with the ultra left anti-white, anti-america, anti-west, anti-euro, anti-capitalism memo. 

People like obama are never pushed, never questioned, never held to account, never challenge because the white leftists are way too afraid of the dreaded R word.   People who worked with obama said he got away with murder as far as missing deadlines, not woking, never doing anything, and accomplishing nothing.   

I believe his entire facade of being some intellectual type fits right into that.  He is no more intellectual than Richard Simmons  as far as I am concerned.

The BC issue is but one of many of these mysteries and passes he has gotten from the MSM and other groups for fear of the dreaded R word.       
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 12, 2011, 01:56:23 PM
   I know people like obama and they are a fucking joke.   .       

You know some Presidents?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 02:31:31 PM
You know some Presidents?

hahaha this guy is failing so bad it's almost unbearable.  Almost hahaha. 

 :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 02:42:33 PM
President of the local rotary club has more leadership experience than bama.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 12, 2011, 02:46:07 PM
President of the local rotary club has more leadership experience than bama.


Ooo burn to Obama!  Watching you fail yet again is  :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 02:49:17 PM
President of the local rotary club has more leadership experience than bama.

And his SSN is authentic too!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 12, 2011, 03:03:33 PM
Oz,

333 would be the biggest 911 skeptic here - if it happened between 92 and 2000, or 2009 and the present.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 03:12:51 PM
Oz,

333 would be the biggest 911 skeptic here - if it happened between 92 and 2000, or 2009 and the present.


That's what I don't understand because they are essentially the same arguments.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 04:56:26 PM
Friday, January 7, 2011
OCON DOCS: Hawaii Ballot Chief...Grandma, Called Obama To Hawaii In 2008
. UPDATED 1/17/11
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html


New analysis of Democrat Party's official 2008 Certification of Nominations for Obama reveals that reasons for his sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 were to visit more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian election laws, media accounts and post-dated documents reveal he may have attended a private hearing with the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer regarding his disqualification from the Hawaiian ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional eligibility.


by Pen Johannson
Editor, The Daily Pen

Honolulu, Hawaii - At the center of the war over Barack Obama’s illegitimacy as president are a series of deep seated, unanswered questions about the detailed involvement of several municipal employees and officials within the government of the State of Hawaii. From former governor, Linda Lingle’s convenient deniability, to former Health Department director, Chiyome Fukino’s intentionally misleading statements about Obama’s vital records. From the blatant, dismissive ignorance of Hawaii’s legislature about the difference between "U.S. Citizenship" and "Natural-born citizenship", to the claims by a former Honolulu senior elections office clerk that the State of Hawaii does not possess an original, 1961 Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Obama, the State of Hawaii has emerged as the primary co-conspirator in keeping Obama’s identity a well kept secret from the American people.


 Now, however, a new investigation of Hawaii’s Election Commission and the laws used by the state’s Office of Elections to approve or deny candidates for inclusion on presidential ballots raises shocking revelations about the administrative power held by too few unaccountable officials and their unmonitored capacity to override the U.S. Constitution. The evidence reveals that municipal agents, working within the jurisdiction of Hawaii state law and complex administrative rules, opened shadowy legal channels which, ultimately, enabled Obama with an opportunity to usurp presidential power and assault the Constitutional sovereignty of the American people.


SETTING THE STAGE


The details of the following account seem somewhat daunting, and even overly exhaustive. However, it is more important to remember that Obama's handlers engaged the prerequisites of his illegitimacy with exhaustive investigation and extreme premeditation long before they pushed him onto his present stage. They looked at all the angles. They weighed all the concequences. They engaged all the legal provisions, and how to "bend", but not break, them. The evidence reveals they may have even pushed too hard on the limits of lawful conduct.


If those seeking the truth about Obama's identity are not equal to that same diligence, then they should question their understanding of the importance of constitutional sovereignty. Remember, among the primary objectives of liberal globalists, in concealing Obama's identity and, ultimately, his illegitimacy, was the endowment of executive political power to a like-minded, radical agent who would "push" extreme doctrine enabling the governmental confiscation of advanced American invidualism. Otherwise, if that truth fails to impress, then we should simply consider the massive five trillion dollars of added indebtedness upon our children and grandchildren, since Democrats took over the government in 2006, the cost of being America.


By now, America is realizing that Obama was tactically positioned not to make America a better nation for all of its citizens, but rather to confiscate the value of America's superior, prosperous heritage and redistribute it to those he and the liberal establishment believes are more deserving of it, globally! Obama's desire for economic equality is motivated by the very same communistic values which have failed humanity for more than 200 years.


However, since communism cannot succeed in America, the neo-liberal establishment is exploiting the executive powers usurped by Obama as a President to enact "punitive" legislation which, essentially, redirects money from vintage American society into an epic liberal cause sought since the end of World War II. Two generations ago, the American people sought to prosper from their work. Now, under Obama, the definition of a new "American Dream" has been hijacked by those lusting to make a profit by defaming the prosperity and sacrifice of coming generations.


Therefore, our momentary visit into the realm of plausibility serves well the value of our new found lessons and reinforces the importance for the American people to seize responsibility and proactively protect the sovereignty of their blood-ransomed, Constitutional freedom. Sometimes, in order to accomplish this, we must vigorously deny access to those with plural, or ambiguous, allegiances. Otherwise, we should resign ourselves to the idea that our value as the last hope for humanity can never be defended or preserved. Unless of course, we are willing to cast out the peddlers of corrupt ideas.


Expulsion is an essential first step in physically removing foul influences which undermine the intended goodness of our founders. This starts by identifying and exposing the components of corruption by members of this radical ruling class. The following report is just one of many authored by other Americans which attempts, in small part, to do this.


THE "O" CON

Recall, over the past two years, we became familiar with the furor over the Democrat Party of Hawaii's refusal to certify Obama's constitutional eligibility. The DPH is the Democrat Party authority in Hawaii in charge of requesting, reviewing and verifying the legal qualifications of a candidate's eligibility for inclusion on the Hawaiian ballot, in compliance with state and Constitutional election laws.


Ultimately, the DPH's rejection of Obama was due to a refusal by Obama to make available the original documented evidence confirming his eligibility. However, this justifiable lack of certification by the DPH was followed by a covert attempt by the Democratic National Committee, chaired by Nancy Pelosi, to artificially proclaim Obama eligible in Hawaii by submitting two separate, sworn Official Certifications of Nomination (OCON) for Obama, each containing different legal language. Both versions of the OCON were sent to the Hawaiian Office of Elections while only one version was submitted to other states' Election authorities. The DNC's fraudulent OCON was an obvious, desperate attempt to control damage and prevent Obama from being disqualified from the Hawaiian ballot and prevent public awareness of the DPH's refusal to certify Obama's eligibility.


. The Official Certification of Nomination is a legally required document submitted by each party's state and national authority to every state elections committee authority prior to each election. It affords the Chief Elections Officer in each state with the documented legal assurance that the candidates seeking inclusion on their state's ballot are indeed certified as constitutionally eligible to serve the office they seek.


Unfortunately, the violation committed by the DNC's falsified certification is that there was no evidence to support claims of Obama's eligibility. The DNC simply fabricated reasons over the authority of the state party authority in order to force Obama's candidacy onto the Hawaiian presidential ballot. Of course, Democrats claim there was no impropriety on the part of Pelosi and the DNC. However, they have failed to explain why the state party authority refused to certify Obama, due to his lack of legal qualifications, while the national party authority simply certified Obama, ignoring that same lack of legal qualifications. The lack of accountability makes the Democrat Party appear pathetically disreputable. The DNC is not served by the multiple state party authorities, it is there to serve the state party authorities. Federal constitutional law prescribes the mandates for Presidential eligibility, but state authorities have the responsibility for validating candidate authenticity for their own ballot.


The OCON controversy is an example of what happens when dishonest, inferior people try to force themselves into positions of power they are not qualified to assume. Even those who seek to uphold the honorability of service at the local level, within their own party, will eventually refuse to endorse their candidacy if the disparity of legal qualifications becomes irreconcilable. Not only was the dual OCON a deceitful maneuver by Nancy Pelosi and DNC to synthetically place Obama's inauthentic candidacy onto Hawaii's presidential ballot, it violated Constitutional election law requiring that each state maintains the sovereign authority to grant or deny ballot inclusion based on their own standards.


Most egregious, however, the agents running Obama's political machine, those of legal mindedness, knew beforehand this very intraparty conflict legally enabled the Chief Elections Officer of Hawaii, Kevin Cronin, to invoke an obscure law and approve Obama's inclusion on the Hawaiian presidential ballot...even though Obama was never determined with irrefutable documented evidence to be constitutionally eligible to appear on the ballot.


SCHATZ' ASCENDANCE


Compounding the OCON controversy is the elevation of several minor characters of the "Obama For President" script into positions of significant professional and political advancement. Since Obama's election, multiple employees and officials in Hawaii have been promoted, transfered or elected to higher positions after they played integral roles in assisting Obama's enthronement.


In August, 2008, just two months before the election, the Democrat Party of Hawaii’s (DPH) chairman, Brian Schatz, had already refused to include legally required, explicit language in its sworn Official Certification of Nomination (OCON) that Barack Obama was qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. The DPH's OCON document was allegedly submitted to the Hawaiian Election's office between August 27th and September 5th, 2008.
. Former DPH Chair, Brian Schatz, now serves as
Hawaii's Lt. Governor under Gov. Neil Abercrombie (2010).
As DPH Chair, Schatz authored the state's Democrat
Party OCON for Obama without including legally required
language stating that Obama was constitutionally
eligible to serve as president. Schatz won the Lt. Gov.
seat by a wide margin after two years of remaining
silent about his OCON controversy.


At first glance, one might think Schatz was simply acting with discretion and, if nothing else, upholding the appearance of legal prudence over political partisanship. However, a review of records held by the State of Hawaii reveals this document was not affixed with a "RECEIVED DATE" or "FILED DATE" stamp by the Hawaiian Elections office like the certification documents in the other 49 states were. Therefore, the possibility remains that the OCON submitted by Schatz may have actually been filed after the first "non-Constitutional" OCON was submitted from the DNC. This would indicate a possible violation of Hawaiian election law HRS 11-113(c)(1) which sets a precise deadline for the submission of this document by the party authorities to the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer.
.
Without, the "RECEIVED" or "FILED" date stamp, it is impossible to determine which document was produced first or whether both documents were submitted to the Hawaiian Elections office before the deadline. The fact that these documents do not contain this stamp raises serious suspicion about their authenticity and about the expected chronology of their chain of possession. To anyone not associated with election procedures, the absence of this stamp might appear like a simple administrative oversight, but to anyone with basic understanding of laws governing official records, this is a shocking dereliction. Compounding this unlawful omission by the Hawaiian Elections Office, the DNC's OCON submitted to Hawaii was also not affixed with this stamp.


The official dating of documents is essential for authorities to track the chain of possession and transaction of documented information. Marks, signatures and stamps allow them to know who has seen the document, who has attested to its content and when the document reached certain people and destinations. These determinations allow officials to know when to initiate administrative procedures and, most importantly, deliver written correspondence to candidates and/or applicants in accordance with election laws, especially if disparities arise during the evaluation of criteria used to approve eligibility for ballot content. Hawaiian election laws, like many states' laws, are particularly precise about the deadlines governing the actions and procedures required for the Chief Elections Officer and the candidate during this process. Failure to indicate the date(s) of any election document's original content or official transaction is a grievous, intentional act meant to conceal or abscure the chronology of that document's creation and chain of possession.


However, the shocking lack of accountability on the part of the Hawaiian Office of Elections and Kevin Cronin essentially forces a conclusion that these two documents were never officially received or filed into the record of the 2008 election, yet they are being disseminated as the original records used to certify Obama. These blatant administrative failures command an investigation into the authenticity of Obama's documented nomination in Hawaii, the individuals in the chain of possession from creation to filing, and the time frame during which these documents were created, signed, notarized, submitted and officially filed with the Elections authority.


Based on the OCON submitted by Schatz, Cronin was forced by Hawaiian statutory requirements to disqualify Obama from the presidential ballot in Hawaii until a lengthy administrative process reconciled the disparity. This process created a series of politically implicative, but highly sensitive, correspondences between Schatz, Cronin, and possibly, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod in order to balance legal deadlines, plan campaign logistics and manage political vulnerability. At the conclusion of the process, we know that Obama was included on the Hawaiian presidential ballot without any protest by Schatz.


After the 2008 election, the relationships between these entrenched individuals conspicuously changed. Schatz, the youngest state party Chairman (2008-2010) in U.S. history at 35, and former member of the Hawaiian House of Representatives (1996-2006, originally elected at the age of 24), entered the race for Lt. Governor and won the position to Gov. Abercrombie's administration, essentially making him the proxy administrative boss over the Chief Elections Officer. Schatz' ascendance to executive power essentially went unscrutinized in the wake of his involvement, and suspicious inaction, in the OCON controversy.


Schatz announced his candidacy for the Lt. Governor's race, the second-highest political seat in the State of Hawaii, on January 10, 2010 after serving as the DPH chairman during Obama's 2008 run for the White House. Of all ten major party candidates running for the position, Schatz' official nomination was issued later than any other candidate, on July 7th, yet he won the nomination just months before the election with 39% of the vote, after receiving high profile endorsements and incumbent promotions from individuals close to Obama.
On January 14, 2010, Schatz was formally endorsed by Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's sister, when Soetoro-Ng returned to Hawaii after a three month stay in Washington D.C. with Obama.


In September, 2010, Star Advertiser reporter, Herb Sample asked why so many people would seek a position bearing no real power under the governor and no real responsibility over the many directors doing the work for Hawaii's multiple agencies. The answer to Sample's question is the only one which makes sense.
.
"I think most people want it as a way of becoming governor," former University of Hawaii history professor Dan Boylan said.
.
As of 2010, of the only six Governors serving the state of Hawaii, three of them were Lt. Governors while at least one other was elected to the U.S. Congress. The Lt. governor position also pays a comfortable six figure salary ($115,000, 2010) compared to the $37,000 Schatz made as a House Representative of District 25. As of 2010, of the only six Governors serving the state of Hawaii, three of them were Lt. Governors while at least one other was elected to the U.S. Congress. The Lt. governor position also pays a comfortable six figure salary ($115,000, 2010) compared to the $37,000 Schatz made as a House Representative of District 25.
.

Schatz graduated from Punahou High School, Obama's alma-mater, in 1990. Ironically, he also spent time in Kenya in 1992, the same year Obama first traveled there, as a part of the School of International Training, a cross-cultural, world-wide education outreach program supported predominantly by liberal-based and foreign scholarship funding sources, where he was educated in civil service, before graduating from Pomona College in 1994.
.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 04:57:21 PM
QUESTIONS THE MEDIA FAILED TO ASK
.
After the DNC submitted a customized OCON, allegedly on August 28th, why did Schatz refuse to inquire to the DNC or request from the DNC the evidence used by the DNC to determine Obama's eligibility in Hawaii?
.
Why did the DPH not have access to this information directly from the State of Hawaii, like the DNC did?
.
Are we supposed to believe that the DNC, in Denver, almost 4000 miles away, had acquired documented proof from the state of Hawaii to legally approve Obama's eligibility, yet the state party authority, whose headquarters is within walking distance from the State of Hawaii records and elections offices, was somehow not able to obtain this evidence before the DNC?
.
Moreover, after the DNC submitted their OCON, allegedly with seven full days remaining in the filing deadline, why was the DPH not able to simply revise their OCON to include the legal language after reviewing the evidence used by the DNC to certify Obama's eligibility?
.
The lies and abetment of Obama's illegitimacy in Hawaii are so glaring, it is breath-taking.
.
Perhaps the most important question, however, is: Was Schatz politically rewarded for cooperating with the DNC's fraudulent certification in 2008?
.
Appearances are worth more than evidence in politics. What is known is that after justifiably filing an official OCON document omitting critical statutorial language which would otherwise certify Obama's candidacy, Schatz had very little to say after the DNC overwrote his authority to oversee the validation of Democrat candidates for the ballot in Hawaii. Schatz legally stated that Obama failed to provide adequate information proving that he was legally qualified to serve as president under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, which he was legally empowered to do, yet the DNC certified Obama's eligibility thereby claiming that Schatz and the DPH did not have access, nor was ever provided with some, as yet undisclosed, "secret", unverified evidence supporting Obama's eligibility that only the DNC was privileged to possess. The absurdity of this scam is laughable and utterly criminal.


Obama appeared on the Hawaiian ballot in 2008. However, Schatz knew there was no documented evidence confirming Obama's eligibility, yet he allowed the DNC to circumvent his authority, without protest. Then, miraculously, two years later, at the mere age of 37, Schatz is elevated to a position to become the Chief Executive Officer of the home state of the man whose lack of legal qualifications he, along with Pelosi and the DNC, helped to conceal from the American people. The lack of congressional investigation into the conduct of Hawaii's election operations is astonishing.


The implications of such incestuous governing powers melding with partisan politics creates, if nothing else, the appearance of a municipal "cartella" serving the interests of national Democrat party politics, not the interests of the people of the state of Hawaii and, therefore, in the case of Obama's fallow credibility, the interests of the entire nation. At most, it makes the entire government of State of Hawaii look like an annexation of Obama's administration...like a co-opted municipal agency placed in charge of Obama's secrets and personal documents.


ANGLES AND TRICKS: (A.K.A, HAWAIIAN LAWS AND CHICAGO POLITICS)


From the beginning, Obama's campaign drones knew that if any state Elections Officer, let alone the one overseeing the legality of election procedure in the very state where Obama grew up, was forced to disqualify Obama's candidacy on the grounds of him being found ineligible there, the issue would have exploded into a firestorm of mainstream inquiry. Imagine the explanation that would have been damanded of the Hawaiian government if Obama actually failed to appear on their ballot. How would other states have been able to justify Obama's inclusion on their ballot if the very state of his alleged origins would not even put him on theirs? Of course, if this had occurred in a state like Texas or Oklahoma, the pro-Obama media's angle may have been strained, but at least they would have been able to spin their cowardice behind political justifications. However, this was not possible in the chronically liberal, remote bastions of Hawaii.
.
Certainly the media failed. The American people understand this. However, the most troubling part of this drama is, quite simply, the irregular behavior by the Democrat party, specifically Obama's throng, when they were faced by something as routine as an eligibility certification. This erratic behavior should have triggered a warning throughout the known universe of journalism. If nothing else, it should have prompted some high profile journalist to ask some basic questions. Yet, it was met with a bizarre and cowardly silence by the mainstream.


Of course, Obama's handlers could not allow the exposure of this controversy so close to the election, no matter how valid the accusations. It would have been politically fatal. There would have been no way to recover from such an endictment against Obama. His 2008 campaign and, possibly, his political career, would not have survived the revelation of the devastating documentable evidence against him, but since the media failed to investigate and inform the people, we can conclude, with confidence, that the media was complicit in the dishonest contortions used to prevent such ramifications for Obama. The media's dereliction in the wake of such obvious illicit behavior has injured the confidence of the American people for years to come. Moreover, Obama is no more eligible for any of it.


However, this was not the only bad consequence "Team Obama" needed to prevent in the wake of the Hawaiian OCON disaster. They also needed to conceal the facts about his illegitimacy, overall, as well as supress public knowledge about Obama's legal requirement to meet specific deadlines and personally attend to proceedings in Hawaii attributed directly to countering claims of his ineligibility. Especially if Obama was required to meet with party authorities in Hawaii and the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer to refute their findings between the OCON filing date of September 5, 2008 and November 4, 2008.
So, let's ask the most obvious question first. Did Obama make an unscheduled or sudden trip to Hawaii between September 5th and November 4th, 2008?


Before answering, let's remember, Obama was operating on a very tight campaign schedule between mid-August and Election day, 2008. A review of his schedule reveals more than 50 events in the final two months. He had several town hall meetings and debates which could not be cancelled or rescheduled because they involved John McCain too. The only way to free himself and cover up his motives was to exploit some personal issue which would serve as a "front story" for his presence in Hawaii.


Complicating the logistical, legal and political nightmare was the fact that Obama had already attended campaign rallies and fundraisers in Hawaii in early to mid-August. He visited his grandmother on August 7th. Therefore, justifying another visit to Hawaii amid the maelstrom of campaign rallies, debates, forums and town hall meetings scheduled in the other 49 states would require a personal reason that Obama's campaign could justify to the public while putting him in Hawaii to secretly attend to his legal matters. Given the weight of Obama's lack of legitimacy, if he appeared in Hawaii too soon after his previous visit, it looks very suspicious and invites media inquiry.


In order to avoid the destructive political consequences, Obama had to engage a private meeting away from the media. Such a private meeting would also have to be justifiable under Hawaii Revised Statutes Adminstrative Rules 91, 92-4, 92-5, and 3-170-11. Specifically, any correspondence or meeting between any candidate or representative of the candidate and members of the Hawaiian Election commission would have to be held in accord with these rules. However, it is HRS 92-5-8 which affords the permission to hold a secret meeting between members of the Elections Commission and Obama. The rules states:

92-5 Exceptions (a) A board may hold a meeting closed to the public pursuant to section 92-4 for one or more of the following reason(s):
.

(8) To deliberate or make a decision upon a matter that requires the consideration of information that must be kept confidential pursuant to a state or federal law, or a court order..


How does this Administrative Rule apply to Obama? Recall, the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDH) has stated that the public disclosure of information contained in vital records to anyone without tangible reasons for obtaining it is prohibited by state law HRS 338-18. For more than three years, employees of the HDH have repeatedly refused to disclose Obama's original natal records citing this law, which requires that vital information "must be kept confidential pursuant to state law." Therefore, based on this tenet, any justification for holding a private meeting for the purpose of reviewing and discussing Obama's natal information as it exists on file with the HDH would fall under the provisions of HRS 92-5-(8).


However, this only resolves the legality of the matter.


LAP DOGS & BLOOD HOUNDS


Obama's presence in Hawaii in October, 2008 ignited suspicions which seemed to resonate among several high profile media sources. On the October 23 broadcast of his radio show, Rush Limbaugh said:
"Who announces days in advance they're rushing to the side of aloved one who is deathly ill, but keeps campaigning in a race that's said to beover, only to go to the loved one's side days later? See, I think this is about something else. You know what's really percolating out there? And I've beenlaying low on this because it just -- it hasn't met the threshold to pass thesmell test on this program. But this birth certificate business, this lawsuitthat a guy named Phillip Berg filed in Philadelphia in August for Obama toproduce his genuine birth certificate, and he still hasn't replied, he hasn'tdone so.
When you first announced this, you're gonna rush, you're gonna hurry, you're gonna make tracks, you're gonna get over there because you don't want your grandmother to die before you got there like your mother did, but somehow you keep campaigning, you take three days to get over there, if he's left yet. And this birth certificate business -- I'm just wondering if something's up. I have no clue, and I -- folks, I'm telling you, this has not reached the threshold until now, and it's now popping up all over the place."
Mr. Limbaugh's premonitions are well oriented. He just didn't quite follow his instincts about the true motives for Obama's behavior and explicitly say the words...which was exploit the condition of this grandmother for political reasons while also giving the sentimental public appearance of being a family-oriented man who cared for his sick grandmother.
During an appearance on the October 22, 2008 broadcast of G. Gordon Liddy's radio show, WND reporter and author, Jerome Corsi said:"I'm headed out to Honolulu. I am not convinced that Barack Obamais going because his grandmother is sick. I appreciate that his grandmother is sick and he wants to be with her. I do recall that Barack Obama's mother died of cancer, and he didn't go to be by her side when she died. He relates that in his autobiography, Dreams From My Father. And I'm going out to do what digging I can on the birth certificate.

I think I'll accomplish something in Hawaii, too. Obama's headed out there, and I believe there's a court challenge that if Obama does not dodge, he's gonna be forced to produce a birth certificate, and there's gonna be something damaging on that birth certificate, because even at the eleventh hour, Obama refuses to show us the hospital-generated birth certificate when he was born.".


The implications are magnetic and compelling. The lasciviousness of the scheme makes it heart-wrenching. While the last living member of Obama's extended family clings to her final moments...or perhaps had already passed prior to Obama's arrival, the political scavengers and the ideologically afoul, having confiscated Obama's existence, were actually exploiting her pain and death for their political gain. Projecting a final thought in those moments in that woman's apartment, we gain understanding of the contemptible scene...
"If Obama waited too long to go to Hawaii, the old-bag might kick the bucket early and leave Obama with no "personal" reason to hide under. A premature death would prevent Obama from protecting his political image while he proliferated more lies about the unresolved facts of his epic illegitimacy. This would leave him exposed just 11 days before the most prolific, fraudulent Presidential election in history, and force him to answer for the actual reasons he was called to Hawaii, which was to rebut claims by the Democrat Party's state authority that he was, simply, an inferior candidate without legal qualifications...or, worse, if he went to Hawaii too early, before the wise medical doctors had a chance to deliver their scripted testimony of a media-approved "looming death decree" -- worthy of Obama's doting presence -- there would have been no way to hide the reasons for another trip there, yet again, in coming weeks, when the political deadlines demanding his presence finally arrived.".

.
"Never let a crisis go to waste", right? The entire affair is despicable and should impose shame on those involved, including everyone in Obama's family, his administration, the media, the State of Hawaii, and the Democrat Party...and, unfortunately, the American people for not violently protesting such disgraceful conduct. Is there any wonder why there is no decency in government today?
.
In summary, Obama sought a way to be in Hawaii at a time that would:


1. Occur as long after the OCON deadline as possible, but no later than October 24th.


2. Allow him to cancel campaign events, but not miss prescheduled debates with McCain or televised town hall meetings.


3. Meet legal deadlines for ballot approval, but not violate deadlines to refute the findings of ineligibility by the DPH.


4. Give the media a "decoy" story to serve as his excuse for being in Hawaii, but not allow the public to discover that the real reason he was in Hawaii was because he was attending executive hearings with the Chief Elections Officer and the DPH per HAR 3-170, HRS 92-4 and 92-5 to contest the DPH's refusal to certify his nomination.


5. Exploit the story of Obama's grandmother's illness, allowing Obama to schedule the trip precisely while citing the doctor's assessment of his grandmother's condition as an excuse to be in Hawaii. However, if Dunham died too soon, or was "not sick enough" to warrant his cancellation of campaign events so close to an election, Obama would be left exposed to media investigation about the truth of all of his activities in Hawaii on October 24th, 2008.

On October 23rd, 2008, even the ultra-liberal New York Times took notice of Obama’s sheepish trip off the grid:



"On a whirlwind trip back to Hawaii, Senator Barack Obama spent more than an hour visiting his ailing grandmother late Thursday and is set to return to her bedside on Friday morning after arriving here on a nine-hour flight from the Midwestern battleground of the presidential campaign.


On the trip to Hawaii, Obama stayed in the secluded front cabin of his campaign plane, reading and rarely talking with a handful of aides who came along. The knot in his red tie was loosened as he walked down the aisle of his plane to stretch his legs, but he stayed a safe distance from a small group of reporters who accompanied him...



"...It was an unusual departure from the tug-of-war of the presidential campaign, with 11 days remaining in the race. While Mr. Obama is only going to be gone for one full day – Friday – it still is an unusual occurrence at this point in a presidential campaign."

“It’s not optimal, but there was never any debate or discussion or
anything,” David Axelrod, the chief strategist for Mr. Obama said in an
interview Thursday. “Barack’s grandmother is one of the formative people in his
life. He wants to go see her on the advice of her doctors. He had to do it now.
So we’ll just make do.” http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/25/us/politics/25obama.html?_r=1&ref=politics


On October 25th, Star Advertiser reporter, Laurie Au gave this peculiar first hand account of Obama's evasive behavior.


The only exciting part of the day (Friday October 24th, 2008) occurred shortly after 10 a.m., when his campaign aides told us Obama would be taking a walk along Young Street in his old Makiki neighborhood. Apparently there was some confusion, though, because by the time we reached Young Street, Obama was already two blocks away, forcing about a dozen of us — media and staff — to chase after him. We stopped a respectful distance away, but he still appeared down and slightly unhappy to see us.




Our day ended just after 5 p.m. when Obama and more than 60 other staff and media boarded his private plane to Nevada for more campaigning.
http://blogs.starbulletin.com/inpolitics/inside-obamas-press-bus/


Au’s account of Obama’s schedule on the morning of October 24th obviously
indicates that Obama was able to slip out of his grandmother’s apartment without
being noticed by the media. Thereafter, there is no accounting of presence
before or after this "solo stroll" until his appearance at the airport. Au then
reports that the next accounting of Obama's presence was when he boarded his
plane seven hours later at 5:00 p.m. So, the obvious question arising from the
media’s fallow account is where was Obama between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on
Friday, October 24th?



You have to hand it to the Obama political syndicate. They squirrelled this one to a tee. It's sad that it was so evil, sheepish and dishonest. Obama was able to pull an epic deception off on the American people, and most of them bought the entire story without any hesitation.




Members of the mainstream network media, on the other hand, have a special wrath stored up for themselves over this one. They were simply played like the fawning tools they have been ever since Obama tickled their fetish six years ago. This proves that today's journalists are a disgrace to their profession. They are not even journalists. They are nothing more than adoring propagandists for the Obama administration. Its disgusting, and they deserve to have this grand lie summarily forced down their gullet, suffering from all the infirmities as it putrifies inside them. They were used so efficiently by Obama it is laughable.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 04:58:16 PM
HAWAIIAN ELECTIONS AUTHORITY

The Constitution gives authority of determining candidate eligibility and to establish relationships enabling candidate placement on each state ballot to each respective state's Elections authority. This evolved out of the the founder's understanding that placing the enforcement of voting security in the hands of local authorities enabled fair access to the residents of the state they apportion and to confirm voting registration information. National party authorities do not have the jurisdiction, resources or logistic capacity to ensure voter apportionment in and between states. The intrusion of the national party authority upon a state party authority during an election is akin to a federal agency, like FEMA, taking over for a local fire department in putting out a house fire or rescuing a cat from a tree. It is a complete misallocation of resources and a violation of jurisdictional laws governing the assurance of voting security. However, this is exactly what the DNC did in Hawaii in 2008.


Just because the DNC determines that a candidate is eligible in, for example, New York, does mean they can force the state of Hawaii to also find that same candidate eligible. The founders understood that by endowing this to a national authority made the people of states who oppose a particular party vulnerable to under-representation and party intimidation.


Under the Electoral College system, according to election laws in every state, Electors from each state are only qualified by the Constitution to cast votes for President and Vice President. They do not participate in certifying the eligibility of the candidates prior to the election. Inexplicably, the certification of each candidate’s eligibility falls under the autonomous authority of each candidate’s state affiliated political party authority, with support of the national party authority, while the approval of the candidate’s placement on each state’s ballot then becomes the responsibility of the Chief Elections Officer of each state. The state’s electors must rely on the relationship between these authoritative bodies to review qualifications, certify the legal eligibility of each candidate and approve ballot placement of each candidate nominated by each qualified party.

In August, 2008, the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer (CEO) was Kevin Cronin. He was appointed by the eight-member Hawaiian Elections Commission on December 10, 2007 and took over the position from Interim CEO, Rex M. Quidilla. By statute, Cronin’s term began on February 1, 2008 and is set to end on February 1, 2012. Cronin is a 30 year veteran of government service and is licensed to practice law in Hawaii and Wisconsin. The fully staffed Hawaiian Elections Commission is made up of the following individuals. Cronin served as the CEO in Hawaii for only two years before resigning amid a series of controversial lawsuits and lapses in administrative accountability, including a failure by Cronin to register as a Hawaiian voter immediately upon assuming the office of the CEO.

Name, Position and Date of Term Expiration
Kevin B. Cronin, Senior Elections Officer 02/01/12
Daniel Young , Chief Justice, Oahu 06/30/12
Warren Orikasa , House Speaker, Maui 06/30/14
Margaret Masunaga, Senate President, Hawaii 06/30/14
Zale Okazaki , Senate President, Oahu 06/30/12
Patricia Berg , Senate Minority Leader, Kauai 06/30/14
Brian Nakashima, Chief Justice, Hawaii 06/30/12
Donna Soares, House Minority Leader, Maui 06/30/12
Charles King, House Minority Leader, Kauai 06/30/14

It was Cronin's constitutional authority to oversee elections in the state of Hawaii under the advisement of the Election Commission. It is his responsibility to maximize registration, equalize registration among districts; and maintain data related to registration, elections, districting and apportionment; educate the public on voting and elections; set up procedures and rules governing elections per HRS 11, AR 91 and Arts. II & IV of the U.S. Constitution. Cronin does not have the authority to certify the Constitutional eligibility of a candidate, however, his most powerful authority is his ability, according to HRS 11-113, to mediate conflict over eligibility and, as a result of mediation, officially approve candidates for placement on the state’s ballot even when the state party's vetting authority refuses to certify the legal qualifications of that candidate.


An investigation of Hawaii Revised Statutes, along with documented evidence, reveals that, Cronin, being bound by law from partisan participation, still had the legal authority to circumvent the vetting process for Obama and simply approve his placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot without ever verifying that he was Constitutionally eligible to serve as President. Moreover, the evidence presented herein further confirms that the legal tactics employed by the Obama machine actually allowed him to fill Hawaiian legal requirements, behind the lies of the media, without actually having to ever present authentic documentation.
Shockingly, adminstrative procedures employed by the Elections Office in the State of Hawaii actually helped Obama avoid public scrutiny by simultaneously allowing him the opportunity to personally attend a hearing about his eligibility while visiting his sick grandmother in late October, 2008. The chronology of available deadlines and correspondences reveal that Obama would have been able to hide this eligibility hearing under the headline of visiting his dying grandmother. HRS 11-113, in coordination with Chapter 91 administrative rules, and differences in time zones (that's right, Hawaii's geographic location may have helped Obama meet legal deadlines), gave Obama the linkage needed to preserve both legal and political appearances by affording him almost 45 days between the Certification deadline and his trip to visit his dying grandmother.

As absurd as this seems...it actually happened in Hawaii in 2008.

Cronin resigned from his position in December 2009 amid the controversies plaguing the Hawaii elections office and Obama's OCON saga. Sources say that he was not forced to resign but evidence shows a pattern of circumstances under Cronin's management in which his "autonomous" approach to managing election procedures may have violated Hawaii election laws. He faced at least two lawsuits challenging the manner in which he made decisions about election procedures, deadlines and vending contracts. However, Cronin's resignation is suspicious because it occurred immediately after the OCON controversy went public in Fall of 2009. The public exposure of the OCON documents revealed that the Elections Office, under Cronin, had violated Hawaiian election laws by failing to properly document and record the chain of possession of these legal documents. The order of records and filing date of Obama's Hawaiian OCONs with the Office of Elections remains unknown, even to this day.

.
THE SCENE OF THE CRIME

On August 27, 2008, the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH), led then by Chairman, Brian Schatz and acting Secretary, Lynn Matusow, signed and had attested by notarization, an Official Certification of Nomination (OCON) for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Some time between August 27, 2008 and 4:30 p.m Hawaiian Time (9:30 p.m. Eastern Time) September 5, 2008, the DPH filed the document with Chief Elections Officer, Kevin Cronin. The copy provided for public review does not contain a Hawaiian Elections Office "RECEIVED DATE" stamp, which is a suspicious omission because the date of reception by the Elections Office initiates the succession of correspondence and deadlines for review, response and possible hearings available to those opposing the findings of the CEO.

The OCON sent to Cronin by the DPH contained the following words in the body of its content:


"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States (Obama and Biden) are legally qualified to serve under the provision of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held on February 19th, 2008 in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held August 27, 2008 in Denver, Colorado."





The only proclamation this document makes is that Democrat Party of Hawaii asked a group of Democrats who they preferred as their nomination for President. However, unfortunately for Obama and the Democratic voters of Hawaii, Hawaiian Revised Statute 11-113 (c)(1)(B) specifically requires that this statement must explicitly state that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution in order for the Hawaiian Elections Commission and the Chief Elections Officer to be able to approve the candidate for ballot placement.



Specifically, the wording of each party’s Hawaiian OCON must adhere to the requirements of HRS §11-113 (c)(1); Presidential Ballots, which states:

(c) All candidates for president and vice president of
the United States shall be qualified for inclusion on the general election ballot under the following procedures:...
...(1) In the case of candidates of political parties which have been qualified to place candidates on the primary and general election ballots, the appropriate official of those parties shall file a sworn application with the chief election officer not later than 4:30 p.m. on the sixtieth day prior to the general election, which shall include:


(A) The name and address of each of the two candidates;

(B) A statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution;

(C) A statement that the candidates are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national party, giving the time, place, and manner of the selection.





The Democratic Party of Hawaii’s OCON for Barack Obama clearly did not meet the requirement of HRS 11-113 (c)(1)(B), which clearly states that the (DPH) party official (Brian Schatz) shall file a sworn application with the chief election officer (Kevin Cronin) which explicitly includes “…a statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution…” and is to be filed not later than 4:30 p.m. on the sixtieth day (September 5, 2008) prior to the general election (November 4, 2008).




Let's mete out the scenerio giving the benefit of doubt to the DPH, first. Perhaps this was simply an omissive error. Maybe the DPH "forgot" to include legally required language in its OCON for Obama on August 27, 2008 and didn't realize the error for another nine days until after the September 5th filing deadline had passed.



Or, despite the fact that the DPH OCON states that Obama was chosen by the DPH Preference Poll and Caucus back in FEBRUARY of 2008, nearly six months earlier, we are to believe there just wasn't enough time to include the required statement that Obama was legally qualified by the constitution for approval for ballot placement by the Chief Elections Officer, and therefore the DPH simply ignored the requirement hoping to sneak it by the Election Commission.




However, comparing documented evidence of OCONs from previous elections reveals that the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s OCONs for both Al Gore/Joe Lieberman in 2000 and John Kerry/John Edwards in 2004 both had the following identical language:


“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national Democratic Parties by balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll
and Caucus held in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National
Democratic Convention held in...”





The Democratic Party of Hawaii included the explicit statement required by HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B) that the 2000 and 2004 candidates were legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution, but the DPH did not do the same for Obama. Also, in another comparison, the Hawaiian Republican Party’s 2008 OCON, signed by RPH Chairman, Willes K. Lee, for John McCain and Sarah Palin, states:


“We do hereby certify that at a National Convention of Delegates representing the Republican Party of the United States, duly held and convened in the City of Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, on September 4, 2008, the following person meeting the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States, and the following person meeting the Constitutional requirements for the Office of Vice President of the United States were nominated for such offices to be filled at the ensuing general election, November 4, 2008…”

The Republican Party of Hawaii’s Official Certification of Nomination for John McCain and Sarah Palin clearly includes the words “…meeting the Constitutional requirements…” and is dated September 4, 2008, and is notarized by Sheila Rae Motzko, notary of Minnesota. Therefore, the RPH obviously had no reservations in certifying the eligibility of McCain and Palin.

Given the indisputable facts that the DPH had included the language in previous OCONs, indicating officials were fully aware of the legal requirement, and that the selection of Obama took place more than six months prior to the submittal of the OCON, indicating they had ample time to review any evidence, if it exists, of Obama's eligibility, it becomes impossible that the DPH either forgot about the need for the specific language or that the DPH simply ignored it. Therefore, the DPH intentionally omitted the language stating that Obama is legally qualified under the provisions of the U.S. constitution because he is not.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 04:59:08 PM
THE "MESS"


The Democratic National Committee (DNC), chaired by Nancy Pelosi, signed and had attested by notarization, its national Official Certification of Nominations with all fifty states on August 28th, 2008. We conclude this based on the "RECEIVED DATE" stamp provided on multiple states' DNC OCONs of "AUGUST 29th, 2009", and the notarization date of August 28. This sworn application was filed sometime between August 28, 2008 and September 5, 2008 with the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer, Kevin Cronin. The copy provided by the Hawaiian Election office for public review, however, does not contain a RECEIVED DATE stamp like other states' OCONs do.

However, a review of the Democratic National Committee’s OCONs for Obama reveals a shocking irregularity in the composition of its Official Certification of Nomination sent to Hawaii. On December 19, 2008, Hawaii’s Chief Elections officer, Kevin Cronin, in response to a written request by a Colorado resident for a copy of the Official Certification of Nominations, sent a letter and a copy of the DPH’s OCON and the DNC’s OCON. However, analysis of the DNC OCON sent to Hawaii in comparison with the DNC’s OCON sent to other states, reveals that they did not match. In fact, Hawaii’s version of the DNC’s OCON contained specific wording not included in the versions sent to ALL the other states, which directly contradicts the Democrat Party of Hawaii's OCON. All the states' Election Commissions, except for Hawaii's, were sent one Official Certification of Nomination with the following statement:


“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively”




The typo “though” is not a mistake. It actually exists in the official document. Notice, in this version of the DNC’s OCON, there is no mention of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility. However, in the version sent separately to Hawaii’s Election Commission, it states the following:


“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution:”


The content of this second OCON from the DNC raises some serious questions about the motives of its author. The fact that the same typo remains on this second version is an indication that it was not independently published but rather amended, suddenly. The fact that there was a typo, at all, in both versions indicates haste on the part of the DNC.

Also, notice the key language is tacked on the final sentence in this second version of the DNC OCON rather than included in the mid-body of the paragraph as with previous DPH OCONs. The inclusion of the language previously omitted by the DPH's OCON and the DNC OCON sent to every other state, indicates nothing less than a conspiracy on the part of the DNC and the DPH to force a confirmation of Barack Obama’s eligibility by the state of Hawaii, without actually verifying it. This is apparent because if either party authority had actually verified it, the other would have also included the legally required language, especially since both OCONs were notarized with seven days remaining in the deadline to submit them to Hawaii CEO, Kevin Cronin, unless, of course, the document was actually submitted to the Hawaiian Elections Office too late for revisions, which is likely the case. Therefore, the DNC was forced to amend its Hawaiian OCON specifically for Obama as a means of creating a direct contradiction with the DPH’s legitimate omission of legal language which, if included, would certify Obama’s constitutional eligibility in accordance with Hawaiian law.


Finally, as discussed previously, there is no FILING DATE stamped on this document! The OCON submitted to the Hawaiian Elections Office was one of fifty authored by the DNC and submitted after August 28, 2008. Yet, the OCON received by the State of Hawaii from the DNC is the only one with no filing date or RECEIVED DATE stamped on its face. A review of OCONs submitted to every other state reveals the Elections Office in those states affixed this stamp on their document. The omission of this date stamp by the Hawaiian Elections Office is particularly suspicious because, in accordance with HRS 11-113(c), (d) and (e), the RECEIPT DATE initiates a roster of deadlines and correspondence between the Chief Elections Officer, the applicant and the candidate, the first of which is a written notification from Kevin Cronin informing the candidate if they were either approved or denied for inclusion on the ballot. The absence of this RECEIPT or FILING DATE suspiciously obscures the time line which would reveal if the second OCON submitted by the DNC was in violation of Hawaiian law or if it was actually submitted BEFORE the DPH's OCON.

The obvious crime in this intentional dissemination of misinformation is that if the DPH was unable to verify Obama’s eligibility, the DNC would have also not been able to verify it. Why would the DNC not share its verification documentation of Obama's candidacy with the Democrat Party of Hawaii's official? If the DNC was actually able to verify Obama's eligibility, the DPH would have also acquired the same documentation to verify it. If the eligibility of Obama candidacy was provable and verifiable, both party authorities would have included the same appropriate language in accordance with Hawaiian law. Hawaiian law also allowed for seven more days from the dates appearing on both OCONs to be filed if more time was needed for the DPH and the DNC to corroborate the verification of Obama's eligibility.




Also, if the original version of the DNC's OCON had been authored with language confirming Obama's constitutional eligbility, the DNC had no rational motive for submitting two different versions. The inclusion of such language only reinforces perception of Obama's eligibility in every state. Therefore, the submittal of different documents indicates an act of deception on the part of Nancy Pelosi and the DNC in an effort to contradict the Democrat Party of Hawaii's OCON.




THE "FIX"

Was the opportunity available for Obama to personally engage a meeting to discuss the matter of his lack of legal qualifications to appear on the Hawaiian ballot? Was it possible that he actually attended such a hearing?


The following account demonstrates the logistic and legal opportunity as well as the fact that Obama was present and unaccounted for during a period of several hours in Hawaii on October 24th, 2008.


This documented contradiction was intentional by the party authorities because the very presence of this conflict activates a series of lawful empowerments to the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer to make autonomous decisions about ballot content. However, Adminstrative procedure law in Hawaii dictates that certain correspondence and deadlines must be met first:


HRS 11-113(d) provides that “…Each applicant and the candidates named, shall be notified in writing of the applicant's or candidate's eligibility or disqualification for placement on the ballot not later than 4:30 p.m. on the tenth business day after filing. The chief election officer may extend the notification period up to an additional five business days, if the applicants and candidates are provided with notice of the extension and the reasons therefore.”




The DPH submitted the OCON to the Hawaiian Elections Office as late as September 5, 2008. We can't confirm this date because the Hawaiian Elections Office did not stamp and "RECEIVED DATE" on the document, like the other 49 states did on theirs, but the official filing date could have occurred on September 8, 2008. Therefore, this means that, by adding the optional five business day extension to the mandated 10 day notification deadline, Cronin mailed the notification to Obama between September 26, 2008 and September 29th, 2008, accounting for weekends, the Labor Day Holiday on September 1st, difference in time zones and end of "business day" Fridays.




HRS 11-113(e) then provides that “…(e) If the applicant, or any other party, individual, or group with a candidate on the presidential ballot, objects to the finding of eligibility or disqualification the person may, not later than 4:30 p.m. on the fifth day after the finding, file a request in writing with the chief election officer for a hearing on the question.”

Therefore, if Cronin notified Obama that he was not qualified to be placed on the ballot in Hawaii, this means that Obama had until approximately October 7th, 2008 to respond in writing and request a hearing.

HRS 11-113(e) then also provides that “…A hearing shall be called not later than 4:30 p.m. on the tenth day after the receipt of the request and shall be conducted in accord with chapter 91.”

Cronin would have received Obama's request sometime around October 9th or 10th, 2008. However, like the OCON, Cronin is not obligated to record receipt of the document on the same day it arrives. Therefore, based on HRS 11-113(e), the latest Cronin was legally able to schedule a hearing for Obama was sometime between Monday, October 20th and Friday, October 24th, 2008.


Cronin has been accused of being overly liberal with statutory deadlines in favor of democrats in the past. In early August, 2008, RPH Chair, Willes Lee filed a lawsuit against Cronin and the Office of Elections (Willes Lee v. Cronin, Civil No. 08-1-1609) challenging the candidacy of a local Democrat, Isaac Choy, to the state's House (24th Dist.). Lee contended that Choy had been unlawfully named a candidate by the DPH when his predecessor, Kirk Caldwell (D), left the post early to run for City Council. The suit alleged that Caldwell had notified the Elections Office on July 22, 2008 that he was leaving the seat. Cronin, however, after waiting until the next day to file the withdrawl, contended that the 72 hour deadline allowed by Hawaiian Election law was actually initiated on July 23rd, not the 22nd, allowing for the DPH's selection of Choy to occur on Saturday, the 26th, not Friday, the 25th.

Moreover, Hawaii Revised Statute, Administrative Rules, Chapter 91-9 (d), Contested Cases; notice, hearing; records states: “Any procedure in a contested case may be modified or waived by stipulation of the parties and informal disposition may be made of any contested case by stipulation, agreed settlement, consent order, or default.”

Essentially, this HAR allows Obama to request a reasonable modification of procedure in order to accommodate a reasonable schedule and effort needed to attend a contesting hearing. Therefore, Obama could have have sought extra time after the hearing began in order to accommodate a pressing personal matter…like a sick grandmother.




Where was Obama between October 23rd - 24th, 2008?




On Monday, October 21, 2008, Reuters reported:


“Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama will leave the campaign trail to go to Hawaii this week to visit the ailing grandmother who helped raise him, an aide said on Monday.




Recently his grandmother has become ill and in the last few weeks her health has deteriorated to the point where her situation is very serious," said Obama aide Robert Gibbs.




Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, who will be 86 on Sunday, helped raise him along with his mother, Ann Dunham, and his grandfather, Stanley Dunham. Gibbs would not discuss the nature of her illness.

The candidate is canceling events in Madison, Wisconsin, and Des Moines, Iowa, that had been scheduled for Thursday. He instead will go to an event in Indianapolis, Indiana, on Thursday, then fly to Hawaii to see his grandmother. He will return to the campaign trail on Saturday, Gibbs said."

On October21, 2008, ABC News reported:


"Sen. Barack Obama has made the very personal decision to leave the campaign trail for two days to visit his ailing 85-year-old grandmother in Hawaii...




Although a candidate has never before stopped campaigning this close to Election Day, Obama's running mate and surrogates will remain on the trail, and more important, his ads will continue to run. Obama decided Monday night to cancel campaign stops on Thursday and Friday and fly to Hawaii
to see his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham...

ABC News then reported on October 24th, 2008:


"After spending about two hours with his ill grandmother in her apartment this morning, Sen. Barack Obama , D-Ill., took a short walk alone in the Makiki neighborhood of Honolulu outside his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham’s, apartment."


KHNL News Hawaii Reported on October 24th:


HONOLULU (KHNL) - Barack Obama's quick visit to the islands came to an end today. He is the first presidential candidate in history to take two days out of the campaign, this close to the general election. But he says, this move is all about family. Senator Obama's jet took off from Honolulu International Airport this evening. His motorcade escorted by Honolulu Police made its way down Lagoon Drive, to the runway. The democratic presidential candidate's plane left Honolulu at about 5 o' clock. Earlier today, the presidential candidate visited with his beloved tutu, which was his main objective on this trip.

Multiple blog and media accounts say that Obama was in Hawaii for approximately 22 hours over two days, an eternity for a Presidential candidate in the final days of a campaign. Yet, he spent only approximately two hours with his gravely ill grandmother, allegedly alone, with no other immediate family members, except his sister, Maya. Except for his reported "stroll about the neighborhood", no other accounting of Obama's time in Hawaii has ever been made known during these hours.

If we accept Robert Gibbs' and the media's account of Obama's "leisurely" time during these days, then it appears he would have been free to attend to eligibility matters in Hawaii during Friday afternoon, at which time it is highly likely he met privately with Cronin, the DPH, the Hawaiian Attorney General and members of the Election Commission. He also would have signed a sworn affidavit falsifying that he was Constitutionally eligible to serve as president, letting Schatz and the DPH off the "legal hook", in exchange for Schatz' silence, of course.


Media coverage of Obama's campaign state that he was delivering a rally speech in Obelisk Square in Indianapolis at noon, EST on October 23rd. Private flight time on Obama's campaign jet, from Indianapolis to Honolulu, is approximately seven to eight hours. Indiana is the western-most state in the eastern time zone which means that if Obama left Indianapolis at 1:00 p.m. EST, subtracting times zones from flight time and adding an hour for a refueling stop in Sacramento at 3:00 PST, he would have arrived in Honolulu between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. that same day.


At least one major media network states that Obama spent an hour at his grandmother's apartment that evening beginning around 7:00, then he returned the next morning for about two hours departing at about 10:45 a.m. Obama's time is unaccounted for between about 11:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on October 24th, when he boarded his campaign jet for for a 5 hour flight to Reno where he arrived around midnight PST, October 25th.


Reno is in the Pacific Standard Time zone, two hours ahead of Honolulu. He appeared at a rally on the Nevada-Reno University campus at 10:15 a.m. where he spoke for 30 minutes to a crowd of 11,000, on Saturday, October 25th.




THE FINALE




Hawaii Revised Statute 11-113(b) then gave Cronin the legal right to choose to include Barack Obama, an uncertified, unverified and, therefore, ineligible presidential candidate on the Hawaiian presidential ballot. HRS 11-113(b) states:

b) A "national party" as used in this section shall mean a party established and admitted to the ballot in at least one state other than Hawaii or one which is determined by the chief election officer to be making a bona fide effort to become a national party. If there is no national party or the national and state parties or factions in either the national or state party do not agree on the presidential and vice presidential candidates, the chief election officer may determine which candidates' names shall be placed on the ballot or may leave the candidates' names off the ballot completely.

Within the legal prose of these corruptive Hawaiian laws lies the permission for the Chief Elections Officer (Kevin Cronin) of Hawaii to include the name of an ineligible candidate (Barack Obama) on the Hawaiian presidential ballot when the state party authority (DPH, chair Brian Schatz) and the national party authority (DNC, chair Nancy Pelosi) do not agree on the eligibility of the candidate. As we know, Obama appeared on the Hawaiian presidential ballot indicating that Cronin acted alone in approving Obama's candidacy for ballot placement.

Hawaii's remote, ridiculous legal moorings have become legendary during the saga of Obama's fake identity. By now, the entire world is at least familiar with HRS 338-17.8 which actually obligates (not, "provides the choice" for) the Director of the Hawaiian Health Department to provide official, original Certificates of Live Birth to foreign born children when a least one parent of the child claimed Hawaii as their residence for at least one year prior to the birth. This law is a direct affront to the U.S. Constitutional mandate that a presidential candidate must be a natural born citizen, if the Director of Health in Hawaii assumes jurisdiction in declaring that its citizens are natural born citizens...which Fukino actually had the afoul audacity to do in a formal press release in July, 2009.



Now we can include more examples of legal absurdity from laws governing the Hawaiian Elections Office.




Perhaps, someday, the politically poisoned, liberal creatures of the defunct American media might engage their responsibility as journalists and serously inquire as to what other grand proclamations the State of Hawaii has made about this strange and ambiguous character referred to as "President Barack Obama."


On the other hand, maybe, as one of the newest states, if Hawaii had a different name, like..."Alaska", we wouldn't even be having a discussion about eligibility.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 05:00:28 PM
SUMMARY




A comparison of the DNC's OCON sent to Hawaii with the OCONs sent to every other state reveals a conspiracy to conceal Obama's ineligibility. Notice the statement added to the Hawaiian document in order to make it compliant with HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B), after it was discovered the DEMOCRAT PARTY OF HAWAII refused to include the legally required language enabling Hawaii's Chief Elections Officer to approve of Obama's inclusion on the Hawaiian Presidential Ballot.




Hawaii Revised Statute HRS 11-113 (d) and (e), in collaboration with HRS 91, 92 and 3-170 creates a series of deadlines which enabled Obama with an opportunity to appear in Hawaii almost 45 days after the OCON controversy occurred, but on the exact day prior to the final deadline for inclusion on the Hawaiian presidential ballot. This time line was critical in creating the appearance that Obama's only reason for visiting Hawaii more than three times in 4 months was for personal reasons.




Obama's time in Hawaii from the afternoon of October 23rd through October 24th remains largely unnaccounted for, except for the brief time he spent with his sick grandmother.



Any conflict among party authorities over candidate eligibility allows the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer the autonomous choice whether or not to include the candidate on the ballot anyway, per HRS 11-113(b), which Cronin did, regardless if that candidate is proven eligible or not. Cronin is not obligated to verify eligibility per HRS 11-113.



This indicates a crime. If the original OCON had contained the amended statement prior to being signed, it would have been left in the body of the statement for ALL the OCONs received by all the states. There is no rational motive for the DNC to omit this statement post-signing because it only reinforces allegations by Obama and the DNC that he is eligible in every state. Which he is not, at least we know, in Hawaii. The fact that it only appears in Hawaii's OCON indicates a cover-up.



The lack of a "RECEIVED DATE" stamp on the DNC's Hawaiian OCON, which is present on other state's version, also prevents an accurate determination of the latest possible date on which Cronin was able to schedule a CONTEST HEARING with Obama after finding Obama uncertified by the DPH. Obama would not have wanted to give the appearance of dealing with an ineligibility issue so close to the election, but he also would not want to allow anyone to know their was a legal problem with his inclusion on the ballot so near the date when Hawaii received the Certifications of Nomination there. Cronin was permitted to record his receipt of the OCON as late as Sept. 5, 2008, 60 days prior to the election, which would have allowed the hearing to begin sometime between October 10, 2008 and October 24, 2008, after exhausting the legally permitted time and personal allowances in the process for scheduling according to HRS 11-113(d) and (e).

Obama cancelled several campaign appointments, just weeks before the election, and suddenly traveled to Hawaii on October 23, 2008 without his family, to visit his ill grandmother.




HRS 92-5-8 affords the Hawaiian Elections Commission the permission to conduct private meetings with candidates when information contained in vital records protected under HRS 338-18 is to be considered.




Madelyn Dunham's death was reported on November 3rd, 2008. It allegedly occurred at about 3:00 a.m. on November 2nd. No official medical documents, death certificate or coronor's report of her passing has ever been publicly revealed..




This documented evidence, in coordination with actions by the Democrat party's authorities and the actions of the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer in coordination with the provisions of Hawaiian election law and Obama's behavior, in coordination with the events of the campaign, his personal life, and his lack of constitutional eligibility to be president all leave little doubt that the election of Obama occurred extralegally and outside the limits of constitutional legitimacy making him, at least, an unconstitutional president and, at most, an enemy usurper of American sovereignty.




By undermining the provisions of the constitution, Barack Obama has injured the American people by illegally circumventing their right to the protections against domestic threats and ineligible usurpation of their sovereign liberties, which include the right of trust and confidence in those presenting themselves as legitimate candidates for government office.




The fact that very specific, and rational questions remain unanswered about Obama's past, including the actions by officials working within the government agencies of the State of Hawaii, reveals nothing less than a web of legally knitted deception in order to conceal the obviousness of Barack Obama complete lack of Constitutional standing to be President of the United States. As such, Obama's entire Presidency has been built on an epic lie of such grand proportions no remedy remains except that which can only come from the common-men and descendants of our vintage American founders.

REVIEWING THE FACTS

1. Electors from each state rely on each party’s state authority in that state to certify the nomination of their candidates and verify their legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.

2. Hawaiian election law specifically requires each state’s party authority to file a sworn application (Official Certification of Nomination) with Hawaii’s Chief Elections Officer certifying the eligibility of each candidate to serve as President and Vice President of the United States.

3. Hawaii Revised Statute 11-113(c)(1)(B) specifically requires that this sworn application from each state party authority contains explicit language stating that all candidates are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution in order for the Chief Elections Officer to approve the candidate for placement on the state’s presidential ballot.

4. On August 27th, 2008, by notary attestment, authorities of the Democrat Party of Hawaii (DPH) signed a sworn Official Certification of Nomination and was required to submit the document to Hawaii's Chief Election Officer, Kevin Cronin before 4:30 p.m. on September 5, 2008 or September 8, 2008 allowing for the count of one additional business day for one lost on Labor day.

5. The DPH, chaired by Brian Schatz, refused to include legally required language, per HRS 11-113(c)(1)(B), within the state party’s Official Certification of Nomination stating that Obama was Constitutionally eligible to serve as President.

6. The Democrat Party of Hawaii included this legally required language for other Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates in past elections dating to, at least, 2000 and 2004. Therefore, the omission of this language within the DPH’s 2008 OCON of Obama’s candidacy is not a mistake or an oversight. It was done intentionally and with full understanding of Brian Schatz that the Hawaiian CEO, Kevin Cronin, would not be legally permitted to approve Barack Obama as a candidate on the Hawaiian presidential ballot, unless the Democratic National Committee (the national party authority) included this language in its OCON.

7. The Republican Party of Hawaii included the legally required language in its sworn 2008 Official Certification of Nomination for John McCain and Sarah Palin, per HRS 11-113, without reservation or exceptions.

8. The Democrat Party of Hawaii refused to acknowledge that Barack Obama was legally qualified to serve as president under the provisions of U.S. Constitution and, therefore, the DPH refused to provide legal certification allowing the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer to approve the placement of Barack Obama on the Hawaiian presidential ballot.

9. Since the DPH did not provide legal certification of Barack Obama's constitutional candidacy, Kevin Cronin, was required to send a written notice to Barack Obama informing him that the DPH refused to provide legal certification of his candidacy for approval of his inclusion on the State of Hawaii’s 2008 presidential ballot. Cronin was legally required to send this notification within 10 business days from the time Cronin received the OCON from the DPH. Cronin also had the option, under HRS 11-113, to extend the notification deadline five more business days for a total of 15 days from the day the DPH filed the OCON.

10. The DPH's OCON is dated August 27th, 2008. However, HRS 11-113 provides that OCONs may be filed by 4:30 p.m. on no less than the 60th day prior to the day of the election. In this case, based on the alleged notarization date appearing the DPH's OCON, the DPH still had eight more days to file the OCON and perhaps request verification documentation from Obama. Therefore, Obama received his notification of the Hawaiian CEO's findings no later than September 29th, 2008.

11. However, documents provided by the Hawaiian Election Commission show that the Democratic National Committee, chaired by Nancy Pelosi, signed its 2008 Official Certification of Nomination with a date of August 28, 2008. However, documented evidence shows that the DNC also authored a separate version of its OCON at a later time. One version was sent only to Hawaii containing specific wording which directly contradicted that state party’s Constitutional authority to declare that Barack Obama was not constitutionally eligible to serve as President and was, therefore, not approved for inclusion on the Hawaiian presidential ballot.

12. Article IV-Section 4, Article IV-Section 1 and Article II-Section 1 of the Constitution grants sovereignty for certifying a candidate’s nomination and approving a candidate’s inclusion on each state’s presidential ballot to each state. The Democratic National Committee does not have the legal authority to supersede the sovereignty of Hawaii’s appointed authority to conduct election, approve ballot content and certify the nomination of candidates.

13. By intentionally contradicting the findings of Hawaii’s party authority for the purpose of forcing the state of Hawaii to include Obama’s candidacy on its ballot, the Democratic National Committee, headed by Nancy Pelosi, committed election fraud and violated the Constitutional right of the people of the state of Hawaii to an election process in which supreme power is held by the citizens and their entitlement to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.

14. The Official Certification of Nomination sent to Hawaii’s Chief Elections Officer by the DNC was not sent to any other state’s CEO.

15. Based on the authority given them by the Constitution, some states’ election laws do not require an explicit statement indicating a candidate’s legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the Constitution, like Hawaii, but rather a general statement citing documentation that the candidate is qualified under federal law to serve as President and Vice President.

16. The DNC sent a different OCON to every other state omitting the reference to Constitutional eligibility.

17. Cronin sent written notification to Obama stating that Obama was found legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution based on the DNC’s OCON.

18. The Democratic Party of Hawaii and the Democratic National Committee do not agree with one another about the Constitutional qualifications of Barack Obama.

19. Cronin’s notifications have never been revealed to the public.

20. If the notification from Cronin to Obama stated that Obama was found not qualified to be on the Hawaiian ballot, Obama had five business days after the finding to send a written request for a hearing to contest the finding and reconcile his lack of eligibility with the DPH.

21. Upon receiving a request for a hearing from Obama, Cronin was obligated to schedule the hearing within 10 business days of receiving the request.

22. Hearings to contest candidate eligibility findings are conducted under Administrative Procedures governed by HRS AR 91, 92 and 3-170.

23. AR 91-9 allows a petitioner for a hearing to request reasonable scheduling accommodations in order to attend the hearing based on travel, personal matters and/or financial issues.

24. The hearing would have been conducted around mid to late October, 2008.

25. Barack Obama’s grandmother was reported to have become gravely ill in early to mid October, 2008.

26. Barack Obama was in Hawaii in mid October, 2008. The American public was told that his only business there was to visit with his ill grandmother.

27. Obama went to Hawaii, suddenly, without his wife and children, even though Dunham's condition was reported to have been expectedly declining for several weeks, during which, at any time, Obama could have otherwise scheduled a planned visit. The exclusion of Dunham's great-grandchildren and Michelle Obama during this visit is odd. Madelyn Dunham did not pass away for two more weeks after Obama's visit having never been visited by Obama's family in her final months.

27. HRS 11-113 (b) states: If there is no national party or the national and state parties…do not agree on the presidential and vice presidential candidates, the chief election officer may determine which candidates' names shall be placed on the ballot or may leave the candidates' names off the ballot completely.

28. Barack Obama was included on the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot.

QUESTIONS FOR CONGRESS

QUESTION 1: Why, after including the legally required language for previous Democratic candidates in elections past, did chairperson, Brian Schatz and the Democrat Party of Hawaii, refuse to include the legally required language upon submitting it for the approval of that state party’s 2008 Official Certification of Nomination when they submitted it to Kevin B. Cronin and the Hawaiian Election Commission?

QUESTION 2: Did Kevin Cronin, Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer in 2008, approve the placement of Barack Obama’s name on the presidential ballot for the 2008 federal election, in spite of the fact that explicit language stating that Obama was Constitutionally eligible to run for president was omitted from the Official Certification of Nomination submitted by the Democrat Party of Hawaii?

QUESTION 3: Did Kevin Cronin, Chief Elections Officer, in coordination with the Hawaiian Election Commission, and HRS 11-113 (1)(d), notify Barack Obama in writing, of his eligibility or disqualification for placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot and what date did he provide this notification?

QUESTION 4: If a notice of disqualification was sent to Obama, upon receiving this notice from the Hawaiian Elections Commission, did Barack Obama file a request, per HRS 11-113 (1)(e), in writing to Mr. Cronin and what date did he submit this request?


QUESTION 5: Did Cronin schedule Obama to a hearing and what date was this hearing scheduled?

QUESTION 6: Where was Obama between October 20th and 24th, 2008?

QUESTION 7: Was Obama present in Hawaii during the time when a hearing was conducted with the Hawaiian Elections Commission regarding his disqualification from the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot?

QUESTION 8: Why did the Democratic National Committee author two separate Official Certifications of Nomination for Barack Obama, sending one version to Hawaii but not the other 49 states?

QUESTION 9: Did The DNC send two separate versions of its OCON to the Hawaiian Election Commission, and if so, why did it do this?

QUESTION 10: What secret evidence, which was obviously not accessible to the Democrat Party of Hawaii (the very state Obama was born in), did Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic National Committee acquire to determine Barack Obama’s legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution and, thereby, include such language in its OCON?

QUESTION 11: When it was determined that the state and national party authorities of the Democratic Party did not agree on the status of Barack Obama’s eligibility, did the Chief Elections Officer of Hawaii, Kevin Cronin, determine to include Obama on the Hawaii presidential election ballot with authority provided by HRS 11-113(b).


QUESTION 12: What documented evidence was used by the DNC, which was not available to the Democrat Party of Hawaii, to determine that Barack Obama was legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution?


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 12, 2011, 05:08:17 PM
President's sister says it's time to move past birther issue
By Staff and the Associated Press
POSTED: 12:22 p.m. HST, Apr 12, 2011

(http://media.staradvertiser.com/images/312*453/73cc32ef37873308ea0e6a706700aa22.jpg)
Associated Press
This March 29, 2011 photo shows Maya Soetoro-Ng at her home in Honolulu. (AP Photo/Eugene Tanner)

The president's sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, answered questions about her brother's birthplace and called the revival of the issue by Donald Trump, "a shame."

Soetero-Ng, who is traveling in New York to promote her children's book, told CNN's Piers Morgan in an interview airing today that continued questions about her brother's birthplace in Hawaii are "unfortunate ... he was born in Hawaii, there's a tremendous amount of proof that has already been presented."

She also told the Associated Press: "The facts are simply that my brother was born in the United States at the Kapiolani Hospital for Women and Children in 1961. His birth certificate has been authenticated by a number of sources. ... Really, I feel that it behooves us to think about moving forward, and up, and really focusing on positive possibilities and solutions, and the facts are that my brother is a U.S. citizen."

Trump, who says he is considering a run for president, recently revived the birther issue with his questions about the Obama's birth certificate.

Officials in Hawaii have long certified Obama's birth in Honolulu, but Trump questions whether the president was born abroad and has suggested that Obama may have violated the Constitution.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/119729064.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 05:10:36 PM
Was she there to witness the nativity of the Messiah?    What the hell would se know about this?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 12, 2011, 05:24:56 PM
Update: Breaking from Hawaii: No More Long-Form Birth Certificates!
HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MAKES UP THE RULES AS IT GOES ALONG…TO PRISON?
by Sharon Rondeau

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/12/breaking-from-hawaii-no-more-long-form-birth-certificates





What is the Hawaii Department of Health hiding? Have they told so many lies that they are now cornered?

(Apr. 12, 2011) — Miki Booth has just reported via telephone to The Post & Email that a man born and currently residing in Hawaii went to the Department of Health this morning and requested a copy of his long-form birth certificate.  He was refused, told that it was no longer available and that all he could obtain is the short-form document.

The man had obtained his short-form “Certificate of Live Birth” several weeks ago and reported to Miki that the request form had had two different boxes which could be checked:  one indicating that the short-form was being requested and the other that the long-form was desired.

Today, the man reported that the form has been changed such that that choice is no longer available.

The short-form document which the man received was labeled “Certificate of Live Birth,” unlike Obama’s purported form which is a “Certification of Live Birth.”  Likewise, Miki Booth’s son, Alan, had received a short-form birth certificate last year which entitled “Certificate of Live Birth.”  The man who obtained his short-form document said that it does not contain the fields for “Father’s Place of Birth” and “Mother’s Place of Birth” as Alan Booth’s does.

Could that be because Obama’s Certification of Live Birth image does not contain those fields, and the Hawaii Department of Health is attempting to legitimize it?

Therefore, when Dr. Chiyome Fukino spoke with MSNBC on Monday morning, she apparently was not lying when she said that long-form birth certificates are no longer available.

But why was that change made?  Who ordered the change in policy?  Was it made because Donald Trump has demanded that Obama release his original, detailed birth certificate to support his claim of a Hawaii birth?

The witness who accompanied the gentleman has a daughter who obtained a copy of her long-form birth certificate last month.  The document was provided to Miki Booth, who supplied it to The Post & Email here.

On April 11, 2011, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former director of the Hawaii Department of Health, told MSNBC that long-form birth certificates were no longer available.  But when did that become policy?  Who ordered this change in policy since at least one such form was issued to a requester last month and posted here?

2:47 p.m. EDT:  The Post & Email has left a message with Dr. Alvin Onaka, Registrar of Vital Statistics at the Hawaii Department of Health, requesting the documentation making long-form birth certificates unavailable to those born in the state.  We also contacted Gov. Neil Abercrombie’s office and asked the secretary why suddenly Hawaii residents can no longer have access to their original birth record.  She asked this writer my name and where I was calling from, which I gave her.  She then interrupted me and transferred me to the governor’s spokesperson, Ms. Donalyn Delacruz, with whom we left a voice message with our phone number and email address.

While Dr. Fukino claimed in her interview with MSNBC that she has seen Obama’s original vital record, Gov. Abercrombie has stated that one does not exist.  Why was Fukino inspecting Obama’s alleged record if it is against the law and the document doesn’t exist?  Or did it exist when she was Health Department Director and now it has disappeared since Abercrombie took office?

Last night, Donald Trump was interviewed by Greta Van Susteren and said, “If he (Obama) had a birth certificate, I think he’d produce it.”

Obama adviser David Plouffe called Trump’s questioning of the existence of Obama’s birth certificate “a sideshow.”

What are the Hawaii officials hiding, why, and how many will pay a price?  What is Obama hiding?

3:24 p.m. EDT:  The following email was sent to Donalyn Delacruz, to whom this writer was referred after reaching Gov. Abercrombie’s secretary:

From:  Sharon Rondeau
Sent:  Tue 4/12/11 3:23 PM
To:  donalyn.delacruz@hawaii.gov
RE:  CHANGE OF POLICY AT THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH‏

Mahalo.  I operate an online newspaper, The Post & Email, and we have been investigating corruption in your state and all over the country for the last 20 months.

A resident of Hawaii went to the Health Department this morning and filled out the request form for a copy of his long-form birth certificate.  The man was told he can no longer obtain one.

When did this policy change, and where is the documentation?  Why would someone be refused a copy of his original vital record?  I have one of mine.

I left a message with your office last week which was not answered, before Dr. Chiyome Fukino told MSNBC yesterday that long-form birth certificates are no longer available.

Your governor has stated that Obama has no long-form birth certificate, although the previous governor said that he did.  In fact, Dr. Fukino said she had seen it twice, in violation of state law.  Also discussing what was in the birth record is a violation of your law.

Can you tell me what is going on?  Has the policy been changed to protect Obama?  Why did Governor Lingle say that Obama had an original vital record but Governor Abercrombie says he doesn’t?  Was it made to disappear, or, as former Elections Clerk Tim Adams has stated, did one never exist?

What are officials in Hawaii hiding from the American people, and why?

Thank you.

Sharon Rondeau
Editor
The Post & Email, Inc.
www.thepostemail.com
editor@thepostemail.com

An excerpt from a report given to us by a researcher who traveled to Hawaii last summer, funded in part by The Post & Email’s Legal Fund, states:

MRS. RONDEAU: There have been reports and affidavits signed by licensed investigators that Obama is using a social security number that had been previously assigned to someone, and the Social Security Administration has been quoted as having said that numbers are never reassigned. And now your research raises the question as to whether or not his certificate number could have previously been assigned.

RESEARCHER: Yes, we’re trying to ascertain to whom it may have been actually assigned and explore the possibility of obtaining a certified copy of the long-form birth certificate which, contrary to what has been reported, the DoH still issues. I don’t know where I’ve seen the statement supporting the Department of Health’s contention that it now issues only a Certificate of Live Birth, but it’s not true. When I was at the Department of Health, I observed a woman who was directly in front of me in line order a copy of her long-form birth certificate. She was told that it would take about a week to obtain. She made arrangements to pick it up at the DoH office in lieu of having it mailed to her since she worked across the street.

The Hawaii Department of Health’s website has an online application form to request “certified copies” of vital records.

The Post & Email has reported previously that the Hawaii Department of Health has lied about birth index data and verbally changed the rules as events unfolded in regard to Obama.  No one from the department has ever refuted our claims, and they will not return our calls.

 

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 05:57:22 PM
 ::)


Let go of your hate Luke.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 12, 2011, 06:31:12 PM
Since it is a constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen of the US, and his ability to hold office has been questioned, then I would say yes he is obligated to produce the long form BC. If nothing else than to put an end to this. As far as the rest it is at his discretion to do so.

this....

I am sorry 333333,  when people apply at Walmart they are required to provide all their academic records?    

Many Hedge funds ask for SAT scores, GMAT scores, etc..GPA's...

It's not unheard of asking for grades.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 12, 2011, 06:54:21 PM
If there is a recent change in policy and Hawaiians can no longer get a copy of their long form birth certificate, that sounds very suspect.  I don't know of any other state where you can't get your long form BC upon request. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 12, 2011, 08:07:49 PM
That's what I don't understand because they are essentially the same arguments.

911 had far more gravity than this.   

3000 dead americans, and anything more than an investigation one of the commisison members called 'a whitewash' was considered unpatriotic. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 08:35:17 PM
this....

Many Hedge funds ask for SAT scores, GMAT scores, etc..GPA's...

It's not unheard of asking for grades.

There is a difference with a $8 dollar and hour job at Walmart. And I am not implying it's unheard of.  

But I dont see that as relative.  It's reasonable to ask the POTUS for this info, but it's also with in his rights to refuse to do so.  The only way is to make a law.  Until then spewing goading rhetoric in an attempt to raise suspicion is a waste of time and very transparent.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 12, 2011, 08:39:25 PM
If there is a recent change in policy and Hawaiians can no longer get a copy of their long form birth certificate, that sounds very suspect.  I don't know of any other state where you can't get your long form BC upon request. 

That's not what was stated a few days ago.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 12, 2011, 08:40:03 PM
911 had far more gravity than this.   

3000 dead americans, and anything more than an investigation one of the commisison members called 'a whitewash' was considered unpatriotic. 


I agree, it's too bad its a dying issue.  As you know I for one support another investigation.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 07:47:04 AM
Sarah Obama said Barack Jr. passed through her hands as an orphan
Jefferson's Rebels ^ | Erica


Posted on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:14:30 AM by EricaD

Sarah Obama Said Barack Obama Jr. Was An Orphan in Kenya

[Note: Go to http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com/2011/04/sarah-obama-said-barack-obama-was.html to view screen shot images of cited articles, and to follow text links.]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sarah Obama said that Barack Obama passed through her hands as an orphan. How could that possibly happen?

Below you will find a fairly recent but undated article about Sarah Obama's humanitarian work with orphans and other vulnerable children over the course of her life.

In the Catholic Relief Services article, Mama Sarah, as she's affectionately called, opened her simple home to dozens of children "over the last 40 years." In addition, she is said to have received help for hundreds of other children. She clearly has dedicated her life to helping vulnerable children.

So strong has been public interest in Kogelo village since Barack Obama's election, that the Mama Sarah Obama Children Foundation was established to collect donations for these children. In contrast to the CRS article, Sarah's Foundation website says unequivocally that Mama Sarah has been tending children since 1945, which means she has been taking care of children for over 65 years.

"Since then to date her household has never missed an orphan or vulnerable child in pursuit of education."

That time frame is relevant to the issue of Barack Obama's early childhood because it means she was caring for children in 1961, the year of Obama's birth.

Why is this relevant? Because Sarah made this stunningly explicit remark on May 4, 2010 when she was awarded an honorary doctorate from the Tom Mboya Labour College in Kisumu:

"This is a show of blessing from God, since I have always dedicated my time to tend to the orphans. Even the US president passed through my hands," added the grandmother."

If indeed Barack Obama Jr. was born in her presence, and if he was born as a conjoined twin as has been suggested due to severe scars on his head, he might have been rejected by his natural mother. Who better than Sarah Obama to care for such a vulnerable child? Additional photos of Obama's scars available at the Daily Mail.

Sarah Obama's comment raises more questions and, not surprisingly, encourages speculation.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 13, 2011, 07:59:31 AM
LOL!  This is awesome!

Obama is a conjoined twin, born in an orphanage in Kenya.  Stolen and whisked away to hawaii to work his life as a drug-abusing spy. 

It's like a cool Leo DiCaprio movie.  Now, we need to replace Obama with his twin brother, a conservative spendthrift locked in an iron mask in a castle by the sea.  Let the swordfights ensue!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 07:59:56 AM
Encourages speculation.....like there is a mind control chip in his head too!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 12:21:04 PM
Obama would not be here without his scholarship
Fox news ^ | April 13, 2011 | jd



In Obama's speech today on his tax plan, he mentioned that he would not be here without his scholarship.

Does anyone know what scholarship he received and for which college? This is the first I heard of it.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
________________________ ________________________ ________

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 12:37:48 PM
Arizona Senate passes Obama birther bill after boost from Donald Trump
Biz Journals ^ | 04/13/2011 | Mike Sunnucks




The Arizona Senate approved the so-called ‘birther’ bill requiring 2012 presidential candidates to prove they were born in the U.S. and are thus eligible to run for president.

The measure, House Bill 2177, is aimed at President Barack Obama and those on the political right who want him to produce a birth certificate proving he was born in Hawaii and not Kenya, where his father if from.

The Arizona Legislature passed the bill 20-8 on a party-line vote in the State Senate with Republicans backing and Democrats opposing.

The measure includes some changes that allow for other documents beside birth certificates to be produced by presidential contenders. It now goes back to the Arizona House of Representatives for another vote. The House previously approved the birther bill without new Senate changes.


(Excerpt) Read more at bizjournals.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 13, 2011, 12:49:56 PM
Sarah Obama said Barack Jr. passed through her hands as an orphan
Jefferson's Rebels ^ | Erica


Posted on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:14:30 AM by EricaD

Sarah Obama Said Barack Obama Jr. Was An Orphan in Kenya

[Note: Go to http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com/2011/04/sarah-obama-said-barack-obama-was.html to view screen shot images of cited articles, and to follow text links.]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sarah Obama said that Barack Obama passed through her hands as an orphan. How could that possibly happen?

Below you will find a fairly recent but undated article about Sarah Obama's humanitarian work with orphans and other vulnerable children over the course of her life.

In the Catholic Relief Services article, Mama Sarah, as she's affectionately called, opened her simple home to dozens of children "over the last 40 years." In addition, she is said to have received help for hundreds of other children. She clearly has dedicated her life to helping vulnerable children.

So strong has been public interest in Kogelo village since Barack Obama's election, that the Mama Sarah Obama Children Foundation was established to collect donations for these children. In contrast to the CRS article, Sarah's Foundation website says unequivocally that Mama Sarah has been tending children since 1945, which means she has been taking care of children for over 65 years.

"Since then to date her household has never missed an orphan or vulnerable child in pursuit of education."

That time frame is relevant to the issue of Barack Obama's early childhood because it means she was caring for children in 1961, the year of Obama's birth.

Why is this relevant? Because Sarah made this stunningly explicit remark on May 4, 2010 when she was awarded an honorary doctorate from the Tom Mboya Labour College in Kisumu:

"This is a show of blessing from God, since I have always dedicated my time to tend to the orphans. Even the US president passed through my hands," added the grandmother."

If indeed Barack Obama Jr. was born in her presence, and if he was born as a conjoined twin as has been suggested due to severe scars on his head, he might have been rejected by his natural mother. Who better than Sarah Obama to care for such a vulnerable child? Additional photos of Obama's scars available at the Daily Mail.

Sarah Obama's comment raises more questions and, not surprisingly, encourages speculation.





hahahahahahahahahahahhah a,are you retarded
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 13, 2011, 01:05:38 PM
Arizona Senate passes Obama birther bill after boost from Donald Trump
Biz Journals ^ | 04/13/2011 | Mike Sunnucks




The Arizona Senate approved the so-called ‘birther’ bill requiring 2012 presidential candidates to prove they were born in the U.S. and are thus eligible to run for president.

The measure, House Bill 2177, is aimed at President Barack Obama and those on the political right who want him to produce a birth certificate proving he was born in Hawaii and not Kenya, where his father if from.

The Arizona Legislature passed the bill 20-8 on a party-line vote in the State Senate with Republicans backing and Democrats opposing.

The measure includes some changes that allow for other documents beside birth certificates to be produced by presidential contenders. It now goes back to the Arizona House of Representatives for another vote. The House previously approved the birther bill without new Senate changes.


(Excerpt) Read more at bizjournals.com ...


Clever way of getting Obama to cough up a more substantial proof of eligibility.  Sounds like AZ will be hearing from Eric Holder again.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 01:08:04 PM
Fact is that bama is hiding his records for a good reason - he knows info about his past would horrify most.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 13, 2011, 01:13:27 PM
Fact is that bama is hiding his records for a good reason - he knows info about his past would horrify most.   

That's a fact? Really? A FACT?!

Come on dude... You know that's not true.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 01:19:09 PM
That's a fact? Really? A FACT?!

Come on dude... You know that's not true.

Yes - between ayeres, klahid rashidi, benradine dohrn, klalid mansour, wright, meetings with the socialist democrats, his bizarre missing records from occidental, columbia, and harvard, etc, he is hiding a ton of info.

Sorry TU - most of you who voted for obama bought into a scam and a lie.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 13, 2011, 01:24:24 PM
Yes - between ayeres, klahid rashidi, benradine dohrn, klalid mansour, wright, meetings with the socialist democrats, his bizarre missing records from occidental, columbia, and harvard, etc, he is hiding a ton of info.

Sorry TU - most of you who voted for obama bought into a scam and a lie.   

But THIS is a fact?! You have some proof to make it so?
Fact is that bama is hiding his records for a good reason - he knows info about his past would horrify most.   

To claim a "fact" requires a LOT more than you've stated... You have all conjecture and zero proof... That does not a "fact" make.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 01:32:47 PM
Its common sense!  Someone comes to me and says:

Chris:  "These assholes keep up with this crap - Pay the $15.00, release the records, and put this to bed" 

or:

Chris:  "We were just served with a summons and complaint in Federal Court challenging your eligibility to be POTUS based on your failure to release your recrods, challenging your NBC status, challenging your birth story as reported thus far, it willcost $450 an hour and run potentially hundreds of thousands to defend and potentially require EBT's, discovery, etc" 


Guess which one I choose?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 01:37:46 PM
Is Obama Ineligibility a Side Show or the Main Event?
BIRTHERS, HISTORIANS AND OBOTS’ DEFINITIONS OF “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/13/is-obama-ineligibility-a-side-show-or-the-main-event



by JB Williams, ©2011





The Certification of Live Birth does not contain the details, nor resemble the format, of a long-form birth certificate which the state of Hawaii now contends cannot be released to anyone



(Apr. 13, 2011) — Despite monumental efforts to keep Obama’s entire past completely under wraps, questions persist over who and what Barack Hussein Obama really is and how a half-term senate political neophyte with a totally blank resume managed to defeat the Clinton machine to become the most secretive president in U.S. history. Is it a side show, or the main event?

Because Obama has refused to release his official vault birth certificate, college, passport records or family history including all medical records, and because he and those covering for him insist that there is ‘nothing to see here’ – many Americans are increasingly interested in how Obama was able to happen to America.

His many overt anti-American and anti-constitution policies have driven speculation that not only is he not a natural born citizen eligible for the office he holds, he may not even be American at all.

Business mogul Donald Trump appears ready to run for office on the search for a real Obama birther certificate. Not a COLB, but a real authentic birth certificate that looks just like every other American birth certificate.

The press is largely responsible for the ongoing circus, as they have been completely uninterested in the matter for almost three years now.  Never before in history has the press taken so little sincere journalistic interest in what could be the greatest scam ever perpetrated on American voters.

They still claim that Obama’s COLB (Certification of Live Birth) is an actual birth certificate, even though we all know that it isn’t. We have seen real Hawaii birth certificates from people born in Hawaii on the same day Obama claims to have been born, even from the same hospital.

But is the missing birth certificate the real issue?

We all agree that the constitution requires one to be a natural born citizen of the United States to be president – “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;” – But there is more than one definition of natural born citizen being proposed.

■The Obot definition is simply citizen – native, natural, naturalized, hatchet, all being one in the same, using 14th Amendment naturalization arguments which are actually unrelated to the subject.
■The birther definition is one line borrowed from Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations – “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” – But this definition ignores everything else Vattel said on the matter.
■The historians definition also comes from Vattel’s Law of Nations, but relies on the entire body of work; 1) As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights; 2) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; 3) in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
According to the Obot definition, all American citizens are natural born citizens eligible for office, including 14th Amendment citizens, which means, Article II – Section I – Clause V of the constitution means nothing at all.

According to birthers searching for an authentic Hawaiian birth certificate, confirming Obama’s birthplace, or native born status, will establish whether or not Obama is eligible for the office he holds.

Obama is happy with both of these definitions. The Obot definition of “citizen” sets the bar so low that Obama is confident he can meet that test, as could any anchor baby or 14th Amendment citizen.

Once birthers help Obots establish that native and natural born are the same thing, Obama will likely find his missing birth certificate, even if the ink is not yet dry.

His opposition will claim that the runny ink on the wrong paper proves it is a forgery, but Obama’s defense team, known as the U.S. Justice Department, will argue that it is authentic. Leftist self-made Academics at FactCheck and Snopes will confirm and the press will say, “See, we told ya so!”

The Supreme Court that has dodged the question for three years will continue to dodge the question. Obama’s name will appear on the 2012 presidential ballot in all 50 states and anyone opposed will be labeled a racist.

But the historian’s definition is not only factually correct – it leaves Obama no escape route and we don’t even need to find the missing birth certificate.

1) those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers;

2) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;

3) it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen;

The true historical meaning of the term natural born citizen is based in natural law, not man-made law.

The Law of Nations is the foundation, but not just the line birthers choose to hang their hat on, but the balance of the entire work, which clearly identifies the bloodline of the natural birth father as the source from which all rights succeed, specifically, natural born citizenship.

We do not need a Hawaiian birth certificate because Obama has repeatedly identified his natural birth father as Barack Hussein Obama I of Kenya, who was at no time in his life a citizen of the United States. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama I could not have passed U.S. natural born citizenship to his son, Barack Hussein Obama II.

As a constitutional law student, certainly, Barack Hussein Obama knows this, and that is why he is thrilled that people continue the silly search for a missing Hawaiian birth certificate, which would only affirm his native born status and also identify Barack Hussein Obama I as his natural birth father.

Because natural rights are transferred to offspring via the bloodline of the father, Barack Hussein Obama II cannot be a natural born citizen of the United States, no matter where he might have been born.

Why are birthers still in search of a birth certificate? What do they think they can gain from finding that missing document?

If the goal is to uphold the constitution and preserve the future of the constitutional republic, then they need only remove Obama from office, along with all who participated in the grandest scam ever perpetrated upon American voters.

Members of Congress and the Supreme Court either know this truth, or they should. They are either looking the other way for political gain, or they are horrifically unqualified for the jobs they currently hold. Either way, they are complicit…

The ongoing search for a birth certificate is a dangerous distraction from the search for truth. The future of freedom and liberty hang in the balance. The people must get this one right, or they will get nothing else right.

This matter is no side show – it is the main event!

———————–

JB Williams is co-founder of the Patriots Union.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 01:38:06 PM
Its common sense!  Someone comes to me and says:

Chris:  "These assholes keep up with this crap - Pay the $15.00, release the records, and put this to bed" 

or:

Chris:  "We were just served with a summons and complaint in Federal Court challenging your eligibility to be POTUS based on your failure to release your recrods, challenging your NBC status, challenging your birth story as reported thus far, it willcost $450 an hour and run potentially hundreds of thousands to defend and potentially require EBT's, discovery, etc" 

Guess which one I choose?   

That's because you are not politically or strategically adept.  

You remember,  "it is what it is"  You have ZERO political sense when it comes to being "political".

Obama doesn't need to at the moment.  Birthers are on their way to becoming looked like 911 nut jobs.  They haven't been able to serve up anything worthwhile except empty evidence, conjecture, and rhetorical questions.

If i was Obama, i wouldn't do shit unless i had to for poltical reasons.  the same stallworth birthers would still not vote for Obama if he proved to them he was a NBC, so whay should he.

He is basically saying to all you birtherS SMOKE MY POLE.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 01:40:15 PM
Yeah 44% at gallup.  Its really working.    ::) 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 13, 2011, 01:43:19 PM
Its common sense!  Someone comes to me and says:

Chris:  "These assholes keep up with this crap - Pay the $15.00, release the records, and put this to bed" 

or:

Chris:  "We were just served with a summons and complaint in Federal Court challenging your eligibility to be POTUS based on your failure to release your recrods, challenging your NBC status, challenging your birth story as reported thus far, it willcost $450 an hour and run potentially hundreds of thousands to defend and potentially require EBT's, discovery, etc" 


Guess which one I choose?   

What you would choose and what is fact, aren't connected what so ever.

Nothing you have presented has any "fact" that goes against his eligibility.

If it is a cover up, it's the biggest conspiracy in the entire world... EVER.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 01:45:39 PM
Yeah 44% at gallup.  Its really working.    ::)  

And he's 44% because of the birther issue?   ::)

(that's not even a "nice try" 33333)

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 01:47:27 PM
News Flash:



"333333 and other birthers continue to smoke Obama's pole as he refuses to release records."
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 01:48:56 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 13, 2011, 01:49:35 PM


He is basically saying to all you birtherS SMOKE MY POLE.

Classic.



Kobe is 333, Shaq is Obama
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 01:59:31 PM
No - the moronic taxpayer paying for this farce is who gets the shaft.     


Obama is the con man of the milienium.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 13, 2011, 02:08:05 PM
No - the moronic taxpayer paying for this farce is who gets the shaft.     


Obama is the con man of the milienium.     

333 loses again! hahaha

Obama is saying a big FU*K YOU to 333
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 02:12:36 PM
No - the moronic taxpayer paying for this farce is who gets the shaft.     


Obama is the con man of the milienium.     

That distinction goes to Bush and his WMD dance.

The Pole position is all Birthers.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 02:15:36 PM
That distinction goes to Bush and his WMD dance.

The Pole position is all Birthers.

Yawn - do you include Powell, the UN, France, Hillary, Kerry, Bill clinton in that too?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 02:22:56 PM
Yawn - do you include Powell, the UN, France, Hillary, Kerry, Bill clinton in that too?   

Snore......

Without BUSH and his pitch it would have never happened.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 02:24:39 PM
Snore......

Without BUSH and his pitch it would have never happened.



So the moron Bush was able to outsmart powell, hllary, kerry, the UN, France, Blair, etc?   Funny - Hillary and Kerry are widely regarded as geniuses by the left.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2011, 02:24:56 PM
If the state of Hawaii now only provides the COLB and not the original BC, then the various state legislatures attempting to force candidates to prove they are a natural born citizen are wasting their time (as is Trump).  Obama will never be required to produce the original BC if the state will not give it to him.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 02:29:46 PM
If the state of Hawaii now only provides the COLB and not the original BC, then the various state legislatures attempting to force candidates to prove they are a natural born citizen are wasting their time (as is Trump).  Obama will never be required to produce the original BC if the state will not give it to him.  

Its pure nonsense - if the state claims they have it on record - then it is available for review.   Its not subject to privacy like divorce records etc unless of course bama wants it kept secret.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 13, 2011, 02:35:28 PM
Its pure nonsense - if the state claims they have it on record - then it is available for review.   Its not subject to privacy like divorce records etc unless of course bama wants it kept secret.   
Catch the budget speech today, buddy?

Obama was owning you, this way and that.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 02:36:36 PM
So the moron Bush was able to outsmart powell, hllary, kerry, the UN, France, Blair, etc?   Funny - Hillary and Kerry are widely regarded as geniuses by the left.   
Use your head 3333333

-  they were only privy to intelligence hat was presented to them by BUSHaside from Powell.
-  American had war fever
-  voting against the war would have been political suicide.


Christ 33333. Sometimes I think you lapse into simpleton mode.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 02:37:28 PM
Catch the budget speech today, buddy?

Obama was owning you, this way and that.

ha ha ha ha ha ha - idiot.  

You morons are still captivated by his lie filled speeches.   Embarrassing.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 02:38:09 PM
Its pure nonsense - if the state claims they have it on record - then it is available for review.   Its not subject to privacy like divorce records etc unless of course bama wants it kept secret.   
Is there a law stating he has too?

So then STFU, already.     ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 13, 2011, 02:38:35 PM
If the state of Hawaii now only provides the COLB and not the original BC, then the various state legislatures attempting to force candidates to prove they are a natural born citizen are wasting their time (as is Trump).  Obama will never be required to produce the original BC if the state will not give it to him.  

There are some instances where a long form birth certificate is required.  If a child is born in Hawaii and wants to play little league baseball in San Dimas, CA (where they require a long form BC), how is that going to work?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 02:41:28 PM
Is there a law stating he has too?

So then STFU, already.     ::)

Yeah ozmo - whatsoever - bama hiding behind hyper-techinica administrative regs to conceal his records is to be applauded when it is obvious he is hiding a shit load of ino.  nice.   


Likre I said - you do more research on the plumber coming in to your home than who you vote for POTUS on.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2011, 02:44:51 PM
Its pure nonsense - if the state claims they have it on record - then it is available for review.   Its not subject to privacy like divorce records etc unless of course bama wants it kept secret.   

It's not available for review if the state says they're not releasing anyone's original BC.  I think a BC should be treated like a medical record.  Those aren't public. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 02:55:42 PM
It's not available for review if the state says they're not releasing anyone's original BC.  I think a BC should be treated like a medical record.  Those aren't public. 

Yeah - but when was this admn reg adopted?    hhhhmmmm?   A woman just got her real BC sent to her from HA last month that contains far more than the bogus crap bama put out.   


 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 02:58:07 PM
Yeah ozmo - whatsoever - bama hiding behind hyper-techinica administrative regs to conceal his records is to be applauded when it is obvious he is hiding a shit load of ino.  nice.   


Likre I said - you do more research on the plumber coming in to your home than who you vote for POTUS on.   

Hiding?  No, he's ramming his pole in your Birther face.  He owns you.

And your plumber argument is pathetic concsidering the scrutiny presidential candidates are subject too.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 02:59:49 PM
Hiding?  No, he's ramming his pole in your Birther face.  He owns you.

And your plumber argument is pathetic concsidering the scrutiny presidential candidates are subject too.

Really - what scrutiny was bama subjected to?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 03:07:03 PM
Really - what scrutiny was bama subjected to?   

Yeah that's right, the entire republican party did no research on Obama.

No enterprising journalist took the opportunity to dig deep to find something news worthy

None of our presidential candidates are ever researched during a race.  ::)

You got your head jammed so Far up your ass today.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

Eat another bowl of dumb fucks this morning?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 03:10:19 PM
Yeah that's right, the entire republican party did no research on Obama.

No enterprising journalist took the opportunity to dig deep to find something news worthy

None of our presidential candidates are ever researched during a race.  ::)

You got your head jammed so Far up your ass today.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

Eat another bowl of dumb fucks this morning?


RECORDS NOT RELEASED: 



Passport records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules(said to be lost), Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the long-form Certificate of Live Birth.



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 03:14:49 PM

RECORDS NOT RELEASED: 

Passport records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules(said to be lost), Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the long-form Certificate of Live Birth.


So after another MONSTER argument FAIL

You resort to more irrelevant blabber.

He is not obligated by law to show you any of that.



Build a fucking bridge and get over it.


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 03:16:50 PM
Bro - generally I like you - but like i said - you would give more scrutiny to a plumber in your house than the same asshole sending your kid off to war. 

Think about that.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 13, 2011, 03:33:53 PM
Bro - generally I like you - but like i said - you would give more scrutiny to a plumber in your house than the same asshole sending your kid off to war. 

Think about that.   
I will always change my opinion so that you will like me.

Think about that.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 03:35:07 PM
Bro - generally I like you - but like i said - you would give more scrutiny to a plumber in your house than the same asshole sending your kid off to war.  

Think about that.  

Thanks,  but lets clear this up a bit:


1.  I don't have the power or the resources to fully scrutinized any president.  However the opposing political party does, and they do.  So do other organizations such as the tea party and private entities.  

2.  Its a pretty safe assumption that if there was anything significant it would have been paraded everywhere.  So far nothing.  

3.  Your level of scrutiny is fueled by your hatred for Obama.  I don't like him either, but I am not letting my dislike cloud my common sense.

4.  You are making invalid arguments for the sake of arguing which is rooted in your hate for Obama.

5.  We are just Internet cowboys here, debating based on what ever the internet can provide and what ever we can surmise from it.  

6.  The only thing I want from a plumber is his license, and some references.  

7.  The plumber's validity doesn't need to be signed off by the governor of a state as Obama's certificate has been.


This is why that argument of yours is invalid.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2011, 03:52:18 PM
Yeah - but when was this admn reg adopted?    hhhhmmmm?   A woman just got her real BC sent to her from HA last month that contains far more than the bogus crap bama put out.   


 

Even if we assume the reg was adopted solely to protect Obama, it's still the reg. and applies to everyone. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 03:59:12 PM
You Hawaiians are up to something,  I know it!   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 04:00:33 PM
I'm not arguing legality - I'm arguing common sense and reality
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 04:03:47 PM
I'm not arguing legality - I'm arguing common sense and reality

I have agreed with you he should show it.  But your argument about the Plumber is invalid for the reasons i listed.

And beating your drum about it is a waste of time and pointless because he is not legally obligated to show it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2011, 04:06:55 PM
You Hawaiians are up to something,  I know it!   :D

 :D

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Ztb0MdPtzhA/SuutLkx9lfI/AAAAAAAABcE/Cek2Z9CGYXA/s400/Holiday+-+Halloween+-+Witch+Brew+Broom+via+Taiga+Company+-+witches-brew.jpg)

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 04:07:30 PM
Even though I am a lawyer I don't vased my opinios on what is legal or not.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 04:12:52 PM
Even though I am a lawyer I don't vased my opinios on what is legal or not.

Do you think i am?

Do you think i am saying you are?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 13, 2011, 04:23:10 PM
Yes.  I think you are giving him a pass on this when its mnot warranted. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 13, 2011, 04:34:42 PM
Yes.  I think you are giving him a pass on this when its mnot warranted. 

I just said I think he should show them.  So how am I giving him a pass?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 13, 2011, 10:51:51 PM

RECORDS NOT RELEASED: 
Passport records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules(said to be lost), Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the long-form Certificate of Live Birth.

LMFAO!

You're mad that we can't see his grade K records!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 06:16:00 AM
Barack Obama's 1st 2 years on earth

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: April 14, 2011
1:00 am Eastern

© 2011 

Word to Donald Trump: Nothing scares our Lilliputian media like facts. Each fact you present makes them rethink their petty little mission to whittle you down to size.

When asked why you don't take President Obama's word that he was born in America, simply reply, "Why should I? The story he has been telling America about the first two years of his life is provably and profoundly untrue."

This will sting. The Lilliputians have invested great emotional equity in what Obama-friendly biographer David Remnick calls his "signature appeal: the use of the details of his own life as a reflection of a kind of multicultural ideal."

From the beginning, Team Obama has worked hard to protect the investment. This has meant shielding the world from all salient documentation about Obama's life, his long-form birth certificate included.

In the last few years, Obama's nativity story has been told almost as often as Jesus' but with nowhere near the accuracy. Obama led with it in his 2004 convention speech and repeated it in the first sentence of his 2008 speech.

Jack Cashill's literary investigation uncovers revelations galore about Obama's alleged life narrative. Order the new book "Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America's First Post-Modern President"

As Obama told the story in 2004, his father had grown up in Kenya "herding goats." His mother he traced to Kansas, as he always did. "My parents shared not only an improbable love," Obama continued, "they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation."

Obama refined his story for a critical speech in Selma, Ala., in March 2007, a speech that would define his presidential campaign.

"Something happened back here in Selma, Alabama," said Obama. This something "sent a shout across the ocean," which inspired the Barack Sr., still "herding goats" back in Kenya, to "set his sights a little higher."

This same something also "worried folks in the White House" to the point that the "the Kennedys decided we're going to do an air lift."

Something about Selma apparently inspired Obama to manufacture facts more flagrantly than usual. For starters, herding goats in his father's town was like delivering newspapers in an American one. Everyone did it as a kid.

Obama Sr. grew up speaking English and attending Christian schools. He was working as a clerk in Nairobi, not a goatherd in "Obama Land," when he applied for the first airlift in 1959. The Republican Eisenhower, not the Democrat Kennedy, was the president when he came to the United States.

Although born in Kansas, Stanley Ann Dunham (Ann), Obama's mother, was not exactly Dorothy. She spent her formative years in the Seattle area where she earned the nickname "Anarchist Annie" under the tutelage of her hipster teachers.

Selma had nothing to do with Obama's birth in any case. He was conceived four years before anyone outside of Alabama ever heard of the town.

The problems, of course, go deeper. According to divorce papers filed in 1964, Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham married in Wailuku, Maui, on Feb. 2, 1961.

One has to wonder, however, whether it was a marriage in anything but name or whether there was a marriage at all. In "Dreams from My Father," Obama says, "In fact, how and when the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I've never quite had the courage to explore."

(Column continues below)

       


No family or friend attended a wedding. In fact, no one in Barack Sr.'s clique seemed to know there was a relationship, let alone a wedding. Clique member Pake Zane could not recall Ann at all.

When current Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie and Zane visited their friend in Nairobi in 1968, Barack Sr. shocked them by never once inquiring about his presumed wife and 6-year-old son.

The facts get more problematic still. After the birth of baby Barry in August 1961, Ann left for Seattle as soon as the doctors cleared her to travel. Once there, she enrolled at the University of Washington. Barack Sr. stayed behind in Hawaii.

The apolitical Washington state historical blog, HistoryLink, now confirms Ann's presence in the fall of 1961, identifies her Capitol Hill apartment in Seattle, names the courses she took, and documents an extended stay by Ann and little Barry into the summer of 1962.

If that is not proof enough, the 1961-1962 Polk Directory confirms an "Obama Anna Mrs studt" at the Capitol Hill address.

Somehow, this information escaped the four book-length biographies I consulted (including one by the New York Times), the official campaign biography and Obama himself in "Dreams."

By the time mom and son returned to Hawaii in the summer of 1962, Barack Sr. had long since left for Harvard. There was no Obama family, never was, no "abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation" save on the teleprompters at the 2004 convention.

Obama knew all of this when he gave his televised Big-Brotherly talk to America's coerced schoolchildren in September. It did not stop him from dissembling.

"I get it," he told the kiddies. "I know what that's like. My father left my family when I was 2 years old, and I was raised by a single mother." Does it get lower?

To be sure, Obama's mother and grandparents created the "Barack Obama" legend not to groom a future president but to give a fatherless biracial kid an identity.

The legend does not withstand scrutiny. Those who have read my book "Deconstructing Obama" know that there is good reason to doubt the very paternity of Barack Obama Sr.

As to the transformation of legend into official story, I believe that it was Bill Ayers who imposed a consciously Homeric structure – the search for the father – on "Dreams" when he took over the book project from the floundering Obama.

I believe, too, that when Obama hooked up with campaign guru David Axelrod in his 2004 race for the U.S. Senate, it was Axelrod who hardened the story into a marketing strategy.

From then on, Obama was stuck with the story, truth be damned. Until Donald Trump entered the scene, he was surely confident that he had gotten away with it.

And now here is "The Donald," blowing the cover not only on his origins, but also on the authorship of "Dreams."

The Lilliputians have their work cut out for them.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue. His latest book is the blockbuster "Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love and Letters of America's First Post-Modern President."


Read more: Barack Obama's 1st 2 years on earth http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=286509#ixzz1JVFlU42w
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 07:57:22 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 08:22:03 AM


For Ozmo - like I said - Bama has ZERO excuse for a CT SS number.  This is the PI who investigated this.  His father left CT in 1965 and Bama applied in 1977.   So whats the excuse bro?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 08:28:30 AM
Sorry I don't give too much  credibility to amateur vids.  Can you give me some cliff notes of important parts that I can cross check.  I am not going to listen 30 minutes to some stupid tea party bitch.

Or os this what the 30 min vid is about.  How his father left CT in 1965?   And 12 years later Obama applies for a social security card? ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 08:33:53 AM
Sorry I don't give too much  credibility to amateur vids.  Can you give me some cliff notes of important parts that I can cross check.  I am not going to listen 30 minutes to some stupid tea party bitch.

Or os this what the 30 min vid is about.  How his father left CT in 1965?   And 12 years later Obama applies for a social security card? ::)

Listen to it - its the Privite Investigator who investigated this whole issue on the SS and puts to bed all the excuses you made for him having a CT number.   Its not an anomoly whatsoever.  She goes over all of that and said its impossible for Bama to have a CT number based on his Hawaiian birth unless he et up residence in CT at the time he applied for the SS number.   

So again - you didnt debunk a damn thing on this.       
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 14, 2011, 08:34:57 AM
i'm a birther... but...

we all come from some messed up homes, some more than others.  We know obama's narrative doesn't match his reality.  But one point of view is that he had to be PERFECT to win in 2008.

I mean, palin's daughter had a live-in boyfriend, posted pics of drinking liquor, and got knocked up - imagine if that shit was obama's daughter.  he would have lost to hilary.  no question.

Mccain was a straight up player.  Admitted poking some new tang in hawaii while his crippled wife pained.  IMAGINE if obama had pulled that shit.  Yikes.  he'd be bounced.  no doubt about it.


So he had to be perfect.  There were too many Rush's, FOX NEWS and Becks out there, ready to talk about his flaws every single day.  And maybe his parents weren't faithful.  Maybe they were viewed as failures.  Maybe they're deceased and he just didn't feel like having a deaf, limp d*cked pill head make fun of his dead parents for 6 years.


So maybe he created a better, happier narative about his childhood.  We all omit little things about our childhood when talking to people, right?  imagine if 100 million people were ready to make fun of your dead mother.  Would you paint her as a saint, or a whore?  So fcukem on this point.  If he falsified paperwork, that's a crime- investigate it.  But being pissed because he told a story different from reality?  So what.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 08:35:16 AM
Also just so you understand.....

-  the governor of Hawaii says his BC is legit.

-  the social security administration says he's legit

-  leaders of the republican party says he's legit

-  no one has come forward with anything substantial except weak ass conjecture

-  the 042 explanation is fine for the SSA and it's fine for me

-  what ever our government does to vet a president says he's legit.


So some fucking fat whore bitch from the tea party who hired a PI means jack shit and her findings don't amount to a steaming pile of dog crap.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 14, 2011, 08:36:53 AM
Also just so you understand.....
-  the governor of Hawaii says his BC is legit.
-  the social security administration says he's legit
-  leaders of the republican party says he's legit
-  no one has come forward with anything substantial except weak ass conjecture
-  the 042 explanation is fine for the SSA and it's fine for me
-  what ever our government does to vet a president says he's legit.
So some fucking fat whore bitch from the tea party who hired a PI means jack shit and her findings don't amount to a steaming pile of dog crap.

Wow.... you have to accept the fact that the leaders of the GOP, all our intel agencies, the entire federal govt, they're all "in on it".

33, do you accept this?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 08:37:29 AM
Listen to it - its the Privite Investigator who investigated this whole issue on the SS and puts to bed all the excuses you made for him having a CT number.   Its not an anomoly whatsoever.  She goes over all of that and said its impossible for Bama to have a CT number based on his Hawaiian birth unless he et up residence in CT at the time he applied for the SS number.   

So again - you didnt debunk a damn thing on this.       
Got a trans script?  I am not going to listen for 30 min.  Maybe time codes?

Like I said, my info was right from the SSA site.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 08:47:13 AM
Wow.... you have to accept the fact that the leaders of the GOP, all our intel agencies, the entire federal govt, they're all "in on it".

33, do you accept this?

Yawn - I'm saying no one ever really questioned him on because they never had to and again - I listed all of the docs he refuses to release.  Why is that?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 08:48:36 AM
Got a trans script?  I am not going to listen for 30 min.  Maybe time codes?

Like I said, my info was right from the SSA site.  

Yawn - she goes over that in very explicit detail.   Funny - bama's sister has a HA SS number.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 14, 2011, 08:52:35 AM
where does the  conjoined twin fit in  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 09:09:08 AM
Yawn - she goes over that in very explicit detail.   Funny - bama's sister has a HA SS number.      

There nothing funny about his sister having a HI SSN when you understand how Obama got his.  So what's your point?

Is this some of  the weak ass pink nail polish wearing arguments in the vid?  If so, I won't waste my time.

I predict if you do ever serve up some of the points in the vid I will be able to shred that whore mount like a wicked awesome pulled pork roast.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 09:17:39 AM
There nothing funny about his sister having a HI SSN when you understand how Obama got his.  So what's your point?

Is this some of  the weak ass pink nail polish wearing arguments in the vid?  If so, I won't waste my time.

I predict if you do ever serve up some of the points in the vid I will be able to shred that whore mount like a wicked awesome pulled pork roast.

The vid came out today Mr. Ostrich.   Again she obliterates every bogus excuse you provide for bama in this thread.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 09:20:02 AM
Serve it up them,  at least give me some time marks so that i don't have to listen to this whore mount the whole time.  

I predict she is nothing but weak ass arguments an conjecture.  

PS  i will be gone for a while today, so don't take my silence as anything but.  And it will give you time to go back and listen to her nonsense and get the time marks.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 09:21:55 AM
Serve it up them,  at least give me some time marks so that i don't have to listen to this whore mount the whole time.  

I predict she is nothing but weak ass arguments an conjecture.  

PS  i will gone for a while today, so don't take my silence as anything but.  And it will give you time to go back and listen to her nonsense and get the time marks. 

When you get a chance listen for yourself.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 14, 2011, 09:25:32 AM

-  what ever our government does to vet a president says he's legit.

So some fucking fat whore bitch from the tea party who hired a PI means jack shit and her findings don't amount to a steaming pile of dog crap.

Who is the whatever?  Has anyone on the federal side gone on record saying they've verified Obama's eligibility like Fukino did for the Hawaii DOH?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 14, 2011, 11:12:02 AM
No one vetted Obama

http://bobmccarty.com/2010/11/25/understanding-the-jack-maskell-memorandum/
Understanding ‘The Jack Maskell Memorandum’ (Update)
November 25th, 2010

By Paul Hollrah, Guest Blogger

By far the most frequently asked question in America since August 28, 2008, the closing day of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, is this: “Does Barack Hussein Obama meet the constitutional qualifications to serve as President of the United States?”  With every reason to believe that he does not, the second most-asked question has been, “How could every single member of Congress… all 535 of them… fail in their constitutional obligation to properly vet Obama’s qualifications before certifying the vote of the 2008 Electoral College?”

For the past two years Americans have been flooding congressional offices with demands for answers to these questions.  And now we know.  The answer to the first question is, “No, Obama is not eligible to serve as president because he is not a ‘natural born’ U.S. citizen.”  The answer to the second question is, “The Jack Maskell Memorandum.”

But before we approach the question of who Jack Maskell might be, and the role he plays in what history will doubtless record as the greatest single crime of all time, let’s first review the facts surrounding Obama’s eligibility.  Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states that, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”

We know that Obama was not a citizen of the United States at the time the Constitution was adopted, we know that he was at least thirty-five years of age when he took office in January 2009, and we know that he had been a U.S. resident for at least fourteen years at the time he was nominated.  But is he a “natural born” citizen?  What is a “natural born” citizen, and how do we prevent someone who is not a natural born citizen from becoming president or vice president?

When the Founding Fathers met in Philadelphia in September 1787 to sign the final draft of the U.S. Constitution, the physical scars of the War of Independence from Great Britain were still visible all around them and a deep-seated animosity toward all things British colored every aspect of their daily lives.  So is it even conceivable that, just five years and eleven months after Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, the Founders would have affixed their signatures to a document that would allow an individual with divided loyalties – e.g., an individual with dual US-British citizenship – to serve as president or vice president of the United States?  Not likely.

That is precisely why the Framers found it necessary to include the words, “or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this constitution…”  At the time the Constitution was adopted, every citizen of the thirteen colonies was a British subject, or a citizen of some other country.  And since the founders wished to exclude all those with dual citizenship (divided loyalties) from serving as president or vice president at any time in the future, they provided an exemption of limited duration for those who were officially U.S. residents at the time and who might wish to serve as president or vice president after reaching the age of thirty-five.

For example, George Washington was 57 years of age when he was inaugurated as our first president.  But Washington, born and raised in Virginia, had been a British subject during all of his 57-plus years.  Hence, as a means of qualifying a class of men for the presidency during the first thirty-five years of our nationhood, while preventing any man with dual or naturalized citizenship from ever serving as president, after a pool of “natural born” men had reached the age of thirty-five… limiting access to those offices only to those born to parents, both of whom were U.S. citizens… the founders included the words, “or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this constitution…”

Few Americans, not even our distinguished members of Congress, have ever stopped to consider what those sixteen simple words mean, or, more importantly, who they exclude from presidential consideration.  That is why, after sitting silently in their chairs while the names of 365 Obama electors were read from the Speaker’s rostrum, not a single member of Congress rose to object… preferring instead to hide behind the legal skirts of the Congressional Research Service (CRS) and their Legislative Attorney, Jack Maskell.

In the days immediately following Barack Obama’s unlikely election in November 2008, members of Congress began flooding the CRS with questions about Obama’s eligibility.  Jack Maskell, a CRS Legislative Attorney drew the “short straw” and was assigned to provide members of Congress with legal cover.  Maskell’s recently-discovered memorandum, dated April 3, 2009 and distributed to all members of Congress, contains the following words:

“Many of the inquiries have questioned why then-Senator, and now President, Obama has not had to produce an original, so-called ‘long’ version of a ‘birth certificate’ from the State of Hawaii, how federal candidates are ‘vetted’ for qualifications generally, and have asked for an assessment of the various allegations and claims of non-eligibility status…

“Concerning the production or release of an original birth certificate, it should be noted that there is no federal law, regulation, rule, guideline, or requirement that a candidate for federal office produce his or her original birth certificate, or a certified copy of the record of live birth, to any official of the United States government; nor is there a requirement for federal candidates to publicly release such personal record or documentation.  Furthermore, there is no specific federal agency or office that ‘vets’ candidates for federal office as to qualifications or eligibility prior to return.”

Clearly, Mr. Maskell overlooked the words of the 20th Amendment, which reads in part, “If a president shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified…”

When members of Congress swear that they will “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” and that they will “bear true faith and allegiance to the same… so help me God,” they take upon themselves, by direct implication, the obligation to rule on the qualifications of those who emerge from the Electoral College as President and Vice President-elect… in spite of what Jack Maskell’s opinion might be.

Under the U.S. system for selecting our president and vice president, there are three distinct vetting opportunities.  The first occurs when the political parties certify their candidates to the state election boards so that ballots can be printed.  And although it is customary for the parties to certify the eligibility of their candidates under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, the Democratic Party made that certification in 2008 only to the State of Hawaii, which has a statutory requirement that such certification be made.  The remaining 49 states received no such certification in support of the eligibility of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

The second vetting opportunity occurs when the members of the Electoral College meet on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December.  It is the obligation of all members of the Electoral College to cast their votes for individuals who are qualified, under Article II, Section 1. However, in spite of the clear knowledge that Obama had been born in 1961 with dual US-British citizenship, Democratic electors in December 2008 ignored that solemn responsibility.

The third and final vetting opportunity occurs during the first week in January following a presidential election when the Congress meets in joint session to certify the votes of the Electoral College.  It is the third and final fail-safe vetting opportunity.

So the question arises, can the Congress simply ignore its obligation to fully vet those selected as president and vice president-elect by the Electoral College?  The answer to that question, in spite of Jack Maskell’s advice to Congress, is a resounding “no.”  As Edwin Viera, Jr., Ph.D., J.D., a leading authority on the Constitution, argues, “… the question of Obama’s eligibility vel non is not within the discretion of Congress to skirt or decide as its Members may deem politically or personally expedient…  Even by unanimous vote, Congress cannot constitutionally dispense with the requirement that Obama must be ‘a natural born citizen,’ by simply assuming that he is such…”

But what if the members of Congress, on the advice of CRS counsel, fail in that responsibility?  Dr. Viera argues that, if no objection is made on the basis that Obama is not a “natural born” citizen… “the matter cannot be said to have been settled to a ‘constitutional sufficiency’ (emphasis added),” because Congress has no power to simply waive the eligibility requirement… Maskell memorandum or no Maskell memorandum.

When we consider the difficulties involved in reversing the effects of two years or four years of an illegitimate presidency, it is difficult to imagine any single written document in recorded history that has had, or will have, the devastating effect on freedom and the rule of law that the Jack Maskell Memorandum will ultimately have.  When Maskell drafted his memorandum and affixed his signature, it is unlikely that he had any concept of the terrible consequences of his words.  If only he had folded it into a paper airplane and tossed it out the window…
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 14, 2011, 11:26:20 AM
This thread should be called "birthers - a guide to right wing lunacy" 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 14, 2011, 11:32:02 AM
Quote
“Concerning the production or release of an original birth certificate, it should be noted that there is no federal law, regulation, rule, guideline, or requirement that a candidate for federal office produce his or her original birth certificate, or a certified copy of the record of live birth, to any official of the United States government; nor is there a requirement for federal candidates to publicly release such personal record or documentation.  Furthermore, there is no specific federal agency or office that ‘vets’ candidates for federal office as to qualifications or eligibility prior to return.”

Leave it up to the government to screw it up.  No federal official checked his eligibility??? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 11:34:51 AM
Leave it up to the government to screw it up.  No federal official checked his eligibility??? 

No!


That is what i have been saying fro Day 1.  He presented his bogus SS Number and got into the system and just kept the scam going.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 11:39:00 AM
When you get a chance listen for yourself.   

Are her arguments so complex you can't use them?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 11:40:17 AM
Are her arguments so complex you can't use them?

Actually - there is too much detail for me to remmber and accurately post.   I'm not kidding or being funny about that.   She goes into a ot of stuff on SS numbers.         
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 11:41:40 AM
Leave it up to the government to screw it up.  No federal official checked his eligibility??? 

Not surprised about this.  Still, all the other points i listed are good enough for me.

You don't think during the campaign or after, the GOP with all their money, had people researching this?

If so, no wonder we are in the mess our country is in.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 11:42:07 AM
Actually - there is too much detail for me to remmber and accurately post.   I'm not kidding or being funny about that.   She goes into a ot of stuff on SS numbers.         

alright i will try an listen to it at some point. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 11:47:21 AM
Birthers Correct False Claims Against Trump
BLOGGERS BLOW FACTCHECK.ORG OUT OF THE WATER!
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/13/birthers-correct-false-claims-against-trump
by WTPOTUS, ©2011



How many lies have been told and policies changed to cover for Obama's lack of eligibility?

(Apr. 13, 2011) — This is in response to an article from FactCheck Blog, “Donald, You’re Fired!”, posted on April 9, 2011.  Excerpts from their article are included for ease of rebuttal–an educational effort.

If FactCheck staffers worked for us, we’d have to say:  “FactCheck, You’re fired–for incompetence, blatant obfuscation, and use of Alinsky tactics!” When it comes to getting facts straight, FactCheck fails miserably, again, and again, and again.

Point by Point Rebuttal

FactCheck said:

Trump claims the president’s grandmother says Obama was born in Kenya. In fact, the recording to which he refers shows Sarah Obama repeatedly saying through a translator: “He was born in America.”

TRUTH: She said this only after a “long pause” during which a conversation in a Kenyan tongue took place in the background, between several men and Sarah Obama, right after she very clearly stated that she was present in Kenya at his birth. Did these men intimidate her into changing her story?  You be the judge.  Many benefits subsequently flowed to the Obama family, such as a paved road, electricity, and piped-in water after they supported Obama in his endeavors.  Early on, Kenyans did not realize the importance of a US birth for any presidential candidate.

FactCheck produced a supposed transcript of the conversation between Mr. McRae and Sarah Obama.  But there’s no translation of the conversation in a Kenyan dialect that can be heard in the background, between what sounds like several men and Sarah Obama.

FactCheck transcribed another part of the conversation thusly:

Translator: Sir, she says he was born in Hawaii.

McRae: OK.

Translator: Yeah, in 1960 this was Hawaii, where his father, his father was also marrying there. This was Hawaii.

Obama claims that he was born in 1961.  But Sarah said 1960.

FactCheck said:

Trump claims that no hospital in Hawaii has a record of Obama’s birth. Hospital records are confidential under federal law, but Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Medical Center has published a letter from Obama calling it “the place of my birth,” thus publicly confirming it as his birthplace.

TRUTH: The hospital promptly removed that letter from its website, where it had been used for fundraising, after its provenance was questioned and after persons who know stated that if the letter is fraudulent, the hospital would be in violation of the law.  The letter is now hidden from view.

Senator Slom of Hawaii has repeatedly asked to see it but has not been allowed to see it. He is told, but does not know for certain, that the letter is on display in a private office for safekeeping.

The White House will NOT confirm that the letter was written by, signed by, or sent by the POTUS. Numerous articles preceding the revelation of this letter, which named Kapiolani as his birth place, said that he was born at Queen’s Medical–another hospital altogether.

FactCheck said:

Trump insists that the official “Certification of Live Birth” that Obama produced in 2008 is “not a birth certificate.”  That’s wrong. The U.S. Department of State uses “birth certificate” as a generic term to include the official Hawaii document, which satisfies legal requirements for proving citizenship and obtaining a passport.

TRUTH: The “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB) that was posted as a digital image on partisan blogs (Daily Kos and FactCheck) and in a campaign ad (Fight the Smears) is NOT an “official Certification of Live Birth” nor is it a “birth certificate.”  Obama did not produce it; it was released by his campaign, not by Obama.  It’s a digital image.

When originally released, that digital image was modified, because the identification number on it was redacted.  It says at the bottom of the image, “Any alterations invalidate this certificate.”  It was altered; therefore, it is invalid.

It matters not what the State Dept. calls such documents, when they’re in three-dimensional form.  The state of Hawaii did not, in 2007, consider a “certification of live birth” to be the same as a “birth certificate” or a “certificate of birth.”

It also matters not whether the State Dept. would accept a COLB (in 3-D form) to satisfy “legal requirements for proving citizenship and obtaining a passport.”  Natural born citizenship differs from simple citizenship, which is sufficient to receive a passport.

No doubt, Arnold Schwarzenegger has a US passport.  No doubt, today he is  a US citizen.  However, he is not and never can be eligible for the presidency, short of a Constitutional amendment. 

Schwarzenegger is a citizen; he is NOT a “natural born” citizen, which is the standard for POTUS eligibility.  As such, he has the same status as Obama:  Ineligible, not a NATURAL BORN citizen.

The president has NEVER released any officially certified document that proves that he was born in Hawaii, to the parents he claims, at the time and on the date he claims, at Kapiolani or at Queen’s Medical. He has never produced a “birth certificate”, a “certification of live birth”, a “certificate of live birth”, a “certificate of birth”, or even a “hospital birth certificate”.

FactCheck said:

Trump claims that there’s no signature or certification number on the document released by Obama. Wrong again. Photos of the document, which we posted in 2008, clearly show those details.

TRUTH: The “document” released by the Obama campaign is a digital image that has no certification number and no signature.  Who would accept as a “document” a digital image released to partisan blogs and posted on a DNC-affiliated Obama campaign website? Trump refers to the image released by Obama’s campaign, not to photos on a partisan blog, which have no PROVENance. Has Obama or his campaign ever referenced those photographs on FactCheck blog or given them the nod as being authentic?  If so, kindly, someone, supply a link.

In fact, no photograph that FactCheck produced of the document, which they claim is the source for the digital image posted on blogs and Obama’s campaign website, shows a certifying signature.  They do not show a photograph of the entire back side of the document. Therefore, nobody can say with certainty what that cropped image of a signature block represents.

There is a certification number on photos of the front of the alleged document, which FactCheck blog posted weeks after they posted the original digital image, and only after others (mostly bloggers) questioned the missing certification number.

When bloggers questioned other details, FactCheck blog reduced the size and resolution of the photos and removed all embedded identifying properties.  [See their story and note the difference between the claimed resolution and the actual resolution.] Is this how a nonpartisan factchecking organization should behave?   Shouldn’t they be more than happy to answer questions?  Shouldn’t they welcome examination of their claims?  What about transparency?  Why have no other members of the media been allowed to see and examine the document that FactCheck blog claims to have photographed?

Why hasn’t Obama presented this “certified document” to judges in any of the court cases addressing his ineligibility?  Why have his lawyers fought discovery, if that COLB is a truthful representation of what’s on file in Hawaii?

FactCheck said:

Trump says newspaper announcements of Obama’s birth that appeared in Hawaii newspapers in 1961 ‘probably’ were placed there fraudulently by his now-deceased American grandparents. Actually, a state health department official and a former managing editor of one of the newspapers said the information came straight from the state health department.

TRUTH: Nobody knows with CERTAINTY that those announcements actually ran in newspapers in Hawaii in 1961. But even if they did, FactCheck blog, please NAME the “state health department official” and the “former managing editor” [Shapiro?  See below.] who said that these announcements came only from the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDOH) and tell us upon what they base their knowledge about how things worked in 1961.

Nobody has ever seen these newspaper announcements in reality. That is, nobody has seen any newspaper. They have seen (again) digital images that are SAID to have come from microfilms at the State Library and at the Honolulu Advertiser.

A factchecker would investigate and then NAME the librarian who copied the images from microfilm at the State Library and sent them to a NAMED individual who sent them to the BLOGS where they first appeared.

A factchecker would locate and publish the underlying evidence that supports the provenance of the images, such as the letter or email making the request, the letter or email accompanying the images, and the receipt of payment for the copies.

A factchecker would investigate and then NAME the person at the Honolulu Advertiser who copied the images from microfilm at the newspaper and sent them to a NAMED person, who released them to BLOGS where they first appeared.

Why haven’t these birth announcement images been presented to any of the judges in any of the ineligibility lawsuits, if they are real? In fact, as blogger jbjd pointed out, the closest these images came to being entered into any court filing by Obama’s lawyers was in a footnote, which has no evidentiary value.

Nobody has stated with certainty that the only way a birth could be listed in those announcements in 1961 was if the HDOH sent the name to the newspaper.

Finally–there’s no PROOF whatsoever that the “son” announced in those newspapers (even if the images are authentic) is the person who is now president.

There’s no PROOF who the mother was.  Barack Hussein Obama (BHO Sr.) had three if not four or more wives.  Any of them could have been the “Mrs.” referred to in the announcements. BHO Sr. had many sons.  Any of them could have been the son referred to in those announcements.  BHO Sr.  never lived at the address listed in the announcements.  No place of birth is identified in those announcements.

So even if legitimate (which is in doubt until someone shows a contemporaneous, 3-D newspaper) the announcements do NOT prove that the POTUS was born in Hawaii.

But if BHO Sr. is his father, Obama is NOT a natural born citizen; so it doesn’t matter where he was born.

FactCheck said:

Trump claims “nobody knew” Obama when he was growing up and “nobody ever comes forward” who knew him as a child. “If I ever decide to run, you may go back and interview people from my kindergarten,” Trump said. Well, two retired kindergarten teachers in a 2009 news story fondly recall teaching a young Barack Obama.

TRUTH: While the usual set of “friends” and “teachers” put themselves forward, repeatedly, to claim that they knew him as a child, numerous discrepancies in their various reports raise suspicions. For example, he attended third grade in two countries, on opposite sides of the world.

Strangely enough, the Dept. of Education in Hawaii cannot locate Obama’s kindergarten records.  A picture was produced supposedly showing Obama in kindergarten.  The story (click link, above) says the caption identifying a certain child as Obama was written on the back of the photo. However, the back of the photo with the caption is conveniently not shown.

The two retired teachers were actually student teachers who said that they did not teach Obama at the same time.  One says she assisted his kindergarten teacher during the first part of that school year, while the other says she assisted his kindergarten teacher during the second part of the school year.   Of course, the records are missing.

One student teacher described him as “heavy build”, which certainly does not sound like the POTUS.  (Look at the photo: He looks thin, not “heavy build”, and his head looks pasted on. A tropical climate, but he alone wears long sleeves.) These women did not know each other at the time but met later, became good friends, compared notes (according to the 2009 story), and were Obama supporters.  His actual kindergarten teacher, if the story is true, was Alice Sakai, who died in 2006, and so conveniently cannot be interviewed.

These two student teachers, Obama supporters and good friends, had the same photograph that was already published in the 2008 story. They claimed that Alice Sakai sent the photo to one of them; but of course, she cannot confirm that as true, being sadly deceased.

FactCheck said:

The evidence that Obama was born in the U.S.A. is so overwhelming that we haven’t had much to say lately about the sort of bogus claims that Trump repeats. Hawaii’s top official in charge of vital records stated long ago, for example, that the confidential records underlying Obama’s official birth certificate show that he was born in Hawaii and is “a natural born American citizen.”

TRUTH: There is NO EVIDENCE that Obama was born in the U.S.A.  None.  If there were, he would have presented it to the courts. If EVIDENCE existed, a MORAL INDIVIDUAL would present it instead of hiding it.

A MORAL INDIVIDUAL would not have allowed a patriot like LTC. LAKIN to be sent to PRISON.


Obama is not a “natural born American citizen.”  He may be a US citizen now; but he never was a “natural born” citizen of the USA, unless he’s not telling the truth about the identity of his father.

The father that Obama claims, BHO Sr., was never a US citizen, never an aspiring immigrant, never a permanent resident.  Thus, Obama was (as his website indicated) born a British subject, later a Kenyan citizen, and later still an Indonesian citizen (as AP evidence shows).  Obama’s site also referred to him as a “native” (not natural born) citizen of the USA.

If he was born outside the USA, he was not even a US citizen at birth.  He may now be a naturalized citizen; but if so, he is ineligible for the presidency.  No documentation has been found to verify that he ever changed his status: his foreign citizenships may remain active.

FactCheck said:

But when a leading prospect for the Republican presidential nomination embraces and repeats these spurious claims and groundless conspiracy theories on national television, we are forced to wade into this swamp once again. For details of where Trump goes wrong, and full documentation of the facts, please read on to our Analysis section.

TRUTH: No truly nonpartisan, factchecking organization would use terms such as “spurious”, “groundless conspiracy theories” or “swamp” when describing one side of an argument to be analyzed with an open mind and resolved via the presentation of facts.  By using such terms, they prove their partisan BIAS.

FactCheck said:

Trump echoed claims that are often repeated by those who wish to believe Obama is not a natural-born American citizen.

TRUTH:   We don’t “wish to believe” that Obama is not a natural born citizen; we know that he’s not, unless he’s lying about his father’s identity. Blood AND Soil.  The two requirements:  Birth on US soil to two US citizen parents.  No allegiance to any other country or sovereign, ever, as documented in a detailed analysis by Leo Donofrio, Esq.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 11:48:07 AM
FactCheck said:

The proof of Obama’s citizenship has long been apparent to us and, we think, to any reasonable person with a mind open to evidence.

TRUTH: “Citizenship” is not the issue; natural born citizenship is the issue. FactCheck blog has provided no admissible ”evidence” of Obama’s natural born citizenship, to the people or to the courts.  What’s apparent to FactCheck is not apparent to REASONABLE persons with open minds who wish only to see PROOF of Obama’s eligibility, which any serious employer would require.

FactCheck said:

The proof is not just the official birth certificate issued by the state of Hawaii and made public by the Obama campaign in 2008.

TRUTH: There is no such document.  No such document has EVER been presented.  It’s a digital image on a partisan blog and in a campaign advertisement.  No official birth certificate has ever been presented to any court of law. Nor has any such document been shown to We the People or to our elected representatives or to journalists in the mainstream media.

FactCheck said:

As we wrote when we published detailed photographs of that document in our “Born in the U.S.A.” article, that document constitutes legal proof of citizenship sufficient to meet all U.S. Department of State requirements for issuance of a passport.

TRUTH: The photographs are hardly detailed, especially after being downsized.  Notice the conveniently placed shadows and the flares of light that obscure pertinent information.  Is this how a reasonable person would photograph a document?

Requirements for obtaining a passport are not the same as requirements for the presidency, as FactCheck well knows. A passport is available to any “citizen”, including naturalized citizens, who are ineligible for the presidency. They are comparing apples and oranges in a transparent and deliberate attempt to reframe the issue.  The issue is NATURAL BORN citizenship.  See how cleverly they mislead, these so-called, self-proclaimed, “nonpartisan” factcheckers?

FactCheck said:

There also were public announcements of Obama’s birth published in Hawaii newspapers shortly after his birth in 1961.

TRUTH: Nobody has ever produced a newspaper from 1961 that contains that announcement.

FactCheck said:

And the state’s top vital records official, Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino, director of the Hawaii Department of Health, issued a statement in 2009 stating that she had “seen the original vital records maintained on file” and that those records, which are confidential under state law, verify that “Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen.”

TRUTH: The vital records, plural, themselves purport to verify that he was born in Hawaii.  An affidavit “verifies” a claim, when “to verify” is used in the legal sense of the word.  Fukino claimed to have consulted the Hawaiian Attorney General prior to releasing her statement.  It was a carefully parsed press release that does not DESCRIBE the contents of those vital records.   Obama can release these records.  All he has to do is make the request.  But he does not.

That these records, whatever they are, “verify” that Obama is a “natural-born American citizen” is Fukino’s interpretation, which is certainly open to argument.  What does she mean by “natural-born American citizen” as compared to the requirement of the US Constitution, which is “natural born citizen of the United States?”  Is Mexico, arguably, America? Yes, it is.  Is Canada?  Yes, it is.  Is Argentina?  Yes, it is.

FactCheck said:

A reporter for an Indianapolis television station filed this story shortly after Obama was elected in November, 2008. And in it Sarah Obama tells (again, through translators) of her grandson’s first visit to Kenya — when he was 25 years old.

TRUTH: That would have been 1986 or 1987, if this is correct. 1983, according to Sarah Obama in another story.  1985, according to Kezia.  1988, according to Obama and one of his biographers.  Stories vary, as usual.  See our timeline for more details.

FactCheck said:

It’s true that the rather poor image that the Obama campaign at first made public showed only one side of the document (the official signature was on the reverse) and the campaign unaccountably obliterated the number, for reasons never fully explained. But when we pressed the campaign for a better image, we were allowed to come to campaign headquarters and photograph it for ourselves, which we did.

TRUTH: The “rather poor” FactCheck photos show only one side of that purported document.  Who exactly are “we?”  Will those persons sign affidavits attesting, under oath, that what FactCheck wrote about visiting that document is absolutely true? Will FactCheck provide evidence that the persons who examined the document have the expertise to determine its authenticity? Did FactCheck ever ask the HDOH if they produced and certified that document?  Did the HDOH ever state that they produced and certified that document?  NO, they did not!

FactCheck said:

Had Trump looked at our 2008 article, he would see the signature stamp of Alvin Onaka, certifying that the document is “a true copy or abstract of the record on file,” issued to Obama June 7, 2007 as he was preparing to run for president.

TRUTH: Trump would have seen no such thing because FactCheck did not photograph the entire back side of the supposed document, making it impossible to validate their claims.  There’s no context for the signature stamp and the date shown in their article.  Why didn’t they photograph the entire back side?

FactCheck said:

Furthermore, the serial number (actually a “certificate” number) shows quite clearly in our photos. The number is 151 1961 – 010641, for whatever that’s worth.

TRUTH: It’s not worth much.  Can they explain why the number is out of sequence with the numbers of the Nordyke twins?  Did they even try to explain this discrepancy, as real factcheckers would?

FactCheck said:

We were amused to see Trump make a show recently of producing what he said was his own “birth certificate,” which wasn’t an official document and wouldn’t  qualify him for a passport [a non sequitur].  “It took me one hour to get my birth certificate,” he told the conservative-leaning news site Newsmax [Newsmax is conservative?  Who knew?]. “It’s inconceivable that, after four years of questioning, the president still hasn’t produced his birth certificate.”

TRUTH: FactCheck shouldn’t be amused; they were punked.  Trump did this to demonstrate bias in the mainstream media, many of whom immediately jumped on Trump for presenting a non-official document.  Ironic, considering they’ve never vetted Obama’s “document”, never asked to examine forensically that so-called document.



They might have asked Obama to request another COLB from Hawaii, to be certified and delivered directly to a media source that’s unimpeachable, although who that might be in the age of Obama, is hard to say.

They might have asked him, very simply, why he didn’t produce that document to any court of law. Can there be any explanation other than that it’s “embarrassing” or that it’s not legitimate so,  therefore,  it’s a crime to present it in court?

FactCheck said:

Trump’s “birth certificate” was actually an unofficial “Certificate of Birth” generated by Jamaica Hospital Medical Center (in Queens, N.Y. — not the island nation) stating that Trump was born there June 14, 1946. But because it was not “issued by the city, county or state” as required by the State Department, it does not constitute legal proof of citizenship sufficient to obtain a passport. When confronted with these facts, Trump later coughed up what he said was his official birth record issued by New York City’s Bureau of Records and Statistics. It is a certified photocopy of a “Certificate of Birth” signed by a physician. This one does appear to meet State Department requirements. And so does Obama’s.


TRUTH:

Trump showed the media an actual 3-D document, and so his evidence is very different from Obama’s lack of evidence.  FactCheck and others in the media went for Trump’s  bait…hook, line, and sinker.

Obama’s COLB is actually an unofficial digital image that would be accepted by NOBODY as proof of identity or birth. Try getting a passport by showing a digital image on a blog. A photoshopped image at that.

FactCheck said:
It’s also true that at least one news story (which was later corrected) incorrectly reported a different hospital as the birthplace, allowing Obama’s foes to engage in unfounded speculation that family members disagreed.

TRUTH:   Multiple sources stated that Obama was born at Queen’s Medical. A student journalist interviewed Maya Soetoro. He reported that Queen’s Medical Center was the site of Obama’s birth.  He has never, so far as we know, “corrected” that article.  (FactCheck refers to another story.)  It’s insulting to this student journalist to assume that he was lax in his research and reporting, simply because he was a student. There are (or were, prior to Internet scrubbing) MANY citations of Queen’s Medical as Obama’s place of birth.

FactCheck said:

It is also true that Kapi’olani can’t legally release individually identifiable health information without that person’s permission because of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

TRUTH:   Kapiolani hospital posted a letter claiming that Obama was born there on a fundraising website, so they already released the information. Illegally? Why doesn’t FactCheck ask Obama to give Kapiolani permission to release the information, again?

FactCheck said:

It’s also very simple to make a false claim.

TRUTH: They should know.

FactCheck said:

Advertiser, Nov. 9, 2008:  Advertiser columnist and former Star-Bulletin managing editor Dave Shapiro was not at either paper in 1961, but he remembers how the birth notices process worked years later when both papers were jointly operated by the Hawaii Newspaper Agency — which no longer exists. “Those were listings that came over from the state Department of Health,” he said. ‘”They would send the same thing to both papers.”

TRUTH: Mr. Shapiro is a FORMER employee of the newspaper and he admits that he did not know how the process worked in 1961. He spoke only about how it “worked years later.” While he says that some listings were sent from the Dept. of Health, he did not say that there could be no other source for these listings.

FactCheck said:

Our job is simply to assess evidence and call out falsehoods and factual mistakes when we find them.

TRUTH: Physician, heal thyself.

FactCheck said:

Nov. 1, 2008: Of all the nutty rumors, baseless conspiracy theories and sheer disinformation that we’ve dealt with at FactCheck.org during campaign 2008, perhaps the goofiest is the claim that Barack Obama is not a “natural-born citizen” and therefore not eligible to be president under the constitution.

TRUTH:   If the “facts” that Obama himself has presented regarding his parentage are true, the FACT is that he is NOT a natural born citizen of the US and, therefore, is NOT eligible to be president under the Constitution.

FactCheck (a project of the Annenberg Foundation, for which Obama worked) and others are free to continue to ridicule, in Alinsky fashion, Donald Trump and all “birthers” who seek only to verify that every candidate for the presidency is eligible.  Eligible to SERVE us, We the People.  TRUTH will out.

We close with wisdom from Barack Hussein Obama II himself:

The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide.

 

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 14, 2011, 11:57:59 AM
Not surprised about this.  Still, all the other points i listed are good enough for me.

You don't think during the campaign or after, the GOP with all their money, had people researching this?

If so, no wonder we are in the mess our country is in.

How can you research records that are sealed?  Congress dropped the ball on this when they had their chance to vet Obama. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2011, 12:00:53 PM
Also just so you understand.....

-  the governor of Hawaii says his BC is legit.

-  the social security administration says he's legit

-  leaders of the republican party says he's legit

-  no one has come forward with anything substantial except weak ass conjecture

-  the 042 explanation is fine for the SSA and it's fine for me

-  what ever our government does to vet a president says he's legit.


So some fucking fat whore bitch from the tea party who hired a PI means jack shit and her findings don't amount to a steaming pile of dog crap.

Former governor and former state department of health director (both Republicans) said he's legit. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 12:03:54 PM
How can you research records that are sealed?  Congress dropped the ball on this when they had their chance to vet Obama. 

Which records would those be?  Birth records?   My understanding is they are sealed to the public.  However, for the state of Hawaii to issue a COLB they would have to verify those records.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 12:06:21 PM
Which records would those be?  Birth records?   My understanding is they are sealed to the public.  However, for the state of Hawaii to issue a COLB they would have to verify those records.   

The same list I have presented many times over.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 12:21:26 PM
I am not all to concerned about what Obama did in kindergarden. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 14, 2011, 12:25:04 PM
Hawaii Democratic Party Did Not Certify Obama’s Eligibility

In 2000 and 2004, the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s official Certifications of Nomination for Al Gore and Joe Lieberman (2000) and John Kerry and John Edwards (2004) both had the following identical language:

This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national Democratic Parties by balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held _____ in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held ______ in _______.

In 2008, the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s official Certification of Nomination for Barack Obama and Joe Biden carried this language:

This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preferences Poll and Caucus held on February 19, 2008 in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held August 27, 2008 in Denver, Colorado.

What the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s 2008 Certification of Nomination left out are these words:
“of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and”

In other words, by omitting the above words, the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) was signalling the following:

DPH is merely certifying that Obama is legally qualified to serve as President by virtue of the ballots of the Democratic Parties of the 50 states. The DPH is not certifying that Obama is legally qualified to serve as President  under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution!
The DPH is also saying that Obama and Biden are NOT the chosen candidates of the state of Hawaii.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 14, 2011, 12:29:56 PM
I am not all to concerned about what Obama did in kindergarden. 

we actually had a thread on it, i think -

He said something once that "i never dreamed of being president" -

33 called him for it - seems he drew something that said "I'll be president one day" in grade K.  Anyone recall that thread?

33 actually called him on the hypocrisy!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 12:35:23 PM
MB I wasn't talking about the democratic party from Hawaii.   

Look at these points:

1.  The governor fo Hawaii says it's legit

2.  The Hawaiin government says it's legit ( hence the COLB)

3.  The social security administration says it's legit in 1977 when they likely received a copy of th long form


This is all good enough.

Pointing out that the DPH didnt do whatever is meaningless here.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 12:37:14 PM
MB I wasn't talking about the democratic party from Hawaii.   

Look at these points:

1.  The governor fo Hawaii says it's legit

2.  The Hawaiin government says it's legit ( hence the COLB)

3.  The social security administration says it's legit in 1977 when they likely received a copy of th long form


This is all good enough.

Pointing out that the DPH didnt do whatever is meaningless here.


The gov of hawaii says he cant a BC for obama and said the best he can find are notes.   and before you go spouting off about the SS # - listen to that clip.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 12:42:56 PM
So notes werE sent to the SSA in 1977?  Doubt it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 12:43:50 PM
So notes werE sent to the SSA in 1977?  Doubt it.

No one knows what was sent!   It definately was not a COLB created in 2007 correct?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 12:50:17 PM
No one knows what was sent!   It definately was not a COLB created in 2007 correct?   

So you are saying the SSA verification process is part of the conpiracy too?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 12:52:41 PM
So you are saying the SSA verification process is part of the conpiracy too?

No one freaking knows what the hll went on.   He went to college at 18 at Occidental in CA as "Barry Soetoro" but some how got a CT SS# at 17 under Barack Obama? 

WTF is that?   At this pioint I am thinking he is running two separate identities at the same time.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 14, 2011, 01:15:07 PM
I'm glad you're able to find time, with your lawyer duties and all, to post on here 12-14 hours a day.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 01:16:06 PM
No one freaking knows what the hll went on.   He went to college at 18 at Occidental in CA as "Barry Soetoro" but some how got a CT SS# at 17 under Barack Obama? 

WTF is that?   At this pioint I am thinking he is running two separate identities at the same time.     

The SSN thing has been soundly debunked.  And he got it at 15 not 17.  the area number aren't 100%.  The zip codes are off by only 1 number which is a 1 in a million chance and expressly explains why his number is 042.

I don't know about the Occidental stuff but i am willing to bet there's a bunch of misconceptions, speculation, conjecture etc with that too.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 01:23:48 PM
The SSN thing has been soundly debunked.  And he got it at 15 not 17.  the area number aren't 100%.  The zip codes are off by only 1 number which is a 1 in a million chance and expressly explains why his number is 042.

I don't know about the Occidental stuff but i am willing to bet there's a bunch of misconceptions, speculation, conjecture etc with that too.

Utter bullshit - listen to my lip.  you are dead wrong on that and assuming bama is the 1 out 1,000,000 who that does not apply to while it in fact applies to everyone else.

And how did he get a CT SS# at 15 y/o if he was still in HA while his sister got a HA SS#?  Its pure bullshit on your part and you know it.   You are relying on the needle in a haystack chance that the SS# number signed to him was an anomoly.  It wasnt and there is a definate sham going on here.     

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 01:25:53 PM
Did you ever read how I explained how he got a SSN from with a area from CT?  

I am starting to think you didn't.  Otherwise you wouldn't keep bringing up his sister as an argument.  Which by the way is completely invalid either way you look at it.   

It's kind of a dumb argument actually ( the sister thing)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 14, 2011, 01:28:02 PM
Did you ever read how I explained how he got a SSN from with a area from CT?  

I am starting to think you didn't.  Otherwise you wouldn't keep bringing up his sister as an argument.  Which by the way is completely invalid either way you look at it.   

It's kind of a dumb argument actually ( the sister thing)

No way he did.  He's basing his argument on debunked information. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 01:28:10 PM
Did you ever read how I explained how he got a SSN from with a area from CT?  

I am starting to think you didn't.  Otherwise you wouldn't keep bringing up his sister as an argument.  Which by the way is completely invalid either way you look at it.   

It's kind of a dumb argument actually ( the sister thing)

YeI did and its addressed in the clip I posted and thoroughly discredited on about 4 different counts.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 01:29:12 PM
And 33333 I am nit relying on a needle in a hay stack type of chance.   The needle was already found and the fact he has a area number consistent with CT proves it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 01:29:40 PM
YeI did and its addressed in the clip I posted and thoroughly discredited on about 4 different counts.  

Then list the 4 different counts!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 14, 2011, 01:30:19 PM
YeI did and its addressed in the clip I posted and thoroughly discredited on about 4 different counts.  

Uh no it's not.  You don't even understand that the numbers 042 don't mean sh*t.  The government says it means basically nothing, the fact remains you've lost on the BC and now have moved onto other bullsh*t.  Can't wait for this thread to be moved cause it's nothing more than 333 repeating lies.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 14, 2011, 01:30:55 PM
MB I wasn't talking about the democratic party from Hawaii.   

Look at these points:

1.  The governor fo Hawaii says it's legit

2.  The Hawaiin government says it's legit ( hence the COLB)

3.  The social security administration says it's legit in 1977 when they likely received a copy of th long form


This is all good enough.

Pointing out that the DPH didnt do whatever is meaningless here.

I'm trying to figure out who actually verified his eligibility. The federal government didn't check his eligibility.  The DNC said it's the Hawaii Democratic Party's responsibility to verify eligibility.  For some reason, the Hawaii Democratic Party changed the wording in their "Certification for Nomination" statement to exclude any reference to the candidate being eligible under the US Constitution.  Fukino came out after the fact and said she and Alvin Onaka saw the original BC, but by that time no one else was allowed to see it and the window of opportunity for the vetting process was closed.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 01:31:07 PM
And 33333 I am nit relying on a needle in a hay stack type of chance.   The needle was already found and the fact he has a area number consistent with CT proves it.

That is pure nonsense.    Pure fucking bullshit.   You are trying to assume that the 1 in a 1,000,000 ishis ciorcumstances which it is not.

Again listen to the clip.  She goes point by point on this.         
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 01:32:42 PM
Uh no it's not.  You don't even understand that the numbers 042 don't mean sh*t.  The government says it means basically nothing, the fact remains you've lost on the BC and now have moved onto other bullsh*t.  Can't wait for this thread to be moved cause it's nothing more than 333 repeating lies.  

Yeah - listen to the clip yourself.     his story is impossible also because of a falsified SS registration she proves it utter horseshit as well.

   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 14, 2011, 01:36:40 PM
Yeah - listen to the clip yourself.     his story is impossible also because of a falsified SS registration she proves it utter horseshit as well.

   

 ::)  Why waste time listening to obvious bullsh*t that has been debunked. 

Gosh what a waste of life when you look back and think - i spent 4+ years of my life researching rubbish. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 01:38:13 PM
::)  Why waste time listening to obvious bullsh*t that has been debunked. 

Gosh what a waste of life when you look back and think - i spent 4+ years of my life researching rubbish. 

Whats been debunked?   You call trying to fit Obama into a lottery winner chance circumstance as debunking something?    ::)  ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 01:41:11 PM
Arizona Senate passes Obama birther bill after boost from Donald Trump
Biz Journals ^ | 04/13/2011 | Mike Sunnucks




The Arizona Senate approved the so-called ‘birther’ bill requiring 2012 presidential candidates to prove they were born in the U.S. and are thus eligible to run for president.

The measure, House Bill 2177, is aimed at President Barack Obama and those on the political right who want him to produce a birth certificate proving he was born in Hawaii and not Kenya, where his father if from.

The Arizona Legislature passed the bill 20-8 on a party-line vote in the State Senate with Republicans backing and Democrats opposing.

The measure includes some changes that allow for other documents beside birth certificates to be produced by presidential contenders. It now goes back to the Arizona House of Representatives for another vote. The House previously approved the birther bill without new Senate changes.


(Excerpt) Read more at bizjournals.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 01:42:18 PM
That is pure nonsense.    Pure fucking bullshit.   You are trying to assume that the 1 in a 1,000,000 ishis ciorcumstances which it is not.

Again listen to the clip.  She goes point by point on this.         
No, you don't get it, you Don't understand it.  I don't know if you are just acting dumb or what.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 02:25:53 PM
Alright I listened to the clip.

This lady is stupid.  And i can't believe you are actually stupid enough to be so easily swayed.  But then again, you did little if any research outside of spamming video and articles.  And you are willing to listen, read and believe anything attacking Obama.  So it makes sense.

Also, you couldn't have posted up her points?  they were that complicated?  give me a fucking break.  :(

Ok here we go:

-  Basically she didn't bring up anything concerning the SSN that we don't already know.  Other than the SS stuff which is likely not relevant anyway.  

-  She sent this incriminating evidence to Rush and Beck what did they do?  They would love to have godo evidence wouldn't they?  So far not a dam thing from Rush or Beck.

-  She said she accessed data basis only lawyers and law enforcement can but didn't name any of them.  I highly doubt she anything of the sort other many of the available back ground services anyone can access today.  Corporate screening, hire right, intellicorp etc.

-  she elluded to numerous cases being filed over this BC thing yet they all get dismissed.  Are the courts in on this too?  they are dismissed because they haven't evidence to go forward.

-  On the SSN from CT:  She said:  "there is no way, no how, ever" a person can get a SSN number like that.  She obviously didn't do the simple research I did that showed you can.

-  Then she tries to bring in Bill Ayers to add to her case. How fucking desperate.

- She says 50% of people think Obama wasn't born here?  Proof positive she doesn't live in reality because its half that and actually if you take out "probably wasn't born here" from the polling you have actually more people that believe in the 9/11 CT.

-  She conveniently served up the stupid CT SSN theories, not the one that actually have facts behind them, such as the zip code, and the SSA procedures.

- And the final stupid assertion:  "The incriminating document that she can't divulge because it won't be there if she does."   ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)



333333, do me a favor.  Don't even again ask me to listen to stupid speculative blabber from some old crusty 2 bit hack.

Shredded as predicted.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 14, 2011, 02:45:56 PM
Cot Dayum... OzmO...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 14, 2011, 02:47:25 PM
No, you don't get it, you Don't understand it.  I don't know if you are just acting dumb or what.

Now understand this 3333...
this can be done with like 90% of the shit you argue and post... but the majority dont want to put the effort OzmO just put in to argue with your dumb ass..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 14, 2011, 02:52:54 PM
Now understand this 3333...
this can be done with like 90% of the shit you argue and post... but the majority dont want to put the effort OzmO just put in to argue with your dumb ass..

he comes on this site,he has to be playing fu#king dumb, their is no way a lawyer is that fu#king stupid
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 14, 2011, 03:11:20 PM
he comes on this site,he has to be playing fu#king dumb, their is no way a lawyer is that fu#king stupid

Substitute "poster" for "lawyer" then apply the sentence to yourself.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 14, 2011, 03:15:20 PM
Yawn.  If you voted for obama you are not in a position to point fingers.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 14, 2011, 04:50:55 PM
Yawn.  If you voted for obama you are not in a position to point fingers.
and i can't wait to vote for him again, just to keep you busy for another four years of fun here !
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2011, 05:22:56 PM
Arizona Senate passes Obama birther bill after boost from Donald Trump
Biz Journals ^ | 04/13/2011 | Mike Sunnucks




The Arizona Senate approved the so-called ‘birther’ bill requiring 2012 presidential candidates to prove they were born in the U.S. and are thus eligible to run for president.

The measure, House Bill 2177, is aimed at President Barack Obama and those on the political right who want him to produce a birth certificate proving he was born in Hawaii and not Kenya, where his father if from.

The Arizona Legislature passed the bill 20-8 on a party-line vote in the State Senate with Republicans backing and Democrats opposing.

The measure includes some changes that allow for other documents beside birth certificates to be produced by presidential contenders. It now goes back to the Arizona House of Representatives for another vote. The House previously approved the birther bill without new Senate changes.


(Excerpt) Read more at bizjournals.com ...


Sounds like all Obama has to provide to comply with this is the COLB. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 05:25:49 PM
Sounds like all Obama has to provide to comply with this is the COLB. 

My question is, how does a single state require the federal government to comply?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2011, 05:27:57 PM
My question is, how does a single state require the federal government to comply?

They're only requiring an individual to comply to be placed on that state's ballot. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 14, 2011, 05:37:46 PM
They're only requiring an individual to comply to be placed on that state's ballot. 
. Oh ok thanks
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2011, 11:23:01 PM
. Oh ok thanks

De nada.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2011, 11:24:21 PM
Obama: Most people confident he was born in Hawaii
By Associated Press
POSTED: 01:51 p.m. HST, Apr 14, 2011

WASHINGTON >> President Barack Obama says Republicans who are sowing doubts about whether he is American-born may gain politically in the short term by playing to their constituencies but will have trouble when the general election rolls around.

Obama says that's because most people are confident that he was born where he says he was — in Hawaii — and are more worried about gasoline prices and unemployment than conspiracy theories or birth certificates.

The president spoke Thursday in an interview with ABC News.

State officials long have certified that Obama was born in Hawaii. But Donald Trump, the real estate tycoon and possible GOP presidential candidate, has revived questions about Obama's place of birth.

Obama says Republican efforts to go after him in a politically expedient way create problems for them.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/Obama_Most_people_confident_he_was_born_in_Hawaii_.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 15, 2011, 05:15:09 AM
i heard it stated the best this morning:  Politicians are "playing to the cheap seats".


It's that simple.  They're spending resources and time to deliver this arizona law requiring proof of citizensihp to be on the ballot for Prez.  Um, COLB and word of hawaii officials is more than adequate.  Repubs in that state voted along party lines for it. 

Total waste of time and resources.  Debt crisis, border crisis, 3 wars.... and they're grandstanding on this birther thing.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 05:17:25 AM
Hey even bama is out there now talking about it himself.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 15, 2011, 06:18:44 AM
Yawn.  If you voted for obama you are not in a position to point fingers.

No response to Ozmo's assertion of the youtube "proof"...usually you would be all over that.. you just gave a meaningless 1 sentence response.. seems like someone is tucking tail
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 11:08:53 AM
No response to Ozmo's assertion of the youtube "proof"...usually you would be all over that.. you just gave a meaningless 1 sentence response.. seems like someone is tucking tail
What amazes me more than anying is that 33333 made this vid sound like is was something.  He said it like addressed the SSN thing point by point and was too complicated for him to list these points.

That stupid bitch on the vid did nothing of the sort and frankly she came across (as shown in the shredding i gave her) as some racist senile old white women.

And 3333 fell for it hook line and sinker.  

I appreciate 333333's position on Obama but do we need to fall for and stand behind stupid shit?

It also cracks me up that any time he seems backed into a corner he just doses the ole "you are a kneepadder, you voted for Obama BS". Which shows  desperation.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 15, 2011, 11:15:29 AM
What amazes me more than anying is that 33333 made this vid sound like is was something.  He said it like addressed the SSN thing point by point and was too complicated for him to list these points.

That stupid bitch on the vid did nothing of the sort and frankly she came across (as shown in the shredding i gave her) as some racist senile old white women.

And 3333 fell for it hook line and sinker.  

I appreciate 333333's position on Obama but do we need to fall for and stand behind stupid shit?

It also cracks me up that any time he seems backed into a corner he just doses the ole "you are a kneepadder, you voted for Obama BS". Which shows  desperation.

he always falls for it.  His hatred has blinded him so much that positions he was once against, he is now for.  Case in point - he posted about medicare cuts under Obama's health care reform, yet he's against medicare and would be happy to abolish it completely.  Unless he can somehow gain a 'point' vs Obama in his crazy little game. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 11:38:01 AM
I'm still waiting for the explanbation how you claim you debunked the ss number thing other than offering a one in a million scenario. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 11:50:27 AM
I'm still waiting for the explanbation how you claim you debunked the ss number thing other than offering a one in a million scenario. 

Its not a 1 in a million scenario because the Area numbers match 4 of 5 digits in place from a HA zip to a CT zip.  Hence you have the CT area number on Obama's SSN.   It would be a 1 in a million thing if the numbers weren't in order or in different places.

I don't know why you insist this is 1 in a million scenario.  Anybody with any sense can see that.

But then again you fell for that stupid old hags vid, so i am not surprised 33333, its just getting annoying now and you are making yourself look like an idiot, sorry, but it is what it is.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 11:58:52 AM
Its the first three numbers that matter.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 12:04:28 PM
Its the first three numbers that matter.

Again you are making yourself look like an idiot.  maybe you need to re-read what i wrote.

ZIP CODE
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 12:11:35 PM
Again you are making yourself look like an idiot.  maybe you need to re-read what i wrote.

ZIP CODE


Again - my first three numbers to my SS are 127, same with all my buddies, same with my sister, same with her friends, who were all born in the bronx. 

Your scenario is assuming an anomoly took place with bama, which it utterly amusing considering his sister has  HA SS number as well.  .   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 15, 2011, 12:16:57 PM
Again - my first three numbers to my SS are 127, same with all my buddies, same with my sister, same with her friends, who were all born in the bronx.  

Your scenario is assuming an anomoly took place with bama, which it utterly amusing considering his sister has  HA SS number as well.  .  

Well, my brother and sister were all born in the same zipcode as I was and ours are all different, so this theory of zip code is ridiculously flawed.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 12:17:46 PM
Again - my first three numbers to my SS are 127, same with all my buddies, same with my sister, same with her friends, who were all born in the bronx. 

Your scenario is assuming an anomoly took place with bama, which it utterly amusing considering his sister has  HA SS number as well.  .   

Did his sister and him apply on the same form at the same time?

You are just being an idiot.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 12:21:25 PM
Well, my brother and sister were all born in the same zipcode as I was and our are all different, so this theory of zip code is ridiculously flawed.

I am not sure what you are saying here.

Its not a theory.  Its a high probability it was either a clerical error or was hand writing error.  (apps were hand written back in 1977)

The zip code for Obama address in Hawaii in 1977 was 96814

the zip code for Danbury, CT in 1977 was 06814
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 15, 2011, 12:22:44 PM
I am not sure what you are saying here.

Its not a theory.  Its a high probability it was either a clerical error or was hand writing error.  (apps were hand written back in 1977)

The zip code for Obama address in Hawaii in 1977 was 96814

the zip code for Danbury, CT in 1977 was 06814

Well, I'm saying that even if they were in the same zipcode, doesn't mean anything... Like I said, my sister, brother and I all have different first 3 digits of our socials, although all being born in the exact same zipcode.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 12:23:29 PM
Did his sister and him apply on the same form at the same time?

You are just being an idiot.  

Again - no one freaking knows.   The whole thing is beyond bizarre.   Did he wait to apply to take a job or something?  did he wait to apply for college?  What name did he apply under?


Here is another WTF - he entered Occidental as "Barry Soetoro" yes the Selective Service Registration he put out says Barack Obama?   what passport did he travel on?   He reigsted in Indnesia as Barry Soetoro.  Did he do a formal name change?   how did he travel back and forth between the countries without a SS or passport before 15 y/o?   hhhmmmm?  


The whole thing is beyond explanation.            
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 12:29:28 PM
Obama: I was born here. Really.
Politico44 ^ | 04/15/11 | MJ LEE




“I was talking to a group earlier, and I said: ‘You know, I grew up here in Chicago. I wasn’t born here,’ ” Obama said, prompting laughter from his supporters. “Just want to be clear. I was born in Hawaii. But I became a man here in Chicago.”

As his audience clapped, Obama continued, “And a lot of the people who are here today – the values, the ideals, my beliefs, my core convictions about what makes America great were forged here.”


________________________ ________________________ ________-

Al Capone values, nice job obama voters. 

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 12:39:32 PM
Well, I'm saying that even if they were in the same zipcode, doesn't mean anything... Like I said, my sister, brother and I all have different first 3 digits of our socials, although all being born in the exact same zipcode.

That's also because it isn't 100% as per the SSA.

33333, premise is that the area number (the first 3 numbers on your SSA) are always from where you were born.

Which supports my argument that the CT number Obama has isn't indicative of were he was born.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 15, 2011, 12:40:12 PM
That's also because it isn't 100% as per the SSA.

33333, premise is that the area number (the first 3 numbers on your SSA) are always from where you were born.

Which supports my argument that the CT number Obama has isn't indicative of were he was born.

Yes... I'm agreeing with your position.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 12:42:35 PM
Again - no one freaking knows.   The whole thing is beyond bizarre.   Did he wait to apply to take a job or something?  did he wait to apply for college?  What name did he apply under?


Here is another WTF - he entered Occidental as "Barry Soetoro" yes the Selective Service Registration he put out says Barack Obama?   what passport did he travel on?   He reigsted in Indnesia as Barry Soetoro.  Did he do a formal name change?   how did he travel back and forth between the countries without a SS or passport before 15 y/o?   hhhmmmm?  


The whole thing is beyond explanation.            

 ::)

Classic CT tactic, when getting cornered switch to another aspect of the loony CT.

I bet if i research that, there probably won't be anything to it. 

Just like that stupid video.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 12:43:55 PM
Again - no one freaking knows.       


Do siblings usually apply on the same form?


 ::) ::) ::) ::)


That's why that's an ignorant argument. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 15, 2011, 12:58:06 PM
IF it were just one thing with Obama (SS#), one could just chalk it off to innocent human error - it happens. But Obama's history is filled with far too many quirks to just brush them aside. Obama has a history that has been scrubbed and being rewritten. I've watched it happen over the last 3 years. Yes, there are flat out fabricated stories out there - most likely by operatives trying to hide the cover-up.

Still waiting to hear the Australia story and the scholarship story which Obama slipped out recently that is no where in the "official" history, nor his 2 autobiographies.

Still, the issue is not the birth certificate, or the lack of one. The issue is his alleged father being a British subject and Obama's dual citizenship AT BIRTH which disqualifies him from being a "natural born Citizen" as required to be POTUS.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 01:01:30 PM
Exactly!   WTF i this so called "scholarship" Obama said he got?   The one from the House of Saud?   To Harvard, Columbia, or Occidental?   

hhhh? ? ? ?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 15, 2011, 01:01:49 PM
IF it were just one thing with Obama (SS#), one could just chalk it off to innocent human error - it happens. But Obama's history is filled with far too many quirks to just brush them aside. Obama has a history that has been scrubbed and being rewritten. I've watched it happen over the last 3 years. Yes, there are flat out fabricated stories out there - most likely by operatives trying to hide the cover-up.

Still waiting to hear the Australia story and the scholarship story which Obama slipped out recently that is no where in the "official" history, nor his 2 autobiographies.

Still, the issue is not the birth certificate, or the lack of one. The issue is his alleged father being a British subject and Obama's dual citizenship AT BIRTH which disqualifies him from being a "natural born Citizen" as required to be POTUS.

Whos gimmick are you
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 01:03:10 PM
Title: Re: Hawaii Governor: We’re going to put a stop to this Birther crap once and for all
Post by: dr.chimps on April 15, 2011, 01:04:37 PM
if it's released and it shows Obama was born in Hawaii, I wonder if the birthers will voice any type of "oops, sorry, we were way off base and wrong" or will they just magically vanish without a word?
'Course not. They'll segue into some other conspiracy angle, and not again mention the BC issue - like it never even occurred.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 01:13:58 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 15, 2011, 03:20:04 PM
Exactly!   WTF i this so called "scholarship" Obama said he got?   The one from the House of Saud?   To Harvard, Columbia, or Occidental?   

hhhh? ? ? ?



This is the first time I've heard about a scholarship from Obama himself. I remember the foreign dude (now deceased) talking Saudi princes, etc. that everyone was in denial mode about. And the wife talking about student loans, the interest of which did not show in their tax returns - but scholarship? Nope, not from the Obama camp.

April 13, 2011 budget speech

The paragraph starts at 34:19

The transcript (not 100% followed)
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/04/13/text-of-obama-speech-on-the-deficit/ (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/04/13/text-of-obama-speech-on-the-deficit/)

Of course, there will be those who disagree with my approach.  Some will argue we shouldn’t even consider raising taxes, even if only on the wealthiest Americans.  It’s just an article of faith for them.  I say that at a time when the tax burden on the wealthy is at its lowest level in half a century, the most fortunate among us can afford to pay a little more.  I don’t need another tax cut.  Warren Buffett doesn’t need another tax cut.  Not if we have to pay for it by making seniors pay more for Medicare.  Or by cutting kids from Head Start.  Or by taking away college scholarships that I wouldn’t be here without.  That some of you wouldn’t be here without.  And I believe that most wealthy Americans would agree with me.  They want to give back to the country that’s done so much for them.  Washington just hasn’t asked them to.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 03:25:49 PM


 ::) ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 15, 2011, 04:02:30 PM
IF it were just one thing with Obama (SS#), one could just chalk it off to innocent human error - it happens. But Obama's history is filled with far too many quirks to just brush them aside. Obama has a history that has been scrubbed and being rewritten. I've watched it happen over the last 3 years. Yes, there are flat out fabricated stories out there - most likely by operatives trying to hide the cover-up.

Still waiting to hear the Australia story and the scholarship story which Obama slipped out recently that is no where in the "official" history, nor his 2 autobiographies.

Still, the issue is not the birth certificate, or the lack of one. The issue is his alleged father being a British subject and Obama's dual citizenship AT BIRTH which disqualifies him from being a "natural born Citizen" as required to be POTUS.

I don't totally disagree with you here.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 15, 2011, 06:17:13 PM

Still, the issue is not the birth certificate, or the lack of one. The issue is his alleged father being a British subject and Obama's dual citizenship AT BIRTH which disqualifies him from being a "natural born Citizen" as required to be POTUS.

This is actually a legitimate question, unlike most of the birther stuff.  But let's face it:  he's never going to answer that question, he's never going to produce his BC, and even if he did, it wouldn't satisfy most of the birthers. 

Once people become so invested in conspiracy theories, they often check their common sense at the door.  (Not talking about you.) 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 15, 2011, 06:20:46 PM
If he released his records like his bc, passports, school records, etc, this would all go away.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 15, 2011, 06:23:01 PM
If he released his records like his bc, passports, school records, etc, this would all go away.

No it wouldn't.  People would accuse his documents of being forgeries, etc., just like they did with the COLB. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 16, 2011, 06:43:14 AM
the hawaii BC topic could be moved forward if someone, born in Hawaii, released their actual birth certificate. that way we can confirm they are available by the person in question.
are there no 'birthers' in HA?  they should post theirs and prove that the BC is actually available.  the story has it that the Health dept. has the actual one on file,but only the person mentioned can see it; they cant have a copy of it.  If this argument is wrong, it would be easy for a birther to publish theirs and debunk this argument.

{this is the 1% post; the rest will be the 99% other kind!}
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 16, 2011, 09:23:29 AM
the hawaii BC topic could be moved forward if someone, born in Hawaii, released their actual birth certificate. that way we can confirm they are available by the person in question.
are there no 'birthers' in HA?  they should post theirs and prove that the BC is actually available.  the story has it that the Health dept. has the actual one on file,but only the person mentioned can see it; they cant have a copy of it.  If this argument is wrong, it would be easy for a birther to publish theirs and debunk this argument.

{this is the 1% post; the rest will be the 99% other kind!}

The last one released was issued by HI Dept of Health on March 15, 2011. It is the 4th one shown on this page http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/14/long-form-birth-certificates-were-available-until-trump-trumped-obama/ (http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/14/long-form-birth-certificates-were-available-until-trump-trumped-obama/).

Hawaii has apparently changed their policy  (I have not been able to determine the date) since last month. Changing the policy now certainly does not look good for HI or Obama.
(http://www.thepostemail.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/march-15-2011-hawaii-long-formenhanced1-1.jpg)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 16, 2011, 09:25:20 AM
I already posted one in this thread earlier chad.  Check it out.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 16, 2011, 09:26:15 AM
Debunking the birther claim
 By: CNN's Ed Hornick
 

Washington (CNN) – Developer and reality show host Donald Trump has been pushing the claim that President Obama was not born in the U.S. - a myth that has dogged the president since he took office.

CNN has investigated these claims and here are the key points:

Certificate of live birth

The Obama team and the state of Hawaii released a certification of live birth, which documents the president’s birth on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu. This is not the original birth certificate. In Hawaii and other states, original birth certificates are not released when requested later.



CNN has seen a copy of the document and verified that it is official.

The certificate, officials say, allows a person born in Hawaii to get a driver's license, purchase land and obtain a U.S. passport.

What about the signature?

The so-called “birthers” say there's no signature or raised seal on the live birth certificate. But the group FactCheck.org, which viewed the original document, took a picture of the back of it and found there is a stamped signature and a raised seal.

Where’s the original birth certificate?

Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the former director of Hawaii's Department of Health, says she has personally viewed the president's original vital records and verified that he was born in Hawaii.

Former Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle, a Republican, has been quoted as saying, "I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records at the Department of Health. We issued a news release at the time saying the president was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that is just a fact."

Newspaper birth announcement

The announcement of Obama's birth appeared in the Honolulu Advertiser on August 13, 1961, and a day later in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin: “Mr. And Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4.”

Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo told the Star-Advertiser in July 2009 that vital statistics such as birth announcements were sent to the newspapers by the Health Department, which received the information from the hospital. These announcements were not sent in by the general public, Okubu said.

Current governor weighs in

Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie, a Democrat, was a close friend of the Obamas and has repeatedly said he was around during the future president’s birth and childhood.

What about his grandma’s claims?

Trump makes the claim that Obama's stepgrandmother in Kenya, Sarah Obama, said in an interview that he was born in Kenya. But the interview was done by a man characterized as a “street preacher” through a translator and there appears to be confusion over her answer.

The translator then came back and said Sarah Obama was saying that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 16, 2011, 09:33:10 AM
I already posted one in this thread earlier chad.  Check it out.

I thought you had, but it was quicker to grab this one rather than sort through 42 pages to find your posting of it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 16, 2011, 09:35:53 AM
04.15.2011. Orly Taitz interview with CNN John King.

Apr 15, 2011
Note how Mrs. Taitz holds up the papers in each hand. It's almost as if we are looking at the painting, 'Orly Taitz and her Exhibits'. I think that that was done deliberately. This was a great interview. Mrs. Taitz came across effectively and John King gave her time to speak. All around not a bad interview at all.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 16, 2011, 02:16:54 PM
Debunking the birther claim
 By: CNN's Ed Hornick
 

Washington (CNN) – Developer and reality show host Donald Trump has been pushing the claim that President Obama was not born in the U.S. - a myth that has dogged the president since he took office.

CNN has investigated these claims and here are the key points:

Certificate of live birth

The Obama team and the state of Hawaii released a certification of live birth, which documents the president’s birth on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu. This is not the original birth certificate. In Hawaii and other states, original birth certificates are not released when requested later.



CNN has seen a copy of the document and verified that it is official.

The certificate, officials say, allows a person born in Hawaii to get a driver's license, purchase land and obtain a U.S. passport.

What about the signature?

The so-called “birthers” say there's no signature or raised seal on the live birth certificate. But the group FactCheck.org, which viewed the original document, took a picture of the back of it and found there is a stamped signature and a raised seal.

Where’s the original birth certificate?

Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the former director of Hawaii's Department of Health, says she has personally viewed the president's original vital records and verified that he was born in Hawaii.

Former Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle, a Republican, has been quoted as saying, "I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records at the Department of Health. We issued a news release at the time saying the president was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that is just a fact."

Newspaper birth announcement

The announcement of Obama's birth appeared in the Honolulu Advertiser on August 13, 1961, and a day later in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin: “Mr. And Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4.”

Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo told the Star-Advertiser in July 2009 that vital statistics such as birth announcements were sent to the newspapers by the Health Department, which received the information from the hospital. These announcements were not sent in by the general public, Okubu said.

Current governor weighs in

Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie, a Democrat, was a close friend of the Obamas and has repeatedly said he was around during the future president’s birth and childhood.

What about his grandma’s claims?

Trump makes the claim that Obama's stepgrandmother in Kenya, Sarah Obama, said in an interview that he was born in Kenya. But the interview was done by a man characterized as a “street preacher” through a translator and there appears to be confusion over her answer.

The translator then came back and said Sarah Obama was saying that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.



Blacken, this is an awesome post....I really commend you...of course it won't make a difference to the nut cases on here...but thanks for the clarification.....I'm sure th conservative nut jobs on here will say all of the people quoted above are apart of the conspiracy to conceal Obama's birth
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 16, 2011, 02:23:07 PM
trump believes the word of a poor, senile kenyan foreigner with an obvious ax to grind (why won't my millionaire grandson get me out of this shithole) over the word of Repub govt Lingle and a slew of others.

To agree with trump, you have to say that out loud.  "I take the word of a pissed off, senile kenyan over that of numerous American govt officials.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 16, 2011, 02:26:28 PM
Was bama's mama even married to bho sr?  She was 18 when she got prego?  Was it a shotgun wedding? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 16, 2011, 02:28:00 PM
Was bama's mama even married to bho sr?  She was 18 when she got prego?  Was it a shotgun wedding? 


they're both deceased.  Who cares?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 16, 2011, 02:28:39 PM
trump believes the word of a poor, senile kenyan foreigner with an obvious ax to grind (why won't my millionaire grandson get me out of this shithole) over the word of Repub govt Lingle and a slew of others.

To agree with trump, you have to say that out loud.  "I take the word of a pissed off, senile kenyan over that of numerous American govt officials.

 ::)

Quote
"But now, the Hawaii state government, led by Republican Governor Linda Lingle, has made a public statement of the facts of Obama’s birth information, and she has said she personally saw his live birth certificate in the archives, and that no more will the state government react to the nearly 50 requests a month for proof about Obama’s birth."


SORRY - But she is a tool for selling obama's big kenyan lie.

Vote for a "real" conservative, brother.


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 16, 2011, 02:28:47 PM
trump believes the word of a poor, senile kenyan foreigner with an obvious ax to grind (why won't my millionaire grandson get me out of this shithole) over the word of Repub govt Lingle and a slew of others.

To agree with trump, you have to say that out loud.  "I take the word of a pissed off, senile kenyan over that of numerous American govt officials.

very nice 240..you were starting to worry me lately..but now I see you are back on track :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 16, 2011, 02:31:28 PM
nah, i'm just messing with 33.   i think the repubs in congress should stop flirting with their voters and being little cawkteases, and do an actual investigation.  once and for all.

either obama gets owned, or repubs get owned.  there's enough Q there to warrant it, and it's important.  Hell, did congress really need to determine which baseball players took a needle in their butt?  This is the legitimacy of 3 years of legislation - kinda a big deal.



So instead of repubs bitching about it on boards, they should be asking their reps why they won't investigate and get it over with ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 18, 2011, 05:22:07 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 18, 2011, 06:30:09 AM
Obama’s House of Cards
From the Trenches World Report ^ | April 18, 2011 | Mark Schumacher

Posted on Monday, April 18, 2011 9:06:39


Donald Trump has had a team of people researching Barry Soetoro AKA Barrack Obama for awhile now, and it looks as if a strong wind is headed for Barry’s house of cards. Mediocre grades in college, shady real estate deals, relationships with crooks, phony birth certificates are bad enough. But also questions on who really wrote a best seller that helped thrust him into office and soured relations with past friends are resurfacing.

Donald Trump is using his wealth to get to the bottom of this phony and it comes at a time that will coincide with Barry’s billion dollar re-election schedule. Barry is going to have his hands full. And From the Trenches World Report will be on it like caked mud on a pig’s a$$. Donald Trump has yet to release his full report on the birth certificate issue, but things aren’t looking good for the president from Kenya. Here is what is commonly known, easily verified by a little digging.

Starting with Barry Soetoro’s mental genius, his handlers, during his initial presidential campaign, were bragging their candidate was one of the smartest presidents ever with an IQ of a supposed 172 and a 167 while tested in a private school in Hawaii. No proof of this anywhere, all speculation. What is coming out now is that his marks did not reflect this in college, putting into question any high IQ claims.

Barry had some big money behind him while trying to get into Harvard. It is thought that his acquaintance with the Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal helped with connections at Harvard Law, in conjunction with affirmative action undoubtedly helping Barry skirt pesky grade problems hampering his admittance to the coveted Law School.

It is known that during his days at Columbia College, the grades were nothing out of the norm achieving a B- average. His grades at Harvard are a matter of speculation. How he even managed to get into Harvard Law is still a mystery. This information is sealed tighter than Goldman Sach’s bank vaults. What is known is that in 1988 Barry had some big time pull from big money acquaintances well known to the Harvard scene. While enrolled at Harvard he was elected president of the student law journal called “The Harvard Law Review”. It is said in order to be elected to that position takes a sharp mind, but affirmative action type pull probably didn’t hurt either.

Barry has written a couple of books that has paid him well, receiving 1.2 million dollars in authoring fees. This was a windfall to a man that used to be a community organizer at $12,000 per year.

Barry and his wife, Michelle, started making big money because of this, and because of his wife’s salary. In 2004 Barry and his wife were worth $207,647, in 2005 $1,655,106, and in 2006 $983,826. In 2005 Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama received 1.2 million in author fees combined with Michelle’s salary of $316,962 as a vice president for community and external affairs at the University of Chicago Hospitals, and her $45,000 salary from Tree House Foods in which she served on the board.

The book deals helped tremendously, making Barry a rich man. The book “Dreams From My Father” did particularly well and was said by handlers that Barry’s exemplary writing skills and storytelling is what helped propel him into the White House. There is only one problem, it is starting to come out that he didn’t actually write the book, a ghost writer whose name is Bill Ayers is thought to be the real author. It is said that if you compare the other book Obama says he wrote, “The Audacity of Hope”, the writing styles are completely different; so different that a non-expert in such things can easily see the comparisons.

Barry and his wife Michelle wanted to purchase a Kenwood, Chicago mansion in 2005, the only problem was that the owners owned two lots, one with the mansion and an undeveloped lot next door adjacent, and insisted that the lot next door be purchased at the same time. Barry and his wife couldn’t afford both. In comes Tony Rezko, Barry’s ex senate campaign finance manager, who was later found complicit in Chicago government fraud which consisted of mail and wire fraud, aiding and abetting bribery and money laundering.

In 2006, a federal grand jury indicted Rezko of 24 counts that exposed Governor Blagojevich and his crony friend Stuart Levine, a Republican insider, of extorting millions of dollars from firms seeking to gain regulatory business approval from Governor Blagojevich. He was also indicted for shaking down a Hollywood executive for 1.5 million for campaign contribution for Governor Blagojevich. In 2008 he was convicted of 16 of the 24 counts. He is supposed to be sentenced in October of 2011; he is still awaiting sentencing because of having to testify in Blagojevich’s upcoming fraud trial. Barry had been friends with Tony Rezko since at least 1990.

What is known is that in 2005, on the same day Barry and his wife closed on their 1.65 million dollar house, Rezko had purchased the lot next door for $625,000, giving Barry and his wife a $300,000.00 discount from the original asking price, obviously, because the owner was probably happy to unload. Both properties closed on the same day. Later, a strip of the lot that Rezko had purchased next door ended up being part of Barry and Michelle’s property being that they wanted to enlarge, roughly a ten foot strip. It is unclear how much money was paid for that strip.

This home had been on the market for several months prior with no takers. People in the know are wondering what the hell was going on here. Where did the $625,000 really come from? Was it by way of fraud? Not too smart of a move from a man who wants to become president of the United States of America is it? Barry himself said that all of this was a boneheaded move.

Barry used to be good friends with the controversial Reverend Wright, Barry’s former pastor, the same man who stood by him during thick and thin during his campaign, and went to bat for him on numerous occasions. The pastor said this during a 2010 CBS interview:

“No one in the Obama administration will respond to me, listen to me, talk to me or read anything that I write to them. I am ‘toxic’ in terms of the Obama administration,” Wright wrote the president of Africa 6000 International earlier this year.

“I am ‘radioactive,’ Sir. When Obama threw me under the bus, he threw me under the bus literally!” he wrote. “Any advice that I offer is going to be taken as something to be avoided. Please understand that!”

In comes Bill Ayers, a man who founded the radical group called the Weather Underground, a group responsible for bombing the U.S Capital, the Pentagon, and the New York City police headquarters in the 70′s protest of the Vietnam War. Ten years later, in 1981, a Brinks Armored was robbed killing two police officers and a security guard; thought to be perpetrated by the same group. By 1981, Bill Ayers says he wasn’t involved by this time with any violence associated with the group. He had moved on to work on his college professorship. He comes from a wealthy family; his father was a rich utility executive.

By this time, Bill Ayers says he wasn’t involved with any of that and was settled with his wife as respectable professors in Chicago. In 2001 he wrote “I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough”, along with many other books. Bill Ayers is considered an extremely gifted author by many. He was never convicted because of illegal wiretaps and other problems associated with the prosecution. No matter what you think of this man, he is admired by many and considered extremely intelligent.

Later, he befriended Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama and from his Hyde Park, Chicago home, they worked hard together to launch Barry’s political career. Barry lived three blocks from Ayers and their kids played with each other. Later during this time, they were both appointed to the board of the Annenberg Foundation, founded by the billionaire Walter Annenberg. From there they funneled millions of dollars to ideological allies. Walter Annenberg was the billionaire who founded the Reader’s Digest.

Bill Ayres is the one who people think is the author of Barry’s best seller “Dreams From My Father”.

Now, for whatever reasons, these two no longer speak. It looks as though the friendship has gone south. Bill Ayers is not the kind of man you want on your bad side. Apparently, this doesn’t worry Barry Soetoro. Barry’s people will tell you that the relationship with Bill Ayers was nothing of any significance and their relationship was blown way out of proportion.

So in conclusion, what we are starting to see develop here is a mixed bag of worms and a man of many faces. And unfortunately, has pulled the wool over America’s eyes big time. From the Trenches World Report will continue to update on this unfortunate “3 Card Monte” type fraud upon our Constitution.


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 18, 2011, 06:43:39 AM
04.15.2011. Orly Taitz interview with CNN John King.

Apr 15, 2011
Note how Mrs. Taitz holds up the papers in each hand. It's almost as if we are looking at the painting, 'Orly Taitz and her Exhibits'. I think that that was done deliberately. This was a great interview. Mrs. Taitz came across effectively and John King gave her time to speak. All around not a bad interview at all.

ha ha ha - when in doubt - throw the race card out there.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 18, 2011, 08:03:08 AM
ha ha ha - when in doubt - throw the race card out there.   

they pulled that shit on 911 skeptics all the time.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 18, 2011, 08:27:39 AM
they pulled that shit on 911 skeptics all the time.

Bush was black? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 18, 2011, 08:35:51 AM
nah, it's when opponents of the 911 quesitons would shout "you probably doubt the holocaust too" or something like that. 

completely unrelated, but one of the techniques used to discredit a belief without addressing its points.

You've heard birtherism compared to 911 skepticism all the time, haven't you?  They try to attach the same stigma to it - without even looking at the Qs that the birthers have.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 18, 2011, 08:40:48 AM
nah, it's when opponents of the 911 quesitons would shout "you probably doubt the holocaust too" or something like that. 

completely unrelated, but one of the techniques used to discredit a belief without addressing its points.

You've heard birtherism compared to 911 skepticism all the time, haven't you?  They try to attach the same stigma to it - without even looking at the Qs that the birthers have.

Look i favor a full investigation into 911 myself.   But my thought is that it will unearth sheer incompetence at all levels going back a few years more than a inside job CT.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 18, 2011, 08:45:34 AM
Look i favor a full investigation into 911 myself.   But my thought is that it will unearth sheer incompetence at all levels going back a few years more than a inside job CT.   

hey, that's your take.  there are things like molten steel under WTC7 and huge insider training betting on the airline stock to fall (put options) which were specifically not investivgated because - according to the 911 commission - they had nothing to do with Al-quida.

The responsibility for the events of 911 were placed 100% on Al-Q.  This fits politically and allowed for the war.  But Atta sure as shit wasn't betting on the stock markets ;)  And the $ from pakistan was ignored too.

it is what it is.  We don't want to derail this into a 911 thread.  The main point is that critics of the birther movement will cry racism, etc - to try to associate birthers with something much worse than "we just wanna see if Obama is legally able to hold that job".  The minute the media (that includes FOX, yall...) translates birtherism to racism, it's an off-limits topic.  Just like 911 is now.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 18, 2011, 07:40:17 PM
Arizona's governor vetoes 'birther bill'
By Paul Davenport
Associated PressOSTED: 04:16 p.m. HST, Apr 18, 2011

PHOENIX >> Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer today vetoed a bill to require President Barack Obama and other presidential candidates to prove their U.S. citizenship before their names can appear on the state's ballot.

The bill vetoed by Brewer today would have made Arizona the first state to pass such a requirement. The Arizona bill included proof-of-qualification for all candidates appearing on Arizona ballots, with those varying by the office sought.

Hawaii officials have certified Obama was born in that state, but so-called "birthers" have demanded more proof.

Brewer said in her veto letter that she was troubled that the bill empowered Arizona's secretary of state to judge the qualifications of all candidates when they file to run for office.

"I do not support designating one person as the gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate, which could lead to arbitrary or politically motivated decisions," said Brewer, who was secretary of state until she became governor in 2009.

"In addition, I never imagined being presented with a bill that could require candidates for president of the greatest and most powerful nation on Earth to submit their 'early baptismal circumcision certificates' among other records to the Arizona secretary of state," she said. "This is a bridge too far."

The certificates are among the documents a candidate could submit in place of a birth certificate.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/120170799.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 18, 2011, 08:08:49 PM
Brewer must be in on the conspiracy.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 19, 2011, 03:07:45 AM
This thread is just depressing.

Time to move on with your lives, boys.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 19, 2011, 04:35:44 AM
Calling all Hawaiians [Birth certificate]
WND ^ | April 19, 2011 | Joseph Farah


________________________ _____________________-


Now we have a new story from the former health director in the state of Hawaii.

Even if the president of the United States wanted his long-form birth certificate, he couldn't get it.

No Hawaiians can, Dr. Chiyome Fukino insists.

But, of course, that presents us with another problem.

What about all the other Hawaiians who have managed to secure these elusive documents without incident?

How did they do it?

How did Eleanor Nordyke manage to get copies of her twins' birth certificates – twins born one day later at the Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital. (You can see those here.)

I'm calling on all Hawaiians to let me know if you have been able to secure a long-form birth certificate from the Hawaii health department in recent years. Send me the image files and tell me your story of how you secured it and what hassles you had or didn't have.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 19, 2011, 06:20:57 AM
let's keep this going until 3 days before the election.
then BO will release his long form; all will be in order.
there goes any chance for the Rep.  all that time was wasted on a non issue.
well played, Mr. Obama !   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 19, 2011, 06:24:06 AM
let's keep this going until 3 days before the election.
then BO will release his long form; all will be in order.
there goes any chance for the Rep.  all that time was wasted on a non issue.
well played, Mr. Obama !   :D

 ::)  ::)

Question - Obama eluded to a supposed Scholarship he got for school that helped him pay his way.    Ca you give me some details on that?     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 19, 2011, 08:17:30 AM
If he released his records like his bc, passports, school records, etc, this would all go away.

not in your mind....you would simply switch to this being a vast left-wing conspiracy to falsify documents in order to legitimize Obama
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 19, 2011, 08:23:35 AM
not in your mind....you would simply switch to this being a vast left-wing conspiracy to falsify documents in order to legitimize Obama

 ::)  ::)

So its ok for him to release nothing at all for the perceived response from the tea party people?   Yeah ok, keep falling for that crap.   Tell me a little more about that scholarship obama claims he got. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 19, 2011, 08:23:53 AM
hey, that's your take.  there are things like molten steel under WTC7 and huge insider training betting on the airline stock to fall (put options) which were specifically not investivgated because - according to the 911 commission - they had nothing to do with Al-quida.

The responsibility for the events of 911 were placed 100% on Al-Q.  This fits politically and allowed for the war.  But Atta sure as shit wasn't betting on the stock markets ;)  And the $ from pakistan was ignored too.

it is what it is.  We don't want to derail this into a 911 thread.  The main point is that critics of the birther movement will cry racism, etc - to try to associate birthers with something much worse than "we just wanna see if Obama is legally able to hold that job".  The minute the media (that includes FOX, yall...) translates birtherism to racism, it's an off-limits topic.  Just like 911 is now.


Well you are wrong in that I believe it is racism that is driving this birther thing...they are trying to de-legitimize Obama by saying he is not a "true American"...and no way would this movement had continued had Obama been white and therefore "more legitimate" in the eyes of the birthers....and these same people are the same who wanted to see a constitutional amendment so that Schwartzenegger could possibly run for president...yet  he wasn't born here but he is "legit" because he is white
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 19, 2011, 09:05:14 AM
333 why do you keep posting articles from wnd?  It's a right wing birther site.  Is that the ONLY source you have?  I mean seriously.  It's as repetitive as your nonsense that Hawaii is lying. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 19, 2011, 09:16:28 AM
Donald Trump: I'll release my tax returns if President Obama shows his birth certificate
New York Daily News ^ | 04/19/2011 | Aliyah Shahid




Donald Trump has a deal for the President: He'll release his tax returns if Obama releases his birth certificate.

The billionaire businessman and aspiring presidential candidate laid out the conditions for his financial records disclosure Tuesday.

"Maybe I'm going to do the tax returns when Obama does his birth certificate … I'd love to give my tax returns. I may tie my tax returns into Obama's birth certificate," he told ABC News' George Stephanopoulos.

Obama revealed Monday that the First Family shelled out $453,770 to the IRS for 2010.

Presidents and potential candidates traditionally reveal how much they pay in taxes, but it's not a requirement. It's unclear just how much Trump - who has been bragging about his personal fortune in recent weeks - is worth.

Trump, who's at the head of the birther chorus, has seen a spike in recent polls. He repeated his doubts that Obama was born in the U.S., a claim that Stephanopoulos immediately blasted.

"George, they've co-opted you. Obviously, Obama and his minions have co-opted you," Trump said.


(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 19, 2011, 12:28:58 PM
333 why do you keep posting articles from wnd?  It's a right wing birther site.  Is that the ONLY source you have?  I mean seriously.  It's as repetitive as your nonsense that Hawaii is lying. 

exactly the point I have made..all of his postings come from fringe right-wing/ conservative/crazy blog sites..they have no legitimacy..its just another guys opinion
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 19, 2011, 12:53:24 PM
::)  ::)

Question - Obama eluded to a supposed Scholarship he got for school that helped him pay his way.    Ca you give me some details on that?     
no, because it doesn't interest me.
Now, teasing you.....that does !  ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 19, 2011, 12:53:52 PM
exactly the point I have made..all of his postings come from fringe right-wing/ conservative/crazy blog sites..they have no legitimacy..its just another guys opinion

duh.. its his "PROOF"
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 19, 2011, 12:59:11 PM
duh.. its his "PROOF"


 ::)  ::)

Where is a duly signed BC from your messiah or hospital generated BC or record?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 19, 2011, 01:43:03 PM

 ::)  ::)

Where is a duly signed BC from your messiah or hospital generated BC or record?


I dont give a fuck.. go on fact finders or some shit.. do your clients know that Obama consumes your thoughts.. What he eats for dinner, where he is born, what his wife looks like,..the bick he rides, who he prays too..
man is he paying rent in your brain because he is living there
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 19, 2011, 01:45:29 PM
yeah, trump is MIGHTY sensitive about his financial records.

I'll take a $5 bet with any getbigger that trump will never release them.  "I'm worth many times the 2.7 bil that Forbes says I am"......  I mean, really? 

He was breaking down the dates, of how long he could go without releasing them.  He didn't know anything about right to privacy/Roe vs Wade, really looked foolish on that one.  But he had all these deadlines (and reasons he won't release his info now) at his fingertips.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 19, 2011, 01:48:44 PM

I dont give a fuck.. go on fact finders or some shit.. do your clients know that Obama consumes your thoughts.. What he eats for dinner, where he is born, what his wife looks like,..the bick he rides, who he prays too..
man is he paying rent in your brain because he is living there

Of course you don't care - you went to the polls like a lemming doing ZERO research on this fraud you put in office for no other reason than he looked and sounded cool.   

Now that he is in office and peopl are trying to piece together the narritve and story of this grifter, all the uncomfortable facts are coming to light you are undoubedtly embarassed by hat had you known at the time probably would have never voted for.   

And by the way - my clients hate obama worse than I do.   In fact, there is not one buisness collegue I have that does not consider obasa anything but the antichrist as far as business goes.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 19, 2011, 01:56:52 PM
Trump should have stuck with the birther issue - he is an expert on that.

The moment he went to that interview yesterday, he was relvealed to be a clueless dope on a lot of issues.  "I'm more pro-defense than all the other candidates!@"

I mean, who says that?  he's gonna get pressed so hard in the primaries, it'll be unbelievable.  He's tops at the polls now, but he won't be in 2 weeks.  He'll jump the shark.  The more we learn about him, the more we learn he's a lib.  And he's working SO HARD to convince us that he's not a liberal.  The lady doth protest too much.

Anyone find a link to the text of that interview yet?  telling us how he's going to force china to stop devalueing their currency.  How he'll tell OPEC to drop oil to 70 a barrel and they'll listen.  Worse part is, the damage he'll do to the other candidates.  He's shitting all over mitt's business experience.  Let's face it, mitt will probably be the GOp candidate.  Now, obama can say "even donald trump pointed out that your business experience is minimal and that you failed as much as you succeeded".

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 19, 2011, 08:52:33 PM
Dr. Orly Taitz: Donald Trump Will Get the Republican Nomination


(Apr. 19, 2011) — On April 18, 2011, The Post & Email spoke with Dr. Orly Taitz just prior to the announced veto by Arizona Governor Janice Brewer of the legislation which would have required candidates for the office of president to provide proof of “natural born Citizenship” status.

Since that time, Taitz has launched a recall campaign against Brewer which can be signed by any Arizona registered voter.

On April 15, Taitz was interviewed by John King of CNN, who labeled her “the leading figure in the birther movement.” Before the interview commenced, King expressed skepticism over the contention that the Arizona bill was not “aimed” at Barack Hussein Obama.

During the telecast, King admitted that what he called the “Certificate of Live Birth,” which he held up to the cameras, is not a complete birth record. He asked his other guest, a pollster, if “the president has to do something more proactively” to convince the public that he was born in Hawaii.

When Taitz held up documents which she claimed proved that Obama is using a stolen social security number, the pollster interrupted Taitz and claimed that her statements arose from racism. When he asked Taitz if the eligibility question would have arisen if Obama had been white, Taitz answered, “Yes.”

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 20, 2011, 05:56:32 AM
Dr. Orly Taitz: Donald Trump Will Get the Republican Nomination


(Apr. 19, 2011) — On April 18, 2011, The Post & Email spoke with Dr. Orly Taitz just prior to the announced veto by Arizona Governor Janice Brewer of the legislation which would have required candidates for the office of president to provide proof of “natural born Citizenship” status.

Since that time, Taitz has launched a recall campaign against Brewer which can be signed by any Arizona registered voter.

On April 15, Taitz was interviewed by John King of CNN, who labeled her “the leading figure in the birther movement.” Before the interview commenced, King expressed skepticism over the contention that the Arizona bill was not “aimed” at Barack Hussein Obama.

During the telecast, King admitted that what he called the “Certificate of Live Birth,” which he held up to the cameras, is not a complete birth record. He asked his other guest, a pollster, if “the president has to do something more proactively” to convince the public that he was born in Hawaii.

When Taitz held up documents which she claimed proved that Obama is using a stolen social security number, the pollster interrupted Taitz and claimed that her statements arose from racism. When he asked Taitz if the eligibility question would have arisen if Obama had been white, Taitz answered, “Yes.”


ah, yes, the one and the only orly !
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 05:58:31 AM
Orly schooled john king on cnn.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 20, 2011, 06:35:30 AM
“You have a real opportunity to talk about American exceptionalism and what made us exceptional. You have a real opportunity to talk about taxes and spending. Instead, you’re gonna waste time on the birth certificate? I understand. I personally think he’s a citizen. I think he was born here. I don’t think he was a Manchurian Candidate from birth. But, if you want to, great. You’re out of your mind if you think that is a winning argument for the next election.”


guess who said that
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 20, 2011, 07:46:25 AM
This story is developing..Hopefully it will open some eyes..The story is breaking..

I pre-ordered my book..

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash7.htm

BOOK TO REVEAL OBAMA'S 'TRUE' IDENTITY?
Wed Apr 20 2011 10:35:52 ET

**Exclusive**

This year's high stakes publishing project quietly went to press this week, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

After years of research and digging by the nation's top private investigators, here it comes:

"WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President."

MORE

The street date is a LONG month away, and author Jerome Corsi, the man who torpedoed John Kerry's presidential dreams with SWIFT BOAT, has gone underground and is holding his new findings thisclose.

"It's utterly devastating," reveals a source close to the publisher. "Obama may learn things he didn't even know about himself!"

MORE

Does Corsi definitively declare the location of Obama's birth?

Will the president's attorneys attempt to interfere with the book's distribution? [The publisher vows to vigorously fight any legal action that may be taken.]

Will the book finally -- once and for all -- put an end to the growing controversy?

Or will it just ignite new ones!?

"When Donald Trump said he sent PIs to Hawaii to get to the bottom of all this, he meant this book," declares an insider. [THE CASE ranked #1,341 on AMAZON's hitparade late Wednesday morning.]

Developing...


http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/
[/youtube]
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 20, 2011, 07:55:18 AM
Well this should be interesting. What happens should Corsi be able to prove Obama is not eligible to be POTUS?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 20, 2011, 08:32:07 AM
“You have a real opportunity to talk about American exceptionalism and what made us exceptional. You have a real opportunity to talk about taxes and spending. Instead, you’re gonna waste time on the birth certificate? I understand. I personally think he’s a citizen. I think he was born here. I don’t think he was a Manchurian Candidate from birth. But, if you want to, great. You’re out of your mind if you think that is a winning argument for the next election.”


guess who said that

wonderful post...agreed 100X
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 20, 2011, 08:32:50 AM
CAN YOU GUESS WHO SAID THAT?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 20, 2011, 08:36:00 AM
Well this should be interesting. What happens should Corsi be able to prove Obama is not eligible to be POTUS?

it won't make a difference....people will believe what they want to believe.....the vast majority of people believe that Obama is a citizen...if he wasn't. the FBI and the rest of the government would NEVER have allowed him to run for president....people like you are set in their ways and will NEVER admit they were wrong..thats whats wrong with this country now..I still have not seen a post from you where you admit you are wrong about something, or of you being contrite when you are caught in a contradiction..you just keep going straight ahead with your arguments no matter how illogical they are
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 20, 2011, 08:40:23 AM
it won't make a difference....people will believe what they want to believe.....the vast majority of people believe that Obama is a citizen...if he wasn't. the FBI and the rest of the government would NEVER have allowed him to run for president....people like you are set in their ways and will NEVER admit they were wrong..thats whats wrong with this country now..I still have not seen a post from you where you admit you are wrong about something, or of you being contrite when you are caught in a contradiction..you just keep going straight ahead with your arguments no matter how illogical they are


You know you are anywhere near as smart as you think you are, just so we get that out in the open.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 20, 2011, 08:47:07 AM
You know you are anywhere near as smart as you think you are, just so we get that out in the open.

don't claim to be...but I do know when I am wrong I admit it..or I am contrite when caught in a contradiction...or I admit when someone other than myself has a point and is right about something....waiting from the same from you
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 20, 2011, 08:52:26 AM
don't claim to be...but I do know when I am wrong I admit it..or I am contrite when caught in a contradiction...or I admit when someone other than myself has a point and is right about something....waiting from the same from you

First what did I post that was incorrect?

"Well this should be interesting. What happens should Corsi be able to prove Obama is not eligible to be POTUS?"

That the book isn't going to be interesting? The rest is framed in the form a question, so.....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 20, 2011, 08:55:08 AM
First what did I post that was incorrect?

"Well this should be interesting. What happens should Corsi be able to prove Obama is not eligible to be POTUS?"

That the book isn't going to be interesting? The rest is framed in the form a question, so.....

okay...I'll give you that....I just made the leap of faith that you were trying to use the question as hyperbole...which I based on your previously held positions about Obama not being born here..I still think I am right, but I'll grant you this
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 09:33:11 AM
Drudge is tweeting on corsi's book.  I wonder if is leaked the info the drudge.

Can't wait.  Hopefully impeachment follows.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 20, 2011, 09:36:02 AM
drudge also reported the ashley todd self-inscribed "B" before the police report was filled out.

drudge also reported on a 'whitey tape' we're yet to see.

maybe we'll wait until they actually post the info.  right now, it's nothing more than drudge hyping a book.  $$$$$$$$$$
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 20, 2011, 09:38:28 AM
wait a second - corsi - he's a 911 truther and fema camp alarmist, isn't he?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 20, 2011, 09:40:07 AM
“You have a real opportunity to talk about American exceptionalism and what made us exceptional. You have a real opportunity to talk about taxes and spending. Instead, you’re gonna waste time on the birth certificate? I understand. I personally think he’s a citizen. I think he was born here. I don’t think he was a Manchurian Candidate from birth. But, if you want to, great. You’re out of your mind if you think that is a winning argument for the next election.”






can someone tell me who that is
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 09:42:29 AM
Definalty not bama.  He hates this country and thinks its no more exceptional than greece or the uk.

Can't wait till corsi comes out w his book and we can deport muBarack to kenya or indonesia.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 20, 2011, 09:44:23 AM
Definalty not bama.  He hates this country and thinks its no more exceptional than greece or the uk.

Can't wait till corsi comes out w his book and we can deport muBarack to kenya or indonesia.

Glen Beck  :-\
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 20, 2011, 09:47:00 AM
“You have a real opportunity to talk about American exceptionalism and what made us exceptional. You have a real opportunity to talk about taxes and spending. Instead, you’re gonna waste time on the birth certificate? I understand. I personally think he’s a citizen. I think he was born here. I don’t think he was a Manchurian Candidate from birth. But, if you want to, great. You’re out of your mind if you think that is a winning argument for the next election.”






can someone tell me who that is

.Glen beck
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 09:50:26 AM
Beck does not speak for me and was already threatened once by soros.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 20, 2011, 09:51:06 AM
Beck does not speak for me and was already threatened once by soros.
LMAO..


Beck is in it to.. LMAO
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 20, 2011, 10:09:42 AM
 :o  The allegation that he faked his Hawaii birth is just downright embarrassing.  Trump better leave this alone. 

I think the only possible inquiry that isn't some absurd conspiracy is FarRightLooney's comments about whether Obama's father was a dual citizen. 

Trump, Abercrombie spar over "birther" issue
Posted: Apr 19, 2011 7:16 PM Updated: Apr 19, 2011 8:07 PM
By Brooks Baehr

HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – There is evidence to refute the claim that President Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii, and therefore is not eligible to be president of the United States, but "birthers" persist with their claims that Obama is in office illegally. Donald Trump is the latest to question the president's birthplace.

Former state Health Director Chiyome Fukino has said several times she has personally inspected President Obama's birth certificate twice. In an interview earlier this month she said claims Obama was not born here are "ludicrous" and "silly."

Both the Honolulu Star Bulletin and the Honolulu Advertiser ran announcements in August, 1961 saying Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama had a son on August 4 of that year.

But Trump and others continue to demand Obama make his birth certificate public.

"If he has a birth certificate he should release it," Trump told NBC News.

Trump exudes confidence. He is so sure of himself he says he may run for president in 2012.

"First of all, my successes, and I think you will attest to this, have been vast," he told NBC's Michael Isakoff. "I have built a great company. I've done a great job. I've put a lot of people to work," Trump added.

When Isakoff asked Trump if he thinks officials in Hawaii are lying about the birth certificate, Trump answered, "The governor of Hawaii said he was there when he was born. Now do you really believe that the governor of Hawaii was there when he was born? I don't."

Hawaii News Now caught up to Governor Neil Abercrombie and asked him to clarify what he meant when he said he was "there."

"Of course here in Hawaii," Abercrombie said.

"Not in the room?" we asked.

"Let's be serious. It is simply reprehensible to have this kind of conversation. Insulting someone's mother and father speaks about the person who is doing it," Abercrombie said.

Abercrombie said Trump is questioning Mr. Obama's birth place because Trump has a political agenda. Abercrombie questioned Trump's credibility and said Trump has ruined lives by spending investors' money on failed real estate ventures.

"It is really difficult to accept inquiries from a serial bankrupt like Donald Trump," Abercrombie said.

As for Obama's roots in Hawaii, Abercrombie told Hawaii News Now he first laid eyes on baby Barack Obama a few days after he was born. Abercrombie said Obama's parents introduced their newborn to friends at the University of Hawaii where Abercrombie was going to college with the president's father.

"We not only saw him and were with them, but were introduced to him of course at our gatherings, our student gatherings. And of course over the years then as he was raised by his mother and his grandparents we of course saw him frequently because he was with his grandfather all the time," Abercrombie added.

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/14479029/trump-abercrombie-spar-over-birther-issue
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 10:12:38 AM
LMAO..


Beck is in it to.. LMAO

This happened about a year and a half ago at a resturant in NYC.   Beck talked about it for weeks.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 20, 2011, 10:13:18 AM
 
 Barack Obamabirth certificatebirthersJerom e CorsiUS Obama Birth Certificate
Comments (0) Share Print By: Christian Tappe 04/20/11 11:40 AM
Special to the Examiner
.Jerome Corsi, PhD has another book coming out. Of course, it’s about President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Because, what else is there to talk about? Right? Certainly not Libya. We’re still at 'kinetic military action' with them, right?

Corsi thrives on these types of things: conspiracy-theory-esque issues concerning liberal politicians (see: Obama Nation and Swift Boat.) So it should come as no surprise that Corsi has grabbed the “birther” cause by the horns and run with it, with the forthcoming title, Where's the Birth Certificate? (sigh). But will it do any good? Almost certainly not. Here’s the description of the book (via Amazon.com):

Over the course of more than three years of research, Jerome Corsi assembles the evidence that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of the presidency. As a New York Times bestselling author, Harvard graduate, and investigative journalist, Corsi exposes in detail key issues with Obama's eligibility, including the fact the President has spent millions of dollars in legal fees to avoid providing the American people with something as simple as a long-form birth certificate. The eligibility issue has major ramifications for every American, and through Corsi's in-depth research, a clear, concise, and compelling case is made for a return to Founding Father principles and transparent, constitutional government, starting from the top down.

Prognosticate as to the book’s contents as you will, but there’s a larger issue here. Why is the Right at large so deeply concerned and invested in this?

I get that the president of the United States must be a natural born American citizen. And I get that Obama’s been withholding when it comes to his long-form birth certificate. But, the man spent several years running for president, and this has always been an issue. I’m sure he has his ducks in a row.

Whether you think there’s a birth certificate or not—indeed, whether there actually is a birth certificate or not—should be moot at this point. And yet a large percentage of America and the Right in particular have become obsessed with it.

And it’s one of the best things that could have happened to President Obama and his allies. Millions are consumed with the birth certificate issue. Legislation has been proposed concerning it, books are being written about it, keyboards have been worn thin with the amount of articles dashed off about it, and it’s a small wonder that anybody at FOX News has a functioning voice after all the shouting that’s been done about it. And meanwhile, real issues float by, with little notice.

Instead of thumping the birther drum, the Right would do well to regroup and focus all that energy on actual legislation and policy that will affect us and affect us greatly, instead of spending all our time tilting at windmills.

Because at the end of the day, whether or not you believe Obama is eligible to be president (I happen to think he is), he is still going to be president. And his policies are going to affect the country.

Corsi’s book isn’t going to tell you where Obama’s birth certificate is…or where it isn’t. It will not definitively answer the question of Obama’s citizenship. That’s almost a guarantee. What it will do is stir the pot some more. It will incite anger. But it will be fruitless, directionless anger.

And all the while, the pressing concerns of the day get passed over. If I were President Obama, I’d never produce my birth certificate. It’s a ready-made deflector shield for his controversial policies. Or a shiny object used to distract children.



this sums it up exactly. right on the money ;D
.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/opinion-zone/2011/04/oh-look-shiny-birth-certificate#ixzz1K5HmLJN5
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 20, 2011, 10:15:06 AM
This happened about a year and a half ago at a resturant in NYC.   Beck talked about it for weeks.     
so the gov of hawaii is lying in the post that BeachBum quoted?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 10:17:37 AM
so the gov of hawaii is lying in the post that BeachBum quoted?

Gov of Hawaii cant keep his own bullshit straight.  He has told about 5 different stories so far and said he cant find a BC for obama 


He set out to ut an end to this and said he gave up when all he could find were some notes scribbled somewhereabout bama's birth.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 20, 2011, 10:20:34 AM
great post blacken.  most common sense repubs seem to agree with that.  obama's getting away with everything else cause repubs are just yelling about the birth cert.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 10:23:04 AM
great post blacken.  most common sense repubs seem to agree with that.  obama's getting away with everything else cause repubs are just yelling about the birth cert.

Oh fuck off.  Even when the "other stuff" is pointed out to you on a platter, you ignore it and shill for bama regardless.  Some of us can do both at the same time. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 20, 2011, 11:01:40 AM
Beck does not speak for me and was already threatened once by soros.

Yet you have quoted Beck for many years when you have tried to prove a point...WOWWWWW....the hypocrisy
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 11:15:59 AM
Yet you have quoted Beck for many years when you have tried to prove a point...WOWWWWW....the hypocrisy

Show me where.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 20, 2011, 11:57:41 AM
Gov of Hawaii cant keep his own bullshit straight.  He has told about 5 different stories so far and said he cant find a BC for obama  


He set out to ut an end to this and said he gave up when all he could find were some notes scribbled somewhereabout bama's birth.  

I'm not an Abercrombie fan at all, but his story has been pretty consistent.  I don't think he ever said he couldn't find a BC.  My recollection is he said he had gone as far as he could go without Obama's consent.  

He did make a fool of himself by talking about how he was going end the "controversy," but I have not seen where he contradicted himself.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 12:01:06 PM
He said he remembers bama days old, and then other places says first memories were bama playing t-ball.   

Also - there are very sketchy details about the mothers whereabouts immediately before and after the alleged birth date.   She was seen in Seattle almost immediately after and before.  I have read many CT's on that one, but the whole thin is really bizarre.   Definately not june and ward cleaver here.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 12:07:37 PM
 :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 20, 2011, 12:08:37 PM

 Barack Obamabirth certificatebirthersJerom e CorsiUS Obama Birth Certificate
Comments (0) Share Print By: Christian Tappe 04/20/11 11:40 AM
Special to the Examiner
.Jerome Corsi, PhD has another book coming out. Of course, it’s about President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Because, what else is there to talk about? Right? Certainly not Libya. We’re still at 'kinetic military action' with them, right?

Corsi thrives on these types of things: conspiracy-theory-esque issues concerning liberal politicians (see: Obama Nation and Swift Boat.) So it should come as no surprise that Corsi has grabbed the “birther” cause by the horns and run with it, with the forthcoming title, Where's the Birth Certificate? (sigh). But will it do any good? Almost certainly not. Here’s the description of the book (via Amazon.com):

Over the course of more than three years of research, Jerome Corsi assembles the evidence that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the office of the presidency. As a New York Times bestselling author, Harvard graduate, and investigative journalist, Corsi exposes in detail key issues with Obama's eligibility, including the fact the President has spent millions of dollars in legal fees to avoid providing the American people with something as simple as a long-form birth certificate. The eligibility issue has major ramifications for every American, and through Corsi's in-depth research, a clear, concise, and compelling case is made for a return to Founding Father principles and transparent, constitutional government, starting from the top down.

Prognosticate as to the book’s contents as you will, but there’s a larger issue here. Why is the Right at large so deeply concerned and invested in this?

I get that the president of the United States must be a natural born American citizen. And I get that Obama’s been withholding when it comes to his long-form birth certificate. But, the man spent several years running for president, and this has always been an issue. I’m sure he has his ducks in a row.

Whether you think there’s a birth certificate or not—indeed, whether there actually is a birth certificate or not—should be moot at this point. And yet a large percentage of America and the Right in particular have become obsessed with it.

And it’s one of the best things that could have happened to President Obama and his allies. Millions are consumed with the birth certificate issue. Legislation has been proposed concerning it, books are being written about it, keyboards have been worn thin with the amount of articles dashed off about it, and it’s a small wonder that anybody at FOX News has a functioning voice after all the shouting that’s been done about it. And meanwhile, real issues float by, with little notice.

Instead of thumping the birther drum, the Right would do well to regroup and focus all that energy on actual legislation and policy that will affect us and affect us greatly, instead of spending all our time tilting at windmills.

Because at the end of the day, whether or not you believe Obama is eligible to be president (I happen to think he is), he is still going to be president. And his policies are going to affect the country.

Corsi’s book isn’t going to tell you where Obama’s birth certificate is…or where it isn’t. It will not definitively answer the question of Obama’s citizenship. That’s almost a guarantee. What it will do is stir the pot some more. It will incite anger. But it will be fruitless, directionless anger.

And all the while, the pressing concerns of the day get passed over. If I were President Obama, I’d never produce my birth certificate. It’s a ready-made deflector shield for his controversial policies. Or a shiny object used to distract children.



this sums it up exactly. right on the money ;D
.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/opinion-zone/2011/04/oh-look-shiny-birth-certificate#ixzz1K5HmLJN5


 :) :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 20, 2011, 12:57:44 PM
Gov of Hawaii cant keep his own bullshit straight.  He has told about 5 different stories so far and said he cant find a BC for obama 


He set out to ut an end to this and said he gave up when all he could find were some notes scribbled somewhereabout bama's birth.   
can you list the 5
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 01:04:01 PM
can you list the 5

Abercrombie Orwellian lies and misinformation, Setup for mainstream media, Tell the big lie and repeat it
Saturday, January 22nd, 2011 at 1:45 pm   


http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:6DH_-Ya8D8YJ:www.barackobamabirthcert ificate.org/blog/abercrombie-orwellian-lies-and-misinformation-setup-for-mainstream-media-tell-the-big-lie-and-repeat-it/%20abercrombie%20hawaii%20lies&cd=12&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com



When Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie stated a few weeks ago that he intended to research and locate Obama’s birth certificate, it was clear what his motivation was. To provide another Orwellian platform for lies and misinformation. The Hawaii law regarding the release of a birth certificate is also clear and Abercrombie knew it.

From Citizen Wells December 24, 2010.

“Things we can depend on from the left. The end justifies the means. Orwellian lies as the means. And corruption. Two of the most corrupt states in the country, Illinois and Hawaii and Obama is closely tied to both states and their corruption.

Neil Abercrombie the newly elected Democrat Governor of Hawaii, is fast becoming the new Orwellian spokesperson for the Obama camp and the left. The LA Times, which did some honest reporting on Obama early in 2008, follows the Orwellian Pied Piper and regurgitates falsehoods from Abercrombie, FactCheck.org and other Obama mouthpieces.

“For Hawaii governor, discrediting anti-Obama ‘birthers’ is a top priority”

“Neil Abercrombie knew Barack Obama’s parents when the future president was born here in 1961, and he has been aggravated by the so-called birther movement, which alleges Obama was not born in the United States and thus should be expelled from office.”"

Let’s examine the first piece of Orwellian spin by Abercrombie (with the help of the LA Times).

“Neil Abercrombie knew Barack Obama’s parents when the future president was born here in 1961″

My response:

People in Kenya knew Obama’s parents, so he must have been born there, applying that logic.

Second.

“Maybe I’m the only one in the country that could look you right in the eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born.’ “

My Response:

I was here when that baby was born. Does that mean Obama was born in NC?

Duh!

Third.

“That June, the Obama campaign released a certificate of live birth, an official document from the Hawaii Health Department certifying the facts of a person’s birth, as proof of his birthplace.”

My response:

First of all, the COLB posted on the internet is a certification not certificate. The one posted on the internet was never validated as having been issued by the state of Hawaii. And even if it had been, a HI COLB does not prove birth in Hawaii. It is as Lou Dobbs stated, a document that refers to another document.

Fourth.

“Investigations by two prominent fact-checking organizations, PolitiFact and FactCheck.org, concluded that the certificate was authentic.”

My response:

Would you trust securing the office of the presidency and upholding the US Constitution to these two FactCheck.org employees?




Fifth.

“FactCheck also turned up a 1961 birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser marking the birth of a son to “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama of Kalanianaole Hwy.””

My response:

Once again, we have more proof that a birth occurred, but not where.

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/12/24/neil-abercrombie-big-brother-spokesman-orwellian-speak-hawaii-corruption-much-like-illinois-corruption-obama-tied-to-both-states/

As expected and planned, the mainstream media feeds off of the Orwellian speak.

From Citizen Wells December 28, 2010.

“Chris Matthews interviewed Clarence Page and  David Corn regarding Neil Abercrombie’s recent remarks about Obama and his birth certificate. If you are really paying attention, you realize that Abercrombie made those statements to provide a forum for the Orwellian Big Brotherhood of the mainstream media to continue to spread their lies about Obama and his eligibility issues. There is no bigger liar on this subject than Chris Matthews. However, Page and Corn proved yesterday that they are strong competitors.”

“Matthews: “i am not a birther. i am an enemy of the birthers.””

“Page: “President’s got more important things to do, thank goodness. Governor Abercrombie says that because he was a classmate of obama’s parents. He is tired of people accusing his parents. He wants to try to put this to rest. Of course, it won’t work because the birthers aren’t interested in evidence that obama was born a u.s. citizen. They only want to hear evidence that he was not. That’s not going to happen.”

My response: If Obama is not eligible, he is not president. What does Abercrombie being in Hawaii and being friends with Obama’s parents have to do with proof Obama was born there? And who is accusing Obama’s parents of anything? Not wanting evidence of Obama’s US birth? That is all we have been trying to get for over 2 years. And once again, it is not Obama’s US Citizenship that is in question, it is his natural born citizen status.”

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/12/28/chris-matthews-enemy-of-birthers-enemy-of-constitution-enemy-of-american-people-abercrombie-mathews-page-corn-lies-lies-and-more-lies/

To make matters worse, Megyn Kelly on Fox News joined in the Orwellian cacophany of caustic comments in this disgusting unfair and unbalanced interview.

From Citizen Wells January 2, 2011.

“I held off of letting Megyn Kelly have it until yesterday even though she had made some stupid, uninformed comments about the Obama eligibility issues. She was undoubtedly influenced by the pontificating, bloviator Bill O’Reilly. She crossed the line a few days ago when she interviewed two biased and uninformed panelists regarding the Governor Neil Abercrombie remarks about Obama’s birth and birth certificate.

First of all, Fox News touts being “fair and balanced.” This show was one of the most unfair and unbalanced that I have viewed. It almost gave MSNBC credibility. The guests were:

Dan Gerstein, president of Gotham Ghostwriters, a Democrat Strategist and clearly a Orwellian spin meister for Obama.

Rich Lowry, editor of the National review. All he did was regurgitate the standard lines from the left.

Not only did Megyn Kelly not ask probing journalistic questions such as:

 Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?

Isn’t Obama ineligible due to not being a natural born citizen? His father was Kenyan/British. The founding fathers had to be grandfathered in to be eligible. Senate resolution 511 stated that McCain had 2 US Citizen parents.

The Certification of Live birth, COLB, placed on the internet. Do we have proof it was issued by the state of Hawaii? Isn’t the COLB, as Lou Dobbs stated, just a piece of paper that refers to another piece of paper? Is it possible to get a COLB and not be born in Hawaii?

There are obviously more questions that could be asked. Not only did Megyn Kelly not ask real questions, she joined in the “feeding frenzy” and lent credence to comments made by her biased panelists. This was one of the more disgusting displays I have ever witnessed on TV!”

Read more:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/megyn-kelly-neil-abercrombie-panel-biased-and-uninformed-fox-news-fair-balanced-fox-biased-boobs-on-news-shows/

So now Abercrombie can’t access the mythical birth certificate of Obama. We knew that over 2 years ago.

From the Associated Presss January 21, 2011.

“A privacy law that shields birth certificates has prompted Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie to abandon efforts to dispel claims that President Barack Obama was born outside Hawaii, his office says.

State Attorney General David Louie told the governor that privacy laws bar him from disclosing an individual’s birth documentation without the person’s consent, Abercrombie spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz said Friday.

“There is nothing more that Gov. Abercrombie can do within the law to produce a document,” said Dela Cruz. “Unfortunately, there are conspirators who will continue to question the citizenship of our president.”

Abercrombie, who was a friend of Obama’s parents and knew him as a child, launched an investigation last month into whether he can release more information about the president’s Aug. 4, 1961 birth. The governor said at the time he was bothered by people who questioned Obama’s birthplace for political reasons.

But Abercrombie’s attempt reached a dead end when Louie told him the law restricted his options.

Hawaii’s privacy laws have long barred the release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who doesn’t have a tangible interest.”

Read more:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jJD1AUmFV0f0ZjUdfkw-1m7Xm8EQ?docId=5aea898abc754aa6a82a99e17b21abe3

Abercrombie finished what he set out to do. To insult, with the aid of the mainstream media, including Fox News, anyone questioning Obama’s eligibility. To state the obvious one more time, Obama, at any time, by law, could release a legitimate birth certificate, if he has one.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 02:54:55 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 20, 2011, 03:04:50 PM
Gov of Hawaii cant keep his own bullshit straight.  He has told about 5 different stories so far and said he cant find a BC for obama 


He set out to ut an end to this and said he gave up when all he could find were some notes scribbled somewhereabout bama's birth.   

Lies.  You're a lying little bitch.

The governor couldn't release anything nor authorize the opening of Obama's health file without CONSENT.  He is still bound by the laws of privacy and just wanting to know is not good enough.

Eat sh*t lying bitch.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 03:06:43 PM
Lies.  You're a lying little bitch.

The governor couldn't release anything nor authorize the opening of Obama's health file without CONSENT.  He is still bound by the laws of privacy and just wanting to know is not good enough.

Eat sh*t lying bitch.

He said all he could find were scribbled notes on this.   Additionally - donest he confirm, by our own post - that bama is withholding something on this?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 20, 2011, 03:09:29 PM
'MISSING RECORDS IN HAWAII, MISSING RECORDS IN KENYA, MISSING RECORDS IN INDONESIA'...
DrudgeReport ^ | 4/20/2011 | Drudge




**Exclusive**

This year's high stakes publishing project quietly went to press this week, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

After years of research and digging by the nation's top private investigators, here it comes:

"WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President."

MORE

The street date is a LONG month away, and author Jerome Corsi, the man who torpedoed John Kerry's presidential dreams with SWIFT BOAT, has gone underground and is holding his new findings thisclose.

"It's utterly devastating," reveals a source close to the publisher. "Obama may learn things he didn't even know about himself!"

MORE

Does Corsi definitively declare the location of Obama's birth?

Will the president's attorneys attempt to interfere with the book's distribution? [The publisher vows to vigorously fight any legal action that may be taken.]

Will the book finally -- once and for all -- put an end to the growing controversy?

Or will it just ignite new ones!?

"When Donald Trump said he sent PIs to Hawaii to get to the bottom of all this, he meant this book," declares an insider.

[THE CASE ranked #1,341 on AMAZON's hitparade late Wednesday morning.]

Developing...


(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 20, 2011, 03:10:51 PM
He said all he could find were scribbled notes on this.   Additionally - donest he confirm, by our own post - that bama is withholding something on this?   

Bullsh*t he could only find what was LEGALLY obtainable without consent.  You're a foolish loser who has been proven wrong again and again on this.

It doesn't confirm sh*t other than that Obama didn't give abercrombie consent.  


By your stupid line of thinking, me asking for your name, address, copy of your BC and blood test and you declining would me you were 'withholding something'.   Oh what you have no house?  You weren't born here?  You have AIDS?

Prove you don't.  

That is your stupid line of thinking.  

I'd like to see you prove you aren't stupid but that won't happen cause you'll still follow this nonsense.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 20, 2011, 03:11:01 PM


Good interview.  Buchanan is right that Obama should release it, but that it should not be an issue in anyone's campaign.  

I suspect Obama will just give birthers a big middle finger right up through election day.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 21, 2011, 07:03:59 AM
The book is now Number 1

http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=sv_b_3

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 21, 2011, 07:06:24 AM
The book is now Number 1

http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/ref=sv_b_3

The CTer in me has to wonder if the author assigns a portion of book sales as a 'promotional fee' to drudge! LOL

their headline didn't deliver any news.  it was nothing but an advertisement for birther stuff.  I pity and laugh at anyone who took the bait and ordered the book.  Fcking sheep.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 07:34:07 AM
I'm loving this.  Maybe we can get this jerk out of office.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 21, 2011, 07:34:52 AM
The CTer in me has to wonder if the author assigns a portion of book sales as a 'promotional fee' to drudge! LOL

their headline didn't deliver any news.  it was nothing but an advertisement for birther stuff.  I pity and laugh at anyone who took the bait and ordered the book.  Fcking sheep.

None the less the issue is getting attention..That is the goal..

The book better be ground breaking OTOH.

BTW, looking great in this picture 240.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 07:38:35 AM
I think another name is on the long form bc.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 08:30:20 AM
Video: Donald Trump On CNN; Americans Will Be Very Surprised By What I've Found...
Obama Release Your Records ^ | April 21, 2011 | Obama Release Your Records




Video: Donald Trump Takes On CNN Over Obama's Birth Certificate: Americans Will Be Very Surprised By What I've Found. The Segment Aired 4/21/2011

Snippet via CNN: TRENDING: Trump says he'll reveal 'interesting things' on Obama

Donald Trump is giving few details about the investigation he claims to have launched in Hawaii to get to the bottom of where President Obama was born, but the business mogul told CNN Thursday Americans will be "very surprised" by what he has found.

"We're looking into it very, very strongly. At a certain point in time I'll be revealing some interesting things," Trump said on CNN's American Morning. -Source.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 21, 2011, 08:34:55 AM
Video: Donald Trump On CNN; Americans Will Be Very Surprised By What I've Found...
Obama Release Your Records ^ | April 21, 2011 | Obama Release Your Records




Video: Donald Trump Takes On CNN Over Obama's Birth Certificate: Americans Will Be Very Surprised By What I've Found. The Segment Aired 4/21/2011

Snippet via CNN: TRENDING: Trump says he'll reveal 'interesting things' on Obama

Donald Trump is giving few details about the investigation he claims to have launched in Hawaii to get to the bottom of where President Obama was born, but the business mogul told CNN Thursday Americans will be "very surprised" by what he has found.

"We're looking into it very, very strongly. At a certain point in time I'll be revealing some interesting things," Trump said on CNN's American Morning. -Source.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 08:44:22 AM
OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=289501

Why do 3 supporters own Obama's home?
Listed as property tax payers for family's Chicago mansion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: April 20, 2011
8:32 pm Eastern


By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily



The Obamas' Chicago mansion (Zillow.com)
 
This, the first of a series of articles on the Obama home at 5046 S. Greenwood, establishes that three individuals other than Obama are listed in public records as owners and taxpayers on the property.

Barack Obama is not among at least three people listed as current owners and taxpayers of the mansion his family calls home in Chicago's upscale Kenwood neighborhood, according to public records.

WND reported in December 2008 that William Miceli, the attorney for convicted political operative Tony Rezko and a fundraiser for Obama, owns the Obama home at 5046 S. Greenwood.

Make your contribution to the TV ad campaign for Jerome Corsi's "Where's the Birth Certificate?" now. Donations of $25 or more gets you a first-edition, author signed copy of the book as soon as it rolls off the presses.

Miceli is a lawyer at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill & Galland, which employed Obama when he did legal work for Rezko.

Now, WND has discovered that, along with Miceli, there are at least two other people listed in public records as owners and taxpayers of 5046 S. Greenwood in the South Side neighborhood of Kenwood, an oasis of pricey homes that has attracted professors at nearby University of Chicago.

The Cook County Recorder of Deeds website shows the property was purchased by the Northern Trust Company, with the mortgage recorded Dec. 19, 2005. The records suggest a Northern Trust Company trust, perhaps headed by Miceli, was the deed holder.

There are no Cook County records that show Barack or Michelle Obama own 5046 S. Greenwood Ave., although the likelihood is that the couple are the owners of the Northern Trust Company trust established to buy the property.

Rezko found the new residence for Obama when the Rezko family lived across the street.

In the 2008 presidential campaign, Rezko's role in the purchase created a scandal that threatened to derail Obama's presidential hopes. The list price for the home was $1.95 million. But the Obamas reportedly were able to negotiate a price of $1.65 million when Tony Rezko's wife, Rita Rezko, closed on the purchase of an adjacent vacant lot for $625,000 on the same day. The Obamas later bought one-sixth of the adjacent lot from Rita Rezko, creating a buffer.

Obama was grilled on the transactions before the election in meetings with the editorial staff of Chicago's two major newspapers, the Sun-Times and the Tribune. He admitted to the Sun-Times that it was a "boneheaded move" but denied he coordinated the purchase with the Rezkos. Critics pointed out that any coordination with supporters would be a clear violation of Senate ethic rules.

Now, a search of records shows that, in addition to Miceli, the Obama mansion is owned by Chicago Probate Judge Jane L. Stuart and Obama accountant Harvey Wineberg, both of whom are paying taxes on the property.

WND was assisted in the inquiry by an expert debt collector who had access to professional databases used by debt collection agencies and skip-tracing companies with proprietary "skip-trace" software designed to find debtors who have attempted to run away to avoid payment.

WND's source wishes to remain anonymous to prevent the type of retaliation faced by other experts who have been cut off from using proprietary databases in their attempt to search Obama's records.

The expert lives in the U.S. Southeast and has more than 10 years of experience in the financial and debt collection industries. He describes himself as a libertarian who voted for Obama in 2008, only to become disillusioned with what he sees as attacks on medical freedom in Obama's health-care reform law.

Owner No. 1: Judge Jane L. Stuart

In the records of the Cook County Assessor's office, Chicago probate Judge Stuart shows up as an owner of the Obama property at 5046 S. Greenwood Ave.



 


The description of the property in the Cook County Assessor's records – with a Property Index Number, or PIN, of 20-11-115-027-0000 – shows that she owns a rear apartment at the Obama's address on 3,000 feet of land. However, the listed sale date and the selling price corresponds with the reported June 15, 2005, sale of the property for $1.65 million to the Obamas.



 


Stuart also shows up in the Cook County Clerk's tax records as having paid taxes on the property in 2009 totaling $5,175.53. The amount was paid in two installments of $3,069.22 and $2,106.31.

According to the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, Stuart has owned 5046 S. Greenwood Ave. since 1988.

However, the public records also show her purchasing the property in 1995 for $1.65 million.

Stuart did not respond to multiple attempts by WND to reach her for comment.



 


Stuart's continued ownership of the property is documented by the record of an easement she granted the U.S. government on Dec. 21, 2010.

The main house is a century-old, multi-story, 6,400-square-foot, brick Georgian Revival home with four fireplaces, six bedrooms, six bathrooms, glass-door bookcases fashioned from Honduran mahogany, and a wine cellar large enough to store 1,000 bottles.

Owner No. 2: Obama accountant Howard Wineberg

Obama accountant Wineberg shows up in the records of the Cook County Assessor's office beginning in 2009:



 


Wineberg also is indicated as an owner in the Cook County Clerk's tax records:



 


The 2009 records show Wineberg paid taxes on the property totaling $25,742.31, paid in two installments of $12,351.04 and $13,391.27.

Wineberg told WND in a telephone interview that he simply pays the tax bills he receives on the Obama property. He said he has no idea whether others are paying taxes on the property or whether the amounts he is paying agree with the amounts Obama reports on his personal IRS income-tax filings.

Note that the PIN associated with Wineberg's ownership, 20-11-115-037-0000, is different than Stuart's.

Entering this PIN number into the Cook Country Recorder of Deeds returns a computer-generated message that says no property record for this PIN number can be found.

Owner No. 3, Obama law partner William Miceli

The third owner of the home is Obama's attorney, William Miceli.



 


Note that the Miceli listing at the Cook County Assessor's Office provides yet a third PIN for 5046 S. Greenwood, 20-11-115-034-0000.

The PIN is different even though the legal description is identical to descriptions for Stuart's and Wineberg's ownership records.

Placing the third PIN into the search function of the Cook County Recorder of Deeds website shows Miceli was involved since April 15, 2005, in purchasing 5046 S. Greenwood Ave. from Frederic Wondisford.

There are no tax records for Miceli on the property.

The office of the Cook County recorder of deeds said it could not explain to WND why 5046 S. Greenwood Ave. has three different PINs.



Read more: Why do 3 supporters own Obama's home? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=289501#ixzz1KAlrFZpi
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 09:01:05 AM
Seinfeld cancels on Trump after Obama comments
CNN Entertainment ^ | April 21, 2011




Donald Trump's "birther" comments are no joke for Jerry Seinfeld.

The 56-year-old comedian has canceled his appearance at a benefit for Donald Trump’s Eric Trump Foundation because the real estate mogul has been questioning whether President Obama was born in America.

(VIDEO AT LINK)

Seinfeld was expected to attend the September 13 event benefiting St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital, but his rep tells CNN that Seinfeld has indeed pulled out of the engagement because of the remarks Trump has been making about the President.

Trump responded to Seinfeld’s move with a letter, writing, "I just learned you canceled a show for my son's charity, The Eric Trump Foundation, which benefits the St. Jude's Children's Research Hospital (children with cancer) because of the fact that you think I am being very aggressive with respect to President Obama, who is doing an absolutely terrible job as our leader - just look at Libya, our economy, gas, food, and clothing prices and maybe you will understand what is going on!"

It’s not so much that Seinfeld pulled out of the benefit, Trump goes on, although “the children of St. Jude are very disappointed" and "Bret Michaels, disgusted by what happened, is taking over."

"What I do feel badly about is that I agreed to do, and did, your failed show, 'The Marriage Ref,' even though I thought it was absolutely terrible,” Trump wrote. “Despite its poor ratings, I didn't cancel on you like you canceled on my son and St. Jude. I only wish I did."

Seinfeld had agreed to do the benefit back in January, but according to his manager, he became “increasingly uncomfortable” with Trump’s questioning of Obama’s citizenship.....


(Excerpt) Read more at marquee.blogs.cnn.com ...


________________________ ________________________ _____________

Typical.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 21, 2011, 09:10:21 AM
weird... trump insults the legitimacy of our commander in chief during wartime, and a patriotic american like seinfeld steers clear.








 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 21, 2011, 10:54:49 AM
Cue 333's nonsense about liberal jews and seinfeld being one of them.     ::)

Seinfeld doesn't want to be associated with a nut job which is what Trump is.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 10:58:41 AM
Cue 333's nonsense about liberal jews and seinfeld being one of them.     ::)

Seinfeld doesn't want to be associated with a nut job which is what Trump is.

I know and deal with more liberal, guilt ridden, annoying, weak, disgusting, communist piece of shit liberal jews before 10 am each day than you will in a life time.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 21, 2011, 11:11:45 AM
I know and deal with more liberal, guilt ridden, annoying, weak, disgusting, communist piece of shit liberal jews before 10 am each day than you will in a life time.    

and exactly why are Jews guilt-ridden???..explain
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 21, 2011, 11:13:27 AM
and exactly why are Hews guilt-ridden???..explain

And they are apparently very weak and communist as well.

333 would you describe their political leanings as liberal?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 11:21:08 AM
And they are apparently very weak and communist as well.

333 would you describe their political leanings as liberal?

Communist
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 21, 2011, 11:26:23 AM
Communist

So they both liberal and communist.

Gotcha.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 21, 2011, 11:32:28 AM
So they both liberal and communist.

Gotcha.

Yes.  Think the following: 

Carl levin
Jerrold Nadler
Barney Frank
Barbara Boxer
Wasserman Schultz
Gary Ackerman
Anthony Wiener
Charles Schumer
Diane Fianstein



etc etc etc etc.         

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 21, 2011, 11:34:26 AM
Yes.  Think the following: 

Carl levin
Jerrold Nadler
Barney Frank
Barbara Boxer
Wasserman Schultz
Gary Ackerman
Anthony Wiener
Charles Schumer
Diane Fianstein



etc etc etc etc.         



Sounds like all the communist jewish populace hangs out in NY.

The Jewish population in LA seem to be more conservative.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 21, 2011, 12:27:15 PM
Seinfeld cancels on Trump after Obama comments
CNN Entertainment ^ | April 21, 2011




Donald Trump's "birther" comments are no joke for Jerry Seinfeld.

The 56-year-old comedian has canceled his appearance at a benefit for Donald Trump’s Eric Trump Foundation because the real estate mogul has been questioning whether President Obama was born in America.

(VIDEO AT LINK)

Seinfeld was expected to attend the September 13 event benefiting St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital, but his rep tells CNN that Seinfeld has indeed pulled out of the engagement because of the remarks Trump has been making about the President.

Trump responded to Seinfeld’s move with a letter, writing, "I just learned you canceled a show for my son's charity, The Eric Trump Foundation, which benefits the St. Jude's Children's Research Hospital (children with cancer) because of the fact that you think I am being very aggressive with respect to President Obama, who is doing an absolutely terrible job as our leader - just look at Libya, our economy, gas, food, and clothing prices and maybe you will understand what is going on!"

It’s not so much that Seinfeld pulled out of the benefit, Trump goes on, although “the children of St. Jude are very disappointed" and "Bret Michaels, disgusted by what happened, is taking over."

"What I do feel badly about is that I agreed to do, and did, your failed show, 'The Marriage Ref,' even though I thought it was absolutely terrible,” Trump wrote. “Despite its poor ratings, I didn't cancel on you like you canceled on my son and St. Jude. I only wish I did."

Seinfeld had agreed to do the benefit back in January, but according to his manager, he became “increasingly uncomfortable” with Trump’s questioning of Obama’s citizenship.....


(Excerpt) Read more at marquee.blogs.cnn.com ...


________________________ ________________________ _____________

Typical.   

This does not make Trump look good.  If he was just Trump the private citizen, I'm o.k. with this.  But Trump the leader of the free world, commander in chief, etc.?  Not if he is acting like this. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 21, 2011, 12:28:27 PM
This does not make Trump look good.  If he was just Trump the private citizen, I'm o.k. with this.  But Trump the leader of the free world, commander in chief, etc.?  Not if he is acting like this. 

Why even mention Television shit. :/

Not keeping your eye on the prize.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 21, 2011, 04:16:37 PM
So to be clear -


Trump, now facing tough Qs in interviews (softball time is over), looking very unsure with Qs about actual issues...

Trump, now facing criticism from RINOs and tea partiers alike...

Trump, now being ostracized by those in his industry because of his outlier beliefs...


Trump suddenly realizes his 15 minutes are almost up - he jumped the shark a little soon - has decided he'll change the subject from birtherism to a feud with Seinfeld.


Sorry, I hope Jerry doesn't "swing down" to the level of this attention whore leech trump.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 22, 2011, 06:00:21 AM
So to be clear -


Trump, now facing tough Qs in interviews (softball time is over), looking very unsure with Qs about actual issues...

Trump, now facing criticism from RINOs and tea partiers alike...

Trump, now being ostracized by those in his industry because of his outlier beliefs...


Trump suddenly realizes his 15 minutes are almost up - he jumped the shark a little soon - has decided he'll change the subject from birtherism to a feud with Seinfeld.


Sorry, I hope Jerry doesn't "swing down" to the level of this attention whore leech trump.
well written, sir.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 22, 2011, 11:43:34 AM
Fox Business: Alan Keyes Discusses Natural Born Citizen Issue - 4/21/11

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3xTBTaaCYU&feature=player_embedded (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3xTBTaaCYU&feature=player_embedded)

Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Apr 21, 2011
LINKS: Fox Business Network: Dr. Alan Keyes discusses The Citizen Vs. Natural Born Citizen Issue And The Courts Evasion Of The Obama Eligibility Issue. Reminder: Dr. Keyes', et. al., lawsuit against Obama will have oral arguments on May 2, 2011 at 9am, in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena division, courtroom 1. More details at link - 4/21/2011
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/fox-business-goes-birther-alan-keyes-on.html (http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/fox-business-goes-birther-alan-keyes-on.html)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 22, 2011, 11:53:30 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 22, 2011, 12:13:10 PM
Fox Business: Alan Keyes Discusses Natural Born Citizen Issue - 4/21/11

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3xTBTaaCYU&feature=player_embedded (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3xTBTaaCYU&feature=player_embedded)

Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Apr 21, 2011
LINKS: Fox Business Network: Dr. Alan Keyes discusses The Citizen Vs. Natural Born Citizen Issue And The Courts Evasion Of The Obama Eligibility Issue. Reminder: Dr. Keyes', et. al., lawsuit against Obama will have oral arguments on May 2, 2011 at 9am, in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena division, courtroom 1. More details at link - 4/21/2011
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/fox-business-goes-birther-alan-keyes-on.html (http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/fox-business-goes-birther-alan-keyes-on.html)

I have a hard time listening to Keyes.  What he did to his daughter was just plain wrong. 

In any event, the only legitimate question he raises is whether Obama's father was dual citizen.  IMO, that is the only legitimate unanswered question.  Birthers should let the other issues go and focus on that question.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 23, 2011, 10:29:40 AM
"Birther" claims force GOP leaders to take a stand
Posted: Apr 22, 2011 9:26 AM
Updated: Apr 22, 2011 9:27 PM
 
WASHINGTON (AP) - It's the conspiracy theory that won't go away. And it's forcing Republican officials and presidential contenders to pick sides: Do they think Barack Obama was born outside the United States and disqualified to be president?

As the Republican candidates tiptoe through the mine field, Democrats are watching. They hope the debate will fire up their liberal base and perhaps tie the eventual GOP nominee to fringe beliefs that swing voters will reject.

In recent days several prominent Republicans have distanced themselves, with varying degrees of emphasis, from the false claim that Obama was born in a foreign country. But with a new poll showing that two-thirds of adult Republicans either embrace the claim or are open to it, nearly all these GOP leaders are not calling for a broader effort to stamp out the allegations.

"It's a real challenge for the Republican Party and virtually every Republican candidate for president," contends Democratic pollster Geoff Garin. If it's not handled well, he said, all-important independent voters might see Republicans as extreme or irrelevant.

Many Americans consider claims of Obama's foreign birth to be preposterous, unworthy of serious debate. Yet the "birther" issue threatens to overshadow the early stages of the GOP effort to choose a presidential nominee for 2012. Real estate mogul Donald Trump has stirred the pot lately, repeatedly saying Obama should provide his original birth certificate.

From a political standpoint, it's impossible to dismiss the matter as conspiratorial fantasy, akin to, say, claims that the 1969 moon landing was staged. In the latest New York Times-CBS News poll, 45 percent of adult Republicans said they believe Obama was born in another country, and 22 percent said they don't know. One-third of Republicans said they believe the president is native born.

The same poll a year ago found considerably less suspicion among Republicans. A plurality of GOP adults then said Obama was U.S.-born, and 32 percent said they believed he was foreign-born.

In the latest poll, about half of all independents said Obama was born in the United States. The other independents were about evenly split between those saying he is foreign-born, and those saying they don't know.

Ten percent of Democrats said Obama was born overseas, and 9 percent were unsure.

Obama's birth certificate indicates he was born in Hawaii in 1961. Newspaper birth announcements at the time reported the birth, and news organizations' investigations have rebutted the birthers' claims. The Constitution says a president must be a "natural born citizen."

Trump's leap to the top tier of potential GOP presidential contenders in recent polls has frustrated party leaders who'd like the birthplace issue to go away.

The House's top Republicans -Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor - say they are satisfied that Obama was born in Hawaii. But they have declined to criticize those who state otherwise, and Boehner has said it's not his job to tell Americans what to think.

Trump, meanwhile, keeps fueling the fire. Even though many people doubt he will run for president, he has forced other Republicans to take stands.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania have been the most direct in rejecting the birthers' claims. "I believe the president was born in the United States," Romney told CNBC.

Santorum has no doubt that Obama was born in Hawaii, and he "believes this debate distracts us from the real issues," said his spokeswoman, Virginia Davis.

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour accepts the president's word about his birthplace, his staff said.

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty told an Iowa audience, "I'm not one to question the authenticity of Barack Obama's birth certificate." He added a little jab: "When you look at his policies, I do question what planet he's from."

When ABC's George Stephanopoulos showed a copy of Obama's birth certificate to Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, who was ambivalent at first, she said: "Well, then, that should settle it. ... I take the president at his word."

Former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin gave mixed signals in a recent Fox News appearance. She praised Trump for "paying for researchers" to dig into claims of Obama's foreign birth. But she added, "I think that he was born in Hawaii because there was a birth announcement put in the newspaper."

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee has dismissed claims that Obama is foreign-born, calling them a distraction. But on a February radio show, Huckabee referred to Obama "having grown up in Kenya," the birthplace of the president's father.

Obama grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia. A spokesman said Huckabee's statement was simply a mistake.

Aides to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said voters have not asked him about the birthplace question and he has not discussed it.

The issue has spread to several states where Republican-controlled legislatures have introduced or passed bills requiring presidential candidates, and sometimes others, to prove their citizenship. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican, recently vetoed such a bill, calling it "a bridge too far."

Democrats think the birthplace issue might fire up liberals, especially minorities, who in many cases have been dispirited by Obama's frequent compromises with conservatives to pass legislation. Blacks who embraced Obama's barrier-breaking election now see some Republicans claiming he has no constitutional right to be president.

The New York Times-CBS poll was worded in a way that might have subtly encouraged respondents to say Obama is foreign born. "Some people say Barack Obama was NOT born in the United States," the poll's callers said, but they did not offer counter arguments.

Moreover, some pollsters think respondents will seize a chance to call Obama a Muslim or non-citizen to convey something else: a dislike for him or his policies.

"Some people who strongly oppose a person or proposition will take virtually any opportunity to express that antipathy," writes Gary Langer, who polls for ABC News.

Garin, the Democratic pollster, doesn't buy it in this case. The birthers' claims are so prevalent, especially on conservative TV and radio shows, he said, that poll respondents are likely to say what they truly believe about a much-discussed topic.

"There are high- profile people, including Donald Trump and many others in the conservative media, who advocate and validate this point of view each and every day," Garin said. The big question about the birthplace issue, he said, "is the extent to which it drives a wedge within the Republican Party" and turns off independents in November 2012.

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/14498647/birther-claims-force-gop-leaders-to-take-a-stand
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 23, 2011, 03:19:23 PM
the power of advertising.
repeat the same thing over and over till people believe it.
fox news has made billions from it. ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 23, 2011, 03:23:19 PM
the power of advertising.
repeat the same thing over and over till people believe it.
fox news has made billions from it. ;)

R u a birther ? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 23, 2011, 05:18:34 PM
R u a birther ? 

Of course he isn't.  Births take place in vaginas.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 24, 2011, 12:48:53 PM
Of course he isn't.  Births take place in vaginas.
well played, sir !  ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 24, 2011, 12:53:53 PM
Even rev graham came out today and said bama should release his records. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 24, 2011, 02:19:19 PM
Obama's isle birth is easily verified, but few check
By MARK NIESSE
Associated Press
POSTED: 08:37 p.m. HST, Apr 23, 2011
ASSOCIATED PRESS

The name Barack Hussain Obama II is seen highlighted in a computer generated birth index from 1960-1964 in a Hawaii State government binder held at the State Department of Health in Honolulu. (AP Photo/Marco Garcia)
More Photos
       

Lost in the renewed scrutiny into President Barack Obama's birth records is the fact that anyone can walk into a Hawaii vital records office, wait in line behind couples getting marriage licenses and open a baby-blue government binder containing basic information about his birth.

Highlighted in yellow on page 1,218 of the thick binder is the computer-generated listing for a boy named Barack Hussein Obama II born in Hawaii, surrounded by the alphabetized last names of all other children born in-state between 1960 and 1964. This is the only government birth information, called "index data," available to the public.

So far this month, only The Associated Press and one other person had looked at the binder, according to a sign-in sheet viewed Wednesday in the state Department of Health building. The sheet showed about 25 names of people who have seen the document since March 2010, when the sign-in sheet begins.

Those documents complement newspaper birth announcements published soon after Obama's Aug. 4, 1961, birth and a "certification of live birth" released by the Obama campaign three years ago, the only type of birth certificate the state issues.

So-called "birthers" claim there's no proof Obama was born in the United States, and he is therefore ineligible to be president. Many of the skeptics suggest he was actually born in Kenya, his father's home country, or Indonesia, where he spent a few years of his childhood.

Possible Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has repeatedly stoked the birther fires recently, and last month called on Obama to "show his birth certificate." Trump said he has investigators in Hawaii searching for more information.

"Nobody has come in and said they're investigating for Donald Trump," said Department of Health spokeswoman Janice Okubo, who acknowledged they could've come in without identifying themselves as representing Trump.

What the would-be sleuths won't find is Obama's "long-form birth certificate," a confidential one-page document containing his original birth records kept on file in the first floor of the Department of Health.

Those original birth records typically include additional birth details, such as the hospital and delivering doctor, said Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the state's former health director who twice looked at and publicly confirmed Obama's original long-form birth records.

But those documents are state government property that can't be released to anyone, even the president himself, said Joshua Wisch, special assistant to the state attorney general. Obama would be able to inspect his birth records if he visited the Health Department in person, but original records of live birth are never released, he said.

Fukino, who served as the state's health director until late last year under former Republican Gov. Linda Lingle, said in an interview with The Associated Press she's convinced the long-form document is authentic. She issued public statements in 2008 and 2009 saying she had seen the original records.

"It is absolutely clear to me that he was born here in Hawaii," Fukino told the AP. "It should not be an issue, and I think people need to focus on the other bad things going on in our country and in our state and figure out what we're going to do about those things."

Before Obama's campaign released his certification of live birth in 2008, he or someone with a tangible interest had to make a written request and pay a $10 fee to receive it, Okubo said. Wisch also said Obama obtained a copy of his own certification of live birth and publicly released it.

State privacy laws prevent a certification of live birth from being released to anyone except those with a tangible interest, such as the person named by the birth record or a close family member.

The document is generated by computer, based on original birth records on file with the state, Fukino said.

New Health Director Loretta Fuddy, a Democratic appointee, declined to comment.

Last week, Republican Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed a bill that would have required presidential candidates to prove their U.S. citizenship before their names could appear on the state's ballot — which was widely viewed as targeting Obama — calling it a "bridge too far."

But the birther conspiracy theory refuses to go away. The latest New York Times-CBS News poll found that 45 percent of adult Republicans said they believe Obama was born in another country, and 22 percent said they don't know. Only one-third of Republicans said they believe the president is native born. The same poll a year ago found that a plurality of Republicans believed the president was born in the U.S.

Obama said in an interview with ABC News this month that Republicans sowing doubts about whether he's American-born may gain politically in the short term by playing to their constituencies, but will have trouble when the general election rolls around.

"Just want to be clear — I was born in Hawaii," the president said at a fundraiser in his hometown of Chicago.

Newspaper birth announcements appeared in both The Honolulu Advertiser and The Honolulu Star-Bulletin in the weeks after he was born.

The Aug. 13, 1961, announcement in the Advertiser appears on page B-6 of the Sunday edition, next to classified ads for carpentry work and house repair.

It says, "Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4." The address belonged to the parents of Ann Dunham, Obama's mother.

A similar announcement appeared the following day on page 24 of the Star-Bulletin.

___

On the Net:

http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/obama.html

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/Obamas_birth_is_easily_verified_but_few_choose_to_do_so.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 24, 2011, 02:29:29 PM
I'd like to see a nice comparison of education vs. position on birther issue.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 05:07:29 AM
Robert DeNiro to Trump: ‘How dare you?’
YahooNews (The Daily Caller) ^ | 4/25/2011




Robert DeNiro is none too pleased with potential 2012 presidential candidate Donald Trump.

The Huffington Post reported that in an interview with NBC anchor Brian Williams at Saturday’s Tribeca Film Festival, DeNiro challenged Trump’s political statements, alluding especially to The Donald’s suggestion that President Obama may not have been born in America.

“I won’t mention names, but certain people in the news the last couple weeks, just, what are they doing? It’s crazy. They’re making statements about people that they don’t even back up,” DeNiro said. “Go get the facts before you start saying things about people.”

DeNiro went on to confirm that Trump was among the unidentified folks to which he referred.


(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 25, 2011, 06:23:50 AM
Even rev graham came out today and said bama should release his records. 
yet another reason to ignore this non issue.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 07:34:31 AM
Donald Trump Responds to Robert DeNiro's Criticisms: 'He's Not the Brightest Bulb'
Fox News.com ^ | 4/25/11 | fox News




Donald Trump slammed Robert DeNiro Monday, following the Oscar-winner’s criticisms of him this weekend, telling Fox News that the actor is “not the brightest bulb on the planet.”

“I like his acting, but in terms of when I watch him doing interviews and various other things, we’re not dealing with Albert Einstein,” Trump told “Fox & Friends” Monday.

“He can say what he wants but the fact is that this guy has not revealed his birth certificate, a lot of people agree with me.”

DeNiro is among a growing number of Hollywood stars who have criticized Trump for his comments, including comedian Jerry Seinfeld.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 25, 2011, 09:06:52 AM
Trump being further ostracized from his peers - both politically and in the entertainment industry. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 25, 2011, 09:39:57 AM
Trump being further ostracized from his peers - both politically and in the entertainment industry. 

Is what an actor says really important? They spend their whole lives pretending to be someone else. More over estimated view of self importance
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Agnostic007 on April 25, 2011, 09:40:41 AM
what do you expect. Trump was stupid for playing the birther card and got called on it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 25, 2011, 09:49:41 AM
Is what an actor says really important? They spend their whole lives pretending to be someone else. More over estimated view of self importance

lol.. i agree.. but when Clint Eastwood said someting Anti Obama. The Right on this board went nuts.. as if Got himself spoke
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 09:51:17 AM
lol.. i agree.. but when Clint Eastwood said someting Anti Obama. The Right on this board went nuts.. as if Got himself spoke


Get off my lawn! 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 25, 2011, 10:53:10 AM
Is what an actor says really important? They spend their whole lives pretending to be someone else. More over estimated view of self importance

You just described Trump perfectly ;)

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 10:57:18 AM
As if Trump has nohing else going on?    ::)  ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 25, 2011, 01:15:27 PM

Get off my lawn! 
well done, sir.
you are starting to play along now; after all, it's still 18 months before the election and we all have to keep our senses of humor.
I'm proud of you on this one. ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 25, 2011, 01:19:27 PM
You just described Trump perfectly ;)



Trump does indeed have a overestimated amount of self importance, but that does not negate the fact that he is a successful business man and brings more to the table than an idiot tube personality
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Agnostic007 on April 25, 2011, 01:29:46 PM
Trump does indeed have a overestimated amount of self importance, but that does not negate the fact that he is a successful business man and brings more to the table than an idiot tube personality

Trump has become an idiot tube personality...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 01:31:12 PM
Trump has become an idiot tube personality...


Compared to Obama he looks like George Washington.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 25, 2011, 01:57:21 PM

Compared to Obama he looks like George Washington.   

To be fair, most white people would.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 25, 2011, 02:02:59 PM
lol.. i agree.. but when Clint Eastwood said someting Anti Obama. The Right on this board went nuts.. as if Got himself spoke


exactly!!!...but the idiots on here are so into their own way of thinking they can't see the hypocrisy they spew every day..which is why they are hysterical to laugh at
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 02:07:23 PM

exactly!!!...but the idiots on here are so into their own way of thinking they can't see the hypocrisy they spew every day..which is why they are hysterical to laugh at

Andre - are you a birther? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 25, 2011, 02:14:51 PM
Andre - are you a birther? 

I'm a birther in that I wish you were never born ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 02:15:59 PM
I'm a birther in that I wish you were never born ;D

How does it feel knowing I cancel out your vote?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 25, 2011, 02:19:09 PM
How does it feel knowing I cancel out your vote?   

actually your vote is worthless due to the fact that you don't know what you are talking about.....voting for trump is a wasted vote anyway therefore my vote will count for somehting and not just cancel out your crazy vote :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 03:06:07 PM
Trump: Obama wasn't qualified for Ivy League
(AP) – 46 minutes ago


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hLwU-RlIyzUA_sZCs1KLt6WiKmCA?docId=292f4280ef89473ca40a7329ce4cc829



NEW YORK (AP) — Real estate mogul Donald Trump suggested in an interview Monday that President Barack Obama had been a poor student who did not deserve to be admitted to the Ivy League universities he attended. Trump, who is mulling a bid for the Republican presidential nomination, offered no proof for his claim but said he would continue to press the matter as he has the legitimacy of the president's birth certificate.

"I heard he was a terrible student, terrible. How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?" Trump said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I'm thinking about it, I'm certainly looking into it. Let him show his records."

Obama graduated from Columbia University in New York in 1983 with a degree in political science after transferring from Occidental College in California. He went on to Harvard Law School, where he graduated magna cum laude 1991 and was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review.

Obama's 2008 campaign did not release his college transcripts, and in his best-selling memoir, "Dreams From My Father," Obama indicated he hadn't always been an academic star. Trump told the AP that Obama's refusal to release his college grades were part of a pattern of concealing information about himself.

"I have friends who have smart sons with great marks, great boards, great everything and they can't get into Harvard," Trump said. "We don't know a thing about this guy. There are a lot of questions that are unanswered about our president."

Katie Hogan, a spokeswoman for Obama's re-election campaign, declined to comment.

Trump, a wealthy businessman and reality TV host, has risen to the top of many polls in part by his outspoken call for Obama to release his long form birth certificate. The state of Hawaii has released a certificate of live birth indicating Obama was born there on August 4, 1961, but that has not quelled critics who believe Obama was born outside the United States and is therefore not qualified to be president.

The so-called "birther" controversy has dominated the early stage of the 2012 GOP nominating contest, with Trump leading the charge.

"I have more people that are excited about the fact that I reinvigorated this whole issue," Trump said, adding "the last guy (Obama) wants to run against is Donald Trump."

Trump is scheduled to travel to the early primary states of New Hampshire and Nevada this week and said he will make a final decision about a presidential bid by June.

Also in the AP interview, Trump:

— Said Republicans had made a mistake by embracing a budget proposal crafted by Wisconsin GOP Rep. Paul Ryan that included deep cuts in Medicare. "The seniors are afraid. The plan Paul Ryan put forth has made the Democrats so happy," Trump said.

— Declined to disclose his net worth, saying he'll do so if he decides to run. "You'll see what it is, possibly, very likely, in the next 4 weeks. I don't want to say because I don't want to ruin the press conference," he said.

— Expressed surprise that the 2008 GOP nominee, John McCain, had suggested Trump's effort was a publicity stunt. "I congratulate him for getting the attention he's getting," McCain told NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday.

Trump said he had been a big supporter of McCain. "I would find it hard to believe he would say anything bad because I raised a fantastic amount of money for him," Trump said.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 25, 2011, 03:21:41 PM
Trump: Obama wasn't qualified for Ivy League
(AP) – 46 minutes ago


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hLwU-RlIyzUA_sZCs1KLt6WiKmCA?docId=292f4280ef89473ca40a7329ce4cc829



NEW YORK (AP) — Real estate mogul Donald Trump suggested in an interview Monday that President Barack Obama had been a poor student who did not deserve to be admitted to the Ivy League universities he attended. Trump, who is mulling a bid for the Republican presidential nomination, offered no proof for his claim but said he would continue to press the matter as he has the legitimacy of the president's birth certificate.

"I heard he was a terrible student, terrible. How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?" Trump said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I'm thinking about it, I'm certainly looking into it. Let him show his records."

Obama graduated from Columbia University in New York in 1983 with a degree in political science after transferring from Occidental College in California. He went on to Harvard Law School, where he graduated magna cum laude 1991 and was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review.

Obama's 2008 campaign did not release his college transcripts, and in his best-selling memoir, "Dreams From My Father," Obama indicated he hadn't always been an academic star. Trump told the AP that Obama's refusal to release his college grades were part of a pattern of concealing information about himself.

"I have friends who have smart sons with great marks, great boards, great everything and they can't get into Harvard," Trump said. "We don't know a thing about this guy. There are a lot of questions that are unanswered about our president."

Katie Hogan, a spokeswoman for Obama's re-election campaign, declined to comment.

Trump, a wealthy businessman and reality TV host, has risen to the top of many polls in part by his outspoken call for Obama to release his long form birth certificate. The state of Hawaii has released a certificate of live birth indicating Obama was born there on August 4, 1961, but that has not quelled critics who believe Obama was born outside the United States and is therefore not qualified to be president.

The so-called "birther" controversy has dominated the early stage of the 2012 GOP nominating contest, with Trump leading the charge.

"I have more people that are excited about the fact that I reinvigorated this whole issue," Trump said, adding "the last guy (Obama) wants to run against is Donald Trump."

Trump is scheduled to travel to the early primary states of New Hampshire and Nevada this week and said he will make a final decision about a presidential bid by June.

Also in the AP interview, Trump:

— Said Republicans had made a mistake by embracing a budget proposal crafted by Wisconsin GOP Rep. Paul Ryan that included deep cuts in Medicare. "The seniors are afraid. The plan Paul Ryan put forth has made the Democrats so happy," Trump said.

— Declined to disclose his net worth, saying he'll do so if he decides to run. "You'll see what it is, possibly, very likely, in the next 4 weeks. I don't want to say because I don't want to ruin the press conference," he said.

— Expressed surprise that the 2008 GOP nominee, John McCain, had suggested Trump's effort was a publicity stunt. "I congratulate him for getting the attention he's getting," McCain told NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday.

Trump said he had been a big supporter of McCain. "I would find it hard to believe he would say anything bad because I raised a fantastic amount of money for him," Trump said.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


Meh.  He went to a feeder school.  Lots of Punahou students go to Ivy League colleges/universities. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 03:23:30 PM
Harvard Lawschool requires an LSAT of at least 160 - 170 plus 3.65 GPA or better.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2011, 03:33:02 PM
Hawaii senator questions Obama's true birth father
WND ^ | April 23, 2011 | WND





The lone Republican in the Hawaii State Senate told a radio interviewer today he believes "the real issue" stopping Barack Obama from releasing his long-form birth certificate is something the president has to hide, perhaps even the name of his actual birth father.

Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom further told the host of "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on WABC 770 AM in New York City that so long as Obama refuses to be transparent about his past, questions about the president's birth remain "a legitimate issue."

"My particular point of view – and why I haven't identified myself as a 'birther,' per se – is that [Obama] probably was born [in Hawaii] and that the real issue is not the birth certificate, but what's on the birth certificate," Slom told Klein.

Asked what that could be, Slom said, "It could have to do with what his name is on the birth certificate, who is actually listed as his father, the citizenship of the father."

He continued, "My belief is that there is a birth certificate, he was born here, but that there is information that for reasons known only to him he doesn't want released. If it were just the birth certificate, that would be one thing, but it's his school records, it's employment records. … Why would anybody, let alone the president of the United States, spend millions of dollars in legal fees to keep that hidden?"


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 25, 2011, 03:44:47 PM
Hawaii senator questions Obama's true birth father
WND ^ | April 23, 2011 | WND





The lone Republican in the Hawaii State Senate told a radio interviewer today he believes "the real issue" stopping Barack Obama from releasing his long-form birth certificate is something the president has to hide, perhaps even the name of his actual birth father.

Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom further told the host of "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on WABC 770 AM in New York City that so long as Obama refuses to be transparent about his past, questions about the president's birth remain "a legitimate issue."

"My particular point of view – and why I haven't identified myself as a 'birther,' per se – is that [Obama] probably was born [in Hawaii] and that the real issue is not the birth certificate, but what's on the birth certificate," Slom told Klein.

Asked what that could be, Slom said, "It could have to do with what his name is on the birth certificate, who is actually listed as his father, the citizenship of the father."

He continued, "My belief is that there is a birth certificate, he was born here, but that there is information that for reasons known only to him he doesn't want released. If it were just the birth certificate, that would be one thing, but it's his school records, it's employment records. … Why would anybody, let alone the president of the United States, spend millions of dollars in legal fees to keep that hidden?"


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


Now this is something I can agree with.  Senator Slom is a smart guy. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: headhuntersix on April 25, 2011, 03:56:38 PM
How about if it says - Caucasian for the race part.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 25, 2011, 07:00:10 PM
20
Washington (CNN) - Republican Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who vetoed a bill in April that would have required presidential candidates to prove they were American citizens born in the United States, thinks the so-called birther movement is a "huge distraction."

"It's just something that I think is leading our country down a path of destruction and it just is not serving any good purpose," Brewer said Monday on CNN's "John King, USA."

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 26, 2011, 12:33:17 AM
White House Slams Rev. Franklin Graham for Comment about Issues Surrounding President Obama's Birth
by Kimberly Schwandt | April 25, 2011

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said comments by Rev. Franklin Graham that there were issues surrounding President Obama's birth were "preposterous charges."

Graham, who has met with Obama before, appeared on ABC's "This Week" and was asked about people like Donald Trump bringing up questions about the president's birth. "Well, the -- the president I know has some issues to deal with here. He can solve this whole birth certificate issue pretty quickly. I don't -- I was born in a hospital in Asheville, North Carolina, and I know that my records are there," Graham said.

"You can probably even go and find out what room my mother was in when I was born. I don't know why he can't produce that. So I'm not -- I don't know. But it's an issue that looks like he could -- he could answer pretty quickly," he added.

Carney, in an abrupt answer, reacted and said, "It's interesting that a minister would use Easter Sunday to make preposterous charges."

A reporter in the daily White House briefing had asked for reaction to Graham's comments that aired Sunday and also for other charges that Graham has made about the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating all parts of the Obama administration.

The interview with the influential evangelical pastor took place late last week, but aired on Easter Sunday.

The issue of the president's faith also came up. As recently as last week, President Obama professed his Christianity, also going to church services with his family in D.C. on Sunday. However, the president still battles misperceptions that he is a Muslim.

"Now, he has told me that he is a Christian. But the debate comes, what is a Christian? For him, going to church means he's a Christian. For me, the definition of a Christian is whether we have given our life to Christ and are following him in faith and we have trusted him as our lord and savior. That's the definition of a Christian. It's not as to what church you are a member of. A membership doesn't make you a Christian," Graham said.

The reverend said he does take the president at his word on that. "Well, when he says it, of course, I can't -- I'm not going to say, "Well, no, you're not." I mean, God -- God is the only one who knows his heart."

http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/04/25/white-house-slams-rev-franklin-graham-comment-about-issues-surrounding-president-obamas-b?test=latestnews
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 26, 2011, 06:32:43 AM
How does it feel knowing I cancel out your vote?   

wait !     I thought your vote was going to cancel MY vote?  How many times are you planning on voting?!?!?!? ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 26, 2011, 08:45:27 AM
The Full Story: CNN Caught Lying About Hawaii Law & The Release Of Obama's Purported Records
ObamaRelease YourRecords ^ | Tuesday, April 26, 2011




The Full Story: CNN Caught Lying About Hawaii Law And The Release Of Obama's Purported Records; Hawaii Law On The Side Of Birthers



Video: CNN's Anderson Cooper, Et. Al., Caught Lying About Hawaii Law And The Release Of Obama's Purported Birth Records: Fact: According To Hawaii State Senator Sam Slom, And The Hawaii Law Itself, The Truth Is On The Side Of The Birthers. CNN's Lies Debunked Below... The Segment Aired 4/25/2011...




First Off: "prima facie": (pry-mah fay-shah) adj. Latin for "at first look," or "on its face," referring to a lawsuit or criminal prosecution in which the evidence before trial is sufficient to prove the case unless there is substantial contradictory evidence presented at trial...- It is fair to say there's substantial contradictory evidence regarding Obama's life narrative and birth... Too bad American voters have no "standing" to challenge the 0ne...

What CNN Failed To Report: CNN showed two different Obama COLB's. One with creases from Factcheck.org and the redacted COLB with out creases posted at Obama's FightTheSmears.com.



The U.S. State Department web site clearly reads; "Please note, some short(abstract) versions of birth certificates may not be acceptable for passport purposes."...

The Birth Announcements: Even if Obama's COLB is real it does NOT prove a Hawaiian birth. The same type COLB's could also be issued to children not born in Hawaii, under Hawaii law, then and now. That also would have triggered the "birth" announcements as they were produced from a list sent from the HDOH, not the hospital or the parents/grandparents.

Researcher Butterdezillion lays down the law regarding the release of vital records: All requests by those authorized by HRS 338-16 through 338-18 to receive either copies or abstracts MUST be fulfilled. (Note the word "SHALL".) Unless disclosure is forbidden by the laws or rules the request as made must be fulfilled.



HRS 338-13 says: (a) Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.

Contrary to the claims of the Hawaii Attorney General's Office, that statute specifically allows photocopies:

(c) Copies may be made by photography, dry copy reproduction, typing, computer printout or other process approved by the director of health.

3. HRS 338-18(a) only forbids disclosures that are not authorized by the rules or by HRS 338-18. HRS 338-18(a) says:

(a) To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.



4. HRS 338-18b allows those with a direct and tangible interest (including the registrant and his/her relatives, among others) to receive a CERTIFIED COPY OF PUBLIC HEALTH STATISTICS RECORDS. HRS 338-1 defines "public health statistics records" thusly:

"Public health statistics" includes the registration, preparation, transcription, collection, compilation, and preservation of data pertaining to births, adoptions, legitimations, deaths, fetal deaths, morbidity, marital status, and data incidental thereto.

And UIPA (HRS 92F-3) defines "government records" thusly:

"Government record" means information maintained by an agency in written, auditory, visual, electronic, or other physical form. The registration of a birth, in written form, is clearly a "public health statistics record". A certified copy of that paper document is discloseable to anybody with a direct and tangible interest.

5. The DOH Administrative Rules distinguish between the standard birth certificate and the abstract of CONTENT from the birth certificate ("abbreviated birth certificate", now commonly called the short-form or CertificaTION of Live Birth/COLB). Anybody who requests it is authorized to receive a non-certified copy of a COLB, but only those with a direct and tangible interest are allowed to receive a certified copy of either the COLB or the standard birth certificate.

The rules specifically say that the confidential medical portion of the standard birth certificate will not be released UNLESS SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED.



"Public Health Regulations", Chapter 8b, 2.4(B)(d) says:

(d) Confidential information. Information contained in the section headed "Confidential Information for Medical and Health Use Only" or other similar designation shall not be included on a standard certified copy unless specifically requested by an individual named on the certificate or by a court of competent jurisdiction.... -snip-

Complete details on Hawaii's dirty deeds including links to the above info located at: http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com

More proof the Media and Hawaii officials are lying to the American people. Hawaii long-form issued on March 15, 2011:








Excerpted, more here with the video...


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 26, 2011, 10:06:42 AM
Poll: What kind of president would Donald Trump make?
By Susan Page, USA TODAYUpdated 12h 29m ago |  1843 |  18
Share
Reprints & Permissions
WASHINGTON — Republicans may be ready for a fling with Donald Trump, but a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll shows they have reservations about installing him in the White House.


By Alex Brandon, AP
Donald Trump waves after addressing the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last February.
Enlarge
By Alex Brandon, AP
Donald Trump waves after addressing the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last February.
Ads by Google
Donald Trump 2012?
Will you support Trump for
presidency. Vote here now.
www.newsmax.com/surveys
Vote In Our Straw Poll
Who Do You Think Would Make The
Best GOP Presidential Candidate?
townhall.com/StrawPoll
NYTimes Online Packages
Get Digital Access To The New York
Times Today. 99c For First 4 Weeks
www.NYTimes.com
The real estate developer and reality TV star, who scores at the top in polls of the GOP field these days, falls to fourth when Republicans are asked to rate who among the contenders would be a “good” or “great” president in office.
Fifty percent of Americans, including 31% of Republicans, say Trump would make a “poor” or “terrible” president.
STORY: Donald Trump on faith and worship
MORE: Despite Barbour's exit, GOP field open for president
STORY: GOP's gamble on the budget pays off, so far
“Trump is filling a huge void in the Republican Party right now, and he’s gathering a protest vote: protest against the way Washington works; protest with the establishment Republicans,” says Scott Reed, manager for Bob Dole’s 1996 presidential campaign. “The jury is still out whether Trump can translate that into a real candidacy for president.”
His possible bid faces broad resistance: 63% of Americans, including 46% of Republicans, say they definitely will not vote for Trump for president. In comparison, 46% of Americans say they definitely will not vote for President Obama — significantly lower but itself a hurdle to winning the 2012 election.
Though Trump initially got attention by expressing doubts whether Obama was born in the USA, that issue is not driving his support. Among those who say they definitely or might vote for Trump, only about a third question whether the president was born in the USA.
Support from the “birthers” is stronger for Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney. The issue has persisted even though Hawaii has released an official Certificate of Live Birth showing Obama was born there, a fact confirmed in non-partisan investigations by FactCheck.org and others.
Still, in the USA TODAY poll, only 38% of Americans say Obama definitely was born in the USA, and 18% say he probably was. Fifteen percent say he probably was born in another country, and 9% say he definitely was born elsewhere.
USA TODAY/Gallup Poll
Views already are polarized about President Obama and some major Republican candidates for 2012.

 
Source: USA TODAY/Gallup Poll of 1,013 adults. April 20-23. Margin of error +/-4 percentage points.
Republicans are inclined to say the president was born abroad by 43%-35%.
For what it’s worth, not everyone is convinced Trump was born in the USA either: 43% say he definitely was born here, and 20% say he probably was; 7% say he definitely or probably was born in another country. Nearly three in 10 say they don’t know enough to say.
The poll of 1,013 adults, taken Wednesday to Saturday, has a margin of error of +/–4 percentage points.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 26, 2011, 12:57:15 PM
RNC Chairman dismisses birther talk
By: CNN Political Reporter Peter Hamby

Washington (CNN) - Donald Trump has spent weeks raising questions about President Barack Obama's birth certificate, but Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said Tuesday that so-called "birther" claims are a distraction from more pressing issues facing the nation.

"Trump and the candidates can talk about it all they want, but my position is that the president was born in the United States," Priebus told reporters at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

Priebus said his main priority as party chairman is winning elections.

"I don't think it's an issue that moves voters," he said of the birth certificate chatter. "It's an issue in my opinion that I don't personally get too excited about, because I think the more important question is what's going on in this country in regards to jobs, to debt, and the deficit and spending. Those are the things that people are worried about. People aren't worried about these other issues."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/26/rnc-chairman-dismisses-birther-talk/#more-156680
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 26, 2011, 01:00:37 PM
Obama in 1980 said he was born in Mombasa, Kenya
thepostemail.com ^ | Dec. 3, 2009 | John Charlton




"He also told me something that I never forgot, for it caused me to do some other things in an effort to be nice to him and possibly a favor. We spoke of where I had been and the world as I saw it. I told him I had been to Africa , Mombassa specifically, and he said to me abruptly, “I was born there.”

In the light of what is called “The Birther” movement, these memories are still foremost in my mind concerning this. While I cannot swear it was Barak Obama, all the details I do remember of that chance encounter fit the profile of the man who some people claim is born in Kenya and others claim he was born in Hawaii .

The man I met was about 18, thin, Mulatto, told me he was born in Mombassa, raised overseas, was living in Hawaii and hadn’t yet been to many places in the world outside of those places, mostly, hadn’t been to the mainland of America for any long time period if at all. And he openly told me he wanted to be President.

And I remember that face, the face of a young man who sat on a table to my right front, his hands resting on the edge of the table, him leaning forward, his smile, all teeth. It was Barak Obama. I don’t know if I’d bet my life on it, but I am willing to tell people openly at the risk of my ridicule. I was there, and saw him, spoke to him, and he openly told me he was born in Mombassa, Kenya, not Hawaii."


(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 26, 2011, 01:46:05 PM
get some VIDEO of him saying he was born there, and BOOOM lights out, it's over, he loses.

But right now, you have WHO EXACTLY saying it there?  LOL your interview didn't even name the person who is making the claim?  Jeebus dude.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 26, 2011, 01:53:43 PM
[WH Press Sec.]Carney: Americans Should Be "Appalled" By Birth Certificate "Distraction" (Video)
RealClearPolitics ^ | 4/26/2011 | Jay Carney




"It's an unfortunate distraction from the issues that I think most Americans care about," White House press secretary Jay Carney said about the controversy surrounding President Obama's long-form birth certificate.


(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 26, 2011, 02:22:22 PM
With all the traction this story is getting, I'm starting to think it could hurt Obama.  If he never releases his BC and never discusses issues surrounding his father's citizenship, there may be a number of voters who start to question whether he is hiding something. 

I still think the Kenyan birth, etc. stuff is nonsense, but the fact he could score some political points by releasing his BC, and refuses to do so, could become problematic.  Unlike most conspiracy theories, it's all over the MSM. 

On the other hand, because I think he was born in Hawaii, he could just be giving people rope to hang themselves with the whole Kenyan birth thing.  Or he could be waiting until later in the campaign to provide documents to blow this whole thing up.   

That said, whatever it is, or whatever happens, I don't think the Republican nominee should even touch this issue.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 26, 2011, 03:08:15 PM
With all the traction this story is getting, I'm starting to think it could hurt Obama.  If he never releases his BC and never discusses issues surrounding his father's citizenship, there may be a number of voters who start to question whether he is hiding something. 

I still think the Kenyan birth, etc. stuff is nonsense, but the fact he could score some political points by releasing his BC, and refuses to do so, could become problematic.  Unlike most conspiracy theories, it's all over the MSM. 

On the other hand, because I think he was born in Hawaii, he could just be giving people rope to hang themselves with the whole Kenyan birth thing.  Or he could be waiting until later in the campaign to provide documents to blow this whole thing up.   

That said, whatever it is, or whatever happens, I don't think the Republican nominee should even touch this issue.   

believe me, the Republican nominee WILL touch on this issue..Republicans are stupid like that
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 26, 2011, 03:21:41 PM
believe me, the Republican nominee WILL touch on this issue..Republicans are stupid like that

No he (or she) will not.  The nominee will let someone else do the dirty work.  That's how the game is played.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 26, 2011, 03:26:09 PM
Bama is taking on a lot of water daily on this. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 26, 2011, 04:41:57 PM
get some VIDEO of him saying he was born there, and BOOOM lights out, it's over, he loses.


How about "I Am So Proud To Come Back Home" while in Kenya?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 26, 2011, 07:59:32 PM
Father’s race on the Obama birth certificate: only a curiosity or a smoking gun?
Canada Free Press ^ | April 26, 2011 | Lawrence Sellin
Posted on April 26, 2011 9:54:27 PM EDT by Ordinary_American

Nevertheless, there is one thing that I don’t quite understand.

On the Certification of Live Birth (COLB), now widely available on the internet, Obama’s father’s race is listed as “African”.

(snip)

For the sake of argument, let’s say that the terminology is peculiar to Hawaii and Obama filed a Late Certificate of Birth or perhaps his documents were updated in recent years.

In that case, the publicly available COLB must reflect what is written on the source birth documents, even updated ones.

In Appendix B “Hawaii Model – Standard for Clustering Race/Ethnicity Categories” contained in an article published in 2003 by employees of the Hawaii Department of Health, the word “African” appears as an “Aggregated Ethnic Group” under the race category “Black (non-Hispanic)”. That differs from the categories in Appendix A, which apparently represented an earlier version and did not contain the word “African”.

Unless I am mistaken, that information might suggest that Barack Obama’s birth data were updated around 2003 or thereafter.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 26, 2011, 08:01:47 PM
How about "I Am So Proud To Come Back Home" while in Kenya?



Bump for 240
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 26, 2011, 08:03:34 PM
There are two types arguing this, those who believe he was born elsewhere, and others who believe that's bunk, but question the hiding of all the documents.

Unfortunately, the latter get lumped in with former, and dismissed as loons.  But its not the case - how can an objective, rational American not question the the non-release of the long form, and the millions spent to hide all the other stuff?

Eventually he will have to answer this question directly.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 26, 2011, 08:10:55 PM
Appeals court set to hear Obama 'birther' case May 2

A federal appeals court will hear arguments next week about whether Barack Obama was born in the United States and is ineligible to serve as president.


The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California will hear arguments on May 2 in the case of Wiley Drake v. Barack Obama. The court decided late last week it would hear 20 minutes of arguments from both sides. No specific date has been set for a decision.

The case is a continuation of a dispute that was heard and dismissed in 2009 by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Wiley Drake was California's vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party in 2008, and Alan Keyes, another of the many plaintiffs in the case, was the candidate for president. As part of those proceedings, plaintiffs questioned the validity of Obama's social security number, and claimed that Obama had failed to produce a formal U.S. birth certificate.


Obama's campaign released a birth certificate in 2008 to prove he was born in the U.S., but people in the so-called birther movement have continued to criticize the certificate.

The arguments have made many in the Republican party uncomfortable, as some prominent Republicans believe the issue has the power to fire up Obama's base and could hurt the GOP in next year's elections.

The skepticism that some have about Obama's status as a U.S. citizen is something that has split the Republican party, as most Republicans see this issue as one taken up only by fringe elements that many describe as "birthers." The fact that many Republicans have ignored arguments about Obama's citizenship is itself an element that may come up next week.

Among other things, plaintiffs are expected to argue that members of Congress, including Republicans such as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas), have failed to hold hearings about Obama's citizenship. Plaintiffs argue this leaves them with no way of pursuing their complaints except through the courts.

Markham Robinson, the chairman of the American Independent Party's executive committee, told The Hill a court decision clarifying which entities are responsible for determining presidential eligibility would be helpful.

"If it was supposed to be election officials, they didn't discharge their duty," Robinson said. "But a decision would make them do their duty next time. That would be constructive, and at least we know we'd accomplished something."

Robinson said a victory would be an appeals court decision that asks the California district court to reconsider its decision to dismiss the case. He said a loss in the appeals court could lead to a decision to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The California district court's dismissal was based in part on the idea that the powers of the judicial branch are limited, and should not be used to fulfill plaintiffs' demands that Obama should be removed from office.

"One of those limits is that the Constitution defines processes through which the president can be removed from office," wrote Judge David Carter, a Clinton appointee. "The Constitution does not include a role for the Court in that process. Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by 'We the People' — over sixty-nine million of the people."
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 26, 2011, 08:50:13 PM
Bump for 240


eh, i'm irish and i'd say the same thing about my irish potato growing homeland.

not a smoking gun we'd have with him telling keyes he's not running for prez so it doesnt matter.


i'm a birther champ, so dont go accusing me of kneepadding here.  But starting this over caucasian is poor at best...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 04:43:32 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 04:48:07 AM


Michigan Goes Birther: Congressman Introduces Proof-of-Eligibility Legislation
Birther Report ^ | April 26, 2011 | Birther Report




Via Detroit Free Press: Lawmaker proposes presidental candidates to produce a birth certificate

A state House lawmaker introduced legislation today that would require candidates for president to produce a certified copy of his or her birth certificate to be eligible to appear on the Michigan ballot.

Rep. Mike Callton, R-Nashville, said the legislation was aimed at “clarify(ing) a constitutional question that has arisen about a number of presidential candidates,” and not about allegations surrounding the birthplace of President Barack Obama.

“I did not introduce this bill to continue the birther debate,” referring to those who have questioned whether Obama was born in the U.S. and eligible to hold the office of president, Callton said in a statement.

“I introduced this bill to end the birther debate. If this bill becomes law, the debate will end once and for all in September 2012.”

The so-called birther question has been pursued mostly on the political fringe since before Obama was elected, focusing largely on the documentation, or lack thereof, of his birth in Hawaii.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 06:11:47 AM
youre grasping at straws with the michelle statement dude. 

get one where he admits he can't be president.  People keep claiming he said it during the Keyes debate... there wasn't a mic rolling?  Come on dude, get that one.  Why wasn't it in the transcript?


I'm irish, i follow notre dame, I went to st vincent in ohio for HS, and I love to drink... Ireland is certainly my homeland... doesn't mean I was born there.  I'm a birther with you, but you can't act like her statement means anything.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 27, 2011, 06:40:21 AM
Hahaha pwned badly.  Long form released nothing like the CT nonsense 333 said. 

BOOOM BITCH!

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2011, 06:40:34 AM
...?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf)


Fake forgery commy plot?   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 06:45:47 AM
...?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf)


Fake forgery commy plot?   :D



Something does not add up on this.  The paper used on this was not the same from 1961 and something 50 years old does not have near perfect condition.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MCWAY on April 27, 2011, 06:47:00 AM
Hahaha pwned badly.  Long form released nothing like the CT nonsense 333 said. 

BOOOM BITCH!



Missing the proverbial forest for the trees. What this has done is shown people what happens when you ignore the left-winged media types, who've been shielding Obama and calling those who question anything about the President "racists", "bigots", "birthers", etc.

Trump ignored all that crap and kept hitting Obama in the face with this issue, until he cracked. Now, if he (or whoever ends up the GOP challenger) keeps this up about the major issues that face up, Obama will melt like butter on a blowtorch. And, we may see a new president in 2012.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 06:48:25 AM


Something does not add up on this.  The paper used on this was not the same from 1961 and something 50 years old does not have near perfect condition.  

I've been scratching and sniffing my computer screen, and it appears to be a scanned PDF.  We can't tell the paper's condition here.

Either way, this is a major bitchslap for the birthers, myself included.  NO WAY the repubs claim a "win" on this.  Obama led them with enough rope to label themselves as Cters, then delivered proof.  Ouch.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2011, 06:48:44 AM


Something does not add up on this.  The paper used on this was not the same from 1961 and something 50 years old does not have near perfect condition.   
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahah

I knew it!

Beach even said so.   Birthers would say what you just said.  Hahahahah
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2011, 06:50:56 AM
Missing the proverbial forest for the trees. What this has done is shown people what happens when you ignore the left-winged media types, who've been shielding Obama and calling those who question anything about the President "racists", "bigots", "birthers", etc.

Trump ignored all that crap and kept hitting Obama in the face with this issue, until he cracked. Now, if he (or whoever ends up the GOP challenger) keeps this up about the major issues that face up, Obama will melt like butter on a blowtorch. And, we may see a new president in 2012.

Trump raised enough public awareness that's all, mianly because of who he is not because of what he believed.     He was as was all the Birthers dead wrong and are even more of a laugh now.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MCWAY on April 27, 2011, 06:58:03 AM
Trump raised enough public awareness that's all, mianly because of who he is not because of what he believed.     He was as was all the Birthers dead wrong and are even more of a laugh now.

Trump said from the beginning that he believed Obama was born in the United States. More information casts some doubt in his mind. But, unless there's an interview I missed, Trump has never declared that Obama wasn't born in the United States.



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 06:59:01 AM
 :(
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 07:00:17 AM
LOL @ anyone who bought swift boater Jereome Corsi's book from the Drudge affiliate link!

LOL!

hospital is even listed.  Doc's signature.  I can't wait to hear bachmann, palin and trump respond.  Smart move on T-Paw and Mitt to avoid this issue!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 07:02:48 AM
SUDDENLY all trump wants to talk about is obama's college records.

oh boy.  not the economy, not the real issue.  nope, he wants college records now.  Crazy.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 27, 2011, 07:03:47 AM
Something doesn't add up.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MCWAY on April 27, 2011, 07:06:17 AM
SUDDENLY all trump wants to talk about is obama's college records.

oh boy.  not the economy, not the real issue.  nope, he wants college records now.  Crazy.

Have you been under a rock? Trump's been talking about the ecomony for WEEKS, especially when it comes to China.

This is precisely what I was mentioning earlier. When Obama's critics hit the president in the face with the "real issue", his defenders hide behind the "birther" thing. And, now they'll hide behind the college records too. The point: If Obama is being so skittish about this stuff, what other foolishness is waiting in the wings for us, regarding things that really matter?

As we've seen, by the time we find out what the real deal is regarding his policies, it's nearly impossible to reverse them.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2011, 07:33:44 AM
Trump said from the beginning that he believed Obama was born in the United States. More information casts some doubt in his mind. But, unless there's an interview I missed, Trump has never declared that Obama wasn't born in the United States.


Of course he didn't.  He had to maintain an exit strategy in case he was wrong.  The fact he raised the questions, the independent investegation, the media manipulationi etc, as a start to his campaign said enough. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Agnostic007 on April 27, 2011, 07:37:23 AM
Of course he didn't.  He had to maintain an exit strategy in case he was wrong.  The fact he raised the questions, the independent investegation, the media manipulationi etc, as a start to his campaign said enough. 

It was complete chickenshit on Trumps part to say "Oh I think he was born here but...hey, ya never know...." Slick haired shyster lawyer type tactics...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 07:44:09 AM
Will Trump follow thru?



DONALD TRUMP: I Will Release My Tax Returns When Obama Releases His Birth Certificate

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-tax-returns-obama-birth-certificate-2011-4#ixzz1KjcXUwXX
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 27, 2011, 07:45:46 AM
Will Trump follow thru?



DONALD TRUMP: I Will Release My Tax Returns When Obama Releases His Birth Certificate

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-tax-returns-obama-birth-certificate-2011-4#ixzz1KjcXUwXX


time to put up ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2011, 08:00:21 AM
What an idiot Trump.   The only thing that made Trump relevent was the Birther issue,  now he's been Trumped.

This is your candidate 3333333?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 08:01:41 AM
What an idiot Trump.   The only thing that made Trump relevent was the Birther issue,  now he's been Trumped.

This is your candidate 3333333?

Really?   He got obama to acknowledge and admit that he has been holding this back from day 1, just like all of us have said. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 27, 2011, 08:02:18 AM
that was my next post..

also.. outside of this birther issue.. Trump is pretty liberal. Healthcare.. hahahahahahah


what a fuckin joke this 333 "guy" ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 27, 2011, 08:03:20 AM
Really?   He got obama to acknowledge and admit that he has been holding this back from day 1, just like all of us have said. 

Fool you said that Obama was born in Kenya.. dont try and pull this shit now..tha fuck?....

See we won, he proved us wrong..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 08:03:32 AM
What an idiot Trump.   The only thing that made Trump relevent was the Birther issue,  now he's been Trumped.

This is your candidate 3333333?

At least he can fall back on his lifelong conservative beliefs...
Wait, he was a major lib until 2009 when he decided to switch?


Hmmmm, well he'll always have the religious folks...
Wait, 3 wives and a helluva lot of Playboy lifestyle?


At least he didn't support abortion, obamacare, and the assault weapons band...
Oh, scratch that.


He's a party uniter, we can give him that.
Wait, he's been trashing Mitt and friends for weeks now?


I'm sure he has foreign policy experience, with all his business.
Yes, he did business with kadaffi to rent him land when nobody else would.


So um, fellahs, why again are you supporting Trump 2012?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 08:04:29 AM
I'm supporting whoever runs that can beat obama, whoever that is.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 08:08:30 AM
I'm supporting whoever runs that can beat obama, whoever that is.   

still think it's trump?   :-\
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 27, 2011, 08:08:47 AM
I'm supporting whoever runs that can beat obama, whoever that is.   

hahahahahaha this is a trend...

*beatboxing*

Another one bites the dust
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 08:14:49 AM
hahahahahaha this is a trend...

*beatboxing*

Another one bites the dust

I'm on record as supporting Madoff/Vandersloot  over Obama early on - so bite me.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 27, 2011, 08:24:44 AM
Trump has done something that no one else has been able to do.  He put enough attention on the BC issue to get Obama to release it.  Good work by Trump, he gets things done. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 08:27:27 AM
Trump has done something that no one else has been able to do.  He put enough attention on the BC issue to get Obama to release it.  Good work by Trump, he gets things done. 

It also shows obama has been playing games intentionally from Day 1 on this since he could have released this all along if he wanted to.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 27, 2011, 08:32:03 AM
Yep. He got himself to go all over national television and look like a damn fool.

Obama really owned birther nut jobs on this one.

In true getbig style...


BBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMM MMMMMM!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 08:33:41 AM
Yep. He got himself to go all over national television and look like a damn fool.

Obama really owned birther nut jobs on this one.

In true getbig style...


BBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMM MMMMMM!!!!!!!!

Why didnt he release this from Day 1? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 09:18:33 AM
Obama: I don't have time for 'silliness,' I'm late for Oprah
Daily Caller ^ | 04/27/2011 | Jonathan Strong




In a press conference announcing the release of his long form birth certificate, Obama denounced the “silliness,” the “sideshows and carnival barkers” that forced him to release a completely unremarkable document after years of speculation on the issue had metastasized into a political phenomenon he could no longer ignore.

“We do not have time for this kind of silliness. We’ve got better stuff to do. I’ve got better stuff to do. We’ve got big problems to solve,” the president said.

Minutes later, he boarded a helicopter, bound for Chicago where he will interview with Oprah, the queen of daytime TV talk shows who recently launched her own network.


(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 27, 2011, 09:18:45 AM
Yep. He got himself to go all over national television and look like a damn fool.

Obama really owned birther nut jobs on this one.

In true getbig style...


BBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMM MMMMMM!!!!!!!!

Someone had to put pressure on Obama.  It's not good for the country if half the people doubt his citizenship.  Trump got done what he set out to do. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 09:28:07 AM
Will Release Of Obama's Purported Birth Certificate Give Rise To New "Certer" Movement?

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/barack-obama/birth-obama-certer-movement-098513






This morning’s White House release of President Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate will, of course, do little to derail the “birther” movement, which will now analyze the document with the kind of verve previously directed toward those Texas Air National Guard memos faxed to CBS from that Kinko’s in Abilene.

So here’s a few nutty points about the birth certificate sure to be seized upon by the nonbelievers:

• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document's safety paper be so seamless?

• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?

• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?

• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.

• In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?

• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?

• Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers: It is spelled “Ukulele.”
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 09:39:09 AM
Birth Certificate Issue Undermining Obama Ability to Do Job: White House Officials Before Release
Wednesday, April 27, 2011 | Kristinn





Last night, before the Obama administration released the president's long-form birth certificate, CNN's Ed Henry reported two of Obama's most senior White House advisers told him that the doubts about Obama's eligibility were affecting his ability to do his job.

Henry reported this on Anderson Cooper 360:

COOPER: Joining me now, White House correspondent Ed Henry, who asked a question to the spokesman today about that at the briefing. Also on the phone, political contributor Cornell Belcher, who did polling for the 2008 Obama campaign and will be working for the 2012 campaign Obama campaign as well.

Ed, you got even more reaction from the White House behind the scenes today. I know you have been talking to administration officials privately. Did they think there's any possible political benefit to this, any downside for some of the President's critics?

ED HENRY, CNN SENIOR WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Well, senior advisers, I spoke to two of the President's most senior advisers today about this. And they insisted with real deep conviction that they think that they're not thinking about the politics, that this is bad for the country, in their words, because they say look, this is settled law to us, basically. They say the President put out the certificate of live birth, as you have been noting, and people like Donald Trump just won't listen.

And they say, in a situation like that, that is just bad for the country because people just want to make the President illegitimate at all costs just because they're critics and it makes it harder for the President to actually cut deals with Republicans, do his day job because it just persists.

COOPER: Well, Ed, let me -- let me argue Donald Trump's point here because he's not here to argue for it himself. Why not, if they want this to go away and they don't like the conversation, why not release the original birth certificate form, the so-called long form, which is actually called a certificate of live birth, rather than the certification of live birth, which they have released?

HENRY: I asked Jay Carney that very question as a follow-up. And he basically said, look, the critics like Donald Trump are just going to move the goalposts. Even if you put out the actual birth certificate, they would raise questions about the signature. They would raise questions about, well, was this doctored? As you heard Donald Trump, every time you presented him with a fact, Anderson, he came up with, well, he was born on a Friday, but it came out on a Sunday, this, that. The goalposts keep moving.

That's the way Jay Carney basically feels. That's what they feel at the White House, that no matter what they do, the conspiracy theorists are going to persist. So they believe the President dealt with this and it's over.

SNIP


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 10:00:52 AM
trump proud of himself.  for playing such a huge role.

god, anyone who buys into this egomaniac should have their head checked.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 10:02:38 AM
LOL @ what b irthers are complaining about now:


David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.



Was the doctor "in on it" by dying before age 90 to avoid getting caught?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 27, 2011, 10:07:35 AM

... don't become distracted by where he was born. It doesn't matter. The only reason to need the birth certificate is to verify Obama Sr. is the babydaddy and not Davis or Malcolm. If Sr. is babydaddy, Jr. is a British subject and not a natural born citizen. Then, dependent upon where he was born, he may or may not be a U.S. citizen of any type.

Okay, he's a citizen, he can stay in the US and not be deported.

He was a dual citizen AT BIRTH. He is NOT a "natural born Citizen" as required to be President. GET OUT OF OUR HOUSE!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 10:21:54 AM
Authors: Even Hawaii birth won't make Obama eligible
WND ^ | April 26, 2011 | WND




Although President Obama released a purported long-form birth certificate today indicating he was born in Hawaii, he still might not fit the constitutional eligibility requirement that stipulates only "natural born" citizens can serve as U.S. president, according to a recent bestselling book.

An investigation by the authors found that according to correspondence from the original framers of the Constitution as well as multiple Supreme Court rulings and the legal writings that helped establish the principles of the Constitution, Obama is not eligible to serve as president since his father was not a U.S. citizen.

With nearly 900 endnotes, the book, "The Manchurian President: Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists," was written by WABC Radio host and WND senior reporter Aaron Klein with researcher Brenda J. Elliott.

While the book was released last May, the work takes on renewed relevance today with Obama's release of his purported long-form birth certificate. In a chapter investigating eligibility issues, the book concluded Obama may not be eligible regardless of his place of birth. The authors recommend further legislative and judicial debate.

"It is undisputed that Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen," wrote Klein, "a fact that should have led to congressional debate about whether Obama is eligible under the United States Constitution to serve as president."


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 27, 2011, 10:25:16 AM
Will Release Of Obama's Purported Birth Certificate Give Rise To New "Certer" Movement?

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/barack-obama/birth-obama-certer-movement-098513






This morning’s White House release of President Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate will, of course, do little to derail the “birther” movement, which will now analyze the document with the kind of verve previously directed toward those Texas Air National Guard memos faxed to CBS from that Kinko’s in Abilene.

So here’s a few nutty points about the birth certificate sure to be seized upon by the nonbelievers:

• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document's safety paper be so seamless?

• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?

• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?

• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.

• In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?

• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?

• Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers: It is spelled “Ukulele.”

Have you ever thought about getting some help for your problem?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 10:32:19 AM
Obama Long Form Layers?
docs.google.com ^ | April 27, 2011 |



If you import the original le from the White House in to Illustrator you will see the image is a clipping mask, meaning they were merged together. The next three pages show the individual pieces. If this were just a scan then why would it be able to be taken apart liket his? Why does the type-writer font look so digitized? Look at the di erence between the two signatures. One looks like it was written on the computer while the other looks like it was actually signed by hand on the document.


(Excerpt) Read more at docs.google.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 27, 2011, 10:34:31 AM
Missing the proverbial forest for the trees. What this has done is shown people what happens when you ignore the left-winged media types, who've been shielding Obama and calling those who question anything about the President "racists", "bigots", "birthers", etc.

Trump ignored all that crap and kept hitting Obama in the face with this issue, until he cracked. Now, if he (or whoever ends up the GOP challenger) keeps this up about the major issues that face up, Obama will melt like butter on a blowtorch. And, we may see a new president in 2012.

Uh no.  Fail.  Your stupid CT's have been proven wrong and you're trying to save face about it now. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 27, 2011, 10:37:31 AM
Okay so mods can we now move this to the CT board?

It has been proven BEYOND reasonable doubt.  There is no more issue here, no more legitimate questions that can be asked about the birth certificate.  It has been released and PROVES BEYOND ANY DOUBT who Obama's father is, who is mother is, where he was born and when he was born.

This has got to be moved.  It's not longer relevant as the point is moot. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 10:40:32 AM
Okay so mods can we now move this to the CT board?

It has been proven BEYOND reasonable doubt.  There is no more issue here, no more legitimate questions that can be asked about the birth certificate.  It has been released and PROVES BEYOND ANY DOUBT who Obama's father is, who is mother is, where he was born and when he was born.

This has got to be moved.  It's not longer relevant as the point is moot. 

 ::)  ::)


Its only all over every single tv channel.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MCWAY on April 27, 2011, 10:45:42 AM
Uh no.  Fail.  Your stupid CT's have been proven wrong and you're trying to save face about it now. 

Earth to KC!!!

WHEN HAVE I EVER CLAIMED that Obama was not born in this country? When have I posted anything to that effect?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 27, 2011, 10:51:59 AM
::)  ::)


Its only all over every single tv channel.   

Yeah because now it's been PROVED BEYOND DOUBT and is now a redundant point. 

 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 10:55:39 AM
Yeah because now it's been PROVED BEYOND DOUBT and is now a redundant point. 

 

Why did he wait 2 years to produce this and doesnt this add credence to those of us who said he was playing games?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 10:58:23 AM
Why did he wait 2 years to produce this and doesnt this add credence to those of us who said he was playing games?   

THIS is where you're at?

youre mad that a politician is 'playing games' by not releasing a personal document?

We never saw Bush or clinton's longform birth cert, did we?  Did we ever see them?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 11:04:30 AM
THIS is where you're at?

youre mad that a politician is 'playing games' by not releasing a personal document?

We never saw Bush or clinton's longform birth cert, did we?  Did we ever see them?

I didnt know there was ever any doubt wuith those two since neither had a marxist Kenyan father, dubious stories of his past, no records whatsoever, and a complete lack of people to verify their bullshit narrative   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 27, 2011, 11:11:03 AM
Why did he wait 2 years to produce this and doesnt this add credence to those of us who said he was playing games?   

Hahaha you are reduced to tears now! this post proves it.  Why did he wait?  Why did he make me look like such a fool? hahahaha

Talk about cry baby lib, you're the poster child for it on the right wing!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 11:15:09 AM
Hahaha you are reduced to tears now! this post proves it.  Why did he wait?  Why did he make me look like such a fool? hahahaha

Talk about cry baby lib, you're the poster child for it on the right wing!

 ::)  ::)

All this shows is that he has been playing games from day 1.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 11:17:48 AM
::)  ::)

All this shows is that he has been playing games from day 1.   

its called politics.

if your adversary is crazy enough to accuse you of something - falsely - after the state says you are indeed born here - there is no responsibility on you to release it.

Obama chose to.

You're pissed he didn't release non-required personal info, well beyond what the state said was required, fast enough for you?


It's sour grapes now, champ.  It stinks and I'm still a birther, but he wins the public perception war, the only one what matters.  I am very sure palin ain't the mama, and 911 was allowed to happen... but history is written by the winners.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 27, 2011, 11:20:40 AM
Hahaha you are reduced to tears now! this post proves it.  Why did he wait?  Why did he make me look like such a fool? hahahaha

Talk about cry baby lib, you're the poster child for it on the right wing!

Obama looks like a fool for not putting this issue to bed 3 years ago.  You can argue that his certification of live birth should have been good enough, but all he had to do was release the long form BC.  See, that wasn't so painful. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 11:26:49 AM
Orly Taitz: Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate Should Say 'Negro' Not 'African'
TPMMuckraker ^ | 4/27/2011 | Ryan J. Reilly




"In those years ... when they wrote race, they were writing 'Negro' not 'African'," Taitz says. "In those days nobody wrote African as a race, it just wasn't one of the options. It sounds like it would be written today, in the age of political correctness, and not in 1961 when they wrote white or Asian or 'Negro'."


(Excerpt) Read more at tpmmuckraker.talkingpoin tsmemo.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 11:29:22 AM
Orly Taitz: Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate Should Say 'Negro' Not 'African'
TPMMuckraker ^ | 4/27/2011 | Ryan J. Reilly

"In those years ... when they wrote race, they were writing 'Negro' not 'African'," Taitz says. "In those days nobody wrote African as a race, it just wasn't one of the options. It sounds like it would be written today, in the age of political correctness, and not in 1961 when they wrote white or Asian or 'Negro'."


(Excerpt) Read more at tpmmuckraker.talkingpoin tsmemo.com ...




Do we have examples from 1961 that did this?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 27, 2011, 11:44:38 AM
Mods move this.  It's jumped the shark big time. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 11:46:21 AM
Mods move this.  It's jumped the shark big time. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 11:56:13 AM
Obama birth certificate released by the president: What's really behind his inevitable decision
Los Angeles Times ^ | April 27, 2011 | 10:52 am



...

In an obvious attempt to keep the goofy issue alive a bit longer, President Obama finally released the long-form version of his birth certificate today.

Rather than simply post it on the White House website, Obama took six minutes of presidential time to visit the White House briefing room, where all the important media folks hang out waiting for their next important broadcast messenger assignment. Such a visit to such an important place by such an important person is guaranteed to attract maximum attention.

Of course, it worked. Would we be writing about this again without the president's appearance?

... If you've got something you want the media to desperately want, tell them they can't have it. High school cheerleaders know this law of human behavior instinctively.

The president says he really, really wants to be talking instead about the crucial, pressing and also the really important real issues facing this nation in the 21st century: national security, the budget, debt limit, energy (but not gas prices).

However, sigh, there's this bunch of, well, you know, different kind of fixated people distracted by something as trivial as whether he's legally qualified to be president of the United States, as he has been for the past 827 days.

And so, as most politicians or appointees claim when forced to do something, he's going to release this long-form birth certificate -- just to end the distraction, mind you.

Which, of course, he could have done 34 months ago when the distraction first began. But the release will keep it going for one more day. And make him look good, a key bipartisan goal of any politician. And keep people busy on that while he does something else.

...


(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 27, 2011, 12:00:53 PM
Dang.  He embarrassed a lot of folks today. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 12:01:39 PM
Dang.  He embarrassed a lot of folks today. 

Yeah - himself.   Why didnt he release this 2 years ago?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 12:04:47 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 12:05:28 PM
Yeah - himself.   Why didnt he release this 2 years ago?  

just take the hit.  can't win em all.  he takes this round - until birthers can find fault with this document.  he was NOT legally required to release this.  he only did after a far-right smear campaign was engaged to smear him - and falsely it would appear.

Birthers look bad on it.  Period.  The man had no obligation to release something just to satisfy people spreading a lie about him.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 12:07:50 PM


OzmO will write:

It's called OCR (optical character recognition). Acrobat and many scanners do this by default. It detects letters and words on the page and allows you to add selectable text to the document without having to type it in manually.

Notice how when you hide a layer, it's white behind it? If it was truly forged, you wouldn't see any of the background missing. It's white because it doesn't know what's behind the text BECAUSE THE TEXT WAS THERE WHEN IT WAS SCANNED.

De-funking and De-bunking CTs since 2005.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 27, 2011, 12:14:39 PM
Yeah - himself.   Why didnt he release this 2 years ago?   

It says a lot about Obama's stubbornness.  He let if get to the point that less than 40% off the population believed without a doubt that he was born in HI.  He feels a natural disdain for many Americans, and didn't want to give them the satisfaction.  In the end, it wasn't just far right looney's questioning him, but the majority of the country.  Poorly played by a President who needs help developing trust with the American people. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on April 27, 2011, 12:19:03 PM


hahaha that's rich coming from you crying like a little b*tch over this.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 27, 2011, 12:21:18 PM
Trump shouldn't be patting himself on the back . . . but he's right.  No way the BC gets released without him barking about this issue. 

Here is what some others had to say: 

GOPers react to Obama's birth certificate

(CNN) - Republicans are reacting on Twitter and via statements to President Obama’s surprise release of his birth certificate Wednesday:
Sarah Palin, former Alaska governor

@SarahPalinUSA Media: admit it, Trump forced the issue. Now, don't let the WH distract you w/the birth crt from what Bernanke says today. Stay focused, eh?

Mitt Romney, former and likely presidential candidate
@MittRomney What President Obama should really be releasing is a jobs plan

Republican National Committee
@RNCResearch Obama's release of his birth cert. is a nice, but temporary distraction for him from high gas prices & a terrible economy
Michael Steel, spokesman to House speaker John Boehner, in a statement:
"This has long been a settled issue. The Speaker’s focus is on cutting spending, lowering gas prices, and creating American jobs.”

Tony Fratto, former Bush press secretary
@TonyFratto So the President is playing his Trump card

Mike Murphy, GOP strategist
@murphymike Now... Do I get to see Trump's income tax returns? Say, last ten years?

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/27/gopers-react-to-obamas-birth-certificate/#more-156942
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 27, 2011, 12:21:36 PM
It says a lot about Obama's stubbornness.  He let if get to the point that less than 40% off the population believed without a doubt that he was born in HI.  He feels a natural disdain for many Americans, and didn't want to give them the satisfaction.  In the end, it wasn't just far right looney's questioning him, but the majority of the country.  Poorly played by a President who needs help developing trust with the American people. 

what poll did you get that from,don't tell me fox ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 27, 2011, 12:22:49 PM
Yeah - himself.   Why didnt he release this 2 years ago?   

Because it was a silly conspiracy theory and he wanted birthers to run around and make fools of themselves for two years?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 27, 2011, 12:24:09 PM
what poll did you get that from,don't tell me fox ;D

Gallup/USA Today poll
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 12:25:59 PM
Because it was a silly conspiracy theory and he wanted birthers to run around and make fools of themselves for two years?

Again - playing games and creating chaos.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 27, 2011, 12:32:39 PM
Again - playing games and creating chaos.   

Not really.  Turns out he actually played this very well.  He only released when it really started to look like he was hiding something.  Turns out he wasn't hiding anything.  The COLB was not a forgery.  Nobody was lying when they said they saw his original BC.  The guy who signed an affidavit claiming there was no BC was not telling the truth.   

As much as I dislike him as president, he really did a good job with this whole thing (in hindsight).
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MCWAY on April 27, 2011, 12:36:26 PM
Again - playing games and creating chaos.  

As I said earlier, Trump has shown how you put it to Obama. YOU POUND HIM!!!

Screw what the left-winged goofies (Chris "Thrill Up My Leg" Matthews, Ed Schultz, Christianne Amanpour, etc.) in the media have to say. Pound him on an issue, until he cracks.

They called Trump a birther; he didn't care; "Where's the birth certificate?" they called him a racist; he didn't care; "Where's the birth certificate?" They called him a joke; he didn't care; "WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?"

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 12:37:37 PM
Not really.  Turns out he actually played this very well.  He only released when it really started to look like he was hiding something.  Turns out he wasn't hiding anything.  The COLB was not a forgery.  Nobody was lying when they said they saw his original BC.  The guy who signed an affidavit claiming there was no BC was not telling the truth.   

As much as I dislike him as president, he really did a good job with this whole thing (in hindsight).

Yes - in terms of playing a game.   However, in the meanwhile - he wasted everyones' time and created chaos.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 27, 2011, 12:41:25 PM
Yes - in terms of playing a game.   However, in the meanwhile - he wasted everyones' time and created chaos.  

He didn't create this whole situation.  He just didn't respond to questions and defended himself.  The chaos was created by people claiming he was born in Kenya.  I probably would have done much of what he did, although I would have released the BC a long time ago. 

Then again, I wouldn't want anyone knowing my mom's name was Stanley.   :-\ 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 27, 2011, 01:20:27 PM
Mods move this.  It's jumped the shark big time. 

Jumping the shark  -  A defining moment when you know that your favorite television program has reached its peak. That instant that you know from now on...it's all downhill. Some call it the climax. We call it 'Jumping the Shark.' From that moment on, the program will simply never be the same."

I hope we've all learned a little something today.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 01:28:03 PM
Via FR:


________________________ ____________



I would have expected the Obama operatives to do a better job this time. They’re incompetent.

““Hate to bring this up, but I just checked the official web site for Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital and according to the information there, the name of the hospital at the time of his birth should have been Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital. According to the web site the name didn’t change to Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital merged with Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in 1978. So how could his official long form birth certificate that was generated in 1961 have the name of the hospital that wasn’t created until 1978?” [link to www.whitehouse.gov] From WIKI: The facility was originally founded by Queen Kapi’olani as the Kapi’olani Maternity Home in 1890 for which she held bazaars and luaus to raise $8,000 needed to start the Home. Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital opened in 1909 named for Emma Kauikeolani Napoleon Mahelona (1862–1931), the wife of Albert Spencer Wilcox (1844–1919).[1] In 1978, it merged with Kapi’olani Maternity Home to become Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children. Check it Out your self at WIKI ! Gives 1978 as the Name Change Date ! [link to en.wikipedia.org]”
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 27, 2011, 01:37:46 PM
Well I looked at the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital website and it does indeed say that it became that in 1978.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 27, 2011, 02:03:38 PM
The Nordyke twins born one day after Obama list the hospital name the same way. Their long form that I reference was issued in 1966, well before the official name change date.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 27, 2011, 02:19:09 PM
Well I looked at the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital website and it does indeed say that it became that in 1978.

HA..give it up
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 02:23:09 PM
HA..give it up

Birthers never die, the fight and struggle goes on.    ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 27, 2011, 02:25:33 PM
HA..give it up

Give what up? Information was cited so I investigated it, I don't accept anything from WIKI as fact.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 02:26:45 PM
Obama Finally Releases His Birth Certificate
The Constitution Club ^ | 04-27-11 | Dave the Sage





Holy crap, he did it. After endless court battles, speculations, conjecture, and even books on the subject, the Obama administration today produced what they say is the long form, certificate of live birth, of President Barack Obama. One can only wonder why it took FOREVER for this to happen. The delay had produced a cottage industry of conspiracy theories that continued to grow and prosper in the absence of definitive proof that Obama was indeed constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States of America. One can only speculate that the powers that be decided that the potential political damage to Obama outweighed the potential damage to the eventual GOP nominee. Though I suppose that after the poll came out that showed that only 38% of Americans thought the president was actually born in the USA, the Obama administration finally decided they better do something. After all, there is a presidential election on the horizon.

I am glad that this has happened. It was a distraction to the multiple and tangible reasons to ideologically attack Obama instead of dwelling on intangible ‘what ifs.’ The man is a bag of flaws, apologetics, mistakes, and poor policies and that is what should be focused on. Though one can only wonder why the heck there had been such immense resistance to such a simple concept as releasing the birth certificate. Another major miscalculation by Obama himself that contributed to a serious portion of the electorate questioning whether he is a legitimate occupant of the white house. Politically, it is a mistake to allow your enemies to undermine you so severely when you can so easily counteract it. But finally, today, the greatest political mystery of this century may finally be at a close. The true ‘silliness’ here is that it took so long for this to happen. About frickin’ time.

Obama releases birth form, decries ‘silliness’ http://myqwest.com/news/read.php?rip_id=%3CD9MS22U00%40news.ap.org%3E&ps=1018&page=1

While Obama and White House officials avoided mentioning Trump by name, officials said they released the birth certificate partially because the issue had moved beyond fringe discussion, and Obama criticized a media culture that had not let the story go.

“This issue has been going on for two, two and a half years now. I think it started during the campaign,” Obama said. “I have watched with bemusement, I’ve been puzzled at the degree at which this thing just kept on going.”

“We’re not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers,” the president said.

He did not take any questions and did not say why the document had not been released earlier.

Though one would think that a lot of people will undoubtedly be disappointed, and perhaps be at a loss at what to say on the internet now, the pressure and questions will only change. Where are the academic transcripts, law review articles, medical records, college records financial aid info and original passport? And of course after waiting for years to produce this the true conspircists will cry fraud and not believe it.

Obama waited too long to slay the dragon here and it will now never truly die. But it will still serve a number of purposes. This bombshell development lets the potential GOP candidates off the hook just in time as we approach the beginnings of the primary season. Today they received a great bit fat political Christmas present hand delivered from Obama himself.

Trump probably did us a favor here, and was the final tipping point on the subject. The Donald made it happen, and whether this will help or hurt him with his own potential presidential run remains to be seen and will play out over the next few days. And the conspiracy theories in regards to that non-conservative and the role he played in all this have already started to fly. He was working for Hillary, it was all a set-up between him and Obama to remove this albatross from around Obama’s neck, he’s getting ready to use this to launch a third party run to split the Republican vote and ensure an Obama second term etc.

Good stuff and an endless supply of subject matter for bloggers like myself.

“He should have done it a long time ago. I am really honored to play such a big role in hopefully, hopefully getting rid of this issue.” -Donald Trump

But we all know this debate is not settled now. You know that right?

From Drudge:

HERE IT IS!

OBAMA SHOWS LONG FORM…

IS IT REAL?

Composed of layers?

TRUMP TAKES CREDIT…

David A. Sinclair, attending doctor, died in 2003...

OBAMA: ‘I’ve got better stuff to do’…

And so I guess the fun continues in a way…

Here is the Most Awesome One himself on the issue:

Obama Sermonizes About This Silly Distraction From His Incompetence http://theothermccain.com/2011/04/27/video-obama-sermonizes-about-this-silly-distraction-from-his-incompetence/

At the link is a great roundup of breaking news and opinion as the internet punditry absorbs and analyzes what has taken place today.

Mr. Instapundit probably put it best:

"The White House may think it’s sprung a trap, but I think they waited too long. By now — as the polls from earlier this week showing how many independents thought Obama wasn’t born here, and which probably prompted the release decision, indicate — the damage is done."

As a blogger one pretty much lives for this kind of political ‘drama.’ Just too much fun I guess.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 02:32:58 PM
ama Birth Doctor's Widow -- I Had NO IDEA ! (Phone Interview Today)
 LISTEN AT...

http://www.tmz.com/2011/04/27/barack-obama-birth-doctor... /


4/27/2011 10:25 AM PDT by TMZ Staff

The wife of the doctor who delivered a newborn Barack Obama back in 1961 claims she had NO CLUE her late husband brought the future President into the world -- IN HAWAII -- until she saw B.O.'s birth certificate this morning.

TMZ spoke to Ivalee Sinclair -- the wife of Dr. David A. Sinclair -- who told us she was SHOCKED to see her husband's signature on Obama's birth certificate ... and now, even though Dr. Sinclair passed away in 2003, the entire family is CELEBRATING.

Ivalee tells us, "Life is full of surprises! We are huge Obama supporters and our whole family has been calling one another all morning."

She continues, "I know my husband is just looking down on us smiling. We had no idea that he delivered President Obama until this morning when we saw the birth certificate ... It is very exciting. I just can't believe it. We had no way of knowing. Everyone is calling us and I'm looking forward to calling all of the family back and informing them that it is true."

We also broke the news to Dr. Sinclair's son, Karl, who was blown away as you'll hear in the audio.
 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 27, 2011, 02:44:48 PM
I am NOT saying the BC is a forgery. It just doesn't agree with that bedrock of correct information known as snopes.com

excerpt from:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp (http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp)

In January 2009, a teacher at the Honolulu prep school attended by Barack Obama recalled discussing his birth with the obstetrician who had delivered him:

When Barack Hussein Obama places his hand on the Bible to take the oath of office as >44th president of the United States, Barbara Nelson of Kenmore will undoubtedly think back to the day he was born. It was Aug. 4, 1961, at Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu.

"I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone," said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here's the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: "So, tell me something interesting that happened this week," she recalls.

His response: "Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that's something to write home about."

The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.

"I penned the name on a napkin, and I did write home about it," said Nelson, knowing that her father, Stanley A. Czurles, director of the Art Education Department at Buffalo State College, would be interested in the "Stanley" connection.

She also remembers Dr. West mentioning that the baby's father was the first black student at the University of Hawaii and how taken he was by the baby's name.

"I remember Dr. West saying 'Barack Hussein Obama, now that's a musical name,'" said Nelson.

Ten years after that memorable birth announcement, Nelson would hear the Obama name again. This time, the father, now a Kenyan government official, was coming to speak at the Punahou School in Honolulu where Nelson was teaching and where his 10-year-old son was a newly enrolled fifth-grader.


I found the original story

http://www.buffalonews.com/494/story/554495.html
 
The Buffalo News

Friday, January 23, 2009
Make us your homepage!



Barbara Nelson was Barack Obama's English teacher in high school in Hawaii.
Sharon Cantillon / Buffalo News

Updated: 01/20/09 08:17 AM
Teacher from Kenmore recalls Obama was a focused student

By Paula Voell
NEWS STAFF REPORTER
Story tools:

Share this story

When Barack Hussein Obama places his hand on the Bible today to take the oath of office as 44th president of the United States, Barbara Nelson of Kenmore will undoubtedly think back to the day he was born. It was Aug. 4, 1961, at Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu.

“I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls.

His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”

The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.

“I penned the name on a napkin, and I did write home about it,” said Nelson, knowing that her father, Stanley A. Czurles, director of the Art Education Department at Buffalo State College, would be interested in the “Stanley” connection.

She also remembers Dr. West mentioning that the baby’s father was the first black student at the University of Hawaii and how taken he was by the baby’s name.

“I remember Dr. West saying ‘Barack Hussein Obama, now that’s a musical name,’” said Nelson, who grew up in Kenmore and went to Hawaii in 1959 to be in Jo-Anne’s wedding party. When Nelson was offered a job as a newspaper reporter and photographer at her friend’s wedding reception, it led to her living in Hawaii for 47 years. She returned to Kenmore in 2006.

Ten years after that memorable birth announcement, Nelson would hear the Obama name again. This time, the father, now a Kenyan government official, was coming to speak at the Punahou School in Honolulu where Nelson was teaching and where his 10-year-old son was a newly enrolled fifth-grader.

“Dr. Obama had this lovely, attentive manner,” she said. “When he answered the children’s questions, he would do it as a story, which is the way they do it in Kenya.

“His son, whom he hadn’t seen in eight years, seemed as fascinated as we all were,” said Nelson, who went on to be a high school principal, a harpist, a watercolor artist and poet.

A few years later, Nelson encountered “Barry” again, when she watched high school basketball games, where her students played.

“The team came alive when he got on the court,” she said. “He was not only quick and graceful, but he could see the pattern and zero in on the opening. Though he wasn’t a starter, he was a graceful, passionate athlete who played back-up forward. He had a definite presence on the court.

“I often sat with his grandmother, who was a no-nonsense woman with these very solid Midwestern ways about her,” said Nelson. “She loved that boy and he adored her.”

As a high school teacher of British, Biblical and Middle Eastern literature, Nelson taught Obama.

“He wasn’t usually the first one to speak, but he was an attentive, active listener,” she said. “While the others might be bouncing off the surface, he came straight from the center. He picked up on the patterns of ideas and then he’d make a statement that moved the class to the focal point.

“He also had a lovely, engaging sense of humor,” Nelson said. “He was firm, but he wasn’t aggressive or in your face.”

During one class the question was posed “of what should we be most afraid,” drawing answers that included “death,” “hell,” “biological warfare,” “fear” and “isolation,” said Nelson.

“I recall Barack sitting in the back of the room,” Nelson said, demonstrating a hands-behind-his- head pose and describing his lanky, outstretched legs.

“When he pulled himself upright I thought ‘Bingo. Here we go,’ ” she said, expecting the discussion to move to a new level.

“And he said, ‘Words. Words are the power to be feared most. Every individual has an unmonitored arsenal and whether they are directed personally or internationally, words can be weapons of destruction.”

It was such moments that led Nelson to honor Obama at his 1979 graduation with the traditional draping of a lei around his neck.

“I had a yellow plumeria tree and I could get only enough blossoms to make five leis,” she said. “I had taught more than 200 students, but one of those leis went around the shoulders of Barack Obama.”

Years later, the ideas Obama expressed resonated as Nelson wrote “War of the Words,” which includes the lines: “ I fear the powerful pugnacious words, Weapons that miss the flesh and pierce the heart.” (Songs of Honor, 2006).

In the author’s notes, Nelson describes the classroom discussion with Obama that inspired the poem and she adds this information: “Interestingly, this former student is now a very wise, articulate U. S. senator.”

pvoell@buffnews.com
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 07:22:31 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Release of President Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate Was Stupid and Wrong
Mediaite ^ | April 27th, 2011 | Tommy Christopher
Posted on April 27, 2011 5:36:48 PM EDT by Qbert

How stupid was it to release President Obama’s long-form birth certificate? Let me count the ways. As Dan Pfeiffer said, the Birther issue was “good politics and good TV,” but I strongly disagree that it was “bad for the American people,” especially from Barack Obama’s point of view. His decision to cash in the Birther chips is an awful decision for them, unless he believes the country would be better off without him as president in 2013, .

As a writer for a media criticism website, the apparent death of the Birther story as a mainstream news meme is beyond tragic. Covering the media’s coverage of Donald Trump’s Birther and Bailey Circus has been like shooting arthritic fish in a barrel with a shotgun.

With any luck, Trump will stick around the Teevee, and the top of Republican primary polls, with a steady regurgitation of other chain emails, crazy talk, and just plain dickishness, but this definite’y puts a crimp in The Donald’s media mojo.

The American people have been well-served by this Birther story, for precisely the reasons President Obama gave to end it. While it did give rise to an absurdly popular Donald Trump candidacy, it also revealed to Americans the unserious nature of an absurdly large number of Republicans. This issue promised to be a crucible against which GOP candidates (as they eventually declared) could be judged sane or not.

Obviously, this also illustrates the huge political advantage that President Obama has given away. The Birther issue is a loser for the GOP in a general election, but hugely influential in a Republican primary. Making every GOP candidate kiss the Birther Blarney Stone would have been an anchor around their necks.

The beauty part of it all is that the President was completely untouchable on this issue. He not only lacked the legal ability to release the long form on his own, but he had absolute moral authority never to do so. But like a child being taunted to prove he likes girls, Obama kissed one, only to have them all say “Ewwww! He kissed a girl!!” This hasn’t ended the Birther movement, or its influence on the Republican base, but has only driven it underground, where it cannot help Obama at all.

Since any possible political advantage to releasing this now would be multiplied by waiting, I can only conclude that President Obama is actually doing this to “take the high road.”

This is an idea guaranteed to give any liberal a case of head-explode-itis, given that every Democratic loser in popular memory has similarly relied on their “rightness,” and the party’s biggest winner was a guy who carried on at the White House like Fredo from The Godfather.

But even notwithstanding the fact that the High Road terminates in Loserville Junction, Obama was already taking the high road! By facilitating the release of the long-form birth certificate, President Obama instantly betrayed every principle that his supporters have used to defend him, and in the process, undercut any future principled refusals to be treated unequally, unfairly, and untruthfully. Obama was asked, without just cause, to show his papers, and he did.

He also invited future candidates, himself included, to have unreasonable demands placed upon them, and created a burden on them to comply if the glare becomes bright enough.

Finally, Obama also comes out of this looking like Donald Trump took his lunch money, high ground or not. Obama would have been better served, and completely justified, in responding to Trump, et al, with a Parkway Salute. In capitulating to Trump, President Obama sent the message that bullying works.

There were people of every political stripe who found the Birther movement distasteful, and its very premise un-American. In releasing this document, President Obama has let all of them down.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 07:25:14 PM
This guy stole my fredo analogy!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 07:51:24 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

IMPEACH OBAMA NOW! Long Form Birth Certificate Proves he is NOT Natural Born Citizen
WebToday ^ | 04-27-11 | WebToday
Posted on April 27, 2011 9:46:49 PM EDT by geraldmcg

At long last, Barack Obama Jr. released his long form birth certificate today, clearly proving he is NOT a natural born citizen. So, why has there been virtually no call in the Senate to begin impeachment proceedings? And why are so many news reporters acting as if all Obama needed to substantiate he was a Natural Born Citizen was to prove he was born in the U.S.A?

The U.S. Constitution and U.S. law, as of the time of Obama Junior’s birth, still required a President to have a father (pictured top left) who was a U.S. citizen. Clearly Obama’s father was a British citizen, as clearly shown on the very document Obama released.

Still not convinced? Let’s take a refresher course in U.S. history. Our founding fathers didn’t want any U.S. President to have mixed loyalties so they required that both parents of a President be U.S. citizens in order to qualify their son or daughter to be a Natural Born U.S. Citizen. Period. Simple. Not complicated.

Here’s the exact language of the Naturalization Act of 1790, passed by the first U.S. Congress: “And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States…”

So there you have it. Obama is not eligible to be U.S. President and needs to be impeached and convicted quickly to avoid a constitutional crisis and to follow rule of law.

Bottom line: It doesn’t matter if Obama was born in Hawaii, which was actually a U.S. Territory at the time of Obama’s birth and not yet a U.S. state. What does matter is that Obama Jr.’s dad Obama Sr. was not a U.S. citizen and thus rendering his son’s Presidential aspirations patently illegal.

Need more proof? The founding fathers put the definition in writing from the defining documents of their day. Founding father John Jay used the definition of “natural born Citizen” straight from The Law of Nations (Vattel) that states: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…” (Vattel in Book 1, Sec 212)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 08:01:47 PM






What is it about twin girls born day after Obama?
Posted: April 27, 2011
9:58 pm Eastern

© 2011 WorldNetDaily
Yesterday, Barack Obama blinked – releasing birth records he has hired lawyers to prevent the public from seeing, even at the expense of allowing U.S. Army Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin to be court-martialed and sent to prison for having dared ask questions the White House until now has resolutely dismissed with ridicule and distain.

A key problem for Obama is that birth certificates issued to twin girls born one day later at Kapi'olani hospital, the Nordykes, are the Rosetta Stone of deciphering both Obama's previously released short-form Certification of Live Birth and the newly released purported copy of his long-form birth certificate.

Be the first to get an autographed copy of Jerome Corsi's upcoming blockbuster, "Where's the Birth Certificate?" and help get TV commercials on the air!

(Column continues below)


    

 

The problem since the short-form certificate was released during the 2008 presidential campaign has always been this:

As WND reported, the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins have certificate numbers lower than the number given Obama, even though the president purportedly was born at the same hospital a day earlier than the Nordykes.
Note, Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth displayed by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form birth certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordykes.

Note, Obama was given certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.
In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.

Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.

This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.

At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar general, with the date of registration inserted in box No. 22 on the lower right hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.

The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.

The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that automatically increased by one each time a birth certificate was stamped.

The question, therefore, is how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days later than the registrar general accepted Obama's birth certificate, when the twins' numbers are lower than Obama's number?

Here are the Nordyke twins birth certificates:



Eleanor Nordyke has speculated that her twins received an earlier birth certificate number because, although she gave birth later than Ann Dunham, she entered Kapi'olani earlier.

Yet, in 1961, birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospital, and the date the mother checked into the medical facility was irrelevant to how birth certificate numbers were assigned.

Moreover, no records for Dunham having been a patient at Kapi'olani in 1961, or of Obama having been born at the hospital on Aug. 4, 1961, have been released by the hospital.

Now that President Obama has personally vouched for the authenticity of the birth certificate the White House released yesterday, he can reasonably be asked to authorize Kapi'olani Medical Center to release any and all medical records the hospital may hold for his mother and Barack Obama Sr., his listed father.

The debate over Obama's eligibility to be president has truly only just begun, with Obama's status having changed overnight from a bemused observer to a full-contact participant.

Two weeks before the publication of my book "Where's the Birth Certificate?" the effort to document Obama's past has begun in earnest.

Fundamentally, the world changed for Barack Obama yesterday morning, not just in increasing pressure for the release of the many hidden documents about his past, but in the inescapable reality that the White House must defend this newly released birth certificate as authentic.

Before yesterday, Obama may have attempted to explain away problems with the short-form Certification of Live Birth as the work of his supporters.

Before yesterday, the president largely remained above the fray. Now, he has fully engaged in the presentation and defense of his birth records and his status as a "natural born citizen" under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Obama's presidency now depends upon the White House being able to support the veracity of all the information contained in the birth document released yesterday morning.

In the final analysis, proof that the document is an authentic Obama birth record will await forensic examination.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 27, 2011, 08:08:50 PM
Obama Supporter Unknowingly Confirms BC Forgery
   
60
Share
0
digg
   
OBAMA’S HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER CLAIMS DIFFERENT DOCTOR
by Miki Booth

Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate
(Apr. 27, 2011, Tulsa, OK) —The putative president and his enablers have really gone over the line today, Wednesday April, 27, 2011. It just goes to show there is a culture of fear and desperation in the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. First off today, World Net Daily published a scathing expose of Hawai’i Dept. of Health and their “helter-skelter” handling of requests for long form birth certificates. They have been doing incredible documentary acrobatics changing policy and procedure to fit Obama’s claims. And if that wasn’t bad enough, Oklahoma votes today on SB 91 the presidential certification bill which is expected to pass by a large margin and signed into law by Gov. Mary Fallin. The bill will then automatically become law within 5 days.
The Obama Public Relations machine decided today was the crucial day to release the recently cooked up Certificate of Live Birth betting its unveiling will influence enough members of the Oklahoma House to have second thoughts about the necessity of such a bill.
The scramble was on when minions tasked to look for negative reporting on the internet discovered the WND story by Bob Unruh. More scrambling. Call the players to the war room, things are unraveling. But Trump has moved on. He’s not even talking about the birth certificate anymore, he’s bringing up the school records. What does he know about Occidental? Does he know about Columbia too? Has he talked to tea party leaders about all the violations of the Constitution? With the release today of the newly “cooked” copy of his birth record Obama has brought the wrath of every red-blooded American down on his head. His father was a British subject therefore Obama is not an Article II, Section I constitutionally eligible “natural born citizen.” He has illegally taken our government and surrounded himself with enemies of the Constitution and those cronies decided today was the day to release this particular red herring.
Why now? Why not last year when he could have kept an 18-year decorated Army flight surgeon from going to federal prison for asking to see the document that Obama now flaunts with seeming impunity. Terry Lakin is nearing completion of a 6-month prison term, leaving Leavenworth stripped of his 18-year career, dismissed from the Army and loss of all benefits. The most disgusting aspect of this travesty is the heartless punishment of putting him in prison three days before Christmas, away from his wife and three children. A clear message to anyone that would challenge Obama’s legitimacy.
The unraveling has begun. Today there are big changes in the Intelligence community. New players and musical chairs in the CIA. Create clutter, create confusion, backlog inquiries, and shake everything up to avoid evidence getting shook out.
Bernanke and Geithner are suspect financial manipulators who have done nothing but damage to the U.S. financial system and jealously guard what is actually in the Federal Reserve. Like Obama and his cronies they are unaccountable to the American people. Something big is coming down.
The birth certificate Obama is flaunting is an obvious fake to any of the millions of people who are on to the treacherous actions of Obama’s push to socialism.
It is indeed convenient that Dr. David A. Sinclair, who coincidentally was my OB/GYN who delivered my son, Alan, has passed therefore he cannot attest to the fact of obama’s birth. The forgery looks good on the surface but is fraught with problems. It appears to be manufactured using the Nordyke twin’s samples and they cannot get away with the higher chronological number belying an alleged earlier birth.
Coincidentally, my husband, Fred, was delivered in Kapiolani by the same doctor that delivered the Nordyke twins. It might have been too much fudging to claim the Nordyke’s doctor on the certificate revealed today but it doesn’t really matter since neither doctor delivered Obama according to supporter Barbara Nelson, Obama’s English teacher at Punahou High School and perhaps “the only person left who specifically remembers his birth.”
Nelson stated for The Buffalo News on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, “I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls.
His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”
The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.
 
 
 
 
 
####
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Possibly Related Posts:
» ShoreBank, Obama, Big Labor, Community Organizers...
» Editorial: Sept. 13, 2009 — Patriots, let's go spend that Political Capital!
» Editorial: Oct. 27, 2009 — The Fraud Merry-go-round
» Following the money trail
» "Release" and "Fraud" Call made for Lt. Col. Lakin
Categories: Editorials
Tags: Alan Booth, Barack Hussein Obama, Bob Unruh, Certificate of Live Birth, CIA, delivery doctor, Donald Trump, Dr. David A. Sinclair, Dr. Rodney T. West, Ft. Leavenworth, Gov. Mary Fallin, Hawaii, Kapiolani Medical Center, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, Miki Booth, Nordyke Twins, Obama, Obama's eligibliity, Occidental College, Punahou High School, Stanley Ann Dunham, The Buffalo News, Waikiki Beach
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 27, 2011, 10:01:55 PM
Please. Stop. You are looking even more foolish.

He is a natural born citizen of this country.

The guy is the President. You don't like him. Vote him out. Don't act like he's not allowed to be the man... he is.

How about finding a candidate who is better.

I'd really like that.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 27, 2011, 10:06:30 PM
Obama Supporter Unknowingly Confirms BC Forgery
   
60
Share
0
digg
   
OBAMA’S HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER CLAIMS DIFFERENT DOCTOR
by Miki Booth

Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate
(Apr. 27, 2011, Tulsa, OK) —The putative president and his enablers have really gone over the line today, Wednesday April, 27, 2011. It just goes to show there is a culture of fear and desperation in the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. First off today, World Net Daily published a scathing expose of Hawai’i Dept. of Health and their “helter-skelter” handling of requests for long form birth certificates. They have been doing incredible documentary acrobatics changing policy and procedure to fit Obama’s claims. And if that wasn’t bad enough, Oklahoma votes today on SB 91 the presidential certification bill which is expected to pass by a large margin and signed into law by Gov. Mary Fallin. The bill will then automatically become law within 5 days.
The Obama Public Relations machine decided today was the crucial day to release the recently cooked up Certificate of Live Birth betting its unveiling will influence enough members of the Oklahoma House to have second thoughts about the necessity of such a bill.
The scramble was on when minions tasked to look for negative reporting on the internet discovered the WND story by Bob Unruh. More scrambling. Call the players to the war room, things are unraveling. But Trump has moved on. He’s not even talking about the birth certificate anymore, he’s bringing up the school records. What does he know about Occidental? Does he know about Columbia too? Has he talked to tea party leaders about all the violations of the Constitution? With the release today of the newly “cooked” copy of his birth record Obama has brought the wrath of every red-blooded American down on his head. His father was a British subject therefore Obama is not an Article II, Section I constitutionally eligible “natural born citizen.” He has illegally taken our government and surrounded himself with enemies of the Constitution and those cronies decided today was the day to release this particular red herring.
Why now? Why not last year when he could have kept an 18-year decorated Army flight surgeon from going to federal prison for asking to see the document that Obama now flaunts with seeming impunity. Terry Lakin is nearing completion of a 6-month prison term, leaving Leavenworth stripped of his 18-year career, dismissed from the Army and loss of all benefits. The most disgusting aspect of this travesty is the heartless punishment of putting him in prison three days before Christmas, away from his wife and three children. A clear message to anyone that would challenge Obama’s legitimacy.
The unraveling has begun. Today there are big changes in the Intelligence community. New players and musical chairs in the CIA. Create clutter, create confusion, backlog inquiries, and shake everything up to avoid evidence getting shook out.
Bernanke and Geithner are suspect financial manipulators who have done nothing but damage to the U.S. financial system and jealously guard what is actually in the Federal Reserve. Like Obama and his cronies they are unaccountable to the American people. Something big is coming down.
The birth certificate Obama is flaunting is an obvious fake to any of the millions of people who are on to the treacherous actions of Obama’s push to socialism.
It is indeed convenient that Dr. David A. Sinclair, who coincidentally was my OB/GYN who delivered my son, Alan, has passed therefore he cannot attest to the fact of obama’s birth. The forgery looks good on the surface but is fraught with problems. It appears to be manufactured using the Nordyke twin’s samples and they cannot get away with the higher chronological number belying an alleged earlier birth.
Coincidentally, my husband, Fred, was delivered in Kapiolani by the same doctor that delivered the Nordyke twins. It might have been too much fudging to claim the Nordyke’s doctor on the certificate revealed today but it doesn’t really matter since neither doctor delivered Obama according to supporter Barbara Nelson, Obama’s English teacher at Punahou High School and perhaps “the only person left who specifically remembers his birth.”
Nelson stated for The Buffalo News on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, “I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls.
His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”
The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.
 
 
 
 
 
####
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Possibly Related Posts:
» ShoreBank, Obama, Big Labor, Community Organizers...
» Editorial: Sept. 13, 2009 — Patriots, let's go spend that Political Capital!
» Editorial: Oct. 27, 2009 — The Fraud Merry-go-round
» Following the money trail
» "Release" and "Fraud" Call made for Lt. Col. Lakin
Categories: Editorials
Tags: Alan Booth, Barack Hussein Obama, Bob Unruh, Certificate of Live Birth, CIA, delivery doctor, Donald Trump, Dr. David A. Sinclair, Dr. Rodney T. West, Ft. Leavenworth, Gov. Mary Fallin, Hawaii, Kapiolani Medical Center, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, Miki Booth, Nordyke Twins, Obama, Obama's eligibliity, Occidental College, Punahou High School, Stanley Ann Dunham, The Buffalo News, Waikiki Beach




I told all of you that 3333 would never give it up....he promised he would stop if Obama released the long form BC.,.he has..but still 3333 persists
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 27, 2011, 10:22:50 PM
he went to THREE manhattan fundraisers tonight.  He milked it.

This is akin to Bush compeltely proving the 911 truthers wrong in one day.  Period. 

The far-right would be howling, gloating, etc, if this had happened.  They got punked on this one.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 28, 2011, 03:14:21 AM
Obama Supporter Unknowingly Confirms BC Forgery
   
60
Share
0
digg
   
OBAMA’S HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER CLAIMS DIFFERENT DOCTOR
by Miki Booth

Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate
(Apr. 27, 2011, Tulsa, OK) —The putative president and his enablers have really gone over the line today, Wednesday April, 27, 2011. It just goes to show there is a culture of fear and desperation in the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. First off today, World Net Daily published a scathing expose of Hawai’i Dept. of Health and their “helter-skelter” handling of requests for long form birth certificates. They have been doing incredible documentary acrobatics changing policy and procedure to fit Obama’s claims. And if that wasn’t bad enough, Oklahoma votes today on SB 91 the presidential certification bill which is expected to pass by a large margin and signed into law by Gov. Mary Fallin. The bill will then automatically become law within 5 days.
The Obama Public Relations machine decided today was the crucial day to release the recently cooked up Certificate of Live Birth betting its unveiling will influence enough members of the Oklahoma House to have second thoughts about the necessity of such a bill.
The scramble was on when minions tasked to look for negative reporting on the internet discovered the WND story by Bob Unruh. More scrambling. Call the players to the war room, things are unraveling. But Trump has moved on. He’s not even talking about the birth certificate anymore, he’s bringing up the school records. What does he know about Occidental? Does he know about Columbia too? Has he talked to tea party leaders about all the violations of the Constitution? With the release today of the newly “cooked” copy of his birth record Obama has brought the wrath of every red-blooded American down on his head. His father was a British subject therefore Obama is not an Article II, Section I constitutionally eligible “natural born citizen.” He has illegally taken our government and surrounded himself with enemies of the Constitution and those cronies decided today was the day to release this particular red herring.
Why now? Why not last year when he could have kept an 18-year decorated Army flight surgeon from going to federal prison for asking to see the document that Obama now flaunts with seeming impunity. Terry Lakin is nearing completion of a 6-month prison term, leaving Leavenworth stripped of his 18-year career, dismissed from the Army and loss of all benefits. The most disgusting aspect of this travesty is the heartless punishment of putting him in prison three days before Christmas, away from his wife and three children. A clear message to anyone that would challenge Obama’s legitimacy.
The unraveling has begun. Today there are big changes in the Intelligence community. New players and musical chairs in the CIA. Create clutter, create confusion, backlog inquiries, and shake everything up to avoid evidence getting shook out.
Bernanke and Geithner are suspect financial manipulators who have done nothing but damage to the U.S. financial system and jealously guard what is actually in the Federal Reserve. Like Obama and his cronies they are unaccountable to the American people. Something big is coming down.
The birth certificate Obama is flaunting is an obvious fake to any of the millions of people who are on to the treacherous actions of Obama’s push to socialism.
It is indeed convenient that Dr. David A. Sinclair, who coincidentally was my OB/GYN who delivered my son, Alan, has passed therefore he cannot attest to the fact of obama’s birth. The forgery looks good on the surface but is fraught with problems. It appears to be manufactured using the Nordyke twin’s samples and they cannot get away with the higher chronological number belying an alleged earlier birth.
Coincidentally, my husband, Fred, was delivered in Kapiolani by the same doctor that delivered the Nordyke twins. It might have been too much fudging to claim the Nordyke’s doctor on the certificate revealed today but it doesn’t really matter since neither doctor delivered Obama according to supporter Barbara Nelson, Obama’s English teacher at Punahou High School and perhaps “the only person left who specifically remembers his birth.”
Nelson stated for The Buffalo News on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, “I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls.
His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”
The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.
 
 
 
 
 
####
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.


Possibly Related Posts:
» ShoreBank, Obama, Big Labor, Community Organizers...
» Editorial: Sept. 13, 2009 — Patriots, let's go spend that Political Capital!
» Editorial: Oct. 27, 2009 — The Fraud Merry-go-round
» Following the money trail
» "Release" and "Fraud" Call made for Lt. Col. Lakin
Categories: Editorials
Tags: Alan Booth, Barack Hussein Obama, Bob Unruh, Certificate of Live Birth, CIA, delivery doctor, Donald Trump, Dr. David A. Sinclair, Dr. Rodney T. West, Ft. Leavenworth, Gov. Mary Fallin, Hawaii, Kapiolani Medical Center, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, Miki Booth, Nordyke Twins, Obama, Obama's eligibliity, Occidental College, Punahou High School, Stanley Ann Dunham, The Buffalo News, Waikiki Beach

You're a liar and a racist. Please cease to exist.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 04:44:37 AM
Obama’s birther day
By Dana Milbank, Wednesday, April 27, 2:04 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/obamas-birther-day/2011/04/27/AFZ3IPzE_print.html




Barack Obama’s birthday, according to Hawaiian long-form birth certificate No. 61-10641, is Aug. 4. This should not be confused with his official birther day, which, after the peculiar events of Wednesday morning, will henceforth be observed on April 27.

Before walking into the White House briefing room to talk to the world about the release of his almost 50-year-old birth certificate, Obama paused in the press office to watch NBC’s Today Show, where Matt Lauer was talking with White House reporter Chuck Todd.

“It’s an extraordinary moment -- kind of shocking and surreal,” Todd told Lauer. “This statement by the president is going to be about the birth certificate, not about these changes – the announcement about the new defense secretary, Leon Panetta, and the new head of the CIA, David Petraeus.”

A few seconds later, Obama walked into the briefing room – and began by complaining to Todd, sitting in the first row. “I was just back there listening to Chuck,” the president said. “He was saying, ‘It’s amazing that he’s not going to be talking about national security.’ I would not have the networks breaking in if I was talking about that, Chuck, and you know it.”

Sorry to contradict you on your birther day, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. NBC had opted to go live with Obama’s remarks because it had originally expected an announcement of his new national security team, now scheduled for Thursday.

Instead, Obama decided to draw the nation’s attention to the conspiracy theory suggesting that he was not born in America. He was stooping to address this oft-disproved canard, he said, because the media had turned it into the nation’s No. 1 news story.

“Now, normally I would not comment on something like this,” he said. “But two weeks ago,” when he and the Republicans outlined their budgets, “the dominant news story wasn’t about these huge, monumental choices that we’re going to have to make as a nation. It was about my birth certificate. And that was true on most of the news outlets that are represented here.”

Sorry again, Mr. President, but, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism, which tracks news coverage, the birther story accounted for all of 4 percent of coverage that week. The top issue was the economy – which claimed 39 percent of coverage – and, in particular, Obama’s budget speech.

Obama did not address the real source of the birthers’ rebirth: the vanity candidacy of Donald Trump. Trump’s surprisingly popular bid for the Republican presidential nomination, based largely on spreading the birther libel, contributed to the belief among Obama’s foes that he was foreign born; in a new USA Today/Gallup poll , 43 percent of Republicans thought so.

It was reasonable for the White House to counteract the conspiracy types by releasing the original certificate (Obama long ago released the standard form Hawaii considers to be a legal birth certificate.) Less evident is why Obama felt he needed to lower himself by appearing in the briefing room, escorted by his chief of staff, to defend himself against the birthers.

As Obama acknowledged, he won’t ever satisfy a certain “segment of people.” For racial and other sinister reasons, they are determined to view him as illegitimate. Indeed, Trump, who held a victory news conference minutes before Obama’s appearance, shifted cynically and seamlessly to a new line of attack on Obama’s legitimacy.

At a stop in New Hampshire, he first congratulated himself for forcing Obama to release the birth certificate (“I am very proud of myself”), then raised suspicions that it might be a forgery (“Experts will look at it”) before pivoting to suggest that Obama is an academic fraud. “The word is, according to what I’ve read, was that he was a terrible student,” Trump alleged. “I don’t know why he doesn’t release his records.”

Obama has potentially released Republicans from a trap: The birther issue had been splitting the party and turning the GOP presidential race into a circus. In a briefing preceding Obama’s statement, White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer, accompanied by the White House counsel and press secretary, allowed that it was in Obama’s “long-term political interests to allow this birther debate to dominate discussion in the Republican Party.” But, Pfeiffer said, Obama “thought it was bad for the country.”

Reporters, who hadn’t been expecting a dump of vital records, asked questions as if they were notaries. “You’ve got two certified copies? . . . “Does that have a stamp?”

Then came a better question: “Why does this rise to the level of a presidential statement?”

Pfeiffer, like his boss, blamed the press rather than The Donald. “It’s not for me to say why mainstream media organizations began to cover this debate,” he said. “They’ll have to answer that for themselves.”

On the same podium a few minutes later, Obama picked up the same theme when he urged his listeners not to “get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers.”

Speaking to “the vast majority of the American people, as well as to the press,” the president said: “We do not have time for this kind of silliness. We’ve got better stuff to do.”

The president then flew off to Chicago to be on Oprah.


danamilbank@washpost.com

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 04:51:39 AM
Birtherism: Where it all began
By: Ben Smith and Byron Tau
April 22, 2011 04:22 AM EDT
www.politico.com


________________________ ______________________


 
Just when it appeared that public interest was fading, celebrity developer Donald Trump has revived the theory that President Barack Obama was born overseas and helped expose the depth to which the notion has taken root—a New York Times poll Thursday found that a plurality of Republicans believe it.

If you haven’t been trolling the fever swamps of online conspiracy sites or opening those emails from Uncle Larry, you may well wonder: Where did this idea come from? Who started it? And is there a grain of truth there?

The answer lies in Democratic, not Republican politics, and in the bitter, exhausting spring of 2008. At the time, the Democratic presidential primary was slipping away from Hillary Clinton and some of her most passionate supporters grasped for something, anything that would deal a final reversal to Barack Obama. (See: Bachmann: Birther issue settled)

The theory’s proponents are a mix of hucksters and earnest conspiracy theorists, including prominently a lawyer who previously devoted himself to ‘proving’ that the Sept. 11 attacks were an inside job. Its believers are primarily people predisposed to dislike Obama. That willingness to believe the worst about officials of the opposite party is a common feature of presidential rumor-mongering: In 2006, an Ohio University/Scripps Howard poll found that slightly more than half of Democrats said they suspected the Bush Administration of complicity in the Sept. 11 attacks.

While there is no grain of truth to either fantasy, there’s something else when it comes to Obama: A visceral reaction against him, a deep sense that the first black president, with liberal views and a Muslim name, must be—in some concrete, provable way—foreign. (See: Mitt: Obama born here. Period.)

A brief history of birtherism

Birtherism is the latest and most enduring version of a theory in search of facts.

The original smear against Obama was that he was a crypto-Muslim, floated in 2004 by perennial Illinois political candidate and serial litigant Andy Martin. Other related versions of this theory alleged that Obama was educated in an Indonesian “madrassa” or steeped in Islamist ideology from a young age, and the theories began to spread virally after Obama appeared on the national stage – to the casual observer, from nowhere – with his early 2007 presidential campaign announcement. (See: Obama kin: Birther rumors 'a shame')

All through that year, the Obama campaign – with the affirmation of most leaders of both parties – aggressively battled that smear by emphasizing his Christian faith. Obama’s controversial but emphatically Christian pastor emerged as a campaign issue and the belief that he was a Muslim seemed to lose traction. (See: Clinton: Birther claims 'ludicrous')

Then, as Obama marched toward the presidency, a new suggestion emerged: That he was not eligible to serve. (See: Birther debate alive across U.S.)

That theory first emerged in the spring of 2008, as Clinton supporters circulated an anonymous email questioning Obama’s citizenship.

“Barack Obama’s mother was living in Kenya with his Arab-African father late in her pregnancy. She was not allowed to travel by plane then, so Barack Obama was born there and his mother then took him to Hawaii to register his birth,” asserted one chain email that surfaced on the urban legend site Snopes.com in April 2008.


Another early version of the theory, reported by the Chicago Tribune in June 2008, depended on a specious legal theory that was, for a time, the heart of the argument: that Obama was born in Hawaii but had a Kenyan father, and his mother was only 18 years old. Therefore, under existing immigration law, he was not eligible for automatic citizenship upon birth — a claim that depended on an understandable, but incorrect, reading of immigration law. Other theories suggested that Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when he moved to Indonesia or visited Pakistan in violation of a supposed State Department ban as a young man. (There was no such ban.)

But it dawned on even the most stubborn anti-Obama lawyers that federal courts were not going to recognize their exotic theories of citizenship, and they narrowed their focus on a claim that, if true, might have disqualified Obama, and resonated with the impulse to view him as foreign.

No single author claims parentage for this theory, now advanced by Trump. Even Martin disavows what became the heart of contemporary birther theory – that the president was born in Kenya and smuggled back into the country.

“I’m absolutely convinced he was born in Hawaii,” he told POLITICO.

Jerome Corsi, who would later become a prominent proponent of birther theories, neglected to mention the Obama birth cover-up conspiracy in his 2008 book, “Obama Nation,” instead claiming, without evidence, that Obama maintained both American and Kenyan citizenship. He didn’t respond to POLITICO’s request for comment.

But while the identity of the First Birther is lost to the mists of chain email, one of the first to put his name to the theory was Phil Berg, a former Pennsylvania deputy attorney general who had spent the previous years accusing President George W. Bush of complicity in the Sept. 11 attack.

Berg filed a complaint in federal District court on Aug. 21, 2008, that alleged, “Obama carries multiple citizenships and is ineligible to run for President of the United States. United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1.”

“All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because the Obama cheated his way into a fraudulent candidacy and cheated legitimately eligible natural born citizens from competing in a fair process and the supporters of their citizen choice for the nomination,” the suit claims.

The debunking

Ironically, the birther movement didn’t really take off in earnest until the Obama team tried to debunk it.

In June 2008, National Review conservative blogger Jim Geraghty, after debunking a number of conspiracy theories about Obama floated by fellow conservatives, asked the Obama campaign to “return the favor” and just release his birth certificate to the public to put to rest questions about both Obama’s birth and whether, as enemies claimed, his middle name was “Mohammed.”

A few days later, the Obama campaign did exactly that.

They posted Obama’s certificate of live birth on their “Fight the Smears” website and gave a copy to the liberal website Daily Kos. It was greeted with immediate cries that it was a fake.

But Geraghty was satisfied, writing “this document is what he or someone authorized by him was given by the state out of its records. Barring some vast conspiracy within the Hawaii State Department of Health, there is no reason to think his [original] birth certificate would have any different data.”


But others were not swayed. The release of the certificate was declared a forgery. Some bloggers pounced, saying it had Adobe Photoshop watermarks that suggested tampering, that it lacked a raised seal, that it lacked a signature and a number of other accusations.

So began round two.

FactCheck.org, the non-partisan website, was allowed to examine the physical copy of the birth certificate in August 2008, and concluded it was real, that it had a raised seal, a signature and met all the State Department criteria for proof of citizenship. Combined with the state’s recognition that the record was real—and contemporary newspaper announcements of Obama’s birth, submitted by the hospitals —they concluded that he was a natural born citizen.

Hawaii has repeatedly confirmed the document’s authenticity.

“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barrack (sic) Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen,” one exasperated state official said in 2008 and again in 2009 in a statement.

“Of course, it’s distantly possible that Obama’s grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday,” FactCheck concluded. But, “those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat.”

Birthers have provided no serious response to this evidence, though the technicalities can confuse a casual observer.

The website World Net Daily, for instance, has written that “Hawaii at the time of Obama’s birth allowed births that took place in foreign countries to be registered in Hawaii.” But that law was not enacted until 1982 which was 21 years after Obama's birth was registered. Further, such a birth certificate would show the actual foreign place of birth instead of listing – as Obama’s does — Honolulu.

In addition to declaring the document a forgery, the birther movement’s main response – echoed by the ill-informed Trump - has been to claim that only a “long form” birth certificate can be valid. But the document shown by Obama is the only one the State of Hawaii is permitted, by law, to release. It is accepted as valid by the government entities like the State Department.

Hawaii law prevents the long-form record from being photocopied or released to anyone — including Obama. Obama himself would only be permitted to inspect it – not copy it or post it online.

Fukino, an appointee of Linda Lingle, the former Republican governor and John McCain supporter, twice inspected the certificate. According to NBC News’ investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff, the certificate is in a bound volume, in a file cabinet in the Hawaii Department of Health.

“Why would a Republican governor — who was stumping for the other guy — hold out on a big secret?” asked Fukino.

By the summer of 2009, then-White House press secretary Robert Gibbs summarized how convoluted the theory had become with each round of disclosures.

“A pregnant woman leaves her home to go overseas to have a child — who there’s not a passport for — so is in cahoots with someone…to smuggle that child, that previously doesn’t exist on a government roll somewhere back into the country and has the amazing foresight to place birth announcements in the Hawaii newspapers? All while this is transpiring in cahoots with those in the border, all so some kid named Barack Obama could run for President 46 and a half years later,” said Gibbs dismissively. “You couldn’t sell this script in Hollywood.”

The forgeries and the lawsuits

As Obama built a commanding lead in the polls, and was eventually became President-elect, a host of lawsuits were filed to prevent him from taking the oath of office. These lawsuits were combined with a letter-writing campaign to presidential electors as well as a fringe media campaign questioning Obama’s citizenship.


Berg’s August 2008 lawsuit wasn’t the last. A few days after Obama decisively won the election, Alan Keyes — Obama’s former opponent in the 2004 Senate race and a presidential candidate — filed a suit against the Secretary of State in California over Obama’s eligibility. Another suit was filed by a New Jersey man, Leo Donofrio.

A California dentist and lawyer, Orly Taitz, filed another round of suits. Every citizenship suit has been dismissed, and courts have slapped or threatened fines on some of the filers, including Taitz.

And with both the law and the facts against them, birthers have sought to create facts and documents of their own.

Taitz unveiled a purported Kenyan birth certificate in the summer of 2009. It was clearly a hoax – the Republic of Kenya didn’t exist when Obama was born, it was dated three years after his actual birth date, it didn’t match other contemporary Kenyan birth certificates and an anonymous blogger took credit for it, demonstrating with photos how the birthers were “punked” and how he produced the fake certificate.

“Fine cotton business paper: $11. Inkjet printer: $35,” wrote the blogger. “Punkin’ the Birthers: Priceless.”

A second Kenyan certificate was put on eBay in 2009, and Taitz again try to have it admitted into court as evidence, despite being an obvious hoax. And yet another hoax showed a fake sign that reads “Welcome to Kenya, Birthplace of Barack Obama” – that is both clearly Photoshopped and contains Arabic script welcoming visitors to a city in the United Arab Emirates.

The birther purge

In a 2008 story about campaign rumors concerning both Obama and McCain, POLITICO reported “whichever candidate wins, these campaign trail rumors will haunt his presidency.”

They have.

The Republican Party has approached the issue with trepidation, but a 2010 poll found more than a quarter of Americans have doubts about President Obama’s birthplace.

During the 2010 midterm campaigns, a number of Republican candidates went on record expressing doubts about President Obama’s birth. Rep. Nathan Deal, now Governor of Georgia, jumped on the birther bandwagon, becoming the first member of Congress to request Obama’s birth certificate.

Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) said, “I personally don’t have standing to bring litigation in court, but I support conservative legal organizations and others who would bring that to court.” Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio) told a voter that she agreed with her that the President wasn’t a natural-born citizen — only to walk back her statements.

The party’s most prominent leaders, however, have firmly dismissed the notion and sought to purge birthers both from the Republican Party and from the comments section of conservative blogs.

“I believe the president was born in the United States. There are real reasons to get this guy out of office,” former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said recently.

“I don’t question the authenticity of his birth certificate, but I do question what planet he’s from when I look at his policies,” former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty joked.

Erick Erickson, editor of the influential conservative blog RedState publicly excommunicated the birthers from his site in 2010.

“If you think 9/11 was an inside job or you really want to debate whether or not Barack Obama is an American citizen eligible to be President, RedState is not a place for you,” he wrote.

Some Republicans take the position out of a basic respect for facts, but they also worry about its consequences for their party.

“It makes us look weird. It makes us look crazy. It makes us look demented. It makes us look sick, troubled, and not suitable for civilized company,” one of the first conservatives to turn against the birthers, talk show host Michael Medved, said in 2009. “I’m not a conspiracist, but this could be a very big conspiracy to make conservatives disgrace themselves.”

Corrections: An earlier version of this story misidentified the Ohio University poll. Also, an earlier version of this article did not note that the foreign registration of birth law did not come into effect until 1982.

 
 
© 2011 Capitol News Company, LLC

________________________ ____________


 ;D  ;D  ;D



Is "birther" going into the latest edition of Websters? 
 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on April 28, 2011, 08:22:45 AM
What is the conclusion now?  The entire birther movement is a laughinstock and this is put to rest or that damn red state of Hawaii is still issuing fake ass birth certificates?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on April 28, 2011, 08:42:10 AM
What is the conclusion now?  The entire birther movement is a laughinstock and this is put to rest or that damn red state of Hawaii is still issuing fake ass birth certificates?

The conclusion is that 62% of the country didn't know for sure if Obama was born in HI.  Of course, now that the long form BC is out, Dems are claiming only "racist" people had doubts.  I think even Michelle was beginning to doubt where Barack was born. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 28, 2011, 08:44:25 AM
I guess it depends

If you are left Obama is the man and kicked everybodys ass because he is so cool

If you are a birther then its a fake/forgery and Obama still sucks

If you are in the middle, don't care one way or the other, the country is still fucked up and we are not making any progress
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 28, 2011, 09:21:05 AM
http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/top-20-conspiracy-theories-that-have-already-sprun
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on April 28, 2011, 09:39:12 AM
http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/top-20-conspiracy-theories-that-have-already-sprun


HAHAHAHAH  Those birthers looking more stupid now than they did while whining and crying about the BC to be released.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 28, 2011, 10:00:34 AM
Obama makes light of birth certificate on campaign trail
Posted by:
CNN White House Producer Jamie Crawford

WASHINGTON (CNN)–Perhaps a subtle dig or not, President Obama seemed to take aim at Donald Trump on Wednesday evening in New York when he said the reasoning behind the release of his long form birth certificate was his “trying to remind the press and trying to remind both parties that what we do in politics is not a reality show. It’s serious.”

The remarks came the same day that Trump, the businessman, reality television personality and possible contender for the 2012 GOP nomination, said he was “proud” of his efforts, and took credit for the release of Obama’s long form birth certificate earlier in the day.

“Today was a fun day,” the president said as he began his remarks. “Nobody checked my ID at the door.”

Obama was speaking at the home of former New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. It was the first of three fundraisers in New York Wednesday evening that a Democratic party official said could raise over $2 million for the DNC and Obama’s re-election campaign.

“My name is Barack Obama. I was born in Hawaii, I’m President of the United States, and I’m running for re-election” he later joked as he kicked off remarks at the second fundraiser at the Waldorf Astoria hotel before returning to his standard stump speech, and a defense of his administration’s record.

Obama’s remarks were interrupted at the third fundraiser by two sets of protestors, the second by the AIDS advocacy group ‘Act Up NY.’ The first group of protestors were quickly escorted out of the room, but as the second group was escorted out, Obama said they should be able to stay. “They made their point,” he said.

http://whitehouse.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/27/obama-makes-light-of-birth-certificate-on-campaign-trail/
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 10:01:33 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/richard-adams-blog/2011/apr/28/barack-obama-father-immigration-files


US officialdom's interest in the 'playboy ways' of Barack Obama seniorNew files reveal Barack Obama father's disturbing treatment at the hands of US immigration and university officials

Barack Obama senior and Ann Dunham, father and mother of Barack Obama




While the release of Barack Obama's birth certificate was the big news of the day, it wasn't the only new document about Obama's life published on Wednesday. A far more interesting trove of documents has also been unearthed by Heather Smathers, an investigative journalist writing in the Arizona Independent, a weekly newspaper.

Smathers made an Freedom of Information Act request for the US immigration service file on Obama's father, Barack Obama senior – and it contains a disturbing picture of Obama senior's treatment by government and university officials.

As early as 1961, a memo in the file notes a statement from a Mrs McCabe, a foreign student adviser at the University of Hawaii:

Mrs McCabe further states that Subject [Obama senior] has been running around with several girls since he first arrived here and last summer she cautioned him about his playboy ways. Subject replied that he would 'try' to stay away from the girls.

The memo also considers Obama senior's earlier Kenya marriage, and after noting that "polygamy is not an excludable or deportation charge," it recommends that "the Subject be closely questioned before another extention is granted – and denial be considered."

The documents show that official enquiries in 1961 were satisfied that the current president was indeed born in Hawaii, as Smathers reports:

A memo dated August 31, 1961 from William Wood of Immigration and Naturalization Services indicates that Barack Obama, Sr, was attending the University of Hawaii on a student visa and that a son, Barack Obama, II, was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961.

Looking at the documents – posted online in full by Smathers – Obama senior is described within as "a slippery character," his relationships with several women are discussed and investigated, while the question of Obama senior's "marital problems" are repeatedly raised – in an era when interracial marriage was still illegal in many parts of the US.

In the memos, immigration officials press for more details on Obama senior's marriages and relationships, while in a memo dated 19 May 1964 an immigration service official appears to be conspiring with Harvard University to get rid of the student:

Obama has passed his general exams, which indicates that on academic grounds he is entitled to stay around here and write his thesis; however [Harvard] are going to try to cook something up to ease him out.... They are planning on telling him that they will not give him any money, and that he had better return to Kenya and prepare his thesis at home.

Another immigration memo, from June 1964, records that Harvard officials were trying "to get rid of him" and "couldn't seem to figure out how many wives he had."

Writer Andrew Rice has read the documents and sees a theme:

What I think the documents reveal, though, is a subtle, institutionalized conspiracy that in a way seems more insidious than overt cross-burning racism, because almost surely none of its participants thought of their actions as discriminatory at all. In that sense, the file is an instructive artifact, not just of our president's biography, but of our nation's history of conflicted attitudes about race, foreign cultures, intermarriage and sex.

Hard as it may be to believe today, it seems clear from a close reading of the the file that the president's father was driven from this country because of his messy personal life. And reading between the lines, it's not hard to see a subtext of miscegenation.

It's worth remembering that state laws banning interracial marriage in the US were only overturned by the US Supreme Court in 1967, at which time 17 states had "anti-miscegenation" laws – including Maryland, Delaware, Oklahoma, Missouri and Virginia.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 28, 2011, 10:02:54 AM
Good article.  I think the answer is "yes."  Like many people who have invested a bit too much in a conspiracy theory, the facts and common sense simply don't matter.  

The birther movement: immune to facts?
By Alan Silverleib, CNN
April 28, 2011

(CNN) -- Can the "birthers" ever be convinced that Barack Obama was born in America and is eligible to serve as president?

Probably not, according to one prominent psychology professor and other political observers.

Since Obama launched his bid for the White House, a sizable minority of Americans has expressed strong doubts about whether he was actually born in the United States. Over the past few years, the allegation that he was born overseas -- in Kenya or perhaps Indonesia -- has taken on a life of its own, despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary.

A recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll showed that roughly 25% of Americans -- including over four in 10 Republicans -- believe Obama was definitely or probably not born in the United States.

Earlier this week, CNN released the results of its own investigation into the controversy. Documents and statements from numerous public officials and childhood friends made clear that the president was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.

On Wednesday, Obama himself addressed the issue, pleading for an end to the distractions of "sideshows" and "carnival barkers."

The president yielded to demands from his critics that he release his original long-form birth certificate, filing a special legal request with Hawaiian authorities to release a document that is no longer used for official purposes and ordinarily remains buried in the basement archives of the state health department.

Obama's 2008 release of the more common "live birth certification" -- a short computer-generated form typically used for documentation purposes -- did little to silence the chorus of skeptics.

It remains to be seen whether Wednesday's release will be received any differently. But the early reaction wasn't exactly positive.

One of the main websites pushing the birther claims -- birthers.org -- declared that "forgery or not, now we can debate the true meaning of a natural born citizen."

The U.S. Constitution says only "natural born" citizens can become president -- a vague clause that some members of the birther movement contend disqualifies Obama if he was born outside the United States.

Joseph Farah, editor-in-chief of the conservative website WorldNetDaily.com, said that "we know (Obama's) father was a Kenyan citizen, and that he would therefore confer Kenyan or U.K. citizenship on his son, which would at best make him a dual citizen."

Dual citizenship, Farah asserted, "is not what the Founders had in mind when they coined the phrase 'natural born citizen.'"

Sharon Guthrie, the legislative director for a Texas state representative backing a bill requiring proof of citizenship for presidential ballot access, told the website Slate.com that she was still suspicious.

"What they produced today ... still says certificate of live birth across the top," she said. "We want to see a 'birth certificate.' ... The one that we have that says 'birth certificate' is from Mombassa, Kenya, with his footprint on it. He has still not produced an American birth certificate."

Why the unrelenting skepticism?

Emory University's Drew Westen, author of the "The Political Brain" and an informal advisor to Obama's 2008 campaign, chalked up much of it to Obama's reluctance to immediately rebut the charge more quickly in the presidential race.

"The right wing was attempting to make him 'one of them' as opposed to 'one of us,'" he claimed.

Westen, a professor of psychology and psychiatry, cited what psychologists call the "sleeper effect."

"If you present negative information about someone and it initially goes unchallenged, you might alter some people's conscious beliefs by challenging it later," he asserted. "But they are left with a negative gut-level feeling that doesn't go away."

"Political feelings, once they are strongly held, tend to be resistant to facts. It's just the result of the way our brains work," he said.

Westen mentioned the so-called "Swift Boat" attacks against Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry in 2004, which called into question the senator's service in Vietnam.

Kerry "allowed his honor to be challenged and didn't respond for weeks," Westen said. "When finally he did respond and had definitive evidence that the attacks were untrue, it was too late. People's feelings towards him had already changed. They wouldn't change back by that point."

Along similar lines, Westen told CNN that if staunch Democrats or Republicans are presented with clear evidence of wrongdoing on the part of their party's nominee shortly before an election, they'll come up with "every kind of rationalization to explain it away."

"We fight off information that makes us feel bad and gravitate toward information that makes us comfortable," he said.

Westen also brought up the explosive issue of race, one of the biggest political lightning rods in U.S. history. He insisted the birther movement never would have taken hold with a white president.

It's not fair to call a large segment of today's electorate "1950s-style racists," he said. But some people are "unconsciously prejudiced in a way that predisposes them to not believing that a black man with a funny name could have really been legitimately elected president of the United States."

But Bill Mayer, a Northeastern University political scientist, took issue with the notion of race as the critical component of the birther movement.

"The fact that Obama is black may affect the form of the conspiracy, but probably not the fact that there is a following for this rumor," he told CNN. "Conspiracy beliefs have a long history in American politics."

Mayer cited a range of political conspiracy theories, including claims regarding the Kennedy assassination, involvement on the part of the Clintons in alleged murders, and George W. Bush's supposed knowledge of the 9/11 terror attacks.

Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley noted that, back in the 19th century, questions were raised over the American roots of Andrew Jackson and Chester Arthur.

But it was "nothing like this," he told CNN. "We are now in the age of electronic journalism. ... This has become a ghastly scenario (over) the last month."

Mayer suggested that Obama's release of the long-form birth certificate will "further marginalize those who insist (the matter of his birth) is an open question." Still, he added, "I don't understand why the White House took so long" to put out the document.

Just how long will the controversy drag on? Westen claimed the birther issue will continue to be political fodder until a critical mass of Republican leaders decide it's making the GOP look "foolish" and hurting the party among independent voters.

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, released a statement Wednesday claiming that the controversy "has long been a settled issue."

History suggests otherwise.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/27/birthers.evidence/index.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 28, 2011, 10:49:49 AM
I guess it depends

If you are left Obama is the man and kicked everybodys ass because he is so cool

If you are a birther then its a fake/forgery and Obama still sucks

If you are in the middle, don't care one way or the other, the country is still fucked up and we are not making any progress


you don't belong in any of the three groups..you're in the twilight zone
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 28, 2011, 10:52:42 AM

you don't belong in any of the three groups..you're in the twilight zone

Here's an idea if you don't like what I post don't read it, you provide nothing other than dumbass jabs at people.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 28, 2011, 10:54:58 AM
Here's an idea if you don't like what I post don't read it, you provide nothing other than dumbass jabs at people.

you do exactly the same...if you want a cease-fire and you want to make personal attacks off-limits and just discuss the issues, I'll abide by that
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 10:56:34 AM
Here's an idea if you don't like what I post don't read it, you provide nothing other than dumbass jabs at people.

I give andre a little slack because he seems like a decent guy and not malicious.  

I probably would like to catch a yankee game with him this year if possible.  

That being said - his posts refelct a desire, to a fault, to see only what he wants in bama, and not the truth.    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 28, 2011, 10:57:54 AM
you do exactly the same...if you want a cease-fire and you want to make personal attacks off-limits and just discuss the issues, I'll abide by that

I really don't care what you do
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 11:41:55 AM
Obama demanded detailed birth certificate after continued questions
The Washington Post ^ | 27 April 2011 | Anne E. Kornblut




Obama had grown incredulous at the overall debate. . . . Finally, on April 19, in a meeting with White House counsel Bob Bauer, the president asked about the feasibility of getting his long-form birth certificate at last.

. . . Last week, it was Obama who made the call to proceed. “He was the driving force,” the official said.

The swift action that followed — in less than 10 days, Obama’s lawyers were able to obtain the legal waivers necessary to bring copies of the certificate back to the White House – raised questions about the timing. Why, for example, did Obama officials wait so long to tamp down rumors that have dogged the president since the 2008 presidential campaign? Why did they release the forms on the very day that Trump is making his first visit to New Hampshire, and during a week when Obama is slated to make other major announcements about his national security team?

According to senior administration officials, the timeframe was the result of Obama’s personal request for a resolution – and reflected his impatience with political frivolity of any kind.

. . .

When administration officials released the paperwork on Wednesday morning shortly after 9 a.m., it came as a shock to the political establishment. White House officials moved quickly to explain how it had come about, holding briefings with reporters, releasing the paperwork via Twitter and then sending the president to the podium in the White House briefing room.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on April 28, 2011, 11:50:31 AM
PROOF!!! Obama Birth Certificate Fraud

Uploaded by TheAlexJonesChannel on Apr 27, 2011
The Obama administration finally laid to rest all the rumors of the place of his birth with the release of his long form birth certificate. But closer inspection has prompted more questions than answers. For starters there are numerous layers. Some of the numerical characters look as if they were added after the fact by a printer rather than a typewriter. Alex Jones and Rob Dew demonstrate that the Obama team is keeping with the trend of being transparent as a brick wall.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 28, 2011, 12:07:50 PM
I give andre a little slack because he seems like a decent guy and not malicious.  

I probably would like to catch a yankee game with him this year if possible.  

That being said - his posts refelct a desire, to a fault, to see only what he wants in bama, and not the truth.    

and what can we catch??!!  ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 12:11:29 PM
Valerie Jarrett to Trump: You Can Forget About the Obama’s School Records
gateway pundit ^ | April 28, 2011




White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett said President Obama will not release his academic records, commenting a day after Obama put out his “long form” birth certificate and Donald Trump decided to press his luck by demanding Obama’s college transcripts.

“We know this is nonsense,” Jarrett said in an interview on The Joe Madison Show on SiriusXM on Thursday morning.”He is almost 50 years old. And he is president of the United States and I don’t think anybody will debate his intelligence and so now we do need to get serious…let’s just get serious…get back to focusing on what’s important.


(Excerpt) Read more at gatewaypundit.rightnetwo rk.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 28, 2011, 12:31:16 PM
Valerie Jarrett to Trump: You Can Forget About the Obama’s School Records
gateway pundit ^ | April 28, 2011




White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett said President Obama will not release his academic records, commenting a day after Obama put out his “long form” birth certificate and Donald Trump decided to press his luck by demanding Obama’s college transcripts.

“We know this is nonsense,” Jarrett said in an interview on The Joe Madison Show on SiriusXM on Thursday morning.”He is almost 50 years old. And he is president of the United States and I don’t think anybody will debate his intelligence and so now we do need to get serious…let’s just get serious…get back to focusing on what’s important.


(Excerpt) Read more at gatewaypundit.rightnetwo rk.com ...

Are you bipolar?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 12:32:33 PM
No, just trying to piece together this shit show admn you voted for.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 28, 2011, 01:21:00 PM
if we can draw out the BC for two + years, the school records are a piece of cake to keep out of the press; oh, until a couple days before the election.. ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 28, 2011, 02:04:52 PM
Here's an idea if you don't like what I post don't read it, you provide nothing other than dumbass jabs at people.
Are you sure you weren't thinking of me here?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 28, 2011, 02:08:44 PM
Are you sure you weren't thinking of me here?

Why? You have a vendetta against 333 not me, at least not yet
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 02:10:45 PM
All the obama dildos and cultists have a vendetta against me.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 28, 2011, 02:25:37 PM
You said if he released his long form BC that you would acquiesce.

You haven't though.

At this point in time you're just trying to save face. If you would just admit you were wrong we could get past this.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on April 28, 2011, 02:28:54 PM
You said if he released his long form BC that you would acquiesce.

You haven't though.

At this point in time you're just trying to save face. If you would just admit you were wrong we could get past this.

What did you expect if the Repub state Hawaii would release one fake COLB?  You think they wouldn't fake a LFBC too?

It true!!  It's a fake!! FFFFFAAAAKKKKKKEEEEEEE!!!!

Let's keep the fan flamed and see how well it goes over in the primary.   ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 28, 2011, 02:33:02 PM
All the obama dildos and cultists have a vendetta against me.

and you have a vendetta against logic
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 28, 2011, 02:34:07 PM
What did you expect if the Repub state Hawaii would release one fake COLB?  You think they wouldn't fake a LFBC too?

It true!!  It's a fake!! FFFFFAAAAKKKKKKEEEEEEE!!!!

Let's keep the fan flamed and see how well it goes over in the primary.   ;D

Not a Republican state.  It's probably the most liberal state in the country.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on April 28, 2011, 02:50:05 PM
PROOF!!! Obama Birth Certificate Fraud

Uploaded by TheAlexJonesChannel on Apr 27, 2011
The Obama administration finally laid to rest all the rumors of the place of his birth with the release of his long form birth certificate. But closer inspection has prompted more questions than answers. For starters there are numerous layers. Some of the numerical characters look as if they were added after the fact by a printer rather than a typewriter. Alex Jones and Rob Dew demonstrate that the Obama team is keeping with the trend of being transparent as a brick wall.

haha i saw it...

this is getting exciting
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 02:55:52 PM
Got to love it.  Of everything I posted today - this is the one thing Team Messiah has an issue with.   Ha ha ha ha. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 28, 2011, 03:21:36 PM
Not a Republican state.  It's probably the most liberal state in the country.

I think California, New York, and Vermont may take issue with that. :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Kazan on April 28, 2011, 04:18:34 PM
haha i saw it...

this is getting exciting

Well OCR software will do that to a document, and since it was scanned into a PDF, that can account for the layers. Alex Jones is going to have to better than it has layers.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 28, 2011, 04:25:21 PM
A snip from: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-28/obamas-birth-certificate-and-the-birther-wingnuts-who-still-dont-believe/?cid=hp%3Amainpromo5#

Perhaps it’s too much to hope that the smug, “I take the president at his word” sound bite offered by Republican leadership in recent months will now be replaced by a simple “the president was born in the United States and anyone who still thinks otherwise should consider seeking psychiatric help.”

 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 28, 2011, 04:48:35 PM
I think California, New York, and Vermont may take issue with that. :)

And Oregon.  But we got em beat.  Here is just one statistic they probably can't touch:  25 state senators, 1 Republican, 24 Democrats. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 28, 2011, 04:50:14 PM
And Oregon.  But we got em beat.  Here is just one statistic they probably can't touch:  25 state senators, 1 Republican, 24 Democrats. 

That's definitely an interesting statistic.

How has Hawaii gone in the Presidential elections over the past 30 years?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 28, 2011, 05:49:15 PM
I give andre a little slack because he seems like a decent guy and not malicious.  

I probably would like to catch a yankee game with him this year if possible.  

That being said - his posts refelct a desire, to a fault, to see only what he wants in bama, and not the truth.    

wow..thats a nice thing to say...I may take you up on your offer..I live about 5-6 blocks from Yankee Stadium...you got season's tickets?....as for Obama...you guys don't give him the credit he deserves...I admit he's not perfect and sometimes I wish he was a little more visible and passionate.....but he is what he is......but he's not as bad a president as people make him out to be ...you gotta really look past the nonsense and really examine his record
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 28, 2011, 05:50:05 PM
I really don't care what you do

you are beginning to sound like my wife when she's on her period..she says the same thing
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 05:58:04 PM
No way season tix.  I usually get em from clients or go on stub hub. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 28, 2011, 06:03:23 PM
That's definitely an interesting statistic.

How has Hawaii gone in the Presidential elections over the past 30 years?

Not exactly sure, but pretty certain Democrat.  We recently had our first Republican governor in 40 years.  We only have 8 Republicans in the state House (out of 25).  All four of our reps in DC are Democrats.  It's pretty frustrating.  (One party rule.) 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 28, 2011, 07:03:24 PM
All the obama dildos and cultists have a vendetta against me.
it's not my vendetta I'd like to have against you....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 28, 2011, 07:05:06 PM
it's not my vendetta I'd like to have against you....

Gross.   Unless you are a chick wqith a fat ass and big tits don't bother. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 28, 2011, 08:56:17 PM
No way season tix.  I usually get em from clients or go on stub hub. 

Hey..you're a Lawyer..you're supposed to be able to afford stuff like that ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 29, 2011, 06:02:22 AM
Gross.   Unless you are a chick wqith a fat ass and big tits don't bother. 
close your eyes and I'll be anything you like.  perhaps it would help relieve some of your tension ?!  ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 06:08:21 AM
April 29, 2011
The Obama Lie That Drove the Birther Movement
By Jack Cashill

www.americanthinker.com



Newly released documents from Barack Obama Sr.'s immigration file,  obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, justify "birther" doubts about the nativity story on which Barack Obama based his presidential campaign.


The documents were posted Thursday in an article by Heather Smathers on the Arizona Independent web site.  When I checked with Brian Wedemeyer, the Independent's managing editor, he confirmed, "They are legitimate documents."


A memo dated Aug. 31, 1961, from William Wood of the Immigration and Naturalization Services, does verify that Barack Obama, Sr. fathered a son, Barack Obama II, who was born in Honolulu on Aug, 4, 1961.  For the record, most birthers of my acquaintance believe that Obama was born in the United States.  That is not their issue.


Wood adds, however, that the child is "living with mother (she lives with her parents & subject resides at 1482 Alencastre St.)."  He adds that Obama's citizen spouse plans "to go to Washington State University next semester."


This document thoroughly undermines the Obama nativity story, a story that has been told almost as often as Jesus's but with nowhere near the accuracy.  Obama led with it in his 2004 convention speech and repeated it in the first sentence of his 2008 speech. 


Friendly biographer David Remnick describes this story as Obama's "signature appeal: the use of the details of his own life as a reflection of a kind of multicultural ideal," and he underscores its essential role in Obama's ascendancy.


As Obama told the story in 2004, his father had grown up in Kenya "herding goats."  His mother he traced to Kansas, as he always did.  "My parents shared not only an improbable love," Obama continued, "they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation."


Obama refined his story for a critical speech in Selma, Alabama in March 2007, a speech that would define his presidential campaign.


"Something happened back here in Selma, Alabama," said Obama.  This something "sent a shout across the ocean," which inspired the Barack Sr., still "herding goats" back in Kenya, to "set his sights a little higher."


This same something also "worried folks in the White House" to the point that the "the Kennedy's decided we're going to do an air lift."


Something about Selma apparently inspired Obama to manufacture facts more flagrantly than usual.  Obama Sr. grew up speaking English and attending Christian schools.  He was working as a clerk in Nairobi, not a goatherd, when he came to Hawaii in 1959.  He came not on any formal airlift but as an independent student.  The Republican Eisenhower, not the Democrat Kennedy, was the president when he came to the United States.


Although born in Kansas, Stanley Ann Dunham (Ann), Obama's mother, was not exactly Dorothy.  She spent her formative years in the Seattle area where she earned the nickname "Anarchist Annie" under the tutelage of her hipster teachers.  Selma had nothing to do with Obama's birth in any case.  He was conceived four years before anyone outside of Alabama ever heard of the town.


The problems, of course, go deeper. According to divorce papers filed in 1964, Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham married in Wailuku, Maui, on February 2, 1961.  One has to wonder, however, whether it was a marriage in anything but name or whether there was a marriage at all. 


The immigration authorities certainly wondered.  An April 1961 memo notes, "If his USC [United States Citizen] wife tries to petition for [Obama Sr.] make sure an investigation is conducted as to the bona-fide of the marriage."


In his memoir Dreams from My Father, Obama says, "In fact, how and when the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I've never quite had the courage to explore."


No family or friend attended a wedding.  In fact, no one in Obama Sr.'s clique seemed to know there was a relationship, let alone a wedding.  Clique member Pake Zane could not recall Ann at all.


When current Hawaii governor Neil Abercrombie and Zane visited their friend in Nairobi in 1968, Barack Sr. shocked them by never once inquiring about his presumed wife and 6-year-old son.


The facts get more problematic still.  After the birth of baby Barry in August 1961, Ann left for Seattle as soon as the doctors cleared her to travel. Once there, she enrolled at the University of Washington, not Washington Sate.  Barack Sr. stayed behind in Hawaii.


The apolitical Washington state historical blog, HistoryLink, now confirms Ann's presence in the fall of 1961, identifies her Capitol Hill apartment in Seattle, names the courses she took, and documents an extended stay by Ann and little Barry into the summer of 1962.


If that is not proof enough, the 1961-1962 Polk Directory confirms an "Obama Anna Mrs studt" at the Capitol Hill address.


Somehow, this information escaped Obama's official campaign biography, Dreams, and four book-length biographies I consulted when researching my book Deconstructing Obama.  Remnick's 2010 biography, The Bridge, concedes Ann's escape to Seattle but fudges the dates. 


Even Janny Scott, the New York Times reporter who wrote the new biography, A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama's Mother, plays with the timeline.  Ann Dunham promptly became pregnant, Scott writes in a New York Times excerpt, "dropped out of school, married him and gave birth shortly before their union ended."  No, based on these documents, the union, if there was one, ended before Obama was born.


By the time mom and son returned to Hawaii in the summer of 1962, Barack Sr. had long since left for Harvard.  There was no Obama family, never was, no "abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation" save on the teleprompters at the 2004 convention.


Obama knew all of this when he gave his televised Big-Brotherly talk to America's coerced schoolchildren in September 2009.  It did not stop him from dissembling.


"I get it," he told the kiddies.  "I know what that's like.  My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother."  Does it get lower?


For the last two years or more, many in the birther community knew that Obama's "multicultural ideal" was based on a lie.  Knowing that Obama was capable of lying about the first two years of his life, they had no reason to believe he was telling the truth about his birth, especially given the lengths he had gone to in order to protect his birth certificate.


For their part, the major media -- almost to a person -- were doing everything in their power to protect the lie.  This was unprecedented on the sunny side of the Iron Curtain.  The birthers had absolutely no reason to believe the media. 


The media proved especially ignorant in their discussion of Obama's birth certificate.  Last week, ABC's George Stephanopoulos set a new media low in his ambush of Rep. Michele Bachmann.  In full partisan fury, he waved a copy of Obama's certification of live birth in her face as excitedly as if he had just discovered Al Capone's vault.


"Well I have the president's [birth] certificate right here," crowed the clueless Stephanopoulos, utterly unaware he had no such thing.  Worse, what he did have had been floating around the Internet since 2008.  "It's certified, it's got a certification number."  Neither he nor his media colleagues seemed to know how foolish this spectacle appeared to the millions of Americans who knew better.


Given the historic performance of the president, and of the media, I think our birther friends are allowed a little grace time before they accept this new immaculately conceived certificate of live birth as Gospel.  We would hate to have this too prove "fake but accurate."

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/the_obama_lie_that_drove_the_b.html at April 29, 2011 - 08:03:02 AM CDT
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 29, 2011, 06:36:58 AM
April 29, 2011
The Obama Lie That Drove the Birther Movement
By Jack Cashill

www.americanthinker.com



Newly released documents from Barack Obama Sr.'s immigration file,  obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, justify "birther" doubts about the nativity story on which Barack Obama based his presidential campaign.


The documents were posted Thursday in an article by Heather Smathers on the Arizona Independent web site.  When I checked with Brian Wedemeyer, the Independent's managing editor, he confirmed, "They are legitimate documents."


A memo dated Aug. 31, 1961, from William Wood of the Immigration and Naturalization Services, does verify that Barack Obama, Sr. fathered a son, Barack Obama II, who was born in Honolulu on Aug, 4, 1961.  For the record, most birthers of my acquaintance believe that Obama was born in the United States.  That is not their issue.


Wood adds, however, that the child is "living with mother (she lives with her parents & subject resides at 1482 Alencastre St.)."  He adds that Obama's citizen spouse plans "to go to Washington State University next semester."


This document thoroughly undermines the Obama nativity story, a story that has been told almost as often as Jesus's but with nowhere near the accuracy.  Obama led with it in his 2004 convention speech and repeated it in the first sentence of his 2008 speech. 


Friendly biographer David Remnick describes this story as Obama's "signature appeal: the use of the details of his own life as a reflection of a kind of multicultural ideal," and he underscores its essential role in Obama's ascendancy.


As Obama told the story in 2004, his father had grown up in Kenya "herding goats."  His mother he traced to Kansas, as he always did.  "My parents shared not only an improbable love," Obama continued, "they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation."


Obama refined his story for a critical speech in Selma, Alabama in March 2007, a speech that would define his presidential campaign.


"Something happened back here in Selma, Alabama," said Obama.  This something "sent a shout across the ocean," which inspired the Barack Sr., still "herding goats" back in Kenya, to "set his sights a little higher."


This same something also "worried folks in the White House" to the point that the "the Kennedy's decided we're going to do an air lift."


Something about Selma apparently inspired Obama to manufacture facts more flagrantly than usual.  Obama Sr. grew up speaking English and attending Christian schools.  He was working as a clerk in Nairobi, not a goatherd, when he came to Hawaii in 1959.  He came not on any formal airlift but as an independent student.  The Republican Eisenhower, not the Democrat Kennedy, was the president when he came to the United States.


Although born in Kansas, Stanley Ann Dunham (Ann), Obama's mother, was not exactly Dorothy.  She spent her formative years in the Seattle area where she earned the nickname "Anarchist Annie" under the tutelage of her hipster teachers.  Selma had nothing to do with Obama's birth in any case.  He was conceived four years before anyone outside of Alabama ever heard of the town.


The problems, of course, go deeper. According to divorce papers filed in 1964, Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham married in Wailuku, Maui, on February 2, 1961.  One has to wonder, however, whether it was a marriage in anything but name or whether there was a marriage at all. 


The immigration authorities certainly wondered.  An April 1961 memo notes, "If his USC [United States Citizen] wife tries to petition for [Obama Sr.] make sure an investigation is conducted as to the bona-fide of the marriage."


In his memoir Dreams from My Father, Obama says, "In fact, how and when the marriage occurred remains a bit murky, a bill of particulars that I've never quite had the courage to explore."


No family or friend attended a wedding.  In fact, no one in Obama Sr.'s clique seemed to know there was a relationship, let alone a wedding.  Clique member Pake Zane could not recall Ann at all.


When current Hawaii governor Neil Abercrombie and Zane visited their friend in Nairobi in 1968, Barack Sr. shocked them by never once inquiring about his presumed wife and 6-year-old son.


The facts get more problematic still.  After the birth of baby Barry in August 1961, Ann left for Seattle as soon as the doctors cleared her to travel. Once there, she enrolled at the University of Washington, not Washington Sate.  Barack Sr. stayed behind in Hawaii.


The apolitical Washington state historical blog, HistoryLink, now confirms Ann's presence in the fall of 1961, identifies her Capitol Hill apartment in Seattle, names the courses she took, and documents an extended stay by Ann and little Barry into the summer of 1962.


If that is not proof enough, the 1961-1962 Polk Directory confirms an "Obama Anna Mrs studt" at the Capitol Hill address.


Somehow, this information escaped Obama's official campaign biography, Dreams, and four book-length biographies I consulted when researching my book Deconstructing Obama.  Remnick's 2010 biography, The Bridge, concedes Ann's escape to Seattle but fudges the dates. 


Even Janny Scott, the New York Times reporter who wrote the new biography, A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama's Mother, plays with the timeline.  Ann Dunham promptly became pregnant, Scott writes in a New York Times excerpt, "dropped out of school, married him and gave birth shortly before their union ended."  No, based on these documents, the union, if there was one, ended before Obama was born.


By the time mom and son returned to Hawaii in the summer of 1962, Barack Sr. had long since left for Harvard.  There was no Obama family, never was, no "abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation" save on the teleprompters at the 2004 convention.


Obama knew all of this when he gave his televised Big-Brotherly talk to America's coerced schoolchildren in September 2009.  It did not stop him from dissembling.


"I get it," he told the kiddies.  "I know what that's like.  My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother."  Does it get lower?


For the last two years or more, many in the birther community knew that Obama's "multicultural ideal" was based on a lie.  Knowing that Obama was capable of lying about the first two years of his life, they had no reason to believe he was telling the truth about his birth, especially given the lengths he had gone to in order to protect his birth certificate.


For their part, the major media -- almost to a person -- were doing everything in their power to protect the lie.  This was unprecedented on the sunny side of the Iron Curtain.  The birthers had absolutely no reason to believe the media. 


The media proved especially ignorant in their discussion of Obama's birth certificate.  Last week, ABC's George Stephanopoulos set a new media low in his ambush of Rep. Michele Bachmann.  In full partisan fury, he waved a copy of Obama's certification of live birth in her face as excitedly as if he had just discovered Al Capone's vault.


"Well I have the president's [birth] certificate right here," crowed the clueless Stephanopoulos, utterly unaware he had no such thing.  Worse, what he did have had been floating around the Internet since 2008.  "It's certified, it's got a certification number."  Neither he nor his media colleagues seemed to know how foolish this spectacle appeared to the millions of Americans who knew better.


Given the historic performance of the president, and of the media, I think our birther friends are allowed a little grace time before they accept this new immaculately conceived certificate of live birth as Gospel.  We would hate to have this too prove "fake but accurate."

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/the_obama_lie_that_drove_the_b.html at April 29, 2011 - 08:03:02 AM CDT

so he wasnt born in America?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on April 29, 2011, 08:30:53 AM
so he wasnt born in America?

Are you really expecting a simple yes or no answer here?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 08:41:58 AM
Are you really expecting a simple yes or no answer here?

Rosemary's Baby aka Obama was not born, he was spawned. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 29, 2011, 09:08:49 AM
Rosemary's Baby aka Obama was not born, he was spawned. 



there you go.. turn it into mush when you dont want to give a definitive yes or no
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 09:16:58 AM
there you go.. turn it into mush when you dont want to give a definitive yes or no

I now believe he was born in Hawaii, yes.   But I do believe he is still hiding a ton of shit.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 29, 2011, 09:18:07 AM
I now believe he was born in Hawaii, yes.   But I do believe he is still hiding a ton of shit.

wow...getting you to say this one little sentence took three years...this should be a HOLIDAY!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 09:19:39 AM
wow...getting you to say this one little sentence took three years...this should be a HOLIDAY!

It only took three years because the Grifter-Looter-Madoff-in -Chief  Obama hid his records and made this an issue by playing games.


   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 29, 2011, 09:37:02 AM
I now believe he was born in Hawaii, yes. 

Do you think the long form was a forgery, or is legit?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 09:42:18 AM
Do you think the long form was a forgery, or is legit?

Forgery.   Its more bullshit.   

If they want to really put this to bed - they would take a photo of the actual book and the actual page where it exists and post that - not this crap.   And the reason I believe he was born here are the immigration records of Rosemary Babies' Kenyan father, not the crap they put out.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 29, 2011, 10:04:45 AM
so you think he WAS born in hawaii. 

I now believe he was born in Hawaii, yes. 

But you also believe he forged a document?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 10:08:06 AM
so you think he WAS born in hawaii. 

But you also believe he forged a document?

Yes.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 11:53:39 AM
Seems Obama born yesterday
 By Michael Graham
Thursday, April 28, 2011 - Added 1 day ago
 


http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view/2011_0428seems_obama_born_yesterday/srvc=home&position=recent


Mr. President — you just got “pwned.”’

That’s Internet geek-speak for “owned” and yesterday you — the president of the United States — got your hat handed to you by a reality TV star. Without any political power, without the benefit of public office — in fact, he hasn’t even voted in a primary in 20 years — Donald Trump forced you to finally fork over your birth certificate.

It’s like being sent to jail by a judge, except in this case, it was Judge Judy.

Forget the certificate itself. The most astonishing thing I saw yesterday was a sitting president waiting for the host of “Celebrity Apprentice” to finish a New Hampshire press availability so he could start his own.

When your presidency is so lackluster you’re getting upstaged by a guy whose job is to coax coherent sentences out of Gary Busey . . . well this was not a good moment for the republic.

It was out of concern for our republic that I had called on the president to release the long form birth certificate just the day before. I was horrified by a new USA Today/Gallup poll that found just 38 percent of Americans are confident Obama was born in the United States. In other words, two-thirds of Americans seriously wonder if our president is serving in violation of the Constitution.

Yes, this doubt was generated in part by anti-Obama kookery from the fringe right. But for the doubt to become a conspiracy, Team Obama had to play along. They had to leave the birth certificate hidden in the Hawaii Department of Health instead of just releasing it when the questions first arose.

Barack Obama and his media allies played the issue perfectly. The media continuously asked Republicans their position on the birther issue, sending a message that everyone who opposed Obamacare or criticized his fiscal failures was somehow linked to a lunatic conspiracy.

This may have been winning politics in the short term, but its long-term effect was to undermine the public’s fundamental level of trust in the president. That’s bad.

When the news broke yesterday morning that Obama was finally relenting, I hoped it was because our “uniter in chief” had seen the new poll and wanted to undo some of the damage. Alas, no.

Instead, we now know the White House contacted Hawaii officials on April 22 — five days earlier. Which raises the question again, “Why now?”

It wasn’t because of Obama’s bogus claim that the press was too birther obsessed to cover anything else. Hours after he played the “bad media” card, the independent Poynter Institute reported that the economy accounted for 39 percent of news coverage the week Obama gave his debt/deficit speech. The birther issue? Four percent.

So again — why? I believe it’s because Obama could never answer the question, “Why not?”

As shamelessly self-interested and oddly-coiffed as Trump may be, he smartly focused on the question typical Americans could grasp — why doesn’t the president just release the damn thing? Typical Americans get that. They also get the arrogance of a “public servant” who, without good reason, simply refuses to answer a simple question.

Even on the issue of his own birth certificate, Obama was once again “leading from the rear.”

The guy out front? He’s plugging the upcoming finale of his TV show.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 29, 2011, 12:01:14 PM
Seems Obama born yesterday
 By Michael Graham
Thursday, April 28, 2011 - Added 1 day ago
 


http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view/2011_0428seems_obama_born_yesterday/srvc=home&position=recent


Mr. President — you just got “pwned.”’

That’s Internet geek-speak for “owned” and yesterday you — the president of the United States — got your hat handed to you by a reality TV star. Without any political power, without the benefit of public office — in fact, he hasn’t even voted in a primary in 20 years — Donald Trump forced you to finally fork over your birth certificate.

It’s like being sent to jail by a judge, except in this case, it was Judge Judy.

Forget the certificate itself. The most astonishing thing I saw yesterday was a sitting president waiting for the host of “Celebrity Apprentice” to finish a New Hampshire press availability so he could start his own.

When your presidency is so lackluster you’re getting upstaged by a guy whose job is to coax coherent sentences out of Gary Busey . . . well this was not a good moment for the republic.

It was out of concern for our republic that I had called on the president to release the long form birth certificate just the day before. I was horrified by a new USA Today/Gallup poll that found just 38 percent of Americans are confident Obama was born in the United States. In other words, two-thirds of Americans seriously wonder if our president is serving in violation of the Constitution.

Yes, this doubt was generated in part by anti-Obama kookery from the fringe right. But for the doubt to become a conspiracy, Team Obama had to play along. They had to leave the birth certificate hidden in the Hawaii Department of Health instead of just releasing it when the questions first arose.

Barack Obama and his media allies played the issue perfectly. The media continuously asked Republicans their position on the birther issue, sending a message that everyone who opposed Obamacare or criticized his fiscal failures was somehow linked to a lunatic conspiracy.

This may have been winning politics in the short term, but its long-term effect was to undermine the public’s fundamental level of trust in the president. That’s bad.

When the news broke yesterday morning that Obama was finally relenting, I hoped it was because our “uniter in chief” had seen the new poll and wanted to undo some of the damage. Alas, no.

Instead, we now know the White House contacted Hawaii officials on April 22 — five days earlier. Which raises the question again, “Why now?”

It wasn’t because of Obama’s bogus claim that the press was too birther obsessed to cover anything else. Hours after he played the “bad media” card, the independent Poynter Institute reported that the economy accounted for 39 percent of news coverage the week Obama gave his debt/deficit speech. The birther issue? Four percent.

So again — why? I believe it’s because Obama could never answer the question, “Why not?”

As shamelessly self-interested and oddly-coiffed as Trump may be, he smartly focused on the question typical Americans could grasp — why doesn’t the president just release the damn thing? Typical Americans get that. They also get the arrogance of a “public servant” who, without good reason, simply refuses to answer a simple question.

Even on the issue of his own birth certificate, Obama was once again “leading from the rear.”

The guy out front? He’s plugging the upcoming finale of his TV show.


This is actually true.  Trump is the reason Obama released his BC.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 29, 2011, 12:13:38 PM
This is actually true.  Trump is the reason Obama released his BC.

No... it wasn't Trump... It was the media and their infatuation with Trump.

Trump came out and spoke nonsense and people like 333 and the media to some extent ate it up... It was complete bullshit.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 29, 2011, 12:15:39 PM
Trump's purposeful willingness to ignore Hawaii state law stating obama had met the burden of requiment...

And his willingness to use his platform to spread disinformation and cast doubt upon the legitimacy of rule of a wartime President...

That's the reason Obama had to do it.  

if Bill gates decided to spend a billion dollars on a "Palin ain't the baby's mama" campaign, and smeared her for every news camera that would listen, she might feel the need to release that birth cert which was never produced.  She could put up with the continual insult (falsely of course) and embarassment, watching her numbers drop as people started to believe Gates' lie, because they heard it enough times.

Or, she could release the birth cert to stop the disinformation campaign.  Would gates "win", or would he just be a bitter rich prick seeking ratings and willing to spread a lie to do so?  ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 29, 2011, 12:23:50 PM
No... it wasn't Trump... It was the media and their infatuation with Trump.

Trump came out and spoke nonsense and people like 333 and the media to some extent ate it up... It was complete bullshit.



Same difference.  Without Trump appearing all over the media calling Obama out on this, Obama wouldn't have released it.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 29, 2011, 12:29:34 PM
Same difference.  Without Trump appearing all over the media calling Obama out on this, Obama wouldn't have released it.   


That makes Trump some kind of special person?

Only in the mind of people who can't admit that he was simply a rich guy with a TV show who gets press because he says "you're fired" every week.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 29, 2011, 12:33:00 PM

That makes Trump some kind of special person?

Only in the mind of people who can't admit that he was simply a rich guy with a TV show who gets press because he says "you're fired" every week.



I never said he was a special person.  He's just the person responsible for Obama producing his BC.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 29, 2011, 12:36:19 PM
I never said he was a special person.  He's just the person responsible for Obama producing his BC.

No... people like 333 are responsible.

Trump wouldn't have even brought it up if he didn't get the idea from the kooks out there.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 29, 2011, 12:42:03 PM
It only took three years because the Grifter-Looter-Madoff-in -Chief  Obama hid his records and made this an issue by playing games.


   
and you, sir, got played !  well done, Mr. President.  You just earned my vote for four more years.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 29, 2011, 12:43:34 PM
No... people like 333 are responsible.

Trump wouldn't have even brought it up if he didn't get the idea from the kooks out there.

Trump brought it up because it kept his name in the headlines.

Just like his feud with whoopi or rosie.
Just like his tiff with Ivana on divorcing just in time.
Just like the many stunts to promote his hotel.
Just like his involvement with football and boxing.
Just like his Kadaffi business.
Just like him suing people who under-estimate his net worth.
Just like his fake 2000 and 1988 presidential runs.

Hell, the man got involved with wrestlemani.  he did the comedy central roast.  he's trying like hell to get deniro or seinfeld into a feud now.

he's a media whore who does anything for attention.  Watch and see.  In 18 months, he'll be all over the news for a feud with some new celebrity or cause, and everyone will be so surprised again.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MCWAY on April 29, 2011, 12:50:59 PM
Trump brought it up because it kept his name in the headlines.

Just like his feud with whoopi or rosie.
Just like his tiff with Ivana on divorcing just in time.
Just like the many stunts to promote his hotel.
Just like his involvement with football and boxing.
Just like his Kadaffi business.
Just like him suing people who under-estimate his net worth.
Just like his fake 2000 and 1988 presidential runs.

Hell, the man got involved with wrestlemani.  he did the comedy central roast.  he's trying like hell to get deniro or seinfeld into a feud now.

he's a media whore who does anything for attention.  Watch and see.  In 18 months, he'll be all over the news for a feud with some new celebrity or cause, and everyone will be so surprised again.



He's a businessman. He hosted WrestleManias 4 and 5 and was part of WrestleMania 23 (shaving Vince McMahon's head). He was in the front row at WrestleMania 7.

And, for all you bodybuilding fans, it was his Taj Mahal that hosted the first WBF Championship.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 12:53:12 PM
No... people like 333 are responsible.

Trump wouldn't have even brought it up if he didn't get the idea from the kooks out there.

wow !    To quote DT - if that is true, that me, 33 from getbig - is responsible for Bama releasing the long form BC -

I AM VERY PROUD OF MYSELF FOR WHAT I ACCOMPLISHED


 ;D  ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 29, 2011, 12:55:47 PM
He's a businessman. He hosted WrestleManias 4 and 5 and was part of WrestleMania 23 (shaving Vince McMahon's head). He was in the front row at WrestleMania 7.

And, for all you bodybuilding fans, it was his Taj Mahal that hosted the first WBF Championship.

Not just a businessman.  A brilliant businessman.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 29, 2011, 01:14:06 PM
wow !    To quote DT - if that is true, that me, 33 from getbig - is responsible for Bama releasing the long form BC -

I AM VERY PROUD OF MYSELF FOR WHAT I ACCOMPLISHED


 ;D  ;D

BUT YOU WERE LIKE WRONG ???
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 01:18:32 PM
BUT YOU WERE LIKE WRONG ???

Wrong about what?   Bama kept this hidden for 3 years.   He could have put this to bed years ago and fomented a cottage industry by his actions. 

Personally, I have been laughing my ass off at this.   Its like the OJ case all over again.       
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 29, 2011, 01:21:07 PM
Wrong about what?   Bama kept this hidden for 3 years.   He could have put this to bed years ago and fomented a cottage industry by his actions. 

Personally, I have been laughing my ass off at this.   Its like the OJ case all over again.       

dude you like said he wasnt born in the US......and he was.. and he proved it.. again.. dude he just cock slapped your dumb ass.. told you to take your thread and shove it up your ass
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 01:25:54 PM
dude you like said he wasnt born in the US......and he was.. and he proved it.. again.. dude he just cock slapped your dumb ass.. told you to take your thread and shove it up your ass


Yawn - he fueld these CT's by acting like an arrogant baby all on to himself.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 01:33:10 PM
Friday, April 29, 2011
OUT OF ORDER: Obama’s Non-sequential Certificate Number Based On Registration Office Location, Not Birth Date



Contrary to recent implications, new evidence supports that Barack Obama was not actually delivered in Kapi’olani hospital, as records suggest, but, rather, he was merely examined there by a private practitioner, David Sinclair, in the days following his birth, which triggered the validation of an administratively issued “Certificate of Live Birth” registration, not a hospital generated birth certificate representing an actual delivery.

By Pen Johannson and Dan Crosby
Of The Daily Pen


http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/out-of-order-obamas-non-sequential.html




The evidence herein is somewhat belaboring and intensive, but necessary to understand in order to place Obama’s recently revealed, Health Department-issued “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration in its accurate context.

We will begin by simply assuming that this "Certificate of Live Birth" document is an authentic record and that no conspiracy was required in order to create it. However, we can also conclude it was not released by Kapi’olani hospital because it remains undocumented that Obama was not actually born in Kapi’olani hospital. Rather, this document was released by the Hawaiian Department of Health based on that state's long-standing municipal vital records laws which mandate the creation of such an official birth record based, not only upon indigenous birth occurrences, but also residential circumstances of the parents preceding the birth.

This evidence shows that baby Obama was examined at Kapi’olani within days after his birth by a physician able to legally attest an original birth record issued, not by the hospital, but by the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDOH).

Kapi’olani hospital has never issued or confirmed an original record for the birth of Barack Obama within its facility to date. However, the HDOH is able to legally name the hospital in its original "Certificate of Live Birth" Regisration based on the fact that, if it is the location of the first examination of a newborn child by a physician there, the doctor triggers the birth location in absence of any other birth location information.

Simply put, Obama was not born in Kapi'olani, but he was examined for the first time there.

This week, Obama released a long-form version of a Health Department issued “Certificate of Live Birth” document which adds merely three more pieces of information about his natal biography than we previously knew before from the fallow “Certification of Live Birth” heavily lauded by his defenders as the holy grail of his eligibility.

Now, with this new and improved ‘Holier Grail”, historical information from the U.S. Department of Health shows that this document only detracts from Obama’s effort to confirm his eligibility and that it would best be described as a ‘Long-form Certificate of Live Birth Registration’ created by administrative procedure as a result of legal confirmation, not a hospital as a result of an actual delivery.

The information provided in the recently revealed HDOH "Certificate of Live Birth" Registration document, when combined with an understanding of Hawaiian vital statistics records laws, municipal reporting procedures, and federal Natality reporting guidelines, shows that this “Certificate of Live Birth” registration was legally produced by the HDOH without Obama necessarily actually being delivered in the hospital named within it, and that the doctor, by affixing his signature, was only required to attest an original record based on his examination of the newborn Obama Jr., not as an attending (birthing) physician present during the actual delivery, but rather as the first physician to actually see the child alive and in good health.

This evidence supports the fact that the on-going, original questions of Obama's actual birth location remain decisively unanswered.

TRICKY NUMBERS

Since the 2008 disclosure of Obama’s other “only official” Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” just days before being ensconced to the Oval Office, many continue to wonder why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with at least two other registration numbers issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health in the days after Obama’s birth.

This evidence reveals that Obama’s non-sequential birth registration number is the result of the birth being registered in a location not used by the hospital Obama claims to have been born in, rendering the possibility that his recent “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration issued by the Hawaii Health Department is merely a record of birth registration legally issued by the Health Department under HRS 338-17.8, after being examined by a doctor at Kapi’olani hospital who could attest to his live birth, post-delivery.

However, recently discovered sources show that Obama’s birth registration number was assigned by the state’s main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health after his birth registration originated in a location not used by the hospital to register births actually occurring within its facility.

Documentation provided by Volume 1 of the “1961 Vital Statistics Report of the United States” further supports the factual plausibility that Obama’s birth occurred in a geographic location other than Hawaii and was not registered in the traditional manner as other children born in the hospital, locally. This evidence supports the claim that his non-sequential birth registration number is indeed the result of his birth being registered in an alternative local office, not the typical office used by the hospital..

Recall, according to copies of birth records released by the hospital, the Nordyke’s twin girls were delivered just 19 hours after Obama was born, supposedly just down the hall from where Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham was allegedly staying in Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital on Saturday afternoon of August 5th, 1961. The Nordyke twins, Susan and Gretchen, were issued sequential birth registration numbers, 151-61-10637 and 151-61-10638, respectively.

The Nordyke's released two photostatic copies of their hospital generated "Certificates of Live Birth" in 2009. Contrarily, Obama released a Health Department generated version of the same document last week. The differences are significant and in need of investigation because the Nordyke's document an actual delivery within the hospital while Obama's documents only a birth registration by the HDOH after he was examined by a doctor from the named hospital.

With the revelation of a belated image of an alleged, original 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” registration record, released by the Hawaiian Department of Health, not the hospital, it is now unanimously accepted that Obama’s birth registration number is 151-61-10641, which is also confirmed by its updated version of 151-1961-10641 on the previously exalted “Certification of Live Birth” and, most importantly, which is a number larger than both the twins even though he was born chronologically before them.

First, we need to recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 states the following:

(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the Director of Health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

As we all have become familiar, the statute explicitly states that the Director of Health in 1961 was obligated to issue a birth certificate “provided that proof had been submitted to the Director of Health that the parents had declared Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth…or adoption of such child”, regardless of the location of that birth.

We know Obama’s parents lived in Hawaii for at least one year preceding his birth or adoption. Therefore, this law would have applied if he were born elsewhere or adopted and was taken to Hawaii where the birth was registered.

Notice the dates of the signatures on the newly released Certificate of Live Birth registration issued by the Health Department. The alleged signature of Obama’s mother was documented on Monday, August 7, 1961, the earliest day available to sign the registration. Obama was born the evening of Friday, August 4th, which means government offices were closed on Saturday the 5th, and Sunday the 6th, but the hospital was not.

The Nordyke twins were born on Saturday, August 5th, but their “Certificates of Live Birth” were not attested by the attending physician of record, assigned numbers and registered by the Department of Health until Thursday, August 11th. Obama’s birth was registered on Tuesday, August 8th even though it occurred just hours before the Nordyke’s. However, both documents for all three births were signed by the parents on the same day, Monday, August 7th.

This week, Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” was released by the Department of Health, not the alleged hospital of record. Although the Health Department was obligated to provide him with a “Certificate of Live Birth” in 1961, via the administrative process mandated by HRS 338-17.8, his birth would not actually have to occur in the Hospital stated on the record in order for this record to be created. However, as provided by HRS 338-5, after baby Obama had been examined by an “attending” physician sometime between August 5th and August 8th at the hospital, the Department of Health was able to create the official record of birth after the doctor’s signed approval, containing the name of the hospital where the examination took place.

Essentially, the Hawaiian Department of Health does not issue an official birth certificate under the provision of HRS 338-17.8 until a board certified physician has examined the child in an official medical facility of record.

So, how was Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” assigned a larger number than his birth-mates?

Section 5-8 of the ‘Vital Statistics of the United States: Volume 1 – Natality” report states:

Sampling of Birth Records

The manner in which records are numbered greatly reduces the sampling variability of totals for geographic areas. Records are numbered in the primary state offices of vital statistics as they are received from the local offices. The assignment of the last digit in the number is not selective and systematic sampling of even-numbered records may be assumed to be unbiased. Furthermore, because the records are always in geographic order BEFORE numbering, twice the same count of births occurring in the great majority of counties is the same as the corresponding figure based on all records.

The key words are, "records are numbered in the primary state offices as they are received and are always in geographic order before numbering." Essentially, this means that Obama's birth registration, which was received by the main office before the Nordyke twins', was assigned a higher number because it was received by the main office in geographic order, not chronological order. Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins' birth.

This confirms that, in 1961, the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health assigned registration numbers based on the order of reception of birth registrations from various local registration offices, not from the hospitals of the births. Therefore, if Obama’s birth registration was included with the Nordyke twins and other births occurring at Kapiolani in same HDOH birth registration office, we should expect the Nordyke's numbers to be assigned in order of reception at the same time as Obama's!!

However, since it is likely that Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins, who were actually born in Kapi’olani hospital, Obama’s birth registration was assigned a number based on its "geographic order", not its chronological order, of registration.

If Obama was actually born in Kapi’olani hospital on August 4th, 1961, why was his birth registered in a different geographic location as indicated by the non-sequential number, on August 8th, which would therefore trigger a registration number out of order with the Nordyke twins' birth of August 5th who were registered with all the other births in Kapi’olani?

DIFFERENT LOCAL REGISTRARS

Obama’s 'Certificate of Live Birth' Registration released by the Hawaiian Department of Health is signed by a different local registrar than is shown on the Nordyke’s Hospital version of the Certificate of Live Birth. A different local registrar worked in each branch office in which births was registered. Obama's birth was registered in an office which is not the office use by Kapi’olani to register births occurring in its facility.

The name of a local registrar is not associated with other birth certificates for births which actually occurred at Kapi’olani and which were attested by physicians who actually delivered those births. This registrar worked in a branch office not used by Kapi’olani to register births. This is why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with other births at the same time as his.

OUT OF ORDER TOO: THE NEWSPAPER ANNOUNCEMENTS

Last month, The Daily Pen’s Dan Crosby, published the results of his investigation of the procedures used to publish birth announcements in Hawaii. He found historical evidence which supports that fact that Obama’s birth did not occur in Kapi’olani, but which was registered in a different local office after he was examined by a doctor at Kapi’olani on August 7th, 1961.

Crosby went to Hawaii to research and investigate the cavalcade of ambiguous information related to Obama’s covert natal history including the origins and protocols used to publish the birth announcements in 1961. He focused on the manner in which the Hawaiian Department of Health and local hospitals coordinated vital statistics information and how the chain of information from the Hospital to the Hawaiian Department of Health resulted in “Weekly Health Bureau Statistics” announcements published in the local papers.

Crosby found evidence that the order in which the announcements were published was not random or chronological. In fact, he discovered they were published by the order of birth registration numbers assigned by the main Office of Vital Records which, in turn, were based on reception from various local registration branches. He discovered that, regardless of when the birth may have occurred, the registration number, assigned by the geographic order of the registration offices, determined the order of the announcements.

This is why Obama’s birth announcements occur near the bottom of each column in each newspaper even though there are births which occurred before and after his but which are published above his in the papers. This is because the births published above his all occurred in the same place and were registered in the same office and then passed to the central main office. The numbers were, therefore, ordered by the main office of the Health department in reference to their geographic registration order, not their chronological occurrence.

An investigation of the addresses of the birth registrations reveals that they migrate proximally to either a medical facility or to a local registration office. This is logical because most pregnant women would desire a hospital in close proximity once contractions began.

The birth announcements and ordering based on geographic registration location are shown below as they appear in the two versions of the newspapers.

Mr. and Mrs. Samuel K. Haas Sr. 849-A 11th Ave. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Charles J. Staley 1319 Anapa St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard R. Kitson Apt. 11, 1635 Clark St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. George P. Ayau Sr. 87-143 Lillana St., Malll 7/31/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Thaddeus J. Raymond 1371 Haloa Drive 7/30/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Robert I. Arakawa 935-B Hausten St., 8/1/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Y. Takahashi 56 Nanea Ave, Wahiawa 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Allington K. Brown Maunawill Road, Kallua 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Cirillo V. Caperto 918 Puuhale Road 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel L. M. Mokuahi Sr 732 Laukea St. 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Peter C. Kamealoha Jr. 441 McNeill St. 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Clifford Sr. 2624 Maunawai Place 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward W. Walker 1660 S. King St., 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Wallace M. Durkin 3813 Radford Drive 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Mike M. Nagaishi 2687 Gardenia 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Glenn E. Earnest 1258 Wilhelmina Rise 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward S. H. Chun 45-440 Akimala St., Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Waidelich 937 18th Ave. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Emmett P. Simpson 2752 Kahiti St. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Melvin K. F. Liu 45-548 Keaahala Road, Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard D. Wright 91-939 Kalapu St., Ewa Beach, Ewa 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Andrew A. M. Hatchle 2420 Kaululaau St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs Harry Y.W. Wong 463 Lawelwe St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Ernesto Kim

Note that the announcements are in the exact same order in both papers. Also, notice Obama’s birth registration announcement nearer the bottom of the order in the last group while the birth dates appear to be grouped rather than ordered from the top of the column to the bottom. This indicates they are indeed grouped by geographic registration occurrence as they are received in batches from each branch location by the main Health Department office, as prescribed by the guidelines described in the NVSD report. Otherwise, the birth order would be published based on either alphabetical or chronological order, which they are not, as obviously shown here. This is an indication that Obama’s birth registration was received by the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health from a location other than the office used to register births occurring in Kapi’olani.

Obama’s DOH “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration omits the “Amendment section” from its lower margin which is present on the hospital generated version and contains space available for amendments, dates of examinations and medical information. It is also used to show the signatures of the Director of Health and the Deputy Registrar. This is absent from Obama’s HDOH document because it was not generated by the hospital and this doctor was not present at his birth and did not preside over later amendments, such as Obama’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro.

CONCLUSIONS

Obama’s birth was not registered in the same Health Department office as the Nordyke twins and nine other births occurring the week of July 30 – August 5th at Kapi’olani hospital.

The publication of Obama’s birth announcement near the bottom of the columns of the two newspapers, printed lower than announcements for births which occurred after his, indicates that his birth registration document was received and ordered in accordance with geographic location, not chronological order or alphabetic order. This, therefore, indicates that Obama's birth actually occurred in a location other than Kapi'olani hospital.

Dr. David Sinclair was not present during the delivery of Barack Obama. However, since he was the first physician to examine baby Obama and his mother at Kapi’olani on August 7th or 8th, he is legally bound to record his signature as the attending physician of record at that time. Per HRS 338, the naming of the hospital is subsequent to the naming of the doctor where the examination, not the birth, took place.

Since Dr. Sinclair was not the birthing physician, he could not officially attest to Obama’s birth weight, which is absent from the HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration.

The name of local registrar is different on Obama’s HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration because Obama’s birth was not registered in the same branch office of the Vital Statistics office as births occurring at Kapi’olani.

As testified by the 1961 Vital Statistics of the United States Report, Obama’s birth registration number is non-sequential with other births at the same time because it was assigned by the main office of the HDOH after it was received from one of multiple registration offices in Hawaii. The HDOH assigned Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth a registration number based on its geographic registration location, not chronological occurrence in a hospital.

Obama’s recently revealed Certificate of Live Birth was created and issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health through administrative procedures based on HRS 338 and Administrative Rules. It was not generated by any hospital and was only attested by an attending physician after an examination of the newborn Obama qualified the HDOH to issue an original birth certificate provided by HRS 338-17.8.

Therefore, the geographic location of Obama’s actual emergence from his mother’s womb remains a mystery.

Regardless, the identity of Obama’s foreign father is confirmed in this newly released Certificate of Live Birth Registration, which disqualifies Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of the presidency even if he was shown by a hospital generated birth certificate to have been born in Hawaii.

Posted by Penbrook One at 3:44 AM 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on April 29, 2011, 01:50:19 PM
wow !    To quote DT - if that is true, that me, 33 from getbig - is responsible for Bama releasing the long form BC -

I AM VERY PROUD OF MYSELF FOR WHAT I ACCOMPLISHED


 ;D  ;D

I said people LIKE you... you know... kooks.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on April 29, 2011, 01:58:33 PM

Yawn - he fueld these CT's by acting like an arrogant baby all on to himself.   

well he released his birth cert and yall dumb shits said it wasnt enough.. you can spin all you want.. jokes on you cha cha
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on April 29, 2011, 02:12:01 PM

Yawn - he fueld these CT's by acting like an arrogant baby all on to himself.   


birthers=dumbass
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 29, 2011, 02:18:26 PM
Why dont you apply the same standard to 911 truthers?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 29, 2011, 03:35:16 PM
Why dont you apply the same standard to 911 truthers?   
Girl, what you been up to?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 29, 2011, 03:35:54 PM
Trump brought it up because it kept his name in the headlines.

Just like his feud with whoopi or rosie.
Just like his tiff with Ivana on divorcing just in time.
Just like the many stunts to promote his hotel.
Just like his involvement with football and boxing.
Just like his Kadaffi business.
Just like him suing people who under-estimate his net worth.
Just like his fake 2000 and 1988 presidential runs.

Hell, the man got involved with wrestlemani.  he did the comedy central roast.  he's trying like hell to get deniro or seinfeld into a feud now.

he's a media whore who does anything for attention.  Watch and see.  In 18 months, he'll be all over the news for a feud with some new celebrity or cause, and everyone will be so surprised again.



very nice post 240....every time I think you're about to go over the deep end you come back with a masterpiece like this..keep up the good work! :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 29, 2011, 03:39:15 PM
wow !    To quote DT - if that is true, that me, 33 from getbig - is responsible for Bama releasing the long form BC -

I AM VERY PROUD OF MYSELF FOR WHAT I ACCOMPLISHED


 ;D  ;D
You're lame. For an attorney, anyway.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 29, 2011, 03:42:18 PM
Why dont you apply the same standard to 911 truthers?   

because we all KNOW the 911 truthers are nuts...the birthers are rational and pretend they are for political gain
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 29, 2011, 03:43:28 PM
because we all KNOW the 911 truthers are nuts...

Wurd.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 29, 2011, 03:58:08 PM
another thought.  drump was a lifetime lib until 2009.

If the popular political climate was liberalism, and it was all about proving mccain was an illegal, I'm sure Trump would have hopped on that train too.

He probably would have enjoyed it too, to be honest.  the guy's capitalizing on the ignorance and hate and fear that people have.  He's NOT SURE if he wants the job of saving america from evil obama?  F him.  Seriously.  You DONT EVEN KNOW if you want to save your country, even if you know you have the power? 

Repubs should look at it that way.  This lifetime lib doesn't like obama, but he's not even sure if he wants to spend his time fixing it.  Unreal. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 29, 2011, 09:07:47 PM
another thought.  drump was a lifetime lib until 2009.

If the popular political climate was liberalism, and it was all about proving mccain was an illegal, I'm sure Trump would have hopped on that train too.

He probably would have enjoyed it too, to be honest.  the guy's capitalizing on the ignorance and hate and fear that people have.  He's NOT SURE if he wants the job of saving america from evil obama?  F him.  Seriously.  You DONT EVEN KNOW if you want to save your country, even if you know you have the power? 

Repubs should look at it that way.  This lifetime lib doesn't like obama, but he's not even sure if he wants to spend his time fixing it.  Unreal. 

exactly....Trump is an opportunist plain and simple
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: George Whorewell on April 29, 2011, 10:47:41 PM
exactly....Trump is an opportunist plain and simple

So, what it does it say about the president of the united states, when he lets a reality tv show freak with bad hair looking to cash in on an opportunity, elevate himself to presidential status.

If you cant see how that makes obama look like a joke, your not paying attention.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 30, 2011, 08:46:33 AM
Obama's father forced out at Harvard
The university was concerned about his personal life and finances, records reveal. | AP Photo
By ASSOCIATED PRESS | 4/29/11 8:58 PM EDT



BOSTON — President Barack Obama’s father was forced to leave Harvard University before completing his Ph.D. in economics because the school was concerned about his personal life and finances, according to newly public immigration records.

Harvard had asked the Immigration and Naturalization Service to delay a request by Barack Hussein Obama Sr. to extend his stay in the U.S., “until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him,” immigration official M.F. McKeon wrote in a June 1964 memo.

Harvard administrators, the memo stated, “were having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn’t seem to figure out how many wives he had.”

An earlier INS memo from McKeon said that while the elder Obama had passed his exams and was entitled on academic grounds to stay and complete his thesis, the school was going to try and “cook something up to ease him out.”

“They are planning on telling him that they will not give him any money, and that he had better return to Kenya and prepare his thesis at home,” the memo stated.

In May 1964, David D. Henry, director of Harvard’s international office, wrote to Obama to say that, while he had completed his formal course work, the economics department and the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences didn’t have the money to support him.

“We have, therefore, come to the conclusion that you should terminate your stay in the United States and return to Kenya to carry on your research and the writing of your thesis,” Henry’s letter stated.

Obama’s request for an extended stay was denied by the INS. He left Harvard and - divorced from president’s mother - returned to his native Kenya in July 1964. He did not complete his Ph.D.

The immigration memos, contained in the elder Obama’s Immigration and Naturalization file, were given to a Boston Globe reporter in 2009 through a Freedom of Information request. The papers were first made public Wednesday by The Arizona Independent, a weekly newspaper. The Associated Press obtained copies of them on Friday.

Harvard issued a statement Friday saying that it could not find in its own records anything to support the accounts given in the INS memos.

“While we cannot verify accounts of conversations that occurred nearly 50 years ago, a review of our existing files did not find any support for either the language or the implied intent described by the U.S. government official in the government documents,” the statement read.

When Obama was attending Harvard, the school faced serious constraints in financing research by international graduate students, the university also said.

Department of Homeland Security spokesman Matt Chandler declined to comment Friday, saying the department does not comment on specific immigration cases.

Concerns about Obama’s personal life while he had been studying in the U.S. had been raised previously, according to the INS documents.

In 1961, while he was an undergraduate student at the University of Hawaii, the school’s foreign student adviser called an immigration official and said Obama had recently married StanleyAnn Dunham - the president’s mother - despite already having a wife in Kenya.

According to a memo written by an INS official in Honolulu, the adviser said Obama had been “running around with several girls since he first arrived here and last summer she cautioned him about his playboy ways.”

Obama told the adviser that he had divorced his wife in Kenya.

He told the president’s mother the same thing, though she would later learn it was a lie.

Obama worked for an oil company and as a government economist after returning to Africa, but his personal and professional life would later deteriorate. He died in a car crash in 1982, when the future president was 21 and a student at Columbia University.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53968.html#ixzz1L1PRE2K9

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 30, 2011, 09:09:19 AM
So, what it does it say about the president of the united states, when he lets a reality tv show freak with bad hair looking to cash in on an opportunity, elevate himself to presidential status.

If you cant see how that makes obama look like a joke, your not paying attention.


how was Obama responsible for elevating Trump to presidential status????????????????????????...trump has played this game before with flirting with running for president and each time he has gotten extensive media coverage only to pull out....he did this in 88' and in 2000 I think......was Obama around then>>???????????

you dumbass conservatives on here always betray your lack of objectivity and hang yourselves
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 30, 2011, 09:11:56 AM

how was Obama responsible for elevating Trump to presidential status????????????????????????...trump has played this game before with flirting with running for president and each time he has gotten extensive media coverage only to pull out....he did this in 88' and in 2000 I think......was Obama around then>>???????????

you dumbass conservatives on here always betray your lack of objectivity and hang yourselves

Than why did he only release this now?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 30, 2011, 09:16:41 AM
Obama's father forced out at Harvard
The university was concerned about his personal life and finances, records reveal. | AP Photo
By ASSOCIATED PRESS | 4/29/11 8:58 PM EDT



BOSTON — President Barack Obama’s father was forced to leave Harvard University before completing his Ph.D. in economics because the school was concerned about his personal life and finances, according to newly public immigration records.

Harvard had asked the Immigration and Naturalization Service to delay a request by Barack Hussein Obama Sr. to extend his stay in the U.S., “until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him,” immigration official M.F. McKeon wrote in a June 1964 memo.

Harvard administrators, the memo stated, “were having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn’t seem to figure out how many wives he had.”

An earlier INS memo from McKeon said that while the elder Obama had passed his exams and was entitled on academic grounds to stay and complete his thesis, the school was going to try and “cook something up to ease him out.”

“They are planning on telling him that they will not give him any money, and that he had better return to Kenya and prepare his thesis at home,” the memo stated.

In May 1964, David D. Henry, director of Harvard’s international office, wrote to Obama to say that, while he had completed his formal course work, the economics department and the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences didn’t have the money to support him.

“We have, therefore, come to the conclusion that you should terminate your stay in the United States and return to Kenya to carry on your research and the writing of your thesis,” Henry’s letter stated.

Obama’s request for an extended stay was denied by the INS. He left Harvard and - divorced from president’s mother - returned to his native Kenya in July 1964. He did not complete his Ph.D.

The immigration memos, contained in the elder Obama’s Immigration and Naturalization file, were given to a Boston Globe reporter in 2009 through a Freedom of Information request. The papers were first made public Wednesday by The Arizona Independent, a weekly newspaper. The Associated Press obtained copies of them on Friday.

Harvard issued a statement Friday saying that it could not find in its own records anything to support the accounts given in the INS memos.

“While we cannot verify accounts of conversations that occurred nearly 50 years ago, a review of our existing files did not find any support for either the language or the implied intent described by the U.S. government official in the government documents,” the statement read.

When Obama was attending Harvard, the school faced serious constraints in financing research by international graduate students, the university also said.

Department of Homeland Security spokesman Matt Chandler declined to comment Friday, saying the department does not comment on specific immigration cases.

Concerns about Obama’s personal life while he had been studying in the U.S. had been raised previously, according to the INS documents.

In 1961, while he was an undergraduate student at the University of Hawaii, the school’s foreign student adviser called an immigration official and said Obama had recently married StanleyAnn Dunham - the president’s mother - despite already having a wife in Kenya.

According to a memo written by an INS official in Honolulu, the adviser said Obama had been “running around with several girls since he first arrived here and last summer she cautioned him about his playboy ways.”

Obama told the adviser that he had divorced his wife in Kenya.

He told the president’s mother the same thing, though she would later learn it was a lie.

Obama worked for an oil company and as a government economist after returning to Africa, but his personal and professional life would later deteriorate. He died in a car crash in 1982, when the future president was 21 and a student at Columbia University.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53968.html#ixzz1L1PRE2K9



Jesus Christ..first, you are still trying your best to de-legitimize Obama but now that you can't go after him about his BC you have started these really stupid and dumbass threads attacking his father who has been dead 30 years......

second, the fact that he was a playboy in college and was running around with different women shows that he was a normal guy....thats all..ALL guys in college are playboys and are banging different chicks...so what are they trying to prove here?....its just more personal attacks...

third, If we all had to be judged by the things our fathers did, NONE OF US would have any legitimacy..I know my own dad wasn't a saint.....he was banging a bunch of chicks as well...but he took care of us an my mother as well..

come on and stop with this silliness...you are really debasing yourself and its becoming embarrassing to watch

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 30, 2011, 09:50:58 AM

Washington Times report: Newly released Obama birth certificate forensic forgery
April 29th, 2011 6:45 pm PT .

Alfred Lambremont Webre Seattle Exopolitics Examiner.FollowSubscribe Sponsor an Examiner ...View all of Alfred's articlesPrintEmailShare on FacebookShare on Twitter.Do you like this Article?




In an exclusive April 29, 2011 interview on ExopoliticsTV with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington Times investigative radio, states that the purported birth certificate released by U.S. President Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic forgery.  In the interview, Mr. Stanley's statement is accompanied by an on-camera demonstration of various forgeries within the nine overlaid digital layers of the birth certificate document as released on the White House website.

Earlier on April 29, 2011, Mr. Stanley reported the breaking news regarding the forensic fraud in Mr. Obama's newly released birth certificate on Washington Times investigative radio's America's Morning News while being interviewed by reporters John McCaslin and Amy Holmes, also a commentator for CNN.

LISTEN TO BREAKING NEWS

http://www.unicusmagazine.com/MP3/breaking%20news.mp3

During his ExopoliticsTV interview Mr. Stanley indicated that the White House has in fact taken down Mr. Obama’s alleged recently released birth certificate from the White House website overnight (see here), although the White House has left a copy of the alleged birth certificate of Mr. Obama here.

As of this writing, Mr. Stanley stated there had been no overt comment from the White House other than the taking of the birth certificate offline.  Neither officials of the Hawaii state birth registrar nor of the Honolulu hospital where Mr. Obama allegedly was born have, as yet, commented.

Mr. Stanley stated that the headquarters of Donald Trump had put him in touch directly with Mr. Trump, and that he had forwarded the evidence of forensic forgery in Mr. Obama’s birth certificate directly to Mr. Trump. 

Donald Trump, a possible contender for the 2012 Republican nomination for U.S. President, stated on April 27, 2011 that he considers himself instrumental in forcing Mr. Obama to release the alleged birth certificate, and now apparent forensic fraud.

View Interview with Robert Stanley on forensic fraud on Obama birth certificate

Readers can view the interview of Robert Stanley by Alfred Lambremont Webre on forensic fraud and the Obama birth certificate in the video embedded in the article above or at the following URL:

VIEW INTERVIEW



During his 25 minute ExopoliticsTV interview, Mr. Stanley graphically demonstrates using copies of various of the nine overlaid digital layers within the forensically fraudulent birth certificate of Mr. Obama that the birth certificate was assembled as a forged document, using components of many other documents. 

Robert Stanley’s conclusions congruent with other independent research on forensic fraud in Obama birth certificate

Robert M. Stanley’s conclusions are also congruent with other independent analyses of Mr. Obama’s alleged birth certificate released April 27, 2011, including the following:

Barack Obama's Birth Certificate is a Digitally Layered Photoshop Fake



 

Proof Obama's 4/27/11 "Long Form Certificate of Birth" is Forged!



 

Obama Birth Certificate Scam? 2011-04-27 Obama



 

Other anomalies in the forensically forged Obama birth certificate

Researchers have identified a number of anomalies on the alleged birth certificate of Mr. Obama, apart from the evidence of forensic forgery provided by analysis of its nine layers.

One researcher states, "Look at the hospital name on this document [Mr. Obama's alleged birth certificate]. The hospital had a different name in 1961, it was not named Kapiolani Maternity and Gynocological Hospital, it was called Kaokiolani Children's Hospital.  It did not get the Kapiolani name until the mid-1970s when they merged. Kenya was not called "Kenya" in 1961 it was called "The British East Africa Protectorate" at the time Obama was born and this document was supposedly printed.  Then in 1963 it became "The Dominion of Kenya." Then later on became the "Republic of Kenya."

Another researcher states, "I’m not going to say that the information on the document is bogus, but I can definitely, without hesitation, say that the document was originally a two-layer piece. The top layer is the ‘black’ part that came from a scanner as a grayscale scan. It was converted to black and white and the white part was made transparent.

"That was dropped onto a generic green watermark background, which is what makes it look official. But that was NOT on the original document as scanned. This is very evident by the white haloing around everything black. It is also extremely evident that a layer was dropped onto the green background because the green marks are very crisp in the areas around the edges of the image, but are very blurred where the black image block covers it.

"Now keep in mind that before the green background was added, the original scan could have easily been altered, dates or names changed. I’m not saying it was. I’m just saying it’s a 100% fact that it could have been. So, this document as we see it is still not proof of anything. I could easily recreate this document with someone else’s original Hawaii birth certificate and a generic watermark background."

Another researcher writes, "Jerome Corsi writes that the issue represents the 'Rosetta Stone' of deciphering both Obama’s previously released short-form Certification of Live Birth and the newly released purported copy of his long-form birth certificate.”

"It centers around the fact that two twins born in the same Kapi’olani hospital listed on the Obama document the day after Obama was purportedly born actually have birth certificate numbers lower than Obama. The number should be lower on the Obama certificate if he was born before the twins.

As Corsi explains, “Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

“Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.”

“Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth displayed by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form birth certificate the White House released today – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordykes.”

“Note, Obama was given certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.”

Why was a forged Obama Hawaii birth certificate necessary?

The forgery of Barack Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate appears to have been made necessary by U.S. immigration and naturalization law in the period between 1953 and 1986.

Between Dec. 24, 1953 and Nov. 13, 1986, an individual born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent married to an alien could be a “natural born citizen” only if the U.S. citizen parent had lived in the U.S. continuously for 10 years, five of which were after their 14th birthday.

Barack Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was born on November 29, 1942.  Obama was allegedly born on August 4, 1961.  Thus, by prevailing U.S. law, Barack Obama could not have been a “natural born U.S. citizen.” If he was born in Kenya, Mr. Obama's mother was only 18 and could not have lived in the U.S. five years after her 14th birthday at the time of his birth.

Thus, it became a political necessity for Barack Obama to have a U.S. birth certificate.  A forged birth certificate may have been produced in this case on April 27, 2011 because a genuine one does not exist despite the fact that the President was born in Hawaii or does not exist because he was born overseas.

For Barack Obama to have become a U.S. citizen under prevailing U.S. law at the time of his birth in 1961, his mother would have had to petition a U.S. immigration court for a naturalized U.S. citizenship status, which would have been readily granted to him because he was born of an American mother.

However, by the tragic timing of his birth taking place a few months short of his mother’s having lived in the U.S. for five years continuously after her 14th birthday, Barack Obama never achieved “natural born citizen” status and was as a matter of law constitutionally ineligible for the U.S. Presidency.

It is an established fact that Mr. Obama acquired Indonesian citizenship when his mother married Indonesian national Lolo Soetoro, who adopted Mr. Obama and moved his family to Indonesia in 1967.  Indonesia requires that its citizens renounce all other citizenships.

There is no record, however, that after she sent Mr. Obama to live with his grandparents in Hawaii in 1971 or divorced Mr. Soetero Mr. Obama’s mother ever petitioned for U.S. nationalization of Mr. Obama.  Thus, it is most plausible that Mr. Obama was an Indonesian citizen when he returned to live with his grandparents in Hawaii in 1971; when he matriculated to Occidental College in Hawaii in 1979; when he ran for the U.S. Senate in January 2003; and when he declared for U.S. President on February 10, 2007.

Advertisement
Thus, as a matter of law, even a valid birth certificate showing that Mr. Obama was born on August 4, 1961 in Hawaii would not suffice to grant Barack Obama the “natural born” status he requires to be U.S. President, absent a special statue of the U.S. Congress as was granted his 2008 Presidential rival John McCain.

Ironically, in 1986, this U.S. immigration and naturalization law was changed to grant John McCain “natural born” status despite his having been born in the U.S. Panama Canal Zone.  The law change permits an individual born overseas to a U.S. parent married to an alien to acquire “natural born” status when born overseas in specific U.S. related facilities and territories.

Why such a clumsy forensic forgery in a Presidential birth certificate?

During his interview, Mr. Stanley was asked to speculate on the reason for such a clumsy forensic forgery in a Presidential birth certificate, as many independent researchers are speculating on this question.  A recent poll indicates that more than 60% of U.S. adults believe that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., thus potentially disqualifying him to be U.S. President.

Mr. Stanley responded that there are many possible scenarios for a clumsy forensic forgery.  One scenario was that Mr. Obama was “set up” intentionally by other parties to release a fraudulent birth certificate to embarrass him politically.  Another scenario was that the parties that colluded in producing the fraudulent birth certificate were careless and produced a second-rate forgery that could be broken by anyone with a working knowledge of Adobe Illustrator.

Is Barack Obama the next Richard Nixon?

In his ExopoliticsTV interview, Robert Stanley calls for a Congressional investigation of the apparent forensically fraudulent birth certificate of Mr. Obama. The White House, and federal agencies such as the FBI and Justice Department, have proved incapable of independently investigating this possible impeachable offence.  The production of a fraudulent birth certificate for the purpose of qualifying for U.S. Presidential office would be a “high crime or misdemeanor” under the impeachment clause of the U.S. constitution.

The historical analogy that occurred to Mr. Stanley and to other reporters such as Amy Holmes while interviewing Mr. Stanley today for the Washington Times was that of former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon.

Mr. Nixon resigned the U.S. Presidency on August 9, 1974 in the face of likely impeachment resulting from the Watergate break-in on June 17, 1972, as a result on an alert security guard who discovered a taped door left unlocked by the Watergate burglars that Nixon himself had sent to steal political intelligence from the Democratic party headquarters at the Watergate Hotel.

By analogy, the carelessness of the forged birth certificate of Mr. Obama could be compared to the carelessness of the Watergate burglars who, by leaving the office door to the Democratic headquarters taped, tipped off a security guard that a Presidential-directed illegal search was afoot, which eventually brought the Nixon presidency down.

Is Barack Obama's birth certificate a distraction from his quantum access time travel pre-identification secret?

Robert Stanley and mainstream media journalists such as CNN commentator Amy Holmes agree that the potential significance of the forensic fraud of Mr. Obama’s, if validated, could go beyond the political repercussions of even Watergate.

There appears to be another hidden factor beyond the location of Mr. Obama’s birth that is at play here – quantum access time travel pre-identification of recent U.S. Presidents, including Barack Obama.  The CIA has been pre-identifying future U.S. Presidents such as Barack Obama for 40 years and has, by the evidence, co-opted each of them into CIA. 

This secret quantum access program controls the U.S. presidency and makes the United States a functional CIA dictatorship.

As this reporter has written, the eyewitness evidence of whistleblower Andrew D. Basiago, the attorney in Washington State who was a participant in the secret DARPA-administered Project Pegasus that developed Tesla technology-based "quantum access" to to past and future events, indicates that it is likely that by 1982 Mr. Obama had been personally informed by CIA that he was destined to be the U.S. President inaugurated on January 20, 2009. 

Barack Obama was pre-identified in time as U.S. president by secret DARPA time travel program

The notion that President Obama has had a lifelong affiliation with the CIA is supported by the revelations of crusading lawyer Andrew D. Basiago about a heretofore unknown “quantum access” capability within the US intelligence community provided by time travel technology.

Mr. Basiago has been identified as a “planetary-level whistleblower” by the Web Bot for his account of a secret time-space program, Project Pegasus, launched by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

According to Mr. Basiago, by 1970, Project Pegasus was teleporting individuals between locations in time-space via “teleporters” based on the later works of Nikola Tesla and also propagating images of past and future events via “chronovisors” first developed by the Vatican scientists Pellegrino Ernetti and Pier Maria Gemelli.

These have been used to provide the U.S. president, intelligence community and military with better information about past and future events by which to engage in better contingency planning for future events.

In numerous TV and radio interviews, Mr. Basiago has described how, among other intelligence findings, Project Pegasus was identifying future American presidents and then approaching them and apprising them of their destinies as President.

He has described how as a child serving in Project Pegasus in the early 1970’s, he was present at lunches held at La Hacienda restaurant in Old Town Albuquerque, NM that were attended by project principals and future American presidents, including George Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush, shortly after they were informed that Project Pegasus had found via quantum access that they would one day serve as President.

In appearances on talk radio’s Coast to Coast AM with George Noory in 2009 and 2010, Mr. Basiago described at length a 1982 meeting with Barack Obama in Los Angeles in which Mr. Obama also revealed his awareness that he had been briefed on the fact that the US government had detected that he was destined to reach the White House.

We can infer from this meeting between Mr. Obama and Mr. Basiago in 1982 that at age 20 Mr. Obama had already entered into at least a consultative relationship with the CIA, because at the time, the US government was the only country with a time travel capability and the CIA was known to be collecting the intelligence data about past and future events that Project Pegasus was gathering via its time travel technologies.

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Hidden story behind Jesse Ventura & Piers Morgan’s CNN clash over Obama CIA ties - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/hidden-story-behind-jesse-ventura-piers-morgan-s-cnn-clash-over-obama-cia-ties#ixzz1Kxml6rXV
Cui Bono?  Who will be U.S. President on January 20, 2013?

The operant question as of this writing is whether Mr. Obama’s quantum access time travel controllers have determined that Mr. Obama will be the individual sworn in as U.S. President on January 20, 2013.

If CIA time travel has pre-identified Mr. Obama as U.S. President on January 20, 2013, then the “secret team” behind Mr. Obama may be taking a calculated risk with the newly released Obama birth certificate that there are enough Obama supporters in the main stream media through Operation Mockingbird and otherwise, and in the population, that the issue “will go away” or can be argued away on the basis of the technicalities of U.S. immigration and naturalization law.

If, on the other hand, Mr. Obama’s CIA quantum access controllers are aware through time travel pre-identification that some other individual is to be sworn in as U.S. President on January 20, 2013, then a crude and obvious forgery may be a perfect way to commence an internal “coup d’état” with outcome as yet unknown.

Vice President Joe Biden, Vice President of the United States, is most certainly a “natural born” citizen and a party loyalist.

Throughout this entire process, whatever the outcome (whether Mr. Obama stays or leaves as U.S. President), the principal objectives of the CIA time travel controllers and their loyal sycophants in the mainstream media will be to maintain the secrecy of the CIA's quantum access capability, and their secret control over the U.S. Presidency.

 

Further References

Covert Encounters in Washington, DC by Robert M. Stanley

http://www.unicusmagazine.com/p2_2.htm

 

Hidden story behind Jesse Ventura & Piers Morgan’s CNN clash over Obama CIA ties

http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/hidden-story-behind-jesse-ventura-piers-morgan-s-cnn-clash-over-obama-cia-ties

..

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Washington Times report: Newly released Obama birth certificate forensic forgery - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/washington-times-report-newly-released-obama-birth-certificate-forensic-forgery#ixzz1L1fIL9oF
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 30, 2011, 09:56:00 AM

Washington Times report: Newly released Obama birth certificate forensic forgery
April 29th, 2011 6:45 pm PT .

Alfred Lambremont Webre Seattle Exopolitics Examiner.FollowSubscribe Sponsor an Examiner ...View all of Alfred's articlesPrintEmailShare on FacebookShare on Twitter.Do you like this Article?




In an exclusive April 29, 2011 interview on ExopoliticsTV with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington Times investigative radio, states that the purported birth certificate released by U.S. President Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic forgery.  In the interview, Mr. Stanley's statement is accompanied by an on-camera demonstration of various forgeries within the nine overlaid digital layers of the birth certificate document as released on the White House website.

Earlier on April 29, 2011, Mr. Stanley reported the breaking news regarding the forensic fraud in Mr. Obama's newly released birth certificate on Washington Times investigative radio's America's Morning News while being interviewed by reporters John McCaslin and Amy Holmes, also a commentator for CNN.

LISTEN TO BREAKING NEWS

http://www.unicusmagazine.com/MP3/breaking%20news.mp3

During his ExopoliticsTV interview Mr. Stanley indicated that the White House has in fact taken down Mr. Obama’s alleged recently released birth certificate from the White House website overnight (see here), although the White House has left a copy of the alleged birth certificate of Mr. Obama here.

As of this writing, Mr. Stanley stated there had been no overt comment from the White House other than the taking of the birth certificate offline.  Neither officials of the Hawaii state birth registrar nor of the Honolulu hospital where Mr. Obama allegedly was born have, as yet, commented.

Mr. Stanley stated that the headquarters of Donald Trump had put him in touch directly with Mr. Trump, and that he had forwarded the evidence of forensic forgery in Mr. Obama’s birth certificate directly to Mr. Trump.  

Donald Trump, a possible contender for the 2012 Republican nomination for U.S. President, stated on April 27, 2011 that he considers himself instrumental in forcing Mr. Obama to release the alleged birth certificate, and now apparent forensic fraud.

View Interview with Robert Stanley on forensic fraud on Obama birth certificate

Readers can view the interview of Robert Stanley by Alfred Lambremont Webre on forensic fraud and the Obama birth certificate in the video embedded in the article above or at the following URL:

VIEW INTERVIEW



During his 25 minute ExopoliticsTV interview, Mr. Stanley graphically demonstrates using copies of various of the nine overlaid digital layers within the forensically fraudulent birth certificate of Mr. Obama that the birth certificate was assembled as a forged document, using components of many other documents.  

Robert Stanley’s conclusions congruent with other independent research on forensic fraud in Obama birth certificate

Robert M. Stanley’s conclusions are also congruent with other independent analyses of Mr. Obama’s alleged birth certificate released April 27, 2011, including the following:

Barack Obama's Birth Certificate is a Digitally Layered Photoshop Fake



 

Proof Obama's 4/27/11 "Long Form Certificate of Birth" is Forged!



 

Obama Birth Certificate Scam? 2011-04-27 Obama



 

Other anomalies in the forensically forged Obama birth certificate

Researchers have identified a number of anomalies on the alleged birth certificate of Mr. Obama, apart from the evidence of forensic forgery provided by analysis of its nine layers.

One researcher states, "Look at the hospital name on this document [Mr. Obama's alleged birth certificate]. The hospital had a different name in 1961, it was not named Kapiolani Maternity and Gynocological Hospital, it was called Kaokiolani Children's Hospital.  It did not get the Kapiolani name until the mid-1970s when they merged. Kenya was not called "Kenya" in 1961 it was called "The British East Africa Protectorate" at the time Obama was born and this document was supposedly printed.  Then in 1963 it became "The Dominion of Kenya." Then later on became the "Republic of Kenya."

Another researcher states, "I’m not going to say that the information on the document is bogus, but I can definitely, without hesitation, say that the document was originally a two-layer piece. The top layer is the ‘black’ part that came from a scanner as a grayscale scan. It was converted to black and white and the white part was made transparent.

"That was dropped onto a generic green watermark background, which is what makes it look official. But that was NOT on the original document as scanned. This is very evident by the white haloing around everything black. It is also extremely evident that a layer was dropped onto the green background because the green marks are very crisp in the areas around the edges of the image, but are very blurred where the black image block covers it.

"Now keep in mind that before the green background was added, the original scan could have easily been altered, dates or names changed. I’m not saying it was. I’m just saying it’s a 100% fact that it could have been. So, this document as we see it is still not proof of anything. I could easily recreate this document with someone else’s original Hawaii birth certificate and a generic watermark background."

Another researcher writes, "Jerome Corsi writes that the issue represents the 'Rosetta Stone' of deciphering both Obama’s previously released short-form Certification of Live Birth and the newly released purported copy of his long-form birth certificate.”

"It centers around the fact that two twins born in the same Kapi’olani hospital listed on the Obama document the day after Obama was purportedly born actually have birth certificate numbers lower than Obama. The number should be lower on the Obama certificate if he was born before the twins.

As Corsi explains, “Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

“Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.”

“Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth displayed by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form birth certificate the White House released today – Barack Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordykes.”

“Note, Obama was given certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.”

Why was a forged Obama Hawaii birth certificate necessary?

The forgery of Barack Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate appears to have been made necessary by U.S. immigration and naturalization law in the period between 1953 and 1986.

Between Dec. 24, 1953 and Nov. 13, 1986, an individual born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent married to an alien could be a “natural born citizen” only if the U.S. citizen parent had lived in the U.S. continuously for 10 years, five of which were after their 14th birthday.

Barack Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was born on November 29, 1942.  Obama was allegedly born on August 4, 1961.  Thus, by prevailing U.S. law, Barack Obama could not have been a “natural born U.S. citizen.” If he was born in Kenya, Mr. Obama's mother was only 18 and could not have lived in the U.S. five years after her 14th birthday at the time of his birth.

Thus, it became a political necessity for Barack Obama to have a U.S. birth certificate.  A forged birth certificate may have been produced in this case on April 27, 2011 because a genuine one does not exist despite the fact that the President was born in Hawaii or does not exist because he was born overseas.

For Barack Obama to have become a U.S. citizen under prevailing U.S. law at the time of his birth in 1961, his mother would have had to petition a U.S. immigration court for a naturalized U.S. citizenship status, which would have been readily granted to him because he was born of an American mother.

However, by the tragic timing of his birth taking place a few months short of his mother’s having lived in the U.S. for five years continuously after her 14th birthday, Barack Obama never achieved “natural born citizen” status and was as a matter of law constitutionally ineligible for the U.S. Presidency.

It is an established fact that Mr. Obama acquired Indonesian citizenship when his mother married Indonesian national Lolo Soetoro, who adopted Mr. Obama and moved his family to Indonesia in 1967.  Indonesia requires that its citizens renounce all other citizenships.

There is no record, however, that after she sent Mr. Obama to live with his grandparents in Hawaii in 1971 or divorced Mr. Soetero Mr. Obama’s mother ever petitioned for U.S. nationalization of Mr. Obama.  Thus, it is most plausible that Mr. Obama was an Indonesian citizen when he returned to live with his grandparents in Hawaii in 1971; when he matriculated to Occidental College in Hawaii in 1979; when he ran for the U.S. Senate in January 2003; and when he declared for U.S. President on February 10, 2007.

Advertisement
Thus, as a matter of law, even a valid birth certificate showing that Mr. Obama was born on August 4, 1961 in Hawaii would not suffice to grant Barack Obama the “natural born” status he requires to be U.S. President, absent a special statue of the U.S. Congress as was granted his 2008 Presidential rival John McCain.

Ironically, in 1986, this U.S. immigration and naturalization law was changed to grant John McCain “natural born” status despite his having been born in the U.S. Panama Canal Zone.  The law change permits an individual born overseas to a U.S. parent married to an alien to acquire “natural born” status when born overseas in specific U.S. related facilities and territories.

Why such a clumsy forensic forgery in a Presidential birth certificate?

During his interview, Mr. Stanley was asked to speculate on the reason for such a clumsy forensic forgery in a Presidential birth certificate, as many independent researchers are speculating on this question.  A recent poll indicates that more than 60% of U.S. adults believe that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., thus potentially disqualifying him to be U.S. President.

Mr. Stanley responded that there are many possible scenarios for a clumsy forensic forgery.  One scenario was that Mr. Obama was “set up” intentionally by other parties to release a fraudulent birth certificate to embarrass him politically.  Another scenario was that the parties that colluded in producing the fraudulent birth certificate were careless and produced a second-rate forgery that could be broken by anyone with a working knowledge of Adobe Illustrator.

Is Barack Obama the next Richard Nixon?

In his ExopoliticsTV interview, Robert Stanley calls for a Congressional investigation of the apparent forensically fraudulent birth certificate of Mr. Obama. The White House, and federal agencies such as the FBI and Justice Department, have proved incapable of independently investigating this possible impeachable offence.  The production of a fraudulent birth certificate for the purpose of qualifying for U.S. Presidential office would be a “high crime or misdemeanor” under the impeachment clause of the U.S. constitution.

The historical analogy that occurred to Mr. Stanley and to other reporters such as Amy Holmes while interviewing Mr. Stanley today for the Washington Times was that of former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon.

Mr. Nixon resigned the U.S. Presidency on August 9, 1974 in the face of likely impeachment resulting from the Watergate break-in on June 17, 1972, as a result on an alert security guard who discovered a taped door left unlocked by the Watergate burglars that Nixon himself had sent to steal political intelligence from the Democratic party headquarters at the Watergate Hotel.

By analogy, the carelessness of the forged birth certificate of Mr. Obama could be compared to the carelessness of the Watergate burglars who, by leaving the office door to the Democratic headquarters taped, tipped off a security guard that a Presidential-directed illegal search was afoot, which eventually brought the Nixon presidency down.

Is Barack Obama's birth certificate a distraction from his quantum access time travel pre-identification secret?

Robert Stanley and mainstream media journalists such as CNN commentator Amy Holmes agree that the potential significance of the forensic fraud of Mr. Obama’s, if validated, could go beyond the political repercussions of even Watergate.

There appears to be another hidden factor beyond the location of Mr. Obama’s birth that is at play here – quantum access time travel pre-identification of recent U.S. Presidents, including Barack Obama.  The CIA has been pre-identifying future U.S. Presidents such as Barack Obama for 40 years and has, by the evidence, co-opted each of them into CIA.  

This secret quantum access program controls the U.S. presidency and makes the United States a functional CIA dictatorship.

As this reporter has written, the eyewitness evidence of whistleblower Andrew D. Basiago, the attorney in Washington State who was a participant in the secret DARPA-administered Project Pegasus that developed Tesla technology-based "quantum access" to to past and future events, indicates that it is likely that by 1982 Mr. Obama had been personally informed by CIA that he was destined to be the U.S. President inaugurated on January 20, 2009.  

Barack Obama was pre-identified in time as U.S. president by secret DARPA time travel program

The notion that President Obama has had a lifelong affiliation with the CIA is supported by the revelations of crusading lawyer Andrew D. Basiago about a heretofore unknown “quantum access” capability within the US intelligence community provided by time travel technology.

Mr. Basiago has been identified as a “planetary-level whistleblower” by the Web Bot for his account of a secret time-space program, Project Pegasus, launched by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

According to Mr. Basiago, by 1970, Project Pegasus was teleporting individuals between locations in time-space via “teleporters” based on the later works of Nikola Tesla and also propagating images of past and future events via “chronovisors” first developed by the Vatican scientists Pellegrino Ernetti and Pier Maria Gemelli.

These have been used to provide the U.S. president, intelligence community and military with better information about past and future events by which to engage in better contingency planning for future events.

In numerous TV and radio interviews, Mr. Basiago has described how, among other intelligence findings, Project Pegasus was identifying future American presidents and then approaching them and apprising them of their destinies as President.

He has described how as a child serving in Project Pegasus in the early 1970’s, he was present at lunches held at La Hacienda restaurant in Old Town Albuquerque, NM that were attended by project principals and future American presidents, including George Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush, shortly after they were informed that Project Pegasus had found via quantum access that they would one day serve as President.

In appearances on talk radio’s Coast to Coast AM with George Noory in 2009 and 2010, Mr. Basiago described at length a 1982 meeting with Barack Obama in Los Angeles in which Mr. Obama also revealed his awareness that he had been briefed on the fact that the US government had detected that he was destined to reach the White House.

We can infer from this meeting between Mr. Obama and Mr. Basiago in 1982 that at age 20 Mr. Obama had already entered into at least a consultative relationship with the CIA, because at the time, the US government was the only country with a time travel capability and the CIA was known to be collecting the intelligence data about past and future events that Project Pegasus was gathering via its time travel technologies.

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Hidden story behind Jesse Ventura & Piers Morgan’s CNN clash over Obama CIA ties - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/hidden-story-behind-jesse-ventura-piers-morgan-s-cnn-clash-over-obama-cia-ties#ixzz1Kxml6rXV
Cui Bono?  Who will be U.S. President on January 20, 2013?

The operant question as of this writing is whether Mr. Obama’s quantum access time travel controllers have determined that Mr. Obama will be the individual sworn in as U.S. President on January 20, 2013.

If CIA time travel has pre-identified Mr. Obama as U.S. President on January 20, 2013, then the “secret team” behind Mr. Obama may be taking a calculated risk with the newly released Obama birth certificate that there are enough Obama supporters in the main stream media through Operation Mockingbird and otherwise, and in the population, that the issue “will go away” or can be argued away on the basis of the technicalities of U.S. immigration and naturalization law.

If, on the other hand, Mr. Obama’s CIA quantum access controllers are aware through time travel pre-identification that some other individual is to be sworn in as U.S. President on January 20, 2013, then a crude and obvious forgery may be a perfect way to commence an internal “coup d’état” with outcome as yet unknown.

Vice President Joe Biden, Vice President of the United States, is most certainly a “natural born” citizen and a party loyalist.

Throughout this entire process, whatever the outcome (whether Mr. Obama stays or leaves as U.S. President), the principal objectives of the CIA time travel controllers and their loyal sycophants in the mainstream media will be to maintain the secrecy of the CIA's quantum access capability, and their secret control over the U.S. Presidency.

 

Further References

Covert Encounters in Washington, DC by Robert M. Stanley

http://www.unicusmagazine.com/p2_2.htm

 

Hidden story behind Jesse Ventura & Piers Morgan’s CNN clash over Obama CIA ties

http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/hidden-story-behind-jesse-ventura-piers-morgan-s-cnn-clash-over-obama-cia-ties

..

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Washington Times report: Newly released Obama birth certificate forensic forgery - Seattle exopolitics | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/washington-times-report-newly-released-obama-birth-certificate-forensic-forgery#ixzz1L1fIL9oF

Henceforth I will not read ANY article which you post which begins with anything having to do with Obama;s birth certificate......it's a dead issue that you refuse to move on from..your credibility as been totally shattered on this issue
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 30, 2011, 10:00:20 AM
Who are you kidding?   You love the birther issue as much as anyone else.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 30, 2011, 12:23:39 PM
There appears to be another hidden factor beyond the location of Mr. Obama’s birth that is at play here – quantum access time travel pre-identification of recent U.S. Presidents, including Barack Obama.  The CIA has been pre-identifying future U.S. Presidents such as Barack Obama for 40 years and has, by the evidence, co-opted each of them into CIA. 

This secret quantum access program controls the U.S. presidency and makes the United States a functional CIA dictatorship.

As this reporter has written, the eyewitness evidence of whistleblower Andrew D. Basiago, the attorney in Washington State who was a participant in the secret DARPA-administered Project Pegasus that developed Tesla technology-based "quantum access" to to past and future events, indicates that it is likely that by 1982 Mr. Obama had been personally informed by CIA that he was destined to be the U.S. President inaugurated on January 20, 2009. 

Barack Obama was pre-identified in time as U.S. president by secret DARPA time travel program


33,

Do you even read the articles you post?

Time travel is now involved in this giant conspiracy.  Oh my.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on April 30, 2011, 12:23:55 PM
Who are you kidding?   You love the birther issue as much as anyone else.   

nope..not true..its a total waste of time and I will no longer debate it nor read anything about it that any one posts....if you guys are that crazy to still keep this issue alive then so be it but I won't be a party to nonsense
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on April 30, 2011, 12:43:58 PM
 :)

Romney: Biden Biggest Loser in Obama Birth Issue
Friday, 29 Apr 2011
By Newsmax Wires

The biggest loser in the controversy surrounding Barak Obam's birthplace was not Donald Trump, said Mitt Romney, but Joe Biden.

"There was no one more disappointed than that amiable, know-it-all windbag, Joe Biden,” Romney joked at the Americans for Prosperity forum in New Hampshire which featured five GOP hopefuls, Politico reports. “But I wish Joe Biden well."

Romney, who followed Tim Pawlenty in speaking to the crowd, criticized Obama's efforts on the economy and health care reform. He was asked about his own health care overhaul while governor, dubbed 'Romney Care.'

"I went to work to solve a problem," Romney said. "Some parts of that experiment worked, some parts didn't."

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/mittromney-barackobama-donaldtrump-timpawlenty/2011/04/29/id/394639
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on April 30, 2011, 03:40:33 PM
the only thing more lame than joe biden is romneycare.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 30, 2011, 04:52:23 PM
Skip to comments.

Obama demanded detailed birth certificate after continued questions
The Washington Post ^ | 27 April 2011 | Anne E. Kornblut
Posted on April 28, 2011 2:37:04 PM EDT by jda

Obama had grown incredulous at the overall debate. . . . Finally, on April 19, in a meeting with White House counsel Bob Bauer, the president asked about the feasibility of getting his long-form birth certificate at last.

. . . Last week, it was Obama who made the call to proceed. “He was the driving force,” the official said.

The swift action that followed — in less than 10 days, Obama’s lawyers were able to obtain the legal waivers necessary to bring copies of the certificate back to the White House – raised questions about the timing. Why, for example, did Obama officials wait so long to tamp down rumors that have dogged the president since the 2008 presidential campaign? Why did they release the forms on the very day that Trump is making his first visit to New Hampshire, and during a week when Obama is slated to make other major announcements about his national security team?

According to senior administration officials, the timeframe was the result of Obama’s personal request for a resolution – and reflected his impatience with political frivolity of any kind.

. . .

When administration officials released the paperwork on Wednesday morning shortly after 9 a.m., it came as a shock to the political establishment. White House officials moved quickly to explain how it had come about, holding briefings with reporters, releasing the paperwork via Twitter and then sending the president to the podium in the White House briefing room.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on April 30, 2011, 04:53:19 PM
33,

Do you even read the articles you post?

Time travel is now involved in this giant conspiracy.  Oh my.
NO ONE could read all the crap that he posts, him included.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Grape Ape on April 30, 2011, 08:29:06 PM
NO ONE could read all the crap that he posts, him included.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=371279.0


All you do is troll.  You should be banned.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 30, 2011, 10:21:41 PM
Busted: White House Now Claims They Ordered Short-Form COLB From Hawaii Department Of Health In 2008 Yet COLB Is Date Stamped 2007

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON 2:12 PM
[revised] The Obama lies keep mounting. I just received a phone call from Pixel Patriot to head over to the White House website and check out the post on Obama's purported long-form birth certificate. After reading the post I was astounded to see what I saw. If you recall, one of the first Obama short-form COLB's posted online was the crease-less, seal-less, redacted COLB that is posted at Obama's FightTheSmears website.

Instead of the White House posting that COLB, or even the short-form with creases and a seal like at Factcheck, Pixel Patriot pointed out to me that they posted a new version of the original COLB in a monochromatic format. That is significant because you can no longer see the patterned background or the date stamp. That new version is a PDF document created from a JPEG image with a date stamp of April 25, 2011 originating from a Snopes message board.

The White House website is attempting to validate a presidential record originally introduced in 2008 to the public by referencing what appears to be a printout from a message board from two days prior. Robert Gibbs is on record admitting that he posted Obama's COLB on the Internet. Why would the White House now choose to source an image of an image which no Hawaii official could legally endorse as being issued from them?

It must be noted that there is no certificate number under the blacked out section of the COLB, now posted at the White House website or the one posted at FightTheSmears website.

Now here is where the big lie begins. If you read the first sentence of the post at the White House you will see that someone is flat out lying as to when the purported short-form COLB was ordered/issued from/by the Hawaii Department of Health.

The first part of the paragraph from the White House website reads:

"In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet." -Source.

This date stamp issue was raised before in the past but Factcheck claimed this:

"We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and "all the records we could get our hands on" according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008,..." -Source.

Now that the White House admits they ordered the short-form in 2008 how could the short-form COLB be issued by the state of Hawaii in 2008 when the actual date stamp on the short-form COLB is date stamped June 6th, 2007?

Below are the pertinent screenshots, just in case they scrub-a-dub-dub, that show the White House and Factcheck are full of malarkey, as if we didn't know... Fact check that CrapCheck.org.

Hat tip Pixel Patriot. Please view Pixel Patriot's latest essay and video to see the real issue that Obama is up against, here.







Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here. 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here. 

Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here. 

Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here. 

Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Hawaii Sr Election Clerk-Obama Was NOT Born in Hawaii-Wash Times Natl Wkly-20100705 Pg 5


| More Share Options
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 01, 2011, 06:00:44 AM
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=371279.0


All you do is troll.  You should be banned.

actually he's absolutely right...YOU should be banned if you can't see that
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 06:05:56 AM
Busted: White House Now Claims They Ordered Short-Form COLB From Hawaii Department Of Health In 2008 Yet COLB Is Date Stamped 2007

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON 2:12 PM
[revised] The Obama lies keep mounting. I just received a phone call from Pixel Patriot to head over to the White House website and check out the post on Obama's purported long-form birth certificate. After reading the post I was astounded to see what I saw. If you recall, one of the first Obama short-form COLB's posted online was the crease-less, seal-less, redacted COLB that is posted at Obama's FightTheSmears website.

Instead of the White House posting that COLB, or even the short-form with creases and a seal like at Factcheck, Pixel Patriot pointed out to me that they posted a new version of the original COLB in a monochromatic format. That is significant because you can no longer see the patterned background or the date stamp. That new version is a PDF document created from a JPEG image with a date stamp of April 25, 2011 originating from a Snopes message board.

The White House website is attempting to validate a presidential record originally introduced in 2008 to the public by referencing what appears to be a printout from a message board from two days prior. Robert Gibbs is on record admitting that he posted Obama's COLB on the Internet. Why would the White House now choose to source an image of an image which no Hawaii official could legally endorse as being issued from them?

It must be noted that there is no certificate number under the blacked out section of the COLB, now posted at the White House website or the one posted at FightTheSmears website.

Now here is where the big lie begins. If you read the first sentence of the post at the White House you will see that someone is flat out lying as to when the purported short-form COLB was ordered/issued from/by the Hawaii Department of Health.

The first part of the paragraph from the White House website reads:

"In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet." -Source.

This date stamp issue was raised before in the past but Factcheck claimed this:

"We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and "all the records we could get our hands on" according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008,..." -Source.

Now that the White House admits they ordered the short-form in 2008 how could the short-form COLB be issued by the state of Hawaii in 2008 when the actual date stamp on the short-form COLB is date stamped June 6th, 2007?

Below are the pertinent screenshots, just in case they scrub-a-dub-dub, that show the White House and Factcheck are full of malarkey, as if we didn't know... Fact check that CrapCheck.org.

Hat tip Pixel Patriot. Please view Pixel Patriot's latest essay and video to see the real issue that Obama is up against, here.







Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here. 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here. 

Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here. 

Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here. 

Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Hawaii Sr Election Clerk-Obama Was NOT Born in Hawaii-Wash Times Natl Wkly-20100705 Pg 5


| More Share Options

Did you see The Donald getting owned by Obama and then Seth Meyers?

That was pretty brutal.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 06:07:39 AM
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=371279.0


All you do is troll.  You should be banned.
Pipe down, sonny.

Adults are talking here.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 06:18:20 AM
Yeah trump was owned alright.  Obama was forced to discuss his bc the whole time.  Lol. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 06:21:35 AM
Yeah trump was owned alright.  Obama was forced to discuss his bc the whole time.  Lol. 
You have no qualms about willfully denying reality, do you?

It's amazing. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 06:21:51 AM
Yeah trump was owned alright.  Obama was forced to discuss his bc the whole time.  Lol.  

hahahahahaha discussing the bc was to shit on trump more,really are you that num,when people tell you  a joke do they have to explain the punch line :D :D :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 06:26:41 AM
hahahahahaha discussing the bc was to shit on trump more,really are you that num,whan people tell you  a joke do they have to explain the punch line :D :D :D

The joke is on bama since he looks like a baby who played games on this for 3 years
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 06:28:53 AM
The joke is on bama since he looks like a baby who played games on this for 3 years

hahahaha more birther talk,you have to love it,here's a shovel keep digging :D :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 06:31:14 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 06:35:01 AM
You commies love the birthed issue. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 06:43:59 AM
You commies love the birthed issue. 

beck talk, ;D this is getting good  ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 06:44:56 AM
beck talk, ;D this is getting good  ;D


You are a commie.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 06:49:02 AM

You are a commie.   

that's what i like, anybody that doen't have your worped twisted thinking is a commie,that's why your post are so credible  :D :D :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 06:50:41 AM
that's what i like, anybody that doen't have your worped twisted thinking is a commie,that's why your post are so credible  :D :D :D

Let's go by the credo of the communist manifesto.  You agree w all of the goals and tenets of it, thus you are a red. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 06:55:47 AM
Let's go by the credo of the communist manifesto.  You agree w all of the goals and tenets of it, thus you are a red. 
McCarthy fan?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 06:57:41 AM
McCarthy fan?

Yes.   Turns out Joe was right. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 06:57:49 AM
Let's go by the credo of the communist manifesto.  You agree w all of the goals and tenets of it, thus you are a red.  

ok mr. beck what's next, god made me do it. earth to hopeless man, get a life  :D,go outside get some fresh air, talk to living moving people,your life doesn't have to revolve around your computer monitor
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 01, 2011, 06:58:35 AM
Yeah trump was owned alright.  Obama was forced to discuss his bc the whole time.  Lol.  

instead of his failure to deliver on the budget, wars, deficit, etc.

Yes, that's a WIN for trump.

Shit, the CTer in me says that Trump - a NBC/GE empployee, was actually working FOR obama all along.  It makes sense.  He's a lifetime lib who said nice things about obama and pelosi just a few years ago.  He engages in a campaign which
1) boosts ratings for NBC (and profits)
2) Adds to his own profile/keeps his name on top
3) benefits his own party (the dems) and obama
4) He still claims a win.

Is it really that crazy of a CT?  A lifetime liberal, using a platform provided by his liberal media employer, delivers a 3-month mission which benefits the liberal president by proving his legitimacy while at the same time keeping most other issues out of the limelight.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 01, 2011, 07:24:08 AM
Is it really that crazy of a CT?  A lifetime liberal, using a platform provided by his liberal media employer, delivers a 3-month mission which benefits the liberal president by proving his legitimacy while at the same time keeping most other issues out of the limelight.

If a lifetime lib like Jane Fonda pulled this kinda bullshit - spreading stories about obama, only to distract from issues obama doesn't want to talk about... vindicating obama in the end... while getting rich along the way... all while employed by NBC.... I think most people here would be calling it a nice stunt, a CT, etc.

But they can't be duped by Trump.  He wouldn't do that, right guys?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 07:32:27 AM
Yes.   Turns out Joe was right. 
Great, you and Ann Coulter agree. I'm sold.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 07:39:49 AM
Kennedy was flirting w the kgb.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 08:18:52 AM
Kennedy was flirting w the kgb.
You are a vile creature, rotten to the core.

Anyone ever told you that?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: George Whorewell on May 01, 2011, 08:41:24 AM
You are a vile creature, rotten to the core.

Anyone ever told you that?

 ::)

Has someone been spending their unemployed days sitting at home and watching endless re-runs of how the Grinch Stole Christmas?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 09:53:14 AM
::)

Has someone been spending their unemployed days sitting at home and watching endless re-runs of how the Grinch Stole Christmas?
Funny.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 10:02:12 AM
Ted kennedys fbi file showed he tried warming up to the commies and kgb.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 01, 2011, 12:11:14 PM
You guys should check out the website, as i couldn't post all the things there here..
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292649


Posted: April 28, 2011
10:19 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

A statement from Barack Obama's half-sister has at least cast a shadow of doubt on the legitimacy of the "Certificate of Live Birth" document that was released by the White House this week in an attempt to stifle questions about his eligibility, by referencing his apparent adoption by her father, Indonesian Lolo Soetoro.

Facebook page comments from Maya Soetoro-Ng
On a Facebook page, Maya Soetoro-Ng wrote to a woman who had met her in Hawaii after Madelyn Dunham, the mother of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro and grandmother to both Maya and Barack, passed away in 2008.

Soetoro-Ng was objecting to having a conversation with a critic of her half-brother, and said she had been misquoted as saying her whole family was Muslim.

She wrote, "I did not say my brother was a Muslim. I did say that I was more philosophically Buddhist. I told you that you were upsetting me. You said that you were not trying to upset me but wanted to know the truth about (Raila) Odinga (a Muslim for whom Barack Obama campaigned in the 2007 presidential race in Kenya). I told you I didn't know who that was and had never met him. You mentioned the adoption laws of Indonesia that you saw as related to my brother's legitimacy (you were suggesting that because my father, his stepfather, had adopted him, that my brother was no longer American) and I said that I had no idea about Indonesian adoption law."

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!

While not a definitive statement, there also are other indications that Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro's second husband, an Indonesia, either adopted Barack Obama or considered him adopted, as documentation obtained by the Associated Press reveals that Obama-Soetoro was registered as a Muslim Indonesian at school when he lived in the Far East with his mother and Lolo Soetoro.


Indonesian school registration for "Barry Soetoro" (AP photo)
The adoption, if it happened, could affect the birth certificate in that in the United States, when an adoption takes place, a birth certificate that would have been generated at birth is replaced by a birth certificate created at an adoption that references the adoptive parents as the actual birth parents. The location of birth is not changed, nor the weight of the baby, or other details. But the mother and father can be changed on an original long-form birth certificate during the adoption process.

WND has confirmed such practices in several states, including Maine, Colorado and California, and it largely is standard practice across the country.

Whether such practices would prevail in international adoptions, especially during the 1960s, remains unclear. Officials with the U.S. State Department provided reams of information on processes for U.S. couples to adopt foreign children, but declined to respond to questions about American citizen children adopted by Indonesians. Officials with both the Hawaii Department of Health and the Hawaii attorney general's office, which monitors the legal proceedings for adoptions there, declined to respond to more than a dozen requests for comment from WND.

Officials with the Indonesian embassy in Washington declined to provide details to WND on any adoption procedures, referring WND to an court in Indonesia instead.
The U.S. State Department was able to confirm that adoptions by U.S. families of Indonesian children during 2010 totaled only three cases. There also were only three such cases in 2009 and only six in 2008.

Young Barack Obama with his mother

Tonya Franklin, the woman who had the exchange with Soetoro-Ng, said she had been researching a variety of subjects and had traveled to Hawaii. She went to the apartment of Madelyn Dunham, who passed away shortly before the election in 2008.

She had left a message at a school for Soetoro-Ng and then bumped into her in the parking lot.

"She believed he had been adopted," Franklin told WND of what she got out of the conversation. But she also said Soetoro-Ng was uncertain of the process that might or might not have taken place – the legalities and formalities. That conversation happened several years ago, but the Facebook exchange came just days ago.

During the 1960s Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship, so if the school record is correct, and Obama attended classes as an Indonesian citizen, the apparent requirement would have been for him to give up an American citizenship.

On his later return to the U.S., in regaining citizenship, he likely would have had to have been listed as a "naturalized" citizen, not a "natural-born Citizen," as demanded by the U.S. Constitution for the office of president.

That remains the focal point of challenges to his ascendancy to the Oval Office, because many interpret that phrase to mean the citizen offspring of two citizen parents. With Kenyan-born Barack Obama Sr. listed as his father, Obama Jr. would not have met those requirements under any circumstances.

Any adoption records that might exist have been kept from public review, however.

WND previously has reported that the dateline for Obama's move to Indonesia, and his later return to Hawaii, remains unclear.

Two newspaper articles from 1990 – apparently based on interviews with Barack Obama – reported that the future president left Hawaii for Indonesia when he was 2 years old, not 6 years old, as he relates in his autobiography.

On May 3, 1990, the Associated Press widely published a feature story on Obama highlighting him as the first African-American named as president of the Harvard Law review.

"Obama moved to Southeast Asia at age 2 when his parents divorced and his mother married an Indonesian," the Associated Press reported. "Until the fifth grade, Obama attended Indonesian schools, where most of his friends were the sons of servants, street peddlers and farmers."

Here is the screen capture of the AP report as published by the Chicago Daily Herald on May 3, 1990:

Here is a close-up of the key two paragraphs:

Assuming that Obama was 10 years old in the fifth grade, this 1990 AP report would have placed Obama in Indonesia for eight years, from around August 1963 until August 1971, when he was 2 years old until he was 10 years old.

Then, on Aug. 1, 1990, reporter Tammerlin Drummond wrote that Obama left for Indonesia at 2 years old, in an article entitled "Harvard Law Review Gets Its First Black President."

"Two years [after Obama was born], Obama's parents separated and he moved to a small village outside Jakarta, Indonesia, with his mother, an anthropologist," Drummond wrote. "There he spent his boyhood playing with the sons and daughters of rice farmers and rickshaw drivers, attending an Indonesian-speaking school, where he had little contact with Americans."

Drummond further reported that, "After six years in Indonesia, Obama was sent back to the United States to live with his maternal grandparents in Hawaii in preparation for college."

Six years in Indonesia? Or eight years, as the AP reported earlier? Regardless of which account may be true, they both contradict the "official" story.

According to the timeline Obama has represented, here are key dates:

Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961;

Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, divorced Barack Obama Sr. on March 20, 1964, when Obama was still 2 years old;

Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro on March 24, 1965, when Obama was 3 years old;

On July 20, 1966, Lolo Soetoro leaves Hawaii, where he had been attending the University of Hawaii, to return to Indonesia;

On June 29, 1967, Stanley Ann Dunham applies to the U.S. Department of State to amend her U.S. passport No. F777788 to change her name from Stanley Ann Dunham to her married name, Stanley Ann Soetoro;

According to her passport records, Ann Dunham Soetoro traveled from Honolulu, Hawaii, to Djakarta, Indonesia, via Japan Airlines in October 1967, using U.S. Passport No. 777788.
If Barack Obama Jr. traveled with his mother to go to Indonesia for the first time in October 1967, he would have been six years old.

The information in Obama's memoir, "Dreams from My Father," generally supports that Obama was in Indonesia for only four years, from the time he was 6 years old until 10 years old, from 1967-1971, although the references to Indonesia in the autobiography are typically vague regarding specific dates.

In trying to determine the Obama timeline in Indonesia, the following passages in "Dreams from My Father" are relevant:

Obama comments he had lived in Indonesia for "over three years by that time," discussing a visit with his mother to the U.S. embassy in Djakarta, at some unspecified time before he returned to the United States ("Dreams from My Father," p. 30).

"In Indonesia, I had spent two years at a Muslim school, two years at the Catholic school" ("Dreams from My Father," p. 154).

On a yet unspecified date, supposedly in 1971, Barack Obama returns from Indonesia to Hawaii alone, unaccompanied by his mother ("Dreams from My Father," p. 53).

Holiyah "Lia" Soetoro Sobah (Source: We the People of the United States)
It was when it was reported a previously unknown stepsister of Barack Obama died that other questions were raised.

Internet researchers made the link between the president and his previously undisclosed stepsister, Holiyah "Lia" Soetoro Sobah, after translating from obituaries published in Indonesia.

The obituaries identified Lia as having been adopted by Lolo Soetoro, Obama's stepfather, and Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro, the president's mother.

The surfacing of Lia as an adopted child of Lolo Soetoro and Dunham raised the question of whether Barack Obama himself might have been adopted officially as Lolo Soetoro's stepson while in Indonesia from 1967 to 1971.

Even though Obama makes no mention in "Dreams from My Father" of having had an Indonesian stepsister, the Indonesian obituaries make clear that Obama slept in the same room as his stepsister while the two of them grew up together in the Soetoro home in Jakarta.

While Obama has not acknowledged having had a stepsister in Indonesia, he discussed at length in his autobiography his half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, who was born in Indonesia to Lolo Soetoro and Ann Dunham on Aug. 15, 1970.

WND has reported that in a passport amendment submitted Aug. 13, 1968, Obama's mother identified her son with an Indonesian surname as Barack Obama II Soebarkah, and asked the State Department to drop him from her U.S. passport.

The transaction could have been part of an effort by Dunham to obtain Indonesian citizenship for her son.

WND also reported it is undisputed that Obama took on the last name of his stepfather in school registration documents while in Indonesia. All Indonesian students were required to carry government identity cards, or Karty Tanda Pendudaks, which needed to bear the student's legal name, which should be matched in public school registration filings.

According to Indonesian legal experts, it was difficult to enroll non-Indonesian citizens in public schooling.

If Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama at age five or younger, then Obama would automatically have become an Indonesian citizen according to the country's laws in the 1960s, which stipulated any child aged five or younger adopted by an Indonesian father is immediately granted Indonesian citizenship upon completion of the adoption process.

Lolo Soetoro could have adopted Obama in Hawaii, although such an adoption would not have necessarily been recognized by Indonesia. Likewise, what happened in Indonesia may or may not have affected the status of Obama-Soetoro in the U.S.

Related offers:

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency

There's a new strategy to get answers to Obama's eligibility questions. See how you can help.

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!

Join the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

Want to turn up the pressure to learn the facts? Get your signs and postcards asking for the president's birth-certificate documentation from the Birth Certificate Store!

Send a contribution to support the national billboard campaign that asks the simple question, "Where's the birth certificate?"

Get your yard signs and rally signs that ask the same question – and make sure it's in time for the next tea-party rally

Get your permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers for your car, truck or file cabinet – and join the campaign for constitutional integrity.

Get the most comprehensive special report ever produced on the Obama eligibility issue.

Previous stories:

Previously unknown Obama stepsister dies

Was young Obama Indonesian citizen?

Old papers tell different tales on Obama's past

New documents point to Indonesian citizenship

1962 Obama articles don't mention wife, son

'62 letter from father ignores Obama, mom

Previously unknown Obama stepsister dies

No Obama birth certificate among passport documents

New documents point to Indonesian citizenship

Oops! Obama mama passport 'destroyed'

Eligibility challenger: Bring on the evidence

Judges evade Obama birth-certificate query

Did Obama even write letter to 'birth hospital'?

Eligibility challenger: Army convicted me without trial

Army disses officer challenging Obama

Call for Obama's resignation cites 'deceit, fraud, dishonesty'

Officer to Army: See you in court

Call for Obama's resignation cites 'deceit, fraud, dishonesty'

Army slams door on Obama details

Hearing set for officer challenging eligibility

CNN places eligibility in primetime spotlight

Army to 'inquire' into charges against Lakin

Army charges Lt. Col. Lakin

Retired Army general: Lt. Col. Lakin has 'valid point'

Approaching apocalypse: Will Obama docs surface?

'Important question about Constitution'

Officer challenging Obama 'reassigned'

Officer to Obama: Burden of proof must rest with you

Officer questioning eligibility faces new threats from Army

Army suggests brain scan for eligibility challenger

Army 'showdown' at eligibility corral

THE FULL STORY: See listing of more than 200 exclusive WND reports on the eligibility issue

Bob Unruh is a news editor for WorldNetDaily.com.




        
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 12:18:52 PM
No wonder he is so fucked in the head.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 01, 2011, 12:34:26 PM
No wonder he is so fucked in the head.

Click on the link for access to the pictures that can't be posted here
>>http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=293113#ixzz1L8BiBOLJ

Birth certificate conflicts with father's real birthday?
Newly released immigration documents indicate Obama Sr. was 2 years older
Posted: April 30, 2011
10:20 pm Eastern

By Art Moore
© 2011 WorldNetDaily


Immigration document listing Barack Obama Sr.'s birthdate as June 18, 1934
Overshadowed by reaction to the release of Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate was the unearthing of half-century-old files that cast doubt on whether the age of the president's father indicated on the Hawaii document is accurate.

The applications, memos and other documents from the Immigration and Naturalization Service acquired in a Freedom of Information Act request by Heather Smathers of the Arizona Independent – which indicate Barack Obama Sr. would have been 27 at the time of his son's birth, not 25 – also suggest that the president's father did not leave the islands from the time of his August 1959 arrival until he departed for graduate studies at Harvard in June 1962.

Some have speculated that the president's parents ventured together to Kenya while his mother was pregnant, but the files present a picture of a financially strapped Barack Obama Sr. known for "playboy ways" who two months after his reported marriage to Ann Dunham was still "running around with several girls." His INS records, which show he had a class F-1 student visa that had to be renewed annually, do not preclude him having made a return trip to Kenya during his U.S. studies. But the only indication of travel outside the U.S. was when officials denied a request for a fifth visa extension and forced him to return to his home country in 1964, when Barack Obama Jr. was 2 years old.

Among the released documents is a copy of a handwritten memo by an immigration official that refers to Barack Obama Jr.'s birth in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961.

The age of Barack Obama Sr. listed on the Certificate of Live Birth released Wednesday by the president is 25, consistent with his commonly reported birthday of June 18, 1936.

Several documents in the newly released immigration files, including applications filled in by hand and signed by Barack Obama Sr., also list a birthdate of June 18, 1936.

However, about a dozen documents – including an alien registration card with fingerprints and an immigration arrival-departure card which presumably accompanied his passport – show a birthdate of July 18, 1934.


Arrival-Departure card, with record of visa extensions, listing Barack Obama Sr.'s birthdate as June 18, 1934
That date of birth would have made him 27 at the time Barack Obama Jr. was born.

(Story continues below)


    

 

In some instances, also, Barack Obama Sr.'s nationality is listed as British, instead of Kenyan.

In an application to extend his visa that was approved July 28, 1960, officials notated: "presents valid British passport 84764 until 4/29/64.

That passport number, 84764, was entered on a June 6, 1963, application to extend his stay that stated he held a Kenyan passport. But this can likely be explained by the fact that Kenya was a colony of the United Kingdom until 1963.

Curiously, on an Aug. 17, 1962, application to extend his visa, Obama Sr. filled in a line asking him to list the names and addresses of children. The only child he listed was Roy Obama, a son from his Kenyan wife, Kezia. At that time, Barack Obama Jr. was 1 year old.

On that application he also listed his mailing address as c/o the Koinoinia Foundation in Pikesville, Md. The organization, according to a website, was a "spiritual community" with "strong Quaker influences" that sought to "take literacy, agriculture, health, and similar practical skills into the undeveloped world." After 1970, it "shifted to New Age and wholistic activities."


Image released by the White House April 27, 2011

An Immigration and Naturalization Service arrival-departure record filled in by hand when he left the United States for Kenya in 1964 indicated a 1934 birthdate and British nationality.

The June 18, 1934, birthdate also was handwritten on an application to extend his temporary stay that was submitted in Honolulu on Aug. 31, 1961, just weeks after Barack Obama Jr. was born.

On the application, Obama's father also indicated he was married to Ann Dunham, and he asked for permission to get employment, explaining: "because unable to get more financial assistance."


"Alien Registration Fingerprint Chart" listing Barack Obama Sr.'s birthdate as June 18, 1934
On a previous application for permission to work, dated March 3, 1961, he indicated the reason was "economic necessity," stating, "This is because I did not come with enough for the entire period of my stay and thought would get some from scholarships and work."

On Aug. 31, 1961, he was granted an exception to the rule that F-1 non-immigrant students not be allowed employment and was permitted to accept up to 25 hours a week of work, expiring Aug. 8, 1962. On the application, he checked: "Because of economic necessity due to unforeseen change in financial circumstances." In the required explanation, he wrote by hand, "because unable to get more financial assistance." On the form, he listed his total income as $1,190 and his total yearly expenses as $2,040.

Interestingly, one year before he filled out that application, he had indicated on an application submitted in Hawaii to extend his visa another year that he he had worked for $5 a day as a dishwasher at the "Inkblot coffee shop."

Yet near the end of his time in the U.S., on April 21, 1964, he indicated on an INS form that he had not "been employed or engaged in business in the United States."

'Child born in Honolulu'

An INS official, William Woods, handwrote a memo dated Aug. 31, 1961, that referred to Barack Obama Jr. being born Aug. 4, 1961, in Hawaii.

"They have one child born Honolulu on 8/4/1961 – Barack Obama II, child living with mother (she lives with her parents & subject resides at 1482 Alencastre St.)," Woods wrote.

Woods also noted Obama Sr.'s wife planned "to go to Washington State University next semester."

As WND reported, school records show Dunham did go to the state of Washington to continue her studies, but she attended the University of Washington in Seattle, not Washington State University in Pullman, Wash. A girlfriend from Ann Dunham's high school days in Mercer Island, Wash., near Seattle, has said she remembers Dunham visiting her, along with newborn Barack Obama Jr., in "late August" 1961.

Dunham's departure from Hawaii shortly after Obama Jr.'s birth conflicts with the president's account of his life story. He told a gathering of schoolchildren in September 2009, for example, "My father left my family when I was 2 years old, and I was raised by a single mother."

In the speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2004 that catapulted him to political stardom, Obama told the nation, "My parents shared not only an improbable love, they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation."

'Get rid of him'

The Obama Sr. files show immigration officials rejected his request for yet another visa extension in July 1964 and forced him to return to Kenya amid reports by Harvard officials of scandalous behavior.

An INS investigator, M.F. McKeon, wrote in a June 8, 1964, memo that Harvard officials "weren't very impressed with him and asked us to hold up action on his application until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him."

"They were apparently having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn't seem to figure out how many wives he had," the investigator said.

A March 6, 1964, letter from an INS official to the American consul in London expresses concern about a Kenyan woman who came to the U.S. in 1962 as a high school student and had been "associating with" Obama Sr.

INS officials communicated similar concerns when Obama Sr. was at the University of Hawaii.

Lyle H. Dahlin, in a typed memo with a handwritten notation dated April 12, 1961, said that the University of Hawaii foreign student adviser reported April 10, 1961, that Obama had been "married on February 2, 1961 to Stanley Ann Dunham, a United States citizen from Seattle, Washington in Maui, Hawaii."

"The problem," Dahlin wrote, "is that when he arrived in the U.S. the subject had a wife in Kenya."

The memo stated Obama was "born on June 18, 1934 in Kisumu, Nyanza, Kenya, Africa."

Dahlin said that according to the adviser, a Mrs. McCabe, Obama "has been running around with several girls since he first arrived here and last summer she cautioned him about his playboy ways."


July 17, 1964, INS memo
"Subject replied that he would 'try' to stay away from the girls," the memo stated.

Dahlin said Obama explained to McCabe that in Kenya all that was necessary to obtain a legal divorce was to declare to the wife that she was divorced.

"Subject claims to have been divorced from his wife in Kenya in this method," the memo said.

Dahlin noted that Obama could not be deported on a polygamy charge, because he's a non-immigrant. But he recommended that Obama be closely questioned before another extension was granted. He instructed that if his American citizen wife, Dunham, tried to petition for him, "make sure an investigation is conducted as to the bone-fide of the marriage."

A Lyle H. Dahlin is listed as a petitioner in a 1977 INS court case as district director of the INS in Portland, Ore.

An INS "Report of Investigation" shows Obama Sr. was to depart the U.S. July 6, 1964, but a memo dated July 17, 1964, indicates he had overstayed his visa and was still in the country.

The report stated: "A [redacted] has called twice and is quite upset because her daughter (27) is planning on marrying this alien."

"Looks like he has over two wives now," the report said. "File shows that his departure time expired 7/8/64 and he is apparently still here. Please have investigation conducted as to his status."

A Report of Investigation states Barack Obama Sr. finally departed the U.S. on July 22, 1964.

Sponsored Link: Why would a geologist risk his life for a penny stock in one of the most isolated regions on the planet? To meet with the CEO of the tiny gold firm, which could pay you 390% or more in the next 12 months. For the incredible story, click here.


Read more: Birth certificate conflicts with father's real birthday? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=293113#ixzz1L8BiBOLJ
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 01:06:22 PM
Oh great, another schmuck who likes to copy and paste obscene amounts of text.

Are you guys related?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 01:07:35 PM
No.  Instead of trolling and stalking, why not contribute something?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 01:19:40 PM
You think copying and pasting everything you come across is 'contributing'?

Ha, you really are delusional.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 01:24:26 PM
Take a poll. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 01, 2011, 02:34:15 PM
Obama is obsessed with Donald trump.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4671338/night-of-comedy/
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 02:39:47 PM
Obama is obsessed with Donald trump.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4671338/night-of-comedy/
Crybaby.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 02:55:34 PM
Obama is obsessed with Donald trump.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4671338/night-of-comedy/


hahahahahaha fox and friends  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 01, 2011, 03:02:25 PM
Yes.   Turns out Joe was right. 

NOW YOU'RE REALLY NUTS
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 01, 2011, 03:03:51 PM
You are a vile creature, rotten to the core.

Anyone ever told you that?

3333 already knows this about himself..he doesn't care
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 01, 2011, 03:07:16 PM
No.  Instead of trolling and stalking, why not contribute something?

we have to resort to trolling and stalking because you guys are so incredibly out of it and still stuck on this stupid birther issue that we just have to come here just to make fun of you..there is really nothing else to discuss concerning this issue...

Obama produced the BC..end of story....but not for you guys apparently..

so we just keep coming here to make fun of you and all the other blockheads who still are talking about this issue.....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 03:07:35 PM
Joe mccarthy was right. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 01, 2011, 03:51:12 PM
333386 - your thoughts? 



Is it really that crazy of a CT?  A lifetime liberal, using a platform provided by his liberal media employer, delivers a 3-month mission which benefits the liberal president by proving his legitimacy while at the same time keeping most other issues out of the limelight.

If a lifetime lib like Jane Fonda pulled this kinda bullshit - spreading stories about obama, only to distract from issues obama doesn't want to talk about... vindicating obama in the end... while getting rich along the way... all while employed by NBC.... I think most people here would be calling it a nice stunt, a CT, etc.

But they can't be duped by Trump.  He wouldn't do that, right guys?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 04:03:46 PM
Trumo has been attacking bama on many issues its just that you crazies on the left only focus on this. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 04:06:15 PM
Bama is still hiding a ton of shit. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 01, 2011, 04:08:46 PM
Trumo has been attacking bama on many issues its just that you crazies  on the left only focus on this. 

pot meet kettle  :D :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 01, 2011, 04:10:45 PM
Joe mccarthy was right. 
You're into bondage, aren't you?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 06:56:08 PM
May 01, 2011
HomeArchivesRSS SyndicationMerchandiseDo nationsContactAboutSearc h


The End of OPEC?
Shocking Energy Discovery Shifts Power Back To America.
www.StansberryResearch.c om/PST

Are You 55 or Older?
Log Onto This Secret Website. You Could Get an Extra $653 Per Week.
www.StansberryResearch.c om/TWP

America’s Big Day In 2011
This day Will Change How You Shop, Travel, And Retire. Please Be Ready.
www.StansberryResearch.c om/PSI
Ads By Stansberry
   « The Logic of a Corporate Tax | Blog Home Page | For the last time - we're not targeting Gaddafi! » EMAIL FRIEND | PRINT ARTICLE | 9 COMMENTS |   SHARE
May 01, 2011
Barack Obama's Aborted Sibling?
Jack Cashill

Say what you will about President Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, but at least she chose life.  Given the track record of her putative husband, Barack Obama Sr., this would surely not have been his idea.

Although the media have taken some notice of Barack Obama Sr.'s immigration documents secured by the Arizona Independent, almost all focus on Obama's Harvard years and yet overlook a disturbing bit of news therein.

Only the British press has addressed the most scandalous allegation in these documents.   Key words were redacted in the file, but the redactions do not hide the abortion of what would have been Barack Obama's half sister or brother.

A March 1964 INS document more than suggests that Obama impregnated a Kenyan high school girl in Massachusetts on an exchange program. 

The girl left inexplicably for London -- a trip almost assuredly subsidized by the 29 year-old Obama -- and this caught the attention of our then vigilant immigration officials.

"The suspicion exists," a March 1964 INS document said, "that she may have gone to London for [redacted]".  The girl cited a visit to her sister, but upon checking, officials discovered she had no sister in London.

"At the time," reports the U.K. Telegraph, "abortions were illegal in the US."  They were not illegal in England. No wonder Obama was strapped for funds.  No wonder Harvard wanted him gone.  Those were the days.
Sponsored Link: ‘Black Market Income’ Video reveals how to get an extra $34,000/year... Without touching regular Wall Street investments. Click here to learn more.
Posted at 09:49 AM | Email | Permalink | 9 Comments |   Share
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2011, 07:00:57 PM
Obama Sr. did not list Obama II as his child on Aug, 31, 1962
Heather Smather's immigration file ^ | May 1, 2011 | self
Posted on May 1, 2011 10:06:50 AM EDT by FR_addict

In Obama Senior's immigration file p.35 part II, there is another extension of time. Obama Sr. lists Ann S. Dunham as his wife (he blacked out something or someone else on this line), but left children blank. On Page 36 part IV of the same form, he certifies that everything is true. The date here is Aug, 31 1961, when Obama II was just a few weeks old.

On p 32, William Wood has a memo dated 8/31/61 saying that Obama has a child living with the mother (Obama II), but he didn't get this off Obama father's form.

Not sure where Wood got this information.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on May 01, 2011, 07:24:53 PM
333 is still hiding imagining a ton of shit. 


fixed
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on May 01, 2011, 09:48:43 PM
Hahaha... Silly Birthers.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 02, 2011, 03:25:10 AM
Now we know why bama released the bc last week. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 02, 2011, 03:54:38 AM
Hahaha... Silly Birthers.
HAHAHA! AWESOME PIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on May 02, 2011, 05:38:33 AM
Now we know why bama released the bc last week. 

Really?  We do?  Tell us why.

I am sure since everyone is supposed to know this it is a reason grounded in fact and not your stupid warped delusions.

So please tell us why he released it last week.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MCWAY on May 02, 2011, 06:03:54 AM


What's Obama going to do next, rip off his T-shirt to expose his bony chest?

 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on May 02, 2011, 06:13:15 AM
Take a poll. 
yours !?!   ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 02, 2011, 06:15:45 AM
What's Obama going to do next, rip off his T-shirt to expose his bony chest?

 ;D

rip off his T-shirt to expose his new tattoo on his bony chest that says mcway owned     ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 02, 2011, 06:23:05 AM
Where is the long form death certificate for obl?  We need to start a "Deathers" thread now. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: blacken700 on May 02, 2011, 06:26:43 AM
Where is the long form death certificate for obl?  We need to start a "Deathers" thread now. 

i'm sure you nuts will be all over it  ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on May 02, 2011, 10:26:03 AM
Where is the long form death certificate for obl?  We need to start a "Deathers" thread now. 
damn, dude ! you posted this before I could....'like minds.....'
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 02, 2011, 10:49:55 AM
obama will probably continue to control the pace and timing of events to his own political benefit.  it's why incumbents are tough to beat.  tell me, which republican is going to declare his/her candidacy this week, and will they have anything but props for obama on his military win here?  Which candidate can now say "Obama sucks on keeping us safe!"  when Dubya let Bin Laden escape tora bora as all the generals screamed about it - and Obama's the one that ordered the kill squad to pinkmist his ass?

it'll be the same way in 2016 when the repub ticket of Ryan/Rubio or some shit gets in.  They'll be facefvcking repubs in 2020 with news timed to their benefit too.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 02, 2011, 10:52:45 AM
A lot can happen in a year and a half.  Remember bush senior? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 02, 2011, 10:56:55 AM
A lot can happen in a year and a half.  Remember bush senior? 

a  lot more of these bullshit surprises can happen too. 

in the course of a week - he pwned half of the repubs in america by wiping his ass with the long-form BC and putting it on their breakfast muffin..

Then he stood there and cracked jokes on Trump to his fcking face - to which trump responded by WHINING?  Is that true?

Then, he showed he personally ordered bringing down the #1 terrorist in the world, and he'll probably leak the evidence photos about 5 minutes before his next piece of bad luck politically, to bury that story too.

He beat mccain and hilary WITHOUT the power of the presidency.  Honestly, I think he's going to be way tougher to beat now - and until some quality GOPers come out, I'm gonna tend to agree they believe it too.  Why is t-paw the only guy to commit to the debate?  Cause the rest know it's going to be a little awkward standing there trying not to commit on the birther issue while giving props to obama?  It's a lose-lose.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on May 02, 2011, 12:49:40 PM
a  lot more of these bullshit surprises can happen too. 

in the course of a week - he pwned half of the repubs in america by wiping his ass with the long-form BC and putting it on their breakfast muffin..

Then he stood there and cracked jokes on Trump to his fcking face - to which trump responded by WHINING?  Is that true?

Then, he showed he personally ordered bringing down the #1 terrorist in the world, and he'll probably leak the evidence photos about 5 minutes before his next piece of bad luck politically, to bury that story too.

He beat mccain and hilary WITHOUT the power of the presidency.  Honestly, I think he's going to be way tougher to beat now - and until some quality GOPers come out, I'm gonna tend to agree they believe it too.  Why is t-paw the only guy to commit to the debate?  Cause the rest know it's going to be a little awkward standing there trying not to commit on the birther issue while giving props to obama?  It's a lose-lose.


3333 just shot his computer monitor
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 02, 2011, 12:54:08 PM
1  1/2 years is a long time off.   If gas is still $5 a gallon,  UE, 10%, inflation raging, etc - this will be a distant memory.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 02, 2011, 01:03:44 PM
1  1/2 years is a long time off.   If gas is still $5 a gallon,  UE, 10%, inflation raging, etc - this will be a distant memory.   

Sarah Palin is awfully quiet ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 02, 2011, 01:05:47 PM
Sarah Palin is awfully quiet ::) ::) ::)

Look - its a great day for everyone.  i was in Grand Central this morning, on the subway, downtown - you and I are both NY'ers, I am not going to be political about this.

This is an awesome victory and day.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 02, 2011, 01:10:13 PM
1  1/2 years is a long time off.   If gas is still $5 a gallon,  UE, 10%, inflation raging, etc - this will be a distant memory.   
Seeing how we refuse to even look at the biggest nuclear nightmare ever and absolutely nobody gives a flying fuck when the shit hits the fan a few days after it happened, I'm guessing most of the population will not remember any of this in 3 weeks max.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 02, 2011, 01:44:25 PM
Look - its a great day for everyone.  i was in Grand Central this morning, on the subway, downtown - you and I are both NY'ers, I am not going to be political about this.

This is an awesome victory and day.     

Well said
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 02, 2011, 07:08:30 PM
a  lot more of these bullshit surprises can happen too. 

in the course of a week - he pwned half of the repubs in america by wiping his ass with the long-form BC and putting it on their breakfast muffin..

Then he stood there and cracked jokes on Trump to his fcking face - to which trump responded by WHINING?  Is that true?

Then, he showed he personally ordered bringing down the #1 terrorist in the world, and he'll probably leak the evidence photos about 5 minutes before his next piece of bad luck politically, to bury that story too.

He beat mccain and hilary WITHOUT the power of the presidency.  Honestly, I think he's going to be way tougher to beat now - and until some quality GOPers come out, I'm gonna tend to agree they believe it too.  Why is t-paw the only guy to commit to the debate?  Cause the rest know it's going to be a little awkward standing there trying not to commit on the birther issue while giving props to obama?  It's a lose-lose.

Didn't Bush senior have an 86% approval rating with a year left?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on May 02, 2011, 07:09:58 PM
Didn't Bush senior have an 86% approval rating with a year left?

He would have won a second term if not for Perot though... Let's remember that.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 02, 2011, 07:11:34 PM
He would have won a second term if not for Perot though... Let's remember that.

great point.  he would have won easily.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 02, 2011, 07:11:48 PM
Bush SR ignored the economy like bam a has done.    A year and a half from now, the issue will be the economy.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 02, 2011, 07:13:24 PM
great point.  he would have won easily.


Bush opened the door Perot with his new world order crap as well as his ignoring the economy like obama.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 03, 2011, 06:28:45 AM

It's settled! Obama's ineligible

Now that Barack Obama has finally released his long-form birth certificate, the controversy is over. Right?

That's the news media's unanimous opinion.

Click here to learn more about the book that helped to reveal Obama's birth certificate.

Within minutes, perhaps seconds, of receiving the handout from the White House, our vigilant press watchdogs were busy attacking people like me and Donald Trump for even raising the issue of constitutional eligibility and proclaiming Obama meets all the requirements of the presidency.

Let me be the first to suggest the document Obama released demonstrates just the opposite – and raises far more questions than it answers.

For me, the release was not unexpected. For about two or three weeks, Jerome Corsi, author of the upcoming and already best-selling book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?," and I have been discussing our mutual expectation that Obama was going to be forced to act. Between the unprecedented success of the book in pre-sales, polls showing most Americans not believing Obama's birth narrative and Donald Trump's megaphone, he had no choice.

Obama recognized he was losing the battle for public opinion.

There's not a doubt in my mind that his central focus was to pull the rug out from under Corsi's book – which promises (and delivers, by the way) to prove Obama is ineligible for the presidency.

He was counting on the media to jump the shark as it did in the last 48 hours.

Now let me be the first to put everything in perspective and quickly dispatch the conventional wisdom about this new "proof" that Obama has released.

First, let's look at the document itself. I would like you to compare and contrast it with what I call the "control" long-form birth certificate from Hawaii circa August 1961 – the one belonging to the Nordyke twins, born just one day later than Obama's reputed Aug. 4 birthdate.

What do you see?

Do you see two documents that provide the same information? No. Do you see two identical documents? No.

Why not?

It's a simple question. Why would two long-form birth certificates from Hawaii, filled out at the same hospital within 24 hours of each other be so different? 

No explanation was provided by Team Obama, and, of course, none was requested by the media watchdogs who were in a hurry to show they didn't miss the biggest political fraud of the 21st century.

Sadly, if what is represented on this new "birth certificate" is an accurate representation of Obama's actual birth, it does not prove he is eligible to be president, but just the opposite.

One of the reasons I was so eager to see the long-form document is because I was relatively certain it would provide different information than we saw in the short form certification of live birth released in 2008. I was relatively certain Obama was hiding something, for instance, the real birth father. Because if Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was, in fact, his dad, then there is no way he is eligible to be president. He was a visiting student from Kenya, a subject of the United Kingdom. He conferred U.K. and Kenyan citizenship on his son at birth.

The men who wrote the Constitution and used the phrase "natural born citizen" as a requirement of office intended that future U.S. presidents would not have "divided loyalties" or even the appearance of "divided loyalties." In other words, the type of president they were trying to avoid with this language was the very type represented by Barack Obama.

But it gets worse for Obama.

His sister, Maya, recently confirmed that her brother was adopted at the age of 5 by his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, who moved Obama there where he lived and attended school for several years. Though we do not have any citizenship records for Obama during this period, it is hard to understand how he could have been adopted by his Indonesian stepfather and moved to that country for years without a change in citizenship. But let's put that issue aside for a moment, because there's something about this adoption that is a game-changer with regard to the validity and accuracy of the "birth certificate" Obama just released.

Anyone who has ever been involved in an adoption knows a few things most others don't know.

When an adoption takes place in the U.S., the original birth certificate is either amended or replaced entirely with a new document that shows the adoptive parent or parents as the birth parents.

Question: Why is the adoption of Barack Obama not noted in the original long-form birth certificate released by the White House this week?

We can hypothesize, of course, since no member of the media has bothered to ask the question. Let's guess that the adoption took place in Indonesia and Hawaii authorities were never notified. Does that change the reality of the adoption itself? Of course not. But it does invalidate the document we all saw this week for the first time. It is not an accurate reflection of the most basic facts needed to determine Obama's eligibility for the presidency. That document should list Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro as his father – not Kenyan Obama.

So here we have a man sitting in the White House who has two fathers – neither of which is able to confer U.S. citizenship on their son.

And yet the Big Media look at this document and see no problems.

Meanwhile, I look at them and, for the first time, can report with confidence that there is no way on earth Obama is eligible to be sitting in the White House. He's not qualified. He doesn't meet the test. And he has provided all the proof we need to draw that conclusion.

But, I must tell you, there is much more to this story than I can briefly share here.

It's coming very soon in the book by Jerome Corsi that prompted Obama to release a document he hoped would quell this controversy.

With your help, we can ensure Obama's political calculation does not succeed.

Joseph Farah
Editor and Chief Executive Officer
WND.com
<>
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 03, 2011, 11:57:49 AM
It's settled! Obama's ineligible

Now that Barack Obama has finally released his long-form birth certificate, the controversy is over. Right?

That's the news media's unanimous opinion.

Click here to learn more about the book that helped to reveal Obama's birth certificate.

Within minutes, perhaps seconds, of receiving the handout from the White House, our vigilant press watchdogs were busy attacking people like me and Donald Trump for even raising the issue of constitutional eligibility and proclaiming Obama meets all the requirements of the presidency.

Let me be the first to suggest the document Obama released demonstrates just the opposite – and raises far more questions than it answers.

For me, the release was not unexpected. For about two or three weeks, Jerome Corsi, author of the upcoming and already best-selling book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?," and I have been discussing our mutual expectation that Obama was going to be forced to act. Between the unprecedented success of the book in pre-sales, polls showing most Americans not believing Obama's birth narrative and Donald Trump's megaphone, he had no choice.

Obama recognized he was losing the battle for public opinion.

There's not a doubt in my mind that his central focus was to pull the rug out from under Corsi's book – which promises (and delivers, by the way) to prove Obama is ineligible for the presidency.

He was counting on the media to jump the shark as it did in the last 48 hours.

Now let me be the first to put everything in perspective and quickly dispatch the conventional wisdom about this new "proof" that Obama has released.

First, let's look at the document itself. I would like you to compare and contrast it with what I call the "control" long-form birth certificate from Hawaii circa August 1961 – the one belonging to the Nordyke twins, born just one day later than Obama's reputed Aug. 4 birthdate.

What do you see?

Do you see two documents that provide the same information? No. Do you see two identical documents? No.

Why not?

It's a simple question. Why would two long-form birth certificates from Hawaii, filled out at the same hospital within 24 hours of each other be so different? 

No explanation was provided by Team Obama, and, of course, none was requested by the media watchdogs who were in a hurry to show they didn't miss the biggest political fraud of the 21st century.

Sadly, if what is represented on this new "birth certificate" is an accurate representation of Obama's actual birth, it does not prove he is eligible to be president, but just the opposite.

One of the reasons I was so eager to see the long-form document is because I was relatively certain it would provide different information than we saw in the short form certification of live birth released in 2008. I was relatively certain Obama was hiding something, for instance, the real birth father. Because if Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was, in fact, his dad, then there is no way he is eligible to be president. He was a visiting student from Kenya, a subject of the United Kingdom. He conferred U.K. and Kenyan citizenship on his son at birth.

The men who wrote the Constitution and used the phrase "natural born citizen" as a requirement of office intended that future U.S. presidents would not have "divided loyalties" or even the appearance of "divided loyalties." In other words, the type of president they were trying to avoid with this language was the very type represented by Barack Obama.

But it gets worse for Obama.

His sister, Maya, recently confirmed that her brother was adopted at the age of 5 by his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, who moved Obama there where he lived and attended school for several years. Though we do not have any citizenship records for Obama during this period, it is hard to understand how he could have been adopted by his Indonesian stepfather and moved to that country for years without a change in citizenship. But let's put that issue aside for a moment, because there's something about this adoption that is a game-changer with regard to the validity and accuracy of the "birth certificate" Obama just released.

Anyone who has ever been involved in an adoption knows a few things most others don't know.

When an adoption takes place in the U.S., the original birth certificate is either amended or replaced entirely with a new document that shows the adoptive parent or parents as the birth parents.

Question: Why is the adoption of Barack Obama not noted in the original long-form birth certificate released by the White House this week?

We can hypothesize, of course, since no member of the media has bothered to ask the question. Let's guess that the adoption took place in Indonesia and Hawaii authorities were never notified. Does that change the reality of the adoption itself? Of course not. But it does invalidate the document we all saw this week for the first time. It is not an accurate reflection of the most basic facts needed to determine Obama's eligibility for the presidency. That document should list Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro as his father – not Kenyan Obama.

So here we have a man sitting in the White House who has two fathers – neither of which is able to confer U.S. citizenship on their son.

And yet the Big Media look at this document and see no problems.

Meanwhile, I look at them and, for the first time, can report with confidence that there is no way on earth Obama is eligible to be sitting in the White House. He's not qualified. He doesn't meet the test. And he has provided all the proof we need to draw that conclusion.

But, I must tell you, there is much more to this story than I can briefly share here.

It's coming very soon in the book by Jerome Corsi that prompted Obama to release a document he hoped would quell this controversy.

With your help, we can ensure Obama's political calculation does not succeed.

Joseph Farah
Editor and Chief Executive Officer
WND.com
<>
Link doesn't work, bro.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 04, 2011, 06:44:38 AM
BORN IN THE USA?
Why does Obama have 2 different birth doctors?
Buffalo News, Snopes, Hawaii disagree on attending physician
Posted: May 03, 2011
8:03 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

The White House release of a copy of Barack Obama's long-form Hawaian birthcertificatecontinue sto raise more questions – since the name of the president's attendingphysiciandiffer s from previous published reports.

The name on the purported birthcertificatelists Dr. David Sinclair as the obstetrician who delivered Obama in 1961.

But reports by the Buffalo News and supposedly confirmed by the hoaxbusting website Snopes.com indicate the name of Obama's birthphysicianwas Dr. Rodney T. West.

Here is an image of what the White House claims is Obama's official, long-form birthcertificate, with Sinclair's name listed as the doctor.


Image released by the White House April 27, 2011

Yet a report that West was the attendingphysician– and not Sinclair – comes fromSnopes.com,the self-described "definitiveInternetrefere nce source":


Snopes reference to Obama birth physician

The name was originally identified in anews story by reporter Paula Voellof theBuffalo Newsin upstate New York:


Buffalo News report from Jan. 20, 2009, identifies Rodney West, not David Sinclair, as the obstetrician who delivered Obama.

It's finally in! Be the first to get the new eligibility book signed by Jerome Corsi, the book that made Obama blink and release his birth certificate!

The previous reports, which date to Jan. 20, 2009, quote a New York woman, Barbara Nelson, who said she "remembers" the birth of Barack Obama. Her statements later were cited by the Democratic Underground website under the headline "Independent Confirmation of Obama's Birth."

(Storycontinuesbelow)


    

 
 

The references continued to appear online as late as this afternoon. WND could get no on-the-record response from the Buffalo newspaper. The Snopes report appeared to be based on the newspaper report.

In 2009, Obama supporters jumped on the Buffalo paper's story, whichquotesNelson saying she may be the only person left "who specifically remembers his birth."

The report said: "When Barack Hussein Obama places his hand on the Bible today to take the oath of office as 44th president of the United States, Barbara Nelson of Kenmore will undoubtedly think back to the day he was born. It was Aug. 4, 1961, at Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu."

The report continued: "'I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,' said Nelson,referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98."



However, Nelson later told WND that her knowledge of the birth came only from West, with whom she was dining, and the subject was brought up because of the mother's novel name and the "musical" name of the son, Barack Hussein Obama.

She told WND at the time that the conversation also was memorable because Obama's mother's name was Stanley, named after her father, and the son also was named after his father.

However, Nelson told WND, "I don't know in what capacity [West] knew about this particular birth."

Nevertheless, the reports continue to cite the reference to West as "the obstetrician who had delivered him."

Nelson explained that West was a leader in the development of obstetrics services throughout Hawaii before Obama was born.

However, she said the assumption that West delivered the baby, or that she said that, were wrong.

"Being one of the leaders in obstetrics in Hawaii, he could have had physical or informational access to all of the obstetrics [on the islands]," she told WND.

The discussion centered on the "peculiarity of a woman named Stanley," she said.

"I just said tell me something [that has happened]," she said. "And he says Stanley had a baby, and that's something to write home about."

He also told her the father was the first African student at the University of Hawaii, "another interesting local thing," Nelson told WND.

"[West] never said to me, 'I delivered a baby,'" Nelson said.

At the time of the claim, a blogger at ObamaCitizenshipFacts.or g pointed out that West could not possibly have delivered Obama since, according to a Hawaiian Pearl Harbor history website, he retired in 1956, five years before Obama's birth. "December of l956, after delivering at least 5,000 babies ... he retired from the practice of medicine," said thePearl Harbor Survivors Project website.

This hasn't been the only controversy over conflicting information about Obama's birth.

Previously, organizations including United Press International and Snopes reported that Obama had beenborn inQueen's Medical Centerin Honolulu, Hawaii.

But both sites suddenly changed the birth hospital to Honolulu'sKapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children.

At the time, Snopes sent WND a statement reading, "A number of readers have written to us to point out thatWikipedia previously updated their Obama-related entries to resolve the same discrepancy, so we included a similar clarification in our latest round of updates."

The same phenomenon happened with UPI.



Sponsored Link:Could this Kill the Republican Party? A wealthy U.S. businessman believes a single event will soon spell the end of the major political parties in America as we know them. If true, this event will change our nation overnight.Watch the free video here...
Related Offers:

It's finally in! Be the first to get the new eligibility book signed by Jerome Corsi, the book that made Obama blink and release his birth certificate!

Get the most comprehensive special report ever produced on the Obama eligibility issue.

Previous stories:

Has newspaper really solved eligibility question?

News sites swap Obama's birthplace like magic

Obama birth mystery: More than 1 hospital

Hospital won't back Obama birth claim

Holder 'conflict' cited in eligibility case

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 04, 2011, 07:28:40 AM
Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth Issued by Hawaiian Health Agency, Not Hospital
The Daily Pen ^ | Tuesday, May 3, 2011 | Dan Crosby





Despite propaganda generated to convince American voters that Obama is a natural-born citizen, the recently released document lauded by handlers and information manipulators remains unvettable due to its municipal origins, vanquished by the absence of an original 1961, Hospital generated “Certificate of Live Birth” which all Natural born presidential candidates would possess…all except one.


(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 09, 2011, 09:14:22 AM
Funny.   :)

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal releases birth certificate
By Associated Press

BATON ROUGE, La. >> Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who was born in Baton Rouge to immigrant parents from India, has released his birth certificate.

The Republican made the move Friday, nine days after President Barack Obama released his own long-form birth certificate to further prove that he was born in the United States.

Jindal is considered by some observers as a potential candidate in the 2012 presidential race.

His office says they released the document on request, after being asked whether Jindal's eligibility to run for office would be affected by a "birthright citizenship" bill introduced by fellow Republican U.S. Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana. It would limit automatic U.S. citizenship to children whose parents were legal residents.

Jindal's parents had green cards for permanent residency and wouldn't have been affected by the legislation.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/Louisiana_Gov_Bobby_Jindal_releases_birth_certificate_.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 09, 2011, 09:16:11 AM
I think bama's long form is a fake.   He times obl with his bullshit release for a reason.   


FUBO. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on May 09, 2011, 09:20:58 AM
I think bama's long form is a fake.   He times obl with his bullshit release for a reason.   


FUBO. 

there you have it.. you ask for long form.. he brings it.. and you deny it too.. hahahaha there is now reasoning with this kind of insanity
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 09, 2011, 09:22:30 AM
there you have it.. you ask for long form.. he brings it.. and you deny it too.. hahahaha there is now reasoning with this kind of insanity

Brings it when it will get the least amount of scrutiny.   IMHO, he is still hiding a ton of shit.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on May 09, 2011, 09:29:09 AM
Brings it when it will get the least amount of scrutiny.   IMHO, he is still hiding a ton of shit.   
Im sure.. youre pathetic
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 09, 2011, 09:35:13 AM
Im sure.. youre pathetic

Ha ha ha - Malcom - are you going to vote for Herman Cain?  i will for sure over TPaw santorum, Huck, et al. 

At this point - Cain/West would be kick ass.   

I like Lt. Col West.   My kind of guy.   Funny too - I get my ass kicked by two black guys nearly every week in my self defense class, one is a Lt. Col. in the Marines (Lt. Col. Ridenhour), and the other is just a tough ass mofo, and I would vote for them over bama any day. 

Lt. Col. Ridenhour, one of the founders of the place where I train self defense shit, is probably the baddest mofo I have ever met, is far more qualified for anything than bama. 

We get bjj guys, etc who come in and get fucking stomped all the time.   Col. AL. is like "oh yeah - we tried some new slugs on some taliban - get this brand - since x brand will only blow their heads up x way, etc."     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 09, 2011, 09:43:41 AM
Brings it when it will get the least amount of scrutiny.   IMHO, he is still hiding a ton of shit.   

Some people thought that the 9/11/2001 attacks were awfully convenient for the afternoon announcement on 9/10/2001 that the pentagon had lost 2.3 trillion dollars.

But I guess only dem presidents do that kind of sneaky shit ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 09, 2011, 10:39:39 AM

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal releases birth certificate


Just another individual who is not eligible to POTUS. His parents were not citizens when he was born. It's shit like this that is keeping the GOP in on the Obama scam. I think Rubio, and even possibly Romney, may have eligibility issues as well.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 09, 2011, 10:39:57 AM
there you have it.. you ask for long form.. he brings it.. and you deny it too.. hahahaha there is now reasoning with this kind of insanity

I told you he would do that :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 09, 2011, 07:07:23 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Bombshell: U.S. government questioned Obama citizenship
World Net Daily ^ | 05/09/2011 | Aaron Klein
Posted on May 9, 2011 8:52:53 PM EDT by Smokeyblue

The U.S. government is on record questioning President Obama's citizenship status as early as when he was 5 years old, stating it lacked documentation to determine his citizenship, WND has learned.

The citizenship inquiry dated back to 1966, when Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was attempting to secure a waiver so her second husband, Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro, could return to the country after his visa had expired.

Dunham separated from her first husband, Barack Obama Sr., in 1963 when the future president was 2 years old. Dunham and Obama Sr. are reported to have divorced in 1964.

In 1965 in Hawaii, Dunham married Soetoro, an Indonesian, and moved to Indonesia in October 1967.

Soetoro had been studying at the University of Hawaii as part of a State Department-initiated student exchange program.

Soetoro's student visa had been sponsored by the University of Hawaii's Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange between East and West. The program enforced strict visa limitations, requiring foreign students to return to their home counties after two years.

According to U.S. immigration files obtained and reviewed by WND, Soetoro was approved for a 21-month study grant beginning Sept. 1, 1962, at the East-West Center.

A memorandum from the center dated July 7, 1965, relates how Soetoro had his Class J visa briefly extended after he married Dunham due to a claimed illness on the part of Dunham. His visa had been set to expire June 15, 1964.

"He gave his wife's illness as the reason for his visa extension request," stated the center's memo.

The memo said Soetoro claimed Dunham had been "suffering from a stomach ailment which may, according to her physician, require surgery."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 10, 2011, 12:05:58 PM
Very credible source.

Thanks for posting.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 10, 2011, 12:07:04 PM
Very credible source.

Thanks for posting.

FR and WND are pretty good no? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 10, 2011, 12:46:04 PM
FR and WND are pretty good no? 
If you're into the Birther issue, YES.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 10, 2011, 08:29:04 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Kenya investigated Obama 'African birth'
World Net Daily ^ | 05/10/2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on May 10, 2011 8:36:52 PM EDT by Smokeyblue

Documents obtained by WND indicate the Kenyan government investigated the possibility that President Obama was born in the East African nation.

Two letters purportedly written by Kenya's immigration secretary during the 2008 U.S. presidential election campaign stated that officials in Nairobi could not find evidence Obama was born in Kenya. But the official said the government had "information" that relevant birth records may have been removed or were missing.

Emmanuel Kisombe, the permanent secretary in the Ministry for Immigration and Registration of Persons, wrote a letter in July 2008 in reply to a letter from the U.S. ambassador in Nairobi that raised the possibility with Kenyan officials that Obama was born in their country.

Kisombe wrote another letter on the issue, this time to Kenya's Criminal Investigation Department, a few days before the Nov. 4 presidential election in the U.S.

Kisombe, 56, has been in public service since 1979, according to his bio. He became principal administrative secretary in the Office of the President in 2004 and was appointed permanent secretary for Immigration and Registration of Persons on Dec. 7, 2005.

His Oct. 22, 2008, letter to Simon Karanja Gatiba, director of the Criminal Investigation Department, indicated an investigation into the possibility Obama was born in Kenya was instigated at the level of the Kenyan Cabinet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on May 11, 2011, 06:19:46 AM
FR and WND are pretty good no? 
i'm all for keeping this alive for the election season.
it will be an easy re election for BO.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 11, 2011, 06:27:28 AM
i'm all for keeping this alive for the election season.
it will be an easy re election for BO.


Why?   He is probably gone from what I can tell.   He won by 6 points last time, not 15 - 25 - 40.   He won with a perfect storm to where anyone would have won running as a dem.  And since then, he has only alienated people. 

Thos obl thing is a flash in the pan.  It will be long forgotten by next year.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on May 11, 2011, 06:35:31 AM

Why?   He is probably gone from what I can tell.   He won by 6 points last time, not 15 - 25 - 40.   He won with a perfect storm to where anyone would have won running as a dem.  And since then, he has only alienated people. 

Thos obl thing is a flash in the pan.  It will be long forgotten by next year.   
;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 11, 2011, 09:04:32 AM
i'm all for keeping this alive for the election season.
it will be an easy re election for BO.

History doesn't show that.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 11, 2011, 09:10:34 AM
History doesn't show that.

30 year recent history does show that without a HUGE outlier like a 3rd party run.... the incumbent has a HUGE advantage.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 11, 2011, 09:16:07 AM
30 year recent history does show that without a HUGE outlier like a 3rd party run.... the incumbent has a HUGE advantage.

Not really.  Clinton had dole at 5% UE, GWB barely won Ohio, etc.

GHWB was a mess between his NWO crap, perot, etc. 

Reagan was of course in his own league. 

Carter was a mess.

Bama is not going to have an easy time by any model.   Again - he won by 6 points in a perfect storm tailor made for any dem.  Since then, economically things have gotten worse, he has alienated tons of indes and others, and he is again pushing his crazy agenda.           
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 11, 2011, 09:20:46 AM
Not really.  Clinton had dole at 5% UE, GWB barely won Ohio, etc.

GHWB was a mess between his NWO crap, perot, etc. 

Reagan was of course in his own league. 

Carter was a mess.

Bama is not going to have an easy time by any model.   Again - he won by 6 points in a perfect storm tailor made for any dem.  Since then, economically things have gotten worse, he has alienated tons of indes and others, and he is again pushing his crazy agenda.           

Re-read what I said.  the incumbent has a HUGE advantage.

GWB barely won Ohio because they never physically counted the ballots ;)
Clinton was able to time things as he pleased following the 94 slaughter which worked really well for him.
Reagan did all his lib shit with taxes early on so a recovery was coming in 84.

I'm emphasizing the power of the incumbency - and it's why I think we aren't going to see any stud candidates come out in 2012 for the GOP.  Just like the reason we won't see any stud Dems come out in 2020 to try to unseat the GOP incumbent ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 11, 2011, 09:24:12 AM
I fucking hope not.  But I also hope every rep gets replaced and corporate  donations become illegal, lobbying gets restricted, wasteful spending gets slashed, bloated gov programs get axed etc...

Ahh yes!  fantasy land.....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 11, 2011, 11:27:09 AM
History doesn't show that.

Agree.  I created a thread about the unemployment rate and its relationship to reelection of a president.  Hasn't happened when the rate is over 7.2. 

A poor economy killed Bush Sr.  Will do the same to Obama. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 11, 2011, 11:36:56 AM
Natural Born Citizen?

4:32
Uploaded by MichaelAmericanView on May 9, 2011
Dr. Herb Titus explains what this term means in light of President Obama's recent birth certificate disclosure.

Atty., Dr. Herb Titus: Obama Not A Natural Born Citizen

28:44
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on May 10, 2011
LINKS: Attorney, Dr. Herbert Titus interview with theAmericanView.com: Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the United States; Herbert W. Titus is of counsel to the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C. Prior to his association with this firm, Mr. Titus taught constitutional law, common law, and other subjects for nearly 30 years at five different American Bar Association approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding Dean of the College of Law and Government in Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Prior to his academic career, he served as a Trial Attorney and a Special Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and Kansas City, Missouri. Today he is engaged in a general practice with a concentration in constitutional strategy, litigation, and appeals.

Mr. Titus holds the J.D. degree (cum laude) from Harvard and the B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Oregon from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa. He is an active member of the bar of Virginia and an inactive member of the bar of Oregon. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Court of Claims, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits. His constitutional practice has taken him into federal district courts in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia and the state courts of Idaho, Texas and North Dakota.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on May 11, 2011, 12:22:47 PM

Why?   He is probably gone from what I can tell.   He won by 6 points last time, not 15 - 25 - 40.   He won with a perfect storm to where anyone would have won running as a dem.  And since then, he has only alienated people. 

Thos obl thing is a flash in the pan.  It will be long forgotten by next year.   
which is why we have to keep this birther certificate thing going!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 11, 2011, 01:30:12 PM
I am not going to post in this thread any longer...you guys are wasting your time on a dead issue..move on
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 11, 2011, 02:12:24 PM
I am not going to post in this thread any longer...you guys are wasting your time on a dead issue..move on

This thread will never die until bama releases all his records and comes clean on everything.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 11, 2011, 04:32:40 PM
This thread will never die until bama releases all his records and comes clean on everything.   

he already did...oops!..I posted in this thread :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 11, 2011, 07:04:16 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama mama promised U.S. to homeschool son
World Net Daily ^ | 05/11/2011 | Aaron Klein
Posted on May 11, 2011 8:19:04 PM EDT by Smokeyblue

President Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, told the U.S. government she would homeschool her son using U.S.-approved textbooks during the period she moved the family to Indonesia, according to testimony unearthed by WND.

Dunham, however, broke her pledge. She enrolled the future president in Indonesian schools, where he was registered as a Muslim going by the name "Barry Soetoro."

Dunham's pledge to homeschool Obama was part of an ongoing attempt to secure an immigration department waiver so her second husband, Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro, could return to the U.S. after his visa had expired.

Dunham separated from her first husband, Barack Obama Sr., in 1963 when the future president was 2 years old. Dunham and Obama Sr. are reported to have divorced in 1964.

SNIP

Schmitz wrote in the immigration file dated May 24, 1967:

"[Mrs. Soetoro] also indicated that her son is now in Kindergarten and will commence the first grade next September and if it is necessary for her and the child to go to Indonesia she will educate the child at home with the help of school texts from the U.S. as approved by the Board of Education in Honolulu. …"

A subsequent document dated Oct. 6, 1967 and addressed to the State Department's Facilitative Services Staff of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, explained Dunham decided to go to Indonesia if her requests for her husband's visa were denied.

"She has made application for a visa for herself and her son to travel to Indonesia as she is determined to join her husband as soon as possible, if he is not permitted to return here, because she can no longer endure the separation," stated the memo.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: LurkerNoMore on May 11, 2011, 08:16:46 PM
This bullshit is still going on?  I guess it is true... birthers are retards.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 11, 2011, 10:29:47 PM
This bullshit is still going on?  I guess it is true... birthers are retards.

yep
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on May 12, 2011, 02:45:59 AM
Not really.  Clinton had dole at 5% UE, GWB barely won Ohio, etc.

GHWB was a mess between his NWO crap, perot, etc. 

Reagan was of course in his own league. 

Carter was a mess.

Bama is not going to have an easy time by any model.   Again - he won by 6 points in a perfect storm tailor made for any dem.  Since then, economically things have gotten worse, he has alienated tons of indes and others, and he is again pushing his crazy agenda.           
Do you mean in regard to raising taxes?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 13, 2011, 09:04:37 AM
That Bogus Birth Certificate
World Net Daily ^ | May 12th, 2011 | Joseph Farah



In response to the success of his book (No. 1 at Amazon in pre-release stage) and the elevation of the eligibility issue because of Donald Trump's big megaphone, his sources in Hawaii were telling him that Barack Obama was about to release a fraudulent birth certificate.

Read more: That bogus birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=297573#ixzz1M8MYyG1D


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 13, 2011, 09:27:16 AM
This bullshit is still going on?  I guess it is true... birthers are retards.

It's sure is looking that way.  BB predicted even with a BC it would still be going on.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 13, 2011, 09:59:53 AM
Schooled!
High Tech High Students Expose Flaws in Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate, Rescind Invitation for President to Speak at Commencement
By Walter Mencken | Published Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Text size: A | A | A


http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2011/may/11/sdqt-schooled


The long-form birth certificate released by the government TAKING A LONG WALK OFF A SHORT PIER, POINT LOMA —


It wasn’t supposed to go down like this. When San Diego’s High Tech High International was named as one of six candidates nationwide to receive a commencement address from president Barack Obama this year, it was supposed to be a validation of how far the fledgling school had come in its first decade of existence. Chief administrative officer Ben Daley boasted that the selection proved the value of his school’s emphasis on “producing meaningful work for a real audience — making things that have lasting value and presenting them to professionals in the field.”

Now, he may be wishing that his students had kept their latest class project to themselves. In a good-natured effort to sweeten the pot for the president prior to his final decision, High Tech High seniors Ramesh Bhangoo and Christina Rivera decided to subject Obama’s recently-released “long-form” birth certificate to the sort of typographic scrutiny given to the so-called “Killian documents” that ultimately led to the resignation/retirement of CBS reporter Dan Rather.

“Remember how the right-wing wackos went nuts in 2004 over those documents that showed how Bush was basically AWOL from the Texas National Guard in the ’70s?” asks Bhangoo. “That guy at Little Green Footballs posted that gif file showing how a memo supposedly typed 30 years ago matched up to a Microsoft Word doc with proportionally spaced font. Of course, they didn’t actually prove that the documents were forgeries, but the fallout was enough to take down Rather, and the whole mess probably helped Bush win in ’04.”

“All this ‘birther’ bullshit sounded like more of the same to us,” adds Rivera. “We knew that the people who believed that Obama was born in Kenya — and that his Hawaiian birth certificate was a fake, and that he therefore had no constitutional right to be president — wouldn’t be convinced by this long-form release. When you’re crazy, you’re crazy, and you can always find a way to justify your craziness. But we figured it couldn’t hurt to at least head them off on this whole typography question. Here at High Tech High, we knew we had the equipment, the training, and the critical thinking skills required to do just that.”

“Yeah, we did,” concluded Bhangoo. “Damn it.”

The title of the students’ report on their work says it all: “Say It Ain’t So: An Inquiry into the Validity of ‘President’ Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate.” “We tried to think like the nutjobs,” recalls Rivera. “We started by asking why they inserted the green-pattern background underneath the original text. Then we started looking for other obvious oddities. Long story short — yeah, this is kind of a fake.”

“You don’t really have to look further than the child’s name,” says Bhangoo. “The way the ‘r’ in ‘Barack’ differs in all sorts of ways from the rest of the letters, the way the green background fades away around certain parts of ‘Hussein’ and ‘Obama.’ It’s a Photoshop job, and not even a particularly careful one. We did a little followup work and found a death certificate for a Herbert Harrison O’Brien from the same hospital, dated August 5, 1961. The date of birth on that death certificate is given as August 4, same as little Barack Hussein Obama. But the funny thing is, there’s no corresponding birth certificate for baby Herbert. Where did it go? And why doesn’t Obama’s mother sign his birth certificate until August 7, three days after her son is born? By then, we were too depressed to dig any deeper.”

“Our commitment to ethics really sets us apart at High Tech High,” says fellow senior and commencement ceremony chair Rishika Daryanani. “This case is no exception. Thanks to these two jerkfaces, now we have to disinvite America’s first black president and maybe get him kicked out of office, too. Thanks a lot, guys. Maybe we can get Donald Trump to fill in.”
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 13, 2011, 12:36:59 PM
Schooled!
High Tech High Students Expose Flaws in Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate, Rescind Invitation for President to Speak at Commencement
By Walter Mencken | Published Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Text size: A | A | A


http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2011/may/11/sdqt-schooled

You do know this is a spoof article? Look at the header section. It reads SD ON THE QT - ALMOST FACTUAL NEWS

Obama was not set to give commencement address, so no dis-invite.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/may/10/memphis-school-beats-out-sd-charter-for-obama-visi/
Obama passes on High Tech High
.....The White House announced Tuesday that Booker T. WashingtonHigh School in Memphis won the contest, beating out both High Tech and Bridgeport High School in rural Washington.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 15, 2011, 06:39:00 PM
I hate to say this but the birth cert released IS fake.  I just confirmed this by checking it out myself after being shown these videos:  Importing the pdf straight from the whitehouse into photoshop also exposes the added layers and items changed.  It's not only fake, it's a really horrible fake.  I guess there is something to this birther stuff.  Isn't forgery a federal offense?


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 15, 2011, 06:44:36 PM
Look when bama released it.  Coincidence?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on May 15, 2011, 06:47:41 PM
I hate to say this but the birth cert released IS fake.  I just confirmed this by checking it out myself after being shown these videos:  Importing the pdf straight from the whitehouse into photoshop also exposes the added layers and items changed.  It's not only fake, it's a really horrible fake.  I guess there is something to this birther stuff.  Isn't forgery a federal offense?




Of course anyone can make a fake anything... That doesn't mean that Obama's is a fake.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 15, 2011, 06:50:42 PM
my CT is that Obama puts out a fake one to keep the birthers talking, marginalizing themselves further.

Then, right before the election, he releases pictures of him being born in Hawaii, his mom wearing a hawaiian lei and a few convenient hawaiian landmarks visible right outside the window. 

 :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 15, 2011, 07:00:25 PM
Of course anyone can make a fake anything... That doesn't mean that Obama's is a fake.
it's taken from the whitehouse webpage.  This isn't about someone duplicating that it can be faked.  It's about showing why the official release IS FAKE.  It looks pretty freaking fishy to me.  Just importing it into photoshop will have you wondering wtf.

Here's what it looks like imported into photoshop straight from the whitehouse servers. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 15, 2011, 07:05:12 PM
Ha ha ha after all of this Hugo is now a birther.   welcome to the club.   Better later than never.   Lol.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 15, 2011, 07:11:57 PM
they need to let a couple document experts authenticate the real thing.  This pdf scan looks real fishy to me.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 16, 2011, 08:16:22 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

SMOKING GUN: OBAMA’S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE FRAUD: Kerning from computer, not typewriter
WebToday ^ | May 16, 2011 | WebToday
Posted on May 16, 2011 10:59:29 PM EDT by geraldmcg

This may in fact be the SMOKING GUN on the Obama long form birth certificate matter. A new video produced by Talk Radio Host, Sr. contributor to PPSIMMONS viral YouTube channel, and Pastor Carl Gallups - has demonstrated proof-positive that the long form Birth Certificate that President Obama presented to the public and "swore" was his original long form birth certificate has been exposed to have been at least partially computer generated.

Available to be your Talk Show Interview Guest is CARL GALLUPS, who has produced a short but explosive three minute video that you can study with your own eyes shows the KERNING effect used on Obama's birth certificate that is strikingly compared to the Nordyke twins' Birth Certificate.

Link to Smoking Gun 3-minute video:


During your interview, Carl shares that the Nordyke twins were born the day after Obama was born and they were born in Kapiolani Hospital - the purported hospital of Obama's birth. This highly provocative video demonstrates the striking and irrefutable difference between birth certificates that are separated only by one day. The differences are striking. The Nordyke certificate was obviously produced on a 1960's typewriter. Obama's was obviously produced on a modern computer.

The video is going viral. Call Special guests today to interview Carl Gallups to explain is how it would be impossible for the Obama birth certificate to have been created in the 1960s. Carl shares his research and intricate, detailed knowledge of the subject of kerning. This is the smoking gun that Obama has feared!

ABOUT YOUR EXPERT GUEST, CARL GALLUPS:

Carl Gallups is the Pastor of Hickory Hammock Baptist Church in Milton, Florida and a major contributor and narrator for various viral videos for the PPSIMMONS YouTube site. PPSIMMONS himself wishes to remain anonymous.

Pastor Gallups:

- Has been the Senior Pastor of HHBC since 1987

- Was a Florida law enforcement officer for 10 years

- Was a Youth Minister from 1985 to 1987 - Metairie, Louisiana

-Serves on the Board of Regents at the University of Mobile, a Southern Baptist University

- Graduate of The Florida Law Enforcement Academy

- Associate of Arts Degree from Florida State University

- Bachelor's Degree from Florida State University

- Master's Degree from New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary (M.Div.)

- Carl has preached all over the United States from Hawaii to Alaska and from California to New York - he has preached in Israel and in Peru. He has preached all over Western Canada from Calgary to Kamloops. Carl has preached numerous crusades, conferences and revivals in and around Lima, Peru as well as served as guest lecturer at the Christian Missionary Alliance Seminary of Lima,


ORIGINAL ARTICLE: http://www.specialguests.com/guests/viewnews.cgi?id=EFpVypppyVbWcJFLwT&tmpl=default
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 17, 2011, 03:31:17 AM
Yea, I'm about 99% sure it's fake. I'm not an expert on pdf docs so I'll leave that 1% unsure.  I can't fathom why the changed portions would show up importing it into photoshop.  But anyone who has photoshop can do the same thing I did, just import the released pdf into photoshop and see it looks seriously screwed with.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on May 17, 2011, 06:16:35 AM
let's keep this alive and make it a major election issue.
Bring back the Donald !
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 17, 2011, 10:33:51 AM
Yea, I'm about 99% sure it's fake. I'm not an expert on pdf docs so I'll leave that 1% unsure.

I did the same thing, but am also no expert. The thing that has me scratching my head is why are the letters left on the background in white? It doesn't fit with anything I understand.

IF it were a background image in layers, it would be totally blank - no white shadows left.

IF it was the paper used in the copy machine (the WH official story), there would not be the break in the pattern on the left hand edge, not the black triangle at the top left.

"They" did this to us on purpose. Infuriating!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 17, 2011, 03:08:37 PM
Just for you 33333, and others  :)

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=299781 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=299781)

A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
Nordyke numbers expose Obama document fraud?
Newly found details about birth registration show president's certificate out of sequence

Posted: May 16, 2011
8:50 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily



Eleanor Nordyke, mother of twins born one day after Barack Obama's reported birth.
NEW YORK – Newly unearthed information about Hawaii's procedure for numbering birth records at the time Barack Obama was born casts further doubt on the authenticity of the short-form and long-form birth certificates published online with the president's authority.

Details about the registration procedure are significant, because some analysts have wondered how Obama could have been issued a registration number that is higher than the numbers of the published birth certificates of Susan and Gretchen Nordyke, which were registered three days later than the president's.

Some have speculated that even though Obama's birth certificate was received by the registrar Aug. 8, 1961, the registration number could have been assigned a few days later by a clerk processing a batch that included the Nordyke twins' birth records.

But a 1955 article by Charles Bennett, Hawaii's registrar general in 1961, and George Tokuyama, chief of the registration and records section for the state's Department of Health, stated birth certificates were numbered immediately upon acceptance by the registrar-general.

JeromeCorsi's new book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore

The article published in the November-December 1955 issue of the Hawaii Medical Journal, titled "Vital Records in Hawaii," makes clear that the territory was streamlining and structuring an undisciplined vital records system to comply with U.S. Bureau of Census practices in preparation for statehood in 1959.

(http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/gretchennordykebirthcertificate.png)

          

As WND reported, the numbers on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani hospital to the Nordyke twins are lower than the number assigned to Obama's published birth certificates, even though the president's birth record indicates it was accepted by the registrar-general three days earlier.

    Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

    Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Aug. 5, 1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

    Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate the White House released last month – Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordyke twins.

    Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.

These facts suggest that if the two Obama documents are forgeries, the forger was unaware of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, which were first published July 28, 2009, in an article in the Honolulu Advertiser, more than one year after Obama's short-form Certification of Live Birth was posted by the Daily Kos.


Birth certificate of Gretchen Nordyke, one of two twin sisters born at what was known in 1961 as the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.

A search of Hawaii newspapers indicates 13 babies were born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961, and 22 on Aug. 5, 1961, suggesting Obama's birth certificate number should be about 30 to 50 digits lower that the Nordyke twins' numbers. Since the Hawaii DOH will not allow an open inspection of the August 1961 birth records, it is impossible to know how many birth certificates the registrar general filed and numbered between Aug. 8 and Aug. 11, 1961.

Birth certificate procedures revised in 1955

In his 1955 article, Bennett and Tokuyama noted that by 1950, Hawaii had reduced the total number of local registrars from 35 to four.

"Since the central office (in Honolulu) can deal more easily with four officials than a larger number, this reduction greatly simplified administration of the system," they wrote. "With present-day communication facilities, the reduction in number of registrars does not inconvenience the public."

The authors made it clear that even with his revisions, family members could report a birth to the Hawaii Department of Health, a practice that WND has shown would have allowed Obama's grandparents to report the birth, even if Obama were not born in Hawaii.

"The attending physician or midwife must report births to the local registrar within seven days after they occur," they wrote. "If neither was in attendance, a parent or other person must report."

As WND reported, the address in the newspaper announcement of Obama's birth was 6085 Kalanianaole Highway, which is where the grandparents lived. There is no indication that Barack Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham ever lived together as husband and wife.

Hospitals prepare birth certificates

Bennett's and Tokuyama's article is also rich in details regarding how the original birth certificates were produced in Hawaii in the era in which Obama was born.

"In practice, a hospital where a birth occurs assumes the responsibility for reporting it," they noted. "Since more than 95% of all birth occur in hospitals, this is the usual procedure."

Here is the critical paragraph:

    A nurse or clerk in the hospital fills in the certificate form and gets the mother to sign it. Then the attending physician enters certain medical data and affixes his signature. Finally the hospital sends the completed certificate to the local registrar.

Then, if any question arose, the registrar asked the hospital about it, rather than contacting the doctor directly, even though the legal responsibility for reporting remained with the physician.

When the local registrar was satisfied the birth certificate was complete, the registrar-general filed it by placing the filing date on the birth certificate and assigning it a number.

The date was recorded by an ink stamp that manually adjusted the date in the format month-day-year.

The certificate number appears to be applied with a Bates numbering stamp that advanced automatically by one number each time the stamp was used.

Bennett's and Tokuyama's description of this procedure shows that birth certificates were numbered upon acceptance by the registrar-general, and there was no provision that would allow an accepted birth certificate to be put in a pile for three days before a number was stamped on it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on May 17, 2011, 08:59:39 PM
I hate to say this but the birth cert released IS fake.  I just confirmed this by checking it out myself after being shown these videos:  Importing the pdf straight from the whitehouse into photoshop also exposes the added layers and items changed.  It's not only fake, it's a really horrible fake.  I guess there is something to this birther stuff.  Isn't forgery a federal offense?



This is quite a convincing video.  We need to get this to Donald Trump and get it exposed to the mainstream media. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 06:08:39 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 06:13:50 AM
The Market Ticker ® - Commentary on The Capital Markets Posted 2011-05-17 12:19
by Karl Denninger
in Editorial
 Whistling... (Birth Certificate Is A Forgery)

 
 
Oh my, what do we have here?

Incidentally, this gentleman is right.  I missed this and shouldn't have.




This is not in the realm of probability stacking any more.  The page portion here is curved as it is allegedly "scanned" from a book page.  The curvature is consistent with both the margin lines and the printed word "Sex."

The typed word Male shows no curvature in the baseline of the text; this is physically impossible if the word "Male" was originally printed upon the same page that was scanned.  Worse, the entire hospital name is straight while the text of the caption is properly curved at the margin - but not elsewhere.

Everyone has tried to explain away the various "coincidences."  But for this to have happened "coincidentally" the typewriter would have had to curve the text it was typing.

Sorry, but no.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 18, 2011, 07:02:22 AM
This will be my last time posting i this thread in the hopes that the level-headed people who come here will read this and stop this nonsense about this stupid BC stuff...the fact of the matter is that ALL documents have some kind of error...this is because no two pieces of paper are alike....and because human error sometimes things aren't spelled correctly or aren't put in the proper box..

This thread is only for crazy people....I will not be back due t the fact that I am sane

I'm sure if you closely examined 3333's law degree you could analyze it under a microscope and find errors or that his degree is slightly different from others
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on May 18, 2011, 07:31:31 AM
i love it.. 3333 has a deep seeded hatred for the president.. not sure why.. but its to the point where he gets delusional and starts making shit up.. its hilarious to sit back and watch.. this guy is  fully guano crazy
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on May 18, 2011, 07:33:11 AM
i love it.. 3333 has a deep seeded hatred for the president.. not sure why.. but its to the point where he gets delusional and starts making shit up.. its hilarious to sit back and watch.. this guy is  fully guano crazy

agreed.....I will leave it up to you guys to battle it out with him..I am leaving this thread permanently..good luck!..bye
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on May 18, 2011, 07:35:56 AM
agreed.....I will leave it up to you guys to battle it out with him..I am leaving this thread permanently..good luck!..bye

lol.. battle?... with this "guy"... you cant battle with facts..this "guy" wont facts get in the way of hatred
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 07:36:13 AM
i love it.. 3333 has a deep seeded hatred for the president.. not sure why.. but its to the point where he gets delusional and starts making shit up.. its hilarious to sit back and watch.. this guy is  fully guano crazy


Even Hugo is now a birther and says this is fake.  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 18, 2011, 10:59:42 AM
Affidavit Of Douglas Vogt

Re: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.

Dear Sir/Madam, I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshopor Illustrator programs and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a Class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense.  When this comes to the public’s attention, it will be the greatest scandal in the country’s history -- nothing comes even close.  This will surpass the all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.

My Credentials

I have a unique background for analyzing this document.  I owned a typesetting company for 11years so I know type and form design very well.  I currently own Archive Index Systems since 1993, which sells all types of document scanners worldwide and also developed document imaging software (TheRepository).  I know how the scanners work.  I have also sold other document imaging programs, such as Laser Fiche, Liberty and Alchemy.  I have sold and installed document imaging systems in city and county governments, so I know their procedures with imaging systems and everything about the design of such programs.  This will be important in understanding what has happened with Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth.

continue reading at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55594183/Obamas-Cert-of-Birth-May-10-2011-News-Realease (http://www.scribd.com/doc/55594183/Obamas-Cert-of-Birth-May-10-2011-News-Realease)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 18, 2011, 11:24:23 AM
Is this like the affidavit from the former state employee who claimed the BC didn't exist? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 11:30:46 AM
Is this like the affidavit from the former state employee who claimed the BC didn't exist? 

If this one is fake and a forgery - maybe he was right?   ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 18, 2011, 11:44:38 AM
If this one is fake and a forgery - maybe he was right?   ;)

lol.  Hey remember when you said if he released his BC this all goes away, and I said no, people would just claim it's a forgery?   :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 18, 2011, 11:45:39 AM
lol.  Hey remember when you said if he released his BC this all goes away, and I said no, people would just claim it's a forgery?   :)

quoted for prophesy 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 18, 2011, 11:53:50 AM
quoted for prophesy 

Hey we only have one prophet on this board:  El Profeta.   :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 12:56:42 PM
Jerome Corsi: Sources Say Hawaii Forged Obama's Certificate of Live Birth Placed It In DOH Book
Birther Report ^ | May 18, 2011 | Birther Report




Video: Dr. Jerome Corsi: Obama's birth certificate is 100% forged; Inside sources say Hawaii made Obama's forged Certificate of Live Birth and placed it in the Hawaii DOH book. The interview was on the Peter Boyles show and aired on 5/18/11.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 18, 2011, 01:01:24 PM
Message from the Obama team i recived via to discredit Corsi

GetbigAZ--

 Let me introduce you to Jerome Corsi.

 This week he released a new book that the publisher says will be a bestseller "of historic proportions."

 The title is "Where's the Birth Certificate?" -- yes, really.

 Corsi's work is a greatest-hits reel of delusions, ranging from 9/11 conspiracies to claiming that there is an infinite supply of oil in the Earth's core. In 2008, he published a book about Barack Obama claiming, among other things, that he (a) is a secret Muslim; (b) is secretly anti-military; (c) secretly dealt drugs; and (d) secretly supported terrorist actions when he was eight years old. So many secrets!

 FactCheck.org called Corsi's work "a mishmash of unsupported conjecture, half-truths, logical fallacies and outright falsehoods."

 There's really no way to make this stuff completely go away. The only thing we can do is laugh at it -- and make sure as many other people as possible are in on the joke.

 So let's just do this -- get your Obama birth certificate mug here:



https://donate.barackobama.com/USA-Made-Mug

 Last year, the President said, "I can't spend all of my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead."

 This is about as close as we can get.

 If the facts can't make these ridiculous smears go away, we can at least have a little fun with it.

 And then we'll get back to the important work of supporting the President as he tackles real problems like high gas prices, the deficit, and unemployment.

 Thanks,

 Julianna

 Julianna Smoot
 Deputy Campaign Manager
 Obama for America
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 01:04:19 PM
I got that crap today too and just started laughing my ass off.   

They must be worried about something in his book coming out.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 18, 2011, 01:06:43 PM
I got that crap today too and just started laughing my ass off.   

They must be worried about something in his book coming out.   

Why address the book if they have nothing to hide? 

Do you get the emails from the obama team just for laughs?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 01:08:00 PM
Why address the book if they have nothing to hide? 

Do you get the emails from the obama team just for laughs?

Pretty much.  Most of my laughs stem from the fact that I know Straw, Benny, KC, Blacken, and Chad get the same emails and fall for that crap.   

 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 18, 2011, 01:09:31 PM
Corsi Book An Important One
american thinker ^ | 5/18/11 | Jack Cashill


________________________ ________________________ ___________-



Jerome Corsi's much-anticipated book, Where's the Birth Certificate?, is important in ways that go beyond the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president of the United States. That question the book addresses but cannot quite resolve.

Perhaps more importantly, the book illuminates the David and Goliath dust-up between old school journalists like Corsi and the anti-journalists who now dominates the media. Although the outcome remains in doubt, the terms of battle do not. And unless those terms are changed, the Goliath media will continue its inexorable drift towards Pravda-style journalism.

Corsi's book could help level the battlefield. He is the Joe Friday of reporters, "Just the facts, ma'm." Even the skeptical reader will have to appreciate how conscientiously he makes his case that Barack Obama's eligibility is by no means a given. And for all its attention to detail, the book is well paced and always engaging.

In the way of disclosure, Corsi and I are both affiliated with the journal at the center of the controversy, WorldNetDaily (WND), Corsi more formally than I. WND Books, in fact, published Where's the Birth Certificate? I chose Simon & Schuster for my recent book, Deconstructing Obama, thinking that its reputation would help me penetrate the anti-journalism force field that protects the president. I was kidding myself.

As I have come to learn firsthand, the anti-journalist does not seek to report the news. The anti-journalist attacks the people who do report the news or, just as likely, ignores them completely. When in attack mode, the anti-journalist disregards the facts and dismisses the fact finder as partisan, whacko, reckless, and inevitably, in regard to Obama, racist. No reporter in America knows this form of abuse better than Harvard Ph.D. Jerome Corsi.

Corsi does not deserve it. In his book, he carefully walks the reader through what would seem to be an important issue, a candidate's constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States. As Corsi documents, that issue certainly seemed important when John McCain emerged as the likely Republican nominee for president in 2008.

"McCain's Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out," screamed a New York Times headline in late February 2008, one of many such articles questioning McCain's eligibility. The United States Senate took the question seriously enough to hold hearings on the matter, and even after the Senate decided in McCain's favor, the Washington Post questioned whether "Senate Resolution 511 was sufficient to prove that McCain was a natural-born citizen."

Corsi provides a useful history into the thinking that informed Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, the natural-born citizenship clause. In brief, the founders did not want a president with divided loyalties. Regardless of where Obama was born, the fact that his presumed father was a British citizen at the time of Obama's birth, and had every intention of remaining one, made Obama's case at least as worthy of adjudication as McCain's.

But that was not to be. From the beginning, one questioned Obama's eligibility, indeed any of his credentials, at his own risk. The introductory section of Corsi's book shows those who may have forgotten with what incredible impunity the Obama campaign was allowed to proceed.

In March 2008, contract employees for the State Department were caught breaching the passport files of the three still viable presidential candidates, Obama, McCain, and Hillary Clinton. While the media allowed Obama to pontificate about the sanctity of confidential records, they spared the public the knowledge that Obama's file was uniquely visited on three occasions and that that visitor just happened to work for Obama adviser John Brennan, now Deputy National Security Adviser. Two weeks later, Obama first disclosed that he had visited Pakistan in 1981, a fact curiously missing from both of his books. The media predictably averted their gaze.

Unlike every other candidate in modern presidential history, Obama did not choose to share any of his essential documents, and the media happily obliged him. As Corsi details, Obama has shielded those records involved with his adoption, his kindergarten, Punahou School, Occidental College, his passport and travel, Columbia University (including his senior thesis), Harvard Law School, his medical history, his Chicago law practice, his State Senate career, as well as his SAT and LSAT scores, and, until recently, his very birth certificate.

Then, too, there is the question of Obama's Connecticut-based Social Security number, a question that Corsi tackles, but the media inevitably dodge.

In a telling incident from late October 2007, the New York Times offered the then underdog Obama a chance to reconcile the account of his New York years in Dreams from My Father with the accounts of those who knew him. "Yet he declined repeated requests to talk about his New York years, release his Columbia transcript or identify even a single fellow student, co-worker, roommate or friend from those years."

A campaign spokesman, Ben LaBolt, offered a conspicuously lame explanation for Obama's reticence: "He doesn't remember the names of a lot of people in his life." Lame or not, it worked. Obama's indifference to the facts on the ground may have shocked the Times, but it did not exactly shock the Times or any other media outlet into action.

Ironically, of course, Obama won his U.S. Senate seat in Illinois only after the Chicago Tribune, likely at the prodding of Team Obama, forced both his primary and then his general election opponent to unseal their unseemly, and ultimately lethal, divorce records.

Of all the records, however, none is important as the birth certificate, the ultimate symbol of Obama's cryptic origins. Until the release of the birth certificate on April 27, I had assumed that Obama was born in, if not Hawaii, at least in the United States, the State of Washington, where he was first sighted as a three-week-old by his mother's friends.

A series of events has made me question my assumptions. One is the release a week after the birth certificate of A Singular Woman, the book about Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. I had expected the book's author, New York Times reporter Janny Scott, to clarify any remaining questions about Obama's birth given her two-plus years of research. In fact, however, she does the opposite.

Scott describes the Maui wedding of Obama's presumed parents with the word "reportedly." She tells us not one word about Dunham's whereabouts from the February 1961 wedding to the August 1961 birth. She offers no baby pictures, no tales of trips to the hospital or anxious grandparents, no account of how Dunham got from Hawaii to Seattle. Indeed, Scott purposely fudges the timeline of Dunham's Seattle exodus. Scott almost forces the informed reader to wonder what she is hiding.

The recent posting of Barack Obama Sr.'s INS records has likewise increased my skepticism. In September 2010, Heather Smathers of the Arizona Independent requested these records through the Freedom of Information Act. She received them in CD form on April 18, 2011, and posted them on April 26. The next day Obama produced his birth certificate.

In the 55-page release, only one page is fully handwritten by an INS official. That memo conveniently insists that "Barack Obama II" -- the same odd locution as on the birth certificate -- was born in Honolulu on "8/4/1961."

Most problematic is the content of the dramatically released birth certificate. Corsi does an excellent job documenting the many efforts made to keep that certificate from public view, efforts that put huge demands on Hawaii officialdom, engaged federal courts in needless ways, and, most inexcusably, sent Lt. Col. Terry Lakin to prison. If the birth certificate is, in fact, as innocuous as it appears, a real reporter has to ask why all the efforts to conceal it.

A real reporter also has to at least examine a document this controversial and long concealed. These past few weeks, Corsi and WND have been doing just that with interesting results. Meanwhile, the anti-journalists sit back and snipe at them. And the least sensible of these snipers, alas, are the anti-journalists of the right.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 18, 2011, 01:18:33 PM
My copy of the book is on the way...However, I'm extremely busy and won't be able to read the book any time soon.. :'(
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 19, 2011, 10:02:00 AM
A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
White House panic: Corsi book targeted
'Fight the Smears' 2.0 launched, mocks No. 1 best-seller as delusional 'joke'
Posted: May 18, 2011
4:41 pm Eastern

© 2011 WND

 
Why is the White House in full defense mode against a book by a small publisher contending Barack Obama is not legally eligible to be president?

Today, the Obama re-election campaign launched an all-out attack on a brand new book critical of Obama, "Where's the Birth Certificate," by bestselling author Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., calling it delusional, laughable and a "joke"... even as it climbed to No. 17 overall, No. 3 in non-fiction and No. 10 in the Kindle version at Amazon.com.

If this sounds like major déjà vu, it's because the Obama election campaign did exactly the same thing in 2008 when it mobilized a major assault on Corsi's previous book about Obama, the No. 1 New York Times bestseller "The Obama Nation." And that was a response to the impact of his previous No. 1 New York Times bestseller, "Unfit for Command."

Jerome Corsi's new book,  "Where's the Birth Certificate?", is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore

Today's attack by the Obama machine on Corsi's latest and most controversial book was introduced as an offering to sell Obama supporters a T-shirt or coffee mug with an image of the Obama "Certificate of Live Birth" released several weeks ago as well as a portrait of Obama, stamped "Made in America."

In an e-mail dispatched from BarackObama.com this morning, Julianna Smoot proclaims, "You'll like this one."

"Let me introduce you to Jerome Corsi," she says. "This week he released a new book that the publisher says will be a bestseller 'of historic proportions.' The title is 'Where's the Birth Certificate?' – yes, really.

"Corsi's work is a greatest-hits reel of delusions, ranging from 9/11 conspiracies to claiming that there is an infinite supply of oil in the Earth's core. In 2008, he published a book about Barack Obama claiming, among other things, that he (a) is a secret Muslim; (b) is secretly anti-military; (c) secretly dealt drugs; and (d) secretly supported terrorist actions when he was eight years old. So many secrets."

The email tells recipients, "The only thing we can do is laugh at it – and make sure as many other people as possible are in on the joke."

(Story continues below)


 
    

 

Then it asks supporters to donate $30 or more to Obama in exchange for a "limited edition" shirt.

The Obama email, and purchase offer:


The Obama email


This is not the first White House reaction to Corsi's latest book. The president himself confirmed that he ordered the release of the "certificate" right after the bestselling "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President" was profiled on the Drudge Report and reached No. 1 on Amazon.

So, why the Obama organization's attack against this particular book, when there are so many other hot-selling books that are also very critical of Obama?

"If what Barack Obama released is really a valid birth certificate that answers all the questions about this controversy, why is the Obama campaign in attack mode on Jerome Corsi's bestselling book?" asks Joseph Farah, CEO of WND.com and WND Books, publisher of "Where's the Birth Certificate?"

"Because he fears it is his undoing. Do you really think the $1 billion Obama campaign cares about selling a few coffee mugs? Give me a break. This is an effort to derail media attention from a successful book and media tour that is focusing renewed attention on his ineligibility for office."

Just an hour earlier, Esquire, the Hearst Corporation-owned 79-year-old national magazine, published a fabricated report attacking the Corsi book.

Esquire, which endorsed Obama for president in 2008, claimed falsely in the story that "Where's the Birth Certificate?" was being "pulled from [bookstore] shelves," was being disavowed by the publisher who was offering refunds to customers, and that all copies were being destroyed.

The magazine later claimed it had "committed satire" but not until after a number of major news organizations apparently accepted the report as genuine and contacted WND Books for reaction.

At the Political Punch blog on the ABC News website, Jake Tapper reported that Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt characterized the new effort as a "mobile version" of Obama's 2008 online "fight the smears" effort, which attempted to mute criticisms about his candidacy.

'Fight the Smears' 2.0

About that déjà vu: In June 2008, Obama launched a website called "Fight the Smears" to stop "ideologues" from "spreading a 'pack of lies' about Barack." As WND reported, the site disappeared in July 2009.

"Whenever challenged with these lies we will aggressively push back with the truth and help our supporters debunk the false rumors floating around the Internet," Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor told the New York Times.

Some of the "smears" they intended to smack down included assertions that "Obama's campaign was funded by foreigners," "Obama sought endorsement from the (socialist) New Party," "Obama has connections to Bill Ayers" and "Obama is a Muslim."

The website reserved a special section for its counter-attack on Corsi's 2008 New York Times No. 1 bestseller, "The Obama Nation," featuring a 40-page rebuttal.

However, many of the so-called "smears" of 2008 have turned out to be widely recognized as factual. Moreover, many charges made against Corsi by the Obama campaign were themselves fabricated. For instance, not only did Corsi not state in "The Obama Nation" that the president is a secret Muslim, he said the opposite. In advice to John McCain's campaign, Corsi offered that it would be unwise to make that claim, because one can't "read another person's soul."

Obama's father was a convert to Islam and his stepfather was a Muslim. During the 2008 presidential campaign, the Associated Press published an image of a document that showed Obama's religion as "Islam" and his citizenship "Indonesian" when he lived in the Muslim-majority nation with his mother and stepfather, Lolo Soetoro.


Indonesian school registration for "Barry Soetoro" (AP photo)
Corsi also endured a fierce backlash to his previous No. 1 New York Times bestseller, co-authored with John O'Neill, "Unfit for Command," which charged that Democratic Sen. John Kerry fabricated his image as a Vietnam war hero. The book also recounted his radical anti-war effort that followed his deployment. Many political analysts believe "Unfit for Command" and the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth campaign that accompanied it was a decisive factor in Kerry's loss to President George W. Bush in 2004.

Media, including the Associated Press, typically call the book's claims "unsubstantiated" or "debunked," usually without evidence. Those who offered evidence contended the military's records supported Kerry's version of events, without mentioning the group's assertion that it was Kerry himself who wrote the "official record" in many instances, in after-action reports.

When the Kerry campaign did respond to specific claims in "Unfit for Command," it was to backtrack, such as in the case of Kerry's long-held assertion – which he later was forced to recant – that he was in Cambodia illegally Christmas Eve 1968.

Instead of addressing the Swift Boat Veterans' specific claims, the Kerry campaign threatened lawsuits against the television stations that aired the group's ads, demanded publisher Regnery pull "Unfit for Command," accused the group of being run by the Republican Party and attacked the character of co-authors O'Neill and Corsi.

But the lesson the Kerry campaign's ineffectual response to the devastating Swift Boat campaign was this: When Corsi writes a book, counter-attack swiftly and with all barrels. That was the strategy followed by the Obama campaign in 2008 with "The Obama Nation," and again now with "Where's the Birth Certificate?"

Of course, sometimes publicity – even bad publicity – is a good thing.

"Obama's campaign skyrocketed Corsi to immediate and certain fame," wrote commentator Judi McLeod at Canada Free Press.

"Marxists liking to mock their enemies is no guarantee folks will buy Obama's silly coffee mugs," she wrote. "There are too many out there worried they won't be able to come up with the scratch for the coffee to pour into them."

"Meanwhile, the big question 'Where's the Birth Certificate?" just got replaced with 'Why would the president of the USA publicly mock the man who asked?' on a coffee mug?"

At the Chicago Sun-Times, Lynn Sweet wrote, "If the 'birthers' will never believe Obama was born in the U.S., the Obama re-election campaign figures it may as well make some money off of them."

Half of Americans still doubt Obama's birth story

On April 27, with great fanfare, Obama finally released his "birth certificate" after years of stonewalling, spending a fortune on attorneys to block its release and defend against dozens of lawsuits brought by citizens wanting to see it, claiming he had already released it and ridiculing everybody who said he had not released it.

Yet a stunning Gallup Poll taken more than a week later (May 5-8) shows more than half of all Americans remain unconvinced Obama was born in the U.S.

Perhaps that's because, while the establishment press continues to ridicule "birthers" as conspiracy nuts, the White House's April 27 document release has generated vexing new questions and outright contradictions regarding the president's "birth certificate."

For instance, two weeks before Obama finally released his "long-form birth certificate," Hawaii's former Health Department chief Chiyome Fukino – the one official who claimed to have examined Obama's original birth document under lock and key in Hawaii – was interviewed by NBC News' national investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff, who reported that Fukino told him she had seen the original birth certificate and that it was "half typed and half handwritten."

However, the document released by the White House was entirely typed. Only the signatures and two dates at the very bottom were "handwritten." What Fukino described is apparently a different document from what Obama released to the public.

Since the document's late-April release, a flood of expert analyses, some by Obama voters, has cast serious doubt on the legitimacy of the president's belatedly produced "birth certificate."

Moreover, despite the book's controversial title, discussion of the "birth certificate" is actually only a small component of the book's argument regarding Obama's eligibility for the presidency.

Among topics dealt with in "Where's the Birth Certificate?":

• The mainstream media feverishly investigated the presidential eligibility story – that is, when it focused on Obama's Republican opponent, John McCain.

• Obama was born a dual citizen of the United Kingdom and the United States, a circumstance the Constitution’s framers considered an iron-clad roadblock to the presidency. The book documents the clear, original intent of the Constitution's founders, which was that no one with dual loyalties would ever be president and commander in chief.

• As a boy, Obama was officially registered in school as a Muslim and Indonesian citizen, another barrier to U.S. natural-born citizenship.

• The press and blogosphere widely reported Obama was born at Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu – before deciding he was born across town at Kapi’olani Women’s and Children’s Hospital. To this day, Kapi'olani is bizarrely secretive about Obama's alleged birth there.

• The Congressional Research Service, a public policy arm of Congress, officially admits no one in the government ever vetted Obama’s constitutional eligibility.

• In preparation for the 2012 election, more than a dozen states are considering legislation to force all presidential candidates to prove they are constitutionally qualified before they can be placed on that state’s ballot

• Going far beyond the issue of birth certificates, Corsi not only documents inconsistencies, blackouts and outright fabrications in Obama's life narrative that have generated widespread doubts, but lays out a compelling body of evidence that Obama is not a natural-born citizen as is required of all presidents by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

One of the biggest disputes that remains unaddressed is why Barack Obama, who lived in Hawaii as a teen, has a Social Security number that indicates he had a Connecticut address.

The controversy over Obama's Social Security number traces back to a WND story May 11, 2010, when it was reported that two private investigators working independently were asking why Obama was using a number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

The records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, when Obama was between 16 and 18 years old and living in Hawaii.

The Social Security website confirms that the first three digits in Obama's Social Security number are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.

Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by one central office, and the first three digits of a person's Social Security number have been determined by the Zip code of the mailing address on the application.

If you would like to sound off on this issue, participate in today's WND Poll.



Read more: White House panic: Corsi book targeted http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=300389#ixzz1MoowI1xg
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 19, 2011, 10:25:08 AM
I wanted to believe the story. I thought Obama was probably born in HI - more so a couple of years ago than now, he has raised too much doubt by not releasing the info when it first became an issue. My issue with his ineligibility is his being born a dual citizen. The only reason to see the true birth details was to insure Obama Sr. was indeed listed as babydaddy.

I was eager to see the long form when I heard it was released. From what I was hearing it confirmed Obama Sr, thus his ineligibility. I rushed to my computer to pull it up and could not believe what I found - just another obviously photoshopped image. I was angry that this a$$hole would do this. Why not just a clean long form with all the proper signatures and seals?

Then came the accusations. The layers. Tried it myself from the file put up by the WH. Yep, those layers are there. I still don't understand what is leaving the white ghosts on the background layer of the green security paper, but image on the WH site is not a scan of a real live document in my very amateur opinion.

So, so far I have seen two flawed documents presented by Obama as his proof of birth. I have also seen one Kenyan birth certificate that I have not seen proven to be fake, although it could be. Right now the ONLY thing I am certain of is that Obama was born... somewhere, to someone.

Some people may be more naive and willing to accept anything that liar wants to present and will go to great lengths to protect and defend him. I am not one of them.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 19, 2011, 10:33:22 AM
Some people may be more naive and willing to accept anything that liar wants to present and will go to great lengths to protect and defend him. I am not one of them.


________________________ ______________________

1.  Energy
2.  Economy
3.  Jobs
4.  Foregin Policy
5.  Labor
6.  Taxes
7.  Transparency


etc etc etc. 


Idiots, dupes, shills, ands brain dead lemmings who suck cock for obama like kc, mal, straw, benny, blacken, andre, et al  will defend anything from this admn. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 20, 2011, 10:13:11 AM
Obama's Social Security Number Tied To An Alias Harrison J Bounel - 5/18/11

39:26
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on May 19, 2011
LINKS: The Plot Thickens: Debt Collector; Obama's Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants also tied to an alias Harrison J Bounel. The debt collector also claims Obama has used two other Social Security numbers in Illinois. This interview covers several issues ranging from O's SS# to his property tax filings in Chicago to 50+ different addresses tied to Obama and Michelle across the country. The interview aired on TruNews Radio 5/18/2011. - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/plot-thickens-debt-collec... -

http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com -

http://www.BirtherReport.com
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on May 20, 2011, 10:54:11 AM
Okay now mods can we agree this is a done deal?  Trump is no longer running he got smoked by this issue, the BC was released and no credible person says otherwise. 

It's a CT in every sense and not politically important anymore.  The 'leader' is done in politics. 

Please move to CT board.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 20, 2011, 11:18:46 AM
Considering obama is selling BC T Shirts and Mugs now for campaign cash - this is not a ct at all and a political issue.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on May 20, 2011, 11:29:38 AM
Considering obama is selling BC T Shirts and Mugs now for campaign cash - this is not a ct at all and a political issue.   

Uh no it's not.  It's a CT.  It was released and hawaii confirms it's legit.  The issue is done.  Mods move.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 20, 2011, 11:40:34 AM
Other than a letter supposedly from HI posted by the oh-so-honest administration on the WH website, when have you heard ANYTHING from a Hawaiian official that they issued any document concerning The One's birth? Onaka's office will NOT communicate with any news outlet to confirm he directed his signature stamp to be placed, or placed it himself, on any Obama document. No one from HI is talking.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 20, 2011, 11:58:31 AM
Considering obama is selling BC T Shirts and Mugs now for campaign cash - this is not a ct at all and a political issue.   

so if any politician is profiting from 911 CTs - we can move those threads up here?  ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 12:00:45 PM
Other than a letter supposedly from HI posted by the oh-so-honest administration on the WH website, when have you heard ANYTHING from a Hawaiian official that they issued any document concerning The One's birth? Onaka's office will NOT communicate with any news outlet to confirm he directed his signature stamp to be placed, or placed it himself, on any Obama document. No one from HI is talking.

The former (Republican) director of the State Department of Health said she personally reviewed the birth records and said they are legitimate. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 20, 2011, 01:02:09 PM
The former (Republican) director of the State Department of Health said she personally reviewed the birth records and said they are legitimate. 

Yes, she reviewed the birth records - before the long form was released. We do not know, nor has she made any statement since the release of the long form stating that it correctly reflects the information she viewed in the records on file.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 20, 2011, 01:58:17 PM
Yes, she reviewed the birth records - before the long form was released. We do not know, nor has she made any statement since the release of the long form stating that it correctly reflects the information she viewed in the records on file.

Just a question.  If she does, would the issue be dead then in your mind?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 20, 2011, 03:25:30 PM
Just a question.  If she does, would the issue be dead then in your mind?

After posting that piece of sh!t on the WH website? As long as it took it should have been perfect. He obviously had assistance in preparing/obtaining that piece of sh!t and since we don't know where that assistance came from... EVERYONE in HI is suspect.

When independent forensic investigators from both sides of the aisle are simultaneously allowed access to both state and hospital original files... we'll see if I'm willing to accept anything. IF it can be documented that he was in deed born in HI to an American mother and a British father...

Then we can proceed to removing the usurper from office since he would be ineligible as a dual citizen at birth.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 20, 2011, 03:31:33 PM
So it doesn't really matter what she says then and you are of the opinion many state officials in Hawaii are part of this conspiracy to hide the birth place of Obama?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 03:35:44 PM
After posting that piece of sh!t on the WH website? As long as it took it should have been perfect. He obviously had assistance in preparing/obtaining that piece of sh!t and since we don't know where that assistance came from... EVERYONE in HI is suspect.

When independent forensic investigators from both sides of the aisle are simultaneously allowed access to both state and hospital original files... we'll see if I'm willing to accept anything. IF it can be documented that he was in deed born in HI to an American mother and a British father...

Then we can proceed to removing the usurper from office since he would be ineligible as a dual citizen at birth.

We'll never see independent forensic investigators examine the original birth records.  I don't think people really care, especially since birthers had all sorts of nutty theories (like the Kenyan birth, false affidavits, etc.).  If they would have focused on the dual citizen issue from the beginning, it would have a much stronger "movement." 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 20, 2011, 03:36:43 PM
Yeah the dual citizen thing seems far more plausible.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 20, 2011, 03:37:20 PM
So it doesn't really matter what she says then and you are of the opinion many state officials in Hawaii are part of this conspiracy to hide the birth place of Obama?

Problem is that everything they do is suspect.   you guys kept saying from day one that bama released all his records, the short form was all that existed, blah blah, then all of a sudden a long form pops out years later.   But wait - its not an original on paper held up by a live person, no , its a shady computer generated iage that is already looking to be faked an the state of HA wont answer any questions about it.  

Everything they do has been presented ad handeled in a shady way to justifably lead to many suspicions.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 20, 2011, 03:39:04 PM
And as predicted, you and Birthers still found problems with it. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 20, 2011, 03:40:28 PM
And as predicted, you and Birthers still found problems with it. 



And as predicted - they handled everything in shady as shit manor.   Sorry - this is total bullshit, if the long form BC exists in an actual book - why not take a picture of the book itself or show the book itself as opposed to a already discredited computer generated image already shown to have multiple issues. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 20, 2011, 03:43:04 PM
And as predicted - they handled everything in shady as shit manor.   Sorry - this is total bullshit, if the long form BC exists in an actual book - why not take a picture of the book itself or show the book itself as opposed to a already discredited computer generated image already shown to have multiple issues. 

Yep, and then you'd have "alleged photoshop" experts claiming it was doctored.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on May 20, 2011, 03:43:47 PM
And as predicted - they handled everything in shady as shit manor.   Sorry - this is total bullshit, if the long form BC exists in an actual book - why not take a picture of the book itself or show the book itself as opposed to a already discredited computer generated image already shown to have multiple issues. 

Shown by who?  Photoshop geeks and people with an agenda?  I'm sure anyone  document could be claimed as 'fake' because of x, y and z.  

Truth smacked you right in the mouth now take your medicine and deal with it.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 03:44:22 PM
Obama actually handled this pretty well.  He gave birthers the middle finger until the MSM jumped on it, then released it and made a lot of people look silly.  

He was never hiding anything.  As it turns out, he had no reason to try and prove false allegations wrong.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: kcballer on May 20, 2011, 03:46:18 PM
Obama actually handled this pretty well.  He gave birthers the middle finger until the MSM jumped on it, then released it and made a lot of people look silly.  

He was never hiding anything.  As it turns out, he had no reason to try and prove false allegations wrong.  

Wow never thought we'd agree so adamantly on something.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 04:02:27 PM
Wow never thought we'd agree so adamantly on something.

It's o.k.  I'm sure we'll have much more to disagree on. 

But if you stop drinking the Kool-Aid we might agree on a lot more.   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 20, 2011, 07:22:31 PM
lol.  Hey remember when you said if he released his BC this all goes away, and I said no, people would just claim it's a forgery?   :)
Your prediction isn't exactly special in this case.  He released a document that raises more questions than before it was released.  The thing is so questionable it has people doubting like me who always believed the birther shit to be a joke.  When the document you release turns skeptics into birthers... yea....  Sorry, no prize for this prediction.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 08:27:52 PM
Your prediction isn't exactly special in this case.  He released a document that raises more questions than before it was released.  The thing is so questionable it has people doubting like me who always believed the birther shit to be a joke.  When the document you release turns skeptics into birthers... yea....  Sorry, no prize for this prediction.

I don't need a prize, but my prediction was dead on.  I am going to give El Profeta a run for his money. 

The release of his BC got the MSM off his back.  It's a total non story at this point. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 20, 2011, 08:33:01 PM
Corsi says he will name the person who forged the latest release.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 20, 2011, 09:28:37 PM
I don't need a prize, but my prediction was dead on.  I am going to give El Profeta a run for his money. 

The release of his BC got the MSM off his back.  It's a total non story at this point. 
All I meant to say is it's not exactly a special prediction.  Dead on doesn't mean much.  Most people figured the issue wouldn't be dropped by everyone.  Now if you had predicted that Obama's released BC would be so sketchy everyone would still have doubts and even more people would wonder WTF then you'd have your special, "I told you so moment"
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 20, 2011, 09:34:01 PM
Shown by who?  Photoshop geeks and people with an agenda?  I'm sure anyone  document could be claimed as 'fake' because of x, y and z.  

Truth smacked you right in the mouth now take your medicine and deal with it.  
no, not any document can be claimed as fake.  There are many ways to authenticate documents that are pretty solid.  Fakes are actually pretty hard to get past good document authenticators. 

This PDF raises more question than there were before.  I wanted this issue to go away.  I thought all the birther shit was a joke.  I didn't have my first doubt until I saw this pdf file.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 10:22:27 PM
All I meant to say is it's not exactly a special prediction.  Dead on doesn't mean much.  Most people figured the issue wouldn't be dropped by everyone.  Now if you had predicted that Obama's released BC would be so sketchy everyone would still have doubts and even more people would wonder WTF then you'd have your special, "I told you so moment"

I don't think it was a special prediction either. 

But here's another one:  it doesn't matter what Obama does or says from till November 2012 regarding his BC.  People who have so much invested in this will never concede that he was born here.  The main difference is it's now tabloid material. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 20, 2011, 10:44:41 PM
I don't think it was a special prediction either. 

But here's another one:  it doesn't matter what Obama does or says from till November 2012 regarding his BC.  People who have so much invested in this will never concede that he was born here.  The main difference is it's now tabloid material. 
whatever makes you happy.  I suppose you have an explaination for the quirks around the pdf other than it doesn't matter, it is because you say so?...

I was right there laughing at birthers when he released his BC...  When I saw the legitimate questions raised by this pdf, I had questions for the first time.  That's a total joke to you right?  Why don't you come up with some valid explainations...  Start with the paper, why is it on the wrong paper?  If you can't, maybe you should stop making predictions and pay attention to legit questions...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 10:50:29 PM
whatever makes you happy.  I suppose you have an explaination for the quirks around the pdf other than it doesn't matter, it is because you say so?...

I was right there laughing at birthers when he released his BC...  When I saw the legitimate questions raised by this pdf, I had questions for the first time.  That's a total joke to you right?  Why don't you come up with some valid explainations...  Start with the paper, why is it on the wrong paper?  If you can't, maybe you should stop making predictions and pay attention to legit questions...

I actually watched the clip you posted of guy who supposedly raised questions.  I don't know what his qualifications are, but he sounded like a kid.  Even if he is an "expert," the clip looked no different than the other clips posted in this thread claiming the COLB was a forgery, that Obama has a Conn. SSN, that his grandmother claimed he was born in Kenya, etc., etc., etc.

I don't really have to explain anything.  I'm taking the word of the Dr. Fukino (former State Health Director) who examined the birth records, including his BC, and confirmed they are legit.  That's good enough for me.  She's not part of some conspiracy to fake his birth in Hawaii.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 20, 2011, 10:51:46 PM
you can't even see the seal on this thing.  lol, it's almost like they wanted to inflate the issue by releasing a document that raises more questions than before.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 20, 2011, 11:03:34 PM
you can't even see the seal on this thing.  lol, it's almost like they wanted to inflate the issue by releasing a document that raises more questions than before.

World Net Daily approved.  :)  http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=301329   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 20, 2011, 11:27:45 PM
Corsi says he will name the person who forged the latest release.

Let me guess... .in his next book?  now available via a drudge link?  lol


Corsi is probably 100% right, but it doesn't matter...  Obama wins because the perception - not the truth - is all that matters.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 21, 2011, 01:02:22 AM
World Net Daily approved.  :)  http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=301329   
::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 21, 2011, 01:05:45 AM
Most of the articles from WND that have been posted here have been from rightwingers.  Put that in your pipe and smoke it BB...  I never even brought up that site over this.  I just see the questionable shit around this PDF BC release. So I'll take that as, "I got nothing" from you.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 21, 2011, 09:30:20 AM
Most of the articles from WND that have been posted here have been from rightwingers.  Put that in your pipe and smoke it BB...  I never even brought up that site over this.  I just see the questionable shit around this PDF BC release. So I'll take that as, "I got nothing" from you.

Most of the articles from WND have probably been posted by yours truly.  They have been all over the birther stuff from day one.  I didn't realize you had some much in common with them.   :)

What you got from me is my statement that I believe the person who reviewed Obama's original birth records and confirmed they are legitimate. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 21, 2011, 09:38:14 AM
People who have so much invested in this will never concede that he was born here. 

I am MORE than willing to accept he was born in HI. I just want non-shady proof. AND, I want to know who the babydaddy is 100%. BOTH parents U.S. citizens and born on U.S. soil, he's a legitimate president. Parentage as he self reports, haul the usurper out of the WH NOW.

I don't believe we will ever see Mr. Transparency allow the records to be opened to legitimate authentication.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 21, 2011, 09:41:42 AM

What you got from me is my statement that I believe the person who reviewed Obama's original birth records and confirmed they are legitimate. 

You need to go back and review what Fukiwhateverhernameis actually said. She claimed that the records are on file in accordance with HI laws, but NEVER actually said what they contained. And no one has vouched for this latest piece of sh!t.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 21, 2011, 09:44:33 AM
I am MORE than willing to accept he was born in HI. I just want non-shady proof. AND, I want to know who the babydaddy is 100%. BOTH parents U.S. citizens and born on U.S. soil, he's a legitimate president. Parentage as he self reports, haul the usurper out of the WH NOW.

I don't believe we will ever see Mr. Transparency allow the records to be opened to legitimate authentication.

I think you have raised a legitimate question about dual citizenship.  But I also agree we will likely never see all of his original birth records.  He doesn't need to release anything else.  It's over.  He won. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 21, 2011, 09:58:59 AM
You need to go back and review what Fukiwhateverhernameis actually said. She claimed that the records are on file in accordance with HI laws, but NEVER actually said what they contained. And no one has vouched for this latest piece of sh!t.

Here is what she said:

"I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai'i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai'i State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai'i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago...."

And:

State Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino — a Republican — tried to put the issue of Obama's Honolulu birth to rest back in 2008 by declaring that she and Hawai'i's registrar of vital statistics had personally seen Obama's birth certificate.

"This has gotten ridiculous," Fukino told The Advertiser at the time. "There are plenty of other, important things to focus on, like the economy, taxes, energy. ... We need to get some work done."


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 21, 2011, 10:02:09 AM
Also:

Ex-Hawaii official denounces 'ludicrous' birther claims
By Michael Isikoff National investigative correspondent
NBC News NBC News
updated 4/11/2011

The Hawaiian state health official who personally reviewed Barack Obama's original birth certificate has affirmed again that the document is "real" and denounced "conspiracy theorists" in the so-called "birther" movement for continuing to spread bogus claims about the issue.

"It’s kind of ludicrous at this point," Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the former director of Hawaii's Department of Health, said in a rare telephone interview with NBC.

Fukino, sounding both exasperated and amused, spoke to a reporter in the aftermath of Donald Trump's statements on the NBC Today show last week questioning whether Obama has a legitimate birth certificate.

Trump, who says he is considering a run for president, repeated his claims on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday, saying that "nobody has any information" about the president's birth and that "if he wasn't born in this country, he shouldn't be president of the United States."

No matter what state officials release on the issue, the "birthers" are going to question it, said Fukino. "They’re going to question the ink on which it was written or say it was fabricated," said Fukino. "The whole thing is silly."

As the top Hawaiian official in charge of state health records in 2008, when the issue of Obama's birth first arose, Fukino said she thought she had put the matter to rest. Contacted by NBC, Fukino expanded on previous public statements and made two key points when asked about Trump's recent comments.

The first is that the original so-called "long form" birth certificate — described by Hawaiian officials as a "record of live birth" — absolutely exists, located in a bound volume in a file cabinet on the first floor of the state Department of Health. Fukimo said she has personally inspected it — twice. The first time was in late October 2008, during the closing days of the presidential campaign, when the communications director for the state's then Republican governor, Linda Lingle (who appointed Fukino) asked if she could make a public statement in response to claims then circulating on the Internet that Obama was actually born in Kenya.

Before she would do so, Fukino said, she wanted to inspect the files — and did so, taking with her the state official in charge of vital records. She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files. She then put out a public statement asserting to the document's validity. She later put out another public statement in July 2009 — after reviewing the original birth record a second time.

"It is real, and no amount of saying it is not, is going to change that," Fukino said. Moreover, she added, her boss at the time, Lingle — who was backing John McCain for president — would presumably have to be in on any cover up since Fukino made her public comment at the governor's office's request. "Why would a Republican governor — who was stumping for the other guy — hold out on a big secret?" she asked.

Her second point — one she made repeatedly in the interview — is that the shorter, computer generated "certification of live birth" that was obtained by the Obama campaign in 2007 and has since been publicly released is the standard document that anybody requesting their birth certificate from the state of Hawaii would receive from the health department.

The document was distributed to the Obama campaign in 2007 after Obama, at the request of a campaign official, personally signed a Hawaii birth certificate request form downloaded on the Internet, according to a former campaign official who asked for anonymity. (Obama was "testy" when asked to sign the form but did so anyway to put the issue to rest, the former campaign official said. The White House has dismissed all questions about the president's birth as "fictional nonsense.")

The certification that the campaign received back —which shows that Obama was born in Honolulu at 7:24 p.m. on Aug. 4, 1961 — was based on the content of the original document in state files, Fukino said.

"What he got, everybody got," said Fukino. "He put out exactly what everybody gets when they ask for a birth certificate."

Hawaiian officials say that the certification is, in fact, only one piece of abundant evidence of Obama's birth in Hawaii. Joshua Wisch, a spokesman for the Hawaii attorney general's office, noted that a public index of vital records, available for inspection in a bound volume at the Health Department's Office of Health Status Monitoring, lists a male child named "Obama II, Barack Hussein" as having been born in the state.

In addition, as Factcheck.org and other media organizations have repeatedly pointed out, both of Honolulu's newspapers, the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 13, 1961, and the Honolulu Star Bulletin, on Aug. 14, 1961, both ran birth announcements listing Obama's birth on Aug. 4 of that year.

Even Fukino accepts that her comments are not likely to end the matter for the die-hard birthers. Trump and other skeptics have questioned why the original birth certificate has not been released.

But Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general's office, said state law does not in fact permit the release of "vital records," including an original "record of live birth" — even to the individual whose birth it records.

"It's a Department of Health record and it can't be released to anybody," he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that authorizes such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted to inspect his birth record, Wisch said.

But if he or anybody else wanted a copy of their birth records, they would be told to fill out the appropriate state form and receive back the same computer generated "certification of live birth" form that everybody else gets — which is exactly what Obama did four years ago.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/42518702
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 21, 2011, 10:06:24 AM
Here is what she said:

"I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai'i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai'i State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai'i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago...."

And:

State Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino — a Republican — tried to put the issue of Obama's Honolulu birth to rest back in 2008 by declaring that she and Hawai'i's registrar of vital statistics had personally seen Obama's birth certificate.

"This has gotten ridiculous," Fukino told The Advertiser at the time. "There are plenty of other, important things to focus on, like the economy, taxes, energy. ... We need to get some work done."




This was a second statement, which immediately after she was no longer working for HI health dept. Curiouser and curiouser.

Her second statement also contradicted her original statement about doing in on her own as opposed to doing it at the direction of Lingle.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 21, 2011, 10:08:11 AM
This was a second statement, which immediately after she was no longer working for HI health dept. Curiouser and curiouser.

Her second statement also contradicted her original statement about doing in on her own as opposed to doing it at the direction of Lingle.

"She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files. She then put out a public statement asserting to the document's validity. She later put out another public statement in July 2009 — after reviewing the original birth record a second time."
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 21, 2011, 10:11:32 AM
Also:

Ex-Hawaii official

I want a NOW - second thought, I don't trust any of them now. I want Onaka UNDER OATH and the custodian of records UNDER OATH and forensic document examiners UNDER OATH. The bar gets higher and higher due to the shady manner it has all been handled.

Had the man just submitted a long form to the first court case instead of fighting it, this  could have been gone by now (and him, but of course that's the problem for him).
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 21, 2011, 10:24:06 AM
I want a NOW - second thought, I don't trust any of them now. I want Onaka UNDER OATH and the custodian of records UNDER OATH and forensic document examiners UNDER OATH. The bar gets higher and higher due to the shady manner it has all been handled.

Had the man just submitted a long form to the first court case instead of fighting it, this  could have been gone by now (and him, but of course that's the problem for him).

Never going to happen.

Nothing was shady.  He produced a COLB.  People claimed it was forged.  He told those people to go screw themselves for about two years.  He then released his BC.  People claim it was forged.  He is telling those people to go screw themselves, and will do so till he gets tossed in November 2012. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 23, 2011, 12:57:12 PM
http://www.ajpfiles.com/May2011/Alex.Jones.5.20.2011.mp3

Jerome Corsi on Alex Jones May 20, 2011

The BC portion starts at 1:09:00

Interesting section at 1:25:38 about missing records in Kenya
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 23, 2011, 01:04:47 PM
Most of the articles from WND have probably been posted by yours truly.  They have been all over the birther stuff from day one.  I didn't realize you had some much in common with them.   :)

What you got from me is my statement that I believe the person who reviewed Obama's original birth records and confirmed they are legitimate. 
some much in common with them? yea.....

No, what we got from you is nothing but faith, and that's about all you got....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 23, 2011, 01:07:09 PM
some much in common with them? yea.....

No, what we got from you is nothing but faith, and that's about all you got....

Yes, I believe the person who said she reviewed the birth records, twice, over some kid on the internet with his computer claiming the documents are a fraud. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on May 23, 2011, 01:39:40 PM
Yes, I believe the person who said she reviewed the birth records, twice, over some kid on the internet with his computer claiming the documents are a fraud. 

As do I.

I know agreeing with Beach is unreal to me too... but that's how it goes.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 23, 2011, 01:41:58 PM
As do I.

I know agreeing with Beach is unreal to me too... but that's how it goes.

Uh oh.  I gotta watch what I say.  :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 23, 2011, 01:47:25 PM
so many switching alliances............... ugh.  this is like the show "Heroes".   :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 23, 2011, 01:51:50 PM
don't trust anyone who freaks out and goes all faith on you over a few questions....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 23, 2011, 02:06:48 PM
so many switching alliances............... ugh.  this is like the show "Heroes".   :D

lol
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 23, 2011, 02:08:32 PM
so many switching alliances............... ugh.  this is like the show "Heroes".   :D
Posted questions nobody is willing to answer... Don't blame me, blame the people that have no answer to good questions.,..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 23, 2011, 02:09:31 PM
Ozmo, you're the king debunker,.... debunk this bitch so I can get back to laughing at birthers....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 23, 2011, 02:17:25 PM
Ozmo, you're the king debunker,.... debunk this bitch so I can get back to laughing at birthers....

At the moment I haven't really looked into it deeply since the LFBC was released.  And i have stated for the record in other threads that while i believe it was legit it does raise some questions that should be addressed.

I do believe ex-Hawaii official and the backing of the state of Hawaii and the other many supporting bits that lead to the legitimacy of Obama's birth in Hawaii, but at the same time do question the way and method of the releasing of the LFBC and agree with some of the questions you are raising.

I will get to it some time soon.  Maybe by then there will be more out there we can look at. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 23, 2011, 04:37:21 PM
I'm on page 67 of the book....I also heard Corsi on Alex jones the other day...


Opinion unchanged..

Obama isn't eligible to be president of the united states.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 24, 2011, 07:31:19 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

UPDATE: Jerome Corsi To File Criminal Charges..
BirtherReport ^ | 5/23/11 | unknown
Posted on May 24, 2011 2:44:34 PM EDT by CainMutiny

[UPDATE BELOW, AUDIO FOUND] WND's Dr. Jerome Corsi stated on the Bill Cunningham Radio Show that he's going to 'file criminal charges against the White House' over the latest birth certificate forgery. I listened to the live show and then went back to the radio station website to download the show podcast and lo and behold the interview with Dr. Corsi was scrubbed from the show podcast. I think maybe Bill O'Reilly gave them some tips on scrubbing show podcasts... ;-)

The radio station in question is Cincinnati's 700 WLW which is owned by none other than Clear Channel Communications, which, by the way, is the parent company of Clear Channel Outdoor who refused to erect World Net Daily's 'Where's the Birth Certificate?' billboards two years back.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 25, 2011, 09:00:22 AM
The "filing criminal charges this week" is in this interview
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 25, 2011, 09:03:51 AM
Good luck.....

I don't have much faith in anything becoming of it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 27, 2011, 01:57:31 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 27, 2011, 08:14:03 PM
Obama's Real Birthcertificate Revealed
Posted by Travis Y. on May 16, 2011 at 11:59am
View Travis Y.'s blog


Here are some FACTS for you to consider:


 
Hawaii Governor, Neil Abercrombie, who knew him as a child, admits that there is no Obama birth certificate in Hawaii. (www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvrb7YqdvxE  )

Tim Adams, a former-Senior Elections Clerk for the City and County of Honolulu Hawaii said this;

“There is no birth certificate [for Barack Obama]. It's like an open secret.  There isn't one. Everyone in the government there [Hawaii] knows this.  It was openly admitted by everyone in the office that was above me... that there is no documentation... that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.   I was told, at the time, that there was no long form birth record, which would have been the case if President Obama was born in hospital in Honolulu... there is no such form in Hawaii.   He does have a Certificate of Live Birth which is given to children of families who were residents of Hawaii when children are born outside the state. So I assert that he was born outside of Hawaii."

Barack Obama, Former CIA Agent, By Deanna Spingola
 Edited by Ken Freeland
 March 13, 2010

I recently had the great pleasure of talking with Dr. James David Manning who has been ministering to the people of Harlem since 1981. He is now the Senior Pastor at ATLAH which stands for All the Land Anointed Holy, Manning’s inspired name for Harlem as of September 14, 1991.

Dr. Manning heads the Columbia Obama Treason Trial  which is scheduled for May 14-19, 2010 at the ATLAH building at 38 West 123rd Street in ATLAH, New York, 10027. Unfortunately, the Department of Justice and the Supreme Court have failed in their duties to uphold the Constitution and address the legitimacy and other questionable issues surrounding the White House’s current resident. So, Dr. Manning, being a longtime resident of the Columbia University area, the school that Obama allegedly attended, began an intense investigation into Obama’s educational background and discovered some profound discrepancies.

According to Dr. Manning, Obama (born in 1961) enrolled at the very pricey Occidental College in Los Angeles, California in 1979 and was apparently recruited there in 1980 by the CIA which has made it a practice since its inception to recruit college students. He was, by his own admission, a “C” student, a dope smoker and a member of the Marxist Club at Occidental, a co-educational liberal arts college. In 1981, Obama allegedly transferred from Occidental to Columbia University to major in Political Science with a specialization in international relations. It is atypical for a student to begin their education in one four-year school and then transfer to another school. Columbia University requires that incoming students pass certain academic requirements which Obama apparently lacked. However, Columbia had a foreign student program and the CIA has major connections and influence with Columbia and the nation’s other educational facilities. Interestingly, Zbigniew Brzezinski, known to have ties to the CIA as early as 1959, was on the Columbia University faculty from 1960 to 1989 and was in charge of the Institute on Communist Affairs. He was also Obama's mentor. Brzezinski was President Carter's National Security Advisor from 1977 to 1981 and recently admitted that his objective was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan in December 1979.

The CIA needed Muslims or others who could easily blend into the Muslim environment in the Middle East. The CIA persuaded Columbia University to extend their foreign student program to Obama, now a Columbia student, so that he might travel to Pakistan and enroll in the universities around Karachi in addition to the Patrice Lumumba School in Moscow.  The school, one of Russia’s most prestigious universities was founded on February 5, 1960 as The Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (PFUR). It was renamed the Patrice Lumumba School on February 22, 1961. On February 5, 1992 the university re-adopted its former name. According to their web site, “The main aim was to give young people from Asia, Africa and Latin America, especially from poor families, an opportunity to get University education and to become highly qualified specialists. The students were admitted through non-governmental organizations, governmental establishments, and the USSR embassies and consulates.” 

Obama, as an undercover agent, was allegedly the lead agent in the arms and money supply for the CIA-trained Taliban Army against the Soviet Army war machine. His actions were integral to the Taliban’s success in their opposition to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Obama, it is publicly acknowledged, went to Pakistan in 1981. There is no way of knowing how often Obama traveled between Pakistan and Russia. According to Dr. Manning, Obama was an interpreter for the CIA during the war in Afghanistan. When Obama completed his CIA operations in the mid-1980’s and returned to the U.S. he persuaded the State Department to maneuver his entrance into Harvard Law School; since the CIA, the U.S. president’s personal agency for black operations throughout the world, also has connections to federal and state politicians, they managed to arrange Obama’s entrance to yet another elite school in 1988.

Percy Ellis Sutton, a civil-rights activist and lawyer, was the Manhattan Borough President from 1966 to 1977. He was an intelligence officer with the Tuskegee Airmen, the name of a group of African American pilots who were part of the 332nd Fighter Group of the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II. Sutton entered Harlem politics and became a leader of the Harlem Clubhouse, known as the “Gang of Four” which has controlled Democratic politics in Harlem for at least fifty years. His Clubhouse allies were New York City Mayor David Dinkins, U.S. Representative Charles Rangel, and New York Secretary of State Basil Paterson, father of the currently beleaguered David Paterson who replaced Spitzer as New York Governor in 2008. Percy Sutton wrote a letter to Harvard officials requesting that they admit Obama as a student after a hiatus of five years (from 1983 when he allegedly left Columbia to 1988).

Despite a five-year absence from the rigors of college activity he was accepted at Harvard where he excelled and on February 5, 1990, was elected president of the venerable celebrated Harvard Law Review, the highest student position at Harvard Law School, a term that lasts for one year.  After graduation he could have worked in any leading law firm except that he lacked the proper citizenship qualifications which would have come to light during the interview and normal background checks pursued by major law firms. Moreover, his academic deficiencies at Occidental College would have disqualified him from the top law firms. Furthermore, he was a CIA operative in the Middle East during the time that he was supposed to be attending Columbia University. So despite his Harvard achievements, Obama became a Saul Alinsky-style community organizer in South Chicago which alleviated the necessity of providing a legitimate background check.

In 1990, Obama accepted a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, a law firm which represented civil rights cases but also represented Rezmar Corp. owned by Chicago slumlord, Tony Rezko. The law firm helped Rezmar Corp. get more than $43 million in government funding. As early as 1995, Rezko started contributing to Obama for his political aspirations. In 2003, Rezko was a fundraiser for Obama’s Senatorial campaign as part of a group that raised over $14 million. In 2006, Rezko was found guilty of sixteen out of twenty-four charges filed against him.

Barack Obama had been employed for a short summer stint as an associate with Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, the same law firm that Harvard graduate Michelle Robinson worked for from 1988 to 1991. She became his trainer and supervisor and, as such, may have handled any background information. Michelle Robinson, through the efforts of Valerie Jarrett, then-deputy chief of staff for Mayor Richard Daley, became an assistant to the mayor. Robinson later became an “economic development coordinator.” Obama married the politically connected Michelle Robinson in October 1992 in the Trinity United Church of Christ. This gave him citizenship and credibility.   In 1993, according to the Records at the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, Michelle Obama, as an attorney, was “voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law” per her request. After she gave up her law license, Michelle Obama worked for the University of Chicago Medical Center where she received a very generous annual salary of $317,000.

Michelle Obama helped to improvise a scheme to shift low-income charity cases to other area hospitals in order to make room for insurance-carrying patients to enhance the hospital’s profitability. She did this under the guise of improving the health care of the Southside residents. In 2006, in conjunction with this scheme, Obama persuaded the hospital to hire lawyer and extremely skillful public relations mastermind, David Axelrod, to conjure up a publicity campaign to market this fallacious program to the poor black community, and make it not only palatable but highly desirable.  Axelrod is now Barack Obama’s Senior Advisor and is undoubtedly masterminding the publicity behind the current healthcare scam the Obamas are attempting to hoist on the rest of the country after the test run in Chicago, a city tarnished by its corrupt political shenanigans.

Dr. Manning, an African American, has called Obama a “good House Negro” and a “long-legged Mack daddy,” and an “emissary of the devil.” When Dr. Manning gave an interview on Fox News, he said, “We also have to talk about his character.” Dr. Manning has also questioned Obama’s eligibility to serve as U.S. President due to the fact that Obama has not complied with numerous requests to reveal his birth records. In fact, Obama has spent thousands of dollars in an attempt to conceal those records.

Dr. Manning, using information from hired investigators declares that Obama never attended Columbia University. He asserts the following:
 1) “Columbia University will not divulge whether the “alleged” diploma issued was in the name of Barry Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama. No public record exists regarding the diploma.”


2) “Obama alleges he attended Columbia in 1982, 1983. But, the investigators have been UNABLE to turn up a single shred of written documentation for the years 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 that show where Obama appeared on a school roster, register, faculty memo, bulletin board, school awards, dean’s list; where Obama’s name appeared in a yearbook, club record, fraternity record, extracurricular activity member roster, student newspaper, student radio or TV activity; where Obama appeared in any records as a worker, employee, laborer in or about Columbia University; where Obama enrolled in any sports activity or program.”

3) “As a graduating senior in 1983 he does not appear in any Political Science (his major) or Graduating Class yearbook or invitation records.”


4) “There is absolutely no documentation of any kind to show Obama attended, lived, worked or played at Columbia University during the investigated 4 years.”


5) “Interviewed professors, college employees, students (who were at Columbia during the years in question) have failed to turn up a single person that can remember Obama. This is irrefutable evidence. Think about your own situation if Obama had attended your college? A “now-famous” person went to your school? Many would be able to say, “Of course I remember.” At Columbia, not a single person has been able to say he or she remembers Obama.”

 
Obama’s background would have been relatively insignificant if he hadn’t been chosen as a presidential candidate by the bankers. But, with funding from George Soros and other international bankers who wish to establish global governance, he ran for office. Obviously there would be records that revealed some very personal details of his life. Passport records are particularly revealing. John O. Brennan, Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser is the owner of The Analysis Corp., the firm that was cited in March 2008 for penetrating the files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain in the State Department’s passport office. Investigators maintain that the target of this illegal activity was Obama’s passport file for the sole purpose of cleansing the records of information that would jeopardize Obama’s candidacy. The breach of the passport records of the other candidates was to create confusion. Brennan was, at the time, an unpaid advisor working with Obama’s campaign. Passport files include an applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number. Additional information may include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee oversees the State Department. Joseph Biden, now Obama’s Vice President, was the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the time of the breach.

The State Department passport records were scrubbed to erase any mention of Obama’s CIA activities and his personal information. The State Department employee, Lt. Quarle Harris, Jr. who had access and apparently scrubbed the records, was killed.  Harris decided to cooperate with the FBI who was investigating the break-in. His body was discovered in his parked car; he had been shot in the head, execution style.  The Indonesian passport, issued in the name of Barry Soetoro, was used to travel to Pakistan to assist the Afghan Mujahideen during the U.S. buildup.

The CIA is not an intelligence-gathering agency. The Truman Administration authorized “psychological warfare” by the newly established National Security Council in NSC 4-A of December 1947 which allowed covert operations during peacetime. This document made the CIA Director responsible for psychological warfare and placed it under the exclusive direction of the Executive Branch. The CIA has unvouchered funds which allow the agency to operate without exposure or Congressional oversight.

With pressure from the Departments of State and Defense, a new NSC directive, NSC 10/2 was issued on June 18, 1948. This new directive stipulated that the CIA could conduct “covert” and “psychological” operations both of which were sponsored by the U.S. Government against foreign states or groups. However, these activities should be “planned and executed in such a way as to provide plausible deniability if revealed. Approved CIA clandestine activities, according to the directive, include “propaganda; economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance movements, guerrillas and refugee liberation groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world. Such operations should not include armed conflict by recognized military forces, espionage, counter-espionage, and cover and deception for military operations.”

During the 2008 presidential change-promising campaign Obama avoided detailed questions about his alleged years at Columbia by saying that he was very anti-social and totally uninvolved with the academic community. Further, he claimed that he lived off campus. For someone who loves the limelight and never misses an opportunity to engage in rhetoric, it is an enigma that he would isolate himself from typical college activities unless, of course, that is simply justification to account for his absence during the time that he was supposed to be attending Columbia. Okay, if Obama was a CIA operative who, with political connections, super funding and media puffing, made it to the White House – is he still a CIA operative bent on destroying what is left of the economy of the U.S.? The CIA was established by Harry Truman, a 33rd Degree Freemason, to implement global governance. Freemasonry is a front group for the satanical organization, the Illuminati whose objectives are world governance.

In mid-February 2010, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs alerted the reporters who regularly cover the White House that certain questions were forbidden including Obama’s job with CIA front company, Business International Corporation (BIC), following his attendance at Columbia University; Obama’s school records while he attended Occidental College in Los Angeles from 1979 to 1981, and his records at Columbia.  Wayne Madsen states that his Kabul sources claim that President Obama has maintained a personal correspondence with a private military company (PMC) whose senior personnel includes numerous Afghan Mujahideen-Soviet war veterans who fought with the late Northern Alliance commander Ahmad Shah Massoud who became Afghanistan’s Defense Minister in 1992 and was assassinated on September 9, 2001, allegedly by al-Qaeda agents. The firm is also involved in counter-insurgency operations in Colombia, where Obama is allegedly building seven new military bases, and in Iraq. 

Henry Kissinger said, “Conflicts across the globe and an international respect for Barack Obama have created the perfect setting for the establishment of ‘a New World Order.”  Allegedly, the upper echelon of Freemasonry was infiltrated long ago by the Satanic Illuminati whose objective is world dominance through one-world governance.  There are claims that Barack Obama is a 32nd degree Prince Hall Freemason. Certainly, Prince Hall Freemasons, Jesse Jackson and Charles Rangel, supported his presidency.   Whether he is a Freemason or not, he might indeed be the chosen vessel of the New World Order proponents unless the citizens call a halt to the scheme. However, there is no doubt that he is a Zionist asset who has surrounded himself with Zionists like Rahm Emanuel, a duel citizen of both Israel and the U.S., a questionable allegiance the Supreme Court would not acquiesce to with our close neighbor, Mexico. And, that despite his campaign promises, intends to pursue the same aggressive Neo-Con policies in the Middle East as the previous administration, as evidenced by his speech  before the 2008 AIPAC Policy Conference where he was introduced by his friend, Lee Rosenberg, a fellow Chicago resident, probably living in the same neighborhood.   Jerusalem's newspaper, Ha’aretz, dated November 13, 2008, reported, “In the Chicago Jewish community many people really are long-time friends” of Obama. “Some of the older people in the community say that they ‘raised him,’ while others half-jokingly call Obama ‘the first Jewish president.’” Dr. Henry Makow wrote, “The Illuminati can take a particular child and manipulate things from behind the scenes and open all the right doors for this person, and they can get them the grants and the schooling and everything they need and adding impetus to this person’s career is the mind control that is steering them in that direction too. The end product is you end up with somebody who is an engineer or a lawyer or a politician who is very highly qualified for what they are doing. Barack Obama fits this description.”   Dr. Manning hopes that thousands of people will support this effort, one that will benefit every single American.

   



 
CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up, a You Tube video that features the Honorable James David Manning who is leading the efforts in the Obama Columbia Treason Trial,
 

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, PFUR History, http://www.pfu.edu.ru/en/?pagec=49

First Black Elected to Head Harvard's Law Review by Fox Butterfield,  The New York Times, February 6, 1990

CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up, a You Tube video that features the Honorable James David Manning who is leading the efforts in the Obama Columbia Treason Trial,


What happened to Michelle Obama's law license?, First lady's legal career on 'court ordered inactive status' by Chelsea Schilling, World Net Daily, August 4, 2009, http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105998

The Obamacare Horror Story You Won't Hear by Michelle Malkin, June 19, 2009,  http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/michelle-obamadavid-axelrodin...

Investigators declare, “Obama never attended Columbia University,” February 8, 2010, http://americangrandjury.org/category/columbia-trial

Obama's Intelligence Adviser Involved in Security Breach, Newsmax, January 12, 2009, http://newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/brennan-passport-breach/2009/01/12/...

CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up, a You Tube video that features the Honorable James David Manning who is leading the efforts in the Obama Columbia Treason Trial,


Key Witness in Passport Fraud Case Fatally Shot, The Washington Times, April 19, 2008, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-pass...

WH Press Corps Forbidden to Ask Certain Questions by Wayne Madsen of the Wayne Madsen Report, The Rock Creek Press, February 17, 2010, http://rockcreekfreepress.tumblr.com/post/394159844/wh-press-corps-...

Note on U.S. Covert Actions, U.S. State Department, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/johnsonlb/xxxii/44504.htm

WH Press Corps Forbidden to Ask Certain Questions by Wayne Madsen of the Wayne Madsen Report, The Rock Creek Press, February 17, 2010, http://rockcreekfreepress.tumblr.com/post/394159844/wh-press-corps-...

Kissinger: Obama primed to create 'New World Order', Policy Guru Says Global Upheaval Presents 'Great Opportunity' by Drew Zahn, World Net Daily, January 06, 2009

Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Michigan, Prince Hall Affiliation, Notable Prince Hall Masons, http://miphgl.org/mi/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&...

Barack Obama’s Speech to AIPAC’s Policy Conference, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6471073053670305892&ei ...

Illuminati, the Cult that Hijacked the World by Dr. Henry Makow, Silas Green, Winnipeg, Canada, 2008, p. 72

Comments: deannaATspingola.com


© Deanna Spingola 2010 - All rights reserved

Deanna Spingola's articles are copyrighted but may be republished, reposted, or emailed. However, the person or organization must not charge for subscriptions or advertising. The article must be copied intact and full credit given. Deanna's web site address must also be included.

 

Also, Watch this video…it details who the real enemies are.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 27, 2011, 08:17:47 PM
His Name Is Not President Barack Obama... It's President Barry Soetoro Soebarkah
Posted by Sarah Roman on May 16, 2011 at 4:52pm
View Sarah Roman's blog


Alright Patriots... I'm going to try & sum this up the easiest way I know how.  Please read this & really try to understand the facts presented.

For sake of trying to make the case point we will ASSUME that Obama was indeed a "natural born citizen" (which we all know this is not true).  But anyway... here are the FACTS!!!
Obama moved to Indonesia with his mother & step-father when he was a child.
Indonesia did not allow people that were US citizens to enroll in school at that time.
Indonesian school records show that Obama's name was "Barry Soetoro".
His mother's passport records show that his name was "Barry Soetoro Soebarkah".
Hawaii adoption laws state that an individual cannot obtain ANY ORIGINAL birth certificate or birth records if they have been adopted.  The reason is because the original documents have been sealed.  The only way for an individual to obtain his/her birth records is if BOTH paternal parents sign that they agree for the original documents to be released.
Both of Obama's parents are deceased.  Thus, there is no way for Obama to obtain any original records.
The media continuously lied to us about Hawaiian's not being able to get their original certificates.  (We found this out to be a lie when other Hawaiian's went & obtained their original documents after it was announced that they could not do so.
Where is the documentation showing that "Barry Soetoro" changed his name back to "Barack Obama"?

Why is all of the above information of any significance?

Because if Barack Obama was indeed adopted by Lolo Soetoro he lost his "natural born citizen" rights.  It also means that his name was changed to "Barry Soetoro Soebarkah".  Which means that "Barry Soetoro Soebarkah" should have paperwork proving that he has changed his name back to "Barack Obama".  Which means that our current President of the United States of America could very well be an Indonesian citizen by the name of "Barry Soetoro Soebarkah".
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 225for70 on May 27, 2011, 08:35:52 PM
Looks like he was born in Mobossa Kenya on his Birth certifacte.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on May 30, 2011, 10:56:37 AM
1961 Kenya Birth Records Criminally Tampered With to Hide Barack Obama's Birth


3:44

Uploaded by SPREADTHISINFO3 on May 28, 2011
Documents obtained by WND indicate the Kenyan government investigated the possibility that President Obama was born in the East African nation.

Two letters purportedly written by Kenya's immigration secretary during the 2008 U.S. presidential election campaign stated that officials in Nairobi could not find evidence Obama was born in Kenya. But the official said the government had "information" that relevant birth records may have been removed or were missing.

Emmanuel Kisombe, the permanent secretary in the Ministry for Immigration and Registration of Persons, wrote a letter in July 2008 in reply to a letter from the U.S. ambassador in Nairobi that raised the possibility with Kenyan officials that Obama was born in their country.

Kisombe wrote another letter on the issue, this time to Kenya's Criminal Investigation Department, a few days before the Nov. 4 presidential election in the U.S.

Kisombe, 56, has been in public service since 1979, according to his bio. He became principal administrative secretary in the Office of the President in 2004 and was appointed permanent secretary for Immigration and Registration of Persons on Dec. 7, 2005.

His Oct. 22, 2008, letter to Simon Karanja Gatiba, director of the Criminal Investigation Department, indicated an investigation into the possibility Obama was born in Kenya was instigated at the level of the Kenyan Cabinet.

Kisombe wrote to Gatiba: We have instructions from the Head of Civil Service and Secretary to the Cabinet carrying out directions of the Cabinet sub-committee on Security and Foreign Relations to investigate and report on efficacy of reports that Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic Party aspirant in the United States could be Kenyan-born.

Kisombe said the Kenyan government investigation was prompted by "numerous intelligence reports that [Obama] might have been born in Mombasa at the Lady Grigg Maternity Wing of the Coast Provincial Hospital."

Kisombe noted that the Kenyan government's inability to find Obama birth records was not conclusive, because "the information we in the ministry have is that some documents have been removed by unknown persons at unknown dates or are missing from birth registry records thus denting the prospects of uncovering the facts of this matter."

He wrote: This tampering, if confirmed, constitutes a serious offense that is punishable by law and it behooves your office to track down the culprits and bring them to justice. My officers have been instructed to fully cooperate as the Kenya Police Criminal Investigation Department performs this task.

View entire Kisombe letter here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=297273

http://leaksource.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/barack-obama-ineligible-to-be-pres...

Original Video Uploaded By TheAlexJonesChannelhttp://www.youtube.com/TheAlexJonesChannel
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on May 30, 2011, 11:09:35 AM
OOOOOhhh.... oooops... So sorry BB...  go dig yourself a head sized plot in the sand and plung away.... hahahahaha
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 30, 2011, 11:45:51 AM
Right.  I'm sure Donald Trump will be all over this.   ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on May 30, 2011, 12:39:42 PM
1) BC is total bullshit... smells bad... obama hiding something, for sure.

2) Doesn't matter.  he won the public perception battle.  He could have been born on the north pole to Mr and ms claus, and that doesn't matter.  PR battle has already been fought.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 30, 2011, 06:23:03 PM


Bombshell: Second CRS Memo Covering for Obama’s Ineligibility Not Released to the Public…Until Now







PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY, PART 1
 

by Joseph DeMaio
 

What else is the Congressional Research Service advising congressmen and senators to tell their constituents about Obama's "eligibility?"
 
(May 30, 2011) — Sherlock Holmes once noted that the perfect crime is the one that is never detected.  Those who are now finally discovering the unsolved mystery of Barack Obama’s eligibility under the Constitution as a “natural born Citizen” should read more Sherlock Holmes.
 
In reality, there is no mystery.  Day-by-day, week-by-week and revelation by revelation, the empirical evidence accumulates that the man now occupying the White House may very well be plainly ineligible to do so.  It only remains for the truth to finally catch up to him, as the truth always does.  And yet legions of his supporters and sycophants are doing all they can to delay and postpone that day of reckoning.
 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 
1.      In order for a person to be born a “natural born Citizen” under Art. 2, Sec. 1, Cl. 5 – the “eligibility clause” of the Constitution as it was understood by the Founders under The Law of Nations by E. de Vattel, a legal scholar during the years the Constitution was conceived, drafted and executed – both such person’s parents must be, at that time, United States citizens and no U.S. Supreme Court case has held otherwise;
 
2.      An April 3, 2009 Congressional Research Service (“CRS”) Memorandum authored by one  Jack Maskell, a Legislative Attorney in the CRS American Law Division and entitled “Qualifications for the Office of President of the United States and Legal Challenges to the Eligibility of a Candidate” and intended for distribution to members of Congress either (a) innocently, but substantively, misreads, misconstrues and/or misapplies federal appellate and U.S. Supreme Court precedent, or (b) intentionally, and thus improperly (and possibly illegally), alters the meaning of precedent through substantive editing by grammatical ellipsis omission of material words, and thus facts, in two federal documents, to arrive at its conclusion that Barack H. Obama is, purportedly, eligible to be president as a “natural born citizen;”
 
3.      A June 5, 2009 Congressional Research Service “Transmittal” message to a member of Congress from one Jerry Mansfield, an “Information Research Specialist” in the CRS “Knowledge Services Group,” misinforms the congressman by stating that questions about Mr. Obama’s birth certificate have been “ultimately resolved” in favor of his eligibility based on a series of biased and badly-skewed Internet postings;
 
4.      A second Congressional Research Service memorandum, dated March 18, 2010 and authored, again, by Mr. Jack Maskell, and entitled “Birth Certificates of Presidential Candidates and Standing to Challenge Eligibility,” but without mentioning or referencing the April 3, 2009 memo, commits the same conceptual errors of the prior April 3, 2009 memo and thus merely compounds and perpetuates the problem;
 
5.      The issue of Barack H. Obama’s eligibility to serve as president under the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution thus far remains unaddressed on the merits by the U.S. Supreme Court and, accordingly, remains unresolved as well.
 


BACKGROUND
 
As frequently noted in postings at various Internet websites, including, notably, The Post & Email  – most recently in the posts appearing here (http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/08/too-hot-to-handle/), by one by one Tracey M. Grissom and which includes a link to an extensive work on presidential eligibility by one Stephen Tonchen first appearing in 2009 (http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm), as well as in a post by one Antoine Francisque appearing here (http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/14/how-could-obama-not-be-a-u-s-citizen-if-his-mother-was-an-american/) – the core issue regarding Mr. Obama’s eligibility is not properly confined to his actual birthplace, be it Honolulu, Mombasa or elsewhere, although that is a related issue.  Rather, the central focus in addition must be on the citizenship status of his mother and, in particular, his father.
 
The Tonchen “Eligibility Primer” is particularly comprehensive and easy to read.  While it does acknowledge the existence of the April 3, 2009 CRS Memo, it does not address the various unexplained anomalies examined in the following memorandum.
 
In addition, the recent publication by Dr. Jerome Corsi of a new book on these issues, “Where’s the Birth Certificate?  The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President,” touches upon, but does not directly address or analyze, the noted anomalies in the CRS Memo.  Thus, while the Corsi book reaches the correct conclusion – that Barack Obama is very likely ineligible to the presidency under the “natural born Citizen” clause of the Constitution – it does so without addressing the more serious problems with the CRS Memo.  Accordingly, Dr. Corsi’s book, if anything, understates the severity of the problem.  And, to be clear, Dr. Corsi and/or his researchers cannot be faulted for the oversight, because the anomaly in the CRS Memo is extremely difficult to discern, at best, unless one is specifically looking for it.
 
Although the Constitution itself does not define the term “natural born Citizen,” these exists a wealth of information and authority (for those willing to review and consider it) bearing upon what the Founding Fathers understood the meaning of the term to be and what their intent was through its incorporation into the Constitution between 1776 and 1789, the years leading up to the drafting, signing and ratification of the Constitution.
 
Specifically, the writings of the Swiss-German legal philosopher, Emmerich de Vattel in his 1758 tome on international law – The Law of Nations – in particular bear heavily on the issue. In the preface to the 1999 digital edition of The Law of Nations, and commenting on the 1883 edition by Joseph Chitty, Esq. (http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel.htm), is found the following:
 
“This 1758 work by Swiss legal philosopher Emmerich de Vattel is of special importance to scholars of constitutional history and law, for it was read by many of the Founders of the United States of America, and informed their understanding of the principles of law which became established in the Constitution of 1787. Chitty’s notes and the appended commentaries by Edward D. Ingraham, used in lectures at William and Mary College, provide a valuable perspective on Vattel’s exposition from the viewpoint of American jurists who had adapted those principles to the American legal experience.” (Emphasis added)
 
In Book I, Chapter XIX, § 212 of The Law of Nations, addressing the issue of what constitutes the citizens and natives of a country, de Vattel notes as follows:
 
“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.” (Bold/emphasis added)
 
It is thus clear that the proper analysis in the determination as to whether one is (or even can be) a “natural born citizen” – at least under de Vattel’s articulation of the principles of law distinguishing “natural born citizens” from “native born citizens” – is immutably fixed in time as of the moment of birth, and not at some subsequent time.
 
Indeed, as noted here (http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/05/03/jefferson-used-vattels-the-law-of-nations-to-write-our-founding-documents/), the Founding Fathers, including Thomas Jefferson, relied upon de Vattel in drafting both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  And since Jefferson as well as many other Founding Fathers were conversant, if not fluent, in French – including Benjamin Franklin, who served as our Ambassador to France from 1776 to 1785 – it is generally acknowledged that they knew exactly what was being stated by de Vattel in The Law of Nations.
 
Moreover, even the U.S.  Supreme Court has recognized that de Vattel’s tome  was of critical influence on the Founding Fathers, stating, for example, that “[t]he international jurist most widely cited in the first 50 years after the Revolution was Emmerich de Vattel. 1 J. Kent, Commentaries on American Law 18 (1826). In 1775, Benjamin Franklin acknowledged receipt of three copies of a new edition, in French, of Vattel’s Law of Nations and remarked that the book ‘has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress now sitting…. ‘” 2 F. Wharton, United States Revolutionary Diplomatic Correspondence 64 (1889)…” (emphasis added)  See U.S. Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Commission, 434 U.S. 452, 462, n. 12 (1978).
 
And one of the Founding Fathers, John Jay – a contributing author, along with Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, to The Federalist Papers and serving as the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court – suggested in a July 25, 1787 letter to then-serving Presiding Officer of the Continental Convention of 1787, George Washington that it would be prudent to include, in the nation’s new Constitution, a specific restriction on who might be eligible to the national presidency. (http://www.familytales.org/dbDisplay.php?id=ltr_joj4101&person=joj). He advised Washington:
 
“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.” (Emphasis added)
 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 30, 2011, 06:23:42 PM
Thus, while a child born of alien parents in this country may be deemed under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution to be a “native born citizen” – as the Supreme Court has frequently noted (see, e.g., United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1897)) – the child cannot, by definition, be at that time or at any other time a “natural born citizen” unless its parents are, at the time of the birth, also citizens.  While the child may later voluntary renounce his or her citizenship upon reaching majority status, it cannot be involuntarily taken away.
 
Stated otherwise, consistent with Jay’s advice to Washington, and under de Vattel’s analysis, with which the Founders were familiar and which “… informed their understanding of the principles of law which became established in the Constitution…,” unless at the time of birth, a child’s parents both were citizens, although the child would be a “native born citizen,” the child could by definition not be a “natural born citizen.”
 
Against this backdrop, the putative current President of the United States (a) confirms in his autobiography, corroborated as well through the newly-released Internet “picture” of what is claimed to be his original birth certificate, that his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a Kenyan and not a U.S. citizen; (b) refuses to release or allow the release of the “hard copy” his original Hawaiian “long form” birth certificate (assuming one exists) while contending that the image of a “certification of live birth” posted on the internet in 2009 and now, on April 27, 2011, proves he was born there, an issue only indirectly related to the legal question of whether he is a “natural born Citizen” under the Constitution; (c) ignores as irrelevant the many reports in newspapers, both here and abroad, that he was born in Kenya or even Indonesia; and (d) dismisses all questions on the point of his constitutional eligibility as “distractions.”
 
THE CRS AND THE BEGINNING OF THE PROBLEM
 
Equally troubling, however, is how the issue has been managed and manipulated by Obama’s supporters and defenders, from the mainstream media to left-wing Hollywood sycophants.  The entire issue has been morphed by the left (and even by many on the not-left) into a conspiracy theory on a par with Roswell UFO’s.  By metastasizing legitimate questions over his eligibility into Saturday Night Live skits, the machine thus far has succeeded in trivializing, marginalizing and, in many cases, demonizing those having the audacity to even think of asking the question.  In true Orwellian form, the Thought Police are alive and well in America.
 
Even more disturbing, though, is the way the specific issue of the putative president’s eligibility has been addressed and seemingly – unless otherwise plausibly explained – manipulated and misrepresented by what should otherwise be an unbiased and objective arm of the United States Congress, the Congressional Research Service (“CRS”).  The Congressional Research Service is a legislative agency within the Library of Congress.  Its website (http://www.loc.gov/crsinfo/) asserts that it
 
“…works exclusively for the United States Congress, providing policy and legal analysis to committees and Members of both the House and Senate, regardless of party affiliation. As a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress, CRS has been a valued and respected resource on Capitol Hill for nearly a century. CRS is well-known for analysis that is authoritative, confidential, objective and nonpartisan. Its highest priority is to ensure that Congress has 24/7 access to the nation’s best thinking.”
 
Let us test those assertions.
 
First, what follows is a brief analysis of a “memorandum” prepared by the CRS and issued April 3, 2009 intended, according to the memorandum’s introductory statements, to address questions “… from congressional offices…” which had been posed to the agency regarding the issue of Mr. Obama’s constitutional eligibility. The memorandum is not an indexed “report” which might otherwise be located at the CRS website (http://www.loc.gov/crsinfo/) or a parallel repository maintained by the State Department (http://fpc.state.gov/c18185.htm).
 
On the other hand, the full text of the CRS Memorandum has been posted on the internet and can be found here: (http://www.scribd.com/doc/41197555/41131059-MoC-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-in-Answer-to-Obama-Eligibility).  Whether the title in the website address originated with the CRS or somewhere else is unknown, but it should give some hint of the purpose underlying the memo.  It will be hereafter referenced as the “CRS Memo.”
 
The CRS Memo begins by stating that, without regard to its distribution to the specific but unidentified “congressional offices” requesting guidance, it was “… prepared to enable distribution to more than one congressional office,” presumably in anticipation that more than one or two members of Congress might want to become enlightened on the topic.  This is a prophetic observation, given the fact that the putative president’s intransigence in refusing to put the controversy to rest by simply releasing a “hard copy” – as opposed to another image of a hard copy posted April 27, 2011 to the Internet – of his original birth certificate, assuming, again, that an original Hawaiian long-form certificate exists, has served only to attract more and more attention to the issue, and, lately, from persons of higher and higher profile.
 
Moreover, given the “release” by the White House on April 27, 2011 of an Internet “image” of a document now purporting to be the “original long form birth certificate,” and the contents of a second CRS memo, discussed herein later, the controversy is only exacerbated.
 
Second, after a brief introductory discussion about the “vetting” of candidates for the office and the purported impropriety of lawsuits seeking to challenge the eligibility of presidential candidates as lacking “standing” and being premised on “non-justiciable political questions,” the CRS Memo delves into what it terms a “Legal Analysis of [the] Natural Born Citizenship Requirement.”
 
It is this section of the CRS Memo dealing with the “vetting” issue which Dr. Corsi’s book seizes upon.  While the issue is significant, as Dr. Corsi points out, because it confirms that candidate (and now president) Obama was, in effect, “given a pass” by the system and those charged with operating it because no federal law required the “vetting” of a presidential candidate’s eligibility under the “natural born Citizen” clause of the Constitution, it is not the end of the inquiry.
 
To state the obvious: just because something is not “required” does not mean that it would be unwise or imprudent to do it anyway.  Dr. Corsi characterizes (at p. 295) the paragraph on the first page of the CRS Memo containing the statement that no “vetting” of presidential candidates is “required” (and which first page is included as Exhibit 124 at p. 234 of the book) as “… the most important paragraph in the document.”  Respectfully, there may be an even more important paragraph farther into the document, as discussed hereafter.
 
The “analysis” portion of the CRS Memo is thereafter subdivided into sections addressing “Background/Summary,” “Constitutional History,” “Common Understanding of the Legal Term ‘Natural Born’ in [the] 1700’s” and “Legal Challenges Brought in 2008,” with subsections addressing challenges involving the presidential eligibility of both Senator John McCain and then-Senator Barack H. Obama.
 
Indeed, while the CRS Memo goes to great lengths to expound upon the fact that, for example, a well-known legal treatise popular in England in colonial times, Blackstone’s Commentaries, was “… widely known in the Colonies…” and that certain commentators believed that the “… Framers had a broad view of the term ‘natural born’ and considered all foreign-born children of American citizen parents eligible for the Office of the Presidency…,” (see CRS Memo at fn. 44 and accompanying text), the CRS Memo is devoid of any reference at all to the teachings of de Vattel, even in a dismissive way.  Unlike the CRS Memo, even Blackstone’s Commentaries and the United States Supreme Court recognize de Vattel and the impact and influence of his writings on the Founding Fathers. 

Moreover, the citation by the CRS Memo (fn. 44) to a law review article for the broad statement regarding the purported ambivalence of the Founders to foreign-born persons being eligible to the presidency is plainly inconsistent with the advice John Jay – clearly, a Founder – to George Washington in 1787.
 
On the other hand, the CRS Memo does mention and discuss Jay’s letter to Washington, but ultimately concludes that the concern over the “natural born citizen” and “eligibility” issues related to a desire to ensure the requisite chief executive fealty and allegiance to the nation and “… to prevent wealthy foreign citizens, and particularly wealthy foreign royalty and their progeny or relations, from scheming and buying their way into the presidency, or creating an American monarchy.”  See CRS Memo at 6-7.
 
This conclusion, of course, seems to be inconsistent with the “broad view of the term ‘natural born citizen’…” espoused elsewhere in the CRS Memo.  In any event, since The Law of Nations was plainly available to the Founders and “… informed their understanding of the principles of law which became established in the Constitution of 1787…,” (see U.S. Steel v. Multistate Tax Commission, ante, and Preface Comments, 1999 digital edition, The Law of Nations, ante), this omission from the CRS Memo’s “analysis” of any reference to de Vattel’s tome, substituting primary reliance on Blackstone’s Commentaries,  is one that stands out like the proverbial “empty room… except for that elephant in the corner,” or, to quote Sherlock Holmes, “the dog that didn’t bark.”
 
At minimum, one would expect a thorough evaluation of the issues from as “…authoritative, confidential, objective and nonpartisan…” an entity as the CRS to include at least a passing reference to § 212 of The Law of Nations, with whatever explanatory, distinguishing or dismissive comments might in the author’s mind be appropriate.  But the complete omission of any reference whatsoever to de Vattel is not only problematic from an objective, intellectual perspective, but could also presage a less benign motivation underlying the ultimate conclusions of the CRS Memo itself.
 
It would take far more time and energy than this writer presently possesses to dissect all of the components of the CRS Memo and explain why, at the end of the day, its ultimate conclusions are highly questionable and suspect, thus demanding far more examination than has thus far been expended on the issues.  Suffice it to say, however, that there are certain aspects of the memo which are extremely problematic and troubling and which thus both invite and necessitate more scrutiny.  Whether that scrutiny should come from official or unofficial sources or whether it should be addressed through legal action is a matter left for others to decide.
 
THE CORE OF THE CRS MEMO ATTACK
 
Specifically, in the first subsection of the “Legal Analysis” portion of the CRS Memo, it is contended that, based on the common law principle of “jus soli” or the “law of the soil” which existed in England and the Original Colonies in 1776, as well as under statutes and constitutional amendments coming into effect thereafter:
 
“… all persons born ‘in’ the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens of the United States ‘at birth.’  As such, any person physically born ‘in’ the United States, regardless of the citizenship status of one’s parents (unless such parents are foreign diplomatic personnel not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States) would appear to be a ‘natural born’ citizen eligible to be President of the United States [fn. 25].” (Emphasis in original)
 
Footnote 25 of the memorandum cites “specifically” – meaning as a primary source for the assertion being made – as the authority for that contention the 1939 U.S. Supreme Court decision in a case called Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939) and its reliance on an 1875 “letter of advice” by U.S. Attorney General Edwards Pierrepont in a matter called Steinkauler’s Case. As will be seen shortly, not only is that reference misleading – the original statement of law coming from a different case involving a different fact situation – even if not misleading, it arrives at exactly the wrong legal conclusion.
 
Even before going through its “analysis,” the CRS Memo thus gives one a preview of the ultimate conclusion that, without regard to the citizenship status of one’s parents, if a person is born here, that person is a “natural born” citizen eligible to be President of the United States.
 
Stated otherwise, the CRS Memo posits for example, that if an illegal alien (some might prefer the term “undocumented immigrant”) pregnant woman, with or without an accompanying father, lawfully or unlawfully crosses the border – whether from Canada into North Dakota, Mexico into Texas, the Pacific Ocean into San Francisco, the Atlantic Ocean into New York City or the Gulf of Mexico into New Orleans – and gives live birth here, the child will, without more, meet the “natural born Citizen” criterion of the Constitution.  In effect, the CRS Memo thus eradicates any distinction between a “native born citizen” and a “natural born citizen,” conflating the two into a single, “one-size-fits-all” principle.
 
This point is recognized by Dr. Corsi at pp. 203-204 of his book, but without the additional analysis of why the eradication of the two concepts by their conflation into a single one is not only exactly what the Founders did not intend, but why it is something that cannot be supported under Perkins v. Elg as originally issued by the Supreme Court…, as opposed to how the Court’s opinion is paraphrased through ellipsis, yet offered up as a quote, in the CRS Memo and as discussed hereafter.
 
Indeed, that the “eligibility” distinction still exists between, on the one hand, a “native-born citizen” or a “naturalized citizen,” and on the other hand, a “natural born citizen” is confirmed by the Supreme Court decision in Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964).  There, Justice Douglas opined for the majority (yes, there was a dissent), 377 U.S. at 165:
 
“We start that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity and are coextensive.  The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the ‘natural born’ citizen is eligible to be President.  Art, II, s [§] 1.”  (Emphasis added).
 
Although the CRS Memo includes – oddly – several references to Schneider v. Rusk in support of its conclusions (see, e.g., CRS Memo fns. 24, 49 and its quote from Hollander v. McCain, 566 F. Supp. 2d 63, 66 (D. N.H. 2008), and fns. 51 and 66, referencing Rusk), nowhere in the CRS Memo is there an attempt to distinguish or explain away the statement (albeit denoted dictum) that “… only the ‘natural born’ citizen is eligible to be President.”
 
A cynic might be thus tempted to conclude that the only way of accomplishing the predetermined objective sought would be to turn to Perkins v. Elg, with its discussion of U.S. Attorney General Edwards Pierrepont’s “letter advice,” and “reverse engineer” a concocted result re-characterizing Marie Elg – who from birth was a natural born citizen – as being merely a ‘native born’ citizen, and then conflate that misleading and restrictive conclusion into what she actually was all along: a natural born citizen eligible to the presidency.
 
The principle to be kept in mind is simply this: all natural born citizens are also native born citizens, but not all native born citizens are natural born citizens. Stated otherwise, since Rusk notes that only a natural born citizen is eligible to serve as president, if Barack H. Obama is not a “natural born citizen,” the only way for the CRS Memo to otherwise “fudge” or “concoct” his eligibility is to morph his status as a “native born citizen” (which, if in fact he was born in Hawaii would be the case under the Wong Kim Ark decision) into a “natural born citizen” through the conflation of the two concepts.  This, as the opinion in Rusk confirms, cannot be done, at least with any intellectual propriety.
 
Moreover, does anyone believe that the CRS Memo’s main conclusion – that a child of foreign-born, non-U.S. citizens would be eligible to the presidency – is what Alexander Hamilton, James Madison or, in particular, John Jay had in mind when writing The Federalist?  Go back in this memo and read Jay’s advice to George Washington in 1787.  Does anyone really believe that the Founding Fathers who signed the Constitution would have agreed that, despite the teachings of de Vattel in § 212 of The Law of Nations with which they were familiar, this was what was intended through their careful selection of the words used in Art. 2, Section 1, Cl. 5 of their newly-minted Constitution?
 
Does anyone who reads the unanimous decision in Perkins v. Elg as originally written – as contrasted with how it is altered and paraphrased in the CRS Memo – really believe that the Founders intended that a child born here of a mother impregnated by an al Qaeda Pakistani father would, could or should be eligible to become president?   Yet that is the result posited by the CRS Memo.
 
Some who read the words of the CRS Memo – again, to be distinguished from the actual words of the Supreme Court decisions upon which it purports to rely for its conclusions, a matter addressed, post – might conclude in the affirmative.  On the other hand, a growing segment of the population might conclude that such a result is decidedly not what the Founders of this nation intended. And yet, this clearly appears to be the logical import of the product of a federal agency touting itself as Congress’ repository of “… the nation’s best thinking.”
 
Really?
 
Stated otherwise, since the teachings of de Vattel articulated in § 212 of The Law of Nations stand in such stark contrast to the conclusion of the CRS Memo – i.e., that the “natural born citizen” status of a person may exist regardless of the citizenship status of both parents, and in particular that of the father – it is at best inaccurate to contend that only the common law principles found in Blackstone’s Commentaries should inform the debate.  At worst, it is intentionally misleading.
 
And yet, the foregoing is not the worst problem with the CRS Memo.
 
The core problem with the CRS Memo takes the form of what seemingly is a conscious effort on the part of the memorandum drafters to “adjust” or “tweak” the actual language of two critical federal documents in order to arrive at a predetermined, targeted result.  The documents thus victimized in the CRS Memo are (1) the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939) and (2) the U.S. Attorney General’s “opinion” in Steinkauler’s Case, 15 Op. Atty. Gen. 15 (1875), accurately quoted in Elg, but altered and thus misquoted in the CRS Memo.  Let us hope this is an innocent mistake, for if it is not, it is a matter which should concern everyone, and in particular, 535 members of Congress.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on May 31, 2011, 05:39:18 AM
Right.  I'm sure Donald Trump will be all over this.   ::)

aren't we still waiting for the Donald's men, who went to Hawaii and "Found out some amazing things...." to tell just what they are?
(or is he planning another book ?)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 31, 2011, 11:18:49 AM
'Birther' book soars
CNN ^ | May 31, 2011 | Gabriella Schwarz


________________________ ________________________ __________


A new book, now number six on the New York Times' Best Sellers list, is putting the so-called "birther" issue back on the national stage.

"Where's the Birth Certificate?" by Jerome Corsi, which debuted on the list out Sunday, argues President Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen and therefore cannot be president.

"Corsi demonstrates conclusively that no legal authority has ever verified Obama's legal eligibility to be president," the book reads.

Corsi also wrote "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command," a 2004 book about Sen. John Kerry that focused on the "Swift Boat" television ads.


(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cn n.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Agnostic007 on May 31, 2011, 12:27:44 PM
And in other news... Thomas Jefferson may have owned slaves.....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 31, 2011, 12:33:48 PM
aren't we still waiting for the Donald's men, who went to Hawaii and "Found out some amazing things...." to tell just what they are?
(or is he planning another book ?)

Yeah.  He should disclose what those "amazing things" were. 

But he'll probably disclose them in a way that increases his bottom line. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on May 31, 2011, 10:14:59 PM
CNN covering this too?   :o

'Birther' book soars
By: CNN Associate Producer Gabriella Schwarz

(CNN) – A new book, now number six on the New York Times' Best Sellers list, is putting the so-called "birther" issue back on the national stage.

"Where's the Birth Certificate?" by Jerome Corsi, which debuted on the list out Sunday, argues President Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen and therefore cannot be president.

"Corsi demonstrates conclusively that no legal authority has ever verified Obama's legal eligibility to be president," the book reads.

Corsi also wrote "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command," a 2004 book about Sen. John Kerry that focused on the "Swift Boat" television ads.

The "birther" controversy was front-and-center earlier this year, as billionaire businessman and real estate mogul Donald Trump repeatedly discussed the issue while considering a run for the White House. President Obama ultimately released the long-form version of his birth certificate that shows he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Soon after, Trump announced he would not make a bid for the GOP presidential nomination.

Despite the president's actions, 17 percent of Americans think the president was definitely or probably not born in the U.S., according to a recent CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll taken after the president's announcement.

The survey showed a drop from the March poll numbers when 25 percent of those surveyed said the president was definitely or probably not born in America.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/31/birther-book-soars/#more-161615
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on June 01, 2011, 06:14:51 AM
And in other news... Thomas Jefferson may have owned slaves.....

...and birthed babies with them !  yikes ! ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 01, 2011, 11:31:12 AM
Time sensitive and coming up fast so I'll post the rest after this.

To learn more, tune in to WNJC 1360 http://www.wnjc1360.com/ (http://www.wnjc1360.com/) AM today from 3:00 – 4:00 p.m. ET. I’ll be a guest on Philadelphia Renaissance Radio, the Re-Patriot Radio American Freedom Watch hosted by Dan Haggerty and New Jersey attorney Billy Baer. If you’re in the northeast, tune in to AM 1360, or listen live online http://www.wnjc1360.com/ (http://www.wnjc1360.com/). If you have a question or comment, call toll free during the show: 866-277-1360.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 01, 2011, 11:35:05 AM
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37113 (http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37113)
Obama’s background of mirrors
- Doug Hagmann  Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Looking into the background of Barack Hussein Obama can be compared to looking into a kaleidoscope.  The difference is that instead of seeing pleasingly colorful and symmetrical designs created by light and mirrors, one sees both the mirrors and mechanisms that create the illusion and the asymmetry of the resultant image caused by a deliberate miscalibration of the mirrors. Turning the tube, or attempting to discern the image, only causes more unpleasant distortion.

Conducting legitimate background investigations should never be like looking into a kaleidoscope. It is a rather straightforward process. I should know, as I’ve done background checks as an investigator in the private sector for the last 26 years, mostly for Fortune 500 companies, screening potential executives selected to sit on boards of mega-corporations.  Questions are asked and answered, and all documentation requested of the selectees is willingly provided for the vetting process.

As one would expect, the requisite documentation includes but is not limited to actual hard copies of certified long form birth certificates, social security cards and passport records. No scanned images, no internet downloads, and most of all, no legal resistance to the process. The reasons for the former are obvious: digital documents are not suitable for authentication. With reference to the latter, legal resistance is a red flag of deception, either by commission or omission, and quickly warrants the selectee to a position of immediate suspicion.

In my years of conducting such background investigations, I’ve experienced such scenarios on less than a handful of occasions. Following through on each instance, I’ve uncovered evidence that the person under consideration was either lying about their credentials or was unqualified for the position due to fraudulent college and post-graduate credentials. In one particularly memorable case, I found that the selectee was actually a “plant” from a rival corporation, using an entirely fraudulent identity. In all such cases in which I’ve been involved, they’ve been dismissed or worse, subjected to criminal charges.

This brings me to the issue of Barack Hussein Obama following the interestingly-timed release of his alleged long form Certificate of Live Birth. Apparently, the establishment media has decided that the case is closed, hoping to send the “Birthers” back to their world of kooky conspiracy theories of obviously racist origins. The media, complicit in the process, has also been caught in some underhandedness regarding the book “Where’s the Birth Certificate” by Dr. Jerome Corsi. Even the self-proclaimed conservative network Fox News vapidly ambushed Dr. Corsi in an interview conducted by Greg Jarrett immediately following the release of his book. We would expect that kind of behavior from the left but not the administration’s number one critic.

Despite what “team Obama,” the complicit corporate media, and many ill-informed conservative pundits proclaim, the case of the deliberately opaque background of Barack Hussein Obama is far from closed. In fact, as Obama and the Obama White House has given his imprimatur of the recently released document, he has legally painted himself and others into a potential criminal corner.

Beyond the digital release of the Certificate of Live Birth, however, lies yet another aspect of his background that suggests the duplicitous use of his social security number. Lest anyone is about to accuse me or my network of being late to the party, we have been investigating this aspect of the background of the man seated in the Oval Office for some time. Much like Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels, investigator Neil Sankey and others have found, irregularities exist with the issuance of Barack Hussein Obama’s social security number. We have collected original proprietary database reports and other documents that indicate that Obama obtained, under possible fraudulent circumstances, an invalid social security number. While much discussion involves the state of issuance of that number, our investigation focuses on the circumstances surrounding that issuance.

Our soon-to-be-released findings will likely surprise you. It will also give you a glimpse of the internal mechanisms of the broken kaleidoscope. And be advised, we’ve found virtual “fingerprints” on the deliberately miscalibrated mirrors.

To learn more, tune in to WNJC 1360 AM today from 3:00 – 4:00 p.m. ET. I’ll be a guest on Philadelphia Renaissance Radio, the Re-Patriot Radio American Freedom Watch hosted by Dan Haggerty and New Jersey attorney Billy Baer. If you’re in the northeast, tune in to AM 1360, or listen live online. If you have a question or comment, call toll free during the show: 866-277-1360.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 01, 2011, 11:51:24 AM
Is it enough?

We have Trump private investigators, we have Corsi's book.

supposedly the LBFC is an obvious fake.

Is there anyone with any power to make put this in the national spotlight?

Or is the evidence so weak it will be dismissed and therefore no one wants to touch it?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on June 01, 2011, 02:41:13 PM
Is there anyone with any power to make put this in the national spotlight?

Or is the evidence so weak it will be dismissed and therefore no one wants to touch it?
huh?  :-\

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 01, 2011, 02:52:59 PM
huh?  :-\



Sorry lol.

Is there any one with the power to put this on the national spot light?

Why isn't Trump doing it?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2011, 03:05:29 PM
Sorry lol.

Is there any one with the power to put this on the national spot light?

Why isn't Trump doing it?

Isn't it already in the national spotlight?  The MSM is covering it.  The whole movement lost whatever credibility it had (if it ever had any), but the media is still talking about it.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 01, 2011, 03:23:01 PM
Isn't it already in the national spotlight?  The MSM is covering it.  The whole movement lost whatever credibility it had (if it ever had any), but the media is still talking about it.

Are they talking about what people on this thread are recently saying since the LFBC was released?  Are they talking how its being accused of being a fake?  Just wondering. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 01, 2011, 04:16:35 PM
Are they talking about what people on this thread are recently saying since the LFBC was released?  Are they talking how its being accused of being a fake?  Just wondering. 

They're talking about Corsi's book, which apparently discusses all of the CTs regarding Obama's citizenship, so I guess it's all already out there. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 02, 2011, 10:42:04 AM
from theobamafile.com
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2726180/posts?page=46#46 (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2726180/posts?page=46#46)
John Mirse says it has been about 4 WEEKS since Obama released his long form birth certificate back on April 27, 2011.

1.  Amazingly during those 4 weeks NOT a single word, sound, or anything has come from Kapiolani Hospital officials to verify that Kapiolani is indeed Obama's birth hospital as it is stated on Obama's long form birth certificate.  It is as if hospital officials have suddenly gone into hiding for some unknown reason.  Why is that?

2.  And I bet another month and another month and so on will pass by and Kapiolani Hosptal officials and Obama still won't allow reporters to examine Obama's mother's hospital records.  Why is that?

3.  Kapiolani Hospital officials know that they can drive a deadly dagger into the heart of birther nation if only Obama would give Kapiolani officials permission to allow reporters to examine Obama's mother's hospital records.

4.  But for some unknown reason, Obama won't give Kapiolani Hospital officials permission to release his deceased mother's records of Aug. 4, 1961---Obama's birth date---to reporters.  Why is that?

5.  My opinion is this: Kapiolani Officials will never release Obama's mother's records to reporters because there are no such records to release, that is, Obama's mother was NEVER a patient at Kapiolani Hospital on Aug. 4, 1961 as is stated on Obama's long form birth certificate.

6.  So until Kapiiolani Hospital officials and Obama allow reporters to examine Obama's mother's records of Aug. 4, 1961, I can only conclude that there are NO records for Obama's mother for Aug. 4, 1961.

7.  I may eat my words later, but I say again that until reporters are allowed to examine Obama's mother's records for Aug, 4, 1961, I can only conclude that there are NO Kapiolani records for Obama's mother for Aug. 4, 1961, the day Obama claims as his birth date.

8.  And the longer Kapiolani officials and Obama play hardball when it comes to the release of Obama's mother's records, the more VOTES Obama will lose on election day Nov. 2012, because many VOTERS like me won't be able to understand how PObama, on the one hand, can release his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press conference on April 27, 1961, but, on the other hand, he continues to play hardball when the public asks him to take the next step and allow Kapiolani Hospital officials to release his deceased mother's records for Aug. 4, 1961, the day Obama says is his birth date.

9.  That is, VOTERS like me are starting to wonder about this: What is so important/damaging about the information in Obama's deceased mother's Aug. 4, 1961 Kapiolani Hospital records that is not already on Obama's long form birth certificate that Obama released to the public with great fanfare at a White House press conference on April 27, 2011?  Strange.  Very strange.

And, why does Obama's campaign website say he was born at Queens Medical Center?
(http://theobamafile.com/_images/QueensHospital01.jpg)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 02, 2011, 03:25:20 PM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306425 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306425)
Author: 'Birth Certificate' prompts departure of White House counsel
Corsi says move 'marks beginning' of end of Obama eligibility cover-up
June 02, 2011

The author of the best-selling "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President" charged today the resignation of White House counsel Bob Bauer is the result of his participation in the release of Barack Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth," which he fears would not stand up to the scrutiny of any serious investigation by the FBI, Congress or the media.

When the announcement about Bauer's departure was made today, the AP said he was returning to private practice and to "represent Obama as his personal attorney and as general counsel to Obama's re-election campaign."

He's being replaced by Kathy Ruemmler, who is a former assistant U.S. attorney.

The AP reported Obama praised Bauer, who before his White House post had defended Obama against lawsuits that challenged his eligibility to be president.

But Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., who authored the "Where's the Birth Certificate?" book that debuted at No. 6 on the New York Times best-sellers list after reaching No. 1 several weeks earlier at Amazon.com, said, "I think Bauer's resignation marks the beginning of the Obama eligibility cover-up starting to unwind."

Corsi believes Bauer "felt compelled" to resign because of the growing substance to worries that the eligibility issue will blow up into a full-scale investigation.

"Bauer sent Perkins and Coie attorneys to Honolulu to pick up from the Hawaii Department of Health what he believed would be two certified copies of Obama's 1961 long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate," Corsi said.

"When the White House released to the public the birth certificate in the form of a PDF computer file obviously created on Adobe software and a Xerox copy, Bauer realized the Hawaii DOH had participated in the fraud," Corsi charged.

He said he had been tipped off early in February that a long-form birth document for Obama had been forged, and that the document was to be released.

"The information came from a mole within the Hawaii DOH who had been examining the vault logbook for months," Corsi explained. "Until just prior to February 24, no Obama long-form hospital-generated birth record could be found in the Hawaii DOH."

Corsi, whose book also has ascended to the upper reaches of a long list of other best-seller tabulations, said, "When [Hawaii] Gov. [Neal] Abercrombie could not find the Obama birth records he had been searching for and radio journalist Mike Evans said so in a broadcast repeated over a series of radio stations across the nation, a decision was made within the White House to use a forgery that may have been in the works since as early as 2008."

Corsi said he believes the scenario developed this way:

Obama and Valerie Jarrett wanted to continue the stonewalling strategy they had used since 2008, relying on the short-form "Certification of Live Birth" and having Hawaii DOH claim that long-form birth certificate copies were no longer available, not even to Obama.

Obama and Jarrett had planned to use the forged birth certificate as an October surprise, just prior to the November 2012 election, if the pressure on Obama's eligibility remained an obstacle to his reelection.

But this strategy was overruled by WH Chief of Staff Bill Daley. He determined that a birth certificate, if it existed, had to be released now – to prevent the issue from gaining momentum.
"I believe both Daley and Bauer believed until recently that Obama was telling the truth and that the birth certificate was really there in the Hawaii DOH," Corsi said. "When they realized that the date stamp on the computer file of the Obama birth certificate that was put up on the White House website on April 27 was that morning, Bauer realized the White House was lying to say a scan of the original document was being released."

Corsi said he's convinced that now top White House operatives such as Daley and Bauer believe there is no document in the Hawaii Department of Health that can withstand forensic analysis.

He said the legal challenges to a specific document that has been made public could be harder to deflect than a lawsuit generally alleging an ineligibility on Obama's part.

Corsi also said he believes top operatives in the Democratic Party "have concluded that if Obama does not kill the birther issue soon, he may have to resign – with the likelihood that Hillary Clinton will be elevated into the DNC presidential candidate in 2012."

Corsi suggested Republicans also are staying away from the "birther" issue because they have reached the same conclusion – and the RNC does not want "to have to face Hillary in the 2012 presidential election in the wake of an Obama resignation."

"What forced the release of the birth certificate on April 27 was the coming publication of the [Where's the Birth Certificate?] book," said Corsi.

"Bauer's resignation is the first step in the crumbling of inside support for Obama in the White House."

Corsi said pursuit of the "forger" who created the Obama "Certificate of Live Birth" already is well under way.

"The forgery consists of a composite of these various Hawaii 1961 legitimate documents, onto which was added Obama-specific information, with the result that the final version was composed in Adobe software," Corsi said.

WND reported when Bauer joined the White House.

Obama announced at that point he was waiving ethics rules for Bauer, his personal and campaign lawyer – and the same attorney who has defended Obama in lawsuits challenging his eligibility to be president.

But Executive Order 13490, "Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel," prohibits political appointees from participating in any matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to former employers or former clients. The rule typically expires two years after the date of appointment.

According to the ethics waiver posted on the White House website, Bauer was exempted from the requirements of the ethics pledge "solely with respect to his former client the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and with respect to his former employer Perkins Coie LLP (Perkins Coie) in its capacity as counsel to the DNC and to President Barack Obama in his personal capacity."

The waiver suggested the ethics rules would have prevented Bauer from working on Obama's financial disclosure forms or issues related to the Democratic National Committee.

As WND reported, in April 2009, Bauer sent a letter to plaintiff Gregory Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, of Hollister v. Soetoro, threatening sanctions if he didn't withdraw his appeal of the eligibility case that earlier was tossed by a district judge because the issue already had been "twittered."

"For the reasons stated in Judge Robertson's ruling, the suit is frivolous and should not be pursued," Bauer's letter warned. "Should you decline to withdraw this frivolous appeal, please be informed that we intend to pursue sanctions, including costs, expenses and attorneys' fees, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 and D.C. Circuit Rule 38."

(http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/hemenwaytwo.jpg)

Bauer also represented Obama and the DNC in Philip Berg's eligibility lawsuit and various other legal challenges.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer functioned as an "attack lawyer," threatening with FEC complaints groups wanting to run anti-Obama television ads.

Also during the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer as counsel for the Obama campaign wrote letters to television station managers and to Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General John Keeney arguing that airing an anti-Obama ad pointing to the known association between Obama and Weather Underground radical Bill Ayers would violate federal election rules.

Additionally, during the 2008 campaign, Bauer intervened on behalf of Obama to block the California-based American Leadership Project from running a television ad campaign over support from unions, including the Service Employees International Union.

Again, Bauer filed a complaint with the FEC alleging that the union-funded television campaign the American Leadership Project planned to run in Indiana against Obama was illegal under federal election laws.

In addition to representing Obama on eligibility cases, Bauer also served as legal counsel to represent the president in the criminal probe into the activities of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 04, 2011, 10:37:22 AM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306873 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306873)
Friday, June 03, 2011
Obama critic coming closer to Social Security records?
Judge advances FOIA dispute over application for Connecticut number
By Bob Unruh

Much information has been reported – and much more still is being sought – about Barack Obama's original birth documentation, and whether it reveals his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirement those in the Oval Office be a "natural born Citizen."
But under the radar of most new organizations a case has been moving forward in Washington, D.C., through which California attorney Orly Taitz is seeking the original application for Obama's Social Security number, a document that could reveal a multitude of factors about the president's early life.

U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth this week rejected a defense concern over procedure in the dispute, and Taitz told WND today the case has moved into discovery and she can issue subpoenas to those holding the documentation she is seeking.

Get the New York Times best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President," by Jerome Corsi.

WND previously has reported on the issue that Obama holds a Connecticut-based Social Security numberdespite allegedly being born in Hawaii, starting his work career in the Aloha State, and never having lived in Connecticut.

For those who never wondered about how Social Security Numbers are generated, the first three digits represent the state of the recipient's mailing address. In other words, if you live or work in Connecticut, for example, the first three digits of your SSN will correspond to the Connecticut code.

(Story continues below)


The first three digits of Obama's SSN are 042. That code of 042 falls within the range of numbers for Connecticut, which according to the Social Security Administration has been 040 through 049.

The national news media has been virtually silent on this potentially criminal fact.

Indeed, when Fox News finally attempted to explain it, it broadcast false information and then scrubbed it from its website.

When WND asked the White House about it, then–Press Secretary Robert Gibbs dodged the question.



Taitz' case is against Social Security commissioner Michael Astrue and explains that because of the multitude of questions surrounding Obama's eligibility, his birth certificate and his other records, the Freedom of Information Act request was submitted.

The Social Security Administration rejected it, and that decision was affirmed by a district court ruling that found the administrative procedures still had a course to run. But that now has been completed and the case is before Lamberth again.

He ruled this week that FOIA actions "are exempt" from a local court "meet and confer" requirement and he gave Astrue 30 days to file "any dispositive motions."

The federal government had argued that Taitz' process to subpoena individuals with access to the long-sought documentation was out of order, but the court ruling means it is within procedures.

According to a report in the Post & Email online blog, Taitz reported, "We're now in discovery, so I can issue subpoenas."

That is a level that no other case challenging Obama's eligibility or birth certificate ever has reached.

She said she already has contacted the Hawaii Department of Health, which is custodian of Hawaiian records, about her requests, and she said another recipient very well could be the White House.

She noted that White House Counsel Robert Bauer resigned that post just yesterday, and suggested Bauer might not have wanted to be deposed regarding questions about Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth," a document presented to the nation as genuine when the White House released it on April 27.

However, a multitude of experts have said it is a document assembled on computer and unlikely to be legitimate.

Taitz suggested that Bauer's move back into private practiced may have been speeded by worries over the eligibility dispute.

In fact, Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., and author of "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President,"said he's convinced Bauer's move is because he fears the "Certificate of Live Birth" document would not stand up to the scrutiny of any serious investigation.

Corsi believes Bauer "felt compelled" to resign because of the growing substance to worries that the eligibility issue will blow up into a full-scale investigation.

"Bauer sent Perkins and Coie attorneys to Honolulu to pick up from the Hawaii Department of Health what he believed would be two certified copies of Obama's 1961 long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate," Corsi said. "When the White House released to the public the birth certificate in the form of a PDF computer file obviously created on Adobe software and a Xerox copy, Bauer realized the Hawaii DOH had participated in the fraud."

He said he had been tipped off early in February that a long-form birth document for Obama had been forged and that the document was to be released.

"The information came from a mole within the Hawaii DOH who had been examining the vault logbook for months," Corsi explained. "Until just prior to February 24, no Obama long-form hospital-generated birth record could be found in the Hawaii DOH."

As WND has reported, there long have been concerns about the Social Security number.

"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," says Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?

"Never," Daniels told Corsi. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security Number issued."

Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security Number is fraudulent."

"A person who wants to hide their true identity often picks up the Social Security Number of a deceased person, thinking that nobody would ever look into it," Daniels added. "I think it was sometime in the 1980s that Obama decided to hide who he really is."

There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.

Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.

An affidavit filed by Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, "it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security Numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence."

Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security Number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.

"I doubt this is President Obama's originally issued Social Security Number," she told WND. "Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security Number in Hawaii."

The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama's inauguration.

Just last month some 11 months after WND began publicizing Obama's Connecticut-based SSN, Bill O'Reilly of the Fox News Channel briefly addressed the issue while reading his viewer mail on the air.

Unfortunately for O'Reilly, the news anchor falsely asserted the president's father lived in Connecticut.

In his viewer email segment April 13, O'Reilly was asked: "What about Obama having a Connecticut Social Security Number? He never lived there."

"His father lived in Connecticut for several years," O'Reilly claimed, adding that "babies sometimes get numbers based on addresses provided by their parents."

In reality, there is no evidence Barack Obama Sr. ever lived in Connecticut. He left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya.

When WND publicized O'Reilly's major error, the information vanished from the Fox News Channel's website, as well as BillOReilly.com.

O'Reilly's full explanation of the "truth" of Obama "myths" is here:



The BirtherReport.com website, responding to complaints by Fox podcast customers that O'Reilly's Social Security claim, broadcast on Fox, had gone missing from the audio archive, trumpeted the headline: "Busted: Fox News scrubbed Bill O'Reilly's 4/13 mailbag segment on Obama's Social Security Number reserved for Connecticut applicants." The site added, "Not only did Fox News scrub the podcast, they also left out the viewer email about Obama's Social Security number at O'Reilly's website. I report, you decide!"
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 04, 2011, 08:05:52 PM
Atty Stephen Pidgeon Found Record of Name Change for Barack Obama in British Columbia - 6/3/11



Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Jun 3, 2011
LINKS: Interview with attorney Stephen Pidgeon. Attorney Pidgeon claims he found a record for a name change from "Barak Mounir Ubayd" to "Barack Hussein Obama" on October 14th, 1982 in Skookumchuck, British Columbia. Attorney Pidgeon also discusses his new book titled "The Obama Error" which can be purchased here. The interview aired 6/3/2011 on TruNews Radio. - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/attorney-stephen-pidgeon-... -

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 04, 2011, 11:56:10 PM
we have proof that FOX NEWS is in on the lie.

Does anyone deny it?  We see above that they scrubbed a line from the transcript/website which sure made obama look bad on it.

So now FOX - along with all the other media - is covering up the lie.

Can we PLEASE lump in fox with the puppet shady ass mainstream media now?  Please?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 12:42:37 PM
we have proof that FOX NEWS is in on the lie.

Does anyone deny it?  We see above that they scrubbed a line from the transcript/website which sure made obama look bad on it.

So now FOX - along with all the other media - is covering up the lie.

Can we PLEASE lump in fox with the puppet shady ass mainstream media now?  Please?

Yes, most people deny it.  Ozmo debunked the Connecticut SSN conspiracy theory. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 12:53:28 PM
my point, BB, is that whenever people accuse the "mainstream media" or the "lamestream media" of covering up obama birthplace Qs, they should really include FOX with that now.

Scrubbing a historical record (online archive) to conceal actual documents which cast doubt upon Obama's eligibility - they're taking sides in a major way here - taking the side of Obama over actual evidence.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 12:54:31 PM
Yes, most people deny it.  Ozmo debunked the Connecticut SSN conspiracy theory. 

Not so - he offered what is a far fetched, but plausible explanation.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 12:57:34 PM
my point, BB, is that whenever people accuse the "mainstream media" or the "lamestream media" of covering up obama birthplace Qs, they should really include FOX with that now.

Scrubbing a historical record (online archive) to conceal actual documents which cast doubt upon Obama's eligibility - they're taking sides in a major way here - taking the side of Obama over actual evidence.



I see.  So Fox News was trying to hide the fact that they aired a show, viewable by the entire world, which included a segment that couldn't have longer than a minute or two, talking about some absurd story regarding a Conn. SSN.

Reasonable people don't believe that kind of nonsense. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 12:58:04 PM
IMO, it all comes down to this...

Obama has some Qs, but since everyone's covering it up, left and right and nonpartisan, it's likely he did some cool top secret govt shit - which makes him a hero for serving the USA>  if that's the case, he must laugh his ass off when people question his patriotism, if he was indeed working for the USA doing dirt overseas during his alleged college years.

Since the media and both parties and the govt are gonna play along, then the FACT is that he's getting away with it.  Period.  PERCEPTION - what people believe - trumps every single fact.  So that's just the reality we live in, true or not.

Suck it up, maybe consider not running a pilled up, loopy moron on the GOP ticket in 2012, and you might just boot his ass out of office and you can stop the birther stuff :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 12:59:04 PM
I see.  So Fox News was trying to hide the fact that they aired a show, viewable by the entire world, which included a segment that couldn't have longer than a minute or two, talking about some absurd story regarding a Conn. SSN.

Reasonable people don't believe that kind of nonsense. 

the point is that FOX made the judgement call to REMOVE what they considered "unreasonable" from their transcripts.

Quite a judgment call there ;)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 12:59:20 PM
Not so - he offered what is a far fetched, but plausible explanation.   

He pretty much blew it up.  

I completely understand why the media isn't covering the "fake" SSN claim.  It's in the same category as the grandmother allegedly saying Obama was born in Kenya.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:00:54 PM
the point is that FOX made the judgement call to REMOVE what they considered "unreasonable" from their transcripts.

Quite a judgment call there ;)

Oh yes.  They're in on the conspiracy to conceal Obama's fake Connecticut SSN.  lol 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 01:02:56 PM
He pretty much blew it up.  

I completely understand why the media isn't covering the "fake" SSN claim.  It's in the same category as the grandmother allegedly saying Obama was born in Kenya.  

Not so at all.   That simply is utter nonsense.   He took what is a statistical possibility and offered that as the explanation for anomoly that is obama's SS number.   There is a lot of info on Obama's bogus SS number that equally shows its horseshit.     

    
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:03:55 PM
There is a lot of info on Obama's bogus SS number that equally shows its horseshit.           

Beach Bum surely cannot list any of this info about the SS number, but he won't hesiate to speak authoritatively that it's all bogus :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Fury on June 05, 2011, 01:05:03 PM
Anyone find it funny that 240 keeps spamming the debt clock link yet the majority of the posts on the last three pages I just skimmed through come from him?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:05:34 PM
Not so at all.   That simply is utter nonsense.   He took what is a statistical possibility and offered that as the explanation for anomoly that is obama's SS number.   There is a lot of info on Obama's bogus SS number that equally shows its horseshit.     

    

That's not my recollection.  I'll have to look at his posts again, but I remember him taking that entire claim apart.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:06:44 PM
Beach Bum surely cannot list any of this info about the SS number, but he won't hesiate to speak authoritatively that it's all bogus :)

LOL.  Nobody has any "authoritative" information showing Obama has a fake Connecticut SSN. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:08:19 PM
LOL.  Nobody has any "authoritative" information showing Obama has a fake Connecticut SSN. 

I was referring to the dozen or so OTHER pieces of info about obama's SSNs popping up all over the grid in places which made no sense.

33 can list them.  You can't.  But I'm guessing you'll speak authoritavely that they're all nonsense.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:09:29 PM
LOL @ this thread.  BB ignoring facts about obama SS BS (we call that blindfolded kneepadding)... and 33 and 240 on the same side of this issue :P
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Fury on June 05, 2011, 01:10:07 PM
LOL @ this thread.  BB ignoring facts about obama SS BS (we call that blindfolded kneepadding)... and 33 and 240 on the same side of this issue :P

www.usdebtclock.org
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:11:14 PM
I was referring to the dozen or so OTHER pieces of info about obama's SSNs popping up all over the grid in places which made no sense.

33 can list them.  You can't.  But I'm guessing you'll speak authoritavely that they're all nonsense.


Nobody can list "authoritative" info showing Obama has "SSNs popping up all over the grid."  That is conspiracy theory garbage, which explains why the media isn't talking about it.  

There is a reason why no Republican candidate for president, or the Republican Party, is talking about "SSNs popping up all over the grid":  it's stooopid.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:12:04 PM
Nobody can list "authoritative" info showing Obama has "SSNs popping up all over the grid."  That is conspiracy theory garbage, which explains why the media isn't talking about it. 

33,

Post what you have on this topic, brah.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:13:10 PM
LOL @ this thread.  BB ignoring facts about obama SS BS (we call that blindfolded kneepadding)... and 33 and 240 on the same side of this issue :P

What facts?   ::)

This is really funny.  The mother of all liberal kneepadders speaks.  You have been a liberal lapdog on this site for years.  lol  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:15:09 PM
Not so - he offered what is a far fetched, but plausible explanation.   

How is it far fetched 3333?  If none of these factors are true: 4/5 of the numbers match, and the one number that is off is in sequence to the other, is in  the same spot (1st number in zip)'lies next to each other on the typewriter, and is commonly mistaken for each other in written form, then yes it's far fetched.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:16:47 PM
You have been a liberal lapdog on this site for years.  lol  

Only since 2005 when I smelled the 911 BS.

I was anti-Kerry, very pro-Bush in 2004 elections.  Longtime getbiggers remember.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:18:34 PM
Only since 2005 when I smelled the 911 BS.

I was anti-Kerry, very pro-Bush in 2004 elections.  Longtime getbiggers remember.

So you think 911 was a repulibcan inside job designed to keep bush in office so therefore you are now liberal?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:19:47 PM
Only since 2005 when I smelled the 911 BS.

I was anti-Kerry, very pro-Bush in 2004 elections.  Longtime getbiggers remember.

 ::)  You claimed when Bush took office that the entire 911 conspiracy would be exposed by a new administration.  It'll probably take me 60 seconds to find a quote. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:19:52 PM
So you think 911 was a repulibcan inside job designed to keep bush in office so therefore you are now liberal?

once I learned that Bush fought 441 days for a shoddy 911 investigation, and learned of all the inconsistencies of that day which he didn't want to look at -

Well, I questioned his judgement.  3000 deaths, and he didn't even wanna investigation?  WTF, man?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:20:52 PM
::)  You claimed when Bush took office that the entire 911 conspiracy would be exposed by a new administration.  It'll probably take me 60 seconds to find a quote. 

and I was wrong.   I am wrong about a lot of things.  Are we going to have a big circle jerk on it?  Is this your means of derailing a thread about Obama?  ;)

let's focus on the topic of the thread - obama's eligibility to be in office.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:22:06 PM
LOL!

Quote
That's right, my friends. 

As you will soon see (or are), my predictions on election day oil pushing to affect gas prices and DOW will come true.
Early next year, you will see 240's dollar recession prediction, sadly, as other nations are all saying it now.
And 9/11 truth will come out in early 2009, as Bush agreed to let all the 911 evidence come out the day he leaves office.

My latest thought is that neoconservatism is dying.  Wolfy, Rummy, and their gang are leaving DC.  The desperation on the puppet generals to get on CNN and trumpet the "we need more war spending" is becoing clear.  McCain has tried to fill the void left on the pro-war boat, but it's getting empty.  Bush's new staff are bush1 transplants who hated the neocons.

The men who got us into these wars did 2 things.  They put a US footprint into the area- much like vietnam or korea, we didn't win shit and we didn't lose shit.  But we set up bases.  Which means we'll never leave.  The US presence in that region is now permanent.  They also got RICH.  Military spending was in the billions, and the neos are all going to wall street or pvt sector mil. contractors now. Cheney is going to be welcomed back to haliburton with open arms, and he'll be more involved with iraq AFTER he leaves office, with less accountability.  And bush and his fam are building a compound in paraguay where they will retire to.  bush will never be the brilliant consultant the others are, but he's rich from the favorable saudi oil deals he giftwrapped for poppy.

They didn't do two things- they didn't get their Iran=Iraq-Afghan hat trick.  The people got wise to it and voted them out.  War in Iran is not going to happen, barring a fake terror attack.  but i don't think these men would be relinquishing power if they planned to hit iran next.  They'll have to wait another 30 years and let their children take a shot at WW5.  not on our dimes.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:22:28 PM
once I learned that Bush fought 441 days for a shoddy 911 investigation, and learned of all the inconsistencies of that day which he didn't want to look at -

Well, I questioned his judgement.  3000 deaths, and he didn't even wanna investigation?  WTF, man?

So the only reason he could have to fight an investigation was because it was an inside job?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:23:26 PM
mods, some people here are attempting to protect obama by turning this into a 240 thread :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:24:22 PM
I guess Obama is in on 911 now 240?

And with all his mysterious SS#'s, his NBC status.....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:24:41 PM
mods, some people here are attempting to protect obama by turning this into a 240 thread :)

Lol
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:25:09 PM
BB is a grown ass man, spending his sunday researching 2006 quotes on another grown ass man.



gayer than strawberry flapjacks :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:25:50 PM
and I was wrong.   I am wrong about a lot of things.  Are we going to have a big circle jerk on it?  Is this your means of derailing a thread about Obama?  ;)

let's focus on the topic of the thread - obama's eligibility to be in office.

You said "Bush agreed to let all the 911 evidence come out the day he leaves office."  What happened? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:26:11 PM
Lol


 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:27:01 PM
You said "Bush agreed to let all the 911 evidence come out the day he leaves office."  What happened? 

mods, please move this post to the CT board where this 911 garbage belongs.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:27:32 PM
mods, please move this post to the CT board where this 911 garbage belongs.

Bwhahahahaha!  Hey has Bush moved to Paraguay yet?  lol . . . .
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:29:29 PM
Bwhahahahaha!  Hey has Bush moved to Paraguay yet?  lol . . . .

Your willingness to interject bush and 911 into threads in order to protect your messiah obama is starting to become obvious.

Your little act of "I'm republican" starts to wear thin when we see how hard you're working to defend his citizenship here.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:30:14 PM
He'll, 240 if I did that I would have to send half of 33333's threads there too.  Because he thinks there is a marxists conspiracy to destroy America through Obama (among other things) playing golf instead of fixing the economy.   ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 01:31:34 PM
He'll, 240 if I did that I would have to send half of 33333's threads there too.  Because he thinks there is a marxists conspiracy to destroy America through Obama (among other things) playing golf instead of fixing the economy.   ;D

Corsi proved this without a shadow of a doubt in his last book.

Only libs and terrorists haven't purchased Corsi's book from the drudge link as instructed.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:40:31 PM


If there was no doubt, if his case was airtight, everyone who is  anyone with something to gain would be right behind it.   Not the case.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 01:42:51 PM
He'll, 240 if I did that I would have to send half of 33333's threads there too.  Because he thinks there is a marxists conspiracy to destroy America through Obama (among other things) playing golf instead of fixing the economy.   ;D

Its not a CT - its right out in the open.  If you had done an ounce of objective research into who you voted for you would understand just who you voted for instead of hoping for change.

The hack you voted for uses classic marxist language, implements reckless policiesthat are weaking and collapsing the economy, surrounded himself with radical leftists his entire life, promotes welfarism, class warfarism, policies that collapse the middle class, and you think this is all by accident that he is suh a complete disaster? 

Ha ha ha .       
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:43:32 PM
Your willingness to interject bush and 911 into threads in order to protect your messiah obama is starting to become obvious.

Your little act of "I'm republican" starts to wear thin when we see how hard you're working to defend his citizenship here.

Find one quote where I've ever said "I'm Republican," you lying liar.  There are plenty of quotes of you saying you're a Republican . . . and a libertarian . . . and Democrat voter . . . depending on which way the wind is blowing.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 05, 2011, 01:44:10 PM

If there was no doubt, if his case was airtight, everyone who is  anyone with something to gain would be right behind it.   Not the case.

Correct.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:57:37 PM
Its not a CT - its right out in the open.  If you had done an ounce of objective research into who you voted for you would understand just who you voted for instead of hoping for change.

The hack you voted for uses classic marxist language, implements reckless policiesthat are weaking and collapsing the economy, surrounded himself with radical leftists his entire life, promotes welfarism, class warfarism, policies that collapse the middle class, and you think this is all by accident that he is suh a complete disaster? 

Ha ha ha .       

First off:

It was a joke with 240 and I was using sarcasm. 

Second:

Just because I do not subscribe to your level of obsessive hate doesn't mean I voted for Obama.

Third:

Can you fucking remember #2 from now on.

Forth:

I am not against you nor do I dislike you.

Fifth:

Don't forget #4 even especially when I give you a ration of shit.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 01:59:35 PM
Sixth,

Stop with the stereotyping, lumping, and broad brushing as a retort every time you are boxed in and called on your BS.   It's stupid and tiresome.  

Ps:  don't forget #4 :D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 05, 2011, 02:01:34 PM
Sixth,

Stop with the stereotyping, lumping, and broad brushing as a retort every time you are boxed in and called on your BS.   It's stupid and tiresome. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 02:01:50 PM
Sixth,

Stop with the stereotyping, lumping, and broad brushing as a retort every time you are boxed in and called on your BS.   It's stupid and tiresome. 


Call it whatever the heck you want, when I know someone is actively on a course to undermine the nations' economy and "fundamentally transform" the USA, damn right I am going to obsess on what that asshole is doing.  

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 02:04:10 PM
Can 240 or Ozmo explain what he meant by this? 

I know - but I want to see if you voted for this crap with open eyes. 


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 02:04:38 PM

Call it whatever the heck you want, when I know someone is actively on a course to undermine the nations' economy and "fundamentally transform" the USA, damn right I am going to obsess on what that asshole is doing.  



Drink some beer and think about the Yankees for a bit dude.  

Try not to think about how your country has been hijacked by a foreign born pink-o commy Muslim.
 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 02:05:24 PM
Can 240 or Ozmo explain what he meant by this? 

I know - but I want to see if you voted for this crap with open eyes. 




I know what you think he meant.   ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 02:30:02 PM
And you are to stubborn to accept that I am right about this. 









Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 05, 2011, 06:01:54 PM
Well he has about 1 year to change the constitution and redefine our nation as communists.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 06:06:36 PM
Well he has about 1 year to change the constitution and redefine our nation as communists.

Its not about that.   He is trying to collapse the capitialist system to where we have a majority of citizens on welfare, govt handouts, programs etc so that they will beg fo socialism and otherwise and that that fundamental nature of the country is changed from a free enterprise, life liberty and the pursuit of happieness of the individual is no longer the focus.   Instead, the focus will be on the "collective" and how they can continually make decisions for your life and redistribute your wealth in ways you have zero control over and order your life according to some crazy progressive NWO twilight zone. 

Its not an event, its a process.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 05, 2011, 06:13:51 PM
Why is Obama's name different on passport? Doesn't match birth records released
WND ^ | June 2, 2011 | Jerome Corsi





In this era of tight airport security, the Transportation Safety Administration typically will not allow a passenger to board an airplane if the name printed on the ticket differs from the way it appears on government-issued identification.

Now that the White House has released President Obama's purported long-form birth certificate, a question arises as to why the name on that document does not match the name on his State Department passport.



This matched how his name was listed on the short-form Certification of Live Birth released during the 2008 presidential campaign, as first presented by DailyKos.com June 12, 2008:



Below is a close-up screen-capture of Obama's passport taken from the White House website:



Note that Obama’s name on his passport is listed as "Barack Hussein Obama," without the "II" the Hawaii documents list to indicate Obama was named after his father.

As seen below, U.S. State Department passport regulations require first-time applicants to submit an embossed birth certificate, complete with registrar's stamp, that lists the applicant's full name.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 06, 2011, 07:11:02 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Documents show marriage of Obama's parents a sham
WND ^ | June 06, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on June 6, 2011 9:28:18 PM EDT by RobinMasters

The recently released immigration file for Barack Obama Sr. indicates the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service had doubts he and Obama's mother were married.

While Ann Dunham may have sought Obama Sr. as her husband and the father of her child, the record suggests the two never lived together as a married couple.

As WND reported, there's no record of Ann Dunham's whereabouts during the last six months of her pregnancy.

Moreover, within weeks of the baby's birth, Dunham left Honolulu with her infant son and traveled to Seattle, where she enrolled in night courses at the University of Washington. She did not return to Honolulu until after Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in September 1962 to attend graduate courses at Harvard.

The INS file shows that Barack Obama Sr. was not faithful to Dunham, even when the two were in Hawaii at the same time.

Instead, the documentation supports the conclusion that Obama Sr. and Dunham took part in a sham marriage that the Kenyan student thought might help him extend his visa and remain in the United States to continue his education.

Economic necessity and his desire to complete his studies as soon as possible forced Obama Sr. to remain in Honolulu during the summer months, both to take summer classes and to work part-time.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 07, 2011, 07:17:58 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Expert: Obama doc is 'proof' – of fraud
World Net Daily ^ | June 7, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on June 7, 2011 9:45:09 PM EDT by conservativegramma

Typeface analysis shows images come from different machines

The online image of a Hawaiian "Certificate of Live Birth" was trumpeted by the White House when it was released on April 27 as "proof positive" that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.

Now an expert in typefaces and typography says it sure was "proof," but not of what the White House would have wanted.

Paul Irey, a retired professional typographer with 50 years experience in his business, has says an analysis of the typefaces used in the Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate that the White House released on April 27 reveals it absolutely to be a forgery.

"My analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one typewriter," Irey told WND.

"Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the fly like that," he said. "This document is definitely a forgery."

Irey acknowledges that an IBM Selectric typewriter could have produced different typefaces in a given document, but only if the Selectric ball was changed every time a different typeface letter was struck which would be unlikely to have been done to produce the word "Student," for example, that had two different styles of the lower case "t."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on June 07, 2011, 07:47:07 PM
U guys are all really big fucking losers
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 07, 2011, 08:01:38 PM
U guys are all really big fucking losers


Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Why did Obama release electronic birth certificate?
WND ^ | June 06, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on June 7, 2011 11:08:11 PM EDT by RobinMasters

NEW YORK – The White House's release of an electronic copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate instead of a certified paper copy raises questions in a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI filed by an international expert in scanners and document-imaging software.

Doug Vogt's complaint charges that individuals within the Hawaii Department of Health, Obama political operatives and an unidentified graphic artist worked in a multi-state conspiracy to create a fraudulent long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama.

Vogt's complaint asserts: "I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs."

He claims the long-form birth certificate the White House released April 27 as an electronic document in PDF format was forged from a composite of legitimate birth certificates obtained from the Hawaii DOH archives and manipulated to replace the original information with a fraudulent Obama birth record.

The birth certificate the White House released consists of an electronic file that when opened as a PDF file in Adobe Illustrator reveals nine different layers that corresponded to different sections of the form, including the signatures.

"I also opened up the White House PDF file in WordPad so I could see the codes and headers in the file. There I discovered the evidence for the nine layers embedded in the code," Vogt writes. "The big surprise I discovered was that the file was finished or created on April 27, 2011, and the copy I had downloaded from the White House web site was modified on April 28, 2011, at 9:58 a.m., the day after the news conference."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on June 07, 2011, 08:20:12 PM
No seriously you have 50000 posts on an internet site about shit that matters to noone except 5 dumbass meatheads....How sad is your life?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on June 07, 2011, 08:21:13 PM
I seriously dont give a fuck about either side of this debate you fucking loser. Go outside see the world a bit. You're life is embarassing
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 08, 2011, 02:38:14 AM
Ok gimmick.  Anyone want to guess whose gimmick this is? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 08, 2011, 04:51:08 AM
Update: “IT’S THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, STUPID!” w/Susan Daniels
T Room ^ | 6 June 2011 | Helen Tansey


________________________ ________________________ ___


Daniels brings our attention to two new documents with the first being an official response from the Social Security Administration to Ms. Daniels request for an investigation into how a legal Hawaiian resident, then Barry Obama, age 15, secured a Connecticut issued Social Security Number.

snip

The next document Daniels highlights is a Social Security Certification of a deceased applicant named Paul Michael Graziano. Mr. Graziano filed his SS-5 application (scroll to page 2) with a Connecticut Social Security office on March 16, 1977. His residential address then was 38 Yorktown Circle, Trumbull, Conn. 06611.

Why is this significant? Well, Mr. Graziano’s SSN is five numbers AFTER Obama’s Connecticut SSN and, again, was filed on March 16, 1977. You may recall in our April post Daniels explaining a Mr. Thomas Wood’s SS-5 Certification form, which immediately preceded Obama’s Connecticut SSN, being applied for on March 21, 1977. Therefore, it is now conclusive that the Connecticut Social Security number Obama secured at the age of 15, and has been using for the last 25 years, was secured in March of 1977 and more narrowly, sometime during the week of March 16 - 21, 1977.


Timeline - Wood/Obama/Graziano

SSN -- REGISTRATION DATE -- NAME -- ADDRESS
042-68-4424 -- March 21, 1977 -- Thomas Louis Wood -- Newington, Connecticut
042-68-4425 -- March ??, 1977 -- Barack Hussein Obama -- Honolulu, Hawaii
042-68-4429 -- March 16, 1977 -- Paul Michael Graziano -- Yorktown, Connecticut
 

Daniels then goes onto explain, “his location in March of 1977 is a quandary because the Social Security regulations, as codified then and today, clearly states ‘If you are age 12 or older and have never received a Social Security Number, you must apply in person.‘


(Excerpt) Read more at t-room.us ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 08, 2011, 04:53:08 AM
Update: “IT’S THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, STUPID!” w/Susan Daniels
Posted by helen
June 6, 2011

by Helen Tansey


Back on April 13, 2011, the T-Room predicted that President Obama would soon post a scanned version of what his inner circle would designate as his “Official” long-form birth certificate -

“More importantly, you can’t change a SSN record, but you can certainly create a long-form birth certificate just in time for the 2012 elections. Which is what many are anticipating, and now with Donald Trump entering the fray you can count on such a document entering into the public arena and soon. After all, anyone who has studied this issue knows the Obama camps next step is to embarrass the “birthers” by producing a long-form birth certificate. That would be checkmate wouldn’t it? Of course, it will be a scanned copy just like the COLB, because it will never hold up under the scrutiny of an independent forensic review team of experts, that is someone other than his former employer, the Annenberg’s,  so get ready for a repeat of a similar ruse coming to a computer screen near you.”

Viola! On the morning of April 27 the Prez posted a digitized “scanned” image captivating the public’s imagination, yet again. Although we were spot on in making our prediction, we take no pride in having to make it at all, and we were certainly not the only ones doing so. More unnerving about this farcical theater is how sad it all is. It took this man two and a half years, millions of dollars and a countless number of lawsuits later,  including the Court Martial of Lt. Col Lakin and trumped up charges of Lt. Commander Fitzpatrick, to post a  “picture” that was immediately found to be a really crappy forgery.
But the beat goes on… Many who have become expert students of this miserable game continue to be ridiculed and verbally assaulted for simply pointing out those pesky facts that crush the naysayers/obots laughable drivel. Who knows who pays these trolls and honestly, who really cares. At this point in the game both sides are worn down, one side from lying all of the time and the other defending our constitutional form of government.  The naysayers/obots/trolls barely have it in them to keep the shield up and few are flocking to replace them, with one exception, the moron who posts death threats from Port Angeles, Washington over at obamareleaseyourrecords. This obot loon can be traced back to 2008 when he was leveling similar threats on blogger Citizen Wells. Same M.O., same threats and same obot lunacy.

With both sides seemingly taking a short pause in the battle for reality, we thought it a good time to provide you with an update on the “It’s the Social Security Number, Stupid!” front. A lot has been happening with some detail already being reported while other detail has not.

We first caught up with Susan Daniels, Susan Daniels & Associates, on the afternoon of May 21, 2011. Daniels is the private investigator who, after a client’s request, first delved into the Obama SSN and all of the peculiarities surrounding it back in 2009.

Two documents - One embarrassingly ridiculous and the other tightens the window

Daniels brings our attention to two new documents with the first being an official response from the Social Security Administration to Ms. Daniels request for an investigation into how a legal Hawaiian resident, then Barry Obama, age 15, secured a Connecticut issued Social Security Number. A Mr. Frank Biro, Acting Associate Commissioner, Office of Public Inquiries, Social Security Administration, issued the formal reply by stating the following  “after reviewing the information you provided, we disagree with your conclusion that a person’s Social Security number depends upon the address of a residence.”

That was it. Nothing more. The Acting Associate Commissioner simply stated the Social Security Administration “disagreed” with Daniels understanding of their longstanding application regulations. He cited no code. He cited no regulation. He cited nothing.  As a formal representative of the SSA all he states is his disagreement. With what exactly? With their own regulations? What utter nonsense! Put this useless response into the loony circular file.

The next document Daniels highlights is a Social Security Certification of a deceased applicant named Paul Michael Graziano. Mr. Graziano filed his SS-5 application (scroll to page 2) with a Connecticut Social Security office on March 16, 1977. His residential address then was 38 Yorktown Circle, Trumbull, Conn. 06611.

Why is this significant? Well, Mr. Graziano’s SSN is five numbers AFTER Obama’s Connecticut SSN and, again, was filed on March 16, 1977. You may recall in our April post Daniels explaining a Mr. Thomas Wood’s SS-5 Certification form, which immediately preceded Obama’s Connecticut SSN, being applied for on March 21, 1977. Therefore, it is now conclusive that the Connecticut Social Security number Obama secured at the age of 15, and has been using for the last 25 years, was secured in March of 1977 and more narrowly, sometime during the week of March 16 - 21, 1977.

 

Timeline - Wood/Obama/Graziano
 
 
SSN REGISTRATION DATE NAME ADDRESS
042-68-4424 March 21, 1977 Thomas Louis Wood Newington, Connecticut
042-68-4425 March ??, 1977 Barack Hussein Obama Honolulu, Hawaii
042-68-4429 March 16, 1977 Paul Michael Graziano Yorktown, Connecticut

 

Daniels then goes onto explain, “his location in March of 1977 is a quandary because the Social Security regulations, as codified then and today, clearly states ‘If you are age 12 or older and have never received a Social Security Number, you must apply in person.‘

Listen to Part 1 of the T-Room’s interview with Daniels -


 

 

 

In the second part of the Daniels update, she highlights longstanding regulations of the Social Security administration that remain on the SSA.gov site for which Commish Biro simply disagrees.

The first item Daniels discusses is a historical guideline written by a Mr. Crow and Ms. Bennett, experts on the Social Security system including number assignments, which states the following -

‘With few exceptions, each geographical area is assigned a range of area numbers. Area numbers assigned prior to 1972 are an indication of the location of the SSA office which originally issued the SSN. Since 1972 SSNs have been issued centrally and the area number in SSNs assigned since 1972 corresponds to the residence location of the applicant as indicated on the application for the SSN.” (emphasis added)

To be clear, Connecticut’s area numbers are 040 - 049 and Hawaii’s area numbers are 575 and 576.

Therefore, based on these two SSA regulations one must suspend all rational thought to believe a young 15 year old boy from Honolulu, Hawaii traveled 5015.6 miles, 8071.8 kilometers, 4355.5 nautical miles or took a 10 hour and 25 minute flight to Connecticut, walked into a Connecticut Social Security office with at least “two legal documents” in hand verifying his age, identity, established place of residence in Connecticut and verification of US citizenship.

Nowhere in all of Barry’s travels, his books, articles written about him or his family does anyone even remotely suggest that Barry ever resided in the state of Connecticut nor his grandparents nor any other relatives. Nowhere.  And don’t waste good folks time trying to convince intelligent people the SS office in Baltimore, Maryland read the zip code wrong on the application. To suggest this only shows how desperate and dumb you are.

Listen to Part 2 of the Daniels interview to better understand what these regulations mean -


 

 

 

But for the sake of those who have any lingering doubts, let’s take a look at where 15 year old Barry Obama was in March, 1977.

Where was Barry Obama 1977?

Let’s first apply some deductive reasoning here. We certainly know he wasn’t attending a prep school in Connecticut. He wasn’t holding down his first part-time job at a Baskin Robbins in Connecticut either. Nope. In March of 1977 Barry Obama was a sophomore in High School. He was reportedly living with his grandparents, Stanley and Toot aka Tut, attending Punahou Academy in Honolulu, Hawai’i, playing junior varsity basketball and singing in the school’s choir, that is according to Obama’s Hawai’i Neighborhood blog -

Punahou & Educational Factoids:

Years Attended

•1971: (5th grade) to 1979 (12th grade)
Extra Curricular Activities

•1975: Plays intermediate football at Punahou as an eighth-grader.
•1976: Sings in the Punahou Boys’ Chorus One - 9th grade
•1977: Sings in the Punahou Concert Choir as a 10th-grader; plays junior varsity basketball
•1978: Makes the Punahou varsity basketball team as a junior
•1979: Plays on the state championship basketball team as the only left-hander; writes for Ka Wai Ola, Punahou’s high school literary journal
•1979: Graduates from Punahou
Which is verified by Punahou Academy -

Years Attended Punahou

1971 (5th grade) to 1979 (12th grade)

Co-curricular Activities

1975 Intermediate Football – 8th grade
1976 Boys’ Chorus One – 9th grade
1977 Concert Choir – 10th grade
1977 Junior Varsity Basketball – 10th grade
1978 Varsity A Basketball
1979 Varsity A Basketball (state champions)
1979 Ka Wai Ola (Punahou’s high school literary journal)

And then you have this story written by a fellow Punahou classmate titled A kid called Barry where this classmate states “Obama soon entered the Academy at Punahou where he juggled new demands and choices: working a part-time job at the neighborhood Baskin-Robbins; singing with the chorale in freshman and sophomore years; playing basketball; and writing for the school literary magazine “Ka Wai Ola.”

According to his alma mater and friends, Barry Obama was definitely attending Punahou Academy located in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1977.

So, we’ve narrowed the question a bit by affirming his whereabouts in 1977, but where was he in “MARCH” of 1977?

Where was, or better yet, wasn’t Barry Obama in March 1977

Let’s take a minute to address some of the fantastical ideas dolts might dream up when trying to explain how a 15 year old, lower to middle-class kid living in Hawaii, who was shooting hoops, singing in the school choir, working a part-time job and doing his homework  was the week of March 16 - 21, 1977.

Let’s first take a quick look at Punahou Academy and what was and was not happening in Barry’s life in March of ’77. First, we know he was on the junior varsity basketball team according to Punahou. Could the team have come to the mainland to play in a tournament? Nope. After speaking with the Punahou Academy’s Athletic Department, the T-Room learned that as a junior varsity basketball player, their season begins roughly in late October to early November and ends early February, that is unless the team goes to state. Punahou Academy’s junior varsity basketball team did go to state in 1977 thereby extending the seasons schedule to mid to late February.  So, it’s safe to rule out a school trip in March to the mainland to play in a basketball tourney.

What about Spring Break? Hardly. After speaking to the operator at Punahou Academy, who has been working the switchboard for 18 years, she shared it would be “safe to say” Punahou spring break was/is typically scheduled sometime during one of the last two weeks in March. Recall, the narrow window in which Barry Obama could have flown to Connecticut and walked into a Connecticut SS office to apply for a Connecticut SSN was March 16 to 21. Well, March 21, 1977 fell on the Monday of the fourth week of March, the first of either of the latter two weeks Punahou students would have had off for spring break.

Anything is possible, especially given the fantastical narrative built up around this guy, but when you apply simple logic to such an adventure you quickly realize the magical fairyland we’d have to live in to believe such nonsense. Indeed, one would have to believe this 15 year old kid made visiting a Connecticut SS office his first priority after arriving to the mainland. What, Hawaii didn’t have a SS office back then? Of course they did! His own half-sister Maya has a Hawaiian SSN. Why not half-brother Barry?

To wrap this up, here’s Chris “tingling leg salesman” Matthews telling us why the Dunham’s couldn’t have hardly afforded to send their grandson to Connecticut in March 1977 for spring break, college tours or to secure a mythical Connecticut SSN -

“On MSNBC, Chris Matthews asked if there was “something missing” in Sen. Barack Obama’s “biography that people can identify with.” Matthews continued: “He’s gone from being a poor kid, growing up in Hawaii, in Indonesia, part of his youth, mixed family background, had to struggle, worked with community organizations; went to these incredibly elite schools, Columbia and Harvard Law, making Law Review and all that. He missed the middle part.” Matthews went on to state: “Does he have that experience that people — most Americans have? Does he connect on the basic struggling-class level?…”

Not only were his grandparents “struggling middle classers” but they weren’t stupid! Just ask yourself as a basic part of the struggling class - would your parents, or grandparents in Barry’s case, have sent you to Hawai’i for a college tour as a sophomore? That’s what I thought. No. Maybe driving a state or two away, but not a full 5015.6 miles, 8071.8 kilometers, 4355.5 nautical miles or a 10 hour and 25 minute flight away from home. And no, Connecticut has never been nor ever will be a spring break destination for a bunch of tenth graders.

Knowing Barry Obama never left the island of Honolulu in March 1977, how in the hell did he “legally” end up with a Connecticut SSN that was issued previously to one born in 1890?


http://www.t-room.us/2011/06/update-its-the-social-security-number-stupid-wsusan-daniels/#more-5043

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on June 08, 2011, 05:06:46 AM
This shit is borderline insane at this point..Like seriously.. from one human to another, your obsession isnt normal
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 08, 2011, 05:10:59 AM
This shit is borderline insane at this point..Like seriously.. from one human to another, your obsession isnt normal

Can you explain how obama got a CT SS number as proven above?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on June 08, 2011, 05:22:07 AM
Can you explain how obama got a CT SS number as proven above?   
I can explain that he showed his MF birth certificate, and the issue is dead..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 08, 2011, 05:24:50 AM
I can explain that he showed his MF birth certificate, and the issue is dead..

He didnt show anything but a forged instrument.  Have you not been following this thread? 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on June 08, 2011, 05:26:24 AM
He didnt show anything but a forged instrument.  Have you not been following this thread? 



Well if it was officially determined a forgery, why the fuck is Donald Trump not all over that?...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 08, 2011, 05:27:23 AM
Well if it was officially determined a forgery, why the fuck is Donald Trump not all over that?...

Call him up and ask him.     
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on June 08, 2011, 05:47:42 AM
Can you explain how obama got a CT SS number as proven above?   

Once again...Who gives a shit?? Loser
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on June 08, 2011, 05:49:31 AM
Call him up and ask him.      
Wow.. amazing, this is your comeback?... Call him and ask him.. stunning
Im saying.. If the birth certificate was OFFICIALLY determined as a forgery, and the birth certificate was Trumps main leg to stand on, he should still be standing right..
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 08, 2011, 05:51:55 AM
Im saying.. If the birth certificate was OFFICIALLY

Again - why not show the actual book and original page?   

Everything they do just feeds the flames of CT's.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 09, 2011, 08:00:52 AM
Trump's back! Casting doubt on birth certificate
WND ^ | June 06, 2011 | WND





After fanning the flames of doubt that pressured Barack Obama to publicize a purported copy of his official birth certificate, Donald Trump's latest statements suggest the White House-released document may be a fake.

"I don't know exactly what he showed," Trump told the Faith & Freedom Coalition annual conference in Washington, D.C., over the weekend, " but you know, someday somebody's gonna figure that one out."

The famed businessman also intoned, "Nobody is protected like Barack Hussein Obama," Politico reports. "I have never seen press that is so protective of a human being before."

Though Trump's true stance on the document remains muddied, WND reported Jerome Corsi, author of "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President," claims Trump was "pumping [him] for information" on the birth certificate.

Corsi reports a conference call with WND Editor and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Farah in which the building magnate said he is concerned about the validity of the document released April 27 by the Obama White House. Farah confirms Trump questioned the authenticity of the birth certificate and said others around him do as well.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 09, 2011, 11:52:52 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 09, 2011, 11:56:23 AM
333333's  Thread title fraud:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=380756.0 (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=380756.0)

No gayass youtube clip needed.   ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 09, 2011, 01:26:26 PM
from theobamafile.com

On May 9, I submitted a Uniform Information Practices act (UIPA found in chapter 92F, "Hawaii Revised Statutes") request to inspect the original long form birth certificate for Mr. Obama.  On May 19, 2011 I received your refusal to allow me and my forensic document expert to examine long form type written original 1961 birth certificate for Mr. Obama.  You stated, that this refusal is made on your behalf and on behalf of the director of the Health Department, Loretta Fuddy.

As such, I am taking required pre-litigation steps of requesting agency review of my appeal of your decision.

In my appeal I would like to reiterated the following:
   
1.  Your assertion, that you are refusing to allow access to the original long form birth certificate for Mr. Obama due to consideration of privacy is of no merit.  If the document produced by Mr. Obama, is a true and correct copy of the original type written birth certificate, than there is no consideration of privacy, as the information in the document on file will be identical to what Mr. Obama released.  The only reason for one to hide the original document, would be knowledge, that the document is a forgery, in which case you and current director of Hawaii Health Department Loretta Fuddy and prior director Chiuome Fukino are complicit and aiding and abetting uttering of a forged document and massive fraud committed upon 311 million American citizens.

2.  Please, review attached sworn affidavit http://www.vectorpub.com/Obama_affidavit_5-10-2011.pdf (http://www.vectorpub.com/Obama_affidavit_5-10-2011.pdf) by Mr. Douglas Vogt, attesting to the fact, that the image http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf) posted by Mr. Obama on WhiteHouse.gov, is a forgery.

3.  Please, review attached Selective Service record http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/DraftRegistration.htm#DraftSSN (http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/DraftRegistration.htm#DraftSSN) for Mr. Obama, showing him using Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425.  This number was assigned in and around March of 1977, when Mr. Obama resided in Hawaii, nowhere near Connecticut.

4.  Please, review attached letter from the Social Security verification Systems, showing that the number 042-68-4425, which Mr. Obama is using, was not assigned to him.  As you are well aware, a person, who possesses a valid birth certificate does not need to resort to using invalid social security numbers or numbers of deceased individuals, whose death was never reported.

5.  Consequently, we have an individual with a forged birth certificate http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/BirthCertificateII.htm (http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/BirthCertificateII.htm) and an invalid Social Security number http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/SocialSecurity.htm (http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/SocialSecurity.htm) usurping the position of the US president and Commander in Chief of the whole US military.  Your and Ms. Fuddy’s refusal to provide access to the original birth certificate can be viewed as aiding and abetting to uttering of a forged document and elections fraud.  Based on all of the above, I am respectfully requesting an administrative review of my appeal and granting access to the original document in question.  If the appeal is not granted within 30 days, I will be taking further action.
     
Sincerely

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=22573 (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=22573)

CC:  Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States;  Robert Mueller, Director of FBI;  Mike Sullivan, Director of Secret Service;  Congressman Darrell Issa, Chairman House Oversight Committee;  Congressman Mike Rogers, Chairman House Intelligence Committee;  Congressman Sam Johnson, Chairman House Subcommittee on Social Security House Ways and Means Committee;  Congressman Dana Rohrbacher, Chairman House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’ House Committee on Foreign Affairs;  Congressman Lamar Smith, Chairman of the Juudiciary Committee

Taitz gets a lot of abuse for her dogged pursuit of Obama, but she's been at this a couple of years now, and each time a judge knocks her down, she just refines her arguments, collects more evidence and comes back for another round with a better case.

Sooner or later, this woman will get her day in court and she's got a lot of ammunition now.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 09, 2011, 01:27:58 PM
I doubt it, but would like to see her get her day in court.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 13, 2011, 09:08:34 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

The Obama forgers who 'punked birthers'
WND ^ | June 13, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on June 13, 2011 11:32:22 PM EDT by RobinMasters

NEW YORK – Radical supporters of Barack Obama have openly admitted to forging Obama birth certificates, going so far as to identify themselves by their usernames to claim responsibility on Internet blogs.

They have described their activities as satire, a tactic designed to deflect criminal charges that might otherwise be filed against them for producing fraudulent official government documents.

As WND has reported in a three-part series, published here, here, and here, scanner expert Doug Vogt has filed criminal charges with the FBI, alleging that the Obama birth certificate released by the White House April 27 was fraudulently created.

In this series of articles WND will examine Obama supporters whose history and involvement in forging Obama birth certificate documents makes them possible suspects in the alleged forgery of the birth document released by the White House.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 13, 2011, 09:12:53 PM
Wnd.com should change their name to Birthers-r-us.com. 

You see the article on the typefaces? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 13, 2011, 09:13:46 PM
Wnd.com should change their name to Birthers-r-us.com. 

You see the article on the typefaces? 


Yes.    I believe the bc Obama put out is a forgery.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 13, 2011, 10:20:10 PM

Yes.    I believe the bc Obama put out is a forgery.   

Do you have any idea what a huge conspiracy theory that is?

I mean, that's bigger than any 911 or pearl harbor. 

You're talking about the leader of teh free world faking his birth and the whole nation playing along with it - except for a few rogue authors and youtube CTers.

I mean, if you wrote a novel like that, it'd get laughed out of the room.  Too unrealistic.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on June 13, 2011, 10:29:00 PM
Do you have any idea what a huge conspiracy theory that is?

I mean, that's bigger than any 911 or pearl harbor. 

You're talking about the leader of teh free world faking his birth and the whole nation playing along with it - except for a few rogue authors and youtube CTers.

I mean, if you wrote a novel like that, it'd get laughed out of the room.  Too unrealistic.
It may be a CT, but it's not bigger than 911 or Pearl.  Those CTs have much bigger ramifications if true.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 13, 2011, 10:41:52 PM
It may be a CT, but it's not bigger than 911 or Pearl.  Those CTs have much bigger ramifications if true.

We have proof that the US Govt ok'd a 911-like plan in the 1960s - operation northwoods.  Yes, it was a penstroke away from downing US planes in an actual false flag attack.  Only JFK himself stopped the generals from doing it!

So a 911 isn't that insane... the govt had no problem-O crashing a plane full of college kids in 1960 in order to get us into Cuba.

Now, faking a birth certificate - and the ENTIRE MEDIA playing along with it?  That shit is nuts.  Every state govt, every politician from each party - they're all IN ON IT?

Seems way more farfetched.  In a world of dirty politics, everyone is all "in on it" with hiding the birth cert?  how the heck, 33?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 09:49:49 AM
We have proof that the US Govt ok'd a 911-like plan in the 1960s - operation northwoods.  Yes, it was a penstroke away from downing US planes in an actual false flag attack.  Only JFK himself stopped the generals from doing it!


I am willing to bet this is pure conjecture turned into spin.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 14, 2011, 09:50:52 AM
I am willing to bet this is pure conjecture turned into spin.

if you don't know what northwoods in, you are a horrible debunker LOL!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 10:10:33 AM
if you don't know what northwoods in, you are a horrible debunker LOL!

I've read about it.  All i am saying is that your are spinning it based on conjecture.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 14, 2011, 10:12:13 AM
I've read about it.  All i am saying is that your are spinning it based on conjecture.

in what respect, charlie?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 10:16:02 AM
in what respect, charlie?

"911 like plan"

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 14, 2011, 10:18:32 AM
"911 like plan"



Operation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.[2] One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."

Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 14, 2011, 10:19:08 AM
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 10:21:06 AM
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.

The spin comes from implying 911 was a "northwoods" style plan. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 14, 2011, 10:24:40 AM
The spin comes from implying 911 was a "northwoods" style plan. 

To you, it's spin.  To many others, it's the totality of all the things that don't make sense, a reluctance for investigation, and the similarities to Northwoods.

Once you look at who benefitted from 911, read PNAC plan for exactly the military action bush enacted, and remove the "but the govt wouldn't do that" excuse - which northwoods has clearly done... the top generals signed off on false flag terrorism, period.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 10:31:15 AM
To you, it's spin.  To many others, it's the totality of all the things that don't make sense, a reluctance for investigation, and the similarities to Northwoods.

Its spin none the less.  Nothing has ever been proven.  the official story, (which i think there should be another investigation) is loaded with evidence supporting it while common CT's have very little supporting their claims if none at all, save conjecture.   

Quote
Once you look at who benefitted from 911, read PNAC plan for exactly the military action bush enacted, and remove the "but the govt wouldn't do that" excuse - which northwoods has clearly done... the top generals signed off on false flag terrorism, period.

The argument:  "The government wouldn't do that" is as unsubstantial as "the government would do that, just look at operation northwoods" in regards to evidence supporting 9/11 as a inside job.

Same as listing people or organizations who benefited from 911 as evidence 911 was an inside job.

All of it empty conjecture. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 14, 2011, 11:21:57 AM
'The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'

-- J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 14, 2011, 11:30:00 AM
'The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'

-- J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI

Wow, FarRight is a 911 truther?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 11:33:29 AM
'The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'

-- J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI

"Our assessment of the quality of new evidence is biased by our previous beliefs"

- Ben Goldacre
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 14, 2011, 11:34:22 AM
I am a 911 Questioner. Not to say I could not be a Truther in the future.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 11:36:06 AM
"I followed the golden rule, whenever a new observation or thought came across me, which was opposed to my general results, to make a memorandum of it without fail and at once; for i had found by experience that such facts and thoughts were far more apt to escape from my memory that favorable ones."

- Charles Darwin
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 14, 2011, 11:40:18 AM
Bringing it back to politics  :D:

"When people learn no tools of judgement and merely follow their hopes, the seeds of political manipulation are sown."

Stephan J. Gould
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on June 14, 2011, 12:12:34 PM
"Common sense is not so common."  Voltaire. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 14, 2011, 08:13:10 PM
FN Contributor Maj Gen Vallely: Ret CIA Agents Look At Obama's Birth Certificate, Say it's a Fraud
obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ^ | 06/14/2011 | ObamaRelease YourRecords
Posted on June 14, 2011 9:00:44 PM EDT by rxsid

"Fox News Contributor Major General Paul Vallely: Retired CIA Agents I've Had Look At Obama's Birth Certificate Say It Is Fraudulent

Video: Fox News Contributor Major General Paul Vallely: I've had retired CIA Agents and Investigators look at Obama's birth certificate and 10 out of 10 say it is fraudulent. The interview aired on the Terry Lakin Action Fund radio show 6/13/2011.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 15, 2011, 12:03:43 AM
Video: Fox News Contributor Major General Paul Vallely: I've had retired CIA Agents and Investigators look at Obama's birth certificate and 10 out of 10 say it is fraudulent. The interview aired on the Terry Lakin Action Fund radio show 6/13/2011.


Yet none of these 10 will go on the record with their belief.


33, I could say I have 100,000 retired military experts that say I'm certifiably more awesome than you.  It's a fact unless you can't prove otherwise?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on June 15, 2011, 05:43:36 AM
A rose is a rose is a rose....Gertrude Stein.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 15, 2011, 09:05:43 AM
Hawaii claims Obama 'birth certificate' is 'confidential' Refuses subpoena...
World Net Daily ^ | 6/14/11 | Bob Unruh


________________________ ____________________



The state of Hawaii claims that the "birth certificate" for Barack Obama in its files – presumably the document that was copied and distributed by the White House – remains confidential.

The image released April 27 by the White House was described by administration officials as "proof positive" of Obama's Hawaiian birth.

At that time, officials in Hawaii's health department and governor's office refused to provide confirmation to WND that the image released by the White House accurately represented the birth documentation in the state's custody.

Now, officials have refused to respond to a subpoena requesting the birth record, citing confidentiality...


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...






 ???
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 16, 2011, 02:19:07 PM
Ex-CIA: 'Forged document' released as birth certificate
World Net Daily ^ | June 15, 2011 | Bob Unruh


________________________ ________________________ ________



Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, the chief of Stand Up America U.S., a national security expert and a Fox News contributor, says the "Certificate of Live Birth" released in April by the White House as "proof positive" of President Obama's Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a "black backlash" if the failings of the nation's first black president are revealed.

In an interview today with Greg Corombos for WND, Vallely, who previously has expressed concerns about whether the Obama administration is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, said, "His actual birth certificate has never been found in Hawaii nor released from Hawaii hospital there, Kapiolani hospital there, if it in fact did exist."

"We've had three CIA agents, retired, and some of their analytical associates look at it, and all came to the same conclusion, that even the long-form was a forged document," Vallely said.

"No members of Congress will take this on. The word I get out of Washington is that they don't want to challenge this because it would be in fact a felony offense and in some cases may be even treasonous and [they are] afraid of a black backlash from some of the urban areas," Vallely said.

SNIP

"I think they're (the FBI) covering for this administration. I think the corruption within this administration is so proliferated through the agencies of government now, we're just in a bad situation here. I think the lack of confidence in our government is growing and many feel that not only all the members of Congress but even our courts are corrupted at this time," he said


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on June 16, 2011, 02:33:39 PM
Wnd is marginalized.  Until something other than a Birther mouthpiece site, something with real credibility starts making noise, nothing significant will happen. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 22, 2011, 09:13:53 AM
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/us-supreme-court-precedent-states-that-obama-is-not-eligible-to-be-president/ (http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/us-supreme-court-precedent-states-that-obama-is-not-eligible-to-be-president/)

US SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT STATES THAT OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT.

The title of this article is correct.  After having completed a more thorough review of the relevant US Supreme Court cases discussing the Constitution’s natural-born citizen clause, I have discovered precedent which states that a natural-born citizen is a person born in the jurisdiction of the US to parents who are citizens.  Read that again.  I said precedent, not dicta.  The precedent holds that Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States.

Up until the publication of this report today, all discussion of the natural-born citizen issue (from both sides of the argument) agreed there had never been a precedent established by the US Supreme Court, and that the various cases which mentioned the clause did so in “dicta”.

Dicta are authoritative statements made by a court which are not binding legal precedent.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines “precedent” as a “rule of law established for the first time by a court for a particular type of case and thereafter referred to in deciding similar cases“.

Precedent that must be followed is known as binding precedent.  Under the doctrine of stare decisis, a lower court must honor findings of law made by a higher court.  On questions as to the meaning of federal law including the U.S. Constitution, statutes, and regulations, the U.S. Supreme Court’s precedents must be followed.

It can no longer be denied that there is controlling US Supreme Court precedent concerning the definition of a natural-born citizen according to Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution.  I predict satori will overcome those of you who have labored over this issue.  This is not a remote obscure reading.  It is, when revealed, a clear undeniable holding and binding precedent established by the highest Court of our nation which specifically defines an Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizen as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens.

Therefore, Obama – according to US Supreme Court precedent – is not eligible to be President.

PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED BY MINOR V. HAPPERSETT

The direct US Supreme Court precedent is stated in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875).  Furthermore, the precedent stated in Minor is consistent with other US Supreme Court cases – both before and afterMinor – which discuss the natural born citizen issue.  While that part of the holding in Minor regarding woman’s suffrage was superseded by the 19th Amendment – which Constitutionally established a woman’s right to vote – the rest of the case is good law.  And the remaining precedent stated regarding the definition of “natural-born citizen” – with regard to Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution – is still binding upon all lower courts.

Therefore, lower court decisions – such as the holding in Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana – which have misconstrued the US Supreme Court’s holding in Minor v. Happersett are wrong.  Below, we will review what the Indiana Court of Appeals had to say and explain why they got it wrong.  But first we must revisit Minor v. Happersett.

THE SUPREME COURT IN MINOR V. HAPPERSETT DIRECTLY CONSTRUED THE US CONSTITUTION’S ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1 NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CLAUSE

Before revisiting Minor, we must revisit Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) to review a clearly erroneous statement made by Justice Gray concerning the prior holding in the Minor case:

In Minor v. Happersett, Chief Justice Waite, when construing, in behalf of the court, the very provision of the Fourteenth Amendment now in question, said: ‘The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.’ “  (Wong Kim Ark at 655.)

This unfortunate remark by Justice Gray contains a clearly erroneous statement.  The Supreme Court in Minor did not construe the 14th Amendment as to the issue of citizenship.  Gray is absolutely wrong.  The Court in Minor construed Article 2 Section 1, not the 14th Amendment.  For over a century, it has been wrongly assumed that the Court in Minor did construe the 14th Amendment, and that the holding of Minor was later superseded by Wong Kim Ark.  This is not correct.

A more careful reading of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Minor makes it clear that it did not construe the 14th Amendment with regard to the citizenship of the woman who wished to vote.  The question presented was whether, since the adoption of the 14th Amendment, women had gained the right to vote.  The Supreme Court in Minor held that nowhere in the Constitution, including the 14th Amendment, was anyone, man or woman, granted a right to vote.  And it was only this part of the Minor case which was superseded by the 19th Amendment.

The other issue decided by the Court in Minor required the Supreme Court to determine if the woman was, in fact, a US citizen.  As to this determination, the Court did not construe the 14th Amendment.  In fact, the Court specifically avoided construing the 14th Amendment with regard to her citizenship.  Instead, the Supreme Court in Minor chose to construe Article 2 Section 1:

There is no doubt that women may be citizens. They are persons, and by the fourteenth amendment ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ‘ are expressly declared to be ‘citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.’ But, in our opinion, it did not need this amendment to give them that position …

“The fourteenth amendment did not affect the citizenship of women any more than it did of men. In this particular, therefore, the rights of Mrs. Minor do not depend upon the amendment. She has always been a citizen from her birth, and entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizenship. The amendment prohibited the State, of which she is a citizen, from abridging any of her privileges and immunities as a citizen of the United States; but it did not confer citizenship on her. That she had before its adoption. If the right of suffrage is one of the necessary privileges of a citizen of the United States, then the constitution and laws of Missouri confining it to men are in violation of the Constitution of the United States, as amended, and consequently void. The direct question is, therefore, presented whether all citizens are necessarily voters.  (Emphasis added.)

There you have it.  The Court stops short of construing the 14th Amendment as to whether the woman in question was a US citizen.  The Court made a certain, direct determination that Mrs. Minor was a US citizen before the adoption of the 14th Amendment and that she did not need the 14th Amendment to be a US citizen.

The Court then, having determined that she was a US citizen, avoided any construction of the 14th Amendment as to her citizenship status.   Therefore, the holding in Minor is in no way superseded by Wong Kim Ark.

The Court in Minor went on to decide the issue of whether citizens are granted a right to vote by the Constitution, holding that it did not.  Again, this part of the holding was superseded by the 19th Amendment, but the determination that Mrs. Minor was a “natural-born citizen” is still controlling precedent.

Since the Court in Minor specifically avoided construing the 14th Amendment as to citizenship, it is clear that Justice Gray’s statement – concerning the citizenship passage by Justice Waite in Minor – was clearly erroneous.  The Supreme Court in Minor chose to construe Article 2 Section 1 instead of the 14th Amendment.  As such, Minor is the only US Supreme Court case which has directly construed the Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizen clause.   Therefore, Minor’s construction below creates binding legal precedent:

Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides that  ‘no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,‘ and that Congress shall have power ‘to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.’ Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.“  (Emphasis added.)

Whether the holding here was influenced by Vattel is not truly important.  Sure, it looks just like Vattel’s definition, but Vattel does not make legal precedent – the US Supreme Court does.  All that matters here is what the Supreme court held.  So we must carefully examine the actual words stated by the Supreme Court.  We must not allow ourselves to be guided by what the Supreme Court did not say.  What the Court actually said is what makes law.

In the above passage, the Court noted that Mrs. Minor was born in the US to parents who were citizens.  The Court stated that such persons were “natural-born citizens”.  The Court also stated – as to such persons – that their “citizenship” was never in doubt.

By recognizing Mrs. Minor as a member of the class of persons who were natural-born citizens, they established her citizenship.  Establishing her citizenship was required before they could get to the issue of whether she had the right to vote.  In doing so, the Court in Minor directly construed Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution.

The Court also noted that some authorities include as “citizens” those born in the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of the parents.  The Court refers to these people as a different “class”.  The Court in Minor refused to comment on the “citizenship” of such persons since Mrs. Minor was not in that class.  They didn’t need to reach the 14th Amendment to determine if Mrs. Minor was a US citizen since the Court previously established that she was a “natural-born citizen”.  Read the following again:

It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.

This class is specifically defined as “natural-born citizens” by the Court.  The other class – those born in the US without citizen “parents” – may or may not be “citizens”.   But the Minor Court never suggested that this other class might also be natural-born citizens.  

It’s quite the opposite.   The Minor Court makes clear that this class arenot Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizens.  If this other class were natural-born there would be no doubt as to their citizenship.

The Minor Court refrained from making a “citizenship” determination as to that class, but the Court did note that they were a different class.  Later, in 1898, the Court in Wong Kim Ark took the question on directly as to who is a citizen under the 14th Amendment, but that case did not directly construe Article 2 Section 1, whereas Minor did.

In order to avoid construing the 14th Amendment, the Court in Minor had to define those who fit into the class of “natural-born citizens”.  Mrs. Minor fit into that class.  Mr. Obama does not.

This is so very evident by the fact that the Minor Court specifically states that the “citizenship” of those who have non-citizen parents was historically subject to doubt.  Whether the 14th Amendment nullified those doubts was irrelevant to the Court in Minor, since Mrs. Minor was a natural-born citizen.

The 14th Amendment specifically confers only “citizenship”.  In Minor, the US Supreme Court directly recognized that natural-born citizens were a class of citizens who did not need the 14th Amendment to establish citizenship.  The class of natural-born citizens was perfectly defined in the Minor case.

Therefore, we have a direct determination by the US Supreme Court which defines a natural-born citizen as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens.  The citizenship of this class has never been in doubt.  The citizenship of the other class was in doubt.  But even if that doubt was erased – as to their citizenship – that they are not natural-born citizens was established as precedent by the Supreme Court in Minor.  In order for that precedent to be reversed, one of two things are necessary:

- a Constitutional amendment which specifically defines “natural-born Citizen” more inclusively than Minor did , or;

- a Supreme Court case which overrules the definition of natural-born citizen in the Minor case

We have neither.

Minor was decided seven years after the adoption of the 14th Amendment.  The Supreme Court in Minor did not consider anyone but those born of citizen parents on US soil to be natural-born citizens.  Later, in Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court stated that persons born on US soil to (some) alien parents were “citizens”, but that case specifically construed only the 14th Amendment.

Read again Justice Gray’s statement as to Minor, “In Minor v. Happersett, Chief Justice Waite, when construing, in behalf of the court, the very provision of the Fourteenth Amendment now in question, said…“  Nope.  Not true.  Gray was wrong in that Justice Waite did not construe the 14th Amendment in the quoted passage.  Chief Justice Waite construed Article 2 Section 1.  Whereas, Justice Gray construed the 14th Amendment.  Therefore, the two cases are not in conflict.

ANKENY V. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA

The Minor case has been severely misconstrued in the Ankeny opinionissued by the Indiana Court of Appeals.  That court quoted Minor’s natural-born citizen language, then stated:

Thus, the Court left open the issue of whether a person who is born within the United States of alien parents is considered a natural born citizen.

False.  The Minor Court did not leave that question open.  Nowhere in the Minor opinion does it state that the class of persons who are natural-born citizens is an open question. The Ankeny Court has it backwards.

The Supreme Court in Minor stated that the “citizenship” of persons who were not natural born citizens was an open question.

That is the most important sentence I’ve ever written at this blog.  So please read it again.

The “citizenship” of those born to non-citizen parents was a question that the Minor Court avoided.   But they avoided that question by directly construing Article 2 Section 1.  In doing so, the Supreme Court in Minor defined the class of persons who were born in the US to citizen parents as “natural-born citizens”.

Since Minor, no Amendment has been adopted which changes that definition, and no other Supreme Court case has directly construed Article 2 Section 1.

The Supreme Court in Wong Kim Ark only construed the question of who was a “citizen” under the 14th Amendment, it did not construe Article 2 Section 1.  Therefore, Minor and Wong Kim Ark do not compete with each other at all.  Minor is the standing precedent for construction of the natural-born citizen clause in Article 2 Section 1, and Wong Kim Ark is the standing precedent as to “citizenship” under the 14th Amendment.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 22, 2011, 09:14:30 AM
WONG KIM ARK SPECIFICALLY DEFERRED TO PRIOR PRECEDENT REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

That the majority opinion in Wong Kim Ark limited its holding strictly to the issue of 14th Amendment citizenship – and did not make any new determination as to Article 2 Section 1 – is evident from the following statement by Gray regarding the dissent by Justice Curtis in the Supreme Court’s earlier ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford:

“In Dred Scott v. Sandford, (1857) 19 How. 393, Mr. Justice Curtis said:

‘The first section of the second article of the Constitution uses the language, ‘a natural-born citizen.’ It thus assumes that citizenship may be acquired by birth. Undoubtedly, this language of the Constitution was used in reference to that principle of public law, well understood in this country at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, which referred citizenship to the place of birth.’

19 How. 60 U. S. 576. And, to this extent, no different opinion was expressed or intimated by any of the other judges.


At first glance, Gray’s reliance upon the dissent’s passage in the Dred Scott case would appear to contradict everything I have written above.  But it doesn’t.  It actually confirms my analysis.

Justice Gray chooses his words carefully and so we must examine them carefully.  Note where Gray says, “And, to this extent, no different opinion was expressed or intimated by any of the other judges.”  Well, if we are talking only about “citizenship”, then – to this extent – Justice Gray is correct.  But if we are talking about the definition of a “natural-born citizen”, then Gray is grossly mistaken.

The Dred Scott majority may not have expressed a different opinion as to “citizenship”, but the majority’s definition of a natural-born citizen is vastly different than that of Justice Curtis in his dissent.  The majority opinion in Dred Scott, citing Vattel directly, stated:

The citizens are the members of the civil society, bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority; they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.”

Again:

“I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen, for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to settle and stay in the country.

Vattel, Book 1, cap. 19, p. 101.

From the views here expressed, and they seem to be unexceptionable…”

Unexceptionable is defined as; ” not open to any objection or criticism.”  The Supreme Court majority, in the Dred Scott case, clearly states that a natural-born citizen is a person born in the US to parents who are citizens.  Therefore, Justice Gray’s reliance upon the dissent in the Dred Scott case is strictly limited to its discussion of “citizenship” by Gray’s very choice of the words, “to this extent”.

Since Gray stated that none of the other justices in the Dred Scott case expressed a different opinion than Curtis did in his dissent, it is obvious that Gray’s statement only applies to general citizenship, and not to the definition of those who fall into the class of natural-born citizens.  The majority in Dred Scott did, in fact, express a completely different opinion than Curtis on the issue of who was an Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizen.

Gray’s use of the words, “to this extent” – with regard to the dissent by Curtis – indicates that the extent to which the holding in Wong Kim Ark applies is to the definition of “citizenship”, not to the definition of who is a natural-born citizen eligible to be President.  The precedent stated by the Court in Minor still stands to this day.

THE US SUPREME COURT DEFINITION OF PRECEDENT

In 1996, the US Supreme Court’s majority opinion by Justice Breyer in Ogilvie Et Al., Minors v. United States, 519 U.S. 79 (1996), stated that when the Court discusses a certain “…reason as an ‘independent’ ground in support of our decision”, then that reasoning is not simply dictum:

Although we gave other reasons for our holding in Schleier as well, we explicitly labeled this reason an ‘independent’ ground in support of our decision, id., at 334. We cannot accept petitioners’ claim that it was simply a dictum.”

The Supreme Court in Minor specifically construed Article 2 Section 1 by defining – as natural-born citizens – those persons born in the US to parents who were citizens.

Again, the Supreme Court specifically avoided the 14th Amendment, by specifically construing Article 2 Section 1.

In order to determine whether Mrs. Minor had the right to vote, the Court first needed to determine if she was a US citizen.  They determined that she was a citizen because she was in the class of “natural-born citizens”.  And, in doing so, they made it clear that persons born of non-citizen parents were not natural-born citizens.

The Court left open the question of whether those born of non-citizen parents were “citizens”.  But the Court did not leave open their specific construction of Article 2 Section 1.  Their definition of a “natural-born citizen” was the core reason they found Mrs. Minor to be a citizen.   Therefore, the Minor Court established binding precedent as follows:

…[A]ll children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners...

Please also note that the Court here makes specific reference to both aliens and foreigners as distinguished from natural-born citizens.  Aliens are just that, aliens.  They are not citizens.  But we have always had many foreigners in this country who were citizens.  Those who came here from foreign lands were foreigners naturalized as citizens.  Some who were born in the US with dual citizenship – like Obama – were also citizens of the nation of their parents.  These are citizens, but also foreigners.  The Court in Minor made the careful distinction that a natural-born citizen is not an alien or a foreigner.

CITIZENS MAY BE BORN OR NATURALIZED

A common misconception of those who argue in favor of Obama’s eligibility is that if one is, at the time of their birth, a US citizen, then that person is also a natural-born citizen.  False.  This was unequivocally established by the majority holding in Minor, which states:

Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it providesthat ‘no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,’and that Congress shall have power ‘to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.’ Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.”

Again, at first glance this appears to provide a neat little soundbite for Obama supporters.  But it doesn’t.  The quote above is taken out of context.  The Court’s opinion goes on to state:

Under the power to adopt a uniform system of naturalization Congress, as early as 1790, provided…that the children of citizens of the United States that might be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, should be considered as natural-born citizens.  These provisions thus enacted have, in substance, been retained in all the naturalization laws adopted since.”

Here, the Minor Court cites the first naturalization act of 1790 to the effect that persons born of US citizen parents – outside the jurisdiction of the US– are “considered as natural-born citizens”.  So, here we can see that while the Minor Court only recognizes two paths to citizenship, birth and naturalization… it is clear that some persons who, at the time of their birth, are US citizens, require naturalization for such status.

So, it’s clear that while there are only two paths to US citizenship, birth and naturalization, those two paths sometimes merge.  But naturalized citizens are not eligible to be President.  (The Minor Court failed to mention that the words “natural-born” were repealed from the naturalization act of 1795.)

Additionally, the current US Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual, at “7 FAM 1131.6-2 Eligibility for Presidency“, comments on the 1790 act as follows:

This statute is no longer operative, however, and its formula is not included in modern nationality statutes. In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.”

This is most likely because the statute did not actually deem such a personto be a natural-born citizen, the act simply stated that such a person was to be “considered as” a natural-born citizen.

The Minor Court also noted that the “substance” of the 1790 act, which granted US citizenship at birth via naturalization, had remained as law up until 1875 when the Minor case was decided.  So, clearly, while citizens may either be born or naturalized, some born citizens are simultaneously naturalized at birth.  Naturalized citizens are not natural-born citizens.  Therefore, they are not eligible to be President.

I am not arguing that Obama was naturalized.  But Minor does establish that not all “born citizens” are “natural-born”.  Minor also gives an unequivocal definition of who fits into the class of natural-born citizens.  Obama does not fit into that class.  Born in the US to a citizen mother and a British/Kenyan father, Obama was born with dual nationality and dual allegiance, part US citizen, part foreigner.  Minor makes a clear distinction between natural-born citizens and aliens or foreigners.

No Constitutional amendment supersedes Minor by defining natural-born citizen in a more inclusive way.  No US Supreme Court case has overruled it.  Justice Gray’s statement that the Court in Minor construed the 14th Amendment in the passage quoted is wrong.  The Court in Minor directly construed Article 2 Section 1 while directly avoiding construction of the 14th Amendment.

The Supreme Court in Wong Kim Ark directly construed the 14th Amendment and specifically avoided construction of Article 2 Section 1.  The two cases are not in contradiction.  They are consistent.

Wong Kim Ark is specifically limited to determining who is a citizen under the 14th Amendment.

Minor is specifically limited to determining who is a US citizen, natural-born.


According to the US Supreme Court precedent established by Minor, Obama is not eligible to the office of President of the United States.

Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 22, 2011, 12:22:49 PM
does WND talk about 911, or they only address Dem CTs?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 22, 2011, 12:23:34 PM
does WND talk about 911, or they only address Dem CTs?

240 Derail #1

I'm keeping count now.       ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on June 22, 2011, 12:32:03 PM
240 Derail #1

I'm keeping count now.       ;D

takes one to know one ;)

I was a birther before you were, champ!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 23, 2011, 06:53:05 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Adobe engineer doubts Obama birth certificate
WND ^ | June 23, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on June 23, 2011 9:09:10 PM EDT by RobinMasters

Gary Poyssick, an early employee of software giant Adobe System Inc., continues to maintain there is something "fishy" about the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House.

"What the White House released is not a simple scan," Poyssick told WND. "Something digital came between the paper and the glass."

Poyssick was at the San Jose-based tech company when it counted no more than 14 employees, and he continues to advise and write on Adobe software products

Poyssick, who today devotes his energies to running The Online Fisherman in Tampa, Fla., has written more than 50 titles about Adobe software, the printing industry, coding and programming, website development and workflow management.

His initial reaction was to declare the birth certificate an outright forgery.

"I could have done a much better replica myself, if the president had asked," Poyssick told The Political Sandbox blog when the birth certificate first appeared and he opened the document in Adobe Illustrator. "The guy that did this is a bimbo in that he forgot to 'flatten' his works to soften the background edges so the fake letters blended, softly into the green paper.

Observing that the birth certificate document had multiple layers when opened in Adobe Illustrator, Poyssick was amazed the White House had released an electronic PDF file that had not been "flattened" so as to remove all evidence that it had been modified.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 29, 2011, 04:29:22 PM
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37835 (http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37835)

Found: Congressman Who Has Read More than Maskell’s Memo!

By Dean C. Haskins  Thursday, June 23, 2011

The ongoing saga of the communications with my Virginia elected officials continues (see: here , here , and here ).  Today, I received a somewhat surprising email response from U.S. Congressman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) in which he appears to know more about the issues than has been indicated by the letters written by his cohorts.

Dear Mr. Haskins:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the recent release of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. It is good to hear from you.

As you know, the Constitution establishes the qualifications of President of the United States.  Only a natural born citizen, at least 35 years of age, and having resided in the United States for at least 14 years is eligible for the Office of President.

A President-elect’s eligibility has traditionally been verified by public record and vetting done by the parties.  It is crucial that any President-elect meet the eligibility criteria as determined by the U.S. Constitution and provide the necessary assurances of eligibility.

Currently, there is no office or agency that certifies a President-elect’s eligibility for the office.  However, I believe that there should be a more formal process of review and validation as a matter of routine certification of candidates.  The Office of the Presidency is undermined if Americans don’t have confidence that the candidates for the highest office in the land are qualified for the position as required by the Constitution.

As you know, President Obama recently released to the public the long-form version of his birth certificate.  Since then, concerns have been raised about the validity of the birth certificate as well as the claim that the President has been using a Social Security Number previously issued to another person.  These concerns have been raised with the relevant oversight committees in the Congress and if there is enough evidence and more experts reach the same conclusions then these claims will lead to an investigation.

During the last Congress I co-sponsored legislation which would require the principal campaign committee of any candidate for election to the Office of President to include with the committee’s statement of organization a copy of the candidate’s birth certificate and any other documentation necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution.  This legislation would ensure that proof of eligibility is provided by candidates before each Presidential election.

While the issue of eligibility has come up in past elections, including whether Chester Arthur (our 20th President succeeding to the office upon the death of James Garfield) was born in the U. S. or Canada, never has the issue arisen as to the eligibility of both major party candidates as it did in 2008 with regard to both John McCain and Barack Obama. The public discussion, controversy, uncertainty and the undermining of the Presidency can all be avoided by a routine requirement that future candidates establish their eligibility under the Constitution.

The United States is a nation based on the rule of law.  The Constitution clearly sets forth the qualifications for the Office of President, Members of the House and Senate, and members of the federal Judiciary.  Any circumvention of these Constitutional requirements would be a slap in the face to the rule of law and our very Democracy.  I believe that our Constitution is a solemn contract between the American people and their government.  I will continue to work to ensure its terms are adhered to by all elected and appointed government officials.

Again, thanks for the benefit of your comments.  Please feel free to contact me whenever I may be of assistance.

Sincerely,

Bob Goodlatte
Member of Congress

To which I replied:

Dear Congressman Goodlatte:

Thank you for your response to my letters.  Before I respond to that, please allow me to commend you for gingerly straying outside the parameters of the Jack Maskell (CRS) memo, unlike virtually every other member of Congress has done in their communications to their constituents.

That being said, I do have some pointed questions about your email to me:

While I concur with your assessment about the past, that “A President-elect’s eligibility has traditionally been verified by public record and vetting done by the parties,” and I also agree with your appraisal of the future, that “It is crucial that any President-elect meet the eligibility criteria as determined by the U.S. Constitution and provide the necessary assurances of eligibility,” and I am pleased at the steps you have taken to try to resolve the matter in the future, what I find to be glaringly absent from your evaluation is your personal conviction and disposition toward a forthright resolution regarding the present.

More specifically, at what point did you address your House cohorts with a “Houston-we-have-a-problem” proclamation?  At what point did you stand on the House floor and announce, “The growing evidence is showing that we have erred, and have not properly exercised our constitutional duties; therefore it is incumbent upon us to do so now?”

You see, as meritorious as your rudimentary understanding of the issues is, without your public outcry that you, as a sitting member of Congress, demand an independent and impartial investigation into the matter, your words appear to be barely more than rhetoric. As to your indication that “these concerns have been raised with the relevant oversight committees in the Congress and if there is enough evidence and more experts reach the same conclusions then these claims will lead to an investigation,” please excuse my lack of confidence in those committees producing anything more than the same coverup we have witnessed for nearly three years now.

Moreover, I am not sure you are aware, but a growing number of notable forensic document examiners are weighing in on their conclusions that the “long form birth certificate” is a forgery.  Most recently, “Joseph M. Newcomer, who exposed the ‘Killian documents’ as fraudulent in 2004,” has stated, “the Obama birth certificate released by the White House April 27 is a ‘highly suspicious’ document that deserves professional forensic examination.  ‘There is something deeply wrong here. There are artifacts in the birth certificate document that are strongly suggestive of a forgery. The document screams out that something is wrong.’” (wnd.com)

Yeah, we have all the faith in the world that the “relevant oversight committees” are all over this.  NOT!

While I am impressed at your inclusion of the Chester Arthur debacle, it doesn’t seem you’ve quite obtained the entire story.  You are correct that there was murmuring that occurred surrounding his birthplace (US or Canada); however, his avoidance of the truth had nothing to do with his birthplace, but with his father’s Canadian citizenship at the time of Chester’s birth.  Arthur’s father did not become a naturalized citizen until Chester was nearly 14 years old, but Chester was indeed born in the United States.  Further proof that Arthur understood the meaning of “natural born Citizen” and was aware that his father’s foreign citizenship precluded his attaining that status at birth, is the fact that Arthur had all of his pertinent documentation burned.  Yes, both Chester Arthur and Barack Obama lied to the American people.  The only difference is that Arthur didn’t have a copy of Photoshop.

As you stated, “The United States is a nation based on the rule of law;” and I concur with you.  But, as I have pointed out, your response to me seems to imply that you perceive the rule of law to have applied to our past, and you desire the rule of law to govern our future, but you appear quite ambivalent toward it’s being enforced in the present.

In my last letter to you, I cited Title 18 U.S.C. Chapter 1, § 4 a law that applies equally to all American citizens (which includes the members of Congress).  Because your response didn’t seem to indicate any specific action on your part against the crimes that have been committed, I must again ask,

“Why are you not guilty of misprision of felony?”

I look forward to your response.

For our Constitution,
Dean C. Haskins

I will continue to keep you apprised of any and all developments as I strive to persuade the great Commonwealth of Virginia to lead the way in rectifying the constitutional crisis that has been created by the usurpation of our presidency.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on June 29, 2011, 04:30:12 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on June 30, 2011, 08:39:15 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Bogus Obama document 'bigger than Watergate'
WND ^ | June 29, 2011 | Bob Unruh
Posted on June 30, 2011 11:50:18 PM EDT by RobinMasters

A retired U.S. military commander who brought a court challenge to Barack Obama's tenure in the Oval Office says the mounting evidence indicating the "Certificate of Live Birth" he released in April is fake should shock the American public.

"If everyone was intellectually honest, they would admit those images put on the Internet are forgeries," said CDR Charles Kerchner, whose lawsuit that alleged Congress failed in its constitutional duty to make sure the man elected president was eligible for the office, was turned down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

He cited the work released this week by longtime Adobe software book author and computer expert Mara Zebest.

Her detailed report explains how the document released in April by Obama as a copy of his original birth certificate isn't even a good forgery.

"This is a 100 times worse situation in that it is not just a crime of some plumbers breaking into an opponent's office, this is a crime against the Constitution and all the people of the Untied States. Obama is not who he says he is. These are forged documents on government property. Before it was a campaign website, now these are government websites," Kerchner told WND today.

Joseph Farah, publisher of WND books, who held a news conference featuring Zebest's research this week at the National Press Club with Jerome Corsi, author of "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President," agreed.

"This is bigger than Watergate," he said after the news conference where it was announced that a lawsuit had been filed against Esquire magazine over its faked "report" that falsely claimed the Corsi book was withdrawn.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on June 30, 2011, 09:25:57 PM
John Birch gave me a BJ, kid.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on July 01, 2011, 11:29:52 AM
 ::)

Birthers are turning into a subculture now.

Nothing but rhetoric, empty conjecture etc.. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 01, 2011, 02:02:04 PM
Adobe Expert Mara Zebest & Jerome Corsi: Derek Forged Obama's Birth
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Jun 30, 2011
LINKS: The Peter Boyles Show: Adobe Expert Mara Zebest & Jerome Corsi; Obama's Forged Birth Certificate - Peter Boyles Show: Adobe Expert Mara Zebest and Dr. Jerome Corsi; Obama's Forged Birth Certificate Explained - Revised: Take note of the caller named "Larry" who called in about 21 minutes in. He claims the header information on Obama's BC PDF shows it was created by "Derek"!!!??? - 6/30/2011 -http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/adobe-expert-mara-zebest-... -

http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com -

What others at theobamafile.com are finding following up on the above interview

What Seriously draws our attention to in this video, is that the caller, Larry, instructs us how to identify the creator of the White House copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate.
 
I followed the directions, and it's not Daryll, as caller Larry remembered, it's Derek
 
(http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/DereksPDF.jpg)
 
Now, all we have to do is find out who Derek is.
 
Could it be this guy?
 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/oua/staff

Or maybe Laura Dunn.
 
In addition to being a "professional" Progressive, she holds a Bachelor of Fine Arts from the School of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, concentrating in painting, and has experience as a professional arts instructor.
 
The perfect background for a forger.
 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/oua/staff/dunn(http://)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 01, 2011, 02:10:17 PM
More from theobamafile today

The Back Door To The Obama Eligibility Lock Down

The Birthers blog says the Courts, Congress and for the most part the Mainstream Media have effectively closed the door to any serious legal challenges to Obama's lack of constitutional eligibility.  That is about to change.

Unknowingly Esquire Magazine has opened the door to have the evidence of fraud presented in a federal court when they wrote in their satire disclaimer about their story about Joe Farah pulling Jerry Corsi's book off the shelves, "(a)re its author and publisher chastened?  Well no.  They double down, and accuse the President of the United States of perpetrating a fraud on the world by having released a forged birth certificate.  Not because this claim is in any way based on reality, but to hold their terribly gullible audience captive to their lies, and to sell books.  This is despicable, and deserves only ridicule."

Joe Farah, Jerry Corsi and WND.com, now have the unique opportunity to present to the world the evidence that the document is in fact a fraud.  And there is nothing Esquire or Obama can do to stop it.  Since Obama will not be mentioned as a defendant, he has no cause to have his wonderful government lawyers intervene, in fact his personal lawyers can not do anything.  The fact is Obama simply will be told what we have been told, he has no standing.  Divine justice is not only just, it is sweet.

What can Esquire do?  The only option they have is to settle out of court, but that requires all parties to agree and for some reason I do not think Joe is going to settle out of court for any price.  Perhaps all those nasty things the left been saying about him are true, you know that he is (OMG) a Christian!  And you all know the motto of those pesky Christians, "and the truth will set you free."  I think Joe will go for the truth instead of the money.

Joe will establish that he has reasonable doubt of the April 27, 2011 release of the so-called long form birth certificate and have those experts that he has published testify to this fact.  Come to think of it, thanks to Esquire this action will give WND the right to get a federal court order for the original birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health to have it examined to substantiate their claim that the document produced on April 27th is in fact a forgery and that Esquire is intentionally lying about it to damage the reputations of Joe Farah, Jerry Corsi and WND.

Saul Alinsky said ridicule is the best weapon, and this is what Esquire Magazine tried to do to Farah, Corsi and WND, but it only works on those with no or little courage.

Esquire made a blunder with the initial article, and perhaps all Joe Farah had to sue them over is trying to restrict the sale of Jerry Corsi's book.  Okay at best that might cost Esquire a couple of million, but then they screwed the proverbial pooch and said Joe was intentionally lying about the birth certificate being a fraud to scam the WND audience.  This just cost the media their blackout on the facts, this is priceless.

Esquire, on behalf of all the Birthers nationwide all I can say to you is, THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!

Check out the following links for more

WND sues Esquire for faked report
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=314605 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=314605)











Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 01, 2011, 02:17:15 PM
It's a full day - of course - into a long holiday weekend. Pravda!

Go to the link to read so you can access all the links in the article

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/justia-com-caught-red-handed-hiding-references-to-minor-v-happersett-in-published-us-supreme-court-opinions/ (http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/justia-com-caught-red-handed-hiding-references-to-minor-v-happersett-in-published-us-supreme-court-opinions/)

JUSTIA.COM CAUGHT RED HANDED HIDING REFERENCES TO MINOR v. HAPPERSETT IN PUBLISHED US SUPREME COURT OPINIONS.
The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions.  They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other issue decided in Minor, voting rights.

I have documented two incredible examples where Justia.com has been caught in the act of taking a hatchet job to US Supreme Court decisions by removing, not just the case name, “Minor v. Happersett”, but whole passages related to Chief Justice Waite’s statements on the citizenship issue which were cited favorably in BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER,143 U. S. 135 (1892), and POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).

I have published my complete investigation into this fraud perpetrated by Justia.com – including snapshots and evidence collected from the Way Back Machine at the Internet Archive – in the comments section of my previous report, THE EXPRESS LANE TO NATURAL BORN CLARITY.  My investigation was triggered by a reader’s comment regarding Boyd.  The comment was on a separate issue.  But I then noticed that the Boyd case, as currently published by Justia.com, made reference to Minor v. Happersett without properly naming the case.

Last evening, I had come across a similar situation in the Pope case.  I was curious, but it wasn’t until I saw the same pattern in the Boyd case that it became clear Justia.com was altering these cases to remove references to Minor v. Happersett when Minor was recognized on the issue of citizenship.  But where Minor is cited on the issue of voting rights, no hatchet was taken to the references in later US Supreme Court cases.

For posterity, due to the incredibly important nature of this information, I have decided to keep the investigative report exactly where I first published it, in the comments section of my previous report.

This is beyond shocking.  Somebody, back in 2008, just prior to the election, ordered these revisions and saw to their execution.  This is direct tampering with United States law. And it is evidence that Minor v. Happersett was known to be a huge stumbling block to POTUS eligibility.

It confirms that Minor v. Happersett was seen as a dangerous US Supreme Court precedent which construed the natural-born citizen clause of Article 2 Section 1 to make only those persons born in the US to citizen parents (plural)… eligible to be President.

According to binding US Supreme Court precedent, Obama is not eligible to be President.  And we are obviously very late coming to this legal truth.  Somebody at Justia.com tried to control and alter our awareness by hiding important Supreme Court references to Minor dating back to 2008.  This is smoking gun proof of tampering.  Please read my full report here.

There needs to be an investigation.

 
Leo Donofrio, Esq.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on July 01, 2011, 02:20:22 PM
More junk....

Is there nothing but arguments?.

No solid evidence?

Nothing?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 02, 2011, 12:42:34 PM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=317705 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=317705)

What did Congress know about 'natural-born citizen'?
8 tries at eliminating requirement suggests organized strategy in place

July 01, 2011

By Bob Unruh

There were eight attempts by members of Congress during the years Barack Obama was developing a power base and running for president to remove the Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born citizen," suggesting an organized strategy, according to a new video.

The video documentary was produced by Carl Gallups, the senior pastor at Hickory Hammock Baptist Church for more than 24 years with a long history of community and law enforcement involvement.

Gallups was a Florida law enforcement officer for 10 years, a youth minister before that and is a national and international youth evangelist with outreaches across the United States and in Canada since 1989. He's also on the board of regents at the University of Mobile and hosts several weekly radio programs in the northwest Florida region.

Get the New York Times best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President," autographed by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.

Documentation for his video comes from a variety of congressional records showing that beginning June 11, 2003, and continuing through the most recent effort, Feb. 28, 2008, there were eight proposals targeting that constitutional requirement.

The video:

[ Invalid YouTube link ]


He outlines the specifics:

June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., brought HJR 59. It was intended to "permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president."

Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., brought HJR67, which would have done the same as Snyder's, only the requirement to be a citizen was lowered to 20 years.

Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., brought S.B. 2128 to "try to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural born citizen requirement." But it defined NBC as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States," which was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution.

Sept. 15, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., brought HJR 104, "to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years."

Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers, D-Mich., HJR2, the same as Rohrabacher's.

Feb. 1, 2005, HJR15, Rohrabacher, to require only 20 years citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.

April 14, 2005, Snyder, HJR42, requiring 35 years' citizenship.

Feb. 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., tried to attach to SB 2678, Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what "natural-born citizen" includes. Obama and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors.
(Story continues below)


Gallups reports that finally, on April 10, 2008, "unable to alter or remove" the requirement, the Senate changed the focus of the issue, with Senate Resolution 511, which addressed Sen. John McCain's qualifications as a "natural-born citizen."

Obama's qualifications never were reviewed.

After his election, Gallups points out, Obama held a secret meeting with eight of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court – from which no public information was released. The meeting was held even though there were legal challenges in which Obama was a defendant pending before the Supreme Court at the time. The attorneys for the plaintiffs never were told of the meeting or invited to participate in what critics have described as extrajudicial contact between the court and a defendant.

WND previously reported on another link between Obama and a campaign to change the constitutional provision. It came from an associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then-Sen. Barack Obama. She advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.


Barack Obama and Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga

The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy was listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cited his membership on the finance committees for both  Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., on the corporate website.

The article by Herlihy was available online under law review articles from Kent University when it originally was the subject of reports but later was removed.

Herlihy's published paper reveals that the requirement likely was considered in a negative light by organizations linked to Obama in the months before he announced in 2007 his candidacy for the presidency.

The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the "stupidest provision" in the Constitution, "undecidedly un-American," "blatantly discriminatory" and the "Constitution's worst provision," Herlihy begins in her introduction to the paper titled "Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle."

She concludes that the "emotional" reasons to oppose changing the Constitution will prevail over the "rational" reasons demanding a change.

The current American perceptions about the effects of globalization and the misunderstanding about what globalization actually is will result in Americans deciding that naturalized citizens should not be president because this would, in effect, be promoting globalization, Herlihy wrote.

"Although this argument is admittedly circular, because globalization is the thing that makes the need to abolish the requirement more and more persuasive, Americans' subsequent perceptions about globalization are the very things that will prevent Americans from embracing the idea of eliminating the natural born requirement.

"Logical Americans are looking for a reason to ignore the rational reasons promoted by globalization so that they may vote based on their own emotions and instincts," she wrote.

In the body of her argument, Herlihy said the constitutional provision simply is outdated.

"Considering that the Founding Fathers presumably included the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution partly out of fear of foreign subversion, the current stability of the American government and the intense media scrutiny of presidential candidates virtually eliminates the possibility of a 'foreigner' coming to America, becoming a naturalized citizen, generating enough public support to become president, and somehow using the presidency to directly benefit his homeland," she wrote.

"The natural born citizen clause of the United States Constitution should be repealed for numerous reasons. Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is outdated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty," she wrote.

Many of the reasons for keeping the limit, she wrote, "are based primarily on emotion."
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 06, 2011, 11:30:27 AM
images of subpoena at link
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/07/05/exclusive-court-subpoena-for-obamas-original-birth-certificate-served-to-hawaii-health-department/ (http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/07/05/exclusive-court-subpoena-for-obamas-original-birth-certificate-served-to-hawaii-health-department/)
Court Subpoena for Obama’s Original Birth Certificate Served to Hawaii Health Department

U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN HONOLULU SUBPOENAS LORETTA J. FUDDY, HAWAII HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
by Sharon Rondeau

The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii issued and served a subpoena on July 5, 2011 to the director of the Hawaii Health Department for Obama's original birth certificate

(Jul. 5, 2011) — A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:”

original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III [sic] issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now.

The subpoena allows Fuddy until August 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to produce the document.
The designated place of production is noted as:
Health Department
State of HI
1250 Punchbowl str. room 325
Honolulu, HI  96813

Above the date, the following text appears:
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached.

The subpoena is signed by a deputy clerk as evidenced by an underline appearing beneath that term under the signature line.  It is dated “0705.2011″ just above the signature.

A second page titled “Proof of Service” reads:

This subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any) Loretta Fuddy
was received by me on (date) 0705.2011

A box is checked and the following preprinted text states:

I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

and the lines are completed with the following:

by certified mail return receipt sent to Attorney General of HI, 485 South King str, room 200, Honolulu, HI 96813 on (date) 07.05.2011; or

The checkbox and line below are blank.

Zeroes appearing on lines with dollar signs indicate that there are no fees charged for the service.

A final statement reads:
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:  07.05.2011

The server’s signature appears in cursive writing and is printed on the line below.  It is stamped with the following below the process server’s signature and printed name:

Law Offices of Orly Taitz, Esq.
29639 Santa Margarita Pkwy. Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA  92688
 

Proof of Service of the Subpoena from the U.S. District Court in Hawaii to the Health Department Director and the Hawaii Attorney General

Envelope in which Dr. Orly Taitz received a copy of the subpoena and its second page, which is the Proof of Service document
Loretta Fuddy and Dr. Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health, had previously refused Taitz’s request to release Obama’s original birth certificate, citing  concerns for “privacy.”  Taitz responded to Onaka’s refusal with a letter copied to several congressmen, putative Attorney General Eric Holder, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, and the statement:
…we have an individual with a forged birth certificate and an invalid Social Security number usurping the position of the US president and Commander in Chief of the whole US military. Your and Ms. Fuddy’s refusal to provide access to the original birth certificate can be viewed as aiding and abetting to uttering of a forged document and elections fraud. Based on all of the above, I am respectfully requesting an administrative review of my appeal and granting access to the original document in question. If the appeal is not granted within 30 days, I will be taking further action.
On April 27, 2011, the White House released what it claimed was a certified copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate on television and the internet.  However, numerous document examiners, typesetting experts, and graphics consultants have come forward to state in formal presentations and reports that the image presented to the public is a poor forgery.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 06, 2011, 11:33:48 AM
I was waiting for you to post this.    ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 06, 2011, 12:24:36 PM
Too bad I don't expect anything to come of it   >:(

I'm going to go watch eagles
http://www.hornbyeagles.com/chatpage_wildearth.htm (http://www.hornbyeagles.com/chatpage_wildearth.htm)

and listen to Nancy Sinatra


And pretend all is right in the world
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 07, 2011, 07:22:13 AM
Father spoke of having Obama adopted
US immigration files from ’61 reveal Kenyan student’s plan
By Sally Jacobs
Globe Staff / July 7, 2011

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2011/07/07/father_spoke_of_having_obama_adopted/?page=full





In the spring of 1961, President Obama’s father revealed a plan for his unborn son that might have changed the course of American political history.

The elder Barack H. Obama, a sophomore at the University of Hawaii, had come under scrutiny by federal immigration officials who were concerned that he had more than one wife. When he was questioned by the school’s foreign student adviser, the 24-year-old Obama insisted that he had divorced his wife in his native Kenya. Although his new wife, Ann Dunham, was five months pregnant with their child - who would be called Barack Obama II - Obama declared that they intended to put their child up for adoption.

“Subject got his USC wife ‘Hapai’ [Hawaiian for pregnant] and although they were married they do not live together and Miss Dunham is making arrangements with the Salvation Army to give the baby away,’’ according to a memo describing the conversation with Obama written by Lyle H. Dahling, an administrator in the Honolulu office of what was then called the US Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Obama, the Subject, and his USC, or United States citizen, wife, obviously, did not put their baby up for adoption. Whether the young couple actually considered such a step, or the elder Obama made the story up in order to appease immigration officials who at the time were considering his request for an extension of his stay in the United States, is unclear. Family members on both sides of the marriage now say they never heard any mention of adoption.

But his statement provides a unique glimpse into the relationship between the president’s parents and the fragility of his connection to the father whom he would little know.

Dahling’s memo, dated April 12, 1961, is one of dozens of documents in the elder Obama’s “alien’’ file released by the Department of Homeland Security in response to a Freedom of Information Act request made in the course of research on a biography of Obama’s father. Obama was visiting the United States on a foreign student visa which required him to apply for an annual extension of his stay during the five years he was attending US colleges.

The memo advised that officials should continue to monitor the senior Obama’s personal life, and raised concerns about his behavior, noting that the previous summer he had been warned about his “playboy ways.’’

Robert L. Gibbs, the former White House press secretary, said at the time the document was released that President Obama had never been told that his mother had considered putting him up for adoption. Nor, Gibbs said, was Obama previously aware of the INS memo. Gibbs said that the White House had made no effort to determine if Dunham had ever had a conversation with the Salvation Army. The president, he added, “is absolutely convinced that she did not.’’

From the early 20th century through the 1970s the Salvation Army operated nearly a dozen residential maternity homes throughout the United States, one of which was located in Honolulu. Residents who chose not to keep their babies were able to make arrangements to put them up for adoption through local agencies. The agency maintains records of its maternity homes but provides them only to birth mothers or children who request them, according to Kathy Lovin, public affairs manager for The Salvation Army’s western territory in Long Beach, Calif. Lovin declined to say whether Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, spoke with Salvation Army officials at all about the possibility of putting her child up for adoption.

Neither President Obama nor the White House has since asked the Salvation Army if there is any record that his parents talked with the organization regarding his possible adoption, according to a White House press person who declined to be identified.

The INS memo can be regarded from several perspectives. On the one hand, Ann Dunham had good reason to consider surrendering her child. At the time that she gave birth in 1961, Dunham was just 18 years old, and mixed-race marriage - while legal in Hawaii - was a felony in many of the 22 states in which it was banned. Even in Hawaii, the only state at the time with a nonwhite majority, blacks accounted for less than 1 percent of the population, and a black face drew curious stares on the streets of Honolulu.

In his memoir, “Dreams from My Father,’’ President Obama mused that his mother might have considered putting her child up for adoption given the cultural hostility to mixed race marriages that existed at the time. Even in sophisticated urban centers, he wrote, “. . . the hostile stares, the whispers, might have driven a woman in my mother’s predicament into a back-alley abortion - or at the very least to a distant convent that could arrange for adoption.’’

While it is possible that the elder Obama’s statement to the student adviser was true, family and friends say they do not believe she ever considered such a thing. Dunham, they maintain, was a bold iconoclast even as a young woman and regarded her unborn child as very much her responsibility, one that she would never have surrendered.

“I never heard any talk of adoption whatsoever,’’ said Charles Payne, Dunham’s maternal uncle, who is now in his 80s and living in Chicago. “Ann decided she had done this and this was her child and she was going to take care of him. From day one, as far as I could tell, she and Madelyn [Dunham] and Stanley [Dunham] were all completely committed to Barack.’’

Nor do several of Ann Dunham’s friends at the time recall her mentioning giving up her baby. On the contrary, Susan Botkin Blake, a high school friend of Dunham’s, describes how entranced her friend was with her small son during a visit to Seattle just weeks after he was born.

“She was wildly in love with Barack Obama, her husband, and very excited about her future with him,’’ recalled Blake. “From my perspective, she had no equivocation about her baby in the slightest. She was thrilled with him.’’

Barack Obama Sr., on the other hand, would have had reason to worry that having a child in the United States could have significant consequences. For starters, Obama, who had two children in Kenya, was having severe financial problems. Although he told Duham that he had gotten divorced from his Kenyan wife, he apparently did not tell her about his other children.

Obama was a member of the Luo ethnic group, the third largest of Kenya’s tribes, among whose members polygamy was common. His own father had at least four wives. In fact, Obama was still married to his Kenyan wife, Grace Kezia Obama, and apparently worried about the financial burden of another child.

Of greater concern was his immigration status. At the time that he made his statement about adoption in spring 1961, Obama was in the midst of applying to the INS for an extension of his stay in the United States. Although it was a routine process that was required of foreign students periodically, the application entailed an examination of the student’s academic record and general behavior.

Obama would have wanted to present a case that would impress immigration authorities. A bigamist with a mixed-race baby, if that is how authorities chose to see him, was not likely to be the strongest of candidates. As Gibbs assessed the elder Obama’s possible motive: “He was trying to convince immigration to let him stay. So, part of his effort was to convince immigration that some of the responsibilities that he had he would not continue to have.’’

University of Hawaii and federal immigration authorities were already alarmed about Obama’s relationships with women and perplexed as to his marital status. Since his arrival at the university in 1959, Obama had repeatedly failed to complete routine paperwork at UH’s foreign students office regarding his domestic status that would have clarified whether he had a wife in Kenya, according to an employee in the office who declined to be identified. Even the exact year of his own birth was unclear. Obama alternately reported to immigration and academic officials that he was born in both 1934 and 1936. Although the INS memo records the year of his birth as 1934, Obama’s family members and other records indicate that he was probably born in 1936.

When he married Dunham in February 1961, school administrators began to probe his status in earnest. Sumi McCabe, then UH’s foreign student adviser, first brought attention to the matter during a phone call to Dahling, the INS administrator, the following April. According to Dahling’s memo, “Mrs. McCabe further states that [Obama] has been running around with several girls since he first arrived here and last summer she cautioned him about his playboy ways. [Obama] replied that he would ‘try’ to stay away from the girls.’’ But he didn’t try very hard. Instead, he began dating the dark-eyed Ann Dunham.

Now that he was married to a US citizen and was soon to become the father of an American child, immigration officials would not have been reassured by his official records. On some of the forms in his alien file, Obama reported that he had a Kenyan wife. After he married Dunham, he sometimes reported her as his wife. More often than not, he left the section blank.

All the while, he wrote letters to his family and friends back home in Kenya, inquiring about his wife and children there.

Noting that Obama appeared to have a wife in Kenya and another in Hawaii, Dahling raised the possibility in his memo of charging Obama with polygamy or bigamy in order to get a deportation order against him. In the end, he suggested they keep an eye on him.

“Recommend that Subject be closely questioned before another extension is granted - and denial be considered,’’ Dahling concluded. “If his USC wife tries to petition for him, make sure an investigation is conducted as to the bona fide of the marriage.’’

As it turned out, the matter soon moved out of Honolulu administrators’ purview. The following year, Obama left his small family in Honolulu and headed to Harvard University to pursue a doctorate in economics. While in Cambridge, Obama would not only meet his third wife, but the question of how many wives he had would spiral into a confrontation with devastating consequences.

Sally Jacobs is a Boston Globe reporter. Her book, “The Other Barack, The Bold and Reckless Life of President Obama’s Father,’’ will be released next week.

© Copyright 2011 Globe Newspaper Company.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 11, 2011, 11:42:45 AM
With all this evidence I look for Obama to be stripped of the presidency within days....
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 12, 2011, 05:54:54 AM
Another [again] graphics expert questions birth certificate
WND ^ | July 11, 2011 | WND


________________________ ________________________ ___________



Another computer graphics expert is questioning the validity of the Obama birth document released by the White House.

Victoria Nicks, who holds both a Bachelor's and a Master's Degree in Information Technology, argues that the presence of "differently sized pixels" in the image released to the public April 27 by the White House indicates that it's not "an exact duplicate of an original document scan."

In a piece on the Decoded Science website, she also points out that there are "misaligned pixels" throughout the document.

"The fact that there are different-sized pixels throughout the document indicates, without a doubt, that the document has been altered from its original state," she writes.While Nicks is not willing to state that the Obama document is a forgery, others graphics experts have come to that conclusion.

Nicks says it's possible that the alteration is solely the result of a standard optimization process, but it's clear that the document is not an exact copy of an original birth certificate.

She says that while most of the Obama document is composed of larger pixels, the layer of pixels that can be removed from the document using the software program Adobe Illustrator is made up of much smaller pixels.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on July 13, 2011, 03:54:37 PM
With all this evidence I look for Obama to be stripped of the presidency within days....

Hours
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on July 13, 2011, 03:59:51 PM
Hours

Minutes.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on July 13, 2011, 04:12:02 PM
Any second now................
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 19, 2011, 07:25:52 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

White House operative heading 'birther' smear campaign?
WND ^ | 7/19/11 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on July 19, 2011 10:10:09 PM EDT by Nachum

White House operative heading 'birther' smear campaign? Former Fannie Mae chief allegedly manages 100-strong attack team from Pennsylvania Ave

NEW YORK – A top Democrat, apparently operating with the full approval and cooperation of the president, has been directing a team of up to 100 who are paid to publish disinformation on a wide variety of websites to discredit "birthers," according to anti-Obama researchers.

The radical supporters of the president, known as Obama robots, or "OBOTs" for short, have confirmed their White House-appointed ring leader is Democratic Party operative James A. Johnson, the former chairman of Fannie Mae.

Initially, the OBOTs attempted to mask their Internet identities by posting under usernames with avatars that suggest their personalities. But due largely to the efforts of anti-Obama researchers, including "birthers" vilified by the OBOTs, the true identities of key OBOT operatives have been revealed.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on July 19, 2011, 10:59:51 PM
A dis-information campaign to battle disinformation?   I love it!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on July 20, 2011, 06:08:35 AM
White House operative heading 'birther' smear campaign?
WND ^ | 7/19/11 | Jerome R. Corsi

Corsi = a birther selling a book

His book sales were cockblocked by obama's long-form release.

Now the guy is a reverse CTer with the disinfo angle?  Yikes!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 21, 2011, 11:42:39 AM
http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=10327 (http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=10327)
Hawaii refuses subpoena of Obama birth certificate, citing privacy concerns
July 20, 2011
by Jack Minor      -

The Hawaii Department of Health has refused to comply with a subpoena compelling the state to provide access to the original, filed copy of the President's birth certificate, citing privacy laws.

In April, President Obama released a copy of what he says is an original copy of his long form birth certificate. The release came after the state of Hawaii had been saying for months they could not release a copy, even to the President.

Former director of Hawaii's health department, Dr. Chiyome Fukimo, claimed she had actually seen the President's birth certificate and it was half typed and half hand-written. The document released by the President was all typed.

Since its release, several document experts have come forward stating the document was altered and could be a forgery. No experts have stated publicly that the document has not been altered in any way.

Fox News posted a story by Jana Winter, who claimed an expert, Jean-Claude Tremblay, said there was "no doubt" the certificate was authentic. Tremblay is an Adobe certified expert with years of experience working with and teaching Adobe illustrator.

However, Tremblay told WorldNetDaily that none of the comments he made to Fox News would lead to the conclusion the birth certificate was authentic. Tremblay said, "Despite my protests, Fox News will not allow me to correct their story."

Dr. Orly Taitz, who has filed multiple lawsuits regarding the President's birth certificate, has filed a case in Washington D.C., seeking Obama's original application for his social security number.

President Obama has a social security number issued in Connecticut, despite never living there. Supporters have offered various explanations for the Connecticut number. In an article on the website Obamaconspiracy.org which supports the President, author Dr. Conspiracy said he believed that, "Obama got his SSN as a child living in Indonesia and the application was just processed in Connecticut."

Another supporter said Obama was a teenager traveling to the state on a college prep trip. "I think it's more likely that Barack Obama may have traveled to the east coast as a teenager, perhaps in connection with some college prep activity for high school age students – that simply isn’t mentioned in his autobiography." The poster went on to say, "It is common for schools to arrange trips for students to visit east coast colleges (Harvard, Yale, etc.); and students need to have a social security number when they register for the SAT. So, it's possible that it was participation in some sort of college prep program that lead to the CT tie in of the social security number."

Colorado private investigator, John Sampson, disputes these explanations, saying in an affidavit, ""It is my knowledge and belief that Social Security numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence."

Taitz filed the case after submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the Social Security Administration seeking access to the President's original birth certificate and other documents. The reason for the FOIA request was because of the many questions surrounding Obama's eligibility including his social security number and whether the birth certificate released by the White house is authentic. The FOIA was rejected by the SSA and affirmed by District  Chief Judge Royce Lamberth, who ruled administrative procedures had not yet run their course. Once that had happened, Lamberth ruled that discovery could go forward.

Taitz told the Gazette a subpoena was issued to the state's attorney general and Loretta Fuddy, the current director of the Hawaii department of health. The document ordered Fuddy to produce the "original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama … issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now."

The state of Hawaii responded, saying they would not release the information, citing "privacy" concerns. Taitz said the privacy issues should not apply since she is asking for access to a document the President has supposedly already released. She has since filed a motion with the court requesting they compel the government to supply the information.

Taitz's case is the first one to be granted discovery. Every other case has been dismissed on procedural grounds without issuing definitive decisions on Obama's eligibility.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on July 29, 2011, 11:39:23 AM
Regardless of what one may think of Taitz, one must admire her tenacity.

Click on the article link for more links backing up references

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=327373 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=327373)

The birth certificate please! Subpoena to be delivered
Attorney, doc experts to show up at Hawaii Department of Health with court document
July 28, 2011
By Jerome R. Corsi

Computer scanning expert Doug Vogt and typesetting expert Paul Irey say they will accompany attorney Orly Taitz when she presents to the Hawaii Department of Health a subpoena that should allow her to examine Barack Obama's original 1961 typewritten birth certificate.

Vogt and Irey both told WND they are making travel plans to join Taitz in Honolulu when she goes to the state agency at 10 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 8, to present the subpoena in person.

"We will plan to hold a press conference late in the day of Aug. 8," Vogt said, "and if the document we see varies from the birth certificate documents the White House released, we plan to file criminal charges in Hawaii immediately."

Get the New York Times best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President," by Jerome Corsi.

Vogt shared with WND a copy of a letter he has written to Hawaii Attorney General David Louie, putting Louie on notice regarding the reasons he believes the birth certificate released by the White House is fraudulent.

WND previously reported on Vogt's decision to file a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI.

Irey says it won't take long to evaluate the original birth record, if it exists.

"Over the years of my career, I've seen everything that can be put on paper," he said. "Now that I'm thoroughly familiar with what the White House released, I will be able to tell you within a few minutes, if what the Hawaii DOH has matches what the White House has released, or not.

"I will expect to see the same differences in typeface that are on the White House version, otherwise I will know immediately that what the Hawaii DOH is showing us is a forgery."

(http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/obamabirthcert.jpg)
What the White House released

Vogt and Irey plan to bring a laptop computer and a portable scanner to the Hawaii DOH for the inspection.

"We will scan the document to compare it to the White House electronic version and the Xerox copies they handed out in the press room," he said. "We will immediately make our scan available to the public over the Internet, so the American public can see for themselves."

Irey told WND he expects the Hawaii DOH at the last minute will do everything possible to prevent Taitz from getting access to the 1961 original Obama birth certificate, if it exists.

"Quite frankly, I doubt the Hawaii DOH has anything to show us," Irey said skeptically, "and if we do see a document, my guess is that it will have been forged for the purpose of showing us something."

Vogt and Irey repeatedly have told WND that if the Hawaii DOH had an original 1961 Obama birth certificate, the most credible thing to have done on April 27 would have been to release that document to the public for professional forensic examination by qualified independent professionals.

As displayed on her website, the July 5 subpoena granted Taitz by the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii allows her to examine the original 1961 Obama birth certificate on Aug. 8 at 10 a.m.:

(http://www.wnd.com/images/2011/07/072811sub.jpg)
Page 1 of Orly Taitz subpoena to Hawaii

(http://www.wnd.com/images/2011/07/072811sub2.jpg)
Page 2 of Orly Taitz subpoena to Hawaii

Taitz's subpoena was served upon Loretta Fuddy, director of the Hawaii Department of Health. Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine is representing Fuddy.

Because Fuddy neglected to file opposition to the court-issued subpoena within the 14 days specified, the Hawaii DOH appears to have little recourse but to comply with the subpoena by producing the Obama original birth certificate for Taitz's examination.

Taitz is planning to travel to the state agency, despite receiving no answer from Fuddy as to whether or not she intends to comply with the subpoena. Taitz put the question to Fuddy in a July 27 letter.

On July 15, Florence Stone, an interested citizen residing in Oregon, was told that Nagamine was on leave and that Fuddy had left the islands.

On April 27, the White House released hard copies and a PDF electronic file of the Obama birth certificate, a document numerous experts, including several in Adobe software, have charged to be a forgery.

Handed out at the White House press conference were paper copies of the Obama birth certificate that lacked the green security paper background seen in the PDF electronic version.

The White House claims to have a certified copy of the birth certificate that contains an embossed seal from the Hawaii Department of Health, a feature that is questionably present in the PDF file and not apparent in the paper copies the White House handed to reporters.

NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie was the only person at the April 27 White House press conference allowed to see the certified copy of the Obama document, feel the seal and take a picture of the document.

To date, the Hawaii Department of Health has kept whatever record of Obama's birth that exists in its files in the agency's vault. The department refuses to grant any requests to show the original document to the public or to allow independent forensic examiners to authenticate it.

Without access to the original document, dozens of traditionally trained court-authorized forensic document examiners approached by WND have refused to render an opinion.

Vogt, who describes himself as an expert in documents, typesetting, imaging, scanners and document imaging programs, has owned Archive Index Systems, a company specializing in the international marketing of scanner equipment and technology, since 1993.

WND previously reported, and later expanded on the report, that Irey has identified different sized and different shaped letters within the Obama birth certificate. Irey believes the letters used to compose the document came from more than one typewriter, which he considers "irrefutable proof" the Obama birth certificate released by the White House is a forgery.

Irey, a typesetting and typeface expert with 50 years of experience in the business, founded Bergan Graphics in Fort Lee, N.J., in 1967.

Taitz said the state's "privacy" regulations should be ignored, as Obama already has released what the White House purported to be a copy of the document to the public.

The subpoena comes in a case she has developed in Washington, D.C., seeking the original application for Obama's Social Security number, a document that could provide significant information about the president's early life that relates to his eligibility.

U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth rejected a defense concern over procedure in the dispute. Taitz said the judge's ruling moved the case into the discovery phase, in which she can issue subpoenas to those holding documentation she is seeking.

WND previously has reported on the issue that Obama holds a Connecticut-based Social Security number despite allegedly being born in Hawaii, starting his work career in the Aloha State and neverhaving lived in Connecticut.

The first three digits of a Social Security number indicate the state of the applicant's mailing address. Obama's number begins with 042, which falls within Connecticut's range of 040 through 049.



The national news media have been virtually silent on this potentially criminal fact.

Indeed, when Fox News finally attempted to explain it, the news networkbroadcast false information and then scrubbed the report from its website.

When WND asked the White House about the issue, then–Press SecretaryRobert Gibbs dodged the question.

Taitz' case, against Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue, explains that because of the numerous questions surrounding Obama's eligibility, his birth certificate and his other records, a Freedom of Information Act request was submitted.

According to a report in The Post & Email, the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii had issued a subpoena that was served on the director of the Hawaii Department of Health.

The demand to Fuddy requires the "original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama … issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now."

As WND has reported, there long have been concerns about the Social Security number.

"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," says Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?

"Never," Daniels told Corsi. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security Number issued."

Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security Number is fraudulent."

"A person who wants to hide their true identity often picks up the Social Security Number of a deceased person, thinking that nobody would ever look into it," Daniels added. "I think it was sometime in the 1980s that Obama decided to hide who he really is."

There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.

Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.

An affidavit filed by Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, "it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security Numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence."

Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security Number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.

"I doubt this is President Obama's originally issued Social Security number," she told WND. "Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security number in Hawaii."

The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama's inauguration.

In April, some 11 months after WND began publicizing Obama's Connecticut-based SSN, Bill O'Reilly of the Fox News Channel briefly addressed the issue while reading his viewer mail on the air.

But the news anchor falsely asserted the president's father lived in Connecticut.

In his viewer email segment April 13, O'Reilly was asked: "What about Obama having a Connecticut Social Security Number? He never lived there."

"His father lived in Connecticut for several years," O'Reilly claimed, adding that "babies sometimes get numbers based on addresses provided by their parents."

However, there is no evidence Barack Obama Sr. ever lived in Connecticut. He left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya.

When WND publicized O'Reilly's error, the information vanished from the Fox News Channel's website and BillOReilly.com.

O'Reilly's full explanation of the "truth" of Obama "myths" is here:



The BirtherReport.com website, responding to complaints by Fox podcast customers that O'Reilly's Social Security claim, broadcast on Fox, had gone missing from the audio archive, trumpeted the headline: "Busted: Fox News scrubbed Bill O'Reilly's 4/13 mailbag segment on Obama's Social Security Number reserved for Connecticut applicants." The site added, "Not only did Fox News scrub the podcast, they also left out the viewer -email about Obama's Social Security number at O'Reilly's website. I report, you decide!"
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on August 08, 2011, 07:17:19 PM
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=24513 (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=24513)

FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS DIRECTOR OF HEALTH TO APPEAR IN COURT AND SHOW CAUSE, WHY SHE REFUSES TO COMPLY WITH THE SUBPOENA AND ALLOW INSPECTION OF OBAMA’S ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE ON FILE, WHICH HE, HIMSELF ALREADY MADE PUBLIC

Posted on | August 8, 2011 | No Comments

Taitz v Astrue motion to show cause

Today, as expected, Loretta Fuddy, director of health, continued stonewalling
claiming privacy. See attached, scanned filed motion for order to show cause
Motion was accepted by the US District Court in HI and was assigned to the chief judge Susan Oke Moulvanney and magistrate Richard Puggliose.

Hearing is set for September 14th, 10 am courtroom 6. This will be motion to compel and show cause for the director of Health to show cause to the judge, why she is refusing to comply with the subpoena and allow inspection of the original birth certificate,  claiming privacy, while Obama has already waived privacy, posting the alleged birth certificate on line.

Fox news sent a crew. FOX HI reporter Andrew Pereira interviewed me and my experts at the Health Department and in the Federal Court.
they will be reporting shortly.

Nationally Syndicated talk  show host Rusty Humphries came to the Health department and recorded the interview. He will be reporting on  280 stations.

I got a call from HI Reporter, their main news paper, I will give them an interview shortly.

I gave an interview to Jerome  Corsi, it will be in Net World Daily
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 08, 2011, 07:18:25 PM
I still wonder where the he'll he was spawned. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on August 18, 2011, 03:54:26 PM
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2011/110817/frontpage-birther.html (http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2011/110817/frontpage-birther.html)
BY LINDA BENTLEY | AUGUST 17, 2011
Birther Summit offers $5K for 1961 Honolulu newspaper

WASHINGTON – After receiving no response from Colin Powell to its $15,000 offer (click herehttp://sonorannews.com/archives/2011/110810/frontpage-birthers.html (http://sonorannews.com/archives/2011/110810/frontpage-birthers.html)) for him to listen to evidence surrounding what a number of experts have deemed are Obama’s forged birth certificate, false use of a Connecticut Social Security number and fraudulently created Selective Service registration, the Birther Summit has announced a new offer: A $5,000 reward for the original edition of either the Aug. 13, 1961 edition of The Honolulu Advertiser or the Aug. 14, 1961 edition of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin.

Those are the two newspapers in which the birth announcements of Barack Obama purportedly appeared.
 
Dean Haskins
Birther Summit Executive Director Dean Haskins said, “While we under-stand that the announcement’s inclusion in those newspapers would not be conclusive proof that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as there were circumstances that would have allowed for them to appear without a Hawaii birth actually occurring, the only evidence anyone has actually seen of the birth’s announcements has been copies of microfiche versions of those newspapers, and they contain suspicious anomalies.”

Haskins went on to say, “As with the vault version of Obama’s birth certificate, which has still not been forensically verified as being a valid document, we would like an opportunity to inspect one of these actual newspapers rather than purported representations of them.”

Photographic evidence of one of those two newspapers may be submitted to dean@birthersummit.org, at which time instructions will be provided regarding the purchase process to be brokered through the Summit’s attorney.

Since Haskins’ announcement on Monday, Summit participants have engaged in a bit of dialogue over this endeavor.

Some expressed fear if the birth announcement did in fact run in those editions it would bolster the anti-birther’s side of the argument.

However, Haskins responded, “Let me clarify some things, First, this money is being fronted for this purpose only – by someone who wants to spend his money to obtain one of these papers.

“Second, we don’t really care if the announcement is there, as we have already acknowledged in the press release that it proves nothing. However, if it is not there, it does a lot for us.”

Because birthplace and parentage are equal parts of the natural born citizen requirement, and Haskins believes Obama misses the mark on both, he said he will ignore neither.

Haskins said, “We are simply pointing out that, like the birth certificate, nobody has seen an original – only digital representations,” adding, “If we are afraid of the truth in any of this, then our motives are wrong. Being afraid that an actual newspaper exists and it has the announcement in it is the same as fearing that an actual birth certificate exists – and allowing that to keep us from trying to see the original. We just want to verify that the announce-ment is in there. If it is, we are in the exact same position as we have been. If it’s not …”

Although Haskins reali-zes the existence of an original copy of one of these two papers is unlikely, he said Aug. 13, 1961 was also the day first reports about construction of the Berlin Wall appeared in news-papers around the globe. So, for that reason, he believes someone may have saved a copy.

Back then, newspaper was also something that was still commonly placed in attic spaces for insulation.

Meanwhile, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., obtained a subpoena for Loretta Fuddy, director, State of Hawaii Department of Health, signed by the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., to produce Obama’s original long form birth certificate for examination by Aug. 8, 2011.

Taitz flew to Hawaii, accompanied by Doug Vogt, who owns a company that specializes in scanners and scanner software, and Paul Irey, a retired graphic artist with a 50-year background in typography, photography and graphic art design, both of whom have deemed the birth certificate displayed online by the White House on April 27, 2011 a forgery, and served the subpoena on Fuddy on Aug. 8.

Instead of Fuddy producing the subpoenaed document, Taitz was provided a letter declining her request, citing privacy concerns.

Taitz responded to the Hawaii Department of Health’s claim of privacy by saying Obama waived all claims to privacy when he posted what is supposedly a certified copy of his long form birth certificate on the Internet.

She then filed an ex-parte emergency motion in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii for an emergency order to show cause and to compel production of documents, and for attorneys’ fees and costs.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard L. Puglisi ordered a hearing in his courtroom at 10 a.m. on Sept. 14 on Taitz’s motion to compel.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on August 18, 2011, 03:59:46 PM
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=24513 (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=24513)

FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS DIRECTOR OF HEALTH TO APPEAR IN COURT AND SHOW CAUSE, WHY SHE REFUSES TO COMPLY WITH THE SUBPOENA AND ALLOW INSPECTION OF OBAMA’S ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE ON FILE, WHICH HE, HIMSELF ALREADY MADE PUBLIC

Posted on | August 8, 2011 | No Comments

Taitz v Astrue motion to show cause

Today, as expected, Loretta Fuddy, director of health, continued stonewalling
claiming privacy. See attached, scanned filed motion for order to show cause
Motion was accepted by the US District Court in HI and was assigned to the chief judge Susan Oke Moulvanney and magistrate Richard Puggliose.

Hearing is set for September 14th, 10 am courtroom 6. This will be motion to compel and show cause for the director of Health to show cause to the judge, why she is refusing to comply with the subpoena and allow inspection of the original birth certificate,  claiming privacy, while Obama has already waived privacy, posting the alleged birth certificate on line.

Fox news sent a crew. FOX HI reporter Andrew Pereira interviewed me and my experts at the Health Department and in the Federal Court.
they will be reporting shortly.

Nationally Syndicated talk  show host Rusty Humphries came to the Health department and recorded the interview. He will be reporting on  280 stations.

I got a call from HI Reporter, their main news paper, I will give them an interview shortly.

I gave an interview to Jerome  Corsi, it will be in Net World Daily

damn 33333
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 20, 2011, 07:00:46 PM
Obama's Alias Harrison J. Bounel Tied To Connecticut Social Security Number Now Scrubbed
Birther Report ^ | aug 20 2011 | www.birtherreport.com
Posted on August 20, 2011 9:54:17 PM EDT by tutstar

From Albert "Al" Hendershot: There has been a development as it pertains to database records for and about Barack H Obama. As we well know I am the one who discovered the Harrison J Bounel alias. Well, these records have been scrubbed from theses databases as of yesterday. All other records are gone except the records belonging to the "chosen one". Albert Hendershot's SSN Pull for 042-68-4425 (Obama) With His Notes Added to the Database Pull

From Carl Swensson: Spent yesterday with a credit investigator (skip tracer) who has very highly specialized search software available to only those in the business and highly protected…

In March of this year he was doing a lookup of BHO’s SSN number and came up with this anomaly. Harrison J. Bounel kept showing up as living at the “O’s” and using the same SSN # ???? Also showed up as a relative of Michelle’s? As of yesterday, the same search yielded no reference to Bounel so here we go again, records scrubbed. This Gentleman (Albert) is working with Jerome Corsi to get this and some really damning evidence concerning tax evasion on the Chicago address of the Obama’s residence (Can we say Capone) out to as many as possible.

Orly had one such investigator working, early on, with the SS numbers but I’m not sure if she tied that together with the voter fraud documents which show multiple fictitious and famous characters living at the addresses of all these BHO residences associated with that CN SSN from across the country. I now have copies of that as well. Anybody here live in Arkansas? Have some interesting leads for you.

I know that name (Bounel) has appeared before but the significance now is that it is being scrubbed as people like Albert find pockets of this info still out there in the virtual world.

I do hope Jerome and Albert can put the pieces of the tax fraud puzzle together in a way that’s easily understandable for the masses to understand. Good luck with that as Cook County, IL is an absolute cesspool of political corruption and does an absolutely excellent job of hiding underhanded political dealings involving land and taxes. Key here is that sliver of land Rezko turned over to the Trust Co. that owned Michelle’s/Barry’s Chicago residence at 5046 S. Greenwood Ave that has every appearance of having avoided any taxes being paid on it. That and the fact that on the Obama’s 2009 tax return it shows taxes paid on real estate when, according to records, they owned NONE.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on August 20, 2011, 08:12:40 PM
YES, now you're talking, 333396@

It's the COVER UP that is a big deal.

When all the preggo rumors surfaced, Palin took down the Alaska Governor website, and REMOVED ALL THE PICS FROM HER "skinny" PREGNANCY PERIOD!

Why the F would she do this?  Things like that make you wonder.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 12, 2011, 09:01:48 PM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342937


Good freaking article.   Too many images to post. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 13, 2011, 06:12:27 AM
Obama in Kenya:  "I am so proud to come back home" 



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on September 14, 2011, 12:10:26 PM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342465 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=342465)
The hole in Ann Dunham's biography
Exclusive: Jack Cashill reveals lack of details surrounding birth of baby Barack
Posted: September 07, 2011
1:36 pm Eastern

By Jack Cashill

In the last year or so respected publishers have released four biographies by mainstream authors that feature, as a central fact, the birth of President Barack Obama to his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Ann), in 1961.

Given that there has been a certain controversy about the birth, one might expect that each of the books would, if not settle the controversy, at least deal with it intelligently. None of them does.

These books include a 2010 biography of the president, "The Bridge," by New Yorker editor David Remnick; a 2011 biography of Dunham, "A Singular Woman," by New York Times reporter Janny Scott; a 2011 biography of Barack Obama Sr., "The Other Barack," by Sally Jacobs of the Boston Globe; and a 2010 multi-generational biography of the Obama family, "The Obamas," by BBC journalist Peter Firstbrook.

Clearly, if Dunham had not given birth to Obama, none of these four books would have been written. Yet the authors are shockingly mute on the subject of Dunham's pregnancy and Obama's birth.

University of Hawaii records show that Dunham left school at the end of January in 1961, and subsequent divorce records suggest a Maui wedding on Feb. 2. This is where the paper trial ends.

As to the Maui wedding, everyone writes with uncertainty. Jacobs says only, "The couple apparently had a quiet civil ceremony." Scott writes that the wedding took place "reportedly on the island of Maui." (Italics mine)

In Remnick's account, Dunham tells no one about the wedding, but in Firstbrook's imaginative account, the parents accompany the happy couple on the trip to Maui. As Obama has conceded, there are no wedding photos and no documents.

After the wedding, Dunham disappears from the record. Not one of these authors provides the slightest hint of what she may have done or where she may have gone between Feb. 2 and Aug. 4 of 1961. Nada. Not a word.

All of these books were published with the eligibility controversy in full flower. The informed reader would expect the authors, especially Dunham's biographer Scott, to at least comment on the absence of information. None does.

The reporting on Obama's birth is, if anything, even more evasive. All four rely on the certification of live birth (COLB) first posted online in 2008 by the Daily Kos.

Since the COLB does not specify a hospital, the authors seem to have accepted Obama's post-election claim to having been born at Kapiolani. Before the election, however, news reports routinely cited Honolulu's Queen's Medical Center as Obama's birthplace.

Of the four authors, only Firstbrook acknowledges the dispute surrounding the COLB, and he does so with a proud indifference to the facts.

According to Firstbrook, the claim that the COLB is not a "proper birth certificate" was "debunked by media investigations, government officials in Hawaii, and judicial reviews."

If nothing else, when Obama presented his "proper birth certificate," one much more detailed than the COLB, he exposed the debunking for the agitprop it was. How authentic that birth certificate is, of course, remains to be seen.

As to the "media investigations," no reporters have gone into more depth about this couple and their child than the four biographers in question. And yet all are silent on the details of Obama's birth.

As to those "officials in Hawaii," one of them was Tim Adams, who served as the senior elections clerk for the City and County of Honolulu in the run-up to the 2008 election.

In his recently posted masters thesis, Adams repeats what he told the media in 2010 before being gagged by his university and menaced by the Obots and their media allies.

"There is no hospital record of [Obama's] birth in Honolulu and the Hawaii Department of Health told us in the Elections Office that there was no birth certificate."

To a person, these biographers fail to provide the kind of supporting evidence that would refute Adams' claim, either with photos or personal testimony.

There is no talk of Dunham's morning sickness, her labor pains, the worried grandparents, the frantic drive to the hospital, the grueling birth, the crying baby, the contented mom, the dubious looks from the hospital staff – the kind of details one would expect in any biography.

Nor do these biographers show any pictures of a pregnant Dunham or a newborn Obama. One has to wonder whether they could find no evidence or simply chose not to share what they did find.

The reader has no reason to trust any of them. If Firstbrook deceives through carelessness, the other three consciously dissemble to protect the Obama narrative of a loving little multicultural family.

As I have documented in these pages earlier, Remnick, Jacobs and Scott all finesse the timeline to make it appear that Dunham and the baby lived with Obama Sr. for at least six months after the birth.

The verifiable paper trail, which picks up weeks after the Aug. 4 birth with Obama Sr.'s INS documents and Dunham's University of Washington records, proves otherwise.

Along with the testimony of Dunham's Seattle friends, these documents confirm that the future president, despite his claim to the contrary, never lived in a family with Ann Dunham and Obama Sr.

No matter. In the age of Obama, the media "debunkers" have turned their sights not on the powers that be but on those who would challenge those powers.

Anti-journalism at its finest!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 14, 2011, 10:03:06 PM
Kapiolani Medical Center Confirms 'African' Never Used On Birth Certificates in 1961 or Now
Birther Report ^ | SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 | Birther Report
Posted on September 14, 2011 11:59:18 PM EDT by RobinMasters

We spent a very long (and hot) day talking with many people on the island and filming several scenes with the “big check” that will be compiled into a video once we get home. There was one conversation, however, that I want to share with you tonight. We spent at least a couple hours at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children today. I got a call this morning from a reporter with the Honolulu Civil Beat who wanted to interview us, so he met us at the Medical Center. His story should run tomorrow.

After that interview, we went into the records office, and Miki asked to file a form to get her son's birth records. While she was filling out the form, I happened to overhear a woman who was sitting at a desk say something about the “race” field on a birth certificate she was preparing. I asked her if this was the office that responsible for filling out the birth certificate information for babies born there, and she said that it was.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 14, 2011, 10:13:45 PM
Obama in Kenya:  "I am so proud to come back home"  




I now totally agree there are some legit questions around this birth thing.  but posts like this cloud it with bullshit.  Hell there are easily many Irish, German and Italians that would announce being proud to come back home while visiting the land of their heritage, or roots even though they are 2nd or 3rd gen in America lol.  That really doesn't mean jack shit.
Title: Sheriff Arpaio's posse to review Obama BC
Post by: FarRightLooney on September 17, 2011, 09:58:18 AM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=345685 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=345685)
Sheriff Arpaio's posse to review Obama BC
Famous Arizona lawman responds to citizen request to probe president
September 16, 2011
By Jerome R. Corsi

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona has constituted a special law enforcement posse to investigate allegations brought by members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party that the birth certificate Barack Obama released to the public April 27 might be a forgery, WND has learned.

The posse, under the authority of Arpaio's office, will consist of two former law enforcement officers and two retired attorneys, headed by Michael Zullo, a retired police detective originally from Bergen County, N.J.

WND confirmed with Zullo and with Arpaio's office that the investigation into the Obama birth certificate has been sanctioned fully by Arpaio's office. The investigation, they said, will be conducted with "utmost diligence," and the investigators will be authorized to utilize subpoena power.

Arpaio spokesman Lt. Justin Griffin told WND that Arpaio's posse will consist entirely of volunteers and will avoid incurring any cost to the taxpayers of Maricopa County.

"I am very grateful that Sheriff Joe Arpaio is a sincere man of his word and a fearless, patriotic American," Brian Reilly, a spokesman for the Surprise Tea Party, told WND.

The document in question, which has been described as a fraud by numerous analysts and experts in imaging, documents and computers:

Reilly had less kind words for his representatives in Washington, D.C.

"Congress should be ashamed," he said. "They didn't even have the backbone to uphold their constitutional oaths of office to initiate this investigation."

Arpaio's move is unprecedented in that WND research can find no other instance in United States history in which a county sheriff's office has undertaken an investigation of a document pertaining to a sitting United States president.

Arpaio's decision follows a meeting held in his office Aug. 17 with a group of Surprise Tea Party representatives, including Reilly. Four days later, the group presented a formal letter to Arpaio expressing concern that should Obama use a forged birth certificate to prove his eligibility for the 2012 presidential ballot in Arizona, the voting rights of the residents of Maricopa County could be irreparably compromised.

WND reported Aug. 21 that the letter formally stated the following charge: "The Surprise Tea Party is concerned that no law enforcement agency or other duly constituted government agency has conducted an investigation into the Obama birth certificate to determine if it is in fact an authentic copy of 1961 birth records on file for Barack Obama at the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu, or whether it, or they are forgeries."

The letter noted that to date, despite continuing legal challenges, the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to make public or to release to independent forensic examination by qualified examiners the original Obama birth records held in secret in the Hawaii Department of Health files.

"Having exhausted all available governmental and law enforcement resources at our disposal, we are turning to you as the highest law enforcement officer in Maricopa County where we reside," the Surprise Tea Party explained in the letter.

"We are asking for your assistance because you have a demonstrated history of enforcing Arizona laws in Maricopa County, even when enforcing those laws is unpopular in Arizona or out-of-favor with the wishes of a federal government that may choose to ignore the law to the detriment of the residents of Maricopa County."

The letter expressed confidence that Arpaio will take his law enforcement responsibilities seriously and "will not ignore the request or delegate the request to some other government or law enforcement agency in the state or the federal government that will choose to not respond to our requests for political reasons."

"But, quite frankly, Sheriff Arpaio, you are our last resort to see Arizona statutes enforced to preserve the integrity of Arizona election law," the letter continued.

Read the letter in its entirely here.

Reilly told WND that he and the Surprise Tea Party believed the posse constituted by Arpaio was an appropriate response to their written request.

"We picked the right man, in the right county, in the right state, at the right time to determine the truth about who Barack Obama is and whether he has presented a fraudulent or authentic birth certificate to the American public," Reilly said. "With God's help, Sheriff Arpaio will find the truth."

In addition to the letter, the Surprise Tea Party delivered to Arpaio a petition with 242 signatures that were obtained at the Aug. 17 meeting.

The group also gave to Arpaio a binder containing the published reports of 20 experts with established credentials who conducted a forensic examination of the computer PDF file published on the White House website and the photocopies of the Obama birth certificate handed out by the White House to the press during the April 27 press conference.

The Arizona State Legislature on April 15 passed a bill that would have required candidates for the presidency to prove to the Arizona secretary of state their eligibility to be president under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. Arizona Republican Gov. Janet Brewer, however, vetoed the bill.

The presentation WND senior staff reporter Jerome R. Corsi made to the Surprise Tea Party in Surprise, Ariz., Aug. 17, can be seen in its entirety on YouTube:

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on September 17, 2011, 08:07:10 PM
why do you keep this thread going???..you've been proven wrong months ago you fool
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 18, 2011, 05:50:09 PM
Elite team of 5 assigned to seek truth on Obama (Arpaio "Cold Case" posse)
World Net Daily ^ | September 18, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on September 18, 2011 8:46:58 PM EDT by Seizethecarp

Arizona's Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio told WND he has assigned a five-member "Cold Case Posse" to investigate the authenticity of Barack Obama's birth certificate.

Arpaio explained to WND that there are over 3,000 people who participate in his office's volunteer posse program.

Arpaio explained to WND that in the final analysis, all decisions stop with him.

"I will have the ultimate authority to decide," he emphasized. "I gave the Cold Case Posse the authority to investigate, but the results of their investigation ultimately come to me and I will then decide how best to proceed from there."

Those wishing to contribute to the 501(c)3 supporting the Cold Case Posse investigation of the Obama birth certificate are asked to send contributions addressed to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office at: MCSO Cold Case Posse, P.O. Box 74374, Phoenix, Ariz., 85087.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on September 18, 2011, 05:53:03 PM
Blah blah blah
 ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on September 20, 2011, 01:34:57 PM
http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/20/singer-pat-boone-insists-obama-born-in-kenya/#ixzz1YVNi1Ksc (http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/20/singer-pat-boone-insists-obama-born-in-kenya/#ixzz1YVNi1Ksc)
Singer Pat Boone insists Obama born in Kenya
09/20/2011
By Laura Donovan

President Barack Obama may have released his birth certificate this spring to debunk rumors that he was born outside the United States, but old school crooner Pat Boone maintains that our nation’s leader originated in Africa and has shown the world “a photo-shopped fraud.”

Speaking to the San Francisco Chronicle, the Beverly Hills tea party member said he interacted with Kenyans a while back who claim Obama was born in Kenya.

“I was in Kenya a year and a half ago and everybody said, ‘You know, he was born here,”’ Boone told the northern California-based publication at a California GOP event last week.

The singer argued that the president is putting millions towards “hiding all of his records” and that esteemed “experts” have dubbed the certificate a fake.

“Why else would he be hiding all of his records? He’s spending millions of dollars so that we do not have his records,” Boone said. “And experts have already looked at and been able to verify that this long-form document is a fraud… But the media ignores it… A total fraud. A photo-shopped fraud.”

Earlier this year, Obama made his birth records public, following billionaire Donald Trump’s insistence that the president release the documents and negate so-called ‘birthers’ who accuse the president of being foreign-born.

The “Celebrity Apprentice” host even took credit when copies of Obama’s birth certificate hit the Internet.

“Today I’m very proud of myself, because I’ve accomplished something that no one else has been able to accomplish,” Trump said at a press conference after the White House announced it would release the certificate. “I want to look at it, but I hope it’s true… But he should have done it a long time ago.”

Watch: Boone talk birtherism

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid823619053?bctid=1164198007001 (http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid823619053?bctid=1164198007001)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on September 20, 2011, 01:43:57 PM
Lol @ the "street talk" of a bunch of illitarate Kenyans to a pothead rock vocalist being taken as FACT!

LOL!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 21, 2011, 06:52:24 AM
http://www.attackwatch.com/attack-files-entry/obama-birth-certificate





lmfao!!!!   I think a 13 y/o made this site.   

 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 21, 2011, 12:00:12 PM
Globe Magazine: Obama Panicked over Secret Police File
Globe Magazine ^ | September 21, 2011


President Obama is panicking over a secret police file loaded with evidence proving that his birth certificate - is a PHONY! Read all about what's in the file, now in the hands of two police departments, and why it's driving the fearful President to drink - only in the new GLOBE.


(Excerpt) Read more at globemagazine.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on September 21, 2011, 12:01:26 PM
Bro, come on... GLOBE?!

It's a supermarket tabloid at a lower level than the National Enquirer... Come on man... Please stop this.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 21, 2011, 12:02:24 PM
Bro, come on... GLOBE?!

It's a supermarket tabloid at a lower level than the National Enquirer... Come on man... Please stop this.

They broke the Edwards story no? 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on September 21, 2011, 12:05:02 PM
They broke the Edwards story no? 

I don't care man... being right one time in 30 years doesn't work for me.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on September 22, 2011, 08:41:36 AM
The big story on that cover may be the reference to Solyndra.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 22, 2011, 08:54:18 PM
Another source claims Obama forgery planted in Hawaii DOH
WND ^ | SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on September 22, 2011 11:51:56 PM EDT by RobinMasters

Another Hawaii source with inside knowledge has asserted that Obama supporters placed a forged 1961 long-form birth certificate in the vault of the Hawaii Department of Health.

Talk-radio host and former Nixon White House operative G. Gordon Liddy told WND that one of his trusted informants in Hawaii reported to him that while the document was forged recently, there may have been tampering with official Obama birth records as far back as 1978.

Liddy's warning came in response to WND reports that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is mobilizing a law enforcement unit with the authority to investigate allegations that the Obama birth certificate released by the White House April 27 is a forgery.

Liddy's warning coincides with similar warnings WND received from another source who said in February that an Obama 1961 birth certificate had been forged and placed into the Hawaii Department of Health records.

That source now says that the White House, by releasing an electronic file of Obama's birth certificate, is laying a trap.

"The computer-generated PDF file was obviously not a scan of an original 1961 birth certificate, so predictably it created a brouhaha that the document was forged," the source said. "Now, all Obama has to do to get a jump in the polls is to release a true photocopy of the forged 'original' to humiliate and destroy the birthers."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 23, 2011, 12:15:05 PM
Update on Taitz's Congressional Meetings with 12 High Ranking Senators and Congressmen
obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ^ | 9/23/2011 | ObamaRelease YourRecords




COULD THIS BE THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE FRAUD?
 

"Update on Taitz's Congressional Meetings with 12 High Ranking Senators and Congressmen

Update on my(Orly Taitz) trip to DC yesterday

I came back from DC in the middle of the night.

I will write a full report a bit later. I flew red eye there, red eye back I have to be back at work today. To add to the hardship, I was diagnosed with a stress fracture in my foot and had to walk between 6 large buildings all day long in a lot of pain, ending up going bare foot between the meetings and carrying my shoes in my hands together with my purse and my brief case and dying of heat in my black lawyers suit. I forwarded my information on Social security fraud to 12 high ranking senators and congressmen and had personal in depth meetings with legal counsel, chiefs of staff and senior advisers for 4 high ranking senators and 3 representatives: Senator Tom Coburn-ranking member of the subcommittee on privacy on senate judicial committee, Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Marco Rubio, Congressman Lamar Smith-chair f the House Judiciary committee, Congressman Alen West, Congressman Steven King.

I also forwarded my information to Senator Schumer, Senator Lieberman, Senator Feinstein, Senator Lautenberg, Senator Blumenthal. Unlike prior 7 , who are conservative Republicans, these 5 senators are Democrats, (Lieberman is a former Democrat, currently Independent) but might join the fight for other reasons.

Some of the chiefs of staff and legal counsel will work together in arranging for me to testify at one of the committee or subcommittee hearings. I should hear from them within a week. It is very important for you as constituency to write to Chair of Judiciary committee Lamar Smith and his legal counsel Holt Lackey and to the ranking member of the House subcommittee on privacy within Senate Judiciary committee Senator Tom Coburn and his chief of staff Michael Schwartz, thanking them for the meeting, for reading the pleadings and investigating the issue and urge them to invite me to the committee hearings to testify on the issue. Keep in mind, they have subpoena power, they can subpoena Judge Lamberth, Judge Puglisi, director of Health Loretta Fuddy, Registrar Onaka, Commissioner of Social Security Astrue and demand answers, whether high ranking officials can commit crimes and use privacy as an excuse, knowing that their appointees and inferior officials will be afraid to do independent investigation. Can 311 million US citizens lose their Constitutional right for redress of grievances and be forced to live under illegitimate regime of an individual occupying the White Hose based on a fraudulently obtained Social Security number and a computer generated forgery instead of a birth certificate, due to the fact, that officials and judges refuse to take on the issues and use privacy as an excuse?

After I landed I was on the air with Doug McIntire KABC and was able to provide millions of people with above information. I also mentioned on the air my interview to Univision in Spanish and the fact, that Hispanic population is extremely angry, that they have to go through e-verify, but Obama can sit in the position of the President with a failed e-verify. Republicans desperately need Republican vote and will lose this vote, if they or their high ranking officials, Like Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Martinez, Governor Sandoval do not raise this issue. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=25819"

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/09/update-on-attorney-taitzs-congressional.html





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on September 24, 2011, 11:00:47 PM
You do realize that noone reads the copy and paste articles you post up right? You're wasting your time moron
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on September 26, 2011, 09:42:50 AM
You do realize that noone reads the copy and paste articles you post up right? You're wasting your time moron

I read ALL of them if I have not read it from the source first.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on September 26, 2011, 10:09:13 AM
I read ALL of them if I have not read it from the source first.

Congrats you are officially a loser
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 26, 2011, 10:12:20 AM
Congrats you are officially a loser

As opposed to who you?   Bro - you voted for Obama, and like the other pieces of rancid trash, you are in no position to call names. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on September 26, 2011, 04:38:06 PM
As opposed to who you?   Bro - you voted for Obama, and like the other pieces of rancid trash, you are in no position to call names. 

Ha jokes on you numbnuts I don't vote! Voting is for idiots like you who think you can make a difference and then copy and past articles that noone gives a shit about. Bottom line Voting is a sham. You're talking politics on a bodybuilding forum trying to accomplish who knows what. Should prob reevaluate some of your life choices
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on September 27, 2011, 09:50:55 AM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=349217 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=349217)

Again! Supremes asked to look into eligibility
Dispute over Obama's background moving well into 2012 campaign
September 26, 2011
By Bob Unruh

The dispute over Barack Obama's eligibility to be president erupted during the 2008 election campaign and featured among others a lawsuit filed on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes against California election officials who did not check whether Obama was eligibile. Now the 2012 campaign is charging ahead at full throttle, and the issue is still alive.

That's because the case was before the U.S. Supreme Court for a conference today. A conference is a meeting at which the justices decide which cases they will review. To date, none of the Obama eligibility challenges that have reached the high court have been accepted. It could be as long as a week or more before an announcement comes from the court.

Attorney Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation is handling the case.

"If the U.S. Supreme court agrees to hear this case, and we pray that it will, it will send shock waves through the Washington political establishment," Kreep said. "It will mean that the Supreme Court is going to follow the lead of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals justice who has publicly commented that this is an important constitutional issue."

He continued, "We are awaiting the court's decision."

It was Judge Marsha Berzon of the 9th Circuit who commented during the oral arguments on the dispute that the issued appeared to be something of importance that needed to be resolved.

Read more: Again! Supremes asked to look into eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=349217#ixzz1ZAkwmBIl


Read more: Again! Supremes asked to look into eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=349217#ixzz1ZAkj929y
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 29, 2011, 07:25:14 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama Informed of 'E-Verify' Notice of Mismatch
September 25, 2011 | Linda Jordan
Posted on September 29, 2011 10:20:29 PM EDT by ethical

September 24th, 2011

To: Barack H. Obama 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500

RE: Social Security Administration Notice of Mismatch Letter

Dear. Mr. Obama, Currently, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (1986) require employers, by law, to establish that their employees are eligible to work in the United States. The Form I-9 was developed for verifying that persons are eligible to work in the United States.

Employers are required by law to have employees hired after November 6, 1986 fill out Section 1 of the Form I-9 when they start to work. Section 1 of Form I-9 asks for your name, birth date, address and social security number (SSN). It also asks you to attest if you are; A citizen of the United States, A non- citizen national of the United States, A lawful permanent resident (Alien#) or An alien authorized to work.

As one of your employers I used due diligence attempting to find a copy of your I-9 on the White House Website and other public records websites and could not. I am including an I-9 Form for you to fill out so I can keep it on file as required by law.

On the White House website I did find your name, date of birth and your address. I found the SSN you are using on a copy of your Selective Service Registration. I have heard you say many times that you are a citizen of the United States.

I registered with the government run E-Verify System and on August 17th, 2011, I entered your name, birthdate, address, SSN and citizen status in to E-Verify. The data was correctly entered. I was allowed to run a check on your eligibility to work in the United States.

I received back a “Notice of Mismatch with Social Security Administration Records: SSA record does not verify, other reason.”

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) have stated that an employer’s failure to adequately follow-up on a Notice of Mismatch could constitute evidence of or contribute to an employer’s constructive knowledge of an employee’s unauthorized status.

When an employer receives a Notice of Mismatch concerning one of their employees the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices states that the employer:

1. Must inform the employee of the no-match notice. Consider yourself informed by means of this letter.

2. Must ask the employee to confirm his/her name and SSN. Please confirm or correct the name and SSN I entered in to the E-Verify System: Barack H Obama 042-68-4425.

3. Please correct or confirm the Citizenship Status I entered with your name, birth date and SSN: A citizen of the United States.

Sincerely,

Linda Jordan Seattle WA

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on September 30, 2011, 06:55:39 AM
Whens the last time you got laid? Guessing never
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 07, 2011, 07:49:59 PM
Hawaii Court Sets Hearing About Obama's Missing Birth Certificate: Fox News Reporter Will Be In Attendance


From attorney Orly Taitz: Update! My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am. If you are a resident of Honolulu or if you are visiting Honolulu on October 12th and you are a supporter of mine, please, come to the hearing to support me. First circuit court of HI, Judge Rhonda Nishimura, 777 Punchbowl str., Honolulu, HI, October 12th 8:30 am.

This case was filed against the registrar Alvin Onaka and Director of Health Loretta Fuddy, seeking access to the original birth certificate of Barack Obama for expert examination.

If you are a tea party member in HI, please, relate this message to the Tea Party members, Republican party members or any decent resident of HI, who wants the truth and justice to prevail. Please, relate this message to the local media.

FOX reporter will be in the courtroom during October 12th hearing in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com

All related court filings and news reports for the Taitz v Fuddy lawsuit can be found here and here.
Taitz v Fuddy - Hawaii Circuit Court - Opposition to Motion to Dismiss - 9/30/2011
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 07, 2011, 07:53:36 PM
Dems Want Law To Keep Obama Records Secret
Judicial Watch


Congressman Edolphus Towns
In an obvious effort to protect President Barack Obama, a group of congressional Democrats has introduced legislation to create an official process that will allow the commander-in-chief to keep presidential records secret after he leaves office.

Ironically, Obama revoked a similar George W. Bush order in one of his first official acts as president. In 2001 Bush penned an executive order severely limiting public access to his presidential records. Shortly after swearing in, Obama killed it as part of his much-ballyhooed commitment to government transparency. At the time, the new president claimed that he was giving the American people greater access to “historic documents.”

It was the right move. The Bush Administration did indeed demonstrate a disappointing penchant for secrecy and Judicial Watch was a frontrunner in the effort to make records public. Examples include: The Dick Cheney Energy Task Force records that JW pursued before the United States Supreme Court; Attorney General John Ashcroft’s order advising government agencies to withhold all discretionary disclosures; invoking executive privilege to block the House Government Reform Committee’s probe of the Campaign Financing Task Force.

If the Democrats’ proposed measure (Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2011) becomes law, former presidents will be allowed to assert a new “constitutionally based privilege” against disclosing records of their liking. Here is how it would work; the Archivist of the United States would be required to notify the former president, as well as the incumbent, of intentions to make records public. Anything that either the former or current president claims should be kept private won’t be released.

The veteran Brooklyn congressman (Edolphus Towns) who recently introduced the law in the U.S. House has yet to explain why it’s necessary. What’s certain is that Obama has failed miserably to keep his promise of running the most transparent administration in history. For examples read highlights from Judicial Watch’s testimony before Congress earlier this year. JW was invited to testify in separate House and Senate hearings during “Sunshine Week,” a national initiative by the news media, nonprofits and other organizations to promote government transparency and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/oct/dems-want-law-keep-obama-records-secret

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 03 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: garebear on October 07, 2011, 07:55:44 PM
Globe Magazine: Obama Panicked over Secret Police File
Globe Magazine ^ | September 21, 2011


President Obama is panicking over a secret police file loaded with evidence proving that his birth certificate - is a PHONY! Read all about what's in the file, now in the hands of two police departments, and why it's driving the fearful President to drink - only in the new GLOBE.


(Excerpt) Read more at globemagazine.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You have got to be kidding me.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 13, 2011, 10:13:00 AM
Woman Denied Request To See Obama's Birth Certificate

http://www.khon2.com/news/local/story/Woman-denied-request-to-see-Obamas-birth/y4QI8hJQJUOXLOl1IwWDWw.cspx ^



| 11-12-11 | Jai Cunningham

Posted on Wednesday, October 12, 2011 6:23:15 PM by sklar

A woman who has been seeking to inspect President Barack Obama's original birth certificate has run into another road block.

Circuit Court Judge Rhonda Nishimura granted the state's motion to dismiss a request by Dr. Orly Taitz to see that certificate.

The state says it has verified that the president's birth certificate is real.


(Excerpt) Read more at khon2.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 13, 2011, 12:32:04 PM

Obama should have been deported with Barak Sr.

700 f2d 1156 diaz-salazar v. immigration and naturalization service ^ | October 9, 2011 | edge919




It has been claimed by Obama apologists that in relatively recent cases, circuit courts have given their opinion on the term "natural-born citizen" as meaning nothing more than being born in the country. Supposably this would presume that Obama, if it can be legally proven that he was born in the United States, as he claims, is a natural-born citizen in spite of being born of a foreign national father and NOT being born to citizen parents, as the Supreme Court defined NBC in Minor v. Happersett, etc.

One example of such a recent decision is Diaz-Salazar v. the INS (1982), in which it says:

The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.
But, there's a problem. Following the guidance in this case, the children, despite the claim of being NBCs, would have been deported with their father.

In the case at hand, no special circumstances are presented sufficient to bring petitioner's situation within the extreme hardship standard. His children are still of pre-school age and thus less susceptible to the disruption of education and change of language involved in moving to Mexico. There are no unique reasons why petitioner, in comparison with the many other Mexicans in his situation now resident in the United States, will be unable to find employment upon returning to Mexico or why he or any member of his immediate family requires health care available only here. Thus, although we recognize the unhappy prospects which the petitioner faces, we cannot hold that the BIA abused its discretion in denying the petitioner's motion to reopen deportation proceedings.



(Excerpt) Read more at openjurist.org ...

And there's more. Another case that has been cited is NWANKPA v. KISSINGER (1974), which claims the child of an exchange visitor is a "natural-born citizen".

The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States. It appears from the complaint that the Plaintiff and his wife have adapted well to life in the United States, have actively participated in the educational, civic and social work in this country and have made valuable contributions to the communities in which they have lived. The Plaintiff was originally in this country on an Exchange Visitor Program No. G-I-1, and in 1965, he was transferred to a classification under the Exchange Visitor Program No. P-I-655. His authorization to remain in the United States as a student was extended on several occasions, and on November 5, 1970, his petition for a sixth preference immigrant status was approved.

Here's the problem: "... under the Immigration and Naturalization Act [aliens] must return to their native land for a two-year residential period before seeking to apply for an immigrant visa, or for permanent residence ..." The plaintiff was trying to waive this requirement and the court said no. The problem then is that he AND his family were forced to return to their native country. In a footnote, the court said, after denying the plaintiff's petition:

As quoted in Silverman v. Rogers, supra, 437 F.2d at 106, the judiciary subcommittee stated: "It is believed to be detrimental to the purposes of the program and to the national interests of the countries concerned to apply a lenient policy in the adjudication of waivers including cases where marriage occurring in the United States, or the birth of a child or children, is used to support the contention that the exchange alien's departure from this country would cause personal hardship."

link
What these cases illustrate, is that the courts only take the claim of natural-born citizenship at face value. It's not based on an examination of what the actual legal definition of the term is. Second, in these cases, the children are NOT being treated as natural-born citizens. Children who are allegedly born in the country of nonimmigrant aliens, even those aliens who are legal, are not protected by the law from deportation. IOW, the law doesn’t look or treat these children as “natural-born citizens.” To call such children “natural-born citizens” is therefore nothing more than a wishful delusion.

Next, this shows that birth on U.S. soil to such an alien does not negate the child nor parents from being subject to a foreign power, since they are being forced to leave the United States and return to their native country. Not only then does this negate the idea that such a child is natural born, but it further invalidates any legitimate claim to 14th amendment citizenship.

When we apply these situations to Barry Soebarkah Soetoro Hussein Obama, we see that even if he could prove he was born in the United States, he would not have been legally considered to be a natural-born citizen. Had Obama’s mama gone to Harvard with her husband (instead of having a sham marriage), the whole family would have been sent back to Kenya when Barak's Sr.'s application for temporary stay was denied. And yes, kids, Barak Sr. was being denied the legal right to stay in the United States. See page 20 in the immigration files:

link to immigration file

Natural-born citizens don’t get sent back to their father’s foreign country. Also, Lolo Soetoro's petition to waive the requirement to return to his native country for two years was denied. This is why his family was in effect forced to move to and live in Indonesia. This explains why Obama would have been considered to be an Indonesian citizen (he was most likely adopted and became an automatic Indonesian citizen anyway).

The other point that needs to be emphasized is that these examples illustrate how these children of aliens do not fit the concept of natural born citizen as John Jay wrote about to George Washington. Birth on soil alone would never be sufficient to provide the “strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government.” The law has treated these children of aliens as foreigners who needed to be sent back to their native country. As the child of an alien who was sent back to Kenya, Obama should have been deported along with him. The only thing that saved him was that his mom was evidently dumped before he was born or that there was never any marriage to begin with. Maybe this would make Obama a natural-born bastard. It does NOT make him a natural-born citizen.


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 18, 2011, 05:39:11 AM
Forged creation matches Obama's birth certificate
WND ^ | 10/17/2011 | Jerome P Korsi




This is the first in a two-part series examining how researcher Ron Polland created a forged duplicate of the Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House. This article details the methodology Polland used to deconstruct the White House document for the purpose of reconstructing his forged version. The second article will examine Polland's belief that the White House document was forged and his deductions about the alleged forger.

Researcher Ron Polland, known for his forensic investigation of Barack Obama's short-form birth certificate, now has constructed from scratch a duplicate of the document released by the White House in April, seeking to validate his contention that it was created by a forger.

"I created Obama's short-form birth certificate in 2008," Polland told WND, "and now I made Obama's long-form birth certificate."

As WND previously reported, Polland has demonstrated that during the 2008 presidential election campaign, the White House website posted an image of a short-form Obama Certification of Live Birth that actually was a forgery created by Polland, not a scan of an original certificate obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health.

"My recreation of the short-form was so convincing, the White House posted it on the White House website, claiming it was the real deal," Polland told WND. "In August 2008, I successfully duplicated the short-form in what I believe is the only way it could have been made. Now I have re-created the long-form with a forgery of my own that I believe most people will find hard to distinguish from the forgery the White House released."


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Option D on October 18, 2011, 06:05:43 AM
this is what perplexes me. Im, not sure you really care who is in office. In the grand scheme of things, it wont affect your every day life. Correct. I mean you spend a good majority of your life fishing out articles, pictures, outrageous stories, videos re, the current president. And the rest of your life, you spend cheerleading for the next failed republican front runner. So what does it matter whose running the country, youre going to do the exact same thing.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 18, 2011, 03:17:18 PM
Team Obama sells Birth Certificate mugs
by Charlie Spiering
Commentary Staff WriterFollow on
Twitter:@charliespiering

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/team-obama-sells-birth-certificate-mugs





President Obama is still bugging birthers by rubbing copies of his birth certificate into their faces. Now the campaign is selling "Made in the USA" coffee mugs for Obama supporters. The mugs cost $20.

"There's really no way to make the birth certificate conspiracy completely go away, so we might as well laugh at it -- and make sure as many people as possible are in on the joke." reads the description on the Obama 2012 website. "Get your Made In The USA mug today."

Follow the Washington Examiner on Facebook



________________________ ______________

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on October 18, 2011, 03:19:49 PM
 ::)

tool time with a CT nut job twist. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on October 18, 2011, 03:29:19 PM
Team Obama sells Birth Certificate mugs
by Charlie Spiering
Commentary Staff WriterFollow on
Twitter:@charliespiering

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/team-obama-sells-birth-certificate-mugs





President Obama is still bugging birthers by rubbing copies of his birth certificate into their faces. Now the campaign is selling "Made in the USA" coffee mugs for Obama supporters. The mugs cost $20.

"There's really no way to make the birth certificate conspiracy completely go away, so we might as well laugh at it -- and make sure as many people as possible are in on the joke." reads the description on the Obama 2012 website. "Get your Made In The USA mug today."

Follow the Washington Examiner on Facebook



________________________ ______________



That's actually pretty funny.   :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 24, 2011, 01:24:05 PM
By Kim Geiger
Washington Bureau
October 24, 2011, 7:34 a.m.


After dining last month with Donald Trump, Texas Gov. Rick Perry isn't sure that President Obama's birth certificate is real.

The GOP presidential candidate was asked by Parade magazine whether he believed that Obama was born in the United States.

"I have no reason to think otherwise," he said.

Pressed for a "definitive" answer, Perry continued: "Well, I don't have a definitive answer, because he's never seen my birth certificate."

"But you've seen his," the interviewer replied.

"I don’t know. Have I?" Perry said.

Obama released a certificate of live birth during his 2008 campaign, but that didn't satisfy some people, who questioned whether it was real. The White House released the long-form version of his Hawaii birth certificate earlier this year, but some in the "birther" movement, including Trump, still aren't convinced.

"I don't know," Perry said when asked if he believed the birth certificate was real. "I had dinner with Donald Trump the other night. ... He doesn’t think it’s real. ... I don't have any idea. It doesn't matter. [Obama is] the President of the United States. He's elected. It's a distractive issue."

kim.geiger@latimes.com
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on October 24, 2011, 01:39:25 PM
Rove issues 'birther' warning to Perry
Posted by
CNN Producer Gabriella Schwarz

(CNN) - Karl Rove said Monday that Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry may harm his campaign by stoking the "birther" controversy.

"You associate yourself with a nutty view like that, and you damage yourself," Rove said.

In an interview published Sunday in Parade magazine, Texas Gov. Perry said he believes the president was born in the United States, but was less confident that the birth certificate he released earlier this year was real.

"I don't know. I had dinner with Donald Trump the other night," Perry said. "He doesn't think it's real."

Real estate mogul Donald Trump championed the "birther" movement during his flirtation with a bid for the White House. President Barack Obama, who was born in Hawaii, eventually released the long form version of the document to seemingly combat the growing rumors.

But Rove, who was the chief campaign and message architect for former President George W. Bush, said Perry should not associate with the group.

"I know he went and he's trying to cultivate … Donald Trump, in order to get his endorsement, but this is not the way to go about doing it," Rove said on Fox News. "It starts to marginalize you in the minds of some of the people whom you need in order to get the election."

According to Rove, Perry should have said: "Yes, he [Obama] was born in the United States, yes, he is eligible to serve and don't associate yourself with this nutty fringe group."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/24/rove-issues-birther-warning-to-perry/
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Dos Equis on October 25, 2011, 03:24:38 PM
Haley Barbour To GOP Field: Drop The Birther Talk
First Posted: 10/25/11 11:34 AM ET Updated: 10/25/11 12:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Among the more established and seasoned field of Republican operatives, there is a bit of concern that sideshow issues and partisan flamboyance could muddy a relatively generous 2012 electoral landscape. It's why Texas Gov. Rick Perry's decision to resuscitate skepticism over President Obama's birth certificate seems so out of place. At a time when the Texas Republican is trying to pitch his economic proposals, such as a flat tax, they believe he's trampling on his own message and hurting the party's image as well.

Sure enough, on Tuesday morning, one of the senior statesmen within the GOP, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, warned Perry and others to cut out the birther talk.

"Look, if this election is about Barack Obama's policies and the results of those policies, Barack Obama is going to lose," Barbour said after an appearance with the American Action Forum at the National Press Club. "Any other issue that gets injected to the campaign is not good for the Republicans. Republicans should want this election to be what American presidential elections have always been: a referendum on the incumbent's record. Barack Obama cannot win a second term running on his record. Zero chance. So anybody who talks about anything else is off-subject."

Barbour claimed he had not seen or heard Perry's comments. When informed that the Republican presidential candidate was echoing Donald Trump's questions about Obama's birthplace and his eligibility for the presidency, Barbour continued to plead ignorance.

"He says Trump says it is a fraud," said Barbour. "Well, I don't know what Trump said."

Still, the urgency Barbour was expressing for the GOP to fine-tune its message was clear. Others in the party, wary of fumbling a strong campaign hand, have made similar comments in the past. What's remarkable is that the issue simply doesn't die: indisputable evidence that the president was born in Hawaii has only dampened -- not killed -- the birther chatter.

"The stakes of this election are so high that I think every voter, precinct leader, county chairman, donor, whatever Republican you are talking about wants to be sure we nominate the candidate that has the best chance to beat Obama," Barbour said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/25/haley-barbour-gop-birther_n_1030520.html
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 26, 2011, 08:32:44 PM
Sheriff Joe predicts Obama investigation to be a 'shock' (Video At Link)
wnd.com ^
Posted on October 26, 2011 11:28:16 PM EDT by tsowellfan

'There are a couple of things ... that could be a little bit exciting'

The results of a formal law-enforcement investigation into whether Barack Obama is eligible to be president of the United States could come as a "shock," according to Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Tuesday night, speaking to a tea-party group in Arizona, Arpaio said, "I can't tell you everything, but there could be a shock there somewhere that my guys came up with. I can't talk too much about it. It's in the process."

WND previously has reported that Arpaio has constituted a special five-member law enforcement posse to investigate allegations brought by members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party that the birth certificate released to the public April 27 might be a forgery....

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=360645

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: 240 is Back on October 26, 2011, 08:35:00 PM
Haley Barbour To GOP Field: Drop The Birther Talk


translation?

Gov Perry, STFU... you're embarassing us all.  Obama's on Leno last night mocking the GOP field for being a joke.  You're not going to win, but you're going to stain Romney so bad he loses. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 26, 2011, 08:44:34 PM

translation?

Gov Perry, STFU... you're embarassing us all.  Obama's on Leno last night mocking the GOP field for being a joke.  You're not going to win, but you're going to stain Romney so bad he loses. 

How much is OFA paying you?   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on October 28, 2011, 11:01:46 AM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=360813 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=360813)
Obama's 2012 run to be non-starter?
Lawsuits seeking to stop Democrats from certifying candidate's qualified
October 27, 2011
By Bob Unruh

Just when the White House probably thought those pesky lawsuits seeking a court determination that Barack Obama fails to meet the Constitution's eligibility requirements for a president were finished, something new has appeared on the horizon.

Or in this case, the court docket.

The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed a pair of lawsuits in state and federal courts that don't ask anything about Obama's birth or for any determination from the court about his eligibility. Or his birth certificate, for that matter.

Instead, they name the national Democratic Party as a defendant, and ask the court to enjoin officials there from certifying that Obama is eligible for the office for the 2012 election.

"This complaint does not request or require this court to find that President Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president of the United States. Instead, this complaint is directed toward defining the term 'natural-born citizen' under the Constitution of the United States, and toward negligence or intentional misrepresentations of the Democratic Party.

"This complaint requests this court to affirm the Supreme Court's definition of 'natural-born citizen' as 'all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.'"

That definition comes from the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Minor v. Happersett from 1875.

"This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States."

It continues, "Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama's constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama's natural-born status.

"Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent."

Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, told WND that one lawsuit was filed in federal court in Arizona to focus on the question of defining the term "natural-born citizen" under the Constitution.

"We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9th Circuit. The 9th Circuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit," he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.

Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.

"The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee secretary of state. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama's Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number," he said.

Other lawsuits also are planned, he said.

Irion said that an injunction obtained through the legal actions would deprive Obama of Democrat Party certification.

"Without such certification from the party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election," his organization said in an announcement about the cases.

"Neither lawsuit discusses Obama's place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF's lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined 'natural-born citizen' as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen's birth. Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant," the group said.

"LLF has learned that all states rely upon the truthfulness of representations made by the political parties that their candidates are qualified to hold the federal office for which they are nominated. By naming the National Democratic Party as the defendant LLF not only targets the entity responsible for vetting the Democratic candidate, LLF also avoids taking on any state or federal government.

"The Democratic Party is a private entity, without any government immunities or government procedural advantages," the group said.

LLF also reported it learned that presidential candidates that are registered with the Federal Election Commission have standing to ask a court to keep another candidate off the ballot. Consequently LLF partnered with FEC-registered Dummett, a conservative Republican who believes that the Constitution should be followed.

While WND has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation that Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state's election ballot in 2012, there also are other developments, too.

WND also has reported on an investigation that revealed a major online court opinion resource, Justia.com, allegedly edited references to the Minor v. Happersett court decision from dozens on documents it posted online.

The issue developed when a Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were altered at Justia.com.

The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation's archives that addresses the definition of "natural-born citizen," a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.

That case states:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
There have been multiple court and other challenges to Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office. Essentially they have argued that he either isn't eligible because he wasn't born in Hawaii as he's said, or that he was never qualified because his father was a Kenyan citizen, giving Barack Obama dual citizenship (the U.S. and the United Kingdom) at his birth. Those people argue that the Founders, with their requirement that the president be a "natural-born citizen," disqualified dual citizens.

The White House in April released an image of a "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama's claim that he was born in the state. However, many computer, imaging, document and technology experts have stated it appears to be a forgery.

The image that, for the purposes of the new lawsuits, is irrelevant:
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 28, 2011, 12:36:26 PM
Joe Arpaio On Birther 'Cold Case Posse' To Orly Taitz: 'There Could Be A Shock There Somewhere'
.The Huffington Post   Luke Johnson   
First Posted: 10/28/11 02:10 PM ET Updated: 10/28/11 02:10 PM ET




Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio addressed his 'Cold Case Posse' looking into President Barack Obama's birth certificate at an Arizona tea party meeting with "birther queen" Orly Taitz Tuesday night.

Taitz, who conservative outlet WorldNetDaily says flew in from California on short notice, talked for a few minutes about her claim that the president was not born in the United States. The audience applauded her during her speech, and several members stood up at the end.

"Thanks for your input. We're looking at this very closely," said Arpaio. "I can't tell you everything, but there could be a shock there somewhere that my guys came up with. I can't talk too much about it. It's in the process."

Arpaio said to Taitz, "There are a couple of things you and nobody else here knows anything about yet that could be a little bit exciting."

Arpaio, the sheriff for Phoenix and its environs, repeatedly declined to give specifics on the investigation. "I'm not going to wait forever," he said. "I want to get the report out."

Arpaio defended his 'Cold Case Posse' on local television in September. "I am the chief law enforcement officer, they asked me to look at that situation. I don't dump everything in the wastebasket. So I have my 'Cold Case Posse,' which I've had for five years. It's free. It doesn't cost a penny to the taxpayers. [It's] made up of ex-cops and some lawyers, so let them look at it."

Arpaio has gained national attention for his tough stance on immigration enforcement. He has undertaken many publicized raids in predominately Latino neighborhoods to sweep up undocumented immigrants. A federal grand jury has been investigating him since early 2010 for alleged abuses of power.

President Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, in 1961. Obama's presidential campaign released a digitally-scanned birth certificate and the White House released the long-form document in April. Yet some still refuse to believe that the president was born in the United States.

In April Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) vetoed a bill that would have required presidential candidates to prove their citizenship using a birth certificate or a baptismal or circumcision certificate. "This bill is a distraction, and we just simply need to get on with the state's business," she said at the time.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 29, 2011, 06:42:09 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on October 29, 2011, 10:59:01 AM


I can't believe you still have this stupid birther thread going...EPIC attempt at padding post count
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 29, 2011, 11:03:02 AM
Sheriff Joe has his possee out there and is going to round the Obama caravan of grifters, looters, robbers, drunks, welfare scum, and leeches.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 31, 2011, 06:59:26 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Sheriff Joe's posse delivers promised Obama surprise
WND ^ | OCTOBER 31, 2011 | WND
Posted on October 31, 2011 9:55:28 PM EDT by RobinMasters

Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe Arpaio promised surprises in his jurisdiction's investigation of Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot and his Cold Case Posse is delivering – raising questions that touch on the authenticity of the long-form birth certificate issued last April and the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security Number.

Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies.

The sources say the panel needs to examine the microfilm documenting Obama's birth, as well as the ink-and-paper original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health is holding in its vault.

The PDF file and various scanned copies of the birth certificate that the White House released April 27 are simply not good enough, the posse has determined.

Earlier this month, WND senior staff reporter Jerome R. Corsi spent 18 hours over a two-day period in Arizona briefing the Cold Case Posse on a wide range of evidence regarding Obama's eligibility.

"The posse wants to see the entire microfilm roll containing Obama's birth certificate, not just a microfilm copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate in isolation," Corsi explained. "An individual microfilm copy could be forged, but forging the entire microfilm reel on which Obama's birth certificate is in sequence would be almost impossible."

Also, Corsi said, the posse wants the ink-and-paper original 1961 Obama birth records still held in vault by the Hawaii Department of Health to be released publicly and subjected to independent court-authorized forensic examination.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on November 01, 2011, 10:24:19 AM
Pathetically, I am again getting hopeful on this issue gaining traction. Oh well, won't be the first time the roller-coaster ride has crashed.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on November 01, 2011, 12:22:53 PM
Pathetically, I am again getting hopeful on this issue gaining traction. Oh well, won't be the first time the roller-coaster ride has crashed.

you describe yourself well
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on November 01, 2011, 12:33:14 PM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=362613 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=362613)
Obamacare challenge to cite eligibility doubts
'Mr. Obama has not yet verified whether he is a natural-born citizen'
October 31, 2011
By Bob Unruh

If the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court thought they could avoid the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility simply by refusing to hear any of the multitude of cases concerning the issue they might be surprised to find that briefs regarding Obamacare's constitutionality will include the topic.

Although the Supreme Court has not yet confirmed it will take on the issue of Obamacare's legality, it is widely expected to happen, as there have been opposing decisions at the lower court level which, if left unaddressed, could create a patchwork across the nation of regions where it is – or isn't – the law.

The arguments primarily have focused on the decision by Congress to order all citizens to buy the insurance products that members of Congress specify or face penalties.

But a new friend-of-the-court brief by the Western Center for Journalism in support of those challenging Obamacare takes the argument back to its foundation. The brief, prepared by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, explains that it's not really known yet whether Obamacare is, in fact, the law.

"Federal legislation, to become law, must be signed by a sitting president," the brief, filed just days ago, states.
"The underlying action herein is a dispute over the constitutionality of legislation purportedly signed into law by Barack Obama, acting as president of the United States. However, pursuant to Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 of the U.s. Constitution, legislation passed by both houses of Congress does not become law unless and until it is signed into law by a sitting U.S. president, or both houses of Congress override a sitting president's veto by a two-thirds vote," the brief argues.

"If there was no sitting U.S. president when Obamacare was purportedly signed into law, then the law was never properly enacted, and it is of no force and effect, being void."

The Supreme Court justices repeatedly have refused to address the constitutional questions involved. In fact,that the justices are "avoiding" the Obama issue apparently has been confirmed by one member of the court. Justice Clarence Thomas appeared before a U.S. House subcommittee when the issue arose. Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., raised the question amid a discussion on racial diversity in the judiciary.

"I'm still waiting for the [court decision] on whether or not a Puerto Rican can run for president of the United States," said Serrano, who was born in the island territory. "That's another issue."

Yet after Serrano questioned him on whether or not the land's highest court would be well-served by a justice who had never been a judge, Thomas not only answered in the affirmative but also hinted that Serrano would be better off seeking a seat in the Supreme Court than a chair in the Oval Office.

"I'm glad to hear that you don't think there has to be a judge on the court," said Serrano, "because I'm not a judge; I've never been a judge."

"And you don't have to be born in the United States," said Thomas, referring to the Constitution, which requires the president to be a natural-born citizen but has no such requirement for a Supreme Court justice, "so you never have to answer that question."

"Oh really?" asked Serrano. "So you haven't answered the one about whether I can serve as president, but you answer this one?"

"We're evading that one," answered Thomas, referring to questions of presidential eligibility and prompting laughter in the chamber. "We're giving you another option."

The video:


The arguments on Obamacare are beginning to coalesce as several appellate courts already have ruled on it, and the rulings don't agree with each other. Most of the arguments say it's simply not within the power of Congress to order the purchase of a commercial product under threat of penalty.

Those who oppose the law say that if it is upheld, there is no action that Congress could not require of Americans, such as the purchase of a product or the consumption of a food or an activity, since the Commerce Clause authority would have been extended to cover the actions of any individual sitting in his or her own home.

The Western Center's brief explains the Constitution has simple requirements for a new law: Congress may legislate only through passage of bills which are approved by both Houses and signed by the president.

"Since a piece of legislation becomes law immediately upon the signature of the president, then there must be an eligible person sitting in the office of president of the United States to sign it. There are two requirements for a person to be eligible to hold the office of president … having either received a majority of the Electoral College votes, or having succeeded a prior president following his, or her, death or constitutional disability, and (2) meeting the minimum eligibility for the office."

Under the Constitution, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of 35 years, and been 14 years a resident with the United States."

The brief states "there is no question as to whether Mr. Obama received the requisite votes from the Electoral College. However, Mr. Obama has not yet verified whether he meets all the requirements for minimum eligibility, namely whether he is a natural born citizen."

The brief states that "a provision of the U.S. Constitution may not be disregarded by means of a popular vote of the people, as there are specific guidelines for amending the Constitution of the United States."

There are ways to change the Constitution, by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress and ratification of three-fourths of all state legislatures.

The brief argues that voters simply do not have the power to determine the eligibility of candidates, and the Constitution must be followed or else the nation would be reduced to "the whims of the majority of voters."

"The proper remedy for eligibility disputes is to bring such disputes to the court for a determination … and this court has the power to make determinations of fact and law regarding controversies over the eligibility of an officeholder," it said.

"The issue of the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama Jr. substantially impacts on the determination of whether the legislation commonly known as Obamacare was ever properly enacted, for, if he is not eligible to serve as president of the United States, Obamacare was never properly enacted, and, as a result, it never legally had any force or effect."

The brief also argues that the mandate for individuals to buy products also is well beyond the reach of the federal government's authority, and so Obamacare should be overturned based on that as well.

The brief cites a case that has been pending since the 2008 election before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concerning eligibility.


The plaintiffs alleged that Obama's qualifications were not checked properly, resulting in a violation of the U.S. Constitution. It argues that a man is occupying the Oval Office who does not meet the requirements of "natural-born" citizenship.

California attorney Orly Taitz told WND her hope is for a decision that will return the case to the district court for proceedings, which could include a discovery process through which a large number of Obama's life documents could be obtained. She is representing one set of plaintiffs in the case.

Another set of plaintiffs is being represented by Kreep.

Since his election, sometimes using private attorneys and sometimes using taxpayer-funded legal teams, Obama has battled almost six dozen lawsuits across the country, including several that reached the U.S. Supreme Court, to keep his records concealed from the public.

Taitz' case cites the removal of Thomas H. Moodie from the office of governor in North Dakota in the 1930s as proof that a government's chief officer can be removed from office by the courts – even after an election and inauguration. Moodie had failed to meet a state residency requirement to be governor. But he was elected anyway, installed and ultimately removed from office by the court over that failure.

The plaintiffs also cite an earlier California case in which a candidate for president was removed from the ballot by state officials because he failed to qualify for the office under the Constitution's age requirements.

Even though Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth" was released by the White House, still-withheld documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: MB on November 01, 2011, 12:36:14 PM
I love the fact that a county sheriff has a posse investigating the president.  
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 02, 2011, 04:05:17 AM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Certifigate : Sheriff Joe: 'Show me the microfilm!'
WND ^ | November 01, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on November 2, 2011 2:33:17 AM EDT by RobinMasters

Sheriff Joe Arpaio came up with the idea to demand the original microfilm of Obama's birth certificate after he saw evidence from his Cold Case Posse in Maricopa County, Ariz., that the White House apparently released to the public three different versions of the long-form birth certificate.

"Show me the microfilm, not the copies the White House released," Arpaio has insisted.

What the White House released on April 27 were not original documents but purportedly scans of original birth documents that remain in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.

WND reported yesterday that in 1966, the Hawaii Depatment of Health provided microfilm copies to Mrs. Eleanor Nordyke of the birth certificates for her twins, born the day after Obama in the same hospital.

"Obama's birth certificate is either on that microfilm roll along with the Nordyke twins' birth certificate, or it's not," Arpaio said.

Sources close to the sheriff's law enforcement investigation explained to WND that Arpaio had come up with a solution to end almost immediately a controversy over the Obama birth certificate that has continued since 2008.

"If the microfilm exists, show us the reel. That's the best evidence the document existed in 1961, not the three different versions the White House released on April 27."

The White House released three versions of Obama's long-form birth certificate, each one of which appears fundamentally different from the other two.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Click to Add Topic
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on November 08, 2011, 08:15:10 AM
Is this stupid thread still going? Stupid virgin 333386
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2011, 08:26:53 AM
Is this stupid thread still going? Stupid virgin 333386
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on November 08, 2011, 08:27:03 AM
This is the energizer thread.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on November 08, 2011, 11:30:35 AM
(http://www.phylliswoods.org/images/pink_elephant.gif)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on November 08, 2011, 11:57:52 AM
F_ _ _!!!

I was totally dismissing the Bâri′ M. Shabazz story. Sounded REALLY out there.

Original "Bâri′, Barry, Barack" story
http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari′-barry-barack/ (http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari′-barry-barack/)

Possibly related
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1373780/Mystery-scars-Obamas-head-begs-question--President-brain-surgery.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1373780/Mystery-scars-Obamas-head-begs-question--President-brain-surgery.html)

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-hussein.html (http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-hussein.html)
Monday, November 7, 2011
Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?
Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?


                                                        By Mario Apuzzo
                                                       November 7, 2011

On November 2, 2011, I published an article entitled and asking the question, “Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City? ”, accessed at
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-barack-hussein-obama-ii-really-bari.html. The basis of the question that I asked came from a November 2, 2011 breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack, accessed at http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari%e2%80%b2-barry-barack/. In her article, Ms. Trowbridge’s contends that putative President Barack Hussein Obama II’s real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz and that his date of birth is October 28, 1959, and his social security number is 084-54-5926. She says he was born in New York City. She adds that he was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz. She also says that to be able to enter the political world, Bâri′ M. Shabazz had to change his birth identity and take on a new one which became Barack Hussein Obama II.

Ms. Trowbridge says: “We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.”

Ms. Trowbridge has found that the Social Security Death Index shows: “SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926.” From this, one would think that Bâri′ died in August 1994. But no, Ms. Trowbridge informs that only his identity was made “dead.” The real person continued to live and that person became “Barack Hussein Obama II.” Note how she explains that the “death” of Bâri′ was only reported by someone (“V” or “Verified”) and that the person did not present any valid death certificate (“P” or “Proof).

What’s more Ms. Trowbridge explains that “

Finally, and the most shocking part of her report is that Ms. Trowbridge contends that Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the biological son of Malcolm X. Hence, if Barack Hussein Obama II is the same person as Bâri′ M. Shabazz, that would make putative President Obama the biological son of Malcolm X.

On November 4, 2011, an anonymous source emailed me something very interesting. To substantiate the content of the email, the writer directed me to go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts. The anonymous source had done just that and so the person provided me with the information which that traffic court shows on its web site.

I did go to the Hawaii traffic court’s web site which is called eCourt Kokua and I was eventually able to confirm the information that the anonymous source sent me. Access to the court’s web set may be gained by going to http://jimspss1.courts.state.hi.us:8080/eCourt/ECC/ECCDisclaimer.iface;jsessionid=FDFF513AA90109AC4375A7CBE7C8AF36 (http://jimspss1.courts.state.hi.us:8080/eCourt/ECC/ECCDisclaimer.iface;jsessionid=FDFF513AA90109AC4375A7CBE7C8AF36). Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.” The following report appears:











What do these reports say and what questions does they raise? The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at
45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI  96744
. The case was continued to April 5, 1982.

The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.

On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”

The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.

The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”

This information raises the following questions:

1. Is the Bari Shabazz named in this traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? If it is the same person, then that puts New Yorker Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, on March 12, 1982. Using a date of birth of October 28, 1959, this would have made Bâri′ M. Shabazz 22 years old at the time that he had this major automobile accident in Honolulu County.

2. The accident is characterized as a major accident. Chances are that Bari Shabazz and/or any passenger was taken to a local hospital in Honolulu County due to his/their injuries. If Bari Shabazz suffered any major injuries or laceration, the physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations could still be present somewhere on his body if he is still alive.

3. Bari Shabazz was charged with driving without a driver’s license. The court ordered him to show proof of his New York driver’s license. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have told the charging police officer or the court that he did have a driver’s license and that it was one issued by the State of New York. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have been a resident of the State of New York. Note that Ms. Trowbridge said that Bâri′ M. Shabazz was born in New York City. Also, what was Bari Shabazz doing driving in Hawaii with what should have been a New York driver’s license? Was he now living in Hawaii? Was he there on vacation? Was he there visiting family or friends? Was he going to school there?

4. On April 9, 2003, the prosecutor filed a motion to recall the bench warrant, to terminate prosecution, and close the case. Why would this case come to the attention of some local prosecutor 21 years following the initial violation of March 12, 1982? A local prosecutor does not just go looking for cases that are 21 years old and file motions to dismiss those cases. Someone must have asked that local prosecutor to dismiss the case so that the arrest warrant was cleared from the court’s and nation’s computer system.

5. Ms. Trowbridge shows that Bâri′ M. Shabazz, according to the Social Security Death Index, died in August 1994. If Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the same person as is listed in this Hawaii auto accident as Bari Shabazz, why would someone care to recall his arrest warrant on April 9, 2003 or almost 9 years after his death? Surely, it could not be Bâri′ M. Shabazz who was interested since he had been dead since 1994. On the other hand, if he was not dead he would be interested.

6. On October 30, 2005, or 23 years following the date of the accident of March 12, 1982, the court again re-visits the case of Bari Shabazz, noting that he did not owe the court any money but to “Pls. check.” Why would the court again concern itself with this case on that date, especially if Bari Shabazz was dead since 1994?

7. So, is the Bari Shabazz named in this Hawaii traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? That question surely merits an investigation. If he is, then that puts the New-York-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, the alleged birth place and once place of residence of putative President, Barack Hussein Obama II. Given what Ms. Trowbridge has concluded in her report, that is a circumstantial piece of evidence that is surely worth investigating. What also supports Ms. Trowbridge’s position that Bâri′ M. Shabazz really did not die in August 1994 and that he is still alive as Barack Hussein Obama II is that the traffic court in Hawaii was still acting on the Bari Shabazz traffic case 9 and 11 years after the alleged death in August 1994 of Bâri′ M. Shabazz. What needs to be investigated is why the local prosecutor and court took those actions so many years after the traffic accident and at whose behest.

8. Finally, when there is an auto accident, the police do a detailed accident report. That report includes the name, addresses, date of birth, and social security number of the person involved in the accident who is charged for that accident. The driver’s license number is also included if that license is produced or otherwise verified. A physical description of the defendant is also included. The make of auto, including the year made and VIN number are also included, along with statements of witnesses. There could be a photograph of the defendant in the police record. A thorough investigation of this matter would surely include searching the police record in Honolulu County for this report so that this information may be examined and evaluated.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2011, 01:26:37 PM
Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice?
Obama release Your Records ^ | November 7, 2011 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq.





On November 2, 2011, I published an article entitled and asking the question, “Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City? ”, accessed at here. The basis of the question that I asked came from a November 2, 2011 breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack, accessed at here. In her article, Ms. Trowbridge’s contends that putative President Barack Hussein Obama II’s real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz and that his date of birth is October 28, 1959, and his social security number is 084-54-5926. She says he was born in New York City. She adds that he was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz. She also says that to be able to enter the political world, Bâri′ M. Shabazz had to change his birth identity and take on a new one which became Barack Hussein Obama II.

Ms. Trowbridge says: “We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.”

Ms. Trowbridge has found that the Social Security Death Index shows: “SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926.” From this, one would think that Bâri′ died in August 1994. But no, Ms. Trowbridge informs that only his identity was made “dead.” The real person continued to live and that person became “Barack Hussein Obama II.” Note how she explains that the “death” of Bâri′ was only reported by someone (“V” or “Verified”) and that the person did not present any valid death certificate (“P” or “Proof).

What’s more Ms. Trowbridge explains that “

Finally, and the most shocking part of her report is that Ms. Trowbridge contends that Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the biological son of Malcolm X. Hence, if Barack Hussein Obama II is the same person as Bâri′ M. Shabazz, that would make putative President Obama the biological son of Malcolm X.

On November 4, 2011, an anonymous source emailed me something very interesting. To substantiate the content of the email, the writer directed me to go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts. The anonymous source had done just that and so the person provided me with the information which that traffic court shows on its web site.

I did go to the Hawaii traffic court’s web site which is called eCourt Kokua and I was eventually able to confirm the information that the anonymous source sent me. Access to the court’s web set may be gained by going to http://jimspss1.courts.state.hi.us:8080/eCourt/ECC/ECCDisclaimer.iface;jsessionid=FDFF513AA90109AC4375A7CBE7C8AF36. Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.” The following report appears: (Click each image to enlarge)









What do these reports say and what questions does they raise? The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at 45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744 . The case was continued to April 5, 1982.

The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.

On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”

The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.

The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”

This information raises the following questions:

1. Is the Bari Shabazz named in this traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? If it is the same person, then that puts New Yorker Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, on March 12, 1982. Using a date of birth of October 28, 1959, this would have made Bâri′ M. Shabazz 22 years old at the time that he had this major automobile accident in Honolulu County.

2. The accident is characterized as a major accident. Chances are that Bari Shabazz and/or any passenger was taken to a local hospital in Honolulu County due to his/their injuries. If Bari Shabazz suffered any major injuries or laceration, the physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations could still be present somewhere on his body if he is still alive.

3. Bari Shabazz was charged with driving without a driver’s license. The court ordered him to show proof of his New York driver’s license. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have told the charging police officer or the court that he did have a driver’s license and that it was one issued by the State of New York. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have been a resident of the State of New York. Note that Ms. Trowbridge said that Bâri′ M. Shabazz was born in New York City. Also, what was Bari Shabazz doing driving in Hawaii with what should have been a New York driver’s license? Was he now living in Hawaii? Was he there on vacation? Was he there visiting family or friends? Was he going to school there?

4. On April 9, 2003, the prosecutor filed a motion to recall the bench warrant, to terminate prosecution, and close the case. Why would this case come to the attention of some local prosecutor 21 years following the initial violation of March 12, 1982? A local prosecutor does not just go looking for cases that are 21 years old and file motions to dismiss those cases. Someone must have asked that local prosecutor to dismiss the case so that the arrest warrant was cleared from the court’s and nation’s computer system.

5. Ms. Trowbridge shows that Bâri′ M. Shabazz, according to the Social Security Death Index, died in August 1994. If Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the same person as is listed in this Hawaii auto accident as Bari Shabazz, why would someone care to recall his arrest warrant on April 9, 2003 or almost 9 years after his death? Surely, it could not be Bâri′ M. Shabazz who was interested since he had been dead since 1994. On the other hand, if he was not dead he would be interested.

6. On October 30, 2005, or 23 years following the date of the accident of March 12, 1982, the court again re-visits the case of Bari Shabazz, noting that he did not owe the court any money but to “Pls. check.” Why would the court again concern itself with this case on that date, especially if Bari Shabazz was dead since 1994?

7. So, is the Bari Shabazz named in this Hawaii traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? That question surely merits an investigation. If he is, then that puts the New-York-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, the alleged birth place and once place of residence of putative President, Barack Hussein Obama II. Given what Ms. Trowbridge has concluded in her report, that is a circumstantial piece of evidence that is surely worth investigating. What also supports Ms. Trowbridge’s position that Bâri′ M. Shabazz really did not die in August 1994 and that he is still alive as Barack Hussein Obama II is that the traffic court in Hawaii was still acting on the Bari Shabazz traffic case 9 and 11 years after the alleged death in August 1994 of Bâri′ M. Shabazz. What needs to be investigated is why the local prosecutor and court took those actions so many years after the traffic accident and at whose behest.

8. Finally, when there is an auto accident, the police do a detailed accident report. That report includes the name, addresses, date of birth, and social security number of the person involved in the accident who is charged for that accident. The driver’s license number is also included if that license is produced or otherwise verified. A physical description of the defendant is also included. The make of auto, including the year made and VIN number are also included, along with statements of witnesses. There could be a photograph of the defendant in the police record. A thorough investigation of this matter would surely include searching the police record in Honolulu County for this report so that this information may be examined and evaluated.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. November 7, 2011 http://puzo1.blogspot.com


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on November 08, 2011, 01:45:56 PM
hmmmm  posting in stereo. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 09, 2011, 07:20:55 AM
Boston Globe reporter withholds Obama file birth (narrative doesn't match up with INS reports)
wnd ^ | Jerome Corsi

Posted on Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:09:04 AM by tutstar

A Boston Globe reporter sympathetic to Barack Obama apparently received favored access to the immigration file of the president's father.

In writing her biography of Barack Obama's father, Boston Globe reporter Sally H. Jacobs had access to what appears to be the father's unredacted Immigration and Naturalization Service file. The documents cover the time Barack Obama Sr. arrived in Honolulu in 1959 until he was forced to leave the United States in 1964.

However, the redacted file the Department of Homeland Security provided in an Freedom of Information Act request to independent reporter Heather Smathers whited-out key facts about the president's birth narrative, judging from the one unredacted page WND has obtained.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 09, 2011, 08:25:34 PM
Sheriff Joe Receiving Death Threats For Probing Obama's Eligibility
WND ^ | 11/9/2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on November 9, 2011 11:11:06 PM EST by Just4Him

Sheriff Joe threatened for probing eligibility Says intimidation comes from drug lords, Obama fans: 'I'm not sure which are worse'

Amid death threats, Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio is scratching his head over the major media's virtual silence about his decision to investigate Barack Obama's eligibility to run for re-election.

"Getting death threats is nothing new for me," Arpaio told WND, referring to his national reputation as a tough enforcer of immigration laws. "But why has the media has decided to black out all news of our Obama investigation? That's what I don't understand.

"I'm a controversial guy and usually the media is all over me," he continued, "but when I decided to investigate Obama, the media has suddenly gone missing in action."

Arpaio said that if the media's strategy is to minimize the impact of his investigation by ignoring it, it is not likely to work.

"If the mainstream media thinks our investigation will go away if it remains unreported, they're wrong. The investigation is proceeding, and I fully anticipate we will publish a report early next year."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; Click to Add Keyword
[ Report Abuse | Bookmark ]
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on November 10, 2011, 09:46:16 AM
Pictured below is the number of ppl who care




































 ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on November 10, 2011, 12:49:30 PM
Pictured below is the number of ppl who care

 ;D

Oopsie, you forgot the attachment
(http://www.jeffhead.com/912teaparty/912-TeaParty-DC-09.jpg)
(http://www.jeffhead.com/912teaparty/912-TeaParty-DC-01.jpg)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 14, 2011, 08:05:34 PM
New Evidence of Document Fraud Uncovered and New Lawsuit Being Filed in Hawaii (Calm Before Storm)
BirtherReport.com ^ | November 14, 2011 | Dean Haskins
Posted on November 14, 2011 9:34:32 PM EST by Seizethecarp

In our last press release, we stated that we had been doing some investigative work, but could not detail our location, due to the sensitive nature of the work we were doing. At this point, The Birther Summit is able to state that our investigation encompassed the greater Honolulu area, where, for two weeks, we were able to uncover key pieces of evidence regarding what are believed by many to be fraudulent documents that have been released to the public.

While we are not yet at liberty to discuss the details of the evidence, due to specific restraints placed upon us by counsel, please be aware that we are merely experiencing the calm before the storm. Once there is a lawsuit filed in Honolulu, we are confident that counsel will allow us to share the vital evidence that will be presented to the court for scrutiny, so that the citizens of this country will be able to weigh it for themselves.

From Honolulu, we headed straight to Phoenix, AZ where we had a lengthy meeting with the lead investigator in Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse. In that meeting, we were able to establish a working relationship whereby we shared the information we had uncovered in our investigation, as well as committed to sharing any future data, including the proceedings of the lawsuit that will be filed soon. Based upon that meeting, we are confident in Sheriff Joe's investigation, as we encountered the highest level of law enforcement professionalism.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on November 15, 2011, 10:18:07 AM
Thank you for moving this OzmO. It makes it much easier to find. It was getting pushed too far down on the other board.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on November 15, 2011, 05:05:46 PM
No Problem FRL.   :)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on November 16, 2011, 10:33:09 AM
Interesting reading. Go to link to access more links with info. Also, more than posted here at Butterzillion's site..
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/ (http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/)
My dear readers: Today I have posted a bunch of important information. I have been absent from the comments because I have been working on these things, some of them to address input in the comments. I put all this stuff up now to make sure it gets out there and so I can take a break for a while and leave the information in the hands of the capable and dedicated people who are pushing to see the rule of law re-established. All along I’ve wanted to do the research and hand it off to somebody who would run with it so I could in good conscience go back to living a normal life. I’ll try to approve comments and I may be in and out but at this point none of the research matters unless we get either a court or a prosecutor to subpoena the embedded computer transaction logs  which alone will tell us the real story of Obama’s records and the actions of the HDOH.

I’m asking each one of you to use this information to inform the public, leaders, and law enforcement of exactly why we need a criminal investigation and/or a lawsuit with standing so that the embedded transaction logs can be subpoenaed and we can get real answers. We need to work our buns off to get a state law passed which merely grants legal standing to any legal resident to challenge presidential eligibility.   

God bless and keep us all.

Much love, Nellie     

NEW: HDOH Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara  This one is critical. The HDOH says they can’t find any birth record under Virginia Sunahara’s name even though she is listed in their 1960-64 birth index. Much more.

NEW: 1960-64 Birth Index Includes Legally Invalid Records .  This one is also critical. The 1960-64 birth index includes the birth names of at least 2 adopted children. Those records are required to be sealed, and their inclusion in the public list indicates that the list has been manipulated by the HDOH. At this point we have no way of knowing whether any name listed in the birth index represents a legally-valid record.

NEW: HDOH Has Two Different Versions of 1960-64 Birth Index. The HDOH sent me copies of the exact same page from the 1960-64 Birth Index Book, 2 months apart. But one has the date range heading and the other doesn’t. Either there are 2 versions of the 1960-64 birth index, or they are altering pages from it at will.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 17, 2011, 01:26:31 PM
New Hampshire Wakes Up to Obama's Social Security Fraud
WorldNetDaily ^ | November 16, 2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:31:19 PM by circumbendibus

A hearing is scheduled in front of the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission on Friday to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, that raises allegations of fraudulent documents and fraudulent Social Security Number use on the part of Barack Obama.


The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present.


The state holds the first primary for presidential elections, and that is scheduled for Jan. 10, 2012.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 20, 2011, 03:54:35 PM
Release the Mugs (Obama for America's Alinski fundraising off Taitz in NH and Arpaio's posse)
Obama for America ^ | November 19, 2011 | Julianna Smoot
Posted on November 20, 2011 1:13:04 PM EST by Seizethecarp

Yesterday, four Republicans in the New Hampshire State House allowed a hearing requested by Orly Taitz, the notorious dentist-lawyer-birther who wants President Obama officially removed from the state's primary ballot.

So in honor of conspiracy theorists everywhere, we're re-releasing the campaign's limited-edition "Made in the USA" mugs.

There's clearly nothing we can do to satisfy this crowd—or anyone else who insists on wasting time and energy on nonsense like this.

But when it starts to make your head hurt, I've found the best remedy is to have some tea in my "Made in the USA" mug.

Works like a charm. I recommend Earl Grey.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 20, 2011, 04:41:56 PM
New Hampshire Wakes Up to Obama's Social Security Fraud
WorldNetDaily ^ | November 16, 2011 | Bob Unruh
Posted on November 16, 2011 9:31:19 PM EST by circumbendibus

A hearing is scheduled in front of the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission on Friday to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, that raises allegations of fraudulent documents and fraudulent Social Security Number use on the part of Barack Obama.

The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present.

The state holds the first primary for presidential elections, and that is scheduled for Jan. 10, 2012.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 20, 2011, 04:59:43 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2739102/posts


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on November 23, 2011, 03:33:29 PM
[...] Orly Taitz [...]

LOL. Orly Taitz. What a joke.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on November 23, 2011, 03:41:26 PM
LOL. Orly Taitz. What a joke.

(http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/entries/icons/original/000/000/015/orly.jpg?1229112642)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 24, 2011, 04:18:10 AM
New Hampshire 'Birther' Hearing: State Attorney General Michael Delaney Calls For Investigation

The Huffington Post   Luke Johnson
First Posted: 11/23/11 01:37 PM ET Updated: 11/23/11 02:03 PM ET
React
Important
Funny
Typical
Scary
Outrageous
Amazing
Innovative
Finally
Follow
  Orly Taitz ,   Video , O'Brien , Obama Birth Certificate , Ballot Law Commission , Bill o'Brien , Birther , Birther Movement , Harry Accornero , Matt Mavrogeorge , Mavrogeorge , Michael Delaney , New Hampshire Birther , New Hampshire Birther Hearing , Politics News
SHARE THIS STORY

342
25
37

Get Politics Alerts
 Sign Up
Submit this story
New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney asked State Police to investigate a Ballot Law Commission hearing on Friday involving several state representatives and "birther queen" Orly Taitz that turned ugly after the committee unanimously rejected an effort to have Obama removed from the state presidential ballot because she claimed that his birth certificate was a fake.

Taitz testified before the committee, alleging the president's social security number was not valid and his birth certificate was forged. The committee rejected her argument, saying it did not have the jurisdiction to assess the validity of the document.

The White House released the president's long-form birth certificate in April after his campaign released a scanned copy. Some, however, refuse to believe that Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.

"Traitors!" shouted one woman after the committee vote. "Shame on you!" yelled another.

"Saying a treasonous liar can go on our ballot?" yelled Republican state Rep. Harry Accornero after the meeting. Accornero and Republican state Rep. Susan DeLemus yelled in Assistant Attorney General Matt Mavrogeorge's face after the hearing, according to a memorandum he wrote. DeLemus demanded an answer from Mavrogeorge on "whether the United States Constitution trumps New Hampshire's laws regarding the qualifications for president." After the hearing, he and Assistant Secretary of State Karen Ladd locked themselves in an office and called capitol security and the attorney general's office. Crowd members yelled and banged on his door, he said.

Delaney wrote that he was "extremely concerned that a member of my staff was put in a position of fearing for his safety" in a letter to the state police.

Republican state House Speaker Bill O'Brien cancelled a planned Tuesday meeting between himself and nine Republican representatives who doubt Obama's citizenship because of the pending investigations. He also asked State House security to investigate the incident.

Accornero told the Concord Monitor that he did not think the investigations are necessary. "A lot of us were - I wouldn't even say angry, but just upset about how the system works," he said. "People have a right to express their opinion."
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on November 24, 2011, 10:56:29 AM
Wow... These people are fucking insane.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on December 02, 2011, 06:57:11 PM
http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2010/03/top-five-birther-debate-tactics.html (http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2010/03/top-five-birther-debate-tactics.html)

Top Five Birther Debate Tactics
As an aid to my fellow Americans who might find themselves confronted with a Birther and his arguments, I thought to prepare a top ten list of rhetorical devices that Birthers tend to use when confronted with counter-arguments and evidence that contradicts their existing beliefs. Learning to recognize these methods and logical fallacies is the first step in promoting useful dialogue and avoiding unnecessary conflict. And as might be appropriate for April Fools Day, it should serve as a handy list of the most common ways that Birthers try to fool others everyday.

However, as I attempted to assemble a list, I was amused to find that I could not think of ten different Birther devices. Rather, the typical Birther responses to critical analysis of their position can be broken down into as few as five categories.

Note, this is a breakdown of Birther responses to questions or criticism, not initial Birther arguments. Those can be summed up largely as Argument from Ignorance (something is true because we don't know it isn't true) and Misrepresenting Evidence (take your pick). These items below are the ways that Birthers respond to challenges to their statements, positions, or worldview.

5. Ad Hominem Attacks

Here, the Birther responds to substantive criticism not by defending his position, but by levying a personal attack upon the questioner, or upon a third party (such as Obama, or FactCheck, or a judge). The subject itself is evaded entirely, and the Birther substitutes an on-topic response with mocking of the questioner, smearing of a third party, or making negative insinuations about whoever might disagree with them.

EXAMPLE: Marvin stated that "the Senate held hearings regarding McCain’s natural born citizenship." I responded to Marvin showing that no such hearings ever took place, and that the only testimony was a single question during a Judiciary Committee briefing. Marvin's entire response was "Your hatred of those questioning your pres_ _ent is coloring your mind. Maybe the kneepads are too tight?" As you see, rather than defend his previous statement, Marvin completely ignored my factual evidence and chose to redirect the subject of the conversation to be about me, making accusations about my emotional state, my mental acuity, and my partisan stance.

4. Special Pleading / Conspiracy Pleading

Special pleading is a logical fallacy where one deflects criticism by concocting an external rationale as to why the usual rules of evidence should not apply to the argument they're making. With Birthers, this most often takes the form of suggesting or implying the existence of a covert conspiracy that has interfered with the available evidence. When confronted with evidence that contradicts Birther beliefs, the Birther alleges that the conspiracy created that evidence to fool the public. When confronted with the lack of evidence supporting Birther beliefs, the Birther alleges that the conspiracy has destroyed or hidden all the secret evidence that would support his beliefs.

EXAMPLE: Birth announcements of Obama's birth were found in two Hawaii newspapers. Solid evidence, no? But Ron responded to this evidence by proposing an elaborate scheme whereby the library's microfiche was altered or forged. The end result is that the birth announcements are discounted because Ron thinks the conspirators created them.

3. Moving the Goalposts

Sometimes new evidence presents itself that meets a Birther's previously-stated evidentiary demand. When confronted with this new evidence, such as newspaper birth announcements or official health official statements, the Birther response is to claim that that new evidence, despite being what they had previously demanded, is now insufficient to satisfy them. So it's no longer enough that the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health issued a statement, they want the Hawaiian Governor to issue a statement too. This turns any attempt to satisfy the Birther's curiosity into a neverending marathon, as the Birther's standard of proof continues to grow higher and higher.

EXAMPLE: "Steven" complained that when Obama took the Oath of Office a second time, the "redo was held a few days later, no witness, no media, behind closed doors." I pointed out that not only was this incorrect in several respects, but CBS Radio released an audio recording of the second oath. "Steven" responded not by conceding his mistake, but only by demanding video footage in addition to the available audio and photographic record.

2. Shifting the Burden / Refusing to Prove Factual Claims

Given the frequency with which Birthers fall back on unsourced claims, a ready response is often to simply ask the Birther to produce a source for his factual claim. On the occasions that the Birther is willing to actually stay on topic (as opposed to the responses exemplified by Tactics 1, 4, or 5), the most common reaction is to refuse to provide any evidence for the factual claim they just made, and to instead tell the skeptic to go look for it himself. This not only allows the Birther to create work for the skeptic but not himself, but it also allows the Birther to claim that any failure to find evidence supporting his factual assertion is the fault of the skeptic questioning the alleged fact, rather than the fault of the Birther who made the questionable assertion.

EXAMPLE: Leonard wrote of Obama that there are "a few witnesses claiming he was born in Kenya." I asked him who. He cited a supposed encounter between Jerome Corsi and a Kenyan health official. Having never heard of such an encounter, I asked Leonard where Corsi reported this event. Leonard's response was "Do your own searches." He never produced any evidence to support his initial claim of witnesses or his specific claim of a Corsi conversation. Instead, he acted like it was my job to find evidence of his claims.

1. Non-Sequiturs / Changing the Subject

My personal favorite of all Birther debating tactics, because they utilize it so incredibly often. If a Birther finds himself pinned down on a position or statement that he simply cannot defend, he will frequently avoid conceding by attempting to shift the topic of discussion to another Birther topic. And often, it will be a topic that is less factually-specific and more speculative or interpretative, and thus less susceptible to absolute proof of falsehood.

Point out that there never was a Pakistani travel ban, and the Birther starts talking about adoption. Illustrate that it was TechDude who made up the claim about Maya's COLB, and suddenly the Birther wants to talk about Vattel. By shifting the focus onto an unrelated issue, the Birther attempts to take the attention off the demonstratably false factual situation, hoping that the new issue will be a distraction.

EXAMPLE: Steve was confronted with the allegation that he is not the credentialed expert that he has posed as and as other Birthers have treated him. Does Steve have forensic experience or not? Steve could have answered the question, or at least address it, but he didn't. Instead, he penned a lengthy response where he completely ignored the questions about his document experience, and opts to talk about about everything from Perkins Coie to citizen grand juries to criminal conspiracies to Obama's poll numbers to Bill Richardson quotes to the issue of legal standing. Having been caught in a statement he cannnot defend, Steve started throwing out multiple other topics in the hopes of diverting attention away from his original, unsupportable position.

-----

So if you find yourself tangling with a Birther, and you get one of the above responses, consider replying with a simple number citation and a link to this post. Whatever you do, don't allow yourself to get distracted by tricks like these.

Fair warning, though: don't be surprised if failing to fall for tricks #1-4 results in #5 being levied at you soon thereafter.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 02, 2011, 07:03:47 PM
I'm still a birther. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 05, 2011, 12:08:58 PM
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/12/01/debunking-the-new-natural-born-citizen-congressional-research-propaganda/#comments (http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/12/01/debunking-the-new-natural-born-citizen-congressional-research-propaganda/#comments)

Debunking The New Natural Born Citizen Congressional Research Propaganda.

Yesterday, attorney Jack Maskell issued yet another version of his everchanging Congressional Research Memo on POTUS eligibility and the natural-born citizen clause.  The CRS memo is actually a blessing for me in that I’ve been putting a comprehensive report together on this issue for about a month now.  But not having an official source standing behind the entire body of propaganda made my job more difficult.
The complete refutation will be available soon, but for now I will highlight one particularly deceptive example which illustrates blatant intellectual dishonesty.  On pg. 48, Maskell states:

In one case concerning the identity of a petitioner, the Supreme Court of the United States explained that “t is not disputed that if petitioner is the son” of two Chinese national citizens who were physically in the United States when petitioner was born, then he is “a natural born American citizen ….”221

221 Kwok Jan Fat v. White, 253 U.S. 454, 457 (1920). The Supreme Court also noted there: “It is better that many Chinese immigrants should be improperly admitted than that one natural born citizen of the United States should be permanently excluded from his country.” 253 U.S. at 464.

Reading this yesterday, I had a fleeting moment of self-doubt.  Could I have missed this case?  Did the Supreme Court really state that the son of two aliens was a natural-born citizen?  The Twilight Zone theme suddenly chimed in.  I then clicked over to the actual case, and of course, the Supreme Court said no such thing.

The petitioner was born in California to parents who were both US citizens.  His father was born in the United States and was a citizen by virtue of the holding in US v. Wong Kim Ark.  His mother’ place of birth was not mentioned.  Regardless, she was covered by the derivative citizenship statute, and was, therefore, a US citizen when the child was born.

It was alleged that the petitioner had obtained a false identity and that the citizen parents were not his real parents.  But the Supreme Court rejected the State’s secret evidence on this point and conducted their citizenship analysis based upon an assumption these were petitioner’s real parents.

Having been born in the US of parents who were citizens, petitioner was indeed a natural-born citizen.  But Maskell’s frightening quotation surgery makes it appear as if the petitioner was born of alien parents.  The Supreme Court rejected that contention.  And Maskell’s ruse highlights thedepravity of lies being shoved down the nation’s throat on this issue.  I can imagine Mini-Me sitting on his lap while this was being prepared.

When you look carefully at Maskell’s creative use of quotation marks, you’ll see that the statement is NOT a quote from the case, but rather a Frankenstein inspired patchwork.  He starts the reversed vivisection off with the following:

t is not disputed that if petitioner is the son…”

These are the first few words of a genuine quote from the Court’s opinion.  Then Maskell goes way out of context for the next two body parts.  The first is not in quotation marks:

of two Chinese national citizens who were physically in the United States when petitioner was born, then he is

And finally, an unrelated quote from elsewhere in the Court’s opinion:

“a natural born American citizen ….”

Put it all together and you get the following monstrosity:

…the Supreme Court of the United States explained that “t is not disputed that if petitioner is the son” of two Chinese national citizens who were physically in the United States when petitioner was born, then he is “a natural born American citizen ….”

But the Supreme Court never said that.  Here’s what they actually said:

“It is not disputed that if petitioner is the son of Kwock Tuck Lee and his wife, Tom Ying Shee, he was born to them when they were permanently domiciled in the United States, is a citizen thereof, and is entitled to admission to the country. United States v. Wong Kim Ark,169 U.S. 649 , 18 Sup. Ct. 456.”  Kwok Jan Fat v. White, 253 U.S. 454, 457 (1920).

This real quote – when liberated from Maskell’s embalming fluid – does not resemble the propaganda at all.

Maskell avoids the inconvenient truth that the Court took direct notice of the authorities having established that the petitioner’s father was born in the US and that he was a voter:

“…the father of the boy was native born and was a voter in that community.”  Id. at 460.

Maskell never mentions that the father and mother were US citizens at the time of petitioner’s birth in California.

This deceitful exercise alone strips the entire memo of all credibility.

Had Maskell simply offered his arguments fairly, using real quotes instead of Frankensteining this crap, I would not have attacked him personally.  But such deceptive behavior deserves no respect whatsoever.  The memo is pure propaganda, and it’s not even shy about it.

LOOMING CONSTITUTIONAL DISASTERS

The timing of the memo’s appearance is alarming.  I have been saying for quite awhile now that Obama doesn’t really have to worry about the natural-born issue coming back to haunt him in court unless he attempts to suspend the Constitution.  I know that sounds paranoid.  And nothingwould please me more than to be wrong on that prophecy.  If my fears don’t come to pass, I will gladly wear the tin foil hat of shame.  But the appearance of the updated CRS memo at this particular moment portends a Constitutional disaster.

If Obama attempts to suspend the US Constitution and/or declare martial law and/or suspend the 2012 election… chances of the natural-born citizen issue finding its way to the Supreme Court on the merits increase exponentially.

Leo Donofrio, Esq.

[See commenting rules here.]

Like
4 bloggers like this post.

This entry was posted on December 1, 2011 at 7:20 AM and is filed underUncategorized .    You can follow any responses to this entry through theRSS 2.0 feed You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Debunking The New Natural Born Citizen Congressional Research Propaganda.”
naturalborncitizen Says:
December 1, 2011 at 6:03 PM
More from pg. 460 of the Court’s opinion:

“Ernest Michaelis, for 26 years a justice of the peace and for many years the official collector of fish licenses, testified, making reference, for purpose of identification, to a photograph of the petitioner. He said he had known the parents of the boy since shortly after he himself went to live at Monterey in 1879; that there were two boys and three girls in the family; that he had seen the petitioner frequently as a little fellow when he went to collect fish licenses (the boy’s father was a fisherman); and had known him ever since; and, referring to the photograph, he declared positively that he was sure of his identity and that he was born in Monterey. He added that the father of the boy was native born and was a voter in that community.”

I smell desperation. If I ever tried to cut up quotes like this… and re-assemble them in such a recklessly cavalier manner, the Court would thrash me. It would be ugly as all hell. Nobody is submitting Frankenstein’s monster to the SCOTUS, not unless they want to be reemed out in oral argument.

The CRS memo is so full of holes… swiss cheese of the rotten variety. I would take a sledgehammer to it, but all I need is a xylophone mallet. Coming soon…

Leo
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on December 05, 2011, 12:53:18 PM
If Obama attempts to suspend the US Constitution and/or declare martial law and/or suspend the 2012 election… chances of the natural-born citizen issue finding its way to the Supreme Court on the merits increase exponentially.

You (and Leo, who you quote) seriously believe that there exists a possibility that Obama will attempt to "suspend the US Constitution and/or declare martial law and/or suspend the 2012 election"? Seriously?!?

Your name is an understatement. You are completely and utterly fucking insane.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 05, 2011, 12:55:46 PM
You (and Leo, who you quote) seriously believe that there exists a possibility that Obama will attempt to "suspend the US Constitution and/or declare martial law and/or suspend the 2012 election"? Seriously?!?

Your name is an understatement. You are completely and utterly fucking insane.


Obama has already greatly underminded the USC via Fast n Furious, the DEA laundering money to the cartels, etc.   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on December 05, 2011, 12:56:35 PM
I'm still a birther. 

This scares me... I truly don't think you are... I think you say it to either:

A: Get a rise out of people
or
B: Just say it because you hate Obama so much that you are willing to suspend your own rationality.

When you stop for about 30 seconds, you sound like a normal rational kind of person... Sure, you don't like Obama, and you won't vote for him (even if the alternative might be more insane... Have you heard the shit that Newt has said in the past?) but let's be honest here.

You can't POSSIBLY believe he's not a US citizen.

The US has every intelligence resource known to man to vet our Presidential candidates and you believe they would not have found out if they are US citizens? Come on man... I implore you to think about how irrational that sounds.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 05, 2011, 12:58:23 PM
This scares me... I truly don't think you are... I think you say it to either:

A: Get a rise out of people
or
B: Just say it because you hate Obama so much that you are willing to suspend your own rationality.

When you stop for about 30 seconds, you sound like a normal rational kind of person... Sure, you don't like Obama, and you won't vote for him (even if the alternative might be more insane... Have you heard the shit that Newt has said in the past?) but let's be honest here.

You can't POSSIBLY believe he's not a US citizen.

The US has every intelligence resource known to man to vet our Presidential candidates and you believe they would not have found out if they are US citizens? Come on man... I implore you to think about how irrational that sounds.






Obama acted no different than Cain in the whole BC issue.   We all know cain was lying.   Same for Obama. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on December 05, 2011, 01:02:45 PM
Obama acted no different than Cain in the whole BC issue.   We all know cain was lying.   Same for Obama.  

What now? How are the two comparable in any way?

Obama hasn't lied about his birth certificate at all. You think he's lying (there's a difference between what you think and what's actually happening) because you are a conspiracy theorist who refuses to look at the evidence that's right in front of your face. Some might even call that being paranoid or in a delusional state.

Obama has already greatly underminded the USC via Fast n Furious, the DEA laundering money to the cartels, etc.

From what we know, laws were almost certainly broken by many people at various levels of the Government, but it's a real stretch to say he undermined the U.S. Constitution. How? Just out of curiosity do you think Reagan undermined it with the Contras?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 05, 2011, 03:09:43 PM
Trump Questions Obama’s Birth Certificate (Trump revives his attack!)
National Review Online ^ | December 5, 2011 | Katrina Trinko

Posted on Monday, December 05, 2011 6:16:13 PM by Seizethecarp

“I happen to think,” Trump continued, “it’s very strange that after years, all of a sudden it appears. And I’ve also said, ‘How come there are no records that his mother was ever in the hospital?’ There are records that other people were in the hospital at that time… There’s no record that Obama or the mother was. And then you have the grandmother making statements, and you have the family pointing to different hospitals. Look, I have real questions, but I also know Obama is totally protected by the press, and unfairly so, I would say. … I find that it’s a very interesting topic because basically it’s a violation of the law.”


(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on December 05, 2011, 08:08:15 PM
3333866 -> Have you seen the thread mocking you on the main bpard (of course you have your only life is on here)..have you come to the realization that you are pathetic..not because of your political beliefs but because you have over 73000 post about politics on a bodybuilding msg board?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 06, 2011, 10:49:16 AM

You can't POSSIBLY believe he's not a US citizen.


This is the typical misdirection spewed forth by Obama defenders. Obama MAY be a citizen. That issue has yet to be addressed by Obama  with supporting documents.

However, us Birthers know Obama was born a dual citizen, and as such, is not a "natural born Citizen" as required by our Constitution to be eligible for the Office of President.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
 
SCOTUS precedent
The Chief Justice Morrison Waite delivered the opinion of the Court.
MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 88 U. S. 162 (1874)
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on December 06, 2011, 12:10:24 PM
This is the typical misdirection spewed forth by Obama defenders. Obama MAY be a citizen. That issue has yet to be addressed by Obama  with supporting documents.

However, us Birthers know Obama was born a dual citizen, and as such, is not a "natural born Citizen" as required by our Constitution to be eligible for the Office of President.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
 
SCOTUS precedent
The Chief Justice Morrison Waite delivered the opinion of the Court.
MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 88 U. S. 162 (1874)
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

You seriously think that the resources in the government would not have vetted that?

Come on man... That's why it's kooky.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on December 06, 2011, 01:14:40 PM
This is the typical misdirection spewed forth by Obama defenders. Obama MAY be a citizen. That issue has yet to be addressed by Obama  with supporting documents.

STOP LYING ALREADY! He released his birth certificate (not that he had to) which is all the proof the Department of State needs to establish his citizenship unequivocally.

However, us Birthers know Obama was born a dual citizen, and as such, is not a "natural born Citizen" as required by our Constitution to be eligible for the Office of President.

Even if he were a dual citizen, dual citizenship by birth does not make some not a "natural born citizen" and if you think it does, then I challenge you to back it up with published precedential decisions, not the rantings of some guy on a blog or on talk-radio.

SCOTUS precedent
The Chief Justice Morrison Waite delivered the opinion of the Court.
MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 88 U. S. 162 (1874)
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

This quote says nothing about whether only those born in the country from two citizen parents are natural born citizens. It only says that they, unequivocally, are natural born citizens.

I understand that you probably aren't the sharpest tool in the shed (or in the scrap yard, for that matter), but if you are trying to convince grown-ups you really can't rely on your 3rd grade reading comprehension.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 06, 2011, 01:17:41 PM
STOP LYING ALREADY! He released his birth certificate (not that he had to) which is all the proof the Department of State needs to establish his citizenship unequivocally.

Even if he were a dual citizen, dual citizenship by birth does not make some not a "natural born citizen" and if you think it does, then I challenge you to back it up with published precedential decisions, not the rantings of some guy on a blog or on talk-radio.

This quote says nothing about whether only those born in the country from two citizen parents are natural born citizens. It only says that they, unequivocally, are natural born citizens.

I understand that you probably aren't the sharpest tool in the shed (or in the scrap yard, for that matter), but if you are trying to convince grown-ups you really can't rely on your 3rd grade reading comprehension.


Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on December 06, 2011, 02:01:14 PM
This is what over 73000 posts about politics on a bodybuilding msg board looks like
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 06, 2011, 02:18:34 PM
You seriously think that the resources in the government would not have vetted that?

Back in about July of 2008, I laughed at the thought myself. Now, after running the story to the source as best as is possible, I have not been laughing for a LONG time.

NO ONE is assigned the task of vetting presidential candidates, nor presidents-elect before assuming office.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 06, 2011, 02:30:46 PM
I am going to be so sorry for engaging, but...

STOP LYING ALREADY! He released his birth certificate (not that he had to) which is all the proof the Department of State needs to establish his citizenship unequivocally.

Even if he were a dual citizen, dual citizenship by birth does not make some not a "natural born citizen" and if you think it does, then I challenge you to back it up with published precedential decisions, not the rantings of some guy on a blog or on talk-radio.

If he had stayed put living in the USA his entire life, I would have to agree, the BC is all it takes to establish citizenship. However, there are issues with him possibly becoming an Indonesian citizen and/or being adopted by an Indonesian national. That is why I say he MAY be a citizen. He was born one, but I do not know if he has remained one.

A dual citizen, born with allegiances to more than one country, can never be a "natural born Citizen."

This quote says nothing about whether only those born in the country from two citizen parents are natural born citizens. It only says that they, unequivocally, are natural born citizens.

It is the only definition (that I am aware of) which has been given to us by the Supreme Court. Can you identify any other definition of a "natural born citizen" given by the Supreme Court?

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on December 06, 2011, 04:03:15 PM
I am going to be so sorry for engaging, but...

If he had stayed put living in the USA his entire life, I would have to agree, the BC is all it takes to establish citizenship. However, there are issues with him possibly becoming an Indonesian citizen and/or being adopted by an Indonesian national. That is why I say he MAY be a citizen. He was born one, but I do not know if he has remained one.

The U.S. statutes in effect at the time made clear that an underage child cannot lose their U.S. citizenship by virtue of moving overseas, provided they returned to and resides in the United Stated before age 21. There is no dispute that Obama was in the United States for longer than 3 years before he turned 21.

But I guess the sinister powers could have made those laws up on purpose, just like they planted fake birth announcements on local newspapers and just how they got the State of Hawaii to falsify its own documents.

A dual citizen, born with allegiances to more than one country, can never be a "natural born Citizen."

That's your assertion - you haven't backed it up by anything except vigorous hand waving. Please provide U.S.C. cite, a reference to a precedential Court decision or opinion issued by a relevant government department to that effect.


It is the only definition (that I am aware of) which has been given to us by the Supreme Court. Can you identify any other definition of a "natural born citizen" given by the Supreme Court?

Except it's not a definition of "natural born citizen." It's a line of reasoning explaining that people born in the U.S. to parents who were U.S. citizens are natural born citizens. It doesn't say "only these people are natural born citizens."

If I tell you that a deep-fried pastry filled with custar and topped with chocolate icing is a donut I am only saying that a deep-fried pastry filled with custard and topped with chocolate icing is a donut. I make no claims about deep-fried pastries filled with lemon and topped with sugar glazing.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 06, 2011, 04:05:39 PM
 >:(
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on December 06, 2011, 04:40:54 PM
>:(

Known Photoshop.

(http://0.tqn.com/d/urbanlegends/1/5/w/1/1/P1010025_Welcome_to_Madha_Closeup.jpg)

Description: Photo hoax
Circulating since: Jan. 2010
Status: Fake

Text example:
Email contributed by an AOL user Feb. 19, 2010:

Subject: OOPS !

Have ya seen this one yet???

Sign Posted on the Road just outside Nairobi, Kenya

(see photo above)


Analysis: This is a hoax. First, Kenya's two main languages are Swahili and English. The road sign above contains what appears to be Arabic script. Second, the image was Photoshopped. The original, discovered by a user posting on the conspiracy-theory website AboveTopSecret.com, is of a road sign in Madha, a territory of Oman located in the United Arab Emirates. In English and Arabic, it says: "Wilayat Madha Welcomes You."


http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/ss/welcome_to_kenya_sign.htm
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on December 06, 2011, 08:16:25 PM
Known Photoshop.

(http://0.tqn.com/d/urbanlegends/1/5/w/1/1/P1010025_Welcome_to_Madha_Closeup.jpg)

Description: Photo hoax
Circulating since: Jan. 2010
Status: Fake

Text example:
Email contributed by an AOL user Feb. 19, 2010:

Subject: OOPS !

Have ya seen this one yet???

Sign Posted on the Road just outside Nairobi, Kenya

(see photo above)


Analysis: This is a hoax. First, Kenya's two main languages are Swahili and English. The road sign above contains what appears to be Arabic script. Second, the image was Photoshopped. The original, discovered by a user posting on the conspiracy-theory website AboveTopSecret.com, is of a road sign in Madha, a territory of Oman located in the United Arab Emirates. In English and Arabic, it says: "Wilayat Madha Welcomes You."


http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/ss/welcome_to_kenya_sign.htm


LOL 0wn3d!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 06, 2011, 08:20:02 PM
Didn't think it was real.  However, Obama aunt said she rememembered the young thug in Kenya as a baby. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on December 06, 2011, 09:52:25 PM
Didn't think it was real.  However, Obama aunt said she rememembered the young thug in Kenya as a baby. 

Come on man... You and I both know that black women can't keep track of which baby is theirs... They have too many.

;D

*Racist Post Reported*
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on December 07, 2011, 07:16:59 AM
Didn't think it was real.  However, Obama aunt said she rememembered the young thug in Kenya as a baby. 

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 09, 2011, 10:57:47 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 09, 2011, 10:58:38 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 09, 2011, 11:40:42 AM
Walter F. Fitzpatrick III, Obama Birther, Arrested For Stealing Court Documents
 
Posted: 12/ 9/11 01:59 PM ET


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/09/walter-f-fitzpatrick-iii-birther_n_1139258.html?view=print&comm_ref=false





Walter F. Fitzpatrick, a retired Navy veteran and outspoken birther, was arrested in Tennessee this week for allegedly stealing confidential documents from a local courtroom.

The Monroe County Court in Tennessee conducted a review of candidates for the incoming grand jury class on Wednesday, asking applicants to fill out forms with their personal information. The papers were then collected by a courtroom clerk for processing, but before they could be filed, authorities allege that Fitzpatrick entered the courtroom and removed the documents.

"At the completion of the meeting the papers were in the courtroom," Monroe County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Jennifer Bledsoe wrote in a release, according to the Knoxville News Sentinel. "The clerk noticed the papers missing and the videotape of the area was reviewed. The video showed an individual positively identified as Fitzpatrick walk over to the desk where the items were and remove the documents."

Officers were then dispatched to apprehend Fitzpatrick, who proved uncooperative.

"Mr. Fitzpatrick refused to come to the door," Bledsoe said in the statement. "After announcements of purpose and intent, force was used to gain entry into the home and Mr. Fitzpatrick was taken into custody."

The forms allegedly stolen by Fitzpatrick, which Bledsoe said are not a matter of public record, were not recovered at the house.

As Talking Points Memo reports, this is not Fitzpatrick's first attempt to meddle with grand jury proceedings over his belief that the body is guilty of treason because of its refusal to pursue charges against President Obama for supposedly not being born in the United States.

In April 2010, Fitzpatrick attempted to conduct a citizen's arrest on Grand Jury Foreman Gary Pettway because Pettway would not agree to convene a grand jury to investigate the AGC's belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen. "I'm charging you with official misconduct," Fitzpatrick told him. "I'm placing you under arrest. You must now come with me." Fitzpatrick was then charged with inciting a riot, disrupting an official public meeting, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest.

Another birther, Darren Wesley Huff, was convicted earlier this year for partaking in an anti-Obama plot to take over a Tennessee courthouse in an armed standoff. He claimed during his trial that he had been motivated by Fitzpatrick.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on December 09, 2011, 06:30:34 PM
(article about the arrest of Fitzpatrick snipped)

You forgot to include your "blame Obama" missive in your post. Since you posted this, without comment, are we to assume that Obama and his éminence grise had the video staged to get Fitzpatrick arrested? Have you considered writing screenplays for Hollywood?
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 12, 2011, 12:43:16 PM
Presidential Candidate: Meeting with Sheriff Joe Arpaio Yielded “Devastating” Information
The Post and Email ^ | December 9, 2011 | Sharon Rondeau




On December 5, 2011, Presidential Candidate John Dummett of California recently traveled 789 miles to Maricopa County, AZ and back to meet with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has been conducting an investigation into questions surrounding the presidential eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.

"Arpaio was intrigued by Van Irion’s and my approach of going after the DNC and not attacking Barack Obama or asking any court to decide Obama’s eligibility. He told us things that I still have to hold in confidentiality. I can say, because it has already been released to the press and I can verify it, that he will produce a report in February, and it will be devastating. I can’t say what it is, but I know what it is.”

When we asked Dummett if the “devastating” part of Arpaio’s future report was communicated in written or verbal form, he was not at liberty to answer.

"Instead of being there for only 20 minutes, we were there speaking with him for an hour and a half. I was then asked to be an expert witness on the birth certificate issue, and I agreed to do that.”

The Post & Email asked, “Is that because you have a background in document analysis or something similar?” and Mr. Dummett replied, “I’m a computer programmer staff analyst for the California Department of Fish & Game. I’m an expert at the staff level at building databases and dealing with computer-generated documents. I figured out that the birth certificate Obama presented was a phony right after I saw it, because I understand how Adobe works because I have to use that and the applications which I built for the state of California.


(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 17, 2011, 06:35:37 AM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama's inclusion on Georgia ballot challenged
Atlanta Journal Constitution ^
Posted on December 16, 2011 8:31:52 PM EST by bushpilot1

Five Georgia men have challenged President Barack Obama’s inclusion on next year’s presidential ballot, with at least some citing an oft-discredited theory that Obama is not eligible for office because the Constitution says that a president must be a “natural born citizen.”

All the challenges have been made through the Georgia Office of the Secretary of State, which referred them to the state administrative hearings office. Hearings have not yet been set.

(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on December 17, 2011, 03:09:23 PM
All this crap yet you haven't changed one persons mind...Get a life
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 17, 2011, 08:47:07 PM
All this crap yet you haven't changed one persons mind...Get a life



Lol. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on December 18, 2011, 01:41:34 PM
 ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 18, 2011, 01:43:28 PM
::)

MONSTER EYE ROLL.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on December 18, 2011, 05:26:43 PM
MONSTER EYE ROLL.

well played
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 21, 2011, 10:32:35 AM
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/ (http://obamaballotchallenge.com/)
"We're going to challenge them in every state"

Sharon Rondeau is reporting that Capt. Pamela Barnett (Ret.) has founded awebsite and initiative which seeks to assist citizens wishing to challenge Obama’s constitutional eligibility and name placement on the presidential ballot for 2012.She and her team are currently compiling election law from all 50 states and will be providing forms and sample letters which registered voters can use to file a complaint.

Barnett has recently appeared on The Roth Radio Show and the Andrea Shea KingRadio Show to detail her plan to challenge Obama’s eligibility based on the claim that he is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Barnett also operates the website “Unlawful President” and will be releasing a book entitled Never Vetted, the first chapter of which was published on the internet at no charge for informational and educational purposes.

In May of last year, Barnett filed a lawsuit against California Secretary of State Debra Bowen challenging the eligibility of Damon Dunn, a Republican candidate running for Bowen’s position. Barnett explained that she had researched California election law in regard to challenging candidate qualifications. “I found out that there was law for challenging the ballot, and part of the Barnett v. Dunn case goes to the criminal negligence of the California Secretary of State and the Attorney General,” she said.

The Post & Email asked Barnett who initiated the idea of a ballot challenge campaign, and she responded, “I did. The Dunn case has been with me since 2010, and I kept it in the back of my mind that if nothing else works, we should challenge the ballot in regard to Obama. In trying to come up with a solution, I thought about it hard. After seeing the total failure of our government, I decided to find all the election laws, make a website, lead a national movement, and overwhelm the Democrats in all 50 states.”

The Obama Ballot Challenge website has been operational for about three weeks. Barnett is director, and Gary Wilmott and George Miller are filling key positions. Barnett is seeking people who can market the website by placing links on other sites about Obama Ballot Challenge. “The goal is to get as many complaints in as many states as possible to inform more people about the fraud crimes going on. We also want more people to know the meaning of “natural born Citizen.”

We asked Barnett how long it took her to research election law in every state, and she replied, “It’s still ongoing. I still need research help. Most states have their election law on the internet, and we’ve done 26 states to date. Looking through election law is not an exciting thing to do, and I’ve already had a few people say they just can’t do it (laughs). It’s not hard; you just have to find the law and start looking for key words such as “contest” and “challenge.” Most secretaries of state that we found have only a ministerial duty, but some of them have more than that but did not follow their states’ laws after receiving complaints. The difference now is that a lot of the deadlines were missed, so many of the complaints that were filed became civil fraud cases. There, you have to prove that you have standing, and some of them sued the secretaries of state, who then wiggled out of it, saying they didn’t have a ministerial duty to check on eligibility. With ballot challenges, you have instant standing.”

The Post & Email asked, “Is it true that all states have a specific ballot challenge period and that the challenge can be made by an average person?” and Barnett responded, “Yes. You have to be a registered voter. Two states which are standing out as undemocratic are Wisconsin and Virginia. Wisconsin says that it’s the Congress’s job to vet candidates, and if you have any questions you should call the FEC. They’re usurping power from the law. That’s the state where we’ll probably need an attorney. In other states it must simply be a registered voter. You can file the challenge, it’s free, and often you can submit it electronically via email or fax.”

Barnett found that some states allow a ballot challenge up to 30 days after an election if new information comes to light about a candidate’s eligibility, even allowing for voiding of an election. “The Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012 is there to assist people in finding the law and steering them in the right direction. We’re probably going to come up with a generic ballot complaint which addresses the “natural born Citizen” issue, which would be appealable up to the Supreme Court.”

Barnett stated that while she was developing the Obama Ballot Challenge project, the Article II SuperPac started up. The Post & Email asked her, “What is the relationship between the two new groups? Is there a nexus?” and she responded, “We are strategic partners, and we’re putting out a press release on that.”

The Post & Email has interviewed the director of the Article II SuperPac organization and will be publishing a report within the next few days.

Of the purpose of each organization, Barnett explained, “We’re more of the action arm; they’re a long-term educational initiative which will be creating a defense fund for people who are challenging the ballot in their states who need an attorney. Whatever comes up as an immediate concern will hopefully be able to be covered with the funds raised. We’re also looking at challenging Republican candidates such as Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal if they are placed on the ballot because they are not natural born Citizens.”

Barnett explained that Obama is not the first occupant of the White House to have his eligibility challenged. Of Chester Arthur, who served as president following the death of President James Garfield after having been shot by an assassin, Barnett said, “He wasn’t even an American citizen, because at the time of his birth, the 14th Amendment had not been passed, and his father was not a U.S. citizen.” The White House biography does not mention anything about Arthur’s personal background except that he was “born in Vermont.” She stated that Arthur’s father did not naturalize until his son was 14 years old, which made the son a U.S. citizen but not a “natural born Citizen.”

We asked Barnett if she knew how many complaints are in the process of being filed, and she responded, “There are people from at least ten states working on ballot challenges now. We’re there to make sure they have prepared a proper complaint according to the law in their states.”

Barnett believes that people “cannot just stand on the sidelines” when it comes to the 2012 election. “If we can keep Obama off the ballot in one state, hopefully others can follow. I was originally planning on waiting until the general election, but we know how long it can take going through the court process. A lot of these challenges will not be resolved at the administrative level and lawsuits will be filed which can go all the way to the Supreme Court. Standing will not be an issue, an injury will exist, and the court will have jurisdiction. We’re overcoming all of the obstacles that were there before.”

Summarizing the scope and purpose of ObamaBallotChallenge.com, Barnett said:

We cannot wait for Congress, the federal judiciary, or the Department of Justice to enforce the law regarding Obama’s eligibility. They have failed us. The Obama State Ballot Challenge puts the power back into the hands of the people. It gives any voter a course of action to take to ensure that the Constitutionally ineligible Obama is not re-elected.
Filing a ballot complaint to keep Obama off the ballot in their state is free, easy, and doesn’t require an attorney. This process gives instant “standing” to the complainant to have their ballot complaint heard on the merits. The complaint absolutely needs to be filed within the legal time frame for their state. The Obama State Ballot Challenge staff will offer assistance with complaints to those who request it.If in the future the administrative complaint is rejected, we hope that our strategic partner, the ART2 SuperPAC, will have a legal fund to assist those who need it.It is the goal of Obama State Ballot Challenge to inspire citizens to file complaints in every state so that the American citizens might finally receive justice against the Un-Constitutional, usurper Barack Obama… and to ensure that he will not be re-elected by finally having the mandate of the Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett enforced within the several states.
 
Barnett also said that hearings concerning ballot challenges normally take place within 30 days after the complaint is filed.

What is the Obama State Ballot Challenge?

This is a national call to action to help ensure Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution is upheld by stopping Obama from getting back in the White House for another 4 un-Constitutional years. The Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012 project was created to help organize and report on the Herculean effort to keep Obama off the Presidential election ballot in 2012 because he does not meet the Constitutional standard of Natural Born Citizen that was established by Minor v. Happersett, and because of his massive fraud crimes committed before and during his tenure in the White House.
 
We need your help now! Challenges can be filed in the primary season. You can file your own complaint with your state without hiring a attorney and without any cost. We are working on providing a generic example complaint that you can use for reference. Please go to the Contact page and email the Director Pamela Barnett if you can file a complaint in your state. See if we have election law on your state by clicking on your state page above. See the Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012 page of this website for more details.
 
The first ballot challenge is ongoing in New Hampshire and citizens have additionally filed ballot challenges in Georgia, Hawaii, Tennessee, Arizona, and Alabama, and many more are in the works. We need to challenge Obama in all 50 states many times. More news to come soon on new ballot challenges and a new partnership that could provide legal resources to citizen voters filing complaints. Join our campaign to stop Obama in 2012 by filing a ballot complaint or volunteering to help with advertising our effort to recruit more people to file complaints.
 
We do this because we are a nation of laws, and the political ruling class has failed to uphold the law regarding Obama's usurpation. We do it for God, country, and family.... and for justice. We will also fight against any non Natural Born Republican that appears on the Presidential ballot. This is not a political initiative, it is about respecting the Constitution.
 
We all lose if we continue to be a nation of men and not of laws. This enables corruption in Congress, the White House and the Courts. As it stands now, they are all operating above the law. This state ballot initiative brings the power back to the states to ensure their citizens are voting for only qualified candidates.
 
This site will mostly concentrate on news related to the Obama State Ballot 2012 initiative. Please subscribe for email updates. Your privacy will be safeguarded to the best of our ability. Your emails will not be shared with anyone. Also, sign up on our Facebook page and Twitter.
 
This is a sister website to http://www.unlawfulpresident.com.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on December 21, 2011, 10:33:39 AM
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/12/17/new-organization-to-educate-and-mobilize-the-public-on-the-significance-of-natural-born-citizen-and-the-2012-election/ (http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/12/17/new-organization-to-educate-and-mobilize-the-public-on-the-significance-of-natural-born-citizen-and-the-2012-election/)

New Organization To Educate and Mobilize the Public on the Significance of “natural born Citizen” and the 2012 Election
“NO DIVIDED LOYALTIES”
by Sharon Rondeau

Logo from the newly-organized Article II SuperPac (art2superpac.com)
(Dec. 17, 2011) — Anorganization which intends “toeducate the majority of voters on what their vote truly means to the future of America in the 2012 election” and thesignificance of the “natural born Citizen” clause has officially been launched.
Article II SuperPac (art2superpac.com) seeks to ensure that Article II of the U.S. Constitution is upheld in all future elections such that all candidates for president and vice president, beginning in 2012, meet the definition of “natural born Citizen.”  The group will not be making political campaign contributions to any candidate.
Director Helen Tansey, who operates the blog “The T-Room,” joined forces with numerous constitutional bloggers to form the new entity, which also plans to raise money for a legal defense fund for citizens facing legal expenses in challenging a candidate’s constitutional eligibility.  Ar2SuperPac will be working as a strategic partner with ObamaBallotChallenge.com, operated by Capt. Pamela Barnett (Ret.), who also interviewed recently with The Post & Email.  The following interview outlines the scope and future plans for the organization.
MRS. RONDEAU:  Who conceived of Art2SuperPac, and how was it launched?
MS. TANSEY:  Over the last four years, I would read constantly that individuals would become very excited regarding the legal challenges against Obama, believing that something was going to happen. When the judge would rule “You have no standing,” it was a deflation of spirit.  I watched the excitement and the deflation over and over again.  After a while, many people started to say that the court system wasn’t the way to go; maybe we needed to go in a different direction.  I had wished folks would put together a vehicle that would help us.  So I decided after reading these things for several years that it was time to do something.
My background is that of political campaigns and issue advocacy campaigns, so I had the organizing skill set.  To be totally candid, I never to use them again, because I’d left it all behind in 2008.  But after watching this and all of these gallant efforts, I finally decided, “We’ve got to do something.”  So I started reaching out to a handful of bloggers with whom I had a relationship and for whose work I had a high regard for the work they were doing specific not just to Barack Obama and his lack of qualifications, but also other presidential candidates who were being touted.
We started meeting in June 2011 and worked for six months to build a truly independent vehicle designed to be a voice for the people with regard to the 2012 political campaigns.  That’s pretty much how it got started.
It’s been a roller-coaster ride for all parties concerned who have filed lawsuits and memorandums of complaint, put their names out there.  Everyone has done everything they could possibly do to bring about some remedy for the people, and it just hasn’t occurred.  Because it was considered a political question, the question then became, “How do we engage this energy, this vibrancy, this wisdom, and inject it into the 2012 political campaign season?”  That’s the goal:  to fire up people, get them engaged.  We’re going to be doing a lot of groundwork and grassroots building.  It’s about all of us coming together and truly working with one voice to make sure that when it comes to the 2012 election that either a) through Pamela’s efforts we keep the unqualified candidates off the state ballot, or b) if we’re not successful there, then we go after the members of the Electoral College, and if we’re not successful there, we keep going until we have exhausted every possible remedy to make sure that no unqualified candidate gets on the presidential ballot.
MRS. RONDEAU:  It sounds as if yuou’re using the 2012 election as an opportunity of sorts.
MS. TANSEY:  Absolutely, because in a political race, everybody is out saying something about the candidates.  Well, there’s no voice for Article II.  We always want to inject for Article II.
MRS. RONDEAU:  How do you intend to educate people about what Article II “natural born Citizen” means?
MS. TANSEY:  The first thing that has to be done when one begins to organize such an effort is to build a volunteer base.  As you’re doing so, you’re raising funds, and you train the volunteer base.  So some of the things you do typically in a political campaign as well as in an issue advocacy campaign is canvassing.  You leave flyers at doors and use direct mail.  You do coffee chats and invite your neighbors to your home.  We provide scripts and all of the resources, materials and tools so that that individual who is willing to host a coffee or canvas a neighborhood or have a table outside of their grocery store has gotten the talking points from us.  They got the messaging and materials from us.  So it’s truly doing the grassroots work so as to reach the average citizen who is somewhat tuned in, not tuned in at all, or very tuned in.
Depending on the funding we raise, we will also be doing a great deal of internet advertising.  We’ll be using YouTube as a vehicle as well as Google videos and some of the other video groups to get our message out.  We will be working to target key states and even key districts within those states to get volunteers where there’s a persuadable vote.  For example, Virginia is a targeted state by both Democrats and Republicans, and say an unqualified candidate gets on the ballot.  What we do is target the really conservative or and/or the really red counties and/or the really blue counties, and we do very specific messaging within those counties where a large portion of voters reside.  So it’s really strategic and much more laser-focused.  Because we don’t have the financial wherewithal, nor do we have the body of individuals such as volunteers where we can do all 50 states.  We have to be focused and strategic as to where we’re putting our resources so it has the greatest impact we can possibly have.
MRS. RONDEAU:  So you know you’ll be focusing on certain counties within certain states?
MS. TANSEY:  I would think right now we’re honing in on the states we’re going to be targeting.  Within those states, we will break it down and identify the counties.  We’ll look at voting records and intensity of voting in 2008.  We’ll also go back to 2004.  We’ll be looking at all the statistics to identify those targets.  So we’re currently honing in on the states, and in those states will be those areas where we will highly likely wage a campaign of getting several citizens to wage a ballot campaign.
The difference between Pamela Barnett’s efforts and Article 2 Super Pac’s is this:  Pamela is focusing on one individual:  Obama.  She is looking at all 50 states.  We’re looking to target specific states.  Where we’re helping the strategic partner relationship is where we’re working together to target those key states.  We’re working to together to target those key states and put forward a campaign and be able to wage that campaign and hopefully be successful.  She’s taken on all 50; we’re just being more strategic.
MRS. RONDEAU:  What is the structure of your organization, and how many people are on your team?
MS. TANSEY:  It’s called a kitchen cabinet, and on the kitchen cabinet there are five individuals.  All of them have been engaged in this fight for at least four years.  We have support from outside the kitchen cabinet which is helping to advise, giving us ideas and supporting the effort.  The core group which has met over the past six months has the same five people, all of whom have been extraordinarily committed.  At some point we’ll release in a press release who we all are.  We’re trying to stagger the information right now so that we keep people coming back.  So soon, rather than later, we’ll announce who we are and where our specialties lie, where our skill sets lie…and you know all of them.
MRS. RONDEAU:  In your daily conversations with people who might not have been active on the internet and cognizant of the Obama eligibility issue, do you find that they now have a questions about it?
MS. TANSEY:  I would say that in 2008, prior to the election itself, when I had that conversation with neighbors, friends and colleagues, they looked at me as if I had a third eye and thought I was absolutely crazy.  Fast-forward to 2011, when I’m having that conversation with some of the same people and also new ones, they are much more in tune, much more aware that something is wrong, and they are more open to having a conversation.  Whereas in 2008 it was a wall, and in 2011, there is some movement in that wall.  It’s a subtle shift in people being more open to learning, whereas in 2008 they weren’t open to that at all.
MRS. RONDEAU:  What would you say to someone who says, “I think he was born in Hawaii, so that makes him eligible; case closed?”
MS. TANSEY:  What I would say is what Leo Donofrio said almost four years ago, and that is that this gentleman could have born on the Supreme Court steps.  It doesn’t matter; the fact of the matter is that his father was not a United States citizen.  Therefore, his birth does not meet the definition of Article II.  So for us, it’s all about the Constitution.  It’s all about the law.  It’s not about all of those other items that have popped up over the course of the last four years in regard to his background.  For us, it’s strictly and solely about the law of the land, and the law of the land requires that the individual who runs for president of the United States is a natural born citizen, which means “citizen parents and born on U.S. soil.”  We’re just all about following the law.  So all of the birth certificate stuff, all of the social security number stuff, although valid, and it has its place; it’s important; but when you look at the law, this man admits that when his father was born, he was a British subject.  That clearly tells you and me that Obama was born as a dual citizen.  Therefore, he is not qualified.  It does not matter where he was born.  It matters only that under the law that he is not qualified under Article II.
MRS. RONDEAU:  Many people do not seem to be aware that citizenship involves the parents.  Pamela mentioned to me during her interview that years ago, when a woman married, hercitizenship, if different, changed to that of her husband, which would have produced two U.S. citizen parents.
MS. TANSEY:  It’s all about allegiance. That is really the key word.  The reason that the Founders put in the “natural born Citizen” clause was that the president would also serve in times of war as the Commander-in-Chief.  Having a Commander-in-Chief with dual or even trial citizenship means, by definition, that that individual would have divided loyalty to the United States of America.  So the Founding Fathers put the natural born citizen clause in to the Constitution to ensure sole allegiance. to the United States of America and her national security.
If you look at the President’s oath of office, you will see that he is the only elected officer who swears sole allegiance to the United States.  When you compare the president’s oath to that ofsenators and congressmen, they’re different.  Sole allegiance feeds in to the military.  Our young people who say, “I’m going to serve in the military” deserve nothing less than a commander-in-chief who is only loyal to them, and no one else.
MRS. RONDEAU:  Do you think Obama has shown signs of foreign loyalties?
MS. TANSEY:  I would say that when he was on the campaign trail, he was talking “red, white and blue,” and he did a bang-up job persuading people of his authenticity.  But when you look at his policy decisions, his national security apparatus, you can clearly see that this man is more global in his thinking and witht he resources and tools that the American society has built, including the military.  He has signed so many bills; the most recent one which Sen. John McCainand Sen. Carl Levin sponsored has language to detain Americans without the right of habeas corpus.  That clearly demonstrates a lack of loyalty to the protection that the Constitution demands.  So, yes, his policy decisions clearly demonstrate, in my opinion, that his loyalty is notto the United States of America and her citizenship; it’s global.  And we are not global; we are the United States of America.
MRS. RONDEAU:  The election is about 11 months away.  When do you expect that your organization will be in full swing?
MS. TANSEY:  We’ll get into full swing after the first of the year.
MRS. RONDEAU:  And you are looking for volunteers and financial support?
MS. TANSEY:  Absolutely.  If we don’t have people on the ground as well as the financial wherewithal to be able to inject our Article II message into the political debate,, we’re just going to be spinning our wheels.  So yes, those two pieces are critical. 
MRS. RONDEAU:  Do you have any thoughts on what could happen if Obama were determined to be ineligible?
MS. TANSEY:  The 2012 election is going to a a critical one, because if an unqualified individual, whether it’s Obama or on the Republican side with Marco Rubio as vice president, it doesn’t matter; it’s a turning point for the United States of America.  If we elect unqualified candidates and they make it into the office of the presidency or the vice presidency, then in my humble estimation, the Constitution will be dead.  So for me, to answer that question, the line in the sand is now.  If we don’t rally and come together to make sure that our Constitution, even though on life support, remains in place so that we have four more years to do what we need to do, we no longer live in a constitutional republic.
MRS. RONDEAU:  Do you believe that if you can get your message across to enough people about presidential eligibility, we can reverse the damage that’s been done?
MS. TANSEY:  That’s a great question!  I’m naive enough to believe in the American people.  I believe strongly and passionately in the common sense, in the patriotic spirit of the citizens of this once-great country.  I believe that if we’re successful in pushing back in 2012, we have four years to engage and keep doing what we have to do peacefully to restore our constitutional republic. So yes, I’m naive enough to believe that.  I realize that there are others out there who absolutely see revolution or some sort of revolt on the horizon.  I’m not allowing myself to go there, because I continue to keep faith and place my faith in the American citizens.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on December 22, 2011, 03:54:50 PM
I'm still a birther. 
which is one of the reasons i love ya, bro !
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 23, 2011, 06:42:47 PM
New Poll: Obama Not Born In The USA

If you doubt Barack Obama was born in the United States and doubt his eligibility to serve as President of the United States, yet another poll has just confirmed that you're not alone.  Public Policy Polling (PPP), a Democratic polling company (yes, you read that right, a Democratic polling firm), just released the results of its latest poll on December 18 and some of the more shocking findings were, yet again, totally ignored and buried by the LameStream Media.

Among those results, a whopping 52% of self-identified caucus goers in Iowa said they either believe that Barack Obama was not born in the United States (31%) or said they were not sure if Obama was born in the United States (21%).  Again, the media totally ignored this bombshell and decided, instead, to report another finding of the poll, namely that Congressman Ron Paul is gaining an edge among Iowa caucus goers.

And here's another shocking revelation from the poll.  Just in case you may be thinking that only "rabid TEA Party types" doubt Obama is eligible to serve as President of the United States, the same poll found that a whopping 74% did not consider themselves to be members of the TEA Party movement and moreover, 28% described themselves as either "very liberal," "liberal," or "moderate."

While we're on the subject shocking trends possibly uncovered by the PPP poll, here are some more interesting findings, also ignored by the LameStream Media, which could indicate that Obama is doomed to be a one-term president. 

Among the poll respondents, only 55% claimed that they participated in the 2008 Republican Iowa Caucus.  32% claimed they didn't vote in the 2008 caucus and 13% actually claimed that they voted in the Democratic Caucus in Iowa in 2008.  Those findings should be very disturbing to Team Obama because they could indicate that a massive shift may be occurring across the nation. At least in Iowa, a massive ground-shift is taking place as people are either switching teams or becoming engaged for the first time.

The PPP Poll also may have discredited yet another myth that the GOP establishment and the LameStream Media have been beating like a cheap drum; namely that Republicans are mainly looking to a candidate that "can beat Barack Obama."  According to the PPP Poll only 32% of respondents listed a "candidate's ability to beat Obama" as the most important criteria in deciding which candidate to support and a clear majority (56%) claimed the candidates’ stands on the issues were the most important criteria.

Of course, the PPP Poll is not the first poll showing that large numbers of Americans still doubt Obama's eligibility.  A number of nationwide polls over the past two years have confirmed that doubt has been wide-spread for some time.  The most recent of these polls is a June 2011 Wenzel survey which indicated that even 28% of Democrats wanted Congress to investigate Obama's eligibility AFTER the publication of Obama's alleged long-form birth certificate on the Internet.

Even a CNN poll taken back in August of 2010, which was heavily weighted toward Democrats, indicated that 6 in 10 of Americans doubt Obama was born in the United States. The LameStream Media continues to ignore the questions over Obama's eligibility but the American people refuse to let the issue die and, this much is sure, it will likely be the issue that dare not speak its name in the November election.

A full report on the methodology of the poll can be found here.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 30, 2011, 10:17:09 AM
Romney's Son Makes Birther Joke, Asks For Obama's Grades

"He has not said that he will not do it. And he's also not said that he will," Matt Romney said about his father releasing his tax returns. "I don't know the answer to that."

"I'm not sure he knows the answer to that, but he'll do everything that he needs to. He's certainly not afraid of anything. He's not hiding anything," the younger Romney said at a campaign event in Concord, NH.

"I heard someone suggest the other day that as soon as President Obama releases his grades and his birth certificate -- then maybe he'd do it," he said.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/12/30/romneys_son_makes_birther_joke_asks_for_obamas_grades.html



Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on January 02, 2012, 11:34:51 AM
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/01/new-hampshire-house-of-representatives-members-to-hold-press-conference-on-obamas-eligibility-on-january-3/ (http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/01/new-hampshire-house-of-representatives-members-to-hold-press-conference-on-obamas-eligibility-on-january-3/)
New Hampshire House of Representatives Members to Hold Press Conference on Obama’s Eligibility on January 3
 
“WE NEED TO INFORM THE PUBLIC”
by Sharon Rondeau

New Hampshire produced the first state constitution on January 5, 1776, prior to the American Revolution
(Jan. 1, 2012) — On January 3, 2012, several members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives will hold a press conference with the primary purpose of informing New Hampshire citizens and registered voters that Barack Hussein Obama may not be eligible to serve as president and therefore should not have his name appear on the 2012 presidential ballot.
The time and place are tentatively set for 10:00 a.m. outside of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.
The website of the New Hampshire House of Representatives provides the following history regarding its beginnings:
Although threatened with reprisals from the British Crown and a bitterly divided constituency, New Hampshire’s leaders set the course for self-government in January 1776. Determined to keep the government close to the people, our forefathers fixed the size of the House of Representatives as a direct ratio to the state’s population. The first House consisted of 87 members, each one representing 100 families. As time passed and the population increased, the number of Representatives grew, until there were 443. In 1942, a constitutional amendment limited the size of the House to 400 but not less than 375 members. As a result, the New Hampshire House is the largest state legislative body in the United States.
New Hampshire has the largest House of Representatives in the nation.  The Concord Monitor has stated that New Hampshire has “the most localized representation of any state in the country.”
On November 15, 2011, Atty. Orly Taitz filed a complaint with the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission regarding the placing of Obama’s name on the state ballot, citing his use of a social security number not assigned to him as well as having presented two forged birth certificates as proof that he was born in Hawaii.  Several state representatives joined the complaint, and citizens from around the country filed challenges as well.  A U.S. Army reserve retired colonel has launched a campaign to prevent Obama’s name from being included on the New Hampshire ballot.
The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission responded to Taitz by holding a hearing on November 18, during which Taitz presented her case challenging Obama’s constitutional eligibility, focusing on the crimes which she alleged he committed.
Although the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s office has disallowed candidates from running for the presidency due to foreign birthplaces in the recent past, the decision of the Ballot Law Commission was that because Obama completed the application and paid the requisite $1,000 fee, it could not prevent his name from appearing on the 2012 ballot.
Atty. Taitz has since stated that “massive election fraud” is occurring in New Hampshire because it appears that in 2008, boxes of ballots were left out on tables rather than locked in a vault, which Gardner admitted in a video to be a deviation from standard protocol.
Nine members of the New Hampshire House attended the hearing of the Ballot Law Commission, one of whom was Rep. Laurence Rappaport (R-Coos).  Rappaport stated that there were nine representatives present at the Ballot Law Commission hearing and that some or all of them organized the press conference to be held on Tuesday, January 3, 2012.
We first asked him about his reaction to the outcome of the Ballot Law Commission hearing, he responded, “I was extremely disappointed.”
We then asked him about the investigation called for by Attorney General Michael Delaney regarding alleged misconduct on the part of some of the representatives at the Ballot Law Commission hearing.  Rappaport’s response was, “There were two investigations.  One was by the House Security, run by Randy Joyner, and he reported to the Speaker of the House, and the Attorney General asked the State Police to investigate.  Neither one of them contacted me, probably because although I was there, I never said anything.  The results of the investigation, as I understand it, were that there were no threats made, and it was basically a non-event.”
Rappaport said that at the time we spoke with him on December 31, a statement to be made at the press conference was in second-draft format.  Working on the statement with him are Reps. Lou and Carol Vita and Harry Accornero.
“What we really need to do is emphasize that Barack Obama was not eligible and is not eligible to become president.  At the Ballot Law hearing, the Commission and the Assistant Secretary of State said publicly, under oath, on the record, that their authority was only to see that the paperwork was properly filled out and that the $1,000 fee was paid.  If you go back a little farther, you find out that they had disqualified a man named Sal Mohamed and another named Abdul Hassan.  There are letters, of which we have copies, signed by Karen Ladd, the Assistant Secretary of State.  So we applied for a rehearing, which was denied, and we applied to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and last week they denied us a hearing.  We can provide complete copies of all of these challenges.”
The Post & Email asked, “Were you surprised that your own state Supreme Court refused to hear your appeal?” and Rappaport responded, “Yes, I was surprised.”  He stated that in the letter he received, having been one of the plaintiffs, no reason had been provided.
Rappaort described the purpose of the press conference:
Our biggest concern is that the public becomes aware of what’s going on.  We think that the public does not understand, and it is our effort to try to enlighten them.  I would cite three things:  First of all, there was Emmerich de Vattel’s Law of Nations, which gave the definition at the time of the Founders.  Second, there was the case Minor v. Happersett from 1875, which established the definition of “natural born Citizen” as one who has two American-citizen parents.  We have tons of evidence that Obama’s alleged father was not a citizen.  He never held a green card and was never a resident alien.  In fact, the truth is he was thrown out of the country.
Rappaport also cited Senate Resolution 511, passed in April 2008, which declared that John McCain was a natural born Citizen by virtue of having two U.S.-citizen parents, but that Obama was not held to the same standard, and he “didn’t know why.”
The Post & Email asked Rappaport, “Do you think that most of your constituents support what you are doing?” and he responded, “Yes.  Obama is definitely not very popular in northern New Hampshire.”  He stated that Coos County is the largest land mass in the state, has only about 30,000 residents, and was the reason he moved there.  New Hampshire has a total of about 1,300,000 residents.
As to his reason for questioning Obama’s eligibility, Rappaport said, “We all swore an oath to two constitutions:  the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution.  I take my oath very seriously, and I feel that I’m required by that oath to do this.  I feel very strongly about that.  I’ve received a death threat on this go-around and a lot of letters from people who disagree with me.  I’ve been called names, but I’ve never gotten a reasoned explanation, not one.  I feel as if everyone is claiming ‘This is a settled matter, but I haven’t heard that.’”
We then asked him, “Do you believe the April 27, 2011 purported birth certificate being released to the public is what they’re considering the point which ‘settled’ it?” and he responded, “It didn’t come from him specifically; it came from the ‘White House.’  It is my opinion that not only is it a forgery, but it is a lousy forgery.  I printed it from the White House website, and I was able to take it apart using Adobe Illustrator.  There were something like 12 different layers.  Through a process called ‘flattening,’ which puts all the layers together such that they can’t be separated, the layers should have been flattened, although a document expert could have still determined that it was a forgery.”
Rappaport stated that his background was in electrical engineering and that he “wrote computer software.”  He said his skills include laying out a website, although he sometimes “hired other people” to do things beyond his skill level and is not a computer “expert.”  Other New Hampshire representatives also have stated that they believe the image is a forgery.
The press conference is expected to last about 30 minutes, and New Hampshire media will be notified.  “There’s no guarantee that any major media will cover it, but my biggest hope is that major media is finally waking up.  When I was growing up, I read The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.  Back then, The Times, in particular, was a really good newspaper.  What you read on the front page was news, and what you read on the Editorial page was opinion, and the two were not mixed.  Today, the news is highly biased.  I feel as if The New York Times and The Washington Post report on a story only if it’s something they agree with. If it’s something they don’t agree with, it doesn’t appear anywhere.   If it’s something that they mostly agree with, then you’ll find it on page 40.”
Rappaport is 71 and serving his second term in the New Hampshire House. He stated that the organizers of the press conference would have preferred to have more time to plan, but the New Hampshire primary is fast approaching on January 10 and they want to inform the people of what they believe has transpired. The group will also invite the attorney general and all New Hampshire representatives.  “My plan is to put out an announcement to all representatives inviting them to support us and to come,” he said.
Final details of the time and place will be released shortly.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on January 02, 2012, 01:54:52 PM
blah blah blah Orly Taitz

As if any of this 'birther' non-sense wasn't ridiculous enough on its own, it's time to throw Orly Taitz in the mix. Why people insist on this birther nonsense, and following the nutjob that is Orly Taitz is beyond me.

It's not like there aren't legitimate and powerful criticisms of Obama on the merits.

I was also amused by this gem from Laurent Rappaport: "I printed it from the White House website, and I was able to take it apart using Adobe Illustrator. There were something like 12 different layers.  Through a process called ‘flattening,’ which puts all the layers together such that they can’t be separated, the layers should have been flattened [...]"

So let me get this straight... He printed it, and somehow, the layers were preserved in the printout? I think someone is very confused about how computers and printers operate. Par for the course for someone who's 71, I guess.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 03, 2012, 01:44:22 PM
Georgia Judge Denies Obama’s Motion to Dismiss in Ballot Challenge 22


http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/03/georgia-judge-denies-obamas-motion-to-dismiss-in-ballot-challenge


 
DOES THE RULE OF LAW STILL STAND IN THE PEACH STATE?
by Sharon Rondeau



Georgia's flag contains the phrase "In God We Trust" under a sentry guarding the state constitution
(Jan. 3, 2012) — Atty. Orly Taitz has posted on her website an order from Judge Michael Malihi denying the request of an attorney representing Barack Hussein Obama to dismiss three ballot challenges filed respectively by Taitz, Atty. Van Irion, and Atty. J. Mark Hatfield on behalf of Georgia registered voters and others.

Taitz represents four presidential candidates and a Georgia voter, David Farra; Irion represents David Welden, a Georgia voter; and Hatfield represents Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, both Georgia voters.

The Post & Email published an article on January 2, 2012 regarding Taitz’s ballot challenge in Georgia as well as in other states.

Also on January 2, 2012, The Post & Email spoke with Atty. Van Irion, who described his ballot challenge on behalf of David Welden.  Irion had stated that a hearing was scheduled for January 26, 2012, and we have contacted him to inquire as to whether or not that hearing will take place given today’s order from Judge Malihi.

In his order, Malihi wrote, in part:

The Georgia Election Code (“the Code”) mandates that “[e]very candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(a).

The Post & Email had published another Georgia voter’s petition asking that a special grand jury be convened to investigate the non-response of Secretary of State Brian Kemp to the voter’s previous FOIA request and formal letter inquiring as to the information Kemp relied upon in 2008 to place Obama’s name on the ballot.  The voter cited the same statute as Malihi in contending that registered voters have a right to challenge candidates’ qualifications for any office.  The voter, Millard Blanchard, claimed that Kemp had broken the law by failing to remove Obama’s name from the 2012 presidential ballot.

Judge Malihi appeared to support Blanchard’s claim in his decision:

Both the Secretary of State and the electors of Georgia are granted the authority under the Code to challenge the qualifications of a candidate.  The challenge procedures are defined in Code Section 21-2-5(b), which authorizes any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate to challenge the qualifications of the candidate by filing a written complaint with the Secretary of State within two weeks after the deadline for qualifying.  O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b).

A former secretary of state, Karen Handel, utilized the law when she disqualified someone from his candidacy for local office.

Of the new development, Taitz stated on her website, “I still can’t believe this…Judge Malihi, Deputy Chief judge of the Administrative court in GA, ruled, that Obama’s motion to dismiss is denied. He will have to stand trial and prove his eligibility for office…Now judge Malihi is sending a message: ‘nobody is above the law.’”

Questions have swirled since 2008 regarding Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office of president.  While he claims a birth in Hawaii, many experts deemed the long-form birth certificate issued on April 27, 2011 a forgery.  Obama also claims having been born to a foreign father who never held U.S. citizenship, thereby raising the issue of whether or not he meets the criterion of “natural born Citizen” as stated in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

The Post & Email is aware of at least one researcher who has stated that Obama falsified his entire background and that he was actually born in New York City to two U.S.-citizen parents but sent to live in Indonesia as a toddler.  Trowbridge has asked Obama to “step forth in integrity.”

Today in Concord, NH, several state legislators held a press conference to inform the public about what they believe could have been election fraud committed in 2008 by Barack Hussein Obama if he was not constitutionally eligible to seek the office of president.  They have also objected to the denial by the New Hampshire Supreme Court to review a decision by the state Ballot Law Commission to include Obama’s name on the ballot for the 2012 election.  The Commission as well as the Secretary of State’s office claimed they were not responsible for vetting candidates, but in both 2011 and 2008, the Assistant Secretary of State had disqualified one candidate, respectively, for failing to meet constitutional eligibility requirements for the presidency.

In 2010, a candidate for U.S. Congress from Texas was disqualified by the Secretary of State for apparently having a party affiliation as he was planning to run as an Independent.

A challenges to Obama’s eligibility has also been filed in New York, and a website with national scope has been established to assist voters to do so in each of the 50 states.


© 2012, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 03, 2012, 02:36:12 PM
Farrar Motion to dismiss by Obama is denied
3Jan2012 | MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge




ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

On December 15, 2011, Defendant, President Barack Obama, moved for dismissal of Plaintiffs' challenge to his qualifications for office. The Court has jurisdiction to hear this contested case pursuant to Chapter 13 of Title 50, the "Georgia Administrative Procedure Act."

For the reasons indicated below, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. 1

I. Discussion 1. The Georgia Election Code (the "Code") mandates that "[e]very candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought." O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(a).

2. Both the Secretary of State and the electors of Georgia are granted the authority under the Code to challenge the qualifications of a candidate. The challenge procedures are defined in Code Section 21-2-5(b), which authorizes any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate to challenge the qualifications of the candidate by filing a written complaint with the Secretary of State within two weeks after the deadline for qualifying. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b).

3. The Georgia law governing presidential preference primaries mandates that "

1 Because Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is denied, in the interest of efficiency, the Court finds it unnecessary to wait for the Plaintiffs' responses before denying the motion.

Page 2 of 4

  party to notify them that the deadline for submitting the list of candidate names for the 2012 presidential preference primary was November 15, 2011. On November 1, 2011, the Executive Committee of the Democratic Party submitted President Barack Obama's name as the sole candidate for the Democratic Party. To be timely, complaints challenging a presidential candidate's qualifications in the presidential preference primary had to be filed no later than November 29, 2011. Plaintiffs, as electors eligible to vote for Defendant, timely filed challenges with the Secretary of State before the deadline of November 29, 2011.

4. In the instant motion, Defendant contends that Georgia law does not give Plaintiffs authority to challenge a political party's nominee for president in a presidential preference primary because Code Section 21-2-5 does not apply to the presidential preference primary.

5. Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this Court finds that the cases cited by Defendant are not controlling. When the Court construes a constitutional or statutory provision, the "first step . . . is to examine the plain statutory language." Morrison v. Claborn, 294 Ga. App. 508, 512 (2008). "Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, judicial construction is not only unnecessary but forbidden. In the absence of words of limitation, words in a statute should be given their ordinary and everyday meaning." Six Flags Over Ga. v. Kull, 276 Ga. 210, 211 (2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Because there is no other "natural and reasonable construction" of the statutory language, this Court is "not authorized either to read into or to read out that which would add to or change its meaning." Blum v. Schrader, 281 Ga. 238, 240 (2006) (quotation marks omitted).

6. Code Section 21-2-5(a) states that "every candidate for federal and state office" must meet the qualifications for holding that particular office, and this Court has seen no case law limiting this provision, nor found any language that contains an exception for the office of president or stating that the provision does not apply to the presidential preference primary.

O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a) (emphasis added). Although the word "candidate" is not explicitly defined in the Code, Section 21-2-193 states that the political party for the presidential preference Page 3 of 4

  primary "shall submit to the Secretary of State a list of the names of the candidates of such party to appear on the presidential preference primary ballot." O.C.G.A. 21-2-193 (emphasis added). Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office.

7. Code Sections 21-2-190 to 21-2-200 set out the procedures of the presidential preference primary and also provide no exception to the Section 21-2-5 qualification requirement. This Court finds no basis under Georgia law why the qualification requirements in Section 21-2-5 would not apply to a candidate for the office of the president in the presidential preference primary.

8. Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.

II. Decision Based on the foregoing, the motion to dismiss is DENIED.

SO ORDERED, this the 3 rd day of January, 2012.

MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge

Page 4 of 4

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 03, 2012, 06:30:19 PM
BREAKING!!! Georgia Court to Hear Natural Born Citizen Case vs Obama
The National Patriot ^ | 1/3/12 | Craig Andresen
Posted on January 3, 2012 6:01:39 PM EST by Nachum

The liberty Legal Foundation has announced that the case pending in Georgia, challenging Obama’s eligibility, has been ACCEPTED.

This is great news considering Obama and his team of attorneys had been actively trying to have this case DENIED!!

The Georgia court in agreeing to hear the case could well be setting the stage for other states in which quite similar cases are pending. Arizona and Tennessee both have such cases waiting right now.

This case, in Georgia, deals specifically with the Natural Born Citizen issue.

In a previous article, we brought up the Minor vs Happersett case from 1875 in which the Supreme Court defined a NBC as one who has 2 parents which were citizens at the time of the subject’s birth. We also cited 3 other cases in which the Supreme Court, previous to the Minor case, said the same thing.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalpatriot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 04, 2012, 03:49:12 AM
Skip to comments.

Court: Obama must be ‘constitutionally’ eligible
WorldNet Daily ^ | 3 January 2012 | Bob Unruh
Posted on January 4, 2012 1:11:25 AM EST by Windflier

For the first time in dozens of court cases challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, a judge has ruled that Obama must, in order to be a candidate on the Georgia ballot for president in 2012, meet the constitutional demands for candidates for the office.

A hearing has been scheduled later this month for evidence on the issue that has plagued Obama and his presidency since long before he took office. At issue is the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural-born citizen.” Some allege he was not born in the U.S. as he has claimed and, therefore, is not eligible.

Others, including top constitutional expert Herb Titus, contend that the term “natural-born citizen,” which is not defined in the Constitution, would have been understood when the document was written to mean the offspring of two U.S. citizens. That argument is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision

Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father, as identified on the “Certificate of Live Birth” image released by the White House, was a foreign national who came from Kenya to study in the U.S. and never was a citizen.

The ruling came today from Judge Michael W. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 04, 2012, 03:51:31 AM
http://www.examiner.com/crime-in-phoenix/obama-eligibility-challenges-to-move-forward-georgia


Great news.   The birther train is rolling down the tracks. 
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: xpac2 on January 04, 2012, 08:27:30 AM
Great news...Noone gives a shit  ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 04, 2012, 02:05:03 PM
January 4, 2012
New Hampshire Lawmakers Call For Investigation Into Obama's Ballot Eligibility, Citizenship
 
(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
The Huffington Post   Luke Johnson   




A group of New Hampshire lawmakers asked the state attorney general's office Tuesday to investigate whether President Barack Obama meets the eligibility requirements to appear on the state's ballot, after their previous attempt to remove his name from the ballot was rejected in November.

Republican state Reps. Laurence Rappaport and Carol and Lucien Vita, say that Obama is not a natural-born citizen because his father was Kenyan. "This is not a birther issue, not a consideration of where Mr. Obama was born," Rappaport said, according to the New Hampshire Union Leader. "Our concern is only if he is a natural-born citizen."

The Congressional Research Service wrote in 2011, "There is no provision in the Constitution and no controlling American case law to support a contention that the citizenship of one's parents governs the eligibility of a native born U.S. citizen to be president."

Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961. The White House released the president's long-form birth certificate in April after his campaign released a scanned copy. Some, however, refuse to believe the veracity of the document.

The attorney general's office doesn't plan to respond. "There's no request in it," said Associate Attorney General Richard Head, according to the Concord Monitor. "I honestly can't figure it out."

New Hampshire Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley said it showed how "crazy town" has taken over the statehouse.

The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission rejected an effort in November led by the group's attorney, "birther queen" Orly Taitz, to remove Obama's name from the ballot. After the commission unanimously rejected the effort, members in the crowd shouted "Traitors!" and "Shame on you!"

Assistant Attorney General Matt Mavrogeorge and Assistant Secretary of State Karen Ladd locked themselves in an office and called authorities because they feared for their safety, saying that crowd members were banging at the door and yelling. The state attorney general has asked state police to investigate the incident.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 04, 2012, 07:47:06 PM
New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara(Virginia' brother)
ObamaRelease YourRecords ^ | Wednesday, January 4, 2012; 5:02 PM
Posted on January 4, 2012 9:33:27 PM EST by Red Steel

Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara
Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates.

The case is listed as follows;



Flashback;
Hawaii Department of Health Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara
Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourReco rds -www.BirtherReport.com via butterdezillion.wordpres s.com

HDOH Denies Having Birth Record for Virginia Sunahara

Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day. Her death was announced in both theHonolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin. Her name is in both the 1960-64 birth index and 1960-64death index.But when I asked for a non-certified copy of her abbreviated birth certificate the HDOH told me thatthey have no records responsive to my request. On previous requests for other COLB I had been told that I could not get a copy because I did not have a direct and tangible interest. But in this case they flat-out told me they don't have a birth record for Virginia. Even though their birth index says they do.

(See the birth index page at http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/ ).

Either the HDOH lied about having no records for her, or they queried her name and the computer no longer has that record under her name, even though it was under her name when they printed the 1960-64 birth index sometime around March of 2010. What happened to Virginia's birth record? Was the name on it changed to Barack Hussein Obama II so he could have her BC#? The HDOH needs to be audited, to find out what has happened with Sunahara's birth record. Here is the HDOH’s claim that they have no birth record for a girl listed on their birth index:


hdohinfo@doh.hawaii.gov



Excerpted, more here at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html#comment-form
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 05, 2012, 07:53:06 AM
GA judge to hear challenge to Obama eligibility
WTVM.com ^ | 4Jan2012




ATLANTA (AP) - A Georgia judge has denied a motion by President Barack Obama that sought to dismiss a complaint that would keep his name off the state's ballot during the March presidential primary.

The Columbus Ledger-Enquirer reports (http://bit.ly/wa7YJs ) that California lawyer Orly Taitz filed a complaint in November on behalf of a Georgia resident arguing that Obama isn't a natural born citizen and is not eligible to be president.


(Excerpt) Read more at wtvm.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 05, 2012, 08:46:42 AM
Orly Taitz Applauds Birther Victory Handed Down By State Judge In Georgia
 
First Posted: 01/ 5/12 10:33 AM ET Updated: 01/ 5/12 10:42 AM ET




Orly Taitz, a California attorney and queen of the birthers, won a small victory this week when a judge in Georgia denied a motion by the Obama administration to have one her many challenges to the president's ballot eligibility dismissed.

Taitz, who maintains that Obama is not a natural-born citizen and therefore is not eligible to be president -- despite the White House's release of his full "long-form" birth certificate last year -- appeared elated at the decision:

"THANK YOU GOD!!! I AM READY TO CRY! AFTER 3 YEARS OF BATTLE FOR THE FIRST TIME A JUDGE RULED THAT OBAMA'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. I CAN NOW DEPOSE OBAMA AND EVERYBODY ELSE INVOLVED WITHOUT ANY IMPEDIMENT," she wrote on her website.

The hearing on Taitz's complaint has been set for Jan. 26 in Fulton County, Ga. Obama will not be required to attend.

Taitz has hit Georgia hard on the birther issue -- as have other complainants -- but this is her first success of this nature there, or anywhere, for that matter. A previous attempt in Georgia resulted in her being fined.

The Columbus Ledger-Enquirer reports:

Taitz represented two soldiers in U.S. District Court in Columbus who sought to avoid deployment by arguing Obama wasn't the commander-in-chief because he wasn’t eligible to be president. Federal Judge Clay Land warned Taitz against filing a frivolous suit, then fined her $20,000 after he denied the second claim.

On her website, she notes the significance of the decision being passed down in the same state where she was so heartily rejected, calling it "particularly sweet."

It's a rare turn of events for the birther die-hard, who has been among the most vocal and most active members of the anti-Obama movement. She was rejected unanimously by a New Hampshire panel last year, after testifying that Obama's birth certificate was a forgery.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 05, 2012, 12:15:34 PM
President Obama will have to deal with birthers
International World News ^ | Jan 1, 2012 | Greg Rogers




Las Vegas 1 January 2011 (sic). President Obama has(sic) had a dream run to the White House and hopes to remain there for another term. His chances of re election are diminished by his failure to convince Americans that he is entitled to the office he holds.

There are many Americans who are concerned that Barack Obama is not who and what he says he is. Veterans like Robert Laity are frustrated that media outlets have not pressured President Obama into releasing a real authenticated copy of his birth certificate. There appears little doubt that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii but many people believe that he is not entitled to hold his office as he is ineligible due to the status of his parents. The President's birth certificate would clear up that issue.

Robert Laity is a vocal American who is complaining to have Barack Obama charged with electoral fraud. The issue seems to be that the election authorities do not require a candidate to prove that he or she is entitled to seek an office. It is up to someone to prove that a candidate is not entitled to stand.


(Excerpt) Read more at international.to ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on January 05, 2012, 12:48:24 PM
Even tho the spin is "citizenship" in this article, Hendershot is challenging Obama's constitutional eligibility.

http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2012/01/jefferson_county_judge_sets_mo.html (http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2012/01/jefferson_county_judge_sets_mo.html)

Jefferson County judge sets hearing on request to dismiss suit over President Obama's citizenship
Published: Wednesday, January 04, 2012, 11:09 AM     Updated: Wednesday, January 04, 2012, 12:22 PM
  By Eric Velasco -- The Birmingham News

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama -- A Jefferson County judge today set a Monday hearing on a lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama's citizenship and right to be on the 2012 ballots in Alabama.
Circuit Judge Helen Shores Lee will consider a request by Mark Kennedy, chairman of the Alabama Democratic Party, to dismiss the suit filed against him on Dec. 14 by Birmingham resident Albert E. Hendershot.
The hearing will start at 9 a.m. Jan. 9 in Lee's Birmingham courtroom.
Hendershot wants Lee to issue an injunction blocking Obama from being certified as a candidate in Alabama. His suit claims he has "staggering evidence" that Obama is using a forged birth certificate and a false Social Security number.
"Barack Hussein Obama II is not a natural born citizen and is not qualified to be on the ballot as a presidential candidate," Hendershot wrote in his suit, which he said is part of an informal effort in several Southern states to keep Obama off ballots in those states.
Democratic Party officials say Obama's citizenship and right to serve as president is a settled matter. Last year the White House released copies of Obama's long-form birth certificate saying he was born in Hawaii in 1961.
Obama's citizenship -- and his right to hold the office of president -- has been called into question during both his 2008 and current election bids. Last year, 24 percent of respondents in a USA Today/Gallup poll questioned whether Obama was a U.S. citizen.
Federal judges dismissed lawsuits in 2008 and 2009 challenging Obama's citizenship and right to serve as president.
Read: The lawsuit
Democratic official's request for early hearing on suit
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on January 05, 2012, 01:47:35 PM
[ Invalid YouTube link ]

Uploaded by birthersummit on Jan 5, 2012
http://www.birthersummit.org An interview in which Duncan Sunahara discusses his late sister Virginia's birth certificate research.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 05, 2012, 10:05:53 PM
New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara(Virginia' brother)
ObamaRelease YourRecords ^ | Wednesday, January 4, 2012; 5:02 PM
Posted on January 4, 2012 9:33:27 PM EST by Red Steel

Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara
Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates.

The case is listed as follows;



Flashback;
Hawaii Department of Health Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara
Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourReco rds -www.BirtherReport.com via butterdezillion.wordpres s.com

HDOH Denies Having Birth Record for Virginia Sunahara

Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day. Her death was announced in both theHonolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin. Her name is in both the 1960-64 birth index and 1960-64death index.But when I asked for a non-certified copy of her abbreviated birth certificate the HDOH told me thatthey have no records responsive to my request. On previous requests for other COLB I had been told that I could not get a copy because I did not have a direct and tangible interest. But in this case they flat-out told me they don't have a birth record for Virginia. Even though their birth index says they do.

(See the birth index page at http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/ ).

Either the HDOH lied about having no records for her, or they queried her name and the computer no longer has that record under her name, even though it was under her name when they printed the 1960-64 birth index sometime around March of 2010. What happened to Virginia's birth record? Was the name on it changed to Barack Hussein Obama II so he could have her BC#? The HDOH needs to be audited, to find out what has happened with Sunahara's birth record. Here is the HDOH’s claim that they have no birth record for a girl listed on their birth index:


Excerpted, more here at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html#comment-form

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on January 06, 2012, 11:51:36 AM
Drip... drip... drip... So far, this has been a really great start to a new year. I almost feel hopeful again.



http://godfatherpolitics.com/2978/goon-squad-targeting-sheriff-joe-before-obama-eligibility-declared/ (http://godfatherpolitics.com/2978/goon-squad-targeting-sheriff-joe-before-obama-eligibility-declared/)
 JANUARY 5, 2012 by DA TAGLIARE

Goon Squad Targeting Sheriff Joe before Obama Eligibility Declared

Maricopa County, Arizona contains Phoenix and eight other cities with populations over 100,000.  The most populace county in the state with nearly four million people could have a significant impact on this year’s presidential election.

In Arizona, the county sheriff is responsible for verifying the eligibility of any candidate wanting to be placed on the ballot in their particular county.  In Maricopa County, that responsibility falls to Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Last year, Arpaio announced that he had instructed his Cold Squad unit to investigate Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for President.  In that announcement, he pretty much ordered the Obama administration to allow his officer’s access to the original birth documents in Hawaii that the President claims verify his US birth and right to run for the Oval Office.

Since that announcement, the President has launched one attack after another at Sheriff Joe.

First he instructed his loyal bird dog, Eric Holder to go after Arpaio and his department for their enforcement of state immigration laws.  The DOJ descended on the Maricopa County Sheriff’s department  like a flock of vultures on a dead carcass.  They swooped in and stripped Sheriff Joe and his detention officers of their federal badges that allowed them to enforce immigration laws.  They trumped up charges of illegal racial profiling to justify their actions.

But unlike most carcasses, Sheriff Joe isn’t dead yet and continues to stand his ground for what he believes is right and legal.

So now another liberal bird dog has moved into the area and is trying to launch a recall drive to get Sheriff Joe removed from office before his department can issue their results of the Obama eligibility investigation scheduled for release in February.

Randy Parraz is a radical leftist activist who has made a career of helping to launch community organized attacks on conservatives in the US and Canada.  His methods follow those of Jewish-American community activist Saul Alinsky who wrote the book Rules for Radicals.  His tactics of community organization resemble those used in 1917 Russia to rid the ruling monarchy and replace it with the communist party.

Last year, Parraz launched a community organized recall against Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce (R).  Using his Berkeley trained radial methods, Parraz rallied the huge Hispanic population to force Pearce from his prominent position in the state senate.

Now Parraz has set his Marxist tactics against Sheriff Joe in an effort to get him out of office before he can announce whether or not Obama’s name will be allowed on the ballot in Maricopa County.  In his announcement, Parraz said,

“Our focus right now is to hold Sheriff Arpaio accountable for what he has done – his abuse of power, the corruption, all the things he has done under his leadership.  We need to have a fresh start; we need to get him out.  The only way we can do this is to engage the citizens in a way in which they have never been engaged before.”

Responding to Parraz’s attack, Arpaio said,

“No way will I resign.”

Parraz is planning on going to the Maricopa Board of Supervisors to force the issue of Sheriff Joe.  He tried this in December, but was unsuccessful and we can only hope and pray that the board once again rejects his demands.

All this continues to make myself and others seriously doubt Obama’s legitimacy to hold the office of president.  If he had the proper documents, why won’t he release it and settle this matter?  No, instead, Obama would rather send his goon squad to destroy his opponents like Sheriff Joe.  When you examine Obama’s tactics, he’s no different than Venezuela’s Chavez or Libya’s former leader Khadafy.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 07, 2012, 10:51:17 AM
Georgia case could determine whether Obama's name may be placed on ANY 2012 state ballot!
Coach is Right ^ | 1/07/2012 | Doug Book




Americans have finally made the acquaintance of a judge who is willing to adhere to the demands of the Constitution and the laws he swore an oath to uphold upon taking office.

Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael M. Malihi ruled this week that, as stated in Georgia law, “every candidate for federal office shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (1)

In his ruling, Mahili stated quite simply that “the court finds that the defendant (Barack Obama) is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (1)

The suits which resulted in Malihi’s ruling were brought in response to Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 Georgia State primary ballot. And one of these complaints in particular might cause problems for the acting President of the United States.

In October of last year, attorney Van R. Irion of the Liberty Legal Foundation filed lawsuits against the Democrat Party both in Tennessee and at the federal level, “…requesting injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election.” (2)

It was this same complaint that comprises the Georgia case for which a hearing is scheduled on January 26th.

Irion’s action has nothing whatever to do with the validity of the birth certificate Obama’s minions posted online last year. And the attorney doesn’t care whether Obama was born in Hawaii or not.

“The only fact relevant to this case,” says Irion, “is the fact that the defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen.” It is Irion’s contention that as Obama’s father was...


(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 08, 2012, 03:35:53 PM
Breaking: Hawaii Judge Knowingly Schedules Next Hearing for Date Taitz Must be in Georgia
Post & Email ^ | 1/6/2012 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on Friday, January 06, 2012 4:57:41 PM by GregNH

(Jan. 6, 2012)— At approximately 3:05 ET, Atty. Orly Taitz contacted The Post & Email following the hearing scheduled for today in Taitz v. Fuddy in the First Circuit Court in Honolulu with Judge Rhonda Nishimura. Astoundingly, although we are told that Nishimura was aware that Taitz was not available on January 26, 2012 because of a ballot challenge hearing in Atlanta, GA, she scheduled a hearing on the subpoena issued by the court in Georgia for the very same day.

Taitz said that because of the Motion for Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement filed with the Hawaii court, Judge Nishimura was aware that Taitz could not be in both Hawaii and Georgia on that day.


(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 08, 2012, 03:51:26 PM
BARACK OBAMA UNABLE TO REGISTER FOR STATE PRIMARY AS ALABAMAREVIEWS HIS ELIGIBILITY
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31406.php ^ | 1/7/2012




UPDATE: An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.

Several Alabama citizens have filed a lawsuit within the Alabama Circuit Court to "prevent certification of President Barack Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary hearings."


(Excerpt) Read more at AmericansUnitedForFreedo m.org ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 09, 2012, 08:02:09 AM
New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara(Virginia' brother)
ObamaRelease YourRecords ^ | Wednesday, January 4, 2012; 5:02 PM




Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara

Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates.



The case is listed as follows;





Flashback;
Hawaii Department of Health Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara
Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourReco rds -www.BirtherReport.com via butterdezillion.wordpres s.com


HDOH Denies Having Birth Record for Virginia Sunahara

Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day. Her death was announced in both theHonolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin. Her name is in both the 1960-64 birth index and 1960-64death index.But when I asked for a non-certified copy of her abbreviated birth certificate the HDOH told me thatthey have no records responsive to my request. On previous requests for other COLB I had been told that I could not get a copy because I did not have a direct and tangible interest. But in this case they flat-out told me they don't have a birth record for Virginia. Even though their birth index says they do.

(See the birth index page at http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/ ).

Either the HDOH lied about having no records for her, or they queried her name and the computer no longer has that record under her name, even though it was under her name when they printed the 1960-64 birth index sometime around March of 2010. What happened to Virginia's birth record? Was the name on it changed to Barack Hussein Obama II so he could have her BC#? The HDOH needs to be audited, to find out what has happened with Sunahara's birth record. Here is the HDOH’s claim that they have no birth record for a girl listed on their birth index:

From: hdohinfo
To: Nellie
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: UIPA Request - non-certified abbreviated BC for Tomiyo
SunaharaAloha Ms. (redacted):We have no records responsive to your request. Hawaii Department of Health Public Information Office staff
Send mail to:State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section/UIPA Request
Honolulu, HI 97801
hdohinfo@doh.hawaii.gov


Excerpted, more here at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html#comment-form



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 09, 2012, 08:05:49 AM
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2012, 08:35:40 AM
Court: Obama must be ‘constitutionally’ eligible
WorldNet Daily ^ | 3 January 2012 | Bob Unruh




For the first time in dozens of court cases challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, a judge has ruled that Obama must, in order to be a candidate on the Georgia ballot for president in 2012, meet the constitutional demands for candidates for the office.

A hearing has been scheduled later this month for evidence on the issue that has plagued Obama and his presidency since long before he took office. At issue is the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural-born citizen.” Some allege he was not born in the U.S. as he has claimed and, therefore, is not eligible.

Others, including top constitutional expert Herb Titus, contend that the term “natural-born citizen,” which is not defined in the Constitution, would have been understood when the document was written to mean the offspring of two U.S. citizens. That argument is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision

Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father, as identified on the “Certificate of Live Birth” image released by the White House, was a foreign national who came from Kenya to study in the U.S. and never was a citizen.

The ruling came today from Judge Michael W. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on January 13, 2012, 11:26:56 AM
A Georgia Judge has issued a subpoena demanding Barack Obama appear in court January 26 AND produce his original long form birth certificate, passport records, college registration records and more.

Any and all certified birth records including a long form birth certificate.

Certified school/university registration records. Certified immigration/naturalization records.

Certified passport records

Redacted certified Social Security card applications for each of the aliases and other legal names used by Barack Obama, including but not limited to his legal surname when adopted by step-father Lolo Soetoro.

In addition, Judge Malihi has reportedly also subpoenaed Hawaii Health Department officials and commanded them to produce an original certified copy of Obama's long form birth certificate.
(http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/subpoenas-Farrar-v-Obama_0003-791x1024.jpg)
(http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/subpoenas-Farrar-v-Obama_0002-791x1024.jpg)
(http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/subpoenas-Farrar-v-Obama_0001-791x1024.jpg)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 13, 2012, 11:33:55 AM
Awesome!!!!      Finally we have a judge with balls.   

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 15, 2012, 03:08:37 PM
THREE MORE “OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGES” REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN FILED IN ILLINOIS
Obama Ballot Challenge ^ | 1-15-2012 | Edward C. Noonan
Posted on January 15, 2012 4:36:49 PM EST by ednoonan7

THREE MORE “OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGES” REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN FILED IN ILLINOIS

It has just been reported to me that three more nationwide challenges to Obama appearing on the upcoming primary ballots have been filed. This time, it is with the Illinois State Board of Elections.

My source of this information is http://obamaballotchallenge.com/3-obama-ballot-challenges-in-illinois-now. Here the OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGE group links directly to the Illinois State Board of Elections where the three petitioners are shown:

[See image here]

What is curious is that two dates for “objection” be to filed is past. The Freeman file expired on the 10th, and the Jackson and Meroni’s date of final objection time is the 13th. This would have been last Thursday… so what gives? Will the Obama people still be able to object even though the date has come and gone?

You can also read more about the Article II matter at: http://www.art2superpac.com/index.html

Edward C. Noonan NBC President 2012
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2012, 01:34:20 PM
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: FarRightLooney on January 26, 2012, 11:27:22 AM
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/ (http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/)

The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born.

I was just made privy to a very important piece of research I had not previously been aware of. It comes by way of a comment forwarded to me by the author of the h2ooflife blog:

“I had presumed that the idiom “natural born citizen” appeared nowhere in U.S. Law other than A2S1C5, but I found it in administrative law and it is contrasted with native and naturalized citizenship. I’ve never seen any mention of this fact before and wonder how many are aware of it in the ineligibility camp. Here’s the quotes:
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html

He then quoted two provisions from the link provided, but there’s actuallythree at the official INS “.gov” site which establish official recognition by the federal government that native-born and natural-born should be separately delineated. When you visit the suggested link to the Immigration and Naturalization service, it brings you to “Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”

Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3) provides:

“The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…” (Emphasis added.)

Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:

“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.

The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)

And again, Interpretation 324.2(b) provides:

“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.” (Emphasis added.)

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48438.html

Three times in this official INS Interpretation – currently published by the Obama Administration – native-born and natural-born are given separate consideration. And in the third example – from Interpretation 324.2(b) – the INS clearly states that each delineation, “naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen“, is a separate status.

The INS includes the following explanation of Interpretations:

“Interpretations were created to supplement and clarify the provisions of the statute and regulations as interpreted by the courts. These materials usually are not included in the regulations because they deal generally with procedural matters and do not deal directly with application and benefit requirements. They are still a useful tool to help you understand how the DHS Bureaus performs their different immigration services and enforcement functions. Users of the Operation Instructions and Interpretations should always consult the relevant regulations and manuals in conjunction with these materials. As the DHS Bureaus have grown, the trend has been towards inclusion of more materials in the regulations and field manuals, and the Operations Instructions and Interpretations have been updated less frequently.”

I am rather rocked by this find, having never seen it before, and it certainly comes to the attention of the nation at a critical moment, one day before the Georgia POTUS eligibility hearings. I do have a policy of only printingcomments from attorneys, but I did say in the comment rules that I would be happy to read messages from anyone. Since this research is new to me, and directly relevant to a proper analysis of the natural-born citizen clause, I have made an exception in posting this comment.

However, I must stress that I do not agree with some things at theh2ooflife blog. While I haven’t had the time to examine everything there, I must point out the following, and zealously dispute it:

“The First U.S. Congress included in the 1790 Immigration & Naturalization Act language to alert the State Department to the fact that Americans born abroad are (“natural born” citizens”  and are not to be viewed as foreigners due to foreign birth.  They were not granted citizenship via that US statute, rather their automatic citizenship was stated as a fact that must be recognized by immigration authorities.  They were not citizens by any other means than natural law, and statutory law was written to insure that their natural citizenship was recognized.”

This is not a reasonable explanation. It fails to recognize that Congress only has powers over naturalization. Congress has no power to define “natural born Citizen”, which has nothing to do with naturalization. Furthermore, if Congress wants to tell the State Department something, they don’t have to enact legislation to do it.

But more important is that all of the following naturalization acts, 1795, 1802, etc., were also passed to naturalize the children of U.S. citizens born abroad. And the words “natural born” were repealed in the 1795 Naturalization Act and never returned again.

In Rogers. v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that persons born abroad are not covered by the 14th Amendment, and therefore, their citizenship can be stripped from them by Congress, whereas Congress cannot strip citizenship from a 14th Amendment citizen, whether born or naturalized here:

“Mr. Justice Gray has observed that the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment was “declaratory of existing rights, and affirmative of existing law,” so far as the qualifications of being born in the United States, being naturalized in the United States, and being subject to its jurisdiction are concerned. United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S., at 688 . Then follows a most significant sentence:

 ”But it [the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment] has not touched the acquisition of citizenship by being born abroad of American parents; and has left that subject to be regulated, as it had always been, by Congress, in the exercise of the power conferred by the Constitution to establish an uniform rule of naturalization.”

Thus, at long last, there emerged an express constitutional definition of citizenship. But it was one restricted to the combination of three factors, each and all significant: birth in the United States, naturalization in the United States, and subjection to the jurisdiction of the United States. The definition obviously did not apply to any acquisition of citizenship by being born abroad of an American parent. That type, and any other not covered by the Fourteenth Amendment, was necessarily left to proper congressional action…

Further, it is conceded here both that Congress may withhold citizenship from persons like plaintiff Bellei and may prescribe a period of residence in the United States as a condition precedent without constitutional question.

Thus we have the presence of congressional power in this area, its exercise, and the Court’s specific recognition of that power and of its having been properly withheld or properly used in particular situations.” Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815, 830-831. (Emphasis added.)

Naional law has always required persons born abroad to be naturalized, whether born of citizen parents or not. Furthermore, those born abroad to citizen parents are subject to conditions precedent which Congress may impose upon them in order for them to remain U.S. citizens, whereas Congress has no such power over natural-born citizens, native-born citizens, or citizens naturalized in the U.S.

Again, not only are children of citizens born abroad not natural-born, the Supreme Court has held that their citizenship is subject to being stripped by Congress, since the Constitution does not directly provide for their citizenship, as it does for those born or naturalized in the United States.

I do not appreciate the author’s argument on this point. It is definitely wrong.

Regardless, the research provided as to the INS Interpretations is superb and greatly appreciated. Well done, sir.

Adding these official Interpretations of the INS, published at the official “.gov” site, to the Supreme Court’s opinion from Minor v. Happersett, the true Constitutional definition of  a natural-born citizen, as one born in the country to citizen parents, is further reinforced.

Like the Obama administration’s prior scrubbing of the Foreign Affairs Manual, on August 21, 2009, the INS web site appears due for a cut and die at the salon.

Leo Donofrio, Esq.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 26, 2012, 09:30:01 PM
This was from the earlier thread just mentioned:

Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.

Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.

Dreams From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 01, 2012, 09:40:22 AM
Obama Ballot Challenge in Illinois Jackson Hearing Feb 2
Obama Ballot Challenge ^ | Feb 1, 2012 | Pamela Barnett

Posted on Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:39:42 AM by ednoonan7

A Feb. 2 hearing will be held to determine whether Illinois State Board of Elections will allow Barack Obama on the Illinois Presidential ballot even though he is NOT a NATURAL Born Citizen according to Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett (1875)

Hearings are open to the public. Please attend to support the objectors if you can.

See PDF file - http://www.scribd.com/doc/80058127/Obama-Ballot-Challenge-Illinois-Jackson-Hearing-Feb-2


(Excerpt) Read more at obamaballotchallenge.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 02, 2012, 03:39:37 PM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 01, 2012, 12:23:38 PM
http://www.abc15.com/generic/news/live-video


BBBBOOOOMMMM!!!!!!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 02, 2012, 05:56:00 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 02, 2012, 09:38:49 AM
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html


Title: Full Video of Sheriff Joe Arpaio Press Conference 3/1/12
Post by: FarRightLooney on March 02, 2012, 10:46:04 AM
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2012, 07:05:09 PM
http://puzo1.blogspot.com


Great!   
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 10, 2012, 07:12:35 PM
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Update on New Jersey Obama Ballot Access Objection
Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers ^ | 04/10/2012 | Mario Apuzzo
Posted on April 10, 2012 8:11:27 PM EDT by TexasVoter

We argued that Mr. Obama has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that he has not presented any evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State showing who he is and that he was born in the United States. We also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

Obama’s attorney made a motion to dismiss the Objection in its entirety. ... Judge Masin denied Obama’s motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.

(snip! - excerpts being what they are...)

Judge Masin will be contacting counsel today or tomorrow morning either by telephone or email as to his decision, stating “yes” or “no” on both issues. He will then provide his written decision to the Secretary of State no later than Wednesday, April 11, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

(Excerpt) Read more at puzo1.blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 01, 2012, 05:26:11 PM
Sheriff Joe set to release more Obama 'shockers' Arpaio sched. another news conf. on eligibility
wnd ^ | July 1, 2012 ;58 mins ago
Posted on July 1, 2012 7:16:52 PM EDT by Red Steel

Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigating Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have been promising more major revelations since their March 1 press conference, and now another event has been scheduled to unveil new information.

Arpaio told WND a press conference will be held July 17 at 2:30 p.m. local time at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Phoenix, Ariz.

WND will once again provide live Web streaming of the event.

The evidence will include information gathered in the posse’s recent investigative trip to Hawaii as well as an update on the ongoing investigation.

At the March 1 conference, as WND reported March 1, Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse announced there is probable cause that the document released by the White House in April 2011 purporting to be Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate is a forgery. The posse said it also found probable cause that Obama’s Selective Service registration form is fraudulent.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 27, 2012, 08:27:11 AM
Skip to comments.

Obama Family: "Barack Obama Sr Married Anna Toot in Hawaii" "Their union produced B. Obama Jr."
All Africa ^ | 15 August 2004 | John Oywa
Posted on April 27, 2010, 7:35:01 PM EDT by bushpilot1

"According to the family, Obama's father travelled to America to study at the University of Hawaii in 1959.

While there, he worked for an oil company and married his second wife, a white woman, named Anna Toot, and their union produced Barack Obama Jr.

Obama's book says Obama Snr left his family in Hawaii after winning a scholarship to study in Harvard when his son was two years old.

The marriage later broke up after Anna's father opposed it, according to Mama Sarah.

"Anna's father was furious about the marriage and threatened to have Obama Snr expelled from the university. Our son sent us letters, pleading that we intervene to save the marriage," remembers Sarah."

(Excerpt) Read more at allafrica.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: andreisdaman on December 28, 2012, 04:14:13 PM
Skip to comments.

Obama Family: "Barack Obama Sr Married Anna Toot in Hawaii" "Their union produced B. Obama Jr."
All Africa ^ | 15 August 2004 | John Oywa
Posted on April 27, 2010, 7:35:01 PM EDT by bushpilot1

"According to the family, Obama's father travelled to America to study at the University of Hawaii in 1959.

While there, he worked for an oil company and married his second wife, a white woman, named Anna Toot, and their union produced Barack Obama Jr.

Obama's book says Obama Snr left his family in Hawaii after winning a scholarship to study in Harvard when his son was two years old.

The marriage later broke up after Anna's father opposed it, according to Mama Sarah.

"Anna's father was furious about the marriage and threatened to have Obama Snr expelled from the university. Our son sent us letters, pleading that we intervene to save the marriage," remembers Sarah."

(Excerpt) Read more at allafrica.com ...


sigh..and how is thei relevant?????????????....you really hurt yourself when you bump your old idiotic threads
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 19, 2013, 03:44:27 PM
Breaking: 1940 Census Shows Obama Alias Harrison Bounel Born 1890; Ties To Connecticut
 BirtherReport.com ^ | January 19, 2013 | Unattributed/Orly Taitz

Posted on Saturday, January 19, 2013 11:42:17 AM by Seizethecarp

As reported here back in May of 2011 skip-tracer and debt collector Al Hendershot uncovered an alias tied to Barack Obama's Connecticut social security number and Michelle Obama.

Dr. Orly Taitz found the 1940 New York Census at Ancestry.com. The image below is taken from that census which list Harry Bounel and also shows he was born in 1890. That is the same year connected to Obama's social security number. It's also reported Bounel lived in Connecticut at one point. Obama's social security number is a number reserved for CT applicants.

Here are some excerpts from Dr. Taitz's blog on her research efforts in regards to Bounel:

According to 1940 census Harry Bounel was born in Russia in 1890. This is the date of birth on some of Lexis records associated with the Social Security number 042-68-4425, worked as a helper in a store.

Also, we had some records showing Harry Bounel residing with Robinson family in CT in 1910.

We see Bounel residing in CT in 1910. The Social Security was issued in 1977 in CT. He was 87 at that time. There was a hospital next to Newton. It was a Newtown psychiatric hospital, where some elderly without family resided their last days.

I see Newtown is right next to DANBURY (where you had placed the switched identities Obama and his Connecticut Social Security number. You had surmised that the identity was taken from someone at a local Danbury NURSING HOME.

What we found out that in 1976-1977, when new SSN laws were adopted, when this CT SNN 042-68-4425 was issued either in Danbury or in Stamford CT Social Security office (both near the hospital) elderly individuals needed to get a SSN in order to get medicare benefits.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on January 21, 2013, 01:20:00 AM
::)

Still at it with this nonsense? What a joke. You're a nutjob 333386 - a bona fide nutjob.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on January 22, 2013, 03:13:23 PM
Even Glenn Beck sez to get off these conspiracy stories. Instead, focus on the real issues that are upon us.
When Glenn thinks there is a crazy right fringe, then the fringe must REALLY be crazy!
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 22, 2013, 05:24:03 PM
Even Glenn Beck sez to get off these conspiracy stories. Instead, focus on the real issues that are upon us.
When Glenn thinks there is a crazy right fringe, then the fringe must REALLY be crazy!

Beck sold out.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 27, 2013, 12:01:28 PM
Team Arpaio: New Evidence Will Convince Greatest Skeptic Document Is 100% Forgery
BirtherReport.com ^ | January 27, 2013 | Unattributed/Mike Zullo
Posted on January 27, 2013, 10:25:19 AM EST by Seizethecarp

Sheriff Joe Arpaio's lead Obama investigator Mike Zullo appeared on Carl Gallups' radio show Freedom Friday. Zullo repeated that the Obama investigation never stopped and that the only thing that stopped is the media coverage around the investigation....

Zullo says; "We are so convinced... let me go out on limb... I am going to put my reputation out there that we have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt--the higher standard--beyond a reasonable doubt that this document is an utter forgery."

Zullo also says; "the evidence we have acquired, new found evidence that we have never made public at any point in time, and we are not going to make public until we have the right opportunity, will convince even the greatest skeptic that this document is 100% a forgery."
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on January 28, 2013, 11:18:14 AM
....... and we are not going to make public until we have the right opportunity, will convince even the greatest skeptic that this document is 100% a forgery."

ha!
you had the right opportunity.
four and 1/2 years ago.
you missed it then and you'll miss it this time.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on January 28, 2013, 05:29:41 PM
Zullo says; "We are so convinced... let me go out on limb... I am going to put my reputation out there that we have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt--the higher standard--beyond a reasonable doubt that this document is an utter forgery."

His what?


Zullo also says; "the evidence we have acquired, new found evidence that we have never made public at any point in time, and we are not going to make public until we have the right opportunity, will convince even the greatest skeptic that this document is 100% a forgery."

So let me get this straight. They claim to have incontrovertbible evidence that will convince even the greatest skeptic that the President is constitutionally ineligible and they are not releasing it immediately? Some patriots...

Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: tu_holmes on January 29, 2013, 12:01:59 PM
His what?


So let me get this straight. They claim to have incontrovertbible evidence that will convince even the greatest skeptic that the President is constitutionally ineligible and they are not releasing it immediately? Some patriots...



I like how every 6 months this crew says something about having all of this shit and then it never materializes.


This is such a waste.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on January 31, 2013, 06:06:39 AM
They are just milking the cows for evey last penny
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 05, 2013, 08:47:32 PM
Affidavit: Debt Collector Al Hendershot; Obama Using Harry Bounel's Social Security Number
BirtherReport.com ^ | February 4, 2013 | Albert Hendershot
Posted on February 5, 2013 9:51:01 PM EST by Seizethecarp

I, Albert Hendershot am a professional debt collector, I am over 18 years old, I have personal knowledge of the facts provided herein and I will be able to competently testify in court of the facts as listed in this affidavit:

1. I personally performed a search with Merlin Information Systems and http://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions database which is routinely used by professional debt collectors.

2. I found that both Barack Obama and Harry J. Bounel are listed as holders of the same Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 and resided at the same address 5046 S. Greenwood Ave, Chicago, Illinois, Exhibit 1 attached herein is the true and correct copy of the printout from http://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions database. Exhibit 2 attached herein is the (FOIA) Freedom of Information Act request which was completed for numident 042-68-4425 with Harry Bounel as the name associated with said numident 042-68-4425. Exhibit 2 clearly states that the aforementioned numident belongs to Harry Bounel and not Barack H. Obama as detailed in the response from the Social Security Administration dated November 2012.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 16, 2013, 12:30:18 PM
Skip to comments.

Investigators Discover No Evidence Of Obama Using Social Security Number From 1976 To 1986
http://www.city-data.com/forum ^ | 02-08-2013 | Old Army Soldier
Posted on February 16, 2013, 2:54:46 PM EST by Cold Case Posse Supporter

Investigators have discovered that for a 10 year span prior to 1986, there is no evidence Obama used a Social Security Number. Obama was said to have got his first job at Baskin Robbins when he was 15 in 1976. He should have got a SS number then. The first evidence of him using the Connecticut SS number is 1986 in Chicago and later in 1988 in Somerville MA, where he lived at the time he went to Harvard. For 10 years there is no prior address or corresponding SSN for Barack Obama. Obama resided in CA in 1979-1981, but there is no address, no record anywhere in CA such as travel, loans, rental agreements, deeds, etc. There is absolutely nothing on public record in existence. That is alarming.

The only factual document in existence prior to 1986 is a record that shows Obama was formally known as Barry Soetoro. That record is his Indonesian school application and it listed him as a Indonesian citizen. That is a fact. How can we have a president of the country with no records in databases of any addresses with evidence of corresponding Social Security numbers for a 10 year time frame from 76 to 86? It is apparent that fraud was committed. The evidence suggests that Barack Obama never registered for the draft in 1980 (since he was likely a foreign student according to the Indonesian school form, and wasn’t required to. The ‘creation’ of the forged Selective Service application, which was the result of repeated FOIA requests in early 2008, was to cover for the fact that he wasn’t required to do so.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 25, 2013, 12:44:52 PM
Alabama Democratic Party Submits Different Obama Birth Certificate In Ballot Challenge Appeal
 McInnish-Goode-v-Chapman-Appeal-ADP-Amicus Brief ^

Posted on Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:21:53 PM by Cold Case Posse Supporter

In a unusual rare move, the Alabama Democratic Party has submitted a amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason being is most likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over it. He supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin during his court martial. Another worry for them is another justice named Tom Parker. He once opined in a prior McInnish case:

"McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."

This has reasons for the Alabama Democratic Party to be alarmed. In the amicus brief, the Alabama Democratic Party attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence submitted by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief” and stated:

"A county sheriff from Arizona is not an “official source” of anything in Alabama."

One thing that stands out in the amicus brief filed, specifically on page 33 is something new. It's a Barack Obama long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something not seen before. It's not the normal security paper backing that the Hawaii Dept. Of Health has been using. It is raising a lot of questions that even has Obama supporters baffled. Click on the link and scroll to page 33 of the brief to see the birth certificate.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on April 26, 2013, 11:02:30 AM
ah, this thread, again.
like a repeat visit from herpes.
(so I'm told)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 21, 2013, 12:18:42 PM
[ Invalid YouTube link ]


New Bombshells Coming
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: OzmO on May 21, 2013, 12:57:08 PM
 ::)

More like wet fire crackers as it has been for years now
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on May 21, 2013, 01:45:48 PM
wait.
I thought Donald Trump sent his minions to Hawaii and THEY found things that would stop the election.
wonder why he hasn't released those ???

hmmmmmm.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 03, 2014, 08:29:55 AM
February 3, 2014
Barack Hussein Soebarkah: In Two Places at the Same Time?
By Jason Kissner



 

The 44th President of the United States is, of course, Barack Hussein Obama II.



Barack Hussein Obama II has also been known by names such as Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, and Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah).



To be sure, only supposed madmen note that the name "Soebarkah" originated in very tight spatiotemporal proximity to the operations of a cult called "Subud" that was founded by a Muslim named Mohammad Subuh -- a cult wherein personal name changes were the order of the day. 







That Soebarkah's mother associated with members of the cult, and that, some 45 years later, a leader of the cult (Deliana Loretta Fuddy) would be the first non-medical doctor in the state of Hawaii to run the State's Department of Health (and therefore have custody over Soebarkah's long form birth certificate) is, shall we say, rather odd -- but nothing more than that, except to the most determined and deluded of conspiracy theorists.



Conspiracy theorists might add that cult leader Fuddy, relatively soon after her certification of Soebarkah's origins, apparently perished in a plane crash survived by everyone on board including the cult leader herself -- until the cult leader, post-collision, poetically disengaged a hand and was swallowed by the ocean.



But, this is truly sheer madness -- all of it; there's simply no denying it.



And yet, the depths of the madness inspired by the most transformative of presidents remain unfathomed -- even by the most ardent of conspiracy theorists.



You see, there are certain very queer facts about the nameshifter that not even the most ardent conspiracy theorist will want to deny.



Astoundingly, it would appear that Soebarkah could be in two places at the same time.



Re-acquaint yourselves, if you will, with the Soebarkah version stamped May 3, 1990.  On that date, as reflected by the Illinois Daily Herald, we have Soebarkah in his typical, comfortable, "Barack Obama" uniform.



He's talking, of course, about stopping "racism" at its core and how bored he is with the suburbs, but we also hear:




Obama moved to Southeast Asia at age 2 when his parents divorced and his mother married an Indonesian.  Until the fifth grade, Obama attended Indonesian schools, where most of his friends were the sons of servants, street peddlers, and farmers (emphasis added)



Got that "until the fifth grade" part?



Now the LA Times, March 19, 1990 (prepare yourself; it's another tear-jerker):




Born in Hawaii, where his parents met in college, Obama was named Barack (blessed in Arabic) after his father. The elder Obama was among a generation of young Africans who came to the United States to study engineering, finance and medicine, skills that could be taken back home to build a new, strong Africa. In Hawaii, he married Obama's mother, a white American from Wichita, Kan.
 
 Two years later, Obama's parents separated and he moved to a small village outside Jakarta, Indonesia, with his mother, an anthropologist. There, he spent his boyhood playing with the sons and daughters of rice farmers and rickshaw drivers, attending an Indonesian-speaking school, where he had little contact with Americans.
 
 Every morning at 5, his mother would wake him to take correspondence classes for fear he would forget his English.
 
 It was in Indonesia, Obama said, where he first became aware of abject poverty and despair...



After six years in Indonesia, Obama was sent back to the United States to live with his maternal grandparents in Hawaii in preparation for college. It was then that he began to correspond with his father, a senior economist for the Kenyan finance ministry who recounted intriguing tales of an African heritage that Obama knew little about (emphases added.)



So, after six years in Indonesia preceded by two Hawaiian years before the separation of BHO I and Stanley Ann Dunham divorce (but click here for an interesting perspective on the BHO I//Dunham "marriage"),  Soebarkah returns to the states to "prepare for college."



OK, let's just leave aside the "prepare for college" at what must have been a very early age nonsense -- or, was it such an early age?



Never mind.





Instead, direct your attention to this October, 2008 text from Hawaii Business:




Now, kids from Hawaii's public schools can also claim ties to the Democratic presidential nominee. I acquired the picture below from Winifred (Wakai) Otaguro, who was in Ms. Sakai's kindergarten class at Noelani Elementary School in 1967. Otaguro's mother, Betty Wakai, had written the names of most of the kids in the class on the back of the picture. Her writing identifies the first little boy in the third row as "Barry Obama." Obama's sister Maya Soetoro-Ng confirms that the boy is Obama, however, the Department of Education has been unable to find his records.



You will note that the Hawaii Business link features a 1967 Noelani Elementary School photo of the kindergartener "Barry Obama" (Soebarkah??) in the third row.






I thought we were told that Soebarkah was in Indonesia at kindergartener age?



Upon reflection, though, there is obviously no problem here.  Soebarkah, by way of a highly classified Subud incantation, perhaps simply folded time and space and was in both locales at once.



Or, was he a kindergartener preparing for college -- genius supreme that he incontrovertibly is?



Or not.



Of course Soebarkah himself did not fold time and space; of course he is not a genius supreme.



The genuine, non-conspiratorial explanation is much more mundane.



Soebarkah lived in Indonesia, then appeared in Hawaii for a very brief spell, then moved right back to Indonesia, and then back to Hawaii again.



We can confirm this by consulting Department of Education records.



Except we can't, of course, because by mere happenstance the Department of Education "has been unable to find his records."



Perhaps instead we could simply examine the 1965 passport of Stanley Ann Dunham?  Nope; the State Department informs us that Dunham's passport materials were destroyed as a matter of routine.



Clearly, these sorts of thing often happen.



Just as it frequently happens that the National Student Clearinghouse -- responsible for collegiate education verification -- goes back and forth on a whether a person was enrolled at an institution for one year or two years -- as it did with Soebarkah.



And, literary agents often, out of nowhere, suppose that their US born clients were in fact born in Kenya.



In addition, and just as unquestionably, the passports of presidential candidates with rock solid identities are breached every election cycle.



In view of the foregoing, it should be obvious that everything is cool with Soebarkah's Social Security Number, his Selective Service card, and so on; only racists and those who oppose amnesty think otherwise.



Any conclusions to the contrary obviously amount to nothing more than conspiracy theories -- racist aspersions cast upon a president whose identity is as constant and known as Ronald Reagan's was.



Dr. Jason Kissner is associate professor of criminology at California State University, Fresno.  You can reach him at crimprof2010@hotmail.com.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/02/barack_hussein_soebarkah_in_two_places_at_the_same_time.html#ixzz2sHFY6D3L
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: chadstallion on February 03, 2014, 05:01:02 PM
just when you think you've gotten rid of herpes, those pesky little bumps return again.
this thread is like an old friend.. ;D
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 03, 2014, 07:33:35 PM
Im still a birther
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: avxo on February 03, 2014, 11:10:23 PM
Im still a birther

No surprise there. Brain cells don't grow on trees after all.
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: alabama ftw on February 06, 2014, 11:32:07 AM
Im still a birther
You are the white version of wiggs ::)
Title: Re: All things "Birther" Thread
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 30, 2014, 10:21:17 AM
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/10/bombshell-maui-police-department.html



 :o