Author Topic: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News  (Read 1035 times)

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Emails Show White House Targeting Fox News Despite Denial

Published July 14, 2011

Newly released emails show the Obama administration communication team privately discussed whether to exclude Fox News from interviews in late 2009, despite claims at the time that the White House did not intend to snub the cable news channel.

The emails, obtained and released by watchdog Judicial Watch, pertain to a kerfluffle over whether the administration tried to lock Fox News out of a round of interviews with "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg, who was then responsible for reviewing compensation of Wall Street executives.

The perceived slight in October 2009 led to a confrontation with the press corps, not just Fox News -- afterward, the administration ultimately granted the interview to Fox News, along with other news outlets. Administration officials at the time rejected any suggestion that they had tried to exclude Fox News in the first place.

But the emails suggest the subject was at least discussed.

"The Obama administration seems to have lied about its attempt to exclude Fox News Channel from access to an interview with the 'pay czar,'" Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement.

Fitton told Fox News the White House treatment was "something Hugo Chavez might do but it really has no place in modern-day America."

The emails cover dozens of conversations in late 2009. But in one email dated Oct. 22, 2009, White House media official Dag Vega wrote to Treasury spokeswoman Jenni LeCompte saying, "we'd prefer if you skip Fox please."

The guidance was in reference to a discussion about whether to make economic officials available. It's unclear whether they were referring at all to Feinberg -- who was, after a back-and-forth, offered up to Fox News for an interview later in the afternoon.

But administration aides showed frustration as they later saw media reports claiming Treasury tried to exclude Fox News at first. That frustration ended up being directed at Fox News itself.

"brett baier just did a stupid piece on it---but he is a lunatic," White House spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki wrote in an email that evening, referencing "Special Report" host Bret Baier.

The next morning, as other media coverage of the run-in popped up, Psaki wrote: "I am putting some dead fish in the fox cubby -- just cause."

At the time of the dispute over access, the explanation offered by the administration was that there was no "effort to exclude" Fox News, and that the administration initially was only offering interviews to the big three networks. Officials claimed Fox News had not made a request, but that the administration eventually made time for other outlets including Fox News.

Deputy White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, in one email, put it this way: "We've demonstrated our willingness and ability to exclude Fox News from significant interviews -- but yesterday, we didn't."

But Fox News, back in 2009, refuted the claim that the cable channel did not request an interview.

Fitton said in a statement that the documents his group obtained show a "pervasive anti-Fox bias in the Obama White House."

But Michael Clemente, senior vice president of News for Fox News, said times have changed.

"On and off-the-air relations with this administration have come a long way since then, and if that unfortunate incident helped get things on a better track, then it served its purpose," Clemente said.

Asked Thursday about the emails, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said he has respect for the reporters at Fox News.

"It is well known that at the time there was a dispute between Fox News ... and the White House and its feelings about the coverage. That was then, and you know, we obviously deal with Fox News regularly," Carney said.

He joked that nobody ever put fish in the Fox News cubby.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are we in Venezuela or USA?




blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
they don't need interviews they can just tap some phones  :D

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
they don't need interviews they can just tap some phones  :D

As usual, you missed the whole point. But, what else is new?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63943
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Another story that has been buried and forgotten.  Just an outrageous abuse of power.  Will anyone have the courage to challenge Obama on his attempt to censor a news organization?   

outby43

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3474
  • Libertarians 2016
Another story that has been buried and forgotten.  Just an outrageous abuse of power.  Will anyone have the courage to challenge Obama on his attempt to censor a news organization?   

As opposed to abuse of freedom of press.  Fox news distorts reality to fit their agenda.  If they reported accurately there wouldn't have been a problem.  They have been busted several times in their web of lies.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63943
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
As opposed to abuse of freedom of press.  Fox news distorts reality to fit their agenda.  If they reported accurately there wouldn't have been a problem.  They have been busted several times in their web of lies.

What do your talking points have to do with the president trying to censor a news organization? 

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
As opposed to abuse of freedom of press.  Fox news distorts reality to fit their agenda.  If they reported accurately there wouldn't have been a problem.  They have been busted several times in their web of lies.

CNN, MSNBC and even Dan Rather have been caugth in exagerations and lies. Rather ended up having to retired. So why wasn't CNN and MSNBC censored? Because they are "news" organizations that have a liberal point of view and kiss Obama's rear end. That is why they were not censored.

Your "statement" makes no sense when the president did not treat the race baiting MSNBC the same way as FOX news.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Another story that has been buried and forgotten.  Just an outrageous abuse of power.  Will anyone have the courage to challenge Obama on his attempt to censor a news organization?   

And it will continue to be ignored by the left because they have no adequate response and they can't bring themselves to condemn Obama's attack on the constitution.

The only response you will see is an idiotic deflection like the 3rd post on this thread.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63943
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
And it will continue to be ignored by the left because they have no adequate response and they can't bring themselves to condemn Obama's attack on the constitution.

The only response you will see is an idiotic deflection like the 3rd post on this thread.

Yep. 

What made the president's censorship attempt even more outrageous is he was simultaneously calling people like Olbermann and Maddow "invaluable" and appearing on their shows.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2011, 12:24:59 PM »
Fox is not a news organization

They argued in court (and won) that they have a right to lie and deliberately distort the news

why does anyone even pretend that Fox is a legitimate news organization when even they themselves admit they are not?

end of story

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39803
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2011, 12:28:09 PM »
Lmfao.  Dan rather approves of this message.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2011, 12:33:36 PM »
Fox is not a news organization

They argued in court (and won) that they have a right to lie and deliberately distort the news

why does anyone even pretend that Fox is a legitimate news organization when even they themselves admit they are not?

end of story

CNN, MSNBC and even Dan Rather have been caugth in exagerations and lies. Rather ended up having to retired. So why wasn't CNN and MSNBC censored? Because they are "news" organizations that have a liberal point of view and kiss Obama's rear end. That is why they were not censored.

Your "statement" makes no sense when the president did not treat the race baiting MSNBC the same way as FOX news.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63943
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News
« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2011, 12:38:07 PM »
lol . . . . .   ;D




Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News
« Reply #14 on: July 16, 2011, 12:44:51 PM »
Fox is not a news organization

They argued in court (and won) that they have a right to lie and deliberately distort the news

why does anyone even pretend that Fox is a legitimate news organization when even they themselves admit they are not?

end of story


They're no different than the other partisan networks. They just happen to be on the right so you vilify them while worshiping "news" organizations like MSNBC because they're as far to the left as you are.










Chris Matthews: 'I Hate That So-called Evenhanded So-called Objective Journalism'

Chris Matthews on Wednesday made it clear that like Al Gore, he believes the media should only be telling one side of the story when it comes to manmade global warming.

Such came out in the middle of a discussion about Gore's new article in Rolling Stone magazine when the "Hardball" host told his guests, "I hate that so-called evenhanded so-called objective journalism" (video follows with transcript and commentary):

CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Where’s the problem with climate change? Isn’t it that half the country’s being sold nonsense?

ERIC BATES, EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROLLING STONE: That’s right, and that’s exactly what this essay says. It’s interesting, the essay is really about the press and the media and how they’ve fallen down on the job in terms of being the referee in the fight between science and reason. Gore really points out that the media hasn’t done its job, and has kind of taken a “He said, she said” approach to climate change when in fact there are, there’s truth and there’s falsity in this, and the two are being conflated.

MATTHEWS: I’m with you on that, Eric. I hate that so-called evenhanded so-called objective journalism. You know, you know, you can’t say something isn’t true if it’s true in the interest of evenhandedness.

Readers are reminded that in November 2007, Gore made the same argument to Meredith Vieira on NBC's "Today" show:

AL GORE: But Meredith, part of the challenge the news media has had in covering this story is the old habit of taking the "on the one hand, on the other hand" approach. There are still people who believe that the earth is flat. But when you're reporting on a story like the one you're covering today, where you have people all around the world, you don't take, you don't search out, for someone who still believes the earth is flat and give them equal time.

Now, almost four years later, after the ClimateGate revelations as well as numerous findings of serious errors in the last Assessment Report from the International Panel on Climate Change, Matthews wants all his colleagues in the media to cease all reporting that disagrees with his ignorant view of this subject.

There are now over 31,000 American scientists - including over 9,000 Ph.Ds - that have signed the Oregon Global Warming Petition stating, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

Contrary to what shills like Matthews and Bates contend, there are far more scientists around the world that don't believe manmade carbon dioxide is responsible for the warming the globe has experienced since 1850 than actually do.

Matthews and Bates likely couldn't name off the top of their heads a handful of climatologists or meteorologists that completely support this theory.

Yet, like Gore, they want to silence everyone that doesn't agree with them.

As NewsBusters reported earlier, Matthews even thinks folks like Rush Limbaugh who don't see it his way are evil.

This coming from a so-called evenhanded so-called objective journalist.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/06/22/chris-matthews-i-hate-so-called-evenhanded-so-called-objective-journa#ixzz1SIc2Db00



Seems MSNBC isn't too fond of being truthful, either. I can only imagine how much more Tingles would lie if he wasn't forced to uphold some sort of journalistic integrity (albeit very little).

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News
« Reply #15 on: July 16, 2011, 12:59:16 PM »
did you read that and watch the video

he's saying you can't argue two sides of a story if there is only one side

So called Climategate was dubunked so it's not a vaild "other side of the story" and has no comparison to Fox News admitting the lied and changed a story to benefit their own corporate interests


Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: 2 years later, truth comes out...White House tried to censor FOX News
« Reply #16 on: July 16, 2011, 03:05:52 PM »
did you read that and watch the video

he's saying you can't argue two sides of a story if there is only one side

So called Climategate was dubunked so it's not a vaild "other side of the story" and has no comparison to Fox News admitting the lied and changed a story to benefit their own corporate interests

No one can prove global warming is being caused by humans, so I'm not sure what you're talking about? ???