Good job little boy proving my initial point. Leftists spew hatred and rhetoric and have absolutely nothing to back it up other than more hatred and noise. Nothing will ever change your mind because ALgore is your pope and global warming is your religion. It's like trying to convince a devote Jew that God didn't create the world. I grow bored with your nonsense and attacks. I'm going back to steroids and not wasting time arguing with immature marxist children on here. Have fun attacking me calling me a gimmick or whatever you think because I won't be reading it. Also fuck you...again.
Ok here you go:
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidencenow I hope you are familiar with NASA. would you like the primary research?
while my quip about the 80s was serious, the reason being, it wasn't till the later 90's 2000's that our best tool satellites became fully viable and reached their potential (probably not).
So let's go over what we know. We know that the C02 levels in the atmosphere are at the highest in history, we can use ice cores to confirm this (see research links), we also note that the temperature of the earth along with other signs of heating (sea level rises) are occurring. We can also account for solar output very accurately since 80's and have other methods that while less accurate and passably .05, we know that's not the sign of warming. So we have record temperatures all over the globe, re-ceding ice sheets, ocean acidification, sea level rises, record temperature years, year after year and your conclusion is that it isn't C02?
we know what C02 does, NASA bases technology off of this assumption for example, so the clear answer is the C02. Then they run models, varying the greenhouse gases, solar output, climate change (climate patterns, I use GW and CC as if they are equal, they are not) things like el nino, nina, and the models that most accurately predicted the trends seen in the last decades are the ones with eleveated C02.
so that's established, now, why would it be human induced? well why the fuck would it go up so much? ever heard of the industrial revolution? well that combined with surface and atmospheric measures indicate the Co2 is through the roof. It's through the roof even for the earth, we know because we can again, use ice cores to track that.
National Research Council (NRC), 2006. Surface Temperature Reconstructions For the Last 2,000 Years. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
4
Church, J. A. and N.J. White (2006), A 20th century acceleration in global sea level rise, Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L01602, doi:10.1029/2005GL024826.
The global sea level estimate described in this work can be downloaded from the CSIRO website.
5
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ anomalies/index.html
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperaturehttp://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp6
T.C. Peterson et.al., "State of the Climate in 2008," Special Supplement to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, v. 90, no. 8, August 2009, pp. S17-S18.
7
I. Allison et.al., The Copenhagen Diagnosis: Updating the World on the Latest Climate Science, UNSW Climate Change Research Center, Sydney, Australia, 2009, p. 11
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20100121/http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/ 01apr_deepsolarminimum.h
tm
8
Levitus, et al, "Global ocean heat content 19552008 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems," Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L07608 (2009).
9
L. Polyak, et.al., History of Sea Ice in the Arctic, in Past Climate Variability and Change in the Arctic and at High Latitudes, U.S. Geological Survey, Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.2, January 2009, chapter 7
R. Kwok and D. A. Rothrock, Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESAT records: 1958-2008, Geophysical Research Letters, v. 36, paper no. L15501, 2009