Define better genetics?

Arnold has better shape on arms, chest and calves

On the drugs in the world wouldn’t make Steve’s arms, chest and calves match Arnold

The stand out body parts


Cue royalty in 3, 2, 1……..

Lol how can you mention standout body parts without delts and shoulders I guess you’ve a feminine build
He was taller more handsome and wider and all women pick him over Arnold (taking away the fame aspect)

Define better genetics?

Arnold has better shape on arms, chest and calves

On the drugs in the world wouldn’t make Steve’s arms, chest and calves match Arnold

The stand out body parts


Cue royalty in 3, 2, 1……..

Better clavicles it all comes down to that that’s why peak Lou is better than most of them and Ruhl is underrated

As I've said from the beginning, this was the aim of Hamas' attacks.

Sure.

But never was Israel's aim a country with Palestinians, from the founding of the state until now. The aim has always been a country for Jews only. Now they have the excuse to finally implement the final solution. Of course the world community isn't buying the rationale for attacking and starving the civilians. Even without terror attacks would the Jews want a two state solution? Of course not. So how was that mustachioed fella morally wrong when you are copying the plan?

If someone would bother to read this,

https://www.unz.com/mhudson/the-truth-about-the-destruction-of-gaza/

I'd like to hear arguments on why the fella is wrong. He says, from his supposed personal experience, that the plan has always been to ethnically cleanse the area and the US has always backed it 100%.

Reeves had better genetics, I think even Arnold would agree.

Define better genetics?

Arnold has better shape on arms, chest and calves

On the drugs in the world wouldn’t make Steve’s arms, chest and calves match Arnold

The stand out body parts


Cue royalty in 3, 2, 1……..

What I don't understand is how you guys are so confident of your position on climate change? Of course there can be conspiracies and of course people can lie, but how can a layman judge one way or another? To me the science must be very complex and you'd need a really outsized IQ as well as education to even begin to consider the arguments. People are so sure about everything, the more stupid someone is usually the more sure he is. It's especially ridiculous when some nobody lectures a real scientist on science. Arrogant and stupid lol.