Author Topic: Election 2016  (Read 170752 times)

M4tad0r

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 404
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #225 on: May 18, 2016, 03:46:15 PM »
He doesn't have to be with us, but I guarantee he's seeing the writing in the wall and all this spending can not be sustained for the next 2 decades, the wars have to end, crony capitalism has to end, this trade deficit with China, Mexico, etc, has to end, somebody need to reign hard on Wall Street, nobody went to jail for the ponzi sheme and the collapse of the economy of 2008, big pharma, and the list just keeps going.

But at least we have a 50% chance, what can we get with Hillary? And obvious Berny has no chance so far, they are screwing him so hard is not even funny, the length that the Hillary campaign will go just to smear him and his followers is unreal.

Democrats Claim Bernie Sanders Supporters Are Violent

M4tad0r

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 404
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #226 on: May 18, 2016, 04:52:12 PM »
My point with Donald Trump is what good is to be a Billionaire in a shitty country than a millionaire in a great country. He has the money to be independent. All the other politicians only aspire to be millionaires through crony capitalism. They are worthless parasitic idiots who couldn't cut it in the real World making a hard and honest living. Let that sink in for a moment.

The USA cannot survive on this path at which we are going. We are in a depression already, what do you think is going to happen if these politicians win and keep serving the 1%, and the multinational corporations?

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #227 on: May 18, 2016, 05:09:42 PM »
He is a billionaire who has made deals his entire life.

He IS crony capitalism.

I can not believe people do not see this.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #228 on: May 23, 2016, 12:57:56 PM »
Moody's Analytics: Hillary Clinton Will Win Presidency
By Joe Crowe   |    Monday, 23 May 2016

Moody's Analytics has released its election model and is predicting that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States.

Moody's Analytics has correctly predicted the winner of the presidency since 1980, basing its predictions on a two-year change in economic data in home prices, income growth, and gasoline prices, according to an NPR report.

Moody's analyst, Dan White, said that those three things affect a person's daily life the most.

"Things that affect marginal voter behavior most significantly are things that the average American is going to run into on an almost daily basis," White said.

The Moody's analyst told NPR that a decline in gas prices points to a win for the incumbent Democratic Party.

"We are currently in the largest decline in gas prices we've had going back to World War II," White said.

The model predicts that the Democratic nominee, who is likely to be Clinton, will earn 332 electoral votes while presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump will win 206.

Moody's also looked at the approval rating of the incumbent president, measuring a two-year range moving up to election day.

White said Obama's approval rating is key to the economic model's prediction. If the rise in approval ratings holds, Obama could have the highest approval rating since President Ronald Reagan at the end of the Cold War.

"President Obama's approval rating has crossed over the important 50-percent threshold for the first time in almost four years," he said in the analysis.

White added that gasoline prices could rise and Obama's approval rating could fall, but those are the only likely indicators that could shift the prediction to the Republican Party's favor.

The oldest prediction model, created at Yale by economics professor Ray Fair, disagrees. Fair wrote in the Los Angeles Times that, based on economic growth per capita in the four years before an election, "the Democratic nominee will lose — through no fault of her own."

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-prediction-election-moodys-analytics/2016/05/23/id/730220/#ixzz49VjABDs

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #229 on: May 25, 2016, 09:37:27 AM »
Poll: Trump has narrow lead over Clinton in NC
By Lisa Hagen
May 25, 2016

Getty Images

Donald Trump holds a narrow lead over Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton in a general election matchup in North Carolina, a new Public Policy Polling (PPP) survey released Wednesday finds.

The poll found the presumptive GOP nominee leading Clinton by 2 points, 43 percent to 41 percent. That’s an improvement for Trump from a March PPP poll, in which the Democratic front-runner was leading by a few points. An April PPP survey found the likely party nominees tied.

“Hillary Clinton’s position in the Presidential race right now is fine,” Dean Debnam, president of Public Policy Polling, said in a statement. “Expectations of some sort of historical landslide from earlier in the year make it seems like she’s doing poorly now in comparison but the reality is that she’s in a similar position to where Barack Obama ended up in 2012. And he won the Electoral College by a wide margin.”

Although Clinton will likely be the Democratic nominee, the poll also found Sen. Bernie Sanders is leading Trump by 3 points, 43 percent to 40 point.

Trump’s boost in the latest poll comes as he performs better among voters within his own party. In the March survey, Trump had a 63-point lead among Republicans, 73 percent to 10 percent. This has increased to a 76-point lead, 81 percent to 5 percent, in this month’s poll.

The poll was conducted May 20-22 and surveyed 928 registered voters via phone and online. The margin of error was 3.2 points.

In the RealClearPolitics polling average, Clinton is leading Trump by 3.3 points.

North Carolina has been under a microscope as it faces a legal battle over a law that requires people to use public restrooms that correspond to their biological sex at birth.

The Obama administration issued guidance earlier this month to all public school districts in the U.S., telling them to allow transgender students to use the bathrooms that match their gender identity. And Attorney General Loretta Lynch is taking legal action against the state, casting the issue as the latest civil rights struggle of the era.

North Carolina officials also filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department, calling its position a “radical reinterpretation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.”

Trump has declined to criticize the Obama administration's directive and said he's always felt it should be left to states to decide on the issue.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/281207-poll-trump-has-narrow-lead-over-clinton-in-nc

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #230 on: June 01, 2016, 08:37:24 AM »

My Bizarre Dinner Party with Donald Trump, Roy Cohn and Estee Lauder


By Peter Manso

Roy Cohn’s weekend house wasn’t large, maybe two bedrooms, a brown shingle lovely that stood over a burbling brook at the end of a long, wooded driveway in north Greenwich, Connecticut. It had once been the guest house on the John P. Marquand estate and was no more than an hour’s drive from midtown Manhattan, which made its privacy all the more special. From the start I couldn’t shake the idea that the place should have been occupied by a writer or painter, not a lawyer like Cohn. There was even a waterwheel there, which would give off a homey creaking sound whenever the brook surged or ran strong.

The dinner party in question was indeed memorable for its guest list, which included Estee and Joe Lauder, the well-known royals of the cosmetics industry; the widow of Hearst columnist Bob Considine; the Cullen oil fortune’s Baron and Baroness Ricardo “Ricky” di Portanova who’d flown in from Houston in their Lear; and, yes, Donald and first wife Ivana Trump. It was 1981, springtime, and how it was I’d come to be part of this uber-rich, right-wing group is explained by the fact that I’d started interviewing Cohn for Playboy only the day before, and Cohn, always the cultivator of the press ever since his McCarthy years when he’d hooked up with gossip columnist Walter Winchell and reactionary foreign correspondent George Sokolsky, insisted that I come.

Undoubtedly, he wanted me there for his own ends, and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t curious. It was to be a very, very strange evening.

Before we all sat down to eat, drinks were served outside on the deck, newly constructed of two by fours, which is important because one of the evening’s many bizarre moments occurred when Estee Lauder, beluga canape in one hand and champagne flute in the other, let out a loud “Fuck!” as she got one of her three-inch heels caught in the space between the wood planking. Instead of handling things calmly, however, she yanked. She came free, the heel didn’t. Cohn sprang forth, offering a pair of bedroom slippers. Lauder simply kicked off the undamaged shoe to walk around all evening in stockinged feet.

So far I hadn’t engaged, really, hanging back as I usually would do early on in a reporting assignment, but that changed when we all sat down to eat. Cohn had put me beside Trump. Back then he was years away from becoming The Donald, but he was already the boyish-faced real estate mogul, habitué of Le Cirque and staple of Page Six. In the weeks that followed this dinner, I would learn more and more about his unusually close relationship with Cohn—a relationship crucial to understanding each of them.

The two met in 1973 when Trump, then 27, and his father were being sued by the Justice Department for housing discrimination. Cohn counter-attacked, accusing the federal prosecutors of using “Gestapo-like tactics.” Later, Cohn secured for Trump massive tax abatement deals from the city for Trump Tower and even introduced Trump to Roger Stone, Richard Nixon’s dirty trickster who’s currently The Donald’s in and out chief braintruster. Cohn was legally indispensable but socially indispensable, too, introducing Trump to nightclub owners, media heavyweights and underworld figures. And, of course, there were the politicos, which included most of the city’s major elected officials and a handful of New York City judges who were said to be at Cohn’s beck and call 24/7. His win-at-any-cost style, brashness and love for the spotlight made an impact on the younger Trump.

Trump was sitting to my left, Ivana opposite us, beside Cohn, the others seated around the table, and all of them, I gathered, friends for years. Di Portanova (a.k.a. “Ricky the Playboy” if you read the tabs) was a Cohn client as well.

Things got off to a happy start with the perennially tanned Cohn playing toastmaster: There was a toast to Ronald Reagan, the still very new president, and another to Alfonse D’Amato, the rookie senator from New York. Then Cohn introduced me as “the Playboy man in our midst,” which obliged me to rise and take a bow. When he finally sat down, the food was served by two of Cohn’s office boys who, I’d already heard through the grapevine, were, as a group, Cohn’s lovers; one of whom our genial host openly addressed as “Saboo.” Why Saboo? Because, as I later found out from Roy himself, the dark skinned Filipino fit “the profile.”

Was Cohn a racist? Of course. Roy Cohn was an anti-Semite, a homophobe, a woman hater and of course an anti-Communist. He harbored a bundle of thinly concealed prejudices that he’d trot out whenever one or more of them worked for him, whenever they were useful. What else is new?

Now, as Saboo placed my salad plate in front of me he came within a hair’s breadth of dumping Trump’s salad, which had been balanced in the crook of the server’s arm, in the developer’s lap. The Donald reacted swiftly, pushing himself away from the table. Saboo nodded an apology and quickly moved on.

Back in his seat, The Donald rolled his eyes. “That’s all I need, right?”

“But, tell me,” he went on, “Roy says you live on the Cape, and that you’re writing a book about Norman Mailer.”

“Correct.”

“Norman’s smart but a little crazy, right?”

I nodded, trying to come up with a serviceable answer to this surpassingly dull question but before I could do so, Trump went on: “Playboy’s called me about doing the interview with them. Should I do it, you think?”

He was looking at me with a kind of hauteur, the way big guys often look at small guys which is what I am—a small guy—and I nodded.

“As a rule they’re very thorough,” I said, referring to Playboy’s interviewers. “The magazine gives its writers as much time as they need and they don’t nickel and dime you on expenses.”

“How much time would it take, do you think?”

I explained that it varies from one subject to the next. He nodded back, not quite looking at me. His hair wasn’t as sculpted as it is now but the balding was obvious, as were his moves to hide it.

We did chitchat for a couple of minutes more, filling the space. At one point, Ivana asked where on Cape Cod I lived. The salad gave way to the main course, which had been brought in from a local restaurant then reheated—it was a pasta and lobster mélange, expensive, but hardly Chez Panisse—and then, out of nowhere, The Donald resumed, saying ever so brightly, “Hey, here’s an idea. I want the hippest, the brightest people living there. You’d fit right in.”

I looked at him quizzically. “’There?’”

Then he did it, I kid you not. He tried to sell me a condo.

“Trump Towers, which is gonna be just spectacular.”

“Huh?”

Was he joking? I let him go on.

“Bruce Willis is signing up, all kinds of people. People in the arts, political figures. You’d fit right in.”

I grinned. Years before I’d learned that the proper response to rich people who don’t, or won’t, appreciate that your situation isn’t the same as theirs is to explode the fiction right off since there’s always the possibility that what they’re doing stems not from ignorance so much as they’re trying to make you feel small and uncomfortable. It’s a form of bullying.

It’s also crass. Here Trump was at his pal lawyer’s dinner table in this lovely house, sitting with at least two other couples who could have bought and sold him several times over yet he’s desperately vying for top-dog status, flexing muscle by trying to sell a free-lance writer real estate. It was the same smarmy narcissism that you find in used car salesmen and which, plainly, these past 35 years has fueled Trump’s biz dealings, his TV forays, his penchant for compliant blonds and, now, his quest for the presidency.

Anything and everything becomes an excuse for stepping on-stage, positioning himself for the close-up. That was the man’s core, the need for the close-up—never mind the unfeasibility of building walls along the Mexican border or the impossibility of kicking out all Muslims, or for that matter, successfully selling me a condo. The real thing here was being up on-stage, which is what I am afraid is what underlies, to a degree we have never before seen in a candidate, his quest for the White House.

But to come back.

I explained that I didn’t have the money to buy a Trump Towers condo, hoping to put an end to this nonsense. He nodded as if he already knew that.

“We’ll work it out, no problem,” he countered, waving his hand dismissively. “We’ve ordered Breccia Pernice which is this rare pink, white-veined marble for the lobby,” he said. “It’s gorgeous stuff. And there’s going to be an atrium with a waterfall. Cafes. Even a pedestrian bridge.”

This was of course the salesman in The Donald, son of Fred Trump. Once past the pedestrian bridge, he went on, enumerating how the building’s block-long arcade was going to have a Gucci boutique, all kinds of merchandise kiosks and a number of fine restaurants. When he got through his list he added, “You’d never have to leave the building. Say you were on-deadline, the weather’s lousy—“

“Donald,” I interrupted, using his given name for the first time, “do you have any idea what Playboy pays me for one of these interviews? Fifteen grand, plus expenses. And these pieces take two months. I’m not Bruce Willis, not some Arab sheikh. So enough, huh?”

He stopped himself in a way that wasn’t a stop since he pulled a business card out of the breast pocket of his blazer that he placed on the table between us—not in front of me but to the side a somewhat, as if, to say, If you want it you’re going to have to reach a little.

“Think about it. You call me, we’ll have lunch.”

Then he got up, excusing himself as he went off to the john.

***

My Cohn profile was published and I saw Roy, whose wit and seemingly unlimited capacity for evil came to fascinate me, a number of times before he died in 1986 after contracting AIDS and his relationship with Trump, reportedly, soured.

In the meantime, Trump’s public profile grew. He completed Trump Towers to great public fanfare and finished up the stalled Wollman Rink renovation in Central Park that allowed him to thumb his nose at archenemy Ed Koch. He acquired what became the Trump Taj Mahal Casino in Atlantic City, put up what seemed like an uncountable number of new structures including the 72-story Trump World Tower and Trump Place on the Hudson. He created a string of golf courses here and abroad, just as he produced a run of ghost-written best-sellers with huckster titles like The Art of the Deal and How to Get Rich, “branded” an assortment of consumer products including steaks, vodka, a cologne and a line of men’s fashions and bought up several beauty contests. But he also got himself sued for $40 million for allegedly swindling thousands of subscribers to his Trump University business course, just as he was forced to declare four Chapter 11 bankruptcies between 1991 and 2009 in connection with his casinos and resorts.

He bounced back, however, like the Icarus who wouldn’t die. His grandiosity, narcissism and competitiveness all allowed him to become The Donald—always on-stage, always recreating the world in his own self-image.

***

I was to see Trump one more time, about three years ago when I went to his office to interview him in connection with a book I was thinking of writing. He was behind his desk, pictures of himself famously covering the walls, and as soon as I sat down he slid two or three sheets of paper at me. They were the first and several of the last pages of his corporate tax return. “Look at the last page,” he said.

There, at the bottom of the page was a figure of many, many zeroes that took me a moment or two to assimilate—7 billion and a fraction, which represented the developer’s (purported) book net worth, here listed in connection with his deductions and depreciations. I was supposed to be impressed. But this time, unlike when he had tried to sell me a condo, I laughed.

I passed the sheets back across to him. It was the same deal, the same showing off.

“This is a joke,” I said, chuckling, “I can’t relate to this, and frankly, I don’t know anyone who could.”

Peter Manso is the author of the standard bios of Norman Mailer and Marlon Brando. He lives in Berkeley and on Cape Cod.


dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #231 on: June 01, 2016, 08:54:24 AM »
This Dos Equis. What a cut-and-paste warrior. Not a single, original (political) thought in his his head. Just a bot.  ::)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #232 on: June 01, 2016, 10:22:15 AM »
This Dos Equis. What a cut-and-paste warrior. Not a single, original (political) thought in his his head. Just a bot.  ::)

 :)

Poll: 71 percent of Dems think Clinton should keep running even if indicted
Published June 01, 2016 
FoxNews.com

A strong majority of Democratic voters think Hillary Clinton should keep running for president even if she is charged with a felony in connection with her private email use while secretary of state, according to a new poll.

Clinton was strongly criticized in a State Department inspector general report last week about her email use.

The report found repeated warnings about cybersecurity were ignored and staffers who expressed concerns were told “never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again.”

Yet, this seems not to be a big issue among Democrats. The Rasmussen poll released Tuesday found 71 percent of Democratic voters believe she should keep running even if indicted, a view shared by only 30 percent of Republicans and 46 percent of unaffiliated voters. Overall, 50 percent of those polled said she should keep running.

The FBI investigation into her email practices is still ongoing. Democratic primary rival Bernie Sanders has avoided commenting specifically on that probe, but campaign manager Jeff Weaver on Wednesday questioned whether she could keep going if an indictment comes down.

"That would be difficult to continue running a race," Weaver told Fox News on Wednesday, when asked about the poll.

The email scandal could still be problematic for Clinton's general election hopes, with 40 percent of all voters saying they are less likely to vote for Clinton because of it -- though 48 percent of voters said it would have no impact on their vote.

The Democratic primary frontrunner’s argument that she did nothing illegal with her email use is also apparently failing to sway many voters. According to the poll, 65 percent of voters consider it likely that Clinton broke the law with her email use, with 47 percent saying it’s very likely.

The poll of 1,000 likely voters was conducted May 29-30. It had a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/01/poll-71-percent-dems-think-clinton-should-keep-running-even-if-indicted.html?intcmp=hpbt2

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #233 on: June 01, 2016, 11:51:38 AM »
:)

Poll: 71 percent of Dems think Clinton should keep running even if indicted
Published June 01, 2016 
FoxNews.com

A strong majority of Democratic voters think Hillary Clinton should keep running for president even if she is charged with a felony in connection with her private email use while secretary of state, according to a new poll.

Clinton was strongly criticized in a State Department inspector general report last week about her email use.

The report found repeated warnings about cybersecurity were ignored and staffers who expressed concerns were told “never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again.”

Yet, this seems not to be a big issue among Democrats. The Rasmussen poll released Tuesday found 71 percent of Democratic voters believe she should keep running even if indicted, a view shared by only 30 percent of Republicans and 46 percent of unaffiliated voters. Overall, 50 percent of those polled said she should keep running.

The FBI investigation into her email practices is still ongoing. Democratic primary rival Bernie Sanders has avoided commenting specifically on that probe, but campaign manager Jeff Weaver on Wednesday questioned whether she could keep going if an indictment comes down.

"That would be difficult to continue running a race," Weaver told Fox News on Wednesday, when asked about the poll.

The email scandal could still be problematic for Clinton's general election hopes, with 40 percent of all voters saying they are less likely to vote for Clinton because of it -- though 48 percent of voters said it would have no impact on their vote.

The Democratic primary frontrunner’s argument that she did nothing illegal with her email use is also apparently failing to sway many voters. According to the poll, 65 percent of voters consider it likely that Clinton broke the law with her email use, with 47 percent saying it’s very likely.

The poll of 1,000 likely voters was conducted May 29-30. It had a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/01/poll-71-percent-dems-think-clinton-should-keep-running-even-if-indicted.html?intcmp=hpbt2
Yeah. Kinda funny, moron. Kinda funny.  ::)

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #234 on: June 01, 2016, 11:55:35 AM »
That is pretty ridiculous.

If she's actually indicted, she should drop out. It's stupid for her to stay in.

Trump will just keep calling her "crooked Hillary" and have an indictment to show as proof.


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #235 on: June 01, 2016, 12:24:30 PM »
Yeah. Kinda funny, moron. Kinda funny.  ::)

Romney Supports David French for Third-Party Run
By Jeffrey Rodack   |    Wednesday, 01 Jun 2016

Mitt Romney has opened the door to supporting attorney David French, should he decide to take up the call for a third-party bid for president.

Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, announced on Twitter Tuesday that French, a National Review columnist, was "honorable, intelligent and patriotic," according to a report in the Washington Examiner.

Romney's tweet:

 Mitt Romney
✔  ‎‎@MittRomney 
I know David French to be an honorable, intelligent and patriotic person. I look forward to following what he has to say.


French, who has been outspoken against presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump, has yet to decide whether he will mount a third-party challenge, the Examiner reported. But there are increasing calls from some conservative elements in the Republican Party for a serious third-party effort to block Trump.

French did tweet out a message to his supporters shortly after Romney seemed supportive to the idea, according to the Examiner.

David French  ‎‎@DavidAFrench 
I'm incredibly humbled by and grateful for the many expressions of support -- thank you.


Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, is pushing for a serious third-party candidate to block Trump and raised the idea of a French candidacy.

"To say that he would be a better and a more responsible president than Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump is to state a truth that would become self-evident as more Americans got to know him," Krisol said in a Weekly Standard column.

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Romney-Supports-David-French-Third-Party/2016/06/01/id/731697/#ixzz4AMDU7GLC

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #236 on: June 01, 2016, 12:25:18 PM »
That is pretty ridiculous.

If she's actually indicted, she should drop out. It's stupid for her to stay in.

Trump will just keep calling her "crooked Hillary" and have an indictment to show as proof.



She's probably still the favorite even if she is indicted. 

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #237 on: June 01, 2016, 12:29:46 PM »
She's probably still the favorite even if she is indicted. 

I can't imagine... Insanity.

Democrats support their person just like Republicans do. It's not like Trump doesn't have his own legal issues right now either.

Not criminal of course, but not necessarily any better to be honest.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #238 on: June 01, 2016, 12:37:19 PM »
I can't imagine... Insanity.

Democrats support their person just like Republicans do. It's not like Trump doesn't have his own legal issues right now either.

Not criminal of course, but not necessarily any better to be honest.

It is crazy.  Trump wasn't too far off when he joked about not losing support even if he shot someone. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #239 on: June 01, 2016, 05:38:09 PM »
It is crazy.  Trump wasn't too far off when he joked about not losing support even if he shot someone. 

most trump supporters don't reach their position through logic or reason.

it's emotion (fear or anger), resentment (vote against establishment), or ignorance (unaware of his lack of knowledge and dangerous statements thus far). 

He's just too erratic, period.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #240 on: June 03, 2016, 09:51:13 AM »
most trump supporters don't reach their position through logic or reason.

it's emotion (fear or anger), resentment (vote against establishment), or ignorance (unaware of his lack of knowledge and dangerous statements thus far). 

He's just too erratic, period.

 ::)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #241 on: June 03, 2016, 09:52:41 AM »
Speaker Ryan: 'I'll be Voting For' Trump
Thursday, 02 Jun 2016

House Speaker Paul Ryan endorsed Donald Trump on Thursday, ending an extraordinary public split between the GOP's presumptive presidential nominee and the nation's highest-ranking Republican office holder.

"I had friends wishing I wouldn't support him. I had friends wishing I would," Ryan said in an exclusive interview with The Associated Press. "I really didn't feel any pressure, other than my goal is to make sure that were unified so that we're at full strength in the fall so we can win the election."

The Wisconsin Republican acknowledged he continues to have concerns Trump's combative style.

"It is my hope the campaign improves its tone as we go forward and it's all a campaign we can be proud of," Ryan said.

Ryan said the endorsement is not the product of any deal with the billionaire developer. Trump won his endorsement, Ryan said, based on "an understanding of our mutually agreed upon principles." Ryan said he specifically wanted to go over Trump's approach to executive power, judicial appointments, and his position on abortion.

"Those conversations took some time," Ryan said.

"I feel much more comfortable that he's in the same page with us. Most importantly, it is obvious that Hillary Clinton is not," Ryan said.

Ryan ended a weeks-long standoff with Trump minutes before the interview by outlining his support for the New York billionaire in a column published in his hometown newspaper.

Ryan's announcement marks a significant shift for a GOP desperately trying to come together ahead of a general election matchup against likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. Some of the Republican Party's best known leaders have vowed not to support Trump, including 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who tapped Ryan as his running mate.

Special: Controversial "Genius Drug" Used by Rich People
The day before Ryan's announcement, Romney signaled support for a possible third-party candidate instead of the presumptive Republican nominee.

Ryan shocked the political world last month by refusing to endorse Trump once the real estate mogul became the last major Republican presidential contender still in the race. The pair spoke privately in a series of Washington meetings last month and their campaigns have maintained contact.

Yet as the GOP's so-called "Never Trump" movement struggled to identify a viable alternative, many believed it was only a matter of time before Ryan fell in line.

"It was basically getting a comfort level of our idea about where the country is headed and where it ought to go," Ryan told AP. "It's more of an understanding of each other and these principles and policies."

Ryan has embraced reforms to Medicare and Social Security as his signature policy fight on Capitol Hill. Most Republicans in Congress have followed Ryan's lead to reduce the cost of the popular programs that are contributing to the national debt.

Trump has repeatedly promised not to cut the popular programs, echoing a position more commonly adopted by Democrats.

"It's no secret that he and I have our differences. I won't pretend otherwise," Ryan wrote in a column in the Janesville Gazette. "And when I feel the need to, I'll continue to speak my mind."

Ryan's announcement was released as Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton was delivering a foreign policy speech excoriating Trump's approach.

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/paul-ryan-endorses-trump/2016/06/02/id/732043/#ixzz4AXII2ell

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #242 on: June 03, 2016, 09:55:55 AM »
This is our next president?  What an embarrassment. 

Trump: Judge in Trump U Case Is Mexican, Has 'Absolute Conflict'

Image: Trump: Judge in Trump U Case Is Mexican, Has 'Absolute Conflict' (Photo by Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)
By Jason Devaney   |   Thursday, 02 Jun 2016

Donald Trump has stepped up his attacks on the judge presiding over the Trump University class action lawsuit, saying Thursday his "Mexican heritage" should preclude him from working the case.

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel has "an absolute conflict" in the case because of his "Mexican heritage" and his membership in a Latino lawyers association, reports The Wall Street Journal.

"I'm building a wall. It's an inherent conflict of interest," Trump said.

Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, also accused Curiel of being an ex-colleague and friend of a lawyer representing one of the plaintiffs in the civil case.

"Neither Judge Curiel's ethnicity nor the fact that we crossed paths as prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office well over a decade ago is to blame" for Trump's remarks, said the attorney, Jason Forge.

Curiel would not comment, but his brother told the Journal, "He's taking it pretty much in stride."

With the Trump University case making headlines, Trump has been critical of the case and the judge. He called him a "hater of Donald Trump" this week.

Last Friday, Trump said Curiel "happens to be, we believe, Mexican, which is great. I think that's fine."

On Thursday, Trump used Twitter to blast the case.

Donald J. Trump  ✔@realDonaldTrump
Even though I have a very biased and unfair judge in the Trump U civil case in San Diego, I have thousands of great reviews & will win case!
6:54 AM - 2 Jun 2016

Donald J. Trump  ✔@realDonaldTrump
After the litigation is disposed of and the case won, I have instructed my execs to open Trump U(?), so much interest in it! I will be pres.
7:02 AM - 2 Jun 2016

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/donald-trump-trump-university-mexican-judge/2016/06/02/id/732058/#ixzz4AXIvXutH

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #243 on: June 03, 2016, 10:11:45 AM »
How can he President of Trump U and the USA?

Did he mean he will be President of only the US?

Odd, stupid, tweets.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #244 on: June 03, 2016, 10:23:38 AM »
How can he President of Trump U and the USA?

Did he mean he will be President of only the US?

Odd, stupid, tweets.

Just being his typical incoherent self. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39766
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #245 on: June 03, 2016, 10:30:27 AM »
I'm so sick of this asshole tossing this election away to that rotten disgusting communist criminal lying bitch

This is our next president?  What an embarrassment. 

Trump: Judge in Trump U Case Is Mexican, Has 'Absolute Conflict'

Image: Trump: Judge in Trump U Case Is Mexican, Has 'Absolute Conflict' (Photo by Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)
By Jason Devaney   |   Thursday, 02 Jun 2016

Donald Trump has stepped up his attacks on the judge presiding over the Trump University class action lawsuit, saying Thursday his "Mexican heritage" should preclude him from working the case.

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel has "an absolute conflict" in the case because of his "Mexican heritage" and his membership in a Latino lawyers association, reports The Wall Street Journal.

"I'm building a wall. It's an inherent conflict of interest," Trump said.

Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, also accused Curiel of being an ex-colleague and friend of a lawyer representing one of the plaintiffs in the civil case.

"Neither Judge Curiel's ethnicity nor the fact that we crossed paths as prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office well over a decade ago is to blame" for Trump's remarks, said the attorney, Jason Forge.

Curiel would not comment, but his brother told the Journal, "He's taking it pretty much in stride."

With the Trump University case making headlines, Trump has been critical of the case and the judge. He called him a "hater of Donald Trump" this week.

Last Friday, Trump said Curiel "happens to be, we believe, Mexican, which is great. I think that's fine."

On Thursday, Trump used Twitter to blast the case.

Donald J. Trump  ✔@realDonaldTrump
Even though I have a very biased and unfair judge in the Trump U civil case in San Diego, I have thousands of great reviews & will win case!
6:54 AM - 2 Jun 2016

Donald J. Trump  ✔@realDonaldTrump
After the litigation is disposed of and the case won, I have instructed my execs to open Trump U(?), so much interest in it! I will be pres.
7:02 AM - 2 Jun 2016

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/donald-trump-trump-university-mexican-judge/2016/06/02/id/732058/#ixzz4AXIvXutH

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #246 on: June 03, 2016, 10:38:21 AM »
I'm so sick of this asshole tossing this election away to that rotten disgusting communist criminal lying bitch


exactly.   "The judge cannot be unbiased because he's mexican".  

Either trump is throwing this election, or he's emotionally unstable, immature, idiotic and just plain out-of-it.   He lacks the sense to realize you just can't say things like this.  Wait til he's president, saying things like this about foreign leaders.

The judge was born in the USA and prosecuted many mexican drug smugglers.  Absurd from trump.

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #247 on: June 03, 2016, 11:13:32 AM »
I'm so sick of this asshole tossing this election away to that rotten disgusting communist criminal lying bitch


This is very true.

Seriously, he can't possibly think he would actually win a majority of the US people with this type of discussion. It does lend some credibility that he never really ran to "win" in the first place.


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63934
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #248 on: June 03, 2016, 12:15:27 PM »
This is very true.

Seriously, he can't possibly think he would actually win a majority of the US people with this type of discussion. It does lend some credibility that he never really ran to "win" in the first place.



He can win.  You can pretty much throw logic out the window.  There is no logical way a man like Trump could say the things he has said, acted the way he did, not spend much of anything during the primaries and caucuses, not spend time on the ground in most places, and become the Republican nominee.  But it happened.  We are in the middle of some unprecedented craziness.   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Election 2016
« Reply #249 on: June 03, 2016, 12:24:21 PM »
He can win.  You can pretty much throw logic out the window.  There is no logical way a man like Trump could say the things he has said, acted the way he did, not spend much of anything during the primaries and caucuses, not spend time on the ground in most places, and become the Republican nominee.  But it happened.  We are in the middle of some unprecedented craziness.   

2016 is no-man's land.   A 3rd party somebody could swoop in.   Trump or Hilary could be ousted.   This is an odd year, nothing can be assumed.   This talk of "it's all trump vs hilary now" is premature.  She's facing indictment and he is going out of his way to just appear crazier by the day.