False. The critique of language is pretty sound.
American drone wipes out a whole wedding in rural Pakistan = Fog of war.
Relatives of said guests drives a truck of explosives into an American check point = Terrorism.
The analogy of the Palestinians fighting with a needle is fairly accurate, considering the might of the Israeli army. A nuclear power. Hamas fires rockets, how effective are they? How many Israeli's have died as a result?
Show me the minute mark where he suggests 'shrugging of terrorism as an annoyance' haha - you've just made that up.
To conclude, not sure why I'm engaging with someone who has already declared he is happy to see Palestinian children die, but there you go.
You are comparing accidents to deliberate acts, typical of terrorist sympathisers, they love to justify and rationalise terrorism. So suicide bombers blowing up children is Israel is akin to nothing more than a man fighting with a needle. Where the fuck do you people get this shit from. I swear to GOD being a libtard needs to be classified as a disease. There isn't any indecent act a libtard couldn't excuse, rationalise or justify.
It sounds like what you really resent is strength and Israels ability to defend itself. Why on earth should they apologize for being strong. But like attracts like, and the weak identify with the weak.
A total of 1,194 Israelis and foreigners were killed and 7,000 wounded between September 2000 and August 2010 by Palestinian terror attacks. This is why they build bomb shelters and missile defense systems, because they actually want to protect their civilians, unlike HAMAS who waste the billions in aid to build terror tunnels and rockets and simply see the population as cannon fodder in the heat of battle. The sad part is how the Muslim world see you as a useful idiot, someone willing to believe a terrorist religious group who hate and despise you over the word of your own people. HAMAS must be amazed by the gullibility of libtards and their willingness to believe anything they say. To watch Muslims take such advantage of naive Westerners is indeed a sad state of affairs.
This is why they willingly use children as shields, knowing that libtards everywhere will equate a disproportionate loss of life with immorality, knowing that libtards are incapable of seeing the big picture, that Israel built bomb shelters and missile defence systems to protect its citizens. The Palestinians built tunnels through which they could carry out terror attacks and kidnap Israelis. Should Israel be blamed for successfully protecting its population in a defensive war? I don’t think so. But if retaliating against Hamas is bound to get innocents killed, and the Israelis manage to protect their own civilians in the meantime, the loss of innocent life on the Palestinian side is guaranteed to be disproportionate.
If anything, libtards support of terrorist tactics like using civilians as shields only encourages terrorist groups like HAMAS to continue doing so. In effect, the blood of these civilians is on the hands of libtards everywhere. Shame on you for encouraging such an act.
And by comparing terrorism to something minor and trivial thing like a man attacking you with a pin while you had several weapons is to suggest that terrorism is no big deal, something to be shrugged off.
To conclude, I don't know how comfortable I am debating with someone who encourages adults to raise children as terrorists who have no hesitation to use them as human shields and teach them to be suicide bombers. Only a libtard could want that for a child.