Author Topic: What happened to the giants?  (Read 22407 times)

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #100 on: November 27, 2012, 02:54:50 PM »
George W. Hill, M.D., dug out a skeleton "of unusual size" in a mound of
Ashland County, Ohio. In 1879, a nine-foot, eight-inch skeleton was
excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana (Indianapolis News, Nov 10,
1975).


A six foot, six inch skeleton was found in a Utah mound. This was at least a
foot taller than the average Indian height in the area, and these natives-
what few there were of them -were not mound builders.


"A skeleton which is reported to have been of enormous dimensions" was found
in a clay coffin, with a sandstone slab containing hieroglyphics, during
mound explorations by a Dr Everhart near Zanesville, Ohio. (American
Antiquarian, v3, 1880, pg61).


Ten skeletons "of both sexes and of gigantic size" were taken from a mound
at Warren, Minnesota, 1883. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, May 23, 1883)
A skeleton 7 feet 6 inches long was found in a massive stone structure that
was likened to a temple chamber within a mound in Kanawha County, West
Virginia, in 1884. (American Antiquarian, v6, 1884 133f. Cyrus Thomas,
Report on Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, 12th Annual Report,
Smithsonian Bureau of Ethnology, 1890-91).


A large mound near Gasterville, Pennsylvania, contained a vault in which was
found a skeleton measuring 7 feet 2 inches. Inscriptions were carved on the
vault. (American Antiquarian, v7, 1885, 52f).


In 1885, miners discovered the mummified remains of woman measuring 6 feet 8
inches tall holding an infant. The mummies were found in a cave behind a
wall of rock in the Yosemite Valley.


In Minnesota, 1888, were discovered remains of seven skeletons 7 to 8 feet
tall. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, June 29, 1888).


A mound near Toledo, Ohio, held 20 skeletons, seated and facing east with
jaws and teeth "twice as large as those of present day people," and besides
each was a large bowl with "curiously wrought hieroglyphic figures."
(Chicago Record, Oct. 24, 1895; cited by Ron G. Dobbins, NEARA Journal, v13,
fall 1978).


The skeleton of a huge man was uncovered at the Beckley farm, Lake Koronis,
Minnesota; while at Moose Island and Pine City, bones of other giants came
to light. (St. Paul Globe, Aug. 12, 1896).


In 1911, several red-haired mummies ranging from 6 and a half feet to 8 feet
tall were discovered in a cave in Lovelock, Nevada.
In February and June of 1931, large skeletons were found in the Humboldt
lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada. The first of these two skeletons found
measured 8 1/2 feet tall and appeared to have been wrapped in a gum-covered
fabric similiar to the Egyptian manner. The second skeleton was almost 10
feet long. (Review - Miner, June 19, 1931).


A 7 foot 7 inch skeleton was reported to have been found on the Friedman
ranch, near Lovelock, Nevada, in 1939.(Review - Miner, Sept. 29, 1939)
In 1965, a skeleton measuring 8 feet 9 inches was found buried under a rock
ledge along the Holly Creek in east-central Kentucky.


AUSTRALIAN GIANTS:

There was a race or group of people found in Australia called "meganthropus"
by anthropologists. These people were of very large size--estimated between
7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read. These people were
found with mega tool artifacts, so their humaness is difficult to question.
Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of
"gigantopithecus blacki"--named after the discover. Based on the size of the
teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as
tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds.

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #101 on: November 27, 2012, 02:55:21 PM »
PROOF OF AUSTRALIAN GIANTS:

In old river gravels near Bathurst, NSW, huge stone artifacts -- clubs,
pounders, adzes, chisels, knives and hand axes -- all of tremendous weight,
lie scattered over a wide area. These weigh anything from 8, 10, 15, to 21
and 25 pounds, implements which only men of tremendous proportions could
possibly have made and used. Estimates for the actual size of these men
range from 10 to 12 feet tall and over, weighing from 500 to 600 lbs.
A fossicker searching the Winburndale River north of Bathurst discovered a
large quartzitised fossil human molar tooth, far too big for any normal
modern man. A similar find was made near Dubbo, N.S.W.


Prospectors working in the Bathurst district in the 1930's frequently
reported coming across numerous large human footprints fossilised in shoals
of red jasper.


Even more impressive were fossil deposits found by naturalist Rex Gilroy
around Bathurst. He excavated from a depth of 6 feet (2 m) below the surface
a fossil lower back molar tooth measuring 67 mm. in length by 50mm. x 42 mm.
across the crown. If his measurements are correct, the owner would have been
at least 25 ft. tall, weighing well over 1,000 lbs!


At Gympie, Queensland, a farmer, Keith Walker, was ploughing his field when
he turned up the large fragment of the back portion of a jaw which still
possessed the hollow for a missing lower back molar tooth. This is now in
Rex GiIroy's possession. The owner of the tooth would have stood
at 10 feet tall.


In the Megalong Valley in the Blue Mountains NSW, a Mr P. Holman found in
ironstone protruding from a creek bank the deeply impressed print of a large
human-like foot. The print was that of the instep, with all 5 toes clearly
shown. This footprint measures 7 inches across the toes. Had the footprint
been complete it would have been at least 2 feet (60 cm in length,
appropriate to a 12 foot human. However, the largest footprint found on the
Blue Mountains must have belonged to a man 20 feet tall!


A set of 3 huge footprints was discovered near Mulgoa, south of Penrith,
N.S.W. These prints, each measuring 2 ft long and 7 inches across the toes,
are 6 ft. apart, indicating the stride of the 12 ft. giant who left them.
These prints were preserved by volcanic lava and ash flows which "occurred
millions of years" before man is supposed to have appeared on the Australian
continent (if one is to believe the evolutionary theory):
Noel Reeves found monstrous footprints near Kempsey, N.S.W. in sandstone
beds on the Upper Macleay River. One print shows toe 4 inches (10cm) long
and the total toe-span is 10 inches (25cm) - suggesting that the owner of
the print may have been 17 feet tall.

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #102 on: November 27, 2012, 02:57:29 PM »
But an intriguing aspect of the bones was their size: from knee to heel they
measured 39 inches. Their owner in life had thus stood over 12 feet tall.
Compounding the mystery further was the fact that the rock in which the
bones were found was dated geologically to the era of the dinosaurs, the
Jurassic - over 185 million years old. The local papers ran several stories
on the marvelous find, and two museums sent investigators to see if any more
of the skeleton could be located. Unfortunately, nothing else but the leg
and foot existed in the rock." Strange Relics from the Depths of the
Earth--Jochmans http://www.ior.com/~kjc/pages/strange.htm

EVEN MORE RECORDS OF GIANTS:

In 1936 Larson Kohl, the German paleontologist and anthropologist, found the
bones of gigantic men on the shore of Lake Elyasi in Central Africa. Other
giant skeletons were later found in Hava, the Transvaal and China. The
evidence for the existence of giants is incontrovertible. "A scientifically
assured fact," says Dr. Louis Burkhalter.

1. Large bones in stone graves in Williamson County and White County,
Tennessee. Discovered in the early 1800s, the average stature of
these giants was 7 feet tall.
2. Giant skeletons found in the mid-1800s in New York state near Rutland and
Rodman.
3. In 1833, soldiers digging at Lompock Rancho, California, discovered a
male skeleton 12 feet tall.
The skeleton was surrounded by caved shells, stone axes, other artifacts.
The skeleton had double rows of upper and lower teeth.
Unfortunately, this body was secretly buried because the local Indians
became upset about the remains.
4. A giant skull and vertebrae found in Wisconsin and Kansas City.
5. A giant found off the California Coast on Santa Rosa Island in the 1800s
was distinguished by its double rows of teeth.
6. A 9-foot, 8-inch skeleton was excavated from a mount near Brewersville,
Indiana, in 1879.
7. Skeletons of "enormous dimensions" were found in mounds near Zanesville,
Ohio, and Warren, Minnesota, in the 1880s.
8. In Clearwater Minnesota, the skeletons of seven giants were found in
mounds. These had receding foreheads and complete double dentition.
9. At Le Crescent, Wisconsin, mounds were found to contain giant bones. Five
miles north near Dresbach, the bones of people over 8 feet tall were found.
10. In 1888 seven skeletons ranging from seven to 8 feet tall were
discovered.
11. Near Toledo, Ohio, 20 skeletons were discovered with jaws and teeth
"twice as large as those of present day people."
The account also noted that odd hieroglyphics were found with the bodies.
12. Miners in Lovelock Cave, California, discovered a very tall, red-haired
mummy In 1911
13. This mummy eventually went to a fraternal lodge where it was used for
"initiation purposes."
14. In 1931, skeletons from 8 ½ to 10 feet long were found in the Humbolt
lake bed in California.
15. In 1932, Ellis Wright found human tracks in the gypsum rock at White
Sands, New Mexico
His discovery was later backed up by Fred Arthur, Supervisor of the Lincoln
National Park and others who reported that each footprint was 22 inches long
and from 8 to 10 inches wide. They were certain the prints were human in
origin due to the outline of the perfect prints coupled with a readily
apparent instep.
16. During World War II, author Ivan T. Sanderson tells of how his crew was
bulldozing through sedimentary rock when it stumbled upon what appeared to
be a graveyard.
In it were crania that measured from 22 to 24 inches from base to crown
nearly three times as large as an adult human skull.
Had the creatures to whom these skulls belonged been properly proportioned,
they undoubtedly would have been at least 12 feet tall or taller.
17. In 1947 a local newspaper reported the discovery of nine-foot-tall
skeletons by amateur archeologists working in Death Valley.
18. The archeologists involved also claimed to have found what appeared to
be the bones of tigers and dinosaurs with the human remains.
19. The Catalina Islands, off California, are the home of dwarf mammoth
bones that were once roasted in ancient fire pits.
These were roasted and eaten by human-like creatures who were giants with
double rows of teeth.

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #103 on: November 27, 2012, 02:58:02 PM »
THE KOSSUTH GIANTS:

Kossuth: October was a month of some excitement in scientific circles as
seven strange and gigantic mummies were discovered just outside of Kossuth
Center. Marvin Rainwater, a local farmer, had been digging a new well on his
property and struck a deposit of very hard stone about nine feet below the
topsoil. In attempting to dig it out, he found that it was more than four
feet wide in every direction. Removing it would be a terrific chore. He
considered the possibility that this was a layer of bedrock, but that would
certainly be odd that close to the surface. Further, being somewhat familiar
with geologic deposits, he knew that the stone was not the familiar
limestone for which such Eastern Iowa areas like Stone City are famous. This
was something else entirely. Upon close inspection Rainwater also saw that
the stone was not as rough as might be expected in a natural formation, but
was in fact smooth and polished.  Now very curious as to the nature of the
find, he called several friends from surrounding farms and they began an
excavation. They discovered that it was not a single stone, but rather one
of at least several irregularly cut slabs stretching out over a wide area,
yet fitted so tightly together that not even a knife blade could be put
between them. Each slab measured roughly 8'x10', and when struck with a
sledge seemed to ring with a hollowness that might indicate this was not a
floor but the outside portion of a ceiling. Rainwater wondered if he had not
stumbled upon some sort of buried stone structure on his property. Believing
that there might be a way to parlay living other than farming if he played
his cards right, Mr. Rainwater contacted Georg Von Podebrad College, who in
turn dispatched a team of archeologists, anthropologists, and geologists to
the site.  The researchers were delighted with the anomalies presented them.
Firstly, the stone was not at all native to Iowa, but was in fact basalt-a
hard, dense volcanic rock composed of plagioclase, augite, and magnetite.
The type of stone used by the Egyptians to build their massive monuments.
The depth of the slabs indicated that they had been there for a very long
time, predating the advent of the kind of modern transportation and heavy
machinery needed to bring such a large quantity of foreign stone to Iowa,
and quite probably the slabs had been laid down before the last glacial age.
It is impossible to gauge with any certainty just how long they had been
there.  After the soil covering the slabs had been entirely removed, the
area covered by the stones was a perfect square measuring 188 feet on each
side. Digging around the perimeter revealed that Rainwater had been correct,
the structure did go deeper into the ground. The cyclopean structure was
revealed to be a pyramid similar in shape to one located at Marietta, Ohio,
although those mounds and monuments erected by the prehistoric Indians were
made of sun dried brick mixed with rushes. This technique, too, is curiously
similar to the Egyptian technique of brick making with straw and mud.  It
took many months, but the entire structure was finally exposed, and on the
eastern side was found a massive filled in archway with strong resemblance
to those of ancient Greece. At the bottom of the arch was a smaller arch,
measuring only 6' to the capstone. This too had been filled in and blocked
off. With genuine awe and some hesitancy the scientists of the Rainwater
Site began the work of opening the smaller entryway, wondering what  light
from the first torch penetrated the gloom of the ancient structure, Albert
Grosslockner gasped at what he thought were seven huge and exquisitely
detailed statues seated in a ring around a very large and deep fire pit.
Moving closer, he realized that the figures were not carved of stone, but
were in fact the mummified remains of some giant humanoid race.

Could what they found be in fact a prehistoric burial vault for some pre-human
creatures or was it a prison designed to hold some freakish aberration of
nature? The figures, were each fully ten feet tall even when measured seated
in their cross-legged positions. They all faced into the circle with arms
folded across their legs. Upon close examination it was seen that they had
double rows of teeth in their upper and lower jaws. The foreheads were
unusually low and sloping, with exceedingly prominent brows. The skin of the
mysterious giants was wrinkled and tough, as though tanned, and the hair of
each of them was distinctly red in color. Their faces, still very expressive
even in death, taunted the scientists with their silence. Who, or what, were
these creatures, how had they come to be locked in this stone room, and
where had the stone itself come from originally?  After careful excavation
of the site, the bodies were removed for x-ray and autopsy examination. The
excitement over the find was far in excess of the "Gypsum Man" find in Iowa
so many years before-a hoax from which the Putnam Museum of Davenport had
never fully recovered from. These giants were very real. The medical
examinations demonstrated that there was definite skeletal structure, that
they were organic creatures who had once been very much alive.  One
explanation for the mummies might lie in the legends of the Paiute Indians
who tell of a race of red-haired giants who were their mortal enemies
centuries ago. They were called the Si-Te-Cahs, driven from Nevada by a
previously unheard of alliance of tribes. Did the Si-Te-Cahs retreat from
the west to Iowa? Was the stone structure here before and simply co-opted by
the giants? No one may ever know, however it is interesting to note that
among the Indian relics held in the Kossuth County chapter of the State
Historical Society are three robes made entirely from very long strands of
red hair. We await DNA comparisons of samples taken from the mummies and the
robes to determine a connection.  In the mean-time, Marvin Rainwater has had
his farm purchased by interested parties in Hopkins Grove for an undisclosed
sum, and is quite happily no longer toiling in his fields or digging wells.

Jadeveon Clowney

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5936
  • The life is like a case of chocolate bonbon.
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #104 on: November 27, 2012, 02:58:11 PM »
I am actually. I can school you on any ancient texts, I have put thousands of hours on ancients texts, this is what I do.  You do not know what you are talking about bro,.... 100s of text of people in excess of 10 feet all over the world, bones found everywhere. One of the Caesar was nearly ten feet tall and acknowledged as such by hundreds of historians and millions of eye witnesses.

what do you do for a living, champ?

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #105 on: November 27, 2012, 03:01:19 PM »
Do you have access to proof of any of this nonsense?  Maybe you could upload some microfiche for us?    :D
if I continued I would fill up 10 getbig pages so you get the picture right? or should I continue, there where men of giants stature in the past and that is a fact bro, accept it

what do you do for a living, champ?
I am a roofer, have my own bussiness, why?

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #106 on: November 27, 2012, 03:33:17 PM »
if I continued I would fill up 10 getbig pages so you get the picture right? or should I continue, there where men of giants stature in the past and that is a fact bro, accept it
I am a roofer, have my own bussiness, why?

So basically you're just copying and pasting what you read on the internet?   ;D  That's solid scientific proof.  I also just watched a video about a captive alien that the govt. experimented on.  It was facinating.  You should check it out.   :D

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #107 on: November 27, 2012, 03:34:16 PM »
there goes that crazy negro Wiggs again with his conspiracy theories

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40804
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #108 on: November 27, 2012, 03:37:54 PM »
Wiggs doesnt sound so crazy now does he?
7

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #109 on: November 27, 2012, 03:40:42 PM »
Wiggs doesnt sound so crazy now does he?

Wiggs, in the real world I don't look like George Peppard.

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #110 on: November 27, 2012, 04:00:24 PM »
So basically you're just copying and pasting what you read on the internet?   ;D  That's solid scientific proof.  I also just watched a video about a captive alien that the govt. experimented on.  It was facinating.  You should check it out.   :D
These accounts are accompanied by news paper articles, archaeological sites and even bone fragments so it is not just internet stuff as you state bro, why are you resorting to very a poor comparisons (alien video) to win an argument on getbig. Why not say it how it is.

In a Museum in India their are bone fragments of a 16 footer, so why is this so hard for you believe. The proof is not only astounding but overwhelming.

Jadeveon Clowney

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5936
  • The life is like a case of chocolate bonbon.
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #111 on: November 27, 2012, 04:04:12 PM »
These accounts are accompanied by news paper articles, archaeological sites and even bone fragments so it is not just internet stuff as you state bro, why are you resorting to very a poor comparisons (alien video) to win an argument on getbig. Why not say it how it is.

In a Museum in India their are bone fragments of a 16 footer, so why is this so hard for you believe. The proof is not only astounding but overwhelming.

assuming you ever made it to india, and they put the bone fragment in your hand, could you tell the difference between that fragment and a fragment from an elephant, mr. roofer?

the reason these "reports" exist is because of idiots like you and wiggs running around and seeing giants and ufos all over the place.  and now you're going to cut and paste them like you've proved something.

it's cute the first couple of times, then it's just pathetic.

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #112 on: November 27, 2012, 04:06:20 PM »
assuming you ever made it to india, and they put the bone fragment in your hand, could you tell the difference between that fragment and a fragment from an elephant, mr. roofer?

the reason these "reports" exist is because of idiots like you and wiggs running around and seeing giants and ufos all over the place.  and now you're going to cut and paste them like you've proved something.

it's cute the first couple of times, then it's just pathetic.
OK dumbass answer this question, how tall do you believe the tallest person in history was?

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #113 on: November 27, 2012, 04:10:34 PM »
These accounts are accompanied by news paper articles, archaeological sites and even bone fragments so it is not just internet stuff as you state bro, why are you resorting to very a poor comparisons (alien video) to win an argument on getbig. Why not say it how it is.

In a Museum in India their are bone fragments of a 16 footer, so why is this so hard for you believe. The proof is not only astounding but overwhelming.

Well fuck me, you were right.  I just googled "16 footer giant skeleton indian museum, and found the following pictures.  I'm a believer now.  I had no idea such beings existed.   :D







Kahn.N.Singh

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
  • Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #114 on: November 27, 2012, 04:13:04 PM »
Intredasting symposium on Gigantology here at the Getbig Institute for Advanced Studies (sponsored by the Departments of Archeology and Philology). Although I seem to recall tangible evidence of a race of oversized humanoids flourishing at, and migrating from, a region once called the Polo Grounds, I regret to say that my academic preparation has not equipped me with enough training to change my, admittedly uninformed, negative ontological commitments to giants of yore.

Herr Doktor Wiggs, Ich danke Ihnen.

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #115 on: November 27, 2012, 04:24:55 PM »
Intredasting symposium on Gigantology here at the Getbig Institute of Advanced Studies (sponsored by the Departments of Archeology and Philology). Although I seem to recall tangible evidence of a race of oversized humanoids flourishing at, and migrating from, a region once called the Polo Grounds, I regret to say that my academic preparation has not equipped me with enough training to change my, admittedly uninformed, negative ontological commitments to giants of yore.

Herr Doktor Wiggs, Ich danke Ihnen .


OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #116 on: November 27, 2012, 04:28:34 PM »
Well fuck me, you were right.  I just googled "16 footer giant skeleton indian museum, and found the following pictures.  I'm a believer now.  I had no idea such beings existed.   :D







why post fake pics in mockery, why dont you answer this question, how tall do you think the tallest human ever was?

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #117 on: November 27, 2012, 04:47:58 PM »
why post fake pics in mockery, why dont you answer this question, how tall do you think the tallest human ever was?

I have no idea.  How tall?   ;D

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #118 on: November 27, 2012, 04:53:06 PM »
I have no idea.  How tall?   ;D
Well, what is your opinion?

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #119 on: November 27, 2012, 05:00:13 PM »
Well, what is your opinion?

I give up, 9ft?   :D

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #120 on: November 27, 2012, 05:06:22 PM »
I give up, 9ft?   :D
No I am not saying that I know but that goofy looking guy in the suit from the 80's in Guinness was 8 feet 11 inches and the history books and reliable sources have the Caesar Maximinus at 8 feet 6 inches and this dude was mobile, could sprint fast and fight in battle, he was perfectly proportioned so Goliath would be only a foot taller, not hard to believe.

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #121 on: November 27, 2012, 05:10:31 PM »
No I am not saying that I know but that goofy looking guy in the suit from the 80's in Guinness was 8 feet 11 inches and the history books and reliable sources have the Caesar Maximinus at 8 feet 6 inches and this dude was mobile, could sprint fast and fight in battle, he was perfectly proportioned so Goliath would be only a foot taller, not hard to believe.

That is one long fucking sentence, and I can't really figure out what you're trying to say.   ???

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40804
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #122 on: November 27, 2012, 05:22:28 PM »
That is one long fucking sentence, and I can't really figure out what you're trying to say.   ???

Bottom line is youre avoiding the question. Instead of talking shit, how about you provide evidence disputing the claims he posted?

As Ive stated before, these beings have been around since biblical times. Written about throughout the bible and many other ancient cultures around the world have similar writings. These beings range from 7-36 feet tall...yes, around 12 fucking meters tall. They were proportional insanely strong and intelligent beings. 

You need to research vs. just dismissing. As Ive stated. The Smithsonian...owned by Illuminati Rockerfellers trys to hide this stuff. Cant get it all. This info would certainly upset the status quo. Research museums NOT in the USA. E.g., South America and the Middle East.

Its true bro. And denile aint just...well, you know the rest.
7

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #123 on: November 27, 2012, 05:28:23 PM »
and now we have motive = rich owners of smithsonian musuem want to dominate the museum industry, and to do so they must crush the notion of giants because the other museums would prosper if the truth came out.


whats the admission price at the smithsonian again?  ;D

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Re: What happened to the giants?
« Reply #124 on: November 27, 2012, 05:35:52 PM »
Bottom line is youre avoiding the question. Instead of talking shit, how about you provide evidence disputing the claims he posted?

As Ive stated before, these beings have been around since biblical times. Written about throughout the bible and many other ancient cultures around the world have similar writings. These beings range from 7-36 feet tall...yes, around 12 fucking meters tall. They were proportional insanely strong and intelligent beings. 

I'm lost, what's the question?   ???  My evidence is that not one scientific study has ever shown proof of a species of giant people.  There is nothing documented, only folklore, and a bunch of made up stories.  Furthermore, if you believe in all this nonsense because you read it in the bible, then I truly feel sorry for you. 

Seriously though, what was the question?  I apologize, I got lost on that part.   :D