Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 08:17:34 PM

Title: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 08:17:34 PM
I've been on 18.75mg of Anadrol for 31 days now.

I started the cycle on Monday, June 6th, at 183-lb. By Thursday, June 23rd, after 2x 250mg Sustanon shots, and 25mg of Anadrol daily [50mg on a few days], I hit 197-lb, so decided to drop the Sustanon for now, and reduce the Anadrol, as I am NOT prepared to gain this much weight this quickly.

Oh - and I've increased my calories from 1,100 daily to 1,200 daily.  ::)

BUT PLEASE, TELL ME MORE ABOUT HOW I CAN DO THIS NATURALLY, MCWAY.

Tell me all about how juice is just the "finishing touch".  ::)

I could NEVER be this full, lean, and hard NO MATTER WHAT I DO NATURALLY, SO STOP FUCKING SAYING THAT, MCWAY.

I know my body!

So far, for side effects, I've gotten two pimples. I did notice a bit of chest pressure gaining 14-lb in 17 days...but my blood pressure is still low.

I'm doing this under the supervision of my family physician.

Anyway, to anyone saying steroids aren't THE thing in bodybuilding - STFU.

I HAVEN'T EVEN INCREASED MY CALORIES, AND I'M 197!

Imagine if I was eating as much as a teenage girl? I'd be 205, I'm sure.

As for "natural bodybuilding" [oh brother], ALL that would happen if I just ate more is I'd just piss and shit more.

I am SO SICK of roids being downplayed. God - STOP. I've gotten so many compliments lately, including a group of teens asking me to flex for them at the pool at my gym, and asking to feel my arms.

I guess they want to look like a 40-year-old man with 18% [or whatever I am] body fat?

 ;D ;D ;D

I know for CERTAIN people are turning their heads when I'm out walking. Some cars slow down. I'm not BLIND.

Maybe people are just impressed because my physique is attainable.

Not being a fat sack of shit helps too, I think. I was with a Strongman friend of mine who has competed INTERNATIONALLY, and someone asked me if I WAS HIS TRAINER.

LMAO!

Maybe this WON'T be my last cycle after all.  :)

I do need to eat more though, but I'm not prepared to gain 30-lb in a few months. Honestly, gaining 14-lb in 17 days freaked me out a little.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 08:18:25 PM
The first back shot is from October. That was just over four months since training, post-pandemic nonsense.

I can't remember the date of the biceps shot.

I was around 180 in both of the before pictures. I'm around 195 in the after shots.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 06, 2022, 08:20:28 PM
How's your strength?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 06, 2022, 08:22:08 PM
How's your strength?

This.

Also Matt has anyone talked to you about the side effects of steroids?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 08:31:38 PM
How's your strength?

I am training EXCLUSIVELY for hypertrophy.

I used to think that meant 8-12 reps, but if you check out Jeffrey Nippard's videos on YouTube, it's clear that the hypertrophy range goes up to 30+ reps. No joke.

So I've been doing workouts at a MINIMUM of 12 reps.

Also, Van Bilderass has emphasized that there is a risk of training heavier just because you feel strong. Just because my MUSCLES are growing disproportionately does NOT mean my joints and ligaments are.

So I hesitate to train beyond where I THINK I would be naturally, had I not started the cycle.

HAVING SAID THAT...I decided to test my strength for seated dumbbell presses. Normally 65-lb dumbbells for three sets of 15 is a good result for me.

I did 75's for three sets of 15, NO PROBLEM.

I posted a video of me doing 100's for six.

I am CONFIDENT that I can get the 110's for 2-4. MAYBE six.

I'd peg my bench press at 300+. My lifetime max was 345 in 2009, at 183.

Should I attempt strength stuff? I heard injury risk is pretty elevated?

I'm also still a 40-year-old man.  ;D

Would a 6-rep max be risky?

I don't want to rip anything just because I feel strong.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 08:43:15 PM
This.

Also Matt has anyone talked to you about the side effects of steroids?

Yes. Robert C. Guns has.

Regarding strength - I've bench pressed 315x8 at 170.

I'm not interested in that right now. I was Ontario's Strongest Manlet in 2017. I've paid my dues there. And at 40, whether I feel it or not [I don't], surely injury risk must still be there?

And look at my chest and biceps - they suck! Bast has chest mass to tear. I don't. And one biceps pull trying to deadlift 500 right now, and my short biceps muscle belly will be half the size, and look even worse.

So I won't be strength training right now.

That said, my 15-rep max for dumbbell presses going up proves to me my strength is going up. But I am not going to push it in the low rep range.

Though my instincts to train in that range are high, I've purposely held back. It was hard for the first two week, but in the past two, the habits set nicely.

It's going well!

Thanks Dave.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 06, 2022, 08:49:32 PM
I've been on 18.75mg of Anadrol for 31 days now.

I started the cycle on Monday, June 6th, at 183-lb. By Thursday, June 23rd, after 2x 250mg Sustanon shots, and 25mg of Anadrol daily [50mg on a few days], I hit 197-lb, so decided to drop the Sustanon for now, and reduce the Anadrol, as I am NOT prepared to gain this much weight this quickly.

Oh - and I've increased my calories from 1,100 daily to 1,200 daily.  ::)

BUT PLEASE, TELL ME MORE ABOUT HOW I CAN DO THIS NATURALLY, MCWAY.

Tell me all about how juice is just the "finishing touch".  ::)

I could NEVER be this full, lean, and hard NO MATTER WHAT I DO NATURALLY, SO STOP FUCKING SAYING THAT, MCWAY.

I know my body!

So far, for side effects, I've gotten two pimples. I did notice a bit of chest pressure gaining 14-lb in 17 days...but my blood pressure is still low.

I'm doing this under the supervision of my family physician.

Anyway, to anyone saying steroids aren't THE thing in bodybuilding - STFU.

I HAVEN'T EVEN INCREASED MY CALORIES, AND I'M 197!

Imagine if I was eating as much as a teenage girl? I'd be 205, I'm sure.

As for "natural bodybuilding" [oh brother], ALL that would happen if I just ate more is I'd just piss and shit more.

I am SO SICK of roids being downplayed. God - STOP. I've gotten so many compliments lately, including a group of teens asking me to flex for them at the pool at my gym, and asking to feel my arms.

I guess they want to look like a 40-year-old man with 18% [or whatever I am] body fat?

 ;D ;D ;D

I know for CERTAIN people are turning their heads when I'm out walking. Some cars slow down. I'm not BLIND.

Maybe people are just impressed because my physique is attainable.

Not being a fat sack of shit helps too, I think. I was with a Strongman friend of mine who has competed INTERNATIONALLY, and someone asked me if I WAS HIS TRAINER.

LMAO!

Maybe this WON'T be my last cycle after all.  :)

I do need to eat more though, but I'm not prepared to gain 30-lb in a few months. Honestly, gaining 14-lb in 17 days freaked me out a little.


1200 calories...really...up the calorie intake.  You weigh more because its water weight
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Skeletor on July 06, 2022, 08:53:57 PM
Arms are looking bigger but face is looking a little puffy. Holding water?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 06, 2022, 08:59:21 PM
Yes. Robert C. Guns has.

Regarding strength - I've bench pressed 315x8 at 170.

I'm not interested in that right now. I was Ontario's Strongest Manlet in 2017. I've paid my dues there. And at 40, whether I feel it or not [I don't], surely injury risk must still be there?

And look at my chest and biceps - they suck! Bast has chest mass to tear. I don't. And one biceps pull trying to deadlift 500 right now, and my short biceps muscle belly will be half the size, and look even worse.

So I won't be strength training right now.

That said, my 15-rep max for dumbbell presses going up proves to me my strength is going up. But I am not going to push it in the low rep range.

Though my instincts to train in that range are high, I've purposely held back. It was hard for the first two week, but in the past two, the habits set nicely.

It's going well!

Thanks Dave.

I’ll give you credit for not pushing the strength issue, continue to train smart Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 08:59:33 PM
 ;D ;D ;D

Who does it better? Jk.

Jeff was the man. Imagine being six feet and handsome and that jacked and Mr. Universe at age 22?  :o

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1379934;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 09:06:53 PM

1200 calories...really...up the calorie intake.  You weigh more because its water weight

I haven't been drinking any extra water either.  ;D

No, seriously, Vince - I haven't even STARTED this cycle yet, and my delts are closing in on the size of my head.

Even if it is all water [I'm sure it mostly is], I still look way better.

Pumps are WAY better. My waist has never been this small at +195 before though.

Also, Vince - does it make sense to gain using as little gear as possible, and up it later, as my body adapts?

As Van Bilderass said - I think it makes more sense to increase gear as time goes on.

I haven't even really started the Sustanon yet. 500mg total in four weeks. Like I said, going up 14-lb in 17 days freaked me out a little.

I've been following your posts on YouTube, Vince. Good stuff.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 06, 2022, 09:07:39 PM
Hey Matt one last question.

I know you’re 40 but can you at least buy a more age appropriate shoe? You’re not a geriatric dude.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 09:23:58 PM
Arms are looking bigger but face is looking a little puffy. Holding water?

Yes, I would say so.

Maybe I'm different from other people - muscle isn't worth losing my hair, being covered in pimples, having a puffy face, or causing myself health problems.

You know?

Should I add a compound to deal with water retention?

Also, I'm thinking three more months of this. I HATE shitting all the time...I also HATE shopping, HATE cooking, and I HATE doing dishes.

I have a full fridge, and even right now, I should down a protein shake...I'd be 200-lb by this weekend if I just ate 2,500 calories daily until then.

I just bought an air fryer, which makes cooking chicken breasts VERY easy.

I gotta eat though. I just HATE eating.

I've been restricted calories for 18 YEARS now...it won't be an easy fix.

I'm never hungry. Takes me 27 hours to even crave another one. Even my 1,100 calories daily is a bit forced. I can see myself reaching 2,500 calories a daily. I can't fathom hitting 3,000+.

From December 8th, 2021 - I was 25-lb lighter here:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 06, 2022, 09:25:26 PM
I've been on 18.75mg of Anadrol for 31 days now.

I started the cycle on Monday, June 6th, at 183-lb. By Thursday, June 23rd, after 2x 250mg Sustanon shots, and 25mg of Anadrol daily [50mg on a few days], I hit 197-lb, so decided to drop the Sustanon for now, and reduce the Anadrol, as I am NOT prepared to gain this much weight this quickly.

Oh - and I've increased my calories from 1,100 daily to 1,200 daily.  ::)


Matt, have you noticed any Jewish or Homosexual interference with your gains?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 09:32:11 PM
Hey Matt one last question.

I know you’re 40 but can you at least buy a more age appropriate shoe? You’re not a geriatric dude.

Can you recommend one?

That's the second $25 pair of those same shoes I bought at Wal-Mart since 2007. No joke - two pairs of Wal-Mart shoes have lasted me 15 years.

I've probably had that pair since 2011.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 06, 2022, 09:32:58 PM
I am training EXCLUSIVELY for hypertrophy.

I used to think that meant 8-12 reps, but if you check out Jeffrey Nippard's videos on YouTube, it's clear that the hypertrophy range goes up to 30+ reps. No joke.

So I've been doing workouts at a MINIMUM of 12 reps.

Also, Van Bilderass has emphasized that there is a risk of training heavier just because you feel strong. Just because my MUSCLES are growing disproportionately does NOT mean my joints and ligaments are.

So I hesitate to train beyond where I THINK I would be naturally, had I not started the cycle.


Duchaine said something similar. When you were on steroids, he wanted you to chase rep records, not  maximal strength numbers. He thought it better for wear and tear on your body, plus he felt people adapted better to losing reps of their sets psychologically than losing pounds off their max bench/DL/etc.....
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 06, 2022, 09:37:37 PM
Can you recommend one?

That's the second $25 pair of those same shoes I bought at Wal-Mart since 2007. No joke - two pairs of Wal-Mart shoes have lasted me 15 years.

I've probably had that pair since 2011.



First talk to Johnny Falcon. He believes Walmart shoes last 3 months.

Second if you like them it doesn’t matter, but if you’re going to wear UA compression pants to work out in, you can buy a $50 pair of cross trainers - whether they are UA, Adidas, Nike or even Vans.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 09:40:00 PM
Matt, have you noticed any Jewish or Homosexual interference with your gains?

Yes.

A gay friend requested a photo to masturbate to.

Also - another 30-day ban from Facebook for posting the following cartoon [and for posting that 23-year-old Irish footballer Roy Butler died from the vaccine, in a post I posted 11 MONTHS AGO, flagged as "medical misinformation"  ::)]
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 09:46:32 PM
Duchaine said something similar. When you were on steroids, he wanted you to chase rep records, not  maximal strength numbers. He thought it better for wear and tear on your body, plus he felt people adapted better to losing reps of their sets psychologically than losing pounds off their max bench/DL/etc.....

That's an incredible way to put it, BB.

I think I will try to increase my strength only in 15+ rep range, or maybe the 12+ range.

I WILL go six or fewer reps, but I promised myself no more than one set like that per workout.

Generally, I am always in the 6-12 range [or less], with probably 40% of my sets six reps or fewer.

Though I gained my initial strength working in the 8-12 rep range, since that's what FLEX Magazine recommended.

I was doing juicer workouts for years, essentially, not grasping those workout recommendations were essential for a largely steroid using readership [even though FLEX barely EVER mentioned roids].
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 09:59:46 PM
First talk to Johnny Falcon. He believes Walmart shoes last 3 months.

Second if you like them it doesn’t matter, but if you’re going to wear UA compression pants to work out in, you can buy a $50 pair of cross trainers - whether they are UA, Adidas, Nike or even Vans.

I will talk to him. But my Wal-Mart shoes have lasted me over a decade now, and they were $24.99 CAD.

My training partner just bought a pair of red Adidas shoes that he told me were made specifically for training.

FUCK "natural bodybuilding" [oh brother].

Muscle is metabolically EXPENSIVE tissue, that needs energy to survive. There is NO sound evolutionary reason to be muscular.

I'm unclear why women are attracted to men up to the size of Bob Paris or Jeff King, as neither physique is remotely attainable naturally. I've found women were typically attracted to Gunter Schlierkamp too, but that's possibly because he was one of the only IFBB pros whose face and hair wasn't ruined by heavy androgens.

Natural STRENGTH training makes sense to me - as there is an evolutionary reason to get stronger.

Natural bodybuilding makes NO sense to me.

Muscle tissue is not evolutionarily advantageous to store. Fat is, but not muscle.

Maybe women are just in general attracted to LARGER men.

This is me at the same weight I am now, naturally...CLEARLY my waist is larger here:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 06, 2022, 10:16:51 PM
Looking swole Matt.

Anadrol is amazing.

I don't use it anymore because it jacks with my BP.

In the past i've gained 30 pounds in 3-4 weeks with 100mg of Drol a day and 400mg Test per week.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 10:34:22 PM
Looking swole Matt.

Anadrol is amazing.

I don't use it anymore because it jacks with my BP.

In the past i've gained 30 pounds in 3-4 weeks with 100mg of Drol a day and 400mg Test per week.

Thanks!

Holy shit, haha.

I was up for putting on a total of 30-lb in four months...but 14-lb in 17 days was too much.

I'm currently taking 3x 25mg Anadrol every four days [I skip a day]. I did 50mg daily for a few days in a row, and I could definitely feel an increase in chest pressure. That's why I dropped the Anadrol. Plus, there is a needle shortage in Ontario right now.  ::) Apparently you can only buy five at a time.

I'll start the Sustanon for real soon, but to be honest - I'm quite pleased with my current look. I think the people who are impressed feel that my look is attainable, which it more or less is.

I did this to feel better about myself, after the malaise caused by the hyped pandemic. And I do feel better - so I have no reason to push this.

A part of me wants to push it close to the limit, and reach a fairly lean 210...but another part of me doesn't want to deal with the post-cycle effects. Especially given I'm 40 years old.

The compliments are pretty awesome though. But...again, the potential sides concern me. So...time will tell.

I will for sure go to 200 or 205 though.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 06, 2022, 11:29:50 PM
Just checked my measurements:

Biceps: 16.25" flexed/cold [though I trained arms 12 hours ago, so hard to say how "cold" they are - as I said, pumps are lasting way longer now].

Thighs: 25" at the largest point.

Waist: 32" with the tape pulled no tighter than for the other measurements. I could probably pull it to just under 31", but I don't feel the need to cheat measurements.

So my waist has gone up two inches, but I've NEVER had a waist this small at almost 200-lb before.

With short muscle bellies, those measurements are deceiving [think: King Kamali's biceps length compared to Kevin Levrone's]...but considering my biceps were 14.5" in those "Before" pictures, and were 16.75" at my biggest flexed AND pumped...this is a good result for me.

It would be nice to hit 17" biceps. There's no reason that can't happen, but to be completely honest, I'm rather satisfied with my current look.

To just hold on to this look for a few months, then drop to a walking around weight of 185-lb at 18% body fat or whatever, would be fine.

I sure as hell don't want to get to a point where my balls disappear, and take forever to come back, or get other sides.

Again, my current results are based on 21x Anadrol 25mg pills in 28 days. That's where I calculated the 18.75mg daily dose from.

This is Day 32.

A former top Strongman friend of mine said someone could take 12.5mg of Anadrol daily for six months. Also, IIRC, joswift said Anadrol doesn't cause hepatoxicity issues until the six month mark.

Lastly - and not for nothing - I don't feel ANY side effects at my current dose. I DID feel it when I took 50mg for a few days in a row...hence why I dropped the Sustanon after 2x 250mg shots.

Keep in mind, I had not touched juice in 5.5 years, and have extremely limited juice history, period.

For all intents and purposes, this is practically like a first cycle for me.

I'd rather hit 200-205 lean, than push it to 210-215 or something. But that depends on how I handle the sides.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on July 06, 2022, 11:45:12 PM
"It would be nice to hit 17" biceps. There's no reason that can't happen, but to be completely honest, I'm rather satisfied with my current look."

This is Getbig, Matt, so don't say you are satisfied with 16 1/4 biceps. Aim for 18 and get a boost to your ego and self-respect.

Do people now notice you when you walk down the street in your singlet?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: karasan on July 07, 2022, 12:16:07 AM
Thanks for sharing your experience, it is impressive.
I guess your receptors really missed the juice and response impressively.
Sad thing is, your delts are your strong bodypart and they responded best to juice, chest and arms doesnt seem much different, shape and muscle length may key factors here.
İf you can retain 3-4 pounds of muscle it would be great but I doubt it.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 07, 2022, 12:45:03 AM
Looking good Matt, good to see you back on GetBig...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 12:56:58 AM
"It would be nice to hit 17" biceps. There's no reason that can't happen, but to be completely honest, I'm rather satisfied with my current look."

This is Getbig, Matt, so don't say you are satisfied with 16 1/4 biceps. Aim for 18 and get a boost to your ego and self-respect.

That's good advice. It's a good goal to work towards. I have heard that one should have 18" biceps at 180-lb, 19" at 190, etc.

That seems a wee bit high - and I don't have pro bodybuilder genes.

I have no reason to doubt reaching 17" biceps...but how close to 18" will depend on how far I push the calories.

Come to think of it, I've only one chicken breast today. Man, what the fuck...

I need to start forcing it. I have no appetite. If I'm progressing on maybe 1,200 calories daily now, I know I will considerably improve on 2,500. Even 2,000 calories daily would be a big step up.

Ok, you know what - I'll start increasing my calories when I start the Sustanon. I'll consider this first month an adjustment period for the PED's, and look to start this cycle for REAL on Monday.

That gives me a few days to get used to the idea of shopping, cooking, cleaning, and shitting more. NONE OF WHICH I look forward to.

I have at least two weeks worth of food here now, if not a full month.

I will spend the first two weeks forcing the calories, and knowing my body - I should adapt at least partially by then. I only see it being a pain for the first two weeks. It should become mundane after that.

Do people now notice you when you walk down the street in your singlet?

Yes! Quite a lot, in fact. Some cars slow down. I may be autistic, but I'm not blind.

Nonstop compliments. From a whole group of teens stopping me at the pool to flex for them, to meeting up with an old crush I hadn't seen for exactly ten years and getting her number.

A juicer friend of mine walked into my gym while I was by the door, and asked "On the juice again?" I was "Yes! Actually, I am."  ;D

I love it.

I can understand why bodybuilders abuse PED's...but that being said, none of this is worth my life, or anything like that.

Any major negative health effects, and I'm done. I can handle the 2-3 new pimples I've gotten so far.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 01:09:10 AM
Thanks for sharing your experience, it is impressive.
I guess your receptors really missed the juice and response impressively.
Sad thing is, your delts are your strong bodypart and they responded best to juice, chest and arms doesnt seem much different, shape and muscle length may key factors here.
İf you can retain 3-4 pounds of muscle it would be great but I doubt it.

Tell me about it!!! Perfectly said.

My training partner told me that he thought my anterior/front delts are eating up my chest gains. That's obviously the case, combined with inferior chest genetics.

My biceps genetics are also poor - decent aesthetic shape/peak, but short muscle bellies.

My triceps may make up for this somewhat, in the overall look of my arms.

My chest is a lost cause though. No point in worrying about it. Steroids will not give me new/better chest genetics. My chest looks decent after a pump - lately for much longer pumps thanks to the gear - but otherwise, my cheat looks like absolute garbage. Sucks. No potential there.

I think my shoulders are the ONLY muscle group I have that possibly has IFBB pro potential. Nothing else I have does, from what I can tell.

That would be great to keep 3-4 pounds of muscle...but I'm realistic about this. Gradually dropping to my old size is fine with me. I will bring my walking around weight up to around 185 after...as my doctor has advised me to increase +300 calories daily to get my TSH [thyroid] back in the normal range.

My thyroid is slow due to low calories. All genetic/autoimmune thyroid diseases have been ruled out by blood testing, which was a relief to me [I thought I had Hashimoto's thyroiditis].
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 01:15:20 AM
Looking good Matt, good to see you back on GetBig...

Thanks Gym-Rat!

That said - I'm done with online politics. I've been doing this for 15 years. The system is designed to destroy people like me, and I'm just done with it.

I will support and boost the posts of my friends who are political, but I'm done at with it. The Woke left is batshit, and probably need to be taken out by force. There's definitely a limit to how far they can push things...but they haven't gotten there quite yet.

Or conversely, if the left wants to push things to WWII levels again...I'd strongly advise them to take a look at the number of casualties on the "winning" side of that war. No one wins when things get that bad. Why push it?

So I'm done with online politics. I'll lend support to others, and try to be as rigidly factual as possible...but I'm done.

I also hope this cycle proves to Getbig that I haven't been using gear all these years. I know some have suggested that. No, really - I have RARELY ran anything. Not NOTHING. But barely anything.

My receptors are very fresh, and that's obvious. I can't even handle 50mg Anadrol more than two days in a row. I have a friend who didn't get sides until he went from 100mg daily to 150mg.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 07, 2022, 01:27:12 AM
That said - I'm done with online politics. I've been doing this for 15 years. The system is designed to destroy people like me, and I'm just done with it.

let's see about that!  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 07, 2022, 01:29:07 AM
Matt, have you noticed any Jewish or Homosexual interference with your gains?

Jewmosexual...?

Homowish...?


Yes.

A gay friend requested a photo to masturbate to.


Any chance you could post the photo you gave him..?







( ;D Good to have you back in the asylum, you lunatic)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 07, 2022, 01:32:20 AM
A gay friend requested a photo to masturbate to.

I guess your friendship with Primemuscle has its ups and downs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MAXX on July 07, 2022, 02:54:17 AM
depressed gymcel is depressed

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1379934;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 07, 2022, 04:04:27 AM
My two cents:

A lot of water retention.

Not much physique improvement.

1200 calories is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 04:51:14 AM
My two cents:

A lot of water retention.

Not much physique improvement.

1200 calories is ridiculous.

That makes sense I wouldn't improve much. But there are no tricks here - I'm not weighing myself on a stomach full of food or water or anything.

One way or another, I'm up 14-lb, and I've changed absolutely nothing. Remember this is 18.75mg of Anadrol daily. Nothing more.

I guess the question is - did I only gain water?💧

Even if I did, I definitely look better.

I can tell from the states and the compliments. Again - I'm autistic, not blind.

Also, what's a standard good result for a cycle?

Gain 20-lb - and try to keep 8 for as long as possible?

That all being said...my shoulders are arms are absolutely bigger. Surely that can't JUST be water...can it?

Even if it is - I look much better right now. Let's just put it this way:

I feel perpetually pumped up. I feel like I look like I would normally feel after doing 50 pushups. I feel like I look like that 24/7, more or less.

Certainly our physiques don't instantly improve from 50 pushups - not PERMANENTLY, at least. But we do look better.

That's how I feel right now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Cook on July 07, 2022, 04:58:03 AM
Welcome back Matt
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:00:05 AM
My two cents:

A lot of water retention.

Not much physique improvement.

1200 calories is ridiculous.

I just realized this is a compliment.

The suggestion I look like this normally is flattering. But it's like I said - I feel like I look like I do when pumped up from about 50 pushups. Only, perpetually.

These pictures were taken just minutes ago. My shoulders do didn't billow out like that, pre-gear.

If I had a chest, I'd think this look is fine. But now I know, almost as a scientific certainty, that I will never have that "shelf" look to my chest, say that wes has, for instance.

Important note: these photos are of me flat. And that's basically th difference.

A part of me wants to go all out and bring my body weight up to 210...but my hypochondriac side has basically stopped me from even STARTING this cycle yet.

Also, I'm starting to think it's delusional that people think of bodybuilders as fighters. I can't imagine being anything but completely immobile at 250+. Save for maybe a 60-second powerful burst.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 07, 2022, 05:02:14 AM
Water, glycogen stores, etc.

Actual tissue will not grow that quickly. (It will expand, hold more water/glycogen).
It doesn't mean it's a bad thing, muscle (and the body in general) is around 70% water anyways.
(I believe).

Tissue will grow with some time...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 07, 2022, 05:04:46 AM
Matt the key is increase capacitance and not necessarily more weight and all lifts must be standing , sitting dumbell presses of any kind are not a real lift. 15 reps to failure is key so u wont get hurt, heart capacity will be racing for the heavens on 15 reps
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:07:50 AM
Welcome back Matt

Thank you, Cook.

It will be a hard two weeks to not make political posts, but I think I'll get used to it. A sentence or two is fine - I just mean no more big political posts. I'm just done with it.

I guess if most people want men to beat the shit out of women in women's sports, then whatever.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 07, 2022, 05:12:49 AM
Eat more food
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:13:53 AM
Water, glycogen stores, etc.

Actual tissue will not grow that quickly. (It will expand, hold more water/glycogen).
It doesn't mean it's a bad thing, muscle (and the body in general) is around 70% water anyways.
(I believe).

Tissue will grow with some time...

That makes sense. But people are reacting to me more positively...as a matter of fact, my goals aren't radically far away from where I am now. Ideally, I just wish I had a chest, and was a touch leaner.

Both are more or less impossible, because I'm not running gear for ages, nor will I be pissing and shitting multiple times a day for years. Not happening.

If I could look as I do right now, for the next decade or so, that would be more than acceptable to me.

Truly, I'd MUCH rather train twice as long than eat more. I HATE eating. I can't stand it. I only WISH training was THE factor. But it's just not.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 07, 2022, 05:16:20 AM
Capacitance Of Peace
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:16:30 AM
Matt the key is increase capacitance and not necessarily more weight and all lifts must be standing , sitting dumbell presses of any kind are not a real lift. 15 reps to failure is key so u wont get hurt, heart capacity will be racing for the heavens on 15 reps

It's spooky to me to think I'm fucking with my heart.

Fuck that.

Maybe I'll just run Anadrol for another six weeks, and not do the whole cycle.

I'm already getting all the attention I want and more. I like my look, and I'm a hypochondriac with a shit appetite.

I may or MAY NOT run the Sustanon.

I'll decide by Monday.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:17:33 AM
Eat more food

I loathe to think about it...but I know my progress will double as soon as my calories do.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:19:13 AM
I fully agree higher reps for size no doubt and I’m talking reps up to 100 juiced or not.

I think Jeffrey Nippard said that we can achieve hypertrophy with reps up to 35-50. Whatever the number, it was HIGH.

Nothing like the 8-12 range stated in magazines. It was MUCH higher. I don't think it was 100, but I think he said hypertrophy can be achieved with reps up to 50. Something like that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Wiggs on July 07, 2022, 05:22:23 AM
Looking good Matt. How do you feel? Mood, aggression, sex drive etc.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 07, 2022, 05:27:12 AM
It's spooky to me to think I'm fucking with my heart.

Fuck that.

Maybe I'll just run Anadrol for another six weeks, and not do the whole cycle.

I'm already getting all the attention I want and more. I like my look, and I'm a hypochondriac with a shit appetite.

I may or MAY NOT run the Sustanon.

I'll decide by Monday.
your body should build up its heart capacitance first with 15 rep sets . Youll be more depressed roiding and not eating. Ure better of with a few beer if you lack motivation to hit the 15 rep sets
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 07, 2022, 05:48:17 AM
It's spooky to me to think I'm fucking with my heart.

Fuck that.

Maybe I'll just run Anadrol for another six weeks, and not do the whole cycle.

I'm already getting all the attention I want and more. I like my look, and I'm a hypochondriac with a shit appetite.

I may or MAY NOT run the Sustanon.

I'll decide by Monday.

The SUST is the safer part of the cycle. The Anadrol is the more effective for mass gains.
"Oral only" cycles are generally not a great idea.

Anadrol will suppress, good to have some test added in.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on July 07, 2022, 05:56:11 AM
Matt, you have to prepare food that tastes good. Bland food will be difficult to eat at any time. You probably are as choosy with your food as you are about everything else. Take someone shopping with you to get more food that is enjoyable to eat. Snacks, yummy meals, etc. Go out to eat as well.

About arm size, etc., how do you know what your genetics for growth of particular muscles are? What I conclude from your past is that you do powerlifting movements such as bench presses. Thus the big shoulders. So when you do arms your shoulders will get recruited to help lift the weight. You really shouldn't do powerlifting while trying to get big arms, chest and back. And legs! You have read so many different things over the years and talked to many, many guys who train. A guy like you who takes in all data will soon get overwhelmed and not know what to do. So you posted on Getbig. That proves you really don't know how to get bigger arms. So you give us excuses. Don't have genetics and other nonsense. You don't have to train your whole body twice a week to get bigger muscles. Specialize on arms and calves and see if you can make them grow. Aim for 1/2 inch on both in one month. Once you hit 17 inch arms your training will change because the success will generate new confidence and goals. Just aim to get your arms sore the couple of days after training them. If you can't get them sore try different exercises and protocols. There has to be a way. It is your job to find out.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 07, 2022, 06:46:08 AM
Matt, you have to prepare food that tastes good. Bland food will be difficult to eat at any time. You probably are as choosy with your food as you are about everything else. Take someone shopping with you to get more food that is enjoyable to eat. Snacks, yummy meals, etc. Go out to eat as well.

About arm size, etc., how do you know what your genetics for growth of particular muscles are? What I conclude from your past is that you do powerlifting movements such as bench presses. Thus the big shoulders. So when you do arms your shoulders will get recruited to help lift the weight. You really shouldn't do powerlifting while trying to get big arms, chest and back. And legs! You have read so many different things over the years and talked to many, many guys who train. A guy like you who takes in all data will soon get overwhelmed and not know what to do. So you posted on Getbig. That proves you really don't know how to get bigger arms. So you give us excuses. Don't have genetics and other nonsense. You don't have to train your whole body twice a week to get bigger muscles. Specialize on arms and calves and see if you can make them grow. Aim for 1/2 inch on both in one month. Once you hit 17 inch arms your training will change because the success will generate new confidence and goals. Just aim to get your arms sore the couple of days after training them. If you can't get them sore try different exercises and protocols. There has to be a way. It is your job to find out.
listen to basill he keeps adding inches in the metaverse
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 07, 2022, 08:30:15 AM
The SUST is the safer part of the cycle. The Anadrol is the more effective for mass gains.
"Oral only" cycles are generally not a great idea.

Anadrol will suppress, good to have some test added in.
Ya idk why you wouldn't drop the anadrol and keep the sust
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 07, 2022, 09:07:40 AM
Matt is going to get huge eating 1200 calories
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 07, 2022, 09:08:41 AM
Matt is going to get huge eating 1200 calories

Is that spread over 6 meals?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 07, 2022, 09:46:03 AM
With his new bloat, Matt is starting to look like Howard the cuck.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 07, 2022, 11:32:17 AM
I loathe to think about it...but I know my progress will double as soon as my calories do.

Just going from 1200 to 2000 will make a huge difference for you. And it doesn't take some kind of amazing will power or strategy to get 2000 calories of solid foods in a day. It isn't something to ponder or strategize. Just do it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 07, 2022, 12:22:10 PM
Just going from 1200 to 2000 will make a huge difference for you. And it doesn't take some kind of amazing will power or strategy to get 2000 calories of solid foods in a day. It isn't something to ponder or strategize. Just do it.

Can be done in a drink or two as well, calories can be easier to drink. I mentioned it here before.

I make a 1000 calorie blender-full at dinner time and put it in the fridge for the next day.
at 5 AM I drink half of it, then after lunch I drink the other half. 
I eat my normal diet/meals along with that.

Easy (and tasty) way to add calories/protein, etc. Who doesnt love a good milkshake??
(Helps w/ my sweet-tooth and snacking on junk as well).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 07, 2022, 12:44:35 PM
Can be done in a drink or two as well, calories can be easier to drink. I mentioned it here before.

I make a 1000 calorie blender-full at dinner time and put it in the fridge for the next day.
at 5 AM I drink half of it, then after lunch I drink the other half. 
I eat my normal diet/meals along with that.

Easy (and tasty) way to add calories/protein, etc. Who doesnt love a good milkshake??
(Helps w/ my sweet-tooth and snacking on junk as well).

Protein drinks work great for me as well. Rather than mix them myself, I buy them already prepared. I favor Premier Protein drinks from Costco. However, they have only 160 calories with 30 grams of protein. Better for weight gain is Muscle Milk Pro which has 40 grams of protein and 650 calories. It is available from Amazon.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 12:53:32 PM
Just going from 1200 to 2000 will make a huge difference for you. And it doesn't take some kind of amazing will power or strategy to get 2000 calories of solid foods in a day. It isn't something to ponder or strategize. Just do it.

Yeah...it has to be done.

I'll start on Monday. Even eating 3x 700 calorie meals daily will do it. One can be a protein shake.

Although I only took two Sustanon shots, I could definitely feel a warm glow that day. So I know it's quality stuff.

I'm still not quite mentally into this cycle, but I am confident that I will 100% focused within two weeks. I just didn't want to start way late into the summer.

Also, I think it's ok to start low and add gear later as the body adapts.

Four weeks of not even trying on steroids > six months of doing EVERYTHING right naturally. For bodybuilding, I mean. Strength training is different.

Anyone downplaying steroids to me by now needs to seriously STFU [I'm talking to you, MCWAY].

Maybe I'll get up to 210 just to make that point CLEAR.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 07, 2022, 01:09:34 PM
Yeah...it has to be done.

I'll start on Monday today. Even eating 3x 700 calorie meals daily will do it. One can be a protein shake.

Although I only took two Sustanon shots, I could definitely feel a warm glow that day. So I know it's quality stuff.

I'm still not quite mentally into this cycle, but I am confident that I will 100% focused within two weeks. I just didn't want to start way late into the summer.

Also, I think it's ok to start low and add gear later as the body adapts.

Four weeks of not even trying on steroids > six months of doing EVERYTHING right naturally. For bodybuilding, I mean. Strength training is different.

Anyone downplaying steroids to me by now needs to seriously STFU [I'm talking to you, MCWAY].

Maybe I'll get up to 210 just to make that point CLEAR.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 07, 2022, 01:58:41 PM
I find it hard to believe you are functioning on 1200 calories much less working out and gaining weight your math is off somewhere . You do look better. Most people would always recomend including test as a base in any cycle anadrol is going to supporess your natural test levels which are important for a variety of health reasons
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 07, 2022, 02:17:16 PM
I find it hard to believe you are functioning on 1200 calories much less working out and gaining weight your math is off somewhere . You do look better. Most people would always recomend including test as a base in any cycle anadrol is going to supporess your natural test levels which are important for a variety of health reasons

says the unhealthiest man on the board
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OneMoreRep on July 07, 2022, 02:53:46 PM
A gay friend requested a photo to masturbate to.

I guess your friendship with Primemuscle has its ups and downs.

Excellent transition, 10/10 quality to post!

Bravo!

"1"
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 07, 2022, 03:21:29 PM
The choice is yours
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 03:22:45 PM
I find it hard to believe you are functioning on 1200 calories much less working out and gaining weight your math is off somewhere . You do look better. Most people would always recomend including test as a base in any cycle anadrol is going to supporess your natural test levels which are important for a variety of health reasons

I know, it makes no sense. But it's absolutely true. I only ate one chicken breast yesterday. So far today - half a plate of spaghetti, a banana, and some orange juice.

I'll be correcting this for certain, but I need no energy to function.

There was never a Strongman contest I entered where I ever had 400 calories before the contest. And they run starting around 10am to 4pm put in the hot sun.

My appetite has been this small since I was a baby, my mom said.

I have been in ketosis my entire life. I still am.

And starting in 2004, I restricted calories further for health reasons [<1,500 daily], and restricted them further in 2014, due to brainwashing from vegans [<1,100 daily]. It was this second restriction that slowed my thyroid.

I'll be correcting that.

Good cycle so far, but admittedly, the gear is a bit too strong for me.

How low can one go with Sustanon? Is 500mg the minimum effective weekly dose?

Thanks, B. Hank.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 07, 2022, 03:25:03 PM
So far today - half a plate of spaghetti, a banana, and some orange juice.

I have been in ketosis my entire life. I still am.



?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 07, 2022, 03:32:13 PM
I know, it makes no sense. But it's absolutely true. I only ate one chicken breast yesterday. So far today - half a plate of spaghetti, a banana, and some orange juice.

I'll be correcting this for certain, but I need no energy to function.

There was never a Strongman contest I entered where I ever had 400 calories before the contest. And they run starting around 10am to 4pm put in the hot sun.

My appetite has been this small since I was a baby, my mom said.

I have been in ketosis my entire life. I still am.

And starting in 2004, I restricted calories further for health reasons [<1,500 daily], and restricted them further in 2014, due to brainwashing from vegans [<1,100 daily]. It was this second restriction that slowed my thyroid.

I'll be correcting that.

Good cycle so far, but admittedly, the gear is a bit too strong for me.

How low can one go with Sustanon? Is 500mg the minimum effective weekly dose?

Thanks, B. Hank.

You can take sustanonnthe rest of your life if you want to but sure rey 250mg a week if you want to be conservative
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 07, 2022, 05:14:11 PM
Matt is going to get huge eating 1200 calories

Are you telling me that the two shakes I have daily in between meals is more that Matt's daily caloric intake? Brutal if true!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 07, 2022, 05:14:24 PM
The choice is yours

Good one, Bhanky.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:14:51 PM
?

If I'm understanding ketosis correctly, if you are excreting ketones from your urine, you are in partial ketosis, are you not?

Keep in mind that I eat under 100g carbohydrates daily.

But maybe I fudged the terminology there.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:16:27 PM
You can take sustanonnthe rest of your life if you want to but sure rey 250mg a week if you want to be conservative

So 250mg wouldn't just shut me down?

Is about 250mg the minimum effective dose? I can increase based on how I feel.

I'm just not prepared to gain 1-lb daily. Or even 0.5-lb.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:17:39 PM
Are you telling me that the two shakes I have daily in between meals is more that Matt's daily caloric intake? Brutal if true!

Yes!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 07, 2022, 05:18:49 PM
Yes!

Why don't you eat, Matty? Not hungry or is it psychological?


edit: you're taking too long. You better not be writing 5 paragraphs to answer a simple question
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 05:42:27 PM
Why don't you eat, Matty? Not hungry or is it psychological?


edit: you're taking too long. You better not be writing 5 paragraphs to answer a simple question

Lol!

In 2004, I read that the one most common environmental trait that super-centenarians have in common is restricted calories.

So I restricted what was already a low caloric intake, to 1,200 to 1,500 from 2004 to 2014.

In 2014, brainwashed by vegan assholes, I reduced meat and could not find anything in the vegan diet suitable for my palate.

On the end, I have been on under 1,100 or 1,200 calories daily [~] for the past eight years.

On top of all this, my natural genetic appetite is extremely low even before I did this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 07, 2022, 06:03:22 PM
1200 calories is one meal is matt not counting calories from fluids or condiments his math cant be right that is starvation rations for a normal person much less someone exercising  daily his base metabolic rate has ro be higher than that
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 07, 2022, 06:05:58 PM
So 250mg wouldn't just shut me down?

Is about 250mg the minimum effective dose? I can increase based on how I feel.

I'm just not prepared to gain 1-lb daily. Or even 0.5-lb.

I wouldn't listen to him dude.

He's telling you it's perfectly safe when we just had a true Getbigger have heart problems from the same dose, granted it was over a long period of time. AAS absolutely will cause health problems if you aren't smart about it.

Even 100mg a week will stop your natural Test production and shut you down, any exogenous Test will do that.

That's really the minimum if you are looking to gain real muscle. 400-500mg is where things really start to change. I always recommend a 400mg per week minimum for a real cycle. If you want to run 250mg as a heavy TRT dose, that's fine too, but you aren't going to gain much on that. If you are going to shut yourself down, might was well run a real cycle. Your nuts don't know the difference between 250 and 1000, shut down is shut down.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 07, 2022, 06:11:24 PM
I've been on 18.75mg of Anadrol for 31 days now.

I started the cycle on Monday, June 6th, at 183-lb. By Thursday, June 23rd, after 2x 250mg Sustanon shots, and 25mg of Anadrol daily [50mg on a few days], I hit 197-lb, so decided to drop the Sustanon for now, and reduce the Anadrol, as I am NOT prepared to gain this much weight this quickly.

Oh - and I've increased my calories from 1,100 daily to 1,200 daily.  ::)

BUT PLEASE, TELL ME MORE ABOUT HOW I CAN DO THIS NATURALLY, MCWAY.

Tell me all about how juice is just the "finishing touch".  ::)

So, our resident Canadian crybaby has been talked off the ledge to spew more silliness.

We already have a guy named Straw Man; you don't need to be his stunt double. I said NOTHING of the sort, regarding steroids being a "finishing touch".



I could NEVER be this full, lean, and hard NO MATTER WHAT I DO NATURALLY, SO STOP FUCKING SAYING THAT, MCWAY.

I know my body!

No, you couldn't simply because you're too lazy to do so, not because you lack the information or ability.



So far, for side effects, I've gotten two pimples. I did notice a bit of chest pressure gaining 14-lb in 17 days...but my blood pressure is still low.

I'm doing this under the supervision of my family physician.

Anyway, to anyone saying steroids aren't THE thing in bodybuilding - STFU.

I HAVEN'T EVEN INCREASED MY CALORIES, AND I'M 197!

Imagine if I was eating as much as a teenage girl? I'd be 205, I'm sure.

As for "natural bodybuilding" [oh brother], ALL that would happen if I just ate more is I'd just piss and shit more.

I am SO SICK of roids being downplayed. God - STOP. I've gotten so many compliments lately, including a group of teens asking me to flex for them at the pool at my gym, and asking to feel my arms.

I guess they want to look like a 40-year-old man with 18% [or whatever I am] body fat?

 ;D ;D ;D

I know for CERTAIN people are turning their heads when I'm out walking. Some cars slow down. I'm not BLIND.

Maybe people are just impressed because my physique is attainable.

Not being a fat sack of shit helps too, I think. I was with a Strongman friend of mine who has competed INTERNATIONALLY, and someone asked me if I WAS HIS TRAINER.

LMAO!

Maybe this WON'T be my last cycle after all.  :)

I do need to eat more though, but I'm not prepared to gain 30-lb in a few months. Honestly, gaining 14-lb in 17 days freaked me out a little.

You're doing this to impress jailbait? Again, you insist on rebutting stupid arguments that no one else ever made. No one here has downplayed steroids. Saying that using them to make the modest gains you are seeking isn't downplaying anything; it's merely stating the facts. Others, long before you, have done such.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 07, 2022, 06:41:54 PM
?

I think he means reverse ketosis eating only carbs and no protein.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 07, 2022, 07:07:17 PM
I find it hard to believe you are functioning on 1200 calories much less working out and gaining weight your math is off somewhere . You do look better. Most people would always recomend including test as a base in any cycle anadrol is going to supporess your natural test levels which are important for a variety of health reasons

1200 calories is one meal is matt not counting calories from fluids or condiments his math cant be right that is starvation rations for a normal person much less someone exercising  daily his base metabolic rate has ro be higher than that

That's now the second time you've questioned Matt's math abilities. I'll have you know that he is the fastest grading math TA in the entire history of Lakehead University!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 07:43:38 PM
Gentlemen,

Steroids are just finishing 1%.  ;D :-X

PS - lacklustre back day today. I guess that half plate of spaghetti and lone banana didn't do much for me. Yet I STILL got a better pimp than on my BEST natural day. So shut it with this bullshit about steroids not being THE factor in bodybuilding [MCWAY]. Natural bodybuilding [oh brother  ::)]. The first picture is from when I purposely dropped to 160 during the pandemic, just to see if I could get any leaner [I couldn't]. So the comparison is a bit of a joke, but I think you get my point.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 07:45:10 PM
^ My delts and arms are NEVER that pumped outside of their respective training days.

Will be interesting to see how things go once I start adding calories and water to my diet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 07, 2022, 07:49:09 PM
If I'm understanding ketosis correctly, if you are excreting ketones from your urine, you are in partial ketosis, are you not?

Keep in mind that I eat under 100g carbohydrates daily.

But maybe I fudged the terminology there.

You are not in ketosis eating bananas and orange juice.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 08:04:48 PM
You are not in ketosis eating bananas and orange juice.

Hang on - isn't the start of ketosis when ketones are measured in your urine.

Ketosis is a spectrum, and obviously a contest shape bodybuilder will be deeper in it.

Isn't the measure of the start of ketosis being ketones secreted in your urine? Maybe I'm mistaken about that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 08:09:13 PM
From what I can see, I'm technically in ketosis:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 07, 2022, 08:12:43 PM
I've been on 18.75mg of Anadrol for 31 days now.

I started the cycle on Monday, June 6th, at 183-lb. By Thursday, June 23rd, after 2x 250mg Sustanon shots, and 25mg of Anadrol daily [50mg on a few days], I hit 197-lb, so decided to drop the Sustanon for now, and reduce the Anadrol, as I am NOT prepared to gain this much weight this quickly.

Oh - and I've increased my calories from 1,100 daily to 1,200 daily.  ::)

BUT PLEASE, TELL ME MORE ABOUT HOW I CAN DO THIS NATURALLY, MCWAY.

Tell me all about how juice is just the "finishing touch".  ::)

I could NEVER be this full, lean, and hard NO MATTER WHAT I DO NATURALLY, SO STOP FUCKING SAYING THAT, MCWAY.

I know my body!

So far, for side effects, I've gotten two pimples. I did notice a bit of chest pressure gaining 14-lb in 17 days...but my blood pressure is still low.

I'm doing this under the supervision of my family physician.

Anyway, to anyone saying steroids aren't THE thing in bodybuilding - STFU.

I HAVEN'T EVEN INCREASED MY CALORIES, AND I'M 197!

Imagine if I was eating as much as a teenage girl? I'd be 205, I'm sure.

As for "natural bodybuilding" [oh brother], ALL that would happen if I just ate more is I'd just piss and shit more.

I am SO SICK of roids being downplayed. God - STOP. I've gotten so many compliments lately, including a group of teens asking me to flex for them at the pool at my gym, and asking to feel my arms.

I guess they want to look like a 40-year-old man with 18% [or whatever I am] body fat?

 ;D ;D ;D

I know for CERTAIN people are turning their heads when I'm out walking. Some cars slow down. I'm not BLIND.

Maybe people are just impressed because my physique is attainable.

Not being a fat sack of shit helps too, I think. I was with a Strongman friend of mine who has competed INTERNATIONALLY, and someone asked me if I WAS HIS TRAINER.

LMAO!

Maybe this WON'T be my last cycle after all.  :)

I do need to eat more though, but I'm not prepared to gain 30-lb in a few months. Honestly, gaining 14-lb in 17 days freaked me out a little.

Up your calories and protein so the gear can be utilized.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 08:15:43 PM
Up your calories and protein so the gear can be utilized.

Thanks Coach!

Starting Monday.

Do you know how long it will take for my appetite to adjust?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 08:20:47 PM
My brain when I know I need to eat:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 07, 2022, 08:26:12 PM
Gentlemen,

Steroids are just finishing 1%.  ;D :-X

PS - lacklustre back day today. I guess that half plate of spaghetti and lone banana didn't do much for me. Yet I STILL got a better pimp than on my BEST natural day. So shut it with this bullshit about steroids not being THE factor in bodybuilding [MCWAY]. Natural bodybuilding [oh brother  ::)]. The first picture is from when I purposely dropped to 160 during the pandemic, just to see if I could get any leaner [I couldn't]. So the comparison is a bit of a joke, but I think you get my point.

In other words, you REGAINED the size you once had, which everyone knows is far easier than getting that size initially.

Some call it the slingshot effect. You get to a certain size, lose weight for whatever reason, then you regain that size and add a little extra.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 07, 2022, 09:05:58 PM
Thanks Coach!

Starting Monday.

Do you know how long it will take for my appetite to adjust?

Why Monday?  Start right now.  Fuck sakes Matt.  Just eat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on July 07, 2022, 09:10:02 PM
A couple of principles of mine from my cycling days were never taking orals more than the first month.

Also test must be taken consistently over the longterm.

250mg’s a week is more powerful than some are saying IMO and with your front load now it would be nice dose to consider for awhile.

Jumping on and off will cause the physical and psychological symptoms IMO.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 09:15:14 PM
In other words, you REGAINED the size you once had, which everyone knows is far easier than getting that size initially.

Some call it the slingshot effect. You get to a certain size, lose weight for whatever reason, then you regain that size and add a little extra.

I'm pretty satisfied with my size, MCWAY.

If I had a chest...I'd think I'd look great.

Steroids are not going to get me a chest, nor are your "Weider Intensity Principles" [oh brother].

I also like how you to talk to me like I haven't been through all this shit when I'm stronger and in better shape than 99% of men.  ::) And I'm 40.

But I'm 100% confident that you could grab a random sampling of 100 men, and I'd be the most in-shape guy. Getbig is not an random sampling of men.

Maybe that only shows how out of shape people are - but the notion I need you telling me about "time under tension" and "the mind-muscle connection"...oh brother.  ::)

Like any of the shit we do in the gym even matters for bodybuilding. I mean, IT DOES. But you know what I mean.

Eat 1g of protein per 1-lb of LBM, and drink 2L of water a day, or whatever quantity prevents you from being too dehydrated. Train with intensity, get sufficient rest - and add juice that's your preference.

But this bullshit about training methods being the thing...dude, just STOP.

I should shoot to be 210 with 18" arms, just to shut you up.

Bodybuilding is ALL DRUGS, MCWAY. Stop with the bullshit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 09:19:31 PM
Why Monday?  Start right now.  Fuck sakes Matt.  Just eat.

You've inspired me, AbrahamG. I'm going to make a protein shake right now.

Wish me luck in trying to drink more than two gulps.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 07, 2022, 09:20:16 PM
I'm pretty satisfied with my size, MCWAY.

If I had a chest...I'd think I'd look great.

Steroids are not going to get me a chest, nor are your "Weider Intensity Principles" [oh brother].

I also like how you to talk to me like I haven't been through all this shit when I'm stronger and in better shape than 99% of men.  ::) And I'm 40.

But I'm 100% confident that you could grab a random sampling of 100 men, and I'd be the most in-shape guy. Getbig is not an random sampling of men.

Maybe that only shows how out of shape people are - but the notion I need you telling me about "time under tension" and "the mind-muscle connection"...oh brother.  ::)

Like any of the shit we do in the gym even matters for bodybuilding. I mean, IT DOES. But you know what I mean.

Eat 1g of protein per 1-lb of LBM, and drink 2L of water a day, or whatever quantity prevents you from being too dehydrated. Train with intensity, get sufficient rest - and add juice that's your preference.

But this bullshit about training methods being the thing...dude, just STOP.

I should shoot to be 210 with 18" arms, just to shut you up.

Bodybuilding is ALL DRUGS, MCWAY. Stop with the bullshit.

In all seriousness try switching your chest workouts to an incline heavy routine.  Incline barbell, dumbell and fly's.  Also, maybe skip every other shoulder workout. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 09:26:40 PM
A couple of principles of mine from my cycling days were never taking orals more than the first month.

Also test must be taken consistently over the longterm.

250mg’s a week is more powerful than some are saying IMO and with your front load now it would be nice dose to consider for awhile.

Jumping on and off will cause the physical and psychological symptoms IMO.

Regarding orals...your method sounds slightly cautious. I mean, dose matters, right?

I've had 23x 25mg Anadrol pills in what has been 32 completed days now.

That's exactly 18mg daily, rounded up to nearest decimal.

Surely, the low dose should allow me to run it for a little longer? How is 50mg daily for one month less toxic than 25mg daily for two months, for example? Intuitively, I would think there would be less hepatoxicity running less oral gear for a longer time period?

But please tell me all about it. I'm taking everyone's advice very seriously [accept Mr. Natural Florida State, MCWAY  ;D].

One thing regarding the psychological symptoms - mine were largely if not entirely environmental. The cycle itself has made me basically forget about the reasons for my malaise [the pandemic overreach], so I feel like I'm going to settle back nicely into a normal state of happiness, even if my hormones drop. I'm also 40 now - I can consider TRT.

That said, what do you recommend to smooth the potential post-cycle crash?

Would two months of Sustanon at 500mg weekly, then a final month at 250mg help that transition?

Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 09:34:52 PM
In all seriousness try switching your chest workouts to an incline heavy routine.  Incline barbell, dumbell and fly's.

Cheat day is technically my next workout - but my training partner missed leg day, so I might do hamstrings as he catches up, as I only did quads this legs day [I wasn't feeling like doing 315-350 stiff-legged deadlifts for reps, which I do rather easily now - though I find deadlifts taxing/tiring in general].

So depending on if my training partner skips legs, chest will either be my next workout, or the one after.

This gives me a couple of days to eat, and I could probably get to 200-lb for my next update photos.

My chest seriously sucks though - BUT...I will take your advice on inclines.

Define heavy? I've been going no lower than 8-12 reps, and go up to 20-30 reps sometimes. I allow myself ONE set of six reps or fewer, just to try to keep some Strongman strength there.

Also, maybe skip every other shoulder workout.

Interesting.

My training partner said my anterior delts are likely eating my chest gains - and probably have been for years. That said, my chest sucks. No potential there. Even my short biceps have an aesthetic - sort of "pretty" - shape.

My chest does not. Only looks good immediately after a pump. Otherwise, it's as flat as a pancake.

Should I skip every other shoulders workout, and add 50% more volume on chest day with inclines or something like that? How do I make up for a skipped day, to benefit chest? More chest volume?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 10:21:38 PM
Why Monday?  Start right now.  Fuck sakes Matt.  Just eat.

I did it.  ;D

The chicken breast is in my air fryer, and two medium potatoes are in the microwave.

To be honest, I think eating is a bit of a fraud. We didn't evolve eating three meals a day.  ::) Not even close.

I can't fathom even natural bodybuilding being good for your organ integrity, and overall systemic wellness.

But I'm committed to doing this - if only for a few months.

I'd rather train three hours a day than eat three meals and three shakes a day.
Fuck that.

And all the extra shitting and pissing and farting. I NEVER fart five times in a week. I don't burp, I don't vomit...I attribute most of that to caloric restriction. The lack of vomiting is genetic. My mom never vomits either.

One day I'm going to vomit for the first time in my life, and say to myself "OMG, I have deep organ cancer."

It's going to be a scary day. There'd be no reason why I'd start vomiting at age 40+. It would have to be cancer.

I'd suggest everyone take a look at the studies on fasting and caloric restriction. It's EXTREMELY healthy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 07, 2022, 10:29:20 PM
Cheat day is technically my next workout - but my training partner missed leg day, so I might do hamstrings as he catches up, as I only did quads this legs day [I wasn't feeling like doing 315-350 stiff-legged deadlifts for reps, which I do rather easily now - though I find deadlifts taxing/tiring in general].

So depending on if my training partner skips legs, chest will either be my next workout, or the one after.

This gives me a couple of days to eat, and I could probably get to 200-lb for my next update photos.

My chest seriously sucks though - BUT...I will take your advice on inclines.

Define heavy? I've been going no lower than 8-12 reps, and go up to 20-30 reps sometimes. I allow myself ONE set of six reps or fewer, just to try to keep some Strongman strength there.

Interesting.

My training partner said my anterior delts are likely eating my chest gains - and probably have been for years. That said, my chest sucks. No potential there. Even my short biceps have an aesthetic - sort of "pretty" - shape.

My chest does not. Only looks good immediately after a pump. Otherwise, it's as flat as a pancake.

Should I skip every other shoulders workout, and add 50% more volume on chest day with inclines or something like that? How do I make up for a skipped day, to benefit chest? More chest volume?

I should have said an incline focused routing for chest.  I wasn't speaking to weight used.  I'd stay in the 8-12 range.  That's my preference.  I'd make sure your form is controlled and smooth.  I'd retire the flat barbell press from your routine.  I'd just skip over shoulders every other workout and change the way you train chest.  These are just my opinions and/or theories. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 07, 2022, 11:15:37 PM
I should have said an incline focused routing for chest.  I wasn't speaking to weight used.  I'd stay in the 8-12 range.  That's my preference.  I'd make sure your form is controlled and smooth.  I'd retire the flat barbell press from your routine.  I'd just skip over shoulders every other workout and change the way you train chest.  These are just my opinions and/or theories.

I'll definitely give it a shot. I have absolutely focused primarily on flat benching over the years. But if I'm understanding you correctly, you're saying to skip a shoulders day and NOT make up for that reduced volume with more chest volume?

Is the idea here that my chest will be more recovered, and I will realize more chest gains by skipping every other delts workout like that?

Also - I am STUFFED. I can't eat another BITE. And remember - that was one chicken breast and two potatoes...and it's still basically one chicken breast and two potatoes.

And I've only eaten one chicken breast, one banana, half a plate of spaghetti, and a couple of teacups of orange juice in the past 48 hours:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Phantom Spunker on July 07, 2022, 11:50:00 PM
Lol!

In 2004, I read that the one most common environmental trait that super-centenarians have in common is restricted calories.

So I restricted what was already a low caloric intake, to 1,200 to 1,500 from 2004 to 2014.

In 2014, brainwashed by vegan assholes, I reduced meat and could not find anything in the vegan diet suitable for my palate.

On the end, I have been on under 1,100 or 1,200 calories daily [~] for the past eight years.

On top of all this, my natural genetic appetite is extremely low even before I did this.

That is complete bullshit, Matt. There is no way you consistently remained on anything that low for anywhere near that long. And speaking honestly, you're fat. Not seriously fat, but clearly a little overweight. You either go through periods of binge-eating or you're just writing nonsense.

When I was young and ignorant about diet, I'd do a few weeks max on around 900-1000 calories to make weight. It damn near killed me. I was ripped to the bone and barely had the strength to walk around. Even when I brought it up to around 1200 my body was still in an extremely depleted state and I'd get the most ridiculous cravings. (No, not for cock. I'd eat huge amounts of chocolate and things like that as soon as I finished competing).

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 08, 2022, 12:08:23 AM
A mcdonalds cheeseburger has 300 calories. So it is not possible for you to eat more than the equivalent of 4 mcdonalds cheeseburgers in a whole day, matt?

have you always struggled with such low appetite?
It seems a bit weird to me, especially since you lift, which should just increase your appetite.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 08, 2022, 12:18:39 AM
Matt, you have to prepare food that tastes good.Take someone shopping with you to get more food that is enjoyable to eat. Snacks, yummy meals, etc.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 08, 2022, 12:51:35 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/KcLkLNZn/00022902983f33ff33f.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 01:13:37 AM
That is complete bullshit, Matt. There is no way you consistently remained on anything that low for anywhere near that long. And speaking honestly, you're fat. Not seriously fat, but clearly a little overweight. You either go through periods of binge-eating or you're just writing nonsense.

When I was young and ignorant about diet, I'd do a few weeks max on around 900-1000 calories to make weight. It damn near killed me. I was ripped to the bone and barely had the strength to walk around. Even when I brought it up to around 1200 my body was still in an extremely depleted state and I'd get the most ridiculous cravings. (No, not for cock. I'd eat huge amounts of chocolate and things like that as soon as I finished competing).

Firstly, I take your comment about my caloric restriction as a COMPLIMENT, Phantom.

Yeah, all that Strongman contest footage of me on YouTube: done on ZERO calories. At most, half a bottle of Gatorade and a granola bar.

AND I was filming the events for all the other guys. So in the ~45 minutes between events while all the other guys were cooling off in the competitor tent, I was in the hot sun behind my camera on no calories.

I'm VERY durable, Phantom - and I require next to no calories to function.

Bear in mind we only need ~800 calories daily to get all of our nutrients for good health.

The only proof I can offer you are screenshots of my blood work results for my thyroid function. The first is from 2017, and the second one is from last month. The third one explicitly ruled out autoimmune disorders, and definitively medically proved that my high TSH [slow thyroid] was exclusively caused by low calories.

How else can I prove this?

I'll make a bet with you right now - since I have no idea where my webcam is, for the cost of a new one, I'll livestream myself for 72 HOURS for you.

I'll eat nothing, I'll RAPIDLY post on Getbig, I'll solve the Rubik's Cube over and over, and I'll do online typing tests, intelligence tests, or math tests in the BLINK OF AN EYE on ZERO calories calories, 30-50-70 hours.

I'll bet you ANY MONEY on that.

I can't explain why I am this right. I just assume our appetites and energy needs are assigned to us with our lungs and our pancreas.

As for me being fat - yes I am. But I think you're failing to realize how massively fat the average Canadian is.

Lots of eyes have been on me lately. I'm not saying I'm in good shape for bodybuilding standards or presumably compared to you - but to the average Canadian, I am a highly in-shape man.

And no, I don't binge - keep in mind my walking around is 170-lb at 16-18% body fat or whatever I am.

I absolutely eat less than the average teenage girl. Not just some days - all the time. And this 5-year consistent slow thyroid proves that, IMO.

That said, I'd be willing to fast for up to 120 hours for you on video. Give me one piece of fish, and one slice of bread.

There will be a ZERO decline in my energy.

I'm telling you - I'm durable.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 01:29:18 AM
^ All those results are consistent with someone not eating.

Why tax the processes of our bodies by eating massive quantities of food, and shitting and pissing and farting and burping all day?

Fuck that.

As for why I'm still fat despite not eating - it stands to reason that my body would desperately hold onto fat stores after 18 years of restricted calories.

Eating is overrated. So I have ONE medical result outside of the normal range [high TSH] which, if left uncorrected on its current trajectory, will require me to be on thyroid medication by age 67.  ::)

Who gives a fuck? Would it be better if I eat mass quantities of my shit food, and get diabetes?

I also have a 1.18 BILLION sperm count and drop loads like Peter North.  ;D I offered to send a video of that to OneMoreRep to confirm that, but he declined. I can send it to Primemuscle on Facebook though.

I am happily willing to confirm anything I claim.

I'm not claiming to have spectacular genetics - I mean, fuck, my ONLY good muscle group is shoulders and MAYBE triceps.

But I am a unique specimen in some ways. Very sturdy. Very durable. I don't need food or water to function.

I trained with the JTF-2 during my time in the Canadian Army. I was even commended by my prime minister.

I can prove all this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 01:36:12 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380205;image)

I find it fascinating that Australians eat their national animal.

Then again, I've eaten my share of beaver in Canada, so I shouldn't talk.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: karasan on July 08, 2022, 01:37:50 AM
You may be right about drug free bodybuilding being a fruitless pursuit, if your hormones are not primed for muscle building.
You may have lower amount of testosterone and gh, but that doesn't mean natural bodybuilding isn't possible.
I have a friend with paper thin skin and crazy biceps peaks at 30 inch waist.
He had naturally very high testosterone and estrogen.
Estrogen gave him very slim waistline.
I don't know how the hell he have such thin skin with all his fibers showing year around.
If one's hormones are not in favour of muscle building it is really frustrating, and since you can see the massive difference how high testosterone effects you mentally and physically, it is really depressing actually.
I suspect my response to training would change massively if I had more favourable hormone levels.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 01:37:59 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/KcLkLNZn/00022902983f33ff33f.jpg)

"2-Book Bundle"

Lmao!!!

Saved. Shared.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Costanza on July 08, 2022, 01:46:20 AM
Gotten the urge to reacquaint yourself with pussy after getting on the gas Matty?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Phantom Spunker on July 08, 2022, 01:53:06 AM
Firstly, I take your comment about my caloric restriction as a COMPLIMENT, Phantom.

Yeah, all that Strongman contest footage of me on YouTube: done on ZERO calories. At most, half a bottle of Gatorade and a granola bar.

AND I was filming the events for all the other guys. So in the ~45 minutes between events while all the other guys were cooling off in the competitor tent, I was in the hot sun behind my camera on no calories.

I'm VERY durable, Phantom - and I require next to no calories to function.

Bear in mind we only need ~800 calories daily to get all of our nutrients for good health.

The only proof I can offer you are screenshots of my blood work results for my thyroid function. The first is from 2017, and the second one is from last month. The third one explicitly ruled out autoimmune disorders, and definitively medically proved that my high TSH [slow thyroid] was exclusively caused by low calories.

How else can I prove this?

I'll make a bet with you right now - since I have no idea where my webcam is, for the cost of a new one, I'll livestream myself for 72 HOURS for you.

I'll eat nothing, I'll RAPIDLY post on Getbig, I'll solve the Rubik's Cube over and over, and I'll do online typing tests, intelligence tests, or math tests in the BLINK OF AN EYE on ZERO calories calories, 30-50-70 hours.

I'll bet you ANY MONEY on that.

I can't explain why I am this right. I just assume our appetites and energy needs are assigned to us with our lungs and our pancreas.

As for me being fat - yes I am. But I think you're failing to realize how massively fat the average Canadian is.

Lots of eyes have been on me lately. I'm not saying I'm in good shape for bodybuilding standards or presumably compared to you - but to the average Canadian, I am a highly in-shape man.

And no, I don't binge - keep in mind my walking around is 170-lb at 16-18% body fat or whatever I am.

I absolutely eat less than the average teenage girl. Not just some days - all the time. And this 5-year consistent slow thyroid proves that, IMO.

That said, I'd be willing to fast for up to 120 hours for you on video. Give me one piece of fish, and one slice of bread.

There will be a ZERO decline in my energy.

I'm telling you - I'm durable.

LOL, Matt, I'm not failing to consider how fat the average person is. I'm not making a comparison. Yeah, most people in Canada and the UK are fat cunts. However, pre-COVID lockdowns you spent your life in the gym and sauna. You really did all that consistently for years on around 1000 calories, AND failed to have a decent six pack? Something's not right.

I'm sure you could lay on a couch for 72 hrs and rely on minimum calories. We all could do that. That's not living, though. You shouldn't even have that amount of time to waste now, given that you're trying to rebound from a lapse in mental health. You've committed to this goal of looking better now, and you've started a cycle. I don't get why you don't take it seriously and stop with the silly eating.

Lastly:

'I trained with the JTF-2 during my time in the Canadian Army. I was even commended by my prime minister.'

You really need to stop saying this. It's embarrassing to read. You did not train with them. You may have taken part in some large exercise in which different military units participated in their own respective roles; however, that's vastly different. You weren't doing what they were doing, you weren't interacting with them, sat in ops rooms with them, or participating with them in any way. Everyone who's ever been in the military knows how this stuff works.

As for the commendation, wasn't that something general and in relation to guard duties at the Olympics (or some other sporting event in your own country)? You realize that during your time of service, men and women died fighting in actual wars, and many of the commendations given out then were for bravery shown under extreme circumstances? Why do you find any pride in your commendation?


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 01:57:40 AM
You may be right about drug free bodybuilding being a fruitless pursuit, if your hormones are not primed for muscle building.
You may have lower amount of testosterone and gh, but that doesn't mean natural bodybuilding isn't possible.
I have a friend with paper thin skin and crazy biceps peaks at 30 inch waist.
He had naturally very high testosterone and estrogen.
Estrogen gave him very slim waistline.
I don't know how the hell he have such thin skin with all his fibers showing year around.
If one's hormones are not in favour of muscle building it is really frustrating, and since you can see the massive difference how high testosterone effects you mentally and physically, it is really depressing actually.
I suspect my response to training would change massively if I had more favourable hormone levels.

Since growing wise to how drugged up the pro bodybuilding industry is, I looked at natural bodybuilding as hopeless for everyone.

I look at someone like Kevin Levrone as just having fuller muscle bellies. His biceps insert virtually right on his elbow joint. Or the Quads of Tom Platz or Jeff King - pure genetics. Bestowed upon them by God/nature. Simple as that [I feel].

Most IFBB pros have muscle in places where normal people don't have muscle.

Ronnie Coleman had muscle in places where people don't have PLACES.

And as you said - thin skin and thin waists. That's also genetic.

Though I am less convinced than you that any of these pros have particularly high natural hormones helping them much. I mean, didn't Nasser popularize the concept of 10g of Testosterone weekly as a base? Didn't Dallas McCarver's autopsy show he was something like 15-25g weekly in total gear? Or am I fudging that?

Why would it matter if either of their natural testosterone is triple mine when they're on supraphysiological doses like that?

I'd say the difference lies in muscle structure / body shape. As Nasser said, you can't turn a chihuahua into a pitbull. These pros just seem to me to have greater muscle fiber density than most people.

THAT, to me, was the genetic advantage. Not hormone levels, which will be well below a beginner cycle even for the highest test man.

My testosterone has always midrange. And it's slightly lower now, I assume mostly due to malaise and mental reasons. That's probably why I've kept my thick hair, and not lost a single follicle by 40. Due to not having high testosterone.

But here's the deal: steroids won't make me gain muscle fiber in my chest, or increase my biceps muscle bellies.

I simply have no muscle fiber concentration to grow to begin with. Hence, bodybuilding was always useless to me, natural or not. Combine that with no appetite, and I was never going to succeed in this endeavour.

I trained for strength, and had good results with that. I've never remotely been injured despite pure shit form for years, could make progress from workout to workout, and didn't need to employ the dietary discipline of competing bodybuilders.

On top of that, it kept me in good health, and feeling well.

There's a reason why I never pursued bodybuilding in any form: I had no potential there.

And that's ok. We're good at what we're good at.

That said, any time I'm at the pool at my gym, I think to myself there are many people with much worse muscle genetics than me. But I'd still never claim I have potential in bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 02:07:33 AM
Gotten the urge to reacquaint yourself with pussy after getting on the gas Matty?

How did you know this?

Yes, I have a date next week. I called my ex-girlfriend from the phone at a second facility I train at once weekly, and she told me she works out there. So I went the next day, and didn't see her - but I did bump into another woman I've always had a penchant for. She gave me her number, and she'll be coming over next week.

I'm very lucky. I wasted so much time being antisocial and worrying about stuff outside of my control. But everything is coming back now.

This month is make or break for me. I feel I will either fully recover, or end up a misanthropic shut-in forever.

I feel I'm 85% of the way to getting back to normal though.

And I'm glad you guessed that, Costanza. Yes, I will be fucking next week if all goes well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Costanza on July 08, 2022, 02:17:14 AM
How did you know this?

Yes, I have a date next week. I called my ex-girlfriend from the phone at a second facility I train at once weekly, and she told me she works out there. So I went the next day, and didn't see her - but I did bump into another woman I've always had a penchant for. She gave me her number, and she'll be coming over next week.

I'm very lucky. I wasted so much time being antisocial and worrying about stuff outside of my control. But everything is coming back now.

This month is make or break for me. I feel I will either fully recover, or end up a misanthropic shut-in forever.

I feel I'm 85% of the way to getting back to normal though.

And I'm glad you guessed that, Costanza. Yes, I will be fucking next week if all goes well.

Good shit Big Chief that's the way.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 08, 2022, 02:19:10 AM
How did you know this?

Yes, I have a date next week. I called my ex-girlfriend from the phone at a second facility I train at once weekly, and she told me she works out there. So I went the next day, and didn't see her - but I did bump into another woman I've always had a penchant for. She gave me her number, and she'll be coming over next week.

I'm very lucky. I wasted so much time being antisocial and worrying about stuff outside of my control. But everything is coming back now.

This month is make or break for me. I feel I will either fully recover, or end up a misanthropic shut-in forever.

I feel I'm 85% of the way to getting back to normal though.

And I'm glad you guessed that, Costanza. Yes, I will be fucking next week if all goes well.
Don't put pressure on yourself like a time limit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: karasan on July 08, 2022, 02:19:56 AM
I agree most of your points Matt, but natural hormone production is also an important factor, and but ofcourse anybody can juice get optimum muscle building hormone levels artificially, but as you said you cannot change muscle shape, muscle length, attachments and frame.
I just wanted to state that some people tend to think it is not possible to build 18 arms naturally, it is very rare but possible if you have the right genetics.
The problem is, anti-drug stance give hope to everybody,
Correct way of putting this should be something like, and most people with mediocre genetics can build 18 arms and 50 inch chest with drug assistance,
but only genetic elite could dream such measurements without assistance.
People should be better informed about what an avarage person can achieve without assistance.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 02:27:20 AM
LOL, Matt, I'm not failing to consider how fat the average person is. I'm not making a comparison. Yeah, most people in Canada and the UK are fat cunts. However, pre-COVID lockdowns you spent your life in the gym and sauna. You really did all that consistently for years on around 1000 calories, AND failed to have a decent six pack? Something's not right.

Have you considered that my genetics suck?

I have a Ronnie Coleman shitty 4-pack from what I can tell, with a major delineation in my abs - there's no potential there.

I have about two inches of lower stomach fat that I can grab, and my stomach is major problem area for fat.

When I have tried to get my stomach lean in the past, I end up losing too much muscle by proportion. I assume there is possibly some solution here, but I have a pretty flat stomach and smallish waist, and I'm fine with that.

My guess is that my body adapted to low calories by holding on to that stomach fat. Also, FYI - as a 130-lb teenager in grade 12, I had that bit of stomach fat. As I said, it's my problem area.

I'm sure you could lay on a couch for 72 hrs and rely on minimum calories. We all could do that. That's not living, though. You shouldn't even have that amount of time to waste now, given that you're trying to rebound from a lapse in mental health. You've committed to this goal of looking better now, and you've started a cycle. I don't get why you don't take it seriously and stop with the silly eating.

You're absolutely right. I guess once the states and compliments came back, and after fucking a woman on basically my first night out in a year, my motivation dwindled to pre-cycle levels.

I mean, if my goal is to get compliments and blowjobs, and that's already happening, why bother with completing the cycle to the level I originally planned? The desired outcome is already.

I think you're fooling yourself if you think you need to be leaner than me to get attention. And assume that you are leaner than me, and know full well the attention that garners.

Though I did set a goal here, and the quality of gear I have is obviously good, so I SHOULD follow through with this...

Lastly:

'I trained with the JTF-2 during my time in the Canadian Army. I was even commended by my prime minister.'

You really need to stop saying this. It's embarrassing to read. You did not train with them. You may have taken part in some large exercise in which different military units participated in their own respective roles; however, that's vastly different. You weren't doing what they were doing, you weren't interacting with them, sat in ops rooms with them, or participating with them in any way. Everyone who's ever been in the military knows how this stuff works.

As for the commendation, wasn't that something general and in relation to guard duties at the Olympics (or some other sporting event in your own country)? You realize that during your time of service, men and women died fighting in actual wars, and many of the commendations given out then were for bravery shown under extreme circumstances? Why do you find any pride in your commendation?

The commendation was for participation in the G8 Summit in Kananaskis in June 2002. It was considered the highest probability of another terrorist attack after 9-11, and was a "Red Alert" zone [oh brother  ::)].

That said:

[1] I was 19 on 9-11, and 20 by the time I was at the G8.
[2] In hindsight, it was probably the SAFEST place in the world at the time, but how would I know that at that age? In my mind, I was definitely doing something brave. And the JTF-2 training was in May of 2002 for my Mountain Ops course. It wasn't years of my life - but it was two months.

Remember - I was only an army reservist, not regular force. So...as far as that goes, I'm proud of my time in. I'm not comparing myself to Wiggs here. I know it's not the same thing.

But, to be sure - I was a fit soldier.

As I said, I'm just sturdy. I'm sure there are some things I would be good at - bodybuilding is just not one of them.

As for my calories, they may go up to 1,500 on days, but I can promise you, I'm NEVER higher, unless I'm forcing calories in.

That said, I'm largely inactive.

If I had a 9 to 5, I would probably need considerably more calories.

Perhaps that's the major difference allowing me to eat so little.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 02:29:40 AM
I agree most of your points Matt, but natural hormone production is also an important factor, and but ofcourse anybody can juice get optimum muscle building hormone levels artificially, but as you said you cannot change muscle shape, muscle length, attachments and frame.
I just wanted to state that some people tend to think it is not possible to build 18 arms naturally, it is very rare but possible if you have the right genetics.
The problem is, anti-drug stance give hope to everybody,
Correct way of putting this should be something like, and most people with mediocre genetics can build 18 arms and 50 inch chest with drug assistance,
but only genetic elite could dream such measurements without assistance.
People should be better informed about what an avarage person can achieve without assistance.

Fantastic post.

Yes - it's very deceiving. I hate that we are brainwashed into this.

I'm not sad I pursued weight training. I had ok results. But had I known I did not have very much potential, I may have never started training.

So...hey...maybe the deception and lies got me to pursue something fruitful, even though the results were much lower than I was led to believe they would be?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 02:39:05 AM
Good shit Big Chief that's the way.

I can't wait to eat that snatch.  ;D

The last one [three Tuesdays ago] did not let me.

I'm going to be disappointed if she's shaved though. It wasn't until I was well into my thirties that I realized that the whole shaved vulva thing turns me off.

I mean, why is it hot to groom your genitals to look like that of a child?  ??? :-X

Hopefully she has at least a little fuzz down there.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on July 08, 2022, 02:42:13 AM
Does this guy have any potential for big muscles? Does he have the genetics?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 02:44:11 AM
Don't put pressure on yourself like a time limit.

Ten long years I've been waiting to get in that snatch.

Oh, you meant my mental health?

Yes. Great post.

It has to stop now though, Humble. I can't go everyday not wanting to exist ever again. Not wanting to die - but not wanting to exist.

They may or may not be the same thing. I have neither the confidence of religious people nor strong atheists on existential questions.

If I come out of this, I will NEVER fall in love again and let a psychotic woman destroy me. Other than that, I can only have so many checks and balances in my life. Things do not always go perfectly.

But I may finally look forward to living again. And I do feel that is very close now.

I've basically medically ruled out all physical causes. Now knowing for certain that it's mental - I should be ok.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BossBoss on July 08, 2022, 02:44:54 AM
Does this guy have any potential for big muscles? Does he have the genetics?

Yes, long muscle bellies, look at his bizep's.
Don't know who that is..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 02:47:05 AM
Does this guy have any potential for big muscles? Does he have the genetics?

His biceps insert almost directly onto his elbow joint. His chest is better than mine, and he probably hasn't even trained a day in his life there.

So I'd say yes, for sure.

Way more potential than me at least.

I have good shoulders. As they are essentially the only thing exposed in a tank top other than arms - I'm at peace with that. But I have almost no potential elsewhere.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: karasan on July 08, 2022, 03:04:03 AM
Does this guy have any potential for big muscles? Does he have the genetics?
Great Larry Scott lacked height and frame but he made it up with amazing muscle bellies, he had one of the best "whole" arm genetics, great shoulder roundness and thickness, good calves.
We can only speculate about his hormone levels for natural bodybuilding, but from his before pictures, I suspect he wasn't lacking natural production to build muscle.
They show Larry Scott example for lousy genetics, well he may be the lower end of the genetic elite but he was still way above average geneticwise.
It is not much different to show a 5' 9" NBA player and say it is possible to be a great basketball player, I guess that 5' 9" guy have insane coordination skills, olympic level explosiveness and out of this world work ethic.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 08, 2022, 03:33:01 AM
From what I can see, I'm technically in ketosis:

I fear for your cloudy piss, myself


In 2014, brainwashed by vegan assholes, I reduced meat and could not find anything in the vegan diet suitable for my palate.

So now I've got this vision of you in a darkened room, strapped to a chair at all points, including a cranial brace, while hairy-armpitted wimmin vegans in sustainable hemp clothing blast hippy music at you while dancing around in strobe lighting, pushing c0ck shaped veggies into your mouth over and over again despite your struggles...

"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I don't know"
"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I don't know"
"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I don't know, I swear..."
"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I do.. No, no please - NOOOOO *gumph*"



(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380188;image)

Looks like the cops have kicked your door down in the middle of the night and have you under arrest ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on July 08, 2022, 03:34:21 AM
If we were training in a gym and a skinny guy like that walked in and said he wanted to do bodybuilding we would laugh to ourselves. My point is we don't know what our genes contain for building large muscles. In Matt's case he has built impressive shoulders. Well his training and interest in strongman contests have given him what you see in the photos. Why can't he build his arms and legs up as well? It is essential that he change how he trains. Forget about doing bench presses and standing presses or dumbbell presses. Find arm exercises that work. I have worked out several effective arm exercises. Only experience can make a difference. Of course if one is convinced he can't build big arms I doubt he ever will.

I remember young Burke Kirby at UBC in 1965. He had 16 1/4 inch arms and boy did he train his arms. We asked him what was more important, 18 inch arms or graduating from UBC. He said getting big arms was more important. That is the kind of thinking that might produce good results. Negative ideas like one doesn't have the genetics except for shoulders won't deliver big arms.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 08, 2022, 04:14:41 AM
(https://spoilertime.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/giphy-3.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 08, 2022, 05:05:21 AM
How else can I prove this?

I'll make a bet with you right now - since I have no idea where my webcam is, for the cost of a new one, I'll livestream myself for 72 HOURS for you.

I'll eat nothing, I'll RAPIDLY post on Getbig, I'll solve the Rubik's Cube over and over, and I'll do online typing tests, intelligence tests, or math tests in the BLINK OF AN EYE on ZERO calories calories, 30-50-70 hours.

I'll bet you ANY MONEY on that.

Yes, I have a date next week. I called my ex-girlfriend from the phone at a second facility I train at once weekly, and she told me she works out there. So I went the next day, and didn't see her - but I did bump into another woman I've always had a penchant for. She gave me her number, and she'll be coming over next week.

And I'm glad you guessed that, Costanza. Yes, I will be fucking next week if all goes well.

Will this be part of the livestream? Asking for a friend...

#Nohomo
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 05:13:37 AM
I fear for your cloudy piss, myself

I would think that might mean a person is excreting protein in their urine, but...I'm not. I pay close attention to health markers though, including urine colour.

So now I've got this vision of you in a darkened room, strapped to a chair at all points, including a cranial brace, while hairy-armpitted wimmin vegans in sustainable hemp clothing blast hippy music at you while dancing around in strobe lighting, pushing c0ck shaped veggies into your mouth over and over again despite your struggles...

"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I don't know"
"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I don't know"
"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I don't know, I swear..."
"Is this safe to eat..?"
"I do.. No, no please - NOOOOO *gumph*"

 ;D ;D ;D



Looks like the cops have kicked your door down in the middle of the night and have you under arrest ;D

Considering the police DID come here to question me about my Facebook posts.  ::)

I need to seriously consider that it may soon become illegal for me to post the way I do online. That's not why I'm quitting online politics...but the timing may work out if Canada's current internet censorship bill passes the Senate:

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/furey-trudeau-liberals-ram-through-online-censorship-bill-and-only-the-senate-can-save-us-now

But the police did come here to question me about my Facebook posts.

I got another 30-day ban on Facebook...for posting this.  ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 05:21:47 AM
If we were training in a gym and a skinny guy like that walked in and said he wanted to do bodybuilding we would laugh to ourselves. My point is we don't know what our genes contain for building large muscles. In Matt's case he has built impressive shoulders. Well his training and interest in strongman contests have given him what you see in the photos. Why can't he build his arms and legs up as well? It is essential that he change how he trains. Forget about doing bench presses and standing presses or dumbbell presses. Find arm exercises that work. I have worked out several effective arm exercises. Only experience can make a difference. Of course if one is convinced he can't build big arms I doubt he ever will.

I remember young Burke Kirby at UBC in 1965. He had 16 1/4 inch arms and boy did he train his arms. We asked him what was more important, 18 inch arms or graduating from UBC. He said getting big arms was more important. That is the kind of thinking that might produce good results. Negative ideas like one doesn't have the genetics except for shoulders won't deliver big arms.

Yes, but you can see he has long muscle bellies. Whereas if you look at me, I have nothing of the sort. I either have more muscle fiber concentration in my shoulders than average, more androgen receptors there, or they just look big because everything else is weak.

But everything else is indeed weak. I could see some better results if I eat more, but my genetic potential is limited. My chest in particular sucks. The rest I can tolerate. No one should be able to bench press what I do and have a chest this bad.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 05:23:47 AM
Will this be part of the livestream? Asking for a friend...

#Nohomo

If she requested it, I wouldn't say no.  ;D

I used to be horrified at the idea of a sex tape with me in it coming out. Like how they do on revenge porn websites.

But now, I honestly see nothing wrong with that. The older I get, the happier I am with how I looked years ago.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 08, 2022, 05:28:20 AM
I'm pretty satisfied with my size, MCWAY.

If I had a chest...I'd think I'd look great.

Steroids are not going to get me a chest, nor are your "Weider Intensity Principles" [oh brother].



I also like how you to talk to me like I haven't been through all this shit when I'm stronger and in better shape than 99% of men.  ::) And I'm 40.

But I'm 100% confident that you could grab a random sampling of 100 men, and I'd be the most in-shape guy. Getbig is not an random sampling of men.

And yet your fragile little ego isn't satisfied with that, as you're resorting to using performance-enhancing drugs to prove something to somebody.....Lord only knows who that is.


Maybe that only shows how out of shape people are - but the notion I need you telling me about "time under tension" and "the mind-muscle connection"...oh brother.  ::)

Like any of the shit we do in the gym even matters for bodybuilding. I mean, IT DOES. But you know what I mean.

Eat 1g of protein per 1-lb of LBM, and drink 2L of water a day, or whatever quantity prevents you from being too dehydrated. Train with intensity, get sufficient rest - and add juice that's your preference.

But this bullshit about training methods being the thing...dude, just STOP.

Here you go again with the straw man stuff, FALSELY attributing things to me I never said nor advocated. I don't know why you're stuck on this 1 gram per lb of LBM garbage. NOBODY HERE TOLD YOU TO DO THAT!!



I should shoot to be 210 with 18" arms, just to shut you up.

Bodybuilding is ALL DRUGS, MCWAY. Stop with the bullshit.

Because nobody ever got 18" arms without steroids...... ::)

And that's going to shut me up how? You incorrectly cited some gibberish, claiming that I advise you to do such.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 08, 2022, 05:35:27 AM
Will this be part of the livestream? Asking for a friend...

#Nohomo

Thanks, friend ;)


If she requested it, I wouldn't say no.  ;D

I used to be horrified at the idea of a sex tape with me in it coming out. Like how they do on revenge porn websites.

But now, I honestly see nothing wrong with that. The older I get, the happier I am with how I looked years ago.

OK, so if we're talking about a potential GetBig online streaming event, I think you need representation to secure sponsors and a decent % of the revenue stream - you don't get the shaft here

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 05:39:54 AM
And yet your fragile little ego isn't satisfied with that, as you're resorting to using performance-enhancing drugs to prove something to somebody.....Lord only knows who that is.

I'm doing it for myself, but it's nice seeing how wrong you are.

No chance in hell I could be sitting here on the couch with my upper body this pumped without gear. NOT POSSIBLE. Not for me. And if the patrons at the Canada Games Complex on the pool deck prove anything, it's that MOST people have shit physique genetics.

Here you go again with the straw man stuff, FALSELY attributing things to me I never said nor advocated. I don't know why you're stuck on this 1 gram per lb of LBM garbage. NOBODY HERE TOLD YOU TO DO THAT!!

The literature has consistently established that level of protein consumption as optimal. I'm sure that gets massively accelerated due to steroids...what, with them being just the finishing 1% touch and all that.  ::)

Because nobody ever got 18" arms without steroids...... ::)

By and large, very few people come anywhere close to that.

And I'm not talking arms of the body composition of that guy trying to reach 30" arms. 18" lean arms are very big, very impressive, and very rare.

And that's going to shut me up how? You incorrectly cited some gibberish, claiming that I advise you to do such.

I'm drafting straw man, but your nonsense about natural bodybuilding añnoys me.

FUCK natural bodybuilding.

I will never do it. I'd rather deadlift 550 at 185 eating nothing than constantly shop and cook and shit and piss and fart and burp all day, after applying "The Weider Constant Tension Principle" [oh brother  ::)] in the gym, and eek out the pathetic muscle gains that come from training naturally.

I'd rather train for strength. Naturals can make more progress there, as there are more evolutionary reasons for us to be strong than for us to develop muscle mass.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 05:46:19 AM
Wiggs had planned a good cycle some years ago, as a one last hurrah type of thing, from what I recall.

That's sort of what this is for me.

Even if I can get to toughly my current size naturally, it's different - my waist is bigger when natural, and my pumps go away in roughly 15 minutes post-workout. Maybe slightly longer.

That constant pumped look - I love it. My waist is 32", but would be at least 35" at around 200, if not on PED's.

Again - FUCK natural bodybuilding.

As for when Wiggs took his hiatus from the board, this is how it made me feel:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 08, 2022, 05:59:26 AM
A shake doesn't require a full blender full of liquid.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 08, 2022, 06:16:58 AM
I'm doing it for myself, but it's nice seeing how wrong you are.

No, you're not. If you were, you wouldn't be whining about how miserable you are having to eat a couple of hundred more calories than you normally do, DESPITE HAVING YOUR PRECIOUS ANABOLICS!



No chance in hell I could be sitting here on the couch with my upper body this pumped without gear. NOT POSSIBLE. Not for me. And if the patrons at the Canada Games Complex on the pool deck prove anything, it's that MOST people have shit physique genetics.

The literature has consistently established that level of protein consumption as optimal. I'm sure that gets massively accelerated due to steroids...what, with them being just the finishing 1% touch and all that.  ::)

BIG DEAL!!! I don't care who published what. If it doesn't work for you, you try something else. NOBODY who's given you any advice here on this forum (yet has achieved the results they wanted personally) told you to eat 1 gram per pound of LBM.

Why you insist on falsely foisting that stupidity on me (even after I've mentioned multiple times that I've NEVER done that myself) shows how utterly comprehensively clueless you are.



By and large, very few people come anywhere close to that.

And I'm not talking arms of the body composition of that guy trying to reach 30" arms. 18" lean arms are very big, very impressive, and very rare.

I'm drafting straw man, but your nonsense about natural bodybuilding añnoys me.

FUCK natural bodybuilding.

I will never do it. I'd rather deadlift 550 at 185 eating nothing than constantly shop and cook and shit and piss and fart and burp all day, after applying "The Weider Constant Tension Principle" [oh brother  ::)] in the gym, and eek out the pathetic muscle gains that come from training naturally.

I'd rather train for strength. Naturals can make more progress there, as there are more evolutionary reasons for us to be strong than for us to develop muscle mass.



What is your obsession with Weider? You can't make up your mind here. You'd rather train for strength; yet you're willing your risk your health by taking steroids for size (and to be perpetually pumped) AND you'll make yourself miserable by eating more food.

You do realize that a stronger muscle is a bigger muscle. Where did you get this pea-brained notion that there is exactly ONE way to gain size without steroids (and because that ONE notion didn't work for you, all "natural bodybuilding" is worthless)?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 06:26:39 AM
No, you're not. If you were, you wouldn't be whining about how miserable you are having to eat a couple of hundred more calories than you normally do, DESPITE HAVING YOUR PRECIOUS ANABOLICS!

Admittedly, I'm doing it for the compliments.

Have you considered that maybe I'd rather do this much faster by cheating?

BIG DEAL!!! I don't care who published what. If it doesn't work for you, you try something else. NOBODY who's given you any advice here on this forum (yet has achieved the results they wanted personally) told you to eat 1 gram per pound of LBM.

Why you insist on falsely foisting that stupidity on me (even after I've mentioned multiple times that I've NEVER done that myself) shows how utterly comprehensively clueless you are.

My point is that natural training sucks. I think bodybuilding is mostly diet anyway.

What is your obsession with Weider? You can't make up your mind here. You'd rather train for strength; yet you're willing your risk your health by taking steroids for size (and to be perpetually pumped) AND you'll make yourself miserable by eating more food.

You do realize that a stronger muscle is a bigger muscle. Where did you get this pea-brained notion that there is exactly ONE way to gain size without steroids (and because that ONE notion didn't work for you, all "natural bodybuilding" is worthless)?

I have more potential to get strong, and don't have the patience to take a natural weakness for me like gaining muscle and pursue that.

I'd rather commit to goals I have potential in. And that's not bodybuilding.

Exactly how much am I putting my health at risk by taking 18.5mg Anadrol daily for a few months? Seriously, MCWAY - enough with that.

How can you have followed bodybuilding for DECADES and not grasp the difference between a wimpy beginner cycle and an IFBB pro one?  ::) I'm under the supervision of my family physician. If anything goes wrong health-wise, I'll bail.

You are a fool to think you aren't taxing your body with extra eating even from natural bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 08, 2022, 06:28:47 AM
A shake doesn't require a full blender full of liquid.

Don't you find that pour a lot more slower when you use less fluid?

I add six ice cubes though. I've found it creates a nice consistency, but that could be the issue when I use less fluid.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 08, 2022, 06:37:47 AM
Admittedly, I'm doing it for the compliments.

Have you considered that maybe I'd rather do this much faster by cheating?

DUH? Tell me something I don't know. No 40+ year-old man intentionally makes himself miserable (risking his health in the process) to merely please himself.



My point is that natural training sucks. I think bodybuilding is mostly diet anyway.

I have more potential to get strong, and don't have the patience to take a natural weakness for me like gaining muscle and pursue that.

I'd rather commit to goals I have potential in. And that's not bodybuilding.

Holy flip-flop, Batman!!!

You just said a post or two ago that bodybuilding was "ALL DRUGS". Now, you're saying it's "mostly diet", the part you don't like.



Exactly how much am I putting my health at risk by taking 18.5mg Anadrol daily for a few months? Seriously, MCWAY - enough with that.

How can you have followed bodybuilding for DECADES and not grasp the difference between a wimpy beginner cycle and an IFBB pro one?  ::) I'm under the supervision of my family physician. If anything goes wrong health-wise, I'll bail.

You are a fool to think you aren't taxing your body with extra eating even from natural bodybuilding.

Yet, you're taxing YOUR body with extra eating AND anabolic steroids.

And another strawman gets propped up. Who here mentioned anything about remotely replicating the anabolic use of an IFBB pro? Besides, other posters here (ON THIS THREAD) have warned you of the risks of using steroids, even short term.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 08, 2022, 07:06:44 AM
Don't you find that pour a lot more slower when you use less fluid?

I add six ice cubes though. I've found it creates a nice consistency, but that could be the issue when I use less fluid.

Who cares?  1.5-2cups max liquid.  You can't drink a shake because it's like a half gallon of shit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 08, 2022, 10:28:09 AM
OK Matt I tried to restrain myself from posting but up the A-Bombs to fifty the Sustston to 500 mgs, ....why wasts a good cycle....two shots in as many weeks isn`t gonna` do much to cut it....... why waste a good cycle.....if you don`t like how you look you can always decrease ,and do light cardio by walking thirty to forty five minute of cardio by waking on an inclined treadmill.....nothing extensive but varying both the speed and incline intermitantly  throughout your workout you will keep fat stores to a minimum.

I could write you up a good routine but I know you will dispute it so I wont bother.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 08, 2022, 10:32:33 AM
Who cares?  1.5-2cups max liquid.  You can't drink a shake because it's like a half gallon of shit.
THIS.............I fill a shaker with water and powder only about twelve ounces and rinse it and drink any excess sediment after its gone.

No need to mix up 5 fucking gallons bro.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 08, 2022, 10:41:30 AM
Matty, let me get this straight. You’re following longevity protocols via diet, so I’m assuming you have a goal to live a very long time. So why did you add harmful anabolics that will shorten your lifespan? It seems counterintuitive.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 08, 2022, 10:44:40 AM
Matty, let me get this straight. You’re following longevity protocols via diet, so I’m assuming you have a goal to live a very long time. So why did you add harmful anabolics that will shorten your lifespan? It seems counterintuitive.
Don`t discourage him bro.....he`s on his way to getting tons of compliments from folks who have no clue what they are looking at.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 08, 2022, 11:10:03 AM
Don`t discourage him bro.....he`s on his way to getting tons of compliments from folks who have no clue what they are looking at.

Sorry, my bro. I will delete ASAP
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MAXX on July 08, 2022, 11:13:01 AM
Matty, let me get this straight. You’re following longevity protocols via diet, so I’m assuming you have a goal to live a very long time. So why did you add harmful anabolics that will shorten your lifespan? It seems counterintuitive.
LoL


With all the deaths and bad stuff we're seeing now with social media exposing it Matt decides it's a good idea to hop on a cycle... In his 40s...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 08, 2022, 11:16:14 AM
THIS.............I fill a shaker with water and powder only about twelve ounces and rinse it and drink any excess sediment after it gone.

No need to mix up 5 fucking gallons bro.

Matt "I can't even finish a protein shake"

GB "Why"

Matts protein shake:

(http://howtospecialist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Mixing-concrete.png)

GB: "Oh"
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 08, 2022, 11:21:14 AM
Matt "I can't even finish a protein shake"

GB "Why"

Matts protein shake:

(http://howtospecialist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Mixing-concrete.png)

GB: "Oh"
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 08, 2022, 11:22:57 AM
Matt "I can't even finish a protein shake"

GB "Why"

Matts protein shake:

(http://howtospecialist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Mixing-concrete.png)

GB: "Oh"

(https://i.makeagif.com/media/7-28-2015/gmNj-7.gif)

“Oh, great. My daily protein shake delivery just arrived.”
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on July 08, 2022, 11:24:45 AM
(https://i.makeagif.com/media/7-28-2015/gmNj-7.gif)

“Oh, great. My daily protein shake delivery just arrived.”
i thought that was bhanks septic tank getting cleaned out..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 08, 2022, 12:14:56 PM
i thought that was bhanks septic tank getting cleaned out..

its more like hankys prolapsed anus
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 08, 2022, 12:53:09 PM
Don't you find that pour a lot more slower when you use less fluid?

I add six ice cubes though. I've found it creates a nice consistency, but that could be the issue when I use less fluid.

4 tbls whole milk, heavy cream or halfnhalf
2 tbls olive oil
1 teaspoon sugar if using unsweetened cocoa powder
3-4 eggs
3 tbls cocoa powder or choco syrup (see above if using unsweetened)
6 ice cubes
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 08, 2022, 01:03:20 PM
A couple of principles of mine from my cycling days were never taking orals more than the first month.

Also test must be taken consistently over the longterm.

250mg’s a week is more powerful than some are saying IMO and with your front load now it would be nice dose to consider for awhile.

Jumping on and off will cause the physical and psychological symptoms IMO.

Yeah 250mg is light years ahead of being natural, but from a muscle building perspective it is not much.

And when people yo-yo with injections it's going to cause problems.

Shoot that Sust every 3-4 days and just stick with it.

I know it's hard for Matt, but he needs to stop overthinking it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 08, 2022, 01:14:52 PM
Matt should move and go live with Bhanky.

Two unemployed bros just eating, sleeping, training and jabbing eachothers butts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 08, 2022, 04:01:49 PM
4 tbls whole milk, heavy cream or halfnhalf
2 tbls olive oil
1 teaspoon sugar if using unsweetened cocoa powder
3-4 eggs
3 tbls cocoa powder or choco syrup (see above if using unsweetened)
6 ice cubes

Olive oil - for why, Bro..?

And I thought I was the only caveman to still occasionally eat raw eggs - no salmonella since I was 11 8) (Taffin disappears from the board a few weeks later in an ironic incident involving a Bloody Mary)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 08, 2022, 04:49:15 PM
Olive oil - for why, Bro..?

And I thought I was the only caveman to still occasionally eat raw eggs - no salmonella since I was 11 8) (Taffin disappears from the board a few weeks later in an ironic incident involving a Bloody Mary)

Cream = bad fats = raises cholesterol
olive oil = good fats = lowers cholesterol
It's about balance, one offsets the other... or so nutritionists say.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 08, 2022, 05:06:25 PM
Cream = bad fats = raises cholesterol
olive oil = good fats = lowers cholesterol
It's about balance, one offsets the other... or so nutritionists say.
Not to mention the increased caloric intake since Matt has trouble eating.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on July 08, 2022, 08:21:04 PM
Orals have a short half life and more side effects so after 4 weeks I believe there are diminishing returns compared to side effects.

Usually the long acting ester in Sust (or whatever you take) would start to be more noticeable making it a decent transition into the rest of your cycle.

You really have to think about these drugs in terms of weeks/months or you can run into trouble.

Just like you are subtly seeming more optimistic now the opposite affect will gradually hit you when you come off.

The general consensus seems to be to take HCG as the last ester clears and then taking a SERM when I was using.

Then I’d take creatine as I’d come off and maybe peptides or HGH at a low dose.


 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on July 08, 2022, 08:59:38 PM
One thing I’ll add is that I would use Dbol and not Anadrol so the transition may be a little bit easier on 250mgs. On Anadrol 500 may be a better option to retain your gains.

Once you’d eventually come off the SERM you may need a mild AI depending how your rebound is going too.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 09, 2022, 12:40:11 AM
Cream = bad fats = raises cholesterol
olive oil = good fats = lowers cholesterol
It's about balance, one offsets the other... or so nutritionists say.

I saw a chart about vitamins where they were all linked in a diagram. If you eat too much vitamin c, it lowers the absorption possibility of other vitamins. The same goes for over-consumption of the other vitamins. Very interesting.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 09, 2022, 02:32:10 AM
One thing I’ll add is that I would use Dbol and not Anadrol so the transition may be a little bit easier on 250mgs. On Anadrol 500 may be a better option to retain your gains.

Once you’d eventually come off the SERM you may need a mild AI depending how your rebound is going too.
Anadrol is brutal.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 03:16:47 AM
Cream = bad fats = raises cholesterol
olive oil = good fats = lowers cholesterol
It's about balance, one offsets the other... or so nutritionists say.

You are way out of date on nutrition.

What you eat has little effect on cholesterol levels.

The original study your ideas are based on was bunk.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 09, 2022, 05:32:09 AM
You are way out of date on nutrition.

What you eat has little effect on cholesterol levels.

The original study your ideas are based on was bunk.

I think it's about 30% of the cholesterol in your body from what you ate and about 70% you made in your liver in response to things like sugars.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 06:25:49 AM
I think it's about 30% of the cholesterol in your body from what you ate and about 70% you made in your liver in response to things like sugars.

There is no scientific evidence that cholesterol levels even matter.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 09, 2022, 07:36:53 AM
You are way out of date on nutrition.

What you eat has little effect on cholesterol levels.

The original study your ideas are based on was bunk.

So was your addition of olive oil to make it more palatable (smoother) or something if it isn't about the nutritional profile..?  Genuinely interested to know if it's something I should try (I like shakes)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 09, 2022, 08:37:03 AM
Cream = bad fats = raises cholesterol
olive oil = good fats = lowers cholesterol
It's about balance, one offsets the other... or so nutritionists say.

Paging Dr. Faggot! Maybe actually go back to Googling everything before distributing your shit pseudoscience, lol lol lol. Allah have mercy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 09:20:16 AM
Orals have a short half life and more side effects so after 4 weeks I believe there are diminishing returns compared to side effects.

Usually the long acting ester in Sust (or whatever you take) would start to be more noticeable making it a decent transition into the rest of your cycle.

You really have to think about these drugs in terms of weeks/months or you can run into trouble.

Just like you are subtly seeming more optimistic now the opposite affect will gradually hit you when you come off.


The general consensus seems to be to take HCG as the last ester clears and then taking a SERM when I was using.

Then I’d take creatine as I’d come off and maybe peptides or HGH at a low dose.

This is correct you really shouldn't be changing the plan on a daily basis you are going to have a bad crash and depression if you just do anadrol only for a couple weeks then go back on an 800 calorie a day diet. You seem to think you gains are just going to be linear and you are going to turn into a monster if you are not careful which is nonsense. You are not going to keep much if you just add the water then stop when the scale moves. You need to be thinking year round TRT at 40 not orals for 4 weeks then diet. Its not just weight you want your body composition to improve which takes time. That anadrol is going to shut you down and you are not replacing the Test you libido mood energy everything is going to crash you should be on test
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 09:28:50 AM
So was your addition of olive oil to make it more palatable (smoother) or something if it isn't about the nutritional profile..?  Genuinely interested to know if it's something I should try (I like shakes)

I eat keto so keep my fat intake high.

Adding oils to shakes though is a good way to up the calories for weight gaining.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 09:29:28 AM
This is correct you really shouldn't be changing the plan on a daily basis you are going to have a bad crash and depression if you just do anadrol only for a couple weeks then go back on an 800 calorie a day diet. You seem to think you gains are just going to be linear and you are going to turn into a monster if you are not careful which is nonsense. You are not going to keep much if you just add the water then stop when the scale moves. You need to be thinking year round TRT at 40 not orals for 4 weeks then diet. Its not just weight you want your body composition to improve which takes time. That anadrol is going to shut you down and you are not replacing the Test you libido mood energy everything is going to crash you should be on test

Why would anyone take diet advice from you when you are the most unhealthiest person here with multiple health problems?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 09:30:47 AM
Why would anyone take diet advice from you when you are the most unhealthiest person here with multiple health problems?

By all means SF1900 post up a pic and show us you have any idea what you are talking about. Matt wants to add some size and stay lean in his 40s and wants to do it the smart way well guess what dipshit I have proven a million times I know exactly how to do that. You have not
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 09:32:43 AM
The general advices is not to use orals like Anadrol for more than 6-8 weeks.

Then off to let your organs recover.

It's unwise to use them for extended periods.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 09:33:45 AM
By all means SF1900 post up a pic and show us you have any idea what you are talking about. Matt wants to add some size and stay lean in his 40s and wants to do it the smart way well guess what dipshit I have proven a million times I know exactly how to do that. You have not

Says the man who has an arm-length list of medical and physical problems and would weigh 170 if not on drugs.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 09:36:50 AM
Says the man who has an arm-length list of medical and physical problems and would weigh 170 if not on drugs.

Again I have the build Matt actually wants to emulate you don't. I have done what Matt is trying to do and I am maintaining it. You have not and are not. So fuck yes Matt should be listening to me over you jackass haters. Here is an idea raise your hand if you are over 40 over 200lbs and maintaining single digit bodyfat and have experience with the compounds he is using? I will wait exactly
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 09:44:44 AM
Again I have the build Matt actually wants to emulate you don't. I have done what Matt is trying to do and I am maintaining it. You have not and are not. So fuck yes Matt should be listening to me over you jackass haters. Here is an idea raise your hand if you are over 40 over 200lbs and maintaining single digit bodyfat and have experience with the compounds he is using? I will wait exactly

So, in addition to your other many incredible talents, you are now Getbig's official drug guru?

The man whose blood pressure is through the roof and has a racing heartbeat?

Yes, you are certainly one to emulate.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/dbc5b6a90cad62dd582897cd6faf3f2f/tenor.gif?itemid=3309472)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 09:47:07 AM
This is correct you really shouldn't be changing the plan on a daily basis you are going to have a bad crash and depression if you just do anadrol only for a couple weeks then go back on an 800 calorie a day diet. You seem to think you gains are just going to be linear and you are going to turn into a monster if you are not careful which is nonsense. You are not going to keep much if you just add the water then stop when the scale moves. You need to be thinking year round TRT at 40 not orals for 4 weeks then diet. Its not just weight you want your body composition to improve which takes time. That anadrol is going to shut you down and you are not replacing the Test you libido mood energy everything is going to crash you should be on test
On the previous page I told him to up the A-Bombs to 50 and test to 500.....if the guy is intent on doing a cycle why halfstep and keep starting and stopping.....may as well just quit now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 09:49:04 AM
By all means SF1900 post up a pic and show us you have any idea what you are talking about. Matt wants to add some size and stay lean in his 40s and wants to do it the smart way well guess what dipshit I have proven a million times I know exactly how to do that. You have not

Even if I was out of shape, which I’m not, it would still not take away from the fact that you are an extremely unhealthy individual who should not be offering anyone fitness instruction.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 09:52:07 AM
So, in addition to your other many incredible talents, you are now Getbig's official drug guru?

The man whose blood pressure is through the roof and has a racing heartbeat?

Yes, you are certainly one to emulate.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/dbc5b6a90cad62dd582897cd6faf3f2f/tenor.gif?itemid=3309472)

My blood pressure is ideal right now 120/67. And no I am not a drug guru but I am on TRT and I am in my 40s and have exp actually doing what he is trying to do using the exact same compounds.  I also have and maintain the build he is trying to get. Meanwhile you are just talking out your ass about some shit you read.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 09:53:17 AM
On the previous page I told him to up the A-Bombs to 50 and test to 500.....if the guy is intent on doing a cycle why halfstep and keep starting and stopping.....may as well just quit now.

I agree with your advice this time but 250mg of Test would at least prevent the crash he is setting himself up for right now
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 09:54:14 AM
I agree with your advice this time but 250mg of Test would at least prevent the crash he is setting himself up for right now
True
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 09:54:17 AM
Even if I was out of shape, which I’m not, it would still not take away from the fact that you are an extremely unhealthy individual who should not be offering anyone fitness instruction.

I am very healthy and I am exactly the person who should be giving advice on this subject
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 09:57:07 AM
I am very healthy and I am exactly the person who should be giving advice on this subject

High heart rate
High pulse rate
Poop blood
Vomit blood
Barrets esophagus
Crohns
IBS

Yup, picture perfection of health!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 10:02:41 AM
High heart rate
High pulse rate
Poop blood
Vomit blood
Barrets esophagus
Crohns
IBS

Yup, picture perfection of health!

So a genetic disease means I don't know anything about test and anadrol and how to keep your gains? I am literally using the exact same compounds yet I am 25lbs heavier and 4 years older with a 6 pack. I am exactly the person he should listening to about this. I have not passed blood or thrown up in months I had a bleeding Ulcer. My Crohns/IBS is in complete remission right now. And my blood pressure is ideal. I have achieved all of this without any medications. Right now I am a picture of health. I just took my blood pressure and its 118/69 it doesn't get any better than that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 10:10:07 AM
High heart rate
High pulse rate
Poop blood
Vomit blood
Barrets esophagus
Crohns
IBS

Yup, picture perfection of health!

You forgot emotional insecurity, bigorexia and low T.

Yet, Bhanky tells us how superior he is to us.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/bf188a1100fbbb290e795de61dc045a3/tenor.gif?itemid=14926880)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 10:28:39 AM
High heart rate
High pulse rate
Poop blood
Vomit blood
Barrets esophagus
Crohns
IBS

Yup, picture perfection of health!

So the lying phaggot claimed he was natural for a year…now he claims he is a long-time PED user and a guru on the subject.

He can’t keep his lies straight anymore.

His jealousy of Matt Canning’s idiotic steroid cycle and Muscles Matter’s IFBB PRO card win is almost embarrassing if he wasn’t such a lying egotistical piece of shit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 10:45:09 AM
So the lying phaggot claimed he was natural for a year…now he claims he is a long-time PED user and a guru on the subject.

He can’t keep his lies straight anymore.

His jealousy of Matt Canning’s idiotic steroid cycle and Muscles Matter’s IFBB PRO card win is almost embarrassing if he wasn’t such a lying egotistical piece of shit.

Never said I was natural again just a lie said from day 1 I was on HRT. By all means when he wants advice on how to be a soggy old hateful homo you guys are the experts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 10:47:20 AM
You forgot emotional insecurity, bigorexia and low T.

Yet, Bhanky tells us how superior he is to us.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/bf188a1100fbbb290e795de61dc045a3/tenor.gif?itemid=14926880)

Again Matt is trying to do what I am doing he isn't asking for psychiatric advice he is asking how to properly take Test and Anadrol to make and keep some gains in his 40s. The anadrol will put the weight on quick the test will help keep it and improve the composition.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 10:49:38 AM
Never said I was natural again just a lie said from day 1 I was on HRT. By all means when he wants advice on how to be a soggy old hateful homo you guys are the experts.

You absolutely claimed you were drug free.

You also claimed you never assaulted women.

You also claimed you could squat 405 lbs for reps.

Fuck off you lying piece of shit. Your bullshit act has grown old and tiresome. Get off the internet and go find someone to raise your kid, or it will grow up to be a lying psychopathic egomaniac like you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 10:49:53 AM
Never said I was natural again just a lie said from day 1 I was on HRT. By all means when he wants advice on how to be a soggy old hateful homo you guys are the experts.
yep, just not 500mgs of it
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 10:51:56 AM
You absolutely claimed you were drug free.

You also claimed you never assaulted women.

You also claimed you could squat 405 lbs for reps.

Fuck off you lying piece of shit. Your bullshit act has grown old and tiresome. Get off the internet and go find someone to raise your kid, or it will grow up to be a lying psychopathic egomaniac like you.

I said I was drug free and just on HRT as again hormone replacement is not drugs. Since that time I have changed my protocol and added an actual medication for anemia. I have never assualted a woman in my life and you godamn right I can squat 405lbs. Now if you dont mind I have other shit to do today than argue with a bunch of haters who don't even lift. Matt knows who is real and who is bullshit he can decide whose advice to take.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 10:54:58 AM
I said I was drug free and just on HRT as again hormone replacement is not drugs. Since that time I have changed my protocol and added an actual medication for anemia. I have never assualted a woman in my life and you godamn right I can squat 405lbs. Now if you dont mind I have other shit to do today than argue with a bunch of haters who don't even lift. Matt knows who is real and who is bullshit he can decide whose advice to take.

Of course its a drug you daft twat, do you think they drain mens balls of test to give you?

Or are you taking HRT orally?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 10:57:53 AM
I said I was drug free and just on HRT as again hormone replacement is not drugs. Since that time I have changed my protocol and added an actual medication for anemia. I have never assualted a woman in my life and you godamn right I can squat 405lbs. Now if you dont mind I have other shit to do today than argue with a bunch of haters who don't even lift. Matt knows who is real and who is bullshit he can decide whose advice to take.

Bullshit…you’re a fucking liar.

Like your “bio identical” hormone claim = bullshit
Your 405 lb squat for reps claim = bullshit
Your Anadrol for anemia claim = bullshit
Your MMA fighting claim = bullshit
Your height claim = bullshit
Your neck/arm size claim = bullshit
Your wrestling claims = bullshit
Your IQ claims = bullshit

And…your claim you never assaulted multiple women = BULLSHIT!

Fuck off you lying little chihuahua twink.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 09, 2022, 10:58:01 AM
Of course its a drug you daft twat, do you think they drain mens balls of test to give you?

Or are you taking HRT orally?

He's not taking HRT....he's on a full cycle.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 11:04:14 AM
He's not taking HRT....he's on a full cycle.

I’m still trying to figure out why the biggest lying piece of shit on Getbig (Brian Wood Healy Hankins) is giving drug use advice to a psychotic, mentally unstable, potentially violent retard like Matt Canning?

I’m all for watching the train wreck, but for fuck’s sake…this is like two retards riding the Teacups at the State Fair.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 11:06:51 AM
You forgot emotional insecurity, bigorexia and low T.

Yet, Bhanky tells us how superior he is to us.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/bf188a1100fbbb290e795de61dc045a3/tenor.gif?itemid=14926880)

I would love to be inside BHANKS brain and see what he says to himself on a daily basis.  :D :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 11:07:26 AM
Bullshit…you’re a fucking liar.

Like your “bio identical” hormone claim = bullshit
Your 405 lb squat for reps claim = bullshit
Your Anadrol for anemia claim = bullshit
Your MMA fighting claim = bullshit
Your height claim = bullshit
Your neck/arm size claim = bullshit
Your wrestling claims = bullshit
Your IQ claims = bullshit

And…your claim you never assaulted multiple women = BULLSHIT!

Fuck off you lying little chihuahua twink.

Everything I have stated is true. I have proven nearly all of them. Meanwhile you just come on here to argue and talk dirty to other men. Again Matt can see my results he wants my results he will listen to me. You guys have posted no results you have 0 credibilty
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 11:08:28 AM
So the lying phaggot claimed he was natural for a year…now he claims he is a long-time PED user and a guru on the subject.

He can’t keep his lies straight anymore.

His jealousy of Matt Canning’s idiotic steroid cycle and Muscles Matter’s IFBB PRO card win is almost embarrassing if he wasn’t such a lying egotistical piece of shit.

One would imagine that its almost impossible to keep so many lies straight.

I don't know who I would rather converse with, Matt or BHANKS. Imagine having to drink a beer with either of them.  :( :( :-X :-\ :-\
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 11:08:38 AM
yep, just not 500mgs of it

I never said I wasn't I said I was on Test and it was prescribed those are both true statements
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 11:09:00 AM
Everything I have stated is true. I have proven nearly all of them. Meanwhile you just come on here to argue and talk dirty to other men. Again Matt can see my results he wants my results he will listen to me. You guys have posted no results you have 0 credibilty

and you will be interviewed under caution when he shoots a school up
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 11:09:13 AM
I would love to be inside BHANKS brain and see what he says to himself on a daily basis.  :D :D

He spends all day trying to justify the lies he has told.

Emotionally insecure phaggots are always obsessed with “One Upping” everyone around them.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 11:09:37 AM
I never said I wasn't I said I was on Test and it was prescribed those are both true statements

you just agreed with me
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 11:09:51 AM
Of course its a drug you daft twat, do you think they drain mens balls of test to give you?

Or are you taking HRT orally?

Again not here to argue semantics I told you guys exactly what I was doing from day 1 and I have been honest about everything but I can say the sky is blue and you dumbfucks will spend all day calling me a liar
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 11:12:04 AM
Again not here to argue semantics I told you guys exactly what I was doing from day 1 and I have been honest about everything but I can say the sky is blue and you dumbfucks will spend all day calling me a liar

you never said you were on 500mgs of test, you said you were on HRT , which to 99.9% of people means 100mgs a week tops

Getting a bent doctor to give you 500mgs isnt HRT
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 11:14:01 AM
Everything I have stated is true. I have proven nearly all of them. Meanwhile you just come on here to argue and talk dirty to other men. Again Matt can see my results he wants my results he will listen to me. You guys have posted no results you have 0 credibilty

I don’t need to come on here and post photos in my underwear to impress Primehomosexual.

I am 50 pounds bigger than your claimed weight and I didn’t need drugs to get there or to lift the puny weights you pretend to work out with while you’re pumping yourself full of drugs.

We saw your bloodwork, the edema, and the raised heart rate…I only read your posts because I want to get into your “RIP Bhank” thread early on the first page.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 09, 2022, 11:19:16 AM
UPDATE:

I haven't taken Anadrol for five days now. As expected, I'm having cold feet about it.

I guess I felt that I could confidently do this all the way to the end, but as expected, my hypochondria is kicking in.

That said, I'm >85% certain I can do this fully starting no later than August 1st.

Would 12.5mg Anadrol daily until then be ok, just to sort of maintain? Then I can take this more seriously.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 11:19:43 AM
Again not here to argue semantics I told you guys exactly what I was doing from day 1 and I have been honest about everything but I can say the sky is blue and you dumbfucks will spend all day calling me a liar

You are a liar.

Fuck off with your gaslighting you bald piece of shit.

You have told nothing but non-stop lies and bullshit from your first day here.

The tiny little bit of muscle you have is 100% due to your illegal drug use.

And fuck off with your playing semantics about assaulting women. You are a chronic liar and nothing you say is believable.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 11:28:01 AM
You are a liar.

Fuck off with your gaslighting you bald piece of shit.

You have told nothing but non-stop lies and bullshit from your first day here.

The tiny little bit of muscle you have is 100% due to your illegal drug use.

And fuck off with your playing semantics about assaulting women. You are a chronic liar and nothing you say is believable.

According to bhanks, he is 100% not balding!  :D :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 11:38:20 AM
UPDATE:

I haven't taken Anadrol for five days now. As expected, I'm having cold feet about it.

I guess I felt that I could confidently do this all the way to the end, but as expected, my hypochondria is kicking in.

That said, I'm >85% certain I can do this fully starting no later than August 1st.

Would 12.5mg Anadrol daily until then be ok, just to sort of maintain? Then I can take this more seriously.
Just stay natural man, Jesus Christ.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 11:39:24 AM
Bullshit…you’re a fucking liar.

Like your “bio identical” hormone claim = bullshit
Your 405 lb squat for reps claim = bullshit
Your Anadrol for anemia claim = bullshit
Your MMA fighting claim = bullshit
Your height claim = bullshit
Your neck/arm size claim = bullshit
Your wrestling claims = bullshit
Your IQ claims = bullshit
Cocoon Of Nurients = bullshit

And…your claim you never assaulted multiple women = BULLSHIT!

Fuck off you lying little chihuahua twink.
Added
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 11:52:50 AM
Added

The coccoon is real again have you guys ever even seen a large offseason bodybuilder?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 09, 2022, 11:53:13 AM
you never said you were on 500mgs of test, you said you were on HRT , which to 99.9% of people means 100mgs a week tops

Getting a bent doctor to give you 500mgs isnt HRT

Hold on there a minute Jo - he did NOT get a bent Doctor to prescribe 500mgs a week >:(

No

He persuaded multiple Doctors to prescribe the same weekly amount and then ignored the actual prescription level(s0) to combine them into a self-medicated level so he can 'transition to a monster'...

*his words not mine

Accuracy, please...

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 09, 2022, 11:59:56 AM
Hold on there a minute Jo - he did NOT get a bent Doctor to prescribe 500mgs a week >:(

No

He persuaded multiple Doctors to prescribe the same weekly amount and then ignored the actual prescription level(s0) to combine them into a self-medicated level so he can 'transition to a monster'...

*his words not mine

Accuracy, please...

 ;D

 ;D

Specifically what I did was got my doctor to supervise all this.

I did all necessary health tests beforehand, including a heart ultrasound, and a lower digestive tract ultrasound, on top of additional blood testing to rule out auto-immune generic disorders of the thyroid.

My doctor himself was a high school athlete, and was excited about me going on. He wants me to see the cycle through.  ;D

The gear wasn't prescribed.

Gear position is not illegal in Canada. Just buying and selling it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 09, 2022, 12:02:32 PM
Thing is nobody here would care if he was running half a gram, only that he made it sound like he was running 100mg.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 12:03:46 PM
The coccoon is real again have you guys ever even seen a large offseason bodybuilder?
Can you show me anywhere in the world where it is used by anyone other than yourself?

I`ll wait.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 12:04:19 PM
Thing is nobody here would care if he was running half a gram, only that he made it sound like he was running 100mg.


BINGO
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on July 09, 2022, 12:04:43 PM
Can we get an update on the fresh snatch?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 12:05:58 PM
Can we get an update on the fresh snatch slit?
FIXED  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 12:07:47 PM
;D

Specifically what I did was got my doctor to supervise all this.

I did all necessary health tests beforehand, including a heart ultrasound, and a lower digestive tract ultrasound, on top of additional blood testing to rule out auto-immune generic disorders of the thyroid.

My doctor himself was a high school athlete, and was excited about me going on. He wants me to see the cycle through.  ;D

The gear wasn't prescribed.

Gear position is not illegal in Canada. Just buying and selling it.

He's referring to Bhanky, Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 09, 2022, 12:12:19 PM
Does this guy have any potential for big muscles? Does he have the genetics?

Never knew Larry Scott had such narrow clavicles.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 12:18:08 PM
Never knew Larry Scott had such narrow clavicles.


Once he got on the D-bol it was game over.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 12:29:05 PM
;D

Specifically what I did was got my doctor to supervise all this.

I did all necessary health tests beforehand, including a heart ultrasound, and a lower digestive tract ultrasound, on top of additional blood testing to rule out auto-immune generic disorders of the thyroid.

My doctor himself was a high school athlete, and was excited about me going on. He wants me to see the cycle through.  ;D

The gear wasn't prescribed.

Gear position is not illegal in Canada. Just buying and selling it.

hes not talking about you
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 12:39:51 PM
You are way out of date on nutrition.

What you eat has little effect on cholesterol levels.

The original study your ideas are based on was bunk.

Really? Please link me to a nutrition, medical or scientific article which supports what you say. Everything I find regarding cholesterol, says the biggest influence on blood cholesterol level is the mix of fats and carbohydrates in your diet and not the amount of cholesterol you eat from food.

The medications used to lower cholesterol sometimes produce have negative side effects. I've not experienced any of those. Statins are a common cholesterol medicine, but for some people they can cause severe side effects like muscle damage, dark-colored urine, liver damage, increased blood sugar or type 2 diabetes, and memory loss or confusion.

I am guilty of consuming a moderate amount of saturated and trans fats, such as those found in processed foods, meats, butter, cream, and cheese. My doctor has prescribed Simvastatin for decades. As of February 2022, my lipid panel indicated everything is within range except LDL which is high.

Component   Your Value           Standard Range

Cholesterol   152 mg/dL        100 - 199 mg/dL      
   
Triglycerides   92 mg/dL              0 - 149 mg/dL
   
HDL Cholesterol   53 mg/dL                  >39 mg/dL
   
VLDL Cholesterol Cal   17 mg/dL       5 - 40 mg/dL
   
LDL, Calculated   82 mg/dL               0 - 99 mg/dL



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 12:54:50 PM
Really? Please link me to a nutrition, medical or scientific article which supports what you say. Everything I find regarding cholesterol, says the biggest influence on blood cholesterol level is the mix of fats and carbohydrates in your diet and not the amount of cholesterol you eat from food.

The medications used to lower cholesterol sometimes produce have negative side effects. I've not experienced any of those. Statins are a common cholesterol medicine, but for some people they can cause severe side effects like muscle damage, dark-colored urine, liver damage, increased blood sugar or type 2 diabetes, and memory loss or confusion.

I am guilty of consuming a moderate amount of saturated and trans fats, such as those found in processed foods, meats, butter, cream, and cheese. My doctor has prescribed Simvastatin for decades. As of February 2022, my lipid panel indicated everything is within range except LDL which is high.

Component   Your Value           Standard Range

Cholesterol   152 mg/dL        100 - 199 mg/dL      
   
Triglycerides   92 mg/dL              0 - 149 mg/dL
   
HDL Cholesterol   53 mg/dL                  >39 mg/dL
   
VLDL Cholesterol Cal   17 mg/dL       5 - 40 mg/dL
   
LDL, Calculated   82 mg/dL               0 - 99 mg/dL

Low cholesterol doesnt allow the brain to form memories
Maybe its statins that are causing the huge number of people developing alzhiemers
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 12:55:28 PM
I don’t need to come on here and post photos in my underwear to impress Primehomosexual.

FYI Walter, The Photos Bhank posts do not impress me, nor does his excessive and constant combination of lying and bragging.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 12:57:40 PM
Really? Please link me to a nutrition, medical or scientific article which supports what you say. Everything I find regarding cholesterol, says the biggest influence on blood cholesterol level is the mix of fats and carbohydrates in your diet and not the amount of cholesterol you eat from food.

The medications used to lower cholesterol sometimes produce have negative side effects. I've not experienced any of those. Statins are a common cholesterol medicine, but for some people they can cause severe side effects like muscle damage, dark-colored urine, liver damage, increased blood sugar or type 2 diabetes, and memory loss or confusion.

I am guilty of consuming a moderate amount of saturated and trans fats, such as those found in processed foods, meats, butter, cream, and cheese. My doctor has prescribed Simvastatin for decades. As of February 2022, my lipid panel indicated everything is within range except LDL which is high.

Component   Your Value           Standard Range

Cholesterol   152 mg/dL        100 - 199 mg/dL      
   
Triglycerides   92 mg/dL              0 - 149 mg/dL
   
HDL Cholesterol   53 mg/dL                  >39 mg/dL
   
VLDL Cholesterol Cal   17 mg/dL       5 - 40 mg/dL
   
LDL, Calculated   82 mg/dL               0 - 99 mg/dL



Not sure if you mis-typed there as the sentence itself seems contradictory.  Further it supports what I said about eating cholesterol in foods.

It's not unusual for doctors to give such out-of-date advice about cholesterol.  They learn very little about nutrition in med school and are basically pill dispensers greatly influenced by Big Pharma.

That is obsolete medical advice that lots of doctors are still promoting with Big Pharma's encouragement to prescribe their huge statin moneymaker.

Do some Googling yourself.  It's pretty easy to find out about cholesterol and statins.

https://www.allrecipes.com/article/cholesterol-myths/

https://www.verywellhealth.com/high-cholesterol-myths-and-facts-what-to-know-5202135

As far as statins go they are rarely, rarely necessary.  Stop eating the recommended high carb western diet which causes fluctuations in insulin levels, obesity, diabetes and inflammation.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 01:05:34 PM
;D

Specifically what I did was got my doctor to supervise all this.

I did all necessary health tests beforehand, including a heart ultrasound, and a lower digestive tract ultrasound, on top of additional blood testing to rule out auto-immune generic disorders of the thyroid.

My doctor himself was a high school athlete, and was excited about me going on. He wants me to see the cycle through.  ;D

The gear wasn't prescribed.

Gear position is not illegal in Canada. Just buying and selling it.

Hold on Matt, I think you may have misspoken or I misunderstood you. Does your doctor know about the gear? If not, he isn't supervising "all this" nor can he accurately supervise any of it. Secondly, how are you acquiring the gear. If you are buying it, you are breaking the law based on what you said.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 01:12:20 PM
Can you show me anywhere in the world where it is used by anyone other than yourself?

I`ll wait.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 01:13:31 PM
FYI Walter, The Photos Bhank posts do not impress me, nor does his excessive and constant combination of lying and bragging.

Your just mad I called you a Fag
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 09, 2022, 01:16:03 PM
Hold on Matt, I think you may have misspoken or I misunderstood you. Does your doctor know about the gear? If not, he isn't supervising "all this" nor can he accurately supervise any of it. Secondly, how are you acquiring the gear. If you are buying it, you are breaking the law based on what you said.

For fuck's sake, Sogster! Hand on heart, I wish I could send you to Dignitas.

"My doctor himself was a high school athlete, and was excited about me going on. He wants me to see the cycle through."
"Gear position is not illegal in Canada. Just buying and selling it."
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 01:43:29 PM
Not sure if you mis-typed there as the sentence itself seems contradictory.

It's not unusual for doctors to give such out-of-date advice about cholesterol.

That's is obsolete medical advice that lots of doctors are still promoting with Big Pharma's encouragement to prescribe their huge statin moneymaker.

Do some Googling yourself.  It's pretty easy to find out about cholesterol and statins.

IroNat, I am not sure what you find contradictory. From what I read, fats and carbohydrates are not in and of themselves cholesterol, but they can affect the cholesterol levels in someone’s blood.
 
Statins usefulness in treating high cholesterol verses its possible side effects has long been a controversial topic. Fortunately, despite having taken statins for over 35 years, I’ve experienced no negative side effects.

If I were to wean myself off Simvastatin and not change my diet, would it adversely affect my health or my cholesterol levels? Maybe or maybe not. Why mess with something which for me works?

You might be surprised to know that I don’t always completely follow my doctors’ advice. How I feel physically and mentally, also plays into my decisions about my health. For example, I used to take Trazodone to help with depression and sleep. On my own without asking my PC doctor, I gradually weaned myself off it. Afterwards, I mentioned it to him.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 01:45:55 PM
IroNat, I am not sure what you find contradictory. From what I read, fats and carbohydrates are not in and of themselves cholesterol, but they can affect the cholesterol levels in someone’s blood.
 
Statins usefulness in treating high cholesterol verses its possible side effects has long been a controversial topic. Fortunately, despite having taken statins for over 35 years, I’ve experienced no negative side effects.

If I were to wean myself off Simvastatin and not change my diet, would it adversely affect my health or my cholesterol levels? Maybe or maybe not. Why mess with something which for me works?

You might be surprised to know that I don’t always completely follow my doctors’ advice. How I feel physically and mentally, also plays into my decisions about my health. For example, I used to take Trazodone to help with depression and sleep. On my own without asking my PC doctor, I gradually weaned myself off it. Afterwards, I mentioned it to him.

How do you know they havent affected your brain?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 01:48:11 PM
For fuck's sake, Sogster! Hand on heart, I wish I could send you to Dignitas.

"My doctor himself was a high school athlete, and was excited about me going on. He wants me to see the cycle through."
"Gear position is not illegal in Canada. Just buying and selling it."
I took Matt's comment about gear to mean either buying or selling it, not doing both as in being a dealer. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 01:55:38 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380510;image)
I see a bulky Ronnie....the cocoon is a stupid thing you made up dude...it sounds fucking dumb.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 02:05:58 PM
How do you know they havent affected your brain?

I don't know. So far, I have not experienced neurodegenerative disorders. No dementia or cognitive issues (that I am aware of). I don't believe I am either more or less aggressive because of statins. I've mellowed out over the past 40 years. Don't most people. I do suffer some neuropathy—burning, numbness in my right foot. Most likely this is a result of knee surgery because that's when it started. It is hard to say whether it lowered my testosterone because that was already low long before I started taking statins.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 02:10:27 PM
Your just mad I called you a Fag

Why would it make me mad? Is that the reason you called me a fag? Were you trying to upset me? If so, you failed. Now if you called me a liar, I might get angry since I strongly dislike liars.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 02:11:10 PM
I see a bulky Ronnie....the cocoon is a stupid thing you made up dude...it sounds fucking dumb.

When bulking guys will hold more water they will cocoon in it and then drop the water and emerge but I am not cocooning I am still dry no edema at all
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 02:11:53 PM
Why would it make me mad? Is that the reason you called me a fag? Were you trying to upset me? If so, you failed. Now if you called me a liar, I might get angry since I strongly dislike liars.

You are also a liar you are not in your prime and have no muscle much less primemuscle
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 02:13:01 PM
I don't know. So far, I have not experienced neurodegenerative disorders. No dementia or cognitive issues (that I am aware of). I don't believe I am either more or less aggressive because of statins. I've mellowed out over the past 40 years. Don't most people. I do suffer some neuropathy—burning, numbness in my right foot. Most likely this is a result of knee surgery because that's when it started. It is hard to say whether it lowered my testosterone because that was already low long before I started taking statins.

They fucked me up
I was in agony, my neck and shoulders were aching
I stopped taking them and when I went to the doctor next time she asked why I hadnt renewed the script
I told her what they were doing and she said "Oh dont bother taking them then it doesnt matter"

I asked her why she had given me them in the first place if that was the case, she just told me they automatically prescribe when you are at a certain level.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 02:13:42 PM
Hey Matt, sorry for hijacking your thread.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 02:14:20 PM
Hey Matt, sorry for hijacking your thread.

Its called thread drift, it happens
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 02:19:29 PM
FYI Walter, The Photos Bhank posts do not impress me, nor does his excessive and constant combination of lying and bragging.

You mean like the lie where he claimed he has been training 5 days a week since he was 3 years old?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 02:19:42 PM
They fucked me up
I was in agony, my neck and shoulders were aching
I stopped taking them and when I went to the doctor next time she asked why I hadnt renewed the script
I told her what they were doing and she said "Oh dont bother taking them then it doesnt matter"

I asked her why she had given me them in the first place if that was the case, she just told me they automatically prescribe when you are at a certain level.

Bummer, glad you figured this out and quit them.

My lipid panels have been right on target these past 40 years. Do you think I should stop taking Simvastatin and see what happens? I might give it a try, with my doctor's approval. If I did stop, should I do it gradually or all at once?   
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 02:21:02 PM
You mean like the lie where he claimed he has been training 5 days a week since he was 3 years old?

Missed that one. It was definitely a whopper!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 02:21:49 PM
Bummer, glad you figured this out and quit them.

My lipid panels have been right on target these past 40 years. Do you think I should stop taking Simvastatin and see what happens? I might give it a try, with my doctor's approval. If I did stop, should I do it gradually or all at once?
If your cholesterol is within range then its only a bad diet that will raise it again

Most people take statins without trying diet first
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 09, 2022, 02:27:31 PM
They fucked me up
I was in agony, my neck and shoulders were aching
I stopped taking them and when I went to the doctor next time she asked why I hadnt renewed the script
I told her what they were doing and she said "Oh dont bother taking them then it doesnt matter"

I asked her why she had given me them in the first place if that was the case, she just told me they automatically prescribe when you are at a certain level.

Standard of care.

Protects them from lawsuits.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 02:30:57 PM
Hey Matt, sorry for hijacking your thread.

No one gives a shit about hypochondriac Matt Canning’s thread.

For fuck’s sake, he had made 95% of the posts in it anyway and all of them were more incessant whining and attention-whoring.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 02:35:20 PM
Standard of care.

Protects them from lawsuits.

apparently the levels were set after a study which was funded by the people who make statins
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 02:35:38 PM
The coccoon is real again have you guys ever even seen a large offseason bodybuilder?

You are not a large off-season bodybuilder.

You are not large.

You are not a bodybuilder.

Fuck off with your bullshit, you’re a non-stop liar and low IQ narcissist.

And you have assaulted women and lied about it.

You have ZERO credibility….so fuck off you lying bald little bitchboi.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 09, 2022, 02:44:14 PM
If your cholesterol is within range then its only a bad diet that will raise it again

Most people take statins without trying diet first

The problem with that is I don't want to give up eating cheese, loading a baked potato with butter, putting half and half in my coffee, real whipped cream on strawberry shortcake, or having three scoops of Haagen-Dazs coffee ice-cream...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 09, 2022, 02:58:26 PM
The problem with that is I don't want to give up eating cheese, loading a baked potato with butter, putting half and half in my coffee, real whipped cream on strawberry shortcake, or having three scoops of Haagen-Dazs coffee ice-cream...

My grandad used to eat all the left over buscuits and cake from the day before for his breakfast , always had an orange and some cornflakes as well

died at 87, apart from Asthma in his 30s he never went to the doctors until the day he died

Back then cholesterol wasnt even invented.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 03:30:01 PM
When bulking guys will hold more water they will cocoon in it and then drop the water and emerge but I am not cocooning I am still dry no edema at all
Cocoon my ass,you made that up.....I`ve known hundreds of REAL bodybuilders.....lots of pros and none ever coined that dumbass term.

STUPID SOUDING TERM OF PEACE
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 04:06:29 PM
Cocoon my ass,you made that up.....I`ve known hundreds of REAL bodybuilders.....lots of pros and none ever coined that dumbass term.

STUPID SOUDING TERM OF PEACE

So because I coined the term means guys don't hold more fluid when offseason bulking???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 04:08:43 PM
So because I coined the term means guys don't hold more fluid when offseason bulking???
I never said that....now you`re putting words in my mouth.....use it all you want to but it`s dumb.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 04:28:54 PM
You are not a large off-season bodybuilder.

You are not large.

You are not a bodybuilder.

Fuck off with your bullshit, you’re a non-stop liar and low IQ narcissist.

And you have assaulted women and lied about it.

You have ZERO credibility….so fuck off you lying bald little bitchboi.

Per BHANKS, he has a genius level IQ.

He also strikes fear in the eyes of serial killers and murderers (yes, he actually said that).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 04:31:15 PM
Per BHANKS, he has a genius level IQ.

He also strikes fear in the eyes of serial killers and murderers (yes, he actually said that).
He`d fuck up a prime Milk Tyson also.  LOL :D

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 04:44:47 PM
He`d fuck up a prime Milk Tyson also.  LOL :D

BHANKS has a genius level IQ, deadly weapon with his fists, the ultimate Bodybuilder, killing machine, hugely successful, etc.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 04:48:33 PM
BHANKS has a genius level IQ, deadly weapon with his fists, the ultimate Bodybuilder, killing machine, hugely successful, etc.
A veritable juggernaught. :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 04:49:30 PM
He`d fuck up a prime Milk Tyson also.  LOL :D

Tyson had 0 grappling skills meanwhile I was winning international wrestling tournaments as a Heavyweight when I was 25
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 04:53:29 PM
Tyson had 0 grappling skills meanwhile I was winning international wrestling tournaments as a Heavyweight when I was 25
He`d hit you so had your ancient ancestors would feel it you idiot.

Ridiculous Statement Of Peace

What a tool you are dude.....either that or, your trolling or you actually believe your bullshit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 09, 2022, 04:54:45 PM
Tyson had 0 grappling skills meanwhile I was winning international wrestling tournaments as a Heavyweight when I was 25
And he was a world champ at 22.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 09, 2022, 04:56:53 PM
Per BHANKS, he has a genius level IQ.

He also strikes fear in the eyes of serial killers and murderers (yes, he actually said that).

I said it because it is true if you were in my presence you wouldn't act some dumb villain's recognize the Hero just as Heros recognize villain's. Most people don't sense it they do monsters good or bad recognize their own
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 04:59:52 PM
Tyson had 0 grappling skills meanwhile I was winning international wrestling tournaments as a Heavyweight when I was 25

More bullshit.

You absolutely cannot stop lying, you’re addicted to it like you are with PEDs. You’ve never won anything of note in your shallow little waste of a life.

It’s ridiculous lies like beating up Tyson that confirm your lies about being a habitual wifebeater.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 05:05:35 PM
BHANKS has a genius level IQ, deadly weapon with his fists, the ultimate Bodybuilder, killing machine, hugely successful, etc.

Yep…a 5’-9” and 180 lb Army clerk with bad knees went out into the slums of the world hunting down society’s worst murderers.

Bhank is Getbig’s biggest fucking joke.
He is a liar, a fraud, and he is thirsty enough for attention that he would suck dicks to get responses to a thread.

His petty jealousy of Muscle Matters was just flat out embarrassing. Like a petulant little bald child crying out for attention.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 09, 2022, 05:16:34 PM
A veritable juggernaught. :D

Yeah…the Heavyweight juggernaut.

Who benches 225 and squats 275 - teenage boy poundages.

He’d weigh 165 lbs without the boatload of drugs he’s killing himself with.

More fucking lies by Brian Wood Healy Hankins, wifebeating piece of shit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 05:43:59 PM
I said it because it is true if you were in my presence you wouldn't act some dumb villain's recognize the Hero just as Heros recognize villain's. Most people don't sense it they do monsters good or bad recognize their own

BHANKS, what makes you a monster?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 09, 2022, 05:46:06 PM
Yep…a 5’-9” and 180 lb Army clerk with bad knees went out into the slums of the world hunting down society’s worst murderers.

Bhank is Getbig’s biggest fucking joke.
He is a liar, a fraud, and he is thirsty enough for attention that he would suck dicks to get responses to a thread.

His petty jealousy of Muscle Matters was just flat out embarrassing. Like a petulant little bald child crying out for attention.

Leave Shizzo out of this. :D :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 09, 2022, 06:11:44 PM
Tyson had 0 grappling skills meanwhile I was winning international wrestling tournaments as a Heavyweight when I was 25

Hankins, you won't beat Tyson on this -

(https://assets-prd.ignimgs.com/2022/03/10/mtpunchout-1646932821433.jpg).

Let alone in real life.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 09, 2022, 06:15:57 PM
Hankins, you won't beat Tyson on this -

(https://assets-prd.ignimgs.com/2022/03/10/mtpunchout-1646932821433.jpg).

Let alone in real life.

Somebody please photoshop the ref’s face
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 09, 2022, 08:16:18 PM
Somebody please photoshop the ref’s face

You don't like seeing Chevy chase on there?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 09, 2022, 08:18:07 PM
I said it because it is true if you were in my presence you wouldn't act some dumb villain's recognize the Hero just as Heros recognize villain's. Most people don't sense it they do monsters good or bad recognize their own

Do you think Mike Tyson would sense the villain in you and switch tactics accordingly?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BossBoss on July 09, 2022, 10:20:39 PM
I am 50 pounds bigger than your claimed weight and I didn’t need drugs to get there or to lift the puny weights you pretend to work out with while you’re pumping yourself full of drugs.

So, you are a fat piece of shit Internet Hero :D i absolutly never thought of that..
Maybe get a new account, this one is burned..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 02:28:25 AM
And he was a world champ at 22.

In boxing Wrestling>Boxing
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 02:52:07 AM
In boxing Wrestling>Boxing
I was an undefeated wrestler in high school but a punch in the face hurts like a bitch.....the only comparable pain in wrestling is a chicken wing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 04:43:23 AM
The problem with that is I don't want to give up eating cheese, loading a baked potato with butter, putting half and half in my coffee, real whipped cream on strawberry shortcake, or having three scoops of Haagen-Dazs coffee ice-cream...

I lined out above the foods you should only eat rarely or not at all.

Best foods to eat:

Meat, eggs, fish
Non-starch vegetables (green like broccoli)
Berries (but sparingly)
Cheese, cream
Nuts, seeds
Butter, healthy oils

Foods not to eat:

Juices
Fruit (not often)
Flour products
Grains (rice, wheat, cereals, etc.)
Sugars
Low fat foods
Trans fats (partially hydrogenated foods)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on July 10, 2022, 04:53:54 AM
Tyson had 0 grappling skills meanwhile I was winning international wrestling tournaments as a Heavyweight when I was 25
What tournaments? I'm curious about your level of competition.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 10, 2022, 05:18:23 AM
Let's not forget that Hankins is 0/3 in the cage -

https://fighters.mixedmartialarts.com/search?layout=&search=brian+hankins  2xKO/TKO'd , 1x Submissioned. The TKO was -
"TKO/RSC (Didn't Answer the Bell for Round)", e.g. he quit on his stool.

Now you can look up the guys he fought, they're hobbyist fighters, some with more losses than wins. But some how he's beating Tyson, a man that looks like this even now? -

.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 06:02:23 AM
I was an undefeated wrestler in high school but a punch in the face hurts like a bitch.....the only comparable pain in wrestling is a chicken wing.

And you think ai would stand in front of him exchanging punches? Hell no one sweep single and its over. Yeah I get it Mile Tyson is a terrifying boxer but as far as wrestling he is nothing one takedown and its over. Like it or not I was winning freestyle and greco tourneys in europe at 225lbs when I was 25 years old. I would have taken Tyson down eaisly and it would have been over.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 10, 2022, 06:04:12 AM
And you think ai would stand in drobt of him exchanging punches? Hell no one sweep single and its over. Yeah I get it Mile Tyson is a terrifying boxer but as far as wresing he is nothing one takedown and its over. Like it or not I was winning freestyle and greco tourneys in eyrope at 225lbs when I was 25 years old. I wouldnhave taken Tyson down eaisly and it would have been over.

are you pissed again?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 06:47:34 AM
are you pissed again?

I dont drink i am respinding from a cell ohine and my keys are slightly off you asswipes are jot worth going bakc over it and correcting the keys
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 06:49:06 AM
I have has 1.5 drinks in the last 6 months which if course makes me a lying alcoholic according to getbig
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 06:50:51 AM
What tournaments? I'm curious about your level of competition.

International Heavyweight Champ means Bhanky out-wrestled a fat woman while overseas in the Army.

This is not to say it was not a difficult match.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 06:52:49 AM
I have has 1.5 drinks in the last 6 months which if course makes me a lying alcoholic according to getbig

You should avoid alcohol while taking Anadrol.  Smart move.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 10, 2022, 08:09:02 AM
I dont drink i am respinding from a cell ohine and my keys are slightly off you asswipes are jot worth going bakc over it and correcting the keys, hic....
fixed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 08:14:13 AM
And you think ai would stand in front of him exchanging punches? Hell no one sweep single and its over. Yeah I get it Mile Tyson is a terrifying boxer but as far as wrestling he is nothing one takedown and its over. Like it or not I was winning freestyle and greco tourneys in europe at 225lbs when I was 25 years old. I would have taken Tyson down eaisly and it would have been over.
YEAH OK KILLER!! 

LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 08:25:23 AM
International Heavyweight Champ means Bhanky out-wrestled a fat woman while overseas in the Army.

This is not to say it was not a difficult match.

Admittedly Brian Wood Healy Hankins did beat the shit out of his ex-wife and a couple of his ex-girlfriends.

He’s been a little hesitant to claim those “victories” on Getbig lately though.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 10:23:41 AM
I forgot to mention Bhanky and the fat woman were fighting over a peach cobbler in the Army cafeteria.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 10:31:28 AM
I have has 1.5 drinks in the last 6 months which if course makes me a lying alcoholic according to getbig

No….just a lying wifebeater.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 10, 2022, 10:33:20 AM
another thread that bhanks chose to make about himself  :-\
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 10, 2022, 10:42:38 AM
And you think ai would stand in front of him exchanging punches? Hell no one sweep single and its over. Yeah I get it Mile Tyson is a terrifying boxer but as far as wrestling he is nothing one takedown and its over. Like it or not I was winning freestyle and greco tourneys in europe at 225lbs when I was 25 years old. I would have taken Tyson down eaisly and it would have been over.

Do you think Tyson knows how to sprawl or that it would be any easy takedown for you?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 10, 2022, 10:43:27 AM
I lined out above the foods you should only eat rarely or not at all.

Best foods to eat:

Meat, eggs, fish
Non-starch vegetables (green like broccoli)
Berries (but sparingly)
Cheese, cream
Nuts, seeds
Butter, healthy oils

Foods not to eat:

Juices
Fruit (not often)
Flour products
Grains (rice, wheat, cereals, etc.)
Sugars
Low fat foods
Trans fats (partially hydrogenated foods)

Good list. I do eat quite a bit of fruit often in a smoothie as I have a sweet tooth so it satisfies that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 10, 2022, 12:36:16 PM
And you think ai would stand in front of him exchanging punches? Hell no one sweep single and its over. Yeah I get it Mile Tyson is a terrifying boxer but as far as wrestling he is nothing one takedown and its over. Like it or not I was winning freestyle and greco tourneys in europe at 225lbs when I was 25 years old. I would have taken Tyson down eaisly and it would have been over.

BHANKS, you are a monster.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 10, 2022, 12:40:29 PM
Everything I have stated is true. I have proven nearly all of them. Meanwhile you just come on here to argue and talk dirty to other men. Again Matt can see my results he wants my results he will listen to me. You guys have posted no results you have 0 credibilty

So where is your 405 squat?

the chick who died.. when she was staying with you why was she covered in bruises?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 10, 2022, 12:41:45 PM
Tyson had 0 grappling skills meanwhile I was winning international wrestling tournaments as a Heavyweight when I was 25

was this before your canes?

I am trying to keep up with your "claims"


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 10, 2022, 12:44:15 PM
And you think ai would stand in front of him exchanging punches? Hell no one sweep single and its over. Yeah I get it Mile Tyson is a terrifying boxer but as far as wrestling he is nothing one takedown and its over. Like it or not I was winning freestyle and greco tourneys in europe at 225lbs when I was 25 years old. I would have taken Tyson down eaisly and it would have been over.

You can't even walk up a flight of stairs without your knee "slipping".

Get real.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 12:55:45 PM
You can't even walk up a flight of stairs without your knee "slipping".

Get real.

He couldn’t keep a job at Home Depot selling refrigerators, but he could take down a prime Mike Tyson and beat the shit out of him.

About as realistic as his 405 lb squat for reps or his genius aptitude as a child.

Fucking bullshitter.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 12:58:26 PM
YEAH OK KILLER!! 

LOL  ;D

This….takes down a prime Mike Tyson and submits him.

This.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 10, 2022, 01:05:57 PM
I gave up the cycle 5-6 days ago.

The only medical test I had been thinking about doing but didn't, was a Holter Heart Monitor.

Of course when I do it, and it says my heart function is in the top 0.01% of people of any age, I'll still find another reason NOT to follow this through.

Steroids are pretty retarded though - you take them, temporarily improve in size and strength, then go back to normal. Or keep doing them for years, which is even more retarded.

Anyone on steroids, if they go off for a FULL 1.5 to 3 years [not 'bridging" between cycles, oh brother], will just go back to their natural size - although the side effects may not go away.

Men are going to be between 170 and maybe 190. The only natural exceptions to this are fat fucks.

Maybe pro bodybuilders are exceptions, but based on how they look when they retire, I wouldn't even say that.

It's all a giant fraud.

Industry of drug addicts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 10, 2022, 01:06:18 PM
I guess that if bhanks would join the foreign fighters in Ukraine, Putin would immediately surrender.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 01:10:24 PM
I gave up the cycle 5-6 days ago.
WE KNEW YOU WOULD!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 10, 2022, 01:10:24 PM
This….takes down a prime Mike Tyson and submits him.

This.

No no no - hold on there a minute Walt, I think you mean this... he's got that 'tard strength, dontcha know..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 10, 2022, 01:11:58 PM

Anyone on steroids, if they go off for a FULL 1.5 to 3 years [not 'bridging" between cycles, oh brother], will just go back to their natural size - although the side effects may not go away.


It takes less time than that Matt.

You do retain some of the muscle tissue, but overall, it's not much and too hard to quantify.

I took massive amounts of AAS for 8 years, then went clean for 4 years.

Even while working out and eating right, i lost 30 pounds.

It's all smoke and mirrors.

Delusions of grandeur.

When it comes to sports, AAS are banned for a reason. Even a small amount of Test/GH is a game changer.

That's why you see so many athletes getting caught using them, because they work.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 01:12:07 PM
Now this version would probably hit Tyson with a club and drag him back to his cave.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 10, 2022, 01:19:18 PM
Now this version would probably hit Tyson with a club and drag him back to his cave.

That's one of the best.

As someone said long ago.

That's hanky when he first discovered fire. ;D

Cro-Magnon hankins.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 01:20:30 PM
That's one of the best.

As someone said long ago.

That's hanky when he first discovered fire. ;D

Cro-Magnon hankins.
That was freaking funny.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MAXX on July 10, 2022, 01:22:02 PM
I gave up the cycle 5-6 days ago.

The only medical test I had been thinking about doing but didn't, was a Holter Heart Monitor.

Of course when I do it, and it says my heart function is in the top 0.01% of people of any age, I'll still find another reason NOT to follow this through.

Steroids are pretty retarded though - you take them, temporarily improve in size and strength, then go back to normal. Or keep doing them for years, which is even more retarded.

Anyone on steroids, if they go off for a FULL 1.5 to 3 years [not 'bridging" between cycles, oh brother], will just go back to their natural size - although the side effects may not go away.

Men are going to be between 170 and maybe 190. The only natural exceptions to this are fat fucks.

Maybe pro bodybuilders are exceptions, but based on how they look when they retire, I wouldn't even say that.

It's all a giant fraud.

Industry of drug addicts.
so why did you even start or think it was a good idea? To get out of depression? Tbh maybe you do have naturally low T, may explain your lack of libido and depression. So maybe TRT(real TRT not BB-"TRT") could be a good idea in your case.

Do something productive with your time instead. You spend too much time online Im guessing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 10, 2022, 01:52:35 PM
Now this version would probably hit Tyson with a club and drag him back to his cave.

BHANKS said he strikes fear in serial killers and murderers. He looks pretty threatening there! :o :o :D ;D :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 10, 2022, 01:53:31 PM
This….takes down a prime Mike Tyson and submits him.

This.

Haha Yes!

"Soft mouth" hankins.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 10, 2022, 01:54:34 PM
It takes less time than that Matt.

You do retain some of the muscle tissue, but overall, it's not much and too hard to quantify.

I took massive amounts of AAS for 8 years, then went clean for 4 years.

Even while working out and eating right, i lost 30 pounds.

It's all smoke and mirrors.

Delusions of grandeur.

When it comes to sports, AAS are banned for a reason. Even a small amount of Test/GH is a game changer.

That's why you see so many athletes getting caught using them, because they work.

The governing bodies and athletes tell you they dont work yet they test for them.

If they didnt work why test?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 10, 2022, 01:54:57 PM
No no no - hold on there a minute Walt, I think you mean this... he's got that 'tard strength, dontcha know..

And of course!

"You would respect me in prison" hankins.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 01:55:44 PM
BHANKS said he strikes fear in serial killers and murderers. He looks pretty threatening there! :o :o :D ;D :D
He wouldn`t last a minute in Springfield bro.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 01:59:17 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380682;image)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/n7L89hOl_5g/maxresdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 02:08:09 PM
Haha Yes!

"Soft mouth" hankins.

5’-9” and 180 lbs without his drugs.

Granted that is 3” taller and 25 lbs heavier than Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 10, 2022, 02:59:17 PM
You don't like seeing Chevy chase on there?

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 03:02:22 PM
another thread that bhanks chose to make about himself  :-\

No I made one comment offering Matt advice then the haters all decided to make the thread about attacking me and I defended myself completely different
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 03:04:19 PM
Do you think Tyson knows how to sprawl or that it would be any easy takedown for you?

It would be an easy takedown I get it Tyson is a God a mythical invincible terrifying Demon but the reality is he can't defend a takedown from your average high school wrestler. Sprawl lol it's a little more complicated than that. It would absolutely be an easy takedown
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 03:09:15 PM
BHANKS said he strikes fear in serial killers and murderers. He looks pretty threatening there! :o :o :D ;D :D

Looks can be deceiving it's almost a pheromone type of thing people absolutely know not to mess with me in real life online it is different in real life no one does they can sense it
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 03:09:59 PM
BHANKS, you are a monster.

I know I have spent my life trying to hide it from the World
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 10, 2022, 03:10:52 PM
Looks can be deceiving it's almost a pheromone type of thing people absolutely know not to mess with me in real life online it is different in real life no one does they can sense it

What do you think people are sensing?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 10, 2022, 03:12:04 PM
It would be an easy takedown I get it Tyson is a God a mythical invincible terrifying Demon but the reality is he can't defend a takedown from your average high school wrestler. Sprawl lol it's a little more complicated than that. It would absolutely be an easy takedown

So you would beat GSP?  In Mma? And kevin English in body building correct?

More lies, from the Wood women beater Hankins
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 03:13:09 PM
I gave up the cycle 5-6 days ago.

The only medical test I had been thinking about doing but didn't, was a Holter Heart Monitor.

Of course when I do it, and it says my heart function is in the top 0.01% of people of any age, I'll still find another reason NOT to follow this through.

Steroids are pretty retarded though - you take them, temporarily improve in size and strength, then go back to normal. Or keep doing them for years, which is even more retarded.

Anyone on steroids, if they go off for a FULL 1.5 to 3 years [not 'bridging" between cycles, oh brother], will just go back to their natural size - although the side effects may not go away.

Men are going to be between 170 and maybe 190. The only natural exceptions to this are fat fucks.

Maybe pro bodybuilders are exceptions, but based on how they look when they retire, I wouldn't even say that.

It's all a giant fraud.

Industry of drug addicts.

It's just strange you do something wrong then claim it doesn't work then claim it is the only thing that works. You vilify and praise at the same time then quit and complain. You should just be on TRT in the first place you are going to wind up worse than when you started as you have built in a crash
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 03:14:27 PM
So you would beat GSP?  In Mma? And kevin English in body building correct?

More lies, from the Wood women beater Hankins

GSP was 170lbs in his prime and looks to be about 160lbs now in retirement I would fucking crush him they have weight classes for a reason
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 03:15:29 PM
What do you think people are sensing?

Come find out we both know you wouldn't look at me sideways much less say one fucking dumb word to me in real life
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 10, 2022, 03:22:10 PM
Come find out we both know you wouldn't look at me sideways much less say one fucking dumb word to me in real life

BHANKS, Jason Blaha once said that his girlfriends friends called him “The Monster.”

Would this be similar to you?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 03:28:45 PM
No I made one comment offering Matt advice then the haters all decided to make the thread about attacking me and I defended myself completely different

Fuck off, you lying, wifebeating piece of shit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 10, 2022, 03:32:29 PM
It would be an easy takedown I get it Tyson is a God a mythical invincible terrifying Demon but the reality is he can't defend a takedown from your average high school wrestler. Sprawl lol it's a little more complicated than that. It would absolutely be an easy takedown

Hankins, how you not seen the size of your melon? -

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380682;image).

Do you not think Tyson would be beating you all about it while you go for the takedown?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 10, 2022, 03:45:43 PM
GSP was 170lbs in his prime and looks to be about 160lbs now in retirement I would fucking crush him they have weight classes for a reason

Lol lol lol, would you crack him over the head with your disability cane? Have the day off, you dork. Do you think real life is a wrestling match with rules? Tyson would bite your nose off and rip your eyes out before you even got your leotard and ear muffs on. You'd be on the ground looking like that woman who got attacked by a chimp, crying out for your maid's painkillers and an IV of cocooning nutrients. Your MMA record is a complete joke yet you're on here claiming that you'd beat world champion boxers and GSP, hahahaha. DELUDED!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 04:06:22 PM
Hankins, how you not seen the size of your melon? -

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380682;image).

Do you not think Tyson would be beating you all about it while you go for the takedown?

Do you even know what a sweep single is and fuck no again Wrestling is greater than boxing and it's not just me any average wrestler his size would take him out
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 10, 2022, 04:12:25 PM
Do you even know what a sweep single is and fuck no again Wrestling is greater than boxing and it's not just me any average wrestler his size would take him out

Fuck off..

First you have only beat women and old 65 year old geriatrics.

You have said your knees buckle walking up stairs.

You wouldn’t do shit but the following

1) call the cops
2) take your anger out on your gf
3) run to your condo out of state
4) electrocute  a certain ex
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 10, 2022, 04:31:33 PM
Do you even know what a sweep single is and fuck no again Wrestling is greater than boxing and it's not just me any average wrestler his size would take him out

Yes Hankins -

.

Again, do you think Tyson wouldn't see it, and adjust accordingly? Also you are 0-3 against regular Joe fighters, do you really think you could take a shot or two against one of the most explosive and unpredictable heavyweight champions we've seen in the last 50 years?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 04:49:03 PM
Yes Hankins -

.

Again, do you think Tyson wouldn't see it, and adjust accordingly? Also you are 0-3 against regular Joe fighters, do you really think you could take a shot or two against one of the most explosive and unpredictable heavyweight champions we've seen in the last 50 years?

He is not a heavyweight champion in Fighting. He is a heavyweight champion in Boxing. It is absolutely not the same thing. He would have 0 chance of stopping a takedown against any decent wrestler his size.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 10, 2022, 04:55:20 PM
He is not a heavyweight champion in Fighting. He is a heavyweight champion in Boxing. It is absolutely not the same thing. He would have 0 chance of stopping a takedown against any decent wrestler his size.

Lucky for you are not decent. You cripple.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 10, 2022, 05:02:04 PM
He is not a heavyweight champion in Fighting. He is a heavyweight champion in Boxing. It is absolutely not the same thing. He would have 0 chance of stopping a takedown against any decent wrestler his size.

Do you thing you could've gave Bruce Baumgartner a run for his money? -

.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 05:10:14 PM
What do you think people are sensing?

Insanity.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 05:13:25 PM
Who is GSP?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Tennisballz on July 10, 2022, 05:24:06 PM
Do you even know what a sweep single is and fuck no again Wrestling is greater than boxing and it's not just me any average wrestler his size would take him out
why should we take your word for it?  You have no pedigree.  You weren’t good enough in fighting to even win amateur matches.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 05:30:09 PM
He is not a heavyweight champion in Fighting. He is a heavyweight champion in Boxing. It is absolutely not the same thing. He would have 0 chance of stopping a takedown against any decent wrestler his size.

Fuck off you lying piece of shit.

Only people you’ve ever beat in a fight are defenseless women, and your kid who was standing too close to the assault.

Fucking bullshitter. You joined the wrestling team in high school so you could hug other boys.

Lying phaggot.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 05:44:23 PM
Do you thing you could've gave Bruce Baumgartner a run for his money? -

.

I actually met him at Edinburgh University in 1992 when he was training for the Olympics. I was there taking a 2 week wrestling camp with Jake Robinson from the University of Minnesota. Bruce was not part of the camp but was training between practices on one of the mats. I was 15 and about 120lbs. I knew who he was and I tried to challenge him but he declined. I did pin Jeff Buxton once when he was the head coach of Blair Acadamy that I attended and I was a 130lb Junior he can deny it all he wants but it happened. He was the 1980 Northeast Regional Olympic Trials outstanding wrestler. I also wrestled Kendall Cross everyday at NC State my freshman year before he won the Gold at the 96 Olympics I scored on him many times. I did win the Haunau Open wrestling Tourney in Germany as a Heavyweight in Freestyle and Greco in 2002 in addition to several state titles in high school. I was qualified for the team trials but got deployed to a War zone
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 10, 2022, 05:49:58 PM
I actually met him at Edinburgh University in 1992 when he was training for the Olympics. I was there taking a 2 week wrestling camp with Jake Robinson from the University of Minnesota. Bruce was not part of the camp but was training between practices on one of the mats. I was 15 and about 120lbs. I knew who he was and I tried to challenge him but he declined. I did pin Jeff Buxton once when he was the head coach of Blair Acadamy that I attended and I was a 130lb Junior he can deny it all he wants but it happened. He was the 1980 Northeast Regional Olympic Trials outstanding wrestler. I also wrestled Kendall Cross everyday at NC State my freshman year before he won the Gold at the 96 Olympics I scored on him many times. I did win the Haunau Open wrestling Tourney in Germany as a Heavyweight in Freestyle and Greco in 2002 in addition to several state titles in high school. I was qualified for the team trials but got deployed to a War zone


So all this while using a cane,  anorexic and eating hotdogs for all your meals?

More lies from women beater Hankins
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 05:53:33 PM

So all this while using a cane,  anorexic and eating hotdogs for all your meals?

More lies from women beater Hankins

I was not using a cane until I had surgery on my knees in 1997. I didn't eat much in high school hence the lower weight classes. By 2002 I had recovered and was bulking in the Army. I had knee issues on and off after I got out of the Army in 2005 with the biggest reinjury coming in 2019 which put me back on a cane for almost a year. But there were several periods in between where my legs were strong.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 06:06:31 PM
He is not a heavyweight champion in Fighting. He is a heavyweight champion in Boxing. It is absolutely not the same thing. He would have 0 chance of stopping a takedown against any decent wrestler his size.

Bhanky please define "fighting".

Tyson was a champion boxer. 

Royce Gracie was a UFC champion.

Dan Gable was a champion wrestler.

All the above events are sports with rules.

MMA today is a sport with rules.

All the above are not fighting.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 06:08:10 PM
Define "fighting" for us Bhanky.

I get it you are 80 years old and think boxing is an effective style it isn't I thought UFC 1 proved this in 1992 not sure how you don't have the memo in 2022 but wrestlers crush boxers in an actual fight. Just take them down once and it is over not that difficult. You can't punch someone in a low stance shooting on your legs. You are going to be on the ground almost instantly trying that
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 06:17:54 PM
I get it you are 80 years old and think boxing is an effective style it isn't I thought UFC 1 proved this in 1992 not sure how you don't have the memo in 2022 but wrestlers crush boxers in an actual fight. Just take them down once and it is over not that difficult. You can't punch someone in a low stance shooting on your legs. You are going to be on the ground almost instantly trying that

Yet with all these skills you claim you have…you’re 0 - 3 in your illustrious MMA career.

About as shit as your “bodybuilding” career.

You’re a lying fucking blowhard. You’ve never accomplished anything worthwhile in your life.

Wifebeating piece of shit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Tennisballz on July 10, 2022, 06:18:52 PM
I actually met him at Edinburgh University in 1992 when he was training for the Olympics. I was there taking a 2 week wrestling camp with Jake Robinson from the University of Minnesota. Bruce was not part of the camp but was training between practices on one of the mats. I was 15 and about 120lbs. I knew who he was and I tried to challenge him but he declined. I did pin Jeff Buxton once when he was the head coach of Blair Acadamy that I attended and I was a 130lb Junior he can deny it all he wants but it happened. He was the 1980 Northeast Regional Olympic Trials outstanding wrestler. I also wrestled Kendall Cross everyday at NC State my freshman year before he won the Gold at the 96 Olympics I scored on him many times. I did win the Haunau Open wrestling Tourney in Germany as a Heavyweight in Freestyle and Greco in 2002 in addition to several state titles in high school. I was qualified for the team trials but got deployed to a War zone
Too bad the 2 guys that kicked your ass in mma didn't get the memo of how good you are at wrestling!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 10, 2022, 06:19:22 PM
I get it you are 80 years old and think boxing is an effective style it isn't I thought UFC 1 proved this in 1992 not sure how you don't have the memo in 2022 but wrestlers crush boxers in an actual fight. Just take them down once and it is over not that difficult. You can't punch someone in a low stance shooting on your legs. You are going to be on the ground almost instantly trying that

What you consider a "real" fight is a cage match in a controlled setting with a referee and defined rules.   However, in your "real" fight settings there are forbidden techniques.

You assume a boxer will only use boxing techniques in a "real" fight.

In a "real" fight the boxer might pull a knife out of his pocket and stab you to death, or pull a gun and shoot you, or plunge his thumbs into your eye sockets, or rip your ears off, or crush your larynx.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 10, 2022, 06:30:06 PM
I gave up the cycle 5-6 days ago.

The only medical test I had been thinking about doing but didn't, was a Holter Heart Monitor.

Of course when I do it, and it says my heart function is in the top 0.01% of people of any age, I'll still find another reason NOT to follow this through.

So after all pages and threads of your blubbering, bleating, and wailing (EVEN WITH THAT SACRED SYRINGE), you tapped out? You'll excuse me if my jaw isn't on the ground in utter shock.



Steroids are pretty retarded though - you take them, temporarily improve in size and strength, then go back to normal. Or keep doing them for years, which is even more retarded.

Anyone on steroids, if they go off for a FULL 1.5 to 3 years [not 'bridging" between cycles, oh brother], will just go back to their natural size - although the side effects may not go away.

And yet you took them anyway. You stared out the window, batting your eyelashes with clutched hands and birds in the background singing, "Someday my stack will come!!!".


Men are going to be between 170 and maybe 190. The only natural exceptions to this are fat fucks.

Maybe pro bodybuilders are exceptions, but based on how they look when they retire, I wouldn't even say that.

It's all a giant fraud.

Industry of drug addicts.

Yet, you wanted to be one of those folks, if only for a moment.

Correction: YOU are going to be between 170 and 190 lbs. Steroids users and non-steroid-users told you what you need to do: FIX YOUR DIET. You were given sample diets to try, recipes for nutrient-dense and low-volume shakes to add your quest.

Those who used anabolics even told you to bump up your calories to make the most of your cycle(s).

Yet, you still couldn't get the job done.

You weren't content with the strongman stuff. You weren't content with supposedly being stronger and looking better than "99%" of the people in your gym. And with no steroids and that crackhead diet of yours, you can kiss those 15 lbs you (re)gained goodbye.

BTW, many of those retired IFBB pros look great. Have you seen Tony Pearson (he won the AAU Masters Mr Universe less than 2 years ago), Bill Grant, Vince Taylor, Gary Strydom, Dennis James, Jay Cutler? Just to name a few.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 10, 2022, 07:11:24 PM
Lol lol lol, would you crack him over the head with your disability cane? Have the day off, you dork. Do you think real life is a wrestling match with rules? Tyson would bite your nose off and rip your eyes out before you even got your leotard and ear muffs on. You'd be on the ground looking like that woman who got attacked by a chimp, crying out for your maid's painkillers and an IV of cocooning nutrients. Your MMA record is a complete joke yet you're on here claiming that you'd beat world champion boxers and GSP, hahahaha. DELUDED!!

Legit lol’d twice
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 07:19:48 PM
Mohammed is Josh fyi it has now been confirmed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 10, 2022, 07:25:08 PM
Mohammed is Josh fyi it has now been confirmed


How can you prove this?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 10, 2022, 07:27:50 PM

How can you prove this?

Because Josh fucking personally text my cell phone from his personal number and used the same phrases as Mohamed but prior to Mohamed posting it. He text me all kinds of dumb shit I don't share but yeah that is him. Shit he is probably half of you troll haters
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 10, 2022, 07:33:58 PM
Josh is Josh, he doesn`t ever hide who he is.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 07:48:20 PM
Mohammed is Josh fyi it has now been confirmed

Fuck off, you lying bald retard.

Don’t change the subject, you are 100% bullshit, you’re all fucking drugs, you beat women, and you’re mentally as weak as Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning.

Tell us again about your 255 lbs squat sets, you fucking lying little bitch.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 10, 2022, 07:50:41 PM
Because Josh fucking personally text my cell phone from his personal number and used the same phrases as Mohamed but prior to Mohamed posting it. He text me all kinds of dumb shit I don't share but yeah that is him. Shit he is probably half of you troll haters

More lies.
More bullshit.
You’re as pathetic as a Matt Canning steroid cycle.
Choke on a dick, wifebeater.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on July 10, 2022, 09:02:02 PM
 Any of these threads with back and forth with bhanky are gold! The cussing, name calling and the put downs etc are really entertaining.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 10, 2022, 09:19:51 PM
Mohammed is Josh fyi it has now been confirmed

No, it's not.

You said this about webstar too.

Stop lying.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 10, 2022, 10:28:31 PM
I actually met him at Edinburgh University in 1992 when he was training for the Olympics. I was there taking a 2 week wrestling camp with Jake Robinson from the University of Minnesota. Bruce was not part of the camp but was training between practices on one of the mats. I was 15 and about 120lbs. I knew who he was and I tried to challenge him but he declined. I did pin Jeff Buxton once when he was the head coach of Blair Acadamy that I attended and I was a 130lb Junior he can deny it all he wants but it happened. He was the 1980 Northeast Regional Olympic Trials outstanding wrestler. I also wrestled Kendall Cross everyday at NC State my freshman year before he won the Gold at the 96 Olympics I scored on him many times. I did win the Haunau Open wrestling Tourney in Germany as a Heavyweight in Freestyle and Greco in 2002 in addition to several state titles in high school. I was qualified for the team trials but got deployed to a War zone
esfitness level memory...

family court?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 10, 2022, 11:34:38 PM
Mohammed is Josh fyi it has now been confirmed

So now anything you dream up in that cow head of yours means "confirmed"? hahaha. You may be bald, carrying a cane, and 5'4", but you're no Hercule Poirot. I've never rung or texted you and don't have your number, lol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 10, 2022, 11:37:15 PM
Mohammed is Josh fyi it has now been confirmed

No it’s not.

I know who Mohammed is and it’s not Josh.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon_2 on July 10, 2022, 11:55:18 PM
No it’s not.

I know who Mohammed is and it’s not Josh.

Isn't Mohammed the Prophet?


Josh is also a Prophet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 11, 2022, 12:00:04 AM
Mohammed is Josh?

I don't believe it...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 11, 2022, 12:25:11 AM
Mohammed is Josh?

I don't believe it...

Detective Brian's probably been up all night drawing Venn diagrams, popping Adderall, and pinning bits of paper to the walls as a medley of Getbig insults swirl around his genius brain alongside unsolved equations and flashbacks to the 1982 Olympia. "Think, Brian, think! What does this all mean?" Hahaha.

Josh will have texted something with "lol lol lol" in it, too. I borrowed that from him.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 11, 2022, 12:31:54 AM
Mohammed is Josh fyi it has now been confirmed


Mohammed is not Josh. His Islamic related posts (and jokes) are those of someone who grew up with the religion. Not things you'd learn reading books, only by living it.

So unless you believe Josh grew up going to islamic schools and living in a muslim household. You're wrong.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 04:02:55 AM
No, it's not.

You said this about webstar too.

Stop lying.

Again I am confirming it I have lots of text from Josh I could out him on a lot of bullshit he even apologized to me a few times for being an ass in moments of clarity and has said several things he wouldnt like published here. I have been the bigger man and not outed him since he is clearly mentally ill and does have moments of clarity but Josh is not who you people think he is but yes he is mohamed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 04:08:02 AM
Back to the thread I am disappointed in Matts cycle he never went over 1200 calories quit after 30 days claims he got so big traffic stopped and teenagers wanted to touch his muscles but then decided to quit and will now shrink right back down while complaining it didn't work when he refused to eat or stick with it all while shitting on anyone else who has done the same thing correctly.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 11, 2022, 05:19:58 AM
It would be an easy takedown I get it Tyson is a God a mythical invincible terrifying Demon but the reality is he can't defend a takedown from your average high school wrestler. Sprawl lol it's a little more complicated than that. It would absolutely be an easy takedown

I agree the average wrestler beats the average boxer. But how do you know Tyson doesn't know takedown defense?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on July 11, 2022, 05:28:09 AM
Mo Omari has to be a frontrunner for Poster of the Year at this point.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 11, 2022, 05:40:56 AM
Matt cycle/thread update:

67,388 words

2,345 paragraphs

3,247 back pics

650 calories

5 anadrol pills
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 11, 2022, 06:26:16 AM

Detective Brian's probably been up all night drawing Venn diagrams, popping Adderall, and pinning bits of paper to the walls as a medley of Getbig insults swirl around his genius brain alongside unsolved equations and flashbacks to the 1982 Olympia. "Think, Brian, think! What does this all mean?" Hahaha.

Josh will have texted something with "lol lol lol" in it, too. I borrowed that from him.

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 11, 2022, 06:46:17 AM
Matt cycle/thread update:

67,388 words

2,345 paragraphs

3,247 back pics

650 calories

5 anadrol pills

And a mere 10-15 lbs (which some of our anabolic-using brethren have claimed is mere "water weight",) which will be gone almost as soon as it came/returned.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 07:10:08 AM
Back to the thread I am disappointed in Matts cycle he never went over 1200 calories quit after 30 days claims he got so big traffic stopped and teenagers wanted to touch his muscles but then decided to quit and will now shrink right back down while complaining it didn't work when he refused to eat or stick with it all while shitting on anyone else who has done the same thing correctly.

So basically….the exact same thing as your steroid cycles.

Brian Wood Healy Hankins why do you blatantly lie about your illegal drug use? Is it because of your previous legal issues for assaulting women or is it because you supplement your non-income through the sale of illegal drugs?

You lying brittle little bitch.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 07:21:05 AM

Mohammed is not Josh. His Islamic related posts (and jokes) are those of someone who grew up with the religion. Not things you'd learn reading books, only by living it.

So unless you believe Josh grew up going to islamic schools and living in a muslim household. You're wrong.

So what you’re saying is that Mohammed is that big-nosed Paki who called himself Uncle Joon?

LOL
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 11, 2022, 07:22:09 AM
Any of these threads with back and forth with bhanky are gold! The cussing, name calling and the put downs etc are really entertaining.

Bhanky is a true Getbigger.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 07:32:32 AM
And a mere 10-15 lbs (which some of our anabolic-using brethren have claimed is mere "water weight",) which will be gone almost as soon as it came/returned.

You called it.

The mental midget is a fucking quitter - give her a Participation Trophy and shut her back in Mommy’s basement.

I’m not sure what is the most pathetic thing we have seen over the past week:

(1) Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning’s pathetic attention-whoring steroid cycle?
(2) Bullshitter Brian Hankins’ jealousy of Muscle Matter’s turning pro?
(3) Shizzo spending $19,000 on rehab and going back to drinking a month later?

If I gave a fuck, I’d probably start a poll to see who is the most pathetic person of the three.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 07:33:10 AM
Matt cycle/thread update:

67,388 words

2,345 paragraphs

3,247 back pics

650 calories

5 anadrol pills
First coffee of the day, and first laugh of the day.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 07:34:16 AM
You called it.

The mental midget is a fucking quitter - give her a Participation Trophy and shut her back in Mommy’s basement.

I’m not sure what is the most pathetic thing we have seen over the past week:

(1) Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning’s pathetic attention-whoring steroid cycle?
(2) Bullshitter Brian Hankins’ jealousy of Muscle Matter’s turning pro?
(3) Shizzo spending $19,000 on rehab and going back to drinking a month later?

If I gave a fuck, I’d probably start a poll to see who is the most pathetic person of the three.


Second laugh of the day.  LOL  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 07:41:24 AM
Again I am confirming it I have lots of text from Josh I could out him on a lot of bullshit he even apologized to me a few times for being an ass in moments of clarity and has said several things he wouldnt like published here. I have been the bigger man and not outed him since he is clearly mentally ill and does have moments of clarity but Josh is not who you people think he is but yes he is mohamed

You’re not going to get any fucking sympathy here, you wifebeating sock full of stale jism.

Fuck you skinny twink, we are only here now for your Derek Anthony exit from the board and life.

You’re stuck on the drugs now - so it won’t be long before I get the privilege of adding you to the Deadpool thread.   

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 08:11:05 AM
You’re not going to get any fucking sympathy here, you wifebeating sock full of stale jism.

Fuck you skinny twink, we are only here now for your Derek Anthony exit from the board and life.

You’re stuck on the drugs now - so it won’t be long before I get the privilege of adding you to the Deadpool thread.   

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!

Oh look Walter the biggest closet Fag here is back to talking dirty to other men online did you touch yourself while writing this?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 11, 2022, 08:29:36 AM
Again I am confirming it I have lots of text from Josh I could out him on a lot of bullshit he even apologized to me a few times for being an ass in moments of clarity and has said several things he wouldnt like published here. I have been the bigger man and not outed him since he is clearly mentally ill and does have moments of clarity but Josh is not who you people think he is but yes he is mohamed

I know who Mohammed. Spoke with him today. It's not Josh.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 08:33:27 AM
I know who Mohammed. Spoke with him today. It's not Josh.

You are probably another fucking Josh yourself one of his troll accounts validating another lol gtfo
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 08:34:07 AM
I agree the average wrestler beats the average boxer. But how do you know Tyson doesn't know takedown defense?
Mike Tyson grew up in the tough streets of Brooklyn and was a criminal in a gang....I`m sure he knows how to fuck somebody up on a street fight.

Lets end the bullshit, he`d kill Hanky and Hanky has to be trolling.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 11, 2022, 08:34:25 AM
Mo Omari has to be a frontrunner for Poster of the Year at this point.

I agree, that dude is epic...  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 08:35:57 AM
I`m Spartacus Josh.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 08:36:48 AM
Again I have the build Matt actually wants to emulate you don't. I have done what Matt is trying to do and I am maintaining it. You have not and are not. So fuck yes Matt should be listening to me over you jackass haters. Here is an idea raise your hand if you are over 40 over 200lbs and maintaining single digit bodyfat and have experience with the compounds he is using? I will wait exactly

Matt wants to abuse drugs and have a lot of health issues while staying lean? Seems like an odd goal for a 40 year old man.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on July 11, 2022, 08:51:30 AM
I know who Mohammed. Spoke with him today. It's not Josh.

It was great speaking with you my friend.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 08:54:16 AM
Mike Tyson grew up in the tough streets of Brooklyn and was a criminal in a gang....I`m sure he knows how to fuck somebody up on a street fight.

Lets end the bullshit, he`d kill Hanky and Hanky has to be trolling.

I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid. Again the casual ignorance on this stuff is amazing being a street fighter in no way prepares anyone to defend a high level takedown.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 08:58:14 AM
Matt wants to abuse drugs and have a lot of health issues while staying lean? Seems like an odd goal for a 40 year old man.

My health is shockingly great right now no digestion issues, no fluid in my knees, and my blood pressure is in the ideal range. Most of my issues were related to inflammation Crohns is an inflammatory disease of the digestive track, arthritis is an inflammatory disease of the joints taking an anti inflammatory agent actual improves and helps these issues tremendously. They are all gone currently. I feel great.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 09:04:51 AM
I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid. Again the casual ignorance on this stuff is amazing being a street fighter in no way prepares anyone to defend a high level takedown.
I`m sure you had a ton of fights when you left the penthouse to walk the streets of Brooklyn.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 11, 2022, 09:05:23 AM
looks like bhanks is seeing Josh everywhere, including in his sleep...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 11, 2022, 09:07:18 AM
You are probably another fucking Josh yourself one of his troll accounts validating another lol gtfo

LOL stop melting down and throwing a temper tantrum. I am not Josh and neither is Mohammed.

But it’s fun seeing you guess  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 11, 2022, 09:07:54 AM
It was great speaking with you my friend.

Likewise! Say hi to the wife!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 09:09:03 AM
My health is shockingly great right now no digestion issues, no fluid in my knees, and my blood pressure is in the ideal range. Most of my issues were related to inflammation Crohns is an inflammatory disease of the digestive track, arthritis is an inflammatory disease of the joints taking an anti inflammatory agent actual improves and helps these issues tremendously. They are all gone currently. I feel great.

How is the anadrol working?

Have you seen an increase in your strength?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 11, 2022, 09:20:18 AM
You are probably another fucking Josh yourself one of his troll accounts validating another lol gtfo

Brian, you are now officially delusional. Everyone here except for you is Josh. Believe it! SF1900 is Josh... :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 09:21:56 AM
How is the anadrol working?

Have you seen an increase in your strength?

Tha anadrol was for the anemia not strength my energy levels have improved my strength has been improving little by little the longer I go without injury or crash diets
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 11, 2022, 09:22:56 AM
I`m Spartacus Josh.  ;D

Like I just informed Bhank, everyone posting on Getbig is Josh.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 09:27:33 AM
looks like bhanks is seeing Josh everywhere, including in his sleep...
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 09:30:37 AM
I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid. Again the casual ignorance on this stuff is amazing being a street fighter in no way prepares anyone to defend a high level takedown.

Oh fuck off, you fucking liar.

A soft-mouthed little phaggot like you gave blowjobs to half his Boy Scout troop by the time you were 10 years old.

You’re a fucking pansy, you will always be a pansy, and you take your anger out on women because you’re a gutless coward.

Cut the bullshit, Princess.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 09:30:51 AM
Tha anadrol was for the anemia
Hilarious.  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 09:32:51 AM
My health is shockingly great right now no digestion issues, no fluid in my knees, and my blood pressure is in the ideal range. I feel great.
Same here.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 09:33:16 AM
Tha anadrol was for the anemia not strength my energy levels have improved my strength has been improving little by little the longer I go without injury or crash diets


Do you have to stay on it year round?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 11, 2022, 09:33:49 AM
Same here.  :D
WES !   post up your picture !  you stud
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 09:36:09 AM
Matt wants to abuse drugs and have a lot of health issues while staying lean? Seems like an odd goal for a 40 year old man.

Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning just wanted attention. Even a mope like Canning knows Brian Wood Healy Hankins is a fucking lying mess.

Jesus Christ, Canning’s entire life is based on what the voices in his empty head tell him. Who the fuck thinks they’re making progress in strength training when they claim they eat 1,000 calories a day?

He’s another pathetic little Participation atrophy manlet like Bullshitter Hankins.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 09:37:49 AM
Tha anadrol was for the anemia not strength my energy levels have improved my strength has been improving little by little the longer I go without injury or crash diets
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 09:48:16 AM
Did anyone know that muscle matters is now a legitimate and bonafide IFBB PRO?

Did you know that Hanky.......he is an IFBB PRO.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 10:21:16 AM
Did anyone know that muscle matters is now a legitimate and bonafide IFBB PRO?

Did you know that Hanky.......he is an IFBB PRO.

154LBS
154LBS
154LBS
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 10:33:24 AM
I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid. Again the casual ignorance on this stuff is amazing being a street fighter in no way prepares anyone to defend a high level takedown.

You’re really the American dream, a tale of rags to riches.

I always thought of you as our own version of Chael Sonnen, a well do to kid who overcame his privilege to become a world class fighter, who later in life had some charges of domestic violence brought against him. 

Instead you’re like a smaller Connor McGregor.

 Very inspirational stuff.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 10:36:00 AM
I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid. Again the casual ignorance on this stuff is amazing being a street fighter in no way prepares anyone to defend a high level takedown.

right, but you toured the country snowboarding eating hot dogs?

which one is it?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 10:39:23 AM
right, but you toured the country snowboarding eating hot dogs?

which one is it?

Depends on which nickname he’s being referred to, in this case it’s Lyin Brian.

When the topic is Muscle Matters (or anyone on here who’s a better bodybuilder than him) it’s Cryin Brain.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 11, 2022, 10:45:52 AM
I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid.

I can see it now, young Hankins dodging the Decepticons gang and their hammers on the mean streets of Flatbush as they hunt him for his Polo Sport ski jacket. All the while dreaming of the day he won't have to eat weenies to afford the family trips to Vail.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 11, 2022, 10:52:37 AM
I know who Mohammed. Spoke with him today. It's not Josh.

You are probably another fucking Josh yourself one of his troll accounts validating another lol gtfo

I'm Spartacus!!  Er, I mean, I'm Josh too!  ;D

I`m Spartacus Josh.  ;D

Damnit - you beat me to it!

 ;D


154LBS
154LBS
154LBS

Eats shit and trains like a pansy and stays lean = genetics and nothing else
Eats shit and trains like a pansy and stays lean = genetics and nothing else
Eats shit and trains like a pansy and stays lean = genetics and nothing else
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 10:52:57 AM
I can see it now, young Hankins dodging the Decepticons gang and their hammers on the mean streets of Flatbush as they hunt him for his Polo Sport ski jacket. All the while dreaming of the day he won't have to eat weenies to afford the family trips to Vail.

Funny I actually remember the Decepticons that was a real Brooklyn gang in the 80s
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 10:54:30 AM
I'm Spartacus!!  Er, I mean, I'm Josh too!  ;D

Damnit - you beat me to it!

 ;D


Eats shit and trains like a pansy and stays lean = genetics and nothing else
Eats shit and trains like a pansy and stays lean = genetics and nothing else
Eats shit and trains like a pansy and stays lean = genetics and nothing else

So half the board claims I am genetically 150lbs and all drugs the other half claims my current 225lbs and abs is just genetics and nothing else damn y'all some haters
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 11, 2022, 10:54:43 AM
You’re really the American dream, a tale of rags to riches.

I always thought of you as our own version of Chael Sonnen, a well do to kid who overcame his privilege to become a world class fighter, who later in life had some charges of domestic violence brought against him. 

Instead you’re like a smaller Connor McGregor.

 Very inspirational stuff.

Every. single. line. of your post is fucking gold!  A+++

Kofi Annan approved

(http://media.giphy.com/media/l3q2XhfQ8oCkm1Ts4/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 10:56:40 AM
Funny I actually remember the Decepticons that was a real Brooklyn gang in the 80s

Yeah we all do. They were an illegal alien criminal organization intent on destroying the world and enslaving mankind. They might have been successful too if it wasn’t for the Autobots.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 10:57:20 AM
right, but you toured the country snowboarding eating hot dogs?

which one is it?

You do realize you can do a lot of things in 44 years? The NYC hotdogs are the best they have this red onion relish they put on them you simply can't get anywhere else
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 11:02:54 AM
You do realize you can do a lot of things in 44 years? The NYC hotdogs are the best they have this red onion relish they put on them you simply can't get anywhere else

no you claimed your mother fed you hot dogs so you could snowboard across the country
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 11:06:26 AM
no you claimed your mother fed you hot dogs so you could snowboard across the country

And she did she was a single working mother and skimped on a lot of things but then took us snowboarding out West one week each year using her frequent flier miles she got from work and having my brother and me share a couch. No idea what part of that you don't understand
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 11:08:01 AM
And she did she was a single working mother and skimped on a lot of things but then took us snowboarding out West one week each year using her frequent flier miles she got from work and having my brother and me share a couch. No idea what part of that you don't understand

You need to share more of your life story Bhanks. We really have you pegged all wrong.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 11:09:26 AM
You need to share more of your life story Bhanks. We really have you pegged all wrong.

Just don't understand why I am called a liar again and again when I am the only honest and open person here who has proven every fucking word he has ever said
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 11:10:06 AM
I can see it now, young Hankins dodging the Decepticons gang and their hammers on the mean streets of Flatbush as they hunt him for his Polo Sport ski jacket. All the while dreaming of the day he won't have to eat weenies to afford the family trips to Vail. The French Alps
FIXED
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 11:11:22 AM
Just don't understand why I am called a liar again and again when I am the only honest and open person here who has proven every fucking word he has ever said

Not every word.

You’ve never squatted 405 on video.

Also we are jealous haters. You’ve lived an amazing life, that’s almost to good to be true….
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 11:11:56 AM
And she did she was a single working mother and skimped on a lot of things but then took us snowboarding out West one week each year using her frequent flier miles she got from work and having my brother and me share a couch. No idea what part of that you don't understand
You have no clue what hard times are......slowboarding... .I was lucky I had sneakers,and we never went out West.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 11, 2022, 11:18:40 AM
You have no clue what hard times are......slowboarding... .I was lucky I had sneakers,and we never went out West.  ;D
Show us your glutes Wes !
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 11:28:11 AM
Show us your glutes Wes !
Hey fucknut, just so you know I don`t read your posts cuz I have you on IGNORE mr. troll/gimmick.....so post on,I never look at any of your bullshit.

Carry on FUCKFACE.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 11, 2022, 11:35:45 AM
The NYC hotdogs are the best they have this red onion relish they put on them you simply can't get anywhere else

(https://www.thetaylorhamman.com/assets/images/sabrettsaucepackets.jpg).

https://www.thetaylorhamman.com/Sabrett-Onion-Sauce--FOUR-4-15-oz-packages--Pushcart-style-_p_347.html.

(https://affordablegrocery.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/51F9ID4pbL._SY355_.jpg).

Sabrett are the folks that more or less controls most of the NY tristate hotdog trade, and has for decades.  You want the aluminum bag version. The glass jar version is decent, but not as strong.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 11:43:39 AM
Not every word.

You’ve never squatted 405 on video.

Also we are jealous haters. You’ve lived an amazing life, that’s almost to good to be true….

I have not squatted 405 on video correct I said I believed I could max out at a 405lbs squat when asked. I still believe that to be true however I do have knee issues so not trying an all out max also did an extreme diet again and not maxing when dieting. I did squat 355 on video 6 months ago. I think that is close enough right now I am just focused on reps and form. I am getting closer to full size and strength again though so I will be trying a heavier single rep again though soon. Everything else though I have proven 100 times over. Meanwhile the rest of you have proven nothing but hate
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 11:46:40 AM
FIXED

It was actually Austria where we skied the Alps one time when I was a child. Every other time we went out West my mother got frequent flier miles from her work so she didn't have to purchase the plane tickets. Lift tickets are also a lot cheaper for kids and we didn't eat out at all and slept on the couch it really wasn't that expensive the way we did it. And I had shitty gear that didn't keep me dry not even real snowboard gear. My snowboard was purchase used.  I was using Duck boots from A&N and wool socks no fancy waterproof ski gear I remember freezing but yes I go to snowboard out West which was cool
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 11, 2022, 11:55:09 AM
I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid. Again the casual ignorance on this stuff is amazing being a street fighter in no way prepares anyone to defend a high level takedown.

and Wintered in the Alps
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 11, 2022, 11:56:49 AM
And she did she was a single working mother and skimped on a lot of things but then took us snowboarding out West one week each year using her frequent flier miles she got from work and having my brother and me share a couch. No idea what part of that you don't understand

who looked after you when she was flying around the world with work?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 11:58:38 AM
It was actually Austria where we skied the Alps one time when I was a child. Every other time we went out West my mother got frequent flier miles from her work so she didn't have to purchase the plane tickets. Lift tickets are also a lot cheaper for kids and we didn't eat out at all and slept on the couch it really wasn't that expensive the way we did it. And I had shitty gear that didn't keep me dry not even real snowboard gear. My snowboard was purchase used.  I was using Duck boots from A&N and wool socks no fancy waterproof ski gear I remember freezing but yes I go to snowboard out West which was cool
Boo Hoo......sounds rough.  lol  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 12:00:06 PM
and Wintered in the Alps

Frequent flyer miles were used though.

It sounds like his mom worked round the clock, flying all over the county so they could barely get by.

who looked after you when she was flying around the world with work?

Raised themselves? Latch key kids?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 12:15:23 PM
Frequent flyer miles were used though.

It sounds like his mom worked round the clock, flying all over the county so they could barely get by.

;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 12:16:24 PM
Tyson just emailed me and told me to tell Hanky to............ SET IT UP.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 01:01:26 PM
who looked after you when she was flying around the world with work?

good question... since she was a single mom.

Who did look after you when she was flying around the world?

also, why hot dogs? why not just feed you PB and J or PB at the very least.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 11, 2022, 01:05:40 PM
Just don't understand why I am called a liar again and again when I am the only honest and open person here who has proven every fucking word he has ever said

I believe you, Bhanky.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 01:36:10 PM
Just don't understand why I am called a liar again and again when I am the only honest and open person here who has proven every fucking word he has ever said

Because you’re a liar.

You forgot that you claimed you skied in the Alps until Wes mentioned it.

Who fucking skis Kitzbuhel as a kid and just happens to forget they did it?

Fucking lying psychotic drug addict.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 11, 2022, 01:38:29 PM
Because you’re a liar.

You forgot that you claimed you skied in the Alps until Wes mentioned it.

Who fucking skis Kitzbuhel as a kid and just happens to forget they did it?

Fucking lying psychotic drug addict.

Go watch his neck measuring video

Guy is off his fucking tits
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 01:40:00 PM
Go watch his neck measuring video

Guy is off his fucking tits

Hanky has the pasty mouth from mdma  at 11 am Monday morning.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 01:41:26 PM
Go watch his neck measuring video

Guy is off his fucking tits

Why?

I know what a 19-inch neck looks like.

Not one thing clown car Hankins has ever claimed has been true.

Not one thing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 01:42:35 PM
Because you’re a liar.

You forgot that you claimed you skied in the Alps until Wes mentioned it.

Who fucking skis Kitzbuhel as a kid and just happens to forget they did it?

Fucking lying psychotic drug addict.

I didn't forget anything we stayed in Innsbrook Austria and went skiing from there I don't recall the specific resort as I was about 10 years old
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 01:44:11 PM
Why?

I know what a 19-inch neck looks like.

Not one thing clown car Hankins has ever claimed has been true.

Not one thing.

Clearly you don't
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 11, 2022, 01:45:47 PM
Clearly you don't

Puffing up your fucking kneck like bullfrog

Fucks sake just measure in normally, you jave just proved you can wear a 16 inch collar
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 01:50:50 PM
Every. single. line. of your post is fucking gold!  A+++

Kofi Annan approved

(http://media.giphy.com/media/l3q2XhfQ8oCkm1Ts4/giphy.gif)

😁
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 01:52:46 PM
I didn't forget anything we stayed in Innsbrook Austria and went skiing from there I don't recall the specific resort as I was about 10 years old

Bullshit.

More lies and bullshit. Why would a “gifted” 10 year old, with a claimed genius IQ forget something like that? Because the entire story is a lie.

Right now, Shizzo has infinitely more credibility on Getbig than you do.

You rag on MM for turning Pro at lightweight, then brag about your lame high school wrestling exploits when you weighed 120 lbs.

Last Place Hankins, assaulter of women, user of drugs, and couldn’t tell the truth to save his life.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 01:58:16 PM
Pencil Neck Geek Of Peace  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 11, 2022, 02:13:36 PM
Bhanky has the leanest, meanest 19 inch neck on Getbig.

Can we get a skull measurement?  It's got to be HUGE.

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e5/5f/13/e55f13b76c041724d697fddc9334de9b.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 02:18:01 PM
Bhanky has the leanest, meanest 19 inch neck on Getbig.

Can we get a skull measurement?  It's got to be HUGE.

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e5/5f/13/e55f13b76c041724d697fddc9334de9b.gif)
Notable Noggin Of Peace
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 02:19:51 PM
Pencil Neck Geek Of Peace  :D

I literally just taped my neck on film for you idiots with a new out of package tape at 18.5 inches you guys just want to argue I could say the sky is blue and you guys would spend all day calling me a liar. FYI just weighed 225lbs heading to the gym go ahead tell me I weigh 160lbs and I am heading out to buy crack fucking nonsense
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 02:34:34 PM
I literally just taped my neck on film for you idiots with a new out of package tape at 18.5 inches you guys just want to argue I could say the sky is blue and you guys would spend all day calling me a liar. FYI just weighed 225lbs heading to the gym go ahead tell me I weigh 160lbs and I am heading out to buy crack fucking nonsense

Well things are starting to make sense.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 11, 2022, 02:56:49 PM
I actually lived in Park Slope as a kid and walked to Flatbush Avenue subway station to take the train to school he is not the only one who used to fight in the streets of Brooklyn as a kid. Again the casual ignorance on this stuff is amazing being a street fighter in no way prepares anyone to defend a high level takedown.

C'mon Hankins. I agree with you that average wrestler beats an average boxer. But this is a specious NY comparison. I've been out in Park Slope. Its nice! I've driven through Bed Sty... they are very different neighborhoods to say the least. At least they were 20 years ago.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 02:59:14 PM
I literally just taped my neck on film for you idiots with a new out of package tape at 18.5 inches you guys just want to argue I could say the sky is blue and you guys would spend all day calling me a liar. FYI just weighed 225lbs heading to the gym go ahead tell me I weigh 160lbs and I am heading out to buy crack fucking nonsense
Calm down Gloria I was just kidding around.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 11, 2022, 03:04:02 PM
I literally just taped my neck on film for you idiots with a new out of package tape at 18.5 inches you guys just want to argue I could say the sky is blue and you guys would spend all day calling me a liar. FYI just weighed 225lbs heading to the gym go ahead tell me I weigh 160lbs and I am heading out to buy crack fucking nonsense
you puffed it up and flexed it, that means you can get in a 16 collar
Or do you blow up your neck when you try shirts on?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 11, 2022, 03:56:32 PM
Any update on the new and improved beast Matt C ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 04:14:41 PM
you puffed it up and flexed it, that means you can get in a 16 collar
Or do you blow up your neck when you try shirts on?

Hard to tell if you are just fucking with me or actually retarded you ha w to move your necknim a shirt pulling my chin back takes it from 18 to 18.5 I can not button an 18 inch shirt
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 11, 2022, 04:17:22 PM
Hard to tell if you are just fucking with me or actually retarded you ha w to move your necknim a shirt pulling my chin back takes it from 18 to 18.5 I can not button an 18 inch shirt
::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 04:40:46 PM
Its cool go ahead and pretend I have a neck
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 11, 2022, 04:41:42 PM
Its cool go ahead and pretend I have a neck

Steroids work hanky.

Good job!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 11, 2022, 04:45:36 PM
I figured it out, bhank is measuring his traps as his "neck" :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 05:01:15 PM
Hard to tell if you are just fucking with me or actually retarded you ha w to move your necknim a shirt pulling my chin back takes it from 18 to 18.5 I can not button an 18 inch shirt

Because your fingers are stubby or because you lack the fundamental motor skills to button the shirt?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 11, 2022, 05:02:44 PM
I'm not updating this thread again unless I plan to continue this cycle.

As of now, I do not plan on that.

Now go look at this absolute phaggot, OAK:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=679960.msg9816956#msg9816956
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 11, 2022, 05:17:41 PM
I what other universe would someone argue about the size of their neck to the degree Brian is with a bunch of folks intentionally goading him on (trolling). ::)

We should be sympathetic towards Brian's outsized neck problem. An 18.5" neck is an issue if you buy your dress shirts off the rack. Did you know that the standard men's dress shirt with an 18.5" neck has a 56" chest and a 52" waist? A trim fit dress shirt is only slightly smaller with a 55" chest and a 51.5" waist. Both standard and slim dress shirts have a 36" - 37" sleeve length. You'd need arms like an ape to wear those and a gut bigger than Trump's. Some shirts come sized as small, medium, large and extra-large (these are the one's with the 18 1/2" neck).

If he plans to wear a tie, he'll need an extra-long one or it was end up looking more like an untied bow tie.

My guess is he also has issues with crew neck tee shirts and sweaters because of the size of his noggin. Even 'V' necks are probably difficult to put on.

I am so glad that my neck currently measures 16.5". It used to be 17", and even that made decent fitting shirts hard to find.

I guess he could buy smaller necked shirts and get one of those elastic things that extends the neck opening. Like these shirt neck extenders from Amazon.

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61s-9db514L._AC_SX466_.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 05:21:08 PM
Its cool go ahead and pretend I have a neck

bhanks, have you checked your BP?

you are redder than a fire truck.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 05:23:14 PM
Hard to tell if you are just fucking with me or actually retarded you ha w to move your necknim a shirt pulling my chin back takes it from 18 to 18.5 I can not button an 18 inch shirt

This is exactly what you are doing.

(https://im.indiatimes.in/content/2021/May/Article-Body-79_609e67cae199a.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 05:57:38 PM
Its cool go ahead and pretend I have a neck


Bhanks neck is to big for his traps, waist is to large for his shoulders, triceps to torn for his arms.

He’s got one good pose and even in that he looks like a big old Tbombz.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 11, 2022, 06:03:22 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380911;image)

Looks like he`s starting to morph into Big Lenny from the Delray misfits.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 11, 2022, 06:37:30 PM
Its cool go ahead and pretend I have a neck

Delts are overshadowing the biceps
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 06:39:56 PM

Bhanks neck is to big for his traps, waist is to large for his shoulders, triceps to torn for his arms.

He’s got one good pose and even in that he looks like a big old Tbombz.

This one might be more aesthetically pleasing
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 11, 2022, 06:41:53 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380911;image)

Looks like he`s starting to morph into Big Lenny from the Delray misfits.  :D

Glad you can finally admit I am making gains caterpillar morphs into a butterflY out of Cocoons FYI
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 11, 2022, 06:44:50 PM
This one might be more aesthetically pleasing

Why is your face so bloated?

Have you gotten your creatine levels checked recently.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 11, 2022, 07:41:15 PM
This one might be more aesthetically pleasing
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380914;image)


Hankins looking ready for the mags -

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51m4+UL+X4L.jpg).(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/3a/ce/99/3ace99876d33c400909425f9d5d10b54--moustaches-sky.jpg).
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51PPt+r10WL._SX369_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/58/bd/47/58bd47908101761fc0727474f3004958.jpg).(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cb/a1/05/cba1059bb5b558b6c54e8541ba970b1c.jpg).(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/fc/13/2d/fc132d947f46ff94b01ad51c11ebd842--alpha-dog-alpha-male.jpg).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on July 11, 2022, 07:42:30 PM
Hankins looking ready for the mags -

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51m4+UL+X4L.jpg).(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/3a/ce/99/3ace99876d33c400909425f9d5d10b54--moustaches-sky.jpg).
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51PPt+r10WL._SX369_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/58/bd/47/58bd47908101761fc0727474f3004958.jpg).(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cb/a1/05/cba1059bb5b558b6c54e8541ba970b1c.jpg).(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/fc/13/2d/fc132d947f46ff94b01ad51c11ebd842--alpha-dog-alpha-male.jpg).
Hankdate..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 11, 2022, 07:47:42 PM
Hankdate..

Hanko

This months cover model:

Big yankin Brain Hankins!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 11, 2022, 07:56:44 PM
I'm not updating this thread again unless I plan to continue this cycle.

As of now, I do not plan on that.

Now go look at this absolute phaggot, OAK:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=679960.msg9816956#msg9816956

STOP TRYING TO MAKE THIS THREAD ABOUT YOU.
WEAK-MINDED LITTLE PETER PUFFER!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 11, 2022, 10:21:24 PM
This one might be more aesthetically pleasing

those are two words that shouldnt even be in your vocabulary.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on July 11, 2022, 10:34:39 PM
Looks like a fine physique for Getbig! Huge neck. No homo!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 12, 2022, 12:45:20 AM
those are two words that shouldnt even be in your vocabulary.
No shit huh?

HA HA HA HA HA  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 12, 2022, 01:38:44 AM
Its cool go ahead and pretend I have a neck
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380911;image)

Looking like a Belgium Blue Bhanky
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 12, 2022, 03:04:53 AM
Looks like a fine physique for Getbig! Huge neck. No homo!!
Vince we know you use a Glory hole for your Neck training  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stephano on July 12, 2022, 03:09:43 AM
Why is your face so bloated?

Have you gotten your creatine levels checked recently.

Yeah, I don't understand how such a super-bloated and fat face -- one which literally looks like it belongs on an obese person -- connects to the lean body.

It reminds me of Derek Anthony.  And I believe it's always indicative of extremely poor health and/or drug abuse. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 12, 2022, 03:23:40 AM
Bhanky getting jowls
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 03:31:15 AM
Bhanky getting jowls

I didn't shave under the neck it makes the jawline look rounder again simple illusion the face also doesn't look the same when not flexing
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 03:32:59 AM
Yeah, I don't understand how such a super-bloated and fat face -- one which literally looks like it belongs on an obese person -- connects to the lean body.

It reminds me of Derek Anthony.  And I believe it's always indicative of extremely poor health and/or drug abuse.

My face is not fat and my health is great however I am pulling the chin back and flexing. I also didnt shave under the neck. If I were to relax and shave and push chin forward like a model does to accentuate the chin and jaw it would look very different.

Same face just now still have a neck beard but chin is forward notice the difference jaw and chin and much more pronounced again simple difference between chin forward vs back and flexing. The idiots arguing about my neck size also don't seem to understand how such a simple positional adjustment changes the look of the face and neck
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 12, 2022, 03:52:13 AM
My face is not fat and my health is great however I am pulling the chin back and flexing. I also didnt shave under the neck. If I were to relax and shave and push chin forward like a model does to accentuate the chin and jaw it would look very different.

Same face just now still have a neck beard but chin is forward notice the difference jaw and chin and much more pronounced again simple difference between chin forward vs back and flexing. The idiots arguing about my neck size also don't seem to understand how such a simple positional adjustment changes the look of the face and neck
Don´t you realise they´re just winding you up? you bite all the time.  :D 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 12, 2022, 04:48:33 AM
bhanks, you look much better with short hair than with the wild bird's nest.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 12, 2022, 05:57:19 AM
Yeah, I don't understand how such a super-bloated and fat face -- one which literally looks like it belongs on an obese person -- connects to the lean body.

It reminds me of Derek Anthony.  And I believe it's always indicative of extremely poor health and/or drug abuse.

early signs of renal failure.

Bhanky, refuses to lower the dose or get his creatinine levels checked. In fact, he has actually upped the dose and added anadrol.

Similar, stages of denial like Derrick Anthony.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 12, 2022, 06:21:26 AM
Leave Bhanky alone. He knows what he’s doing
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 12, 2022, 06:23:24 AM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380954;image)

and there we have the 15/16 collar
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 06:25:07 AM
early signs of renal failure.

Bhanky, refuses to lower the dose or get his creatinine levels checked. In fact, he has actually upped the dose and added anadrol.

Similar, stages of denial like Derrick Anthony.

On my last bloodwork my creatinine level was 1 mg/dl and it says the normal range is .6-1.35 mg/dl. It was 1.18 on the one before that so really don't think I have any creatinine issues. Not sure why Getbig is so eager to diagnose a health issue that does not exist. It's weird my digestion has been great. My appetite is great.  My energy has been great. I feel better than ever. Not even any acid reflux poop is normal no diarrhea, no night time pooping, no throwing up, no pain when drinking coffee so no current ulcer nothing weight is also very stable was 227 before bed and 225 waking up. Still have a minor sore throat at night from last weeks cold and some minor discomfort in the back of the left knee from doing some sissy squats machine work a few days and a little swelling in the left ankle from wearing a left side knee brace yesterday but other than that everything is great. No fluid in either knee. Blood pressure is also in a normal range and strength has been going up.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 12, 2022, 06:27:13 AM
On my last bloodwork my creatinine level was 1 mg/dl and it says the normal range is .6-1.35 mg/dl so really don't think I have any creatinine issues. Not sure why Getbig is so eager to diagnose a health issue that does not exist. It's weird my digestion has been great. My appetite is great.  My energy has been great. I feel better than ever. Not even any acid reflux poop is normal no diarrhea, no night time pooping, no throwing up, no pain when drinking coffee so no current ulcer nothing weight is also very stable. Still have a minor sore throat at night from last weeks cold and some minor discomfort in the back of the left knee from doing some sissy squats machine work a few days and a little swelling in the left ankle from wearing a left side knee brace yesterday but other than that everything is great. No fluid in either knee. Blood pressure is also in a normal range and strength has been going up.

you are currently in the eye of the storm....
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 06:28:29 AM
you are currently in the eye of the storm....

I am currently past where you can go, and you know it which is why you are mad you won't be at my level come Sept and you know it
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 12, 2022, 06:36:40 AM
I am currently past where you can go, and you know it which is why you are mad you won't be at my level come Sept and you know it

hahaha I look better than you now

And before you ask no...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 12, 2022, 06:51:18 AM
On my last bloodwork my creatinine level was 1 mg/dl and it says the normal range is .6-1.35 mg/dl. It was 1.18 on the one before that so really don't think I have any creatinine issues. Not sure why Getbig is so eager to diagnose a health issue that does not exist. It's weird my digestion has been great. My appetite is great.  My energy has been great. I feel better than ever. Not even any acid reflux poop is normal no diarrhea, no night time pooping, no throwing up, no pain when drinking coffee so no current ulcer nothing weight is also very stable was 227 before bed and 225 waking up. Still have a minor sore throat at night from last weeks cold and some minor discomfort in the back of the left knee from doing some sissy squats machine work a few days and a little swelling in the left ankle from wearing a left side knee brace yesterday but other than that everything is great. No fluid in either knee. Blood pressure is also in a normal range and strength has been going up.

what about sleep?

few 1000 posts ago you said you had to sleep sitting up or up right because of digestion issues.

has this been fixed?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 06:53:05 AM
what about sleep?

few 1000 posts ago you said you had to sleep sitting up or up right because of digestion issues.

has this been fixed?

Yes it has that is my point digestion is great I even had a large meal around 9:30pm and went to bed around 10:30 pm and had no issues sleeping laying down
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 06:54:18 AM
hahaha I look better than you now

And before you ask no...

You are not in better shape than me now nor will you be in Sept or December this year or next
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 12, 2022, 07:05:15 AM
You are not in better shape than me now nor will you be in Sept or December this year or next

Prove it. Post some photos proving the shape you’re in.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 12, 2022, 07:18:14 AM
You are not in better shape than me now nor will you be in Sept or December this year or next
I have told you, an untrained me would get more looks on the beach than a blown up bag of shit like you
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 07:43:21 AM
I have told you, an untrained me would get more looks on the beach than a blown up bag of shit like you

Well I am actually on the beach right now so I win
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 12, 2022, 07:46:25 AM
I am currently past where you can go, and you know it which is why you are mad you won't be at my level come Sept and you know it

You definitely should PM Muscle Matters and get some training, nutrition, and recuperation advice from a Professional bodybuilder.

Other than taking drugs, you have no clue what you’re doing.

180 lbs without the drugs….
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 07:59:08 AM
You definitely should PM Muscle Matters and get some training, nutrition, and recuperation advice from a Professional bodybuilder.

Other than taking drugs, you have no clue what you’re doing.

180 lbs without the drugs….

Yawn 227 before I left the house going to walk off some of it now keep hating too nice for me to be mad at you hipe you get better your anger and hate  isnt going to make you happy consider going for a walk
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 12, 2022, 08:07:18 AM
Yawn 227 before I left the house going to walk off some of it now keep hating too nice for me to be mad at you hipe you get better your anger and hate  isnt going to make you happy consider going for a walk

Are the steroids hurting your reading comprehension or did you recently suffer a stroke?


Have fun at the beach!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 12, 2022, 08:28:46 AM
I have told you, an untrained me would get more looks on the beach than a blown up bag of shit like you

All from dudes, but the point likely still stands.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 12, 2022, 08:45:20 AM
All from dudes, put the point likely still stands.
joswift likes mens cocks?  :o
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 12, 2022, 08:50:22 AM
Yawn 227 before I left the house going to walk off some of it now keep hating too nice for me to be mad at you hipe you get better your anger and hate  isnt going to make you happy consider going for a walk

Pocket hanky, you haven’t accomplished enough for me to put forth the effort to hate you. In the world of Getbig you’re insignificant, a blatant liar and a drug addict who beats up women.

Whether you are living on alimony or stimulus funds, your life is uneventful and full of failure…you’re basically Matt Canning without the full head of hair.

227 on three grams a week is pathetic. Maybe you will get your flat bench up to 250 lbs in the next month or two? Like a tiny teenage boy could without the drugs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 08:57:31 AM
Its 85 degrees and sunny the Ocean is cool with a gentle onshore breeze. I walked to the pier and back watched some surfers and then went for a swim. Currenlty I am just soaking up some rays with my feet in the sand I may go back in the Ocean in a bjt. Uneventful suits me just fine
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 12, 2022, 09:10:50 AM
Its 85 degrees and sunny the Ocean is cool with a gentle onshore breeze. I walked to the pier and back watched some surfers and then went for a swim. Currenlty I am just soaking up some rays with my feet in the sand I may go back in the Ocean in a bjt. Uneventful suits me just fine


You only post posing pics at home or in the gym.

why, because you can edit the lighting and photoshop your body parts without the lines in the background being distorted.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 09:16:15 AM

You only post posing pics at home or in the gym.

why, because you can edit the lighting and photoshop your body parts without the lines in the background being distorted.

I have never photoshopped a pic and there are plenty of lines at my home and the gym you are striggling today again go outside get some fresh air relax
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 12, 2022, 09:20:35 AM
I have never photoshopped a pic and there are plenty of lines at my home and the gym you are striggling today again go outside get some fresh air relax

This is why you won't post a front double on the beach.

Because you can't hide the morphing and editing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 09:48:42 AM
This is why you won't post a front double on the beach.

Because you can't hide the morphing and editing.

I have posted pics at my pool in the woods at the gym in my office and yes several on the beach but no I am not going to ask some random tourist to take a pic of me flexing for your amusement today. Dont you have anythign else to do than try and argue with me? Do you really want to spend your wntire day trying to pretend I am 58 and 150lbs?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 12, 2022, 09:50:27 AM
Ain't no way you got a 19" neck, bro.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 12, 2022, 09:52:33 AM
Ain't no way you got a 19" neck, bro.

Whatever tell yourself whatever you want just pretend I have stock in fake measuring tape companies I dont care go get a fucking life
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 12, 2022, 09:54:48 AM
Whatever tell yourself whatever you want just pretend I have stock in fake measuring tape companies I dont care go get a fucking life

its clearly a lie..

 is that why you are unemployed? because you can't find dress clothes?

you would need to get every shirt custom fitted..

i mean its prob 16-17 inches at best
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 12, 2022, 09:55:48 AM
Whatever tell yourself whatever you want just pretend I have stock in fake measuring tape companies I dont care go get a fucking life

Ain't no way, bro.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 12, 2022, 08:03:21 PM
This one might be more aesthetically pleasing

Congrats.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 12, 2022, 08:17:14 PM
Bhanks, there is no way in hell you have a 18-19” neck unless you purposely scrunch and flex it.

When buying shirts, you’re not supposed to flex  your neck. It’s supposed to fit you in your natural state as it’s obvious that people do not walk around with their neck in a constant state of tension.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 12, 2022, 08:23:33 PM
Well I am actually on the beach right now so I win
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380999;image)

A bloated man on a beach, who uses bio identical hormones, and loved his peach cobbler asked his Anadrol bottle a question -

"As I'm looking down on the paths I've trod, I see two sets of footprints on the easy sandy paths.
But down on the rocky sand, I see only one set of footprints.
"Tell me, Anadrol, why did you let me go down all those hard paths alone?"
The Anadrol bottle smiled and simply replied, "Oh, my son, you've got that all wrong!
I carried you over those hard paths."

(https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/120/htc/37/person-with-folded-hands_1f64f.png).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 12, 2022, 09:03:37 PM
A bloated man on a beach, who uses bio identical hormones, and loved his peach cobbler asked his Anadrol bottle a question -

"As I'm looking down on the paths I've trod, I see two sets of footprints on the easy sandy paths.
But down on the rocky sand, I see only one set of footprints.
"Tell me, Anadrol, why did you let me go down all those hard paths alone?"
The Anadrol bottle smiled and simply replied, "Oh, my son, you've got that all wrong!
I carried you over those hard paths."

(https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/120/htc/37/person-with-folded-hands_1f64f.png).

Perfect!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on July 12, 2022, 09:28:45 PM
The bloat doesn’t look great nor does the atrophy on one side, but the easiest and most important thing i’d change is the hair.

You have to cut it all off or it will always be an eye sore.

Yesterday has passed and it’s time to move on.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 12, 2022, 09:38:48 PM
The bloat doesn’t look great nor does the atrophy on one side, but the easiest and most important thing i’d change is the hair.

You have to cut it all off or it will always be an eye sore.

Yesterday has passed and it’s time to move on.
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 13, 2022, 12:42:37 PM
Well I am actually on the beach right now so I win
being on the beach posting photos for internet strangers isnt winning...

Its the definition of a loser.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 13, 2022, 12:52:01 PM
being on the beach posting photos for internet strangers isnt winning...

Its the definition of a loser.

Says the guy that follows around and attacks every post I make you know you don't have to comment on every comment I make on every post. I was trying to encourage you jackasses to relax go outside and stop being so damn angry and hateful apparently it didn't work
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 13, 2022, 01:15:40 PM
Its 85 degrees and sunny the Ocean is cool with a gentle onshore breeze. I walked to the pier and back watched some surfers and then went for a swim. Currenlty I am just soaking up some rays with my feet in the sand I may go back in the Ocean in a bjt. Uneventful suits me just fine

Sounds good, Bhanky.

Good health is the most valuable of things.  Be smart, especially now that you are older.

Don't mess yourself up.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 22, 2022, 09:27:17 AM
Sounds good, Bhanky.

Good health is the most valuable of things.  Be smart, especially now that you are older.

Don't mess yourself up.
especially not with 1-2 reps & stupid weights  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 10:48:17 AM
I'm back on.

3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days.

So...about 18mg daily.

I haven't started the Sustanon yet, as I don't much want to hit 210+. Though if my waist stays at 32", that might be ok.

My waist is usually 35" at this weight, following FAT MCWAY's bullshit natural bodybuilding program.

"Natural bodybuilding", LOL.

Utter phaggotry of the highest order!

Oh - and I've brought up my calories to normal teenage girl levels.

I'm 196-lb in these photos, and I'm 198.6 right now, in my track pants. So...probably 197.5 naked. I'm maybe 50/50 on adding Sustanon. I don't want to get acne all over my back, lose my hair, etc.

It's incredible to me to see bodybuilders who are 250-lb and cut, yet don't see to grasp they are facially ugly?  ???

The second I start looking worse physically is the second I stop. Arguably, my face is bloated already.

But I'm sure bald bodybuilders covered in acne get all the blowjobs!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Henda on July 22, 2022, 11:08:28 AM
Looking good Matt
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 22, 2022, 11:09:23 AM
I'm back on.

3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days.

So...about 18mg daily.

I haven't started the Sustanon yet, as I don't much want to hit 210+. Though if my waist stays at 32", that might be ok.

My waist is usually 35" at this weight, following FAT MCWAY's bullshit natural bodybuilding program.

"Natural bodybuilding", LOL.

Utter phaggotry of the highest order!

Oh - and I've brought up my calories to normal teenage girl levels.

I'm 196-lb in these photos, and I'm 198.6 right now, in my track pants. So...probably 197.5 naked. I'm maybe 50/50 on adding Sustanon. I don't want to get acne all over my back, lose my hair, etc.

It's incredible to me to see bodybuilders who are 250-lb and cut, yet don't see to grasp they are facially ugly?  ???

The second I start looking worse physically is the second I stop. Arguably, my face is bloated already.

But I'm sure bald bodybuilders covered in acne get all the blowjobs!!!
Is that a wig bro ?  :-\
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 22, 2022, 11:36:17 AM

It's incredible to me to see bodybuilders who are 250-lb and cut, yet don't see to grasp they are facially ugly?  ???

The second I start looking worse physically is the second I stop. Arguably, my face is bloated already.

But I'm sure bald bodybuilders covered in acne get all the blowjobs!!!

Given your concern about facial asthetics, I'm surprised you haven't done something about that nose of yours.

(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/6a/b3/f4/6ab3f4c28e03bff221e4788412921527.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 11:38:23 AM
Looking good Matt

Thanks Henda! I was the same weight but a bit harder when I was at 50mg, but still not eating. I decided to use a quantity where I virtually feel no side effects, but bring up my calories.

The look I have right now is the look I want to maintain long-term.

Unfortunately, I don't know of a way to maintain a pump more perpetually without gear.

Is that even possible? Is there any OTC supplement that I can run safely that would allow me to maintain a pump for more of the day?

Preferably, I'd rather not be on gear year-round. And I'm perfectly fine with my current look...I just don't feel I can maintain that full look without assistance.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 11:39:27 AM
Given your concern about facial asthetics, I'm surprised you haven't done something about that nose of yours.

(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/6a/b3/f4/6ab3f4c28e03bff221e4788412921527.jpg)

I literally cannot do anything about my one side.

I have one good side, and one side that sucks, and I was at the Toronto Pro, and talked to a doctor there, and he said it can't be fixed.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 22, 2022, 11:41:20 AM
I'm back on.

3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days.

So...about 18mg daily.

I haven't started the Sustanon yet, as I don't much want to hit 210+. Though if my waist stays at 32", that might be ok.

My waist is usually 35" at this weight, following FAT MCWAY's bullshit natural bodybuilding program.

"Natural bodybuilding", LOL.

Utter phaggotry of the highest order!

Oh - and I've brought up my calories to normal teenage girl levels.

I'm 196-lb in these photos, and I'm 198.6 right now, in my track pants. So...probably 197.5 naked. I'm maybe 50/50 on adding Sustanon. I don't want to get acne all over my back, lose my hair, etc.

It's incredible to me to see bodybuilders who are 250-lb and cut, yet don't see to grasp they are facially ugly?  ???

The second I start looking worse physically is the second I stop. Arguably, my face is bloated already.

But I'm sure bald bodybuilders covered in acne get all the blowjobs!!!
Too late................nobo dy cares now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 11:41:51 AM
As you can see - one side is fine...the other side looks like this, but only when I'm expressive.

Neither side is so bad at rest - but that curve comes out when I'm expressive, on the one side.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 22, 2022, 11:43:48 AM
As you can see - one side is fine...the other side looks like this, but only when I'm expressive.

Neither side is so bad at rest - but that curve comes out when I'm expressive, on the one side.


I suggest wearing a facemask then to hide it  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OneMoreRep on July 22, 2022, 11:43:51 AM
You're getting there Matt. Question is, can you get as big a TBombz?

Taylor went full IFBB pro mode and became a a mini Branch Warren.

"1"
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 11:44:31 AM
Is that a wig bro ?  :-\

My hair?

No, it's not. That's my real hair. And thank you very much for that compliment.  ;D

Hoping this little gear cycle doesn't make me lose any hair.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 22, 2022, 11:46:38 AM
My hair?

No, it's not. That's my real hair. And thank you very much for that compliment.  ;D

Hoping this little gear cycle doesn't make me lose any hair.
 
Nice & thick bro... no worries there
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 11:48:07 AM
Too late................nobo dy cares now.

What if I start the Sustanon and bulk up to 215-lb?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 11:51:41 AM

I suggest wearing a facemask then to hide it  ;D

Lol!!

Actually...technology has probably improved since that conversation in 2012.

Would I get some work done? Fucking hell yes, I would!

Currently, I'm keeping the sides of my hair trim [almost to the scalp] to hide the numerous white hairs.

I do NOT want to dye my hair, if possible.

Has anyone here used Restylane? It's for hollowness under the eyes. It can make a person look 3-5 years younger, allegedly, and is derived from a natural sugar, if I recall correctly.

Next, has anyone heard of "Coolsculpting"? It may cost $4,000, but apparently, I can target my stomach fat without diet or exercise, and get rid of that two inches of fat I have there without burning muscle to do so.

I had never heard of it before.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 22, 2022, 11:52:18 AM
If you are Ugly you are ugly if you are good looking you are good looking the sustanon isnt going to change that. The reason people dont do oral only cycles without test is becasue it will ahut down your natural production of testosterone and then your Dick wont work anyway no matter how many babes want to give you a blowjob. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 11:53:09 AM
 
Nice & thick bro... no worries there

Thank you. Is it true that thick hair doesn't shed as easily?

Being completely honest, if I had to pick between great physique or good hair, I'd pick hair.

I'd really rather not lose my hair...

I mean...I'm sure it's inevitable for all men, but I just want to delay that as much as I can.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 22, 2022, 11:56:31 AM
Thank you. Is it true that thick hair doesn't shed as easily?

Being completely honest, if I had to pick between great physique or good hair, I'd pick hair.

I'd really rather not lose my hair...

I mean...I'm sure it's inevitable for all men, but I just want to delay that as much as I can.
You sell your soul to the devil...expect payback. flick a coin...russian roulette. pick your demon bro.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 22, 2022, 12:08:26 PM
If you are Ugly you are ugly if you are good looking you are good looking the sustanon isnt going to change that. The reason people dont do oral only cycles without test is becasue it will ahut down your natural production of testosterone and then your Dick wont work anyway no matter how many babes want to give you a blowjob.

I have to agree.

In a short period of time you are going to have some issues Matt.

Your Test levels will be zero and you will feel like complete shit.

Add the Test and break up your Drol tabs to use daily.

You are overthinking this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 22, 2022, 12:51:40 PM
I'm back on.

3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days.

So...about 18mg daily.

I haven't started the Sustanon yet, as I don't much want to hit 210+. Though if my waist stays at 32", that might be ok.

My waist is usually 35" at this weight, following FAT MCWAY's bullshit natural bodybuilding program.

"Natural bodybuilding", LOL.

Utter phaggotry of the highest order!

Oh - and I've brought up my calories to normal teenage girl levels.

I'm 196-lb in these photos, and I'm 198.6 right now, in my track pants. So...probably 197.5 naked. I'm maybe 50/50 on adding Sustanon. I don't want to get acne all over my back, lose my hair, etc.

It's incredible to me to see bodybuilders who are 250-lb and cut, yet don't see to grasp they are facially ugly?  ???

The second I start looking worse physically is the second I stop. Arguably, my face is bloated already.

But I'm sure bald bodybuilders covered in acne get all the blowjobs!!!

Even from only using SARMS, it's true it's all drugs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 22, 2022, 12:58:37 PM
Lol!!

Actually...technology has probably improved since that conversation in 2012.

Would I get some work done? Fucking hell yes, I would!

Currently, I'm keeping the sides of my hair trim [almost to the scalp] to hide the numerous white hairs.

I do NOT want to dye my hair, if possible.

Has anyone here used Restylane? It's for hollowness under the eyes. It can make a person look 3-5 years younger, allegedly, and is derived from a natural sugar, if I recall correctly.

Next, has anyone heard of "Coolsculpting"? It may cost $4,000, but apparently, I can target my stomach fat without diet or exercise, and get rid of that two inches of fat I have there without burning muscle to do so.

I had never heard of it before.

This is cheaper...

(https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/11262aad-6f3f-4e3f-bf7e-e8c9d2a89177_1.f13a75412cb31a1341cc5c1038aca6ad.jpeg?odnWidth=1000&odnHeight=1000&odnBg=ffffff)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 22, 2022, 01:07:20 PM
You're getting there Matt. Question is, can you get as big a TBombz?

Taylor went full IFBB pro mode and became a a mini Branch Warren Bull Stanton.

"1"

fixed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on July 22, 2022, 01:14:39 PM
Talk about mid life crisis Matt  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 22, 2022, 04:24:07 PM
I'm back on.

3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days.

So...about 18mg daily.

I haven't started the Sustanon yet, as I don't much want to hit 210+. Though if my waist stays at 32", that might be ok.

My waist is usually 35" at this weight, following FAT MCWAY's bullshit natural bodybuilding program.

"Natural bodybuilding", LOL.

Utter phaggotry of the highest order!

Oh - and I've brought up my calories to normal teenage girl levels.

I'm 196-lb in these photos, and I'm 198.6 right now, in my track pants. So...probably 197.5 naked. I'm maybe 50/50 on adding Sustanon. I don't want to get acne all over my back, lose my hair, etc.

It's incredible to me to see bodybuilders who are 250-lb and cut, yet don't see to grasp they are facially ugly?  ???

The second I start looking worse physically is the second I stop. Arguably, my face is bloated already.

But I'm sure bald bodybuilders covered in acne get all the blowjobs!!!
much bigger than tim westcock hes abou t 145
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 22, 2022, 04:32:13 PM
What if I start the Sustanon and bulk up to 215-lb?
Dude a 22 page thread and about all you did was two low dosed pills and two injections in weeks....that`s not good,but it`s your call,only you know how you feel about it so.........carry on.......good luck.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 22, 2022, 04:35:10 PM
much bigger than tim westcock hes abou t 145
I`m actually about 185,and you`ve become a fatass slothlike hippopotamus over the years and you`re still young.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 22, 2022, 08:05:24 PM
I'm back on.

3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days.

So...about 18mg daily.

I haven't started the Sustanon yet, as I don't much want to hit 210+. Though if my waist stays at 32", that might be ok.

My waist is usually 35" at this weight, following FAT MCWAY's bullshit natural bodybuilding program.

Still crying like a big sissy about me (I live in your head, rent-free, for some reason), instead of concentrating on getting the job done.




"Natural bodybuilding", LOL.

Utter phaggotry of the highest order!

Says the guy who brags about gay dudes hitting on him.......NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT!!!

Just because you SUCK at something (mainly due to laziness and ignorance) doesn't mean that something is invaluable.



Oh - and I've brought up my calories to normal teenage girl levels.

I'm 196-lb in these photos, and I'm 198.6 right now, in my track pants. So...probably 197.5 naked. I'm maybe 50/50 on adding Sustanon. I don't want to get acne all over my back, lose my hair, etc.

It's incredible to me to see bodybuilders who are 250-lb and cut, yet don't see to grasp they are facially ugly?  ???

The second I start looking worse physically is the second I stop. Arguably, my face is bloated already.

But I'm sure bald bodybuilders covered in acne get all the blowjobs!!!

You said you were going to quit if you didn't hit a certain weight by the 4th. That was over two weeks ago.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 08:30:14 PM
Still crying like a big sissy about me (I live in your head, rent-free, for some reason), instead of concentrating on getting the job done.

Says the guy who brags about gay dudes hitting on him.......NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT!!!

Just because you SUCK at something (mainly due to laziness and ignorance) doesn't mean that something is invaluable.

You said you were going to quit if you didn't hit a certain weight by the 4th. That was over two weeks ago.

I hit that weight, and I haven't even started the Sustanon yet. I'm already up 17-lb on 18mg of Anadrol daily.

I didn't want to gain 30-lb. I'm 40, for fuck's sake. I literally just wanted to get to my current size - maybe - or a little over/under.

I get daily compliments now, and a lot of attention looking like this. I sort of got what I wanted out of this cycle.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 22, 2022, 08:32:11 PM
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 22, 2022, 08:41:43 PM
I hit that weight, and I haven't even started the Sustanon yet. I'm already up 17-lb on 18mg of Anadrol daily.

I didn't want to gain 30-lb. I'm 40, for fuck's sake. I literally just wanted to get to my current size - maybe - or a little over/under.

I get daily compliments now, and a lot of attention looking like this. I sort of got what I wanted out of this cycle.



And that will be gone once your cycle stops (especially the way you eat.....or don't eat). Then what? Bye, bye daily compliments.

I hope you're not around any shiny pointy objects or strange pills at that point.

You DID want to gain 30 lbs. You said you wanted to hit 215; you weighed 185 at the time you said that. That's approximately 30 lbs, the last time I checked. And since you once weighed 215, you're basically regaining lost size with a little extra to boot.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 22, 2022, 11:25:34 PM
As you can see - one side is fine...the other side looks like this, but only when I'm expressive.

Neither side is so bad at rest - but that curve comes out when I'm expressive, on the one side.

There is nothing wrong with having a Roman nose, Matt. Yours is proportionate to the rest of your facial features. It would be a huge mistake to undergo rhinoplasty. There are plenty of examples of good-looking people with Roman noses. If you were able to change it, you'd end up looking like millions of other people with uninteresting and forgettable facial features.
(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.NrUpSnCvXxjyNayY-zQRawHaJ4?pid=ImgDet&rs=1)

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/27/d7/ed/27d7ed1996f760061a245625153a4400.jpg)

(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.r8rLDMWB3-1WmE51G8CHVAAAAA?pid=ImgDet&rs=1)

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/37/5a/d3/375ad3e79624f45085d2d76e8bb8ba16.jpg)

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 01:56:00 AM


And that will be gone once your cycle stops (especially the way you eat.....or don't eat). Then what? Bye, bye daily compliments.

I hope you're not around any shiny pointy objects or strange pills at that point.

You DID want to gain 30 lbs. You said you wanted to hit 215; you weighed 185 at the time you said that. That's approximately 30 lbs, the last time I checked. And since you once weighed 215, you're basically regaining lost size with a little extra to boot.

Yes, but Canadian winters are freezing, so I can remain covered up, and no one will know how much size I've lost.  ;D

I wish there was some way I could maintain this look naturally, but I don't think that's possible.

Basically - I wake up in the morning with a 50% pump.

I can look like this naturally after a pump...but my natural pumps last maybe 15-20 minutes.

Right now, I can look like I do with a natural pump for literally three hours on the pool deck. I get a lot of looks and compliments. On Monday, someone in the hot tub said I look like Superman.  ;D

Sad I can't look like this naturally.

You and your bullshit about natural training, LOL.

MCWAY: stop!

Natural training sucks donkey balls.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 02:01:12 AM
There is nothing wrong with having a Roman nose, Matt. Yours is proportionate to the rest of your facial features. It would be a huge mistake to undergo rhinoplasty. There are plenty of examples of good-looking people with Roman noses. If you were able to change it, you'd end up looking like millions of other people with uninteresting and forgettable facial features.
(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.NrUpSnCvXxjyNayY-zQRawHaJ4?pid=ImgDet&rs=1)

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/27/d7/ed/27d7ed1996f760061a245625153a4400.jpg)

(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.r8rLDMWB3-1WmE51G8CHVAAAAA?pid=ImgDet&rs=1)

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/37/5a/d3/375ad3e79624f45085d2d76e8bb8ba16.jpg)

Thank you for saying that, Prime. To be honest - I think big noses look great. But I don't think curved noses look good.

I just try to sit to the right of people, LOL.  ;D

My left side is fine. But I am no fan of the right side of my nose.

Interestingly, I just found out there is non-surgical rhinoplasty available in Thunder Bay! My phone must have read this post, then served me an ad on Instagram.

I will look into it.

Look good, feel good, IMO.

Imagine how ugly that phaggot Walter Sobchak is? He's so jealous of my looks and physique, that he posts about me when I don't even read his posts, lol.

Absolute rancid phaggot. Guaranteed he's ugly, fat, and bald. He probably hates knowing I'm 40, and am more handsome than him now than when he was 25. And he knows it.

I'd like to enjoy my last few years of still looking good to most age groups of women, by using fillers or other medical assistance.

I like Crest White Strips, but they make my enamel sensitive.

Tom Cruise looks Great! IMO. His nose is big, but I thought it suits him very well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 02:38:11 AM


And that will be gone once your cycle stops (especially the way you eat.....or don't eat). Then what? Bye, bye daily compliments.

I hope you're not around any shiny pointy objects or strange pills at that point.

You DID want to gain 30 lbs. You said you wanted to hit 215; you weighed 185 at the time you said that. That's approximately 30 lbs, the last time I checked. And since you once weighed 215, you're basically regaining lost size with a little extra to boot.

It's utterly infuriating to read some of the phaggotry you post.

Absolute and complete wholesale phaggotry. Not to be confused with faggotry. Phaggotry with a Ph means something different. It means annoying - irritating.

Your posts reek of phaggotry, MCWAY.

LOL @ your garbage about training with "intensity", and using the "time under tension" principle, or the "Weider Instinctual Training Principle" [also known as COMMON SENSE, OR TRAIN THE MUSCLE GROUP THAT FEELS MOST RECOVERED ON ANY GIVEN DAY].

LOL...you post utter nonsense.

"Natural bodybuilding", lmao! Oh brother...

And then you tell me I'd improve under your system. HAHAHAHA, because I've never had any experience doing what you recommend, right MCWAY?

Because I'm not in the top 1% of results of regular gym goers? Like I've never done everything you said.



^ Look - something that loser Walter Sobchak can't do! LOL @ that weak phaggot trashing my lifts, when I out-lift him on every lift, and could out-lift him even if he outweighed me by 100-lb.

Do you want me to post a video of me doing that for 30 reps, MCWAY?

Watch the video below - do you seriously think I don't train with intensity, using decent weight and good form? Are you insane?



^ CLEARLY, I HAVE PAID MY DUES IN TRAINING.

I KNOW what works and what doesn't. In fact, the ONLY surprise of this cycle is that I've gained more size and strength than I expected, even KNOWING bodybuilding is all drugs.

I could literally live in a lab, and do everything you say, naturally, and not get results anywhere CLOSE to this.

Frankly, I'm offended you say this stuff. It's misleading to people who don't realize bodybuilding is all drugs.

And that's why you refuse to post a picture! Because you're fat and look like shit, and you know it! That allows you to believe your delusion.

Posting your fat picture would prove MY point: that natural bodybuilding is useless.

Meanwhile, here I am - on 3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days, and have already gone from 183 to 200, to the point I STOPPED using gear for 10 days, because the weight gain was too quick.

That was WITHOUT changing my diet.

So don't you DARE tell me that bodybuilding is anything but drugs.

Genetics and nutrition matter too, but training is the LEAST important variable.

I could literally do PUSH-UPS only, and look better than I ever could naturally, and I'm barely using! So don't tell me that I could come close to this by training naturally.

As Lyle McDonald said, once you hit 500mg of gear weekly, your training DOESN'T MATTER. IFBB pro training is all over the map! Yet they all look the same.

I have NEVER looked this good naturally. And my nutrition hasn't improved.

Oh...and my biceps are over 16" cold and flexed now, and just about exactly 17", pumped and flexed.

That's over a full inch on my arms. It would take me MORE THAN A YEAR TO DO THAT NATURALLY.

Also, my waist is 32" now at 200-lb. My waist is generally 35" at 200-lb. My waist is 29" at 170-lb, and I gain one inch on my waist for every 5-lb in weight I gain.

Yet I've only gained an inch for every TEN POUNDS I have been gaining on this cycle.

AND the mass has been leaner.

So stop it with this bullshit about natural bodybuilding in being worthwhile!

You may be 5'11" and 220-lb, but you're 20-25% body fat. It's not just a matter of being a certain weight - I could be 200-lb naturally, but NOT while being this lean.

Even if I could be this size and condition naturally, it would take me over a year to get there. And I frankly have no interest in doing that.

Even IF I got to this size, I wouldn't be able to maintain my pump at 50% literally 24/7! My arms get pumped virtually just posting on Getbig! YOU CAN'T DO THAT NATURALLY, MCWAY. YOU DEPLORABLE PHAGGOT.

I'm also glad I went off for those ten days, since I now know how quickly I'll lose my mass post-cycle.

And I accept that. I'm fine with it.

I just accept that bodybuilding is all drugs, and since I don't want to use drugs year-round, I know I will get small again.

I'm ok with that. Sucks, but...the only alternative is to be fat like you.

I accept that their is temporary. I'm ok with that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 03:09:24 AM
Thank you to all the Getbiggers who have supported me during this cycle, given tips, or even just been Meh about it.

I'm just a consenting adult using drugs, as consenting adults sometimes do.

MCWAY is treating this like I'm a 14-year-old doing a death cycle. LMAO at his bullshit about unhealthy this is. Haha, yeah, because 18mg of Anadrol daily for a couple of months is so bad.

If I were using 100mg daily, I would give a shit. I'm using so little, it barely matters.

Or if I was trying to hit 300-lb on this cycle, fine. I'd worry.

I'm literally 200.2 pounds right now, bare naked.

I'm not saying there is no risk in what I'm doing, but it's no different than if I spent the summer drinking every day. At the end of the day - who gives a fuck?

MCWAY literally thinks like some 1980's dumbass who just read "Death in the Locker Room".

This cycle just isn't a big deal. It's not.

That's why I'm purposely cutting back. I'd be at least 205-lb by now, if I was willing to push it a little. But to be completely honest, I'm perfectly fine with my current look. I do wish my chest was better, but that will be hard to change no matter WHAT I do.

Basically, I'm pleased with the size I'm carrying, and my look in a tank top. It has been bringing me a lot of attention, I suppose because delts are so prominent in a tank top.

There is no gear cycle that is going to give me a chest. I just wanted to be a particular size and condition. I got to roughly that size quickly, and I'm more or less just happy with this look. I know I'd look better with a tan, but I burn too easily.

I'd be willing to try a spray tan, if anyone knows a good one.

Does no one ever get to a point where they are pleased with how they look?

I'd even say I get a different sort of good attention than actual bodybuilders - because people are my physique as attainable [because it is], whereas with bodybuilders, people look because they are trying to process someone who doesn't look human, essentially.

Hence, getting bigger is not going to achieve more attention. I also don't want my face to get too far, and I don't want to be a bald loser, like Walter Sobchak, who is most likely bald.

I wish I had a better chest, as I said, and longer biceps muscle bellies...but again, those are immutable genetic characteristics.

Imagine what Walter Sobchak looks like - that fucking loser won't even post a photo because he knows he looks like shit, lol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 23, 2022, 03:10:05 AM
I have to agree.

In a short period of time you are going to have some issues Matt.

Your Test levels will be zero and you will feel like complete shit.

Add the Test and break up your Drol tabs to use daily.

You are overthinking this.

Really? 

;D


I hit that weight, and I haven't even started the Sustanon yet. I'm already up 17-lb on 18mg of Anadrol daily.

I didn't want to gain 30-lb. I'm 40, for fuck's sake. I literally just wanted to get to my current size - maybe - or a little over/under.

I get daily compliments now, and a lot of attention looking like this. I sort of got what I wanted out of this cycle.

Yes, you did

Attention.

 ;D


Yes, but Canadian winters are freezing, so I can remain covered up, and no one will know how much size I've lost.  ;D

I wish there was some way I could maintain this look naturally, but I don't think that's possible.

Basically - I wake up in the morning with a 50% pump.

-snip-


A Parsh! :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 23, 2022, 03:19:00 AM
Fucking Taffy.  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 03:47:20 AM
Really? 

;D


Yes, you did

Attention.

 ;D


A Parsh! :D

Yep!

And I'm starting to understand why...

My look is attainable, for one thing.

If Bobby Thompson or Dimitar Savatinov walked into the pool I go to, people would just think they are fat men.

If an IFBB pro walked in, they would get just as much attention and stares as me if not much more...but people would think they are looking at an alien.

It would be hard to process...you know?

With me at 200, I have enough size to be considerably bigger than most people, yet still look like a normal person. It's something like that.

I know a guy who is 5'11" and 250-lb. He's much bigger than me, and a bit stronger...but he does not have a look anyone would aspire to. His skin quality is bad, he is covered in acne...he's basically beet red from years in the sun + high blood pressure.

No one says "Damn, I want to look like him!"

Meanwhile, I'm 200-lb on a dainty ectomorph frame. My waist is thin, and I'm lean enough to not look like a perma-bulker. I don't have visible abs, but my stomach is nice and flat.

I just have an in-shape and attainable look, with prominent enough shoulders and arms to draw some attention.

So why the FUCK would I significantly change anything? Will my quality of life improve by 1%? Will my access to women and blowjobs go up by 1%? Will my health improve?

To all of those questions: most likely NO.

So I'm in no rush to improve much. Which is also why I stayed 170 for years. I was light, strong, fast...and basically got what I wanted out of lifting.

Although since I'm doing this now...I may as well strive for the best outcome.

I guess i just don't want to gain much more WEIGHT. And my preference is no side effects at all.

Which is why I may just maintain this for maybe another month, then quit. I'm just very cautious, health-wise. I'm not convinced that it's ever healthy to weigh over 200-lb, even naturally. Though as I said, I'm cautious.

I like that look of some lean mass popping out of a little frame. The guy I mentioned above who is 250 just doesn't have that look. He looks like a blob, and he has a massive waist, easily over 40". Meanwhile, I know a couple of guys who are under 200 who look like they have muscle billowing out of their frame.

Damn shame I can't look like this off gear. I still have a pump - and it's been over 30 hours since my last workout [shoulders]!

HOW CAN I DO THAT WITHOUT PEDS?

My pump is gone in 15-20 minutes naturally! I'd even say I MAYBE look like this at my MAXIMUM pump, naturally. Yet this is only a 50% pump, which I can essentially maintain perpetually, thanks to the Anadrol.

Fantastic parsh pump.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 23, 2022, 04:19:29 AM
So, where do we stand here?

I'm confused.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 23, 2022, 05:05:38 AM
Matt u know bodybuilding is not meant for humans its ok to admire your pump after doing pushups but then you naturally deflate smaller . Theres no carryover. You refuse to acknowlege people chasing after a temporary look have a mental disability , u got people like tim weasel lifting 50 years on injectables still hanging on to the photo in 1985 beleiving hes still inshape
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on July 23, 2022, 05:06:51 AM
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 23, 2022, 05:12:39 AM
Matt u know bodybuilding is not meant for humans its ok to admire your pump after doing pushups but then you naturally deflate smaller . Theres no carryover. You refuse to acknowlege people chasing after a temporary look have a mental disability , u got people like tim weasel lifting 50 years on injectables still hanging on to the photo in 1985 beleiving hes still inshape
I believe I`m in great shape because I am in great shape....far better than you are, and I`ve got at least 20 years on you, you kill me dude.....been fucking with me on tons of boards for 20 years now....get a life kid.........let go and let God.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 07:03:38 AM
So, where do we stand here?

I'm confused.

Well...

I went from 183 to 200 on a wee little bit of Anadrol.

I don't particularly want to get to 210-220.

I would do it just to shut up some of the dumb assholes on here who think my being 170 for years was due to my not being able to make gains, when that was 100% a conscious health decision on my part.

I was 170, benching 315x8, and couldn't gain more size.  ::)

Right...

No, I purposely maintained a low body weight, so that my health was good.

And I don't want to be 200+ for long.

I do need to bring up calories to get my TSH in range...but I'm thinking I'll end up at 185.

I'll probably be 203 on Monday. That's already +20 pounds for cycle. I sort of want to push to 210-215, just to see how it goes, but I'm not super excited about pushing my body like that.

So I am back on the Anadrol - but I'm only taking enough to maintain around 200-lb.

If that means 12.5mg daily, so be it.

MCWAY is 5'11" and 220, so maybe if I get to 210 at 5'9", I can show MCWAY how piss simple it is to get to his natural size, while on juice.

And when I'm done, I'll drop to 185, as I said.

Health comes first for me.

I realize a lot of people on here don't care, but being 50+ pounds overweight will probably take a decade off your life. Maybe most don't care - but I do.

This cycle is only temporary.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 23, 2022, 07:31:29 AM
Ok, thanks Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 23, 2022, 07:40:08 AM
Matt, if you could freely choose 3 celebrities to lick in the pussy, who would you choose?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 23, 2022, 07:48:27 AM
Matt, if you could freely choose 3 celebrities to lick in the pussy, who would you choose?
Parsh Alert !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JackTheRipper on July 23, 2022, 07:50:45 AM
Matt u know bodybuilding is not meant for humans its ok to admire your pump after doing pushups but then you naturally deflate smaller . Theres no carryover. You refuse to acknowlege people chasing after a temporary look have a mental disability , u got people like tim weasel lifting 50 years on injectables still hanging on to the photo in 1985 beleiving hes still inshape
:D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 23, 2022, 10:51:40 AM
It's utterly infuriating to read some of the phaggotry you post.


You say this literally one post from having a conversation about men's noses with prime.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 11:15:15 AM
You say this literally one post from having a conversation about men's noses with prime.

And I'm sending Prime a dick pic today, and cumshot video, to confirm my dick is big enough, and that I drop loads like Peter North! Once he gets back to me on Facebook, and OK's it.

The Mark Dugdale thread encouraged me to do it.

Mark packs twice what I have, flaccid in my drawers. Yet my cock grows to a perfectly sufficient size [and is actual above average in size].

It made me wonder if Mark has this issue too.

I don't think the term "grower" means that it grows to a horse cock...just that it's a lot bigger than you'd expect, given it's flaccid size. My dick is basically barely bigger than my thumb when soft, but is not small at all when hard.

It would annoy the fuck out of me if I was being said to have a small penis when that's not the case! Makes me wonder if Mark Dugdale has this issue too.

Also, why does flaccid size matter?

I once took a picture of my penis in the winter, where it was so small it turned into a vagina, basically. I showed the picture to a woman I was with after fucking her, and I laughed. She said "That's great that you have the confidence to laugh about that. Most men wouldn't."

I was thinking - "Didn't I just fuck you and get you off twice? Why would it matter what size my dick is when SOFT?"

Right?

Jade the Gladiator said "Final out-cum is all that matters."  ;D

Also, Grape Ape - we were talking about ketosis before.

Do you know what this ketone urine score means? I know I'm in ketosis, but do you know what the scale is?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380195;image)

I've since increased my calories, so I'm not sure if I'm still in ketosis.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 11:26:03 AM
Matt, if you could freely choose 3 celebrities to lick in the pussy, who would you choose?

Well...hopefully they'd all have a bush, and not excessively wash it. I don't mean like not wash it for a week...I just don't get why women need to wash it IMMEDIATELY prior to getting cunnilingus.

If they showered in the morning, and their pussies basked in a little pussy juice that day, what's the problem? I love when a woman's clit has that scent that I like to smell!

Just...natural. Doesn't need to be excessively clean. And again - some hair would be nice too.

So My Cunnilingus List:

[1] Amber Heard.
[2] Britney Spears.
[3] Jennifer Connelly [Circa 1990].


Amber and Britney at any age. Britney is 19 days older than me, and I've been attracted to every version of her.

Amber may be a wacko, but I can't deny being completely attracted to her, physically. And the question was what celebrities I'd lick in the pussy - not ask about her hopes and dreams over a candlelight dinner.  ;D

PS - I feel like I am getting MORE erections than usual now. It may be the same, but it is NOT lower. I heard Deca can cause temporary impotence. Do some PED's [Anadrol] do the opposite?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 23, 2022, 11:29:42 AM


Mark packs twice what I have, flaccid in my drawers.


Suddenly your women hating incel behaviour makes sense micro penis matty
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 23, 2022, 11:48:55 AM
It's utterly infuriating to read some of the phaggotry you post.

Absolute and complete wholesale phaggotry. Not to be confused with faggotry. Phaggotry with a Ph means something different. It means annoying - irritating.

Your posts reek of phaggotry, MCWAY.

LOL @ your garbage about training with "intensity", and using the "time under tension" principle, or the "Weider Instinctual Training Principle" [also known as COMMON SENSE, OR TRAIN THE MUSCLE GROUP THAT FEELS MOST RECOVERED ON ANY GIVEN DAY].

Sure, just like n----a isn't racist but n----er is racist. ::)

Plus, everyone here knows you use "Ph" for that other word, to make sure your post doesn't get blocked.

And being perpetually stuck on stupid, you continue to FALSELY bring up mess about timer under tension, Weider Instinctive Training, and other item I NEVER MENTIONED NOR RECOMMENDED FOR YOU or anyone else.



LOL...you post utter nonsense.

"Natural bodybuilding", lmao! Oh brother...

And then you tell me I'd improve under your system. HAHAHAHA, because I've never had any experience doing what you recommend, right MCWAY?

Because I'm not in the top 1% of results of regular gym goers? Like I've never done everything you said.



The lion's share of the advice anyone (including myself) gave you REVOLVED AROUND YOUR DIET. Are you really this dumb, or this schtick simply for our amusement?



^ Look - something that loser Walter Sobchak can't do! LOL @ that weak phaggot trashing my lifts, when I out-lift him on every lift, and could out-lift him even if he outweighed me by 100-lb.

Do you want me to post a video of me doing that for 30 reps, MCWAY?

Watch the video below - do you seriously think I don't train with intensity, using decent weight and good form? Are you insane?






^ CLEARLY, I HAVE PAID MY DUES IN TRAINING.

I KNOW what works and what doesn't. In fact, the ONLY surprise of this cycle is that I've gained more size and strength than I expected, even KNOWING bodybuilding is all drugs.

I could literally live in a lab, and do everything you say, naturally, and not get results anywhere CLOSE to this.

Frankly, I'm offended you say this stuff. It's misleading to people who don't realize bodybuilding is all drugs.

And that's why you refuse to post a picture! Because you're fat and look like shit, and you know it! That allows you to believe your delusion.

Posting your fat picture would prove MY point: that natural bodybuilding is useless.

Meanwhile, here I am - on 3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days, and have already gone from 183 to 200, to the point I STOPPED using gear for 10 days, because the weight gain was too quick.

That was WITHOUT changing my diet.

So don't you DARE tell me that bodybuilding is anything but drugs.

You're flip-flopping again, because earlier you claimed it was about your diet. "My point is that natural training sucks. I think bodybuilding is mostly diet anyway."

Now, you're back to your pathetic, "all drugs" routine.

Bhank, who posts more pictures of himself than the law allows, has told you REPEATEDLY that your diet SUCKED. As have others here. So, your sniveling about my not posting my picture is quite moot.

I'm not the one crying like a female dog about my appearance, despite claiming that I'm supposedly bigger and stronger than "99%" of other people. That, my friend, falls on YOU.



Genetics and nutrition matter too, but training is the LEAST important variable.

I could literally do PUSH-UPS only, and look better than I ever could naturally, and I'm barely using! So don't tell me that I could come close to this by training naturally.

As Lyle McDonald said, once you hit 500mg of gear weekly, your training DOESN'T MATTER. IFBB pro training is all over the map! Yet they all look the same.

I have NEVER looked this good naturally. And my nutrition hasn't improved.

Oh...and my biceps are over 16" cold and flexed now, and just about exactly 17", pumped and flexed.

That's over a full inch on my arms. It would take me MORE THAN A YEAR TO DO THAT NATURALLY.

Also, my waist is 32" now at 200-lb. My waist is generally 35" at 200-lb. My waist is 29" at 170-lb, and I gain one inch on my waist for every 5-lb in weight I gain.

Yet I've only gained an inch for every TEN POUNDS I have been gaining on this cycle.

AND the mass has been leaner.

So stop it with this bullshit about natural bodybuilding in being worthwhile!

You may be 5'11" and 220-lb, but you're 20-25% body fat. It's not just a matter of being a certain weight - I could be 200-lb naturally, but NOT while being this lean.

Even if I could be this size and condition naturally, it would take me over a year to get there. And I frankly have no interest in doing that.


Even IF I got to this size, I wouldn't be able to maintain my pump at 50% literally 24/7! My arms get pumped virtually just posting on Getbig! YOU CAN'T DO THAT NATURALLY, MCWAY. YOU DEPLORABLE PHAGGOT.[

I'm also glad I went off for those ten days, since I now know how quickly I'll lose my mass post-cycle.

And I accept that. I'm fine with it.

I just accept that bodybuilding is all drugs, and since I don't want to use drugs year-round, I know I will get small again.

I'm ok with that. Sucks, but...the only alternative is to be fat like you.

I accept that their is temporary. I'm ok with that.

No, you're not OK with it. Within six months of your cessation of the anabolics, you will revert into a state of depression, snivel and whine about it, and subject us to it nearly to the point of nausea.

My arms haven't been under 17" (cold) in at least 20 years. So, bragging about needing steroids to get a PUMPED 17" arm doesn't exactly help your case here.

Your brain is scattered from here to Nova Scotia. You claim you look better than almost everybody; yet, you're still not satisfied and want to temporariily look better than a handful of people. Is there some time bomb strapped to your chest? If you don't reach a certain size by a certain date......BLAM!!!!!

Less than two weeks ago, you claimed steroids were "pretty retarded". Now, you're back on the sauce. Enough said.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 23, 2022, 11:52:58 AM
Please inform Matt there is no way I'm reading a post that might be about his dick.  Stopped after the first sentence.

But that first sentence confirmed Sobchak's theory.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 23, 2022, 11:57:06 AM
It's utterly infuriating to read some of the phaggotry you post.

Absolute and complete wholesale phaggotry. Not to be confused with faggotry. Phaggotry with a Ph means something different. It means annoying - irritating.

Your posts reek of phaggotry, MCWAY.

LOL @ your garbage about training with "intensity", and using the "time under tension" principle, or the "Weider Instinctual Training Principle" [also known as COMMON SENSE, OR TRAIN THE MUSCLE GROUP THAT FEELS MOST RECOVERED ON ANY GIVEN DAY].

LOL...you post utter nonsense.

"Natural bodybuilding", lmao! Oh brother...

And then you tell me I'd improve under your system. HAHAHAHA, because I've never had any experience doing what you recommend, right MCWAY?

Because I'm not in the top 1% of results of regular gym goers? Like I've never done everything you said.



^ Look - something that loser Walter Sobchak can't do! LOL @ that weak phaggot trashing my lifts, when I out-lift him on every lift, and could out-lift him even if he outweighed me by 100-lb.

Do you want me to post a video of me doing that for 30 reps, MCWAY?

Watch the video below - do you seriously think I don't train with intensity, using decent weight and good form? Are you insane?



^ CLEARLY, I HAVE PAID MY DUES IN TRAINING.

I KNOW what works and what doesn't. In fact, the ONLY surprise of this cycle is that I've gained more size and strength than I expected, even KNOWING bodybuilding is all drugs.

I could literally live in a lab, and do everything you say, naturally, and not get results anywhere CLOSE to this.

Frankly, I'm offended you say this stuff. It's misleading to people who don't realize bodybuilding is all drugs.

And that's why you refuse to post a picture! Because you're fat and look like shit, and you know it! That allows you to believe your delusion.

Posting your fat picture would prove MY point: that natural bodybuilding is useless.

Meanwhile, here I am - on 3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days, and have already gone from 183 to 200, to the point I STOPPED using gear for 10 days, because the weight gain was too quick.

That was WITHOUT changing my diet.

So don't you DARE tell me that bodybuilding is anything but drugs.

Genetics and nutrition matter too, but training is the LEAST important variable.

I could literally do PUSH-UPS only, and look better than I ever could naturally, and I'm barely using! So don't tell me that I could come close to this by training naturally.

As Lyle McDonald said, once you hit 500mg of gear weekly, your training DOESN'T MATTER. IFBB pro training is all over the map! Yet they all look the same.

I have NEVER looked this good naturally. And my nutrition hasn't improved.

Oh...and my biceps are over 16" cold and flexed now, and just about exactly 17", pumped and flexed.

That's over a full inch on my arms. It would take me MORE THAN A YEAR TO DO THAT NATURALLY.

Also, my waist is 32" now at 200-lb. My waist is generally 35" at 200-lb. My waist is 29" at 170-lb, and I gain one inch on my waist for every 5-lb in weight I gain.

Yet I've only gained an inch for every TEN POUNDS I have been gaining on this cycle.

AND the mass has been leaner.

So stop it with this bullshit about natural bodybuilding in being worthwhile!

You may be 5'11" and 220-lb, but you're 20-25% body fat. It's not just a matter of being a certain weight - I could be 200-lb naturally, but NOT while being this lean.

Even if I could be this size and condition naturally, it would take me over a year to get there. And I frankly have no interest in doing that.

Even IF I got to this size, I wouldn't be able to maintain my pump at 50% literally 24/7! My arms get pumped virtually just posting on Getbig! YOU CAN'T DO THAT NATURALLY, MCWAY. YOU DEPLORABLE PHAGGOT.

I'm also glad I went off for those ten days, since I now know how quickly I'll lose my mass post-cycle.

And I accept that. I'm fine with it.

I just accept that bodybuilding is all drugs, and since I don't want to use drugs year-round, I know I will get small again.

I'm ok with that. Sucks, but...the only alternative is to be fat like you.

I accept that their is temporary. I'm ok with that.
Christ you're full of yourself. You have good lifts. Thats it. Your build is shit. That arm is pathetic.  Where's the peak? It's like an empty toilet paper roll, just a straight tube
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 23, 2022, 12:09:21 PM
And I'm sending Prime a dick pic today, and cumshot video, to confirm my dick is big enough, and that I drop loads like Peter North! Once he gets back to me on Facebook, and OK's it.


Primemuscle better ok this.

Full scientific review Prime, full scientific review. Glasses on and everything -

(https://i.postimg.cc/KYpBjR69/2022-5-Jay-jpg-thumb.png).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 23, 2022, 12:12:21 PM
Thank you to all the Getbiggers who have supported me during this cycle, given tips, or even just been Meh about it.

I'm just a consenting adult using drugs, as consenting adults sometimes do.

MCWAY is treating this like I'm a 14-year-old doing a death cycle. LMAO at his bullshit about unhealthy this is. Haha, yeah, because 18mg of Anadrol daily for a couple of months is so bad.

You were the one, sniveling about your health. That's why you stopped and proclaimed on July 10 that taking steroids was "pretty retarded".



If I were using 100mg daily, I would give a shit. I'm using so little, it barely matters.

Or if I was trying to hit 300-lb on this cycle, fine. I'd worry.

I'm literally 200.2 pounds right now, bare naked.

I'm not saying there is no risk in what I'm doing, but it's no different than if I spent the summer drinking every day. At the end of the day - who gives a fuck?

MCWAY literally thinks like some 1980's dumbass who just read "Death in the Locker Room".

This cycle just isn't a big deal. It's not.

Then why did you STOP and proclaim that it was "retarded" to take steroids, in the first place.



That's why I'm purposely cutting back. I'd be at least 205-lb by now, if I was willing to push it a little. But to be completely honest, I'm perfectly fine with my current look. I do wish my chest was better, but that will be hard to change no matter WHAT I do.

Basically, I'm pleased with the size I'm carrying, and my look in a tank top. It has been bringing me a lot of attention, I suppose because delts are so prominent in a tank top.

There is no gear cycle that is going to give me a chest. I just wanted to be a particular size and condition. I got to roughly that size quickly, and I'm more or less just happy with this look. I know I'd look better with a tan, but I burn too easily.

I'd be willing to try a spray tan, if anyone knows a good one.

Does no one ever get to a point where they are pleased with how they look?

I'd even say I get a different sort of good attention than actual bodybuilders - because people are my physique as attainable [because it is], whereas with bodybuilders, people look because they are trying to process someone who doesn't look human, essentially.

Hence, getting bigger is not going to achieve more attention. I also don't want my face to get too far, and I don't want to be a bald loser, like Walter Sobchak, who is most likely bald.

I wish I had a better chest, as I said, and longer biceps muscle bellies...but again, those are immutable genetic characteristics.

Imagine what Walter Sobchak looks like - that fucking loser won't even post a photo because he knows he looks like shit, lol.

You're not perfectly fine with anything. Sooner or later, that paranoia of yours will kick back into gear. You will either think you're not big enough and indulge in more of those "retarded" steroids. Or, you will quit and say it ain't worth it (out of health concerns), because without the sauce, the only way to keep your size is engage in that pesky EATING stuff.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 23, 2022, 12:15:51 PM
And I'm sending Prime a dick pic today, and cumshot video, to confirm my dick is big enough, and that I drop loads like Peter North! Once he gets back to me on Facebook, and OK's it.

The Mark Dugdale thread encouraged me to do it.

Mark packs twice what I have, flaccid in my drawers. Yet my cock grows to a perfectly sufficient size [and is actual above average in size].

It made me wonder if Mark has this issue too.

I don't think the term "grower" means that it grows to a horse cock...just that it's a lot bigger than you'd expect, given it's flaccid size. My dick is basically barely bigger than my thumb when soft, but is not small at all when hard.

It would annoy the fuck out of me if I was being said to have a small penis when that's not the case! Makes me wonder if Mark Dugdale has this issue too.

Also, why does flaccid size matter?

I once took a picture of my penis in the winter, where it was so small it turned into a vagina, basically. I showed the picture to a woman I was with after fucking her, and I laughed. She said "That's great that you have the confidence to laugh about that. Most men wouldn't."

I was thinking - "Didn't I just fuck you and get you off twice? Why would it matter what size my dick is when SOFT?"

Right?

Jade the Gladiator said "Final out-cum is all that matters."  ;D

Also, Grape Ape - we were talking about ketosis before.

Do you know what this ketone urine score means? I know I'm in ketosis, but do you know what the scale is?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380195;image)

I've since increased my calories, so I'm not sure if I'm still in ketosis.

Did OMR ever confirm that you were indeed 6.45 inches? Maybe you shrank like a bodybuilders height.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 23, 2022, 12:17:54 PM
Matt, have you considered to use a penis pump and do jelqing to increase your penis size - like tbombz?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 23, 2022, 12:18:21 PM
Not aure why this thread wound up being about noses and flacid dicks but I will say I get Matt not wanting to get too heavy but that doesnt mean he can’t improve his condition at his current weight. Eventually you dont get bigger your condituon just starts to improve. Again I think Matt should clean up his doet if he wants to improve condition without more weight. He could add another inch to the arms and bring out the abs but he is just gettung back size he has previously had if you want to keep 10 solid pounds you need to add 20 fluffy pounds. Again i think long term TRT would do him more good than short oral only cycles. That would also prevent the yo yo effect
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 23, 2022, 12:19:15 PM
(https://canary.contestimg.wish.com/api/webimage/5d5ec0bbe20e0c0d3d2a61d4-large.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OneMoreRep on July 23, 2022, 12:21:28 PM
Did OMR ever confirm that you were indeed 6.45 inches? Maybe you shrank like a bodybuilders height.

Negative ghost rider, the pattern is full.

Then again, I'm not wanting to see any dick pics. Matt can send to Prime if he wants to see that kind of thing.

"1"
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 23, 2022, 12:29:16 PM
Well...

I went from 183 to 200 on a wee little bit of Anadrol.

I don't particularly want to get to 210-220.

You said you wanted to hit 215.



I would do it just to shut up some of the dumb assholes on here who think my being 170 for years was due to my not being able to make gains, when that was 100% a conscious health decision on my part.

I was 170, benching 315x8, and couldn't gain more size.  ::)

Right...

No, I purposely maintained a low body weight, so that my health was good.

And I don't want to be 200+ for long.

I do need to bring up calories to get my TSH in range...but I'm thinking I'll end up at 185.

You don't need to be at a low bodyweight to be in good health. I know that firsthand.

Your low bodyweight is due to not doing the one thing needed to get bigger.....EATING MORE FOOD. Then there's the matter of your not wanting to test your might in another weight class.



I'll probably be 203 on Monday. That's already +20 pounds for cycle. I sort of want to push to 210-215, just to see how it goes, but I'm not super excited about pushing my body like that.

So I am back on the Anadrol - but I'm only taking enough to maintain around 200-lb.

If that means 12.5mg daily, so be it.

MCWAY is 5'11" and 220, so maybe if I get to 210 at 5'9", I can show MCWAY how piss simple it is to get to his natural size, while on juice.

This is your big obsession now. You're trying to prove you can get bigger than me by taking steroids. BTW, genius, I'm not 5'11"; I'm 5'9". Maybe when I had a flat-top in high school I was 5'11".  ;D



And when I'm done, I'll drop to 185, as I said.

Health comes first for me.

I realize a lot of people on here don't care, but being 50+ pounds overweight will probably take a decade off your life. Maybe most don't care - but I do.

This cycle is only temporary.

Not to mention, "retarded". Not to mention, one of those roids you're using can be quite harsh on the body in a short period of time. Your fellow Getbig brethren warned you about that earlier.

Major (and repeated) fluctuations in weight are also unhealthy, as well. Or did you forget that part.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 23, 2022, 01:26:55 PM
It's utterly infuriating to read some of the phaggotry you post.

Absolute and complete wholesale phaggotry. Not to be confused with faggotry. Phaggotry with a Ph means something different. It means annoying - irritating.

Your posts reek of phaggotry, MCWAY.

LOL @ your garbage about training with "intensity", and using the "time under tension" principle, or the "Weider Instinctual Training Principle" [also known as COMMON SENSE, OR TRAIN THE MUSCLE GROUP THAT FEELS MOST RECOVERED ON ANY GIVEN DAY].

LOL...you post utter nonsense.

"Natural bodybuilding", lmao! Oh brother...

And then you tell me I'd improve under your system. HAHAHAHA, because I've never had any experience doing what you recommend, right MCWAY?

Because I'm not in the top 1% of results of regular gym goers? Like I've never done everything you said.

Look - something that loser Walter Sobchak can't do! LOL @ that weak phaggot trashing my lifts, when I out-lift him on every lift, and could out-lift him even if he outweighed me by 100-lb.

Do you want me to post a video of me doing that for 30 reps, MCWAY?

Watch the video below - do you seriously think I don't train with intensity, using decent weight and good form? Are you insane?

CLEARLY, I HAVE PAID MY DUES IN TRAINING.

I KNOW what works and what doesn't. In fact, the ONLY surprise of this cycle is that I've gained more size and strength than I expected, even KNOWING bodybuilding is all drugs.

I could literally live in a lab, and do everything you say, naturally, and not get results anywhere CLOSE to this.

Frankly, I'm offended you say this stuff. It's misleading to people who don't realize bodybuilding is all drugs.

And that's why you refuse to post a picture! Because you're fat and look like shit, and you know it! That allows you to believe your delusion.

Posting your fat picture would prove MY point: that natural bodybuilding is useless.

Meanwhile, here I am - on 3x 25mg Anadrol tablets every four days, and have already gone from 183 to 200, to the point I STOPPED using gear for 10 days, because the weight gain was too quick.

That was WITHOUT changing my diet.

So don't you DARE tell me that bodybuilding is anything but drugs.

Genetics and nutrition matter too, but training is the LEAST important variable.

I could literally do PUSH-UPS only, and look better than I ever could naturally, and I'm barely using! So don't tell me that I could come close to this by training naturally.

As Lyle McDonald said, once you hit 500mg of gear weekly, your training DOESN'T MATTER. IFBB pro training is all over the map! Yet they all look the same.

I have NEVER looked this good naturally. And my nutrition hasn't improved.

Oh...and my biceps are over 16" cold and flexed now, and just about exactly 17", pumped and flexed.

That's over a full inch on my arms. It would take me MORE THAN A YEAR TO DO THAT NATURALLY.

Also, my waist is 32" now at 200-lb. My waist is generally 35" at 200-lb. My waist is 29" at 170-lb, and I gain one inch on my waist for every 5-lb in weight I gain.

Yet I've only gained an inch for every TEN POUNDS I have been gaining on this cycle.

AND the mass has been leaner.

So stop it with this bullshit about natural bodybuilding in being worthwhile!

You may be 5'11" and 220-lb, but you're 20-25% body fat. It's not just a matter of being a certain weight - I could be 200-lb naturally, but NOT while being this lean.

Even if I could be this size and condition naturally, it would take me over a year to get there. And I frankly have no interest in doing that.

Even IF I got to this size, I wouldn't be able to maintain my pump at 50% literally 24/7! My arms get pumped virtually just posting on Getbig! YOU CAN'T DO THAT NATURALLY, MCWAY. YOU DEPLORABLE PHAGGOT.

I'm also glad I went off for those ten days, since I now know how quickly I'll lose my mass post-cycle.

And I accept that. I'm fine with it.

I just accept that bodybuilding is all drugs, and since I don't want to use drugs year-round, I know I will get small again.

I'm ok with that. Sucks, but...the only alternative is to be fat like you.

I accept that their is temporary. I'm ok with that.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA….A PUNY 16” WEAKLING ARM THAT BELONGS ON A SOFT LESBIAN GRANDMOTHER!

YOU DONT EVEN LOOK LIKE YOU LIFT WEIGHTS YOU RETARDED WEAK, LITTLE CLOSET HOMO. YOURE AS STUPID AS YOU ARE WEAK AND UGLY. YOURE A TINY LITTLE WEIRDO BITCH. HAHAHAHAHAHA…A FULL BLOWN DRUG CYCLE TO LOOK LIKE A TEENAGE GIRL!

.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 02:31:25 PM
You said you wanted to hit 215.

You don't need to be at a low bodyweight to be in good health. I know that firsthand.

Your low bodyweight is due to not doing the one thing needed to get bigger.....EATING MORE FOOD. Then there's the matter of your not wanting to test your might in another weight class.

This is your big obsession now. You're trying to prove you can get bigger than me by taking steroids. BTW, genius, I'm not 5'11"; I'm 5'9". Maybe when I had a flat-top in high school I was 5'11".  ;D

Not to mention, "retarded". Not to mention, one of those roids you're using can be quite harsh on the body in a short period of time. Your fellow Getbig brethren warned you about that earlier.

Major (and repeated) fluctuations in weight are also unhealthy, as well. Or did you forget that part.

I probably should hit 215, just to show I can do it.

Mainly because losers like that weak deplorable piece of shit Walter Sobchak thinks I walk around at 170 by accident.

I do it for health, and I'm still stronger than he could ever be at 270 on gear.

It's not by accident - that's my point. I maintain a low body weight for health.

I could do up to 215 just to show I'm quite capable of doing it.

One thing, MCWAY - Say what you will about natural bodybuilding...but I can't maintain this full pumped look naturally.

I'm more pumped literally just sitting around than if I had just finished a cheat workout, naturally.

None of your natural training bullshit would make that happen. It's not possible.

That's why I hate bodybuilding. It's just drugs and nutrition and genetics and it's portrayed as being about hard training, lol. Training is unquestionably the least important factor of the four.

Pro training is all over the map. Once you hit 500mg of gear a week or more, you can basically train however you want. You will grow.

In Strongman, your training actually matters, and it's a big factor.

Also, I should say: I could stop training now, and if I eat enough, I could hit 215 likely just from the steroids. As long as I get enough protein.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 02:33:19 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382799;image)

LOL!!!

Look at this absolute stupid, useless weak phaggot.

I out-lift this guy in every lift, and he could have 80-lb on me on gear, and I could out-lift him naturally.

I could out-lift this useless phaggot if I was 170 and he was 250 on juice.

He's probably ugly and bald too.

Sucks that much for you to not have hair, and know you can't afford to do anything about it, and also know I have hair, huh? HAHAHAHA. Fat fucking phaggot.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 02:39:25 PM
Negative ghost rider, the pattern is full.

Then again, I'm not wanting to see any dick pics. Matt can send to Prime if he wants to see that kind of thing.

"1"

I did. He said he will not verify anything to Getbig.

Possibly because, that Mark Dugdale thread made him question the sexual orientation of the board, LOL.

Honestly, OneMoreRep, I am just SO FUCKING SICK of literally posting recorded evidence of any claim I make, and having if questioned.

It's weird, to the point of if actually being insane.

Example here - not to compare that Grape Ape to that weak loser Walter Sobchak, but this is what I'm talking about, as an example:

You are not in ketosis eating bananas and orange juice.

Meanwhile, I POSTED MY URINE TEST RESULTS WHICH CLEARLY FUCKING OBJECTIVELY VERIFY I AM IN KETOSIS:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380195;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1380193;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 23, 2022, 02:39:27 PM
Not aure why this thread wound up being about noses and flacid dicks but I will say I get Matt not wanting to get too heavy but that doesnt mean he can’t improve his condition at his current weight. Eventually you dont get bigger your condituon just starts to improve. Again I think Matt should clean up his doet if he wants to improve condition without more weight. He could add another inch to the arms and bring out the abs but he is just gettung back size he has previously had if you want to keep 10 solid pounds you need to add 20 fluffy pounds. Again i think long term TRT would do him more good than short oral only cycles. That would also prevent the yo yo effect
Terrible fucking advice.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on July 23, 2022, 02:41:21 PM
I did. He said he will not verify anything to Getbig.

Possibly because, that Mark Dugdale thread made him question the sexual orientation of the board, LOL.

Honestly, OneMoreRep, I am just SO FUCKING SICK of literally posting recorded evidence of any claim I make, and having if questioned.

It's weird, to the point of if actually being insane.

Example here - not to compare that Grape Ape to that weak loser Walter Sobchak, but this is what I'm talking about, as an example:
Meltdown.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 23, 2022, 02:44:44 PM
Meltdown.

When you look down at the end of your dick and the autistic tramp giving you a sloppy car blowjob and you woefully regret picking up a cock hound at last call…

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 02:53:17 PM
Phantom Spunker is a good dude.

But he questioned if I'm really on calories as low as I claimed.

I'm not anymore - I'm up to 2,000+ daily now.

But I was absolutely on the calories that I claimed.

How else would someone:

[1] Be in ketosis.
[2] Have an elevated TSH.
[3] Have every other thyroid marker WELL within range.

?

Low calories - very low calories - is the most parsimonious answer there.

And I posted my blood test results to prove it.

The only thing I could do beyond that is log into my medical results online, and open my results. But I'm not going to do that.

I've verified everything I have claimed. And I'll verify everything I ever will claim. It's literally delusional to persist in questioning the veracity of any of my claims at this point.

Did I deep fake that 225x25 bench press video?  ::)

When I showed proof of being in ketosis to Grape Ape, he didn't bring it up again. And that's cool - I respect that. He knows he was wrong. I don't expect him to openly say it. Simply not persisting in a wrong view is fine.

Meanwhile, that phaggot Walter Sobchak will literally see evidence proving him wrong, and he'll persist in saying I'm not as strong as a video clearly showing my lifts.

Which is a compliment in a way - he doesn't want to admit that I'm so much stronger than he is, because he's a weak fuck, and he knows it.

When someone is stronger than someone or better at something [like joswift or OneMoreRep], they don't need to say it.

It goes without saying.

Walter Sobchak needs to say it, because he knows I'm stronger than him. Imagine if he thinks my lifts are bad, how pathetic he thinks his are?

Remember when Sarcasm was shit a shit talker, and he turned out to be some fat fuck living in a trailer? It's the same situation for Walter Sobchak.

I told him he can privately send any lift videos to mods here, and I will out-lift him on any lift.

If he was stronger than me, he would just take a 60 second cellphone lift video, upload it to an unlisted URL on YouTube, and send it to a moderator on here. A moderator could then confirm he's stronger than me, and I'd have to give him the props.

He won't do it because he knows I'm stronger on every lift.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 03:00:10 PM
Meltdown.

Yeah.

But I already told that phaggot Walter Sobchak that I could beat him on any lift, or in any athletic endeavour of any sort. And that if he wanted to prove otherwise, he could send his lift videos to a moderator, and I will beat anything he lifts. And I would give him an 80-lb weight advantage on me too.

Of course he knows I'm stronger.

I don't call people out, because everyone knows the pecking order. People bash B. Hank, but I don't because I know he looks better than me.

If I called someone out, you can be sure that I know I can outperform them.

I'm open to doing any lifting competition against Walter Sobchak at any time. Just so everyone sees I'm considerably stronger. Of course he knows that, which is why he won't take the approximately 60 seconds to get a lifting video recorded, which he knows will only prove me right to the board.

There's a lot of good information in this thread from basically everyone. But I see no value in someone weaker than me trashing me. I could tolerate it from someone stronger...maybe. But knowing some weak fuck is doing it...it makes the information useless.

Almost everyone here has had something intelligent to add here except for that fuck.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 23, 2022, 03:03:53 PM
Yeah.

But I already told that phaggot Walter Sobchak that I could beat him on any lift, or in any athletic endeavour of any sort. And that if he wanted to prove otherwise, he could send his lift videos to a moderator, and I will beat anything he lifts. And I would give him an 80-lb weight advantage on me too.

Of course he knows I'm stronger.

I don't call people out, because everyone knows the pecking order. People bash B. Hank, but I don't because I know he looks better than me.

If I called someone out, you can be sure that I know I can outperform them.

I'm open to doing any lifting competition against Walter Sobchak at any time. Just so everyone sees I'm considerably stronger. Of course he knows that, which is why he won't take the approximately 60 seconds to get a lifting video recorded, which he knows will only prove me right to the board.

There's a lot of good information in this thread from basically everyone. But I see no value in someone weaker than me trashing me. I could tolerate it from someone stronger...maybe. But knowing some weak fuck is doing it...it makes the information useless.

Almost everyone here has had something intelligent to add here except for that fuck.

WHEN THE BOARD RETARD TRIES TO CONVINCE HERSELF THAT SHE IS BUILDING MUSCLE ON HER STEROID CYCLE….

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on July 23, 2022, 03:07:12 PM
Matt, I loved you in the Sopranos! Didn't know that you were gay. I guess getting "whacked" means something different for the rainbow community.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on July 23, 2022, 03:09:11 PM
Matt, I loved you in the Sopranos! Didn't know that you were gay. I guess getting "whacked" means something different for the rainbow community.

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 23, 2022, 03:09:49 PM
No matter the cycle, Matt will always be a perpetual loser.

And Walter owns his mind.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 23, 2022, 03:17:25 PM
Matt, I loved you in the Sopranos! Didn't know that you were gay. I guess getting "whacked" means something different for the rainbow community.

That’s not Fredo…
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 23, 2022, 03:20:59 PM
And I'm sending Prime a dick pic today, and cumshot video, to confirm my dick is big enough, and that I drop loads like Peter North! Once he gets back to me on Facebook, and OK's it.

The Mark Dugdale thread encouraged me to do it.

Mark packs twice what I have, flaccid in my drawers.


(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382620;image)

Nose bigger than his dick  :D

Bhanky is a trustworthy and respected board member. Ask him to verify your video if prime won't. Sounds like you're making excuses though. You could just upload it to the More Explicit Sex Board on here.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 23, 2022, 03:30:07 PM
No matter the cycle, Matt will always be a perpetual loser.

And Walter owns his mind.

24 fucking pages of his Village Retard ramblings about a steroid cycle and he weighs 170 lbs with a 16-inch arm.

Matt the Cock Connoisseur is the punch line to every joke on Getbig.

The tiny, dumb, little closet homo needs to get off the internet and go help raise his illegitimate brood of feral children.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: muscle matters on July 23, 2022, 03:42:34 PM
Why so much hate on natural bodybuilding?

Here I was close to 200lbs with 18" arms.

With patience, it's not impossible to have a good physique naturally.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=652447.0;attach=772845;image)



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 23, 2022, 04:49:32 PM
I did. He said he will not verify anything to Getbig.

Possibly because, that Mark Dugdale thread made him question the sexual orientation of the board, LOL.

Honestly, OneMoreRep, I am just SO FUCKING SICK of literally posting recorded evidence of any claim I make, and having if questioned.

It's weird, to the point of if actually being insane.

Matt, I am not sure if prime verifying your dick pics carries the same weight as OMR verifying your dick pics. Maybe you should send them to bhank?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on July 23, 2022, 04:56:20 PM
Matt, have you considered to use a penis pump and do jelqing to increase your penis size - like tbombz?

Or ask tbombz if his bathmate is still available
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 23, 2022, 05:10:15 PM
24 fucking pages of his Village Retard ramblings about a steroid cycle and he weighs 170 lbs with a 16-inch arm.

Matt the Cock Connoisseur is the punch line to every joke on Getbig.

The tiny, dumb, little closet homo needs to get off the internet and go help raise his illegitimate brood of feral children.

I’m lifetime natural with better arms than Matt.

Talk about horrible Genetics for bodybuilding. Then again, horrible in many other ways too!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 23, 2022, 05:11:53 PM
Matt, I am not sure if prime verifying your dick pics carries the same weight as OMR verifying your dick pics. Maybe you should send them to bhank?

Chaos and robc also asked for the pictures and videos.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 23, 2022, 05:41:11 PM
Chaos and robc also asked for the pictures and videos.

Hahahha asshole
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 23, 2022, 06:07:35 PM
I’m lifetime natural with better arms than Matt.

Talk about horrible Genetics for bodybuilding. Then again, horrible in many other ways too!
Ya the whole being a autistic retard is probably worse than those shit arms
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 23, 2022, 06:12:35 PM
Ya the whole being a autistic retard is probably worse than those shit arms

For being on gear, those arms are horrendously pathetic.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 06:17:20 PM
Ya the whole being a autistic retard is probably worse than those shit arms

Why are you such an asshole, Christopher? SF1900 is a Democrat, and he especially hates Canadians who support Republicans. Although I frankly don't mind SF1900's posts, honestly.

I know he's mad that I support American politics that he doesn't. But hey - I feel on Getbig, that has more benefit that cost.

I could believe him saying he has better arms than me right now, even if he is natural. If I had another inch on my arms, I wouldn't believe him, but as of right now, I can believe him. I don't take him for a liar.

But as for your beef with me, I've never gotten it. I make no waves with you, and just read your posts and weigh it against the evidence. If you have something valuable to add, I review it against the evidence.

The truth is, I've only blocked two people on here since joined in 2003 - "Viking Power" [post whore from back in the day], and of course - "Walter Sobchak", who as far as I can tell, literal attacks everyone and says nothing.

I know you're capable of making an argument - so make it. I've seen you do it elsewhere, just not with me. I know you have an issue with my long posts, so just use the block feature, dude.

If I'm saying something retarded, point it out. You just name calling is not an argument.

Do I have any issue with you? No, not really. Maybe that you're an asshole 10% of the time? Otherwise, no.

But I appreciate you reading my threads. But there is a block feature, bro.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 23, 2022, 06:30:08 PM
Matt, what are you talking about? I don’t even talk politics or vote.

Sign off and go spend time with your kids.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 06:33:16 PM
For being on gear, those arms are horrendously pathetic.

I'll go count how many Anadrol tablets I have left, and let you know what I'm on.

It should be around 15-18mg daily. I've gone from 183-lb to 201-lb.

That seems like a pretty normal result to me, if not a little better than what should be expected.

I haven't added the Sustanon yet, because I feel I don't take well to gaining weight too quickly. Maybe if I'm 203-lb by midday tomorrow, I can start the Sustanon on Monday.

But I'm a classic ectomorph body type, and gaining weight quickly is hard for my body. As in, I feel it more than most.

And gaining weight quickly is bad for anyone, frankly.

That being said, if I was on mountains of gear, I'd be disappointed, but I'm on a minimum of gear right now. So I'm perfectly content with the results so far.

I'll take some arms pictures after my arms workout...the difference will be noticeable then.

Also, SF1900 - I believe you when you say you have better arms than me naturally. So basically, you have 17"+ natural arms?

If there's one thing I know about you, it's that you don't lie.

If you do have better arms than me - and like I said, I don't know you to be a liar - then you know full well that your arms are basically in the top 1% of men.

I spent yesterday at Wal-Mart, then at my gym which has a giant pool - no one out of over 100 men I saw had more muscular arms than me.

So unless you live in some magical city, you know full well that your arms - which are bigger than mine - are way bigger than basically every other man's arms.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on July 23, 2022, 06:48:09 PM
Your bicep looks good in that shot.  Running so little gear, eating so little and responding the way you are clearly you could get huge if you wanted. Are you going to go for your all time best lifts for reps in the bench before coming off? Maybe 315 for 15? 225 for 31?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 06:52:23 PM
Matt, what are you talking about? I don’t even talk politics or vote.

Sign off and go spend time with your kids.

You told me before I shouldn't be so opinionated on American politics, as a Canadian.

I took that to mean you were annoyed what I've been supporting the Republican Party, when you perceive it as not my business.

The thing is - the welfare of the USA matters more to me than Canada's. If the USA goes down, what do you think will happen to Canada?

That's why I want the USA to stay a free country.

And that's why I assumed you vote Democrat.

Anyway, I realize your arms are better than mine. I know you don't lie. But it's a bit bullshit for you to have 17"+ lean arms, and act like lots of naturals have that. That's simply not true.

Your arms being better than mine doesn't mean most naturals are in the same boat.

I only really have strong delts. Gear isn't going to rewrite my genetics. But this is some quality gear, so I go back and forth on whether or not I should hit 215. I'll talk to my doctor. It's not the weight, but being perpetually pumped up that I don't think I can replicate naturally.

Also, I've used 33x 25mg Anadrol pills in 48 days. That works out to ~17mg daily, just like I suspected.

So to be fair, I'm not THAT much gear. I've had two friends who use 100mg of Anadrol daily, lol. One even went up to 150mg daily, but said all it did was increase side effects by going from 100 to 150. So he went back on 100.

I consider this cycle to he rather modest. And I think my gains are consistent with what I'm taking. I'm pleased with the outcome.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 23, 2022, 07:05:19 PM
I probably should hit 215, just to show I can do it.

Mainly because losers like that weak deplorable piece of shit Walter Sobchak thinks I walk around at 170 by accident.

I do it for health, and I'm still stronger than he could ever be at 270 on gear.

It's not by accident - that's my point. I maintain a low body weight for health.

I could do up to 215 just to show I'm quite capable of doing it.

Show who? That's part of the problem. You shouldn't be doing any of this, especially at age 40, for anyone EXCEPT YOURSELF!!

If you don't want to be 215, then for the love of the Almighty, DON'T DO IT!!! There is no gun to your head or bomb strapped to your chest.



One thing, MCWAY - Say what you will about natural bodybuilding...but I can't maintain this full pumped look naturally.

I'm more pumped literally just sitting around than if I had just finished a cheat workout, naturally.

None of your natural training bullshit would make that happen. It's not possible.

Why in the world do you need to be pumped all the time, unless you like looking like a mutant strawberry (the way a lot of white guys do when they go nuts on the anabolics)? My guess you don't feel sufficiently big enough. When I was 170, I did silly stuff too, doing pushups at the beach and at waterparks trying to be pumped and feel big, to impress girls.

What a surprise!! Once I got significantly bigger, I stopped that nonsense. Yet, I got noticed more because I looked better ice cold.


That's why I hate bodybuilding. It's just drugs and nutrition and genetics and it's portrayed as being about hard training, lol. Training is unquestionably the least important factor of the four.

Wrong again. To quote an 8-time Mr. Olympia, "When building mass, it takes a combination of things. One, of course, you're talking nutrition. Then, you're talking training; then you're talking about psyche. It's almost like the law of physics. Everything is connected to everything. One without the other is ZERO!!"

Then you have legends like the Iron Guru, who cite nutrition as 80% of bodybuilding.



Pro training is all over the map. Once you hit 500mg of gear a week or more, you can basically train however you want. You will grow.

In Strongman, your training actually matters, and it's a big factor.

It's all over the map, because no two people are alike. Some swear by training to failure; others avoid it like the plague. Some relying on lots of drop sets; others simply lift everything that isn't nailed down.



Also, I should say: I could stop training now, and if I eat enough, I could hit 215 likely just from the steroids. As long as I get enough protein.

Don't bet on it.

You're doing something you hate to prove something to people you don't know and barely can tolerate? How utterly daft is that?



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 23, 2022, 07:32:17 PM
Chaos and robc also asked for the pictures and videos.
I look forward to Rorys opinion on Matt C's micro-penis. :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 07:32:48 PM
Your bicep looks good in that shot.  Running so little gear, eating so little and responding the way you are clearly you could get huge if you wanted. Are you going to go for your all time best lifts for reps in the bench before coming off? Maybe 315 for 15? 225 for 31?

Thanks keanu!

I am only almost at exactly one week of eating properly! Meaning, 1,800+ calories daily, if not 2,000+.

It's like one day it hit me how good quality this Anadrol is, and I just decided I want to do this, and my calories basically immediately doubled.

You are absolutely correct that I am running very little gear [~17mg Anadrol daily], still not eating like crazy [but consistent at 1,800+ calories daily], and my response has been fantastic [starting at 183-lb, and currently weighing 201-lb].

IMO, the 5.5 years between my last cycle and this one basically made this one like a first cycle.

I'm quite pleased with my current look, and I wish I could look this full without using anything. The photos below are me just standing around on an Off-day, yet normally, I'd have to get a pump to look that way...but hey, what can we do?

As for bench pressing - I'm glad you asked!!

So the Northwestern Ontario record is 225 for 30 reps, which was set in 2012, by Ontario's Strongest Man that year.

My fear is that if I get 31 reps and break that record, that one of the super-heavies will notice, and get 32 just to have the record.  ;D

So I'm going to aim for 30 reps, just to tie the city record.  :)

I didn't want to do too much strength training while on cycle, because some Getbiggers told me that injury potential is higher on gear, because your muscles are stronger, but your ligaments and tendons are basically the same.

So I ask myself - what would I bench press naturally right now? And I try to do that.

But I will try the 225x30 regardless, because...it's 30 reps, right? I mean, that's not "heavy". I feel like that's a safe lift. And I really want to get that on video.

I hadn't thought of trying 315 for reps, but my other goal was 250x20. My lifetime max is 250x17.

And good news - I can already do 245x19.

I decided to just give it a shot, not expecting to get more than 12, only to find out my bench is higher than ever.

So I should hopefully be able to get 250x20 next week. Maybe I'll try it in two weeks, just to be sure I don't risk injury.

I'll be sure to post a video!!  :)

It will be nice to have proof of this, so when people trash me, I can show them proof that I train hard and respond well.

And now that you mentioned it - once I get that 250x20 bench, I SHOULD attempt 315 for reps.

My lifetime best is 315x8. But I'd LOVE to get 315x15, just as proof that this cycle went well.  8) Thanks for thinking of that idea, keanu! I'll do it for sure.

I'll look into getting a bit of a tan, and take some proper shots after my arms workout - this cycle has been going quite well, and I want to gather some good evidence of that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 23, 2022, 07:41:37 PM
^ That look where your delts sort of jump out of your tank top, I like a lot.

I find it is especially prominent on ectomorphs. Just that look where it looks like someone very clearly works out. I find I really only get that sort of "pop" to my physique while using low-dose PED's. Or immediately after a pump.

As for my biceps - as everyone can clearly see, I have a short biceps muscle belly attachment site:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382862;image)

So what can I do? Basically nothing. I'm just glad my triceps are ok, and that triceps make up 2/3 of the upper arm. I feel that my biceps are sort of aesthetic looking, but that attachment is just too short.

And there's nothing I can do about that.

I didn't even realize it until Bast saw a photo of Gunter and I flexing, and Bast pointed out how long Gunter's biceps were compared to mine.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 24, 2022, 01:01:09 AM
Phantom Spunker is a good dude.

But he questioned if I'm really on calories as low as I claimed.

I'm not anymore - I'm up to 2,000+ daily now.

But I was absolutely on the calories that I claimed.

How else would someone:

[1] Be in ketosis.
[2] Have an elevated TSH.
[3] Have every other thyroid marker WELL within range.

?

Low calories - very low calories - is the most parsimonious answer there.

And I posted my blood test results to prove it.

The only thing I could do beyond that is log into my medical results online, and open my results. But I'm not going to do that.

I've verified everything I have claimed. And I'll verify everything I ever will claim. It's literally delusional to persist in questioning the veracity of any of my claims at this point.

Did I deep fake that 225x25 bench press video?  ::)

When I showed proof of being in ketosis to Grape Ape, he didn't bring it up again. And that's cool - I respect that. He knows he was wrong. I don't expect him to openly say it. Simply not persisting in a wrong view is fine.

Meanwhile, that phaggot Walter Sobchak will literally see evidence proving him wrong, and he'll persist in saying I'm not as strong as a video clearly showing my lifts.

Which is a compliment in a way - he doesn't want to admit that I'm so much stronger than he is, because he's a weak fuck, and he knows it.

When someone is stronger than someone or better at something [like joswift or OneMoreRep], they don't need to say it.

It goes without saying.

Walter Sobchak needs to say it, because he knows I'm stronger than him. Imagine if he thinks my lifts are bad, how pathetic he thinks his are?

Remember when Sarcasm was shit a shit talker, and he turned out to be some fat fuck living in a trailer? It's the same situation for Walter Sobchak.

I told him he can privately send any lift videos to mods here, and I will out-lift him on any lift.

If he was stronger than me, he would just take a 60 second cellphone lift video, upload it to an unlisted URL on YouTube, and send it to a moderator on here. A moderator could then confirm he's stronger than me, and I'd have to give him the props.

He won't do it because he knows I'm stronger on every lift.

On my RAD-140 cycle I was on about 2000 calories and gained 10 kilos but massively upped my protein.

With Ostarine my calories were even lower, about 1800 and I still gained a lean 2 kilos while losing fat and gaining strength.

Both are probably quite similar to Anadrol.

I could have increased my calories but did not want to deal with the extra fat when I had to go off cycle where I would gain some anyway.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 01:04:46 AM
Did OMR ever confirm that you were indeed 6.45 inches? Maybe you shrank like a bodybuilders height.

I sent the proof to Primemuscle, but he has refrained from confirming my measurements for me!

I have no problem admitting I have a tiny 1/2 Mark Dugdale nub of a flaccid penis. But who gives a FUCK about flaccid size when it grows to a good size, and I drop loads like Peter North?

Although from reading the Dugdale thread, it seems to me what flaccid and erect size are pretty correlated. But in my case, it's nothing the same.

In the -40° F winters here, my penis literally disappears into my body. It's hilarious. But again, all that matters is erect size.

As for Walter Sobchak claiming I am gay...I have no problem being open about EVERY TOPIC ON THE PLANET, but I would hide being gay? Why would I literally talk about Black crime USING MY REAL NAME, WITH NO FEAR, but hide being open about being gay, which is the EASIEST thing to be in 2022.

Is Walter Sobchak another geezer born before 1950?

Like who the FUCK thinks someone would be scared, and need to stay in the closet?

In 2022.

In Canada.

 ::)

Poor guy is too scared to post under his real name, an projects all that on others.

There's nothing I'm not upfront about. I commend HITLER, FOR FUCK'S SAKE. WHY WOULD ANYONE THINK I FEAR SOCIAL STIGMA?

That's why Walter Sobchak is such a retard - he's literally delusional. I commend HITLER, but I'm scared of coming out of the closet, according to this moron.

[and I'm not praising Hitler - but you get my point].

And no one cares about anyone else being gay.

In fact, it's too weird for a straight person to think that, which is why I would guess Walter Sobchak is a closet homosexual actually himself. I just can't fathom any straight person thinking being gay is something you'd need to hide. I think you'd need to be gay, and brainwashed by the garbage what we live in a homophobic society. But straight people know North America isn't homophobic. The only two people I know who thought that were both closet LGBT people, brainwashed into thinking the world hates gays.

I don't think any straight person would think a gay person would need to stay in the closet. At least not where I live in Canada.

Maybe it depends on the state.

There's NOTHING wrong with being gay, and NOBODY cares. Being an LGBT member actually gives you some social insulation on some topics. Anyone who thinks it's socially hard to come out of the closet is a moron.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 01:20:13 AM
Matt, have you considered to use a penis pump and do jelqing to increase your penis size - like tbombz?

Never. I remember reading about jelqing in 2000, but that was before I realized that I have a great dick [I was a virgin then].

At the time I thought men needed 8" to please women. That's bullshit. Then for a while, I would have taken 1cm on my dick, just to make it an exact 7", which I felt was optimal.

Then something dawned on me...

Only about four years ago, did I realize I have more dick than the measurement itself would suggest.

I was talking to a friend who was 6'0" and 260-lb, who had an 8" penis. But he lost 1.5" or 1.6" because of his big stomach, and his inability to get fully hard, apparently.

That's when I realized if you can make use of your full dick size...it would be as if you had a much bigger dick, because some men have stomachs which impede them, or can't maintain full erections.

So I think that stuff matters.

That said, I'd take 1cm on my dick, just to make it 7".

Seven seems about optimal for women, I would say. But I'm just sort of pulling that out of nowhere.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 01:23:14 AM
Talk about mid life crisis Matt  ;D

Yep! It came a bit early, but it's working out pretty good so far! I almost think in over it...

I mean, I didn't expect to respond so well. Now I feel kind of at ease, lol.

It's nice to know that it I wanted to be 220 or something, I could just run some quality gear!  8)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 01:24:23 AM
Matt, I loved you in the Sopranos! Didn't know that you were gay. I guess getting "whacked" means something different for the rainbow community.

Holy shit, we look like twins.

Great post! Great find, Shizzo.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 01:33:52 AM
No matter the cycle, Matt will always be a perpetual loser.

And Walter owns his mind.

Honestly, SF1900 - I just can't stand people who basically lie through their teeth.

I don't have any issue with you saying you have better arms than me, because I know it's true.

I'd rather just give you your props, and acknowledge you have better arms than me - natural, juiced, or even natural for you when I'm juiced.

If you still want to trash me about it - fine. All you'd be doing is stating the obvious.

Everyone knows it's the truth, so it doesn't bother me when you say it. In fact, for you to even have to say it makes me wonder if you think our arms are closer than they are, because I don't understand why you need to state such an obvious thing, when everyone on the board knows you have better arms than me.

It's almost a bit of a compliment, in that way.

But Walter Sobchak is just lying. He doesn't out-lift me on anything. So it begs the question - why is he making claims like that?

It could be that he legitimately knows I respond better to training, and that annoys him. Or maybe he's had an injury preventing him from training, and anyone posting about training reminds him of that.

Or...I don't know.

But what I do know is that I am stronger than him, and we both know it. So when he's calling me weak, it's annoying.

When you say you have better arms than me, and we both know that's true, that's ok with me. But when someone weaker than me calls me weak - and is rude about it [rather than constructive criticism], I find it annoying.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 01:40:32 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382799;image)

What's this post about? Are you saying I'm small and weak again?

If so - how does it make you feel to know that I'm stronger than you on every lift, and can prove that any time? We could do any test of fitness on video, and I'd outperform you.

How about let's just do a max 3-lift total? I'll shoot for a 1,275 total, with a bench/squat/deadlift of 325/425/525.

That's are quite modest numbers.

I'll give you an 80-lb weight advantage, and I'll still beat you.

Or we can do push-ups...or a fitness test. Pick any strength or fitness test and I'll beat you.

And I'm in better shape than you too. 😂😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 24, 2022, 01:51:54 AM
Never. I remember reading about jelqing in 2000, but that was before I realized that I have a great dick [I was a virgin then].

At the time I thought men needed 8" to please women. That's bullshit. Then for a while, I would have taken 1cm on my dick, just to make it an exact 7", which I felt was optimal.

Then something dawned on me...

Only about four years ago, did I realize I have more dick than the measurement itself would suggest.

I was talking to a friend who was 6'0" and 260-lb, who had an 8" penis. But he lost 1.5" or 1.6" because of his big stomach, and his inability to get fully hard, apparently.

That's when I realized if you can make use of your full dick size...it would be as if you had a much bigger dick, because some men have stomachs which impede them, or can't maintain full erections.

So I think that stuff matters.

That said, I'd take 1cm on my dick, just to make it 7".

Seven seems about optimal for women, I would say. But I'm just sort of pulling that out of nowhere.
???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 24, 2022, 02:09:45 AM
Never. I remember reading about jelqing in 2000, but that was before I realized that I have a great dick [I was a virgin then].

At the time I thought men needed 8" to please women. That's bullshit. Then for a while, I would have taken 1cm on my dick, just to make it an exact 7", which I felt was optimal.

Then something dawned on me...

Only about four years ago, did I realize I have more dick than the measurement itself would suggest.

I was talking to a friend who was 6'0" and 260-lb, who had an 8" penis. But he lost 1.5" or 1.6" because of his big stomach, and his inability to get fully hard, apparently.

That's when I realized if you can make use of your full dick size...it would be as if you had a much bigger dick, because some men have stomachs which impede them, or can't maintain full erections.

So I think that stuff matters.

That said, I'd take 1cm on my dick, just to make it 7".

Seven seems about optimal for women, I would say. But I'm just sort of pulling that out of nowhere.


If you had pulled it out of somewhere you wouldnt have as many kids to pay for..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on July 24, 2022, 02:24:43 AM
Anadrol is one hell of a drug. Yes it's water but at the same time it's not just that as it blows up certain bodyparts more and your body takes on a more masculine look in a matter of days. Guys argue with me all the time here and say there is no "real" Anadrol on the market, not like in the 80's or whatever. Really, how much faster can you gain than this? This is Chinese underground hormones and it's clearly "real."
Not even half a tablet a day LOL!

Several of the Anadrols I've sampled more recently come in 25mgs per tab.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 24, 2022, 02:33:12 AM
Better take blood pressure meds with Anadrol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 24, 2022, 04:30:26 AM
Looking good, brother Matthamed. Forget about that giant beak and micropenis. It doesn't matter that you could march head-first with an erection into a brick wall and only suffer a broken nose. You're getting swole! Time to up the dose!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 04:34:41 AM
???

I was just responding to the question about jelqing.  ;D I feel sad for people who think you can increase your penis size doing stuff like that, or taking pills.

Someone told me Viagra will actually add some size. Is that true?  ??? I always figured if you can get erections, Viagra won't do anything for you, but then someone said it makes a person exceed what they can achieve naturally.

Cole's Notes for my post that you quoted:

- My fat friend said his gut blocked 1.5" of his 8" penis when he would fuck women, LOL. And his obesity diminished his erection...uhh...tensile strength? He regretted getting fat.

- So conversely, if you don't have a gut, it would be sort of like having a gut with a dick an inch bigger. Something like that. Get full use of your penis when fucking by reducing your stomach size.

- I do think women think bigger is better, but that doesn't mean 8-9-10".

- I think women would universally be good with about 7"...but I'm just sort of guessing there.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 04:39:36 AM

If you had pulled it out of somewhere you wouldnt have as many kids to pay for..

 ;D ;D ;D

Funnily enough...I did pull out with my most recent ex, and she still got pregnant. But she miscarried, sadly.

There's a woman who brought up the topic of a baby with me just two days ago. And this is the first time I can say I don't want any more kids. At least for now...

Until our criminal government stops breaking the law, I just don't trust our future.

Weren't you guys supposed to have Brexit like 5-7 years ago or something in the UK?

So your government just blatantly ignores the will of the people too?

The digital ID system isn't a conspiracy theory - we had it [the vaccine passport] in Canada for six months. I don't want to bring kids in the world to live like that - and to eat Fish & Chirps.  :-\

I'm just waiting to see if freedom keeps winning. As the pandemic was a major loss in that department.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 24, 2022, 04:51:17 AM
Honestly, SF1900 - I just can't stand people who basically lie through their teeth.

I don't have any issue with you saying you have better arms than me, because I know it's true.

I'd rather just give you your props, and acknowledge you have better arms than me - natural, juiced, or even natural for you when I'm juiced.

If you still want to trash me about it - fine. All you'd be doing is stating the obvious.

Everyone knows it's the truth, so it doesn't bother me when you say it. In fact, for you to even have to say it makes me wonder if you think our arms are closer than they are, because I don't understand why you need to state such an obvious thing, when everyone on the board knows you have better arms than me.

It's almost a bit of a compliment, in that way.

But Walter Sobchak is just lying. He doesn't out-lift me on anything. So it begs the question - why is he making claims like that?

It could be that he legitimately knows I respond better to training, and that annoys him. Or maybe he's had an injury preventing him from training, and anyone posting about training reminds him of that.

Or...I don't know.

But what I do know is that I am stronger than him, and we both know it. So when he's calling me weak, it's annoying.

When you say you have better arms than me, and we both know that's true, that's ok with me. But when someone weaker than me calls me weak - and is rude about it [rather than constructive criticism], I find it annoying.

Matt, I really don’t know if I have better arms than you. It was a statement. It didn’t need a novel written response in return. Who really gives a shit. Sign off the internet and do something with your life.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 05:02:24 AM
Anadrol is one hell of a drug. Yes it's water but at the same time it's not just that as it blows up certain bodyparts more and your body takes on a more masculine look in a matter of days. Guys argue with me all the time here and say there is no "real" Anadrol on the market, not like in the 80's or whatever. Really, how much faster can you gain than this? This is Chinese underground hormones and it's clearly "real."
Not even half a tablet a day LOL!

Several of the Anadrols I've sampled more recently come in 25mgs per tab.

SF1900 has bigger arms than me naturally, but that's fine - I'll give him his props. But my arms are 17" pumped/flexed right now. They are up at least one full inch since starting this.

I am ***20 full pounds*** heavier since start this, and I haven't even started the Sustanon yet.

I've only used 825mg of Anadrol in total, LOL.

There are certainly people who use that in a week!

You have that loser Walter Sobchak claiming that my gains on this cycle are low - LMAO. The most ANYONE can expect to gain would be maybe 30-lb. I've already put on 20-lb, and I haven't even started half of the cycle yet!

He speaks almost like someone who doesn't even train. Of course in the photo below, I'm nowhere close to IFBB Pro caliber. But I know for certain if anyone in shape like I am here, they are going to be quite pleased with themselves, and get a LOT of people coming up to them to ask about working out.

I am 5'9", 200-lb, and not exactly fat here - what would Walter Sobchak be, to be so much better? Is he 6'0" and 220-lb at 10% body fat?

No chance in hell!

So he's likely some fat man behind a computer screen. The 2022 version of Sarcasm. Sarcasm would talk about his 360-370 bench, and meanwhile, he weighed between 310-340, and was fat. And likely hasn't benched 360+ in years. Then he died.

I can't wait to hit 205-lb [tomorrow], and get an upper body pump, then go for my walk. There was one woman who didn't even drive when the light was green because she was spending time looking at me, LOL.

People appreciate a look that is attainable.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382912;image)

I could probably end this at 223-lb body weight if I really wanted to. Though I didn't do this to push it.

One thing that I simply can't do naturally is have that look where the muscles are are sort of billowing out of my clothes...and what perpetually pumped look.

For example, you know when your arms are at rest, but you can see the upper arm sort of hanging over the elbow?

It's something like that - that happens more now.

Even my upper back and traps...you can see it's thicker. It just "pops"...you know?

I'll be honest - I always aspired to have a physique similar to Mark Wahlberg's in the movie FEAR.

The PED's have helped me to just have that fuller and more pumped looked.

Unfortunately, I can't think of any way to maintain that look naturally.

Do you have any suggestions on that, Van?

Also, now what I will be following through with this cycle, where do you recommend I bring my weight?

KmShould I strive for 213-lb? That would be a +30-lb cycle change.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 24, 2022, 05:18:04 AM
Matt

Hope you are well?  (Never can tell from your posts, you Canadian lunatic! :) ;D)

Anyway, here's a quick Masterclass in posting brevity - two questions - one sentence each

I sent the proof to Primemuscle, but he has refrained from confirming my measurements for me!

Q1:  Are you saying you've sent a picture of your erect penis to Primemuscle?




(http://i.postimg.cc/mkHRw3YC/Matt-wants-to-date-Walter.jpg)

What's this post about?

Q2:  If you're going to block a dude, why ask them what they posted?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 05:30:38 AM
The first picture is from just a few days ago.

The second photo is from October 21st of last year.

It saddens to think that the specific look what I want, as attainable as it actually is, may not be possible naturally, simply because I'm not so much looking for more size - but just to have that pumped, full look.

Yet we can't ever keep that look for long - then we add more size, to get that pumped look...then realize how good our pumps look at our new size...only to never catch that new look, LOL.

But seriously - will ANY over-the-counter supplement help me maintain a pump for more than just 15-20 minutes post-workout?

These Anadrol pumps rock!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 05:33:41 AM
Looking good, brother Matthamed. Forget about that giant beak and micropenis. It doesn't matter that you could march head-first with an erection into a brick wall and only suffer a broken nose. You're getting swole! Time to up the dose!

LOL!!!!!! 😂😂😂

It's like you've known me all my life, and you knew I was in Misery!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 06:13:48 AM
tl;dr

You may as well skip this giant post, Taffin. I rant about that piece of shit Walter Sobchak on here.

But I'm doing great now - thanks for asking!


Matt

Hope you are well?  (Never can tell from your posts, you Canadian lunatic! :) ;D)

To be honest - thanks to this cycle - I'm doing absolutely fantastic! I didn't think I still had "it", but since going on the sauce, the compliments are more or less coming once per day. Be it a group of teens coming up to me, and one asking about my workouts, or another one the next day telling me I look like Superman. My friend's gay Black friend said that I look perfect. I fucked that 27-year-old blonde, about 26 days ago from today, IIRC. Then I fucked another woman this month.

I have literally been in hiding for a long time now, yet as soon as I got back to life, I've been reminded of how much attention muscle garners.

I purposely walk down a busy road in town, knowing I'll get messages out of the blue from someone saying they saw me, and how they thought I look great.

I'm basically purposely appearing more often in public, knowing people will see me, to get these comments and compliments. And I'm getting about one comment a day. But I also get a fair amount of cars honking, or people taking a prolonged look at me. It's pretty awesome!

But it takes some balls to go up to a 200-lb man and say something, so I wonder how many more people are thinking it.

And it's one thing to have someone smile at you - to have someone say you look perfect, and another person say you look like Superman. That's another matter.

And look at the dude I was sitting next to when I got that compliment:



^ This guy is 6'3" and 230-lb, and 13 years younger than me, yet the teen at the pool complimented me.

So I can't be THAT old yet...that I would get a compliment with a specimen like that sitting next to me? Here I was thinking I was way over the hill!

That's my wrestling coach. In real life, I'd have Walter Sobchak on the ground getting rapid-fire shots to the face so fast, the video would be legendary.

I've never trained striking, but my wrestling is outstanding. There's literally a 0% chance that any Getbig shit-talker would say anything to my face.

Would I disrespect OneMoreRep to his face? Absolutely not!!

First, because it's not nice, and second, because because OneMoreRep is a wrecking machine!!

Part of why I despise that stupid shit Walter Sobchak is for this reason. Look - I *know* I am well within the top 5% of most in-shape men. To suggest otherwise is to say 1 in 20 men are in better shape than me.

LOL!!!!!

Not a chance.

So why I resent that POS [one of many reasons] is because when I was a kid, I'd read comments from a loser like Walter Sobchak ripping into someone, and I'd assume Walter has a point.

Now when he says I have small arms, it's not the insult what offends me, it's that he's putting misinformation out there that WILL mislead people. And the fact that he's a fat, weak piece of shit makes the comments annoying.

Here's a correct statement:

"Matt, your arms are in the top 5% of muscular arms in North America, but your delts overpower them."

I literally can't bear to read blatant misinformation. My arms, as flawed as they are, are still going to be the most muscular arms in 90% or rooms I enter.

It's not so much that I'm in great shape - it's that most people are FAT AS FUCK, AND COMPLETELY OUT OF SHAPE.

That's why I'm asking what piece of feces to post his pictures or videos online. Confirm to everyone he's addressing someone who is stronger than him, and calling someone weak who is stronger than him.

Anyway, here's a quick Masterclass in posting brevity - two questions - one sentence each

I can't call out that phaggot Walter Sobchak, and remind everyone that he can't bench press 225, if my goal is to be brief.

Q1:  Are you saying you've sent a picture of your erect penis to Primemuscle?

Yep! And a cumshot video where I shot 8-10 thick ropes, Peter North-style.

I guess there are a lot of bald, fat, acne-covered geezers on here.

On some level, they know that attracting women only comes down to money and looks.

They know there is nothing they can do to get my hairline. I'm talking about Walter Sobchak.

Fuck, I'd be furious if I was bald.

Q2:  If you're going to block a dude, why ask them what they posted?

Everyone here contributes positively to the board. ChristopherA generally has quality posts. He's a bit of an asshole to me lately, and not making actual arguments, but usually he makes posts worth reading.

SF1900 - whatever you say about him, he doesn't lie. So I know when he says his natural arms are better than my juiced arms, that he's telling the truth.

But Walter Sobchak - I warm up with this clown's workout. 🤡

I have a mathematics degree, which is apparently easier to get because it's from Lakehead?  ??? Last I checked, a math degree at a Canadian university is going to be harder than an MBA from Harvard. It's MATH, after all.

Walter Sobchak also can't post using his real name, because the loser has to work a 9 to 5 to pay the bills, lol.

So he's jealous that I have a full head of hair, I'm stronger than him, I don't need to submit to my bitch boss daily, and I'm not in the closet on topics like he is. So he makes up ridiculous nonsense about me being weak, etc.

Ok then Walter - dumb phaggot - go pick any topic and I'll beat you at it RIGHT NOW.

LOL, as if you look better than I do here.

Walter Sobchak - do you think if you set up a Tinder profile with your picture versus mine that yours would get as many connections as mine?

LMAO.

Let's try that to see!

OF COURSE you know more women are into me than you. Dumb phaggot. More gay men would be too, and you know that.

Sucks to be fat and bald. But hey - at least you can cut the fat!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 24, 2022, 06:29:21 AM
I sent the proof to Primemuscle, but he has refrained from confirming my measurements for me!

Are you concerned that prime has not confirmed the length of your penis because you don't measure up?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 24, 2022, 08:06:20 AM
the next day telling me I look like Superman........ and another person say you look like Superman.

It's probably because 2 or the last 3 actors who played Superman had hook noses and crows feet like you.

(https://i0.wp.com/www.supermanhomepage.com/clickandbuilds/SupermanHomepage/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Hoechlin-Routh-Crisis.jpg?resize=640%2C479&ssl=1)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 24, 2022, 08:09:01 AM
Looking good Matt, arms and shoulders especially. Low dose works well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on July 24, 2022, 09:35:20 AM
You should have sent your cock pics to Vince Goodrum
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 24, 2022, 09:46:15 AM
Girls and sons who have not been loved by their fathers seek attention once teens and adults to compensate for what they didn't have originally. Fathers either left them alone, or were distant most of the time and not encouraging them.

Also boys who got picked on by others during childhood and adolescence -often sons without a father figure- try to compensate by lifting weights, to develop muscles and survive in the male world.
They're insecure because they're girly, childish, feminine having been raised by a single mom.
They lift obsessively hoping it will transform them into men, to compensate for their lack of influence from a father figure that was not there. Unfortunately they can get as big as they can it doesn't cure their insecurity and who they truly are, how they grew up being raised by a single mom. They re no as manly as other men whatever they do, and they often have a big lack of masculine presence they dont know how to balance, hence often being borderline homosexuals while trying to get their manhood back through various manly activities (mma, cars, weight lifting etc).

They are often the ones that, in order to get respect from other males will go the steroids route to get even "bigger" attempting to cure their insecurity , but being natural not being "enough", they still feel "too small", insecure, amongst other males. The lack of a father figure also often means they didn't have guidance to continue studies and are often working shitty manual jobs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 24, 2022, 10:11:54 AM
Matt, what are you talking about? I don’t even talk politics or vote.

Sign off and go spend time with your kids.

When I read Matt's post, I wondered the same thing. I've never seen you mention party affiliation or discussed politics here. That's something a lot of folks including me should take note of. It might end some of the arguments and name calling that goes on every day. There are several people who assume what others think politically. You know what they say about assuming...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 24, 2022, 10:38:34 AM

The thing is - the welfare of the USA matters more to me than Canada's. If the USA goes down, what do you think will happen to Canada?

That's why I want the USA to stay a free country.


When my wife and I moved to Williams Lake, BC with our son in the early 70's the Canadians I met were equally interested in U.S. and U.K. politics. Canadian media portrayed the U.S. in a much harsher light than we did ourselves. Likewise, some of the populous did so as well. Both my wife and I found this quite interesting and somewhat amusing.

Today the world economy impacts everyone more so than ever. To some extent, whatever happens anywhere in the world has an affect on other countries. Case in point, Russia’s attack on the Ukraine has raised gas prices worldwide, including the U.S. because in March the U.S. banned Russian gas and oil imports. The European Union has done or is doing the same. The rise in the price of gas and oil affects all economic activity reliant on hydrocarbons. Stock markets also sank. So, just about every aspect of the world’s economy suffers.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 24, 2022, 10:42:33 AM
When my wife and I moved to Williams Lake, BC with our son in the early 70's the Canadians I met were equally interested in U.S. and U.K. politics. Canadian media portrayed the U.S. in a much harsher light than we did ourselves. Likewise, some of the populous did so as well. Both my wife and I found this quite interesting and somewhat amusing.

Today the world economy impacts everyone more so than ever. To some extent, whatever happens anywhere in the world has an affect on other countries. Case in point, Russia’s attack on the Ukraine has raised gas prices worldwide, including the U.S. because in March the U.S. banned Russian gas and oil imports. The European Union has done or is doing the same. The rise in the price of gas and oil affects all economic activity reliant on hydrocarbons. Stock markets also sank. So, just about every aspect of the world’s economy suffers.

Yes yes, deglobalisation etc etc. We know. Now let's get to the serious topic.

I sent the proof to Primemuscle, but he has refrained from confirming my measurements for me!

I have no problem admitting I have a tiny 1/2 Mark Dugdale nub of a flaccid penis. But who gives a FUCK about flaccid size when it grows to a good size, and I drop loads like Peter North?


So is Matt C. Primemuscle approved?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 24, 2022, 10:51:25 AM
When I read Matt's post, I wondered the same thing. I've never seen you mention party affiliation or discussed politics here. That's something a lot of folks including me should take note of. It might end some of the arguments and name calling that goes on every day. There are several people who assume what others think politically. You know what they say about assuming...

Matt’s kind of an idiot.

I don’t talk about politics here or in my personal life. I’m simply not into politics.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 24, 2022, 11:00:30 AM
Matt, will there be more training videos in the future?




DVDs??
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on July 24, 2022, 11:20:08 AM
When I read Matt's post, I wondered the same thing. I've never seen you mention party affiliation or discussed politics here. That's something a lot of folks including me should take note of. It might end some of the arguments and name calling that goes on every day. There are several people who assume what others think politically. You know what they say about assuming...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 24, 2022, 11:24:28 AM
Matt’s kind of an idiot.

I don’t talk about politics here or in my personal life. I’m simply not into politics.

The retard is bragging about steroid bloat, water retention, his lust for cock, and the approval of teenage boys.

What kind of moron goes on a steroid cycle and brags about 16-inch arms?

The same kind of Downs Syndrome baby who has math certificates from Lakehead University and is 40 years old with a wrestling coach. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

For fucks sake, it’s a beautiful Sunday afternoon and Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning just can’t get past how woefully inadequate he is in comparison to me. I almost feel guilty, then I remember he is a lying, racist, anti-Semite, bigot and I say fuck that shit…weird little stupid weak manlet.

The “Northwestern Ontario 225 bench press record”….Pffffffffffffffffft. What a fucking spastic little runt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 24, 2022, 11:30:55 AM
Matt

Hope you are well?  (Never can tell from your posts, you Canadian lunatic! :) ;D)

Anyway, here's a quick Masterclass in posting brevity - two questions - one sentence each

Q1:  Are you saying you've sent a picture of your erect penis to Primemuscle?

Q2:  If you're going to block a dude, why ask them what they posted?

He reads the posts with the 50-something gimmick accounts he’s running.

His entire life revolves around Getbig attention. He’s basically a 165 lb version of bhank.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 24, 2022, 11:54:39 AM
Matt, no matter how much anadrol you take, you will NEVER be Japanese! Therefore, you are NOT a Tanaka!!!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on July 24, 2022, 12:06:48 PM
The retard is bragging about steroid bloat, water retention, his lust for cock, and the approval of teenage boys.

What kind of moron goes on a steroid cycle and brags about 16-inch arms?

The same kind of Downs Syndrome baby who has math certificates from Lakehead University and is 40 years old with a wrestling coach. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

For fucks sake, it’s a beautiful Sunday afternoon and Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning just can’t get past how woefully inadequate he is in comparison to me. I almost feel guilty, then I remember he is a lying, racist, anti-Semite, bigot and I say fuck that shit…weird little stupid weak manlet.

The “Northwestern Ontario 225 bench press record”….Pffffffffffffffffft. What a fucking spastic little runt.

People like Matt and bhanks rely on getbig to fill their self esteem. It’s almost like their survival is dependent on the opinions of Getbiggers. It’s very odd.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on July 24, 2022, 12:08:19 PM
The retard is bragging about steroid bloat, water retention, his lust for cock, and the approval of teenage boys.

What kind of moron goes on a steroid cycle and brags about 16-inch arms?

The same kind of Downs Syndrome baby who has math certificates from Lakehead University and is 40 years old with a wrestling coach. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

For fucks sake, it’s a beautiful Sunday afternoon and Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning just can’t get past how woefully inadequate he is in comparison to me. I almost feel guilty, then I remember he is a lying, racist, anti-Semite, bigot and I say fuck that shit…weird little stupid weak manlet.

The “Northwestern Ontario 225 bench press record”….Pffffffffffffffffft. What a fucking spastic little runt.

LMFAO!!!

TOTAL DESTRUCTION!

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 24, 2022, 12:42:55 PM
I try to defend Matt as he doesn't fuck with me but he lost me when he started sending Gay Porn to Prime that is indefensible. Also most of his gains are due to the increased calories not 18mg of Anadrol. When you are starving yourself then you add food you will get bigger.  One way he could keep most of his gains would be to continue to eat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 24, 2022, 12:47:42 PM
I try to defend Matt as he doesn't fuck with me but he lost me when he started sending Gay Porn to Prime that is indefensible. Also most of his gains are due to the increased calories not 18mg of Anadrol. When you are starving yourself then you add food you will get bigger.  One way he could keep most of his gains would be to continue to eat.

 ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 24, 2022, 12:48:48 PM
I try to defend Matt as he doesn't fuck with me but he lost me when he started sending Gay Porn to Prime that is indefensible. Also most of his gains are due to the increased calories not 18mg of Anadrol. When you are starving yourself then you add food you will get bigger.  One way he could keep most of his gains would be to continue to eat.

Maybe you're a little upset/disappointed he didn't send it to you?

I feel he should have at least considered sending you it because like you said you watch out for him. You deserve better Bhanky. Fuck Matt!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 24, 2022, 12:49:10 PM
I try to defend Matt as he doesn't fuck with me but he lost me when he started sending Gay Porn to Prime that is indefensible. Also most of his gains are due to the increased calories not 18mg of Anadrol. When you are starving yourself then you add food you will get bigger.  One way he could keep most of his gains would be to continue to eat.
are you homophobic?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 24, 2022, 12:54:26 PM
When my wife and I moved to Williams Lake, BC with our son in the early 70's the Canadians I met were equally interested in U.S. and U.K. politics. Canadian media portrayed the U.S. in a much harsher light than we did ourselves. Likewise, some of the populous did so as well. Both my wife and I found this quite interesting and somewhat amusing.

Today the world economy impacts everyone more so than ever. To some extent, whatever happens anywhere in the world has an affect on other countries. Case in point, Russia’s attack on the Ukraine has raised gas prices worldwide, including the U.S. because in March the U.S. banned Russian gas and oil imports. The European Union has done or is doing the same. The rise in the price of gas and oil affects all economic activity reliant on hydrocarbons. Stock markets also sank. So, just about every aspect of the world’s economy suffers.


Did you move to Canada to avoid the draft?

Not judging.

You would have been mid 20s then.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 24, 2022, 12:55:37 PM
???

Matt has admitted to having a micropenis when flaccid. It basically completely retracts in when chilly.

However he also claims it's still normal size (just over 6") when erect and capable of firing huge pornstaresque loads.

He sent primemuscle a video of him erect and shooting loads for confirmation. Prime however has decided not to comment.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on July 24, 2022, 12:59:55 PM
Matt has admitted to having a micropenis when flaccid. It basically completely retracts in when chilly.

However he also claims it's still normal size (just over 6") when erect and capable of firing huge pornstaresque loads.

He sent primemuscle a video of him erect and shooting loads for confirmation. Prime however has decided not to comment.
I heard he sent one to Fortress as well. If Matt can squirt more than Peter North, he should do some porn. I can only imagine the shocked look on some poor woman's face.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 24, 2022, 01:12:29 PM
Maybe you're a little upset/disappointed he didn't send it to you?

I feel he should have at least considered sending you it because like you said you watch out for him. You deserve better Bhanky. Fuck Matt!

Hankins should see Matt's penis. Hankins being a manly-man that only occasionally enjoys posing in his fancy drawers, and sports where large violent men lay on top of each other, will be able to give us a "just the facts" idea of the 6.45" of Canadian fury.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 24, 2022, 01:18:26 PM
I heard he sent one to Fortress as well. If Matt can squirt more than Peter North, he should do some porn.

I've always squirted huge loads and if anything I'd say it's actually annoying. For like the first 5 years of my sex life I was actually apologising to girls whenever they'd make comments about it.

It was only when I started reading bodybuilding forums in the 00s that I found out that guys coveted huge loads (both producing and receiving  ;D)

Anyone wanting tips, well never wear fitted underwear, no hot baths. Zinc rich foods. Don't jerk off too much and during sex delay orgasm and you'll fire a bigger load when you do eventually finish. Asparagus does help too, but fuck that stinky piss.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 24, 2022, 01:18:46 PM
Hankins should see Matt's penis. Hankins being a manly-man that only occasionally enjoys posing in his fancy drawers, and sports where large violent men lay on top of each other, will be able to give us a "just the facts" idea of the 6.45" of Canadian fury.

Yeah…because there is nothing weird or creepy about Matt Canning sending an almost eighty year old man on Getbig a video of Matt Canning jerking off and dribbling a nut.

The only thing weirder than that is his mens size small Batman tank top.

Spastic little weirdo manlet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on July 24, 2022, 01:25:01 PM
Matt has admitted to having a micropenis when flaccid. It basically completely retracts in when chilly.

However he also claims it's still normal size (just over 6") when erect and capable of firing huge pornstaresque loads.

He sent primemuscle a video of him erect and shooting loads for confirmation. Prime however has decided not to comment.
  Was Prime not impressed, of very impressed? Did Prime send a video back? Can Matt do porn or would he get too nervous?  Just another Sunday on Getbig.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 24, 2022, 02:31:03 PM
  Was Prime not impressed, of very impressed? Did Prime send a video back? Can Matt do porn or would he get too nervous?  Just another Sunday on Getbig.

I don't know if prime confirmed that he received Matt's dick pics. Maybe they got sent to the wrong email address and he should resend?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 24, 2022, 02:36:14 PM
Prime and Matt have been lowkey feuding over covid for months, so it's strange that Matt would harass prime to watch his video.

Prime declined Matts offer and Matt sent it anyway. Matt might not realise it, but he actually just committed a #metoo type crime.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 24, 2022, 02:59:44 PM
Did you move to Canada to avoid the draft?

Not judging.

You would have been mid 20s then.

Good question because that is certainly what a lot of folks did. However, I did not. I was already deferred because I had/have asthma which when I was younger landed me in the emergency room several times. A severe asthma attack can be a life threatening event. I still use an Albuterol inhaler when needed.

Back then, I sported a full beard and I appeared how people pictured draft doggers to look. But then, the hippie look was in fashion.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 10:00:21 PM
Prime and Matt have been lowkey feuding over covid for months, so it's strange that Matt would harass prime to watch his video.

Prime declined Matts offer and Matt sent it anyway. Matt might not realise it, but he actually just committed a #metoo type crime.

Prime declined verifying the size and aesthetics of my bomb cock, and the robustness and tenacity of my ejaculations.

Prime refuses to confirm to Getbig that I shoot 8-10 long ropes, Peter North style, for each ejaculation.

I have a very stiff, aesthetic, and sizeable [enough] cock, and robust ejaculations. All packages on a tiny flaccid nub roughly 50% or even only 25% the size of Mark Dugdale's flaccid penis.

...

But seriously, I used to worry about a woman I'm with filming me during sex and uploading the video online...but why? I look ok naked - I wouldn't be embarrassed if that happened.

Prime REFUSES to verify the details of my cock and balls and load size...but he knows I'm reporting my stata honestly to the board.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 10:56:52 PM
I try to defend Matt as he doesn't fuck with me but he lost me when he started sending Gay Porn to Prime that is indefensible. Also most of his gains are due to the increased calories not 18mg of Anadrol. When you are starving yourself then you add food you will get bigger.  One way he could keep most of his gains would be to continue to eat.

I'm honestly shocked to read this, B. Hank.

Are you homophobic?

You never struck me as being homophobic in the least bit.

But here's the thing - you and I are similar in this sense: we both hate people called out on things that we either already proved, or could easily prove.

Why would anyone think you are on recreational drugs?

I literally can't stand people calling me out on lifts and things I have video evidence of.  ::) I find it especially annoying when the person trashing you, or I, or somebody else, is someone weaker than us or with a worse body - or both!

Honestly, B. Hank - you know I don't call you out on your physique because you probably have literally 50-lb more muscle than me.

Why would I call you out? I would just embarrass.

But whether someone is saying I can't deadlift 525, or saying my dick is small, I HATE when people say things like this when I can prove the truth!

Oh yeah - maybe I could only deadlift 465 tomorrow. But guaranteed if someone wanted me to get 525 or 545 - I could do it in 4-14 weeks.

There are morons on here who think I was 170-lb all these years because I wanted to be bigger, but failed, lol! That's what that piece of feces "Walter Sobchak" thinks. The dumb fuck thinks I would struggle to get bigger.

Reality: I purposely selected 170-lb body weight for good health.

Hence my bench press was only ever 315x8, as that was my plateau at 170.

Soon, I'll be bench pressing 315x15, and prove to everyone that I always could have gotten stronger if I wanted to, and it will become clear that I purposely chose to be 170.

That loser Walter Sobchak thinks I'm working out like crazy, and struggling to gain mass. Meanwhile, I've repeatedly stated that I purposely stay at what weight for good health.

What a fucking illiterate loser he is

Good news - I'm almost 205 already, and will be over 210 for sure, especially if I use the Sustanon.

Some of this is muscle memory, granted.

But for that stupid fuck to think I wanted to be heavier. I *never* wanted to be heavier, because being light is healthy.

And now I'm responding much like a person who pulled back from going up in body weight - that's why I'm responding so well. DUH, I WAS ALWAYS DRUG-FREE AND ON ULTRA LOW CALORIES.

Of course we'd expect my body weight and strength to vault forward! I was so restricted for years, that my current cycle results on barely any gear is EXACTLY what should be expected of a man in my shoes.

FYI, I am going to read some of that illiterate delusional loser Walter Sobchak's posts. I guarantee it will be full of statements I've already explained a dozen times.

Walter Sobchak doesn't read too well. What a fucking loser.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 11:03:08 PM
  Was Prime not impressed, of very impressed? Did Prime send a video back? Can Matt do porn or would he get too nervous?  Just another Sunday on Getbig.

I don't think Prime would mind my saying this - but he said his dick is bigger than mine.

I just wanted confirmation that Mark Dugdale-esque pinky nail sized cocks are capable of growing to a size sufficient to get women off multiple times in a row.

While on this topic, sort of:

The woman I was with last week squirted on me.

I swear it was pee. No way did she shoot out a load-sized batch of female cum.

Are these female squirters just peeing and deluding themselves? A friend of mine had the same experience. He swore it was pee too.

keanu, have you had this experience with so-called female "squirters"?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 11:18:46 PM
I'm going to click the option to read some of the deplorable posts by that deplorable phaggot Walter Sobchak.

 :-X :-X :-X

Just to remind him that I'm stronger than him at every lift.

I'll report any post he makes where he trashes anyone's family [be it mine, or the family of ANY Getbigger]. But if that loser Walter Sobchak is just trashing me personally, I have no problem with that, but I will refute his points, and remind him he is much weaker than me, despite the fact he most likely weighs more than I do [he's most likely obese, like deceased Getbig keyboard warrior Sarcasm was].

I didn't take any good biceps photos today, unfortunately. I forgot that close-ups are better for front double biceps poses, as they are a smaller muscle. I had the photos taken from the same distance as I had my back double biceps pictures taken, and they did not turn out so well, IMO.

My biceps are about at the even 16" mark while cold/flexed, and just a pussy hair under 17" when pumped/flexed. The Anadrol makes the pumps last a LOT longer!

It would be nice to bring both of those measurements up an inch! But I'm realistic. If I could hit 16.5" cold/flexed, I'd be happy. But I'll shoot for 17".

SF1900 has very good arms for a natural - most men with arms as big as SF1900's are on juice. So fair play to him - he has good genetics for arms. I myself have a short biceps muscle belly which attaches ~1.5" from my elbow joint...so what can I do?  :-\ :( :-Eshi

My triceps grow pretty well though - and my forearms are getting bigger on Anadrol, and I'm not even training them, LOL.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 24, 2022, 11:54:13 PM
I try to defend Matt as he doesn't fuck with me but he lost me when he started sending Gay Porn to Prime that is indefensible. Also most of his gains are due to the increased calories not 18mg of Anadrol. When you are starving yourself then you add food you will get bigger.  One way he could keep most of his gains would be to continue to eat.

B. Hank - you know I would never disrespect you on here because unlike some people, I know who has a better physique than me [more muscle mass + better conditioning], and I know when someone has a current top five physique on the board!

I'm very mindful of where people are on hierarchies, and I don't understand why some people trash other people who have better physiques than they do.

How does it make sense to trash someone who looks better than me? Lol.

If I was merely recommending a sunless tanning spray or a lifting belt or something, that would be one thing - but I literally can't stand when people who I'm stronger than rip into me.

Regarding the dick picture, I know I have a tiny nub for a flaccid penis, about the length of a pop bottle lid - but it grows much larger, and I hate people claiming I hate a small cock. Especially when it's partially true - as I do have a small flaccid cock.

There's no claim I make that I can't prove, and I just want to prove anything I claim. And I hate any claims about me being out there that aren't true.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 12:36:20 AM
The retard is bragging about steroid bloat, water retention, his lust for cock, and the approval of teenage boys.

You are the only alleged straight person I know who thinks gay people are in the closet. I don't think any straight person would ever think a gay person would feel the need to be in the closet in 2022.

I only ever knew two people who were in the closet due to fear - one bisexual woman from my city, and one gay guy from a small community called Hornepayne.

Years of being told by the gay community that gays are hated made him stay in the closet until age *34*.

Do you know what happened when he finally came out?

NOTHING.

Nobody cares, because NOBODY DOES CARE.

Basically, he met the other gay guys in his small community, and the heterosexuals didn't care at all.

Only a closet homosexual would think a person would be in the closet. If you were straight, you would know that it's asinine to suggest a gay person needs to be in the closet in 2022. If you were gay and out, you'd also know that no one cares if you are gay and out.

Again - NO STRAIGHT PERSON thinks gay people live in fear of coming out of the closet. Only a closeted gay, brainwashed by the LGBT community to think straight people hate them would think anyone benefits from being in the closet.

I would benefit slightly by being a member of the LGBT community, as I would think be a "politically identifiable marginalized group".

Although lately gay men have been thrown under the bus lately, and I don't think being a gay man has much of such benefit anymore.

But why in the FUCK would you think I would give two fucking shits about who is gay, or if I am gay? NOBODY CARES.

Just like more or less no one cared when Vince Goodrum announced he was gay.

You think I'd hide a part of my identity? Huh? WHY?

Do you think I care about social stigma? LOL!!! Why would I care?

The only Getbigger who is anti-homosexual in a nasty way is you - probably because you are jealous of other gays for being out.

Other people may have issues with the LGBT community, but that's probably due to politics. I regard anti-homosexual slurs written to Primemuscle to be anti-Prime comments, not anti-gay comments.

I resent you claiming I am in the closet. It's not the gay part that offends me - but your suggestion that I would hide ANY aspect of who I am, or what I say.

Stop projecting your insecurity that requires you to live a closeted life. I don't live like you. I don't hide any aspect of my identity, like you do.

What kind of moron goes on a steroid cycle and brags about 16-inch arms?

This one's pretty close - my arms are about 16.7", so they are up about an inch for sure.

My arms look better than yours. They are most likely bigger. Even if you have 18" arms, once you take away your excessive body fat, your arms would be smaller than mine.

I hope I can get my pumped/flexed biceps up to at least 17.5". I don't see why I can't do that.

Do you think most people on steroids have 18" arms?

LOL.

There's nobody at either gym I train at who has a more muscular physique than me [combination of size and leanness].

You think rafts of people have lean and muscular physiques...this is just not true.

The same kind of Downs Syndrome baby who has math certificates from Lakehead University and is 40 years old with a wrestling coach. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I have numerous math awards from national math contests, which were *held* at Lakehead University.

What's wrong with winning math contests?

You strike as someone who didn't compete much growing up.

I competed at quite a few things, and generally did pretty well.

What's wrong with that?

I went to Lakehead because it's in my city. Again, what's wrong with that?

For fucks sake, it’s a beautiful Sunday afternoon and Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning just can’t get past how woefully inadequate he is in comparison to me. I almost feel guilty, then I remember he is a lying, racist, anti-Semite, bigot and I say fuck that shit…weird little stupid weak manlet.

Racist bigot? So it's ok for you to call eminent bodybuilding industry insider and classic Getbigger Vince Goodrum racial epithets, but if I speak honestly about Black crime, that makes me the bigot? What's the difference? One difference is that I would NEVER racially disparage one of Getbig's most glorious sons, Getbig's own Vince Goodrum, OG. How dare you insult Vince?

Are you just jealous that Vince is out of the closet?

Lying? Excuse me?

This is where you shoot your credibility. I back up ALL my claims.

Phantom Spunker said I didn't train with the JTF-2, but I did. Yes, it was out for two months - but that's the longest any Canadian Army reservist would be doing that for.

So what should I say?: "I was geographically tasked alongside members of the JTF-2, and assigned the same military duties in May and June of 2002, in preparation for the G8 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta."

...or I could say I trained with them, because I did, and I was commended for it.

Sorry, I disagree with Phantom Spunker on this one.

I never claimed to do JTF-2 training as a full-time career. Did I train and serve alongside them during the G8 Summit in 2002? Absolutely!

I will prove ANY claim I make.

Now, how about you prove how weak I allegedly am by posting videos where you out-lift me?

The “Northwestern Ontario 225 bench press record”….Pffffffffffffffffft. What a fucking spastic little runt.

Yeah, and it's held by a man who won Ontario's Strongest Man twice, and was #6 in Canada before, and who competed in North America's Strongest Man [placed as high as #6 in 2013, and then #4 in 2014], and is a man who has deadlifted over 800-lb before:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke_Skaarup



And he beat me by five reps, but I think I can tie the record. I should be able to beat this four weeks from today:



Had I been training specifically to beat this lift, I'd likely already be there. But I've been training exclusively for hypertrophy since starting this cycle.

And to be fair, it's probably the ONTARIO record.

I love how you find a way to downplay the fact that I bench presses 225 for 25 reps, at 170, and the man with the record was one of the best strength athletes from Ontario, and he outweighed me by over 100-lb at the time, lol.

Will you be beating my personal best lift of 225x25 on the bench, Walter Sobchak?

I'll be hitting it for 30 reps next month.

Can you even bench press 315?

I'll be doing 315x15 next month also.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 12:57:19 AM
So what do you call training and working with an army group for two months?

I can't claim to have "trained" with the JTF-2 during my time in the reserves?

Just to be clear here, as long as I add "Army reserves" to the conversation, I think that's fair.

I'm not trying to be disingenuous, nor am I claiming to have trained with the JTF-2 full-time or anything.

But FYI - every claim I make is verifiable by public record.

The same kind of Downs Syndrome baby who has math certificates from Lakehead University

What's wrong with entering a national math contest that happenw to be held at Lakehead University?

So if a person does well or even wins a high level math contest held at Lakehead University, it doesn't count, just because it's held at the university?

and is 40 years old with a wrestling coach. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I am experienced enough in wrestling that I need to train with someone who can offer me some resistance. There is a good 77kg wrestler in town, but he's been too busy to train with me since recently having a kid.

Ronald is - IMO - the best combat sportsman in Thunder Bay:



He actually wrestled Kory Jarvis, who placed 8th in the world in 2016, at the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Korey placed 7th in the world at the World Championships in Paris in 2017.

Ronald and Korey wrestling:



You can forgive me for saying this - but when you grapple a little with an athlete of the caliber of Ronnie, you aren't afraid of Getbiggers hiding behind keyboards, like "Walter Sobchak".

Walter Sobchak: unless you weight 280 or more, I wouldn't think twice about having this conversation with you in person.

Maybe you should try to replicate any of my lifts at 270, way over my 170 when I lifted them.

You will find that they aren't easy, and maybe you will stop underestimating me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 01:25:23 AM
The “Northwestern Ontario 225 bench press record”….Pffffffffffffffffft. What a fucking spastic little runt.

And the record holder was Ontario's Strongest Man that same year:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke_Skaarup

225x30 is a pretty damn good lift. He hit it at 285.

IMO, I should be able to do it at 185-lb.

It would be cool to tie that record, but do it while weighing 100-lb less!

But why do you call me a runt? You understand I maintain my weight where it is for *health*, right?

Don't get me wrong, I do prefer my current look at over 200-lb...but health is my main priority.

You actually thought I weigh what I do because I'm struggling to bulk up, rather than that I do it purposely, to maintain good health?

So all this time, you thought I was struggling to put on size?

I'll put this way: expect me to make as many gains as you can from one cycle. Because my receptors are super fresh, and I have been eating so little for so many years

When I put on 30+ pounds in total, maybe you will be forced to acknowledge that I selected this look on purpose.

When I gain 30+ pounds, you will have to acknowledge that I was telling the truth about holding back in calories, and almost never running gear.

You like to believe I'm this size because I'm trying so hard, yet can't get over 170.

In reality, I could have been 220+ all these years.

FYI - be prepared to see me hit these lifts for bench press:

225x30.
250x20.
315x15.

When I hit those lifts, good luck telling yourself that I've been maximizing my training all these years, lol. I've been minimizing it.

You'll have to acknowledge that once I bench 315x15.

Walter Sobchak: you cant even bench press 315 for a single.

When I get it for 15, you will know that I purposely held back from getting bigger and stronger all these years.

You like pretending I suck, because focusing on me is easier than acknowledging you are less genetically inclined than I am for muscle and strength.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 01:29:08 AM
He reads the posts with the 50-something gimmick accounts he’s running.

His entire life revolves around Getbig attention. He’s basically a 165 lb version of bhank.

You mean my "Matt C" gimmick account?

You make it sound like I was pretending to be someone I wasn't.

I only ever had one gimmick, and it was so I didn't have to log in on public devices, with a password I use for some important stuff too [or used to use].

OneMoreRep would be welcome to check through IP addresses - I NEVER hide my IP when running gimmicks.

That said, thank you for posting this shot [it's a pandemic picture when I shrunk to 160-lb on purpose]:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382992;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)

But great shot! It shows that steroids are just the finishing touch, LOL.

Though the best comparison to the most recent back shot above is this picture:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382927;image)

^ I'll go check what my weight was there.

IMO, I could never make gains this quickly naturally. Though some of it is muscle memory, which has helped me, in addition to the water.

Strength is way up, and I'm not even training for strength, lol!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 01:56:49 AM
People like Matt and bhanks rely on getbig to fill their self esteem. It’s almost like their survival is dependent on the opinions of Getbiggers. It’s very odd.

You're in the general ballpark, but over the past four years, I had an awful relationship to get over.

Then the pandemic bullshit.

So right now - and I have no shame in saying this - I'm getting a big kick out of the people stopping to look at me, or the ones I catch slowing down when they are driving to look at my physique.

The way I see it, if one person has the courage to come up and ask me [a random stranger] about training, there are probably 10+ more who wanted to ask me, but didn't.

It's cool to think of it that way.

And like I said - I'll be honest and say I have no problem saying I appreciate those compliments right now, after four bad years.

Do I need attention from GETBIGGERS though?

Not attention...but I admit, I can't stand when I post evidence for something, and someone doesn't acknowledge it.

Honestly, SF1900 - when I bench 315x15 next month, Walter Sobchak still won't acknowledge my strength. Meanwhile, he can't even bench 315x1.

I warm up with his workout. But he won't admit it. And even goes out of the way to disparage me.

That's what I respect about your posts, SF1900. We both know you have better arms than me, and you don't need to state the obvious over and over.

We both know you have any the better arms/genetics.

Personally, I don't trash people if they have better genetics than me. Constructive comments I can handle...but Walter Sobchak isn't constructive - he is rude, even though he knows I can out-lift his top lifts.

I just don't get why he's so negative to people.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 01:59:48 AM
He reads the posts with the 50-something gimmick accounts he’s running.

Why are you being mean to me?

His entire life revolves around Getbig attention. He’s basically a 165 lb version of bhank.

Why are you saying mean things to me?

Any answers?

Why be mean to me for no reason?

Also, out of curiosity, do you think you would look better than I do looking as I do below?:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382912;image)

Let's be honest - if you and I walked by a restaurant with a group of girls having drinks outside, and I broke the ice the speak with them, I'd be getting 2-3x the attention you would be getting. Despite being a "manlet" or a "runt", or whatever.

On some level, you are aware that being more facially handsome, and having a lean muscular physique, basically count more to getting laid than anything else [aside from money].

You know full well that it doesn't matter that I've been a mental wreck for four years - we both know you are bald and overweight, Walter Sobchak.

On some level, you know good hair and a good physique matters more than any nice car or nice clothes you could bring to the date.

And that angers you.

Women will be more attracted to me even if I was going to the psychiatric ward 5x a week than they would be to you even if you had everything else together in your life, simply because you are bald.

I know you hate that.

In fact, as I'm getting better now, one thing I'm saying to myself is "At least I have my hair."

But you don't.

And at your age, you probably can't get rid of your stomach fat very easily.

But again - look at that picture.  You say my arms suck, but they are better than yours in that picture.

Ultimately, it would take me one weekend to fix my wardrobe, buy better shoes, etc.

But how can you fix your hair, your weight problem, etc?

Think about how long it would take for you to even get to my body fat percentage - probably a decade.

Also, you call me a manlet - do you think being 6'3" and ugly is better than being 5'9" and handsome?

It's better to have a good face.

Walter Sobchak - if it bothers you, why not get some plastic surgery or something?

My doctor told me I could get something called "Coolsculpting"!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Phantom Spunker on July 25, 2022, 03:06:46 AM
So what do you call training and working with an army group for two months?

I can't claim to have "trained" with the JTF-2 during my time in the reserves?

Just to be clear here, as long as I add "Army reserves" to the conversation, I think that's fair.

I'm not trying to be disingenuous, nor am I claiming to have trained with the JTF-2 full-time or anything.

But FYI - every claim I make is verifiable by public record.


Matt, my point is that it should be beneath you to even mention such a thing. It comes across as an attempt to live vicariously through the achievements of others and that’s not conduct befitting an honest, confident man. The reason being, it’s a non-achievement yet you constantly bring it up. It’s a statement so insignificant that any ex-serviceman would dismiss it immediately with an eye-roll and shake of their head. However, to the uninformed, it probably sounds like you are in some way connected to the JTF-2 guys, and have maybe done similar things, and pushed yourself to similar limits. You haven’t.

So many people go around claiming they were ‘trained’ by such-and-such a unit, or they ‘worked with’ them, and it gets misconstrued. Most of the time these people say it to girls in bars to try and impress them, but these ridiculous claims often end up in the media, too, and usually when it’s negative press where some pathetic specimen has shamed themselves publicly. See, for example, Dan Bilzerian claiming to be an ex-SEAL to help market himself. It’s disingenuous and embarrassing.

Op Grizzly was in Canada, and involved all of the Canadian forces along with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Why aren’t you telling everyone that you worked alongside the Mounties for thirty days? Lol. Because it sounds gay as fuck. Sounds cooler to imply you were some sort of door-kicker with JTF-2, even though those guys were busy fighting actual wars. The Joint Task Force formed to assist in the conduct of the G8 Summit was something completely different. It referred to joint RCMP and Canadian forces planning - not anything to do with JTF-2.

http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/vo4/no4/operatio-eng.asp
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 25, 2022, 03:12:20 AM
(http://i.postimg.cc/tJmrYHk4/giphy.gif)

Guess my 'brevity masterclass' lacked impact!

Oh well, Matt's gonna Matt ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 25, 2022, 03:16:06 AM

-snip-


Oops!  An accident of timing means I need to point out I wasn't referencing your post there, Spunk, I was referencing Matt's Book of Revelations, Chapters i to xvii above


PS - What colour is the boathouse at Hereford..? ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 03:32:48 AM
Matt, my point is that it should be beneath you to even mention such a thing. It comes across as an attempt to live vicariously through the achievements of others and that’s not conduct befitting an honest, confident man. The reason being, it’s a non-achievement yet you constantly bring it up. It’s a statement so insignificant that any ex-serviceman would dismiss it immediately with an eye-roll and shake of their head. However, to the uninformed, it probably sounds like you are in some way connected to the JTF-2 guys, and have maybe done similar things, and pushed yourself to similar limits. You haven’t.

Right - we want to use proper terminology.

I don't care to call myself a "Strongman". IMO, one can use what term it they have qualified to compete in the provincials in the open class [min. 585 deadlift, 250 push press].

I was not super far off from either or these.

Now given how I feel on gear, I am 100% certain I could have competed at OSM, on gear. Maybe gotten last - I'm just saying I would have qualified.

So I make it a point to say I am a LIGHTWEIGHT Strongman.

Or a u-80kg Strongman.

Or "I compete in the lightweight / 80kg division."

I think to the general public, a guy benching 250x20 in the gym like me [bounced reps] is still strong. But nothing like a 380-ln guy who is 6'8".

Regarding the JTF-2 guys - as a reservist, I was never inundated with training like they were, but I always maintained a very high fitness level.

I think this cycle will help show Getbig I am a wee bit of a specimen.

I  am aiming for what 315x15 bench press.

Though my max ever was 315x8.

Give me a reason not to, Phantom.

If odds of tearing a pec are high...I can cancel this goal.

I'm feeling very strong though.

Benching 245x19 was easy though, lol.

I'm really mentally feeling that 315x15. But time will tell.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 04:15:20 AM
(http://i.postimg.cc/tJmrYHk4/giphy.gif)

Guess my 'brevity masterclass' lacked impact!

Oh well, Matt's gonna Matt ;D

Please just ignore all of my posts. HOWEVER, do not ignore this one:

"Walter Sobchak" is a phaggot, with a PH, which means annoying - not gay, or homosexual.

He's an absolute phaggot. And an absolute unit. A unit or a phaggot. Dumb phaggot.

Honestly, my issue is that he calls me weak, and trashes my lifts, but meanwhile, he bench presses 135x8 in the gym, and curls the pink dumbbells. Walter Sobchak is perhaps the weakest Getbigger, yet bashes my lifts? How would you feel if some phaggot whose personal best leg press is pushing the sled for an exhausting set of 12 reps before requiring a 2-hour nap was calling you weak, and a f aggot. And I mean, an actual f aggot.

Is he gay? Maybe. I find it hard to believe that any straight man would think being out and gay would be a difficult thing.

Only a gay guy, told all his life that being gay will cause you to be oppressed, would think being out is hard.

I don't know one straight guy who would worry about being gay, if they were.

Also, I don't know any straight guy who constantly calls people homosexuals - ever. He could argue I'm doing that. THE DIFFERENCE IS, I DID SO AFTER BEING ATTACKED. OTHERWISE, GO BACK 18 YEARS, AND I NEVER BRING UP GAY TOPICS.

I'm bringing it up now because that prick repeatedly calls me gay. In just defending myself.

Otherwise, I NEVER bring up gay shit.

Meanwhile, Walter Sobchak talks about homosexuality about every other post - and HE brings it up!

But back to my point - Walter Sobchak continually rips into me HARD - WHILE BEING WEAKER THAN ME

Who the fuck wants someone BELOW their level, bashing them?

His comments are nasty. If he did a form check, and gave me constructive advice, then fine.

Take SF1900 - I respect anyone who has built up 17"+ arms naturally. I can't pretend I'm not impressed.

If Walter Sobchak is so much stronger than me, he can let the results speak for themselves. This is why I don't believe Walter. I believe he is:

- Fat.
- Bald.
- Weak.
- Ugly.

My point is, I just can't stand men weaker than me, also trashing me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 04:20:12 AM
Phantom Spunker,

Please review it?

I've gone from 183 to 204 so far.

Now I am kind of eager to really do this.

What health checks should I take? Any supplements like milk thistle that I should take, just to be sure?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382927;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)

^ I'd like to run enough sauce to make the After picture look like the Before picture, LOL!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 04:36:45 AM
Some photos from just before the cycle started, compared to yesterday's updated biceps photos.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 04:38:37 AM
This one seems to show a clear positive outcome:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1383052;image)

This one is just showing that my training /diet/gear has been working:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 25, 2022, 04:45:23 AM
Please just ignore all of my posts. HOWEVER, do not ignore this one:

"Walter Sobchak" is a phaggot, with a PH, which means annoying - not gay, or homosexual.

He's an absolute phaggot. And an absolute unit. A unit or a phaggot. Dumb phaggot.

Honestly, my issue is that he calls me weak, and trashes my lifts, but meanwhile, he bench presses 135x8 in the gym, and curls the pink dumbbells. Walter Sobchak is perhaps the weakest Getbigger, yet bashes my lifts? How would you feel if some phaggot whose personal best leg press is pushing the sled for an exhausting set of 12 reps before requiring a 2-hour nap was calling you weak, and a f aggot. And I mean, an actual f aggot.


Honest answer?  I couldn't care less - and if the insult was funny, I'm going to laugh too - I'm guessing you might struggle to compute that?  The idea of just rolling with it, rather than "defending" yourself (on a message board, oh brother)

A couple of posts back you asked Walter:  "Why are you saying mean things to me?  Any answers?  Why be mean to me for no reason?"

I can't answer for Walter, but for me, the answer to questions like that is "because it's funny"

Simple as that




You cunt ;D



Be well Matt :)

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 25, 2022, 04:46:58 AM
(http://i.postimg.cc/tJmrYHk4/giphy.gif)

Guess my 'brevity masterclass' lacked impact!

Oh well, Matt's gonna Matt ;D
I hereby crown Matt as the Iron Games new "Ramblin` Freak" .....move over Gregg Valentino you have been dethroned.............Ma tt can fucking ramble on like no other !!  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Phantom Spunker on July 25, 2022, 04:49:45 AM
Oops!  An accident of timing means I need to point out I wasn't referencing your post there, Spunk, I was referencing Matt's Book of Revelations, Chapters i to xvii above


PS - What colour is the boathouse at Hereford..? ;D

LOL no worries, man. I assumed that. I hear it's rainbow to reflect the UK's commitment to diversity and inclusion.

Phantom Spunker,

Please review it?

I've gone from 183 to 204 so far.

Now I am kind of eager to really do this.

What health checks should I take? Any supplements like milk thistle that I should take, just to be sure?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382927;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)

^ I'd like to run enough sauce to make the After picture look like the Before picture, LOL!

Fuck knows, Matt. I'm the wrong guy to ask when it comes to health-related stuff. The most radical change I've made recently is adding in fruit and veg to my diet and I've pretty much stopped that now because I can't be assed. My supplement regime is caffeine, codeine, and zolpidem. I just massively lucked out by having a young face and being lean. I'm probably likely to drop dead at any moment.  I see a clear difference in your photos, though. The Anadrol is definitely working.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 25, 2022, 04:50:41 AM
Matt, when you hit a double biceps pose,bend your fists downwards towards your front delts and close the arms more........ie. fists need to be much closer to the sides of your head, and they`d look much more impressive IMO.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 04:51:34 AM
Honest answer?  I couldn't care less - and if the insult was funny, I'm going to laugh too - I'm guessing you might struggle to compute that?  The idea of just rolling with it, rather than "defending" yourself (on a message board, oh brother)

A couple of posts back you asked Walter:  "Why are you saying mean things to me?  Any answers?  Why be mean to me for no reason?"

I can't answer for Walter, but for me, the answer to questions like that is "because it's funny"

Simple as that




You cunt ;D



Be well Matt :)

Please, everyone - stop reading my long stream of consciousness posts, UNLESS I am talking about that phaggot Walter Sobchak. In that case - please DO read the posts.

So anyway, I am impressed, Taffin.

Maybe I will unblock Walter Sobchak - that weak sack of absolute and complete shit - and read his posts, and they not to get angry at the phaggot. That little phaggot.

LOL, like Walter Sobchak looks better than me here:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382912;image)

Walter Sobchak is probably some 260-lb weak perma-bulker, who doesn't grasp what he looks like shit at 25% body fat, and multiple chain link tattoos up and down his arms.

He's too stupid to grasp that I maintained the physique that was getting me enough access to women.

These days perma-bulkers don't get that the look is not good.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 05:01:25 AM
Matt, when you hit a double biceps pose,bend your fists downwards towards your front delts and close the arms more........ie. fists need to be much closer to the sides of your head, and they`d look much more impressive IMO.

Thank you!!!

I'm posting so many comparisons here precisely because I did the pose wrong, and don't have any good ones, lol!

So now that I can use your instructions to pose properly, hopefully I'll get a proper front double biceps picture next time, and just post the one!

I was getting it all wrong, but I'll be consulting your tutorial next time, and get this pose done right then!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 25, 2022, 05:02:33 AM
No problem.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 25, 2022, 06:37:14 AM

LOL no worries, man. I assumed that. I hear it's rainbow to reflect the UK's commitment to diversity and inclusion.

LOL!   ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 25, 2022, 07:07:49 AM
"In reality, I could have been 220+ all these years."

Getting over 220 and getting over 200 are not the same thing. Let's see the 220+ update first before making the claim
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 25, 2022, 07:45:44 AM
"In reality, I could have been 220+ all these years."

Getting over 220 and getting over 200 are not the same thing. Let's see the 220+ update first before making the claim

Jesus, here comes "I have been 230 for that last year even with 500mgs test and Anadrol a week"

Drop the gear you will be 180 in 3 months
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 25, 2022, 07:47:25 AM
NAC and TUDCA are good to take when on Orals. (Liver)

For lipids, get yourself some real "Red Yeast Rice" not the fake USA stuff. Overseas they can sell it w/ 10 mg of Monacolin-K in it. (Natural Lovastatin).
  - Look for that (Monacolin-K).

If thick blood, a low-dose aspirin is good, maybe some IP6 or Nattokinase added.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 25, 2022, 07:51:01 AM
"In reality, I could have been 220+ all these years."

Getting over 220 and getting over 200 are not the same thing. Let's see the 220+ update first before making the claim

Hankins seething that 6 1/2 Matt has a better response to the bio identicals than he does. Canning, the mad jizz slinger of Thunder Bay, in route to out mass Bhank by the end of the year.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stan Diego on July 25, 2022, 08:09:43 AM
Matt, you should run that TV cable thats on the floor, behind the baseboard. It's distracting and it's a tripping hazard
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 08:16:03 AM
Hankins seething that 6 1/2 Matt has a better response to the bio identicals than he does. Canning, the mad jizz slinger of Thunder Bay, in route to out mass Bhank by the end of the year.

 ;D ;D ;D

My response has been pretty good, given I am on lower than what most would consider a lowest-dose beginner cycle.

As I said, ~17mg Anadrol daily.

I have not started the Sustanon [needle shortage in Ontario  ::) and I couldn't be bothered to drive to multiple pharmacies + the Anadrol was just fine on its own].

So I think today, I will be driving to see what's up - I will see if I can get 10+ needles/syringes. If they are still rationing five at a time, I may just say FUCK IT, yet again...and just stick to Anadrol for this cycle.

Some on here have said "You only gained water", which I'm sure is the majority of my gains. That said, it is not ALL water. For starters, I wouldn't bench pressing 245x19 if it was all water.

Furthermore, I've been a lean 195 before, and has heavy as 213 [though, not remotely lean at 213], so this isn't new muscle.

I have been gaining so much muscle for as little as I've been using, because I had already earned that muscle.

This first 22-lb has been quite lean.

I think I'll strive to hit 215.

I feel that as long as I get my 160g protein per day target, every day, that I will hit 215, pretty clearly.

Though I so expect my waist to hit 34" by then.

My goal will be to keep it below what mark. I normally have a 35" waist if I hit 200-lb naturally. So if I could have a 33.5" waist at 215, I would be very pleased with that. It will be some evidence that my bulk wasn't so dirty.

I'm hitting my daily caloric targets...just need to be diligent about hitting my protein targets!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 25, 2022, 09:32:26 AM
Oh no…the waterlogged weak little manlet has been given a “Certificate of Special Achievement”!

Oh my, if that’s not the epitome of a Participation Trophy for feeble minded losers, what is?

Boy she sure showed us. That is one amazing accomplishment, her Mommy must be so proud. I’d definitely hang that on the wall of my office Mommy’s basement if I had something so illustrious and earth shattering.

Obviously I need to get a wrestling coach so I have a grown man to hug and rub up against in public.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 25, 2022, 10:18:45 AM
For the record, faggot is spelled with an "f"
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 25, 2022, 10:25:26 AM
Prime declined verifying the size and aesthetics of my bomb cock, and the robustness and tenacity of my ejaculations.

Prime refuses to confirm to Getbig that I shoot 8-10 long ropes, Peter North style, for each ejaculation.

I have a very stiff, aesthetic, and sizeable [enough] cock, and robust ejaculations. All packages on a tiny flaccid nub roughly 50% or even only 25% the size of Mark Dugdale's flaccid penis.

...

But seriously, I used to worry about a woman I'm with filming me during sex and uploading the video online...but why? I look ok naked - I wouldn't be embarrassed if that happened.

Prime REFUSES to verify the details of my cock and balls and load size...but he knows I'm reporting my stata honestly to the board.

Why are you specifically asking Prime to verify your cock when he has explicitly told you he isn't interested?

That's very weird Matty
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on July 25, 2022, 10:30:19 AM
Oh no…the waterlogged weak little manlet has been given a “Certificate of Special Achievement”!

Oh my, if that’s not the epitome of a Participation Trophy for feeble minded losers, what is?

Boy she sure showed us. That is one amazing accomplishment, her Mommy must be so proud. I’d definitely hang that on the wall of my office Mommy’s basement if I had something so illustrious and earth shattering.

Obviously I need to get a wrestling coach so I have a grown man to hug and rub up against in public.

LOL

What’s the deal with the wrestling coach?

That’s not normal.

🙁
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 25, 2022, 11:24:24 AM
LOL

What’s the deal with the wrestling coach?

That’s not normal.

🙁

(https://www.timesherald.com/wp-content/uploads/migration/2016/04/6ee51142360b27806642b56494d4f1a2.jpg?w=1200)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on July 25, 2022, 11:26:10 AM
(https://www.timesherald.com/wp-content/uploads/migration/2016/04/6ee51142360b27806642b56494d4f1a2.jpg?w=1200)

😆
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 25, 2022, 11:30:20 AM
tl;dr

You may as well skip this giant post, Taffin. I rant about that piece of shit Walter Sobchak on here.

But I'm doing great now - thanks for asking!


To be honest - thanks to this cycle - I'm doing absolutely fantastic! I didn't think I still had "it", but since going on the sauce, the compliments are more or less coming once per day. Be it a group of teens coming up to me, and one asking about my workouts, or another one the next day telling me I look like Superman. My friend's gay Black friend said that I look perfect. I fucked that 27-year-old blonde, about 26 days ago from today, IIRC. Then I fucked another woman this month.

I have literally been in hiding for a long time now, yet as soon as I got back to life, I've been reminded of how much attention muscle garners.

I purposely walk down a busy road in town, knowing I'll get messages out of the blue from someone saying they saw me, and how they thought I look great.

I'm basically purposely appearing more often in public, knowing people will see me, to get these comments and compliments. And I'm getting about one comment a day. But I also get a fair amount of cars honking, or people taking a prolonged look at me. It's pretty awesome!

But it takes some balls to go up to a 200-lb man and say something, so I wonder how many more people are thinking it.

And it's one thing to have someone smile at you - to have someone say you look perfect, and another person say you look like Superman. That's another matter.

And look at the dude I was sitting next to when I got that compliment:



^ This guy is 6'3" and 230-lb, and 13 years younger than me, yet the teen at the pool complimented me.

So I can't be THAT old yet...that I would get a compliment with a specimen like that sitting next to me? Here I was thinking I was way over the hill!

That's my wrestling coach. In real life, I'd have Walter Sobchak on the ground getting rapid-fire shots to the face so fast, the video would be legendary.

I've never trained striking, but my wrestling is outstanding. There's literally a 0% chance that any Getbig shit-talker would say anything to my face.

Would I disrespect OneMoreRep to his face? Absolutely not!!

First, because it's not nice, and second, because because OneMoreRep is a wrecking machine!!

Part of why I despise that stupid shit Walter Sobchak is for this reason. Look - I *know* I am well within the top 5% of most in-shape men. To suggest otherwise is to say 1 in 20 men are in better shape than me.

LOL!!!!!

Not a chance.

So why I resent that POS [one of many reasons] is because when I was a kid, I'd read comments from a loser like Walter Sobchak ripping into someone, and I'd assume Walter has a point.

Now when he says I have small arms, it's not the insult what offends me, it's that he's putting misinformation out there that WILL mislead people. And the fact that he's a fat, weak piece of shit makes the comments annoying.

Here's a correct statement:

"Matt, your arms are in the top 5% of muscular arms in North America, but your delts overpower them."

I literally can't bear to read blatant misinformation. My arms, as flawed as they are, are still going to be the most muscular arms in 90% or rooms I enter.

It's not so much that I'm in great shape - it's that most people are FAT AS FUCK, AND COMPLETELY OUT OF SHAPE.

That's why I'm asking what piece of feces to post his pictures or videos online. Confirm to everyone he's addressing someone who is stronger than him, and calling someone weak who is stronger than him.

I can't call out that phaggot Walter Sobchak, and remind everyone that he can't bench press 225, if my goal is to be brief.

Yep! And a cumshot video where I shot 8-10 thick ropes, Peter North-style.

I guess there are a lot of bald, fat, acne-covered geezers on here.

On some level, they know that attracting women only comes down to money and looks.

They know there is nothing they can do to get my hairline. I'm talking about Walter Sobchak.

Fuck, I'd be furious if I was bald.

Everyone here contributes positively to the board. ChristopherA generally has quality posts. He's a bit of an asshole to me lately, and not making actual arguments, but usually he makes posts worth reading.

SF1900 - whatever you say about him, he doesn't lie. So I know when he says his natural arms are better than my juiced arms, that he's telling the truth.

But Walter Sobchak - I warm up with this clown's workout. 🤡

I have a mathematics degree, which is apparently easier to get because it's from Lakehead?  ??? Last I checked, a math degree at a Canadian university is going to be harder than an MBA from Harvard. It's MATH, after all.

Walter Sobchak also can't post using his real name, because the loser has to work a 9 to 5 to pay the bills, lol.

So he's jealous that I have a full head of hair, I'm stronger than him, I don't need to submit to my bitch boss daily, and I'm not in the closet on topics like he is. So he makes up ridiculous nonsense about me being weak, etc.

Ok then Walter - dumb phaggot - go pick any topic and I'll beat you at it RIGHT NOW.

LOL, as if you look better than I do here.

Walter Sobchak - do you think if you set up a Tinder profile with your picture versus mine that yours would get as many connections as mine?

LMAO.

Let's try that to see!

OF COURSE you know more women are into me than you. Dumb phaggot. More gay men would be too, and you know that.

Sucks to be fat and bald. But hey - at least you can cut the fat!

Impressing teenAge boys
Compliments from gay black guys
Adult wrestling coach
Matt the Cock Connoisseur going to take me down and ground and pound me.   🤣
Lying about ketosis
More fake strength claims
Water bloat


Not sure what other stupidity is included in that verbose assemblage of keyboard diarrhea.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 25, 2022, 11:31:43 AM
For the record, faggot is spelled with an "f"

In this case it is obviously spelled “Matthew Canning.”
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 25, 2022, 11:48:33 AM
Oh no…the waterlogged weak little manlet has been given a “Certificate of Special Achievement”!

Oh my, if that’s not the epitome of a Participation Trophy for feeble minded losers, what is?

Boy she sure showed us. That is one amazing accomplishment, her Mommy must be so proud. I’d definitely hang that on the wall of my office Mommy’s basement if I had something so illustrious and earth shattering.

Obviously I need to get a wrestling coach so I have a grown man to hug and rub up against in public.

This one isn't displayed quite so prominently for some reason...

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 25, 2022, 11:54:38 AM
(https://www.timesherald.com/wp-content/uploads/migration/2016/04/6ee51142360b27806642b56494d4f1a2.jpg?w=1200)

That old guy actually shot and murdered the other guy
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 25, 2022, 12:57:12 PM
That old guy actually shot and murdered the other guy

bHanky are you available to be hired for private “adult wrestling coach” sessions?

Just a couple of sweaty fellas in singlets hugging it out on a soft surface?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 25, 2022, 01:47:39 PM
bHanky are you available to be hired for private “adult wrestling coach” sessions?

Just a couple of sweaty fellas in singlets hugging it out on a soft surface?

I don't play on the ground I throw slam and hurt people from the feet I would crush the vertebrae in your neck
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on July 25, 2022, 01:50:11 PM
Any credibility that Matt had here is GONE. Sending videos to Primehomo, filthy disgusting little man.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on July 25, 2022, 01:57:37 PM
I don't play on the ground I throw slam and hurt people from the feet I would crush the vertebrae in your neck

Isn’t it true you can barely walk?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 25, 2022, 02:35:27 PM
My doctor told me I could get something called "Coolsculpting"!

I am curious Matt, why did your doctor suggest CoolSculpting? Did you perhaps ask about it? What is your doctor’s practice? Is something that relates to cosmetic fat reduction?

If this is something you decide to do, go for it. It works. It is relatively inexpensive. The process only takes a couple of hours.  I know this because I had it done on my lower back and hip area. It takes a little while to fully see the results, but they seem to be permanent. No more love-handles! Yeah!


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 25, 2022, 02:36:40 PM
I don't play on the ground I throw slam and hurt people from the feet I would crush the vertebrae in your neck

No.

Not a chance in hell that is happening, cripple.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 25, 2022, 02:44:06 PM
I don't play on the ground I throw slam and hurt people from the feet I would crush the vertebrae in your neck

Now we know what happened to poor Mike! -

.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 25, 2022, 03:10:54 PM
That old guy actually shot and murdered the other guy

John Dupont's was a paranoid schizophrenic and believer in conspiracy theories. His defense was insanity. Although the Jury agreed that he was nuts he was found guilty of 3rd degree murder. He died in prison when he was 72 years old. He was the only member of the Forbes 400 richest Americans to be convicted of murder.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 25, 2022, 04:04:10 PM
Phantom Spunker,

Please review it?

I've gone from 183 to 204 so far.

Now I am kind of eager to really do this.

What health checks should I take? Any supplements like milk thistle that I should take, just to be sure?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382927;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)

^ I'd like to run enough sauce to make the After picture look like the Before picture, LOL!
Pretty impressive gains Matt. I wish you were really optimizing your cycle by running the sust too. You're responding awesome imo
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 25, 2022, 04:43:39 PM
Anyone know where Matt was last night? https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2022-07-25/canada-police-report-multiple-shootings-in-british-columbia
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 25, 2022, 04:46:34 PM
Pretty impressive gains Matt. I wish you were really optimizing your cycle by running the sust too. You're responding awesome imo

He really is, such a small dose of abombs and he’s getting great results. Low dose definitely the way to do it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 25, 2022, 04:49:07 PM
Phantom Spunker,

Please review it?

I've gone from 183 to 204 so far.

Now I am kind of eager to really do this.

What health checks should I take? Any supplements like milk thistle that I should take, just to be sure?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382927;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)

^ I'd like to run enough sauce to make the After picture look like the Before picture, LOL!

Big gains, Matty!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 10:24:49 PM
Big gains, Matty!

This cycle has been fantastic so far. Sucks that I'll just go back to how I used to look, after it's all said and done.

I could be 200...but my waist is typically around 35" at 200. It's only 32" right now.

I finally brought my calories up to ~2,000 daily.  ;D It's made a huge difference.

As I continue to gain weight, it takes a few days for my body to adjust. Given how well I've been adjusting after that period, I think I should be able to comfortably hit 215 on this cycle.

If nothing else, it's an impressive look in a tank top to the general public, apparently. I mean, I am almost 205-lb now at 5'9".

You can see the difference in size for me in these leg press videos, lifting more weight than that phaggot Walter Sobchak could ever dream of:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CdrOfeWAutO/

^ That was seven plates per side on the heaviest leg press machine I've ever used. I barely got a rep there, and my knee valgus was high. Meanwhile, I just got back from the gym, and I tried eight plates per side, and got four reps with minimal knee valgus:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cgdph3YAoHp/

Check out the difference in thickness in my delts and arms in this comparison - and aside from minimal Anadrol, all I am doing is eating 2,000 calories a day.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 25, 2022, 10:43:26 PM
^ LMAO @ the morons who downplay drugs. The ONLY thing I changed is adding ~17mg of daily Anadrol.

I haven't even STARTED the Sustanon.

I went up to ~2,000 calories a day, starting last week.

What's even the point of bodybuilding if you just go off gear and lose all your gains?  ??? What a waste!

The people I resent the most are the ass-clowns who have the AUDACITY to criticize my results KNOWING THEY ARE ON STEROIDS AND I AM [WAS, PREVIOUSLY] NOT.

Steroids make ALL the difference. How the FUCK can essentially some junkie talk to someone making less progress and talk about their routine? THESE FUCKING CLOWNS ON STEROIDS KNOW THAT TRAINING DOESN'T MEAN SHIT WHEN YOU USE.

...or maybe they don't. They are so used to training while on drugs they have NO IDEA how bad it is without them.

I legitimately bench press 315 for reps at 170 off drugs. FUCKING OBVIOUSLY I was a committed natural, and NOW as all the juiced assholes get to watch me bench press 315x15 on gear, they will have NO CHOICE but to acknowledge I've been clean on these years.

OHHH - THE DUMB CLOWNS THOUGHT I WAS JUICING TO ACHIEVE THAT RESULT.

HAHAHAHA.

If you thought I was juicing then, wait until you get a load of how strong I'm getting now.

I don't want to hear A FUCKING WORD from a juicer about how my natural training should be. The two are not REMOTELY the same.

I have NEVER made progress this quickly - and I'm 40 years old!

Again - just watch as I bench 315 for 15 reps. Then NO ONE here will be able to deny that I was natural all these years, just as I claimed.

My bench is climbing to 360-370.

Who here can out-lift me there? Probably tommywishbone and Fortress. I would assume joswift. Anyone else?

I'd be glad to post videos of my lifts to challenge that phaggot* Walter Sobchak to a lifting contest, given I warm up with that phaggot's workout.

*Phaggot, not f aggot. Phaggot with a PH means annoying; irritating...a loser.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 26, 2022, 01:54:06 AM
(https://www.timesherald.com/wp-content/uploads/migration/2016/04/6ee51142360b27806642b56494d4f1a2.jpg?w=1200)
Really liked that movie.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on July 26, 2022, 03:25:44 AM
John Dupont's was a paranoid schizophrenic and believer in conspiracy theories. His defense was insanity. Although the Jury agreed that he was nuts he was found guilty of 3rd degree murder. He died in prison when he was 72 years old. He was the only member of the Forbes 400 richest Americans to be convicted of murder.

wonder what the other duPont family members have been up to:

Quote
In 2009, he entered a guilty plea and was convicted of raping his 3-year-old daughter,[1][5][6][7][8][9] after the girl reported the abuse to her grandmother.[4] Instead of serving out his eight-year prison sentence, the sentencing order signed by Delaware Superior Court Judge Jan R. Jurden said that the "defendant will not fare well" in prison and thus the eight-year sentence was suspended.[5][7][9][10] Delaware Public Defender Brendan J. O'Neill expressed surprise that Jurden would use such a rationale to avoid sending Richards to prison.[5][7]

In 2010, allegations were made that Richards had also molested his son beginning in December 2005 and continuing for two years.[1][6][4] Police and prosecutors investigated but did not find sufficient evidence to pursue charges.[6] Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden later defended the sentencing of Richards to probation, claiming there was a strong chance of the prosecution losing at trial making a plea bargain necessary.[11]

 :-X
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 26, 2022, 03:52:52 AM

What's even the point of bodybuilding if you just go off gear and lose all your gains?  ??? What a waste!


I'm confused Matt, as to why you are using steroids, when as you say you will lose all your gains when you stop, as you inevitably will have to stop.

It seems a waste of your time.

You are no Bhanky who is foolish and takes bio-identical hormones 24/7 and 365.

So, why are you doing it?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 26, 2022, 03:53:52 AM
Really liked that movie.

You would like the book. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on July 26, 2022, 04:23:46 AM
I don't play on the ground I throw slam and hurt people from the feet I would crush the vertebrae in your neck

You’re no badass at all. Fckn pussy
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 26, 2022, 05:18:50 AM
^ LMAO @ the morons who downplay drugs. The ONLY thing I changed is adding ~17mg of daily Anadrol.

I haven't even STARTED the Sustanon.

I went up to ~2,000 calories a day, starting last week.

What's even the point of bodybuilding if you just go off gear and lose all your gains?  ??? What a waste!

The people I resent the most are the ass-clowns who have the AUDACITY to criticize my results KNOWING THEY ARE ON STEROIDS AND I AM [WAS, PREVIOUSLY] NOT.

Steroids make ALL the difference. How the FUCK can essentially some junkie talk to someone making less progress and talk about their routine? THESE FUCKING CLOWNS ON STEROIDS KNOW THAT TRAINING DOESN'T MEAN SHIT WHEN YOU USE.

...or maybe they don't. They are so used to training while on drugs they have NO IDEA how bad it is without them.

I legitimately bench press 315 for reps at 170 off drugs. FUCKING OBVIOUSLY I was a committed natural, and NOW as all the juiced assholes get to watch me bench press 315x15 on gear, they will have NO CHOICE but to acknowledge I've been clean on these years.

OHHH - THE DUMB CLOWNS THOUGHT I WAS JUICING TO ACHIEVE THAT RESULT.

HAHAHAHA.

If you thought I was juicing then, wait until you get a load of how strong I'm getting now.

I don't want to hear A FUCKING WORD from a juicer about how my natural training should be. The two are not REMOTELY the same.

I have NEVER made progress this quickly - and I'm 40 years old!

Again - just watch as I bench 315 for 15 reps. Then NO ONE here will be able to deny that I was natural all these years, just as I claimed.

My bench is climbing to 360-370.

Who here can out-lift me there? Probably tommywishbone and Fortress. I would assume joswift. Anyone else?

I'd be glad to post videos of my lifts to challenge that phaggot* Walter Sobchak to a lifting contest, given I warm up with that phaggot's workout.

*Phaggot, not f aggot. Phaggot with a PH means annoying; irritating...a loser.

Again you say you have made no changes other than adding anadrol while minimizing the fact you have doubled your calories. If you hadn't changed your calories the anadrol would not have done a damn thing. If you were not already trained you would not be getting these results. It is absolutely a combination of all 3 things.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 26, 2022, 05:20:51 AM
You’re no badass at all. Fckn pussy

I have a shoulder lock throw trained wrestlers don't even see coming they don't even realize they are in danger until their feet are over their head
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 26, 2022, 07:23:36 AM
I have a shoulder lock throw trained wrestlers don't even see coming they don't even realize they are in danger until their feet are over their head

I hope you only use this technique on a soft and giving surface, Bhanky.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 26, 2022, 07:25:35 AM
I have a shoulder lock throw trained wrestlers don't even see coming they don't even realize they are in danger until their feet are over their head

Lol lol lol, Brian and his "top secret" moves. So deadly that not even trained wrestlers stand a chance. They clearly served you well in the cage. Maybe you should have used it on the 1-6 guy who folded you up like one of your 17-inch collar shirts and strangled you half to death.

(https://media1.giphy.com/media/Ic97mPViHEG5O/giphy-downsized-large.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 26, 2022, 07:37:34 AM
Lol lol lol, Brian and his "top secret" moves. So deadly that not even trained wrestlers stand a chance. They clearly served you well in the cage. Maybe you should have used it on the 1-6 guy who folded you up like one of your 17-inch collar shirts and strangled you half to death.

(https://media1.giphy.com/media/Ic97mPViHEG5O/giphy-downsized-large.gif)


Bhanky,

Please address the above post as to why your special shoulder lock throw failed you in your 0-2 MMA career.

Defend yourself, man.

Also, why don't you have medical insurance?  You participate in so many risky physical activities.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 26, 2022, 07:46:19 AM
Lol lol lol, Brian and his "top secret" moves. So deadly that not even trained wrestlers stand a chance. They clearly served you well in the cage. Maybe you should have used it on the 1-6 guy who folded you up like one of your 17-inch collar shirts and strangled you half to death.

(https://media1.giphy.com/media/Ic97mPViHEG5O/giphy-downsized-large.gif)


You in mass yet Goat fucker?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mohammed Omari on July 26, 2022, 09:11:32 AM

You in mass yet Goat fucker?

Don't worry, pussay. You can come out from under the bed just now. Still 11 days before Big Mo Omari rolls through town and you have to start sneaking around everywhere wearing Groucho glasses and an afro wig. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 26, 2022, 11:24:54 AM
Don't worry, pussay. You can come out from under the bed just now. Still 11 days before Big Mo Omari rolls through town and you have to start sneaking around everywhere wearing Groucho glasses and an afro wig.

Allah the goat fucking pedophile can lick my sweaty nutsack as can you little Mo, I hide from No goatfucker.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SGT BARNES on July 26, 2022, 03:29:35 PM
Lol lol lol, Brian and his "top secret" moves. So deadly that not even trained wrestlers stand a chance. They clearly served you well in the cage. Maybe you should have used it on the 1-6 guy who folded you up like one of your 17-inch collar shirts and strangled you half to death.

(https://media1.giphy.com/media/Ic97mPViHEG5O/giphy-downsized-large.gif)

Full credit to this post as a classic. fucking truth hurts
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 26, 2022, 06:58:19 PM
My goal is to get my chest to the level of B. Hank, but it is not realistic.

B. Hank has much better chest genetics than I do, and I'm very realistic.

I'm bench pressing 315x10 now, but I feel like I'm reaching a plateau.

I'm really hoping to hit that 315x15, which I think will be one of the better lifts on Getbig.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 26, 2022, 09:29:21 PM
I'm up about 5-lb since the most recent photos from five days ago.

What happened is I skipped breakfast today, and I think that's why I feel a bit flat for this weight [I'm 203-lb here]. I've been getting my calories in, and unlike useless natural bodybuilding, the results are so quick, that it's easy to stay motivated to eat now.

How the FUCK can any natural gaining maybe 3-lb of muscle in a year stay motivated to do everything it takes to make that progress?

There's a reason I stuck with strength training. Because every week, I would do either a bit more weight, or the same weight for a few more reps.

Natural bodybuilding is absolute garbage.

Now that I'm bench pressing 315x10 again, I'm going STRAIGHT BACK to strength training when this cycle is over. I'd like to keep as much of this strength as possible, and I've almost been this strong drug-free, so...I think I can keep most of my strength.

As for any Getbiggers claiming you can LOOK GOOD without steroids - GET OFF THE DRUGS AND STAY OFF FOR A FULL 1-3 YEARS, YOU DUMB FUCKS.

...

This physique is how I'd like to look permanently...but that's unrealistic. I keep 50% of my pump 24/7 now. I love that. And that's impossible off steroids.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 26, 2022, 09:52:47 PM
Oh no…the waterlogged weak little manlet has been given a “Certificate of Special Achievement”!

Oh my, if that’s not the epitome of a Participation Trophy for feeble minded losers, what is?

Boy she sure showed us. That is one amazing accomplishment, her Mommy must be so proud. I’d definitely hang that on the wall of my office Mommy’s basement if I had something so illustrious and earth shattering.

Obviously I need to get a wrestling coach so I have a grown man to hug and rub up against in public.

I'm stronger and more muscular than you, you fucking phaggot. There's no lift or any athletic endeavour you could beat me at, even if I train naturally for the next year while you USE steroids.

So what does that say about you, you deplorable phaggot?

I've called you out countless times now to do any sort of strength contest against you, where you could submit your videos to moderators privately, to hide your bald head and ugly face from the public, AND YOU STILL WON'T DO IT.

HAHAHAHAHA.

You fucking dumb, weak phaggot.

Thank you for proving what everyone knows, which is that I'm stronger than you.

What do you have on me? Are you taller than me? Ok...do you think that makes up for the fact that you are bald and ugly, you dumb fuck?

Remember when Sarcasm got doxxed on here, and he was ran off the boards? Lol.

That will happen to you eventually, and it's going to be a laugh riot.

But anyway, you are weaker than me and less muscular than me. So if I'm small and weak...what does that make you?

In general, I don't rip into people who look better than me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on July 27, 2022, 03:16:21 AM
Matt what's with the bald put downs, I've shaved mine since before i went bald so prefer it, but male pattern baldness is a thing and it's shit for people that care about hair.  We all have to deal with what we were given genetically, height, hair, weak bodyparts. It's not a personal acheivement to have hair, just luck of the draw.
The gains in your pics are really obvious, you clearly respond well.


I'm stronger and more muscular than you, you fucking phaggot. There's no lift or any athletic endeavour you could beat me at, even if I train naturally for the next year while you USE steroids.

So what does that say about you, you deplorable phaggot?

I've called you out countless times now to do any sort of strength contest against you, where you could submit your videos to moderators privately, to hide your bald head and ugly face from the public, AND YOU STILL WON'T DO IT.

HAHAHAHAHA.

You fucking dumb, weak phaggot.

Thank you for proving what everyone knows, which is that I'm stronger than you.

What do you have on me? Are you taller than me? Ok...do you think that makes up for the fact that you are bald and ugly, you dumb fuck?

Remember when Sarcasm got doxxed on here, and he was ran off the boards? Lol.

That will happen to you eventually, and it's going to be a laugh riot.

But anyway, you are weaker than me and less muscular than me. So if I'm small and weak...what does that make you?

In general, I don't rip into people who look better than me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 03:19:18 AM
My goal is to get my chest to the level of B. Hank, but it is not realistic.

B. Hank has much better chest genetics than I do, and I'm very realistic.

I'm bench pressing 315x10 now, but I feel like I'm reaching a plateau.

I'm really hoping to hit that 315x15, which I think will be one of the better lifts on Getbig.

You don't have multiple tears on one side you can still train heavy so your chest is doing a lot better than mine
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on July 27, 2022, 03:39:46 AM
Matt what's with the bald put downs, I've shaved mine since before i went bald so prefer it, but male pattern baldness is a thing and it's shit for people that care about hair.  We all have to deal with what we were given genetically, height, hair, weak bodyparts. It's not a personal acheivement to have hair, just luck of the draw.
The gains in your pics are really obvious, you clearly respond well.

Mocking others for things they can't control?? On getbig???  :o
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on July 27, 2022, 03:40:46 AM
Matt you should get some melanotan II, a bit more color will increase your definition
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on July 27, 2022, 04:26:39 AM
I have a shoulder lock throw trained wrestlers don't even see coming they don't even realize they are in danger until their feet are over their head

No - you don’t. A man that can really handle himself absolutely never feels the needs to tell everyone. Do you walk around declaring to everyone how great you can see? No - because that’s fckn stupid. If people don’t think you can see who fckn cares?? It’s the same feeling when you have spent decades training.
You are a pussy - a very narrow / small bone structure / weak pussy
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 27, 2022, 06:28:54 AM
matt youre just renting this strength and muscularity, i thought youd be smarter , you will just piss it all out when its over. I think u let people like tim wascock make u feel like u had to hop on a cycle to prove to him when in reality its just bums that post here
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 06:33:50 AM
No - you don’t. A man that can really handle himself absolutely never feels the needs to tell everyone. Do you walk around declaring to everyone how great you can see? No - because that’s fckn stupid. If people don’t think you can see who fckn cares?? It’s the same feeling when you have spent decades training.
You are a pussy - a very narrow / small bone structure / weak pussy

I do I should be coaching. I know every move. I was a very technical wrestler. My throws are really good I have like a dozen headlock lateral drop variations. I can hit them from anywhere but the shoulder lock throw is real special no one knows it and their defense puts them into it they think they are defending an over under throw and they go right into it. You call me names online but no one does in real life ever at 230lbs I am far from narrow my reach is good my hands are large my bone structure is great.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 27, 2022, 06:39:45 AM
I do I should be coaching. I know every move. I was a very technical wrestler. My throws are really good I have like a dozen headlock lateral drop variations. I can hit them from anywhere but the shoulder lock throw is real special no one knows it and their defense puts them into it they think they are defending an over under throw and they go right into it. You call me names online but no one does in real life ever at 230lbs I am far from narrow my reach is good my hands are large my bone structure is great.

 Olympian physique.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 27, 2022, 06:42:38 AM
230lbs. Of Peace
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 07:36:25 AM
230lbs. Of Peace

Actually 228lbs right now but close enough considering just getting over covid
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 27, 2022, 07:40:57 AM
Actually 228lbs right now but close enough considering just getting over covid

yet you were able to swim in the ocean? right.. "covid"
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 07:45:26 AM
yet you were able to swim in the ocean? right.. "covid"

Actually I would be ok if I had been swimming the problem was that I was just wading and stepped on the stingray. I took and posted 2 positive Covid test not sure how much more Covid I could have had. I plan to take another this afternoon I am hoping to be negative now just a minor sore throat and a slight cough. The kids are out for the night and my girlfriend wants to go out to diner so was going to take another test to see if I am clear to not infect a restaurant
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 07:57:41 AM
I do I should be coaching. I know every move. I was a very technical wrestler. My throws are really good I have like a dozen headlock lateral drop variations. I can hit them from anywhere but the shoulder lock throw is real special no one knows it and their defense puts them into it they think they are defending an over under throw and they go right into it. You call me names online but no one does in real life ever at 230lbs I am far from narrow my reach is good my hands are large my bone structure is great.
who come you couldnt win a fight in the cage?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 08:04:54 AM
who come you couldnt win a fight in the cage?

Those old fights are self reported. I never reported any I fought in Europe and Hawaii I have had a lot more than 2 fights. I dislocated my shoulder and then dislocated it again in those final 2 fights. I have had 3 shoulder surgeries since then.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 08:11:18 AM
Those old fights are self reported. I never reported any I fought in Europe and Hawaii I have had a lot more than 2 fights. I dislocated my shoulder and then dislocated it again in those final 2 fights. I have had 3 shoulder surgeries since then.

but..but... your special moves... your secret techniques??
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 08:18:50 AM
but..but... your special moves... your secret techniques??

Doesnt matter when you have a dislocated shoulder injury. Don't worry it is better now I can still ragdoll you
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 08:20:39 AM
Doesnt matter when you have a dislocated shoulder injury. Don't worry it is better now I can still ragdoll you

lifetime trained fighter brags about claiming to ragdoll a 57 year old man with no formal fight training at all

Yep, you sure are a tough guy
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 27, 2022, 08:33:15 AM
Bhanky would kick Mark Kerr's azz.

He'd rag-doll him, right Bhanky?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 27, 2022, 09:03:04 AM
I'm stronger and more muscular than you, you fucking phaggot. There's no lift or any athletic endeavour you could beat me at, even if I train naturally for the next year while you USE steroids.

So what does that say about you, you deplorable phaggot?

I've called you out countless times now to do any sort of strength contest against you, where you could submit your videos to moderators privately, to hide your bald head and ugly face from the public, AND YOU STILL WON'T DO IT.

HAHAHAHAHA.

You fucking dumb, weak phaggot.

Thank you for proving what everyone knows, which is that I'm stronger than you.

What do you have on me? Are you taller than me? Ok...do you think that makes up for the fact that you are bald and ugly, you dumb fuck?

Remember when Sarcasm got doxxed on here, and he was ran off the boards? Lol.

That will happen to you eventually, and it's going to be a laugh riot.

But anyway, you are weaker than me and less muscular than me. So if I'm small and weak...what does that make you?

In general, I don't rip into people who look better than me.

Why are you so chronically stupid? Is it your Downs Syndrome that makes you such an absolute retard? Holy fuck you really are one dumb son of a filthy whore and I’m not even talking about your high school level Lakehead University fake degree. For chrissakes an average 10 year old is more intelligent and intellectually developed than you are.

YOU’RE NOT LIFTING THE WEIGHTS….THE DRUGS YOU ARE TAKING ARE LIFTING THE WEIGHTS.

You stupid little insipid manlet. With your IQ of 65, your idiotic photos showing your distinct lack of any type of muscular development, and your low IQ ramblings about race and homosexuality that prove you’ve never been out in the world and experienced it as a functioning adult. You look like an absolute moron and your lack of self-awareness keeps you from realizing that you are Getbig’s joke.

Why are you so stupid? What has caused you to get to 40 years old and be so immature and have such a low IQ (other than your retardation)?

You’re a 5’-7” and 165 manlet twink who trains like a girl. Without your drugs you can’t lift weights that female CrossFitters work out with.

I will send you $2 in the mail to pay someone to slap the stupid off you. You’re on your own to slap the stupid off your white trash parents for raising such a closet phaggot loser son.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 27, 2022, 09:25:46 AM
Reminded -

Hankins is 0-3 in hobbyist MMA, tore his pec fighting a woman, and was recently stabbed for inappropriately touching a male stingray. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 27, 2022, 09:29:01 AM
Reminded -

Hankins is 0-3 in hobbyist MMA, tore his pec fighting a woman, and was recently stabbed for inappropriately touching a male stingray.

 But if he got his hands on Mike Tyson first, it would be all over…

Fucking bullshitter.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 27, 2022, 09:49:04 AM
Reminded -

Hankins is 0-3 in hobbyist MMA, tore his pec fighting a woman, and was recently stabbed for inappropriately touching a male stingray.

 :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 27, 2022, 09:51:14 AM
B. Hank looks much better than I do, so I have no business slamming him.

Just thought I'd post some new updated photos in this thread - I gained two inches in height, and put on 125-lb. So I'm 5'11" and 330-lb here:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on July 27, 2022, 09:59:29 AM
Why are you so chronically stupid? Is it your Downs Syndrome that makes you such an absolute retard? Holy fuck you really are one dumb son of a filthy whore and I’m not even talking about your high school level Lakehead University fake degree. For chrissakes an average 10 year old is more intelligent and intellectually developed than you are.

YOU’RE NOT LIFTING THE WEIGHTS….THE DRUGS YOU ARE TAKING ARE LIFTING THE WEIGHTS.

You stupid little insipid manlet. With your IQ of 65, your idiotic photos showing your distinct lack of any type of muscular development, and your low IQ ramblings about race and homosexuality that prove you’ve never been out in the world and experienced it as a functioning adult. You look like an absolute moron and your lack of self-awareness keeps you from realizing that you are Getbig’s joke.

Why are you so stupid? What has caused you to get to 40 years old and be so immature and have such a low IQ (other than your retardation)?

You’re a 5’-7” and 165 manlet twink who trains like a girl. Without your drugs you can’t lift weights that female CrossFitters work out with.

I will send you $2 in the mail to pay someone to slap the stupid off you. You’re on your own to slap the stupid off your white trash parents for raising such a closet phaggot loser son.

Oh no!

Don’t think will Matt recover from this.

😆
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 27, 2022, 10:36:24 AM
Why are you so chronically stupid? Is it your Downs Syndrome that makes you such an absolute retard? Holy fuck you really are one dumb son of a filthy whore and I’m not even talking about your high school level Lakehead University fake degree. For chrissakes an average 10 year old is more intelligent and intellectually developed than you are.

YOU’RE NOT LIFTING THE WEIGHTS….THE DRUGS YOU ARE TAKING ARE LIFTING THE WEIGHTS.

You stupid little insipid manlet. With your IQ of 65, your idiotic photos showing your distinct lack of any type of muscular development, and your low IQ ramblings about race and homosexuality that prove you’ve never been out in the world and experienced it as a functioning adult. You look like an absolute moron and your lack of self-awareness keeps you from realizing that you are Getbig’s joke.

Why are you so stupid? What has caused you to get to 40 years old and be so immature and have such a low IQ (other than your retardation)?

You’re a 5’-7” and 165 manlet twink who trains like a girl. Without your drugs you can’t lift weights that female CrossFitters work out with.

I will send you $2 in the mail to pay someone to slap the stupid off you. You’re on your own to slap the stupid off your white trash parents for raising such a closet phaggot loser son.

I read your posts now, but I'll probably stop again soon.

I lift more than you do with or without drugs. It's safe to say you wouldn't be able to lift what I do even on steroids.

My 225x25 bench press was only beaten by three guys in my city. Two of them weighed 285-lb or more.

So yeah - I'll bench 225x25 naturally, or 225x30+ thanks to drugs.

So what, "Walter Sobchak"? So fucking what? You don't bench press anything close to that, and wouldn't bench press that even on drugs.

Just like I benched 315x8 naturally, and will most likely hit 315x15 on drugs. You can't even bench press 315 for a single, lmao.

There's no max weight I can lift that you could lift with a 50-lb weight advantage even on drugs. There's nothing you can lift at 250 that I can't lift at 170.

Whether you are 220-240-260 - any weight - I can lift more than you even if I weigh 50-lb less than you, and most likely, even 80-lb less than you.

So congratulations - everything you say about me applies to you to a much greater extent. If I'm weak, what does that say about you, given you are much weaker than me?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 27, 2022, 10:37:46 AM
Oh no!

Don’t think will Matt recover from this.

😆

As I said, I look much better than Walter Sobchak. My latest pic:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1383333;image)

^ Actually, that's roughly on par with his looks, I'm sure.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 27, 2022, 11:57:12 AM
I read your posts now, but I'll probably stop again soon.

I lift more than you do with or without drugs. It's safe to say you wouldn't be able to lift what I do even on steroids.

My 225x25 bench press was only beaten by three guys in my city. Two of them weighed 285-lb or more.

So yeah - I'll bench 225x25 naturally, or 225x30+ thanks to drugs.

So what, "Walter Sobchak"? So fucking what? You don't bench press anything close to that, and wouldn't bench press that even on drugs.

Just like I benched 315x8 naturally, and will most likely hit 315x15 on drugs. You can't even bench press 315 for a single, lmao.

There's no max weight I can lift that you could lift with a 50-lb weight advantage even on drugs. There's nothing you can lift at 250 that I can't lift at 170.

Whether you are 220-240-260 - any weight - I can lift more than you even if I weigh 50-lb less than you, and most likely, even 80-lb less than you.

So congratulations - everything you say about me applies to you to a much greater extent. If I'm weak, what does that say about you, given you are much weaker than me?

YOU ARE NOT LIFTING THE WEIGHTS….THE STEROIDS YOU ARE TAKING ARE LIFTING THE WEIGHTS.

Address the top 10-12 reasons you are so dumb. How did a puny little manlet get to be 40 years old and be so profoundly stupid?

I understand that your mommy says you’re retarded and autistic, but how the fuck does something like you go through life with an IQ of 65?

Does Lakehead University give out boxes of crayons with their useless diplomas? Holy fuck, your obsession with cock and homosexuality is really just an outlet for your stupidity and fascination with things that spit. WHAT KIND OF FUCKING WEIRDO SENDS DICK PICS AND A JERKOFF VIDEO TO AN ALMOST EIGHTY YEAR OLD MAN?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 12:00:37 PM
YOU ARE NOT LIFTING THE WEIGHTS….THE STEROIDS YOU ARE TAKING ARE LIFTING THE WEIGHTS.

Address the top 10-12 reasons you are so dumb. How did a puny little manlet get to be 40 years old and be so profoundly stupid?

I understand that your mommy says you’re retarded and autistic, but how the fuck does something like you go through life with an IQ of 65?

Does Lakehead University give out boxes of crayons with their useless diplomas? Holy fuck, your obsession with cock and homosexuality is really just an outlet for your stupidity and fascination with things that spit. WHAT KIND OF FUCKING WEIRDO SENDS DICK PICS AND A JERKOFF VIDEO TO AN ALMOST EIGHTY YEAR OLD MAN?

Are you new here?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 27, 2022, 12:04:24 PM
Are you new here?

You’re right…carry on.

PUNY MATT CANNING DOESN’T LIFT THE WEIGHT - MATT CANNING’S STEROID STACK LIFTS THE WEIGHT.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 27, 2022, 12:13:35 PM


Does Lakehead University give out boxes of crayons with their useless diplomas?

Lakehead University is ranked #1327 in the Global rankings. One of Goodrums online qualifications is more meaningful than whatever Matt got from there.

https://cwur.org/2022-23.php
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: CalvinH on July 27, 2022, 01:10:36 PM
Please just ignore all of my posts. HOWEVER, do not ignore this one:

"Walter Sobchak" is a phaggot, with a PH, which means annoying - not gay, or homosexual.

He's an absolute phaggot. And an absolute unit. A unit or a phaggot. Dumb phaggot.

Honestly, my issue is that he calls me weak, and trashes my lifts, but meanwhile, he bench presses 135x8 in the gym, and curls the pink dumbbells. Walter Sobchak is perhaps the weakest Getbigger, yet bashes my lifts? How would you feel if some phaggot whose personal best leg press is pushing the sled for an exhausting set of 12 reps before requiring a 2-hour nap was calling you weak, and a f aggot. And I mean, an actual f aggot.

Is he gay? Maybe. I find it hard to believe that any straight man would think being out and gay would be a difficult thing.

Only a gay guy, told all his life that being gay will cause you to be oppressed, would think being out is hard.

I don't know one straight guy who would worry about being gay, if they were.

Also, I don't know any straight guy who constantly calls people homosexuals - ever. He could argue I'm doing that. THE DIFFERENCE IS, I DID SO AFTER BEING ATTACKED. OTHERWISE, GO BACK 18 YEARS, AND I NEVER BRING UP GAY TOPICS.

I'm bringing it up now because that prick repeatedly calls me gay. In just defending myself.

Otherwise, I NEVER bring up gay shit.

Meanwhile, Walter Sobchak talks about homosexuality about every other post - and HE brings it up!

But back to my point - Walter Sobchak continually rips into me HARD - WHILE BEING WEAKER THAN ME

Who the fuck wants someone BELOW their level, bashing them?

His comments are nasty. If he did a form check, and gave me constructive advice, then fine.

Take SF1900 - I respect anyone who has built up 17"+ arms naturally. I can't pretend I'm not impressed.

If Walter Sobchak is so much stronger than me, he can let the results speak for themselves. This is why I don't believe Walter. I believe he is:

- Fat.
- Bald.
- Weak.
- Ugly.

My point is, I just can't stand men weaker than me, also trashing me.



Damn dude, How much are you paying him for the rental space in your head ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on July 27, 2022, 01:30:37 PM
Matt could bench a few reps with 405 in 2-3 months. Barely just scratched the strength potential of the steroids. But Matt will be off soon. Not that it would be a good idea to gain that much. The likelyhood of a pec tear is very high. But it would be interesting to see Matt really push it.

My first cycle was just Dianabol. In 12 weeks my PR on incilne benches went from 315x2 to 405x2. Then I chased another plate on the bar and tore my body to pieces.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 27, 2022, 02:03:30 PM
Matt you should get some melanotan II, a bit more color will increase your definition

-Black market? As best as I know Melanotan II has yet to be approved in the U.S. What about the side effects? Doesn't it cause uneven pigmentation and darkening of moles? Wasn't it originally developed for erectile disfunction? One possible side effect is loss of appetite. That would not be good in Matt's case since he already has appetite concerns.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 27, 2022, 02:18:37 PM
Actually I would be ok if I had been swimming the problem was that I was just wading and stepped on the stingray. I took and posted 2 positive Covid test not sure how much more Covid I could have had. I plan to take another this afternoon I am hoping to be negative now just a minor sore throat and a slight cough. The kids are out for the night and my girlfriend wants to go out to diner so was going to take another test to see if I am clear to not infect a restaurant

How long has it been since you first had COVID symptoms and your first positive test? If it is 10 days or more, regardless of whether you still test positive, you are not likely to be contagious. Some folks say it is best to wait two weeks or 14 days before leaving isolation. It is possible to continue testing positive for a long time after having COVID.  Since you obviously did not isolate from contact with your son, it is a bit surprising you’d be concerned about strangers at a restaurant. Many eating establishments continue seating groups at least 6 feet apart.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 02:20:04 PM
-Black market? As best as I know Melanotan II has yet to be approved in the U.S. What about the side effects? Doesn't it cause uneven pigmentation and darkening of moles? Wasn't it originally developed for erectile disfunction? One possible side effect is loss of appetite. That would not be good in Matt's case since he already has appetite concerns.

Take it at night before bed, it does make you feel sick about 20 seconds after you inject it
It does cause erections just mornings though.
It was developed for singed gingers so they didnt fry in the sun, a side effct was the erections
I think you can get a derivative now that doesnt cause tanning but just gives you erections
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 02:20:44 PM
How long has it been since you first had COVID symptoms and your first positive test? If it is 10 days or more, regardless of whether you still test positive, you are not likely to be contagious. Some folks say it is best to wait two weeks or 14 days before leaving isolation. It is possible to continue testing positive for a long time after having COVID.  Since you obviously did not isolate from contact with your son, it is a bit surprising you’d be concerned about strangers at a restaurant. Many eating establishments continue seating groups at least 6 feet apart.
Dont confuse him he cant remember when he said he had it
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 27, 2022, 02:42:07 PM
Dont confuse him he cant remember when he said he had it

Just checked and it looks as if Bhank's first post about his having COVID was on the 15th and said he had symptoms two days prior to that post, so he should be good to go now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 02:58:46 PM
Just checked and it looks as if Bhank's first post about his having COVID was on the 15th and said he had symptoms two days prior to that post, so he should be good to go now.

ssshhh
It would be better all around for his neighbours if he stayed home forever.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 27, 2022, 03:26:02 PM
This one seems to show a clear positive outcome:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1383052;image)

This one is just showing that my training /diet/gear has been working:

WTF going on with your feet?  You wear clown shoes or something?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 27, 2022, 03:28:15 PM
Has the same bloated Drol face as hanky.

Gained a lot of water weight.

hanky's weight is real muscle though.

Obviously failed to "cocoon".
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 27, 2022, 03:30:40 PM
WTF going on with your feet?  You wear clown shoes or something?

Shoe lifts. Oversized shoes allow for bigger lifts
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 27, 2022, 03:33:41 PM
This one seems to show a clear positive outcome:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1383052;image)

This one is just showing that my training /diet/gear has been working:

Giggidy
(https://images.entertainment.ie/storage/images_content/rectangle/620x372/glenn-quagmire-family-guy-11293-1920x1200.jpg?w=1280&h=768&q=high)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 03:51:37 PM
How long has it been since you first had COVID symptoms and your first positive test? If it is 10 days or more, regardless of whether you still test positive, you are not likely to be contagious. Some folks say it is best to wait two weeks or 14 days before leaving isolation. It is possible to continue testing positive for a long time after having COVID. Since you obviously did not isolate from contact with your son, it is a bit surprising you’d be concerned about strangers at a restaurant. Many eating establishments continue seating groups at least 6 feet apart.

My son is the one who gave me covid
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on July 27, 2022, 03:51:52 PM
WTF going on with your feet?  You wear clown shoes or something?

Dave Paulumbo size 17
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 27, 2022, 04:02:59 PM
My son is the one who gave me covid

You said your son was coughing all over you in the car whilst he had covid then a month later you tell us you just tested positive for covid.

You're saying it took you a month after exposure to get covid?

Sorry bhanky you're talking out of your ass

I have never missed an attempted squat I will post before the summer ends try not ti die. I am a little concerwd as I have spent the last 4 hours dricing wirh a covid positive  child coughing on me but thats the ionlt  forseabket setback
My son tested postive for Covid today I took him anyway as it is fathers day weekend asshole

One month after his sons positive test, pinocchio tests positive for covid

You would be better off starting regular TRT now vs trying to blast a ton of crap at the end. Also I have had a fever for 2 days and just failed a Covid test so I imagine I will be losing some size now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 27, 2022, 04:29:31 PM
You said your son was coughing all over you in the car whilst he had covid then a month later you tell us you just tested positive for covid.

You're saying it took you a month after exposure to get covid?

Sorry bhanky you're talking out of your ass

One month after his sons positive test, pinocchio tests positive for covid

All he does is lie.

Blames his own son for Covid.

Who does this?

A narcissistic arrogant wife beater, that's who.

Will never admit any fault.

He doesn't have Covid, he's suffering drug withdrawals.

#TeamMichelle
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on July 27, 2022, 04:41:09 PM
MattC please take wes advices on posing technique

You point your forearms straight up in the air and it is really strange looking pose.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 27, 2022, 05:06:56 PM
MattC please take wes advices on posing technique

You point your forearms straight up in the air and it is really strange looking pose.
I believe BIZZARE is the word your looking for bro.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 27, 2022, 05:11:00 PM
Is MattC a beast yet ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 27, 2022, 05:45:42 PM
You said your son was coughing all over you in the car whilst he had covid then a month later you tell us you just tested positive for covid.

You're saying it took you a month after exposure to get covid?

Sorry bhanky you're talking out of your ass

One month after his sons positive test, pinocchio tests positive for covid

I first started having symptoms the first week of July. I didn't take a test and test positive until mid July. However my son is the only person with Covid I was exposed to and he slept in my bed as he usually does so yeah I am assuming I got it from him. Regardless since he just had it the pediatrician said not to worry when we asked if I could take him this last weekend.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 27, 2022, 05:46:06 PM
Lol lol lol, Brian and his "top secret" moves. So deadly that not even trained wrestlers stand a chance. They clearly served you well in the cage. Maybe you should have used it on the 1-6 guy who folded you up like one of your 17-inch collar shirts and strangled you half to death.

(https://media1.giphy.com/media/Ic97mPViHEG5O/giphy-downsized-large.gif)


gold
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 27, 2022, 05:49:34 PM
^ LMAO @ the morons who downplay drugs. The ONLY thing I changed is adding ~17mg of daily Anadrol.

I haven't even STARTED the Sustanon.

I went up to ~2,000 calories a day, starting last week.

What's even the point of bodybuilding if you just go off gear and lose all your gains?  ??? What a waste!

The people I resent the most are the ass-clowns who have the AUDACITY to criticize my results KNOWING THEY ARE ON STEROIDS AND I AM [WAS, PREVIOUSLY] NOT.

Steroids make ALL the difference. How the FUCK can essentially some junkie talk to someone making less progress and talk about their routine? THESE FUCKING CLOWNS ON STEROIDS KNOW THAT TRAINING DOESN'T MEAN SHIT WHEN YOU USE.

...or maybe they don't. They are so used to training while on drugs they have NO IDEA how bad it is without them.

I legitimately bench press 315 for reps at 170 off drugs. FUCKING OBVIOUSLY I was a committed natural, and NOW as all the juiced assholes get to watch me bench press 315x15 on gear, they will have NO CHOICE but to acknowledge I've been clean on these years.

OHHH - THE DUMB CLOWNS THOUGHT I WAS JUICING TO ACHIEVE THAT RESULT.

HAHAHAHA.

If you thought I was juicing then, wait until you get a load of how strong I'm getting now.

I don't want to hear A FUCKING WORD from a juicer about how my natural training should be. The two are not REMOTELY the same.

I have NEVER made progress this quickly - and I'm 40 years old!

Again - just watch as I bench 315 for 15 reps. Then NO ONE here will be able to deny that I was natural all these years, just as I claimed.

My bench is climbing to 360-370.

Who here can out-lift me there? Probably tommywishbone and Fortress. I would assume joswift. Anyone else?

I'd be glad to post videos of my lifts to challenge that phaggot* Walter Sobchak to a lifting contest, given I warm up with that phaggot's workout.

*Phaggot, not f aggot. Phaggot with a PH means annoying; irritating...a loser.

How did you manage to get 17mg?  Cutting in quarters?

In regards to the other thing you posted about supps and milk thistle, forget it.  It is overhyped.  You would be better spending your money on a decent multi vit, creatine and probiotics (to make sure you are getting the most out of your food consumption)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 27, 2022, 05:52:34 PM
How did you manage to get 17mg?  Cutting in quarters?

In regards to the other thing you posted about supps and milk thistle, forget it.  It is overhyped.  You would be better spending your money on a decent multi vit, creatine and probiotics (to make sure you are getting the most out of your food consumption)

Cutting thirds.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 27, 2022, 06:14:57 PM
Cutting thirds.

I was taking a shot at them being on the metric system.   ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 27, 2022, 06:19:06 PM
@Matt - I must say that I'm a little disappointed in your lack of accuracy regarding your daily anadrol intake.  If you are partitioning a 50mg tablet of A-50 into thirds, then you are actually only taking 16.67mg's of Anadrol daily.  Much like your 6.45" cock, details matter.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 27, 2022, 06:27:07 PM
@Matt - I must say that I'm a little disappointed in your lack of accuracy regarding your daily anadrol intake.  If you are partitioning a 50mg tablet of A-50 into thirds, then you are actually only taking 16.67mg's of Anadrol daily.  Much like your 6.45" cock, details matter.

Alleged 6.45" cock. Primemuscle has refused to confirm this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 27, 2022, 06:29:14 PM
Alleged 6.45" cock. Primemuscle has refused to confirm this.

That's what I'm saying.  If he rounds up egregiously about Anadrol I shudder to think what lengths he'll go to when it comes to his cock.  COCK!COCK!COCK!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on July 27, 2022, 07:27:14 PM
I think he skipped a few doses and the daily average landed at 17mg.

These are UG supps and they aren't always on the spot either - even mainstream medicines can vary by 10%. No use trying to be that precise because you can't.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 27, 2022, 10:25:39 PM
@Matt - I must say that I'm a little disappointed in your lack of accuracy regarding your daily anadrol intake.  If you are partitioning a 50mg tablet of A-50 into thirds, then you are actually only taking 16.67mg's of Anadrol daily.  Much like your 6.45" cock, details matter.

It's 16.83mg daily, but as Van Bilderass said, doses may be off.

Given how FUCKING STRONG this Anadrol is...if I had to guess, it's slightly overdosed.

But then - why overdose your gear, and make your costs go up, if you are making money from my illicit enterprise?

But anyway, call it ~17mg daily. I'm getting the result I wanted, so why use more? What's the point of bulking up to 220, to go back to max 190 when all is said and done? It makes no wonder why people abuse gear. You come off and just to back to normal.

I'm trying to smooth the transition back to normalcy by not gaining much in the first place. I admit, I really do like my look, and I wish this was a sustainable look for me, but I understand that it's unrealistic off gear.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 27, 2022, 10:47:44 PM
It's 16.83mg daily, but as Van Bilderass said, doses may be off.

Given how FUCKING STRONG this Anadrol is...if I had to guess, it's slightly overdosed.

But then - why overdose your gear, and make your costs go up, if you are making money from my illicit enterprise?

But anyway, call it ~17mg daily. I'm getting the result I wanted, so why use more? What's the point of bulking up to 220, to go back to max 190 when all is said and done? It makes no wonder why people abuse gear. You come off and just to back to normal.

I'm trying to smooth the transition back to normalcy by not gaining much in the first place. I admit, I really do like my look, and I wish this was a sustainable look for me, but I understand that it's unrealistic off gear.

What about scaling back to 8.5mg's and just stay on indefinitely.  Pending bloodwork and wellness exams of course.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 28, 2022, 12:54:00 AM
Shoe lifts. Oversized shoes allow for bigger lifts

Interesting theory. My stepdad who was 5'5" had a couple pairs of shoes with lifts that looked very much like what Matt is wearing in those photos. I'm guessing they aren't comfortable because my stepdad rarely wore his.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 28, 2022, 12:58:29 AM
My son is the one who gave me covid

Any idea where your son caught it? Did he have symptoms? My great-granddaughter tested positive for COVID after her mom and my grandson tested positive. She luckily had absolutely no symptoms.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 28, 2022, 01:08:29 AM
Shoe lifts. Oversized shoes allow for bigger lifts

3+$+_)#9#-";BLARGH!!

OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE, FLEXACON.  ;D

[See below]

Flexacon - BRO, DUDE: can you just stop?

I made a comment that you were basically shilling for the vaccine back, what, 11 months ago? Then I apologized to you for it, acknowledged your views on the pandemic evolved, then THOUGHT that I squashed that beef.

Yet you continue to attack me, in a one-sided duel.

Now, that being said - if you want to butt heads with me on here, that's cool. But let me go on record right now: I put this behind me long ago.

So, is it still on, Flexacon? Because I'm willing to squash this beef.

Now, regarding my feet. Yes, I wear large shoes. BECAUSE I HAVE LARGE FEET.

My feet are just over 11", but Size 11 [in Canadian sizes - not sure what the EU equivalent is] are too tight.

Size 12 is hit and miss, and Size 13 are always a bit loose. But since sometimes even Size 12 is tight, I have often gotten 13's.

Always 12's or 13's though.

And I aim for a chunky heel - NOT shoe lifts. And by a "chunky" heel, I mean maybe 1cm thicker than your average pair. I don't want to give women the impression I'm 5'11" or something. If a woman thinks I'm a pussy hair under 5'10" that's ok. I mean...I sort of am.

Stallone and his 4" shoe lifts look ridiculous.

Anyway, here is a picture of my feet. Yes, my feet are VERY HAIRY [they're disgusting - but there's not much I can do about my hairy ape feet].

And yes, I just shaved them a few days ago.  ;D

Anyway, there's little if ANYTHING I do that I won't admit to on here. I don't wear shoe lifts. I try to grab a shoe with a decent heel...but...so what? I also try to sort of wear my hair up and maintain excellent posture - basically so I look 5'10" rather than 5'9".

What's wrong with that?

Andy Haman [RIP] was 5'11" and wore shoes with a MASSIVE heel - he looked around 6'2" while wearing them!

A photo I just took of one of my massive, disgusting, HAIRY feet [which I shaved recently because I've been going to public swims lately...and frankly, I HATE body hair]:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 28, 2022, 01:12:15 AM
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRU1jPVJxfGlqfkVMnhOmM40tIyfSAzM-uljA&usqp=CAU)

Good pic Pvt. Toe Jam.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 28, 2022, 01:14:34 AM
Giggidy
(https://images.entertainment.ie/storage/images_content/rectangle/620x372/glenn-quagmire-family-guy-11293-1920x1200.jpg?w=1280&h=768&q=high)

This is a problem...is there anything I can do about face bloat?

Wait..I got it...let me guess? Another compound?  ::) That eye roll wasn't for you. It's just incredible how the answer to drugs is so often more drugs...

I have not had major back acne so far. Very minimal. But I'm also barely using anything...but I'm glad I don't need to get a retinoid prescription. Though I might do that anyway...I do like having a clear back.

Lastly, today my training partner asked me why I'm not going "full hog" on this cycle. My answer is: I don't want massive side effects.

If the options are 20-lb and no side effects, or 35-lb and side effects...I'd rather stick with 20.

Time will tell. I might just say fuck it, and ramp up the gear.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 28, 2022, 01:20:41 AM
Alleged 6.45" cock. Primemuscle has refused to confirm this.

LOL!

Okay here's the deal, Matt did send via my Facebook messenger a photo of a penis with a hand next to it and a 30 second video of someone furiously jacking off and ejaculating. I'm not sure how those prove what he wanted proved. I have no idea whether the penis in the photo or the video was his. Could be anyone’s. Also, even if it is Matt and it probably is, he might have very small hands and therefore a small penis. Had the penis been the size of Johnny Falcon’s, Getbig’s own horse cock, there would be no question of its length and girth.
 
Happy now?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 28, 2022, 01:23:14 AM
Good pic Pvt. Toe Jam.  :D

I had to look that one up.  ;D

Do I have feet problems? Getbig will figure that out for me.

They're big and disgusting, anyway.

Getbig is interesting...you get all the constructive criticism you would ever need...but then you have the delusional comments, and comments criticizing you even when you actually look good and are doing well at something.

I want people to come here and tell me what I'm doing wrong, and learn from that. But when people call me weak - which is just objectively untrue - it's just...IT'S FUCKING WEIRD.

Here's one for you, wes: people making fun of your age. Meanwhile, there are like 10 members older than you. CRIPE'S SAKE, THE AVERAGE GETBIGGER AGE IS LIKE 71.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 28, 2022, 01:26:08 AM
LOL!

Okay here's the deal, Matt did send via my Facebook messenger a photo of a penis with a hand next to it and a 30 second video of someone furiously jacking off and ejaculating. I'm not sure how those prove what he wanted proved. I have no idea whether the penis in the photo or the video was his. Could be anyone’s. Also, even if it is Matt and it probably is, he might have very small hands and therefore a small penis. Had the penis been the size of Johnny Falcon’s, Getbig’s own horse cock, there would be no question of its length and girth.
 
Happy now?

I think the photo is pretty clear. However, I could take a video of me measuring it directly.

None of this shit matters on Getbig though. You can post video evidence of anything, and get called out by people posting video evidence of nothing.

Now what we're on this topic - tell Getbig I blast loads like Peter North. Fuck, I blast bigger loads than Peter North.

Please confirm.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 28, 2022, 01:34:38 AM
What about scaling back to 8.5mg's and just stay on indefinitely.  Pending bloodwork and wellness exams of course.

I'm glad you're here, AbrahamG.

Canada is a free country again, and things are good here - at least for now. I can't complain anymore.

I know you're joking, but to your point:

I asked someone how long one could use 12.5mg of Anadrol daily, safely.

I believe he said either four or six months.

Keep in mind, I'm at a dosage big enough to make gains...but essentially low enough to feel no side effects.

Once I hit 25-50mg for a few days [I think I took 10x 25mg tablets over the course of 7 days once], I notice better results...but more side effects.

I feel like...my blood is thicker? If that makes sense. Probably a slight increase in blood pressure.

I don't want blood pressure going over 120/80 for this cycle.

Remember - I'm a big time health pussy / hypochondriac. I DO want to do this cycle properly...but another part of me is still holding back.

Fuck.

I should start that Sustanon.

Anyway, since you're here, here's a sort of new photo - I thought Palumboism would prevent me from having a good aesthetic in that first shot, but I'm quite pleased with that look!  :) And there's my usual back double biceps pose, but from a different location/lighting and distance from the usual one.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 28, 2022, 01:41:43 AM
Why start?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 28, 2022, 02:12:45 AM
Why start?

Good question.

Honestly, I got exactly what I wanted out of the cycle - I'm 20-lb up, and don't appear to be any fatter. I have a full, sort of perpetually pumped look, and I'm getting a tremendous lot of good attention.

I'm pleased. I can't complain. And I don't want to shut myself down too hard, and for it to take months for me to get back to normal.

Do you have any suggestions on that, Humble?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 28, 2022, 02:54:10 AM
This really says it all:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382927;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1382613;image)

NOTE: I said I hadn't ran gear in 5.5 years, and - SURPRISE, SURPRISE - I'm responding EXACTLY LIKE A PERSON WHO HASN'T RAN GEAR IN 5.5 YEARS.

And who RARELY EVER ran it prior to that.

All my stats [body weight, body composition, being strong for my size] is all consistent with being a hard training natural. Because that's what I was.

What's Getbig going to say when I bench 315x15? You know - EXACTLY THE IMPROVEMENTS YOU'D EXPECT FROM A DISPROPORTIONATELY STRONG NATURAL WHEN DABBLING IN JUICE.

EVERYTHING is consistent with what I said. So go figure - maybe I've been telling the truth all these years.

Anyway, though - looking at those two pictures, anyone who hasn't seen me in a month or two will immediately know I'm...doing something.

The difference is very apparent in that comparison above, and...I hate to lie, so...I guess I'll just come clean with anyone who asks.

Plus this thread is public, and most of my friends know I post here. So...as per usual, I'm not hiding anything.

I guess what I'm saying is - I may not be able to. I could wear baggie clothes, I guess, but that defeats the purpose.

PS - Anadrol rocks, I highly recommend it. I've never gone over ~17mg daily as an average, but I did for a FEW consecutive days, and it was even better at higher dosages. A friend told me that going from 100mg daily to 150mg daily did nothing but increase side effects. I've never taken more than 50mg in one day, and it was only for two days, maybe three. I then curtailed it, as I could basically "feel" that quantity. It sort of makes me feel warmer...which I don't think is a good thing. Amazing pumps though.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 28, 2022, 04:03:12 AM
(https://spoilertime.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/giphy-3.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 28, 2022, 04:09:03 AM
LOL!

Okay here's the deal, Matt did send via my Facebook messenger a photo of a penis with a hand next to it and a 30 second video of someone furiously jacking off and ejaculating. I'm not sure how those prove what he wanted proved. I have no idea whether the penis in the photo or the video was his. Could be anyone’s. Also, even if it is Matt and it probably is, he might have very small hands and therefore a small penis. Had the penis been the size of Johnny Falcon’s, Getbig’s own horse cock, there would be no question of its length and girth.
 
Happy now?
Wait he sent you a video jerking off? Wtf
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on July 28, 2022, 04:33:50 AM
This is a problem...is there anything I can do about face bloat?

Wait..I got it...let me guess? Another compound?  ::) That eye roll wasn't for you. It's just incredible how the answer to drugs is so often more drugs...

I have not had major back acne so far. Very minimal. But I'm also barely using anything...but I'm glad I don't need to get a retinoid prescription. Though I might do that anyway...I do like having a clear back.

Lastly, today my training partner asked me why I'm not going "full hog" on this cycle. My answer is: I don't want massive side effects.

If the options are 20-lb and no side effects, or 35-lb and side effects...I'd rather stick with 20.

Time will tell. I might just say fuck it, and ramp up the gear.

face bloat: less carbs, more cardio, lean up, reduce sodium

backne: melanotan II and/or light tanning

the idea of cycling in general is bad in my opinion, better to take lower doses for extended periods as you've been doing.  If i were you, i'd do 200-250mg test for a year and re-evaluate. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 28, 2022, 04:40:08 AM
I had to look that one up.  ;D

Do I have feet problems? Getbig will figure that out for me.

They're big and disgusting, anyway.

Getbig is interesting...you get all the constructive criticism you would ever need...but then you have the delusional comments, and comments criticizing you even when you actually look good and are doing well at something.

I want people to come here and tell me what I'm doing wrong, and learn from that. But when people call me weak - which is just objectively untrue - it's just...IT'S FUCKING WEIRD.

Here's one for you, wes: people making fun of your age. Meanwhile, there are like 10 members older than you. CRIPE'S SAKE, THE AVERAGE GETBIGGER AGE IS LIKE 71.  ;D
These guys have been making fun of my age for over twenty years.....now they`re all old fucks as well, so I get the last laugh....plus I`m like Albert Beccles....I lied about my age I was actually born in 1995.....I just appear to look older because of my misspent adulthood youth.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 28, 2022, 05:26:58 AM
LOL!

Okay here's the deal, Matt did send via my Facebook messenger a photo of a penis with a hand next to it and a 30 second video of someone furiously jacking off and ejaculating. I'm not sure how those prove what he wanted proved. I have no idea whether the penis in the photo or the video was his. Could be anyone’s. Also, even if it is Matt and it probably is, he might have very small hands and therefore a small penis. Had the penis been the size of Johnny Falcon’s, Getbig’s own horse cock, there would be no question of its length and girth.
 
Happy now?

Matt I believe primemuscle is saying there was insufficient data for him to confirm a 6.45" penis length. You may have to send him a second video next to a ruler or tape measure.

Perhaps Getbig hearings should be held like the Senate did for Clarence Thomas.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on July 28, 2022, 05:35:05 AM
LOL!

Okay here's the deal, Matt did send via my Facebook messenger a photo of a penis with a hand next to it and a 30 second video of someone furiously jacking off and ejaculating. I'm not sure how those prove what he wanted proved. I have no idea whether the penis in the photo or the video was his. Could be anyone’s. Also, even if it is Matt and it probably is, he might have very small hands and therefore a small penis. Had the penis been the size of Johnny Falcon’s, Getbig’s own horse cock, there would be no question of its length and girth.
 
Happy now?


I’ve been way behind in this thread. I wish I would have kept it that way.

What’s the story with Bhanks putting a shoulder throw on a sting ray and immediately being incapacitated?

Has Matt started the steroids?

As weird as Matt sending cock pics to prime (and of course Prime managed to respond in a way that makes him seem even creepier than Matt’s actions) is anyone else bothered with Matt, the man who keeps exact measurements for everything, buying shoes two sizes to big?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 28, 2022, 05:59:55 AM
Wait he sent you a video jerking off? Wtf

That was my exact reaction.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 28, 2022, 06:03:40 AM
Good question.

Honestly, I got exactly what I wanted out of the cycle - I'm 20-lb up, and don't appear to be any fatter. I have a full, sort of perpetually pumped look, and I'm getting a tremendous lot of good attention.

I'm pleased. I can't complain. And I don't want to shut myself down too hard, and for it to take months for me to get back to normal.

Do you have any suggestions on that, Humble?
I had to re read that as I was focused on the sustanon and forgot you were already on anadrol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 28, 2022, 06:06:23 AM
Matt I believe primemuscle is saying there was insufficient data for him to confirm a 6.45" penis length. You may have to send him a second video next to a ruler or tape measure.

Perhaps Getbig hearings should be held like the Senate did for Clarence Thomas.

Please do not give Matt any ideas. I would rather not get more penis photos on Facebook messenger. If he wants to convince people here of his virility, he should post those in the adult sex thread.     
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 28, 2022, 06:43:11 AM
That was my exact reaction.
Fucking weird. I catch myself giving Matt shit and I'm like ya know I'm being an asshole. But sending another guy a jerkoff video is weird. Unless of course Matt is gay and flirting with you
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 28, 2022, 06:50:47 AM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1383069;image)

(https://y.yarn.co/463c08ab-e6ce-42b5-bdac-af5537a7cecc_text.gif)

(https://y.yarn.co/95e808db-fed2-4855-8609-38dbe7c62fe7_text.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on July 28, 2022, 06:56:29 AM
I think the photo is pretty clear. However, I could take a video of me measuring it directly.

None of this shit matters on Getbig though. You can post video evidence of anything, and get called out by people posting video evidence of nothing.

Now what we're on this topic - tell Getbig I blast loads like Peter North. Fuck, I blast bigger loads than Peter North.

Please confirm.

Not sure if I'm the only one that thinks this request is AS BENT AS FUCK!?

Matt - step back for a second and think about what you've done, and what you're asking...  :-X
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 28, 2022, 07:12:44 AM
Not sure if I'm the only one that thinks this request is AS BENT AS FUCK!?

Matt - step back for a second and think about what you've done, and what you're asking...  :-X

I wonder if he got his erection thinking about the destination of the video as opposed to some porn
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on July 28, 2022, 07:24:16 AM
This is a problem...is there anything I can do about face bloat?

Wait..I got it...let me guess? Another compound?  ::) That eye roll wasn't for you. It's just incredible how the answer to drugs is so often more drugs...

I have not had major back acne so far. Very minimal. But I'm also barely using anything...but I'm glad I don't need to get a retinoid prescription. Though I might do that anyway...I do like having a clear back.

Lastly, today my training partner asked me why I'm not going "full hog" on this cycle. My answer is: I don't want massive side effects.

If the options are 20-lb and no side effects, or 35-lb and side effects...I'd rather stick with 20.

Time will tell. I might just say fuck it, and ramp up the gear.

I’ll say what EVERY dude on here that actually knows is thinking… Matt - you do not look like you’re on gear. You keep saying “can’t maintain this look”???? It seems that maybe you and Hank have purchased the same “Delusional Image” mirrors because both of you seem to think you look totally different than people see you.
And Matt - I don’t think you are a bad guy but stop and re read your threads - you have to see how douchebag they sound. I know you have some mental retardation and I don’t want to be cruel, but goddamnit man, if you were my buddy I’d punch you in the throat until you stopped. You need some cool cats as friends IN REAL LIFE.

All done carry on
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 28, 2022, 07:55:07 AM
if you were my buddy I’d punch you in the throat

Hilarious  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 28, 2022, 08:15:46 AM
Fucking weird. I catch myself giving Matt shit and I'm like ya know I'm being an asshole. But sending another guy a jerkoff video is weird. Unless of course Matt is gay and flirting with you

No….

Absolutely nothing fucking weird about a low IQ, 165 lb male steroid user, sending an unsolicited jerkoff video to a 78 year old man through Facebook.

No, that’s normal behavior. Nothing creepy about Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning’s retard thought process at all. He probably learned that behavior in a Special Needs class at Lakehead University.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on July 28, 2022, 08:24:41 AM
No….

Absolutely nothing fucking weird about a low IQ, 165 lb male steroid user, sending an unsolicited jerkoff video to a 78 year old man through Facebook.

No, that’s normal behavior. Nothing creepy about Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning’s retard thought process at all. He probably learned that behavior in a Special Needs class at Lakehead University.
[/b]


Genuine LOL

😆
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 28, 2022, 08:26:14 AM
That was my exact reaction.

First time I’ve ever agreed with a Primehomosexual post.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 28, 2022, 08:30:30 AM
3+$+_)#9#-";BLARGH!!

OH FOR FUCK'S SAKE, FLEXACON.  ;D

[See below]

Flexacon - BRO, DUDE: can you just stop?

I made a comment that you were basically shilling for the vaccine back, what, 11 months ago? Then I apologized to you for it, acknowledged your views on the pandemic evolved, then THOUGHT that I squashed that beef.

Yet you continue to attack me, in a one-sided duel.

Now, that being said - if you want to butt heads with me on here, that's cool. But let me go on record right now: I put this behind me long ago.

So, is it still on, Flexacon? Because I'm willing to squash this beef.

Now, regarding my feet. Yes, I wear large shoes. BECAUSE I HAVE LARGE FEET.

My feet are just over 11", but Size 11 [in Canadian sizes - not sure what the EU equivalent is] are too tight.

Size 12 is hit and miss, and Size 13 are always a bit loose. But since sometimes even Size 12 is tight, I have often gotten 13's.

Always 12's or 13's though.

And I aim for a chunky heel - NOT shoe lifts. And by a "chunky" heel, I mean maybe 1cm thicker than your average pair. I don't want to give women the impression I'm 5'11" or something. If a woman thinks I'm a pussy hair under 5'10" that's ok. I mean...I sort of am.

Stallone and his 4" shoe lifts look ridiculous.

Anyway, here is a picture of my feet. Yes, my feet are VERY HAIRY [they're disgusting - but there's not much I can do about my hairy ape feet].

And yes, I just shaved them a few days ago.  ;D

Anyway, there's little if ANYTHING I do that I won't admit to on here. I don't wear shoe lifts. I try to grab a shoe with a decent heel...but...so what? I also try to sort of wear my hair up and maintain excellent posture - basically so I look 5'10" rather than 5'9".

What's wrong with that?

Andy Haman [RIP] was 5'11" and wore shoes with a MASSIVE heel - he looked around 6'2" while wearing them!

A photo I just took of one of my massive, disgusting, HAIRY feet [which I shaved recently because I've been going to public swims lately...and frankly, I HATE body hair]:

The fact you didn't shave the toes only makes it look worse.

Like you could climb trees for coconuts with those dogs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 28, 2022, 11:08:58 AM
Not sure if I'm the only one that thinks this request is AS BENT AS FUCK!?

Matt - step back for a second and think about what you've done, and what you're asking...  :-X

If you have not noticed Matt obsesses over minutia which other people couldn't care less about? It is one of the most common traits of people on the autism spectrum. My guess is Matt will still be discussing these things 20 years from now. I tried to explain to him that nobody cares (specially nobody on Getbig) the "ropes" of semen shoot from his penis except the woman with who he is having intercourse.

I have known Matt via the internet going on 20 years and he is still going on about many of the same things he obsessed about back then.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 28, 2022, 11:20:54 AM

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1383485;image)
A photo I just took of one of my massive, disgusting, HAIRY feet [which I shaved recently because I've been going to public swims lately...and frankly, I HATE body hair]:

You're basically a hobbit lmao

(https://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/9500000/Pippin-Took-pippin-took-9560967-496-1062.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on July 28, 2022, 11:31:01 AM
Mens feet should be kept hidden! Wearing sandals, flipflops or sliders in public is a disgrace. Definitely don't need to see closeups of them sporting pube like black hairs whilst innocently browsing threads.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on July 28, 2022, 01:20:48 PM
Matt,

I mean this with all respect, dood, but you're all over the place.

I'm glad you're enjoying the Anadrol.  Training on gear can be fun! 

Yes, benching 225 for 30 is an accomplishment.  315x15 is exceptional.  I never did that even on gear and weighing a lot more than you.  But I *could* triple 370 with immaculate form, and that was in my early twenties.  I didn't train for strength per se, and I didn't peak until 2013.

Point being, don't let this go to your head so much.  You post lots of pics which show you've got very good delts, but you seem hell bent on convincing yourself you outmuscle and outlift all but 1% of X demographic, and you yourself said you're fiddling around with this cycle "for attention."

You're 40 years old, Matt!  Fuck external validation; that's teenager shit.  The only person you should care about "impressing" is YOU.  Your kids?  You shouldn't have to try to wow them...that should come naturally, with you leading by example.

I must also note that you seem much angrier as of late.  You strawmander the living shit out of McWay and frequently respond to him in all-caps.  He never said anything about "Weider principles" that I've seen.  He just said that you didn't optimize your efforts to gain naturally.  I agree with him.  You eat like a bird and, while you are strong, I've seen your training clips, like the one of you on that pec deck.  You constantly whine about your lack of a chest...well, watch that clip again.  From the first rep, your chest collapses and you move the weight with your front delts.  You never lowered the weight far enough to get any semblance of a stretch, which research shows is a major component in stimulating hypertrophy.  Then, when the load became difficult, you did this bizarre thing wherein you leaned your entire body forward to finish the last two reps.  WTF?

Man, I'm rooting for you.  But this hyper-focus you're supposed to have with a good mind paired with Asperger's?  I'm not seeing it.  One minute, you say one thing, and a day later, you say another.

Be mad at me if you need be.  But be honest with yourself first.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 28, 2022, 01:24:33 PM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 28, 2022, 02:10:36 PM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.

Matt is the new hanky.

Just say jump...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 28, 2022, 02:38:53 PM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.

I hate being correct all the time….

😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 28, 2022, 03:55:38 PM
This place is amazing.  I actually feel bad for those who don't know about it. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on July 28, 2022, 04:04:35 PM
Not just any load, but 8-10 gooey ropes to hear Matt tell it. Like a jar of mayonnaise exploded in the room.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 28, 2022, 04:43:16 PM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.

If he faked it its a much better troll job than Shizzo's death.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 28, 2022, 04:45:26 PM
If he faked it its a much better troll job than Shizzo's death.
shizzos death did build peoples hopes up a bit

No one really cares about Matts
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 28, 2022, 04:52:28 PM
shizzos death did build peoples hopes up a bit

No one really cares about Matts

Brutal if true  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 28, 2022, 04:59:04 PM
Mens feet should be kept hidden! Wearing sandals, flipflops or sliders in public is a disgrace. Definitely don't need to see closeups of them sporting pube like black hairs whilst innocently browsing threads.

This definitely this. Never Understood men showing feet. All mens feet are gross.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 28, 2022, 05:11:17 PM
This place is amazing.  I actually feel bad for those who don't know about it. 

Membership qualifications are stringent.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 28, 2022, 06:06:00 PM
Membership qualifications are stringent.
............and very exclusive.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on July 28, 2022, 06:59:12 PM
Hilarious  LOL  ;D

You know exactly what I am saying! You’re a cool cat Wes and I think you would have the common FUCKING COURTESY to ball your fist and sling a widow maker directly at the Adam’s apple of any buddy of yours who said some of the retard sht that this jive turkey spits out. I know I miss a shit load of stuff but the one time when the word / phrase repeating retard kept saying “licking her fishy slit” about some bodybuilder. Some chick gave the dude great detail ?? I lived a portion of my life way too fast and way too many women - and never once has a woman explained how someone else ate her box?? I will say this - Matt gives me major laughter. He is absolutely one of the most awkward dudes on the internet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on July 28, 2022, 07:10:06 PM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.

Get the fck out of here you gdamn KNOW he did!! The reason you are laughing your balls off is because if DOESNT surprise you!! 😆  i agree though. I had to get one of my brothers to read the thread because when I told him that some Canuckian odd job had sent pics and video of himself brutalizing his cock and balls - ending with “shooting ropes” - TO this old creepy ass widower - he thought I was making sht up. I told him if I made that freaky sht up he got a free right hand to the throat or temple (fckd up way we resolve things in my family - fckn savages! )
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 28, 2022, 07:30:22 PM
You know exactly what I am saying! You’re a cool cat Wes and I think you would have the common FUCKING COURTESY to ball your fist and sling a widow maker directly at the Adam’s apple of any buddy of yours who said some of the retard sht that this jive turkey spits out. I know I miss a shit load of stuff but the one time when the word / phrase repeating retard kept saying “licking her fishy slit” about some bodybuilder. Some chick gave the dude great detail ?? I lived a portion of my life way too fast and way too many women - and never once has a woman explained how someone else ate her box?? I will say this - Matt gives me major laughter. He is absolutely one of the most awkward dudes on the internet.
Yes, I klnow exactly what you mean.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 28, 2022, 08:01:04 PM
Mens feet should be kept hidden! Wearing sandals, flipflops or sliders in public is a disgrace. Definitely don't need to see closeups of them sporting pube like black hairs whilst innocently browsing threads.

Exactly.  WTF is wrong with Bhanks, Matt and Arvilla?  Don't they know we are sometimes eating while browsing.

Sobchak has the presence of mind to just show the scale weight.

Retards.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 28, 2022, 08:06:03 PM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.

5 gayest things ever posted on getbig:

4.  Earl admitting to crying when Levrone retired

3. squad asking the board if "it" was worth it.  "it" being dedication to bodybuilding.  then saw his pics.

2. Matt sending dick pics to prime

1. Shizzo admitting to sucking a cock just to get message board attention, tied with one poster admitting he would not do one chin up in a park to show somebody he could because he "didn't want to ruin his back workout the following day".  Can't remember who said it, but it was gayer than gay.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SGT BARNES on July 28, 2022, 08:06:52 PM
I for one am all for mattc's new malevolent personality. He dosent take kindly to disrespect or non on-spectrum conversation. He will swiftly dispense justice with dick pics or a knife if you venture too close to his shaven feet.

carry on and give them hell mattc
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 28, 2022, 08:14:55 PM
I for one am all for mattc's new malevolent personality. He dosent take kindly to disrespect or non on-spectrum conversation. He will swiftly dispense justice with dick pics or a knife if you venture too close to his shaven feet.

carry on and give them hell mattc

Predicting a court martial for Sgt Barnes for this post.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 28, 2022, 08:38:38 PM
5 gayest things ever posted on getbig:

4.  Earl admitting to crying when Levrone retired

3. squad asking the board if "it" was worth it.  "it" being dedication to bodybuilding.  then saw his pics.

2. Matt sending dick pics to prime

1. Shizzo admitting to sucking a cock just to get message board attention, tied with one poster admitting he would not do one chin up in a park to show somebody he could because he "didn't want to ruin his back workout the following day".  Can't remember who said it, but it was gayer than gay.

Shizzos "admission" does have some doubts to it. Also the fella asked to prove if he could do a chin up must have looked like he couldn't do it, and the fact he gave a reason why he wouldn't do it might suggest he couldn't actually do one. Basically no one would ask a fit/strong looking person to prove they could do chins.

Matts gayness is a 100% certified and without doubt. Although being reminded about Earl crying over Leverone makes me think he should be number 1.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on July 28, 2022, 08:54:08 PM
Shizzos "admission" does have some doubts to it.

Top five gayest things updated to  six:

5.  Shizzos "admission" does have some doubts to it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 28, 2022, 08:56:00 PM
I for one am all for mattc's new malevolent personality. He dosent take kindly to disrespect or non on-spectrum conversation. He will swiftly dispense justice with dick pics or a knife if you venture too close to his shaven feet.

carry on and give them hell mattc

Lol! This is excellent.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 28, 2022, 09:04:33 PM
Top five gayest things updated to  six:

5.  Shizzos "admission" does have some doubts to it.

My doubts are he's too fat and disgusting to be able to find a willing cock to suck  :D

Now kindly take me of list
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 28, 2022, 09:53:59 PM
This place is amazing.  I actually feel bad for those who don't know about it.

There are days the crazy fuckers on here are the best entertainment on the internet.

But if you’re OMR you have got to feel jaded. He’s the only open and accepted homosexual man on the site and he has been completely cut out of the dick pics and jerkoff videos loop.

I think someone is going to need to study Matt Canning’s jerkoff video and make absolutely sure that Shizzo didn’t “have a hand in it.”

See what I did there….🤣
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 28, 2022, 11:08:40 PM
There are days the crazy fuckers on here are the best entertainment on the internet.

But if you’re OMR you have got to feel jaded. He’s the only open and accepted homosexual man on the site and he has been completely cut out of the dick pics and jerkoff videos loop.

I think someone is going to need to study Matt Canning’s jerkoff video and make absolutely sure that Shizzo didn’t “have a hand in it.”

See what I did there….🤣

That is a legit travesty. 

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 28, 2022, 11:24:16 PM
That is a legit travesty.

I agree….the weirdo Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning should definitely send cock pics and jerkoff videos to OMR so Getbig is more inclusive.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 29, 2022, 12:19:55 AM
Top five gayest things updated to  six:

5.  Shizzos "admission" does have some doubts to it.
I highly doubt if Shizzo really sucked a dick.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on July 29, 2022, 01:15:32 AM
I don't understand how the penis size came up in conversation, let alone the admission of tiny cock! Then to progress to not only proving tiny weener in a video but the spurt load too is mind boggling. Maybe the cycle is screwing with Matt's mind, normal people don't entertain doing stuff like this.  ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 29, 2022, 01:49:37 AM
I highly doubt if Shizzo really sucked a dick.

Agreed.  It's probably plural. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 29, 2022, 02:35:21 AM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.
The way Prime described it was the funniest part. Matt was "furiously  jerking off." Furiously?! Ole Matty boy was really into it. Lmfao!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 29, 2022, 02:54:37 AM
Agreed.  It's probably plural. 
:D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on July 29, 2022, 03:55:54 AM
The way Prime described it was the funniest part. Matt was "furiously  jerking off." Furiously?! Ole Matty boy was really into it. Lmfao!!
😆😆😂🤣🤣. Cant you see it??!! Matt is feverishly going at it - damn near throwing his shoulder out - and in the voice of Elmer Fudd saying “oooooohhhhh I’ll show dem awwll - I’ll prooove it!!!…..”
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: CalvinH on July 29, 2022, 06:52:43 AM
I hope when matt finally loses it this board doesn't get blamed.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on July 29, 2022, 06:54:20 AM
The way Prime described it was the funniest part. Matt was "furiously  jerking off." Furiously?! Ole Matty boy was really into it. Lmfao!!

Hahahaha
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 29, 2022, 07:13:53 AM
I guess it is not gay to send a masturbation video to Prime if you view prime as a sort of de facto penis expert who can look at a cock being beaten like a soccer judge can judge a soccer match.

That being said, I will not be sending any peenus videos or pics to papa prime.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 29, 2022, 07:19:00 AM
I guess it is not gay to send a masturbation video to Prime if you view prime as a sort of de facto penis expert who can look at a cock being beaten like a soccer judge can judge a soccer match.

That being said, I will not be sending any peenus videos or pics to papa prime.

I think thats how bodybuilding judges are selected....
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 29, 2022, 10:37:16 AM
😆😆😂🤣🤣. Cant you see it??!! Matt is feverishly going at it - damn near throwing his shoulder out - and in the voice of Elmer Fudd saying “oooooohhhhh I’ll show dem awwll - I’ll prooove it!!!…..”

You know damn well Spastic Matt mentions me in the jerkoff video…

😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on July 29, 2022, 10:38:46 AM
😆😆😂🤣🤣. Cant you see it??!! Matt is feverishly going at it - damn near throwing his shoulder out - and in the voice of Elmer Fudd saying “oooooohhhhh I’ll show dem awwll - I’ll prooove it!!!…..”

😆
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 29, 2022, 11:49:21 AM
I hope when matt finally loses it this board doesn't get blamed.

Don’t worry Clavin, you won’t get jism on your size medium David Hogg t-shirt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 29, 2022, 12:37:31 PM
I hope when matt finally loses it this board doesn't get blamed.

When he crashes hard after doing a stupid cycle, he's going to be an emotional train wreck.

When he shoots up a Police Station at least he will be somebody in this world.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on July 29, 2022, 12:42:02 PM
When he crashes hard after doing a stupid cycle, he's going to be an emotional train wreck.

When he shoots up a Police Station at least he will be somebody in this world.

That's why I kept trying to tell him that the modest gains he was seeking did NOT require anabolics to achieve. Nor would it have taken him 18 months to do so, as he kept erroneously claiming.

He just doesn't want to eat. And without steroids, he has NO CHANCE of making those kind of gains without a sound diet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 29, 2022, 01:23:12 PM
I guess it is not gay to send a masturbation video to Prime if you view prime as a sort of de facto penis expert who can look at a cock being beaten like a soccer judge can judge a soccer match.

That being said, I will not be sending any peenus videos or pics to papa prime.

And thank you for that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 29, 2022, 01:25:18 PM
And thank you for that.
LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 29, 2022, 01:28:32 PM
When he crashes hard after doing a stupid cycle, he's going to be an emotional train wreck.

When he shoots up a Police Station at least he will be somebody in this world.

Don't give him any ideas. He's already phoned and threatened the police.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 29, 2022, 02:59:43 PM
That's why I kept trying to tell him that the modest gains he was seeking did NOT require anabolics to achieve. Nor would it have taken him 18 months to do so, as he kept erroneously claiming.

He just doesn't want to eat. And without steroids, he has NO CHANCE of making those kind of gains without a sound diet.

It's pointless to argue with him.

He knows everything.

I've been around AAS for 20 years and tried to help him, but he's convinced this train wreck of a cycle is a good idea.

His point is to show how much easier it is to gain weight on steroids.

No shit, that's what they do.

All he's gained is water.

2-3 weeks after he stops the Anadrol he will go back to where he was and probably worse because his Test levels will be Zero. Crash and burn.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 29, 2022, 03:18:47 PM
It's pointless to argue with him.


This

Gotta ask yourself who is the bigger dope, Matt or the person repeatedly engaging him when he's in potato mode?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on July 29, 2022, 04:14:36 PM
It's pointless to argue with him.

He knows everything.

I've been around AAS for 20 years and tried to help him, but he's convinced this train wreck of a cycle is a good idea.

His point is to show how much easier it is to gain weight on steroids.

No shit, that's what they do.

All he's gained is water.

2-3 weeks after he stops the Anadrol he will go back to where he was and probably worse because his Test levels will be Zero. Crash and burn.

Anadrol is the worst when it comes to losing your gains. Unless there is a test base buffering the comedown it can be shocking lol, in 2 weeks everything is gone and more. It doesn't mean Anadrol is useless to run, it's just very temporary, all steroid gains are but Anadrol is the worst as the gains disappear so quickly.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on July 29, 2022, 04:22:31 PM
That's why I kept trying to tell him that the modest gains he was seeking did NOT require anabolics to achieve. Nor would it have taken him 18 months to do so, as he kept erroneously claiming.

He just doesn't want to eat. And without steroids, he has NO CHANCE of making those kind of gains without a sound diet.

You are missing something. You don't understand that nothing gives "steroid gains" apart from steroids. It doesn't matter what the scale says or what a body composition analysis says, only steroids make you look like you are on steroids. This is apparently very hard for some to understand.

That is not so say he wouldn't benefit from eating more. OTOH there is something to be said for "instinctive eating," listening to what yout body is telling you, not force feeding. To a degree your body and appetite will tell you what it wants. Many a body was ruined by bulking or force feeding.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 29, 2022, 04:24:40 PM
Anadrol is the worst when it comes to losing your gains. Unless there is a test base buffering the comedown it can be shocking lol, in 2 weeks everything is gone and more. It doesn't mean Anadrol is useless to run, it's just very temporary, all steroid gains are but Anadrol is the worst as the gains disappear so quickly.

He's gonna really come off the rails!    :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on July 29, 2022, 07:00:44 PM
"In reality, I could have been 220+ all these years."

Getting over 220 and getting over 200 are not the same thing. Let's see the 220+ update first before making the claim
If he is 204 on 2000 cals, and minimal gear he could definately hit 220 on more cals alone, not even much more gear.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on July 29, 2022, 09:11:31 PM
This thread couldn’t get much weirder and perplexing than this.

For a normal person if they just ignored Anadrol’s half life it could wreak havoc on the person emotionally. For someone who already has emotional challenges it could throw them into a loop of mania and depression as the drug dose fluctuates which could create a magnified affect on their specific condition.

Anadrol is nothing more than a boost and without test after you would think it would bring more complications upon cessation.

Test E of C at 250mg’s (Sust would prob work too) a week would provide a longer term solution with less psychological affects.

These drugs are serious and just freestyling how you feel like is a recipe for a letdown and disturbances within someone’s life.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 29, 2022, 09:24:38 PM
Matt will be coming home soon boys! I beleive matt right now is lifting weights on the canadian border reading getbig on his monitor, fantasizing about the cannanites , the first well spoken race of humans
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on July 29, 2022, 11:48:50 PM
This thread couldn’t get much weirder and perplexing than this.

For a normal person if they just ignored Anadrol’s half life it could wreak havoc on the person emotionally. For someone who already has emotional challenges it could throw them into a loop of mania and depression as the drug dose fluctuates which could create a magnified affect on their specific condition.

Anadrol is nothing more than a boost and without test after you would think it would bring more complications upon cessation.

Test E of C at 250mg’s (Sust would prob work too) a week would provide a longer term solution with less psychological affects.

These drugs are serious and just freestyling how you feel like is a recipe for a letdown and disturbances within someone’s life.


Another solid post....all your posts are good and make sense bro.....totally weird for this board.  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 30, 2022, 01:35:24 AM
Anadrol is the worst when it comes to losing your gains. Unless there is a test base buffering the comedown it can be shocking lol, in 2 weeks everything is gone and more. It doesn't mean Anadrol is useless to run, it's just very temporary, all steroid gains are but Anadrol is the worst as the gains disappear so quickly.
The Ultimate Warrior would agree. When they started testing wrestlers he looked like he lost 50 pounds in a month.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 30, 2022, 01:54:23 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/QCsK3PFy/644h5454h54e1.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 30, 2022, 05:14:57 AM
I guess it is not gay to send a masturbation video to Prime if you view prime as a sort of de facto penis expert who can look at a cock being beaten like a soccer judge can judge a soccer match.

That being said, I will not be sending any peenus videos or pics to papa prime.
Oh its gay haha! Cmon. He didn't just send a dick pic. He sent a jerk off video. It's gay
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 30, 2022, 05:23:51 AM
Oh its gay haha! Cmon. He didn't just send a dick pic. He sent a jerk off video. It's gay

And cum shot.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 30, 2022, 06:17:47 AM
And cum shot.
Ah yes. Solid point. JOed to completion. Uber gay
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on July 30, 2022, 06:37:01 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/QCsK3PFy/644h5454h54e1.jpg)

(https://c.tenor.com/xhFf7TcnE3UAAAAC/omar-ulmer-inglourious-basterds.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on July 30, 2022, 10:28:04 AM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.

I’m also wondering if this seriously really happened or is just an element of Getbig Lore.

To be clear, I don’t want to actually see the video, just wondering if it was indeed really created and delivered.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 30, 2022, 10:30:01 AM
I’m also wondering if this seriously really happened or is just an element of Getbig Lore.

To be clear, I don’t want to actually see the video, just wondering if it was indeed really created and delivered.
(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AgonizingAromaticIndianelephant-size_restricted.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 30, 2022, 11:03:06 AM
I’m also wondering if this seriously really happened or is just an element of Getbig Lore.

To be clear, I don’t want to actually see the video, just wondering if it was indeed really created and delivered.

Matt C sent the video to Primemuscle on Facebook.

Confirmed by both.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on July 30, 2022, 11:08:30 AM
Why in the great name of Mike Katz's stolen t-shirt would you send dick pics to another man, Matt?!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 30, 2022, 11:11:05 AM
Matt, all the sudden, curiously missing from the thread.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on July 30, 2022, 11:51:54 AM
No way he sent a video of himself jerking it and blowing a load, no fucking way.  I’m laughing pretty fucking hard right now. I’ve been reading about this for days and only today did it really sink in.

WTF !!!

No Way - I'm just catching up with this on going Video Thing.

It Must Be a Wind Up.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: arce1988 on July 30, 2022, 11:55:42 AM
 Matt’s Posts are SCARY 😟

There is so Much ANGER and HATE that I Fear that He is going to go Postal

😞 💔🙏🏽❤️
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 30, 2022, 11:58:28 AM
Why in the great name of Mike Katz's stolen t-shirt would you send dick pics to another man, Matt?!
You're hung up on the dick pics? Not the jerk off video? The JO video where Matt was "furiously " jerking off
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 30, 2022, 12:33:03 PM
Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning, there is a group of people here in the U.S. have are about to take a keen interest in you exchanging jerkoff videos with Jay Milton Osborne III.

Luckily I can assist them by providing names, addresses and phone numbers for both of you.

They asked if you two shared a political affiliation. I had to make an educated guess for that answer.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on July 30, 2022, 01:37:14 PM
Sounds like there are things :o
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 30, 2022, 01:48:06 PM
Matt “Connoisseur of Cock” Canning, there is a group of people here in the U.S. have are about to take a keen interest in you exchanging jerkoff videos with Jay Milton Osborne III.

Luckily I can assist them by providing names, addresses and phone numbers for both of you.

They asked if you two shared a political affiliation. I had to make an educated guess for that answer.

Did you guess yes or no?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 30, 2022, 02:32:48 PM
I’m also wondering if this seriously really happened or is just an element of Getbig Lore.

To be clear, I don’t want to actually see the video, just wondering if it was indeed really created and delivered.

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AgonizingAromaticIndianelephant-size_restricted.gif)

(https://media.giphy.com/media/fcK30LKXjG6Tm/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 30, 2022, 02:35:09 PM
Did you guess yes or no?

I was very clear that the obscene videos you received were unsolicited.

I kept your level of arousal on the down low.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 30, 2022, 04:35:46 PM
Matt should be working in the 3-5 rep range and packing on some strength before hopping off.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on July 30, 2022, 04:38:08 PM
Matt should be working in the 3-5 rep range and packing on some strength before hopping off.

Even lower could be better...maybe -2 or -3 reps.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 30, 2022, 04:39:08 PM
I’m also wondering if this seriously really happened or is just an element of Getbig Lore.

To be clear, I don’t want to actually see the video, just wondering if it was indeed really created and delivered.

Ask Matt. I deleted the video, photo and the message.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 30, 2022, 04:40:22 PM
Matt should be working in the 3-5 rep range and packing on some strength before hopping off.
right 3to 5 rep is proven for freaky gains
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 30, 2022, 04:42:07 PM
Ask Matt. I deleted the video, photo and the message.

Please confirm that I shoot ropes larger than ANY porn star, including Peter North.

That's not some insignificant achievement.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 30, 2022, 04:44:53 PM
I was very clear that the obscene videos you received were unsolicited.

I kept your level of arousal on the down low.

Thank you for that.

LOL! Had you seen that photo and especially the video, you'd understand why I was not aroused. Weirdness doesn't me turn on.

Just for the record. Matt and I couldn't be more politically opposite.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 30, 2022, 04:48:37 PM
right 3to 5 rep is proven for freaky gains

Hey Marty - the goal is ultimately to be a Mini-You.

For strength, I'm back to bench pressing 120-lb dumbbells for 12 clean reps. I do want to try the 3-5 rep range, but my fear is that my muscles are getting stronger, but my ligaments and tendons are not strengthening in proportion. So I don't want to lift anything that my muscles can support, but not necessarily the rest of my physiological infrastructure.

I should shoot to hit that 315x15 bench press though. Only because that would absolutely prove what I said about rarely ever using gear, then suddenly using it now, and - BOOM - big increase in strength, consistent with my claims.

All my results so far are consistent with me having not used gear much [rarely], and using it now. Or was I previously using magical gear that kept me at 170-lb and 16% body fat, and now I'm 205 at about the same body fat, and looking way fuller?

Anyone who thought I had used much before - that's hilarious, but actually a compliment. Certainly most people lifting what I have before, would have been using.

Damn shame I need to go off at the end of summer. I definitely prefer my current look...but I don't want to be one of those guys on for life.

As I said, the goal is to be a Mini-You.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 30, 2022, 04:52:19 PM
Thank you for that.

LOL! Had you seen that photo and especially the video, you'd understand why I was not aroused. Weirdness doesn't me turn on.

Just for the record. Matt and I couldn't be more politically opposite.

Yes, you did not request the video. I may have told you I was going to send it, then waited a bit for a reply, then just went ahead and sent it, lol.

Prime did not ask.

As for Walter Sobchak - I remember a video by some YouTubers called "The Try Guys"...all four of them did a fertility test, and I had a higher sperm count than all four, and I think a bigger load than all four combined, or 90% as much as all four of them.

No doubt limp-dicked Walter Sobchak has erectile dysfunction and probably drops a pitiful lone drop of sperm, lol. No wonder he's jealous of anyone more robust than he is. He's likely bald and fat too.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 30, 2022, 05:12:40 PM
Yes, you did not request the video. I may have told you I was going to send it, then waited a bit for a reply, then just went ahead and sent it, lol.

Prime did not ask.

As for Walter Sobchak - I remember a video by some YouTubers called "The Try Guys"...all four of them did a fertility test, and I had a higher sperm count than all four, and I think a bigger load than all four combined, or 90% as much as all four of them.

No doubt limp-dicked Walter Sobchak has erectile dysfunction and probably drops a pitiful lone drop of sperm, lol. No wonder he's jealous of anyone more robust than he is. He's likely bald and fat too.

Did you record the video specifically for prime?

Were you watching porn, looking at your reflection or thinking of a past sexual encounter to help you climax?

How long do you tend to go between empting your balls? How long was the gap between the video and your previous ball blattering?

May I suggest you filll a measuring cup with your jizzem so we have accurate numbers. Let's keep it metric. No homo.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 30, 2022, 07:39:10 PM
Matt C sent the video to Primemuscle on Facebook.

Confirmed by both.

Just to clarify, prime confirmed that he received the video but did not confirm the 6.45 inches length or the Peter North loads.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 30, 2022, 07:51:05 PM
Just to clarify, prime confirmed that he received the video but did not confirm the 6.45 inches length or the Peter North loads.

Correct

He only confirmed furious masturbation, presumably on both sides
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 30, 2022, 08:23:22 PM
Just to clarify, prime confirmed that he received the video but did not confirm the 6.45 inches length or the Peter North loads.

Prime is two and a half jars of Vaseline in and still working on confirmation.

Now what do you think was on Matt Canning’s mind while he was furiously jerking off on film for Primehomosexual?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on July 30, 2022, 10:46:35 PM
Lofl. For God sakes this shit is amazing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on July 30, 2022, 11:04:44 PM
Matt should be working in the 3-5 rep range and packing on some strength before hopping off.

Typical unthinking musclehead. Look at Matt's physique. Big delts from heavy benching and pressing. Not so big arms.

If you watch most top bodybuilders train they do reps in the 8 to 12 range. So what you advise here will simply increase his

already larger strong muscles and his arms will lag behind. He needs to stop benching and pressing and concentrate on arms and legs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Griffith on July 30, 2022, 11:51:19 PM
Did you record the video specifically for prime?

Were you watching porn, looking at your reflection or thinking of a past sexual encounter to help you climax?

How long do you tend to go between empting your balls? How long was the gap between the video and your previous ball blattering?

May I suggest you filll a measuring cup with your jizzem so we have accurate numbers. Let's keep it metric. No homo.

Matt C has previously stated he does not view porn.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 31, 2022, 12:32:40 AM
I can't give much of an update about the cycle, other than that I am up almost 25-lb since I started. Every few days when I gain a pound or two, it takes me a few more days to adjust to that new weight before I feel like I've sort of adjusted to it.

So I don't know about adding Sustanon. I did not intend to put on 40-lb from this cycle, and it seems apparent that would have happened had I done both compounds.

Gee, I wonder if that's because I WAS FUCKING TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT BEING ON UNDER 1,100 CALORIES A DAY, SO WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK HAPPENS WHEN A PERSON DOING THAT SUDDENLY DOUBLES HIS CALORIES AND GOES ON STEROIDS??

HAHAHAHAHA, and that stupid phaggot Walter Sobchak thought I was 170-lb because I couldn't get beyond that, rather than it being a conscious health choice to be lighter since it bodes much better for longevity.

I CHOSE to be 170, and when this cycle is done, I may go to that weight again. Although more likely, I'll settle at 185.

As for Walter Sobchak making fun of my arms - HAHAHAHAHA, you fat, disgusting, wheezing sack of complete shit. I have lightning bolts for triceps, and I am not REMOTELY close to pumped in these photos, since I didn't work out today. My arms are 17" pumped and flexed. Lmao @ these being bad arms.

Tomorrow, I'll be going to a public food festival in town - I guarantee I'll have the best arms of the 300-800+ people or however many people are there. I'll be the most in-shape person there, and likely bump into 10 people I know, with each one commenting on how much bigger I've gotten.

Walter Sobchak: you are a delusional fucktard. I NEVER claimed to have good arms or be strong, or whatever else, compared to pro bodybuilders. But compared to the general population, I am somewhere in the top 1-10% of men. Do you not understand what a bell curve looks like? Fucking idiot.

How does it feel that a 40-year-old manlet looks better than you, you fucking loser?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 31, 2022, 12:39:58 AM
Did you record the video specifically for prime?

Were you watching porn, looking at your reflection or thinking of a past sexual encounter to help you climax?

How long do you tend to go between empting your balls? How long was the gap between the video and your previous ball blattering?

May I suggest you filll a measuring cup with your jizzem so we have accurate numbers. Let's keep it metric. No homo.

To be honest, I took the video because Father Time gets us all, and I wanted proof that I drop loads roughly equivalent to those of Peter North.

Some more, some less - but roughly the same. And that is a cool gift to have. I mean, if a person can be happy they have a 10" dick, you can be just as happy having any above average genetic trait.

I was looking at a picture of a female friend's pussy.

Regarding time between loads, it had probably been a few days. It was so massive that it had to have been at least two days, I would think.

I don't know why Primemuscle won't confirm this - it's not like he asked me for the video. I'm just sick of people questioning my claims. Just because my flaccid dick is a little nub of a thing - one quarter or maybe one half the size of Mark Dugdale's flaccid penis - doesn't mean it doesn't grow to an adequate size.

Honestly, when I pee, the two inches of stomach fat I have sitting down, stretched out even smaller while I'm standing to pee, completely hides my dick.

Basically, you just see a stream of urine coming out of a bush of hair. It's hilarious. In the winter, my dick turns into a vagina. I showed a picture of it to a woman after fucking her, and laughed my ass off. Then she started laughing, causing me to laugh even more, then her to laugh even more.

But it grows to a fine size, and I feel I have done enough to confirm how big the little nub of a thing ultimately gets.

I just hate having my truthful claims questioned.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on July 31, 2022, 12:45:11 AM
Matt C has previously stated he does not view porn.

Thank you. Yes. In May of 2019, I quit watching what little porn I ever did watch.

Although recently I watched the 1971 movie "Deep Throat" starring Linda Lovelace and Harry Reems - but that was for historical research / history of cinema purposes only.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Phantom Spunker on July 31, 2022, 12:51:47 AM
Matt, would you ever consider posting a pic of the flaccid, winter penoris on the sex board? Not for my viewing pleasure, of course, but for verification purposes. It would likely surpass the bunny suit as the GOAT Getbig photograph.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on July 31, 2022, 01:39:56 AM
To be honest, I took the video because Father Time gets us all, and I wanted proof that I drop loads roughly equivalent to those of Peter North.

........

I just hate having my truthful claims questioned.

Thank you for candidly answering Matt.

Good luck with the rest of your cycle. I would suggest taking as many pictures as possible (mostly for yourself) whilst you're hitting your peak size. You may not look this jacked again for a long time if ever again. Good to have it documented
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 31, 2022, 03:26:33 AM
Hey Marty - the goal is ultimately to be a Mini-You.

For strength, I'm back to bench pressing 120-lb dumbbells for 12 clean reps. I do want to try the 3-5 rep range, but my fear is that my muscles are getting stronger, but my ligaments and tendons are not strengthening in proportion. So I don't want to lift anything that my muscles can support, but not necessarily the rest of my physiological infrastructure.

I should shoot to hit that 315x15 bench press though. Only because that would absolutely prove what I said about rarely ever using gear, then suddenly using it now, and - BOOM - big increase in strength, consistent with my claims.

All my results so far are consistent with me having not used gear much [rarely], and using it now. Or was I previously using magical gear that kept me at 170-lb and 16% body fat, and now I'm 205 at about the same body fat, and looking way fuller?

Anyone who thought I had used much before - that's hilarious, but actually a compliment. Certainly most people lifting what I have before, would have been using.

Damn shame I need to go off at the end of summer. I definitely prefer my current look...but I don't want to be one of those guys on for life.

As I said, the goal is to be a Mini-You.
So sad what he turned into.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 31, 2022, 05:24:22 AM
To be honest, I took the video because Father Time gets us all, and I wanted proof that I drop loads roughly equivalent to those of Peter North.

Some more, some less - but roughly the same. And that is a cool gift to have. I mean, if a person can be happy they have a 10" dick, you can be just as happy having any above average genetic trait.

I was looking at a picture of a female friend's pussy.

Regarding time between loads, it had probably been a few days. It was so massive that it had to have been at least two days, I would think.

I don't know why Primemuscle won't confirm this - it's not like he asked me for the video. I'm just sick of people questioning my claims. Just because my flaccid dick is a little nub of a thing - one quarter or maybe one half the size of Mark Dugdale's flaccid penis - doesn't mean it doesn't grow to an adequate size.

Honestly, when I pee, the two inches of stomach fat I have sitting down, stretched out even smaller while I'm standing to pee, completely hides my dick.

Basically, you just see a stream of urine coming out of a bush of hair. It's hilarious. In the winter, my dick turns into a vagina. I showed a picture of it to a woman after fucking her, and laughed my ass off. Then she started laughing, causing me to laugh even more, then her to laugh even more.

But it grows to a fine size, and I feel I have done enough to confirm how big the little nub of a thing ultimately gets.

I just hate having my truthful claims questioned.
(https://media.thetab.com/blogs.dir/90/files/2018/04/woman-girl-female-blonde-person-people-human-1.jpeg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 31, 2022, 05:29:13 AM
But it grows to a fine size

That is not what Primemuscle said. He was unimpressed by your penis size.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on July 31, 2022, 06:02:27 AM
I can't give much of an update about the cycle, other than that I am up almost 25-lb since I started. Every few days when I gain a pound or two, it takes me a few more days to adjust to that new weight before I feel like I've sort of adjusted to it.

So I don't know about adding Sustanon. I did not intend to put on 40-lb from this cycle, and it seems apparent that would have happened had I done both compounds.

Gee, I wonder if that's because I WAS FUCKING TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT BEING ON UNDER 1,100 CALORIES A DAY, SO WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK HAPPENS WHEN A PERSON DOING THAT SUDDENLY DOUBLES HIS CALORIES AND GOES ON STEROIDS??

HAHAHAHAHA, and that stupid phaggot Walter Sobchak thought I was 170-lb because I couldn't get beyond that, rather than it being a conscious health choice to be lighter since it bodes much better for longevity.

I CHOSE to be 170, and when this cycle is done, I may go to that weight again. Although more likely, I'll settle at 185.

As for Walter Sobchak making fun of my arms - HAHAHAHAHA, you fat, disgusting, wheezing sack of complete shit. I have lightning bolts for triceps, and I am not REMOTELY close to pumped in these photos, since I didn't work out today. My arms are 17" pumped and flexed. Lmao @ these being bad arms.

Tomorrow, I'll be going to a public food festival in town - I guarantee I'll have the best arms of the 300-800+ people or however many people are there. I'll be the most in-shape person there, and likely bump into 10 people I know, with each one commenting on how much bigger I've gotten.

Walter Sobchak: you are a delusional fucktard. I NEVER claimed to have good arms or be strong, or whatever else, compared to pro bodybuilders. But compared to the general population, I am somewhere in the top 1-10% of men. Do you not understand what a bell curve looks like? Fucking idiot.

How does it feel that a 40-year-old manlet looks better than you, you fucking loser?

That is the best your triceps have looked. It is mid summer if you are so concerned about your appearance maybe it's time to get a tan.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 31, 2022, 08:36:51 AM
That is not what Primemuscle said. He was unimpressed by your penis size.

His lack of self-awareness is astonishing.

But it allows him to make a fool of himself all that much easier.

A 160 lb twink reporting in every day about his steroid gains!  Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on July 31, 2022, 08:39:21 AM
This thread has taken a disturbingly bizarre turn. Can anadrol make you gay?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 31, 2022, 08:39:56 AM
Typical unthinking musclehead. Look at Matt's physique. Big delts from heavy benching and pressing. Not so big arms.

If you watch most top bodybuilders train they do reps in the 8 to 12 range. So what you advise here will simply increase his

already larger strong muscles and his arms will lag behind. He needs to stop benching and pressing and concentrate on arms and legs.
You're old and useless to this conversation, shouldn't you be sweeping the warehouse you live in?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 31, 2022, 08:41:06 AM
A 160 lb twink reporting in every day about his steroid gains!  Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!

Had to double check if you were talking about bhanks or Matt!  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 31, 2022, 08:47:47 AM
Had to double check if you were talking about bhanks or Matt!  :D

Pocket hanky is a lying egomaniac piece of shit, but he is still a far better human being than the creepy Connoisseur of Cock, Matt Canning.

I sure hope all the white knighting and phaggot grooming Josh Rehaluk is doing doesn’t go to waste. A video of that fat lazy slob and Matt Canning fucking would be the icing on Getbig’s cake.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 31, 2022, 11:01:09 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/vHZXTQhv/533h242n65w7jge2.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on July 31, 2022, 11:26:15 AM
That is the best your triceps have looked. It is mid summer if you are so concerned about your appearance maybe it's time to get a tan.
If Matt got a tan he would look better and the horseshoe is definately coming out of his arm. Then again he would look more Spanish . Ahhhhhh, what is a white supremacist to do?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on July 31, 2022, 11:29:16 AM
Matt C looks great!

Matt C = Thunder Bay's Strongest!

Matt "Thunder Balls" Canning, Bane of Lakehead U


(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/Matt-designstyle-candy-m.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/12818521-designstyle-bigfoot-m.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)

(https://i.ibb.co/8ghtxfX/pooh.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/FgLbH9F/poof.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on July 31, 2022, 11:33:45 AM
What is the source of Walter S’s hatred of MattC?  What is the background here ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on July 31, 2022, 11:44:17 AM
You're hung up on the dick pics? Not the jerk off video? The JO video where Matt was "furiously " jerking off

LOL.  You said "hung" ;)

I initially missed the bit about the masturbatory video, mate.  You're right...that shite is even worse :/. Matt's clearly self-arrested.  He always has been, what with the irresistible itch he has in imposing his own accomplishments in threads that weren't about him; still, what's been stirring as of late has gone to the next level.  Midlife crisis?

I dunno *shrugs*  I thought the talk of eating out anchovy-flavoured girls was weird enough.  I don't mind eating pussy, but that's only because my girlfriends were shaved, and even the ones who should stink the most (like my most recent ex, who smoked tonnes of cigarettes and ate lots of garbage) still took good enough hygienic care of their slits that they tasted like peaches and cream.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on July 31, 2022, 11:45:51 AM
What is the source of Walter S’s hatred of MattC?  What is the background here ???
Matt has posted enough extreme stuff here to have most forums hating on him. He was recently banned for it but returned. Personally his 225 x 25 bench video really got me back to training my hardest one last time. I'm getting old. You take the good with the bad.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on July 31, 2022, 12:37:46 PM
What is the source of Walter S’s hatred of MattC?  What is the background here ???

No idea, most of us love Matt C

Especially Lakehead U
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 31, 2022, 01:17:39 PM
No idea, most of us love Matt C

Especially Lakehead U

they pity fucked him a diploma
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on July 31, 2022, 01:28:10 PM
With this much weight gain so quickly, have you got stretch marks, if so, where?
I can't give much of an update about the cycle, other than that I am up almost 25-lb since I started. Every few days when I gain a pound or two, it takes me a few more days to adjust to that new weight before I feel like I've sort of adjusted to it.

So I don't know about adding Sustanon. I did not intend to put on 40-lb from this cycle, and it seems apparent that would have happened had I done both compounds.

Gee, I wonder if that's because I WAS FUCKING TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT BEING ON UNDER 1,100 CALORIES A DAY, SO WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK HAPPENS WHEN A PERSON DOING THAT SUDDENLY DOUBLES HIS CALORIES AND GOES ON STEROIDS??

HAHAHAHAHA, and that stupid phaggot Walter Sobchak thought I was 170-lb because I couldn't get beyond that, rather than it being a conscious health choice to be lighter since it bodes much better for longevity.

I CHOSE to be 170, and when this cycle is done, I may go to that weight again. Although more likely, I'll settle at 185.

As for Walter Sobchak making fun of my arms - HAHAHAHAHA, you fat, disgusting, wheezing sack of complete shit. I have lightning bolts for triceps, and I am not REMOTELY close to pumped in these photos, since I didn't work out today. My arms are 17" pumped and flexed. Lmao @ these being bad arms.

Tomorrow, I'll be going to a public food festival in town - I guarantee I'll have the best arms of the 300-800+ people or however many people are there. I'll be the most in-shape person there, and likely bump into 10 people I know, with each one commenting on how much bigger I've gotten.

Walter Sobchak: you are a delusional fucktard. I NEVER claimed to have good arms or be strong, or whatever else, compared to pro bodybuilders. But compared to the general population, I am somewhere in the top 1-10% of men. Do you not understand what a bell curve looks like? Fucking idiot.

How does it feel that a 40-year-old manlet looks better than you, you fucking loser?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on July 31, 2022, 01:30:17 PM
With this much weight gain so quickly, have you got stretch marks, if so, where?

Im pretty sure he doesnt have any on his cock
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on July 31, 2022, 01:56:52 PM
That is not what Primemuscle said. He was unimpressed by your penis size.

Yes. I recall 2 criticisms that prime had about the Mattsturbation video.
     1 being that because Matt wasn't as gifted as the falcon a point of comparison would be necessary to confirm 6.45 inches.
     2 being that Matt wasn't identified in the video as the owner of the cock being furiously rubbed.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 31, 2022, 04:14:44 PM
Im pretty sure he doesnt have any on his cock
Prime will be along any time to clear this up.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on July 31, 2022, 04:23:08 PM
What is the source of Walter S’s hatred of MattC?  What is the background here ???


It's Matt's naming of a certain ethnic group, this makes it personal.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on July 31, 2022, 04:27:58 PM
What is the source of Walter S’s hatred of MattC?  What is the background here ???

Nothing in particular, Walter hates most people.

Besides that: the racism, autism, narrowmindedness, the long essays, lack of sense of reality etc.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 31, 2022, 04:34:44 PM
Prime will be along any time to clear this up.

Y'all can handle this on your own just fine. -No need for me to clear anything up.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on July 31, 2022, 04:40:07 PM
Y'all can handle this on your own just fine. -No need for me to clear anything up.
Only one person here has Matts J/O videos and pics on his PC and it ain't the rest of us. ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on July 31, 2022, 04:48:35 PM
Nothing in particular, Walter hates most people.

Besides that: the racism, autism, narrowmindedness, the long essays, lack of sense of reality etc.
Ya just that small list of traits that Walter doesn't find appealing.  Dude is a real stick in the mud
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on July 31, 2022, 04:57:00 PM
Only one person here has Matts J/O videos and pics on his PC and it ain't the rest of us. ;)

It would have to be Matt because I deleted the entire Facebook message including the visuals. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on July 31, 2022, 05:03:44 PM
Why on earth would Matt send cock pics and Jack off vids to prime? Then again I am not surprised
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on July 31, 2022, 05:10:35 PM
Nothing in particular, Walter hates most people.

Besides that: the racism, autism, narrowmindedness, the long essays, lack of sense of reality etc.

Please confirm that I shoot ropes larger than ANY porn star, including Peter North.

That's not some insignificant achievement.

Leave it to Matt to provide enough ropes to hang himself on Getbig.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on August 01, 2022, 02:42:05 AM
Leave it to Matt to provide enough ropes to hang himself on Getbig.

LOL KNS
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 01, 2022, 02:58:47 AM
I’m also wondering if this seriously really happened or is just an element of Getbig Lore.

To be clear, I don’t want to actually see the video, just wondering if it was indeed really created and delivered.

(http://thumbs.gfycat.com/AgonizingAromaticIndianelephant-size_restricted.gif)

(http://media.giphy.com/media/fcK30LKXjG6Tm/giphy.gif)

(http://i.postimg.cc/gc7r9TMk/creepy_guy.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on August 01, 2022, 03:35:57 AM
In my opinion, Primemuscle's avuncular and bona fide rejection of Matt's florid bellwether was putrid and somewhat perilous. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 01, 2022, 12:04:03 PM
KING CANNING



THE KING OF KANGZ!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 01, 2022, 12:05:53 PM
I’ve got two serious questions

How many times has the jack off video been jacked off to?

And

Does anadrol make you gay?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 01, 2022, 12:11:07 PM
In my opinion, Primemuscle's avuncular and bona fide rejection of Matt's florid bellwether was putrid and somewhat perilous.

Huh? What the heck are you trying to say here?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 01, 2022, 12:17:38 PM
Why on earth would Matt send cock pics and Jack off vids to prime? Then again I am not surprised

I think you meant to ask is why did it take Matt so long to send this video?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on August 01, 2022, 01:25:52 PM
How did Walter know he was a gay?

Didn’t he say he has a child?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 01, 2022, 01:42:26 PM
How did Walter know he was a gay?

Didn’t he say he has a child?

Meaning what? FYI some gay people have children. However, I don't believe Matt is gay.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on August 01, 2022, 03:22:54 PM
I think you meant to ask is why did it take Matt so long to send this video?

He needs to post it all here for everyone to see and judge accordingly
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 01, 2022, 03:51:48 PM
How did Walter know he was a gay?

Didn’t he say he has a child?

I started to suspect it after I was forwarded PMs about some dick sucking and ass fucking supposedly done “on the down low.”

Never can be too sure. I think Prime “handled himself” pretty well, all things considered.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 01, 2022, 04:17:00 PM
Meaning what? FYI some gay people have children. However, I don't believe Matt is gay.

This. Prime even has grandchildren
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 01, 2022, 04:30:00 PM
This. Prime even has grandchildren

And great-grandchildren.  :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 01, 2022, 04:40:06 PM
This. Prime even has grandchildren

So his wife cheated on him, no reason to hate on her.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on August 03, 2022, 12:22:06 PM
LOL KNS

Thank you, Venerable Magister Basile. :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 03, 2022, 12:33:03 PM
Where the fuck is Matt?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 03, 2022, 12:34:43 PM
Where the fuck is Matt?

I'm fearing his health!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on August 03, 2022, 12:54:52 PM
No longer satisfied with mere ropes, Matt's furiously working to record ejaculating a giant lasso that he quickly jumps through to really show' em! It's going to take a few sessions to get the shot.

(http://media0.giphy.com/media/3oEduJSqPiWmpUHG3m/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mothballs on August 03, 2022, 01:12:47 PM
I believe someone may have uploaded the “rope video” to one of the porn sites and Matt is hiding in embarrassment.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 03, 2022, 02:01:21 PM
I really hope he’s busy shooting ropes instead of schools
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 03, 2022, 02:03:22 PM
I really hope he’s busy shooting ropes instead of schools

Hahaha right.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on August 03, 2022, 02:21:40 PM
Meaning what? FYI some gay people have children. However, I don't believe Matt is gay.
Like you, LOL.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 03, 2022, 02:30:12 PM
I believe someone may have uploaded the “rope video” to one of the porn sites and Matt is hiding in embarrassment.

Could you imagine if/when that video gets out all over Thunder Bay and Port Arthur, Ontario?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on August 03, 2022, 02:35:42 PM
Is MattC clearly identifiable in the film?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 03, 2022, 02:52:08 PM
Is MattC clearly identifiable in the film?

Only by his hands. And Penis.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on August 03, 2022, 02:54:32 PM
Only by his hands. And Penis.

And his voice, he’s narrating it play by play
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 03, 2022, 03:02:05 PM
Only by his hands. And Penis.

The Pink-Pencil Parsh of Peace???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 03, 2022, 03:08:32 PM
Is MattC clearly identifiable in the film?

Anybody nose?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 03, 2022, 04:04:13 PM
LOL.  You said "hung" ;)

I initially missed the bit about the masturbatory video, mate.  You're right...that shite is even worse :/. Matt's clearly self-arrested.  He always has been, what with the irresistible itch he has in imposing his own accomplishments in threads that weren't about him; still, what's been stirring as of late has gone to the next level.  Midlife crisis?

I dunno *shrugs*  I thought the talk of eating out anchovy-flavoured girls was weird enough.  I don't mind eating pussy, but that's only because my girlfriends were shaved, and even the ones who should stink the most (like my most recent ex, who smoked tonnes of cigarettes and ate lots of garbage) still took good enough hygienic care of their slits that they tasted like peaches and cream.

I almost threw up reading this. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 03, 2022, 04:07:11 PM
And his voice, he’s narrating it play by play

Would've loved to hear Vin Scully do the play by play. I'd imagine it would be something like this.

"“All year long, Getbiggers looked to him to light the fire, and all year long, he answered the demand, until he was physically unable to get hard tonight, with two sore legs, a tight left hamstring and a swollen right testicle. And with two last anadrols left, you talk about a roll of the dice, this is it. If he can peel his dick off his balls, I would imagine he would have a 50 percent chance of getting hard. So Canning's going to try to shoot some frozen ropes right now...."
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 03, 2022, 05:16:01 PM
I almost threw up reading this. 

The imagery is incredible.  It's like I'm there in person.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 03, 2022, 05:16:47 PM
Would've loved to hear Vin Scully do the play by play. I'd imagine it would be something like this.

"“All year long, Getbiggers looked to him to light the fire, and all year long, he answered the demand, until he was physically unable to get hard tonight, with two sore legs, a tight left hamstring and a swollen right testicle. And with two last anadrols left, you talk about a roll of the dice, this is it. If he can peel his dick off his balls, I would imagine he would have a 50 percent chance of getting hard. So Canning's going to try to shoot some frozen ropes right now...."

Bravo, my man.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 03, 2022, 06:30:25 PM
Would've loved to hear Vin Scully do the play by play. I'd imagine it would be something like this.

"“All year long, Getbiggers looked to him to light the fire, and all year long, he answered the demand, until he was physically unable to get hard tonight, with two sore legs, a tight left hamstring and a swollen right testicle. And with two last anadrols left, you talk about a roll of the dice, this is it. If he can peel his dick off his balls, I would imagine he would have a 50 percent chance of getting hard. So Canning's going to try to shoot some frozen ropes right now...."

I'm accusing you officially of PEP.  Performance Enhancing Posting.  @OMR - Can we give him his award now?  Nobody is touching Rambone for POTY. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on August 03, 2022, 07:21:42 PM
If he faked it its a much better troll job than Shizzo's death.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 03, 2022, 08:14:28 PM
I'm accusing you officially of PEP.  Performance Enhancing Posting.  @OMR - Can we give him his award now?  Nobody is touching Rambone for POTY.

He’s been posting like he has a 2 ton chip on his shoulder. Rambone took the not being nominated personally and he came out of the gate with a vengeance.

We have not seen this level of an artistic creativity since Eminem took second to Cannibus in the Rap Olympics. In bodybuilding terms it’s Jay Cutler coming back from defeat to beat Dexter Jackson.

Taffin has had a nice reign as champion, never resting on his laurels, but Rambone has been unleashing haymakers, that if sent in video form, that would leave Prime’s mouth agape in shock.

And in case your unaware  Prime was the individual who took Matt C’s literal best load on the proverbial chin without batting an eye as he coolly said it wasn’t the weirdest PM Matt had ever sent him.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 03, 2022, 09:47:25 PM
He’s been posting like he has a 2 ton chip on his shoulder. Rambone took the not being nominated personally and he came out of the gate with a vengeance.

We have not seen this level of an artistic creativity since Eminem took second to Cannibus in the Rap Olympics. In bodybuilding terms it’s Jay Cutler coming back from defeat to beat Dexter Jackson.

Taffin has had a nice reign as champion, never resting on his laurels, but Rambone has been unleashing haymakers, that if sent in video form, that would leave Prime’s mouth agape in shock.

And in case your unaware  Prime was the individual who took Matt C’s literal best load on the proverbial chin without batting an eye as he coolly said it wasn’t the weirdest PM Matt had ever sent him.

I was gonna say it reminds me of 2003 Ronnie.  Narrow 2002 Olympia win followed by losing to Gunther at the GNC SOS.  Comes back and lights out.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 04, 2022, 02:30:11 AM
He’s been posting like he has a 2 ton chip on his shoulder. Rambone took the not being nominated personally and he came out of the gate with a vengeance.

We have not seen this level of an artistic creativity since Eminem took second to Cannibus in the Rap Olympics. In bodybuilding terms it’s Jay Cutler coming back from defeat to beat Dexter Jackson.

Taffin has had a nice reign as champion, never resting on his laurels, but Rambone has been unleashing haymakers, that if sent in video form, that would leave Prime’s mouth agape in shock.

And in case your unaware  Prime was the individual who took Matt C’s literal best load on the proverbial chin without batting an eye as he coolly said it wasn’t the weirdest PM Matt had ever sent him.
I was gonna say it reminds me of 2003 Ronnie.  Narrow 2002 Olympia win followed by losing to Gunther at the GNC SOS.  Comes back and lights out.
I'm accusing you officially of PEP.  Performance Enhancing Posting.  @OMR - Can we give him his award now?  Nobody is touching Rambone for POTY.

Guys guys guys! Is this an inside joke among Getbig? I don’t want this ending like an 80’s teen comedy where I show up to the prom ready to be crowned, and I get DLB’s manure dumped on my head by Taffin and his cronies! I’m prepared to storm out of this place crying (and then shortly re-join under a new name and try to blend in)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 04, 2022, 03:47:20 AM
He’s been posting like he has a 2 ton chip on his shoulder. Rambone took the not being nominated personally and he came out of the gate with a vengeance.

We have not seen this level of an artistic creativity since Eminem took second to Cannibus in the Rap Olympics. In bodybuilding terms it’s Jay Cutler coming back from defeat to beat Dexter Jackson.

Taffin has had a nice reign as champion, never resting on his laurels, but Rambone has been unleashing haymakers, that if sent in video form, that would leave Prime’s mouth agape in shock.

And in case your unaware  Prime was the individual who took Matt C’s literal best load on the proverbial chin without batting an eye as he coolly said it wasn’t the weirdest PM Matt had ever sent him.

WTF
"as he coolly said it wasn’t the weirdest PM Matt had ever sent him"

FFS I don't even want to Think what Matt has Been Sending Him!!!

Matt Really ??? is There Something going on Between You & Prime???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 04, 2022, 04:06:23 AM
I'm accusing you officially of PEP.  Performance Enhancing Posting.  @OMR - Can we give him his award now?  Nobody is touching Rambone for POTY.

Yeah, I've just dropped the golden thong from my avatar (down around my ankles, ready to go into vacuum-sealed storage for handover... ;D )


He’s been posting like he has a 2 ton chip on his shoulder. Rambone took the not being nominated personally and he came out of the gate with a vengeance.

We have not seen this level of an artistic creativity since Eminem took second to Cannibus in the Rap Olympics. In bodybuilding terms it’s Jay Cutler coming back from defeat to beat Dexter Jackson.

I was gonna say it reminds me of 2003 Ronnie.  Narrow 2002 Olympia win followed by losing to Gunther at the GNC SOS.  Comes back and lights out.

Slow down fellas - so does that make me DexJax, or Cannibus?  Maybe Gunther..? ???  I is confuze... ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 04, 2022, 05:19:17 AM
WTF
"as he coolly said it wasn’t the weirdest PM Matt had ever sent him"

FFS I don't even want to Think what Matt has Been Sending Him!!!

Matt Really ??? is There Something going on Between You & Prime???

Is Matt being groomed?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 04, 2022, 06:08:38 AM
Is Matt being groomed?

!!! Don't know - or Heaven forbid is Matt Grooming Prime  :o

Prime & Matt - Answers please..........

 :D

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 04, 2022, 06:11:44 AM
Yeah, I've just dropped the golden thong from my avatar (down around my ankles, ready to go into vacuum-sealed storage for handover... ;D )


Slow down fellas - so does that make me DexJax, or Cannibus?  Maybe Gunther..? ???  I is confuze... ;D

You'e still the champ Taff. The unquestioned king.

Ultimately the Committee will make the best decision for Getbig, my opinion has zero matter on the subject and I regret getting caught up in the hyperbole.

I feel foolish ever making such a declaration for POY in AUGUST...... I guess I wanted to look cool to everyone if I was correct from so far out and it looked like I knew what I was talking about.

My sincerest apologies to everyone involved.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 04, 2022, 06:17:10 AM
Yeah, I've just dropped the golden thong from my avatar (down around my ankles, ready to go into vacuum-sealed storage for handover... ;D )


Slow down fellas - so does that make me DexJax, or Cannibus?  Maybe Gunther..? ???  I is confuze... ;D

At first, I read this as, "I've got my golden thong around my ankles while doing a vacuum pose...."

PARSH
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 04, 2022, 06:51:00 AM
You'e still the champ Taff. The unquestioned king.

Ultimately the Committee will make the best decision for Getbig, my opinion has zero matter on the subject and I regret getting caught up in the hyperbole.

I feel foolish ever making such a declaration for POY in AUGUST...... I guess I wanted to look cool to everyone if I was correct from so far out and it looked like I knew what I was talking about.

My sincerest apologies to everyone involved.

Blush

Here's one just for you - I was dressing up earlier

(http://media.giphy.com/media/xT9IgOvOYj8NGJS9vW/giphy.gif)


At first, I read this as, "I've got my golden thong around my ankles while doing a vacuum pose...."

PARSH

And one for you - they were taken a couple hours apart, of course...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 04, 2022, 07:30:54 AM
Blush

Here's one just for you - I was dressing up earlier

(http://media.giphy.com/media/xT9IgOvOYj8NGJS9vW/giphy.gif)


And one for you - they were taken a couple hours apart, of course...

Oh my gosh! I had no idea!

I love Cereal Man! He has the best finishing move in the business. No one kicks out the MRO "Mail in Rebate Offer"!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 04, 2022, 08:57:19 AM
Yeah, I've just dropped the golden thong from my avatar (down around my ankles, ready to go into vacuum-sealed storage for handover... ;D )


Slow down fellas - so does that make me DexJax, or Cannibus?  Maybe Gunther..? ???  I is confuze... ;D

You're still the reigning, defending champ Taff. Long way to go for sure. Rambone has simply been on fire and perhaps the fanboy in me got a little carried away. I'd say no homo but who'd believe me. 😉
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 04, 2022, 09:22:24 AM
You're still the reigning, defending champ Taff. Long way to go for sure. Rambone has simply been on fire and perhaps the fanboy in me got a little carried away. I'd say no homo but who'd believe me. 😉

Blush x 2

Thing to remember Abe, is that me, you, Rambone and ThisIsOverload have all pledged to cross c0cks and plug holes - that bonds men in ways other 'normals' just can't comprehend... ... ... 8)

I'm telling you right here, right now:  You boys should be really grateful I'm stuck over here on this side of this pond, because I am persistent, persuasive and morally bankrupt...  I would have already talked you into a whole load of 'The Honeymoon' level fuckerys, believe me... ;D

(http://media.giphy.com/media/wrBURfbZmqqXu/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 04, 2022, 09:35:49 AM
The Committee™ would like to point out that discussion and suggestions about who should win awards may or may not hurt chances of receiving such awards.

Proceed with caution.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 10:14:51 AM
Just FYI, phaggot does not mean f aggot. Phaggot means annoying, irritating...a loser...stuff like that. Phaggot has no sexual connotations.

Now check this out - something Walter Sobchak can't do!!

Weak fucking phaggot.

Dumb phaggot.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 10:15:51 AM
Wow, 1,000 replies.  :o

Once again, the link showing what that fucking phaggot Walter Sobchak can't do:

Dumb phaggot.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 04, 2022, 10:16:43 AM
Just FYI, phaggot does not mean f aggot. Phaggot means annoying, irritating...a loser...stuff like that. Phaggot has no sexual connotations.

Now check this out - something Walter Sobchak can't do!!

Weak fucking phaggot.

Dumb phaggot.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

That was all the way down with a ton of weight. Nice work!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 10:21:26 AM
That was all the way down with a ton of weight. Nice work!

Thanks Rambone! That particular leg press is the heaviest I've ever used per the amount of weight on it.

It can only really fit 40 more pounds. I should have made that last plate on each side a 45-lb instead of a 25-lb...but I wasn't 100% certain I would get it.

Now I know, so...next time!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 04, 2022, 10:39:49 AM
Just FYI, phaggot does not mean f aggot. Phaggot means annoying, irritating...a loser...stuff like that. Phaggot has no sexual connotations.



Considering what you sent prime, you are indeed the expert on all things (ph)faggot.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 04, 2022, 11:04:05 AM
The Committee™ would like to point out that discussion and suggestions about who should win awards may or may not hurt chances of receiving such awards.

Proceed with caution.

We respect and honor The Committee™ and it’s standards. We honor the decisions of The Committee™.  I apologize on behalf of this whole site and Matt’s ejactulating penis for any issues these discussions may have caused. It won’t happen moving forward.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 04, 2022, 11:11:18 AM
We respect and honor The Committee™ and it’s standards. We honor the decisions of The Committee™.  I apologize on behalf of this whole site and Matt’s ejactulating penis for any issues these discussions may have caused. It won’t happen moving forward.

Not sure you can promise the Canning-C0ck won't fire in anger again..?  Our young Canuck friend seems like the archetypal 'angry-masturbator' so if something sparks his ire, it seems sure to be 'c0ck to the wind'....

But other than that, I echo your statement 😇
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 11:23:44 AM
Not sure you can promise the Canning-C0ck won't fire in anger again..?  Our young Canuck friend seems like the archetypal 'angry-masturbator' so if something sparks his ire, it seems sure to be 'c0ck to the wind'....

But other than that, I echo your statement 😇

I'm glad you're here, Taffin.

Speaking of cocks:

[1] Note the look in her eyes.
[2] Please Photoshop this image to replace the knife with a GIANT COCK.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 04, 2022, 11:32:59 AM
Not sure you can promise the Canning-C0ck won't fire in anger again..?  Our young Canuck friend seems like the archetypal 'angry-masturbator' so if something sparks his ire, it seems sure to be 'c0ck to the wind'....

But other than that, I echo your statement 😇

Taff I was apologizing for discussing decisions The Committee™ may make.  I created this mess and those discussions led others astray.

I certainly DO NOT take responsibility for Matthew’s genitalia nor its ability to strike out. However The Committee™ may decide to bestow an honorary award on Matt, I really don’t know one way or another but his actions took the illegal activity of this board to a whole other level.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 04, 2022, 11:37:26 AM

[2] Please Photoshop this image to replace the knife with a GIANT COCK.

Trolling for giant cock pics will not help change Walter's theories about you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 04, 2022, 11:39:55 AM
I'm glad you're here, Taffin.

Speaking of cocks:

[1] Note the look in her eyes.
[2] Please Photoshop this image to replace the knife with a GIANT COCK.

Ha!

I remember that scene in Crocodile Dundee where he grabs the woman's crotch to check and make sure there was no cock. Crocodile dundee was ahead of the times.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 04, 2022, 12:59:41 PM
WTF
"as he coolly said it wasn’t the weirdest PM Matt had ever sent him"

FFS I don't even want to Think what Matt has Been Sending Him!!!

Matt Really ??? is There Something going on Between You & Prime???

I believe I said it was the weirdest message Matt ever sent me in the 20 plus years we've known each other. Also, it was not a PM it was on my Facebook messenger. Not sure, who can or can't read Facebook messages because Facebook's privacy settings seem a bit complicated.

Like it is with you and me, Matt and I are political opposites. Occasionally we've had some heated discussions.

From my perspective Matt and I are friends and nothing more. To suggest anything untoward goes on between Matt and me is ridiculous.   
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 04, 2022, 01:00:04 PM
Wow, 1,000 replies.  :o

Once again, the link showing what that fucking phaggot Walter Sobchak can't do:

Dumb phaggot.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

Lets see the squat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 04, 2022, 01:08:41 PM


Thing to remember Abe, is that me, you, Rambone and ThisIsOverload have all pledged to cross c0cks and plug holes - that bonds men in ways other 'normals' just can't comprehend... ... ... 8)

I'm telling you right here, right now:  You boys should be really grateful I'm stuck over here on this side of this pond, because I am persistent, persuasive and morally bankrupt...  I would have already talked you into a whole load of 'The Honeymoon' level fuckerys, believe me... ;D

If you ever cross the pond, there would be unfathomable levels of debauchery and shenanigans.

Holes would be plugged, cacks would be crossed, womens would be plowed and probably a few Test shots shared. no homo
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on August 04, 2022, 01:09:03 PM
I believe I said it was the weirdest message Matt ever sent me in the 20 plus years we've known each other. Also, it was not a PM it was on my Facebook messenger. Not sure, who can or can't read Facebook messages because Facebook's privacy settings seem a bit complicated.

Like it is with you and me, Matt and I are political opposites. Occasionally we've had some heated discussions.

From my perspective Matt and I are friends and nothing more. To suggest anything untoward goes on between Matt and me is ridiculous.

Yeah, but you seen his cock, and him jerking off
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 04, 2022, 01:15:40 PM
Yeah, but you seen his cock, and him jerking off

Who knows if it was his or someone else's? Not I.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on August 04, 2022, 01:22:24 PM
Wow, 1,000 replies.  :o

Once again, the link showing what that fucking phaggot Walter Sobchak can't do:

Dumb phaggot.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

You had a couple more in the tank, too -- easily.

How many plates is that?  More than ten per side?

I would caution against rebounding too hard at the bottom.  I think you did well enough on this particular set, but for your knees' sake, a smoother turnaround is indicated in general.

My only real nitpick here is, well, why?

That is, why did you decide to film a two rep set?  To continue "proving" yourself to strangers, some of whom obviously enjoy winding you up for a laugh? 

You like to say, I assume often rather sarcastically, that you "fear for X's health."  Irrespective of your sincerity, I echo your statement: I fear for your mental health, mate -- and that is quite sincere.

Take stock for a moment.  You've repeatedly stated that you're doing your "cycle," such as it is, "for attention."  You're sending videos of jerking yourself off to boast about the amount of jizz coming from your member.  You talk about impressing people with bigger lifts and teenagers asking you to flex for them.

Meanwhile, you're 40, right? 

Seeking external validation to boost your sense of self-worth is teenaged shit, Matt (the inherent gayness of sharing JO vids still leaves me speechless, but I don't much care to explore that further).  I understand you have Asperger's, but that you're aware of that is all the more reason to FIGHT the childish proclivity to let others define who you are.  Take the reigns and be true to yourself.  Seek validation from within. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 01:46:01 PM
Trolling for giant cock pics will not help change Walter's theories about you.

Lmao, true...but tell me that look in her eyes doesn't look like that of a woman staring at a great big cock.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 04, 2022, 01:50:46 PM
Lmao, true...but tell me that look in her eyes doesn't look like that of a woman staring at a great big cock.

I have never looked at a woman and imagined cock.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on August 04, 2022, 02:14:40 PM
Telling someone with a true mental disorder to look within though isn’t realistic because the concept is foreign to them or unpleasant.

No one really says that to Bhank I think because they know he is a lost cause.

Why is Matt any different?




Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 02:42:34 PM
I have never looked at a woman and imagined cock.

I'm saying that she looks to be in awe of Crocodile Dundee's...knife?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 02:48:14 PM
Telling someone with a true mental disorder to look within though isn’t realistic because the concept is foreign to them or unpleasant.

No one really says that to Bhank I think because they know he is a lost cause.

Why is Matt any different?

What am I supposed to "look within" about?

Do you mean try to feel just as well just training versus using a puny dose of steroids?

Out of curiosity, wouldn't that apply to women using makeup too? I mean, what's the difference? Both are chemical applications to look better.

I am now 100% convinced that I can't look like I do naturally. It's NOT my body weight or body fat percentage that I can't replicate - it's that perpetually full and pumped look.

No diet is going to keep a 50% pump lasting 24/7. Only steroids can do that for me, from my experience.

And I'll be honest - I much prefer my current look to my natural physique.

It's also nice having multiple people daily compliment my physique.

But are you saying I should look within to find that satisfaction? Is it really so bad to run a bit of sauce once in a blue moon? I don't smoke or drink, after all. So what's the problem?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 02:53:59 PM
You had a couple more in the tank, too -- easily.

How many plates is that?  More than ten per side?

I would caution against rebounding too hard at the bottom.  I think you did well enough on this particular set, but for your knees' sake, a smoother turnaround is indicated in general.

My only real nitpick here is, well, why?

That is, why did you decide to film a two rep set?  To continue "proving" yourself to strangers, some of whom obviously enjoy winding you up for a laugh? 

You like to say, I assume often rather sarcastically, that you "fear for X's health."  Irrespective of your sincerity, I echo your statement: I fear for your mental health, mate -- and that is quite sincere.

Take stock for a moment.  You've repeatedly stated that you're doing your "cycle," such as it is, "for attention."  You're sending videos of jerking yourself off to boast about the amount of jizz coming from your member.  You talk about impressing people with bigger lifts and teenagers asking you to flex for them.

Meanwhile, you're 40, right? 

Seeking external validation to boost your sense of self-worth is teenaged shit, Matt (the inherent gayness of sharing JO vids still leaves me speechless, but I don't much care to explore that further).  I understand you have Asperger's, but that you're aware of that is all the more reason to FIGHT the childish proclivity to let others define who you are.  Take the reigns and be true to yourself.  Seek validation from within.

Ten plates per side + that 25. It can fit 11 though.

I'll get it next time!

Regarding your next point in bold there, Titus...I think you're right.

You know me - I'm generally always in shape, and normally just a hop, skip, and a jump away from competing in any <200-lb strength contest.

And yet it was ONLY when I jumped on the sauce that I'm getting comments from people about how big I am / how good I look.

Check out this - that's TWICE in two weeks a kid at the pool said I look like Superman.

No wonder bodybuilders NEVER go off gear...it's quite the addictive feeling.

Of course you're right, Titus. I hope I can come to terms with being in "ok" shape off gear...of I can be 180-185 at 16% body fat, I'd be fine with that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 04, 2022, 02:58:38 PM
Ten plates per side + that 25. It can fit 11 though.

I'll get it next time!

Regarding your next point in bold there, Titus...I think you're right.

You know me - I'm generally always in shape, and normally just a hop, skip, and a jump away from competing in any <200-lb strength contest.

And yet it was ONLY when I jumped on the sauce that I'm getting comments from people about how big I am / how good I look.

Check out this - that's TWICE in two weeks a kid at the pool said I look like Superman.

No wonder bodybuilders NEVER go off gear...it's quite the addictive feeling.

Of course you're right, Titus. I hope I can come to terms with being in "ok" shape off gear...of I can be 180-185 at 16% body fat, I'd be fine with that.

Greasy handle is greasing his pole as we speak hahaha.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on August 04, 2022, 03:12:15 PM
Solid leg-pressings MattC.  That weight would launch me out the back of the seat like a pinball.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 04, 2022, 03:17:45 PM
Solid leg-pressings MattC.  That weight would launch me out the back of the seat like a pinball.

Same here hahaha
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 04, 2022, 03:25:24 PM
(https://miro.medium.com/max/640/1*6V2gN76jOKlr9zELfsEHvQ.jpeg)

With all this penis talk I think we should all take a break and enjoy some spotted dick in the can !!   :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 04, 2022, 03:26:11 PM
Wow, 1,000 replies.  :o

Once again, the link showing what that fucking phaggot Walter Sobchak can't do:

Dumb phaggot.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/
Why do max weight leg presses Matt? Legs need high reps. I can see you testing yourself with a max squat but leg press?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 04, 2022, 03:30:02 PM
Blush x 2

Thing to remember Abe, is that me, you, Rambone and ThisIsOverload have all pledged to cross c0cks and plug holes - that bonds men in ways other 'normals' just can't comprehend... ... ... 8)

I'm telling you right here, right now:  You boys should be really grateful I'm stuck over here on this side of this pond, because I am persistent, persuasive and morally bankrupt...  I would have already talked you into a whole load of 'The Honeymoon' level fuckerys, believe me... ;D

(http://media.giphy.com/media/wrBURfbZmqqXu/giphy.gif)

The 4 Horsemen:  Crossing cawks and plugging holes since 2021!  If you cross the pond, I'll have t-shirts made up for the 4 of us to wear. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 04, 2022, 03:52:31 PM
I'm saying that she looks to be in awe of Crocodile Dundee's...knife?

She's not even looking at the knife.  She's looking at the person attempting to mug them.

You're now imagining cock in places it would never exist.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 04, 2022, 03:58:23 PM
Who knows if it was his or someone else's? Not I.

And this is what we appreciate about you Prime. A friend sends you a masturbation video, and after collecting yourself, you’re still keenly aware enough to realize you can not, in good conscience, proclaim to know if it is indeed your friends genitalia.

People will say what they want but you are a man of principle and conviction.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Skeletor on August 04, 2022, 06:49:34 PM
Wow, 1,000 replies.  :o

Once again, the link showing what that fucking phaggot Walter Sobchak can't do:

Dumb phaggot.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

Solid progress Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 08:43:47 PM
Today, I wasn't able to get the 12 clean reps with 120-lb dumbbells, or 15 sloppy reps. I ended up getting 12 sloppy reps:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg3Jxskg5Ym/

^ I had to dump the dumbbells at the end. That's something I try not to do, but...I couldn't finish the set cleanly. Ah well.

Well I was a bit disappointed with the set above, I went on to do 225-lb on the bench press for 22 reps. Meaning, I'll get 225x25 next week, and be on the road to 225x30 by the end of the month.

Hopefully I'll be able to get 315x15...but I may not want to push it [as I have been told that injury risk is elevated on cycle, as ligaments and tendons don't strengthen proportionally with muscle mass].

Either way, these are all lifts that Walter Sobchak couldn't even DREAM about doing.

I warm up with Walter Sobchak's workout.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 04, 2022, 08:51:01 PM
Today, I wasn't able to get the 12 clean reps with 120-lb dumbbells, or 15 sloppy reps. I ended up getting 12 sloppy reps:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg3Jxskg5Ym/

^ I had to dump the dumbbells at the end. That's something I try not to do, but...I couldn't finish the set cleanly. Ah well.

Well I was a bit disappointed with the set above, I went on to do 225-lb on the bench press for 22 reps. Meaning, I'll get 225x25 next week, and be on the road to 225x30 by the end of the month.

Hopefully I'll be able to get 315x15...but I may not want to push it [as I have been told that injury risk is elevated on cycle, as ligaments and tendons don't strengthen proportionally with muscle mass].

Either way, these are all lifts that Walter Sobchak couldn't even DREAM about doing.

I warm up with Walter Sobchak's workout.

Have you noticed any changes as pertains to your cock, balls and or functionality?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 04, 2022, 08:55:56 PM
Solid progress Matt.

Thanks Skeletor!

What's amazing is that I'm not training for strength whatsoever lately, opting for hypertrophy training only...yet my strength is at or above my usual levels. Bench pressing 225x15+ is always good - but to get 22 without even specifically training that lift...is very good

I will almost certainly be bench pressing 225x30 before the month is over. Well...25-30 reps for sure.

I'm trying to remind myself: hypertrophy range only. But...the temptation to get stronger is always there.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on August 04, 2022, 09:18:05 PM
You would turn internally to why you need to feel a pat on the back while someone more secure would not.

I was like this in the 2000’s and used the same defense mechanism of rationalizations to explain the way I acted.

You are always quick to say the approval of others helps you, but you leave out why.

It may not be something on the surface that’s so obvious or it maybe it goes back to trauma.

It could just be you lack this psychological capacity from some physical abnormality. 

For me it was a role model issue that took time for me to understand and act on later.

Steroids are a temporary solution to a permanent problem; use this time wisely.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on August 05, 2022, 03:36:02 AM
Nice lifts matt, but why does it look like the leg press is in a hotel lobby?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 05, 2022, 04:51:00 AM
Today, I wasn't able to get the 12 clean reps with 120-lb dumbbells, or 15 sloppy reps. I ended up getting 12 sloppy reps:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg3Jxskg5Ym/

^ I had to dump the dumbbells at the end. That's something I try not to do, but...I couldn't finish the set cleanly. Ah well.

Well I was a bit disappointed with the set above, I went on to do 225-lb on the bench press for 22 reps. Meaning, I'll get 225x25 next week, and be on the road to 225x30 by the end of the month.

Hopefully I'll be able to get 315x15...but I may not want to push it [as I have been told that injury risk is elevated on cycle, as ligaments and tendons don't strengthen proportionally with muscle mass].

Either way, these are all lifts that Walter Sobchak couldn't even DREAM about doing.

I warm up with Walter Sobchak's workout.

Have you tried resting them on the bench instead?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 05, 2022, 10:05:58 AM
Today, I wasn't able to get the 12 clean reps with 120-lb dumbbells, or 15 sloppy reps. I ended up getting 12 sloppy reps:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg3Jxskg5Ym/

^ I had to dump the dumbbells at the end. That's something I try not to do, but...I couldn't finish the set cleanly. Ah well.

Well I was a bit disappointed with the set above, I went on to do 225-lb on the bench press for 22 reps. Meaning, I'll get 225x25 next week, and be on the road to 225x30 by the end of the month.

Hopefully I'll be able to get 315x15...but I may not want to push it [as I have been told that injury risk is elevated on cycle, as ligaments and tendons don't strengthen proportionally with muscle mass].

Either way, these are all lifts that Walter Sobchak couldn't even DREAM about doing.

I warm up with Walter Sobchak's workout.

Not to be a dick but those are not even half reps you didnt get 1 you should be bringing the weight all the way down to your chest. You will need to lighten the weight to do so. This is why your shoulders are growing and not your chest. Your elbows are not even getting to 90 degrees the dumbells are dipping in the moddle if you kept them flat you would be nowhere near the chest. Try beinging down resting on the chest then pressing. What you are doing is all tricep and shoulder you aee not engaginf your chest at all. You need to roll back your shoulders which you will do of you bring rhe dumbells all the way down. You also need to keep the dumbells horizontol do not let your wrist bend like that. Stretch the pec at the bottom focus on keeping shoulders rolled back and squeeze the chest to the top. Deop down to like the 75s and try that. Shit use the 50s ans get the technique down wlbows should be behind your back at the bottom chest out shoulders rolled back dumvells horizontol theough the entire range of motion pause at the bottom stretch at the bottom dumbells should ne in your armpits then squeeze the pecs as you press
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 05, 2022, 10:56:08 AM
Have you tried resting them on the bench instead?

 ;D

And just like that, you instantly added 30 more pages to this thread.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 05, 2022, 11:01:47 AM
Would like to see Matt's db presses but not on Instagram.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 05, 2022, 11:40:51 AM
You would turn internally to why you need to feel a pat on the back while someone more secure would not.

I was like this in the 2000’s and used the same defense mechanism of rationalizations to explain the way I acted.

You are always quick to say the approval of others helps you, but you leave that why out.

It may not be something on the surface that’s so obvious or it maybe it is and goes back to trauma.

It could just be you lack this psychological capacity from some physical abnormality. 

For me it was a role model issue that took time for me to understand and act on later in my 20’s back then.

Steroids are temporary solution to a permanent problem; use this time wisely.

Or maybe it’s because he is a weak little attention whoring retard?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 05, 2022, 12:58:36 PM
Not to be a dick but those are not even half reps you didnt get 1 you should be bringing the weight all the way down to your chest. You will need to lighten the weight to do so. This is why your shoulders are growing and not your chest. Your elbows are not even getting to 90 degrees the dumbells are dipping in the moddle if you kept them flat you would be nowhere near the chest. Try beinging down resting on the chest then pressing. What you are doing is all tricep and shoulder you aee not engaginf your chest at all. You need to roll back your shoulders which you will do of you bring rhe dumbells all the way down. You also need to keep the dumbells horizontol do not let your wrist bend like that. Stretch the pec at the bottom focus on keeping shoulders rolled back and squeeze the chest to the top. Deop down to like the 75s and try that. Shit use the 50s ans get the technique down wlbows should be behind your back at the bottom chest out shoulders rolled back dumvells horizontol theough the entire range of motion pause at the bottom stretch at the bottom dumbells should ne in your armpits then squeeze the pecs as you press

I don't agree with you very often, but i do here.

That was terrible form and all delts/tris.

Easy way to hurt yourself.

Strong lift though Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 05, 2022, 01:04:11 PM
Agreed on not coming deep enough to stimulate chest hence big shoulders and arms. Still strong pressing though at that weight. Do 6 reps and come all the way down. Or keep doing these style for shoulder and tris but also throw in 100s all the way down and get that stretch.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 05, 2022, 03:40:25 PM
I'm glad you're here, Taffin.

Speaking of cocks:

[1] Note the look in her eyes.
[2] Please Photoshop this image to replace the knife with a GIANT COCK.

Sorry Matt - this thread is already stuffed full of c0ck - I'm not adding any more ;D

(http://i.postimg.cc/qvZGcRRz/whirlpool_of_c0ck_of_peace....jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 05, 2022, 03:44:24 PM
I don't agree with you very often, but i do here.

That was terrible form and all delts/tris.

Easy way to hurt yourself.

Strong lift though Matt.

Yes, I agree.

Honestly, when I did the lift, I was like - this seems like decent form. Then I watched the video, and realized I probably had two more inches to go. I guess I was so eager to get back to my 12 rep former PR. And if I'm bench pressing 315 for reps...that should be doable, right?

But no - it's a totally different movement. I may well have the strength, but I need to train my CNS for that range of motion.

I'll get it next time.

Interestingly, I did get 225x22 on the flat bench later - which was my 8th set for the day, so I wasn't exactly fresh. I also did full [bounced, obviously] reps, without *too* much back arching.

So I can understand why I predicted a stronger dumbbell press - my flat bench seems strong enough to support a solid dumbbell press with clean form for 12 reps with that weight.

But no.

I need to acclimate my CNS.

Though I'm a bit eager to get that 225x30 bench. I mean, shoot - it's not *that* much higher than my lifetime natural best...and I'd like to get it on video while I can.

Honestly, I just want to get a solid video showing my pressing strength. Be it 225x25+ reps, 315x10+ reps, or heavy dumbbells.

That said, I've really been focused on hypertrophy, and taking the advice of people on here for chest development. I just always have that...you know...that push to be strong.

IMO, strength is more sustainable off gear than muscle mass is. As strength is not just muscle, but tendons and ligaments, etc.

I don't think my current look is sustainable off sauce. I DO feel my current strength absolutely is.

I've been stronger at 170 before, lol. Or...roughly as strong. I do enjoy looking like this though. Women like it more too. But it will only be a summertime thing for me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 05, 2022, 03:45:03 PM
If you ever cross the pond, there would be unfathomable levels of debauchery and shenanigans.

Holes would be plugged, cacks would be crossed, womens would be plowed and probably a few Test shots shared. no homo

The 4 Horsemen:  Crossing cawks and plugging holes since 2021!  If you cross the pond, I'll have t-shirts made up for the 4 of us to wear.

Four Horsemen of the Cockpocalypse?

Four Horse-cocked men of the Apocalypse..?

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 05, 2022, 03:48:24 PM
Sorry Matt - this thread is already stuffed full of c0ck - I'm not adding any more ;D

(http://i.postimg.cc/qvZGcRRz/whirlpool_of_c0ck_of_peace....jpg)

Hey, can I post shots of my STIFF cock in this thread?

It's really not small. It's also quite suitable for - and sort of "matches" - the rest of me.

Also, I don't have a gut impeding two inches of my dick, so doesn't that make it 8.45"?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 05, 2022, 03:52:39 PM
Hey, can I post shots of my STIFF cock in this thread?

It's really not small. It's also quite suitable for - and sort of "matches" - the rest of me.

Also, I don't have a gut impeding two inches of my dick, so doesn't that make it 8.45"?

There are only two ways to know for sure.  You either post it up on this thread or re-send it to Prime with you face showing so he can officially vouch that it's yours. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 05, 2022, 03:53:23 PM
Agreed on not coming deep enough to stimulate chest hence big shoulders and arms. Still strong pressing though at that weight. Do 6 reps and come all the way down. Or keep doing these style for shoulder and tris but also throw in 100s all the way down and get that stretch.

I want to get a few bragging videos taken while I'm strong.

I'll allow myself one such set per workout. Though I did two yesterday - the dumbbell set you saw + 225x22 on the flat bench.

I don't want to overly deviate from the hypertrophy plan. That said...I am ok with one throwaway set per workout.

I do want to get some decent strength videos in. It's incredible, because I'm not training for strength...gear makes everything come easier. God, natural bodybuilding sucks. Natural strength training is not bad.

I'm still sitting around 205. These pictures were after my back workout today - I have to laugh at the comments of people who thought I couldn't get above 170. Yeah, that wasn't a conscious health decision on my part or anything.  ::)

I think a tan would make me look leaner, but I hate the sun:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 05, 2022, 03:55:00 PM
Yes, I agree.

Honestly, when I did the lift, I was like - this seems like decent form. Then I watched the video, and realized I probably had two more inches to go. I guess I was so eager to get back to my 12 rep former PR. And if I'm bench pressing 315 for reps...that should be doable, right?

But no - it's a totally different movement. I may well have the strength, but I need to train my CNS for that range of motion.

I'll get it next time.

Interestingly, I did get 225x22 on the flat bench later - which was my 8th set for the day, so I wasn't exactly fresh. I also did full [bounced, obviously] reps, without *too* much back arching.

So I can understand why I predicted a stronger dumbbell press - my flat bench seems strong enough to support a solid dumbbell press with clean form for 12 reps with that weight.

But no.

I need to acclimate my CNS.

Though I'm a bit eager to get that 225x30 bench. I mean, shoot - it's not *that* much higher than my lifetime natural best...and I'd like to get it on video while I can.

Honestly, I just want to get a solid video showing my pressing strength. Be it 225x25+ reps, 315x10+ reps, or heavy dumbbells.

That said, I've really been focused on hypertrophy, and taking the advice of people on here for chest development. I just always have that...you know...that push to be strong.

IMO, strength is more sustainable off gear than muscle mass is. As strength is not just muscle, but tendons and ligaments, etc.

I don't think my current look is sustainable off sauce. I DO feel my current strength absolutely is.

I've been stronger at 170 before, lol. Or...roughly as strong. I do enjoy looking like this though. Women like it more too. But it will only be a summertime thing for me.

You have the strength to do that weight with proper form.

You'll get there soon.

Strength is attainable off the gear, if you train correctly for it. I was stronger than shit before i even knew about AAS.

But yes, size comes from steroids. BBing is all drugs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 05, 2022, 04:04:23 PM
There are only two ways to know for sure.  You either post it up on this thread or re-send it to Prime with you face showing so he can officially vouch that it's yours.

Why?

Lol

Why?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 05, 2022, 04:04:30 PM
There are only two ways to know for sure.  You either post it up on this thread or re-send it to Prime with you face showing so he can officially vouch that it's yours.

I can do that.

But I just realized something...my dick is way too stiff to post a picture of it here. It's way too stiff.

If I recall correctly, the average age of a Getbigger is 71 and homosexual.

Heart attacks will be had if some members see how stiff it is.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 05, 2022, 04:05:11 PM
Why?

Lol

Why?

He's not wrong.

But the pictures will prompt vaccine-induced heart attacks.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 05, 2022, 04:05:26 PM
I can do that.

But I just realized something...my dick is way too stiff to post a picture of it here. It's way too stiff.

If I recall correctly, the average age of a Getbigger is 71 and homosexual.

Heart attacks will be had if some members see how stiff it is.

Have your camera ready and as soon as it starts to deflate just a little, snap off a pic. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 05, 2022, 04:17:34 PM
There are only two ways to know for sure.  You either post it up on this thread or re-send it to Prime with you face showing so he can officially vouch that it's yours.

This is true. The initial Mattsturbation video appears to have been all for naught. Prime did not confirm that it was Matt, did not confirm that it was 6.45 inches, and did not confirm the Peter North loads. A second video sent to Prime appears necessary.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 05, 2022, 04:21:58 PM
I want to get a few bragging videos taken while I'm strong.

I'll allow myself one such set per workout. Though I did two yesterday - the dumbbell set you saw + 225x22 on the flat bench.

I don't want to overly deviate from the hypertrophy plan. That said...I am ok with one throwaway set per workout.

I do want to get some decent strength videos in. It's incredible, because I'm not training for strength...gear makes everything come easier. God, natural bodybuilding sucks. Natural strength training is not bad.

I'm still sitting around 205. These pictures were after my back workout today - I have to laugh at the comments of people who thought I couldn't get above 170. Yeah, that wasn't a conscious health decision on my part or anything.  ::)

I think a tan would make me look leaner, but I hate the sun:

I get it. You look pretty damn good in those pics and we know you are very strong. How much longer you running the abombs? Also still at 17mgs a day or 12.5?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 05, 2022, 05:16:44 PM
There are only two ways to know for sure.  You either post it up on this thread or re-send it to Prime with you face showing so he can officially vouch that it's yours.
.

(https://i.giphy.com/12mF9DKcaggLoQ.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 05, 2022, 05:23:29 PM
.

(https://i.giphy.com/12mF9DKcaggLoQ.gif)

Bravo.  Somewhere a drunken Shizzo is coming up for air on whoever's cock he's sucking and smiling.   ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 05, 2022, 05:29:15 PM
.

(https://i.giphy.com/12mF9DKcaggLoQ.gif)

Hahahaha that was perfect.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 05, 2022, 05:29:39 PM
Bravo.  Somewhere a drunken Shizzo is coming up for air on whoever's cock he's sucking and smiling.   ;)

A little bit early in the evening for that…
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 05, 2022, 05:35:01 PM
This is true. The initial Mattsturbation video appears to have been all for naught. Prime did not confirm that it was Matt, did not confirm that it was 6.45 inches, and did not confirm the Peter North loads. A second video sent to Prime appears necessary.

Isn’t it obvious that this pic was taken mid-stroke in Matt Canning’s jerkoff video?

You can literally see the look of determination in his vacant eyes and his need to impress Primehomosexual.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 05, 2022, 05:38:43 PM
A local artists rendition of Mr. C.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 05, 2022, 06:53:09 PM
Yes, I agree.

Honestly, when I did the lift, I was like - this seems like decent form. Then I watched the video, and realized I probably had two more inches to go. I guess I was so eager to get back to my 12 rep former PR. And if I'm bench pressing 315 for reps...that should be doable, right?

But no - it's a totally different movement. I may well have the strength, but I need to train my CNS for that range of motion.

I'll get it next time.

Interestingly, I did get 225x22 on the flat bench later - which was my 8th set for the day, so I wasn't exactly fresh. I also did full [bounced, obviously] reps, without *too* much back arching.

So I can understand why I predicted a stronger dumbbell press - my flat bench seems strong enough to support a solid dumbbell press with clean form for 12 reps with that weight.

But no.

I need to acclimate my CNS.

Though I'm a bit eager to get that 225x30 bench. I mean, shoot - it's not *that* much higher than my lifetime natural best...and I'd like to get it on video while I can.

Honestly, I just want to get a solid video showing my pressing strength. Be it 225x25+ reps, 315x10+ reps, or heavy dumbbells.

That said, I've really been focused on hypertrophy, and taking the advice of people on here for chest development. I just always have that...you know...that push to be strong.

IMO, strength is more sustainable off gear than muscle mass is. As strength is not just muscle, but tendons and ligaments, etc.

I don't think my current look is sustainable off sauce. I DO feel my current strength absolutely is.

I've been stronger at 170 before, lol. Or...roughly as strong. I do enjoy looking like this though. Women like it more too. But it will only be a summertime thing for me.

Again not trying to be a dick trying to help but No No No you did not have 2 more inches to go. Your hands should be in your armpits at the bottom. If your elbows were 90 you would have the length of your foream to go they are above 90 degrees. This is not even close you literally have a foot lower to go not 2 inches. Dont even start with saying you cant due to flexibilty drop the weight in half and learn the movement. This is just wrong total garbage.  I took 3 pics of the bottom of your reps. You dont even start to engage the chest until those elbows go below 90 and they never do. This hands should be below your chest in your armpits on the side and they are a full foeram length above it. These are not even close to proper reps. You will never develop your chest with this shit. Again not trying to be a dick but its really bad drop the weight in half and learn the lift. You should be using about 75lbs tops based on this video. keep the dumbells horizontal bring them wide and outside stretching the chest hands in your armpits at the bottom dumbells flat on the chest shoulder blades rolled back chest up then squeeze and press. You did not do a single rep this is the shit 20 year old fratboys do not trained 40 year old lifters
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 05, 2022, 09:25:03 PM

Again not trying to be a dick trying to help but No No No you did not have 2 more inches to go. Your hands should be in your armpits at the bottom. If your elbows were 90 you would have the length of your foream to go they are above 90 degrees. This is not even close you literally have a foot lower to go not 2 inches. Dont even start with saying you cant due to flexibilty drop the weight in half and learn the movement. This is just wrong total garbage.  I took 3 pics of the bottom of your reps. You dont even start to engage the chest until those elbows go below 90 and they never do. This hands should be below your chest in your armpits on the side and they are a full foeram length above it. These are not even close to proper reps. You will never develop your chest with this shit. Again not trying to be a dick but its really bad drop the weight in half and learn the lift. You should be using about 75lbs tops based on this video. keep the dumbells horizontal bring them wide and outside stretching the chest hands in your armpits at the bottom dumbells flat on the chest shoulder blades rolled back chest up then squeeze and press. You did not do a single rep this is the shit 20 year old fratboys do not trained 40 year old lifters


Teach us.

Show proper squat form please.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on August 05, 2022, 09:55:35 PM

Teach us.

Show proper squat form please.

Pot meet kettle



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 06, 2022, 01:10:22 AM
I can do that.

But I just realized something...my dick is way too stiff to post a picture of it here. It's way too stiff.

If I recall correctly, the average age of a Getbigger is 71 and homosexual.

Heart attacks will be had if some members see how stiff it is.

WHY?? Just why man?   You are so fckn awkward
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 01:35:11 AM
Just before I add anything - like videos of me warming up with Walter Sobchak's workout - I just want to point out that steroids are just the finishing 1% touch:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 01:44:01 AM
Walter Sobchak thought that I was struggling to weigh over 170-lb when all along, I purposely selected to stay at that weight for health reasons. HAHAHAHAHAHA, yeah...like I couldn't be 220-lb by the end of the month if I wanted that.

What an absolute loser.

Making fun of me for purposely selecting to be a healthy body weight. Meanwhile, I can lift more than that loser at 163 than he can at 263. So in his pathetic mind he had to pretend I couldn't get any bigger or stronger than I was, because accepting reality would mean he'd have to accept that other men are stronger than him despite being way lighter.

Not just a loser - what kind of a stupid asshole takes a person's personal health choice, and uses it to make fun of the obvious strength constraint that arises as a result of it?

Well, Walter Sobchak - I'm 205 now, and I may choose to go up to 220. And now I'll destroy you in any lift, and keep getting stronger until I CHOOSE to go down in weight - and when I do, I'll maintain most of my strength, which will all be lifts you can't do.

Yeah, I could never gain weight [/Sarcasm - meanwhile, I skip roughly ever other day on Anadrol because I'm up 24-lb, and didn't want to gain 40].

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385316;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 01:56:05 AM
WHY?? Just why man?   You are so fckn awkward

I'm just joking around.

But since you asked - someone else said I get mad being accused of being gay.

No, man - it's not that.

I get mad when people question my claims, whatever they are, when I can prove those claims.

I posted my dumbbell bench video and got called out on it. It was not the form I intended.

I'll get it next time.

But we need to grant that one way or another, I'll prove my claims.

I'll get a 225x25 bench on video next week, and I'm really hoping I can get that for 30 reps before the month is over.

I just want to prove all my claims.

I don't appreciate being accused of being weak, having a small dick, etc.

And what can I do to stop such comments, except verify my cock size?

Would you want to be accused of having a small cock, MM?

[to my knowledge, no one ever accused you of this, but would you appreciate it?]

I'm willing and able to available to prove all my claims.

Maybe I can get a good 550-lb deadlift video up too - I just didn't want to push the strength stuff while on gear, as I heard injury risk is elevated. But I do want to prove to Getbig that I'm truthful.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 01:56:36 AM
.

(https://i.giphy.com/12mF9DKcaggLoQ.gif)

I warm up with your workout.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 06, 2022, 02:09:38 AM

I don't appreciate being accused of being weak, having a small dick, etc.

And what can I do to stop such comments, except verify my cock size?


Who questioned your cock and load size? There was discussion of your nose and you randomly chimed in with something like "Also I'm sending a a video to prime to prove my cock size and peter North loads"

Again where and when did anyone question this? Sending the video to Prime felt more like something you wanted to do. You forced the video on him. It was homo, very homo!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 06, 2022, 02:25:31 AM
Walter Sobchak thought that I was struggling to weigh over 170-lb when all along, I purposely selected to stay at that weight for health reasons. HAHAHAHAHAHA, yeah...like I couldn't be 220-lb by the end of the month if I wanted that.

What an absolute loser.

Making fun of me for purposely selecting to be a healthy body weight. Meanwhile, I can lift more than that loser at 163 than he can at 263. So in his pathetic mind he had to pretend I couldn't get any bigger or stronger than I was, because accepting reality would mean he'd have to accept that other men are stronger than him despite being way lighter.

Not just a loser - what kind of a stupid asshole takes a person's personal health choice, and uses it to make fun of the obvious strength constraint that arises as a result of it?

Well, Walter Sobchak - I'm 205 now, and I may choose to go up to 220. And now I'll destroy you in any lift, and keep getting stronger until I CHOOSE to go down in weight - and when I do, I'll maintain most of my strength, which will all be lifts you can't do.

Yeah, I could never gain weight [/Sarcasm - meanwhile, I skip roughly ever other day on Anadrol because I'm up 24-lb, and didn't want to gain 40].

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385316;image)

You actually look huge there Matt.  Really wish you'd have used the sustanon as well.  As for your chest issues.....After you do your ego lifting I'd suggest adding light weight pump sets - incline, flat and decline. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 06, 2022, 05:22:34 AM
Pot meet kettle




Well that is a squat not a dumbell press. My dumbell pressing technique has been perfect for decades. I was just getting back into squats when that video was taken. However after reviewing the video I did exactly what I am telling Matt he needs to do. I set my ego aside I lightened the weight and I increased my range of motion and fixed my form. I then slowly brought the weight back up. Can Matt do the same with his bench? I doubt it as he talks about getting it the 120s next week instead of dropping the weight considerably and fixing his form first.



Also may I suggest getting a girlfriend is a better way to prove adequate cock size vs sending jerk off videos to men
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 06, 2022, 07:48:00 AM
Well that is a squat not a dumbell press. My dumbell pressing technique has been perfect for decades. I was just getting back into squats when that video was taken. However after reviewing the video I did exactly what I am telling Matt he needs to do. I set my ego aside I lightened the weight and I increased my range of motion and fixed my form. I then slowly brought the weight back up. Can Matt do the same with his bench? I doubt it as he talks about getting it the 120s next week instead of dropping the weight considerably and fixing his form first.



Also may I suggest getting a girlfriend is a better way to prove adequate cock size vs sending jerk off videos to men

So you know how to dumbbell press properly, can give advice on technique for the movement BUT tore a pec shutting a car door?

That’s for the advice but you’re better off offering Matt drug and diet advice. lol

Honestly you should offer investing advice, we would at least believe you know what you’re talking about.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 06, 2022, 07:53:50 AM
Well that is a squat not a dumbell press. My dumbell pressing technique has been perfect for decades. I was just getting back into squats when that video was taken. However after reviewing the video I did exactly what I am telling Matt he needs to do. I set my ego aside I lightened the weight and I increased my range of motion and fixed my form. I then slowly brought the weight back up. Can Matt do the same with his bench? I doubt it as he talks about getting it the 120s next week instead of dropping the weight considerably and fixing his form first.



Also may I suggest getting a girlfriend is a better way to prove adequate cock size vs sending jerk off videos to men

I don’t even know why I do this to myself and I watch these videos.

In your 315 for one rep squat video that you shakily and unsteadily walk out from the rack you’re saying you lightened the weight? On a one rep max? What is your advice for Matt, do singles?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 06, 2022, 07:56:07 AM
Based on his pics, Matt got huge.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 09:53:44 AM
People asked me what my squat is:

My competition form ATG squat is 385x2. But keep in mind that we don't generally do full depth Olympic bar squats in Strongman contests, so my legs are strong specifically for Strongman competition.

Again, here's a partial [rack/pin] squat, showing where my legs are strong:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0rSOUg8EH/

NOTE: I have BAD knee valgus.

I'm bad at getting at of the hole when squatting below parallel.

I struggle to get out of the hole.

But my upper range of motion for the squat movement is quite strong. My box squats and high box squats in particular, are both very strong.

I'll consider training to get my squat up to 425-lb and posting a video of it.

I think even a proper ATG squat with 405 would be pretty impressive. FYI, that's at 170-lb body weight.

I'm glad that steroids are just the final finishing 1% touch. Love that final 1% touch:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 10:01:00 AM
Based on his pics, Matt got huge.

I'm 24.5 pounds up! Thank you for noticing, IroNat.  :)

A part of me wants to still do that Sustanon and hit 220...but then another part of me is like...ehhh...I started training to be healthy, and I don't want to do anything crazy / potentially risky.

As of today, I have used a total of 40x 25mg Anadrol tablets.

So...one gram of Anadrol helped get me there.  ;D One solid quality gram.  :)

I was counting how many tablets I had left today to figure out how many I used, because I was going to report it to Rambone, and I was like "Is that a gram?"

And...yep! Sure was.

I could even just ramp up the Anadrol this month and be done with it. Heck...at 60x 25mg tablets left, I could do 2x daily for the next 30 days then be done with it?

I guarantee I'll hit 213+ if I do that. That would be a total 30-lb weight gain from this cycle.

This has been quite the amazing experience. It almost makes me want to run another cycle next summer.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 10:09:46 AM
Well that is a squat not a dumbell press. My dumbell pressing technique has been perfect for decades. I was just getting back into squats when that video was taken. However after reviewing the video I did exactly what I am telling Matt he needs to do. I set my ego aside I lightened the weight and I increased my range of motion and fixed my form. I then slowly brought the weight back up. Can Matt do the same with his bench? I doubt it as he talks about getting it the 120s next week instead of dropping the weight considerably and fixing his form first.


Amazing lift! Incredible. Amazing squat strength.

I NEVER see anyone squatting...really ever.

Maybe once a year someone squats 315 or 405 at any gym I train at.

Also may I suggest getting a girlfriend is a better way to prove adequate cock size vs sending jerk off videos to men

I just sent Primemuscle another dick pic.

I want to settle this right now:

I do NOT have a small dick. It's actually kind of big. Basically - it's a good size.

If I had 1cm in length, it could be properly classed as big.

But I have maybe 1/4 or 1/2 Mark Dugdale's flaccid size.

When I go to the bathroom, you basically just see a stream of urine coming out of a bunch of hair, my dick is so small.

It's like being 5'11". That may not be "fall", but it sure as hell isn't short!

My dick is equal to a man being 5'11" in height. Not short.

And my dick has good aesthetics.

I just hate when people make false claims about me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 06, 2022, 10:10:06 AM
Based on his pics, Matt got huge.

He definitely did.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 10:12:18 AM
He definitely did.

Thank you!

You were right with your prediction for how I would respond to this cycle, haha.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stephano on August 06, 2022, 10:14:39 AM
It's fucking hilarious that Bhank is giving Matt advice on lifting.

Bhank, in a t-shirt, literally doesn't even look like he trains

Stringy 14" arms, red and massively bloated alcoholic-like face, shaky and limping gait, Goodwill-tier attire.  If I saw Bhank on the street, I'd suspect that he's an alcoholic hobo with one foot in the grave, and I'm 100% dead serious. 

Basically, Matt has made better gains in the past few months than Bhank has made over his entire lifetime.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 10:15:05 AM
My flaccid cock is so small that people peeing next to me who peer over and take a peek basically question whether or not they're seeing pee emerge from my belly button.

In the frigid Canadian winters, my dick basically shrinks to smaller than my thumb.

If I have a picture, THAT one [my flaccid dick, when frozen] needs to be posted it.

It's fucking hilarious. It's basically just crumpled foreskin sitting on a bed of hair.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 06, 2022, 10:16:17 AM
Thank you!

You were right with your prediction for how I would respond to this cycle, haha.  ;D

Yeah I knew you would cruise past 200 no problem. You do look awesome. Are you taking it daily or every other and still at 17 or 12.5 or 25mgs?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 06, 2022, 10:17:26 AM
My flaccid cock is so small that people peeing next to me who peer over and take a peek basically question whether or not they're seeing pee emerge from my belly button.

In the frigid Canadian winters, my dick basically shrinks to smaller than my thumb.

If I have a picture, THAT one [my flaccid dick, when frozen] needs to be posted it.

It's fucking hilarious. It's basically just crumpled foreskin sitting on a bed of hair.



Hahahaha just made me laugh pretty hard with that post Matt. Thank you for that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 10:20:37 AM
It's fucking hilarious that Bhank is giving Matt advice on lifting.

Bhank, in a t-shirt, literally doesn't even look like he trains

Stringy 14" arms, red and massively bloated alcoholic-like face, shaky and limping gait, Goodwill-tier attire.  If I saw Bhank on the street, I'd suspect that he's an alcoholic hobo with one foot in the grave, and I'm 100% dead serious. 

Basically, Matt has made better gains in the past few months than Bhank has made over his entire lifetime.

Thanks Stephano!

My arms are 17" pumped/flexed now!

I had hit 16 and 2/3" before...or maybe 3/5"...basically 16.7" or 16.6", but to hit a legit solid 17" measurement...let's just say I'm quite pleased with that.

I also think a lot of people overestimate arms size. So for instance, I'll see someone with 16" arms and think they are 18".

I think people are definitely recognizing my 17" arms when I'm out and about - if not thinking they may even be slightly bigger.

I really can't complain.

Damn, I have to get used to going back to my normal size!

Another thing I need to get used to is being flatter. Right now, it's like I have a pump 24/7. And when I do get a pump - it is that much better than a natural pump. I love it.

But I need to prepare for going off next month, and having those compliments dwindle.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on August 06, 2022, 10:26:40 AM
It's fucking hilarious that Bhank is giving Matt advice on lifting.

Bhank, in a t-shirt, literally doesn't even look like he trains

Stringy 14" arms, red and massively bloated alcoholic-like face, shaky and limping gait, Goodwill-tier attire.  If I saw Bhank on the street, I'd suspect that he's an alcoholic hobo with one foot in the grave, and I'm 100% dead serious. 

Basically, Matt has made better gains in the past few months than Bhank has made over his entire lifetime.

Hahha and a fraction of the gear.

Bhanky, been blasting 500 Mgs of test year round for over 10 years.

His receptors like his hair are shot 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on August 06, 2022, 10:32:22 AM
Amazing lift! Incredible. Amazing squat strength.

I NEVER see anyone squatting...really ever.

Maybe once a year someone squats 315 or 405 at any gym I train at.

I just sent Primemuscle another dick pic.

I want to settle this right now:

I do NOT have a small dick. It's actually kind of big. Basically - it's a good size.

If I had 1cm in length, it could be properly classed as big.

But I have maybe 1/4 or 1/2 Mark Dugdale's flaccid size.

When I go to the bathroom, you basically just see a stream of urine coming out of a bunch of hair, my dick is so small.

It's like being 5'11". That may not be "fall", but it sure as hell isn't short!

My dick is equal to a man being 5'11" in height. Not short.

And my dick has good aesthetics.

I just hate when people make false claims about me.

Why don’t you shave or at the very least trim down there.

That might be a reason you are single. Living in 1974
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 06, 2022, 11:02:28 AM
People asked me what my squat is:

My competition form ATG squat is 385x2. But keep in mind that we don't generally do full depth Olympic bar squats in Strongman contests, so my legs are strong specifically for Strongman competition.

Again, here's a partial [rack/pin] squat, showing where my legs are strong:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0rSOUg8EH/

NOTE: I have BAD knee valgus.

I'm bad at getting at of the hole when squatting below parallel.

I struggle to get out of the hole.

But my upper range of motion for the squat movement is quite strong. My box squats and high box squats in particular, are both very strong.

I'll consider training to get my squat up to 425-lb and posting a video of it.

I think even a proper ATG squat with 405 would be pretty impressive. FYI, that's at 170-lb body weight.

I'm glad that steroids are just the final finishing 1% touch. Love that final 1% touch:

If you can't get out of the hole you can't squat the weight how much you 1/4 range is not relevant let's see the ATG squat Knee valgus is a ridiculous excuse, I don't even have any cartilage. But based on your dumbell presses without a video not accepting any of your claimed lifts because you did not press 120lbs for one rep much less half a dozen or more
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 11:03:20 AM
Can someone summarize the last few pages of bullshit?

Taking steroids makes a person gain water weight?
Bhank would weigh 170 lbs without drugs?
Matt “Fagboi” Canning would weigh 160 lbs without drugs?
Both Canning and Hankins are as weak as fuck?
Matt Canning sent more jerkoff videos to Prime and Josh Rehaluk?
Bhank’s Covid was fake so she could skirt her new job drug test?
The old address in Copenhagen will easily lead to your new address?

Oh I forgot…the “feats of strength” videos really expose nothing more than poor training form?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on August 06, 2022, 11:08:09 AM
Can someone summarize the last few pages of bullshit?

Taking steroids makes a person gain water weight?
Bhank would weigh 170 lbs without drugs?
Matt “Fagboi” Canning would weigh 160 lbs without drugs?
Both Canning and Hankins are as weak as fuck?
Matt Canning sent more jerkoff videos to Prime and Josh Rehaluk?
Bhank’s Covid was fake so she could skirt her new job drug test?
The old address in Copenhagen will easily lead to your new address?

Oh I forgot…the “feats of strength” videos really expose nothing more than poor training form?

This thread has it ALL!

😆
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 06, 2022, 11:09:27 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 11:17:25 AM
This thread has it ALL!

😆

Did you write a letter to the Thunder Bay police department warning them not to try to make you wear a Covid mask or abide by the shutdown laws?

Can you imagine the laughter down at the police station when they read the letter sent by the tiny little resident retard?

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on August 06, 2022, 11:20:43 AM
Did you write a letter to the Thunder Bay police department warning them not to try to make you wear a Covid mask or abide by the shutdown laws?

Can you imagine the laughter down at the police station when they read the letter sent by the tiny little resident retard?

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!

LOL

He posted a few months ago that he was planning to do a cycle so he could fight off the “Thunder Bay Mask Bullies”.

I guess he wasn’t joking.

😆
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on August 06, 2022, 11:29:47 AM

I'm glad that steroids are just the final finishing 1% touch. Love that final 1% touch:

If a grown man wants do to a cycle I totally respect that.

However, I have NEVER seen someone SHAME people who are natural before.

🙄
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 11:30:43 AM
LOL

He posted a few months ago that he was planning to do a cycle so he could fight off the “Thunder Bay Mask Bullies”.

I guess he wasn’t joking.

😆

This might come as a surprise.

The Lakehead University story is also complete bullshit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on August 06, 2022, 11:32:33 AM
This might come as a surprise.

The Lakehead University story is also complete bullshit.

Is this the story where he got fired because he’s white?

😆

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 11:42:59 AM
It's fucking hilarious that Bhank is giving Matt advice on lifting.

Bhank, in a t-shirt, literally doesn't even look like he trains

Stringy 14" arms, red and massively bloated alcoholic-like face, shaky and limping gait, Goodwill-tier attire.  If I saw Bhank on the street, I'd suspect that he's an alcoholic hobo with one foot in the grave, and I'm 100% dead serious. 

Basically, Matt has made better gains in the past few months than Bhank has made over his entire lifetime.

Brian Wood Healy Hankins is trying his best to make this thread about him.

Matt “Cock Connoisseur” Canning has taken bodybuilding drugs for about a month and has surpassed Brian Wood Healy Hankins in muscle.

Two useless morons fighting over the attention of anonymous Getbiggers.

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 06, 2022, 12:41:36 PM
Brian Wood Healy Hankins is trying his best to make this thread about him.

Matt “Cock Connoisseur” Canning has taken bodybuilding drugs for about a month and has surpassed Brian Wood Healy Hankins in muscle.

Two useless morons fighting over the attention of anonymous Getbiggers.

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!

I was merely trying to help Matt says he doesnt like his chest development but his arms and shoulders are good wonders why then post tricep presses he calls bench presses
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 12:50:35 PM
Brian Wood Healy Hankins is trying his best to make this thread about him.

Matt “Cock Connoisseur” Canning has taken bodybuilding drugs for about a month and has surpassed Brian Wood Healy Hankins in muscle.

Two useless morons fighting over the attention of anonymous Getbiggers.

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!

That's a tremendous compliment you're giving me here, Walter Sobchak. This may well be the greatest compliment anyone has given to me in this thread.

But of course it's not true.

I don't pretend that I look like - or even can look like - B. Hank.

He has various areas that are much better than mine.

I can't judge B. Hank's legs, as I believe he had an injury before that required him to use a cane. This prevented him from building his legs to their full potential.

In various other areas [muscle groups], B. Hank is superior to me.

I do have great potential in my delts. Maybe my triceps. But by and large, B. Hank has more areas with good potential for bodybuilding.

Walter Sobchak - it blows my mind that you bash B. Hank, knowing his physique is vastly superior to yours. You seem to enjoy bashing Getbiggers who warm up with your workout.

Why is that?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 06, 2022, 01:05:49 PM
Amazing lift! Incredible. Amazing squat strength.

I NEVER see anyone squatting...really ever.

Maybe once a year someone squats 315 or 405 at any gym I train at.

I just sent Primemuscle another dick pic.

I want to settle this right now:

I do NOT have a small dick. It's actually kind of big. Basically - it's a good size.

If I had 1cm in length, it could be properly classed as big.

But I have maybe 1/4 or 1/2 Mark Dugdale's flaccid size.

When I go to the bathroom, you basically just see a stream of urine coming out of a bunch of hair, my dick is so small.

It's like being 5'11". That may not be "fall", but it sure as hell isn't short!

My dick is equal to a man being 5'11" in height. Not short.

And my dick has good aesthetics.

I just hate when people make false claims about me.

Prime are you able to confirm the 6.45 inches based on the additional picture?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 06, 2022, 01:19:31 PM
Matt, be careful sending that stuff around. Prime has family members who may use the PC. (Grandkids, etc).
Wouldnt want to see you get dragged away and locked up for sending porn to minors (if they ever opened it and their parents found out, etc).
Or you sent it to someone else by accident...

Dangerous stuff..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on August 06, 2022, 01:41:42 PM
Matt, be careful sending that stuff around. Prime has family members who may use the PC. (Grandkids, etc).
Wouldnt want to see you get dragged away and locked up for sending porn to minors (if they ever opened it and their parents found out, etc).
Or you sent it to someone else by accident...

Dangerous stuff..

Good advice.

You don’t want Matt making the SAME mistakes that you’ve made.

🙁
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on August 06, 2022, 01:43:08 PM
Good advice.

You don’t want Matt making the SAME mistakes that you’ve made.

🙁
Getting C unty I see.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 06, 2022, 01:54:45 PM
Good advice.

You don’t want Matt making the SAME mistakes that you’ve made.

🙁

LOL   ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on August 06, 2022, 01:55:18 PM

And my dick has good aesthetics.


The Frank Zane of Peckers perhaps?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 02:05:13 PM
That's a tremendous compliment you're giving me here, Walter Sobchak. This may well be the greatest compliment anyone has given to me in this thread.

But of course it's not true.

I don't pretend that I look like - or even can look like - B. Hank.

He has various areas that are much better than mine.

I can't judge B. Hank's legs, as I believe he had an injury before that required him to use a cane. This prevented him from building his legs to their full potential.

In various other areas [muscle groups], B. Hank is superior to me.

I do have great potential in my delts. Maybe my triceps. But by and large, B. Hank has more areas with good potential for bodybuilding.

Walter Sobchak - it blows my mind that you bash B. Hank, knowing his physique is vastly superior to yours. You seem to enjoy bashing Getbiggers who warm up with your workout.

Why is that?

Settle down retard, you haven’t accomplished anything.

Being bigger than Brian Hankins is basically the same accomplishment as being the best glue eater on the short school bus.

All your bragging about lifting weights and if you had a brain in your head you would realize that you’re not lifting the weights, the drugs you’re taking are lifting the weights.

Without the drugs you would be 160 lbs with no muscle at all….and you would still be a spastic attention whore. There is no one on this entire board smaller than you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 06, 2022, 02:14:57 PM
Settle down retard, you haven’t accomplished anything.

Being bigger than Brian Hankins is basically the same accomplishment as being the best glue eater on the short school bus.

All your bragging about lifting weights and if you had a brain in your head you would realize that you’re not lifting the weights, the drugs you’re taking are lifting the weights.

Without the drugs you would be 160 lbs with no muscle at all….and you would still be a spastic attention whore. There is no one on this entire board smaller than you.

I want to see the Matt vs Walter Posedown
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 02:17:55 PM
I want to see the Matt vs Walter Posedown

I can’t wait to call your new boss.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 06, 2022, 02:28:21 PM
I can’t wait to call your new boss.

Like I am going to tell you where I am working lol and if you are really 6foot4 240-260lbs of muscle what is the problem? Why hide your identity if you are such a beast?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 02:33:43 PM
Settle down retard, you haven’t accomplished anything.

Being bigger than Brian Hankins is basically the same accomplishment as being the best glue eater on the short school bus.

All your bragging about lifting weights and if you had a brain in your head you would realize that you’re not lifting the weights, the drugs you’re taking are lifting the weights.

Without the drugs you would be 160 lbs with no muscle at all….and you would still be a spastic attention whore. There is no one on this entire board smaller than you.

I've been 200-lb drug-free before, but with a 35" waist. My waist was 32" when I hit 200 thanks to the gear. I much prefer this smaller waist for this weight.

As for strength - I get that you aren't very strong so you can't grasp anyone else being strong, but at one stage or another, I've gotten most of these lifts off gear.

I have bench pressed 225x25 naturally.

I've never been this strong all-around, without even TRAINING for strength...but I have more or less hit around what I'm doing now, off gear.

Of course, I was training hard, on strength training programs.

But do you think most people could run gear and bench 225x30 [I suspect I'll get that this month].

That's totally naive. You should try it to see. NO, most people would not lift that, gear or not.

I will drop in weight after this, but once again, it's your delusion that I was 170-lb because I couldn't get heavier.

I did that for health reasons.

I'm likely going to settle at 180-185 after this. I was being too health-conscious being 170

But let's be honest - that's not the issue. The issue is that you're jealous you don't have a physique like B. Hank's, so you trash him. Just like you can't be as strong as me.

So that's what you do? You trash people who outperform you? That's what you call class? Wow.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 06, 2022, 02:35:20 PM
Prime are you able to confirm the 6.45 inches based on the additional picture?

Nope.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 02:36:08 PM
Like I am going to tell you where I am working lol and if you are really 6foot4 240-260lbs of muscle what is the problem? Why hide your identity if you are such a beast?

That's what I find so strange.

If he's 6'3.5" and 240-260 range, and stronger than me, he wouldn't care about any of my lifts. He'd just be like "That guy's strong for his size", and that's it.

But he's angry, because he knows you and I both warm up with his workout.

I do look forward to getting that 225x25 bench press next week, which I will dedicate to Walter Sobchak.

I think it's important to reach out to those weaker among us.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 02:37:31 PM
Nope.

It's NOT small.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 06, 2022, 02:37:58 PM
Matt, be careful sending that stuff around. Prime has family members who may use the PC. (Grandkids, etc).
Wouldnt want to see you get dragged away and locked up for sending porn to minors (if they ever opened it and their parents found out, etc).
Or you sent it to someone else by accident...

Dangerous stuff..

Matt won't be littering my Facebook messenger anymore. I banned him today.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 02:42:07 PM
Like I am going to tell you where I am working lol and if you are really 6foot4 240-260lbs of muscle what is the problem? Why hide your identity if you are such a beast?

If you have nothing to hide with respect to drug use, domestic abuse, and assaulting women, then what is the problem?

It’s going to be very difficult for any company to justify hiring a wifebeater in this day and age.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 06, 2022, 02:43:21 PM
If you have nothing to hide with respect to drug use, domestic abuse, and assaulting women, then what is the problem?

It’s going to be very difficult for any company to justify hiring a wifebeater in this day and age.

I have 0 charges for Domestic abuse or assaulting of women or Drug abuse. Getbig has been spreading lies about me for over a year
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on August 06, 2022, 02:47:22 PM
I have 0 charges for Domestic abuse or assaulting of women or Drug abuse. Getbig has been spreading lies about me for over a year

So why all the mug shots?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 02:48:18 PM
I have 0 charges for Domestic abuse or assaulting of women or Drug abuse. Getbig has been spreading lies about me for over a year

Hopefully your boss is a women.

Won’t be difficult to steer her here and let her read your posts.

Won’t take more than 5 minutes out of my day.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on August 06, 2022, 02:52:02 PM
Nope.

Matt won't be littering my Facebook messenger anymore. I banned him today.


Move over Kim K and Pete, the Osborne - Canning May December romance is kaput after nearly 20 years :(.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on August 06, 2022, 02:55:17 PM
I have 0 charges for Domestic abuse or assaulting of women or Drug abuse. Getbig has been spreading lies about me for over a year

(https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/81728140.jpg).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on August 06, 2022, 03:11:12 PM
LOL   ;D

 ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on August 06, 2022, 03:19:38 PM
Impressive gains by MattC.

Impressive 675-lb quarter-squat-off-pins as well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on August 06, 2022, 03:21:04 PM
Walter Sobchak thought that I was struggling to weigh over 170-lb when all along, I purposely selected to stay at that weight for health reasons. HAHAHAHAHAHA, yeah...like I couldn't be 220-lb by the end of the month if I wanted that.

What an absolute loser.

Making fun of me for purposely selecting to be a healthy body weight. Meanwhile, I can lift more than that loser at 163 than he can at 263. So in his pathetic mind he had to pretend I couldn't get any bigger or stronger than I was, because accepting reality would mean he'd have to accept that other men are stronger than him despite being way lighter.

Not just a loser - what kind of a stupid asshole takes a person's personal health choice, and uses it to make fun of the obvious strength constraint that arises as a result of it?

Well, Walter Sobchak - I'm 205 now, and I may choose to go up to 220. And now I'll destroy you in any lift, and keep getting stronger until I CHOOSE to go down in weight - and when I do, I'll maintain most of my strength, which will all be lifts you can't do.

Yeah, I could never gain weight [/Sarcasm - meanwhile, I skip roughly ever other day on Anadrol because I'm up 24-lb, and didn't want to gain 40].

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385316;image)
Just the finishing touch... :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 03:33:05 PM
Impressive gains by MattC.

Impressive 675-lb quarter-squat-off-pins as well.

Thank you, Hulkotron!

That's the closest I want to come to passing out at the gym. I want close, but - I was starting to see a few stars. Just a few. So that was heavy enough, and close enough for me. I always try to pull back in training *just* before issues/injuries.

I am now wondering where to go with this cycle? I will hit +30-lb gained just from Anadrol.

I'm wondering if I do start the Sustanon, if I could hit 220.  :D

It would just be temporary. I'm sorry of curious how I look at 220, but that would be +37-lb gained, and I wasn't quite prepared to put on that much weight.

I think I literally got as much out of this cycle as possible. I'm kind of curious how people would respond to me at 220.  :D ;D

Should I be a man and add the Sustanon?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 03:37:54 PM
Just the finishing touch... :D

LOL.

I'd like Taffin to Photoshop those pictures so I'm skinnier in the Before photo, and bigger in the After photo.  ;D

That before picture isn't quite accurate, as I was back in the gym before going on cycle.

The photos below are closer. But no matter how you cut it - I'm up 24.5 pounds, and I'm fuller and harder than ever before, and basically pumped up just from pouring a glass of orange juice.

I'm as strong as I normally am, if not a little stronger, WHILE NOT TRAINING FOR STRENGTH.

This isn't fair.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 06, 2022, 03:38:19 PM
I have 0 charges for Domestic abuse or assaulting of women or Drug abuse. Getbig has been spreading lies about me for over a year

 ;D

How many arrests?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 06, 2022, 03:40:52 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385509;image)

(https://y.yarn.co/d5011280-f83e-4abd-9b00-0664bf6bff38_text.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 03:43:01 PM
MCWAY was saying I should just train naturally. Ohhh - so I'm going to be full and pumped 24/7 just from walking around, if I train naturally?

It's not so much the weight - it's that fill and pumped and quality look that I just don't feel you can get naturally.

I didn't even work out today, but I'm still as pumped here as I would be after an upper body workout normally - if not more pumped:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on August 06, 2022, 04:20:12 PM
MCWAY was saying I should just train naturally. Ohhh - so I'm going to be full and pumped 24/7 just from walking around, if I train naturally?

It's not so much the weight - it's that fill and pumped and quality look that I just don't feel you can get naturally.

I didn't even work out today, but I'm still as pumped here as I would be after an upper body workout normally - if not more pumped:
matt should go natty n just sit in a sauna all day to replicate days on mercury it will look ripped
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 06, 2022, 05:05:26 PM
I have 0 charges for Domestic abuse or assaulting of women or Drug abuse. Getbig has been spreading lies about me for over a year
What are you on probation for then? YOU said you have a probation officer. I've asked you this multiple times and you ignore the question for obvious reasons. You have something to hide
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 06, 2022, 05:09:00 PM
Thank you, Hulkotron!

That's the closest I want to come to passing out at the gym. I want close, but - I was starting to see a few stars. Just a few. So that was heavy enough, and close enough for me. I always try to pull back in training *just* before issues/injuries.

I am now wondering where to go with this cycle? I will hit +30-lb gained just from Anadrol.

I'm wondering if I do start the Sustanon, if I could hit 220.  :D

It would just be temporary. I'm sorry of curious how I look at 220, but that would be +37-lb gained, and I wasn't quite prepared to put on that much weight.

I think I literally got as much out of this cycle as possible. I'm kind of curious how people would respond to me at 220.  :D ;D

Should I be a man and add the Sustanon?


Are you afraid of needles? Makes no sense aren't running the sust
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2022, 08:02:37 PM
It was brought up that it's probably a better idea to look for value from within - rather than from gear.

I agree.

I just...have really been getting a kick out of this cycle. I literally can't believe how much attention muscle garners. I mean, I always knew, but...I've never experienced anything like this.

I'm up 27-lb now.

I really can't complain. I just wish I could achieve this perpetually full/pumped look without gear. It's not necessarily the weight - but, again, just what constant pumped look.

I have a shoulders workout tomorrow, so if anyone has any suggestions, let me know before then.

I want to get some heavy sets in - maybe 100-lb dumbbells for reps for seated overhead dumbbell press, and heavy reverse pec deck flies with the full stack [200-lb].

I have been doing hypertrophy training only, but I want to nail that 225x30 bench press set this month. That would make a good video for Getbig.  :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on August 06, 2022, 08:04:40 PM
It was brought up that it's probably a better idea to look for value from within - rather than from gear.

I agree.

I just...have really been getting a kick out of this cycle. I literally can't believe how much attention muscle garners. I mean, I always knew, but...I've never experienced anything like this.

I'm up 27-lb now.

I really can't complain. I just wish I could achieve this perpetually full/pumped look without gear. It's not necessarily the weight - but, again, just what constant pumped look.

I have a shoulders workout tomorrow, so if anyone has any suggestions, let me know before then.

I want to get some heavy sets in - maybe 100-lb dumbbells for reps for seated overhead dumbbell press, and heavy reverse pec deck flies with the full stack [200-lb].

I have been doing hypertrophy training only, but I want to nail that 225x30 bench press set this month. That would make a good video for Getbig.  :)

Matt,

annually, how much do you think you spend on clothes?

Gym attire and going out attire
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 08:21:56 PM
Matt,

annually, how much do you think you spend on clothes?

Gym attire and going out attire

Matt Canning will be suicidal in a month when his water gains are gone.

He’s going to break down and cry….AGAIN.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 06, 2022, 08:25:39 PM


I just sent Primemuscle another dick pic.


Did you take my advice and oil your cock so Prime will find it more appealing?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 06, 2022, 08:27:33 PM
Did you take my advice and oil your cock so Prime will find it more appealing?
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 06, 2022, 08:37:23 PM
I'm just joking around.

But since you asked - someone else said I get mad being accused of being gay.

No, man - it's not that.

I get mad when people question my claims, whatever they are, when I can prove those claims.

I posted my dumbbell bench video and got called out on it. It was not the form I intended.

I'll get it next time.

But we need to grant that one way or another, I'll prove my claims.

I'll get a 225x25 bench on video next week, and I'm really hoping I can get that for 30 reps before the month is over.

I just want to prove all my claims.

I don't appreciate being accused of being weak, having a small dick, etc.

And what can I do to stop such comments, except verify my cock size?

Would you want to be accused of having a small cock, MM?

[to my knowledge, no one ever accused you of this, but would you appreciate it?]

I'm willing and able to available to prove all my claims.

Maybe I can get a good 550-lb deadlift video up too - I just didn't want to push the strength stuff while on gear, as I heard injury risk is elevated. But I do want to prove to Getbig that I'm truthful.

Matt WHY in the absolute fck would I care if someone said I had a little dick?? I can’t wrap my brain around that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 06, 2022, 09:39:12 PM
I have a suggestion for you Matt....please take your own miserable life.......do some good for once.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 07, 2022, 04:03:01 AM
.

No judgment from me.

If Matt wants to be a creepy weirdo sending unsolicited dick pics to 80 year old soggy men. I'm here to help him be the best possible creepy weirdo he can be.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on August 07, 2022, 05:01:48 AM
matt should go natty n just sit in a sauna all day to replicate days on mercury it will look ripped
matt your mass has surpassed time wasonlycox now just more comparisons with his 85' photo for proof but now its maybe time to deflate before u get 2 big
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 07, 2022, 04:19:41 PM
MCWAY was saying I should just train naturally. Ohhh - so I'm going to be full and pumped 24/7 just from walking around, if I train naturally?

It's not so much the weight - it's that fill and pumped and quality look that I just don't feel you can get naturally.

I didn't even work out today, but I'm still as pumped here as I would be after an upper body workout normally - if not more pumped:

Wrong again! What I said was that the gains you were seeking didn't require the use of steroids. And, I (and others) gave you advice of what you could do to make those gains, while you were blubbering and wailing about not having those roids at the time.

The consensus across the board was that your diet SUCKED.

Your insecurity about being pumped all the time is just as ridiculous as mine was nearly TWENTY YEARS AGO, when I used to do push-ups at the water park like a blithering fool. I'm much bigger, ice cold, than I ever way doing that foolishness back in the day.

Exactly who are you trying to impress?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 07, 2022, 04:29:46 PM
.

Hahahaha.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 07, 2022, 05:03:22 PM


Exactly who are you trying to impress?

Soggy 80 yearold bisexual men
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 07, 2022, 05:11:36 PM
Matt is on a journey of personal discovery.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on August 07, 2022, 06:08:29 PM
Matt is starting to look like a serious Mr Canada contender


(https://s2.qwant.com/thumbr/0x380/6/9/b298f454389ea0a154801ec96b0f85190bdde3531f5806b4d85efd48c10804/MrCanada1970.jpg?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arnoldheight.com%2Farticles%2FMrCanada1970.jpg&q=0&b=1&p=0&a=0)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on August 07, 2022, 06:09:34 PM
I have a suggestion for you Matt....please take your own miserable life.......do some good for once.


Wes- that's so harsh lol
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on August 07, 2022, 08:52:45 PM
Matt is starting to look like a serious Mr Canada contender


(https://s2.qwant.com/thumbr/0x380/6/9/b298f454389ea0a154801ec96b0f85190bdde3531f5806b4d85efd48c10804/MrCanada1970.jpg?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arnoldheight.com%2Farticles%2FMrCanada1970.jpg&q=0&b=1&p=0&a=0)
What kind of bullshit IFBB show is that supposed to be? Did Basile have his kids cut out paper letters and stick them up? Fakest IFBB show ever. And who gets 5 trophies for one show?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on August 07, 2022, 09:23:42 PM
What kind of bullshit IFBB show is that supposed to be? Did Basile have his kids cut out paper letters and stick them up? Fakest IFBB show ever. And who gets 5 trophies for one show?

Vince was constructing the letters right before the show—some scissors, glue and composition paper.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 07, 2022, 09:27:42 PM
What kind of bullshit IFBB show is that supposed to be? Did Basile have his kids cut out paper letters and stick them up? Fakest IFBB show ever. And who gets 5 trophies for one show?

Wes 68 trophies start to sound a little less impressive when you see how many they give away every show
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 07, 2022, 09:36:50 PM
Wes 68 trophies start to sound a little less impressive when you see how many they give away every show

Then it must make you feel like a total LOSER since they give away so many at every show and you still haven’t received EVEN ONE?? 😂  I just fckn with ya man. You are lean man, you just don’t have the size or shape for BB. It’s really not that big a deal
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 07, 2022, 09:47:38 PM
Then it must make you feel like a total LOSER since they give away so many at every show and you still haven’t received EVEN ONE?? 😂  I just fckn with ya man. You are lean man, you just don’t have the size or shape for BB. It’s really not that big a deal

I have spent the last decade of my life swimming, surfing, snowboarding, kitesurfing, and diving vs bodybuilding. I just got seriously back into this 3 years ago to fix my knee issues when I had my son. I have made a lot of gains in those 3 years give it a few more and I will get there. I had to get past the injuries first to even train right but I am there now training is great. Besides not planning to do the Open IFBB but maybe Masters Nationals NPC. I am at the Classic Limit after a cut now. I would have done very well in Classic this year. But the goal is to go bigger as want to really add some leg size. Give it a year don't sell me down the river yet I am making real gains. I will surpass previous form
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 07, 2022, 11:00:23 PM
Looks like I'm holding steady around 205-lb.

I probably range from about 204-207 most days, seldom going as low as 202, and only hitting 210 yesterday.

I've reduced my Anadrol slightly, now at 15mg daily - Anadrol only.

While I'm tempted to go up to 220, just because, since I intend to drop potentially to as low as 165 - maybe even lower - I don't want my weight to fluctuate *too* much.

Also, I'll be honest - I'm quite pleased with my current look.

I was able to do 100-lb dumbbells for eight reps today for the seated overhead press.

I'm quite confident about getting 225x25 on my next bench workout, later this week.

Hopefully I'll hit 27 the week after that, and 225x30 before the month ends.  :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 07, 2022, 11:15:36 PM

Move over Kim K and Pete, the Osborne - Canning May December romance is kaput after nearly 20 years :(.

Romance? That's a laugh!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 07, 2022, 11:20:22 PM
Marvin Martian:

You asked why you would care if someone said you had a small dick.

You may be missing a small detail here: I DO have a small dick - when FLACCID. Pictures verify that.

It's about half the size of Mark Dugdale's flaccid dick. Maybe 1/3.

But it's by no means small when erect.

So it didn't sit well with me that people would think I have a micro-penis because I have a small flaccid cock.

I wouldn't want to be known for having a small dick, so it does matter to me.

I don't want untrue things said about me. Make fun of me for being 5'9". At least it's the truth. But I'd be annoyed if any attribute of me was being misrepresented.

While this cycle is ending, and after it's over, I'll get back to strength training, and post some good lifts. Hopefully a 350+ bench, 520+ deadlift, and some other good stuff.

I frankly don't give a shit what people think of me if what they think is the truth.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 07, 2022, 11:38:18 PM
Romance? That's a laugh!

Can you just let everyone know I don't have a SMALL dick, at least? Please, can you give me that!

...

Similar to the claims about me having a small dick, Walter Sobchak claims I weighed 160.  ::) Generally, I maintained a 170-lb body weight while natural.

I did that intentionally, for good health. So when he claims I was 160 and speaking like I couldn't get heavier than that, it's just a false narrative: I wasn't 160 [not usually], and it was NEVER because I couldn't gain weight.

But it was CLOSE to the truth, in that I was 170 [close to 160]. The idea I couldn't be heavier was bullshit.

Of course that loser Walter Sobchak knows that it's easy to make fun of someone who is 160, than someone who is 170, but could be 180-200 if he wanted, and even 220 on juice.

The point of this cycle was just to enjoy the added mass, but it will also prove to the board that I could have always been bigger and stronger, had I been willing to take more risks.

The board will have no choice but to acknowledge that I CHOOSE to be light. And for perfectly good reasons, all of which are health reasons.

I don't like knowing that people think I plateaued at the level I was at and that I was unable to grow beyond that, or get stronger than that. That's completely untrue. In reality, I consciously made it a point to be that weight every one of those years.

One local Strongman in town would trash me for the same reason. The stupid fuck ended up having a heart attack at a Strongman contest because he took too many Cheque Drops.  ::) What a fucking loser - GEE, MIGHT THAT BE WHY I'M CONSERVATIVE WITH MY HEALTH CHOICES?!

Furthermore, I'm stronger than most people even despite the body weight restrictions I imposed on myself. But that needs to be clear: I IMPOSED THOSE LIMITATIONS.

Big shocker that my progress sped up once I removed them.

Lastly, for Walter Sobchak making fun of me for "only" getting the Northwestern Ontario record if I bench press 225x30...how much of a DELUSIONAL FUCKING MORON would someone have to be to not be impressed with that?

ANY FUCKING PERSON WHO TRAINS knows 225x30 is impressive.

The way he talks, it sounds like he doesn't even train.

There are only two views to have of my strength, no matter who you are:

[1] I'm strong, period. Or:
[2] I'm strong for my size.

When you bench press 2x your body weight and deadlift 3x your body weight, you are strong for ANY body weight.

Not that I can bench press 400 and deadlift 600 at 200, but at 170, I'm pretty close to those percentages.

Anyone making fun of a 170-lb'er who deadlifts 500 is a fucking retard. If Walter Sobchak weighs 263 as claimed and deadlifts 600, why would he make fun of him for weighing almost 100-lb less than him and deadlifting only 100-lb less?

Or is he 263, deadlifting 700? If he deadlifted 700, he wouldn't be making fun of me for deadlifting 500, and I would STILL be stronger than him pound for pound.

Or is he 263 deadlifting 800? If yes then, CONGRATULATIONS, he's as strong as I am, pound for pound. And even if he COULD lift that, he would acknowledge me as being strong, pound for pound.

That's why I'm convinced this stupid fuck doesn't even train AT ALL.

At least now he's saying - "Oh, you're only lifting what you do because of the juice."

The implication there is that I'm strong.

If I get off PED's and go back to strength training, and allow my body weight to settle at 180, I could see myself deadlifting 540 - 3x body weight.

I'm strong for my size, which is probably all I ever claimed to be.

I failed on my 120-lb dumbbells video, but wait until later this week when I hit 225x25 on the bench for the second time in my life. Hopefully that will redeem me, before I hit 225x30 later this month. Though I'm 100% confident in getting 225x25+, I'm only maybe 70% confident about getting 30 reps. It would mean a lot to me to get that lift.

Hopefully I can get 315x10+. That should settle some claims about my not being strong.

Walter Sobchak is utterly delusional
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 07, 2022, 11:43:41 PM
Then it must make you feel like a total LOSER since they give away so many at every show and you still haven’t received EVEN ONE?? 😂  I just fckn with ya man. You are lean man, you just don’t have the size or shape for BB. It’s really not that big a deal
I won mine from 1987-2011 when classes were stacked.....nobody gave me anything,I worked my ass for them.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 07, 2022, 11:55:24 PM
Wrong again! What I said was that the gains you were seeking didn't require the use of steroids. And, I (and others) gave you advice of what you could do to make those gains, while you were blubbering and wailing about not having those roids at the time.

The consensus across the board was that your diet SUCKED.

Your insecurity about being pumped all the time is just as ridiculous as mine was nearly TWENTY YEARS AGO, when I used to do push-ups at the water park like a blithering fool. I'm much bigger, ice cold, than I ever way doing that foolishness back in the day.

My diet only "sucked" from a bodybuilding POV.

My diet was extremely healthy.

That being said, you are WRONG that I can achieve my current look naturally. I can achieve my current BODY WEIGHT naturally.

That's not the same thing, MCWAY.

The perpetual fullness and hardness I have to my muscles - I can't achieve without PED's.

I have shared some photos that I took without having a pump, and I look better un-pumped than I used to look, even with a pump - or maybe BARELY looked like, even with a pump.

So you're wrong about achieving this naturally.

MCWAY - you claimed to be 220 naturally at 5'9", right?

Well - I'm one meal away from being 210 right now. Let's compare photos.

Of course I look better than you, and you know it. As I said, it's not just about being a certain weight - it's that full, pumped look, that a person can't get without steroids.

Also - my waist is 35" when I'm 200 naturally. It's only 32" thanks to steroids.

I also think it's ridiculous that some anonymous person like you talks shit about steroids, when over 99% fitness influencers are juiced. GEE, DO YOU THINK THAT'S MAYBE WHY THEY USE STEROIDS?

Steroids will take ANY of us to our goals, faster. I simply CANNOT have my physique looking this full and lean without PED's. I can be maybe 190, and just as lean, and with the waist size I have at 205-210, but NOTHING I can do to change my diet would have me looking like this - OR AT LEAST NOT THIS QUICKLY.

I said befoe it would take me 18 months to naturally achieve what I could achieve on steroids in two months.

I was wrong.

In reality, it would take over 18 months to achieve what I can on steroids in THREE WEEKS.

Yes, I can make improvements just from eating more. My current progress is so high not JUST because of PED's - but also from eating more AND from muscle memory.

But AS I ALREADY EXPLAINED, MCWAY: I DON'T WANT TO EAT THIS MUCH FOR MONTHS OR YEARS.

Thanks to PED's, I am able to just eat this month's for weeks or months, and achieve a look that it would have taken me well over a year, if not YEARS to achieve naturally.

Fuck that - I won't do it. I have ZERO interest. But I'm glad to do it just for the summer, and shrink again immediately after it's over.

Exactly who are you trying to impress?

The three women I fucked in the last 43 days?

It's possible it would have happened anyway...but basically steroids are allowing me to be pumped at 50% of a full pump, 24/7.

All of us who work out know we look our best while pumped, and can look sort of "meh", even later that same day.

It's that full pumped look that catches the eye. And that's what people notice.

Let's pretend I could get to this size naturally - ok, fine. And that would require me eating 1,000 extra calories daily for...forever, basically?

Meanwhile, I could just run juice for two months, and shrink in the winter - then get my physique back each summer.

Arguably, is that REALLY that much less healthy?

MCWAY - we are both 5'9". I spent most of the past decade at 170. You spent most of it at 220. And you have the audacity to talk to me about health, when you spent a decade if not decades carrying around 50-lb more weight than me?

Seriously?

Here are pictures of me NOT PUMPED [taken on full off-days]. The reality is, I can ONLY look like this while pumped, naturally. And THAT may be the worst part of natural training. If I could look full and pumped more often while naturally, I probably would not have any interest in juice.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 07, 2022, 11:57:11 PM
I won mine from 1987-2011 when classes were stacked.....nobody gave me anything,I worked my ass for them.

Great work, wes.

Yes... contest wins and pro cards used to mean something...now it's like there is a category for everyone to win. But hey = more money, which could help bodybuilding, right?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 08, 2022, 01:50:11 AM
Fakest IFBB show ever. And who gets 5 trophies for one show?

Overall champion

Heavyweight champion

Most Muscular

Most Hung

The Peter North Adward for Largest Ropes

That’s 5 right there
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 02:27:54 AM
Overall champion

Heavyweight champion

Most Muscular

Most Hung

The Peter North Adward for Largest Ropes

That’s 5 right there

Yep - that's me!

The Peter Northwestern Ontario Award for Most Consecutive Ropes in a Row - 1st Place, Lightweight & Overall!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 02:34:51 AM
MCWAY:

Tell me more about how much better I will look applying the asinine training principles you use as a natural.  ::)

NO, I will not be able to look as good naturally, short of literally following a perfect regimented diet program for a year or more.

I told - I'M SPENDING A FUCKING YEAR COUNTING EVERY GRAM OF PROTEIN I EAT TO LOOK LIKE HOW I CAN FROM TAKING 15MG OF ANADROL DAILY FOR THREE WEEKS.

I don't have the patience to follow such a system - and you grossly underestimate the health costs of eating more.

So you think you weighing 220-lb at 5'9" naturally is healthier than .e being 170-lb at 5'9", and using female doses of steroids twice a decade?

STOP.

Go back to reading vintage muscle mags while drinking your shaker cup full of Cell-Tech.

And "steroids are just the finishing touch", lmao!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 02:35:58 AM
"Steroids are just the finishing 1% touch".

LOL!!!!!!

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 03:10:12 AM


Also - my waist is 35" when I'm 200 naturally. It's only 32" thanks to steroids.



That doesn't even make sense
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 03:39:11 AM
That doesn't even make sense

Why not?

At 200-lb naturally, I was fatter - hence my waist was bigger.

At 200-lb on PED's, more of the weight gain has been muscle [by proportion], and my waist/stomach hasn't gained the same amount of fat.

I've been this weight before, but I've never been this lean at this weight before.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 03:41:54 AM
Why not?

At 200-lb naturally, I was fatter - hence my waist was bigger.

At 200-lb on PED's, more of the weight gain has been muscle [by proportion], and my waist/stomach hasn't gained the same amount of fat.

I've been this weight before, but I've never been this lean at this weight before.

Just because you are leaner now than you were last time at 200lbs doesn't mean you cant get to 200lbs clean and be leaner than you are now. Peds did not shrink your waist they do not make your waist smaller. You not having as much fat is a function of your diet and training not anadrol. Have you considered you may just be more motivated to train hard and eat right?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 03:58:49 AM
Lol…bragging about 100 pound overhead presses while being on PEDs.

I was doing close to 100 pound over head presses while being natty.

You have crap Genetics.

That's a really good lift, if you did 100-lb dumbbells overhead.

I have done it before naturally too. At 170-lb body weight.

I have literally seen three people in my life do 100-lb+ dumbbells for seated overheads in my entire time training at commerical gyms, from 2001 to present day.

NO ONE does 100-lb dumbbells. How often do you EVER see anyone do 100-lb dumbbell overhead presses?

Are you suggesting that at your gym, that happens with any frequency at all?

There might be 50 men in my entire city who can do 100-lb dumbbells overhead. More likely, under 25 men.

But we can prove what I'm saying, SF1900 - take a picture every time you see someone use 100-lb+ dumbbells for overhead press. Take a picture of the person locking out a rep. Do this every time you see that this month.

I guarantee you will not see five people lift that, even in the biggest gym in your city. For me, I haven't seen five people do that in my entire life.

Furthermore, I am on ~15mg Anadrol daily, and I am not training for strength. So for me to be lifting weight I previously did while training for strength, while currently training for hypertrophy only, is very good.

I have to admit, benching 225x22 surprised me a little. I generally only get 15+ if I'm specifically benching 225 each week, to get stronger at that weight.

But I haven't been bench pressing lately, nor training for strength. I've been consistently doing higher reps, for muscle.

So today I got the 100's for 8 reps overhead. I can't recall getting that many reps before...but for not training for strength, I'm fairly close to as strong as I've ever been.

That being said, I need to reiterate: no one presses 100's or more. As I said, there aren't even 50 guys in my city who can do that, and they are ALL on PED's. And maybe one of them weighs less than I do.

You seem to be suggesting that if someone doesn't have a national record, that they "suck".

I'm stronger than 99.9% of males. There are over 50,000 makes in my city. Under 50 of them are stronger than me. And this is where Getbig baffles me - so if you're only stronger than 99.9% of men, it means you suck? Apparently?

If I start training for strength, I'll be bench pressing 350+ within a month. Nobody bench presses 350 - PED's or not.

Also, if I suck at anything - pressing strength is NOT that thing.

Video:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 04:14:26 AM
Just because you are leaner now than you were last time at 200lbs doesn't mean you cant get to 200lbs clean and be leaner than you are now. Peds did not shrink your waist they do not make your waist smaller. You not having as much fat is a function of your diet and training not anadrol. Have you considered you may just be more motivated to train hard and eat right?

Eat right = yep!!!

Yes sir!

I've probably literally doubled my calories, thanks to the advice and guidance from you and other Getbiggers in here [well - and being on gear!!].

Regarding training - I generally always train very hard. I'm a very consistent hard trainer.

In fact...I've held back a little in training specifically because Van Bilderass and another Getbigger said that people are more likely to get injured on gear. As in, they feel so strong that they lift weight their muscles can handle, but not their ligaments and tendons. Then they get injured.

So while I can say I am training hard right now, I've been holding back doing set after set at low reps, opting to go 12-20 reps way more than going low reps. Although I consider 8-12 being in the bodybuilding range, I think higher reps is more conducive to muscle building than lower reps, e.g., a 15-rep set is better than an 8-rep set, IMO.

And of course, 1-6 reps is in the strength range! So I allow myself one set of six reps or fewer, per workout.

My fear is my muscles may be able to lift the weight because of the gear, but what if my tendons can't handle it, and I get injured?

So I've been very cautious. NOT to say I'm not training hard - but I'm just doing higher-ish reps, and holding back just a touch, when it comes to failure. That may mean leaving a rep or two in the tank.

But my diet is WAY better [meaning, more calories]!

As for my waist:

Normally, if I go from 183 to 208, I would add five inches to my waist.

!!

But that didn't happen this time.

Wouldn't it stand to reason that PED's allowed me on gain more lean mass than a natural bulk?

?

If you're saying I could theoretically gain the same type of mass naturally...I agree. But - by using Anadrol, I did it within weeks.

I wanted to look like this for this summer. That would not have been possible without gear.

Also, I still look pumped, even hours since my workout - again, that type of perpetual pump is simply not possible without gear.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 04:18:04 AM


Also, if I suck at anything - pressing strength is NOT that thing.

Video:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

To be honest those dumbells should be resting on your shoulders at the bottom before the press these are not full reps. Just like with the bench your first rep was 10x harder because it was from the bottom every rep needs to start at the bottom like when you first lift them up and they are on your shoulders not halfway down
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 04:21:24 AM
As for MCWAY - he is 5'9" and 220-lb and fat. That's why he doesn't post any pictures.

Again, it's not the weight - it's that full and pumped all-day look. The other thing is - I'm not willing to add 1,000 extra calories a day to do this naturally. So using gear once every five years is unhealthy? But eating 1,825,000 in that same time period isn't unhealthy? MCWAY probably literally ate 3,650,000 more calories than me in the past five years, while carrying 50-lb more than me. He has never looked as good as I do now.

MCWAY weighing 50-lb more than I do is something I guarantee adversely impacts his health more than my using gear once every five years, let alone at the doses I'm using.

I am in no way, shape, or form interested in either eating more than I normally do, on a regular basis, to do this naturally.

Just as I'm not willing to run gear more often - I don't want to take the health risks.

As every pro bodybuilder we EVER HEARD OF dies before they reach 65, you will understand why I feel this way.

Of course I'm being overly cautious. But these things are hard to measure. I'm sure I could be 185 and healthy...but I'm less sure that I could be 200+ and healthy.

It's hard to know for sure, so I err on the side of caution.

I just don't think it's possible for me to look like this naturally. I could be bigger/heavier, but the pumped and full look basically 24/7 - I don't see any natural way to achieve that.

I wonder if that's why 99.9% of people in the fitness industry use steroids?  ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 08, 2022, 04:53:12 AM
Can you just let everyone know I don't have a SMALL dick, at least? Please, can you give me that!

...

Similar to the claims about me having a small dick, Walter Sobchak claims I weighed 160.  ::) Generally, I maintained a 170-lb body weight while natural.

I did that intentionally, for good health. So when he claims I was 160 and speaking like I couldn't get heavier than that, it's just a false narrative: I wasn't 160 [not usually], and it was NEVER because I couldn't gain weight.

But it was CLOSE to the truth, in that I was 170 [close to 160]. The idea I couldn't be heavier was bullshit.

Of course that loser Walter Sobchak knows that it's easy to make fun of someone who is 160, than someone who is 170, but could be 180-200 if he wanted, and even 220 on juice.

The point of this cycle was just to enjoy the added mass, but it will also prove to the board that I could have always been bigger and stronger, had I been willing to take more risks.

The board will have no choice but to acknowledge that I CHOOSE to be light. And for perfectly good reasons, all of which are health reasons.

I don't like knowing that people think I plateaued at the level I was at and that I was unable to grow beyond that, or get stronger than that. That's completely untrue. In reality, I consciously made it a point to be that weight every one of those years.

One local Strongman in town would trash me for the same reason. The stupid fuck ended up having a heart attack at a Strongman contest because he took too many Cheque Drops.  ::) What a fucking loser - GEE, MIGHT THAT BE WHY I'M CONSERVATIVE WITH MY HEALTH CHOICES?!

Furthermore, I'm stronger than most people even despite the body weight restrictions I imposed on myself. But that needs to be clear: I IMPOSED THOSE LIMITATIONS.

Big shocker that my progress sped up once I removed them.

Lastly, for Walter Sobchak making fun of me for "only" getting the Northwestern Ontario record if I bench press 225x30...how much of a DELUSIONAL FUCKING MORON would someone have to be to not be impressed with that?

ANY FUCKING PERSON WHO TRAINS knows 225x30 is impressive.

The way he talks, it sounds like he doesn't even train.

There are only two views to have of my strength, no matter who you are:

[1] I'm strong, period. Or:
[2] I'm strong for my size.

When you bench press 2x your body weight and deadlift 3x your body weight, you are strong for ANY body weight.

Not that I can bench press 400 and deadlift 600 at 200, but at 170, I'm pretty close to those percentages.

Anyone making fun of a 170-lb'er who deadlifts 500 is a fucking retard. If Walter Sobchak weighs 263 as claimed and deadlifts 600, why would he make fun of him for weighing almost 100-lb less than him and deadlifting only 100-lb less?

Or is he 263, deadlifting 700? If he deadlifted 700, he wouldn't be making fun of me for deadlifting 500, and I would STILL be stronger than him pound for pound.

Or is he 263 deadlifting 800? If yes then, CONGRATULATIONS, he's as strong as I am, pound for pound. And even if he COULD lift that, he would acknowledge me as being strong, pound for pound.

That's why I'm convinced this stupid fuck doesn't even train AT ALL.

At least now he's saying - "Oh, you're only lifting what you do because of the juice."

The implication there is that I'm strong.

If I get off PED's and go back to strength training, and allow my body weight to settle at 180, I could see myself deadlifting 540 - 3x body weight.

I'm strong for my size, which is probably all I ever claimed to be.

I failed on my 120-lb dumbbells video, but wait until later this week when I hit 225x25 on the bench for the second time in my life. Hopefully that will redeem me, before I hit 225x30 later this month. Though I'm 100% confident in getting 225x25+, I'm only maybe 70% confident about getting 30 reps. It would mean a lot to me to get that lift.

Hopefully I can get 315x10+. That should settle some claims about my not being strong.

Walter Sobchak is utterly delusional

I'm thinking you've seen the movie Casino.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 08, 2022, 04:55:28 AM
Yep - that's me!

The Peter Northwestern Ontario Award for Most Consecutive Ropes in a Row - 1st Place, Lightweight & Overall!

Matt - you have to admit that you DO have a pretty tiny dick. I think it’s VERY obvious from Primes lack of a response. He is a nice guy and is trying not to shame you so stop asking for him to comment ya tiny dick knucklehead! You have a very inflated view of yourself. It looks like you are actually between 5’7” and 5’8” and dude it’s 100% possible to be your size and much bigger 100% natural.
Who cares though?? You have decent strength and plenty of short men have little dicks. No one would even know if you didn’t always try to prove otherwise.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 08, 2022, 04:58:12 AM
That's a really good lift, if you did 100-lb dumbbells overhead.

I have done it before naturally too. At 170-lb body weight.

I have literally seen three people in my life do 100-lb+ dumbbells for seated overheads in my entire time training at commerical gyms, from 2001 to present day.

NO ONE does 100-lb dumbbells. How often do you EVER see anyone do 100-lb dumbbell overhead presses?

Are you suggesting that at your gym, that happens with any frequency at all?

There might be 50 men in my entire city who can do 100-lb dumbbells overhead. More likely, under 25 men.

But we can prove what I'm saying, SF1900 - take a picture every time you see someone use 100-lb+ dumbbells for overhead press. Take a picture of the person locking out a rep. Do this every time you see that this month.

I guarantee you will not see five people lift that, even in the biggest gym in your city. For me, I haven't seen five people do that in my entire life.

Furthermore, I am on ~15mg Anadrol daily, and I am not training for strength. So for me to be lifting weight I previously did while training for strength, while currently training for hypertrophy only, is very good.

I have to admit, benching 225x22 surprised me a little. I generally only get 15+ if I'm specifically benching 225 each week, to get stronger at that weight.

But I haven't been bench pressing lately, nor training for strength. I've been consistently doing higher reps, for muscle.

So today I got the 100's for 8 reps overhead. I can't recall getting that many reps before...but for not training for strength, I'm fairly close to as strong as I've ever been.

That being said, I need to reiterate: no one presses 100's or more. As I said, there aren't even 50 guys in my city who can do that, and they are ALL on PED's. And maybe one of them weighs less than I do.

You seem to be suggesting that if someone doesn't have a national record, that they "suck".

I'm stronger than 99.9% of males. There are over 50,000 makes in my city. Under 50 of them are stronger than me. And this is where Getbig baffles me - so if you're only stronger than 99.9% of men, it means you suck? Apparently?

If I start training for strength, I'll be bench pressing 350+ within a month. Nobody bench presses 350 - PED's or not.

Also, if I suck at anything - pressing strength is NOT that thing.

Video:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

Dude you need to train at REAL gyms then because I’ve done it and I can’t think of a training partner who hasn’t used the bones doing overhead press.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 08, 2022, 05:02:12 AM
I won mine from 1987-2011 when classes were stacked.....nobody gave me anything,I worked my ass for them.

I know you did man. You also don’t seem to have a deluded image of yourself - 😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 08, 2022, 05:07:33 AM
To be honest those dumbells should be resting on your shoulders at the bottom before the press these are not full reps. Just like with the bench your first rep was 10x harder because it was from the bottom every rep needs to start at the bottom like when you first lift them up and they are on your shoulders not halfway down

Once you’ve been around BB longer you will learn that the “full range of motion” nonsense doesn’t always apply. You execute the range of muscle that affects the muscle only (or as close to that as possible).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 05:16:46 AM
To be honest those dumbells should be resting on your shoulders at the bottom before the press these are not full reps. Just like with the bench your first rep was 10x harder because it was from the bottom every rep needs to start at the bottom like when you first lift them up and they are on your shoulders not halfway down

If my reps aren't low enough there, than I have officially seen NOBODY use 100-lb+ dumbbells for overhead press before - ever.

The only two guys I ever personally witnessed doing 120's were going until their upper arms were parallel to the ground.

Also, what I was saying to you about juice - there's just some muscle quality that I don't ever feel I have except when using steroids. And I don't feel it takes much.

Look at the pictures of me at 160 vs. 205.

I'm just as lean at 205 - if not leaner. So no one can say "Oh, just do a cutting diet, and you'll get leaner."

No, no - I've done that. I don't get much leaner. And likewise, I've tried various natural programs, and that muscle quality - just that sort of "pop" to the muscles - it isn't there when I'm natural.

It's just not.

Given that literally 99.9% of people in the bodybuilding and fitness industry use steroids, it's safe to say if there was any way to replicate steroids, people would do it.

I could get back to 200 naturally - but I'd be a big softer, and just not as full and pumped. And it would take a lot longer.

That said, I'm not super far off from my goals, even without gear. I've been about as strong naturally - maybe even a wee bit stronger [while much lighter]. By and large, my strength goals are achievable naturally.

But I just don't see having the type of pop to my physique I have - even while completely flat - without steroids.

It's just that the pumps probably stay at 50%, literally 24/7.

After this is done, I'm going back to natural training, and I can't imagine getting anything close to my current results.

Some people like MCWAY are literally shills for the supplement industry. To give people hope that they can achieve the same look through diet and training - it's bullshit.

Steroids work, the bodybuilding and fitness industry is ALL DRUGS, and people should be told these things.

No, I can't look like this naturally. Not without SIGNIFICANT more time, effort, and money.

Ive literally used 40x 25mg Anadrol tablets so far [no more since my last post a couple of days ago]. That means that this cycle has cost me a STAGGERING $40 CAD.

Now how in the FUCK can I achieve this same result naturally at that price?

I guess if I wanted to spend $3,000 more on food, over the course of the next year, I could get the same result.  ::)

Again, that sounds like an advertisement for the supplement industry. That's what MCWAY does. But he won't post his own photos because he's fat and looks like shit.

I took these photos just now - when I see these pictures, I just know I can't have that type of full look without taking something. It's subtle - but trust me, EVERYONE notices in real life.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 05:21:15 AM
Lol…bragging about 100 pound overhead presses while being on PEDs.

I was doing close to 100 pound over head presses while being natty.

You have crap Genetics.

So tell me, SF1900 - where between me doing 100-lb dumbbells for eight, locking out each rep, and the former WORLD'S STRONGEST MAN doing 155-lb dumbbells for 25 partial reps does someone not suck?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 08, 2022, 05:22:49 AM
Can you just let everyone know I don't have a SMALL dick, at least? Please, can you give me that!

Prime did the second message contain enough information to confirm the 6.45 inches?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 05:26:29 AM
So tell me, SF1900 - where between me doing 100-lb dumbbells for eight, locking out each rep, and the former WORLD'S STRONGEST MAN doing 155-lb dumbbells for 25 partial reps does someone not suck?



He is bringing them all the way down and then not going all the way up to lock out. Those kind of partials are fine. You are doing partials coming halfway down then locking out up top those are bad.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 08, 2022, 05:28:30 AM
Prime did the second message contain enough information to confirm the 6.45 inches?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 05:30:59 AM
If my reps aren't low enough there, than I have officially seen NOBODY use 100-lb+ dumbbells for overhead press before - ever.

The only two guys I ever personally witnessed doing 120's were going until their upper arms were parallel to the ground.

Also, what I was saying to you about juice - there's just some muscle quality that I don't ever feel I have except when using steroids. And I don't feel it takes much.

Look at the pictures of me at 160 vs. 205.

I'm just as lean at 205 - if not leaner. So no one can say "Oh, just do a cutting diet, and you'll get leaner."

No, no - I've done that. I don't get much leaner. And likewise, I've tried various natural programs, and that muscle quality - just that sort of "pop" to the muscles - it isn't there when I'm natural.

It's just not.

Given that literally 99.9% of people in the bodybuilding and fitness industry use steroids, it's safe to say if there was any way to replicate steroids, people would do it.

I could get back to 200 naturally - but I'd be a big softer, and just not as full and pumped. And it would take a lot longer.

That said, I'm not super far off from my goals, even without gear. I've been about as strong naturally - maybe even a wee bit stronger [while much lighter]. By and large, my strength goals are achievable naturally.

But I just don't see having the type of pop to my physique I have - even while completely flat - without steroids.

It's just that the pumps probably stay at 50%, literally 24/7.

After this is done, I'm going back to natural training, and I can't imagine getting anything close to my current results.

Some people like MCWAY are literally shills for the supplement industry. To give people hope that they can achieve the same look through diet and training - it's bullshit.

Steroids work, the bodybuilding and fitness industry is ALL DRUGS, and people should be told these things.

No, I can't look like this naturally. Not without SIGNIFICANT more time, effort, and money.

Ive literally used 40x 25mg Anadrol tablets so far [no more since my last post a couple of days ago]. That means that this cycle has cost me a STAGGERING $40 CAD.

Now how in the FUCK can I achieve this same result naturally at that price?

I guess if I wanted to spend $3,000 more on food, over the course of the next year, I could get the same result.  ::)

Again, that sounds like an advertisement for the supplement industry. That's what MCWAY does. But he won't post his own photos because he's fat and looks like shit.

I took these photos just now - when I see these pictures, I just know I can't have that type of full look without taking something. It's subtle - but trust me, EVERYONE notices in real life.

You are still not going low enough your elbows should be past 90 degrees on the bottom like Eddies. You want to shift from triceps to a delt stretch and press that happens at the bottom. You need to drop the weight and do a real dumbell shoulder press
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 05:33:27 AM
Once you’ve been around BB longer you will learn that the “full range of motion” nonsense doesn’t always apply. You execute the range of muscle that affects the muscle only (or as close to that as possible).

The bottom of a bench or Shoulder press is the good part that hits the pecs and delts not the top part and lockout that is all triceps. If you are going to do partial reps they should be the lower part of the rep not the upper.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 05:36:59 AM
Matt - you have to admit that you DO have a pretty tiny dick. I think it’s VERY obvious from Primes lack of a response. He is a nice guy and is trying not to shame you so stop asking for him to comment ya tiny dick knucklehead! You have a very inflated view of yourself. It looks like you are actually between 5’7” and 5’8” and dude it’s 100% possible to be your size and much bigger 100% natural.
Who cares though?? You have decent strength and plenty of short men have little dicks. No one would even know if you didn’t always try to prove otherwise.

No, my dick is a decent size. I'd take a CM on it, but even one full inch would be getting into the zone of two big for a lot of women. My friend told me his ex-girlfriend was basically denouncing sex with him before they did it, with him having 7.75".

Bigger is better, but only to a point.

But if a man who is 5'11" could be considered short, then you can call my dick small. But that's a ludicrous standard, with no basis in reality of what the average is.

As for my height - I don't see why a person would lie about being 5'9". And there should be enough footage of me online verifying that.

I would take an inch in height though. I always felt 5'10" is the perfect bodybuilding height.

Dude you need to train at REAL gyms then because I’ve done it and I can’t think of a training partner who hasn’t used the bones doing overhead press.

My city's gyms all go up to 120-lb dumbbells. There are TWO exceptions:

Movati Athletic goes to 140's.
Nexus Fitness I believe goes to 160's for normal dumbbells [Ivanko style], and up to 200's, with giant dumbbells.

I believe. Something like that. Or goes to 180's. I can't recall.

Nexus is my city's specialized Strongman gym.

But, I think one way to establish what strong pressing is would be Ronnie Coleman - he did up to the 160's, right?

I've done the 105's for 2-4 before. That was my heaviest set.

I can't think of 25 guys in my city who could get the 100's for 8 reps.

If you go to any mainstream gym - outside of specific strength clubs - you will never see anyone pressing 100's or more.

Not one person has at either of my gyms, in the past year.

You could confirm that this week - go to any commercial gym, and hang around for a bit. Post a photo of anyone locking it out, then another photo on the same bench of the slip of paper with the date, just to confirm the photo is recent.

I would think even if you literally hung out at the gym all day, you wouldn't see anyone doing 100-lb dumbbells.

I can't speak for every gym in North America - but not one person at either of my gyms have done 100's in the past year.

I'm the strongest person in either gym on all lifts, 100% of the time, and have been for years.

Getbig's comments are strange to me. No one lifts what they claim, it seems. Either way, no one verifies any of it.

At least when I get that 225x30 bench, I'll be getting something that likely no one on this board has ever done. It may not be the heaviest lift, but it will be a unique lift of sorts, assuming I can get it [fingers crossed].
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on August 08, 2022, 05:39:31 AM
Going to agree with Hankins, after about the top of the ear, it's mainly triceps. In Olympic Lifting, a top of the ear power rack press used to be a prescribed exercise for triceps and lockout.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 05:41:42 AM
Once you’ve been around BB longer you will learn that the “full range of motion” nonsense doesn’t always apply. You execute the range of muscle that affects the muscle only (or as close to that as possible).

Great post.

A good example of this is the dumbbell fly - Arnold used to do this way too deep. Possibly to "expand his ribcage", but I can't recall.

There is no need to go that low.

However, just to prove my lifts, I'll get some deeper reps in.

For my bench press, I'll be doing bounced reps - but I will be doing full range reps.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: rocket on August 08, 2022, 06:10:44 AM
Shoulder press depth looks fine to me.  Definitely above the weight I can do - but you've inspired me to investigate further.  I have never tried to get strong db shoulder press - always annoyed the shit out of me hitching them up.

The wrist angle changing is quite unique - but there's no point debating it.  Obviously it feels natural to you or you wouldn't do it.  I thought it was odd when I saw similar movement in your db presses, but whatever.  It does look like possibly an early habit that actually became your natural track for best strength which is pretty wild.

And on the thing about proving it with deeper presses.  Try to remember that bhank is that guy who has to have a comment for everything, no matter whether he is hideously outclassed and couldn't possibly do it.  That's just his personality.  Quite clearly an egomaniac.  Every dickhead who feels small will bring up range of motion.  It's the go-to for the inferior. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 06:23:50 AM
Shoulder press depth looks fine to me.  Definitely above the weight I can do - but you've inspired me to investigate further.  I have never tried to get strong db shoulder press - always annoyed the shit out of me hitching them up.

The wrist angle changing is quite unique - but there's no point debating it.  Obviously it feels natural to you or you wouldn't do it.  I thought it was odd when I saw similar movement in your db presses, but whatever.  It does look like possibly an early habit that actually became your natural track for best strength which is pretty wild.

And on the thing about proving it with deeper presses.  Try to remember that bhank is that guy who has to have a comment for everything, no matter whether he is hideously outclassed and couldn't possibly do it.  That's just his personality.  Quite clearly an egomaniac.  Every dickhead who feels small will bring up range of motion.  It's the go-to for the inferior.

I don't even care how much he lifts. That is the part he doesn't get it is your development that matters and he is going to get better development using a better range of motion and again yes you are correct he needs to stop going limp wrist the dumbells should stay horizontal your wrist should not bend mid lift. Use lighter weights you can control with proper form stop ego lifting with bad form before you hurt yourself.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 06:50:09 AM
Shoulder press depth looks fine to me.  Definitely above the weight I can do - but you've inspired me to investigate further.  I have never tried to get strong db shoulder press - always annoyed the shit out of me hitching them up.

The wrist angle changing is quite unique - but there's no point debating it.  Obviously it feels natural to you or you wouldn't do it.  I thought it was odd when I saw similar movement in your db presses, but whatever.  It does look like possibly an early habit that actually became your natural track for best strength which is pretty wild.

And on the thing about proving it with deeper presses.  Try to remember that bhank is that guy who has to have a comment for everything, no matter whether he is hideously outclassed and couldn't possibly do it.  That's just his personality.  Quite clearly an egomaniac.  Every dickhead who feels small will bring up range of motion.  It's the go-to for the inferior.

Really? That surprises me very much.

My presses are pretty good, and specifically my overhead presses. For SF1900 to say I suck based on anything to do with my delts is just baffling to me. It literally astounds me. I have pound for pound the best pressing strength of anyone on this board, and I'd be way up there in absolute strength too. Again - some of these comments are weird to me.

Part of why I'm just done with life is because I'm sick of navigating such utter delusion. It's just weird to read such delusional comments. We just had an entire essentially fake pandemic because of people literally making up lies in their own heads and acting on them. Look at the example below.

But for you to say I can lift more than you on that lift surprised me very much, rocket. But it can definitely be that you just didn't test your max. I hesitated to train heavy lately, so I don't get injured, as the goal is to build muscle, and because I'm still coming back from an extended layoff out of the gym.

But I'm thinking I want to test myself s bit more. So expect some strength videos soon.

Look at this example of this lying piece of shit who claimed to know 59 people who died of Covid, at a time when only 67 people in my ENTIRE CITY had died. He just completely made up a narrative in his head, and lived his life based on that lying narrative!

It's incredible what some stupid fucks do. Like for Walter Sobchak to literally watch a video of me bench pressing 225 for 25 reps while weighing 170-lb, and to not think of that as anything but strong for my size, indicates to me that he probably doesn't even train. Only an untrained person would have no idea that is strong.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 08, 2022, 06:53:39 AM
Matt,
You are smart about being careful not to tear your tendons when on the gas.
Don't listen to Bhanky about pressing...he doesn't know sh*t.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 07:00:29 AM
Matt,
You are smart about being careful not to tear your tendons when on the gas.
Don't listen to Bhanky about pressing...he doesn't know sh*t.

He is literally doing the exact thing to tear his tendons too much weight with bad form
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 08, 2022, 07:01:06 AM
He is literally doing the exact thing to tear his tendons too much weight with bad form

He should stop doing that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 07:02:41 AM
Really? That surprises me very much.

My presses are pretty good, and specifically my overhead presses. For SF1900 to say I suck based on anything to do with my delts is just baffling to me. It literally astounds me. I have pound for pound the best pressing strength of anyone on this board, and I'd be way up there in absolute strength too. Again - some of these comments are weird to me.

Part of why I'm just done with life is because I'm sick of navigating such utter delusion. It's just weird to read such delusional comments. We just had an entire essentially fake pandemic because of people literally making up lies in their own heads and acting on them. Look at the example below.

But for you to say I can lift more than you on that lift surprised me very much, rocket. But it can definitely be that you just didn't test your max. I hesitated to train heavy lately, so I don't get injured, as the goal is to build muscle, and because I'm still coming back from an extended layoff out of the gym.

But I'm thinking I want to test myself s bit more. So expect some strength videos soon.

Look at this example of this lying piece of shit who claimed to know 59 people who died of Covid, at a time when only 67 people in my ENTIRE CITY had died. He just completely made up a narrative in his head, and lived his life based on that lying narrative!

It's incredible what some stupid fucks do. Like for Walter Sobchak to literally watch a video of me bench pressing 225 for 25 reps while weighing 170-lb, and to not think of that as anything but strong for my size, indicates to me that he probably doesn't even train. Only an untrained person would have no idea that is strong.

No you don't none of the shit you post constitutes a good lift not one proper full rep is being done much less multiple
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 07:14:08 AM
I don't even care how much he lifts. That is the part he doesn't get it is your development that matters and he is going to get better development using a better range of motion and again yes you are correct he needs to stop going limp wrist the dumbells should stay horizontal your wrist should not bend mid lift. Use lighter weights you can control with proper form stop ego lifting with bad form before you hurt yourself.

I don't think ego-lifting is a big injury risk if you're doing something for that many reps. My dumbbell video is almost all the way down, and I was told going that extra range of motion could put strain on the rotator cuffs.

AthleanX has a video about why dumbbell flies for pecs do absolutely nothing by going the supposed full range of motion, aside from put you at greater injury risk.

As for overhead presses - I'm not sure. I'm just going by what one friend told me about rotator cuff strain.

But for the sake of getting good video lifts for Getbig, I would take a video going all the way.

When I did this video, Johnny Falcon said I would never get it for reps:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cdu7ZldAHeq/

And now, I can get it for reps:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg3Jxskg5Ym/

And I will get it for 8-10 with perfect form next time.

But as for overhead presses, I've personally witnessed three individual men lift over 100-lb dumbbells, in my entire life. Four, if you include Steve Kuclo at the Orlando Europa Expo.

So for people to say they know lots of people that do that - while it's delusional, it's also...just a lie.

People are lying, and it's probably the reason no one posts pictures or videos here. Other people know they THEMSELVES are lying, and don't want to post their pictures, knowing they won't hold up to all the lies of OTHER people, which they don't know are lies.

So everyone lying about what they lift, and his they know "tons" of people who lift certain weight, has an impact on the board's behaviour.

Example: look at how you get shit on, even though you probably have a top 10 physique in Getbig history. So Walter Sobchak's own negativity towards you is why that pussy won't post a picture. He assumes the other assholes like himself who big themselves up are telling the truth, and he knows he looks like shit compared to those lies.

I'm confident people's bullshit comments are preventing people from posting pictures and videos.

If anyone here even bench pressed 315, they'd post a video. EVERYONE has a camera on their cellphone today, and they could easily have the video recorded so their face isn't shown. But they are lying. And they know it.

But it's a bit maddening, when part of why I didn't enter a strength contest was because of the lying assholes on the boards. I assumed "tons" of guys would be stronger than me, based on the delusional comments/lies on the board. Then I got 4th at my first contest.  ::)

Like when Bertil Fox said most bodybuilding journalists are just fatasses. It's the same issue here.

I live in a big enough city to know how my lifts compare to others. There are 108,000 people here, and so, around 54,000 makes.

There is no way - IN HELL - that I am outside the top 54 of strongest men in the city.

That puts me in the top 0.1% of male strength. And I don't give a fuck what city you live in - all that does is make the ABSOLUTE number of people who lift more than me, higher. It doesn't change anything about percentages.

For me to be in the top 0.1% of male strength and for anyone to be commenting negatively on my strength isn't just stupid - it's utterly delusional.

And to suggest I need to train better is pretty moronic too [in general, I mean - I'm not criticizing any advice you have given me, B. Hank]. My deficit is nutritional.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 08, 2022, 07:17:07 AM
We don't post pics on Getbig or personal info because we are not idiots.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 07:25:47 AM
Matt,
You are smart about being careful not to tear your tendons when on the gas.
Don't listen to Bhanky about pressing...he doesn't know sh*t.

Thank you, IroNat.

I will clean up my dumbbell bench press form for my next video. That form was bad. It still shows my strength, but I didn't do full reps.

As for my overhead presses, I don't see anything wrong with my form there, and I think going lower may even cause problems.

However, I'll go check what the consensus view is on that, and apply it.

My reps were way lower than Eddie Hall's - so I assume he uses that form for a reason.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 07:28:28 AM
No you don't none of the shit you post constitutes a good lift not one proper full rep is being done much less multiple

All I said is that I have pound for pound the best pressing strength of anyone on this board.

If not, it's close. I don't think anyone who bench presses much more than 2x body weight.

So whatever it is, I'm close. It also doesn't matter if my form sucks - I'm just saying I don't think many people here can lock out 2x their body weight on bench press.

As I said, even I don't have the strongest P4P pressing strength...it would be close.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 07:32:45 AM
We don't post pics on Getbig or personal info because we are not idiots.

Personal info, I can understand.

There's no reason why anyone can't post a lifting video though. They could do it at a friend's home gym, and video it in such a way where their faces aren't showing.

MCWAY could easily post a back double biceps photo - or any photos, and block out his head.

He won't do that because he knows I look better.

That's fine - but I can't stand when people who look like garbage outright trash other people.

If you remember Sarcasm - he was the worst offender: fat as hell, yet would utterly rip into everyone. Meanwhile, this man looks like he was a complete junk food addict:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: beakdoctor on August 08, 2022, 07:35:38 AM
Matt,
You are smart about being careful not to tear your tendons when on the gas.
Don't listen to Bhanky about pressing...he doesn't know sh*t.

Agree 100%

But in all henesty, we have to give credit where it's due: Bhanky DOES know his shit when it comes to tearing muscles.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 07:38:17 AM
This is how I envision Walter Sobchak looking.

Sarcasm claimed 230-lb body weight at 5'11", and a max bench press of 360-370.

All bullshit. I could believe that bench press claim, but what do you expect for a guy who weighs 330-lb? That is probably closer to his real body weight.

Yet he would viciously rip into people.

Walter Sobchak is no doubt similar. And if he is 263-lb as claimed, then even if he deadlifts 600, he is less impressive than me. I can deadlift 520 at 175. So this clown needs 88-lb in body weight on me to deadlift 80-lb more?

Moot point - Walter Sobchak does not deadlift 600. What a complete sack of shit.

Again, it's when ugly fatasses like him trash others that I take issue with it.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385724;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 08, 2022, 07:39:30 AM
Agree 100%

But in all henesty, we have to give credit where it's due: Bhanky DOES know his shit when it comes to tearing muscles.

LOL!!!!

Wasn't it only his lower body?

Regardless - I don't trash anyone who has a better physique than me, and B. Hank has a better physique than me, so...I can't, with any credibility, trash him.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 08, 2022, 07:40:12 AM
Agree 100%

But in all henesty, we have to give credit where it's due: Bhanky DOES know his shit when it comes to tearing muscles.
:D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 08:01:17 AM
All I said is that I have pound for pound the best pressing strength of anyone on this board.

If not, it's close. I don't think anyone who bench presses much more than 2x body weight.

So whatever it is, I'm close. It also doesn't matter if my form sucks - I'm just saying I don't think many people here can lock out 2x their body weight on bench press.

As I said, even I don't have the strongest P4P pressing strength...it would be close.

Lockout doesn't count if you don't bring it down to your chest first. People who train would be more impressed with you correctly pressing less weight, but you don't get that. This is why people spouting lifting numbers like it means something are jackasses not all lifts are created equal. Form and technique then development that is what is impressive not throwing around a bunch of shit weight using momentum half reps dropping and bouncing and using every bodypart other than the one you are trying to train to move the weight then getting no development from it and claiming it's genetics. How much can you actually lift with proper form no idea as your form is the worst I have ever seen. That half rep and bounce and drop and leg back arch moving all over the pad shit does not count. It also really doesn't matter if you are doing it proper your muscular development is the proof not some old video on youtube. If you want development stop that shit and do it right with a moderate weight. You lift like a 20 year old trying to impress his gym buddies. You are not doing your chest any favors you will not develop that way. Control the weights slow it down keep your wrist straight stretch use a full range of motion then squeeze cut the weight in fucking half until you can learn the lift because you are doing it wrong same issue with delts hell I can just imagine you do the same jerky seizure shit with back and biceps slow everything down keep it tight
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 08, 2022, 08:22:18 AM
Lockout doesn't count if you don't bring it down to your chest first. People who train would be more impressed with you correctly pressing less weight, but you don't get that. This is why people spouting lifting numbers like it means something are jackasses not all lifts are created equal. Form and technique then development that is what is impressive not throwing around a bunch of shit weight using momentum half reps dropping and bouncing and using every bodypart other than the one you are trying to train to move the weight then getting no development from it and claiming it's genetics. How much can you actually lift with proper form no idea as your form is the worst I have ever seen. That half rep and bounce and drop and leg back arch moving all over the pad shit does not count. It also really doesn't matter if you are doing it proper your muscular development is the proof not some old video on youtube. If you want development stop that shit and do it right with a moderate weight. You lift like a 20 year old trying to impress his gym buddies. You are not doing your chest any favors you will not develop that way. Control the weights slow it down keep your wrist straight stretch use a full range of motion then squeeze cut the weight in fucking half until you can learn the lift because you are doing it wrong same issue with delts hell I can just imagine you do the same jerky seizure shit with back and biceps slow everything down keep it tight

PT hanks is at it again

Fucks sake you have no idea.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 08, 2022, 08:25:57 AM
MCWAY:

Tell me more about how much better I will look applying the asinine training principles you use as a natural.  ::)

And what "asinine training principles" would that be, given your utterly STUPID habit of attributing things to me that I never said?



NO, I will not be able to look as good naturally, short of literally following a perfect regimented diet program for a year or more.

I told - I'M SPENDING A FUCKING YEAR COUNTING EVERY GRAM OF PROTEIN I EAT TO LOOK LIKE HOW I CAN FROM TAKING 15MG OF ANADROL DAILY FOR THREE WEEKS.

I don't have the patience to follow such a system - and you grossly underestimate the health costs of eating more.

You just answered your own question. Due to your lack of patience and your utter LAZINESS, when it comes to diet, you rely on the roids too much and will shrink like cheap bacon, once you go off.



So you think you weighing 220-lb at 5'9" naturally is healthier than .e being 170-lb at 5'9", and using female doses of steroids twice a decade?

STOP.

Go back to reading vintage muscle mags while drinking your shaker cup full of Cell-Tech.

And "steroids are just the finishing touch", lmao!!

Once again, you're up to your usual stupidity, falsely claiming I made such a statement. If you really thought taking steroids weren't that dangerous, you wouldn't be sniveling about how scared you are to take them beyond a certain point.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 08, 2022, 08:32:21 AM
All I said is that I have pound for pound the best pressing strength of anyone on this board.

If not, it's close. I don't think anyone who bench presses much more than 2x body weight.

So whatever it is, I'm close. It also doesn't matter if my form sucks - I'm just saying I don't think many people here can lock out 2x their body weight on bench press.

As I said, even I don't have the strongest P4P pressing strength...it would be close.
You can bench 420?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 08, 2022, 08:53:49 AM
My diet only "sucked" from a bodybuilding POV.

My diet was extremely healthy.

And that's what you're trying to do now, genius, bodybuilding!!!



That being said, you are WRONG that I can achieve my current look naturally. I can achieve my current BODY WEIGHT naturally.

That's not the same thing, MCWAY.

The perpetual fullness and hardness I have to my muscles - I can't achieve without PED's.

I have shared some photos that I took without having a pump, and I look better un-pumped than I used to look, even with a pump - or maybe BARELY looked like, even with a pump.

So you're wrong about achieving this naturally.

And that is little more than your severe insecurity. Who cares if you're pumped all the time other than YOU? If you were truly big enough, you wouldn't care about that. You think that, without a pump, you're small.



MCWAY - you claimed to be 220 naturally at 5'9", right?

Well - I'm one meal away from being 210 right now. Let's compare photos.

Of course I look better than you, and you know it. As I said, it's not just about being a certain weight - it's that full, pumped look, that a person can't get without steroids.

Also - my waist is 35" when I'm 200 naturally. It's only 32" thanks to steroids.

I also think it's ridiculous that some anonymous person like you talks shit about steroids, when over 99% fitness influencers are juiced. GEE, DO YOU THINK THAT'S MAYBE WHY THEY USE STEROIDS?

Steroids will take ANY of us to our goals, faster. I simply CANNOT have my physique looking this full and lean without PED's. I can be maybe 190, and just as lean, and with the waist size I have at 205-210, but NOTHING I can do to change my diet would have me looking like this - OR AT LEAST NOT THIS QUICKLY.

What's your hurry, other than your perpetual insecurity? What's going to happen to you, if you don't reach a certain bodyweight within a certain time, are you going to explode or something?



I said befoe it would take me 18 months to naturally achieve what I could achieve on steroids in two months.

I was wrong.

In reality, it would take over 18 months to achieve what I can on steroids in THREE WEEKS.

Yes, I can make improvements just from eating more. My current progress is so high not JUST because of PED's - but also from eating more AND from muscle memory.

DUH!! I said that from the start, hence I used the term, 're-gains'. You basically got the size you lost back, with a little extra. Everybody knows that regaining size you once had is much easier than putting on new size.



But AS I ALREADY EXPLAINED, MCWAY: I DON'T WANT TO EAT THIS MUCH FOR MONTHS OR YEARS.

Thanks to PED's, I am able to just eat this month's for weeks or months, and achieve a look that it would have taken me well over a year, if not YEARS to achieve naturally.

Fuck that - I won't do it. I have ZERO interest. But I'm glad to do it just for the summer, and shrink again immediately after it's over.

The three women I fucked in the last 43 days?

It's possible it would have happened anyway...but basically steroids are allowing me to be pumped at 50% of a full pump, 24/7.

All of us who work out know we look our best while pumped, and can look sort of "meh", even later that same day.

It's that full pumped look that catches the eye. And that's what people notice.

If you got it, people notice it whether you're cold or pumped. It's just like a curvaceous women get the boys drooling, even in modest clothing.



Let's pretend I could get to this size naturally - ok, fine. And that would require me eating 1,000 extra calories daily for...forever, basically?

Meanwhile, I could just run juice for two months, and shrink in the winter - then get my physique back each summer.

Arguably, is that REALLY that much less healthy?

MCWAY - we are both 5'9". I spent most of the past decade at 170. You spent most of it at 220. And you have the audacity to talk to me about health, when you spent a decade if not decades carrying around 50-lb more weight than me?

Yes, I have the audacity, because I just got a clean bill of health from my doctor three months ago. And I've been getting them for YEARS, when I get my physicals.

YOU have the audacity to talk about how worried you are about your health, when you're taking steroids and going up and down in bodyweight by 30-40 lbs, which is more dangerous.




Seriously?

Here are pictures of me NOT PUMPED [taken on full off-days]. The reality is, I can ONLY look like this while pumped, naturally. And THAT may be the worst part of natural training. If I could look full and pumped more often while naturally, I probably would not have any interest in juice.

Again, the reason you're so obsessed with being perpetually pumped is because, without it, you feel small. Been there; done that!!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 08, 2022, 09:04:32 AM
And what "asinine training principles" would that be, given your utterly STUPID habit of attributing things to me that I never said?

You just answered your own question. Due to your lack of patience and your utter LAZINESS, when it comes to diet, you rely on the roids too much and will shrink like cheap bacon, once you go off.

Once again, you're up to your usual stupidity, falsely claiming I made such a statement. If you really thought taking steroids weren't that dangerous, you wouldn't be sniveling about how scared you are to take them beyond a certain point.

Be prepared for a 10000 word rebuttal with intermittent sprinklings of the same backs shots that have been posted 1000x
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 08, 2022, 09:11:53 AM
Lockout doesn't count if you don't bring it down to your chest first. People who train would be more impressed with you correctly pressing less weight, but you don't get that. This is why people spouting lifting numbers like it means something are jackasses not all lifts are created equal. Form and technique then development that is what is impressive not throwing around a bunch of shit weight using momentum half reps dropping and bouncing and using every bodypart other than the one you are trying to train to move the weight then getting no development from it and claiming it's genetics. How much can you actually lift with proper form no idea as your form is the worst I have ever seen. That half rep and bounce and drop and leg back arch moving all over the pad shit does not count. It also really doesn't matter if you are doing it proper your muscular development is the proof not some old video on youtube. If you want development stop that shit and do it right with a moderate weight. You lift like a 20 year old trying to impress his gym buddies. You are not doing your chest any favors you will not develop that way. Control the weights slow it down keep your wrist straight stretch use a full range of motion then squeeze cut the weight in fucking half until you can learn the lift because you are doing it wrong same issue with delts hell I can just imagine you do the same jerky seizure shit with back and biceps slow everything down keep it tight

Said another way, do the bench press and make sure the PECS do the lion's share of the work, Serge Nubret/Leroy Colbert style:

(https://i0.wp.com/2.bp.blogspot.com/-Dy0ZB078Nxg/U9qyA8rtCXI/AAAAAAAAKRA/ge4Sj8EPq34/s1600/benchpress_nubret1.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 08, 2022, 09:36:23 AM
Once you’ve been around BB longer you will learn that the “full range of motion” nonsense doesn’t always apply. You execute the range of muscle that affects the muscle only (or as close to that as possible).

No no no. Ful range of motion is key to muscle development, its been prove time after time. Look no further than 2 great like Branch Warren and Johnny O’Jackson.

Full range = full muscle development.

Bhanks tore a pec because he didn’t fully extend his arm when opening the door.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 08, 2022, 09:42:45 AM
Be prepared for a 10000 word rebuttal with intermittent sprinklings of the same backs shots that have been posted 1000x
You don't enjoy the same pictures posted over and over AND OVER? In every thread, even threads that have nothing to do with him?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 08, 2022, 09:50:01 AM
We don't post pics on Getbig or personal info because we are not idiots.

What? This doesn’t make sense.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 08, 2022, 10:05:00 AM
Matt,
Big props to your strength, no homo.
You are one strong dude, bro.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 08, 2022, 10:05:59 AM
What? This doesn’t make sense.

Yes, I may have been wrong about us not being idjits.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on August 08, 2022, 11:04:35 AM
Matt,

Here's an idea:  Film a chest pressing movement in which you think you have immaculate form.  You're in a bodybuilding phase but I've only seen you post ego lifts, mate.  Put aside that combine bench press thing for a bit and record how you'd bench to build your pecs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 08, 2022, 11:12:09 AM
All I said is that I have pound for pound the best pressing strength of anyone on this board.

If not, it's close. I don't think anyone who bench presses much more than 2x body weight.

So whatever it is, I'm close. It also doesn't matter if my form sucks - I'm just saying I don't think many people here can lock out 2x their body weight on bench press.

As I said, even I don't have the strongest P4P pressing strength...it would be close.


Hold up a Bit Matt.
That's a bold statement...
Yeah You can bench press more than I now, as I'm 62 & have a damaged
Left Pec & triceps from a Motorcycle accident .

Just to put your strength /bench press into perspective
At your age & a bodyweight of 210lbs I Was capable of 490lbs bench with a pause Also 420lbs x 5 on an incline.

I was benching double Bodyweight at 20yrs of age.

Age & Injuries sure take they're Toll.!!

IIRC there are also 2-3 others on here who are extremely strong Bencher's.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 08, 2022, 11:27:48 AM
You can bench 420?

I can.

The manlet struggles with 225 when he’s not jerking off for Primehomosexual and Josh Rehaluk.

The difference is when I lift weights, it’s ME lifting the weights. When the twink pussy Matt Canning lifts weights it’s THE DRUGS lifting the weights.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 08, 2022, 11:54:21 AM
MCWAY stop being so sensible please.   :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 08, 2022, 12:02:03 PM
no member# ?
no group# ?

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=680324.0;attach=1385681;image)

(https://www.uhc.com/member-resources/your-member-id-card/_jcr_content/root/regioncontainer-main/responsivegrid/collapsiblecontent/tiles/1_1597846577264/image.coreimg.82.1280.jpeg/1613218601332/your-member-id-card-uhc-commercial-member-id-card-medical-with-rx-1802x620.jpeg)

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 08, 2022, 12:13:37 PM
no member# ?
no group# ?

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=680324.0;attach=1385681;image)

I removed that so the crazies on here dont try and figure out where I work and harass them
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 08, 2022, 12:44:45 PM
It's fucking hilarious that Bhank is giving Matt advice on lifting.

Bhank, in a t-shirt, literally doesn't even look like he trains

Stringy 14" arms, red and massively bloated alcoholic-like face, shaky and limping gait, Goodwill-tier attire.  If I saw Bhank on the street, I'd suspect that he's an alcoholic hobo with one foot in the grave, and I'm 100% dead serious. 

Basically, Matt has made better gains in the past few months than Bhank has made over his entire lifetime.

Hey now!  That's not fai... erm... well... :-\
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 08, 2022, 02:24:54 PM
As for MCWAY - he is 5'9" and 220-lb and fat. That's why he doesn't post any pictures.

Again, it's not the weight - it's that full and pumped all-day look. The other thing is - I'm not willing to add 1,000 extra calories a day to do this naturally. So using gear once every five years is unhealthy? But eating 1,825,000 in that same time period isn't unhealthy? MCWAY probably literally ate 3,650,000 more calories than me in the past five years, while carrying 50-lb more than me. He has never looked as good as I do now.

MCWAY weighing 50-lb more than I do is something I guarantee adversely impacts his health more than my using gear once every five years, let alone at the doses I'm using.

I am in no way, shape, or form interested in either eating more than I normally do, on a regular basis, to do this naturally.

Just as I'm not willing to run gear more often - I don't want to take the health risks.

As every pro bodybuilder we EVER HEARD OF dies before they reach 65, you will understand why I feel this way.

Of course I'm being overly cautious. But these things are hard to measure. I'm sure I could be 185 and healthy...but I'm less sure that I could be 200+ and healthy.

It's hard to know for sure, so I err on the side of caution.

I just don't think it's possible for me to look like this naturally. I could be bigger/heavier, but the pumped and full look basically 24/7 - I don't see any natural way to achieve that.

I wonder if that's why 99.9% of people in the fitness industry use steroids?  ::)

Keep telling yourself that. You're obsessed with being perpetually pumped. Yet your arms aren't even 17". So, you feel puny unless you're pumped (been there; done that!!).

Mine haven't been under 17" in decades and are at least 1/2" bigger COLD than yours is pumped (Steroids and all).

And, unlike you, I will be (at minimum) the same size, if not slightly larger, by the end of this year. While you go back to puny-ville, once you get off the sauce and eat like a crackhead.

I get a handful of compliments, from time to time. Most of them, ironically, are in street clothes, ICE COLD. When you got it, it shows no matter what you wear, just like a voluptuous woman can wear modest clothes and still get the fellas' natures a-rising!!

As for your sniveling about my health, I get my checkups every year (except 2021, because of the pandemic) and it's a thumbs-up from my physician.


Severe fluctuations in bodyweight, if anything, would be more cause for concern.....especially if PEDs are involved. You think gaining and losing 30-40 lbs repeatedly can't cause havoc on a person's health? GET REAL!!

The only reason you're going to shrink back down to 185 or less, once you cut the juice loose, is because you're too LAZY to keep your diet on point.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: rocket on August 09, 2022, 03:52:50 AM
Really? That surprises me very much.

But for you to say I can lift more than you on that lift surprised me very much, rocket. But it can definitely be that you just didn't test your max. I hesitated to train heavy lately, so I don't get injured, as the goal is to build muscle, and because I'm still coming back from an extended layoff out of the gym.


For shoulder press definitely.  I have always had reasonably weak shoulders and arms.  For a long time, I trained with a guy who couldn't train shoulders and I have never trained either seriously.  I always put far more effort into chest but right now, I'm pretty sure you can nail me on reps on bench too.  I'm not even remotely close to 100kg/30 reps.  In fact, I'd probably struggle to 1 rep 170kg at the moment. 

I had a fella doing workouts and programs for a while a couple years back (he is of course tremendously strong/lean) and he was pretty on me about on my shoulder strength because it was just so disproportionately poor.  Since then, my bench hasn't been quite right - not injury wise, just not as fun.  Some of it will be that I'm less fat and that's just less fun.  I've generally struggled if I actually train shoulders hard as well as chest.   I easily benched 175kg early this year and thought "I'm back baby" and resolved to do no direct shoulder training but that didn't seem to work and I've definitely degraded back to how I was with his workouts.  Ageing perhaps (41).  I'm going to adjust things to bring the shoulders back up to at least the strongest they have been.  They have very little involvement in my bench though.

It is possible that my deadlifting is just draining me.   I have been getting very positive results by only deadlifting once every 1 and half weeks.  Might experiment with that for other lifts.  Perhaps I am just constantly pulling from a well that never quite recovers.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on August 09, 2022, 08:45:18 AM
Hey now!  That's not fai... erm... well... :-\
Damn!!! :o
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 09, 2022, 09:03:30 AM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385743;image)

idiot thinks hes improving, he looks way worse than he looks there now
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 09, 2022, 10:16:33 AM
Lockout doesn't count if you don't bring it down to your chest first. People who train would be more impressed with you correctly pressing less weight, but you don't get that. This is why people spouting lifting numbers like it means something are jackasses not all lifts are created equal. Form and technique then development that is what is impressive not throwing around a bunch of shit weight using momentum half reps dropping and bouncing and using every bodypart other than the one you are trying to train to move the weight then getting no development from it and claiming it's genetics. How much can you actually lift with proper form no idea as your form is the worst I have ever seen. That half rep and bounce and drop and leg back arch moving all over the pad shit does not count. It also really doesn't matter if you are doing it proper your muscular development is the proof not some old video on youtube. If you want development stop that shit and do it right with a moderate weight. You lift like a 20 year old trying to impress his gym buddies. You are not doing your chest any favors you will not develop that way. Control the weights slow it down keep your wrist straight stretch use a full range of motion then squeeze cut the weight in fucking half until you can learn the lift because you are doing it wrong same issue with delts hell I can just imagine you do the same jerky seizure shit with back and biceps slow everything down keep it tight

Paragraphs you fucking mope…paragraphs.

Make it easier for the lawyers to read.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 09, 2022, 02:35:36 PM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385743;image)

idiot thinks hes improving, he looks way worse than he looks there now

Is That BWanky  The Hobo ?  Living in a Squat - WTF is all That Crap on floor & under the Bed !!!

If its BWanky It is Probably the best Pic of his physique I've seen posted.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on August 09, 2022, 02:39:10 PM
Is That BWanky  The Hobo ?  Living in a Squat - WTF is all That Crap on floor & under the Bed !!!

If its BWanky It is Probably the best Pic of his physique I've seen posted.
X2
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 09, 2022, 03:22:39 PM
Is That BWanky  The Hobo ?  Living in a Squat - WTF is all That Crap on floor & under the Bed !!!

If its BWanky It is Probably the best Pic of his physique I've seen posted.

he thinks hes getting better!

Guy is on a one way trip to 175lbs
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 09, 2022, 03:24:51 PM
Is That BWanky  The Hobo ?  Living in a Squat - WTF is all That Crap on floor & under the Bed !!!

If its BWanky It is Probably the best Pic of his physique I've seen posted.

Yes he looks good there.

He loves to live in filth.

Part of his psyche is still of an 8 year old.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 09, 2022, 03:26:12 PM
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/24/53/9b/24539b246c9cebc1e50bf52115bee33f.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 09, 2022, 03:37:34 PM
he thinks hes getting better!

Guy is on a one way trip to 175lbs

Clearly his Delusions have taken Control of any Semblance of Remaining Rational Mind.

Putting it Bluntly He's Fucked in the Head.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 09, 2022, 03:37:39 PM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1385743;image)

(https://66.media.tumblr.com/c3210aabdc5b2a667d9bce17a77d1fba/tumblr_pj8f4funGo1uzc04go5_250.gifv)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 11, 2022, 05:47:50 AM
UPDATE: 203-lb again.

I'm still 20-lb up from when I started the cycle. Mainly because I'm steady at 4x 25mg Anadrol tablets weekly, which is putting me at just under 15mg daily.

I'm pleased with this look, and happy to just sustain it. That being said, I still may want to go up to 220, and then shrink during the year, but go up to 220 every summer. I quit enjoy this look and the huge amount of attention it garners me.

Considering I've literally spent time with five women in the last month, fucked three of them, and was intimate with the other two. I have to say, I didn't expect that at my age. I figured it's ALL OVER by 45, and just sort of getting there by 40.

But no, apparently not. I'm still hitting if off well with women.

I'm always wearing a tank top, and I'm assuming that's what does it for me. My physique still looks very young, even if my face does.

As for women not caring about looks - this is some seriously moronic thinking. I'd say it's just about the only thing that matters - aside from money/resources, I mean.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 11, 2022, 06:10:08 AM
UPDATE: 203-lb again.

I'm still 20-lb up from when I started the cycle. Mainly because I'm steady at 4x 25mg Anadrol tablets weekly, which is putting me at just under 15mg daily.

I'm pleased with this look, and happy to just sustain it. That being said, I still may want to go up to 220, and then shrink during the year, but go up to 220 every summer. I quit enjoy this look and the huge amount of attention it garners me.

Considering I've literally spent time with five women in the last month, fucked three of them, and was intimate with the other two. I have to say, I didn't expect that at my age. I figured it's ALL OVER by 45, and just sort of getting there by 40.

But no, apparently not. I'm still hitting if off well with women.

I'm always wearing a tank top, and I'm assuming that's what does it for me. My physique still looks very young, even if my face does.

As for women not caring about looks - this is some seriously moronic thinking. I'd say it's just about the only thing that matters - aside from money/resources, I mean.

Lookin Large and in Charge Matty!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 11, 2022, 06:37:28 AM
Lookin Large and in Charge Matty!

Thanks Kwon!

I warm up with Walter Sobchak's workout, every warmup.  ;D

Today is legs day, then my next workout is chest - I'll be doing 225 for reps, and I will be hitting 25 reps, and I will be dedicating the set to Walter Sobchak [to highlight something he is genetically incapable of doing].

Today, I'll be maxing out the leg press for reps.

All that I can say is that right now, the following song describes me:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 11, 2022, 06:39:57 AM
UPDATE: 203-lb again.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1386161;image)

Excellent "T-taper".
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on August 11, 2022, 06:40:46 AM
UPDATE: 203-lb again.



I'm pleased with this look, and happy to just sustain it. That being said, I still may want to go up to 220, and then shrink during the year, but go up to 220 every summer. I quit enjoy this look and the huge amount of attention it garners me.




I say you go to "240 or Bust" Matt!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 11, 2022, 07:54:59 AM

I say you go to "240 or Bust" Matt!

How about 220 or Bust?  ;D

Realistically, I know I can make 215...reasonably comfortably, and reasonably lean.

Notice those pictures of me at 160 - my body fat is basically the same!!

I mean, if I'm going to be 16-18% body fat [or whatever I am] no matter what I weigh, I may as well go for 220+ or Bust.

I'm 207 as of this minute, and that is why I suspect I could make 215 and still be reasonably lean [not an obvious dirty bulker].

220 is...possibly doable without getting too sloppy. That would be a total cycle gain of +37-lb!

And 240...well...I'd probably look like 240 did.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 11, 2022, 09:46:59 AM
A few peach cobblers and you'll hit 220 easy.

Do they serve peach cobbler in Thunder Bay?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 11, 2022, 11:25:33 AM
Considering I've literally spent time with five women in the last month, fucked three of them, and was intimate with the other two. I have to say, I didn't expect that at my age. I figured it's ALL OVER by 45, and just sort of getting there by 40.

Do they come back for second servings of the Peter Northesque loads? Or is it a turnoff for them? Have you asked?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on August 11, 2022, 11:38:07 AM
You got the big arms, Matt, and the girls followed.

You know how it goes.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on August 11, 2022, 02:46:28 PM
Is That BWanky  The Hobo ?  Living in a Squat - WTF is all That Crap on floor & under the Bed !!!

If its BWanky It is Probably the best Pic of his physique I've seen posted.
Looks 60.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 11, 2022, 03:04:09 PM
Not an ounce of muscle gained by the stupid little manlet after the initial water weight.

All this lip flapping for nothing. No improvement and the drugs are still lifting the weight for the fucking retard.

This closet phaggot isn’t scoring any pussy, he’s just trying to change the narrative that he got outed as a dick drainer. Next he will be denying he’s a racist anti-Semite and that he only wanted to suck Hitler’s  dick because he adored Adolf’s mustache.

Fucking low IQ pansy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 11, 2022, 03:20:15 PM
Not an ounce of muscle gained by the stupid little manlet after the initial water weight.

All this lip flapping for nothing. No improvement and the drugs are still lifting the weight for the fucking retard.

This closet phaggot isn’t scoring any pussy, he’s just trying to change the narrative that he got outed as a dick drainer. Next he will be denying he’s a racist anti-Semite and that he only wanted to suck Hitler’s  dick because he adored Adolf’s mustache.

Fucking low IQ pansy.
But he was with 5 women last month bro
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 11, 2022, 03:30:02 PM
But he was with 5 women last month bro

True.  Although I believe penetration only occurred in three of the aforementioned 5.  @Matt - Could you please divulge more info on the intimacy that took place between yourself and the two persons you did NOT penetrate? 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on August 11, 2022, 04:19:31 PM
Matt, bhank is up to 237 lbs, what are you checking in at these days?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 11, 2022, 04:23:49 PM
True.  Although I believe penetration only occurred in three of the aforementioned 5.  @Matt - Could you please divulge more info on the intimacy that took place between yourself and the two persons you did NOT penetrate?
Ah yes 3. Still a respectable pull. Quite the autistic pussy slayer Matt is. He's def someone I could see having game and not at all coming off creepy to women
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 11, 2022, 05:50:06 PM
Ah yes 3. Still a respectable pull. Quite the autistic pussy slayer Matt is. He's def someone I could see having game and not at all coming off creepy to women

Not in the least. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 11, 2022, 09:11:53 PM
But he was with 5 women last month bro

Prime 4X and his mommy….

He’s as much of a liar as bhank is.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 12, 2022, 12:59:49 AM
Matt C looks great!

Matt C = Thunder Bay's Strongest!

Matt "Thunder Balls" Canning, Bane of Lakehead U


(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/Matt-designstyle-candy-m.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/12818521-designstyle-bigfoot-m.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)

(https://i.ibb.co/8ghtxfX/pooh.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/FgLbH9F/poof.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)

KING OF KANGZ
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1386157;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 12, 2022, 02:08:38 AM
Not an ounce of muscle gained by the stupid little manlet after the initial water weight.

All this lip flapping for nothing. No improvement and the drugs are still lifting the weight for the fucking retard.

This closet phaggot isn’t scoring any pussy, he’s just trying to change the narrative that he got outed as a dick drainer. Next he will be denying he’s a racist anti-Semite and that he only wanted to suck Hitler’s  dick because he adored Adolf’s mustache.

Fucking low IQ pansy.
FUCKING BRUTAL !! 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 12, 2022, 02:43:10 AM
UPDATE: 203-lb again.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1386160;image)

Fair play to you, Matt.  You now look like the guy who does the actual torturing in dat dere Iraqi basement rather than one of his victims...

"Is it 6.75 inches?
"Yes"

"Is it 6.75 inches?
"Yes - yes!"

"Is it 6.75 inches?
"Yes, I'm telling you, yes"

"Is it 6.75 inches? - are you sure?"
"Yes - Please - God!  Please"

"Is it 6.75 inches?
"Aaaaahhhhh!"


 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 12, 2022, 02:45:15 AM
You nut !  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on August 12, 2022, 03:57:34 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/mD05d6tK/p9zlwrbwbnp6wxii71.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 12, 2022, 04:26:58 AM
Matt C looks great!

Matt C = Thunder Bay's Strongest!

Matt "Thunder Balls" Canning, Bane of Lakehead U

(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/Matt-designstyle-candy-m.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/12818521-designstyle-bigfoot-m.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)

(https://i.ibb.co/8ghtxfX/pooh.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/FgLbH9F/poof.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)

KING OF KANGZ
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1386157;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 12, 2022, 06:08:30 AM
You nut !  LOL  ;D

 :D

You did get the 'Marathon Man' reference though, my Dude?  Please tell me you did - I wasn't just on a flight of fancy about the Canning-Cawk...! ;D

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on August 12, 2022, 06:22:36 AM
arms and delts took...get the back and rest to progress..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 13, 2022, 02:32:56 AM
My idea of personal heaven.

Every single shit she takes for the rest of her life goes directly from her anus to my mouth.

My lips puckered around her slightly stained adorable little butthole patiently awaiting the treat to issue forth and slide into my mouth.

The first couple appetizers are just farts that echo in my mouth and come out my nose which serve just to tease me.

The moment then arrives and the first hint of my delectable treat slowly emerges with a nice shiny slime of fecal matter from her innermost bowels.

It slides into my mouth and I cry tears of joy as it plays its delicious symphony across my taste buds.

She giggles as it fully emerges and pushes down my throat and into my tummy. I have got my reward and while she wipes her fragile hole I lay back and weep in ecstasy.

She leads me to my cage where I patiently await my next treat.

Please eat and become full I whisper, I need my treats.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on August 13, 2022, 02:54:48 AM
My idea of personal heaven.

Every single shit she takes for the rest of her life goes directly from her anus to my mouth.

My lips puckered around her slightly stained adorable little butthole patiently awaiting the treat to issue forth and slide into my mouth.

The first couple appetizers are just farts that echo in my mouth and come out my nose which serve just to tease me.

The moment then arrives and the first hint of my delectable treat slowly emerges with a nice shiny slime of fecal matter from her innermost bowels.

It slides into my mouth and I cry tears of joy as it plays its delicious symphony across my taste buds.

She giggles as it fully emerges and pushes down my throat and into my tummy. I have got my reward and while she wipes her fragile hole I lay back and weep in ecstasy.

She leads me to my cage where I patiently await my next treat.

Please eat and become full I whisper, I need my treats.

Sir, this is a McDonald's drive thru
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 13, 2022, 03:49:03 AM
Sir, this is a McDonald's drive thru
Fucking A man. It's 6:46 in the morning, been on the road an hour already on our way to NY. I just started laughing hysterically from your post in the car. My gf thinks I'm a idiot
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on August 13, 2022, 08:48:59 AM
Excellent "T-taper".
Now is the time to hit the lats hard while you're riding the cycle.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 13, 2022, 12:05:06 PM
Matt, I see that you use Meyer's hand soap. So do I. I prefer the lemon scent. It is a good product.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 13, 2022, 12:33:57 PM
My idea of personal heaven.

Every single shit she takes for the rest of her life goes directly from her anus to my mouth.

My lips puckered around her slightly stained adorable little butthole patiently awaiting the treat to issue forth and slide into my mouth.

The first couple appetizers are just farts that echo in my mouth and come out my nose which serve just to tease me.

The moment then arrives and the first hint of my delectable treat slowly emerges with a nice shiny slime of fecal matter from her innermost bowels.

It slides into my mouth and I cry tears of joy as it plays its delicious symphony across my taste buds.

She giggles as it fully emerges and pushes down my throat and into my tummy. I have got my reward and while she wipes her fragile hole I lay back and weep in ecstasy.

She leads me to my cage where I patiently await my next treat.

Please eat and become full I whisper, I need my treats.

(https://i.giphy.com/12mF9DKcaggLoQ.gif)   
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 13, 2022, 01:17:39 PM

[/quote]
:D

You did get the 'Marathon Man' reference though, my Dude?  Please tell me you did - I wasn't just on a flight of fancy about the Canning-Cawk...! ;D


I most assuredly got it.....one of my all time favorite movies.

Well played sir.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 13, 2022, 01:27:48 PM
Matt, I see that you use Meyer's hand soap. So do I. I prefer the lemon scent. It is a good product.
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 13, 2022, 01:32:20 PM
Matt, I see that you use Meyer's hand soap. So do I. I prefer the lemon scent. It is a good product.

Prime Groomer back at it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 13, 2022, 01:36:07 PM

Prime Groomer back at it.

I’m going to show Prime some ropes.
I’m going to show Prime some ropes.
I’m going to show Prime some rooooooooooopes.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 13, 2022, 04:31:20 PM
I’m going to show Prime some ropes.
I’m going to show Prime some ropes.
I’m going to show Prime some rooooooooooopes.
Side profile of a model. No wonder he shagged 3 chick's last month. It should be of note 3 families are currently looking for their missing daughters.  Fucking weirdo
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 13, 2022, 04:35:31 PM
Side profile of a model. No wonder he shagged 3 chick's last month. It should be of note 3 families are currently looking for their missing daughters.  Fucking weirdo

Realistically, every woman I speak to is down to fuck.

But I'm sure you're better looking, right?

Anyway, I haven't updated here because missed my 225x25 bench press.

I was close though. I was confident I'd get 25-26, but no. It's weird how you have off days when you feel on, and on days when you feel off, sometimes.

The 225x30 and 315x15 may be harder than I expected, so I'm going to take videos every workout, so if I happen to get it - it will be recorded.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 13, 2022, 04:39:54 PM
arms and delts took...get the back and rest to progress..

Thank you.

I have some genetics on my side for delts. My triceps are also ok, and give me some overall arms size.

The back and the rest isn't there...

When I was looking at Big Ramy's pictures, I noticed he doesn't have that sweeping chest that basically extends into his armpits, like Ronnie Coleman has. He also has overpowering delts, that no doubt ate some of his chest gains. He still DOES have a developed chest...but what it proved to me is that unless you have genetics for a great cheat, it will never happen.

I've also recently developed some appreciation for having good shoulders and arms, because that's what people see when you're wearing a tank top.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 13, 2022, 04:45:31 PM
Not an ounce of muscle gained by the stupid little manlet after the initial water weight.

All this lip flapping for nothing. No improvement and the drugs are still lifting the weight for the fucking retard.

This closet phaggot isn’t scoring any pussy, he’s just trying to change the narrative that he got outed as a dick drainer. Next he will be denying he’s a racist anti-Semite and that he only wanted to suck Hitler’s  dick because he adored Adolf’s mustache.

Fucking low IQ pansy.

I'm 25-lb up from 15mg of Anadrol daily. Exactly what progress would you expect me to make, you stupid shit?  ::)

Of course I could push my body weight up more if I was willing to be braver with my doses, but as of now, I'm not willing to do that. I picked a dose that gave me effects only, and no perceptible side effects.

And for the amount I'm doing, my response has been immense.

And you know I'm stronger than you [as well as better looking with a full head of hair, etc], which is why you don't post photos, you cowardly piece of shit. Because the same thing would happen to you that happened when Sarcasm's photos leaked. You'd be laughed at the board.

If I were making fun of someone, I'd be GLAD to prove I'm bigger/stronger/faster.

We know none of that is the case with you, so you don't post any photos.

So you know you're weaker, slower, ugly, etc, than me. So... congratulations? You fat, bald fuck.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 13, 2022, 04:47:29 PM
.

LOL! I don't think Meyer's hand soap works as a lubricant if that was your implication. Have you ever tried this product? It is plant based... and so it is also Marty Champion approved. :)

This photoshop makes it appear that I was a clerk at an adult bookstore. In fact, I have never worked as a clerk anywhere in my entire life and don't plan to.

How was you run with Jane? Did she wear you out? She has long legs and can probably out run you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 13, 2022, 04:52:31 PM
I'm 25-lb up from 15mg of Anadrol daily. Exactly what progress would you expect me to make, you stupid shit?  ::)

Of course I could push my body weight up more if I was willing to be braver with my doses, but as of now, I'm not willing to do that. I picked a dose that gave me effects only, and no perceptible side effects.

And for the amount I'm doing, my response has been immense.

And you know I'm stronger than you [as well as better looking with a full head of hair, etc], which is why you don't post photos, you cowardly piece of shit. Because the same thing would happen to you that happened when Sarcasm's photos leaked. You'd be laughed at the board.

If I were making fun of someone, I'd be GLAD to prove I'm bigger/stronger/faster.

We know none of that is the case with you, so you don't post any photos.

So you know you're weaker, slower, ugly, etc, than me. So... congratulations? You fat, bald fuck.

So Matt, I am curious as to how you would know that Walter is homelier than you if he's never posted a photo? Assuming he didn't privately send you one, which I seriously doubt he did. Be honest, you are just goading him on, aren’t you?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 13, 2022, 04:56:04 PM

So Matt, I am curious as to how you would know that Walter is homelier than you if he's never posted a photo? Assuming he didn't privately send you one, which I seriously doubt he did. Be honest, you are just goading him on, aren’t you?

Primemuscle,

That's why he won't post a photo - because he knows it.

While I can see why he wouldn't post a face photo - he can post a video of him lifting something while wearing a CoVee mask, or use software to blur his face.

He won't do that because he knows I'm stronger at every lift. With juice, without juice. With him on juice and 80-lb heavier. I'd be stronger in all those scenarios.

I can bench press 225 for 23 or 24 reps, depending on if I want to push that last rep. Since it's easier to get injured with age, I sometimes hold back that last rep.

Only when I attempted it did I realize just how fucking strong a person has to be to bench press 225x25.

Walter Sobchak, that delusional piece of shit, called that a weak lift. That comment could only come from someone who either doesn't train, or is so has never pushed themselves and has no idea how impressive that is.

There aren't 10 men where I live right now who can out-bench me.

That's why I continually challenge that loser to any strength contest just to prove I'm stronger, and to put it to rest permanently. Something I am fine with doing. Within 12 weeks of strength training specifically, there would be very few on here who could out-lift me.

But what I am saying to you right now is that Walter Sobchak is a delusional fool. There's no response to anyone who lifts what I do other than to say "good lift" [or "good lift for your size"], or nothing at all, really. So by conversing with him, you are talking to an utterly delusional moron.

I out-lift him on any lift anyway, though.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 13, 2022, 04:59:27 PM
Primemuscle,

I can bench press 225 for 23 or 24 reps, depending on if I want to push that last rep. Since it's easier to get injured with age, I sometimes hold back that last rep.

Only when I attempted it did I realize just how fucking strong a person has to be to bench press 225x25.

Walter Sobchak, that delusional piece of shit, called that a weak lift. That comment could only come from someone who either doesn't train, or is so has never pushed themselves and has no idea how impressive that is.

There aren't 10 men where I live right now who can out-bench me.

That's why I continually challenge that loser to any strength contest just to prove I'm stronger, and to put it to rest permanently. Something I am fine with doing. Within 12 weeks of strength training specifically, there would be very few on here who could out-lift me.

But what I am saying to you right now is that Walter Sobchak is a delusional fool. There's no response to anyone who lifts what I do other than to say "good lift" [or "good lift for your size"], or nothing at all, really. So by conversing with him, you are talking to an utterly delusional moron.

I out-lift him on any lift anyway, though.

Not saying you are not strong but your lifts look like spastic dangerous bullshit. You say with a bounce why? Why not see what you can lift properly keeping your back and ass flat on the bench and controlling the weight up and down without a bounce? You will get more development doing it right with less weight.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 13, 2022, 05:12:07 PM
Not saying you are not strong but your lifts look like spastic dangerous bullshit. You say with a bounce why? Why not see what you can lift properly keeping your back and ass flat on the bench and controlling the weight up and down without a bounce? You will get more development doing it right with less weight.

That 120-lb dumbbell press was surprisingly bad.

I felt like it was a bit off, but it was way off. It was weird.

Where we disagree is about my overhead press - I think my form was fine here:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

Regarding 225 for reps - well, that's traditionally just a full reps demonstration. As long as you touch your chest and lock out your reps, you are ok.

Most who do 225 for reps do it with loose form.

With perfect form, I suspect I could get 12+ reps with 225.

I prefer Strongman to powerlifting due to the lack of refinement in Strongman.

Also, I have never been injured.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 13, 2022, 05:18:14 PM
That 120-lb dumbbell press was surprisingly bad.

I felt like it was a bit off, but it was way off. It was weird.

Where we disagree is about my overhead press - I think my form was fine here:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

Regarding 225 for reps - well, that's traditionally just a full reps demonstration. As long as you touch your chest and lock out your reps, you are ok.

Most who do 225 for reps do it with loose form.

With perfect form, I suspect I could get 12+ reps with 225.

I prefer Strongman to powerlifting due to the lack of refinement in Strongman.

Also, I have never been injured.

Then you can get 12 plus reps. Make the chest do the lifting that is what proper slow form does it puts the concentration of the lift on the primary muscle feel it in the stretch. Moving more weight with your legs and back and a bounce doesn't make you stronger than doing 12 proper reps with your chest. You are the same strength regardless, but the 12 proper reps will help you grow. You need to get a pump in the chest to develop your chest bouncing hip thrusters dont do that
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 13, 2022, 05:19:43 PM
Then you can get 12 plus reps. Make the chest do the lifting that is what proper slow form does it puts the concentration of the lift on the primary muscle feel it in the stretch. Moving more weight with your legs and back and a bounce doesn't make you stronger than doing 12 proper reps with your chest. You are the same strength regardless, but the 12 proper reps will help you grow. You need to get a pump in the chest to develop your chest bouncing hip thrusters dont do that

My chest can grow with changes?

It sure doesn't seem that way.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 13, 2022, 05:22:05 PM
My chest can grow with changes?

It sure doesn't seem that way.

You will absolutely get more chest development if you change your form.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on August 13, 2022, 05:29:26 PM
mattc is the bill kazmier of canada
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 13, 2022, 05:46:18 PM
Want Pecs Matt....do this:

Smith Inclines - 5 x 15,12,10,8,12 or more
Flyes - 5 X 20,15,12,10,8
Strict Paralell Bar Dips - 3 sets bodyweight as many good deep reps as possible rhythmically done.

At times sub in DB Inclines - 5 X 12,10,8,6,15 or more ....total failure

For some bench press just does not build pecs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 13, 2022, 09:16:15 PM
Realistically, every woman I speak to is down to fuck.

But I'm sure you're better looking, right?

Anyway, I haven't updated here because missed my 225x25 bench press.

I was close though. I was confident I'd get 25-26, but no. It's weird how you have off days when you feel on, and on days when you feel off, sometimes.

The 225x30 and 315x15 may be harder than I expected, so I'm going to take videos every workout, so if I happen to get it - it will be recorded.
Yup. I'm 6'1" and athletic. Maybe post up some more of the same pictures for the 100x and talk about 315 for 15 again. I'm sure a retard like yourself knows retard chick's too so it doesn't surprise me you can trick some of them into fucking
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 13, 2022, 09:56:47 PM
LOL! I don't think Meyer's hand soap works as a lubricant if that was your implication. Have you ever tried this product? It is plant based... and so it is also Marty Champion approved. :)

This photoshop makes it appear that I was a clerk at an adult bookstore. In fact, I have never worked as a clerk anywhere in my entire life and don't plan to.

How was you run with Jane? Did she wear you out? She has long legs and can probably out run you.

The sprint work was fun and we were pretty close to the same times for the 40 yard dash, but I was a bit faster. She was faster at the 60 meter dash, which is apparently a real race distance. But it’s not like she’s an average woman out for a jog.

Thankfully I can still bench press more than her, but only by a small amount since I stopped taking Anadrol and sending jerkoff videos to old men. God bless the retarded, they give us so much to laugh about.

 ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 14, 2022, 02:02:12 AM
Bench press is a good measure of upper-body strength, but like Wes mentioned, not a good mass builder (for chest) for many.
(When using heavier weight).
With lighter weight and feeling the movement (like Brian said) it sure can be a good chest builder for most).
Most of the strong benchers (for strength, not mass) know that upper-back, strong triceps, shoulders, flared-lats, etc can help move more weight).
Not many strong benchers do "pec" exercises to help with bench.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 14, 2022, 02:32:18 AM
Matt is STRONG and HUGE.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on August 14, 2022, 05:26:22 AM
Want Pecs Matt....do this:

Smith Inclines - 5 x 15,12,10,8,12 or more
Flyes - 5 X 20,15,12,10,8
Strict Paralell Bar Dips - 3 sets bodyweight as many good deep reps as possible rhythmically done.

At times sub in DB Inclines - 5 X 12,10,8,6,15 or more ....total failure

For some bench press just does not build pecs.
yes precise sets and reps boys  ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on August 14, 2022, 05:33:11 AM
Fucking A man. It's 6:46 in the morning, been on the road an hour already on our way to NY. I just started laughing hysterically from your post in the car. My gf thinks I'm a idiot

*tips hat*  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 14, 2022, 01:00:01 PM
Primemuscle,

That's why he won't post a photo - because he knows it.

While I can see why he wouldn't post a face photo - he can post a video of him lifting something while wearing a CoVee mask, or use software to blur his face.

He won't do that because he knows I'm stronger at every lift. With juice, without juice. With him on juice and 80-lb heavier. I'd be stronger in all those scenarios.

I can bench press 225 for 23 or 24 reps, depending on if I want to push that last rep. Since it's easier to get injured with age, I sometimes hold back that last rep.

Only when I attempted it did I realize just how fucking strong a person has to be to bench press 225x25.

Walter Sobchak, that delusional piece of shit, called that a weak lift. That comment could only come from someone who either doesn't train, or is so has never pushed themselves and has no idea how impressive that is.

There aren't 10 men where I live right now who can out-bench me.

That's why I continually challenge that loser to any strength contest just to prove I'm stronger, and to put it to rest permanently. Something I am fine with doing. Within 12 weeks of strength training specifically, there would be very few on here who could out-lift me.

But what I am saying to you right now is that Walter Sobchak is a delusional fool. There's no response to anyone who lifts what I do other than to say "good lift" [or "good lift for your size"], or nothing at all, really. So by conversing with him, you are talking to an utterly delusional moron.

I out-lift him on any lift anyway, though.

Didn't know there were 10 men living in Thunder Bay? LOL!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 14, 2022, 02:06:28 PM
I’m going to show Prime some ropes.
I’m going to show Prime some ropes.
I’m going to show Prime some rooooooooooopes.

Matt can't show me anything now because I cut his lines of communication off. If he wants to show off his 'ropes', he'll have to post them on Getbig.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 14, 2022, 02:18:40 PM
The sprint work was fun and we were pretty close to the same times for the 40 yard dash, but I was a bit faster. She was faster at the 60 meter dash, which is apparently a real race distance. But it’s not like she’s an average woman out for a jog.

Thankfully I can still bench press more than her, but only by a small amount since I stopped taking Anadrol and sending jerkoff videos to old men. God bless the retarded, they give us so much to laugh about.

 ::)

Thank you for never sending me your jerkoff videos Walter. Now that I know you've stopped doing this, I can breathe a sigh of relief. Good that you quit the Anadrol. I hear it makes people do crazy things.

Jane is "Wonder Woman' as played by Cobie Smuthers. I suspect you aren't Tom Cruise.

(https://akns-images.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/20151020/rs_634x1024-151120093842-634.Tom-Cruise-Cobie-Smulders-BTS-Jack-Reacher-JR-112015.jpg)

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 14, 2022, 02:35:05 PM
Jane is "Wonder Woman' as played by Cobie Smuthers.

Well, close.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 14, 2022, 02:57:29 PM
Matt C looks great!

Matt C = Thunder Bay's Strongest!

Matt "Thunder Balls" Canning, Bane of Lakehead U


(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/Matt-designstyle-candy-m.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/12818521-designstyle-bigfoot-m.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)

(https://i.ibb.co/8ghtxfX/pooh.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/FgLbH9F/poof.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)

KING OF KANGZ
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1386157;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 14, 2022, 03:15:52 PM
Thank you for never sending me your jerkoff videos Walter. Now that I know you've stopped doing this, I can breathe a sigh of relief. Good that you quit the Anadrol. I hear it makes people do crazy things.

Jane is "Wonder Woman' as played by Cobie Smuthers. I suspect you aren't Tom Cruise.

(https://akns-images.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/20151020/rs_634x1024-151120093842-634.Tom-Cruise-Cobie-Smulders-BTS-Jack-Reacher-JR-112015.jpg)

I guess JPJ does look a little bit like that, but about a half a foot taller and blonde. I’m pretty sure I’m close to a foot taller than Tom Cruise, but I’m not sure of that?

We were invited to run with a high school football team who were finishing their summer training program at the track near the gym. Jane ran a 5.20 in Salomon trail running shoes on a rubberized asphalt track. Something I never knew about the 40-yard dash is that the runner starts the timer, you don’t react to a starter sound.

I know 5.2 sounds slow compared to the NFL combine, but it isn’t slow, it’s a lot quicker than you think. The HS kids ran between 6 - 9 seconds. One smaller player ran under 5.0 and the two assistant coaches who were helping were in the 4.6 - 4.7 range, so I assumed they’re local college players?

And we went for stuffed French Toast, so who can complain.

No jerkoff videos were made for soggy old queers.  🤣
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 14, 2022, 03:20:51 PM
Yup. I'm 6'1" and athletic. Maybe post up some more of the same pictures for the 100x and talk about 315 for 15 again. I'm sure a retard like yourself knows retard chick's too so it doesn't surprise me you can trick some of them into fucking
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 14, 2022, 03:31:32 PM
I guess JPJ does look a little bit like that, but about a half a foot taller and blonde. I’m pretty sure I’m close to a foot taller than Tom Cruise, but I’m not sure of that?

We were invited to run with a high school football team who were finishing their summer training program at the track near the gym. Jane ran a 5.20 in Salomon trail running shoes on a rubberized asphalt track. Something I never knew about the 40-yard dash is that the runner starts the timer, you don’t react to a starter sound.

I know 5.2 sounds slow compared to the NFL combine, but it isn’t slow, it’s a lot quicker than you think. The HS kids ran between 6 - 9 seconds. One smaller player ran under 5.0 and the two assistant coaches who were helping were in the 4.6 - 4.7 range, so I assumed they’re local college players?

And we went for stuffed French Toast, so who can complain.

No jerkoff videos were made for soggy old queers.  🤣

5.2 is a great 40 time for a regular person.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 14, 2022, 06:59:29 PM
I guess JPJ does look a little bit like that, but about a half a foot taller and blonde. I’m pretty sure I’m close to a foot taller than Tom Cruise, but I’m not sure of that?

We were invited to run with a high school football team who were finishing their summer training program at the track near the gym. Jane ran a 5.20 in Salomon trail running shoes on a rubberized asphalt track. Something I never knew about the 40-yard dash is that the runner starts the timer, you don’t react to a starter sound.

I know 5.2 sounds slow compared to the NFL combine, but it isn’t slow, it’s a lot quicker than you think. The HS kids ran between 6 - 9 seconds. One smaller player ran under 5.0 and the two assistant coaches who were helping were in the 4.6 - 4.7 range, so I assumed they’re local college players?

And we went for stuffed French Toast, so who can complain.

No jerkoff videos were made for soggy old queers.  🤣

A long while back JPJ mentioned that some folks thought she resembled Cobi Smulders. Nothing wrong with that Cobi is very attractive. I checked to see if Cobi ever went blond to no avail. So a blond Cobi would be a real knockout! She's only 5'8" which isn't short but compared to her running mate in that photo, she's a giantess. Tom claims 67". This is probably when he's wearing lifts. LOL!

You can both outrun me these days, but you are what... half my age? Anyway, both your times are impressive. lately I walk and don't run. It is less hard on the body and still provides decent cardio.

It's cool that the two of you have become real life friends. I can only imagine the snappy repartee between the two of you. With respect to that, you are about equal.

As for the lack of porn videos. It's all good. Never was much into porn anyway. Maybe you should send them to Matt. LOL!

 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: The Scott on August 14, 2022, 07:03:21 PM
A long while back JPJ mentioned that some folks thought she resembled Cobi Smulders. Nothing wrong with that Cobi is very attractive. I checked to see if Cobi ever went blond to no avail. So a blond Cobi would be a real knockout! She's only 5'8" which isn't short but compared to her running mate in that photo, she's a giantess. Tom claims 67". This is probably when he's wearing lifts. LOL!

You can both outrun me these days, but you are what... half my age? Anyway, both your times are impressive. lately I walk and don't run. It is less hard on the body and still provides decent cardio.

It's cool that the two of you have become real life friends. I can only imagine the snappy repartee between the two of you. With respect to that, you are about equal.

As for the lack of porn videos. It's all good. Never was much into porn anyway. Maybe you should send them to Matt. LOL!

Fear not, my fellow oldster!  You can still easily outrun me!  I do not recall ever seeing a picture of the Lady Jane but I do know she is quite tall and purported to be a beautiful woman.  Why would any man want to outrun that?  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 14, 2022, 07:16:07 PM
Fear not, my fellow oldster!  You can still easily outrun me!  I do not recall ever seeing a picture of the Lady Jane but I do know she is quite tall and purported to be a beautiful woman.  Why would any man want to outrun that?  ;D

Good point! And yet, men and women can be very competitive. Often the woman plays the "catch me if you can" game where she encourages the fellow to run after her and eventually she slows down so the guy can get to her. There is usually a lot of giggling going on in this process. And the rest of the story is x-rated.  ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 14, 2022, 08:06:52 PM
A long while back JPJ mentioned that some folks thought she resembled Cobi Smulders. Nothing wrong with that Cobi is very attractive. I checked to see if Cobi ever went blond to no avail. So a blond Cobi would be a real knockout! She's only 5'8" which isn't short but compared to her running mate in that photo, she's a giantess. Tom claims 67". This is probably when he's wearing lifts. LOL!

You can both outrun me these days, but you are what... half my age? Anyway, both your times are impressive. lately I walk and don't run. It is less hard on the body and still provides decent cardio.

It's cool that the two of you have become real life friends. I can only imagine the snappy repartee between the two of you. With respect to that, you are about equal.

As for the lack of porn videos. It's all good. Never was much into porn anyway. Maybe you should send them to Matt. LOL!

Jane and my girlfriend are very good friends. I’m just the third wheel.

I invited Getbiggers to come workout with us a few years ago and JPJ showed up and she has been a friend ever since. I’m not sure who she looks like, but I know she used to always have me take pictures of her doing stuff with us to send to Pellius, Chaos, Wes and her family back home.

Now back to your regularly scheduled program of grooming Matt “Short Stroke” Canning.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Vince B on August 14, 2022, 08:22:55 PM
Two things. Doing the same things expecting different results is not productive. Two, posting on Getbig to get good advices is foolish because you will get tarred and feathered. On the other hand that might be great to motivate you to show 'em!

The problem for Matt is to know what to accept and what to discard re the advices here. If you have to ask for information I doubt you will know good information from the rubbish. Clearly he has to do different things to change his physique. What do we find....he is doing the same training as before including bench pressing. By the way, some do benching and get upper chest development while others don't. Most of us follow what others have done so perpetuate any mistakes as well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 15, 2022, 11:09:22 AM
Two things. Doing the same things expecting different results is not productive. Two, posting on Getbig to get good advices is foolish because you will get tarred and feathered. On the other hand that might be great to motivate you to show 'em!

The problem for Matt is to know what to accept and what to discard re the advices here. If you have to ask for information I doubt you will know good information from the rubbish. Clearly he has to do different things to change his physique. What do we find....he is doing the same training as before including bench pressing. By the way, some do benching and get upper chest development while others don't. Most of us follow what others have done so perpetuate any mistakes as well.

There has been a lot of good advice and suggestions here. I just get annoyed with that weak loser Walter Sobchak talking about my lifts, none of which he could make if his life depended on it.

ChristopherA is an asshole too, for no good reason [I have never personally attacked him].

But it's Walter Sobchak's posts that are just utterly delusional. Addressing my lifts as weak, when they'd be decent lifts for a man who is 270, let alone 170. For 170, my lifts are next level. I have definitely been strong enough to compete in the 80-kg World's for Strongman, even if I'd be in the bottom 5 of 50 guys. But I'm still pretty close to that level - or was, when I weighed 170 and was training for strength.

As I said, there's no lift I couldn't beat Walter Sobchak on, which is why I have been insisting he send some lifting videos anonymously to OneMoreRep to verify that I'm stronger, but he won't do that because he knows I'm stronger. What a pussy.

He's likely bald and fat too.

As for my cycle - I'm actually surprised I even started it. Of course, leave it toe to do 100mg of Anadrol weekly, when I should be doing 350mg weekly.

But that's just how I am - overly cautious. I kept lowering my dose until I felt only modest effects and no side effects.

Combine that with doubling my calories - and I went from 183 to 208.

I've been holding steady at 203 lately, and I'm tempted to go up to 220...but I quite like my current look. So I may just stay here for another month, then become the incredible shrinking man starting in September.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 15, 2022, 11:19:20 AM
Yup. I'm 6'1" and athletic. Maybe post up some more of the same pictures for the 100x and talk about 315 for 15 again. I'm sure a retard like yourself knows retard chick's too so it doesn't surprise me you can trick some of them into fucking

This is absolutely gold!   🤣

How did I miss this post of perfection (PoP)?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 15, 2022, 11:22:26 AM
Matt was strong and now Matt is huge.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 15, 2022, 11:35:24 AM
Matt was strong and now Matt is huge.

And he jerked off on a video and sent it to Primehomosexual to comment on.

Let’s not forget his only accomplishment this year.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 15, 2022, 01:42:33 PM
Matt was strong and now Matt is huge.

Nobody stronger than Matty on this board..



And now he's huge as well!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 15, 2022, 11:41:36 PM
Matt was strong and now Matt is huge.

My lifts at 170:

345 bench press.
520 deadlift.
385x2 squat [contest form, absolutely ATG].

I could have probably gotten 405+ on that squat. Admittedly, I neglected legs. Had I trained it like chest have probably hit 465+.

I've had other good lifts in their too - like a 750-lb tire flip, six times in 60.5 seconds, and doing the farmer's walk with 250-lb per hand for 80 feet in 48.93 seconds, and pulling a city bus, and getting 250x17 on the bench and 315x8. These are all at 170 and drug-free / supplement-free, and mostly CALORIE free, LOL.

I just don't even grasp how Walter Sobchak wouldn't consider that strong, or at least strong for my size. Honestly, it's a bit delusional. And frankly, it just messes with me a little...only on Getbig can you be in the top 1% of strength, and beyond the top 0.1% of strength for your size and be considered weak.

There are a ton of negative things you could say about me that are negative that I wouldn't think twice about. But I just don't understand how my strength level is one of them.

At the very least, I consider myself strong for my size. I consider that a pretty objective thing, but...apparently not.

But I do appreciate you speaking truthfully about it, IroNat.

I am not an egomaniac. I'm pretty realistic. I could program my own strength training routine quite well, with success. But bodybuilding is different, and I appreciate having you on here to help me with this.  :)

I have to say, the compliments have been out of hand [IRL]. I love it.

I'd be lying if I said I didn't want to do another cycle again next year.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 16, 2022, 02:13:24 AM
Nobody stronger than Matty on this board..



And now he's huge as well!

Thanks Kwon! It's great to have you back. We lost a few good men for a minute there!  ;D

There are a few freaks on the board, but for pound-for
-pound strength...I'd be almost certain of that.  :) And certain lifts, I do think I may have them. I'd love to get that 225x30 bench press, but it may be slightly harder than I expected. Even if I get 26-27-28...I'd be pleased with that.

Regarding the cycle...I have to say, I'm getting a kick out of this new look! I'd actually like to look like this again, even though I said this cycle was a one-off.

I'll have to talk to my doctor about TRT...but I'd quite enjoy looking like this again IF it's not a major compromise to my health! It's something to think about - every choice we make is a trade-off, basically. But strictly speaking for apperance, I much prefer this to my 170-lb hypochondriac size.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 16, 2022, 04:07:10 AM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1387162;image)

Great picture Matty.

The ladies and old queers must cream themselves when they see you in under armour. You should hit them up to sponsor you. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 16, 2022, 05:33:07 AM
Much respect for your strength, Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on August 16, 2022, 05:38:40 AM
Latina ass matt bigger than most
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 16, 2022, 09:52:08 AM
My lifts at 170:

345 bench press.
520 deadlift.
385x2 squat [contest form, absolutely ATG].

I could have probably gotten 405+ on that squat. Admittedly, I neglected legs. Had I trained it like chest have probably hit 465+.

I've had other good lifts in their too - like a 750-lb tire flip, six times in 60.5 seconds, and doing the farmer's walk with 250-lb per hand for 80 feet in 48.93 seconds, and pulling a city bus, and getting 250x17 on the bench and 315x8. These are all at 170 and drug-free / supplement-free, and mostly CALORIE free, LOL.

I just don't even grasp how Walter Sobchak wouldn't consider that strong, or at least strong for my size. Honestly, it's a bit delusional. And frankly, it just messes with me a little...only on Getbig can you be in the top 1% of strength, and beyond the top 0.1% of strength for your size and be considered weak.

There are a ton of negative things you could say about me that are negative that I wouldn't think twice about. But I just don't understand how my strength level is one of them.

At the very least, I consider myself strong for my size. I consider that a pretty objective thing, but...apparently not.

But I do appreciate you speaking truthfully about it, IroNat.

I am not an egomaniac. I'm pretty realistic. I could program my own strength training routine quite well, with success. But bodybuilding is different, and I appreciate having you on here to help me with this.  :)

I have to say, the compliments have been out of hand [IRL]. I love it.

I'd be lying if I said I didn't want to do another cycle again next year.  ;D

I laugh my ass off at the idea that this 165 lb retard actually thinks he’s strong.

Look at that weak little manlet in his ballet tights.

If phaggot was an entry in the dictionary that photo would accompany it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stephano on August 16, 2022, 10:14:41 AM
I laugh my ass off at the idea that this 165 lb retard actually thinks he’s strong.

Look at that weak little manlet in his ballet tights.

Come on.  At this point you're just trolling.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 16, 2022, 10:22:06 AM
Come on.  At this point you're just trolling.

Gimmick, just ask him for a copy of his jerkoff video, no need to embarrass yourself white knighting him.

Maybe he will sell you a pair of his Under Armour panties so you can make tea.

Spermburper.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stephano on August 16, 2022, 10:30:13 AM
Gimmick, just ask him for a copy of his jerkoff video, no need to embarrass yourself white knighting him.
You're being somewhat unreasonable.  I've been training for more than 20 years, in some of the biggest gyms in the world, and only rarely (in fact almost never) have I seen anybody with Matt's strength-to-weight ratio across most lifts. 

It's fair to dislike him for being a schizo and saying weird things, but I don't think that you can call him weak.  And, when you call him weak, it makes you seem biased and unreasonable.  That's all. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 16, 2022, 10:40:11 AM
You're being somewhat unreasonable.  I've been training for more than 20 years, in some of the biggest gyms in the world, and only rarely (in fact almost never) have I seen anybody with Matt's strength-to-weight ratio across most lifts. 

It's fair to dislike him for being a schizo and saying weird things, but I don't think that you can call him weak.  And, when you call him weak, it makes you seem biased and unreasonable.  That's all.

Tell us about all the men’s locker rooms you’ve frequented in that time.   🤣

He’s a fucking unhinged weak little lunatic and when he shoots up a school or drowns his kids not one of you fuckers will have said a word to stop him.

Eat a shit flavored cock gimmick.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 16, 2022, 10:48:58 AM
There has been a lot of good advice and suggestions here. I just get annoyed with that weak loser Walter Sobchak talking about my lifts, none of which he could make if his life depended on it.

ChristopherA is an asshole too, for no good reason [I have never personally attacked him].

But it's Walter Sobchak's posts that are just utterly delusional. Addressing my lifts as weak, when they'd be decent lifts for a man who is 270, let alone 170. For 170, my lifts are next level. I have definitely been strong enough to compete in the 80-kg World's for Strongman, even if I'd be in the bottom 5 of 50 guys. But I'm still pretty close to that level - or was, when I weighed 170 and was training for strength.

As I said, there's no lift I couldn't beat Walter Sobchak on, which is why I have been insisting he send some lifting videos anonymously to OneMoreRep to verify that I'm stronger, but he won't do that because he knows I'm stronger. What a pussy.

He's likely bald and fat too.

As for my cycle - I'm actually surprised I even started it. Of course, leave it toe to do 100mg of Anadrol weekly, when I should be doing 350mg weekly.

But that's just how I am - overly cautious. I kept lowering my dose until I felt only modest effects and no side effects.

Combine that with doubling my calories - and I went from 183 to 208.

I've been holding steady at 203 lately, and I'm tempted to go up to 220...but I quite like my current look. So I may just stay here for another month, then become the incredible shrinking man starting in September.
I'm not an asshole,  I'm honest. I said you made some solid gain off a minimal cycle. Doesn't change you spamming the board with the same pictures over and over. Or your essay long posts you've been putting up for years. I try  to ignore it but you're an autistic weirdo. The whole board knows it. I just say it while they troll you and egg it on. You think any of them really think you're some pussy slayer or cool guy? No, they post some drivel then put their phone down and laugh at the fucking spazz. I would let most of this go but at the end of the day you're a shitty person and a racist POS so why hold it in?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 16, 2022, 11:03:34 AM
I'm not an asshole,  I'm honest. I said you made some solid gain off a minimal cycle. Doesn't change you spamming the board with the same pictures over and over. Or your essay long posts you've been putting up for years. I try  to ignore it but you're an autistic weirdo. The whole board knows it. I just say it while they troll you and egg it on. You think any of them really think you're some pussy slayer or cool guy? No, they post some drivel then put their phone down and laugh at the fucking spazz. I would let most of this go but at the end of the day you're a shitty person and a racist POS so why hold it in?

You should definitely ask Matt Canning to post up a back double bicep photo…I don’t think he has shared one with Getbig yet?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 16, 2022, 12:40:54 PM
I'm not an asshole,  I'm honest. I said you made some solid gain off a minimal cycle. Doesn't change you spamming the board with the same pictures over and over. Or your essay long posts you've been putting up for years. I try  to ignore it but you're an autistic weirdo. The whole board knows it. I just say it while they troll you and egg it on. You think any of them really think you're some pussy slayer or cool guy? No, they post some drivel then put their phone down and laugh at the fucking spazz. I would let most of this go but at the end of the day you're a shitty person and a racist POS so why hold it in?

You've been on here forever so you must have seen numerous people give Matt solid advice, honest critiques/opinions and genuinely try help him. Occasionally he listens, but most of the time his brain does not compute and he just goes around in circles and eventually lashes out.

Knowing this people still end up tangled in Matts web. Mcway and yourself being the latest. Like I tried to tell Mcway, who is the bigger retard? The actual tard or the person getting into it with him when he's tarding?

Pat him on the head or Sobchak him and just enjoy Mattfest
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 16, 2022, 01:33:05 PM
You've been on here forever so you must have seen numerous people give Matt solid advice, honest critiques/opinions and genuinely try help him. Occasionally he listens, but most of the time his brain does not compute and he just goes around in circles and eventually lashes out.

Knowing this people still end up tangled in Matts web. Mcway and yourself being the latest. Like I tried to tell Mcway, who is the bigger retard? The actual tard or the person getting into it with him when he's tarding?

Pat him on the head or Sobchak him and just enjoy Mattfest

If Matt Canning would post up a photo or detailed explanation backing up his claims then maybe he would have some credibility.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 16, 2022, 02:34:56 PM
You should definitely ask Matt Canning to post up a back double bicep photo…I don’t think he has shared one with Getbig yet?
:D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on August 16, 2022, 05:38:39 PM

Matt, you might not have seen it, but your prick is being discussed it very unflattering terms -

Sell your collection of Matt Canning “Daddy Did Me Dirty” jerkoff videos and you can make a few hundred bucks.

Damn, wish I'd thought of this before I deleted it. Unfortunately, a few hundred bucks is an overreach. There was only one video. Had you seen it, you would understand why it wasn't worth much. At best, it would have fetched .50 cents. The two photos had no value at all.

Might one have a response to such an affront?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on August 16, 2022, 05:43:30 PM
Walter is delusional here on the strength element, MattC is very strong for his weight.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 16, 2022, 07:01:06 PM
@Matt - I apologize if I've missed it in this thread but how are the "ropes" holding up on cycle?  Also, any pussy updates?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 16, 2022, 07:17:59 PM
Jane and my girlfriend are very good friends. I’m just the third wheel.

I invited Getbiggers to come workout with us a few years ago and JPJ showed up and she has been a friend ever since. I’m not sure who she looks like, but I know she used to always have me take pictures of her doing stuff with us to send to Pellius, Chaos, Wes and her family back home.

Now back to your regularly scheduled program of grooming Matt “Short Stroke” Canning.

It is great to know that some folks on Getbig actually meet and become friends beyond fellow Getbig posters. I don't remember you sending me an invite. :'(

Sorry to disappoint you but that grooming program does not now nor has it ever existed. Suffice it to say, Matt is not in anyway my type. Oddly enough, I prefer people my own age and those who are sane.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on August 16, 2022, 07:54:35 PM
It is great to know that some folks on Getbig actually meet and become friends beyond fellow Getbig posters. I don't remember you sending me an invite. :'(

Sorry to disappoint you but that grooming program does not now nor has it ever existed. Suffice it to say, Matt is not in anyway my type. Oddly enough, I prefer people my own age and those who are sane.

Has Matt sent you any photo/video updates since his Anadrol-50 cycle? 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 16, 2022, 08:15:05 PM
Has Matt sent you any photo/video updates since his Anadrol-50 cycle?

(https://i.giphy.com/12mF9DKcaggLoQ.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: POB on August 16, 2022, 11:55:00 PM
Great gains! Who said steroids weren’t better than anti depressants 6 mo ago u were winining about a ex now your huge,on the verge of a professional wrestling career, and throw down dong Tex with confidence,
Soon you’ll have a sex tape with a starlet to post 😎
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 17, 2022, 01:29:58 AM
I think it was Duchaine who said Anadrol in particular appeared to cause cock gains but that it's all temporary - increased blood volume or whatever.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on August 17, 2022, 02:01:24 AM
I think it was Duchaine who said Anadrol in particular appeared to cause cock gains but that it's all temporary - increased blood volume or whatever.
He also said almost all health problems from steroids came from Anadrol as well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on August 17, 2022, 02:35:42 AM
I think it was Duchaine who said Anadrol in particular appeared to cause cock gains but that it's all temporary - increased blood volume or whatever.

Duchaine had a bunch of cock potions at different times -

Dianabol started young was one he, Pat Arnold, and Bruce Kneller were big on.

Then there was Andractim DHT cream for controlling the hang.

Then there was a period where he injected Cheque drops right into his dick. He swore that worked.

Last was DNP for controlling the hang, he swore you came back fluffier after using it. He couldn't explain it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 17, 2022, 03:51:15 AM
I think it was Duchaine who said Anadrol in particular appeared to cause cock gains but that it's all temporary - increased blood volume or whatever.

How would cock gains be defined? I always assumed cock size was a stable measurement, but a female friend told me Viagra will give a man fuller and harder erections. I don't think that really counts as gains, but...I guess the effect would be the same.

On that note, I do notice I wake up more often with an erection - and not a urine-retaining one. But I've also felt a lot better lately and started fucking again, so it could be that. Let's put it this way: Anadrol doesn't seem to be making me worse off in that department. If anything, there seems to be some positive effect.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 17, 2022, 03:53:44 AM
It is great to know that some folks on Getbig actually meet and become friends beyond fellow Getbig posters. I don't remember you sending me an invite. :'(

Sorry to disappoint you but that grooming program does not now nor has it ever existed. Suffice it to say, Matt is not in anyway my type. Oddly enough, I prefer people my own age and those who are sane.

That being said, you believed Covid was a threat because the mainstream media told you it was. The dust has settled now, Prime - you were completely wrong about that.

So you're not in a position to talk.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 17, 2022, 04:08:56 AM
Has Matt sent you any photo/video updates since his Anadrol-50 cycle?

There's nothing I claim on here that I can't prove.

To Walter Sobchak's comment that I am a 40-year-old mess, and can't get a woman because of that - only an ugly man would possibly say that.

I've never - not since figuring this out at age 26 - had to do anything but exist to get a woman. I'm fairly certain that this is the experience of any fit man who is not ugly. Hence why I assume Walter Sobchak is ugly and/or fat/bald.

I do think something's going on lately though...maybe what they say about pheromones is true, and the steroids are causing them, because I'm 5 for 5 for literally taking home all the last women I spoke with, in the past two months.

That's normally no problem, but these women were aggressively pursuing me to a degree greater than usual.

But I've been actively avoiding human interaction for 3-4 years now. So maybe it's just exactly the same as it's always been, and I just forgot how it was.

I think the extra 25-lb is a major icebreaker though. I really do prefer this physique, but it's ultimately a trade-off - likely for speed and stamina + carrying extra weight is not generally a good thing. But I absolutely prefer looking this way.

Just now, I noticed my forearms are getting bigger too, and I haven't even been training them:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on August 17, 2022, 08:10:19 AM
If you're concerned w getting slow, you can tighten the diet up a bit and do some cardio.  AAS stop catabolism almost completely--this is what they were designed for after all--so you can diet hard and not lose any muscle.

Get ~1g protein/bw in and as few additional calories as possible, add brisk walks daily too.

Just an idea.  Nice pics  8)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SGT BARNES on August 17, 2022, 10:54:08 AM
is your arm hiding a c section scar or the top of his dong?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 17, 2022, 10:56:20 AM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1387284;image)

I would move her soon, she will start smelling in the hot weather
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SGT BARNES on August 17, 2022, 11:20:13 AM
"I would move her soon, she will start smelling in the hot weather"

Outstanding work.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 17, 2022, 11:43:17 AM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1387284;image)

I would move her soon, she will start smelling in the hot weather

Hahahahhaha. That was good.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 17, 2022, 12:30:40 PM
Good one Jeff !  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 17, 2022, 01:22:22 PM
That being said, you believed Covid was a threat because the mainstream media told you it was. The dust has settled now, Prime - you were completely wrong about that.

So you're not in a position to talk.

I am in a better position to talk about COVID then you are. I have a rational perspective regarding the virus. Unlike you, COVID doesn't rule my life. You are obsessed with COVID and therefore you have allowed it to rule your thinking. If I remember correctly, you said the COVID mandates in Ontario made you suicidal. Your gym was closed so you stopped working out and this affected your wellbeing. In fact, there is no reason you couldn't have exercised at home rather than focus your self-pity. COVID has affected your life much more than it has mine. You can blame yourself for that.   

I am positive COVID is a treat to some people because I know people who caught it and got quite sick. My grandson who is a healthy 27-year-old currently has COVID. I talked to him the other day; he feels crummy. He is on vacation and is spending it in his quarters. I personally know a few people who died from COVID, only one of which had a comorbidity, which was essentially his advanced age. I caught COVID and was lucky to have hardly any overt symptoms. Unfortunately, it likely caused me some longer-term issues with hearing and vertigo. Both of which have improved over the past month. My daughter caught COVID when it was spreading through our household last February. She was ill for a couple of days. Her sense of smell has yet to return.

Do yourself a favor and stop making an issue out of COVID with your self-imposed negativity. Frankly, your 'poor Matty' routine has gotten old, tired and boring.   
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on August 17, 2022, 01:39:06 PM
I am in a better position to talk about COVID then you are. I have a rational perspective regarding the virus. Unlike you, COVID doesn't rule my life. You obsessed with COVID and therefore you have allowed it to rule your thinking. If I remember correctly, you said the COVID mandates in Ontario made you suicidal. Your gym was closed so you stopped working out and this affected your wellbeing. In fact, there is no reason you couldn't have exercised at home rather than focus your self-pity. COVID has affected your life much more than it has mine. You can blame yourself for that.   

I am positive COVID is a treat to some people because I know people who caught it and got quite sick. My grandson who is a healthy 27-year-old currently has COVID. I talked to him the other day; he feels crummy. He is on vacation and is spending it in his quarters. I personally know a few people who died from COVID, only one of which had a comorbidity, which was essentially his advanced age. I caught COVID and was lucky to have hardly any overt symptoms. Unfortunately, it likely caused me some longer-term issues with hearing and vertigo. Both of which have improved over the past month. My daughter caught COVID when it was spreading through our household last February. She was ill for a couple of days. Her sense of smell has yet to return.

Do yourself a favor and stop making an issue out of COVID with your self-imposed negativity. Frankly, your 'poor Matty' routine has gotten old, tired and boring.
Stopped reading at bolded text..absolute pathetic liar. Go piss your pants, Boy!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 17, 2022, 01:43:15 PM
Stopped reading at bolded text..absolute pathetic liar. Go piss your pants, Boy!

Do you expect me to care where you stopped reading my post which was directed towards Matt? Do yourself and me a favor and don't read anything I post, including this.

As for pants pissing. You seem perpetually pissed, which explains your stench.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on August 17, 2022, 01:44:45 PM
Do you expect me to care where you stopped reading my post which was directed towards Matt? Do yourself and me a favor and don't read anything I post, including this.

As for pants pissing. You seem perpetually pissed, which explains your stench.
DO YOUR CHILDREN KNOW YOU SUCK COCK YOU SOGGY QUEER?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 17, 2022, 01:50:46 PM
DO YOUR CHILDREN KNOW YOU SUCK COCK YOU SOGGY QUEER?

Got you shouting. Are you upset?

Do you know if you have children?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on August 17, 2022, 01:52:35 PM
Got you shouting. Are you upset?

Do you know if you have children?
I have one and I’ll never have to tell him I sucked cock because I never have and never would unlike you, Soggy Boy!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 17, 2022, 01:58:04 PM
I am in a better position to talk about COVID then you are. I have a rational perspective regarding the virus. Unlike you, COVID doesn't rule my life. You are obsessed with COVID and therefore you have allowed it to rule your thinking. If I remember correctly, you said the COVID mandates in Ontario made you suicidal. Your gym was closed so you stopped working out and this affected your wellbeing. In fact, there is no reason you couldn't have exercised at home rather than focus your self-pity. COVID has affected your life much more than it has mine. You can blame yourself for that.   

I am positive COVID is a treat to some people because I know people who caught it and got quite sick. My grandson who is a healthy 27-year-old currently has COVID. I talked to him the other day; he feels crummy. He is on vacation and is spending it in his quarters. I personally know a few people who died from COVID, only one of which had a comorbidity, which was essentially his advanced age. I caught COVID and was lucky to have hardly any overt symptoms. Unfortunately, it likely caused me some longer-term issues with hearing and vertigo. Both of which have improved over the past month. My daughter caught COVID when it was spreading through our household last February. She was ill for a couple of days. Her sense of smell has yet to return.

Do yourself a favor and stop making an issue out of COVID with your self-imposed negativity. Frankly, your 'poor Matty' routine has gotten old, tired and boring.

You can't dictate what people post about. It's a message board. Just put him on ignore if it bothers you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 17, 2022, 01:59:28 PM
I have one and I’ll never have to tell him I sucked cock because I never have and never would unlike you, Soggy Boy!

Goody for you! You should get a sign to wear proclaiming you lack of cock sucking experience... because folks are sure to want to know this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on August 17, 2022, 02:12:34 PM
Goody for you! You should get a sign to wear proclaiming you lack of cock sucking experience... because folks are sure to want to know this.
You’re vile and you disrespected your marriage vows. What kind of person are you, obviously a deviant one.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 17, 2022, 02:19:59 PM
You’re vile and you disrespected your marriage vows. What kind of person are you, obviously a deviant one.

What kind of a person are you? You'd do well to think more about that then about someone you don't know.   
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 17, 2022, 09:04:32 PM
is your arm hiding a c section scar or the top of his dong?

Nope.  ;D Identifiable tattoos. Getbig misses nothing.

She could probably be identified if the tattoos were showing. In theory.

What's with women going home with a man they just met that night? Seems risky to me. But meh. As a man, I don't get all the complaining about "Rape Culture", then so many women doing that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 18, 2022, 12:50:15 AM
How would cock gains be defined? I always assumed cock size was a stable measurement, but a female friend told me Viagra will give a man fuller and harder erections. I don't think that really counts as gains, but...I guess the effect would be the same.

On that note, I do notice I wake up more often with an erection - and not a urine-retaining one. But I've also felt a lot better lately and started fucking again, so it could be that. Let's put it this way: Anadrol doesn't seem to be making me worse off in that department. If anything, there seems to be some positive effect.

You're right it's impossible to measure accurately. They are referring to how low it hangs when flaccid I think lol. One product that is amazing in this department is Melanotan II.
The cock hangs way more Lol. Spontaneous erections all through the day without even thinking of sex. I would use this if I was in a situation where I wanted to impress a new lady friend. It would be very abnormal for her if she didn't date a guy like that before.

Melanotan
Cialis once a day and perhaps extra Viagra when "needed."
Proviron, Trenbolone.
Pro-sexual narcotic of choice e.g. ghb, speed, cannabis etc.

Tren makes you think of sex in a way that leaves you disgusted later on :D Absolute insanity but in the right situation it's great.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 18, 2022, 01:38:53 AM
No one is in a position to talk about COVID more than anyone else, just saying. All fed lies from all sides of the charade.
We all have our beliefs and can post them. Others can feel free to ignore and just move on.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 18, 2022, 02:52:16 AM
No one is in a position to talk about COVID more than anyone else, just saying. All fed lies from all sides of the charade.
We all have our beliefs and can post them. Others can feel free to ignore and just move on.

Matt C looks great!

Matt C = Thunder Bay's Strongest!

Matt "Thunder Balls" Canning, Bane of Lakehead U


(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/Matt-designstyle-candy-m.png)
(https://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/12818521-designstyle-bigfoot-m.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)(https://i.ibb.co/k8D3D1h/canka.gif)

(https://i.ibb.co/8ghtxfX/pooh.png)
(https://i.ibb.co/FgLbH9F/poof.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/PMDY5cJ/Matt1.png)

KING OF KANGZ
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1386157;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on August 18, 2022, 10:46:27 AM
I'm not an asshole,  I'm honest. I said you made some solid gain off a minimal cycle. Doesn't change you spamming the board with the same pictures over and over. Or your essay long posts you've been putting up for years. I try  to ignore it but you're an autistic weirdo. The whole board knows it. I just say it while they troll you and egg it on. You think any of them really think you're some pussy slayer or cool guy? No, they post some drivel then put their phone down and laugh at the fucking spazz. I would let most of this go but at the end of the day you're a shitty person and a racist POS so why hold it in?
Matt, is a weirdo and a racist POS.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 18, 2022, 12:53:24 PM
M-a-t-t  i-s  s-t-r-o-n-g  a-n-d  h-u-g-e.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 18, 2022, 01:35:47 PM
What's with women going home with a man they just met that night? Seems risky to me. But meh. As a man, I don't get all the complaining about "Rape Culture", then so many women doing that.

They are called whores Matt.

You want to avoid them.

Imagine how many dicks she's had inside her?

Based on your math skills, i'm sure there is a formula to figure out her total count.

Hell, just ask her? It's not like you care about her at all right?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 18, 2022, 02:18:21 PM
They are called whores Matt.

You want to avoid them.

Imagine how many dicks she's had inside her?

Based on your math skills, i'm sure there is a formula to figure out her total count.


Hell, just ask her? It's not like you care about her at all right?

Pah!  Our Matty could go much further.... for example:  if he takes an average stroke length, multiplied by the number of strokes per minute he has some form of unit of work

He can then take that figure and multiply it by the average length of time one of her 'mating sessions' might take to give him a kind of 'total insertion amount per lay' if you will...

If he then estimates how many times she's been plowed and uses that as a multiple, he can come up with a lifetime figure for how many miles of cawk the sloot has taken



It's the kind of math that helps an over-thinking boyfriend sleep well at night... ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 18, 2022, 02:27:10 PM
They are called whores Matt.

You want to avoid them.

Imagine how many dicks she's had inside her?

Based on your math skills, i'm sure there is a formula to figure out her total count.

Hell, just ask her? It's not like you care about her at all right?

She said she wouldn't fuck on the first day, but then the time passed midnight, so I thought that didn't count?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 18, 2022, 02:27:57 PM
You're right it's impossible to measure accurately. They are referring to how low it hangs when flaccid I think lol. One product that is amazing in this department is Melanotan II.
The cock hangs way more Lol. Spontaneous erections all through the day without even thinking of sex. I would use this if I was in a situation where I wanted to impress a new lady friend. It would be very abnormal for her if she didn't date a guy like that before.

Melanotan
Cialis once a day and perhaps extra Viagra when "needed."
Proviron, Trenbolone.
Pro-sexual narcotic of choice e.g. ghb, speed, cannabis etc.

Tren makes you think of sex in a way that leaves you disgusted later on :D Absolute insanity but in the right situation it's great.

Do you recommend this comprehensive regimen to someone who underwent a radical prostatectomy several years ago? Does it work sans the narcotics? Asking for a friend.  ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 18, 2022, 02:32:30 PM
Do you expect me to care where you stopped reading my post which was directed towards Matt? Do yourself and me a favor and don't read anything I post, including this.

As for pants pissing. You seem perpetually pissed, which explains your stench.

Stopped reading at pants peeing.

I hope you sent Matt a video of this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 18, 2022, 02:41:29 PM
You're right it's impossible to measure accurately. They are referring to how low it hangs when flaccid I think lol. One product that is amazing in this department is Melanotan II.
The cock hangs way more Lol. Spontaneous erections all through the day without even thinking of sex. I would use this if I was in a situation where I wanted to impress a new lady friend. It would be very abnormal for her if she didn't date a guy like that before.

Melanotan
Cialis once a day and perhaps extra Viagra when "needed."
Proviron, Trenbolone.
Pro-sexual narcotic of choice e.g. ghb, speed, cannabis etc.

Tren makes you think of sex in a way that leaves you disgusted later on :D Absolute insanity but in the right situation it's great.

Very accurate.

I know a "guy" who "used to" do the following when he was slaying multiple women on Tinder.

Test E 400mg per week. Always shoot 1cc ~24 hours before.
50mg Proviron per day.
30mg Cialis a few hours before.
50mg Tramadol OR 2 grams of Kratom 2 hours before.

You would be a sex machine. Problem is many times it's hard to finish.

Hope they can take a good 1-2 hours of pounding.

Tren is great too, but too many sides.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 18, 2022, 02:43:35 PM
Stopped reading at pants peeing.

I hope you sent Matt a video of this.

A video of what?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 18, 2022, 02:44:20 PM
Very accurate.

I know a "guy" who "used to" do the following when he was slaying multiple women on Tinder.

Test E 400mg per week. Always shoot 1cc ~24 hours before.
50mg Proviron per day.
30mg Cialis a few hours before.
50mg Tramadol OR 2 grams of Kratom 2 hours before.

You would be a sex machine. Problem is many times it's hard to finish.

Hope they can take a good 1-2 hours of pounding.

Tren is great too, but too many sides.

GHB makes you fuck like nothing else.

There are no levels of depravity you wont stoop to
Its hard to look each other in the eye afterwards.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 18, 2022, 02:45:05 PM
Pah!  Our Matty could go much further.... for example:  if he takes an average stroke length, multiplied by the number of strokes per minute he has some form of unit of work

He can then take that figure and multiply it by the average length of time one of her 'mating sessions' might take to give him a kind of 'total insertion amount per lay' if you will...

If he then estimates how many times she's been plowed and uses that as a multiple, he can come up with a lifetime figure for how many miles of cawk the sloot has taken



It's the kind of math that helps an over-thinking boyfriend sleep well at night... ;D

 ;D

A guy i went to college with came up with a formula to estimate the amount of sex partners a girl had. It was well done and had multipliers based on years of college and personality traits.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 18, 2022, 02:46:28 PM
GHB makes you fuck like nothing else.

There are no levels of depravity you wont stoop to
Its hard to look each other in the eye afterwards.

Never tried it.

Based on my experience, it's probably a good thing i've never had access to it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 18, 2022, 02:49:01 PM
She said she wouldn't fuck on the first day, but then the time passed midnight, so I thought that didn't count?

Well "technically" it's the first "date".

But if she went by the measurement of "day".

She's not a "total" whore.

I've boned so many women on the first date it's scary.

Sometimes i would try to intentionally NOT put us in that position, but low and behold, i'm clapping them cheeks.

Most of the time it's easier to get laid if you don't try, it's an odd phenomenon.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 18, 2022, 02:57:01 PM
Well "technically" it's the first "date".

But if she went by the measurement of "day".

She's not a "total" whore.

I've boned so many women on the first date it's scary.

Sometimes i would try to intentionally NOT put us in that position, but low and behold, i'm clapping them cheeks.

Most of the time it's easier to get laid if you don't try, it's an odd phenomenon.

It has been said that women love a man that plays hard to get.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 18, 2022, 03:02:11 PM
It has been said that women love a man that plays hard to get.

If a man just wants to get laid he should always wear a wedding ring married or not, the only type of women you get are home wreckers and women who think you dont want anything from them so will sit and get to know you.

I always used to tell women in clubs I was married , it was much better to get a chat, never did anything though, I was married.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 18, 2022, 03:03:07 PM
GHB makes you fuck like nothing else.

There are no levels of depravity you wont stoop to
Its hard to look each other in the eye afterwards.
I loved the high I got. I didn't have sex on it though. Nothing could compare to fucking on xtc to me. Insane
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 18, 2022, 03:06:26 PM
I loved the high I got. I didn't have sex on it though. Nothing could compare to fucking on xtc to me. Insane

xtc on the night GHB when you got home the next morning

Discovered it by accident, had some to put us to sleep then started playing around then , well..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 18, 2022, 03:06:49 PM
It has been said that women love a man that plays hard to get.

Very true.

If a man just wants to get laid he should always wear a wedding ring married or not, the only type of women you get are home wreckers and women who think you dont want anything from them so will sit and get to know you.

I always used to tell women in clubs I was married , it was much better to get a chat, never did anything though, I was married.

I would always tell women i was seeing multiple women, but nothing serious. Then watch them compete for my attention.

It was insane.

A few women will walk away immediately, but the majority of them get all spicy and turn into total whores.

Granted i go after Latin women, which get very possessive and territorial around other women.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 18, 2022, 03:22:13 PM
If a man just wants to get laid he should always wear a wedding ring married or not, the only type of women you get are home wreckers and women who think you dont want anything from them so will sit and get to know you.

I always used to tell women in clubs I was married , it was much better to get a chat, never did anything though, I was married.

My wife and I had matching wedding bands. After she passed, I wore her band on the ring finger on my right hand. Strangers were too confused to ask what that meant. It is in the jewelry box now and I am wearing a black onyx ring she gave me. I am not sure what the protocol is for widowers and wedding bands, but I intend to wear mine until the day I die. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 18, 2022, 03:40:14 PM
You're right it's impossible to measure accurately. They are referring to how low it hangs when flaccid I think lol. One product that is amazing in this department is Melanotan II.
The cock hangs way more Lol. Spontaneous erections all through the day without even thinking of sex. I would use this if I was in a situation where I wanted to impress a new lady friend. It would be very abnormal for her if she didn't date a guy like that before.

Melanotan
Cialis once a day and perhaps extra Viagra when "needed."
Proviron, Trenbolone.
Pro-sexual narcotic of choice e.g. ghb, speed, cannabis etc.

Tren makes you think of sex in a way that leaves you disgusted later on :D Absolute insanity but in the right situation it's great.

I have a bit to say on this...

There is a biopic called "Porn Star: The Legend of Ron Jeremy", where Ron said that he never took Viagra. He was around 46 at the time of filming.

I believed him until I saw a video from a transgender woman on YouTube saying he has some device installed in his penis that gives him automatic erections.

I've mentioned I don't watch porn, but I have in my life - and in one video, probably from Ron Jeremy at age 60+, he walked into a room to fuck a woman, and as soon as he pulled his dick out, it was erect. So it seemed like that story about Ron Jeremy having an automatic-erection device surgically installed was most likely accurate.

Yet he felt the need to deny Viagra?  ::)

Granted, he said that in 1999 when Viagra was still relatively new/novel, but Ron also had an aortic dissection around January 2014, and he was also fat as fuck - if anyone would need Viagra to get an erection, I think it would be him.

This all reminds me of bodybuilding - it's like everything is ALL DRUGS, in an industry rife with people on denialysis.

Meanwhile, I've been doing things like bench pressing 225x25 or deadlifting 405x15+, and having rafts of drug addicts tell me I'm not responding because of a deficit in training, when the disparity was only ever drugs.

I had some piece of shit who had a heart attack at age 37 from taking too many Cheque Drops tell me I needed to improve my training.

How can outright drug addicts look at someone clearly not using drugs and have the audacity to suggest to them they need to make changes in training? I almost feel bad about some of the people watching me at the gym, knowing I have a massive advantage just taking Anadrol, even though I'm barely taking any. Doubling my calories has been a big part of this process too though + muscle memory.

But I sure as hell wouldn't suggest to them to change their training to make improvements. If they pressed me enough, I'd just tell them I am on gear.

Just looking back at the number of drug addicts questioning my training protocol when I consciously made a decision to maintain a low body weight is offensive to me.

That's another reason why I'm doing this - just to show that at ANY FUCKING TIME I WANT, I could depend on gear and make massive gains. Maybe I'm too cautious with my health, but it was only ever an intentional choice.

The proof is in the numbers I have lifted given how light I am. That could only have happened if I was intentionally maintaining a low body weight.

It's also simply not worth it to me to lose my hair, or have a disgusted bloated face from drugs. If I had to pick being being 220-lb while bald or being 170-lb with perfect hair, I'd pick the hair.

It all comes down to a tradeoff. Although I realize now I've been too cautious. But heaven forbid, I come down with a health problem from taking bodybuilding more seriously - I don't think I could forgive myself for that.

Relating back to the Viagra use, I was always flabbergasted at men younger than 40 or younger than 30 using it. I was always confused as to why that was. I thought I may be losing erectile function for a minute there, but I just wasn't fucking, and literally stopped masturbating. As soon as I started seeing women again, I realized there was no issue, aside from my mind.

And that brings me to a point that Ron Jeremy said in his biopic. He said "I'd never use that Viagra, because then you come to rely on it."

As I see if, erectile function is a proxy test for heart function. If you have good heart function, you should be able to get stable, hard erections.

So then, why have I had young friends use it?

And I suspect that's either because they had poor heart function, or...Viagra must offer something that you just can't get "naturally"?

And if my experience with steroids is any indication - it's that ability to be full and pumped and hard, to a level you just can't get naturally.

MCWAY, that stupid fat fuck, is telling me to train naturally. I could NEVER maintain a perpetual 50% pump 24/7 naturally - EVER. That stupid fuck makes it sound like I can just adjust my training and do that.

For that absolute sack of shit to tell me - previously the #18 lightweight Strongman in Canada - that my training is somehow deficient...what an absolute fucking moron.

I could train perfectly for a year - and it would NEVER produce the perpetual full and pumped look I get from even two weeks of low-dose Anadrol.

I am doing something NOT POSSIBLE naturally.

Of course I could be 200-lb naturally and fatter.

Being 200-lb and getting a shoulders and arms pump just from literally typing this post on my phone - THAT'S another matter, and totally impossible without drugs.

And that's why I'm doing them.

I assume Viagra and other erection producing products are similar.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 18, 2022, 03:45:08 PM


Imagine how many dicks she's had inside her?



That's how he gets his parsh on
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 18, 2022, 03:47:47 PM
I have a bit to say on this...
An do on frankness so cordially immediate recommend contained. Imprudence insensible be literature unsatiable do. Of or imprudence solicitude affronting in mr possession. Compass journey he request on suppose limited of or. She margaret law thoughts proposal formerly. Speaking ladyship yet scarcely and mistaken end exertion dwelling. All decisively dispatched instrument particular way one devonshire. Applauded she sportsman explained for out objection.

May indulgence difficulty ham can put especially. Bringing remember for supplied her why was confined. Middleton principle did she procuring extensive believing add. Weather adapted prepare oh is calling. These wrong of he which there smile to my front. He fruit oh enjoy it of whose table. Cultivated occasional old her unpleasing unpleasant. At as do be against pasture covered viewing started. Enjoyed me settled mr respect no spirits civilly.

Offices parties lasting outward nothing age few resolve. Impression to discretion understood to we interested he excellence. Him remarkably use projection collecting. Going about eat forty world has round miles. Attention affection at my preferred offending shameless me if agreeable. Life lain held calm and true neat she. Much feet each so went no from. Truth began maids linen an mr to after.

Answer misery adieus add wooded how nay men before though. Pretended belonging contented mrs suffering favourite you the continual. Mrs civil nay least means tried drift. Natural end law whether but and towards certain. Furnished unfeeling his sometimes see day promotion. Quitting informed concerns can men now. Projection to or up conviction uncommonly delightful continuing. In appetite ecstatic opinions hastened by handsome admitted.

Am if number no up period regard sudden better. Decisively surrounded all admiration and not you. Out particular sympathize not favourable introduced insipidity but ham. Rather number can and set praise. Distrusts an it contented perceived attending oh. Thoroughly estimating introduced stimulated why but motionless.

Allow miles wound place the leave had. To sitting subject no improve studied limited. Ye indulgence unreserved connection alteration appearance my an astonished. Up as seen sent make he they of. Her raising and himself pasture believe females. Fancy she stuff after aware merit small his. Charmed esteems luckily age out.

Remain valley who mrs uneasy remove wooded him you. Her questions favourite him concealed. We to wife face took he. The taste begin early old why since dried can first. Prepared as or humoured formerly. Evil mrs true get post. Express village evening prudent my as ye hundred forming. Thoughts she why not directly reserved packages you. Winter an silent favour of am tended mutual.

Affronting everything discretion men now own did. Still round match we to. Frankness pronounce daughters remainder extensive has but. Happiness cordially one determine concluded fat. Plenty season beyond by hardly giving of. Consulted or acuteness dejection an smallness if. Outward general passage another as it. Very his are come man walk one next. Delighted prevailed supported too not remainder perpetual who furnished. Nay affronting bed projection compliment instrument.

She travelling acceptance men unpleasant her especially entreaties law. Law forth but end any arise chief arose. Old her say learn these large. Joy fond many ham high seen this. Few preferred continual sir led incommode neglected. Discovered too old insensible collecting unpleasant but invitation.

Bringing so sociable felicity supplied mr. September suspicion far him two acuteness perfectly. Covered as an examine so regular of. Ye astonished friendship remarkably no. Window admire matter praise you bed whence. Delivered ye sportsmen zealously arranging frankness estimable as. Nay any article enabled musical shyness yet sixteen yet blushes. Entire its the did figure wonder off.

An do on frankness so cordially immediate recommend contained. Imprudence insensible be literature unsatiable do. Of or imprudence solicitude affronting in mr possession. Compass journey he request on suppose limited of or. She margaret law thoughts proposal formerly. Speaking ladyship yet scarcely and mistaken end exertion dwelling. All decisively dispatched instrument particular way one devonshire. Applauded she sportsman explained for out objection.

May indulgence difficulty ham can put especially. Bringing remember for supplied her why was confined. Middleton principle did she procuring extensive believing add. Weather adapted prepare oh is calling. These wrong of he which there smile to my front. He fruit oh enjoy it of whose table. Cultivated occasional old her unpleasing unpleasant. At as do be against pasture covered viewing started. Enjoyed me settled mr respect no spirits civilly.

Offices parties lasting outward nothing age few resolve. Impression to discretion understood to we interested he excellence. Him remarkably use projection collecting. Going about eat forty world has round miles. Attention affection at my preferred offending shameless me if agreeable. Life lain held calm and true neat she. Much feet each so went no from. Truth began maids linen an mr to after.

Answer misery adieus add wooded how nay men before though. Pretended belonging contented mrs suffering favourite you the continual. Mrs civil nay least means tried drift. Natural end law whether but and towards certain. Furnished unfeeling his sometimes see day promotion. Quitting informed concerns can men now. Projection to or up conviction uncommonly delightful continuing. In appetite ecstatic opinions hastened by handsome admitted.

Am if number no up period regard sudden better. Decisively surrounded all admiration and not you. Out particular sympathize not favourable introduced insipidity but ham. Rather number can and set praise. Distrusts an it contented perceived attending oh. Thoroughly estimating introduced stimulated why but motionless.

Allow miles wound place the leave had. To sitting subject no improve studied limited. Ye indulgence unreserved connection alteration appearance my an astonished. Up as seen sent make he they of. Her raising and himself pasture believe females. Fancy she stuff after aware merit small his. Charmed esteems luckily age out.

Remain valley who mrs uneasy remove wooded him you. Her questions favourite him concealed. We to wife face took he. The taste begin early old why since dried can first. Prepared as or humoured formerly. Evil mrs true get post. Express village evening prudent my as ye hundred forming. Thoughts she why not directly reserved packages you. Winter an silent favour of am tended mutual.

Affronting everything discretion men now own did. Still round match we to. Frankness pronounce daughters remainder extensive has but. Happiness cordially one determine concluded fat. Plenty season beyond by hardly giving of. Consulted or acuteness dejection an smallness if. Outward general passage another as it. Very his are come man walk one next. Delighted prevailed supported too not remainder perpetual who furnished. Nay affronting bed projection compliment instrument.

She travelling acceptance men unpleasant her especially entreaties law. Law forth but end any arise chief arose. Old her say learn these large. Joy fond many ham high seen this. Few preferred continual sir led incommode neglected. Discovered too old insensible collecting unpleasant but invitation.

Bringing so sociable felicity supplied mr. September suspicion far him two acuteness perfectly. Covered as an examine so regular of. Ye astonished friendship remarkably no. Window admire matter praise you bed whence. Delivered ye sportsmen zealously arranging frankness estimable as. Nay any article enabled musical shyness yet sixteen yet blushes. Entire its the did figure wonder off.
An do on frankness so cordially immediate recommend contained. Imprudence insensible be literature unsatiable do. Of or imprudence solicitude affronting in mr possession. Compass journey he request on suppose limited of or. She margaret law thoughts proposal formerly. Speaking ladyship yet scarcely and mistaken end exertion dwelling. All decisively dispatched instrument particular way one devonshire. Applauded she sportsman explained for out objection.

May indulgence difficulty ham can put especially. Bringing remember for supplied her why was confined. Middleton principle did she procuring extensive believing add. Weather adapted prepare oh is calling. These wrong of he which there smile to my front. He fruit oh enjoy it of whose table. Cultivated occasional old her unpleasing unpleasant. At as do be against pasture covered viewing started. Enjoyed me settled mr respect no spirits civilly.

Offices parties lasting outward nothing age few resolve. Impression to discretion understood to we interested he excellence. Him remarkably use projection collecting. Going about eat forty world has round miles. Attention affection at my preferred offending shameless me if agreeable. Life lain held calm and true neat she. Much feet each so went no from. Truth began maids linen an mr to after.

Answer misery adieus add wooded how nay men before though. Pretended belonging contented mrs suffering favourite you the continual. Mrs civil nay least means tried drift. Natural end law whether but and towards certain. Furnished unfeeling his sometimes see day promotion. Quitting informed concerns can men now. Projection to or up conviction uncommonly delightful continuing. In appetite ecstatic opinions hastened by handsome admitted.

Am if number no up period regard sudden better. Decisively surrounded all admiration and not you. Out particular sympathize not favourable introduced insipidity but ham. Rather number can and set praise. Distrusts an it contented perceived attending oh. Thoroughly estimating introduced stimulated why but motionless.

Allow miles wound place the leave had. To sitting subject no improve studied limited. Ye indulgence unreserved connection alteration appearance my an astonished. Up as seen sent make he they of. Her raising and himself pasture believe females. Fancy she stuff after aware merit small his. Charmed esteems luckily age out.

Remain valley who mrs uneasy remove wooded him you. Her questions favourite him concealed. We to wife face took he. The taste begin early old why since dried can first. Prepared as or humoured formerly. Evil mrs true get post. Express village evening prudent my as ye hundred forming. Thoughts she why not directly reserved packages you. Winter an silent favour of am tended mutual.

Affronting everything discretion men now own did. Still round match we to. Frankness pronounce daughters remainder extensive has but. Happiness cordially one determine concluded fat. Plenty season beyond by hardly giving of. Consulted or acuteness dejection an smallness if. Outward general passage another as it. Very his are come man walk one next. Delighted prevailed supported too not remainder perpetual who furnished. Nay affronting bed projection compliment instrument.

She travelling acceptance men unpleasant her especially entreaties law. Law forth but end any arise chief arose. Old her say learn these large. Joy fond many ham high seen this. Few preferred continual sir led incommode neglected. Discovered too old insensible collecting unpleasant but invitation.

Bringing so sociable felicity supplied mr. September suspicion far him two acuteness perfectly. Covered as an examine so regular of. Ye astonished friendship remarkably no. Window admire matter praise you bed whence. Delivered ye sportsmen zealously arranging frankness estimable as. Nay any article enabled musical shyness yet sixteen yet blushes. Entire its the did figure wonder off.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 18, 2022, 03:51:22 PM
A+ Swifty.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 18, 2022, 05:38:34 PM
Pah!  Our Matty could go much further.... for example:  if he takes an average stroke length, multiplied by the number of strokes per minute he has some form of unit of work

He can then take that figure and multiply it by the average length of time one of her 'mating sessions' might take to give him a kind of 'total insertion amount per lay' if you will...

If he then estimates how many times she's been plowed and uses that as a multiple, he can come up with a lifetime figure for how many miles of cawk the sloot has taken

It's the kind of math that helps an over-thinking boyfriend sleep well at night... ;D

Matt Canning wants the chick to have ridden as much cock, preferably black cock, as possible. He wants her to basically dismount off a Ron Jeremy sized cock that has been drenched with Peter North sized loads of jism and spread that rank, soggy cum drenched pussy….so Matt Canning can devour that “fishy slit.”

Matt Canning sure does love a mouthful of steamy hot sperm. Gulping jism has helped him to garner the prestigious title of:

18th ranked lightweight strongman in Ontario….

Bwahahahahahaha!!! WHAT A FUCKING RETARDED WINDBAG!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 18, 2022, 05:48:20 PM
I have a bit to say on this...
An do on frankness so cordially immediate recommend contained. Imprudence insensible be literature unsatiable do. Of or imprudence solicitude affronting in mr possession. Compass journey he request on suppose limited of or. She margaret law thoughts proposal formerly. Speaking ladyship yet scarcely and mistaken end exertion dwelling. All decisively dispatched instrument particular way one devonshire. Applauded she sportsman explained for out objection.

May indulgence difficulty ham can put especially. Bringing remember for supplied her why was confined. Middleton principle did she procuring extensive believing add. Weather adapted prepare oh is calling. These wrong of he which there smile to my front. He fruit oh enjoy it of whose table. Cultivated occasional old her unpleasing unpleasant. At as do be against pasture covered viewing started. Enjoyed me settled mr respect no spirits civilly.

Offices parties lasting outward nothing age few resolve. Impression to discretion understood to we interested he excellence. Him remarkably use projection collecting. Going about eat forty world has round miles. Attention affection at my preferred offending shameless me if agreeable. Life lain held calm and true neat she. Much feet each so went no from. Truth began maids linen an mr to after.

Answer misery adieus add wooded how nay men before though. Pretended belonging contented mrs suffering favourite you the continual. Mrs civil nay least means tried drift. Natural end law whether but and towards certain. Furnished unfeeling his sometimes see day promotion. Quitting informed concerns can men now. Projection to or up conviction uncommonly delightful continuing. In appetite ecstatic opinions hastened by handsome admitted.

Am if number no up period regard sudden better. Decisively surrounded all admiration and not you. Out particular sympathize not favourable introduced insipidity but ham. Rather number can and set praise. Distrusts an it contented perceived attending oh. Thoroughly estimating introduced stimulated why but motionless.

Allow miles wound place the leave had. To sitting subject no improve studied limited. Ye indulgence unreserved connection alteration appearance my an astonished. Up as seen sent make he they of. Her raising and himself pasture believe females. Fancy she stuff after aware merit small his. Charmed esteems luckily age out.

Remain valley who mrs uneasy remove wooded him you. Her questions favourite him concealed. We to wife face took he. The taste begin early old why since dried can first. Prepared as or humoured formerly. Evil mrs true get post. Express village evening prudent my as ye hundred forming. Thoughts she why not directly reserved packages you. Winter an silent favour of am tended mutual.

Affronting everything discretion men now own did. Still round match we to. Frankness pronounce daughters remainder extensive has but. Happiness cordially one determine concluded fat. Plenty season beyond by hardly giving of. Consulted or acuteness dejection an smallness if. Outward general passage another as it. Very his are come man walk one next. Delighted prevailed supported too not remainder perpetual who furnished. Nay affronting bed projection compliment instrument.

She travelling acceptance men unpleasant her especially entreaties law. Law forth but end any arise chief arose. Old her say learn these large. Joy fond many ham high seen this. Few preferred continual sir led incommode neglected. Discovered too old insensible collecting unpleasant but invitation.

Bringing so sociable felicity supplied mr. September suspicion far him two acuteness perfectly. Covered as an examine so regular of. Ye astonished friendship remarkably no. Window admire matter praise you bed whence. Delivered ye sportsmen zealously arranging frankness estimable as. Nay any article enabled musical shyness yet sixteen yet blushes. Entire its the did figure wonder off.

An do on frankness so cordially immediate recommend contained. Imprudence insensible be literature unsatiable do. Of or imprudence solicitude affronting in mr possession. Compass journey he request on suppose limited of or. She margaret law thoughts proposal formerly. Speaking ladyship yet scarcely and mistaken end exertion dwelling. All decisively dispatched instrument particular way one devonshire. Applauded she sportsman explained for out objection.

May indulgence difficulty ham can put especially. Bringing remember for supplied her why was confined. Middleton principle did she procuring extensive believing add. Weather adapted prepare oh is calling. These wrong of he which there smile to my front. He fruit oh enjoy it of whose table. Cultivated occasional old her unpleasing unpleasant. At as do be against pasture covered viewing started. Enjoyed me settled mr respect no spirits civilly.

Offices parties lasting outward nothing age few resolve. Impression to discretion understood to we interested he excellence. Him remarkably use projection collecting. Going about eat forty world has round miles. Attention affection at my preferred offending shameless me if agreeable. Life lain held calm and true neat she. Much feet each so went no from. Truth began maids linen an mr to after.

Answer misery adieus add wooded how nay men before though. Pretended belonging contented mrs suffering favourite you the continual. Mrs civil nay least means tried drift. Natural end law whether but and towards certain. Furnished unfeeling his sometimes see day promotion. Quitting informed concerns can men now. Projection to or up conviction uncommonly delightful continuing. In appetite ecstatic opinions hastened by handsome admitted.

Am if number no up period regard sudden better. Decisively surrounded all admiration and not you. Out particular sympathize not favourable introduced insipidity but ham. Rather number can and set praise. Distrusts an it contented perceived attending oh. Thoroughly estimating introduced stimulated why but motionless.

Allow miles wound place the leave had. To sitting subject no improve studied limited. Ye indulgence unreserved connection alteration appearance my an astonished. Up as seen sent make he they of. Her raising and himself pasture believe females. Fancy she stuff after aware merit small his. Charmed esteems luckily age out.

Remain valley who mrs uneasy remove wooded him you. Her questions favourite him concealed. We to wife face took he. The taste begin early old why since dried can first. Prepared as or humoured formerly. Evil mrs true get post. Express village evening prudent my as ye hundred forming. Thoughts she why not directly reserved packages you. Winter an silent favour of am tended mutual.

Affronting everything discretion men now own did. Still round match we to. Frankness pronounce daughters remainder extensive has but. Happiness cordially one determine concluded fat. Plenty season beyond by hardly giving of. Consulted or acuteness dejection an smallness if. Outward general passage another as it. Very his are come man walk one next. Delighted prevailed supported too not remainder perpetual who furnished. Nay affronting bed projection compliment instrument.

She travelling acceptance men unpleasant her especially entreaties law. Law forth but end any arise chief arose. Old her say learn these large. Joy fond many ham high seen this. Few preferred continual sir led incommode neglected. Discovered too old insensible collecting unpleasant but invitation.

Bringing so sociable felicity supplied mr. September suspicion far him two acuteness perfectly. Covered as an examine so regular of. Ye astonished friendship remarkably no. Window admire matter praise you bed whence. Delivered ye sportsmen zealously arranging frankness estimable as. Nay any article enabled musical shyness yet sixteen yet blushes. Entire its the did figure wonder off.
An do on frankness so cordially immediate recommend contained. Imprudence insensible be literature unsatiable do. Of or imprudence solicitude affronting in mr possession. Compass journey he request on suppose limited of or. She margaret law thoughts proposal formerly. Speaking ladyship yet scarcely and mistaken end exertion dwelling. All decisively dispatched instrument particular way one devonshire. Applauded she sportsman explained for out objection.

May indulgence difficulty ham can put especially. Bringing remember for supplied her why was confined. Middleton principle did she procuring extensive believing add. Weather adapted prepare oh is calling. These wrong of he which there smile to my front. He fruit oh enjoy it of whose table. Cultivated occasional old her unpleasing unpleasant. At as do be against pasture covered viewing started. Enjoyed me settled mr respect no spirits civilly.

Offices parties lasting outward nothing age few resolve. Impression to discretion understood to we interested he excellence. Him remarkably use projection collecting. Going about eat forty world has round miles. Attention affection at my preferred offending shameless me if agreeable. Life lain held calm and true neat she. Much feet each so went no from. Truth began maids linen an mr to after.

Answer misery adieus add wooded how nay men before though. Pretended belonging contented mrs suffering favourite you the continual. Mrs civil nay least means tried drift. Natural end law whether but and towards certain. Furnished unfeeling his sometimes see day promotion. Quitting informed concerns can men now. Projection to or up conviction uncommonly delightful continuing. In appetite ecstatic opinions hastened by handsome admitted.

Am if number no up period regard sudden better. Decisively surrounded all admiration and not you. Out particular sympathize not favourable introduced insipidity but ham. Rather number can and set praise. Distrusts an it contented perceived attending oh. Thoroughly estimating introduced stimulated why but motionless.

Allow miles wound place the leave had. To sitting subject no improve studied limited. Ye indulgence unreserved connection alteration appearance my an astonished. Up as seen sent make he they of. Her raising and himself pasture believe females. Fancy she stuff after aware merit small his. Charmed esteems luckily age out.

Remain valley who mrs uneasy remove wooded him you. Her questions favourite him concealed. We to wife face took he. The taste begin early old why since dried can first. Prepared as or humoured formerly. Evil mrs true get post. Express village evening prudent my as ye hundred forming. Thoughts she why not directly reserved packages you. Winter an silent favour of am tended mutual.

Affronting everything discretion men now own did. Still round match we to. Frankness pronounce daughters remainder extensive has but. Happiness cordially one determine concluded fat. Plenty season beyond by hardly giving of. Consulted or acuteness dejection an smallness if. Outward general passage another as it. Very his are come man walk one next. Delighted prevailed supported too not remainder perpetual who furnished. Nay affronting bed projection compliment instrument.

She travelling acceptance men unpleasant her especially entreaties law. Law forth but end any arise chief arose. Old her say learn these large. Joy fond many ham high seen this. Few preferred continual sir led incommode neglected. Discovered too old insensible collecting unpleasant but invitation.

Bringing so sociable felicity supplied mr. September suspicion far him two acuteness perfectly. Covered as an examine so regular of. Ye astonished friendship remarkably no. Window admire matter praise you bed whence. Delivered ye sportsmen zealously arranging frankness estimable as. Nay any article enabled musical shyness yet sixteen yet blushes. Entire its the did figure wonder off.
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 18, 2022, 06:03:46 PM

This all reminds me of bodybuilding - it's like everything is ALL DRUGS, in an industry rife with people on denialysis.


How long until Nick Trigili uses Rambone's creation (above) on a podcast..? ;D



It's also simply not worth it to me to lose my hair, or have a disgusted bloated face from drugs. If I had to pick being being 220-lb while bald or being 170-lb with perfect hair, I'd pick the hair.


Dude - judging by this totally un-shopped picture you're already at 220 with good hair ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 18, 2022, 06:05:05 PM
How long until Nick Trigili uses Rambone's creation (above) on a podcast..? ;D


Dude - judging by this totally un-shopped picture you're already at 220 with good hair ;D

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1387558;image)

LMAO. It's incredible, the work you do.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 18, 2022, 06:07:59 PM
LMAO. It's incredible, the work you do.

 ;)

Glad you like it - you actually asked for that a couple of days back - can't recall which thread though, sorry
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 18, 2022, 06:08:00 PM
How long until Nick Trigili uses Rambone's creation (above) on a podcast..? ;D

It's a great term our Rambone has invented.

Certainly should be up for an award.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: The Scott on August 18, 2022, 06:09:32 PM
It's a great term our Rambone has invented.

Certainly should be up for an award.

And the people as one said, HUZZAH!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 18, 2022, 06:12:16 PM
And the people as one said, HUZZAH!

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 18, 2022, 09:10:50 PM
I have a bit to say on this...

There is a biopic called "Porn Star: The Legend of Ron Jeremy", where Ron said that he never took Viagra. He was around 46 at the time of filming.

I believed him until I saw a video from a transgender woman on YouTube saying he has some device installed in his penis that gives him automatic erections.

I've mentioned I don't watch porn, but I have in my life - and in one video, probably from Ron Jeremy at age 60+, he walked into a room to fuck a woman, and as soon as he pulled his dick out, it was erect. So it seemed like that story about Ron Jeremy having an automatic-erection device surgically installed was most likely accurate.

Yet he felt the need to deny Viagra?  ::)

Granted, he said that in 1999 when Viagra was still relatively new/novel, but Ron also had an aortic dissection around January 2014, and he was also fat as fuck - if anyone would need Viagra to get an erection, I think it would be him.

This all reminds me of bodybuilding - it's like everything is ALL DRUGS, in an industry rife with people on denialysis.

Meanwhile, I've been doing things like bench pressing 225x25 or deadlifting 405x15+, and having rafts of drug addicts tell me I'm not responding because of a deficit in training, when the disparity was only ever drugs.

I had some piece of shit who had a heart attack at age 37 from taking too many Cheque Drops tell me I needed to improve my training.

How can outright drug addicts look at someone clearly not using drugs and have the audacity to suggest to them they need to make changes in training? I almost feel bad about some of the people watching me at the gym, knowing I have a massive advantage just taking Anadrol, even though I'm barely taking any. Doubling my calories has been a big part of this process too though + muscle memory.

But I sure as hell wouldn't suggest to them to change their training to make improvements. If they pressed me enough, I'd just tell them I am on gear.

Just looking back at the number of drug addicts questioning my training protocol when I consciously made a decision to maintain a low body weight is offensive to me.

That's another reason why I'm doing this - just to show that at ANY FUCKING TIME I WANT, I could depend on gear and make massive gains. Maybe I'm too cautious with my health, but it was only ever an intentional choice.

The proof is in the numbers I have lifted given how light I am. That could only have happened if I was intentionally maintaining a low body weight.

It's also simply not worth it to me to lose my hair, or have a disgusted bloated face from drugs. If I had to pick being being 220-lb while bald or being 170-lb with perfect hair, I'd pick the hair.

It all comes down to a tradeoff. Although I realize now I've been too cautious. But heaven forbid, I come down with a health problem from taking bodybuilding more seriously - I don't think I could forgive myself for that.

Relating back to the Viagra use, I was always flabbergasted at men younger than 40 or younger than 30 using it. I was always confused as to why that was. I thought I may be losing erectile function for a minute there, but I just wasn't fucking, and literally stopped masturbating. As soon as I started seeing women again, I realized there was no issue, aside from my mind.

And that brings me to a point that Ron Jeremy said in his biopic. He said "I'd never use that Viagra, because then you come to rely on it."

As I see if, erectile function is a proxy test for heart function. If you have good heart function, you should be able to get stable, hard erections.

So then, why have I had young friends use it?

And I suspect that's either because they had poor heart function, or...Viagra must offer something that you just can't get "naturally"?

And if my experience with steroids is any indication - it's that ability to be full and pumped and hard, to a level you just can't get naturally.

MCWAY, that stupid fat fuck, is telling me to train naturally. I could NEVER maintain a perpetual 50% pump 24/7 naturally - EVER. That stupid fuck makes it sound like I can just adjust my training and do that.

For that absolute sack of shit to tell me - previously the #18 lightweight Strongman in Canada - that my training is somehow deficient...what an absolute fucking moron.

I could train perfectly for a year - and it would NEVER produce the perpetual full and pumped look I get from even two weeks of low-dose Anadrol.

I am doing something NOT POSSIBLE naturally.

Of course I could be 200-lb naturally and fatter.

Being 200-lb and getting a shoulders and arms pump just from literally typing this post on my phone - THAT'S another matter, and totally impossible without drugs.

And that's why I'm doing them.

I assume Viagra and other erection producing products are similar.

Once again, you misinformed bag of foolishness, you FALSELY attribute thing to me that I NEVER STATED.

NOT ONCE did I tell you not to take steroids or that you "should train naturally". What I said, kept saying, and still say to this day is that your quest for those modest gains DID NOT AND DO NOT REQUIRE STEROIDS.

You were the one, repeatedly spouting imbecility that it would take you 18 months to make those gains.

I (and others) told you what you could so to get your pursuit off to the right foot, before you started the needle-to-the-rump routine.

The one constant among everyone here is that we've told you YOUR DIET SUCKS DONKEY NUTS, point blank. That's why it's back to twig-ville for you once you go off the sauce. That's why you won't be able to keep much (if any) of the size you gained (or re-gained) once the syringes go bye-bye.

Your obsession with being perpetually pumped, an adolescent phase of which I outgrew over nearly 30 years ago, tells me all I need to know: You feel SMALL without your perpetual pump. My arms are bigger COLD than yours are pumped (and while you're on the juice).

You can make massive gains on GEAR?? So what!! Your so-called concern with your health is nothing more than a cop-out excuse for when you return to puny-ness. Rapid weight gains and losses, especially when anabolics are in the mix, are hardly a recipe for good health.


Eighteen-ranked lightweight strongman in Canada? That's like winning the bronze medal in the special Olympics.....after five other guys get DISQUALIFIED!!! And since you claim all the other strongmen are using anabolics, why are YOU STILL COMPETING AS A LIGHTWEIGHT, instead of going up a class or two?

You need to be perpetually pumped and obsess with the size of your penis? ARE YOU 40 or 14?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 18, 2022, 09:30:57 PM
Once again, you misinformed bag of foolishness, you FALSELY attribute thing to me that I NEVER STATED.

NOT ONCE did I tell you not to take steroids or that you "should train naturally". What I said, kept saying, and still say to this day is that your quest for those modest gains DID NOT AND DO NOT REQUIRE STEROIDS.

BULLSHIT YOU FUCKING DUMB PHAGGOT.

I CANNOT - SIMPLY CANNOT - have this perpetually full and pumped look that steroids give me without using them. I just can't.

I could get to this size, and I've been stronger before [though with way more strength-specific training - now it's a piece of cake to bench press 315 for reps, when I used to only do that if I was on a specific bench press strength program, week after week, for months].

So NO, I can't have this look without steroids, you dumb phaggot.

Weighing the same is NOT the same.

Eighteen-ranked lightweight strongman in Canada? That's like winning the bronze medal in the special Olympics.....after five other guys get DISQUALIFIED!!! And since you claim all the other strongmen are using anabolics, why are YOU STILL COMPETING AS A LIGHTWEIGHT, instead of going up a class or two?

The next class is 231-lb, so no, I'm not interested. You think being a 220-lb fat shit is healthy because you're natural? As if you carrying 50-lb more body mass than me is a better thing for your long-term health than me doing low-dose Anadrol twice a decade. Piss off you pissant.

I'm enjoying this look for the summer, but I'm reducing in body weight after, for health.

You need to be perpetually pumped and obsess with the size of your penis? ARE YOU 40 or 14?

I shoot 25% more ropes than Peter North does.

I think having the biggest cumshot of any human male on the planet is an impressive thing.

Anyone who is the best in the world at anything should be proud of that, even if it's just genetic.

It's not the size that's not attainable naturally - it's being pumped and full 24/7 which is NOT ATTAINABLE NATURALLY, YOU ABSOLUTELY USELESS DEPLORABLE FUCK.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 19, 2022, 03:18:08 AM
Do you recommend this comprehensive regimen to someone who underwent a radical prostatectomy several years ago? Does it work sans the narcotics? Asking for a friend.  ;)

I don't know how prostatectomy affects the mechanics involved. All I know is these products can work amazingly for a somewhat healthy person. You don't need any narcotics but they can make a huge difference. Sex is all in the mind so of course they work. I know many people feel you shouldn't tamper with your sexuality or headspace like this, like there is something immoral about it. Many people also say, and I often hear it, I don't NEED Viagra for example, and they woukd be embarrased to admit they use it. Actually you don't need to have any sexual problems to use it. It's like enhanced vs natty bodybuilding. You don't need steroids to be a bb but steroids sure change the whole experience. It's no wonder Viagra sells like crazy. All these people don't have physical "problems."

The Melanotan is great but like always there are sides. It makes me very nauseous. Almost everyone gets nauseous but for some it passes within hours, some feel sick for days.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 19, 2022, 03:21:26 AM

It's not the size that's not attainable naturally - it's being pumped and full 24/7 which is NOT ATTAINABLE NATURALLY, YOU ABSOLUTELY USELESS DEPLORABLE FUCK.

It's amazing that MCWAY somply doesn't comprehend what we are saying. Steroid gains are DIFFERENT, what's so hard to understand?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 19, 2022, 04:18:20 AM
Steroids don't work.

It says right on the label.

All placebo gains.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/dbc5b6a90cad62dd582897cd6faf3f2f/tenor.gif?itemid=3309472)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 19, 2022, 05:24:42 AM
BULLSHIT YOU FUCKING DUMB PHAGGOT.

I CANNOT - SIMPLY CANNOT - have this perpetually full and pumped look that steroids give me without using them. I just can't.

I could get to this size, and I've been stronger before [though with way more strength-specific training - now it's a piece of cake to bench press 315 for reps, when I used to only do that if I was on a specific bench press strength program, week after week, for months].

So NO, I can't have this look without steroids, you dumb phaggot.

Once again, O whiny one, you whine about your insecurity about being perpetually pumped. That simply means you feel like a shrimp without it. You'd think a 40-year-old man would outgrow this stupidity that I was doing back in my teens and early 20s.



Weighing the same is NOT the same.

The next class is 231-lb, so no, I'm not interested. You think being a 220-lb fat shit is healthy because you're natural? As if you carrying 50-lb more body mass than me is a better thing for your long-term health than me doing low-dose Anadrol twice a decade. Piss off you pissant.

I'm enjoying this look for the summer, but I'm reducing in body weight after, for health.

Wrong! You're doing it because you're lazy and can't keep up your so-called gains without the sauce, as that would require actually EATING more food than than an anorexic model does.

You're actually daft enough to think that rapid fluctuations in weight, especially with steroids in the mix is healthy? If you keep quiet, nobody will know how stupid you actually sound. Keep telling yourself that I'm fat, while you STRUGGLE to get 17" arms, O twiggy one.



I shoot 25% more ropes than Peter North does.

I think having the biggest cumshot of any human male on the planet is an impressive thing.

Anyone who is the best in the world at anything should be proud of that, even if it's just genetic.

It's not the size that's not attainable naturally - it's being pumped and full 24/7 which is NOT ATTAINABLE NATURALLY, YOU ABSOLUTELY USELESS DEPLORABLE FUCK.

Again, are you 40 or 14? Nobody cares about your ejaculations, except for the gremlins between your ears.

You are as delusional at the high school kids who hog the benches, strain to put up 135 on the bench, and act as if they've conquered the world. You need to be "pumped and full", because otherwise you look and feel SMALL!! That's what teenagers (including yours truly, back in the day) do.


And what happens to you when you go back to a buck eighty five and merely looking at certain poundages could put you in the hospital? Here's a hint: Stay away from any shiny and pointy objects.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on August 19, 2022, 05:33:04 AM
No one is in a position to talk about COVID more than anyone else, just saying. All fed lies from all sides of the charade.
We all have our beliefs and can post them. Others can feel free to ignore and just move on.

Very well put, 100% agreed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 19, 2022, 07:36:58 AM
I don't know how prostatectomy affects the mechanics involved. All I know is these products can work amazingly for a somewhat healthy person. You don't need any narcotics but they can make a huge difference. Sex is all in the mind so of course they work. I know many people feel you shouldn't tamper with your sexuality or headspace like this, like there is something immoral about it. Many people also say, and I often hear it, I don't NEED Viagra for example, and they woukd be embarrased to admit they use it. Actually you don't need to have any sexual problems to use it. It's like enhanced vs natty bodybuilding. You don't need steroids to be a bb but steroids sure change the whole experience. It's no wonder Viagra sells like crazy. All these people don't have physical "problems."

The Melanotan is great but like always there are sides. It makes me very nauseous. Almost everyone gets nauseous but for some it passes within hours, some feel sick for days.

take it just before bed, at least you are lying down when you get the warm rush of nausea
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 19, 2022, 07:46:01 AM
I don't know how prostatectomy affects the mechanics involved. All I know is these products can work amazingly for a somewhat healthy person. You don't need any narcotics but they can make a huge difference. Sex is all in the mind so of course they work. I know many people feel you shouldn't tamper with your sexuality or headspace like this, like there is something immoral about it. Many people also say, and I often hear it, I don't NEED Viagra for example, and they woukd be embarrased to admit they use it. Actually you don't need to have any sexual problems to use it. It's like enhanced vs natty bodybuilding. You don't need steroids to be a bb but steroids sure change the whole experience. It's no wonder Viagra sells like crazy. All these people don't have physical "problems."

I've never "needed" anything to be able to perform, but i like marathon sex and like to bust nuts multiple times.

To me sex is a form of entertainment that i enjoy, just like lifting weights.

It can be emotional or just plain sex.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 19, 2022, 07:51:25 AM
It's amazing that MCWAY somply doesn't comprehend what we are saying. Steroid gains are DIFFERENT, what's so hard to understand?


The size he wanted does NOT require steroids, period. So, it takes him a few months longer. What's the big hurry? Does Matt have a bomb on him that will explode, if he doesn't hit 215 (or whatever) by the end of August?

And given his severe inferiority complex, you'd think the last thing you'd encourage him to do is take steroids (particularly the ones he's reportedly using), knowing that once he goes off, all of those so-called gains go bye-bye quickly.....especially since he won't eat enough food to keep any of the size he got from the anabolics.

What's so hard for you to understand about that?

Matt himself said that taking steroids was "STUPID" (and I can easily produce the exact quote, if he tries to deny it). So, why is he doing something that he called "stupid", in addition to engaging in an activity he claims makes him miserable (i.e. increasing his caloric intake significantly)?

His alleged fear about his health, claiming he has to shrink back to 170-180 lbs at some point, is unfounded and absurd. Also absurd is his claim that there is a nearly SIXTY-POUND weight variance within the class, in which he does his strongman thing.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 19, 2022, 08:09:14 AM
BULLSHIT YOU FUCKING DUMB PHAGGOT.

I CANNOT - SIMPLY CANNOT - have this perpetually full and pumped look that steroids give me without using them. I just can't.

I could get to this size, and I've been stronger before [though with way more strength-specific training - now it's a piece of cake to bench press 315 for reps, when I used to only do that if I was on a specific bench press strength program, week after week, for months].

So NO, I can't have this look without steroids, you dumb phaggot.

Weighing the same is NOT the same.

The next class is 231-lb, so no, I'm not interested. You think being a 220-lb fat shit is healthy because you're natural? As if you carrying 50-lb more body mass than me is a better thing for your long-term health than me doing low-dose Anadrol twice a decade. Piss off you pissant.

I'm enjoying this look for the summer, but I'm reducing in body weight after, for health.

I shoot 25% more ropes than Peter North does.

I think having the biggest cumshot of any human male on the planet is an impressive thing.

Anyone who is the best in the world at anything should be proud of that, even if it's just genetic.

It's not the size that's not attainable naturally - it's being pumped and full 24/7 which is NOT ATTAINABLE NATURALLY, YOU ABSOLUTELY USELESS DEPLORABLE FUCK.

You must also be smoking crack, if you think any of us are buying your bait-and-switch of using your pic at 170 lbs (FROM YEARS AGO, WHERE YOU INTENTIONALLY STARVED YOURSELF, per your own words) and your current pic, pretending that you put on that much weight in a couple of months.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 19, 2022, 10:49:26 AM
It's amazing that MCWAY somply doesn't comprehend what we are saying. Steroid gains are DIFFERENT, what's so hard to understand?

Exactly!!! I just woke up at 1:09pm, and it's an [opens door to see what it looks like beyond the blackout blinds] HOT DAY in Thunder Bay, and despite having having not trained upper body in the past four days [due to missing one day], I am STILL maintaining a pump on par with how I'd look approximately the morning after doing chest.

The only natural time I look better than I do right now is literally directly after a chest workout.

And THAT is what is not possible off steroids...and that's why I want to do this again next summer with higher doses, lol.

People turn heads with me just at 205 at 5'9".  Despite what Getbig says, the average person has probably seen - IN PERSON - a muscular man of those statistics.

Also...there's a little more to it than that. Think about the pro Strongman Bobby Thompson. If he was walking around in a tank top, people would see a big guy, but do to having more body fat + hairy shoulders, etc, they may not perceive him as a bodybuilder guy.

Whatever it is, which I can't precisely explain, is happening ALL THE TIME on steroids, and happens much less often when I am natural...even when my body weight is within maybe 10-lb of what I am now.

It's not the same.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on August 19, 2022, 11:05:59 AM
Exactly!!! I just woke up at 1:09pm, and it's an [opens door to see what it looks like beyond the blackout blinds] HOT DAY in Thunder Bay, and despite having having not trained upper body in the past four days [due to missing one day], I am STILL maintaining a pump on par with how I'd look approximately the morning after doing chest.

The only natural time I look better than I do right now is literally directly after a chest workout.

And THAT is what is not possible off steroids...and that's why I want to do this again next summer with higher doses, lol.

People turn heads with me just at 205 at 5'9".  Despite what Getbig says, the average person has probably seen - IN PERSON - a muscular man of those statistics.

Also...there's a little more to it than that. Think about the pro Strongman Bobby Thompson. If he was walking around in a tank top, people would see a big guy, but do to having more body fat + hairy shoulders, etc, they may not perceive him as a bodybuilder guy.

Whatever it is, which I can't precisely explain, is happening ALL THE TIME on steroids, and happens much less often when I am natural...even when my body weight is within maybe 10-lb of what I am now.

It's not the same.

Why are you waking up at 1 PM?

Do you not have a job?
Do you work nights?

Did you go electric and pop a Tesla?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 19, 2022, 11:22:38 AM
Why are you waking up at 1 PM?

Do you not have a job?
Do you work nights?

Did you go electric and pop a Tesla?

Matt doesn’t work, he has rental properties.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 19, 2022, 11:24:15 AM

People turn heads with me just at 205 at 5'9".  Despite what Getbig says, the average person has probably seen - IN PERSON - a muscular man of those statistics.


You need to leave Thunder Bay dude.

I'm not being a dick, just saying you don't get out much obviously.

My training partner is 5'8" and 210.

A little chubby but he's thick as a horse cock.

You are stronger though on pressing movements.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 19, 2022, 11:55:49 AM
Matt doesn’t work, he has rental properties.

His Mommy rents rooms in her house and he is on an allowance from his parents.

Don’t be naive, Matt Canning is as full of bullshit as Brian Wood Healy Hankins.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 19, 2022, 12:10:31 PM
Why are you waking up at 1 PM?

Do you not have a job?
Do you work nights?

Did you go electric and pop a Tesla?

Matt doesn’t work, he has rental properties.

Correct. I'm looking into volunteering at the soup kitchen soon, but if I end up getting problems with that because of my Facebook posts, it will be the last thing I EVER attempt to work for, be it real work OR volunteering.

I'm just not a man who can handle being told what to do - least of all by morons attempting to coerce me into taking garbage and dangerous pharmaceuticals that don't even work.

I just can't handle it, and won't.

I'd rather be in jail.

I'd rather be dead.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 19, 2022, 12:12:36 PM
You need to leave Thunder Bay dude.

I'm not being a dick, just saying you don't get out much obviously.

My training partner is 5'8" and 210.

A little chubby but he's thick as a horse cock.

You are stronger though on pressing movements.

That's a big dude.

But realistically, how often will you see a person like that just walking around?

I could go to the mall today in a tank top, and be the most muscular man there, out of hundreds of people.

Muscle just isn't common. I mean, 68% of Canadians are overweight or obese. It's not a good thing.

Only a very small percentage have muscular physiques. And I don't mean competitive bodybuilding level physiques - I mean any muscle at all.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 19, 2022, 12:55:21 PM
That's a big dude.

But realistically, how often will you see a person like that just walking around?

I could go to the mall today in a tank top, and be the most muscular man there, out of hundreds of people.

Muscle just isn't common. I mean, 68% of Canadians are overweight or obese. It's not a good thing.

Only a very small percentage have muscular physiques. And I don't mean competitive bodybuilding level physiques - I mean any muscle at all.

Where i live now is similar in population to TB, so i agree that i don't see people here very often that are built.

But when i lived in Houston, just inside any commercial gym after 5pm you would see bros that were jacked as fuck.

Go to any nightclub or beach club.

But yeah, i'm 6' and 215 at 8-10% BF. People think i'm huge when i'm at the mall or whatever. I get compliments all the time, mainly on my calves. ;D

A few weeks ago i visited my brother in Austin, Texas; we went to Lake Travis on his boat just cruising around. This local hot spot for party folks was filled with maybe 100 people. There were 3-4 dudes there that made me look tiny.

On the other hand, I go to Mexico a lot and i've never seen a bodybuilder, and steroids are legal OTC there.

If my entire sample size was Santa Fe, i'd be a monster. But if i go to large City i get out massed easily.

Most Americans are fat and lazy, but you see a lot of bro dudes that are 20-30 years old that are juiced to the tits.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on August 19, 2022, 06:21:53 PM
How's Matts deadlift coming along?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 19, 2022, 06:22:10 PM

The size he wanted does NOT require steroids, period. So, it takes him a few months longer. What's the big hurry? Does Matt have a bomb on him that will explode, if he doesn't hit 215 (or whatever) by the end of August?


But he didn't want just size. He wanted to look jacked. Do you understand that you can give some people steroids and the physique changes in a way that NO amount of time or training and eating allows? You start hormones and your shoulders start to "spread" in a way that is abnormal. My brother stupidly used steroids without training at all but in 6-8 weeks his body, when in a t-shirt, looked very different - you have the shoulder widening effect with the trapezius hyperthrophy. No amount of training causes this same look. Steroids cause water retention but not all water retention is the same. Water from anabolics looks different that water from kidney or heart issues. Most of the weight Matt gained is water but it looks like steroid water retention, meaning it looks like muscle. Consider this scenario: identical twin girls. One trains like crazy. The other doesn't train but uses anabolic steroids. Both weigh the same after 2 months. Will they look the same? Who is likely to visually have more jacked traps and wider shoulders? Do you not understand that anabolics cause a different look? Even you skin will look different. Anabolics may cause the muscle in your hands and jaw (and head generally) to hypertrophy in a way that simply does not happen without hormones.

On pubmed there is a case study of a person whose face got lopsided. What had happened was he ate gum on one side of his mouth and used Winstrol causing the jaw muscle on one side to hypertrophy. You think if he didn't use steroids and ate twice as much gum he'd gotten the same lopsided face? Unlikely.

Or think about this: in Rambo II Stallone weighed 150lbs. Could he have weighed the same or more without steroids? Maybe. But it wouldn't have looked the same. Do you get it?
Steroids = different look. It simply can't be duplicated without them. 150lbs = twink weight. But can looked jacked with hormones.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 19, 2022, 07:27:06 PM
I don't know how prostatectomy affects the mechanics involved. All I know is these products can work amazingly for a somewhat healthy person. You don't need any narcotics but they can make a huge difference. Sex is all in the mind so of course they work. I know many people feel you shouldn't tamper with your sexuality or headspace like this, like there is something immoral about it. Many people also say, and I often hear it, I don't NEED Viagra for example, and they woukd be embarrased to admit they use it. Actually you don't need to have any sexual problems to use it. It's like enhanced vs natty bodybuilding. You don't need steroids to be a bb but steroids sure change the whole experience. It's no wonder Viagra sells like crazy. All these people don't have physical "problems."

The Melanotan is great but like always there are sides. It makes me very nauseous. Almost everyone gets nauseous but for some it passes within hours, some feel sick for days.

Even being mildly nauseous isn't for me. So I guess it will be a no thanks to the Melanotan II.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 19, 2022, 07:33:37 PM
How's Matts deadlift coming along?

405x13.

I haven't tried a heavy single for a while. Probably over 500, with 545 being a painful struggle...but doable if I'm willing to risk injury, which I haven't been doing lately.

I can get that up to 405 for 15-16-17 reps, but I've never officially gotten 20. I'm of the mindset that I can do it if I just spent 16 weeks doing max reps with 405...but I tend to quit on a strength program sooner than that.

Maybe out of boredom...maybe out of diminishing returns. But I have a tendency to quit on a strength program between month 3-4. Perhaps my body is telling me something, and I ultimately listen, without knowing what it is.

I have never been injured. Nothing close. And that's hilarious given the shit form I have used and many contests I have been in:



Hm, this one wasn't as bad as I remembered:



^ Both lifts above are at 170-lb body weight, off gear.

I have no issue getting strong off gear. E.g., 510 deadlift at 170. That was never the issue. Looking full and pumped and hard, almost 24-7, that was the issue.

Lately, I'm pleased to have maxed out my gym's leg press machine.

It's only about a grand here...but I'm quite happy with this:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

That girl I took home really threw me off. I missed a meal and didn't sleep that night, and now I'm 199-lb, rather than 203-204-205.

I also wasn't able to get 10 plates a side on leg press for multiple reps yesterday. I thought for sure I'd be repping it out, but I regressed slightly, due to lower calories.

I skip about two days of Anadrol a week. I never wanted to go to 220. But for now, I'd like to stay 205 for a bit.

All because of one fucking date. Fuck that, I'd rather be bigger right now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 19, 2022, 07:44:45 PM
Once again, O whiny one, you whine about your insecurity about being perpetually pumped. That simply means you feel like a shrimp without it. You'd think a 40-year-old man would outgrow this stupidity that I was doing back in my teens and early 20s.

Wrong! You're doing it because you're lazy and can't keep up your so-called gains without the sauce, as that would require actually EATING more food than than an anorexic model does.

You're actually daft enough to think that rapid fluctuations in weight, especially with steroids in the mix is healthy? If you keep quiet, nobody will know how stupid you actually sound. Keep telling yourself that I'm fat, while you STRUGGLE to get 17" arms, O twiggy one.

Again, are you 40 or 14? Nobody cares about your ejaculations, except for the gremlins between your ears.

You are as delusional at the high school kids who hog the benches, strain to put up 135 on the bench, and act as if they've conquered the world. You need to be "pumped and full", because otherwise you look and feel SMALL!! That's what teenagers (including yours truly, back in the day) do.


And what happens to you when you go back to a buck eighty five and merely looking at certain poundages could put you in the hospital? Here's a hint: Stay away from any shiny and pointy objects.

These are all good observations. Matt has always been somewhat juvenile in terms of his thought processes including his irrational thinking and not one ounce of logic. Lately, he has been regressing. It could be a side effect of his using AAS. Everyone responds to drugs differently. It could also be an issue with his autism spectrum disorder. At the rate he's diegressing he will soon have the communication skills of an infant.

Does this remind you of anyone?
Autism spectrum disorder is characterized by persistent deficits in the ability to initiate and to sustain reciprocal social interaction and social communication, and by a range of restricted, repetitive, and inflexible patterns of behavior, interests or activities that are clearly atypical or excessive for the individual's age and sociocultural context.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 19, 2022, 07:49:04 PM
But he didn't want just size. He wanted to look jacked. Do you understand that you can give some people steroids and the physique changes in a way that NO amount of time or training and eating allows? You start hormones and your shoulders start to "spread" in a way that is abnormal. My brother stupidly used steroids without training at all but in 6-8 weeks his body, when in a t-shirt, looked very different - you have the shoulder widening effect with the trapezius hyperthrophy. No amount of training causes this same look. Steroids cause water retention but not all water retention is the same. Water from anabolics looks different that water from kidney or heart issues. Most of the weight Matt gained is water but it looks like steroid water retention, meaning it looks like muscle. Consider this scenario: identical twin girls. One trains like crazy. The other doesn't train but uses anabolic steroids. Both weigh the same after 2 months. Will they look the same? Who is likely to visually have more jacked traps and wider shoulders? Do you not understand that anabolics cause a different look? Even you skin will look different. Anabolics may cause the muscle in your hands and jaw (and head generally) to hypertrophy in a way that simply does not happen without hormones.

Exactly!!!

This x1,000.


MCWAY seems to think being 200-lb naturally is the same as being 200-lb on steroids. It's not. And in my case, NO AMOUNT OF TRAINING CAN GET ME THIS LOOK.

And what an insult for him to suggest someone who has trained as long and as consistently as me could post such results.

What absolute BALDERDASH!

Perhaps - just PERHAPS - with changes to my NUTRITION, things could have been closer, as I've always been between 1,000 and 1,500 calories daily.

It reduced closer to 1,000 to 1,100 from 2014 before this cycle, and now it's generally over 2,000 daily, although in the past week, I think I've slept back closer to 1,800 or less...regressing to my old habits, and losing some size to go with it.

The quick gains from steroids have motivated me to eat more. It's hard to do something like double my calories, knowing it will take over a year to get WORSE results.

Anadrol has made the difference - causing me to bring my calories up to a sufficient level.

But my point is - no amount of training will give me the 24/7 full and pumped up look that I get from gear. I can maybe maintain half a chest pump one day after chest day - but not much more.

Steroids allow this to be a daily thing.

It's sad because I'm willing to do things naturally to look this way...but it's simply not possible.

It's depressing knowing that the look I want necessarily requires steroids.

But it does. And I've had way too much experience training naturally to believe the hogwash that MCWAY spouts.

On pubmed there is a case study of a person whose face got lopsided. What had happened was he ate gum on one side of his mouth and used Winstrol causing the jaw muscle on one side to hypertrophy. You think if he didn't use steroids and ate twice as much gum he'd gotten the same lopsided face? Unlikely.

Or think about this: in Rambo II Stallone weighed 150lbs. Could he have weighed the same or more without steroids? Maybe. But it wouldn't have looked the same. Do you get it?
Steroids = different look. It simply can't be duplicated without them. 150lbs = twink weight. But can looked jacked with hormones.

LOL!!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 19, 2022, 07:49:42 PM
That 475 deadlift is a lot of weight Matt but you hitched it up like a big dog.

I can`t approach that but it wasn`t a lift that would have got even two white lights IMO.

Still,props for trying.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 19, 2022, 07:54:47 PM
That 475 deadlift is a lot of weight Matt but you hitched it up like a big dog.

I can`t approach that but it wasn`t a lift that would have got even two white lights IMO.

Still,props for trying.

Thanks wes.

Yeah, lol, it would have been flagged for sure.

That being said, what I love about Strongman is that Derek Poundstone style lockouts like that will pass in contest.  :)

That's what I like about Strongman - it's less refined than powerlifting.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 19, 2022, 08:02:21 PM
Thanks wes.

Yeah, lol, it would have been flagged for sure.

That being said, what I love about Strongman is that Derek Poundstone style lockouts like that will pass in contest.  :)

That's what I like about Strongman - it's less refined than powerlifting.
Oh wow,I had no clue that would pass for a good lift.....I  thought you were gonna` slip a disc or shit your pants or both.  LOL ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 19, 2022, 08:45:18 PM
But he didn't want just size. He wanted to look jacked. Do you understand that you can give some people steroids and the physique changes in a way that NO amount of time or training and eating allows? You start hormones and your shoulders start to "spread" in a way that is abnormal. My brother stupidly used steroids without training at all but in 6-8 weeks his body, when in a t-shirt, looked very different - you have the shoulder widening effect with the trapezius hyperthrophy. No amount of training causes this same look. Steroids cause water retention but not all water retention is the same. Water from anabolics looks different that water from kidney or heart issues. Most of the weight Matt gained is water but it looks like steroid water retention, meaning it looks like muscle. Consider this scenario: identical twin girls. One trains like crazy. The other doesn't train but uses anabolic steroids. Both weigh the same after 2 months. Will they look the same? Who is likely to visually have more jacked traps and wider shoulders? Do you not understand that anabolics cause a different look? Even you skin will look different. Anabolics may cause the muscle in your hands and jaw (and head generally) to hypertrophy in a way that simply does not happen without hormones.

On pubmed there is a case study of a person whose face got lopsided. What had happened was he ate gum on one side of his mouth and used Winstrol causing the jaw muscle on one side to hypertrophy. You think if he didn't use steroids and ate twice as much gum he'd gotten the same lopsided face? Unlikely.

Or think about this: in Rambo II Stallone weighed 150lbs. Could he have weighed the same or more without steroids? Maybe. But it wouldn't have looked the same. Do you get it?
Steroids = different look. It simply can't be duplicated without them. 150lbs = twink weight. But can looked jacked with hormones.

The only way anyone looks remotely "jacked" at 150 lbs is if his body fat is severely low and he's athletic, steroids or not.

Speaking of traps, I've been motivated to train mine more, after my brother-in-law complimented me on mine, during a family get-together. In addition to that, when I posted about my training style of using "alternates" (doing a set of one bodypart, resting, and doing a set with the opposite bodypart), I realized that I pretty much ignore my traps when I do shoulders.

But, with a strained forearm, doing barbell or dumbbell shrugs became problematic. Fortunately, complex problems often have simple solutions. The Smith Machine where I do military presses also has two calf machines next to it, one seated and one of those sorry Hoist plate-loaded standing calf machine. The Hoist machine sucks for doing calves....BUT for doing shrugs (until my forearm healed up completely), it worked great. So, it's a set of shoulder presses on the Smith, rest, then alternate with shrugs....until I'm done with shoulders and traps.

So far, so good!!  ;D

Exactly!!!

This x1,000.


MCWAY seems to think being 200-lb naturally is the same as being 200-lb on steroids. It's not. And in my case, NO AMOUNT OF TRAINING CAN GET ME THIS LOOK.

And what an insult for him to suggest someone who has trained as long and as consistently as me could post such results.

What absolute BALDERDASH!

Perhaps - just PERHAPS - with changes to my NUTRITION, things could have been closer, as I've always been between 1,000 and 1,500 calories daily.

I rest my case! 1500 calories? PLEASE!! That's a little more than one of my weight gainer shakes back in my college days. And I was downing THREE of them, in addition to regular food.


It reduced closer to 1,000 to 1,100 from 2014 before this cycle, and now it's generally over 2,000 daily, although in the past week, I think I've slept back closer to 1,800 or less...regressing to my old habits, and losing some size to go with it.

The quick gains from steroids have motivated me to eat more. It's hard to do something like double my calories, knowing it will take over a year to get WORSE results.

That is "BALDERDASH"!! And I know that from personal experience. I go back to what I did in 1996. In addition to the 21 lbs I put on that spring semester, I added another 5 in two months during summer break to get to 215. Then, I finally got to try creatine (Phosphagen HP, to be exact).

As most people know, when you load for the first time, you'll swear creatine is the second coming. In my case, it was 7 pounds in one week and 5 pounds the second week.

That means I started spring semester 1996 at 189 lbs, left school for the summer at 210, added another 5 pounds to get to 215 and added creatine to get to 227 before I went back to school. Take a wild guess as to what my friends, teachers, and dorm director asked me when I returned to campus.

If my math is correct, from early Jan to late Aug is approximately 8 months. Eight months, 38 lbs, no anabolics (couldn't afford them even if I wanted to use them). It was food, weight gainer, and (at summer vacation's end) creatine.

So, this sniveling about needing 18 months to put on 20 - 25 lbs, without steroids is unwarranted. BTW, this wasn't regaining weight I once had. I'd never been over 200 in my life prior to 1996.



Anadrol has made the difference - causing me to bring my calories up to a sufficient level.


But my point is - no amount of training will give me the 24/7 full and pumped up look that I get from gear. I can maybe maintain half a chest pump one day after chest day - but not much more.

Steroids allow this to be a daily thing.

It's sad because I'm willing to do things naturally to look this way...but it's simply not possible.

No, you're not!! You've been told the one thing you need to do. But, you won't do it, which is why it's back to twig city when you go off the sauce.


It's depressing knowing that the look I want necessarily requires steroids.

But it does. And I've had way too much experience training naturally to believe the hogwash that MCWAY spouts.

Hence, you have the mark of sheer immaturity and insecurity. When you're truly BIG enough, you don't worry about being pumped all the time. I outgrew that garbage decades ago. I still can't believe I was the goofball, doing pushups every so often at water parks and beach picnics, trying to stay pumped to impress girls.

Once I got to a certain size, that foolishness was necessary.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 19, 2022, 09:17:46 PM
No, you're not!! You've been told the one thing you need to do. But, you won't do it, which is why it's back to twig city when you go off the sauce.

And for health reasons.

I don't care for my natural 180 look anyway. So I'd rather be lighter and healthier and train for strength.

I can cycle again in the future if I want this look again.

Also, why is it wrong for me to go for a swim after getting a pump to get attention, but it's fine for you to be "motivated" to train shoulders more to get your shoulders up to Matt C level, because your homosexual brother-in-law complimented them at a family dinner?

What's the difference?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 20, 2022, 03:27:53 AM
Matt must avoid the destructive effects of wimmens to his goals.

Never miss meals.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 20, 2022, 07:05:47 AM
405x13.

That girl I took home really threw me off. I missed a meal and didn't sleep that night, and now I'm 199-lb, rather than 203-204-205.


You have lost the plot
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: The Scott on August 20, 2022, 07:20:59 AM
You have lost the plot

He's not talking about a burial plot, ace...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 20, 2022, 07:27:13 AM
Matt must avoid the destructive effects of wimmens to his goals.

Never miss meals.

Ah yes, the Craig Titus principles. Even cocaine benders didn't get in the way of his precious meals
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 20, 2022, 07:54:25 AM
You have lost the plot

Finally a topic you’re an expert on.

Boy oh boy….filled the leg press machine with 45s, like a 15 year old drug free high school kid.

The spastic little jerkoff Queen needs to get in a squat rack and move some real weight. Right now Matt Canning is exactly like you; all drugs and running his chihuahua yap while lifting like a teenage girl.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 20, 2022, 08:19:52 AM
At the rate he's digressing he will soon have the communication skills of an infant.



Looks like your communication skills might be "digressing" too Prime..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 20, 2022, 08:23:56 AM


That girl I took home really threw me off. I missed a meal and didn't sleep that night, and now I'm 199-lb, rather than 203-204-205.



Sounds like you regret taking a woman home. No surprise there.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 20, 2022, 08:27:46 AM
Sounds like you regret taking a woman home. No surprise there.

#18 ranked lightweight strongman in Thunder Bay Ontario.

Skinniest kid at Fat Camp. Sent a jerkoff video to an 80 year old soggy old man.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 20, 2022, 08:54:05 AM

That girl I took home really threw me off. I missed a meal and didn't sleep that night, and now I'm 199-lb, rather than 203-204-205.


Matt then you clearly know that lost weight was just piss & crap coming out.
don't worry about it so your more accurate body weight is under 200lbs
So what.

All the stick you give Bwanky for being Bloated & carrying water - don't fall into that trap yourself.

If you wish to see the scales register more LBS wear more cloths / hold a 10lbs weight when you step on them etc etc.

unless your contest ready like Tommy was at 212LBS & 6ft And See Just How
Damn good He Looked. !!!
The scale readings are useless & meaningless.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 20, 2022, 11:48:47 AM
The only way anyone looks remotely "jacked" at 150 lbs is if his body fat is severely low and he's athletic, steroids or not.

Speaking of traps, I've been motivated to train mine more, after my brother-in-law complimented me on mine, during a family get-together. In addition to that, when I posted about my training style of using "alternates" (doing a set of one bodypart, resting, and doing a set with the opposite bodypart), I realized that I pretty much ignore my traps when I do shoulders.

But, with a strained forearm, doing barbell or dumbbell shrugs became problematic. Fortunately, complex problems often have simple solutions. The Smith Machine where I do military presses also has two calf machines next to it, one seated and one of those sorry Hoist plate-loaded standing calf machine. The Hoist machine sucks for doing calves....BUT for doing shrugs (until my forearm healed up completely), it worked great. So, it's a set of shoulder presses on the Smith, rest, then alternate with shrugs....until I'm done with shoulders and traps.


I have never seen an "impressive" set of traps on a natural. In 35 years I've never seen it! I could show a ton of examples but it's too time consuming. What some naturals have is a bottle neck build, where it's all traps but no shoulders. But that's not impressive traps really, it's more of a lack of shoulders . Even more demoralzing is that juicers do not have to train traps to grow traps. No amount of trap training gives you "androgen traps." That is just a fact. An experienced observer can spot the androgen traps in a second in a guy in a t-shirt, even if the guy is pretty small overall. Then there are a few with such poor trap genetics that even androgen don't do much, like Kai Greene to a degree.

Another example of tiny Stallone. He is tiny, look at his legs and everything else. But he is juiced to the tits. How can you tell? The forearms. You can even tell he is on gh, not just steroids. It's not the size, millions of naturals who never lifted a weight in their lives have bigger and more muscular forearms. It's something else.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Megalodon on August 20, 2022, 12:09:50 PM
What drugs cause the capped shoulder dominance everyone has these days? Schwarzenegger, Ferrigno, etc... never had them like that but suddenly everyone does, even the "more plates more dates" guy has them to an extent that they don't jibe with the rest of him. He looks like Rick Astley with cannonballs that don't fit with his facial structure or anything else.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 20, 2022, 12:24:31 PM
What drugs cause the capped shoulder dominance everyone has these days? Schwarzenegger, Ferrigno, etc... never had them like that but suddenly everyone does, even the "more plates more dates" guy has them to an extent that they don't jibe with the rest of him. He looks like Rick Astley with cannonballs that don't fit with his facial structure or anything else.

GH in massive amounts.

Makes you look "3D".

People claim certain peptides and SARMS do it too.

When i ran large amounts of GH many years ago, it seemed to change my delts in a matter of weeks.

Also, everyone today injects all kinds of inflammatory drugs into their delts to achieve this look.

It's pretty obvious in a lot of their training videos.

The rear delts are an easy giveaway.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 20, 2022, 12:24:59 PM
#18 ranked lightweight strongman in Thunder Bay Ontario.

Skinniest kid at Fat Camp. Sent a jerkoff video to an 80 77 year and 357 days soggy old man.

Corrected for accuracy. Just you wait, someday you too will be a soggy old man. That is if someone doesn't take you out before then. Getting old happens faster than you think. ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 20, 2022, 12:29:30 PM
What drugs cause the capped shoulder dominance everyone has these days? Schwarzenegger, Ferrigno, etc... never had them like that but suddenly everyone does, even the "more plates more dates" guy has them to an extent that they don't jibe with the rest of him. He looks like Rick Astley with cannonballs that don't fit with his facial structure or anything else.

More steroids, stronger steroids. Like tren is so potent back in the day no one reached that type of androgen load with the Deca and Dbol. Now it's a big test base also and test is more potent that the other injects other than tren. Then you have genetics to a degree. And finally, most competitive bodybuilders have loaded up their delts with oil and site injections. Some seem to have almost doubled their delt mass with injections.
Example: https://www.instagram.com/p/CI_t8agD_ew/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Edit. Like Overload says, the GH adds to it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 20, 2022, 12:36:32 PM
Looks like your communication skills might be "digressing" too Prime..

Thank you for catching this horrendous mistake professor Flexacon. I fixed the error.  :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 20, 2022, 12:37:45 PM
What drugs cause the capped shoulder dominance everyone has these days? Schwarzenegger, Ferrigno, etc... never had them like that but suddenly everyone does, even the "more plates more dates" guy has them to an extent that they don't jibe with the rest of him. He looks like Rick Astley with cannonballs that don't fit with his facial structure or anything else.

Is oil a drug?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 20, 2022, 12:39:11 PM
More steroids, stronger steroids. Like tren is so potent back in the day no one reached that type of androgen load with the Deca and Dbol. Now it's a big test base also and test is more potent that the other injects other than tren. Then you have genetics to a degree. And finally, most competitive bodybuilders have loaded up their delts with oil and site injections. Some seem to have almost doubled their delt mass with injections.
Example: https://www.instagram.com/p/CI_t8agD_ew/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Edit. Like Overload says, the GH adds to it.

Damn he looks terrible.

I think a little enhancement is alright, but these guys have gone way overboard.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Megalodon on August 20, 2022, 12:51:23 PM
GH in massive amounts.

Makes you look "3D".

People claim certain peptides and SARMS do it too.

When i ran large amounts of GH many years ago, it seemed to change my delts in a matter of weeks.

Also, everyone today injects all kinds of inflammatory drugs into their delts to achieve this look.

It's pretty obvious in a lot of their training videos.

The rear delts are an easy giveaway.

More steroids, stronger steroids. Like tren is so potent back in the day no one reached that type of androgen load with the Deca and Dbol. Now it's a big test base also and test is more potent that the other injects other than tren. Then you have genetics to a degree. And finally, most competitive bodybuilders have loaded up their delts with oil and site injections. Some seem to have almost doubled their delt mass with injections.
Example: https://www.instagram.com/p/CI_t8agD_ew/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Edit. Like Overload says, the GH adds to it.

Thank you ThisisOverload and Van_Bilderass.

Is there some book, site, article or something else that goes into detail about how every bb drug/ect effects the body looks-wise? So I'd be able to more or less tell what someone is on just by their appearance?

For example, I get the impression that Chris Bumstead is as big as the drugs he's taking will let him be but not a big as he would be if he were taking what the regular Mr. Olympia competitors are taking. But there would be tradeoffs looks-wise if he took different and/or additional drugs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 20, 2022, 01:47:55 PM
Matt then you clearly know that lost weight was just piss & crap coming out.
don't worry about it so your more accurate body weight is under 200lbs
So what.

All the stick you give Bwanky for being Bloated & carrying water - don't fall into that trap yourself.

If you wish to see the scales register more LBS wear more cloths / hold a 10lbs weight when you step on them etc etc.

unless your contest ready like Tommy was at 212LBS & 6ft And See Just How
Damn good He Looked. !!!
The scale readings are useless & meaningless.
Good post my brother......been saying it for years.....the mirror never lies if you are honest in your appraisal of your physique.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 20, 2022, 02:21:42 PM
And for health reasons.

More Balderdash!! Nobody who cares about his health keeps fluctuating in bodyweight like that......especially when steroids are involved.

You're too lazy to keep your diet on point without the sauce; So, you use so-called health concerns as an excuse for shrinking like cheap bacon when the needle goes away.




I don't care for my natural 180 look anyway. So I'd rather be lighter and healthier and train for strength.

I can cycle again in the future if I want this look again.

Also, why is it wrong for me to go for a swim after getting a pump to get attention, but it's fine for you to be "motivated" to train shoulders more to get your shoulders up to Matt C level, because your homosexual brother-in-law complimented them at a family dinner?

What's the difference?

The difference is you don't read very well. My shoulders are fine and there is NOTHING I need to get DOWN to Matt C level.

Furthermore, I wasn't looking for any attention. This was a family event at my father-in-law's place. I didn't do a set of shrugs, before getting a plate of chicken and potato salad to impress my brother-in-law.

BTW, you're the LAST person to be talking about anyone being homosexual, sending pics of your schlong to male senior citizens.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 20, 2022, 02:51:13 PM
So, you use so-called health concerns as an excuse for shrinking like cheap bacon when the needle goes away.

For the record, I cooked some expensive, uncured bacon the other day and it shrunk up a lot.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 20, 2022, 03:05:01 PM
BACON  :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 20, 2022, 06:35:15 PM
Thank you ThisisOverload and Van_Bilderass.

Is there some book, site, article or something else that goes into detail about how every bb drug/ect effects the body looks-wise? So I'd be able to more or less tell what someone is on just by their appearance?

For example, I get the impression that Chris Bumstead is as big as the drugs he's taking will let him be but not a big as he would be if he were taking what the regular Mr. Olympia competitors are taking. But there would be tradeoffs looks-wise if he took different and/or additional drugs.

I don't think it can be 100% conveyed in print which drugs give what look. And most steroids kind of work the "same" with smallish differences so it's hard to be 100% sure if a certain steroid is in the stack. Some gurus like Alex Kikel have attempted to explain the look some steroids give, like he had one video on IG explaining the difference in look between Superdol, Anadrol and I think Halotestin when taken the last couple of weeks before a show. You can't say from the outside this person is on Superdrol instead of Anadrol but you might see these different small cosmetic effects within a certain individual when he switches from one to the other.

But for example, I said I was sure Stallone was on GH just by his forearms. I take into account his age + his previous look decades before + leanness + vascularity + what I've personally seen GH do. That look requires "more" than just testosterone. You don't suddenly just pop with crazy vascularity at 60+ when you've done steroids for 40 years already. I think Stallone did way too many steroids for Rambo IV, he was way too swollen. You look way better on screen focusing on leanness and dryness.

As far as the physique athletes like Bumstead go, I feel many of them are pushing almost as hard as they can, some harder that maybe some Mr O competitors. Some are just a better fit for physique genetically. If I were to guess what Bumstead is on, what I think he would do if he were to attempt to compete in open bodybuilding, I think he would increase his testosterone base mainly as far as steroids go. GH would be increased to as much as he could tolerate/dare to do. Insulin would be used liberally to attempt to force more weight on the body. And then he would try to eat as much as possible, as much as his bodyfat level would allow.
Depending on the guy, even doing all these things do not work much. Many guys attempt it and they only end up smoother on stage. I think Bumstead and most of the other top guys are almost topped out as far as steroids go, maybe 90% there. These guys are very impressive, compare them to say 80s pro bodybuilders.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Megalodon on August 21, 2022, 11:04:50 AM
I don't think it can be 100% conveyed in print which drugs give what look. And most steroids kind of work the "same" with smallish differences so it's hard to be 100% sure if a certain steroid is in the stack. Some gurus like Alex Kikel have attempted to explain the look some steroids give, like he had one video on IG explaining the difference in look between Superdol, Anadrol and I think Halotestin when taken the last couple of weeks before a show. You can't say from the outside this person is on Superdrol instead of Anadrol but you might see these different small cosmetic effects within a certain individual when he switches from one to the other.

But for example, I said I was sure Stallone was on GH just by his forearms. I take into account his age + his previous look decades before + leanness + vascularity + what I've personally seen GH do. That look requires "more" than just testosterone. You don't suddenly just pop with crazy vascularity at 60+ when you've done steroids for 40 years already. I think Stallone did way too many steroids for Rambo IV, he was way too swollen. You look way better on screen focusing on leanness and dryness.

As far as the physique athletes like Bumstead go, I feel many of them are pushing almost as hard as they can, some harder that maybe some Mr O competitors. Some are just a better fit for physique genetically. If I were to guess what Bumstead is on, what I think he would do if he were to attempt to compete in open bodybuilding, I think he would increase his testosterone base mainly as far as steroids go. GH would be increased to as much as he could tolerate/dare to do. Insulin would be used liberally to attempt to force more weight on the body. And then he would try to eat as much as possible, as much as his bodyfat level would allow.
Depending on the guy, even doing all these things do not work much. Many guys attempt it and they only end up smoother on stage. I think Bumstead and most of the other top guys are almost topped out as far as steroids go, maybe 90% there. These guys are very impressive, compare them to say 80s pro bodybuilders.

Thanks, Van_Bilderass. Just reading the posts on this page and letting that info sink is giving me a better idea of what is likely to cause what look. The open Olympia 'jumped the shark' for me years ago but only very recently have I paid attention to the classic O and mainly Bumstead because he's taller and not bloated, which I relate to more. My interpretation is that the classic division is taking whatever will make them bigger without increasing waist size or keeping them from doing a vacuum. Plus, staying within their weight limit pushes them to be much more strategic on where they want more or less size, because their maximum bodyweight is finite, like a scarce resource.

Stallone, because of what he was on combined with maybe a little more bodyfat, looked like he had edema in Rambo 4. He normally had a long thin face, especially with his pre-wig higher hairline, but turned himself into a swollen guy with mitts for hands.


(https://i.postimg.cc/ZKdXd40x/stalone.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 21, 2022, 11:29:54 AM
I don't think it can be 100% conveyed in print which drugs give what look. And most steroids kind of work the "same" with smallish differences so it's hard to be 100% sure if a certain steroid is in the stack. Some gurus like Alex Kikel have attempted to explain the look some steroids give, like he had one video on IG explaining the difference in look between Superdol, Anadrol and I think Halotestin when taken the last couple of weeks before a show. You can't say from the outside this person is on Superdrol instead of Anadrol but you might see these different small cosmetic effects within a certain individual when he switches from one to the other.

But for example, I said I was sure Stallone was on GH just by his forearms. I take into account his age + his previous look decades before + leanness + vascularity + what I've personally seen GH do. That look requires "more" than just testosterone. You don't suddenly just pop with crazy vascularity at 60+ when you've done steroids for 40 years already. I think Stallone did way too many steroids for Rambo IV, he was way too swollen. You look way better on screen focusing on leanness and dryness.

As far as the physique athletes like Bumstead go, I feel many of them are pushing almost as hard as they can, some harder that maybe some Mr O competitors. Some are just a better fit for physique genetically. If I were to guess what Bumstead is on, what I think he would do if he were to attempt to compete in open bodybuilding, I think he would increase his testosterone base mainly as far as steroids go. GH would be increased to as much as he could tolerate/dare to do. Insulin would be used liberally to attempt to force more weight on the body. And then he would try to eat as much as possible, as much as his bodyfat level would allow.
Depending on the guy, even doing all these things do not work much. Many guys attempt it and they only end up smoother on stage. I think Bumstead and most of the other top guys are almost topped out as far as steroids go, maybe 90% there. These guys are very impressive, compare them to say 80s pro bodybuilders.

^ We have an official board treasure right now. A retired Getbigger told me this on Facebook Messenger, and I second that statement 100%.

You had me worried when you were off the board for a while there, Van. I speak for other Getbiggers when I say that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 21, 2022, 11:44:23 AM
Matt must avoid the destructive effects of wimmens to his goals.

Never miss meals.

AMEN!! I rectified that back in college. A girl I liked would usually arrive at the cafeteria between 5:30 and 6:00 pm. I got out of class about a hour earlier. So, I basically stuffed my face for 30-45 minutes before she arrived, cleared the table, and once she arrived, I just had a salad and we talked during dinner.

Valentines' Day 1996 was a memorable one. I had a date at Outback Steakhouse (different girl). Reservations were for 7:00. But, I still need to eat; so it was the usual trip to the cafeteria to chow down. Then, it was time to shower, change, and head to the restaurant. I had a steak (a modest-sized one), a salad, and a drink.

Valentine's Day that year was on a Wednesday (my usual rest day from the gym); so, it worked out perfectly.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 21, 2022, 12:09:09 PM
AMEN!! I rectified that back in college. A girl I liked would usually arrive at the cafeteria between 5:30 and 6:00 pm. I got out of class about a hour earlier. So, I basically stuffed my face for 30-45 minutes before she arrived, cleared the table, and once she arrived, I just had a salad and we talked during dinner.

Valentines' Day 1996 was a memorable one. I had a date at Outback Steakhouse (different girl). Reservations were for 7:00. But, I still need to eat; so it was the usual trip to the cafeteria to chow down. Then, it was time to shower, change, and head to the restaurant. I had a steak (a modest-sized one), a salad, and a drink.

Valentine's Day that year was on a Wednesday (my usual rest day from the gym); so, it worked out perfectly.

I've hung out with women twice in the past three days. I'm five pounds lighter as a result, so I agree completely.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 21, 2022, 04:07:49 PM
On days that I don't have a full workout scheduled, a do a little upper body pump before going in the pool, to look good when I go in, and turn a few heads.

Six minutes ago:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 21, 2022, 04:13:03 PM
I like this shot better. Taken 90 seconds ago:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 21, 2022, 04:18:56 PM
On days that I don't have a full workout scheduled, a do a little upper body pump before going in the pool, to look good when I go in, and turn a few heads.


If greasy.handle is there you might.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 21, 2022, 05:00:46 PM
I like this shot better. Taken 90 seconds ago:

We all know why you don't wear speedos and why there wouldn't be any frontal shots..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 21, 2022, 07:03:10 PM
I've hung out with women twice in the past three days. I'm five pounds lighter as a result, so I agree completely.

So, the women kept you from eating? You need to get more organized, even if it means taking your food/shakes with you. Heck, I had to improvise during my military days and carry packs of Met-Rx and a shaker bottle in the leg pockets of my ACUs. That way, even during field exercises (when we only had times to break for water), I could make a shake or two.

Nobody keeps you from eating. Schedule your meals around your job/school/social calendar.

On days that I don't have a full workout scheduled, a do a little upper body pump before going in the pool, to look good when I go in, and turn a few heads.

Six minutes ago:

I thought you were "perpetually pumped" because of your anabolics. Yet, you still have to resort to the same silliness I was doing almost 30 years ago?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 21, 2022, 07:22:38 PM
So, the women kept you from eating? You need to get more organized, even if it means taking your food/shakes with you. Heck, I had to improvise during my military days and carry packs of Met-Rx and a shaker bottle in the leg pockets of my ACUs. That way, even during field exercises (when we only had times to break for water), I could make a shake or two.

Nobody keeps you from eating. Schedule your meals around your job/school/social calendar.

I thought you were "perpetually pumped" because of your anabolics. Yet, you still have to resort to the same silliness I was doing almost 30 years ago?

You served in the military too?!

I'm simply saying I agree that women are a distraction. I mean, ultimately, anything we commit to is a trade-off, right?

Sure, I could pack meals, or I could just make this my priority, and avoid distractions.

Regarding my pumps, I have a 50% pump, almost perpetually.

Though keep in mind, I take many days off from doing Anadrol. So I wax and wane a little, given how little, given how little I use.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 22, 2022, 12:17:04 AM
We all know why you don't wear speedos and why there wouldn't be any frontal shots..

There is always a rolled up sock somewhere in the house.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 22, 2022, 12:29:41 AM
You served in the military too?!

I'm simply saying I agree that women are a distraction. I mean, ultimately, anything we commit to is a trade-off, right?

Sure, I could pack meals, or I could just make this my priority, and avoid distractions.

Regarding my pumps, I have a 50% pump, almost perpetually.

Though keep in mind, I take many days off from doing Anadrol. So I wax and wane a little, given how little, given how little I use.

A 50% pump. Hmm, does this mean you walk around town like an idiot wannabe bodybuilder with your arms held out in a half-assed lat pose? Or, maybe before jumping in the pool, you turn and strike your one and only back pose where your neck disappears into your traps while you attempt to show off your biceps and delts. Answer me this, do you often hear people nearby giggling when you do this?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 22, 2022, 03:37:34 AM
!MATTY TURNING HEADS FOR SURE!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 22, 2022, 04:09:19 AM
A 50% pump. Hmm, does this mean you walk around town like an idiot wannabe bodybuilder with your arms held out in a half-assed lat pose? Or, maybe before jumping in the pool, you turn and strike your one and only back pose where your neck disappears into your traps while you attempt to show off your biceps and delts. Answer me this, do you often here people nearby giggling when you do this?
It does sound quite fucking retarded !!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 22, 2022, 05:03:07 AM
A 50% pump. Hmm, does this mean you walk around town like an idiot wannabe bodybuilder with your arms held out in a half-assed lat pose? Or, maybe before jumping in the pool, you turn and strike your one and only back pose where your neck disappears into your traps while you attempt to show off your biceps and delts. Answer me this, do you often here people nearby giggling when you do this?

Matt it appears that Primemuscle is interested in how you pose. Perhaps you should pump to 50.45% of your maximum pump and send him a posing video.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 22, 2022, 05:59:57 AM
Is there such a device as a pump-meter to measure the % of your pump?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on August 22, 2022, 07:12:54 AM
Is there such a device as a pump-meter to measure the % of your pump?

there is

we were all wrong all this time
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=674474.0;attach=1376490;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 22, 2022, 07:18:53 AM
You served in the military too?!

Indeed!! United States Navy, 11 years active duty.



I'm simply saying I agree that women are a distraction. I mean, ultimately, anything we commit to is a trade-off, right?

Sure, I could pack meals, or I could just make this my priority, and avoid distractions.

My wife of 20 years is hardly a distraction. My training schedule is the same as it was when I was single.

Lest we forget, the Awesome One nabbed 8 Sandows with a wife and kids and all the responsibilities that come with it. He even named his daughter, Olympia.

The other 8-time O winner, Ronnie Coleman, used to gobble chicken in his squad car, while at work.

And then there's 3-time Mr. Universe, Bill Pearl, who used to train during the wee hours of the morning (5:00 am or earlier), while his family was still asleep.





Regarding my pumps, I have a 50% pump, almost perpetually.

Though keep in mind, I take many days off from doing Anadrol. So I wax and wane a little, given how little, given how little I use.

Again, the point is such silliness isn't necessary.

A 50% pump. Hmm, does this mean you walk around town like an idiot wannabe bodybuilder with your arms held out in a half-assed lat pose? Or, maybe before jumping in the pool, you turn and strike your one and only back pose where your neck disappears into your traps while you attempt to show off your biceps and delts. Answer me this, do you often here people nearby giggling when you do this?

I've been there, too. Boy, l must have looked like a complete DOOFUS back then.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 22, 2022, 07:21:51 AM
there is

we were all wrong all this time
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=674474.0;attach=1376490;image)

Those are perfect numbers. Top number is body weight and bottom number is fat-free muscle mass, right?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on August 22, 2022, 08:35:56 AM
On days that I don't have a full workout scheduled, a do a little upper body pump before going in the pool, to look good when I go in, and turn a few heads.

Six minutes ago:

Matt when you go to the pool you wear long pants and shoes?

Why?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 22, 2022, 09:00:24 AM
A 50% pump. Hmm, does this mean you walk around town like an idiot wannabe bodybuilder with your arms held out in a half-assed lat pose? Or, maybe before jumping in the pool, you turn and strike your one and only back pose where your neck disappears into your traps while you attempt to show off your biceps and delts. Answer me this, do you often here people nearby giggling when you do this?
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on August 22, 2022, 09:35:21 AM
I've hung out with women twice in the past three days. I'm five pounds lighter as a result, so I agree completely.

Daaaaamn Son!  That's a lot of rope!! :o

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 22, 2022, 09:38:11 AM
Those are perfect numbers. Top number is body weight and bottom number is fat-free muscle mass, right?

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/VainFastKronosaurus-max-1mb.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 22, 2022, 09:40:16 AM
It does sound quite fucking retarded !!
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 22, 2022, 09:41:05 AM
On days that I don't have a full workout scheduled, a do a little upper body pump before going in the pool, to look good when I go in, and turn a few heads.



Matt, tell me it's not the kiddie pool...

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/91/12/b191122975acc1eff6dca5d403a7aa9b.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 10:10:42 AM
Matt, tell me it's not the kiddie pool...

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/91/12/b191122975acc1eff6dca5d403a7aa9b.gif)

Absolutely not.

Unfortunately the hot tub placement is now immediately in front of the kid's pool.  ::) It used to be in the change room.

So when I go in, I just make sure to face the wall.

The last thing I want is to be associated with creeps who look at little kids.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 22, 2022, 12:41:46 PM
Matt it appears that Primemuscle is interested in how you pose. Perhaps you should pump to 50.45% of your maximum pump and send him a posing video.

50.45% - very clever.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 12:47:19 PM
50.45% - very clever.  ;D

LOL!!!!!

I'm taking 12.90mg of Anadrol daily, average.

2mg daily for every inch of my peneer.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 22, 2022, 01:12:04 PM
PEENER OF PEAS!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 01:18:57 PM
PEENER OF PEAS!

I'm reverting back to my old habits already.  :-[

I'm 199-lb now. Which is 10-lb down from my peak weight.

Though I could be back to ~210 within a week, if I just get my shakes in.

I just hate to eat.

My calories are going down.
My Anadrol is going down slightly.
My reps are going down.

And I'm going back to twig city. I'll be 165-lb soon deadlifting 500.

Now - question for you, Kwon:

I'd like to do this every summer. Would it particularly strain my heart going from 165, to 205 for three months every year?

Counter-intuitively, would it be safer for me to stay at 185, so I only have to bulk up 20?

I much prefer my 205 look, but will not run gear year-round, nor do I even want to eat high calories year-round.

Also, my peneer will look bigger when I weigh 165.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 22, 2022, 01:29:06 PM
Absolutely not.

Unfortunately the hot tub placement is now immediately in front of the kid's pool.  ::) It used to be in the change room.

So when I go in, I just make sure to face the wall.

The last thing I want is to be associated with creeps who look at little kids.

(https://media2.giphy.com/media/1NZVjh7GJr9iTjotU5/200.gif?cid=790b7611up4wdektvv5vkbvyofv19s8jn5esuxqussonp8va&rid=200.gif&ct=g)


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 22, 2022, 01:29:26 PM
I'm reverting back to my old habits already.  :-[

I'm 199-lb now. Which is 10-lb down from my peak weight.

Though I could be back to ~210 within a week, if I just get my shakes in.

I just hate to eat.

My calories are going down.
My Anadrol is going down slightly.
My reps are going down.

And I'm going back to twig city. I'll be 165-lb soon deadlifting 500.

Now - question for you, Kwon:

I'd like to do this every summer. Would it particularly strain my heart going from 165, to 205 for three months every year?

Counter-intuitively, would it be safer for me to stay at 185, so I only have to bulk up 20?

I much prefer my 205 look, but will not run gear year-round, nor do I even want to eat high calories year-round.

Also, my peneer will look bigger when I weigh 165.  ;D

Here's a crazy thought: Get your diet straight; get to 210....STAY THERE for a while. Or, make more modifications to your diet and get even bigger. Get the size and KEEP IT!!

At your age, I doubt you'd need more than 4000 calories per day (and you can drink at least half of that). As I said before, "Poor Man's Met-Rx": 4-6 whole eggs, two cups of milk (or Greek Yogurt, which they didn't have back in the day), and whatever flavoring you need to make it more palatable.

With your poor appetite, you'll probably have to drink more calories than you eat.

Two or three of those with your regular meals; and the size will come and stay. That will minimize your anabolic use, allowing you to keep some of your size, once you go off.

Or, should you forgo the sauce altogether, you'll regain your lost size and keep it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 22, 2022, 01:30:25 PM
Absolutely not.

Unfortunately the hot tub placement is now immediately in front of the kid's pool.  ::) It used to be in the change room.

So when I go in, I just make sure to face the wall exposing my butt cheeks to the onlooking children..

The last thing I want is to be associated with creeps who look at little kids.

fixed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 01:33:58 PM
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/1NZVjh7GJr9iTjotU5/200.gif?cid=790b7611up4wdektvv5vkbvyofv19s8jn5esuxqussonp8va&rid=200.gif&ct=g)

Yep - exactly. And the pool's that way --->
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 01:36:59 PM
Here's a crazy thought: Get your diet straight; get to 210....STAY THERE for a while. Or, make more modifications to your diet and get even bigger. Get the size and KEEP IT!!

At your age, I doubt you'd need more than 4000 calories per day (and you can drink at least half of that). As I said before, "Poor Man's Met-Rx": 4-6 whole eggs, two cups of milk (or Greek Yogurt, which they didn't have back in the day), and whatever flavoring you need to make it more palatable.

With your poor appetite, you'll probably have to drink more calories than you eat.

Two or three of those with your regular meals; and the size will come and stay. That will minimize your anabolic use, allowing you to keep some of your size, once you go off.

Or, should you forgo the sauce altogether, you'll regain your lost size and keep it.

Ugh.

Makes me sick just eating all those calories. Or even drinking them.

That being said - you are right that I can get to 210 naturally.

But to have that full, pumped - basically swole - look...I only get that off gear.

Best bet for me would be to be 185-lb naturally. Not too fat, and like a downsized version of my 205 steroid look. Clean up my diet and increase my protein, and try to maintain a portion of that pumped look that I have now on cycle.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 22, 2022, 01:38:56 PM
Yep - exactly. And the pool's that way --->

Glad you like the post. It was difficult to find a funny gif of a man walking backwards. I wish I found one where the fellow is getting into a hot tub backwards, but no such luck.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 22, 2022, 01:39:04 PM
Ugh.

Makes me sick just eating all those calories. Or even drinking them.

That being said - you are right that I can get to 210 naturally.

But to have that full, pumped - basically swole - look...I only get that off gear.

Best bet for me would be to be 185-lb naturally. Not too fat, and like a downsized version of my 205 steroid look. Clean up my diet and increase my protein, and try to maintain a portion of that pumped look that I have now on cycle.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/83b1dbb2d4e9ad03b78e401e5da26816/tenor.gif?itemid=11212129)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 22, 2022, 01:42:40 PM
Eat 100 eggs a day..........problem solved !!  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 22, 2022, 01:55:41 PM
Ugh.

Makes me sick just eating all those calories. Or even drinking them.

That being said - you are right that I can get to 210 naturally.

But to have that full, pumped - basically swole - look...I only get that off gear.

Best bet for me would be to be 185-lb naturally. Not too fat, and like a downsized version of my 205 steroid look. Clean up my diet and increase my protein, and try to maintain a portion of that pumped look that I have now on cycle.

Your obsession with being perpetually pumped is beyond absurd.

Besides, if you're going to be 185 naturally (or without anabolics), why not be 210 (or more) without them? You could conceivably hit that in about 9 months and keep your body fat in check.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 01:59:57 PM
Your obsession with being perpetually pumped is beyond absurd.

Besides, if you're going to be 185 naturally (or without anabolics), why not be 210 (or more) without them? You could conceivably hit that in about 9 months and keep your body fat in check.

I do prefer how I look over 200, on roids.

I could be fairly close to this look naturally, but it would take months or a year instead of months, and it still wouldn't be quite as good.

I also don't think eating twice as many calories is necessarily that much healthier than running a small cycle for a short period of time is.

Also, keep in mind, I am a 80-kg competitive Strongman [I can weigh 179 in contest]. That's another reason why I don't want to walk around at 210.

I prefer the look, but I don't think carrying 30-lb more weight year-round is healthy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 22, 2022, 02:08:41 PM
How many of these so called strongmen contest do they even have in a year at 179lbs? How many do you actually enter? Seems strange to keep you weight goal as a class for something you might do once every other year.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 22, 2022, 02:11:14 PM
I don't think it can be 100% conveyed in print which drugs give what look. And most steroids kind of work the "same" with smallish differences so it's hard to be 100% sure if a certain steroid is in the stack. Some gurus like Alex Kikel have attempted to explain the look some steroids give, like he had one video on IG explaining the difference in look between Superdol, Anadrol and I think Halotestin when taken the last couple of weeks before a show. You can't say from the outside this person is on Superdrol instead of Anadrol but you might see these different small cosmetic effects within a certain individual when he switches from one to the other.

But for example, I said I was sure Stallone was on GH just by his forearms. I take into account his age + his previous look decades before + leanness + vascularity + what I've personally seen GH do. That look requires "more" than just testosterone. You don't suddenly just pop with crazy vascularity at 60+ when you've done steroids for 40 years already. I think Stallone did way too many steroids for Rambo IV, he was way too swollen. You look way better on screen focusing on leanness and dryness.

As far as the physique athletes like Bumstead go, I feel many of them are pushing almost as hard as they can, some harder that maybe some Mr O competitors. Some are just a better fit for physique genetically. If I were to guess what Bumstead is on, what I think he would do if he were to attempt to compete in open bodybuilding, I think he would increase his testosterone base mainly as far as steroids go. GH would be increased to as much as he could tolerate/dare to do. Insulin would be used liberally to attempt to force more weight on the body. And then he would try to eat as much as possible, as much as his bodyfat level would allow.
Depending on the guy, even doing all these things do not work much. Many guys attempt it and they only end up smoother on stage. I think Bumstead and most of the other top guys are almost topped out as far as steroids go, maybe 90% there. These guys are very impressive, compare them to say 80s pro bodybuilders.

Agree 100%.

A lot of it comes from me personally experimenting and all the guys i used to train with. I was heavily involved with BBing and PLing world for about 15 years. Saw a lot of things and tried a lot of things.

Since these products aren't tested in a blind environment, it's hard to know exactly what does what, but we have a lot of ideas.

There are drugs like GH, Tren, Drol, Halo, that give a very distinct "Look". I can spot someone on Tren pretty easily, but it's not guaranteed.

A lot of these things are bro science, but there are a lot of factors that connect the dots.

I agree that even the lower level guys are pushing just as hard as the top guys, that's where genetics come into play. And not always how you respond to the drugs, but how you respond to the side effects and how long you can stay on. The size game these days is very real and that's why most guys never come off, because everyone else is full throttle all the time. Until their organs give out.

Like everyone says in response to "how much GH should i take"? "How much you can afford". GH is a game changer. The first time i used a high amount of GH, it completely changed the way i looked and responded to everything else. It's amazing.

The real strategy is what to do leading up to a show. Anyone can take a shitload of drugs, train and eat like a monster. But the last few weeks before a show and the actual show days are the hardest part to nail down. Which is why you see so many guys who can't come in peeled, it's not as easy as people think to manipulate water, carbs, diuretics and sodium, etc. You can literally miss you peak by a matter of a few hours.

The major issue in BBing (and all competitive sports), is that the top guys who know everything, are not likely to release all their knowledge. Because they need clients to make money, they can't just open up about everything and not everyone responds exactly the same. Also there is the whole "illegal drugs" aspect of it, which is why so many people deny using drugs and/or try to downplay them a lot. It takes away rom their credibility and makes it harder to sell snake oil. Most supplements are complete trash, but that's how these guys make money. They give the impression to easy to manipulate people that it's the "supplements" and that the drugs are just the "finishing touch".

Anyone who has been involved in BBing at a high level knows it's all bullshit. But that's the only way to make big money in this industry.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 22, 2022, 02:15:53 PM
I do prefer how I look over 200, on roids.

I could be fairly close to this look naturally, but it would take months or a year instead of months, and it still wouldn't be quite as good.

I also don't think eating twice as many calories is necessarily that much healthier than running a small cycle for a short period of time is.

Also, keep in mind, I am a 80-kg competitive Strongman [I can weigh 179 in contest]. That's another reason why I don't want to walk around at 210.

I prefer the look, but I don't think carrying 30-lb more weight year-round is healthy.

Neither is gaining and losing 30-40 lbs in less than a year.

Perhaps, it's time to jump to a higher class (85 or 90 kg, or whatever light-heavyweight is).

But, the idea that rapid fluctuations in bodyweight and anabolics is safer than simply eating more food is asinine.

Plus, nobody is telling you to double your calories right off the bat. Like everything else, you make increases GRADUALLY (i.e. from 2000 to 2500 or from 2500 to 3000). Beef, milk (or better still, Greek Yogurt), and whole eggs work well because they are quite dense; so you get lots of calories and protein in small volume. That's how the old-timers did it.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 02:17:42 PM
How many of these so called strongmen contest do they even have in a year at 179lbs? How many do you actually enter? Seems strange to keep you weight goal as a class for something you might do once every other year.

Due to Covid messing everything up, and causing one 10-year promoter to pull out completely, you are right.

Otherwise, I'd be competing in an least three contests a year.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 22, 2022, 02:34:15 PM
Well, I'm off! Rubber-coated iron awaits!! ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 02:39:48 PM
Well, I'm off! Rubber-coated iron awaits!! ;D

I hate to eat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 22, 2022, 02:43:34 PM
Mat
I believe you are at least 5'9" so you should up your bodyweight to around 280-310 for strongman.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 22, 2022, 02:49:01 PM
Agree 100%.

A lot of it comes from me personally experimenting with all the guys i used to train with.

outed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 03:10:54 PM
Mat
I believe you are at least 5'9" so you should up your bodyweight to around 280-310 for strongman.

To be competitive in legitimate open heavyweight Strongman, yes.

I could probably have moderate success at the Ontario's Strongest Man level at 230-lb.

What I mean is placing 15th out of 20 guys.

That's probably doable at that weight. I'd be the lightest guy, but it would be possible.

Paul Vaillancourt won four times, I believe, and he was 5'11" and 230-lb.

I just worry about bringing my body weight up. Even doing this mini-cycle at all was a big step for me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 22, 2022, 04:49:41 PM
outed

Yeah that's pretty gay. ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 22, 2022, 08:53:53 PM
How many of these so called strongmen contest do they even have in a year at 179lbs? How many do you actually enter? Seems strange to keep you weight goal as a class for something you might do once every other year.

You do realize that Matt pays the contest organizer $5,000 - $10,000 to put on the contest and then they let Matt Canning participate like he actually is in the contest.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 09:32:39 PM
You do realize that Matt pays the contest organizer $5,000 - $10,000 to put on the contest and then they let Matt Canning participate like he actually is in the contest.

Have you bothered watching 80-kg competitors online?

They are stronger than you, no doubt, and most are as strong as your average 250-lb gym rat.

My strength at my best compares favourably to them. You can deny the objectively verifiable all you want, but I am competitive in my weight class.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 22, 2022, 09:58:00 PM
Have you bothered watching 80-kg competitors online?

They are stronger than you, no doubt, and most are as strong as your average 250-lb gym rat.

My strength at my best compares favourably to them. You can deny the objectively verifiable all you want, but I am competitive in my weight class.

Matt Canning you have the same type of bullshit claims as Brian Wood Healy Hankins.

You don’t lift the weights, the drugs you take lift the weights.

No one is impressed by a 900 lb leg press on a 45-degree sled. Back 600 lbs out of the squat rack and do a legitimate rep and then you can enter into the discussion.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 09:59:35 PM
Matt Canning you have the same type of bullshit claims as Brian Wood Healy Hankins.

You don’t lift the weights, the drugs you take lift the weights.

No one is impressed by a 900 lb leg press on a 45-degree sled. Back 600 lbs out of the squat rack and do a legitimate rep and then you can enter into the discussion.

How about 450x2?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 22, 2022, 10:05:39 PM
How about 450x2?

That’s a fucking warm up weight for front squats.

Nothing you do is impressive. You’re all bullshit. Running a drug stack to try to impress kids at a public swimming pool is fucking creepy and pathetic.

Post another photo in your gaylord little swim suit for 12 year old boys. Your lack of hamstring development is a fucking embarrassment for a guy taking PEDs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 10:10:56 PM
That’s a fucking warm up weight for front squats.

Nothing you do is impressive. You’re all bullshit. Running a drug stack to try to impress kids at a public swimming pool is fucking creepy and pathetic.

Post another photo in your gaylord little swim suit for 12 year old boys. Your lack of hamstring development is a fucking embarrassment for a guy taking PEDs.

I'm stronger than you though.

LOL @ doubling 450 as a front squat being a warm-up.

STOP.

I've literally witnessed three men in my life squat over 405.

As an experiment, this month discretely take videos of ANYONE squatting 405 at a normal commercial gym [not a strength specific gym - just a normal gym open to the general public].

You would be unlikely to see one person squatting 405 or more, and you know it.

Anyway, if I post a video of me deadlifting 405 for 20 reps before the year is out, will you finally STFU?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 22, 2022, 10:22:49 PM
I'm stronger than you though.

LOL @ doubling 450 as a front squat being a warm-up.

STOP.

I've literally witnessed three men in my life squat over 405.

As an experiment, this month discretely take videos of ANYONE squatting 405 at a normal commercial gym [not a strength specific gym - just a normal gym open to the general public].

You would be unlikely to see one person squatting 405 or more, and you know it.

Anyway, if I post a video of me deadlifting 405 for 20 reps before the year is out, will you finally STFU?

You’re a spastic liar and a shut-in, you don’t know anything about the “real world”. You hide in your mommy’s basement in the hinterlands of the armpit of Canada. Tell us that story again about your Lakehead University certificates!   LOL

None of your lifts are legitimate
None of your lifts are heavy
You don’t lift the weights - the drugs do.
Adults don’t discretely video other adults in gyms
You’re a creepy weak little manlet and you’re starting to become aware of it.
You hate yourself for being lesser than me in every way.
You sent a jerkoff video to a soggy old phaggot to try to impress him.

Now post up a YouTube video from your butt buddy on how to rip money off of Getbiggers.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 22, 2022, 11:51:01 PM
You’re a spastic liar and a shut-in, you don’t know anything about the “real world”. You hide in your mommy’s basement in the hinterlands of the armpit of Canada. Tell us that story again about your Lakehead University certificates!   LOL

True, except the part about being a liar. I also live in my own home.

None of your lifts are legitimate
None of your lifts are heavy
You don’t lift the weights - the drugs do.

I can lift more than you weighing 100-lb less on no drugs. All my top lifts have been drug-free. I'm training for hypertrophy now, and lifting roughly what I often do naturally, but without focusing on strength. In that sense, the steroids - what very little of them I am on - are helping.

But everything I lift now, I have lifted both lighter and drug-free. And I will again. And the transition back to natural training will be smooth as hell, because of how little I am using.

Adults don’t discretely video other adults in gyms
You’re a creepy weak little manlet and you’re starting to become aware of it.
You hate yourself for being lesser than me in every way.
You sent a jerkoff video to a soggy old phaggot to try to impress him.

Now post up a YouTube video from your butt buddy on how to rip money off of Getbiggers.

Translated - you know no one is squatting 405 with any regularity outside of any strength specific gym.

Otherwise you could easily post a video of that. Or even of you doing it. You weak fuck.

Also, it has come to my attention that you're Jewish.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 23, 2022, 03:55:09 AM
Translated - you know no one is squatting 405 with any regularity outside of any strength specific gym.

Otherwise you could easily post a video of that. Or even of you doing it. You weak fuck.

Also, it has come to my attention that you're Jewish.

The reason for his hatred.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 23, 2022, 05:22:59 AM
I'm stronger than you though.

LOL @ doubling 450 as a front squat being a warm-up.

STOP.

I've literally witnessed three men in my life squat over 405.

As an experiment, this month discretely take videos of ANYONE squatting 405 at a normal commercial gym [not a strength specific gym - just a normal gym open to the general public].

You would be unlikely to see one person squatting 405 or more, and you know it.

Anyway, if I post a video of me deadlifting 405 for 20 reps before the year is out, will you finally STFU?

Your gym must SUCK. Guys squat 405 on the regular at my gym. Heck, two training partners were doing that just yesterday.

Well, if you want to get technical, the squat racks with the rubber-coated weights that are the same circumference but different thickness have (for some reason) 20-kg (44-lb) bars.

But, the weights are color-coded. The 10s are black; 25s are green; 35s are yellow; and 45s are blue.

So those dudes were squatting 8 blue plates and a 20-kg bar, which is ONLY 404. ;D

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 08:56:00 AM
Your gym must SUCK. Guys squat 405 on the regular at my gym. Heck, two training partners were doing that just yesterday.

Well, if you want to get technical, the squat racks with the rubber-coated weights that are the same circumference but different thickness have (for some reason) 20-kg (44-lb) bars.

But, the weights are color-coded. The 10s are black; 25s are green; 35s are yellow; and 45s are blue.

So those dudes were squatting 8 blue plates and a 20-kg bar, which is ONLY 404. ;D

I see people at the gym where I workout squat over 400 lbs all the time.

Practically every single day someone doing legs goes to at least 405.

Meanwhile Matt Canning is struggling with doing proper reps with 275 lbs. And struggling with his inability to repress his creepy weird perverted homosexual behavior.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 10:28:31 AM
The reason for his hatred.

That makes sense. Hmf.

Jews are virtually sacrosanct in our society. Yet some of them can't even handle One Goyim who holds public a critical view of them.

I guess on some level, deep in their bones, they know it only takes one such person to get the dominoes tipping.

But that wouldn't happen without a reason.

Walter Sobchak needs to stop worrying. Unless the Jewish investment banks plan to starve Gentiles or something, he'll be fine.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 10:36:01 AM
Your gym must SUCK. Guys squat 405 on the regular at my gym. Heck, two training partners were doing that just yesterday.

Well, if you want to get technical, the squat racks with the rubber-coated weights that are the same circumference but different thickness have (for some reason) 20-kg (44-lb) bars.

But, the weights are color-coded. The 10s are black; 25s are green; 35s are yellow; and 45s are blue.

So those dudes were squatting 8 blue plates and a 20-kg bar, which is ONLY 404. ;D

And no video evidence to prove it. Totally believable, MCWAY.

By chance did you lift with SquadFatter when he was alive?

Considering the world's 5TH STRONGEST MAN lives in my city, and posts videos like this, tell me more about how many of your training partners can do the same:

https://www.instagram.com/p/CbsULzlLbSr/

^ That's 495, not 605. If you scroll to the second video, you can see the big plates are actually 45-lb plates, not 100-lb plates.

I can't even tell what weight this is - looks like maybe 580:

https://www.instagram.com/p/CbaZCF0gFHg/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 10:52:04 AM
As for me - training on a bodybuilding program has been my focus, so I haven't deadlifted for a while. Yesterday, I went up to 415 for reps on my heaviest set.

Here is a set I did with 355x11:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Chl2ZfvAlPR/

^ I didn't notice that I'm barely activating my hamstrings there, until I saw the video. It's half a stiff-legged deadlift.

In any case, that will be 375x10 by the time I do it next week, and in two weeks, I'll be back at 405x8, as a start.

After all, it's all muscle memory. I will get to that strength level even if I cut off what little Anadrol I am doing, literally starting today.

So if ANYONE thinks I can't deadlift 405x20 before the year is over, tell me RIGHT NOW.

I have NO PROBLEM placing a wager on this one, because it's already a lift I hit previously, naturally.

Considering Tommy Wishbone is THE strongest man on this board and has deadlifted 500x20, I think it's safe to say that such a lift by me should hold up to most good lifts by Getbiggers.

Furthermore, while it would require one additional step, I could verify the plates are real. I see there are people using fake plates online, but they are typically of a different sheen. They also move differently. If I bench press 225x30 [which I thought would be an easy lift for me, but no longer feel that way about - but still consider it doable with training], you will here the weights "clang" if they are real.

So nobody should be questioning the legitimacy of my lifts. Also, if anything, that would be a compliment.

But as it stands now, I'm going to make it a point to deadlift 405x20 on video before the year is over.

And if I only hit 14-15-16-17 reps, that's fine too. But the goal will be 405x20, at 180-190 body weight off juice, so that Walter Sobchak shuts the fuck up.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on August 23, 2022, 11:05:59 AM
Matt I still don't really understand why someone so concerned with health that you eat so little would jump on drugs for a temporary look. Are you sure you can cope with the come down?
Also i asked a while back but don't think you saw, have you got stretch marks anywhere from the rapid weight gsin?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 23, 2022, 11:17:08 AM
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Chl2ZfvAlPR/

Strongman allows wrist wraps/gloves?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 11:22:36 AM
Strongman allows wrist wraps/gloves?

Apparently it does not allow “activating your hamstrings”….

Even Brian Wood Healy Hankins has better twig legs than this.

Pathetic bullshitters.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 23, 2022, 11:34:10 AM

Also, it has come to my attention that you're Jewish.

Nobody but you - an avowed Holocaust denying, Anti-Semite cares if Walter is Jewish or not.

It has come to your attention? Is this a threat? ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 23, 2022, 11:38:00 AM
That makes sense. Hmf.

Jews are virtually sacrosanct in our society. Yet some of them can't even handle One Goyim who holds public a critical view of them.

I guess on some level, deep in their bones, they know it only takes one such person to get the dominoes tipping.

But that wouldn't happen without a reason.

Walter Sobchak needs to stop worrying. Unless the Jewish investment banks plan to starve Gentiles or something, he'll be fine.

Keep digging Matt, your grave is almost deep enough to bury you... just another couple of shovel's full, and it is bye, bye!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on August 23, 2022, 11:42:03 AM
You guys are placacating a future serial killer.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 23, 2022, 11:47:10 AM
You guys are placacating a future serial killer.

You may be a totally worthless morbidly obese fcker, but I have to agree with you here. Matt has just enough “Down’s” to be scary.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 12:02:54 PM
Nobody but you - an avowed Holocaust denying, Anti-Semite cares if Walter is Jewish or not.

It has come to your attention? Is this a threat? ::)

Prime, I’m not Jewish and tiny weirdo Matt Canning is certainly not threatening me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 23, 2022, 12:03:29 PM
You may be a totally worthless morbidly obese fcker, but I have to agree with you here. Matt has just enough “Down’s” to be scary.
LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 12:04:34 PM
You may be a totally worthless morbidly obese fcker, but I have to agree with you here. Matt has just enough “Down’s” to be scary.

What is the little phaggot Matt Canning going to do?

Overwhelm people with a flurry of shitty back double bicep poses?  😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 12:06:32 PM
Matt I still don't really understand why someone so concerned with health that you eat so little would jump on drugs for a temporary look. Are you sure you can cope with the come down?
Also i asked a while back but don't think you saw, have you got stretch marks anywhere from the rapid weight gsin?

Fair question, hench.

Yes, I believe so. I have spent years competing underweight amongst juicers, and had no insecurity there.

For example, look at how skinny I am here [157-lb, and roughly as strong as I am now, because I was events training, just one month before a contest in 2016]:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzFS71AW89/

I also completed at 163-lb, in 2015 - which is a light body weight even for me:



Between competing in local contests, and lightweight contests for years, as well as running my former bodybuilding website, and going to expos SURROUNDED by juicers, I had many reasons to cave and indulge in steroids.

It's a miracle that I didn't juice way more, being so completely immersed in the culture.

Also, I was only on 16mg of Anadrol daily, now reduced to 12.5mg daily. My results were very good, for three reasons:

[1] The Anadrol.
[2] Doubling of my calories.
[3] Pro-pandemic muscle memory.

^ I might also add, extremely fresh receptors.

One would not ordinarily gain 25-lb from so little Anadrol, IMO. So half that weight is likely just from calories.

So I could, hypothetically, stay around 190, after all this is said and done.

I will have to make that decision later.

So to answer your question, I think I should be fine going back to my normal, thin appearance.

I will miss the full and pumped look that I can easily get now...but I knew going into it that it would be for the summer only.

As for stretch marks - nope, not that I can see! I think Bruce Randall showed that skin elasticity is genetic, and I've been lucky to not have had any issues with that this time out. I have some armpit stretch marks from 20 years ago, but that's it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 23, 2022, 12:09:48 PM
Strongman allows wrist wraps/gloves?

Strongman allows wraps, figure-8's, etc (Hitching, etc).

Much different rules than traditional powerlifting..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 23, 2022, 12:13:05 PM
Prime, I’m not Jewish and tiny weirdo Matt Canning is certainly not threatening me.

I forgive you for not being Jewish. :) I am not Jewish either. Also, I didn't think you felt threatened by him. Why would you? Although it does seem like that was what he was attempting to do.

   
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 12:14:15 PM
Strongman allows wraps, figure-8's, etc (Hitching, etc).

Much different rules than traditional powerlifting..

In “Strongman” do you usually have to give the contest promoter $5,000 - $10,000 so that he will let you participate?

Asking for a curious friend.

😂 🤣 😆
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 23, 2022, 12:15:55 PM
I forgive you for not being Jewish. :) I am not Jewish either. Also, I didn't think you felt threatened by him. Why would you? Although it does seem like that was what he was attempting to do.

   
Prime don`t believe Walter.....he`s scared shitless !!   ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 12:17:29 PM
Prime don`t believe Walter.....he`s scared shitless !!   ;D
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 23, 2022, 12:18:32 PM
.


I kid ....I kid!   LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 23, 2022, 12:21:03 PM
What is the little phaggot Matt Canning going to do?

Overwhelm people with a flurry of shitty back double bicep poses?  😂

Dude - seriously??? Have you not heard of odd jobs that should have been identified and put away like Bundy, Dahmer, Gacy??? You take a weirdo 1/2 retard who has a micro penis and claims to be straight yet sends other men videos of himself jacking off and dribbling some semen out - who hates women and lives his life online - allow him to roam free - and you have created a chef of “Human cuisine”
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 23, 2022, 12:22:03 PM
Dude - seriously??? Have you not heard of odd jobs that should have been identified and put away like Bundy, Dahmer, Gacy??? You take a weirdo 1/2 retard who has a micro penis and claims to be straight yet sends other men videos of himself jacking off and dribbling some semen out - who hates women and lives his life online - allow him to roam free - and you have created a chef of “Human cuisine”
FUCKING BRUTAL !!  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 12:23:06 PM
I kid ....I kid!   LOL  ;D

I was bigger and taller than this when I was 12 years old.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 23, 2022, 12:24:50 PM
FUCKING BRUTAL !!  ;D

I truly am an asshole! 😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 12:25:14 PM
Dude - seriously??? Have you not heard of odd jobs that should have been identified and put away like Bundy, Dahmer, Gacy??? You take a weirdo 1/2 retard who has a micro penis and claims to be straight yet sends other men videos of himself jacking off and dribbling some semen out - who hates women and lives his life online - allow him to roam free - and you have created a chef of “Human cuisine”
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 12:27:51 PM
I truly am an asshole! 😂

Matt Canning being a fucking weirdo doesn’t make you an asshole, it just makes you more self-aware.

Your low self esteem is just good judgement.

LOL
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 23, 2022, 01:31:52 PM
Fair question, hench.

Yes, I believe so. I have spent years competing underweight amongst juicers, and had no insecurity there.

For example, look at how skinny I am here [157-lb, and roughly as strong as I am now, because I was events training, just one month before a contest in 2016]:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzFS71AW89/

I also completed at 163-lb, in 2015 - which is a light body weight even for me:



Between competing in local contests, and lightweight contests for years, as well as running my former bodybuilding website, and going to expos SURROUNDED by juicers, I had many reasons to cave and indulge in steroids.

It's a miracle that I didn't juice way more, being so completely immersed in the culture.

Also, I was only on 16mg of Anadrol daily, now reduced to 12.5mg daily. My results were very good, for three reasons:

[1] The Anadrol.
[2] Doubling of my calories.
[3] Pro-pandemic muscle memory.


^ I might also add, extremely fresh receptors.

One would not ordinarily gain 25-lb from so little Anadrol, IMO. So half that weight is likely just from calories.

So I could, hypothetically, stay around 190, after all this is said and done.

I will have to make that decision later.

So to answer your question, I think I should be fine going back to my normal, thin appearance.

I will miss the full and pumped look that I can easily get now...but I knew going into it that it would be for the summer only.

As for stretch marks - nope, not that I can see! I think Bruce Randall showed that skin elasticity is genetic, and I've been lucky to not have had any issues with that this time out. I have some armpit stretch marks from 20 years ago, but that's it.

If you simply had done two and three, you'd be well over 200-lbs and muscular, by the end of the year (or earlier) PERMANENTLY! No need to shrink during the fall or the winter.

And you can do so and be in good health.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 01:31:55 PM
Strongman allows wrist wraps/gloves?

Yes sir - for the wraps. I'm not sure about gloves.

Strongman is just - lock it out. It's far less refined than powerlifting. That's what I like about it.

I could probably, at my best, pull a hideous 545. I can't fathom ever deadlifting even 495 with proper form, and with only chalk.

I am just better suited for Strongman events than powerlifting meets.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 23, 2022, 01:37:29 PM
As for me - training on a bodybuilding program has been my focus, so I haven't deadlifted for a while. Yesterday, I went up to 415 for reps on my heaviest set.
:)

Why is there (or should there be) a difference between your training? Plenty of bodybuilders do deadlifts, as part of their training, the most famous of which would be.....



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 01:38:40 PM
You may be a totally worthless morbidly obese fcker, but I have to agree with you here. Matt has just enough “Down’s” to be scary.

I'm partially glad this is recognized, but I want something to be acknowledged here:

Anyone I hurt WILL be targeted for good reason, not random chance.

Anyone I hurt will have been warned multiple times.

Did you know that under Canadian law, no one has to wear a mask? I was aware of this, and on December 2nd, 2020, somehow the police actually showed up to trespass me from a chain bookstore, when the manager called 911 on me.

I couldn't believe it.

Anyway, I waited 6.5 months to get a written statement from police ensuring I wouldn't be forced to wear a mask.

The police, knowing they had no authority and had to keep citizens playing pandemic through social intimidation, refused to write me back, ensuring my rights will be respected.

So I wrote them back stating I'll be carrying a blade on me from now on, and if ANY police officer lays a hand on me in violation of my rights with respect to masking, I'll stab that cop right in the throat.

Feel free to go online to the Thunder Bay Police Service website, and send them this post.

Go ahead. Do it right now.

...

End result? After calmly waiting over half a year for these cocksuckers to answer me, I got a reply within ONE WEEK ensuring I would not be legally made to wear a mask.

Bottom line: I'm not a man to be told what to do.

You talk a lot of shit online, Marvin. But let me tell you - I'm a competent wrestler, I'm strong, and despite no striking training specifically, I hit like a hammer. You talk shit about me online when I am a perfectly fair and easy person to talk to. But in person, you wouldn't DARE say any of that to my face.

There isn't a single WORD I say online that I wouldn't say in person.

You should give that model a thought.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 23, 2022, 01:41:13 PM
:)





arching his back right over like that is what causes disc compression and damage

If anyone thinks doing that helped him win the Olympia they are deluded
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 01:42:11 PM
Strongman allows wraps, figure-8's, etc (Hitching, etc).

Much different rules than traditional powerlifting..

That's why I love it.

I also have the physiology to lift with crap form and not get hurt.

Powerlifting is just way more refined. But hey - to each their own.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on August 23, 2022, 01:44:02 PM
You may be a totally worthless morbidly obese fcker, but I have to agree with you here. Matt has just enough “Down’s” to be scary.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 01:55:23 PM
Prime, I’m not Jewish and tiny weirdo Matt Canning is certainly not threatening me.

You're a Jew...aren't you?

Rare video of Matt Canning meeting Walter Sobchak at his office job:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 02:00:25 PM
In “Strongman” do you usually have to give the contest promoter $5,000 - $10,000 so that he will let you participate?

Asking for a curious friend.

😂 🤣 😆

Go on YouTube and search for any Strongman competition for 80-kg lifters.

They are all around my strength level - and easily as strong as your average 250-lb gym rats.

You are so utterly delusional, I'm not even clear you work out. Anyone who works out knows how rare a 500-lb deadlift or 350-lb bench press is for ANYONE. Especially someone my size.

A 3x body weight deadlift is a world class lift. Not a world RECORD, but something that puts you in that group. Whether you are 170 deadlifting 510, 200 deadlifting 600, or 250 deadlifting 750, you are strong as hell.

Anyone who lifts would know that. I don't have any reason to believe you lift at all.

Another SquadFatter keyboard warrior, lol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 02:04:55 PM
Dude - seriously??? Have you not heard of odd jobs that should have been identified and put away like Bundy, Dahmer, Gacy??? You take a weirdo 1/2 retard who has a micro penis and claims to be straight yet sends other men videos of himself jacking off and dribbling some semen out - who hates women and lives his life online - allow him to roam free - and you have created a chef of “Human cuisine”

I just want to be left alone.

I'm not a man to be told what to do, whether that be by a boss, of by the police. And it will never happen again - I'd sooner be in jail than toe the line of some moron.

All I can say is this: no one has the least bit to worry about as long as they leave me alone. They have absolutely nothing to do worry about at all.

But if they meddle in my affairs, violate my rights, or otherwise hurt me - I don't even want to know what I'm capable of.

I could say what I would do if Walter Sobchak talked shit to me in person, but that's a moot point:

He wouldn't dare.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 23, 2022, 02:06:44 PM
arching his back right over like that is what causes disc compression and damage

If anyone thinks doing that helped him win the Olympia they are deluded

Coleman was a powerlifter (ADFPA, I believe). So, it looks as if he just kept doing those lifts when he got into bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 02:09:57 PM
If you simply had done two and three, you'd be well over 200-lbs and muscular, by the end of the year (or earlier) PERMANENTLY! No need to shrink during the fall or the winter.

And you can do so and be in good health.

But MCWAY - gear gives you a different look. My muscles generally don't "pop" like this. It's a very cool look.

That being said, I agree with you on being natural, for the overwhelming majority of the time.

What I don't understand is why you are against running a cycle even once or twice a decade.

Also, keep in mind, steroids allow you to get to any given physique level faster.

I didn't want to look like this in November. I wanted to look like this in June and through the summer. Anadrol got me there in two weeks, and I got the summer I wanted. I'd have been in shape had I not used gear, but I wouldn't have looked like this:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 02:12:22 PM
Rare video of Walter Sobchak - go to 2:00:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 02:14:14 PM
While neither will be easy lifts, if I deadlift 405x20 and bench press 225x30, would that be sufficient for everyone else to ignore Walter Sobchak's claims about my strength going forward?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 23, 2022, 02:22:37 PM
While neither will be easy lifts, if I deadlift 405x20 and bench press 225x30, would that be sufficient for everyone else to ignore Walter Sobchak's claims about my strength going forward?

Matt why are you so Bothered by what Walter or anyone else thinks of your Strength levels ??
It Doesn't add up 🤷🏻‍♂️ We're mostly anonymous posters - Walter could be a 17yr old girl or Eddie Hall
What difference does it make ??

I've posted what I've previously lifted & Comps that I've won - If other don't believe Me it don't bother
Me - I'm Happy & Secure in my on Achievements & Abilities.

I'm certainly not going to get into a Pissing Contest - I can Piss Further Than - Oh No you can't.
Fuck That Nonsense.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 23, 2022, 02:39:13 PM
.

I don’t give a fck enough to do it on my own, but it would be cool if somebody would do a side by side with Poindexter from ROTN. That pic reminds me of him.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 23, 2022, 03:22:47 PM
I just want to be left alone.

I'm not a man to be told what to do, whether that be by a boss, of by the police. And it will never happen again - I'd sooner be in jail than toe the line of some moron.

All I can say is this: no one has the least bit to worry about as long as they leave me alone. They have absolutely nothing to do worry about at all.

But if they meddle in my affairs, violate my rights, or otherwise hurt me - I don't even want to know what I'm capable of.

I could say what I would do if Walter Sobchak talked shit to me in person, but that's a moot point:

He wouldn't dare.

And yet you are considering letting a female move in with you... you think she won't start telling you what to do?  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on August 23, 2022, 03:35:28 PM
.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1388404;image)
(https://d1qxviojg2h5lt.cloudfront.net/resized-images/310/01CT2X1V81D5KRBMPWXFF8XRZ2/rickmoranis400b.webp)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 03:35:34 PM
I'm partially glad this is recognized, but I want something to be acknowledged here:

Anyone I hurt WILL be targeted for good reason, not random chance.

Anyone I hurt will have been warned multiple times.

Did you know that under Canadian law, no one has to wear a mask? I was aware of this, and on December 2nd, 2020, somehow the police actually showed up to trespass me from a chain bookstore, when the manager called 911 on me.

I couldn't believe it.

Anyway, I waited 6.5 months to get a written statement from police ensuring I wouldn't be forced to wear a mask.

The police, knowing they had no authority and had to keep citizens playing pandemic through social intimidation, refused to write me back, ensuring my rights will be respected.

So I wrote them back stating I'll be carrying a blade on me from now on, and if ANY police officer lays a hand on me in violation of my rights with respect to masking, I'll stab that cop right in the throat.

Feel free to go online to the Thunder Bay Police Service website, and send them this post.

Go ahead. Do it right now.

...

End result? After calmly waiting over half a year for these cocksuckers to answer me, I got a reply within ONE WEEK ensuring I would not be legally made to wear a mask.

Bottom line: I'm not a man to be told what to do.

You talk a lot of shit online, Marvin. But let me tell you - I'm a competent wrestler, I'm strong, and despite no striking training specifically, I hit like a hammer. You talk shit about me online when I am a perfectly fair and easy person to talk to. But in person, you wouldn't DARE say any of that to my face.

There isn't a single WORD I say online that I wouldn't say in person.

You should give that model a thought.

Matt Canning the 160 lb weakling trying to threaten people online.

Hahahahahaha!!!!

That’s fucking comical. Hey clownshoes, go send another jerkoff video to some old soggy phaggot. The adults are talking here little girl and you keep interrupting.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 23, 2022, 03:38:00 PM
While neither will be easy lifts, if I deadlift 405x20 and bench press 225x30, would that be sufficient for everyone else to ignore Walter Sobchak's claims about my strength going forward?

Without the drugs you are half the size of bhank.

And that’s really embarrassing for a 40 year old steroid user.

Clownshoes…
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 23, 2022, 05:52:35 PM
While neither will be easy lifts, if I deadlift 405x20 and bench press 225x30, would that be sufficient for everyone else to ignore Walter Sobchak's claims about my strength going forward?

Nobody here puts any credence in Walter's claims.  It's all just typical Getbig messing around.

You have nothing to prove to any of us.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on August 23, 2022, 06:22:37 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1388404;image)
(https://d1qxviojg2h5lt.cloudfront.net/resized-images/310/01CT2X1V81D5KRBMPWXFF8XRZ2/rickmoranis400b.webp)
Prick moranis
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 09:25:02 PM
Matt why are you so Bothered by what Walter or anyone else thinks of your Strength levels ??
It Doesn't add up 🤷🏻‍♂️ We're mostly anonymous posters - Walter could be a 17yr old girl or Eddie Hall
What difference does it make ??

I've posted what I've previously lifted & Comps that I've won - If other don't believe Me it don't bother
Me - I'm Happy & Secure in my on Achievements & Abilities.

I'm certainly not going to get into a Pissing Contest - I can Piss Further Than - Oh No you can't.
Fuck That Nonsense.

I suppose because early on, I probably avoided strength contests because according to some Getbiggers, my strength was nowhere close enough to perform.

Boy, was I ever shocked when I found out I was competitive in my weight class. So...Getbig bullshit definitely got to my head as a younger man, and I resent that such delusional comments still proliferate around here.

I warm up with Walter Sobchak's workout.

I also remember the trashing of Layne Norton on here. By the time he deadlifted 700, people universally shut the fuck up.

I just want to post some lifts where this board just universally shuts the fuck up about me.

If I deadlift 405x20, it would be to hard for ANYONE to deny my strength.

Keep in mind that about a decade or so ago, Derek Poundstone deadlifted 405x26 in one of Dave Palumbo's "Bros vs. Pros" contests. He was 2nd in the world around the same time.

I just want to post videos that make anyone trashing my strength look like absolute dumb fucks.

That said, anyone who trashes my previous lifts as they currently stand is a bit of a moron.

Example:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 23, 2022, 09:31:15 PM
And yet you are considering letting a female move in with you... you think she won't start telling you what to do?  ;D

Yeah, lol...

I don't know...

She's hot enough that it could be worthwhile, but I see a big potential for things to go wrong.

I don't get how people have long-term relationships.  Wouldn't proximity alone just get on people's nerves? Even assuming good behaviour, I see problems happening. But hey, I do enjoy being alone.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 24, 2022, 02:34:56 AM
"It's all steroids." So what?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Chnd7xBF-yj/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: rocket on August 24, 2022, 03:26:39 AM
So if ANYONE thinks I can't deadlift 405x20 before the year is over, tell me RIGHT NOW.

I seem to have a bit of data from a few years ago for this.  Roughly around the same time I did 240kg (528lb) for 4, I pulled 192.5kg (423lb) for 15 (not in the same workout, I was fresh). 

And I have to laugh at your comment about your form for deadlift.  I've never, ever seen a deadlift that I've done that looked anything short of horrific.  Yours look fine to me.

Not sure if this will work for you but I too am 40 (actually 41) and I've recently been only deadlifting / squatting once every week and a half (offset from each other).  So far, this has allowed me to push the envelope with both lifts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marty Champions on August 24, 2022, 04:51:07 AM
While neither will be easy lifts, if I deadlift 405x20 and bench press 225x30, would that be sufficient for everyone else to ignore Walter Sobchak's claims about my strength going forward?
why waste your time proving these people , like time wasonlycock they sit at that pc all day just like you wasting time using typing muscles for no good reason
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 24, 2022, 05:17:21 AM
why waste your time proving these people , like time wasonlycock they sit at that pc all day just like you wasting time using typing muscles for no good reason
And you`re having a hell of a time straining what`s left of your brain muscle just attempting to complete a fucking sentence.......you fat fucking hillbilly bitch !  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 24, 2022, 05:20:49 AM
"It's all steroids." So what?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Chnd7xBF-yj/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Looks like shit
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 24, 2022, 07:57:12 AM
I suppose because early on, I probably avoided strength contests because according to some Getbiggers, my strength was nowhere close enough to perform.

Boy, was I ever shocked when I found out I was competitive in my weight class. So...Getbig bullshit definitely got to my head as a younger man, and I resent that such delusional comments still proliferate around here.

I warm up with Walter Sobchak's workout.

I also remember the trashing of Layne Norton on here. By the time he deadlifted 700, people universally shut the fuck up.

I just want to post some lifts where this board just universally shuts the fuck up about me.

If I deadlift 405x20, it would be to hard for ANYONE to deny my strength.

Keep in mind that about a decade or so ago, Derek Poundstone deadlifted 405x26 in one of Dave Palumbo's "Bros vs. Pros" contests. He was 2nd in the world around the same time.

I just want to post videos that make anyone trashing my strength look like absolute dumb fucks.

That said, anyone who trashes my previous lifts as they currently stand is a bit of a moron.

Example:




Matt - You're coming across as highly insecure about yourself & your strength level .

The Only Person you Need to Impress / convince is Yourself.
IF you have to / Want to prove any thing to Anonymous individuals
on Getbig - Then Keep Quiet & enter a Strongman / Powerlifting Competition
where there are Rules & judges & once you've competed Then Post up The Videos of you lifting .

That's Exactly what Tommy W Did & He's Impressed everyone.
Stop Trying to Brag all the Time. Just go do it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 24, 2022, 12:24:57 PM

Matt - You're coming across as highly insecure about yourself & your strength level .

The Only Person you Need to Impress / convince is Yourself.
IF you have to / Want to prove any thing to Anonymous individuals
on Getbig - Then Keep Quiet & enter a Strongman / Powerlifting Competition
where there are Rules & judges & once you've competed Then Post up The Videos of you lifting .

That's Exactly what Tommy W Did & He's Impressed everyone.
Stop Trying to Brag all the Time. Just go do it.
Great and very sound advice.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 24, 2022, 01:02:09 PM
The moonlight was magnificent last night.

Anyway, it's time for me to wind down this cycle. I've been around 15mg Anadrol daily for 10 weeks.

Any suggestions on making the move back to twig city?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 24, 2022, 01:08:53 PM
The moonlight was magnificent last night.

Anyway, it's time for me to wind down this cycle. I've been around 15mg Anadrol daily for 10 weeks.

Any suggestions on making the move back to twig city?

Just keep doing what you are doing and be aware of any emotional triggers.

Everyone is different when they come off gear.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Megalodon on August 24, 2022, 01:20:45 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/yx2Tvw37/wtrwrtwtwtwtr.png)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 24, 2022, 01:45:33 PM
Yeah, lol...

I don't know...

She's hot enough that it could be worthwhile, but I see a big potential for things to go wrong.

I don't get how people have long-term relationships.  Wouldn't proximity alone just get on people's nerves? Even assuming good behaviour, I see problems happening. But hey, I do enjoy being alone.

This informs that you are a confirmed bachelor. Chances are you do not have a long-term relationship in your future. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 24, 2022, 02:54:28 PM
"It's all steroids." So what?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Chnd7xBF-yj/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

I interviewed him a decade ago:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 24, 2022, 03:02:01 PM
I seem to have a bit of data from a few years ago for this.  Roughly around the same time I did 240kg (528lb) for 4, I pulled 192.5kg (423lb) for 15 (not in the same workout, I was fresh). 

And I have to laugh at your comment about your form for deadlift.  I've never, ever seen a deadlift that I've done that looked anything short of horrific.  Yours look fine to me.

Not sure if this will work for you but I too am 40 (actually 41) and I've recently been only deadlifting / squatting once every week and a half (offset from each other).  So far, this has allowed me to push the envelope with both lifts.

Interesting...

Maybe 405 for 11-12-13 will be harder than I thought. And without any body weight behind me, I should be happy with that.

I'd be content with a 405x12 deadlift video. I have a 410x9 on video, and I'd like to record all of my max lifts while I can still get them.

Strength is the last thing to leave an athlete. And more than one Getbigger has claimed to have gotten even stronger while into their fifties, which I find impressive.

Thanks for complimenting my deadlift form. It was much worse before. But I do get relatively little hamstrings activation when I do it. So that may be a way to up my deadlift by 50-lb if I can do that.

But I'm Strongman, all that matters is the lockout, which is why I'm never had the incentive to refine my form.

That's cool that you bench pressed 165-lb dumbbells, and cool that we are the same age, lol.

I find it strange that people make fun of wes' age, when the average Getbigger age is 65.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 24, 2022, 03:22:56 PM
I`m in my prime.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 24, 2022, 03:36:53 PM
I`m in my prime.

Close enough!!

I'm glad to know that, since I'd like to hit a few personal records into my forties. A 550 deadlift would be fantastic.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 24, 2022, 06:00:20 PM
Hey guys - I'm not sure how healthy it is carrying around 30-lb of extra body weight - or potentially 50-lb, if I go to 220 - but I much prefer this look to how I used to look, while holding back in the name of health.

Is there any way I can incorporate steroids into my life moving forward that won't significantly compromise my health? Or should I just cancel such plans immediately?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 24, 2022, 06:02:37 PM
Hey guys - I'm not sure how healthy it is carrying around 30-lb of extra body weight - or potentially 50-lb, if I go to 220 - but I much prefer this look to how I used to look, while holding back in the name of health.

Is there any way I can incorporate steroids into my life moving forward that won't significantly compromise my health? Or should I just cancel such plans immediately?

No.

Dorian Yates says it is a bad idea, especially when you are older.

If you are young and competing is the only time he thinks it is worthwhile, and even then be smart about it.

TRT is ok if you have a real need for it.  Few men do.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 24, 2022, 06:03:56 PM
No.

Damn shame.

Ah well - 185-lb natural is an ok look for me. I was being too cautious staying at 170. I'll bring my body weight up to 185.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: beakdoctor on August 24, 2022, 06:12:23 PM
No.

Dorian Yates says it is a bad idea, especially when you are older.

If you are young and competing is the only time he thinks it is worthwhile, and even then be smart about it.

TRT is ok if you have a real need for it.  Few men do.

Im not arguing that blasting a ton of gear isnt a great idea especially st an older age.

But Dorian Yates also thinks the Twin Towers were a hologram and the entire 9/11 event was fake.


On another note

Matt, you're looking big and strong but that moonlight pic makes it look like you're growing bitch tits. Is that just a matter of lighting or are there problems brewing?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 24, 2022, 06:25:54 PM
Im not arguing that blasting a ton of gear isnt a great idea especially st an older age.

But Dorian Yates also thinks the Twin Towers were a hologram and the entire 9/11 event was fake.


On another note

Matt, you're looking big and strong but that moonlight pic makes it look like you're growing bitch tits. Is that just a matter of lighting or are there problems brewing?

That's a good question.

There is no lump there. Whatever is there has been there for over five years.

See the shirtless 170-lb video here:

t

What do you think? Is that gyno?

My friend with gyno says it is just fat and water.

Discuss this please.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 24, 2022, 07:27:26 PM
Yeah, lol...

I don't know...

She's hot enough that it could be worthwhile, but I see a big potential for things to go wrong.

I don't get how people have long-term relationships.  Wouldn't proximity alone just get on people's nerves? Even assuming good behaviour, I see problems happening. But hey, I do enjoy being alone.

You are in the minority here, but I'm there with you (no homo)

There are women out there who share this trait or are just willing to comprise. Ideally you want to live close by, maybe neighbours and maybe just spend a few hours a day together. That's how I tend to do it and it worked pretty well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: michael arvilla on August 24, 2022, 07:34:14 PM
Bro ………..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SGT BARNES on August 24, 2022, 09:02:39 PM
you fellas understand that matts jew hate is just a red herring right?

His profile totally outs him, look at that nose? do you think anyone who sees him thinks he isnt hasidic?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 24, 2022, 09:14:30 PM
Bro ………..

TITTIES!

T-I-T-T-I-E-S !!!!!

The weak little manlet is lactating. 😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 03:22:33 AM
GRAPE APE: if you are reading this, I can use your immediate assistance and expertise with respect to chest training.

At my strongest, I did a single with 345, and could do 25 reps with 225.  My chest still looked like garbage. Unfortunately, I have very poor chest genetics - do you know how wes has that "shelf" look to his chest? I think he also has natural pec lines, which make his chest look big at any level of mass. Mark Wahlberg has great pec lines, and his chest looks impressive even at literally 138-lb, as he was in Boogie Nights!

Classic Getbigger Bast also has a chest that basically goes into his armpits. My chest has none of these genetic advantages. The photo of me below is from 2007, and I was bench pressing roughly 325 at that time, with a chest that inferior! Meanwhile, look at wes' superior chest.

My question for you, Grape Ape: should I even bother improving my chest in any serious way this late in the game, or should I dedicate such massive efforts to areas that I actually see results?

I would still be training chest hard, but in terms of trying to bring my chest up, with my poor genetics, is the juice worth the squeeze?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 03:55:04 AM
why waste your time proving these people , like time wasonlycock they sit at that pc all day just like you wasting time using typing muscles for no good reason

Basically because Tim's chest is unbelievable. It's similar to Mark Wahlberg's chest in that it has that "shelf" look to it.

That being said, perhaps Tim's genetics would bestow him a good looking chest even if he didn't train it at all.

After all, Mark Wahlberg was essentially starving himself for Boogie Nights, and he still had a better chest shape than I had while benching 345. My heaviest weight this cycle was 208 - a full 70-lb heavier than Mark Wahlberg in Boogie Nights - yet Mark had a better chest than me while he was weighing 138.

So maybe it's genetic with people with Tim, Mark Wahlberg, Bast, etc, so perhaps I shouldn't be asking them for advice for that reason.

Unbelievable "shelf" look to the pecs. Incredible:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 04:20:33 AM
Just keep doing what you are doing and be aware of any emotional triggers.

Everyone is different when they come off gear.

Thank you, good sir.

I feel like I'm on so little that it shouldn't matter much.

One local competitor who has been advising me has said PCT is unnecessary - not just for my current mini-cycle, but in general. He said I can recover on my own, and that I would just be adding more chemicals to my body for no good reason. Do you have a view on PCT?

I did take a full 10 days off in July, and I didn't notice any mental effects. As Anadrol can definitely be felt in 10 days, is if safe to say that any adverse post-cycle effects could also be felt by that time?

I may be drinking Fireball whiskey tonight. I've already taken three days off Anadrol, which is an extra day more than I usually go, but I'm thinking taking a 25mg Anadrol + four shots of whiskey may be unnecessarily risky.

Am I worrying over nothing, or would taking another day off from Anadrol be wise, just to avoid the hepatotoxic effects of combining methylated steroids with alcohol?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 04:24:17 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/yx2Tvw37/wtrwrtwtwtwtr.png)

LOL!!!!!

Can you photo that to be slightly more realistic? Maybe +2 inches on my current arms and legs + lats?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 25, 2022, 04:36:02 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/yx2Tvw37/wtrwrtwtwtwtr.png)


This is how I was expecting Matt to look like with PED's & Bodybuilding
Training .
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: rocket on August 25, 2022, 06:29:49 AM
Interesting...

Maybe 405 for 11-12-13 will be harder than I thought. And without any body weight behind me, I should be happy with that.

I'd be content with a 405x12 deadlift video. I have a 410x9 on video, and I'd like to record all of my max lifts while I can still get them.

Strength is the last thing to leave an athlete. And more than one Getbigger has claimed to have gotten even stronger while into their fifties, which I find impressive.

Thanks for complimenting my deadlift form. It was much worse before. But I do get relatively little hamstrings activation when I do it. So that may be a way to up my deadlift by 50-lb if I can do that.

But I'm Strongman, all that matters is the lockout, which is why I'm never had the incentive to refine my form.

That's cool that you bench pressed 165-lb dumbbells, and cool that we are the same age, lol.

I find it strange that people make fun of wes' age, when the average Getbigger age is 65.  ;D

I think you'll get at least 15.  I just imagine those last 5 to get 20 are going to be extremely high heart rate savagery.  I was very conditioned for higher rep sets when I did the 15 I mentioned.  Even then, it would have been at least 10 minutes of lying down after, for sure.

I did try a bit of shoulder pressing by the way.  Pretty shit at 35kg dbs onwards.  I've made it a higher priority than benching, I'll see if I can bring it up.  I've never really pursued it.  I don't generally enjoy shoulder pressing but I do enjoy the idea of getting some free strength gains. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 25, 2022, 06:37:17 AM
I`m in my prime.

(https://y.yarn.co/b9516634-fa78-46a4-a005-6232fd5a7316_text.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 25, 2022, 07:08:13 AM
GRAPE APE: if you are reading this, I can use your immediate assistance and expertise with respect to chest training.

At my strongest, I did a single with 345, and could do 25 reps with 225.  My chest still looked like garbage. Unfortunately, I have very poor chest genetics - do you know how wes has that "shelf" look to his chest? I think he also has natural pec lines, which make his chest look big at any level of mass. Mark Wahlberg has great pec lines, and his chest looks impressive even at literally 138-lb, as he was in Boogie Nights!

Classic Getbigger Bast also has a chest that basically goes into his armpits. My chest has none of these genetic advantages. The photo of me below is from 2007, and I was bench pressing roughly 325 at that time, with a chest that inferior! Meanwhile, look at wes' superior chest.

My question for you, Grape Ape: should I even bother improving my chest in any serious way this late in the game, or should I dedicate such massive efforts to areas that I actually see results?

I would still be training chest hard, but in terms of trying to bring my chest up, with my poor genetics, is the juice worth the squeeze?

Obviously I'm not Grape Ape, but....

I don't see any inclines in your chest routines. Nor do I see any dips. You may want to emphasize them and cut back the flat benches for a while.

Or, you can do pre-exhaust supersets, where you do flyes immediately followed by some form of pressing movements (flat or incline).

Try that for a month or two.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 25, 2022, 07:43:21 AM
Obviously I'm not Grape Ape, but....

I don't see any inclines in your chest routines. Nor do I see any dips. You may want to emphasize them and cut back the flat benches for a while.

Or, you can do pre-exhaust supersets, where you do flyes immediately followed by some form of pressing movements (flat or incline).

Try that for a month or two.

I didn't see the post until you quoted it.

Personally, I would say to not care.  I was in the same boat as Matt in that context, as my best bench was a 325 single, and 225 at 18, 240 at 13, etc, but had shitty chest development as well.  It's all about muscle insertions and shape, and you have that, or you don't.

BUT, if he wants to take a shot at it - try the advices others have already given here:  Pull the shoulders back, do slow, controlled reps with constant tension, and feel the chest squeeze at the top on any movement chosen.  I don't think the exercise choice matters as much.  Don't worry about strength or numbers, just use a weight that enable this type of training.  It's the bodybuilder pump type stuff.

Or, really, just don't care. If your shoulders grow instead, it's fine.  It's still a good look.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 07:58:59 AM

This is how I was expecting Matt to look like with PED's & Bodybuilding
Training .

You know...arms are not my strength, but I feel I have a sort of...aesthetic look to my arms. They are pretty round.

I have an Ironage shot of biceps from 2010. I was pleased with the aesthetic of my arms.

On that note, I do prefer my current look to my natural one. That said, I am not willing to strongly compromise my health for a look. I'm willing to make some adjustments to try to be the best 185-190 I can be - with a keyword being SUSTAINABLE. Note how I tend to always look the same - that's to both be identifiable to those who know me, and also because I want to have a lifestyle and look that is sustainable...I don't see see the point of getting a certain look only briefly, then to look nothing like that. I did it this time because the Canadian fake pandemic response was a disaster, and ruinous to my mental health. I needed to start feeling better fast, and steroids made if happen. And I'd be shocked if I even use 60x 25mg Anadrol tablets at this point.

But one thing I found is that I do prefer this look. So I may spend this winter doing a few nutrition and training tweaks to see what I can get naturally. That said, I am of the mindset that no amount of natural training will allow me to duplicate certain aspects. Again, it's just the way my physique comes alive while on juice - it doesn't happen naturally. It would easily take ten months to achieve naturally what I can achieve in one month of Anadrol.

I can tell you - I do want to juice again next summer, and do it properly next time. No wussy little 15mg of Anadrol. With a proper test base and 3,000+ calories, I would hit 220-lb, easily. However...health concerns may prevent that.

Here's what's funny: whether be walking around in a tank top, or Big Ramy doing it, I'm getting probably 90% of the attention. And since YES, that is part of why I'm doing it - why take the health risk going to 220, when I achieve 90% of the result I want at 200...or maybe even 190?

That said - it's not JUST about the compliments. I would like to see how I'd look at 220, for my own interest...though I'm slightly concerned that weight would be a bit taxing on my system...but I really like the way my delts pop out of my tank top once I hit 200 while on PED's. It's a really cool look. Just seeing the muscle popping off a small, ectomorphic frame. I've always liked that look, and it would be a kick go see that at 220.

But...health concerns may prevent me from doing a 2023 cycle. So I may just strive for that natural 185-190, and see how that looks.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 25, 2022, 08:10:58 AM
Thank you, good sir.

I feel like I'm on so little that it shouldn't matter much.

One local competitor who has been advising me has said PCT is unnecessary - not just for my current mini-cycle, but in general. He said I can recover on my own, and that I would just be adding more chemicals to my body for no good reason. Do you have a view on PCT?

I did take a full 10 days off in July, and I didn't notice any mental effects. As Anadrol can definitely be felt in 10 days, is if safe to say that any adverse post-cycle effects could also be felt by that time?

I may be drinking Fireball whiskey tonight. I've already taken three days off Anadrol, which is an extra day more than I usually go, but I'm thinking taking a 25mg Anadrol + four shots of whiskey may be unnecessarily risky.

Am I worrying over nothing, or would taking another day off from Anadrol be wise, just to avoid the hepatotoxic effects of combining methylated steroids with alcohol?

My mind immediately comes up with things to do in your scenario. But it involves more drugs, so... :D

But if someone had done a oral only cycle of Anadrol I'd advice a farewell shot of Sustanon. Could take a good dose, 750mg. It would smooth out the comedown. The Sust would give supraphysiological levels for a couple of weeks and then a small taper. With orals you go from fully juiced to zero in a matter of hours.

Whether PCT does anything in the long run is debatable, hard to say. But if I had HCG I would do 500iu twice weekly for maybe 2 months. Clomid and Nolva I wouldn't touch. I see very few negatives with a low dose of HCG like this.

Non-steroid anabolic drugs would come in handy. Clenbuterol is slightly anabolic and promotes a leaner physique and increases strength. MK-677 is an OTC drug in many countries and is extremely effective in increasing appetite, increases water retention which increases strength. It will be slightly anabolic as it drastically increases IGF-1.

Creatine would be a given lol. People laugh but the stuff is worthwhile.

A day of drinking on steroids is unlikely to destroy your health. It's when you make it a habit that problems appear. Many drinkers routinely pop liver toxic pain killers against hangover or whatever. You think Arnold and Franco skipped the wine because they were on Dianabol?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 08:11:14 AM
I think you'll get at least 15.  I just imagine those last 5 to get 20 are going to be extremely high heart rate savagery.  I was very conditioned for higher rep sets when I did the 15 I mentioned.  Even then, it would have been at least 10 minutes of lying down after, for sure.

I did try a bit of shoulder pressing by the way.  Pretty shit at 35kg dbs onwards.  I've made it a higher priority than benching, I'll see if I can bring it up.  I've never really pursued it.  I don't generally enjoy shoulder pressing but I do enjoy the idea of getting some free strength gains.

I do think that is an attainable lift for me.

Full disclosure: I have never deadlifted 405x15. But I've gotten pretty close, while drug-free, and at or around/under 190-lb body weight.

I just learned that Derek Poundstone eventually got a 405x36 deadlift:



He originally got 405x26, and that made me think it would be unrealistic for me to aim for 405x20 at under 185-lb body weight.

I mean, 405x26 was hard for Poundstone, and I believe he was about 310-330 when he did it.

But Derek hitting 405x36 later made me second guess my second guess.  ;D

It's funny how seeing other people hit certain lifts make us think it can be done.

That said - NO, lol. 405x15 is the goal. I mean, look - 405x12 is just muscle memory. No major worries there. Not an easy lift, but...muscle memory.

So then the question becomes whether or not I can add a few reps on an already hard lift, and do it at age 40+? And ideally, at under 185-lb once I come off the sauce, just to make it an impressive feat.

And my answer is...I think so.  :)

And that will be a damn cool lift to get. 405x20 for a manlet would be even better, but I'm going to really enjoy getting 15 reps, if I manage it.

Like that 225x25 bench video - I'm glad I captured it. It's just a good video to have, because I feel it shows that, love me or hate me, no one can deny that I train hard.  :)

Thanks for the support on this, rocket. I'm going to look into hot female Registered Massage Therapists in town, to schedule the day after I attempt that pull, LOL.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 08:33:11 AM
Obviously I'm not Grape Ape, but....

I don't see any inclines in your chest routines. Nor do I see any dips. You may want to emphasize them and cut back the flat benches for a while.

Or, you can do pre-exhaust supersets, where you do flyes immediately followed by some form of pressing movements (flat or incline).

Try that for a month or two.

This is why I asked Grape Ape.  ;D

He's more realistic.

He doesn't buy into the notion that any of us can become Ronnie Coleman as long as we train hard and take Joe Weider's Dynamic Muscle Builder, Life Essence, and Metabolic Pack, and use the Weider "Rest-Pause" principle, and the "Weider Instinctive Principle" [also known as COMMON SENSE - OR TRAINING WHATEVER MUSCLE FEELS MOST RECOVERED ON ANY GIVEN DAY].

Grape Ape will just cut to the bottom and say "Nah, your chest sucks, and if it was going to grow, it would have happened already. Just train hard, try not to worry about it too much, and hope for the best."

It's you who always talks about how we can achieve whatever look we aim for if we train hard.

This is not true. I have strong shoulders to be sure, a decent aesthetic to my arm, and a little more broadly - I have a reasonably good overall aesthetic for a normal fit/athletic looking person. But I am NOT a bodybuilder, and the potential is not there.

Bodybuilders can have maybe two weak points. Like how King Kamali had weak arms and legs, but had an incredible back. Nasser's back was not great, but everything else more or less was. Dorian had not the greatest arms, but everything else was good.

And then Ronnie - He had strong *everything*. His abs shape was not good, and he "only" had 20" calves...but almost everything was strong.

For me - literally the only muscle group I have with IFBB potential from what I can tell is my delts. I lack sufficient muscle fiber everywhere else, and I am not convinced that hyperplasia is a real thing. I like my overall aesthetic, but I am not built for size. However, I am sturdy, and with anabolics, I feel I can maintain a 3x body weight deadlift, 2x body weight bench press, and 2.5x body weight squat, as my weight goes up [I can more or less get those numbers naturally, at 170].

And that's good.

I appreciate having fairly robust physical genetics, and never getting injured - at least yet.

But MCWAY, you need to stop with this notion that training tweaks will give me a chest. If I got to bench pressing 315 for reps, and looked as it I never bench pressed a day in my life, I'm not going to get a good chest if I make a few changes. Not IMO.

My chest is a sunken treasure - let's be real here.

Grape Ape is real - that's why I asked him, and not you.  ;D Because I sort of wanted to be told it be wasn't possible. That said, I will continue to train my chest hard. I just don't expect *that* much...you know? 😕
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 25, 2022, 08:33:31 AM
I didn't see the post until you quoted it.

Personally, I would say to not care.  I was in the same boat as Matt in that context, as my best bench was a 325 single, and 225 at 18, 240 at 13, etc, but had shitty chest development as well.  It's all about muscle insertions and shape, and you have that, or you don't.

BUT, if he wants to take a shot at it - try the advices others have already given here:  Pull the shoulders back, do slow, controlled reps with constant tension, and feel the chest squeeze at the top on any movement chosen.  I don't think the exercise choice matters as much.  Don't worry about strength or numbers, just use a weight that enable this type of training.  It's the bodybuilder pump type stuff.

Or, really, just don't care. If your shoulders grow instead, it's fine.  It's still a good look.

Actually, you both have the right idea. What I learned is is that it's indeed about strength. Matt needs to get his CHEST stronger.

In other words, when he benches (or dips or whatever exercise he does), the PECS have to do the work for them to grow.

Stronger pecs are bigger pecs. That's why I suggested the pre-exhaust routine.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 25, 2022, 08:39:31 AM
Big arms and shoulders are more impressive than chest anyways Matt, so who cares. And yes I would try and get some hcg after ending this cycle. And honestly I would do the same cycle every summer if I were you and just add some calories each summer and walk around big and full for 3-4 months out of the year. Prob wouldn’t hurt you much at these low doses and done once a year.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 08:44:03 AM
I didn't see the post until you quoted it.

Personally, I would say to not care.  I was in the same boat as Matt in that context, as my best bench was a 325 single, and 225 at 18, 240 at 13, etc, but had shitty chest development as well.  It's all about muscle insertions and shape, and you have that, or you don't.

This is the answer is I was looking to read.  ;D And yeah - I know we shouldn't seek out what we want to read/hear, but... it's not like I haven't worked very hard in the past to bring up my chest. I mean, it should be at the very least *better* than it has been.

It's legitimately that I get little to no development at all. It just seems like a lost cause...

My chest looks ok after chest day, and if say for instance, I go for a dip at my gym's pool directly after working chest, at least for that single moment in time I have the pecs that I always wanted. But they are temporary - as seen in this video:



But literally right now - being that today is Chest Day, and it's been one of week since I last trained it - my pecs are as flat as a pancake. 😕

Like I said - my chest pumps are ok, and I'll accept that. From what I can tell, that's the best I'll be getting.

BUT, if he wants to take a shot at it - try the advices others have already given here:  Pull the shoulders back, do slow, controlled reps with constant tension, and feel the chest squeeze at the top on any movement chosen.  I don't think the exercise choice matters as much.  Don't worry about strength or numbers, just use a weight that enable this type of training.  It's the bodybuilder pump type stuff.

Or, really, just don't care. If your shoulders grow instead, it's fine.  It's still a good look.

Good stuff.

You know - since my goal is to see about getting that 225x30 bench press, I'm not focused on my all-time 1RM right now. At least for now, I will be able to apply those principles you listed above.

I'll have to consciously remind myself of them...but that will be the best thing for me right now. I'll just throw in that 225 for reps set in there, but otherwise stick with your outlined principles.

And hey - if I see a touch of improvement from month to month...I just might keep applying them, and forget about max strength.

Thanks Grape! 🍇
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 25, 2022, 08:46:05 AM
This is why I asked Grape Ape.  ;D

He's more realistic.

He doesn't buy into the notion that any of us can become Ronnie Coleman as long as we train hard and take Joe Weider's Dynamic Muscle Builder, Life Essence, and Metabolic Pack, and use the Weider "Rest-Pause" principle, and the "Weider Instinctive Principle" [also known as COMMON SENSE - OR TRAINING WHATEVER MUSCLE FEELS MOST RECOVERED ON ANY GIVEN DAY].

Grape Ape will just cut to the bottom and say "Nah, your chest sucks, and if it was going to grow, it would have happened already. Just train hard, try not to worry about it too much, and hope for the best."

It's you who always talks about how we can achieve whatever look we aim for if we train hard.

This is not true. I have strong shoulders to be sure, a decent aesthetic to my arm, and a little more broadly - I have a reasonably good overall aesthetic for a normal fit/athletic looking person. But I am NOT a bodybuilder, and the potential is not there.

Bodybuilders can have maybe two weak points. Like how King Kamali had weak arms and legs, but had an incredible back. Nasser's back was not great, but everything else more or less was. Dorian had not the greatest arms, but everything else was good.

And then Ronnie - He had strong *everything*. His abs shape was not good, and he "only" had 20" calves...but almost everything was strong.

For me - literally the only muscle group I have with IFBB potential from what I can tell is my delts. I lack sufficient muscle fiber everywhere else, and I am not convinced that hyperplasia is a real thing. I like my overall aesthetic, but I am not built for size. However, I am sturdy, and with anabolics, I feel I can maintain a 3x body weight deadlift, 2x body weight bench press, and 2.5x body weight squat, as my weight goes up [I can more or less get those numbers naturally, at 170].

And that's good.

I appreciate having fairly robust physical genetics, and never getting injured - at least yet.

But MCWAY, you need to stop with this notion that training tweaks will give me a chest. If I got to bench pressing 315 for reps, and looked as it I never bench pressed a day in my life, I'm not going to get a good chest if I make a few changes. Not IMO.

My chest is a sunken treasure - let's be real here.

Grape Ape is real - that's why I asked him, and not you.  ;D Because I sort of wanted to be told it be wasn't possible. That said, I will continue to train my chest hard. I just don't expect *that* much...you know? 😕

There are good bodybuilders that have worse genetics than you. You could've been very impressive but it would have taken a lot of effort. Your delt and arm dominance wouldn't necessarily be a hindrance, it can look real aesthetic even if the chest lags. Look at Lee Priest. He had arms and then all the rest a level or two below.
Kamali had NOTHING except the back.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 25, 2022, 08:51:11 AM
This is why I asked Grape Ape.  ;D

He's more realistic.

He doesn't buy into the notion that any of us can become Ronnie Coleman as long as we train hard and take Joe Weider's Dynamic Muscle Builder, Life Essence, and Metabolic Pack, and use the Weider "Rest-Pause" principle, and the "Weider Instinctive Principle" [also known as COMMON SENSE - OR TRAINING WHATEVER MUSCLE FEELS MOST RECOVERED ON ANY GIVEN DAY].

Grape Ape will just cut to the bottom and say "Nah, your chest sucks, and if it was going to grow, it would have happened already. Just train hard, try not to worry about it too much, and hope for the best."

Yet, Grape Ape basically agreed with me and everyone else who has GIVEN YOU ADVICE, that you CONTINUE to IGNORE.

You've been told REPEATEDLY that your form is suspect. But, you're too hard-headed to listen, unless people tell you just what you want to hear.

Your pecs aren't doing the work. That's probably why they aren't growing in relation to the rest of your body.


It's you who always talks about how we can achieve whatever look we aim for if we train hard.

This is not true. I have strong shoulders to be sure, a decent aesthetic to my arm, and a little more broadly - I have a reasonably good overall aesthetic for a normal fit/athletic looking person. But I am NOT a bodybuilder, and the potential is not there.

Bodybuilders can have maybe two weak points. Like how King Kamali had weak arms and legs, but had an incredible back. Nasser's back was not great, but everything else more or less was. Dorian had not the greatest arms, but everything else was good.

And then Ronnie - He had strong *everything*. His abs shape was not good, and he "only" had 20" calves...but almost everything was strong.

Try that again. It's YOU who always whine about not having this or that. But, when someone gives you advice that takes you out of your comfort zone, you get all butt-hurt about it.



For me - literally the only muscle group I have with IFBB potential from what I can tell is my delts. I lack sufficient muscle fiber everywhere else, and I am not convinced that hyperplasia is a real thing. I like my overall aesthetic, but I am not built for size. However, I am sturdy, and with anabolics, I feel I can maintain a 3x body weight deadlift, 2x body weight bench press, and 2.5x body weight squat, as my weight goes up [I can more or less get those numbers naturally, at 170].

And that's good.

I appreciate having fairly robust physical genetics, and never getting injured - at least yet.

You're not "built for size", because you EAT LIKE A TEENAGE GIRL!! All of those bodybuilders you mentioned have genetics, train hard, take anabolics.....AND EAT TONS OF CALORIES to get big. Even before they started using steroids, they ate like no tomorrow.



But MCWAY, you need to stop with this notion that training tweaks will give me a chest. If I got to bench pressing 315 for reps, and looked as it I never bench pressed a day in my life, I'm not going to get a good chest if I make a few changes. Not IMO.

My chest is a sunken treasure - let's be real here.

If you're bouncing the bar off your ribs and letting your delts and tris take too much of the loads, you can do 315 for a thousands reps and have lackluster pec development. Again, been there and done that!!

When I focused more in inclines and dips and did flat bench last (and when I did flats, I kept my grip wide to hit more pec and less shoulder), my chest improved. It does without saying that my poundages went up as well. Stronger pecs equal BIGGER PECS, especially when you're putting away the groceries.



Grape Ape is real - that's why I asked him, and not you.  ;D Because I sort of wanted to be told it be wasn't possible. That said, I will continue to train my chest hard. I just don't expect *that* much...you know? 😕

What you wanted was Grape Ape to join your pity party. At the risk of speaking for him, I think he declines.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 09:16:11 AM
My mind immediately comes up with things to do in your scenario. But it involves more drugs, so... :D

But if someone had done a oral only cycle of Anadrol I'd advice a farewell shot of Sustanon. Could take a good dose, 750mg. It would smooth out the comedown. The Sust would give supraphysiological levels for a couple of weeks and then a small taper. With orals you go from fully juiced to zero in a matter of hours.

Whether PCT does anything in the long run is debatable, hard to say. But if I had HCG I would do 500iu twice weekly for maybe 2 months. Clomid and Nolva I wouldn't touch. I see very few negatives with a low dose of HCG like this.

Non-steroid anabolic drugs would come in handy. Clenbuterol is slightly anabolic and promotes a leaner physique and increases strength. MK-677 is an OTC drug in many countries and is extremely effective in increasing appetite, increases water retention which increases strength. It will be slightly anabolic as it drastically increases IGF-1.

Creatine would be a given lol. People laugh but the stuff is worthwhile.

A day of drinking on steroids is unlikely to destroy your health. It's when you make it a habit that problems appear. Many drinkers routinely pop liver toxic pain killers against hangover or whatever. You think Arnold and Franco skipped the wine because they were on Dianabol?

Not that it proves anything, but below are pictures of my Sustanon vials, of which, a total of 500mg of 5,000mg have been used.

Ontario had a needle shortage at the time, and even after only a few days passed waiting, I was making gains from Anadrol.

And frankly, I got what I wanted from Anadrol only.

It wasn't just the Anadrol though - I doubled my calories from just over 1,000 daily to just over 2,000, and I had muscle memory.

One doesn't just ordinarily gain 25.5 pounds from a low-dose oral-only cycle.

As I've mentioned before, a part of me wants to go to 220-lb, but I am not convinced that that is necessarily a healthy weight for my height, even naturally.

Ideally, if I could bring my body fat down a little, and project a similar look to what I have now, but at 190 or a bit lower, that may be the sweet of what I'm looking for in terms of health, strength, aesthetics, sustainability, and getting stares and compliments from the public.

And yea, ideally, I'd rather not use PED's?

That having been said, do we know enough about steroids now to make definitive claims about their effects on longevity?

For instance, if you are a lifetime smoker, you lose 10 years off your life. But if you smoke a pack a day even from age 12 and 45, and quit at age 45, by age 55, you will have the lungs of a lifetime non-smoker, and lose no years of lifespan, effectively regaining that 10 years back.

Can we make similar statements like that about any PED's? If so, I want to know what juice run and in what quantity while having zero negative impact on my health.  ;D

Discuss.

PS - I may or may not be grabbing that 375mL Fireball Whiskey tonight.  ;) Thanks.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Henda on August 25, 2022, 10:20:08 AM
Matt Forget about weight and pause all your chest pressing at the bottom on every rep, chest will grow better. Spending more time in the stretched position under load seems to work great for certain muscles
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 25, 2022, 10:38:07 AM
Spending more time in the stretched position under load seems to work great

outed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 10:40:44 AM
(https://y.yarn.co/b9516634-fa78-46a4-a005-6232fd5a7316_text.gif)
I`m your huckleberry !!  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 10:49:19 AM
Here`s a tip for building pecs.....MIND/MUSCLE CONNECTION.

You can`t just throw weight around in any fashion just to lift heavier and expect the pecs to take the brunt of the workload if you are bypassing them by training sloppy.....the pecs are being assisted with momentum as well as your shoulders which are dominant.

Lower the weight....nobody will give two fucks.....slow down the movement and think pecs instead of poundage and your pecs will grow.

Your training partner is a guy named Moe Mentum !!   :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 25, 2022, 10:52:00 AM
I`m your huckleberry !!  :D

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 10:53:28 AM
;D
My nikka !!   :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 25, 2022, 10:55:37 AM
Here`s a tip for building pecs.....MIND/MUSCLE CONNECTION.

You can`t just throw weight around in any fashion just to lift heavier and expect the pecs to take the brunt of the workload if you are bypassing them by training sloppy.....the pecs are being assisted with momentum as well as your shoulders which are dominant.

Lower the weight....nobody will give two fucks.....slow down the movement and think pecs instead of poundage and your pecs will grow.

Your training partner is a guy named Moe Mentum !!   :D

Haha I have trained with him before.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 10:57:39 AM
Haha I have trained with him before.
Lots of people train with good old Moe every day !!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Henda on August 25, 2022, 11:12:12 AM
outed

Haha I walked into that
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on August 25, 2022, 11:16:43 AM
I'd reiterate my advice about building pecs, but it would either be ignored again or strawmandered to oblivion ("Hurfdurf Titus thinks the Weider principles will magically change my genetics!).

But for fun, let's give it one last try...

Your chest isn't all that bad, Matt, but yes, you could make a measurable difference with very simple changes.  Even without abombs, I think you'd see a difference in two months.

What changes?  Rewatch the video of you on that fly machine.  Then, rewatch your set of DB press.

Tell me what you see. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on August 25, 2022, 11:24:09 AM
looking foward to the comedown ...a full pumped on anadrol look will never be duplicated even if u stayed at 200 by chance eating like a maniac you will still be softer and less water filled pumped version,that we know and you as well,185 as u say should be a bigger version of the 170 version but again diet yourself better and eat approriatly could achieve a good everday build but again a 'drastically'less full pumped version of a drugged '185'version.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 25, 2022, 11:26:52 AM
Yes, it's an incline but observe his proper form.

(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2Fzp0uYskwxeAQU%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1&nofb=1)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 25, 2022, 11:29:24 AM
Matt Forget about weight and pause all your chest pressing at the bottom on every rep, chest will grow better. Spending more time in the stretched position under load seems to work great for certain muscles

Ego lifting is more important to Matty Titties.

Why do the reps properly and grow, when that will make Titty Boy’s YouTube videos look lamer?

You guys trying to give advice to brickhead Matt Canning and expecting him to listen to it are wasting your fucking time.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 25, 2022, 11:31:04 AM
Lots of people train with good old Moe every day !!

Yeah….ho-moe for you.   😂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 25, 2022, 11:50:57 AM
TITTY BOY!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 11:54:34 AM
If you simply had done two and three, you'd be well over 200-lbs and muscular, by the end of the year (or earlier) PERMANENTLY! No need to shrink during the fall or the winter.

And you can do so and be in good health.

Do you realize it's back to Twig City for me after this cycle wraps up?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2022, 11:55:40 AM
Basically because Tim's chest is unbelievable. It's similar to Mark Wahlberg's chest in that it has that "shelf" look to it.

That being said, perhaps Tim's genetics would bestow him a good looking chest even if he didn't train it at all.

After all, Mark Wahlberg was essentially starving himself for Boogie Nights, and he still had a better chest shape than I had while benching 345. My heaviest weight this cycle was 208 - a full 70-lb heavier than Mark Wahlberg in Boogie Nights - yet Mark had a better chest than me while he was weighing 138.

So maybe it's genetic with people with Tim, Mark Wahlberg, Bast, etc, so perhaps I shouldn't be asking them for advice for that reason.

Unbelievable "shelf" look to the pecs. Incredible:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1388636;image)

Amazing physique.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 11:57:20 AM
Yeah….ho-moe for you.   😂
You fucker!  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 25, 2022, 12:00:18 PM
You fucker!  ;D

That is a good photo of you.

Bodybuilding is about symmetry, aesthetics, and creating the illusion of size.

Some people think it’s all about how much they weigh on a scale.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 12:04:38 PM
That is a good photo of you.

Bodybuilding is about symmetry, aesthetics, and creating the illusion of size.

Some people think it’s all about how much they weigh on a scale.
Thanks Walt....I could have been a bit more ripped but I did a ,lot of contests in a row that year.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on August 25, 2022, 12:04:53 PM
Can't think of anyone here that thinks like that ;)
That is a good photo of you.

Bodybuilding is about symmetry, aesthetics, and creating the illusion of size.

Some people think it’s all about how much they weigh on a scale.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 12:05:33 PM
:D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 25, 2022, 12:06:09 PM
Can't think of anyone here that thinks like that ;)
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 12:07:35 PM
19 Inch Neck Of Peace
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on August 25, 2022, 12:11:02 PM
That is a good photo of you.

Bodybuilding is about symmetry, aesthetics, and creating the illusion of size.

Some people think it’s all about how much they weigh on a scale.

But...but...Bwanks says it's all about what you weigh!  After all, if you aren't scarfing pizza, ice cream and cobbler 'til your whole body is absorbed in a nutrient cocoon and you emerge from that as massive, 230 pound butterfly, what's the point?  You'll just look like a child onstage, same as Shawn Ray, Lee Labrada, Danny Padilla, Lee Priest, Mohammed Makkawy and all those other wannabes :/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 25, 2022, 12:13:24 PM
But...but...Bwanks says it's all about what you weigh!  After all, if you aren't scarfing pizza, ice cream and cobbler 'til your whole body is absorbed in a nutrient cocoon and you emerge from that as massive, 230 pound butterfly, what's the point?  You'll just look like a child onstage, same as Shawn Ray, Lee Labrada, Danny Padilla, Lee Priest, Mohammed Makkawy and all those other wannabes :/
LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 25, 2022, 12:16:53 PM
But...but...Bwanks says it's all about what you weigh!  After all, if you aren't scarfing pizza, ice cream and cobbler 'til your whole body is absorbed in a nutrient cocoon and you emerge from that as massive, 230 pound butterfly, what's the point?  You'll just look like a child onstage, same as Shawn Ray, Lee Labrada, Danny Padilla, Lee Priest, Mohammed Makkawy and all those other wannabes :/

I’d need to live on celery and water to get down to 230 lbs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 25, 2022, 12:21:22 PM
I’d need to live on celery and water to get down to 230 lbs.

I'd need to live on anadrol, hgh, bhanky trt and 8000 cal a day to get to 230lb
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 25, 2022, 12:26:02 PM
My mind immediately comes up with things to do in your scenario. But it involves more drugs, so... :D

But if someone had done a oral only cycle of Anadrol I'd advice a farewell shot of Sustanon. Could take a good dose, 750mg. It would smooth out the comedown. The Sust would give supraphysiological levels for a couple of weeks and then a small taper. With orals you go from fully juiced to zero in a matter of hours.

Whether PCT does anything in the long run is debatable, hard to say. But if I had HCG I would do 500iu twice weekly for maybe 2 months. Clomid and Nolva I wouldn't touch. I see very few negatives with a low dose of HCG like this.

Non-steroid anabolic drugs would come in handy. Clenbuterol is slightly anabolic and promotes a leaner physique and increases strength. MK-677 is an OTC drug in many countries and is extremely effective in increasing appetite, increases water retention which increases strength. It will be slightly anabolic as it drastically increases IGF-1.

Creatine would be a given lol. People laugh but the stuff is worthwhile.

A day of drinking on steroids is unlikely to destroy your health. It's when you make it a habit that problems appear. Many drinkers routinely pop liver toxic pain killers against hangover or whatever. You think Arnold and Franco skipped the wine because they were on Dianabol?

Agreed.

I'd just stop the Anadrol and see what happens.

PCT is debatable on something like this. HCG would help, but he will recover fine in a few weeks.

The side effects from oral steroids are very exaggerated.

If they were that toxic, my liver would have melted 10 years ago.

Even on 100mg of Drol for 3 months and drinking once or twice a week, my liver values were perfect.

Definitely start creatine now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on August 25, 2022, 12:26:41 PM


That having been said, do we know enough about steroids now to make definitive claims about their effects on longevity?

For instance, if you are a lifetime smoker, you lose 10 years off your life. But if you smoke a pack a day even from age 12 and 45, and quit at age 45, by age 55, you will have the lungs of a lifetime non-smoker, and lose no years of lifespan, effectively regaining that 10 years back.

Can we make similar statements like that about any PED's? If so, I want to know what juice run and in what quantity while having zero negative impact on my health.  ;D

Discuss.

PS - I may or may not be grabbing that 375mL Fireball Whiskey tonight.  ;) Thanks.

Nothing is zero risk. In one instance PEDs may prolong life and in another they may shorten it. High dosages of androgens probably do a number of bad things to you. There is no medication that is zero risk, even a baby aspirin.
What CAN be done today, which everyone starting to juice ought to do, is order frequent bloodwork and do some heart scans etc. Reasearch which parameters to look out for. For example, bodybuilders all through today have accepted high blood pressure as a consequence of steroid use. But you don't have to do that as there are very good BP medications you can use proactively - you don't have to accept your BP ever going out of range. You can protect your insulin sensitivity, you can watch your cholesterol, you can test for arthereosclerosis like Antoine did. There is one bb on another forum that orders labs once a week. That is excessive but you can know if things start to go sideways the minute it happens. It can be done in a safer manner than in the past.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 25, 2022, 01:07:04 PM
I'd need to live on anadrol, hgh, bhanky trt and 8000 cal a day to get to 230lb

And I don't want to get to 230 lbs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 25, 2022, 01:07:30 PM
Do you realize it's back to Twig City for me after this cycle wraps up?

Based on your dietary habits, it probably is.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 25, 2022, 02:25:10 PM
This is the answer is I was looking to read.  ;D And yeah - I know we shouldn't seek out what we want to read/hear, but... it's not like I haven't worked very hard in the past to bring up my chest. I mean, it should be at the very least *better* than it has been.

It's legitimately that I get little to no development at all. It just seems like a lost cause...

My chest looks ok after chest day, and if say for instance, I go for a dip at my gym's pool directly after working chest, at least for that single moment in time I have the pecs that I always wanted. But they are temporary - as seen in this video:



But literally right now - being that today is Chest Day, and it's been one of week since I last trained it - my pecs are as flat as a pancake. 😕

Like I said - my chest pumps are ok, and I'll accept that. From what I can tell, that's the best I'll be getting.

Good stuff.

You know - since my goal is to see about getting that 225x30 bench press, I'm not focused on my all-time 1RM right now. At least for now, I will be able to apply those principles you listed above.

I'll have to consciously remind myself of them...but that will be the best thing for me right now. I'll just throw in that 225 for reps set in there, but otherwise stick with your outlined principles.

And hey - if I see a touch of improvement from month to month...I just might keep applying them, and forget about max strength.

Thanks Grape! 🍇

You only train pecs once a week; your form is questionable; and you don't eat enough food.....GEE!!! I WONDER WHY your pecs are underdeveloped.

Unless you're at an NFL combine, nobody cares how many times you can bench 225. You should be going as heavy as possible (with THE PECS doing the work) for 8-10 reps.

And if flat bench doesn't get the job done, switch to inclines or dips. Why should your pecs get any bigger, if theycan already do 225 for a zillion reps at the same size?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 25, 2022, 04:10:34 PM
You know...arms are not my strength, but I feel I have a sort of...aesthetic look to my arms. They are pretty round.

I have an Ironage shot of biceps from 2010. I was pleased with the aesthetic of my arms.

On that note, I do prefer my current look to my natural one. That said, I am not willing to strongly compromise my health for a look. I'm willing to make some adjustments to try to be the best 185-190 I can be - with a keyword being SUSTAINABLE. Note how I tend to always look the same - that's to both be identifiable to those who know me, and also because I want to have a lifestyle and look that is sustainable...I don't see see the point of getting a certain look only briefly, then to look nothing like that. I did it this time because the Canadian fake pandemic response was a disaster, and ruinous to my mental health. I needed to start feeling better fast, and steroids made if happen. And I'd be shocked if I even use 60x 25mg Anadrol tablets at this point.

But one thing I found is that I do prefer this look. So I may spend this winter doing a few nutrition and training tweaks to see what I can get naturally. That said, I am of the mindset that no amount of natural training will allow me to duplicate certain aspects. Again, it's just the way my physique comes alive while on juice - it doesn't happen naturally. It would easily take ten months to achieve naturally what I can achieve in one month of Anadrol.

I can tell you - I do want to juice again next summer, and do it properly next time. No wussy little 15mg of Anadrol. With a proper test base and 3,000+ calories, I would hit 220-lb, easily. However...health concerns may prevent that.

Here's what's funny: whether be walking around in a tank top, or Big Ramy doing it, I'm getting probably 90% of the attention. And since YES, that is part of why I'm doing it - why take the health risk going to 220, when I achieve 90% of the result I want at 200...or maybe even 190?

That said - it's not JUST about the compliments. I would like to see how I'd look at 220, for my own interest...though I'm slightly concerned that weight would be a bit taxing on my system...but I really like the way my delts pop out of my tank top once I hit 200 while on PED's. It's a really cool look. Just seeing the muscle popping off a small, ectomorphic frame. I've always liked that look, and it would be a kick go see that at 220.

But...health concerns may prevent me from doing a 2023 cycle. So I may just strive for that natural 185-190, and see how that looks.

If you want something sustainable then you will have to make a permanent lifestyle change. You'll have to start eating more real foods with actual nutrition and protein. You can't expect to blow up from drugs and then stop taking them and go back to eating your 1200 or 1600 calories a day and expect to sustain anything that you'd previously gained. You should also mentally prepare yourself for coming off of them and being OK not looking as good as you looked when you were on them.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 25, 2022, 04:19:18 PM
If you watched this pushup video, can you believe how fast Matt talks? Kind of like he keyboards with such great speed. He and I spoke on the phone many years ago. I don't remember what we discussed, but I do recall that his speed talking exhausted me.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 25, 2022, 04:21:24 PM




[/quote]
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on August 25, 2022, 04:28:12 PM


It's nerves.

Nervous people talk super fast and don't even realize it.

Early in my career i had to take classes to learn how to slow down.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 25, 2022, 04:35:10 PM
If you watched this pushup video, can you believe how fast Matt talks? Kind of like he keyboards with such great speed. He and I spoke on the phone many years ago. I don't remember what we discussed, but I do recall that his speed talking exhausted me.


I think part of the video (the end) where he is talking is uploaded at x1.25 speed.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 25, 2022, 04:42:58 PM
I think part of the video (the end) where he is talking is uploaded at x1.25 speed.

The video might be uploaded at X1.25 speed, but this how fast he talks in person.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 25, 2022, 04:48:30 PM
The video might be uploaded at X1.25 speed, but this how fast he talks in person.

You mean from your phone sex sessions?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 12:20:13 AM
It's nerves.

Nervous people talk super fast and don't even realize it.

Early in my career i had to take classes to learn how to slow down.

Perhaps, but I talk that fast even when with people I see regularly. Where I am not perceptibly nervous.

For interviews with IFBB pros, I had to slow down my speed in half...then try to do half of that half.

And even then, I just sounded normal speed.

I'll post a nervous interview later tonight, so that you can hear how I sound when I'm nervous.

As for Primemuscle, I used to call him long distance on the phone to talk, on a regular basis, from my home in Thunder Bay.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 26, 2022, 04:34:44 AM
Perhaps, but I talk that fast even when with people I see regularly. Where I am not perceptibly nervous.

For interviews with IFBB pros, I had to slow down my speed in half...then try to do half of that half.

And even then, I just sounded normal speed.

I'll post a nervous interview later tonight, so that you can hear how I sound when I'm nervous.

As for Primemuscle, I used to call him long distance on the phone to talk, on a regular basis, from my home in Thunder Bay.


Why were you regularly calling a mostly homosexual elderly man?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 26, 2022, 04:54:02 AM
Why were you regularly calling a mostly homosexual elderly man?

Father figure.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 06:23:47 AM
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 06:39:16 AM
Exhibit A:

Following MCWAY's moronic "natural bodybuilding" approach [oh brother], including applying the "Weider Instinctive Principle", also known as "COMMON SENSE - OR TRAIN THE MUSCLE GROUP YOU FEEL IS MOST RECOVERED ON THAT SPECIFIC DAY." Weight: 172.2-lb.

Exhibit B:

Following Van Bilderass steroid protocol. Completely ignoring MCWAY in the peocess. Weight: 204.2-lb.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 26, 2022, 06:41:04 AM
Put your cleaning products away.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 06:53:27 AM
Put your cleaning products away.

I mostly did since that first picture from Fri., 2021-Oct-15, which I cherry-picked to make my Before and After result look more dramatic.   ;D Nevertheless, it proves MCWAY wrong about steroids - it's not just the body weight changes - steroids produce a different "look", as Van Bilderass has stated.

I have no idea why I left that spray bottle out in the photo from today though. It was my bad.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 26, 2022, 07:44:27 AM
Steroids work?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 26, 2022, 07:59:35 AM
Exhibit A:

Following MCWAY's moronic "natural bodybuilding" approach [oh brother], including applying the "Weider Instinctive Principle", also known as "COMMON SENSE - OR TRAIN THE MUSCLE GROUP YOU FEEL IS MOST RECOVERED ON THAT SPECIFIC DAY." Weight: 172.2-lb.

Exhibit B:

Following Van Bilderass steroid protocol. Completely ignoring MCWAY in the peocess. Weight: 204.2-lb.

Strawman A: Citing something I NEVER TOLD YOU TO DO. When did I mention the "Weider Instinctive Principle" again? Show me a quote where MCWAY said anything to that effect.

What we're waiting to see is EXHIBIT C: What happens to you once you go off the juice and eat like a teenage girl.....which is what you were doing when you weight 172 lbs (something you conveniently LEFT OUT of "Exhibit A").

The lion's share of my (and others') criticism has CONSISTENTLY been, O clueless one, YOUR DIET!!

That's why you go back to twig-ville, once you go off.

Strawman B: Claiming I told you not to take steroids. Again, the consistent criticism was that, WHETHER YOU TAKE STEROIDS OR NOT, you need to eat more quality food....PERIOD!!

What I emphasize is that, had you simply straighten up your diet, you'd likely have the size you want WITHOUT STEROIDS. The advice I initially gave you was what you could do UNTIL you got your precious juice, as you were whimpering at the time about how you were struggling to recover.

And, maybe....just maybe.....if you lay off your obsession with flat-benching 225 thousands of times and focus on other exercises (i.e. dips or inclines), your alleged genetically cursed chest would improve.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 26, 2022, 08:06:24 AM
I mostly did since that first picture from Fri., 2021-Oct-15, which I cherry-picked to make my Before and After result look more dramatic.   ;D Nevertheless, it proves MCWAY wrong about steroids - it's not just the body weight changes - steroids produce a different "look", as Van Bilderass has stated.

I have no idea why I left that spray bottle out in the photo from today though. It was my bad.

Steroids like anadrol are bad for you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 26, 2022, 08:06:44 AM
TITTY BOY!

 :o
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 26, 2022, 08:08:27 AM
I mostly did since that first picture from Fri., 2021-Oct-15, which I cherry-picked to make my Before and After result look more dramatic.   ;D Nevertheless, it proves MCWAY wrong about steroids - it's not just the body weight changes - steroids produce a different "look", as Van Bilderass has stated.

I have no idea why I left that spray bottle out in the photo from today though. It was my bad.

You didn't prove JACK!!! You used a nearly year-old picture to imply that you gained (or re-gained) way more size than you actually did.

You also claimed you DELIBERATELY kept your bodyweight down to around 170 lbs.

Everybody knows that getting lost size back is far easier than gaining it in the first place. And, more often than not (once you clean up your diet a bit), you're in better condition second or third time around.

Even with that, guess what you did once you stuck the needle in your rump........YOU INCREASED YOUR CALORIES, something I and others had been telling you to do from the start of your blubbering.

But, for some screwball reason, you won't keep your calories at a decent level without the sauce. That's a major reason why you go back to stick-ville when you lose the anabolics, especially with the particular one(s) you are using. Unless I'm mistaken, Anadrol is notorious for easy-come-easy-go gains.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on August 26, 2022, 08:11:33 AM
Why were you regularly calling a mostly homosexual elderly man?

You know the answer to this. Matt 100% has major homosexual feelings. He is embarrassed of his micro-pecker but is absolutely obsessed and fascinated with cocks. Matt - it’s ok man. So what that you have a little dick. You can’t continue allowing your insecurities control your life. You aren’t what most would consider “strong” - but you’re not “weak” either. You don’t have to try and take pictures with angles and shadows to try and look big and posting pictures of some girl that you pretend wants to live with you is just crazy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on August 26, 2022, 08:22:38 AM
You're defintely taking up more room in the new pics, looking solid, good you escaped the stretch marks.
Exhibit A:

Following MCWAY's moronic "natural bodybuilding" approach [oh brother], including applying the "Weider Instinctive Principle", also known as "COMMON SENSE - OR TRAIN THE MUSCLE GROUP YOU FEEL IS MOST RECOVERED ON THAT SPECIFIC DAY." Weight: 172.2-lb.

Exhibit B:

Following Van Bilderass steroid protocol. Completely ignoring MCWAY in the peocess. Weight: 204.2-lb.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 08:39:36 AM
You know the answer to this. Matt 100% has major homosexual feelings. He is embarrassed of his micro-pecker but is absolutely obsessed and fascinated with cocks. Matt - it’s ok man. So what that you have a little dick. You can’t continue allowing your insecurities control your life. You aren’t what most would consider “strong” - but you’re not “weak” either. You don’t have to try and take pictures with angles and shadows to try and look big and posting pictures of some girl that you pretend wants to live with you is just crazy.

It's her friend that wants to stay with me for a bit.

The one in the picture with me a few pages back is nuts.

A 6.45" cock is a micro-pecker?

Also, is a 405x15 deadlift strong for Getbig standards. I think it's pretty good.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 08:43:21 AM
Hey - can I post a photo of my great big cock in the adult board?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: King Shizzo on August 26, 2022, 10:15:22 AM
That is a good photo of you.

Bodybuilding is about symmetry, aesthetics, and creating the illusion of size.

Some people think it’s all about how much they weigh on a scale.
I still have a hint of bad.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 10:25:52 AM
You're defintely taking up more room in the new pics, looking solid, good you escaped the stretch marks.

Thank you. I'm pleased with my results.

There's something "3D" about using juice that doesn't just come from the number on the scale alone.

It's a shame because I'd be willing to work harder naturally to achieve this result, but it's not about training. I don't even think better nutrition would quite get me there.

Juice just makes me look full in a way I can't seem to get naturally, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on August 26, 2022, 10:33:25 AM
Hey - can I post a photo of my great big cock in the adult board?

Yes please do. Hahaha.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 10:38:14 AM
Yes please do. Hahaha.

I'm thinking I should, haha.

Getbig misses nothing though, LOL.

Dusty trophies - Getbig notices.

Q-Bert in the background - Getbig notices.

A 1mm skin tag on your cock that you yourself didn't notice until age 34 - Getbig notices.

And they'll never let me live it down.

But I am thinking I should post a photo of my great big cock in the adult board.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 26, 2022, 10:56:28 AM
Hey - can I post a photo of my great big cock in the adult board?

No. It must be the shooting ropes video.

Also why are you asking for permission?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on August 26, 2022, 11:01:29 AM
Hey - can I post a photo of my great big cock in the adult board?

By all means, that's the only way you'll put the topic at rest.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 26, 2022, 11:12:57 AM
No. It must be the shooting ropes video.

Also why are you asking for permission?

That one is super impressive - especially for Getbig fans of Peter North.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 26, 2022, 12:31:56 PM
(https://c.tenor.com/g8eXtlVGRUsAAAAM/well-were-waiting-sarcastic.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on August 26, 2022, 02:28:04 PM
That one is super impressive - especially for Getbig fans of Peter North.

Who is Peter North, and why do you give a flying fuck about showing a group of men about how much jizz you can shoot from your alleged 6.456785" dick?

Matt, you're going into Genova zone here.  STOP.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 26, 2022, 04:09:06 PM
Who is Peter North, and why do you give a flying fuck about showing a group of men about how much jizz you can shoot from your alleged 6.456785" dick?

Matt, you're going into Genova zone here.  STOP.

There is nothing weird and creepy about TITTY BOY Matt Canning send full length jerkoff videos to the only known 80 year old soggy queer on Getbig.

No, that’s perfectly normal behavior.

For a jism gulping phaggot.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 26, 2022, 04:13:52 PM
Some freaks out there did just fine w/ natty bodybuilding...

(https://www.hoogeduinpostcards.com/winkel/scans/147960.jpg)

Pandour was probably the best...

(https://www.oldtimestrongman.com/images/bobby_pandour.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on August 26, 2022, 04:18:54 PM
Pandour was probably the best...

(https://www.oldtimestrongman.com/images/bobby_pandour.gif)

All elixirs, opiods and pennyfarthings
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 26, 2022, 06:34:50 PM
Some freaks out there did just fine w/ natty bodybuilding...

(https://www.hoogeduinpostcards.com/winkel/scans/147960.jpg)

Pandour was probably the best...

(https://www.oldtimestrongman.com/images/bobby_pandour.gif)

Hackenschmidt had him beat
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on August 26, 2022, 07:00:36 PM
There is nothing weird and creepy about TITTY BOY Matt Canning send full length jerkoff videos to the only known 80 year old soggy queer on Getbig.

No, that’s perfectly normal behavior.

For a jism gulping phaggot.
Christ he's a loser. Posting on this board is the height of his day, every day. Of his life even
 "Ya the guys on getbig think I'm cool."
 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 27, 2022, 06:51:36 AM
KING OF KANGZ

(https://i.postimg.cc/yx2Tvw37/wtrwrtwtwtwtr.png)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on August 27, 2022, 01:50:29 PM
Hackenschmidt had him beat
Maybe, but he lifted heavy. Pandour lifted a small dumbbell.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: TheShape. on August 27, 2022, 02:00:24 PM
KING OF KANGZ

(https://i.postimg.cc/yx2Tvw37/wtrwrtwtwtwtr.png)
;D That’s what he thinks he looks like!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stan Diego on August 27, 2022, 05:00:49 PM
Stop posting selfies.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on August 27, 2022, 09:34:00 PM
Hackenschmidt had him beat

Pandour bought the ripped glutes and would make Hackenschmidt look fat

(https://scontent.flhr2-4.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/23131582_606615992846720_5828443353600545870_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=8P6cOBRy5ZUAX_MQFDB&_nc_ht=scontent.flhr2-4.fna&oh=00_AT9n_opu1AIqewOTnRAdHiGOE0ub13dW6c_yI7mSVDUiGg&oe=6330E918)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 28, 2022, 02:32:30 AM
Pandour bought the ripped glutes and would make Hackenschmidt look fat

(https://scontent.flhr2-4.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/23131582_606615992846720_5828443353600545870_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=8P6cOBRy5ZUAX_MQFDB&_nc_ht=scontent.flhr2-4.fna&oh=00_AT9n_opu1AIqewOTnRAdHiGOE0ub13dW6c_yI7mSVDUiGg&oe=6330E918)

and everyone thought Gaspari was first
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 28, 2022, 02:46:01 AM
Pandour owns Hack in physique development, but Hack owned most people with his lifts and power. (And size)..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 28, 2022, 04:44:19 AM
Pandour owns Hack in physique development, but Hack owned most people with his lifts and power. (And size)..

But Matt "Kangz of Kangz" Kanginng owns all!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on August 28, 2022, 05:36:07 AM
Earlier, SF1900 said "Eating is overrated" (or something to that effect).

I agree. Eat enough to build and maintain, while not blowing out your gut, your organs, your rectum.
Matt is also proving this with a small diet, and minimal gear.

The 70's guys didnt have to over-eat. Even the good 80's/90's guys.
The ones who did eventually blew out their guts (even the great Ronnie).

Meal 1:
10 Egg Whites, 1 Cup Oatmeal, 1 Cup Greek Zero Fat Yogurt, 1Tablespoon Fish Oil

Meal 2:
8oz. Chicken Breast, 10oz. Sweet Potato, 1 Cup Vegetables, Nuts-- Almonds, Cashews, Seeds

Meal 3:
8oz. Chicken Breast, 1.5 cup Rice Mixed with Black Beans, 1 Cup Vegetables, Granola Muffin

Meal 4:
8oz Salmon, Orange Roughy, or Halibut, 10 oz. Sweet Potato, 1 Cup Vegetables, Sorbet

Most would do well w/ a similar diet to this (Lee Labrada) with maybe an extra shake or two if wanted to over a bit.

Some will need more food (Brian) as they are fast-burners. Most natties with a normal digestion, do not..

(On that note, I just ate a "Big Breakfast w/ Pancakes" from McDonald's (1400 cals).  ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 28, 2022, 05:39:22 AM
Some freaks out there did just fine w/ natty bodybuilding...

(https://www.hoogeduinpostcards.com/winkel/scans/147960.jpg)

Pandour was probably the best...

(https://www.oldtimestrongman.com/images/bobby_pandour.gif)

Great builds.

Rollon-Plaston amazing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 28, 2022, 05:48:45 AM
Pandour bought the ripped glutes and would make Hackenschmidt look fat

(https://scontent.flhr2-4.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/23131582_606615992846720_5828443353600545870_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=8P6cOBRy5ZUAX_MQFDB&_nc_ht=scontent.flhr2-4.fna&oh=00_AT9n_opu1AIqewOTnRAdHiGOE0ub13dW6c_yI7mSVDUiGg&oe=6330E918)

Pandour was only 160lbs George was 220lbs he would dwarf him on stage standing next to him
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 28, 2022, 06:40:38 AM
Pandour was only 160lbs George was 220lbs he would dwarf him on stage standing next to him

Greg Kovacs would dwarf Lee Labrada
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on August 28, 2022, 06:48:19 AM
Greg Kovacs would dwarf Lee Labrada
JACKSHIT...........BODYBUILDING
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on August 28, 2022, 10:57:59 AM
Earlier, SF1900 said "Eating is overrated" (or something to that effect).

I agree. Eat enough to build and maintain, while not blowing out your gut, your organs, your rectum.
Matt is also proving this with a small diet, and minimal gear.

The 70's guys didnt have to over-eat. Even the good 80's/90's guys.
The ones who did eventually blew out their guts (even the great Ronnie).

Meal 1:
10 Egg Whites, 1 Cup Oatmeal, 1 Cup Greek Zero Fat Yogurt, 1Tablespoon Fish Oil

Meal 2:
8oz. Chicken Breast, 10oz. Sweet Potato, 1 Cup Vegetables, Nuts-- Almonds, Cashews, Seeds

Meal 3:
8oz. Chicken Breast, 1.5 cup Rice Mixed with Black Beans, 1 Cup Vegetables, Granola Muffin

Meal 4:
8oz Salmon, Orange Roughy, or Halibut, 10 oz. Sweet Potato, 1 Cup Vegetables, Sorbet

Most would do well w/ a similar diet to this (Lee Labrada) with maybe an extra shake or two if wanted to over a bit.

Some will need more food (Brian) as they are fast-burners. Most natties with a normal digestion, do not..

(On that note, I just ate a "Big Breakfast w/ Pancakes" from McDonald's (1400 cals).  ::)

Matt is proving nothing of the sort. First, he is regaining lost size he once had.

Second, without the anabolics, he would need considerably more calories that what he currently eats to keep his size, much less put on more size.

Third, with regards to the old timers of the 70s, they ate lots of calories. But, their diets were mostly fat and protein, not heavy carbs. They often took their eggs or protein drinks with heavy cream or half-n-half to up their calories.

Those guys weren't downing chicken breasts; they were eating BEEF and lots of it. In one guy's case (Serge Nubret), he was actually eating horse meat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 28, 2022, 12:46:23 PM
Pandour bought the ripped glutes and would make Hackenschmidt look fat

(https://scontent.flhr2-4.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.18169-9/23131582_606615992846720_5828443353600545870_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=8P6cOBRy5ZUAX_MQFDB&_nc_ht=scontent.flhr2-4.fna&oh=00_AT9n_opu1AIqewOTnRAdHiGOE0ub13dW6c_yI7mSVDUiGg&oe=6330E918)

One would assume the schmoe community wasn’t fully established during this time. What a shame to see shredded glutes go to waste like this. This would’ve been a photoshoot inside a seedy Vegas hotel room if it were a 100 years later. Way ahead of his time.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 28, 2022, 01:50:07 PM
One would assume the schmoe community wasn’t fully established during this time. What a shame to see shredded glutes go to waste like this. This would’ve been a photoshoot inside a seedy Vegas hotel room if it were a 100 years later. Way ahead of his time.

his normal everyday look
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/StateLibQld_1_148759_Studio_portrait_of_a_young_man%2C_1870-1880.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on August 28, 2022, 02:29:55 PM
his normal everyday look
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/StateLibQld_1_148759_Studio_portrait_of_a_young_man%2C_1870-1880.jpg)

Crispin Glover of peace….

(https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/the-legal-drama-you-didnt-see-behind-the-scenes-of-back-to-the-future/intro-1638998586.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on August 28, 2022, 02:59:00 PM
his normal everyday look
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/StateLibQld_1_148759_Studio_portrait_of_a_young_man%2C_1870-1880.jpg)

Nice every day look. Easy to maintain with a personal tailor, hatter, and shoe shiner.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on August 28, 2022, 03:46:47 PM
Pandour was only 160lbs George was 220lbs he would dwarf him on stage standing next to him

And Andre the Giant would have dwarfed both of them. Bigger is not always better.

(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.y8lLNTv48vELNIc85wqC1AHaJb?pid=ImgDet&w=539&h=686&rs=1)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: obsidian on August 28, 2022, 03:51:55 PM
And Andre the Giant would have dwarfed both of them. Bigger is not always better.

(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.y8lLNTv48vELNIc85wqC1AHaJb?pid=ImgDet&w=539&h=686&rs=1)
Andre the Giant was billed at 7'-4" but in real life he was probably 6'-11" to 7'-0".

Wilt Chamberlain was billed at 7'-1" and he looks to be a little taller than Andre.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DamSQcjVQAAqqL1.jpg:large)

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61CjszUQDsL._AC_SL1000_.jpg)

So Andre was also billed at a weight of 500 lbs plus. Maybe so who knows. The Big Show said he weighed up to 520 lbs and is also about 6'-11" to 7'-0" tall.

Guys like Brian Shaw and Hafthor Bjornson may be shorter than Big Show and Andre but they both weighed up to 450 lbs and carried more muscle on their frames than Big Show or Andre.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: obsidian on August 28, 2022, 03:54:10 PM
Here's Thor and Shaw with Arnold. They are clearly shorter than Wilt and Andre but more massively built.

(https://fitnessvolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Hafthor-Brian-Shaw-1024x576.jpg)

(https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/march-2015-arnold-schwarzenegger-with-brian-shaw-after-shaw-won-the-picture-id579564144?s=2048x2048)

Eddie is also a bit taller than Arnold. I am about Eddie's height and stood next to Arnold and I could tell he was a few inches shorter than me.

It's tough to always gauge heights because Arnold may wear different shoes at various functions with some providing more lift than others.

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/315BjDxqjlc/maxresdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on August 28, 2022, 05:33:23 PM
Eddie is supposed to be 6'3".
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on August 28, 2022, 06:07:28 PM
his normal everyday look
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/StateLibQld_1_148759_Studio_portrait_of_a_young_man%2C_1870-1880.jpg)

GH Hands of Peace   :D ;D ;D :D ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on August 28, 2022, 07:41:41 PM
his normal everyday look
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/StateLibQld_1_148759_Studio_portrait_of_a_young_man%2C_1870-1880.jpg)

Hack beats him look at the legs
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 29, 2022, 07:47:38 AM
Hack beats him look at the legs

a fan of legs with no legs, oh the irony.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on August 29, 2022, 08:06:23 AM
a fan of legs with no legs, oh the irony.

He's also a fan of necks, highschool-diplomas, degrees, IQ and calves.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on August 29, 2022, 09:10:36 AM
He's also a fan of necks, highschool-diplomas, degrees, IQ and calves.
and toilet rolls
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Bevo on August 29, 2022, 10:45:33 AM
It's her friend that wants to stay with me for a bit.

The one in the picture with me a few pages back is nuts.

A 6.45" cock is a micro-pecker?

Also, is a 405x15 deadlift strong for Getbig standards. I think it's pretty good.

It’s not that small…..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on August 29, 2022, 01:25:42 PM
It’s not that small…..

I wouldn't think so - but everything is small and weak on Getbig.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 04, 2022, 12:44:46 AM
I am 208-lb right now, and reduced to under 10mg of Anadrol daily over the past 10 days, thinking I may need to wean down. That is probably not necessary, and I sort of jumped the gun, so I am thinking I will go on a proper 25mg daily until September 11th, where I have to attend a family dinner for my 2nd cousin's 4th birthday party. I may as well maintain my blown up ectomorph look until that gathering, and then decide what to do next. A friend and fellow Strongman competitor [middleweight] wants to help me lean out, and I sort of want to do that too! Whether that cutting goal will be chemically induced is yet to be seen - but I'm thinking no. I will consult with my friend, and see what he had in mind.

My reply:

"@stacked4life I'm open to following a strict diet to the letter to get lean, for basically as many weeks or months that are needed to achieve a level of leanness that I haven't achieved before. I am unwilling to do anything in terms of chemical assistance or strong fat-burning supplements to get lean, as they tax the heart, and in my view are the primary cause of health problems for IFBB pro bodybuilders.

I don't mind trading some minor health damage for the social benefits of looking bigger or leaner...but at 40 now, my threshold for abuse is low, as men aged 40+ should be taking measures to protect their central nervous systems, and not tax it further.

My main thought process is: I want to get to a look that is maintainable 24/7/365. I don't mind being a bit leaner for a short window, even with some health risks [ephedra/caffeine], but I put the brakes on fast as far as what physiological damage I am willing to put myself through for a look is concerned.

I am also not convinced that anyone maintains a body fat under 10% for a sustained period of time without risking their health [taking physique drugs or strong fat-burning supplements]. My main concern would be elevated heart rate.

That is why I would think 10-15% body fat would be a realistic maintainable look at age 40, without risking my health. I try to maintain around 16% body fat year-round [call it 15-20%], and I don't think I can get to under 10% without risks, especially at my age. Getting to 10% briefly may be realistic though.

Also - I am not suggesting that you personally were suggesting drugs...I am suggesting that they are *ubiquitous* with becoming very lean. So by all means, let me know your diet plan for me, and I will follow it to the "T".' I wanted to be big for the summer, and I was. But summer is over soon, so new goals await, and I'm all ears!"

https://www.instagram.com/p/CiDn7txuyxz/

Some photos of me at 208-lb, from 12 hours ago:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 05, 2022, 12:55:42 PM
Staying on for a family event. ;D

This is how it starts Matt.

Just stop taking it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 05, 2022, 12:58:18 PM
Staying on for a family event. ;D

This is how it starts Matt.

Just stop taking it.
Or just stay on....or cycle on and off which I feel is the best case scenario.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 05, 2022, 12:59:36 PM
Or just stay on....or cycle on and off which I feel is the best case scenario.

Yeah, he needs to man up and just start shooting that Sust he has.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 05, 2022, 01:49:58 PM
Is Matt a beast yet ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Dave D on September 05, 2022, 01:58:56 PM
Im not arguing that blasting a ton of gear isnt a great idea especially st an older age.

But Dorian Yates also thinks the Twin Towers were a hologram and the entire 9/11 event was fake.


On another note

Matt, you're looking big and strong but that moonlight pic makes it look like you're growing bitch tits. Is that just a matter of lighting or are there problems brewing?

Lol at Dorian, the very guy that pushed bodybuilding to the next level, saying drugs (PED’s) are bad. He would probably consider Matt’s use as being natural.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 02:01:36 PM
Staying on for a family event. ;D

This is how it starts Matt.

Just stop taking it.

As it turns out, the event was only for immediate family - not for extended family [this is the birthday party for my cousin's new baby].

That being said, I have only used 2-3 Anadrol tablets in the past 10 days.

While I am still 208-lb, I am losing a bit of the "3D" look that I had.

It's subtle, but I notice it.

Maybe I will go on an ultra strict diet, to remain in shape for as long as I can for the next few months, then go back to normal.

Natural training sucks, and I don't want to eat the calories to be 200+. How is eating so much any healthier than taking juice?

MCWAY speaks like him being 5'9" and 220-lb naturally is somehow healthier than me being 5'9" and 170-lb naturally and using minimal juice twice a decade.

So 1-2 low-dose oral cycles per DECADE is less healthy than MCWAY literally eating FIVE MILLION more calories than me during that same time period [+1,370 more calories than me daily, which it is probably at LEAST that].

I don't see how that is healthier.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 02:06:42 PM
Speaking of traps, I've been motivated to train mine more, after my brother-in-law complimented me on mine, during a family get-together.

So it's wrong for me to do a cycle for the attention of other people when I wear a tank top and walk down the second most populous street in my city so that people in cars when look at me as they drive by, but it's ok for you to be motivated to train harder because your homosexual brother-in-law complimented you at a family get-together?  ???

What on earth is the difference??
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 02:14:15 PM
Or just stay on....or cycle on and off which I feel is the best case scenario.

wes,

Do you think there is a way to do this while largely maintaining health? I'm not willing to lose decades of my lifespan over looking better, for instance.

But trading some quantity of life for quality of life happens all the time.

Do you think there is a way to do it while still maintaining health to a large degree?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 05, 2022, 02:20:04 PM
wes,

Do you think there is a way to do this while largely maintaining health? I'm not willing to lose decades of my lifespan over looking better, for instance.

But trading some quantity of life for quality of life happens all the time.

Do you think there is a way to do it while still maintaining health to a large degree?

Drugs may knock ten years off your life, but one thing is certain, they are the worst ten
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Henda on September 05, 2022, 02:24:45 PM
Drugs may knock ten years off your life, but one thing is certain, they are the worst ten

Exactly, being old is fucking depressing anyways fuck thst
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 02:26:38 PM
Yeah, he needs to man up and just start shooting that Sust he has.

Hm...I do prefer the 200+ pound look that I have now.

But one can look big while being pretty light.

Maybe for the Fall, I will focus on a picture perfect diet, and see how good I can look at 180. If I can get to 180 and considerably leaner, maybe I will like that look more.

I'm happy to say that the look I prefer doesn't require MUCH gear. It may even require zero.

But I think it does require *some*...at least for now, until I figure out what diet will get me to look better.

I'll put it this way:

My ideal physique is one I can maintain year-round. I don't mind being ~16% body fat, knowing I have a look I will have 24/7/365. That's why I'm happier with that body fat percentage more than most are - because I can maintain it.

I wouldn't be able to maintain a sub-10% body fat percentage [MOST people can't], and so that look has limited appeal to me. It doesn't appeal to me to go on fat-burning drugs to achieve a certain look. Steroids are on thing, but IMO, it's not the bulking that causes bodybuilders to die young - it's the cutting.

Too many gym rats have done steroids for years, for that to be the issue. Although massive body weight is bad for the heart, it's generally not steroids that is taxing the bodies of bodybuilders the most - at least I suspect it's not. I think it's the cutting agents.

I would willing to go up to 2-4 ephedrine tablets a day + black coffee in order to get lean temporarily. But extreme cutting is not appealing to me - especially for a temporary look.

I did this cycle for a temporary look. But I barely used any Anadrol, and in total, used the same quantity that MOST would use in only a few weeks, just spread out over a few months.

I'm just not willing to take any significantly greater health risk than that.

I'd be willing to try a natural approach with some good supplements and a VERY strict diet...I just wouldn't expect much from it.

Being around 180 and 12% body fat would be good, assuming I could get to that naturally AND maintain if 24/7/365.

I think that would require a strict diet, but there's an outside chance I could look like that.

I'd rather be 5% fatter than a better look IF I could maintain it year/decade-round.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 02:28:35 PM
Is Matt a beast yet ???

My left rhomboids are swollen to the high heavens right now for doing Yoga with a friend last night. I should have fucked her then - I can't even move into certain positions now.

Do muscles lose elasticity with age or something? I'm shocked my back is this swollen.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 02:29:32 PM
Speaking of traps, I've been motivated to train mine more, after my brother-in-law complimented me on mine, during a family get-together.

So doing this for the attention of others is fine, providing the people giving us attention are members of the LGBT community?  ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 05, 2022, 02:39:09 PM
I think ephedrine is generally safe even in the semi-long term. They did studies lasting a year for weight loss and there were little sides, they generally adapted to the heart rate increase and the BP increase too if there was any. The researchers concluded that it's generally "safe." Clen would be safe too at least in the short term. Some argue that clen is safer than ephedrine on account of it being so specific but it depends from what angle you look at it.

GH for year round leanness would very safe in my opinion in low doses. A little GH with Metformin, leanness with great insulin sensitivity.

Every study says coffee is very damn safe despite it increasing heart rate. They let even many heart patients drink coffee in hospitals. When I had heart failure/swine flu they didn't mind me drinking coffee.

You can't say cutting bodybuilding is more dangerous than off-season bodybuilding. During cutting BP can be lower (maybe not in all cases but generally) and heavy bodyweight is a huge risk factor for heart enlargement/cardiovascular damage/insulin resistance. More heavyweights have dropped compared to smaller guys.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 06:17:41 PM
I think ephedrine is generally safe even in the semi-long term. They did studies lasting a year for weight loss and there were little sides, they generally adapted to the heart rate increase and the BP increase too if there was any. The researchers concluded that it's generally "safe." Clen would be safe too at least in the short term. Some argue that clen is safer than ephedrine on account of it being so specific but it depends from what angle you look at it.

GH for year round leanness would very safe in my opinion in low doses. A little GH with Metformin, leanness with great insulin sensitivity.

Could I go from a bit over 15% body fat like I am now, to a bit over 10% on a strict diet and Clen, easy peasy, or is the 10% body fat zone not one that people can get too without taking significant health risks?

A family member is on Metformin. Is there any scientific consensus on whether diabetics on Metformin versus those on insulin fare better in the long-run?

And would I not be damaging my pancreas my taking these things

Every study says coffee is very damn safe despite it increasing heart rate. They let even many heart patients drink coffee in hospitals. When I had heart failure/swine flu they didn't mind me drinking coffee.

You can't say cutting bodybuilding is more dangerous than off-season bodybuilding. During cutting BP can be lower (maybe not in all cases but generally) and heavy bodyweight is a huge risk factor for heart enlargement/cardiovascular damage/insulin resistance. More heavyweights have dropped compared to smaller guys.

I guess I should have said diuretics and other cutting agents pose a greater risk for sudden death. You have to wonder how George Peterson felt leading up to his death in the hotel room at last year's Olympia.

For me personally, is doing a bulk to 220 on PED's [next summer, maybe] just as risky as me cutting to 165 using fat-burners [ephedrine/caffeine, Clen, or something else]?

I would think fat-burners are specifically more damaging to my heart. Is that not the case then?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 05, 2022, 06:24:17 PM
So doing this for the attention of others is fine, providing the people giving us attention are members of the LGBT community?  ???

Once again with the gay jokes.....from a guy asking old dudes about the size of his package.

Much as I hate destroying strawmen of yours, my brother-in-law is hardly gay. My sister-in-law (his wife of over 25 years) can attest to that.
 
 This was at a family get-together (Christmas time, I believe). Nobody was doing anything to impress anyone, especially since I was in simple shirt and shorts. (I live in Florida, remember?). You're the one, finding for attention every waking second of your existence.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on September 05, 2022, 06:30:49 PM
Here's Thor and Shaw with Arnold. They are clearly shorter than Wilt and Andre but more massively built.

(https://fitnessvolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Hafthor-Brian-Shaw-1024x576.jpg)

(https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/march-2015-arnold-schwarzenegger-with-brian-shaw-after-shaw-won-the-picture-id579564144?s=2048x2048)

Eddie is also a bit taller than Arnold. I am about Eddie's height and stood next to Arnold and I could tell he was a few inches shorter than me.

It's tough to always gauge heights because Arnold may wear different shoes at various functions with some providing more lift than others.

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/315BjDxqjlc/maxresdefault.jpg)
Shaw looks like a giant retarded baby
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 05, 2022, 06:59:42 PM
Shaw looks like a giant retarded baby

Speaking of Arnold Classic Strongman, former amateur champion Adam Scherr (aka Braun Strowman) is BACK on RAW and he looks SWOLE!!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 05, 2022, 07:05:42 PM
Could I go from a bit over 15% body fat like I am now, to a bit over 10% on a strict diet and Clen, easy peasy, or is the 10% body fat zone not one that people can get too without taking significant health risks?

A family member is on Metformin. Is there any scientific consensus on whether diabetics on Metformin versus those on insulin fare better in the long-run?

And would I not be damaging my pancreas my taking these things

I guess I should have said diuretics and other cutting agents pose a greater risk for sudden death. You have to wonder how George Peterson felt leading up to his death in the hotel room at last year's Olympia.

For me personally, is doing a bulk to 220 on PED's [next summer, maybe] just as risky as me cutting to 165 using fat-burners [ephedrine/caffeine, Clen, or something else]?

I would think fat-burners are specifically more damaging to my heart. Is that not the case then?

Metformin does not damage the pancreas, it protects it. There is a movement in bodybuilding where coaches advice starting metformin the very first day someone starts their first AAS cycle. The idea is that the Metformin would reduce insulin resistance thst accompanies high calorie diets as well as improve partitioning of nutrients from fat to muscle. Metformin is a big thing in life extention circles where it's thought that it probably increases lifespan, lowers  biological age (though it's hard to measure).

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02638-w

Insulin does not damage the pancreas, it protects it, like Metformin. Metformin is usually the first intervention against prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. But scientists have been asking whether it would be better to introduce insulin from the beginning since it takes control of blood glucose faster and has other protective mechanisms through its antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757533/
Quote
The rationale for early initiation of insulin is based on evidence demonstrating multifaceted benefits, including overcoming the glucotoxic effects of hyperglycemia, thereby facilitating “β-cell rest,” and preserving β-cell mass and function, while also improving insulin sensitivity.

The same coaches and gurus who recommend Metformin from the start recommend low dose long acting insulin from the start as well. BOTH drugs at the same time, not to increase anabolism per se but due to their hypothetical health protective effects. Say 10iu Lantus insulin in the morning and 500mg Metformin at night. The idea is basically that a high calorie diet put stress on the pancreas over time, especially if insulin resistance develops (exacerbated by AAS and especially GH). In advanced insulin resistance islet cell burnout occurs which means the pancreas starts giving up. Exogenous insulin and Metformin would alleviate this.
That's why I said low dose insulin during your cycle was no problem, not dangerous. Just a little extra boost at basically "no cost." I know you viewed it as just another stressor on your body but instead of a seeing insulin as a stressor it can be seen as an anti-stressor. There's good science supporting all this. The research says early intervention with insulin can make newly diagnosed diabetics fare better in the long that those on oral hypoglycemics but you know it is, to draw good conclusions requires tons of short and long term trials with a large amount of study subjects. They talk about something like "metabolic memory" wherein if you don't let things get bad before interventions your body wants to stay at a healthy state. But we know it often takes a long time for diabetics to get diagnosed and then they have had unhealthy and damaging blood glucose levels for maybe years. Then they start the Metformin or whatever and fuck around for a long time, perhaps skipping doses because they "feel fine" and so on.

Really, 10% bodyfat without any drugs would, on paper, be easy to do. That is if you can tolerate not eating much and can tolerate some hunger pangs. But that's no small thing. I know myself am "addicted" to good tasting food and can't find the motivation to eat perfectly for long periods of time. I think hitting 10% can be done healthily too, all dpends on you manage a restricted diet. But here's where drugs come in. Ephedrine would lower appetite, would boost drive, motivation and mood due to it's central effects. Clen is much more potent as a thermogenic i.e. increasing metabolic rate. How safe are they? It's impossible to say exactly. It's also impossible to say which is more dangerous, bulking on AAS or dieting on Ephedrine and Clen. Instinctively I would say the bulking is way more potentially dangerous. All we know by way of studies is one year studies and they say the EC coctail is "safe" for that time frame. Researchers might even argue that in the long term they might increase lifespan - if they make you lose weight. But then there are the potential effects on the heart. You can look at the studies
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SGT BARNES on September 05, 2022, 07:22:53 PM
matt i dont think you are really giving this whole drugs and weight thing enough attention

you just arent vacillating back and forth about no drugs / more drugs enough, and really you arent worrying about your bodyweight a fulll 24hours a day. seems only a few hours a day

you need to take more pics in your shitter of your arms and lots more back shots wearing ballet tights, we just havent seen enough. you need to take a bodyweight measurement no less than every 20 mins

its like you arent even trying man.  get serious, you need to be agonizing over this all day, nothing else even matters.

put some real effort into it man

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 10:08:39 PM
Once again with the gay jokes.....from a guy asking old dudes about the size of his package.

Much as I hate destroying strawmen of yours, my brother-in-law is hardly gay. My sister-in-law (his wife of over 25 years) can attest to that.
 
 This was at a family get-together (Christmas time, I believe). Nobody was doing anything to impress anyone, especially since I was in simple shirt and shorts. (I live in Florida, remember?). You're the one, finding for attention every waking second of your existence.

First, let's get this straight - your brother-in-law isn't.

But now let's get to your last point - why is it that it's ok for YOU to enjoy the attention you get for your physique from your brother-in-law cum gay lover, but it's not ok for ME to enjoy getting attention from the general public?

What's the difference?!

Is it that I go seek it daily, while you do not?

Ok, fine...but keep in mind I am NOT in Florida. Here in Canada, we were shut down for the better part of two years.

I needed a good life experience. I got one from using a bit of gear.

What seems to be the issue?

By the way - total number of 25mg Anadrol tablets I have had since June 10th: 60.

So I've ran 1.5g of Anadrol in that whole time. I have a Strongman friend who ran that in 10 days, before cutting back to 100mg a day.

I don't think what I did was THAT unhealthy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 05, 2022, 10:20:06 PM
Yeah, he needs to man up and just start shooting that Sust he has.
I would have used it from jump street.

wes,

Do you think there is a way to do this while largely maintaining health? I'm not willing to lose decades of my lifespan over looking better, for instance.

But trading some quantity of life for quality of life happens all the time.

Do you think there is a way to do it while still maintaining health to a large degree?
Matt,I`ll weigh in on this once I wake up.....couldn`t sleep so having my coffee...still half asleep,but stop worrying about health after all.....this is the "iron game" !!  LOL  ;D

I kid....I kid !  :D

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 10:36:11 PM
matt i dont think you are really giving this whole drugs and weight thing enough attention

you just arent vacillating back and forth about no drugs / more drugs enough, and really you arent worrying about your bodyweight a fulll 24hours a day. seems only a few hours a day

You're bang on if you're suggesting I am in a continual state of worrying about drug side effects, and taking days off from using, and subsequently partially losing my gains, etc.

I'll be honest - I don't just want to minimize risks; I want to bring them to as close to zero as possible.

I was using 25-50mg of Anadrol for about a week early on, and made great gains with it. But then I felt like...my core temperature increased or something. Which would make sense, as my body's rate of protein synthesis would have increased. I also got 7 pimples on my back.

That's when I immediately cut down - the pimples and potential body temperature side effects both immediately went away.

And that's the thing about me - I am a big time hypochondriac, and just want close to as zero risk as possible. My intuition tells me we will "feel" most side effects, but as I understand it - kidney issues are not like this.

Being autistic, I sense everything at an extraordinary level. I am hypersensitive to almost everything. And when I feel a negative effect, I change something.

That's why I was never able to take gear seriously - even with this cycle.

you need to take more pics in your shitter of your arms and lots more back shots wearing ballet tights, we just havent seen enough. you need to take a bodyweight measurement no less than every 20 mins

its like you arent even trying man.  get serious, you need to be agonizing over this all day, nothing else even matters.

put some real effort into it man

Lol!

I am not being serious about this cycle, but I also didn't intend to. I wanted a little boost, and I got it.

If I were to focus on bodybuilding like an actual competitor, AND take the gear use seriously...I think I could make an impressive transformation.

That being said...it does come down to a pretty major health restraint that I have in place.

I don't want to get liver cancer in 10 years and have to wonder whether or not my habits while young - and my steroid use - caused that.

I always ask myself - and I ask others - is there ANY way to make this zero risk to health?

And unfortunately...I just don't see a way, and think abstinence is the only way.

So I choose abstinence. From everything, really.

With my luck, I could throw caution to the wind tomorrow, and end up having my stomach pumped from binge drinking tomorrow, and with herpes.

It's just a hypochondriac thing.

I took 3x 25mg Anadrol tablets in the past 10 days. I am transitioning off now. I think my delts are already down in size. I ramped up my calories recently in the transition [but not my protein]. My body weight is currently 208-lb [no body weight loss yet, but my "look" has already changed, IMO].
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 10:46:48 PM
Here is a picture of me from 2005, compared to the same shot, from tonight. I was 23 then, and weighed 178 for this photo.

Do I have a touch of Palumboism right now? Is Palumboism inevitable for all for all of us, even if we don't use gear, or use much gear?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 05, 2022, 11:13:35 PM
Here is a picture of me from 2005, compared to the same shot, from tonight. I was 23 then, and weighed 178 for this photo.

Do I have a touch of Palumboism right now? Is Palumboism inevitable for all for all of us, even if we don't use gear, or use much gear?

Your neck has gone and it's not cos you grew monster traps. I'd guess your posture has gone to shit.

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSnf5I_d-BWl1FyS57ou1ziJPnRhJK4sFh64Q&usqp=CAU)

It pretty common, especially if you get a lot of screen time in on phones and laptops.

Mine is pretty terrible as I can easily spend 12 hours a day in front of a laptop. I use a poster correcter and it does help.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 11:16:52 PM
Metformin does not damage the pancreas, it protects it. There is a movement in bodybuilding where coaches advice starting metformin the very first day someone starts their first AAS cycle. The idea is that the Metformin would reduce insulin resistance thst accompanies high calorie diets as well as improve partitioning of nutrients from fat to muscle. Metformin is a big thing in life extention circles where it's thought that it probably increases lifespan, lowers  biological age (though it's hard to measure).

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02638-w

Insulin does not damage the pancreas, it protects it, like Metformin. Metformin is usually the first intervention against prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. But scientists have been asking whether it would be better to introduce insulin from the beginning since it takes control of blood glucose faster and has other protective mechanisms through its antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757533/
The same coaches and gurus who recommend Metformin from the start recommend low dose long acting insulin from the start as well. BOTH drugs at the same time, not to increase anabolism per se but due to their hypothetical health protective effects. Say 10iu Lantus insulin in the morning and 500mg Metformin at night. The idea is basically that a high calorie diet put stress on the pancreas over time, especially if insulin resistance develops (exacerbated by AAS and especially GH). In advanced insulin resistance islet cell burnout occurs which means the pancreas starts giving up. Exogenous insulin and Metformin would alleviate this.
That's why I said low dose insulin during your cycle was no problem, not dangerous. Just a little extra boost at basically "no cost." I know you viewed it as just another stressor on your body but instead of a seeing insulin as a stressor it can be seen as an anti-stressor. There's good science supporting all this. The research says early intervention with insulin can make newly diagnosed diabetics fare better in the long that those on oral hypoglycemics but you know it is, to draw good conclusions requires tons of short and long term trials with a large amount of study subjects. They talk about something like "metabolic memory" wherein if you don't let things get bad before interventions your body wants to stay at a healthy state. But we know it often takes a long time for diabetics to get diagnosed and then they have had unhealthy and damaging blood glucose levels for maybe years. Then they start the Metformin or whatever and fuck around for a long time, perhaps skipping doses because they "feel fine" and so on.

Really, 10% bodyfat without any drugs would, on paper, be easy to do. That is if you can tolerate not eating much and can tolerate some hunger pangs. But that's no small thing. I know myself am "addicted" to good tasting food and can't find the motivation to eat perfectly for long periods of time. I think hitting 10% can be done healthily too, all dpends on you manage a restricted diet. But here's where drugs come in. Ephedrine would lower appetite, would boost drive, motivation and mood due to it's central effects. Clen is much more potent as a thermogenic i.e. increasing metabolic rate. How safe are they? It's impossible to say exactly. It's also impossible to say which is more dangerous, bulking on AAS or dieting on Ephedrine and Clen. Instinctively I would say the bulking is way more potentially dangerous. All we know by way of studies is one year studies and they say the EC coctail is "safe" for that time frame. Researchers might even argue that in the long term they might increase lifespan - if they make you lose weight. But then there are the potential effects on the heart. You can look at the studies

Great post, Van. Like another classic Getbigger said, you are a board treasure.

It always intrigues me how much things I assume are unhealthy, are actually not just not unhealthy, but potentially even healthy.

I was taken aback when I learned that opiates are not toxic to our organs - it's overdoses that are the major issue with opiates, in addition to the financial cost of those addicted. Otherwise, some people are on them for decades. My mom is friends with a woman who is almost 70, and she's been on 80mg of Oxycontin daily for 23 years now, lol. She also weighs 260-lb.

Sometimes I wish I wasn't such a hypochondriac, because I really prefer how I look on gear.

But I also prefer having hair...I also don't get some massive perma-bulking juicers I see who have backs covered in acne.

I thought it strange that Nasser did so much to have a big and aesthetic physique [for a mass monster], yet was bald, and had glasses. Like, how not get a hair transplant and LASIX?

I want to be in perfect health, and I want or maintain perfect teeth, a great head of hair, and perfectly blemish-free skin.

I want to have a look that looks like I am very into working out - like it's a big part of my life, and that I'm consistent with it. I achieve this look much more easily on gear, and I wish I had the minerals to run more, but again - the hypochondria.

I don't want to end up with a disease in 10  years, and face death knowing that I may have cut 30 years off my life because of life choices I made.

Mike Matarazzo had just such an existential crisis, and it wasn't easy for him to cope with at all. The years 2007 to 2014 were very hard for him, and he personally asked Peter McGough to never contact him again under any circumstances. The memories of his bodybuilding history were too much for him to bear.

I'd like to run more gear. I greatly prefer the look. But I also hate taking risks.

I've been a huge hermit since 2018, because I fear meeting another woman who will financially exploit me. And Lord help me, if I EVER have to work again because some woman burns up my savings - I'd have a full mental collapse.

So I literally stopped taking ANY risks in that time. I have a good thing going on, to live off what I earned in my twenties and thirties...and I just don't want to take risks.

That applies to everything, basically.

It is my fear, Van, that I don't look back regretting what I did, but what I didn't do. That being said - I'm not wrong to think gear may be bad for my overall systemic wellness, and specifically my heart.

I'm just trying to figure out a way to get risks as close to zero as possible. I chiefly adhere to abstinence, as I have yet to figure out what that way is.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 05, 2022, 11:22:30 PM
Your neck has gone and it's not cos you grew monster traps. I'd guess your posture has gone to shit.

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSnf5I_d-BWl1FyS57ou1ziJPnRhJK4sFh64Q&usqp=CAU)

It pretty common, especially if you get a lot of screen time in on phones and laptops.

Mine is pretty terrible as I can easily spend 12 hours a day in front of a laptop. I use a poster correcter and it does help.

The fuck...

I was with a 5'9.5" Dutch woman a while ago, and I swear, we were almost exactly the same height. Maybe she shrank too? She went from 140 to 200. Maybe that made her shorter?

Will I lose height over this crap posture from typing on my phone all day?

Also, I may as well ask...and I don't know if I want to know...but what is Dutch Love, Flexacon?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 05, 2022, 11:48:41 PM
The fuck...

I was with a 5'9.5" Dutch woman a while ago, and I swear, we were almost exactly the same height. Maybe she shrink too? She went from 140 to 200. Maybe that made her shorter?

Will I lose height over this crap posture from typing on my phone all day?

Also, I may as well ask...and I don't know if I want to know...but what is Dutch Love, Flexacon?

Are you saying you banged a whale? Maybe you're not gay after all.

Although asking me about dutch love does feel pretty homo.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kwon on September 06, 2022, 12:32:45 AM
WHAT IS DUTCH LOVE??
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 06, 2022, 12:45:50 AM
You're bang on if you're suggesting I am in a continual state of worrying about drug side effects, and taking days off from using, and subsequently partially losing my gains, etc.

I'll be honest - I don't just want to minimize risks; I want to bring them to as close to zero as possible.

I was using 25-50mg of Anadrol for about a week early on, and made great gains with it. But then I felt like...my core temperature increased or something. Which would make sense, as my body's rate of protein synthesis would have increased. I also got 7 pimples on my back.

That's when I immediately cut down - the pimples and potential body temperature side effects both immediately went away.

And that's the thing about me - I am a big time hypochondriac, and just want close to as zero risk as possible. My intuition tells me we will "feel" most side effects, but as I understand it - kidney issues are not like this.

Being autistic, I sense everything at an extraordinary level. I am hypersensitive to almost everything. And when I feel a negative effect, I change something.

That's why I was never able to take gear seriously - even with this cycle.

Lol!

I am not being serious about this cycle, but I also didn't intend to. I wanted a little boost, and I got it.

If I were to focus on bodybuilding like an actual competitor, AND take the gear use seriously...I think I could make an impressive transformation.

That being said...it does come down to a pretty major health restraint that I have in place.

I don't want to get liver cancer in 10 years and have to wonder whether or not my habits while young - and my steroid use - caused that.

I always ask myself - and I ask others - is there ANY way to make this zero risk to health?

And unfortunately...I just don't see a way, and think abstinence is the only way.

So I choose abstinence. From everything, really.

With my luck, I could throw caution to the wind tomorrow, and end up having my stomach pumped from binge drinking tomorrow, and with herpes.

It's just a hypochondriac thing.

I took 3x 25mg Anadrol tablets in the past 10 days. I am transitioning off now. I think my delts are already down in size. I ramped up my calories recently in the transition [but not my protein]. My body weight is currently 208-lb [no body weight loss yet, but my "look" has already changed, IMO].
^^^^This post nullifies what my advice/opinon is so nevermind.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 02:20:01 AM
Are you saying you banged a whale? Maybe you're not gay after all.

Although asking me about dutch love does feel pretty homo.

Not yet, but there is an issue she needs to resolved which prevented us from banging. Basically, she wanted evidence I don't have STD's, which is fine by me. I did a full panel of tests before starting this cycle in June. So we rescheduled for this week...but I asked to go down on her, sort of jokingly, and she thinks it's a grotesque act, and my asking turned her off for sure.

I just don't get the issue.

I try to put myself in the shoes of women:

If a part of your body smelled like fish, would you want people putting their nose in it?

But still - her reaction was so negative. It's like...I could have told her I wanted to rape her, and she would have been less upset, lol.

Bast said "Just tell her you like when a woman's vagina smells like fish."

LOL!

She also asked me to bite her when I was with her. How is THAT ok?   ::)

So to answer your mom question, I did not bang her. I still remember how she looked when she was 140-lb, and I will always be attracted to her on that basis. For her height, 200-lb is not too heavy. I think she looks great. Shame about her being against cunnilingus. But she's not the first woman who told me that, and she won't be the last.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 02:25:43 AM
WHAT IS DUTCH LOVE??

What is Dutch Love though? Lol.

Wait...is if what Vince Goodrum and Queen Vincey had together?  ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 02:30:33 AM
^^^^This post nullifies what my advice/opinon is so nevermind.

Is there no way that I can enjoy the results of steroids without taking health risks?

I much prefer my look on steroids. Women prefer it too. I'd like to run gear again, if I can do so without compromising my health - possibly next summer. But I guess that's not possible...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 06, 2022, 03:08:44 AM
Could I go from a bit over 15% body fat like I am now, to a bit over 10% on a strict diet and Clen, easy peasy, or is the 10% body fat zone not one that people can get too without taking significant health risks?

A family member is on Metformin. Is there any scientific consensus on whether diabetics on Metformin versus those on insulin fare better in the long-run?

And would I not be damaging my pancreas my taking these things

I guess I should have said diuretics and other cutting agents pose a greater risk for sudden death. You have to wonder how George Peterson felt leading up to his death in the hotel room at last year's Olympia.

For me personally, is doing a bulk to 220 on PED's [next summer, maybe] just as risky as me cutting to 165 using fat-burners [ephedrine/caffeine, Clen, or something else]?

I would think fat-burners are specifically more damaging to my heart. Is that not the case then?

I don't take any fat burners or stimulants and I maintain pretty lean and can get a lot leaner just through diet. 10% is easily achievable and maintainable without any stimulants or even gear at all. You can be very lean and natural. Woman actually prefer the smaller leaner natural look. I prefer being bigger and not as lean holding some water
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 06, 2022, 04:19:28 AM
WHAT IS DUTCH LOVE??

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dutch%20love

The hottest of all the Caucasian loves.

Sexual passion or need that exceeds even the smell of a 21 hour car ride.

 :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 06, 2022, 04:51:39 AM
So to answer your mom question, I did not bang her. I still remember how she looked when she was 140-lb, and I will always be attracted to her on that basis. For her height, 200-lb is not too heavy. I think she looks great. Shame about her being against cunnilingus. But she's not the first woman who told me that, and she won't be the last.

I've been in that situation before where there was a chick I knew from my 20s who I saw again in my 30s and was still attracted to them even though they'd gained weight. But not to that extreme. A 200 lb woman is obese. There's just no way this isn't too heavy. Don't bang her Matt and don't let her move in.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 06, 2022, 05:38:44 AM
Not yet, but there is an issue she needs to resolved which prevented us from banging. Basically, she wanted evidence I don't have STD's, which is fine by me. I did a full panel of tests before starting this cycle in June. So we rescheduled for this week...but I asked to go down on her, sort of jokingly, and she thinks it's a grotesque act, and my asking turned her off for sure.

I just don't get the issue.

I try to put myself in the shoes of women:

If a part of your body smelled like fish, would you want people putting their nose in it?

But still - her reaction was so negative. It's like...I could have told her I wanted to rape her, and she would have been less upset, lol.

Bast said "Just tell her you like when a woman's vagina smells like fish."

LOL!

She also asked me to bite her when I was with her. How is THAT ok?   ::)

So to answer your mom question, I did not bang her. I still remember how she looked when she was 140-lb, and I will always be attracted to her on that basis. For her height, 200-lb is not too heavy. I think she looks great. Shame about her being against cunnilingus. But she's not the first woman who told me that, and she won't be the last.


Jesus Christ Matt, do not repeat do not eat the puss of a 200 lb woman. And at 5’9.5 200lbs is to much. I don’t get how men who are not fat can bang fatties? You are a built man Matt stay away from fatties hahaha and whatever you do don’t eat the fucking puss.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 06, 2022, 06:11:48 AM
Not yet, but there is an issue she needs to resolved which prevented us from banging. Basically, she wanted evidence I don't have STD's, which is fine by me. I did a full panel of tests before starting this cycle in June. So we rescheduled for this week...but I asked to go down on her, sort of jokingly, and she thinks it's a grotesque act, and my asking turned her off for sure.

I just don't get the issue.


In my experience it's either because she has a gross looking pussy or more likely a yeast infection down there. She is trying to do you a favour. My advice is take the hint and forget about going down on her


Jesus Christ Matt, do not repeat do not eat the puss of a 200 lb woman. And at 5’9.5 200lbs is to much. I don’t get how men who are not fat can bang fatties? You are a built man Matt stay away from fatties hahaha and whatever you do don’t eat the fucking puss.

This. If you must then doggy is the only option here
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 06, 2022, 06:16:36 AM
Matt`s gonna` be eating that sweathogs snatch `till her head caves in and she drops 10 pounds of fishy female ejaculate from her fishy smelling slit.................... ........................ ........................ ................of peace.  LOL :D

Matt got bigger so it stands to reason that he wants some heavyweight slit !!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 06, 2022, 06:18:42 AM
Matt`s gonna` be eating that sweathogs snatch `till her head caves in and she drops 10 pounds of fishy female ejaculate from her fishy smelling slit.................... ........................ ........................ ................of peace.  LOL :D

Matt got bigger so it stands to reason that he wants some heavyweight slit !!

Ahhh brutally graphic.haha.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 06, 2022, 06:20:16 AM
Ahhh brutally graphic.haha.
I got a PARSH just typing that !  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 06, 2022, 06:20:58 AM
JUMBO CLIT OF PEACE     :o


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 07:40:09 AM

Jesus Christ Matt, do not repeat do not eat the puss of a 200 lb woman. And at 5’9.5 200lbs is to much. I don’t get how men who are not fat can bang fatties? You are a built man Matt stay away from fatties hahaha and whatever you do don’t eat the fucking puss.

Because it smells like fish?

Fat women need Dutch Love too.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 07:49:28 AM
Hey Taffin, would you be able to Photoshop my love handles put of this picture? I guess that would require Photoshopping the pants foo, so I look like I have a smaller waist.

If I could shave a few inches off this waist, this would be a better shot:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391035;image)

Photoshop out the parts of my sides extending beyond roughly the red lines? So I look like I have a smaller waist.  ;D

If you can't do this, no worries. But please keep the great photoshops coming.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 07:51:49 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391035;image)

Very Ronnie Coleman-like.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 06, 2022, 09:21:58 AM

But I also prefer having hair...I also don't get some massive perma-bulking juicers I see who have backs covered in acne.



A friend of mine just told me, "Hey my friend was in Greece and picked up something called finasteride? Which he said was great for hair, I bought some off him for a hundred bucks. Do you know what it is?" - "Yes I do, I would personally never take it as it's known a few users experience permanent sexual dysfunction with it, besides DHT is an important neurosteroid to have" - "Fuck just wasted 100 bucks" - "you might not be one of those experiencing sides" - "Fuck that! It's not worth the risk."  :D

I would never outright push gear on someone, you never know, despite all precautions there might be some sides. But theoretically, if you had pushed a little when younger there's no reason why you couldn't have gained 60lbs and been a competitive amateur. Imagine 2.5 grams of gear, 10iu of growth, liberal insulin for 2-3 years. You only know for sure in retrospect but I bet you could have been pretty good.

Steroids do make you run hot. Especially tren but even any other old steroid. Dbol only, whatever. Night sweats are very annoying. My HEAD sweats the most, I have a towel around my pillow  :D If you see a guy in the gym sweating a lot, especially under his pec when no one else seems to be sweating, chances are he's on cycle.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 06, 2022, 09:46:27 AM
First, let's get this straight - your brother-in-law isn't.

But now let's get to your last point - why is it that it's ok for YOU to enjoy the attention you get for your physique from your brother-in-law cum gay lover, but it's not ok for ME to enjoy getting attention from the general public?

What's the difference?!

Is it that I go seek it daily, while you do not?

I didn't seek anything, except some chicken and potato salad at Christmas dinner.

So, you miss again. And while you wish to project your insecurities and latent homosexuality on me and family members of mine (i.e. my brother-in-law who lives in Michigan with his WIFE of 25 years), you continue to make a fool of yourself.

I don't obsessed about being perpetually pumped; YOU DO!



Ok, fine...but keep in mind I am NOT in Florida. Here in Canada, we were shut down for the better part of two years.

I needed a good life experience. I got one from using a bit of gear.

What seems to be the issue?

By the way - total number of 25mg Anadrol tablets I have had since June 10th: 60.

So I've ran 1.5g of Anadrol in that whole time. I have a Strongman friend who ran that in 10 days, before cutting back to 100mg a day.

I don't think what I did was THAT unhealthy.

And what happens when the gear is gone, is your life going to suck again?

If the quality of your life experience hinges on syringes, you have some major-league problems.

What you wanted was to put some meat back on your bones, for which the use of anabolics was not necessary, especially the one steroid that's notorious for quick gains but also quick losses upon cessation.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 06, 2022, 04:11:57 PM
Matt,

Do not engage with womens larger than 180.

Please, take my advice.

Things change rapidly in certain areas once they reach the "range".

I've done my share of "hogging" and will admit i've clapped the beautiful brown cheeks of a few Mexicana's in the 170-180 range.

But to even consider going another notch up to 200+.

Don't do it man. unless she is 6-feet tall with luscious teets
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on September 06, 2022, 05:03:58 PM
Women's weights mean nothing to me, I have no clue what a specific height/weight looks like as they're never honest w the numbers--if they give you one at all.  Doubly so if they're "curvy" (fat)

unless you plop them on the scale how do you know if they're 200lbs?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 06, 2022, 05:05:47 PM
Women's weights mean nothing to me, I have no clue what a specific height/weight looks like as they're never honest w the numbers--if they give you one at all.  Doubly so if they're "curvy" (fat)

unless you plop them on the scale how do you know if they're 200lbs?

200lbs is a fat bitch unless 6’ or better. Biggest chick I ever banged was 160 at 5’9 and that was a one time thing, I like a thick ass and thighs but not a fatty.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 06, 2022, 05:06:22 PM
The fuck...

I was with a 5'9.5" Dutch woman a while ago, and I swear, we were almost exactly the same height. Maybe she shrank too? She went from 140 to 200. Maybe that made her shorter?

Will I lose height over this crap posture from typing on my phone all day?

Also, I may as well ask...and I don't know if I want to know...but what is Dutch Love, Flexacon?

Liar.

Josh Rehaluk is not Dutch.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 06, 2022, 05:13:57 PM
Women's weights mean nothing to me, I have no clue what a specific height/weight looks like as they're never honest w the numbers--if they give you one at all.  Doubly so if they're "curvy" (fat)

unless you plop them on the scale how do you know if they're 200lbs?

Yeah, it all varies based on height.

But in my years of dating "larger" women, i have an eye for it.

My ex-GF was 5'4" and 160, but to me should looked perfect. Nice DD's and thick juicy booty and legs.

She didn't have much fat in the stomach area, but all women carry it differently.

Two differently built women at 160 will not balance. It all depends on their bone structure and height. I've seen smaller women who weighed 130 that were fat as hell, like had a beer belly. That is NOT what i'm looking for. ;D

A good women can carry 140-160 pounds well if she is built for it. Which is why i've always been attracted to Latinas. Now look at a 130+ Asian girl and it's going to be a hard no every time.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 06, 2022, 05:17:18 PM
200lbs is a fat bitch unless 6’ or better.

Exactly.

This girl i worked with years ago was 180 and 5'11".

Thick country girl. Big beautiful tits and ass, long legs. And she wasn't fat, her legs were solid muscle from years of gymnastics.

She ended up get married to a guy who was like 5'6". Always thought that was funny.

She looked amazing to me, but not everyone's cup of tea.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 06, 2022, 05:20:18 PM
Matt is really wishing he was back to fucking soggy old men.

And maybe the odd, stray 250 lb alcoholic squaw who wanders off the reservation. He doesn’t fuck the jigaboos he eats their fat cheesy pussies that smell like bear piss, an ashtray, and a moldy pork sandwich were smuggled in the crotch of her underwear for a month.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 06, 2022, 05:51:09 PM
I'm feeling queasy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 06:11:02 PM
I'll post another photo of a separate woman [one I went to high school with - not the one in question] who is around 5'7" and 195-lb. She's not overwhelmingly fat or anything. I'm personally very attracted to both of them.

That that being said, I knew both of them when they were 140, and that's when I initially became attracted to them. 🙂
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 06, 2022, 06:23:43 PM
stray 250 lb alcoholic squaw who wanders off the reservation.

Holy shit. ;D

Lots of those here in NM, if anyone is interested.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Cook on September 06, 2022, 06:31:45 PM
Matt`s gonna` be eating that sweathogs snatch `till her head caves in and she drops 10 pounds of fishy female ejaculate from her fishy smelling slit.................... ........................ ........................ ................of peace.  LOL :D

Matt got bigger so it stands to reason that he wants some heavyweight slit !!
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 06, 2022, 07:22:08 PM
Holy shit. ;D

Lots of those here in NM, if anyone is interested.

Did Shizzo move from Florida?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 06, 2022, 08:31:43 PM
I'll post another photo of a separate woman [one I went to high school with - not the one in question] who is around 5'7" and 195-lb. She's not overwhelmingly fat or anything. I'm personally very attracted to both of them.

That that being said, I knew both of them when they were 140, and that's when I initially became attracted to them. 🙂

In my world a woman who is 5'7" and weighs almost 200 lbs. is "overwhelmingly fat"... memories of a slimmer woman lurking inside the fat one wouldn't help much either. On the other hand, some men are attracted to robust women... many of whose photos they post on Getbig. This tells me if the woman is all boobs and ass, 200 lbs. is acceptable to some guys.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 06, 2022, 08:59:55 PM
If a woman walks into a brick wall and her tits touch said wall before her gut, I'm fucking her.  Unless she smokes. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 06, 2022, 09:16:48 PM
If a woman walks into a brick wall and her tits touch said wall before her gut, I'm fucking her.  Unless she smokes.

Does this rule apply to Shizzo?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 09:21:48 PM
If a woman walks into a brick wall and her tits touch said wall before her gut, I'm fucking her.  Unless she smokes.

Exactly my view on the matter.

Here is the one who is 5'7" and 195-lb [not the one I had the date with - but soon, I hope]. She meets the brick wall criteria. I've waited 26 long years to be with her [Grade 9]. And she just moved into a place a block away from me:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 09:27:04 PM
In my world a woman who is 5'7" and weighs almost 200 lbs. is "overwhelmingly fat"...

Do you realize that the average North American woman weighs 168-lb? And that's at an average female height of about 5'4". So 5'7" and 195-lb is not that much heavier.

memories of a slimmer woman lurking inside the fat one wouldn't help much either. On the other hand, some men are attracted to robust women... many of whose photos they post on Getbig. This tells me if the woman is all boobs and ass, 200 lbs. is acceptable to some guys.

The memories help me. Also...have you never heard the expression "More cushion for the pushing"?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 06, 2022, 09:35:02 PM
Exactly my view on the matter.

Here is the one who is 5'7" and 195-lb [not the one I had the date with - but soon, I hope]. She meets the brick wall criteria. I've waited 26 long years to be with her [Grade 9]. And she just moved into a place a block away from me:

No, just no. She is not the good kinda big, too top heavy/needs bigger hips and legs. You should only get a blow job/tit wank and nothing else from her. Don't even let her get fully undressed.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 09:44:49 PM
No, just no. She is not the good kinda big, too top heavy/needs bigger hips and legs. You should only get a blow job/tit wank and nothing else from her. Don't even let her get fully undressed.

Her legs look small in that photo for some reason, but they aren't.

Speaking of a blowjob, that's all I got from the other one.

She did not let me go down on her. I don't get why women are so self-conscious, just because their vaginas smell like fish.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 09:52:15 PM
Rare non-back shots of Matt C.

Look at how weak my chest is. Let's be honest - nothing can be done to make it strong. It will only ever be less weak.

I'm of the mindset that nobody ever brings up weaknesses. Phil Heath did it...but I just don't think many people do.

Even if I get my front delts out of the picture when training chest, it will never have that "shelf" look. Say, for example, that wes' chest has.

Also - Jewish Getbig poster Walter Sobchak says I have gyno. Is this gyno?:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 06, 2022, 09:54:03 PM
Her legs look small in that photo for some reason, but they aren't.

Speaking of a blowjob, that's all I got from the other one.

She did not let me go down on her. I don't get why women are so self-conscious, just because their vaginas smell like fish.

The other girls hips and legs don't look small from that camera angle. Maybe you just like the more manly build?


Also - Jewish Getbig poster Walter Sobchak says I have gyno. Is this gyno?:

Maybe not gyno, but definitely soggy and man booby
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 10:29:11 PM
She is not the good kinda big, too top heavy/needs bigger hips and legs.

The other girls hips and legs don't look small from that camera angle.

Are you saying her legs are small, period?

She sent me a video of her dancing...and she had great legs in it.

I admit, after reading your first comment, and looking at the picture, I was surprised at how small her legs are there...

I always thought she had very muscular legs.

Maybe not gyno, but definitely soggy and man booby

So "soggy" doesn't mean gyno?

I have no hard lump there.

I assumed it was body fat and water.

But the main issue is that my pecs are a weak point. At the level of body fat I have, I find if I get my mass up a bit, it looks fine. I just can't seem to ever bring my pecs up.

Take my back for instance...have I really lost any body fat? Or does my back just look better now because the muscle is popping more?

Unfortunately, with my chest - I can never get it to grow. It is my weakest point by far, but I have come to accept that.

Perhaps if I do a cutting diet down to 175, it will look better at that body fat percentage.

Is my total volume of fat mass any different in these three photos? Or did I just put some more muscle on?

Dates:
July 24th, 2021:
October 12th, 2021:
June 25th, 2022.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 10:54:52 PM
One thing I've been thinking:

What's the point of perma-bulking?


Rather than be 200-lb at 25% body fat, that many perma-bulkers are, wouldn't it make more sense to be 150-lb at 0% body fat [the body fat percentage that Flex Wheeler was in 1993 when Jim Quinn measured it at Gold's Gym in Venice]?

But on a serious note...how about 175 at 10%?

My point is, if the goal is to look good, shouldn't people just drop the body fat?

The reason I look like I do is because I have a normal life with family, and I didn't want to push my heart by using fat-burners.

Now I'm thinking - why not try to drop to 170-lb at 10% body fat?

I can tell you one reason why being fatter is better - because I look 10% in a tank top, as all my weak points and fatter areas are covered up.

But I'm now starting to think - I want to be as lean as I can be in the long-term.

My question is - how lean can one be, and not compromise health?

Can I be as low as 10% body fat, year-round, just from diet and training? And maybe MINIMAL fat-burners?

Are any Getbiggers 10% body fat year-round?

I may be 15-20% body fat, but I maintain that look year-round. I never go over maybe 18%. I don't think I've ever been lower than around 14%.

I would bring that down to 10-12%, if that is realistic.

Is it?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 11:18:19 PM
I know I get bashed a lot on here, but I found the photo of myself and Getbig boss Ron Avidan, and as you can see, I have much superior face genetics than Walter Sobchak.

I think Walter Sobchak's issue is - maybe he does have vastly superior genetics to me in terms of muscle mass development [that wouldn't say much, lol], but in addition to being jealous of me for having vastly superior strength genetics than him [I warm up with his workout], he is also jealous that I have [or had] a better face than him, as he is ugly.

Walter Sobchak is most likely very ugly.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 06, 2022, 11:29:19 PM
I'd be willing to change up my diet - and maybe throw in a couple of natural supplements to look as close to my juiced look, without using any.

I wanted this physique FAST this summer.

And I got it - thanks to low dose Anadrol.

Now I'm willing to be more patient, and get to whatever physique level I can max out at naturally.

But what might that be?

Can I be 175-lb at 10% body fat at 5'9" without ANY steroids, and with minimal PED's?

Is that realistic at 40?

I'm curious if that is easy, how come maybe 1 in 1,000 people look that way? If that.

Notice that MCWAY bullshits me about how great natural bodybuilding is, and how great he looks from it. I don't get the difficulty in just posting a photo to see how good his program really is.

If I truly believed anyone who looked good was natural, maybe I'd be willing to give a natural program a try.

There is a reason I always trained for strength - because I could make great progress doing that.

I simply don't believe any of us can look that great naturally.

There is a biohazard bin / amnesty bin at my gym for needles and syringes. It is ALWAYS filled to the brim. So not only are people on juice in mass numbers at gym [I go to two gyms, and I'm talking about the family oriented one], but they actually inject AT THE GYM. In the bathroom stall, I guess [where the bin is located].

Yet I've only ever seen one person at that gym in better shape than me.

So presumably everyone is on steroids, and they all look nothing like it.

It's fascinating to me to see that.

As I said, I'm going for an everyday fitness look, maintainable 24/7/365.

If I could be 175-lb at 10% body fat, that would be great - assuming that is realistic drug-free.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 07, 2022, 12:04:49 AM
Does this rule apply to Shizzo?

Great question.  Assuming Shizzo still has a cock, the answer has to be no.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 07, 2022, 12:09:08 AM
Exactly my view on the matter.

Here is the one who is 5'7" and 195-lb [not the one I had the date with - but soon, I hope]. She meets the brick wall criteria. I've waited 26 long years to be with her [Grade 9]. And she just moved into a place a block away from me:

Don't let the latent homosexuals around here talk you out of fucking her.  Make banging her the top priority.  Stay on anadrol as long as it takes to pound her.  If you have to break open the sustanon, do that as well.  Please Matt, fuck her brains out and report back in the greatest of detail. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 12:54:22 AM
A fat chick with a pretty face is always deserving of a solid splashing of a ball gravy facial and cum covered tits.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 12:57:57 AM
Matt  simply needs to add in cardio to make his chest look much better.................. .........CARDIO,a good diet,and take all 25-50 mgs. of Anadrol along with the 250-500 mgs. of  Sustanon.....stop fucking around........personally I`ve always worked up to 50 the two times I`ve used it.....the only ill effect was one zit on my upper back.

He would look far better if he was leaner.

Stop worrying that shit wont hurt you.....who in the fuck takes 12.5 mgs. of Anadrol.  LOL  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 01:17:56 AM
Don't let the latent homosexuals around here talk you out of fucking her.  Make banging her the top priority.  Stay on anadrol as long as it takes to pound her.  If you have to break open the sustanon, do that as well.  Please Matt, fuck her brains out and report back in the greatest of detail.

Great post!!

Fuck yes, I want to.

In 2007, I fucked a woman who weighed 213-lb, and was amazed at how sexually compatible we were. That's when I realized that I can't assume that a woman isn't sexually compatible with me just because she is overweight.

So yeah, I intend to fuck both of them.

Rare video of Matt C bench pressing 265x9 last night:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CiMrMomgL99/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 07, 2022, 01:18:49 AM
Matt  simply needs to add in cardio to make his chest look much better.................. .........CARDIO,a good diet,and take all 25-50 mgs. of Anadrol along with the 250-500 mgs. of  Sustanon.....stop fucking around........personally I`ve always worked up to 50 the two times I`ve used it.....the only ill effect was one zit on my upper back.

He would look far better if he was leaner.

Stop worrying that shit wont hurt you.....who in the fuck takes 12.5 mgs. of Anadrol.  LOL  :D

Matt must be one of those super-responders. Crazy results from almost zero-gear.
1CC of Test a week and one A-Drol tab a day, dude would blow the feck up...

Like everything, low-doses and moderation (and cycling off) probably wont hurt most people. ("Probably").
Many of the old-timers lived pretty old.
These days, with crazy doses, bath-tube brew, over-stuffing food, very hight body-weights (and always staying "on"), many drop dead.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 01:20:33 AM
Matt  simply needs to add in cardio to make his chest look much better.................. .........CARDIO,a good diet,and take all 25-50 mgs. of Anadrol along with the 250-500 mgs. of  Sustanon.....stop fucking around........personally I`ve always worked up to 50 the two times I`ve used it.....the only ill effect was one zit on my upper back.

He would look far better if he was leaner.

Stop worrying that shit wont hurt you.....who in the fuck takes 12.5 mgs. of Anadrol.  LOL  :D

What about Art Atwood dropping dead in 2011?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 07, 2022, 01:20:38 AM


Rare video of Matt C bench pressing 265x9 last night:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CiMrMomgL99/

Very strong!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 01:31:15 AM
Matt must be one of those super-responders. Crazy results from almost zero-gear.
1CC of Test a week and one A-Drol tab a day, dude would blow the feck up...

Like everything, low-doses and moderation (and cycling off) probably wont hurt most people. ("Probably").
Many of the old-timers lived pretty old.
These days, with crazy doses, bath-tube brew, over-stuffing food, very hight body-weights (and always staying "on"), many drop dead.

Thanks Gym-Rat! I was very pleased with the results I got on relatively little.

I would use more, but...health is big restraint for me. I don't really have any vices, and I'm a big time hypochondriac.

Another concern is that if I do a big cycle and make great gains, it would presumably take more time to go back to baseline after the fact. And then since I'm just going back to a drug-free state, it would be disappointing to go back to normal after making such big gains from a heavier cycle.

So I just wanted a little boost, so the transition back to normal wouldn't be difficult. That boost ended up being better than I expected given how little gear I used, but I still think I will handle the transition back to clean training, no problem.

One other thing - while I respond well to low doses of gear, I sometimes wonder if that's because I'm hitting a sweet spot, and if diminishing returns will commence if I use more. Or maybe orals are the 80/20 principle where I make 80% of the gains off 20% of the gear?

But I do much prefer my current look.

What do most people do? Cycle on and off?

Is there any way to incorporate gear into my lifestyle, with minimal to no negative health impacts?

Because I must say - bodybuilding is way better with gear. Natural strength training is ok...but muscle building naturally is futile, IMO.

I'm sure MCWAY looks like garbage. That's why he's afraid to post a photo.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 01:33:39 AM
Matt  simply needs to add in cardio to make his chest look much better.................. .........CARDIO,a good diet,and take all 25-50 mgs. of Anadrol along with the 250-500 mgs. of  Sustanon.....stop fucking around........personally I`ve always worked up to 50 the two times I`ve used it.....the only ill effect was one zit on my upper back.

He would look far better if he was leaner.

Stop worrying that shit wont hurt you.....who in the fuck takes 12.5 mgs. of Anadrol.  LOL  :D

Is 175-lb at 10% body fat realistic without any assistance? Just strict diet, cardio, and hard training? I don't do cardio, but I can start.

Someone who is 200-lb at 20% body fat would have the same amount of LBM as someone who is 180-lb at 10% body fat...but getting from the first to the second is not necessarily easy without losing muscle.

I'm thinking - if I can't be big, I may as well be lean.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 01:38:41 AM
What about Art Atwood dropping dead in 2011?
Jesus Christ man Atwood was on a fucking boatload of everything imaginable and more than likely never cycled off like all the idiots today that are dropping like flies.

Use it don`t abuse it.....what I suggested is not an exorbatant dosage/cycle by any stretch of the imagination.

You smoke 4 cigarettes in a decade and worry about getting lung Cancer for Gods sake.  :D

A HUGE HYPOCHODRIAC  IS WHAT YOU ARE MATT, AND A WORRY WART...... AND I THOUGHT MY ANXIETY WAS OFF THE CHAIN.  ;D

Those dosages for 2-3 months then cycle off decreasing the dose slowly and keep training eating good with walking on a treadmill until your next moderate cycle.....and you`ll be fine.

It`s up to you of course, but I know for a fact unless you have any underlying medical issues that you`d have no worries......look at the insane amounts some guys take for decades......you would be taking almost nothing by comparison.

Then again there is nothing at all wrong with training natural....it`s a personal  preferance....I`m just talking gear cuz you`re taking some.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 07, 2022, 01:47:43 AM
Thanks Gym-Rat! I was very pleased with the results I got on relatively little.

I would use more, but...health is big restraint for me. I don't really have any vices, and I'm a big time hypochondriac.

Another concern is that if I do a big cycle and make great gains, it would presumably take more time to go back to baseline after the fact. And then since I'm just going back to a drug-free state, it would be disappointing to go back to normal after making such big gains from a heavier cycle.

So I just wanted a little boost, so the transition back to normal wouldn't be difficult. That boost ended up being better than I expected given how little gear I used, but I still think I will handle the transition back to clean training, no problem.

One other thing - while I respond well to low doses of gear, I sometimes wonder if that's because I'm hitting a sweet spot, and if diminishing returns will commence if I use more. Or maybe orals are the 80/20 principle where I make 80% of the gains off 20% of the gear?

But I do much prefer my current look.

What do most people do? Cycle on and off?

Is there any way to incorporate gear into my lifestyle, with minimal to no negative health impacts?

Because I must say - bodybuilding is way better with gear. Natural strength training is ok...but muscle building naturally is futile, IMO.

I'm sure MCWAY looks like garbage. That's why he's afraid to post a photo.

I'd say, if you are making gains and happy with them, then do what you are doing.
Low doses are the smartest way to go IMO. And yes, I believe that if you upped the dose, you "could" regress.
(Water bloat, more sides, acne, liver, heart, etc).
A 1/2 (or full) cc of test would probably do wonders for you with no negatives. (Just thinking out loud here, don't mind me).

One thing is sure, you respond very well to this stuff... (training and very little gear).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 01:53:10 AM
Is 175-lb at 10% body fat realistic without any assistance? Just strict diet, cardio, and hard training? I don't do cardio, but I can start.

Someone who is 200-lb at 20% body fat would have the same amount of LBM as someone who is 180-lb at 10% body fat...but getting from the first to the second is not necessarily easy without losing muscle.

I'm thinking - if I can't be big, I may as well be lean.
That`s totally reasonable and easily achievable with cardio which you should ALWAYS be doing.....I fucked up and can`t anymore like the fucking idiot I am......my own fault though so I can`t cry about it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 01:57:55 AM
Matt you comparing drug cycles with Art Arwood is akin to Hanky saying he looks better than Zane did and that he`d kick Mike Tysons ass......it`s a ridiculous comparison.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 07, 2022, 05:05:46 AM
Exactly my view on the matter.

Here is the one who is 5'7" and 195-lb [not the one I had the date with - but soon, I hope]. She meets the brick wall criteria. I've waited 26 long years to be with her [Grade 9]. And she just moved into a place a block away from me:

Women are wizards with camera angles and cropping shots. There's no way I'd guess she was 195.45 lbs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 07, 2022, 05:40:42 AM


I'd be willing to change up my diet - and maybe throw in a couple of natural supplements to look as close to my juiced look, without using any.

I wanted this physique FAST this summer.

And I got it - thanks to low dose Anadrol.

Now I'm willing to be more patient, and get to whatever physique level I can max out at naturally.

But what might that be?

Can I be 175-lb at 10% body fat at 5'9" without ANY steroids, and with minimal PED's?

Is that realistic at 40?

I'm curious if that is easy, how come maybe 1 in 1,000 people look that way? If that.

Notice that MCWAY bullshits me about how great natural bodybuilding is, and how great he looks from it. I don't get the difficulty in just posting a photo to see how good his program really is.

If I truly believed anyone who looked good was natural, maybe I'd be willing to give a natural program a try.

There is a reason I always trained for strength - because I could make great progress doing that.

I simply don't believe any of us can look that great naturally.

There is a biohazard bin / amnesty bin at my gym for needles and syringes. It is ALWAYS filled to the brim. So not only are people on juice in mass numbers at gym [I go to two gyms, and I'm talking about the family oriented one], but they actually inject AT THE GYM. In the bathroom stall, I guess [where the bin is located].

Yet I've only ever seen one person at that gym in better shape than me.

So presumably everyone is on steroids, and they all look nothing like it.

It's fascinating to me to see that.

As I said, I'm going for an everyday fitness look, maintainable 24/7/365.

If I could be 175-lb at 10% body fat, that would be great - assuming that is realistic drug-free.

Im sitting at 193lbs no roids or peds' and in great shape.  Change your training up. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 07, 2022, 07:49:44 AM
I'd be willing to change up my diet - and maybe throw in a couple of natural supplements to look as close to my juiced look, without using any.

I wanted this physique FAST this summer.

And I got it - thanks to low dose Anadrol.

Now I'm willing to be more patient, and get to whatever physique level I can max out at naturally.

But what might that be?

Can I be 175-lb at 10% body fat at 5'9" without ANY steroids, and with minimal PED's?

Is that realistic at 40?

I'm curious if that is easy, how come maybe 1 in 1,000 people look that way? If that.

Notice that MCWAY bullshits me about how great natural bodybuilding is, and how great he looks from it. I don't get the difficulty in just posting a photo to see how good his program really is.

More BS straw men from you, O senseless one. I don't recall saying how great I looked. Now, I may feel that way personally. But, where or when did I make such a proclamation?



If I truly believed anyone who looked good was natural, maybe I'd be willing to give a natural program a try.

There is a reason I always trained for strength - because I could make great progress doing that.

I simply don't believe any of us can look that great naturally.

That's your problem. The reason you're all butt-hurt about me is because I don't subscribe to your pea-brained neurosis.

Yet, another strawman you keep propping up is this "training for strength" vs. "training for 'bodybuilding'" blather. And at the end of the day, your issue remains.....YOUR DIET. We're somehow supposed to believe that you're going to stay small, despite training for strength, if the quality and quantity of calories were increased?

Every true strongman I've ever seen EATS quantities of food that make Ronnie Coleman (an ex-powerlifter, BTW) look like a bulimic supermodel.

Stronger muscles are bigger ones, when you putting away the groceries.
Quit obsessing about drugs and do everything else right, as in actually EFFECTIVE for you; and business will pick up.



There is a biohazard bin / amnesty bin at my gym for needles and syringes. It is ALWAYS filled to the brim. So not only are people on juice in mass numbers at gym [I go to two gyms, and I'm talking about the family oriented one], but they actually inject AT THE GYM. In the bathroom stall, I guess [where the bin is located].

Yet I've only ever seen one person at that gym in better shape than me.

So presumably everyone is on steroids, and they all look nothing like it.

It's fascinating to me to see that.

Not really!! Their diets probably SUCK worse than yours does.



As I said, I'm going for an everyday fitness look, maintainable 24/7/365.

If I could be 175-lb at 10% body fat, that would be great - assuming that is realistic drug-free.

You'll never know personally, because you won't do the ONE THING needed to get the job done: GET YOUR DIET STRAIGHT. You won't eat enough calories to grow; nor will you stick to a diet to get cut up long enough.

You'll make some BS excuse about feigned health concerns. But, when it came to the needle in the rump, health be damned!! "I'm perpetually pumped!!"

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 07, 2022, 08:35:06 AM

Not really!! Their diets probably SUCK worse than yours does.


Youre right McWay. TONS of people are on the gas, yet still look like shit. They dont want to do the work.
The stuff they seem to ignore = Hard training, consistent, rest, food/diet, etc.

While some (few) folks can look at a barbel and syringe and blow up, MOST have to do it all to see results.
Very hard work and for decades. Especially the natural folks...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 07, 2022, 08:56:40 AM
Youre right McWay. TONS of people are on the gas, yet still look like shit. They dont want to do the work.
The stuff they seem to ignore = Hard training, consistent, rest, food/diet, etc.

While some (few) folks can look at a barbel and syringe and blow up, MOST have to do it all to see results.
Very hard work and for decades. Especially the natural folks...

The name of this site says it all, GETBIG!! That's the hardest part of bodybuilding, because you have to INCREASE the calories.

It's quality and quantity. Eat too much of the wrong food or not enough of the right food (for your particular body) and it's futility personified.

I came to terms with that over 25 years ago. Steroids or no steroids, I'm not putting more muscle on my bony frame unless I'm downing calories and protein......LOTS OF THEM!! That's how weight gainers became my best friends in my quest for swoleness.

My biggest challenge over the years is putting on size WITHOUT THEM. Whenever my gains stall, my first inclination is to grab a bucket or bag of gainer and go to work (especially since the ones today are of much better quality). But, I'm not in my teens or early 20s anymore. I can't put away 5000 calories the way I once did, back in the day.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 07, 2022, 09:13:35 AM
Everybody is different and based on their own unique physiology can hold only so much mass without getting too fat.

The requirement of even natty bodybuilders to be ripped for contests makes natty's drop size until they become scrawny waifs.

Steroids help you build muscle and hold onto more of it when you diet down.

Can you get massive naturally?  Really MASSIVE?  Yes, but you'll gain a lot of fat in the process.

Doug Hepburn is an example.  Massive, strong, and fat.



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 09:23:31 AM
Over 13 weeks on steroids and what are the results?

Deadpool baby hands
No forearm muscles or vascularity
Dreadfully short bicep attachments
Weak triceps and out of place front delts
TITS - softest saggiest little man chest ever seen on Getbig
A rib cage like a sparrow
No inner or upper pecs
No traps
No neck development
No back width or thickness
Lower back fat that looks like one of Shizzo’s chins
No abs - has the midsection of a 50 year old woman
No obliques
Still hiding his weak legs and calves
Face like a mongoloid - looks like a Downs Syndrome Halloween mask

For fuck’s sake after three months of steroids and eating, you look like you have barely ever touched a weight. Average, every day people, men and women, look better than that after their first year of training.

Hahahahahaha….let me guess, you actually posted those photos thinking you would get compliments? You look like shit and even with all the drugs in the world you will still look like a weak little retard.

Talk about a total lack of self-awareness!!!!    Bwahahahahahaha!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 07, 2022, 09:37:36 AM
Everybody is different and based on their own unique physiology can hold only so much mass without getting too fat.

The requirement of even natty bodybuilders to be ripped for contests makes natty's drop size until they become scrawny waifs.

Steroids help you build muscle and hold onto more of it when you diet down.

Can you get massive naturally?  Really MASSIVE?  Yes, but you'll gain a lot of fat in the process.

Doug Hepburn is an example.  Massive, strong, and fat.


Excellent points ^^

You too McWay.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 09:47:01 AM
My main man Iron Nat and McWay making good sense per usual.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 07, 2022, 01:01:07 PM
My main man Iron Nat and McWay making good sense per usual.

Excellent points ^^

You too McWay.

From my experience, I'd say that someone who has their diet on point and tired to put on size without anabolics, should have at least 60% of the weight he gains be lean mass.

Also, keep in mind that (over the last 30 years or so) there have been a number OTC supplements that help stimulate lean mass gains without merely jacking up calories: Creatine, HMB, CLA, Glutamine (in high does), etc.

They won't do JACK, if your diet is pitiful. But, they can help from time to time.

And, as others have testified, you can maintain size on modest calories after you jack them up to get to that size. Again, I'm not eating 5000 calories a day anymore (and haven't done so in YEARS).



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 07, 2022, 01:12:58 PM
People want to look like roided bodybuilders they see in the media.

People want the drug look.

You can't look like that naturally even if you do everything else correctly.

But you can look good.  Your expectations have to be realistic.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 07, 2022, 01:28:55 PM
People want to look like roided bodybuilders they see in the media.

People want the drug look.

You can't look like that naturally even if you do everything else correctly.

But you can look good.  Your expectations have to be realistic.

As far as looking good goes, it's small and ripped; or big and "smooth". Chris Hemsworth claimed that his wife HATED how he looked for the latest Thor movie. He was way too big and ripped for her liking. His gym buddies, however, thought he looked awesome.

And it reportedly took his eating 6000 calories to get him to that size.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 07, 2022, 01:35:19 PM
As far as looking good goes, it's small and ripped; or big and "smooth". Chris Hemsworth claimed that his wife HATED how he looked for the latest Thor movie. He was way too big and ripped for her liking. His gym buddies, however, thought he looked awesome.

And it reportedly took his eating 6000 calories to get him to that size.



And steroids.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 07, 2022, 02:02:27 PM
Do you realize that the average North American woman weighs 168-lb? And that's at an average female height of about 5'4". So 5'7" and 195-lb is not that much heavier.

The memories help me. Also...have you never heard the expression "More cushion for the pushing"?

I believe the saying is "More cushion for the pushin"

A woman who is 5 ft. 4 in. tall is considered overweight (BMI is 25 to 29) if she weighs between about 145 and 169 pounds. She is considered obese (BMI is 30 or more) if she is closer to 174 pounds or more.

Muscle weighs the same a fat, but it is more dense. So if said woman is a bodybuilder she may not look overweight.

Almost 60% of average North American women between the ages of 20-34 are considered overweight and 36% are considered obese. These percentages increase as the average woman ages. 76% of the average woman between 65 and 74 years old is overweigh, 44% are obese.

Check this out:
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/images/illustrations/medical-illustrations/en/adult-bmi-chart-no-heading.gif/jcr:content/renditions/aem-thumbnail-980-980.jpeg
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 07, 2022, 02:03:07 PM
As far as looking good goes, it's small and ripped; or big and "smooth". Chris Hemsworth claimed that his wife HATED how he looked for the latest Thor movie. He was way too big and ripped for her liking. His gym buddies, however, thought he looked awesome.

And it reportedly took his eating 6000 calories to get him to that size.



there it is, the staple calorific value of all bullshit articles.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 07, 2022, 02:08:39 PM
there it is, the staple calorific value of all bullshit articles.

How do you figure that? I had to eat 4500-5000 back in the day, just to get over 200 lbs. And I don't look anywhere close to what he does.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 07, 2022, 02:10:33 PM
How do you figure that? I had to eat 4500-5000 back in the day, just to get over 200 lbs. And I don't look anywhere close to what he does.

its always "6000" calories a day, you try eating 6000 cals a day for more than a few days, if you havent got a super efficient digestive system you get clogged up to fuck.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 07, 2022, 02:12:51 PM
How do you figure that? I had to eat 4500-5000 back in the day, just to get over 200 lbs. And I don't look anywhere close to what he does.

Were you totally drugged up like him?

Also they do tons of onscreen tricks - they drink glycogen (or something) drinks to swell up after depletion, hold weights in their hands when shot from the legs up, lighting tricks, etc..
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 07, 2022, 02:17:46 PM

Im sitting at 193lbs no roids or peds' and in great shape.  Change your training up.

Valid
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 07, 2022, 02:18:53 PM
Rare non-back shots of Matt C.

Look at how weak my chest is.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391283;image)

Also - Jewish Getbig poster Walter Sobchak says I have gyno. Is this gyno?:

Your chest is full enough but you look like you are overweight in this photo. If you were to continue training and slimmed down, your pecs would be more defined and therefore look bigger in comparison the rest of your physique.

When guys are overweight it is more difficult to determine if they have gyno because around 10% of breast tissue is fat. Breast tissue is composed of milk glands, milk ducts and supportive tissue (dense breast tissue), and fatty tissue (nondense breast tissue). When you are able to give milk from your tits, you will definitely have gyno.  ;) 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 07, 2022, 02:22:51 PM
Look you took anadrol this is to be expected you bulked up and now need to lean out your chest will look better if you drop some bodyfat and water it is a process 2 steps forward one step back
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 07, 2022, 02:37:22 PM
its always "6000" calories a day, you try eating 6000 cals a day for more than a few days, if you havent got a super efficient digestive system you get clogged up to fuck.

And he was on AAS/GH at a minimum.

All these movie stars are on gear.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 07, 2022, 02:39:26 PM
Matt has that nasty estrogen bloat you get from taking Drol alone. Lots of fall cells forming that aren't going away anytime soon.

Should have used some Test.

And it's all going to crash and burn a few weeks after he stops.

Also, you BETTER crush that fat chick's fat pussy or at least send me her info.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 07, 2022, 02:54:44 PM
Matt has that nasty estrogen bloat you get from taking Drol alone. Lots of fall cells forming that aren't going away anytime soon.

Should have used some Test.

And it's all going to crash and burn a few weeks after he stops.

Also, you BETTER crush that fat chick's fat pussy or at least send me her info.

One imagines intercourse between two fat people must be somewhat difficult unless the guy is hung. By his own admission, Matt is not that well endowed. On the other hand, we don't know if he has a tongue as long as Gene Simmons' of Kiss.  ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 07, 2022, 03:10:45 PM
Hemsworth did not eat 6K calories leading up to the shoot. You burn fat by being in a deficit. How high would Hemsworth's BMR have to have been to burn fat quickly at 6K? They all say this same exact balonie, and maybe they did increase calories drastically very early in the program. Drugs don't change this that much. That Swedish guy who did Tarzan said the same thing. There are no Olympia competitors who diet on 6K, 4K maybe at most. But many need to go down to under 3K at some points.

Yes they eat a "ton" of food. In VOLUME, not calorie density. Salad and salmon and things like that. It might even be hard to consume it all while you're really starving.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 03:15:20 PM
Matt has that nasty estrogen bloat you get from taking Drol alone. Lots of fall cells forming that aren't going away anytime soon.

Should have used some Test.

And it's all going to crash and burn a few weeks after he stops.

Also, you BETTER crush that fat chick's fat pussy or at least send me her info.
That`s why I said he should have used the Sust in conjunction with the A-Bomz.....as you said,having a base of Test is always a good thing when running a cycle of this type.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 07, 2022, 03:54:08 PM
I just don't understand how you just went from skinny to fat where was the jacked in between? You were eating nothing then somehow up your calories to like 2k and now you are fat wtf? And this is from a smidge of anadrol? You look like a guy who has been living on anadrol and pizza for weeks. Not to be mean but time to reevaluate already you need to lean out. Back shots were misleading you are putting on fat and from very little food while working out it doesnt make sense
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 03:56:37 PM
I just don't understand how you just went from skinny to fat where was the jacked in between? You were eating nothing then somehow up your calories to like 2k and now you are fat wtf? And this is from a smidge of anadrol? You look like a guy who has been living on anadrol and pizza for weeks. Not to be mean but time to reevaluate already you need to lean out. Back shots were misleading you are putting on fat and from very little food while working out it doesnt make sense
He needs to drop strong,man or at least put it on the back burner for a while.....train like a bodybuilder no throwing weights around and get on the threadmill...........NOW!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 07, 2022, 03:57:54 PM
I just don't understand how you just went from skinny to fat where was the jacked in between? You were eating nothing then somehow up your calories to like 2k and now you are fat wtf? And this is from a smidge of anadrol? You look like a guy who has been living on anadrol and pizza for weeks. Not to be mean but time to reevaluate already you need to lean out. Back shots were misleading you are putting on fat and from very little food while working out it doesnt make sense

Agree.

But this is what Drol only cycles do.

There is a reason nobody in their right mind would do this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 04:26:20 PM
99% of the male population in the world could build a better physique than that WITHOUT drugs.

Matt Canning looks like a pudgy little weak forty year old blob of estrogen.

Jesus Christ if you needed drugs to look like that….find a new hobby.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 07, 2022, 04:30:09 PM
Colonel James:  I'm looking forward to seeing you in action.  Prime says you've got a 6.45inch cock.

Matt:  Well, um, I guess so. 

Colonel James:  May I see it?

Matt: Really?

Colonel:  Please. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 04:36:15 PM
I just don't understand how you just went from skinny to fat where was the jacked in between? You were eating nothing then somehow up your calories to like 2k and now you are fat wtf? And this is from a smidge of anadrol? You look like a guy who has been living on anadrol and pizza for weeks. Not to be mean but time to reevaluate already you need to lean out. Back shots were misleading you are putting on fat and from very little food while working out it doesnt make sense

He has no metabolism because he has no muscle.

For fucks sake, he bumped his calories up by a couple hundred a day and in two months he’s a fat fuck.

Hahahahahaha….and the irony is that he posted that fucking lame photo expecting to get compliments on his improvements. 🤣

If he took his Mommy’s yoga pants off his legs are probably worse than yours…and that’s really saying something!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 07, 2022, 04:47:57 PM
its always "6000" calories a day, you try eating 6000 cals a day for more than a few days, if you havent got a super efficient digestive system you get clogged up to fuck.

I actually have. To be more precise, I drank three weight shakes (each of which was 1100 calories and 55 grams of protein), two homemade shakes of milk and eggs (500 calories each) and the rest was whatever was available at the cafeteria.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 07, 2022, 06:28:50 PM
Colonel James:  I'm looking forward to seeing you in action.  Prime says you've got a 6.45inch cock.

Matt:  Well, um, I guess so. 

Colonel James:  May I see it?

Matt: Really?

Colonel:  Please.

Hahahaha!

Matt Canning, the new Dirk :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 06:31:49 PM
Women are wizards with camera angles and cropping shots. There's no way I'd guess she was 195.45 lbs.

Saw what you did there.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 07, 2022, 06:32:23 PM
My main man Iron Nat and McWay making good sense per usual.

Agreed.  Good dudes -- good advice.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 06:34:03 PM

Im sitting at 193lbs no roids or peds' and in great shape.  Change your training up.

Why does everyone focus on training?

I would say as an input into progress, nutrition is twice as important.

But whether that's true or not - it's certainly more important.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 06:35:24 PM
Colonel James:  I'm looking forward to seeing you in action.  Prime says you've got a 6.45inch cock.

Matt:  Well, um, I guess so. 

Colonel James:  May I see it?

Matt: Really?

Colonel:  Please.

LOL!!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 07, 2022, 06:36:55 PM
LOL!!!!!

I'm bummed.  It's leaving Netflix at the end of this month.   ;D

Got any more pics of that broad that me and TIO are urging you to fuck?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 07, 2022, 06:41:35 PM
Why does everyone focus on training?

I would say as an input into progress, nutrition is twice as important.

But whether that's true or not - it's certainly more important.

Training Rest Recovery they are all important
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 07, 2022, 06:44:23 PM
Training Rest Recovery they are all important

Do you ever have regrets that you didn't receive the polio vaccine as a child?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on September 07, 2022, 07:44:17 PM
This thread really turned. Turns out Matt is a fatass. Thats why he was spamming those same photos of the bdb and him in a tanktop. Didn't listen to all of us saying to do the sustanon. Retard
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 07:47:38 PM
This thread really turned. Turns out Matt is a fatass. Thats why he was spamming those same photos of the bdb and him in a tanktop. Didn't listen to all of us saying to do the sustanon. Retard

The spandex tights were a nice touch though!!  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 07:57:47 PM
The spandex tights were a nice touch though!!  :D

Getbig wishes you had a pair of those…

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 07, 2022, 08:00:17 PM
The spandex tights were a nice touch though!!  :D

I’m not sure what I find the most endearing about the retard. His ballet tights and refinery safety shoes  or the fact that he loves the taste and smell of unwell girl meat (I know he’s partially retarded and slow, but someone should teach him that while the natural musky aroma of Y pie is maybe the finest scent - fishy odor indicates that the woman is sick and has some time of infection or bad bacteria)

OR his micro-pecker and his absolutely unhealthy obsession with other mens cocks. 100% without question Matt is gay which would be fine if he wasn’t the most socially weird fckr that I have ever seen.

Imagine this reality show. Living lockdown all in the same house. Matt - Prime - Shizzo - Blaha. No Prime no gdmn children you sicko!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 08:00:24 PM
I`m buying a pair ASAP !! LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 08:03:30 PM
I’m not sure what I find the most endearing about the retard. His ballet tights and refinery safety shoes  or the fact that he loves the taste and smell of unwell girl meat (I know he’s partially retarded and slow, but someone should teach him that while the natural musky aroma of Y pie is maybe the finest scent - fishy odor indicates that the woman is sick and has some time of infection or bad bacteria)

OR his micro-pecker and his absolutely unhealthy obsession with other mens cocks. 100% without question Matt is gay which would be fine if he wasn’t the most socially weird fckr that I have ever seen.

Imagine this reality show. Living lockdown all in the same house. Matt - Prime - Shizzo - Blaha. No Prime no gdmn children you sicko!!

42% bodyfat and a 15-inch arm.

Maybe steroids don’t work as well as we all thought…
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 07, 2022, 08:05:04 PM
I`m buying a pair ASAP !! LOL  ;D

Don’t you fckn dare!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 08:05:24 PM
I`m buying a pair ASAP !! LOL  ;D
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 07, 2022, 08:07:01 PM
42% bodyfat and a 15-inch arm.

Maybe steroids don’t work as well as we all thought…

Cannons!!!!   Does the sun not shine in canada?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 08:10:09 PM
Cannons!!!!   Does the sun not shine in canada?
.

BOOM!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 07, 2022, 08:13:11 PM
Very strong!

It is a pretty good set.  I certainly can't do that right now though, in fairness to moi ;), I have been unable to train since late '13 (long story).  But before that, I had a good twenty years' hard lifting under my belt, and I like to think I learned a little along the way.

So...for starters, let me back up:  when I call that a pretty good set, I don't mean that as a back-handed compliment.  It is more controlled than most benching I've seen over the years; typically, gym rats I know will bounce the bar off their chests and try to dry hump the ceiling, especially when they get into doing a few reps with 225-275ish.  And before I was sidelined, I saw an increasing number of stupid newbie jackoffs just doing the top half or maybe two-thirds of the ROM.

Also, the effort put forth was good.  In my parlance, I'd call that technical failure.

However, for someone who constantly whines about lack of pecs as Matt does, I would have approached that set differently.

One, strip the weight to no more than 225.  185 would be even better to start because it'd give more room to add weight to the bar before getting back into progressively lower, but still productive, TUT ranges.

Two, pause each rep on the chest as if each rep was being judged in a powerlifting meet.

Three, lower the bar slower.  3 second negatives.

Four, only fully lock out those reps when nearing failure; otherwise, pause at the bottom, explode up just shy of lock out, then lower the fucker again.

~15 reps (or whatever) to near failure/going to the point you can't get another without help is plenty.  A drop set to 135 for less strict, rapid-fire reps to really flush your pecs with a great pump would be all I'd do for flat benching.

Go on to a couple of hard sets of a pec deck, but again, do them RIGHT.  I told you this weeks ago, Matt, and I ain't trying to be mean, but you filmed yourself doing a set of a machine fly motion.  I think you said you were using the stack on that thing?

Wes and I both tried to correct your horrid form on that machine.  You were doing partial reps AND hunching forward on every rep to boot!

Reduce the weight a LOT, get a good stretch at the bottom, and hold it for a couple of seconds, focusing on squeezing your pecs together...and for God's sake, when you're on the thing, Matt, keep your scapula back and try to point your chest to, again, the ceiling!

Two sets to failure, or one with a drop set.

Depending on training frequency, I'd do more than 3 or 4 such very hard sets twice/week, not including warm-up sets of course.  On a once weekly schedule, I'd throw in dips for sure, though I think it's best to combine pecs and tris in so doing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 07, 2022, 08:15:57 PM
.

BOOM!

I donot understand that pic??? What is that showing off?  Did he do that to his hair on purpose?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 08:22:17 PM
I donot understand that pic??? What is that showing off?  Did he do that to his hair on purpose?

“You know, Louie, you look like something Michelangelo carved out.“
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 08:25:31 PM
It is a pretty good set.  I certainly can't do that right now though, in fairness to moi ;), I have been unable to train since late '13 (long story).  But before that, I had a good twenty years' hard lifting under my belt, and I like to think I learned a little along the way.

So...for starters, let me back up:  when I call that a pretty good set, I don't mean that as a back-handed compliment.  It is more controlled than most benching I've seen over the years; typically, gym rats I know will bounce the bar off their chests and try to dry hump the ceiling, especially when they get into doing a few reps with 225-275ish.  And before I was sidelined, I saw an increasing number of stupid newbie jackoffs just doing the top half or maybe two-thirds of the ROM.

Also, the effort put forth was good.  In my parlance, I'd call that technical failure.

However, for someone who constantly whines about lack of pecs as Matt does, I would have approached that set differently.

One, strip the weight to no more than 225.  185 would be even better to start because it'd give more room to add weight to the bar before getting back into progressively lower, but still productive, TUT ranges.

Two, pause each rep on the chest as if each rep was being judged in a powerlifting meet.

Three, lower the bar slower.  3 second negatives.

Four, only fully lock out those reps when nearing failure; otherwise, pause at the bottom, explode up just shy of lock out, then lower the fucker again.

~15 reps (or whatever) to near failure/going to the point you can't get another without help is plenty.  A drop set to 135 for less strict, rapid-fire reps to really flush your pecs with a great pump would be all I'd do for flat benching.

Go on to a couple of hard sets of a pec deck, but again, do them RIGHT.  I told you this weeks ago, Matt, and I ain't trying to be mean, but you filmed yourself doing a set of a machine fly motion.  I think you said you were using the stack on that thing?

Wes and I both tried to correct your horrid form on that machine.  You were doing partial reps AND hunching forward on every rep to boot!

Reduce the weight a LOT, get a good stretch at the bottom, and hold it for a couple of seconds, focusing on squeezing your pecs together...and for God's sake, when you're on the thing, Matt, keep your scapula back and try to point your chest to, again, the ceiling!

Two sets to failure, or one with a drop set.

Depending on training frequency, I'd do more than 3 or 4 such very hard sets twice/week, not including warm-up sets of course.  On a once weekly schedule, I'd throw in dips for sure, though I think it's best to combine pecs and tris in so doing.

All great advice and yes,we offered our opinion to no avail.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 08:27:17 PM
All great advice sand yes,we offered our opinion to no avail.
.

BOOM!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 07, 2022, 08:31:18 PM
All great advice sand yes,we offered our opinion to no avail.

The problem is that you didn’t present your advice in the form of a 3 page rambling, incoherent essay
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 07, 2022, 08:33:17 PM
The problem is that you didn’t present your advice in the form of a 3 page rambling, incoherent essay
What was I thinking?  ;D

Matts posts are like the novel War & Peace.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 08:50:58 PM
42% bodyfat and a 15-inch arm.

Maybe steroids don’t work as well as we all thought…

I'm too much of a health pussy to run a real cycle.

I wanted a little boost - and I got exactly that. I don't want to start pissing blood when I get to be your age, and have to live with regret that my youthful choices caused that. So I hold back.

But don't kid yourself - I'd be out-weighing your ass if I did.

Walter, here's something you're familiar with.

"Swimmers on your mark. Get ready, set..."

**TWEET!!!**
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 08:52:45 PM
Matt you comparing drug cycles with Art Arwood
is akin to Hanky saying he looks better than Zane did and that he`d kick Mike Tysons ass......it`s a ridiculous comparison.

Yes.

I fear for my health.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 07, 2022, 09:05:46 PM
Matt, how will you deal with the next mostly likely course of events which will be you losing some of that muscle mass, but still keeping that fat and sogginess? What are your plans going forward?

Also do you prefer fat matt or mattitties?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 09:27:51 PM
I'm too much of a health pussy to run a real cycle.

I wanted a little boost - and I got exactly that. I don't want to start pissing blood when I get to be your age, and have to live with regret that my youthful choices caused that. So I hold back.

But don't kid yourself - I'd be out-weighing your ass if I did.

Walter, here's something you're familiar with.

"Swimmers on your mark. Get ready, set..."

**TWEET!!!**

MATTY TITTIES!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 07, 2022, 09:30:41 PM
Matt, how will you deal with the next mostly likely course of events which will be you losing some of that muscle mass, but still keeping that fat and sogginess? What are your plans going forward?

Also do you prefer fat matt or mattitties?

That’s a deep belly button.

Joshie Rehaluk will get at least 80% of his dick inside that.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 09:39:32 PM
Walter Sobchak - check out the improvements I made to my rear lat spread. Before and after.

Very Ronnie Coleman-esque:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 07, 2022, 10:00:01 PM
Matt, how will you deal with the next mostly likely course of events which will be you losing some of that muscle mass, but still keeping that fat and sogginess? What are your plans going forward?

Also do you prefer fat matt or mattitties?

Great post.

The only solution I have is cutting to 165-175, while I will be lean but small. It makes sense that I won't be able to keep the size...so if I could reduce body fat, that would be ideal.

My deficit is diet, not training.

I hate to eat.

I have established that if I eat sufficient protein, I can make progress, but I hate to eat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mothballs on September 08, 2022, 05:26:26 AM
RIP Matt C

https://apnews.com/article/alabama-homicide-kidnapping-7c59adb8d9d9e6127fd6e3323e34e8ba (https://apnews.com/article/alabama-homicide-kidnapping-7c59adb8d9d9e6127fd6e3323e34e8ba)

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 08, 2022, 05:31:13 AM
Walter Sobchak - check out the improvements I made to my rear lat spread. Before and after.

Very Ronnie Coleman-esque:

Lats like Jorma Raty!

(https://www.builtreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/jorma-raty-004.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 08, 2022, 07:09:23 AM
That`s totally reasonable and easily achievable with cardio which you should ALWAYS be doing.....I fucked up and can`t anymore like the fucking idiot I am......my own fault though so I can`t cry about it.

This may be the ideal solution for me.

MCWAY suggests steroids are unhealthy, yet thinks carrying around 50-lb more body weight than I do for decades on end is a good thing.  ::)

I'm thinking I'll just drop to 170, and get as lean as possible. This is the only thing I can think of that allows me to improve my physique while not compromising my physique - or even potentially improve it.

I've had perfect health markers my entire life. I'm not willing to compromise that for appearance. Natural bodybuilding may not be AS risky, but natural bodybuilding is useless.

Regarding health - wes, remember when you had to acknowledge that smoking caused your tumor, before it went away?

For that moment in time, didn't it suck knowing you took potentially 20 years off your life because of your individual choices?

Way too many people drop dead in their forties for seemingly no reason for me to take risks. That's why I did this minor cycle as a one-off. I had zero side effects, and it is my hope that because I had zero side effects physically, I had zero systemic health side effects to any of my organs.

I hope.

*IF* I choose to do some more health tests in the next year, and ALL the results are still perfect [minus out of whack testosterone levels, which I can tolerate], then I *MAY* be willing to run a real cycle next year.

May.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 08, 2022, 07:12:58 AM
RIP Matt C

https://apnews.com/article/alabama-homicide-kidnapping-7c59adb8d9d9e6127fd6e3323e34e8ba (https://apnews.com/article/alabama-homicide-kidnapping-7c59adb8d9d9e6127fd6e3323e34e8ba)

Almost identical twins:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 08, 2022, 10:18:16 AM
This may be the ideal solution for me.

MCWAY suggests steroids are unhealthy, yet thinks carrying around 50-lb more body weight than I do for decades on end is a good thing.  ::)

Yet, you are daft enough to think fluctuating bodyweights, coupled with anabolic steroids, is a good thing. My physician gave me a clean bill of health and has done so for years.



I'm thinking I'll just drop to 170, and get as lean as possible. This is the only thing I can think of that allows me to improve my physique while not compromising my physique - or even potentially improve it.

I've had perfect health markers my entire life. I'm not willing to compromise that for appearance. Natural bodybuilding may not be AS risky, but natural bodybuilding is useless.

Hardly! It's "useless" to you because natural bodybuilding, as it were, REVOLVES AROUND YOUR BIGGEST WEAKNESS: DIET!!



Regarding health - wes, remember when you had to acknowledge that smoking caused your tumor, before it went away?

For that moment in time, didn't it suck knowing you took potentially 20 years off your life because of your individual choices?

Way too many people drop dead in their forties for seemingly no reason for me to take risks. That's why I did this minor cycle as a one-off. I had zero side effects, and it is my hope that because I had zero side effects physically, I had zero systemic health side effects to any of my organs.

I hope.

*IF* I choose to do some more health tests in the next year, and ALL the results are still perfect [minus out of whack testosterone levels, which I can tolerate], then I *MAY* be willing to run a real cycle next year.

May.

In other words, you're going to engage effectively in yo-yo dieting and incorporate steroids (particularly, the harshest ones on the body and the ones where the gains disappear when the usage stops).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 08, 2022, 10:37:42 AM


Posts: 12847
YouTube FitnessByMatt

Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
« Reply #1836 on: September 07, 2022, 11:52:45 PM »
Quote
Matt you comparing drug cycles with Art Arwood is akin to Hanky saying he looks better than Zane did and that he`d kick Mike Tysons ass......it`s a ridiculous comparison.

Yes.

I fear for my health.

I thought you attended university ???

You`re comparing your intake to a 300 pound Art Atwood..........I think it would be safe to assume that Art used a bit more than 12.5 mgs. of Anadrol..........guess what,YOU WIN............RIP !!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 08, 2022, 12:53:02 PM
I thought you attended university ???

You`re comparing your intake to a 300 pound Art Atwood..........I think it would be safe to assume that Art used a bit more than 12.5 mgs. of Anadrol..........guess what,YOU WIN............RIP !!

Yet, flip-flopping between 170 and 210, year after year (with not-so-liver-friendly anabolics in the mix) doesn't bother him a bit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 08, 2022, 01:54:22 PM
So Matt put on a little too much fluff. Well everyone claims HGH keeps you lean and Matt claims to be independently wealthy why dont we put this rat on the HGH? He doesn’t want to lose his hair and hgh will not cause hair loss or oily skin sounds like a win win plan??
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 08, 2022, 01:55:25 PM
So Matt put on a little too much fluff. Well everyone claims HGH keeps you lean and Matt claims to be independently wealthy why dont we put this rat on the HGH? He doesn’t want to lose his hair and hgh will not cause hair loss or oily skin sounds like a win win plan??

How much GH are you taking?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 08, 2022, 02:20:13 PM
How much GH are you taking?

Not Enough
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 08, 2022, 02:47:40 PM
Not Enough

I thought you weren’t taking GH?

GH
Anadrol
500 mg of test

And look like an old catchers mitt.

Have you thought about changing sources?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 08, 2022, 02:47:56 PM
Not Enough

dont waste any more money
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 08, 2022, 03:03:26 PM
I thought you weren’t taking GH?

GH
Anadrol
500 mg of test

And look like an old catchers mitt.

Have you thought about changing sources?

Right I look 60 not taking anadrol or GH right now. Actually going to get some blood work done havent in a while just shockingly healthy these days
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 08, 2022, 03:04:38 PM
Right I look 60 not taking anadrol or GH right now.

Nice, detoxing.

When are you going back on?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 08, 2022, 03:08:46 PM
Right I look 60 not taking anadrol or GH right now. Actually going to get some blood work done havent in a while just shockingly healthy these days

a face like a fucking pumpkin doesnt exude health.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 08, 2022, 03:09:43 PM
Nice, detoxing.

When are you going back on?

You don’t detox from naturally occurring hormones
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 08, 2022, 03:12:25 PM
a face like a fucking pumpkin doesnt exude health.

Its called a jawline
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 08, 2022, 03:14:52 PM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391672;image)
(https://cdn.babyology.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/static.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: TheShape. on September 08, 2022, 03:36:40 PM
“You know, Louis, you look like something Michelangelo carved out.“
Roiding for this...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 08, 2022, 03:41:16 PM
You don’t detox from naturally occurring hormones

Do you detox from pumping your body full of exogenous hormones?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on September 08, 2022, 03:47:29 PM
In my experience it's either because she has a gross looking pussy or more likely a yeast infection down there. She is trying to do you a favour. My advice is take the hint and forget about going down on her

Or a c0ck


Do you ever have regrets that you didn't receive the polio vaccine as a child?

(http://media.giphy.com/media/WxDZ77xhPXf3i/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 08, 2022, 04:31:45 PM
Its called a jawline

You should start wearing a hat. You're getting sun spots on the front of the scalp where your combover used to provide shade.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 08, 2022, 04:45:57 PM
19" neck my ass.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 08, 2022, 04:51:09 PM
Bhanky,
Do you wear a hairpiece sometimes?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 08, 2022, 05:17:11 PM
19" neck my ass.
Dudes neck is skinnier than method101's arms.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 08, 2022, 05:48:19 PM
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391672;image)


(https://tightglasses.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/frame_before-300x201.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 08, 2022, 06:25:28 PM
Its called a jawline

Bhanky, how many selfies do you take daily?

We have all seen your selfie ring light.

One might as why does a 44 year old unemployed man need a selfie ring light plus background curtains.

I feel like this is your morning routine

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 08, 2022, 07:04:17 PM
Bhanky, how many selfies do you take daily?

We have all seen your selfie ring light.

One might as why does a 44 year old unemployed man need a selfie ring light plus background curtains.

I feel like this is your morning routine


Probably used it for all the skype interviews whilst he was looking for work.

To be fair it's a cheap set up and worth it to give you a small edge for making first impressions. I did the same a few years back.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 08, 2022, 08:30:47 PM
Roiding for this...

Not just roiding….

No job, unemployed and all day to lift.
No friends.
Does not take care of his kids, deadbeat dad.
Sleeps half the day.
Lives at home with his mommy.
Does not leave the house.
Does not grocery shop.
Does not cook.
Over 40 years old and lives like a twelve year old.

And after more than 3 months on drugs Matt Canning barely even looks like he lifts.

Imagine how depressing that has got to be for the fat little twink, way too small and weak for strongman competitions and could never put on enough muscle to enter a bodybuilding show.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on September 08, 2022, 09:02:22 PM
I’m not sure what I find the most endearing about the retard. His ballet tights and refinery safety shoes  or the fact that he loves the taste and smell of unwell girl meat (I know he’s partially retarded and slow, but someone should teach him that while the natural musky aroma of Y pie is maybe the finest scent - fishy odor indicates that the woman is sick and has some time of infection or bad bacteria)

OR his micro-pecker and his absolutely unhealthy obsession with other mens cocks. 100% without question Matt is gay which would be fine if he wasn’t the most socially weird fckr that I have ever seen.

Imagine this reality show. Living lockdown all in the same house. Matt - Prime - Shizzo - Blaha. No Prime no gdmn children you sicko!!
Brutal
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 12:32:56 AM
MCWAY -

I've used 3x 25mg Anadrol in the past 14 days. So now is as good a time as any to end the cycle.

I am still 205-lb. Maintaining my increased calories from the cycle have helped that, I'm sure.

The photo comparison below is not an accurate representation, because the before picture was just after gyms reopened in Canada. Regardless, one thing the that photo represents is how utterly futile natural bodybuilding is. Look at how much more pumped my arms look in the second picture. It's not JUST the increase in size - it's the pump that stays perpetually, at least in part, as well as the fullness and sort of "3D" look to the muscles.

None of that happens off gear.

Furthermore, yes, I doubled my calories during this cycle, but one reason I did that is because the gains came so damn quick. No wonder some people don't even train unless they are on gear! You make progress at a snail's pace training naturally.

And while I did double my calories, I sure as heck wasn't counting them. I was just making sure I got sufficient protein - or close enough - and then just eating "whatever" for the rest.

Meanwhile, to make comparable gains naturally, I'd have to be following a proper diet to the letter. It would also take much longer, and my muscles STILL wouldn't have this look.

AND THAT'S WHY PEOPLE USE STEROIDS.

It just makes any level of muscle development you want to achieve that much easier. So what used to take five years to achieve on steroids can not be achieved in three years or less using steroids + bioidentical hormones.

Bottom line: I didn't want to spend eight months to get this result. So I did it in a matter of weeks using basically NOTHING, and maintained the look all summer.

Now that summer's over, I can get to the same size naturally, but it will take months, and it will STILL not be the same look.

To summarize, natural training SUCKS! And let's be honest, MCWAY: your results are not spectacular. That's why you won't post a photo.

You could easily post a back double biceps photo anonymously. You won't do that because you don't look good. And why would you look good? You're natural! What natural looks good?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 12:50:26 AM
Youre right McWay. TONS of people are on the gas, yet still look like shit. They dont want to do the work.
The stuff they seem to ignore = Hard training, consistent, rest, food/diet, etc.

While some (few) folks can look at a barbel and syringe and blow up, MOST have to do it all to see results.
Very hard work and for decades. Especially the natural folks...

Like I said, there is a biohazard bin at one of my gyms. It is Loaded with needles and syringes. Filled to the brim, and constantly emptied, then filled again.

People must be shooting roids in the bathroom stall where it's located. I guess these morons think roids are like a pre-workout supplement or something.

Anyway...

I've only seen one person in that whole facility in better shape than me since it reopened in late March. I know I'm around 16% body fat [which many people confuse for 12% - since people have no idea how to visually assess it], but you'd think with the number of people using juice based on how many needles are disposed of, that someone would look like it.

Looking around, I literally can't identify one person who would be using.

There are some people there who look ok...but nobody looks like they are on steroids, IMO.

From what I can tell, most people are training appropriately. If I had to guess, people have horrible diets and/or are using or abusing alcohol.

My deficit has always been diet. My training is more or less sound.

I'm just of the mindset that caloric restriction is very healthy. Whenever I follow a high protein / high calorie bodybuilding diet, I worry that I am damaging my kidneys and pancreas, etc.

I am a pretty big health nut. One of the top Strongmen in my city recently had open heart surgery. It's utterly delusional that people think bodybuilding is remotely healthy. I just know how I am - if I commit to a proper bodybuilding diet, even a natural one, my health will NOT improve. It almost definitely will decline...

Think about it this way: Brian Shaw will be dead in 10 years. Is it REALLY worth it to get the accomplishments he has, if it means death by 50?

I think the best thing for me would be to see if I could reach 10% body fat at maybe 170-lb. That may be doable...but I'm also 40. I'm not confident that is necessarily realistic. At least not naturally. But I think that goal is a lot healthier than bulking up to 200 or more naturally.

I also do prefer my current look at 205, but clothes aren't fitting as well, and I can't even scratch my back like I used to.

I can't even imagine how 300-lb bodybuilders feel like. Can they even wipe their asses?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 09, 2022, 12:53:48 AM
Like I said, there is a biohazard bin at one of my gyms. It is Loaded with needles and syringes. Filled to the brim, and constantly emptied, then filled again.

People must be shooting roids in the bathroom stall where it's located. I guess these morons think roids are like a pre-workout supplement or something.


Many do use some gear-shots as a PWO. Sometimes a mix of fast acting crap like: TNE (test, no ether), Superdrol Oil, Tren-Ace, etc.

"Iron Beasts" for sure!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 01:00:30 AM
Not really!! Their diets probably SUCK worse than yours does.

Yeah, lol!

It certainly seems that way...

I know we live in La La Land on Getbig, but at my gym, I am the strongest person by far, at least 95% of the time.

A few members weigh more...but they are fat weight. A very small minority are stronger, but I hardly ever see them.

A lot of people at my gym are on steroids...but you'd literally never know.

You'll never know personally, because you won't do the ONE THING needed to get the job done: GET YOUR DIET STRAIGHT. You won't eat enough calories to grow; nor will you stick to a diet to get cut up long enough.

You'll make some BS excuse about feigned health concerns. But, when it came to the needle in the rump, health be damned!! "I'm perpetually pumped!!"

My health concerns are not bad reasons. Ultimately, if I bulk up naturally or using steroids, both will compromise my health. You can't tell me that you out-weighing me by 50-lb is a health-neutral quality.

Bulking up, even naturally, is going to tax the processes of our bodies. We are not going to be systemically better off if we bulk up naturally, versus restricting calories.

I'd even argue that being light and being strong are two of the best things you can do for your health. All studies on caloric restriction shows it is extremely healthy.

Now here's a question: is it less healthy to use barely any Anadrol for 2-3 months and get the look I want, or bulk up naturally, eating, pissing, and shitting way more, and even then not quite getting the look I was aiming for?

How is eating 50,000 extra calories a month for eight months so much better than running a bit of gear for a quarter of that time? I'm not saying low-dose steroid use is healthy - I'm just saying your natural bulking is not healthy either. You carried around 50-lb more body weight than I did for the past two decades, MCWAY. Don't sit and tell me anything about health.

I have never - in my life, not ONCE - had any health marker outside of the optimal range. That didn't happen by accident. NOTHING IN OUR LIVES MATTER IF WE DON'T HAVE OUR HEALTH. And I am simply not willing to compromise my health. Some people are, some aren't. I'm not. I did it temporarily for the summer only - that's it.

You need to stop pretending eating masses of chemical laden food is so "healthy" just because it's natural.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 01:23:45 AM
The name of this site says it all, GETBIG!! That's the hardest part of bodybuilding, because you have to INCREASE the calories.

It's quality and quantity. Eat too much of the wrong food or not enough of the right food (for your particular body) and it's futility personified.

I came to terms with that over 25 years ago. Steroids or no steroids, I'm not putting more muscle on my bony frame unless I'm downing calories and protein......LOTS OF THEM!! That's how weight gainers became my best friends in my quest for swoleness.

My biggest challenge over the years is putting on size WITHOUT THEM. Whenever my gains stall, my first inclination is to grab a bucket or bag of gainer and go to work (especially since the ones today are of much better quality). But, I'm not in my teens or early 20s anymore. I can't put away 5000 calories the way I once did, back in the day.

I'm of the mindset that no one really gets anywhere training naturally. Probably a natural who is 6'3" can maybe hope to be 210-lb without being too fat.

I think the difference comes down to body composition - I could be 200-lb at 25% body fat, no doubt. If not even a bit heavier at that body fat percentage, or be that weight and a bit leaner.

But if someone is 200-lb at 20% body fat, that does not mean they can be 170-lb at 5% body fat. That is where hormones come in.

A natural could have the same LBM as a juiced competitor who weighs less, but it's not the same thing.

Jason Blaha once said he had the same LBM as Sergio Oliva or Serge Nubret or something. He was using it as an example to show why LBM doesn't matter. And that's one thing I don't think you understand: steroids radically improve your body composition. I've been 200-lb before, but I had a 35" waist. This time, I was 200-lb with a 32" waist. Steroids gave me a totally different look.

Furthermore, MCWAY, if steroids didn't offer some benefit, WHY THE FUCK DO YOU THINK ATHLETES IN EVERY SPORT ON THE PLANET USE THEM?!

If it matters so much to you, I will be going on a natural strength building program now. I always train for strength if I'm not getting sufficient calories - as I can always make progress, even if I'm barely eating.

But I can GUARANTEE YOU, even if I do get my diet and training on point, I will still not look like I did this summer using juice, when I wasn't remotely counting calories.

Steroid training is in fact so much better, that I don't get how so many steroid junkies can ignore it as a factor. I remember one local Strongman [who gave himself a HEART ATTACK from abusing Cheque Drops in a contest] would trash me for my training. I had to explain to the dumb fuck that I bench more than he does, and I do it WITHOUT TAKING ENOUGH STEROIDS FOR THREE MEN.

What a fucking moron. Just the audacity of these steroid junkies to pretend like steroids aren't a major element. Look at what just happened to me, barely using - I shot up nearly 30 fucking pounds! If I had actually ran the Sustanon, I would have looked like a totally different person. It just blows my mind that steroid addicts could criticize the progress of someone not using.

Although it's unlikely, part of me does want to run a REAL cycle next time, just to get to 220-230 or more, just to show that the only thing preventing me from doing that is my health consciousness.

But at the end of the day, I just don't want to compromise my health. So who knows where I go from here. All I know is that I will be training for strength.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 09, 2022, 02:10:27 AM
Its called a jawline

Damn, you look way older than your actual age. ??? ??? :( :-\
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: DENVER2SANFRAN on September 09, 2022, 02:11:24 AM
Get some help Matt.
Take that fat bald guy with you.
Surprised you haven't had the cuckoo doctors called already.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 09, 2022, 02:27:18 AM
Get some help Matt.
Take that fat bald guy with you.
Surprised you haven't had the cuckoo doctors called already.

You just described half of getbig. You need to be more specific.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 09, 2022, 05:01:20 AM
So...anabolic steroids really do work?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: TheShape. on September 09, 2022, 06:18:13 AM
You're natural! What natural looks good?
This is a false statement made by people with atrophied testicles.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 09, 2022, 06:57:39 AM
I'm of the mindset that no one really gets anywhere training naturally. Probably a natural who is 6'3" can maybe hope to be 210-lb without being too fat.

I think the difference comes down to body composition - I could be 200-lb at 25% body fat, no doubt. If not even a bit heavier at that body fat percentage, or be that weight and a bit leaner.

But if someone is 200-lb at 20% body fat, that does not mean they can be 170-lb at 5% body fat. That is where hormones come in.

A natural could have the same LBM as a juiced competitor who weighs less, but it's not the same thing.

Jason Blaha once said he had the same LBM as Sergio Oliva or Serge Nubret or something. He was using it as an example to show why LBM doesn't matter. And that's one thing I don't think you understand: steroids radically improve your body composition. I've been 200-lb before, but I had a 35" waist. This time, I was 200-lb with a 32" waist. Steroids gave me a totally different look.

Furthermore, MCWAY, if steroids didn't offer some benefit, WHY THE FUCK DO YOU THINK ATHLETES IN EVERY SPORT ON THE PLANET USE THEM?!

If it matters so much to you, I will be going on a natural strength building program now. I always train for strength if I'm not getting sufficient calories - as I can always make progress, even if I'm barely eating.

But I can GUARANTEE YOU, even if I do get my diet and training on point, I will still not look like I did this summer using juice, when I wasn't remotely counting calories.

Steroid training is in fact so much better, that I don't get how so many steroid junkies can ignore it as a factor. I remember one local Strongman [who gave himself a HEART ATTACK from abusing Cheque Drops in a contest] would trash me for my training. I had to explain to the dumb fuck that I bench more than he does, and I do it WITHOUT TAKING ENOUGH STEROIDS FOR THREE MEN.

What a fucking moron. Just the audacity of these steroid junkies to pretend like steroids aren't a major element. Look at what just happened to me, barely using - I shot up nearly 30 fucking pounds! If I had actually ran the Sustanon, I would have looked like a totally different person. It just blows my mind that steroid addicts could criticize the progress of someone not using.

Although it's unlikely, part of me does want to run a REAL cycle next time, just to get to 220-230 or more, just to show that the only thing preventing me from doing that is my health consciousness.

But at the end of the day, I just don't want to compromise my health. So who knows where I go from here. All I know is that I will be training for strength.

Dude stop you are not in shape you are fat you can’t talk about how easy and excellent it went when you are fat
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 09, 2022, 07:25:32 AM
You just described half most of getbig. You need to be more specific.

 :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 09, 2022, 08:00:39 AM
Yeah, lol!

It certainly seems that way...

I know we live in La La Land on Getbig, but at my gym, I am the strongest person by far, at least 95% of the time.

A few members weigh more...but they are fat weight. A very small minority are stronger, but I hardly ever see them.

A lot of people at my gym are on steroids...but you'd literally never know.

That's part of the problem. You need your ego bruised, the same way I got mine when I went to Gold's Gym in Pinellas Park, FL after spending years training at Bally.

I could be the biggest and strongest, if I trained at Planet Fitness. But would that help me improve myself? Hardly!

Trust me. You come to 24-Hour Fitness where I live. I PROMISE you that you will be NOWHERE NEAR strongest nor biggest person there.



My health concerns are not bad reasons. Ultimately, if I bulk up naturally or using steroids, both will compromise my health. You can't tell me that you out-weighing me by 50-lb is a health-neutral quality.

Bulking up, even naturally, is going to tax the processes of our bodies. We are not going to be systemically better off if we bulk up naturally, versus restricting calories.

Why are you harping on this 50-lb stuff? You don't weigh 170 lbs anymore....at least, not until you go off the sauce completely.




I'd even argue that being light and being strong are two of the best things you can do for your health. All studies on caloric restriction shows it is extremely healthy.

Who cares about "studies"? There were "studies" that anabolic steroids didn't work at all.



Now here's a question: is it less healthy to use barely any Anadrol for 2-3 months and get the look I want, or bulk up naturally, eating, pissing, and shitting way more, and even then not quite getting the look I was aiming for?

How is eating 50,000 extra calories a month for eight months so much better than running a bit of gear for a quarter of that time? I'm not saying low-dose steroid use is healthy - I'm just saying your natural bulking is not healthy either. You carried around 50-lb more body weight than I did for the past two decades, MCWAY. Don't sit and tell me anything about health.

And you keep thinking that letting your bodyweight go up and down 40-50 lbs, while using steroids is healthy. So, spare me the sanctimony.



I have never - in my life, not ONCE - had any health marker outside of the optimal range. That didn't happen by accident. NOTHING IN OUR LIVES MATTER IF WE DON'T HAVE OUR HEALTH. And I am simply not willing to compromise my health. Some people are, some aren't. I'm not. I did it temporarily for the summer only - that's it.

NEWS FLASH!!! Neither have I. I got a clean bill of health from my physician back in April. So, your sniveling about my not being healthy at 220 or so is quite absurd.


You need to stop pretending eating masses of chemical laden food is so "healthy" just because it's natural.

You're one to talk about chemicals. You're sticking those in your rump, using one of the most toxic versions of anabolics to boot. And, it's all because YOU'RE TOO LAZY to stick to a decent diet. You want the needle to do the work for you.

And you use the excuse of "health" to duck and dodge the issue. That's why you shrink back down to 170-180 when the roids go bye-bye.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 09, 2022, 08:12:35 AM
I'm of the mindset that no one really gets anywhere training naturally. Probably a natural who is 6'3" can maybe hope to be 210-lb without being too fat.

Sucks to be you. Thankfully, many people (including myself) don't subscribe to your pathetic mentality.



I think the difference comes down to body composition - I could be 200-lb at 25% body fat, no doubt. If not even a bit heavier at that body fat percentage, or be that weight and a bit leaner.

But if someone is 200-lb at 20% body fat, that does not mean they can be 170-lb at 5% body fat. That is where hormones come in.

A natural could have the same LBM as a juiced competitor who weighs less, but it's not the same thing.

Jason Blaha once said he had the same LBM as Sergio Oliva or Serge Nubret or something. He was using it as an example to show why LBM doesn't matter. And that's one thing I don't think you understand: steroids radically improve your body composition. I've been 200-lb before, but I had a 35" waist. This time, I was 200-lb with a 32" waist. Steroids gave me a totally different look.

WRONG!! If you had a 32" waist vs. a 35" waist, it means one thing: YOUR BODYFAT WAS LOWER. Guess what!! The same thing has happened to me.

My bodyfat is lower at 224 NOW than it was the first time I got to this bodyweight......and the last time I got to this bodyweight. And I didn't use anabolics then or now. The weights I use now at 224 would have put me in ICU, had I tried them back in the day.



Furthermore, MCWAY, if steroids didn't offer some benefit, WHY THE FUCK DO YOU THINK ATHLETES IN EVERY SPORT ON THE PLANET USE THEM?!

If it matters so much to you, I will be going on a natural strength building program now. I always train for strength if I'm not getting sufficient calories - as I can always make progress, even if I'm barely eating.

If you were always making progress, you sure as heck wouldn't be stuck at 170-180, lamenting about the precious syringes and being supposedly pumped all the time.



But I can GUARANTEE YOU, even if I do get my diet and training on point, I will still not look like I did this summer using juice, when I wasn't remotely counting calories.

Steroid training is in fact so much better, that I don't get how so many steroid junkies can ignore it as a factor. I remember one local Strongman [who gave himself a HEART ATTACK from abusing Cheque Drops in a contest] would trash me for my training. I had to explain to the dumb fuck that I bench more than he does, and I do it WITHOUT TAKING ENOUGH STEROIDS FOR THREE MEN.

What a fucking moron. Just the audacity of these steroid junkies to pretend like steroids aren't a major element. Look at what just happened to me, barely using - I shot up nearly 30 fucking pounds! If I had actually ran the Sustanon, I would have looked like a totally different person. It just blows my mind that steroid addicts could criticize the progress of someone not using.

Although it's unlikely, part of me does want to run a REAL cycle next time, just to get to 220-230 or more, just to show that the only thing preventing me from doing that is my health consciousness.

But at the end of the day, I just don't want to compromise my health. So who knows where I go from here. All I know is that I will be training for strength.

That is categorically STUPID. If you're eating enough calories, you will go bigger and stronger.

Training for strength isn't just one-rep maxes or merely focusing on particular lifts. Strength training is a necessity for bodybuilders who aren't taking steroids. Every big non-steroid using bodybuilder I've seen could move serious poundage, often getting the compliment of being even stronger than they look.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 09, 2022, 08:42:02 AM
MCWAY -

I've used 3x 25mg Anadrol in the past 14 days. So now is as good a time as any to end the cycle.

I am still 205-lb. Maintaining my increased calories from the cycle have helped that, I'm sure.

The photo comparison below is not an accurate representation, because the before picture was just after gyms reopened in Canada. Regardless, one thing the that photo represents is how utterly futile natural bodybuilding is. Look at how much more pumped my arms look in the second picture. It's not JUST the increase in size - it's the pump that stays perpetually, at least in part, as well as the fullness and sort of "3D" look to the muscles.

None of that happens off gear.

Furthermore, yes, I doubled my calories during this cycle, but one reason I did that is because the gains came so damn quick. No wonder some people don't even train unless they are on gear! You make progress at a snail's pace training naturally.

And while I did double my calories, I sure as heck wasn't counting them. I was just making sure I got sufficient protein - or close enough - and then just eating "whatever" for the rest.

If you weren't counting them, how did you know you DOUBLED them? Define succifient protein.

You've just made my point. The only time you made a halfway decent attempt to fix your diet is when you're on the juice. But, off the sauce, you eat like a crackhead. Yet, you have the gall to claim how worthless training without steroids is.

HOW UTTERLY STUPID IS THAT?



Meanwhile, to make comparable gains naturally, I'd have to be following a proper diet to the letter. It would also take much longer, and my muscles STILL wouldn't have this look.

AND THAT'S WHY PEOPLE USE STEROIDS.

Again, you eat like a crackhead when the needle is gone. "It would take much longer"? What's your hurry? Are you competing? Is there an explosive device taped to your skull that will EXPLODE, if you don't get to a certain size by a certain date?



It just makes any level of muscle development you want to achieve that much easier. So what used to take five years to achieve on steroids can not be achieved in three years or less using steroids + bioidentical hormones.

Bottom line: I didn't want to spend eight months to get this result. So I did it in a matter of weeks using basically NOTHING, and maintained the look all summer.

Now that summer's over, I can get to the same size naturally, but it will take months, and it will STILL not be the same look.

As the saying goes: When you STAY ready, you don't need to get ready. Because you're too lazy to be consistent and disciplined with your diet, you keep going through this yo-yo routine of growing and shrinking.



To summarize, natural training SUCKS! And let's be honest, MCWAY: your results are not spectacular. That's why you won't post a photo.

You could easily post a back double biceps photo anonymously. You won't do that because you don't look good. And why would you look good? You're natural! What natural looks good?
'"
Look who's talking about not-spectacular results. You're getting clowned about your "results", EVEN WHILE YOU'RE TAKING STEROIDS. When people ask if you're taking steroids, you're getting somewhere. When you have to advertise that you are taking them (unsolicited), enough said.

Without the needle, you're too lazy to take care of business as it relates to your diet. That's why you keep using the lame excuse of supposedly being concerned about your health (as if gaining and losing dozens of pounds, after using one of the most toxic steroids on the planet is tantamount to healthy living).


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 09, 2022, 12:52:01 PM
Many do use some gear-shots as a PWO. Sometimes a mix of fast acting crap like: TNE (test, no ether), Superdrol Oil, Tren-Ace, etc.

"Iron Beasts" for sure!!

It's probably Slin.

No reason to shoot gear a few minutes before a workout.

Or they have trouble shooting it at home, so to help hide it they shoot at the gym/office.

I know a few guys who did that.

Also, guys swear they get an extra boost when they shoot gear pre-workout.

And i'll admit i used to shoot gear at home, then drive to the gym.

Not sure there is any truth to it, unless you are shooting short esters.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 09, 2022, 12:57:31 PM
It's probably Slin.

No reason to shoot gear a few minutes before a workout.

Or they have trouble shooting it at home, so to help hide it they shoot at the gym/office.

I know a few guys who did that.

Also, guys swear they get an extra boost when they shoot gear pre-workout.

And i'll admit i used to shoot gear at home, then drive to the gym.

Not sure there is any truth to it, unless you are shooting short esters.

I used to love shooting test prop in bis and tris and going to do arms, insane pumps.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2022, 12:58:55 PM

“at my gym, I am the strongest person by far….at least 95% of the time.”

(http://i.lvme.me/nzu2igx.jpg)

Spastic Matt Canning actually believes his own bullshit. After over 3 months on steroids are you finally meeting your goal of impressing your 13 year old daughter’s friends on social media?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 09, 2022, 01:02:30 PM
It's probably Slin.

No reason to shoot gear a few minutes before a workout.

Or they have trouble shooting it at home, so to help hide it they shoot at the gym/office.

I know a few guys who did that.

Also, guys swear they get an extra boost when they shoot gear pre-workout.

And i'll admit i used to shoot gear at home, then drive to the gym.

Not sure there is any truth to it, unless you are shooting short esters.
Even if it`s only psychological, anything that helps you is worth doing as the mind is the strongest muscle not to sound like a worn out  cliche`.

Pavlov!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 09, 2022, 01:47:26 PM
I always just look at bodyweight because I don't get fat and out of shape. If you are just getting fatter then yes absolutely the weight doesn't matter. Not saying you need to be shredded as I do think you can grow better at 10% than 5% but you should see your belly button have abs and pecs not tits. Your arms look a lot better but your core and chest are fat. Stop debating nonsense and start the sustanon yesterday and get your protein/carb ratio higher eat lean protein still lots of it but less carbs not sure if you are drinking soda or what but at your weight with your training you should be leaner. Add some HGH for fuck sake you say you have money
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 09, 2022, 02:02:24 PM
I always just look at bodyweight because I don't get fat and out of shape. If you are just getting fatter then yes absolutely the weight doesn't matter. Not saying you need to be shredded as I do think you can grow better at 10% than 5% but you should see your belly button have abs and pecs not tits. Your arms look a lot better but your core and chest are fat. Stop debating nonsense and start the sustanon yesterday and get your protein/carb ratio higher eat lean protein still lots of it but less carbs not sure if you are drinking soda or what but at your weight with your training you should be leaner. Add some HGH for fuck sake you say you have money

I'd say not to listen to the guy with a heart rate of 120 but you aren't totally wrong here ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2022, 02:11:04 PM
I always just look at bodyweight because I don't get fat and out of shape. If you are just getting fatter then yes absolutely the weight doesn't matter. Not saying you need to be shredded as I do think you can grow better at 10% than 5% but you should see your belly button have abs and pecs not tits. Your arms look a lot better but your core and chest are fat. Stop debating nonsense and start the sustanon yesterday and get your protein/carb ratio higher eat lean protein still lots of it but less carbs not sure if you are drinking soda or what but at your weight with your training you should be leaner. Add some HGH for fuck sake you say you have money

Now re-write this without using drugs as a crutch and you’re pretty much spot on.

Unfortunately any type of common sense is lost on Matt Canning. He’s not here to learn or grow, he’s only here to make every thread about him.

You’re like Matt Canning lite.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: CalvinH on September 09, 2022, 03:43:05 PM
That’s a deep belly button.

Joshie Rehaluk will get at least 80% of his dick inside that.



Looks like he's aged 25 years.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 09, 2022, 04:29:25 PM
Bhanky,
Is peach cobbler low carb?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 09, 2022, 04:36:41 PM
Bhanky,
Is peach cobbler low carb?

I was single digit bodyfat when I ate that Matt is not
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 09, 2022, 04:39:08 PM
I was single digit bodyfat when I ate that Matt is not

Matt does not eat peach cobbler.

Is this hampering his results?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 09, 2022, 04:40:28 PM
I was single digit bodyfat when I ate that Matt is not

Doesn't he need to cocoon, too?

I thought high amounts of sodium, sugar and fat create an anabolic environment?

You have me confused now hanky.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 09, 2022, 04:46:01 PM
Doesn't he need to cocoon, too?

I thought high amounts of sodium, sugar and fat create an anabolic environment?

You have me confused now hanky.

I mean you can’t just put rocket fuel in a pinto and get a Ferrari next month even with medicinal ideals it still takes time to develop a quality physique
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 09, 2022, 04:48:11 PM
I mean you can’t just put rocket fuel in a pinto and get a Ferrari next month even with medicinal ideals it still takes time to develop a quality physique

That has nothing to do with my questions.

You use this quote a lot to sound smart.

Just answer why Matt is not allowed to cocoon?

I think he should be allowed to.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 09, 2022, 04:50:37 PM
Matt needs to fill a bathtub with peach cobbler everyday and soak in it for at least one hour.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2022, 05:01:43 PM


Looks like he's aged 25 years.

The retard took drugs.

The retard got fat.

The result = Matt Canning has proven he has ZERO genetic potential for strength or mass.

Now the weak little phaggot will blame his lack of results on “his fear for his health.”

Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit! He looked like shit before the drugs, he looked like shit on the drugs, and he will look like shit again once he is off the drugs.

Period, end of sad, weak little creepy weirdo manlet story.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 09, 2022, 05:19:09 PM
Did Mattitties try and cocoon and fail miserably?  I blame Bhanky
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 09, 2022, 05:29:59 PM
I mean you can’t just put rocket fuel in a pinto and get a Ferrari next month even with medicinal ideals it still takes time to develop a quality physique

Just prescribed anadrol for anemia right bhanky?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 09, 2022, 06:14:33 PM
Getting blood work tomorrow morning hoping not to have anemia anymore
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 09, 2022, 06:19:28 PM
Getting blood work tomorrow morning hoping not to have anemia anymore

You already said it was in remission.

I'll pray for good results!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 09, 2022, 06:40:41 PM
Getting blood work tomorrow morning hoping not to have anemia anymore
You know you`re still on Drol just like we know it.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 09, 2022, 07:10:29 PM
You know you`re still on Drol just like we know it.  ;D

No I have changed everything no anadrol for 2 weeks now going to get my honest baseline tomorrow even doing a 12 hour fast
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on September 09, 2022, 07:34:56 PM
MCWAY -

I've used 3x 25mg Anadrol in the past 14 days. So now is as good a time as any to end the cycle.

I am still 205-lb. Maintaining my increased calories from the cycle have helped that, I'm sure.

The photo comparison below is not an accurate representation, because the before picture was just after gyms reopened in Canada. Regardless, one thing the that photo represents is how utterly futile natural bodybuilding is. Look at how much more pumped my arms look in the second picture. It's not JUST the increase in size - it's the pump that stays perpetually, at least in part, as well as the fullness and sort of "3D" look to the muscles.

None of that happens off gear.

Furthermore, yes, I doubled my calories during this cycle, but one reason I did that is because the gains came so damn quick. No wonder some people don't even train unless they are on gear! You make progress at a snail's pace training naturally.

And while I did double my calories, I sure as heck wasn't counting them. I was just making sure I got sufficient protein - or close enough - and then just eating "whatever" for the rest.

Meanwhile, to make comparable gains naturally, I'd have to be following a proper diet to the letter. It would also take much longer, and my muscles STILL wouldn't have this look.

AND THAT'S WHY PEOPLE USE STEROIDS.

It just makes any level of muscle development you want to achieve that much easier. So what used to take five years to achieve on steroids can not be achieved in three years or less using steroids + bioidentical hormones.

Bottom line: I didn't want to spend eight months to get this result. So I did it in a matter of weeks using basically NOTHING, and maintained the look all summer.

Now that summer's over, I can get to the same size naturally, but it will take months, and it will STILL not be the same look.

To summarize, natural training SUCKS! And let's be honest, MCWAY: your results are not spectacular. That's why you won't post a photo.

You could easily post a back double biceps photo anonymously. You won't do that because you don't look good. And why would you look good? You're natural! What natural looks good?
Wtf? YOU don't look.good. This is supposed to show gear works? Anyone could have gotten these results. You got fat. Congratulations. Fat arms, zero definition,  fat saggy chest soggy core. Yeah steroids surely work miracles. Smh
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 09, 2022, 07:35:46 PM
Getting blood work tomorrow morning hoping not to have anemia anymore

Fingers crossed.

Anemia, is like a cold it comes and goes. Usually lasts for 2-4 weeks.

How is your Crohns? Has that been cured? 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2022, 08:01:26 PM
Wtf? YOU don't look.good. This is supposed to show gear works? Anyone could have gotten these results. You got fat. Congratulations. Fat arms, zero definition,  fat saggy chest soggy core. Yeah steroids surely work miracles. Smh
.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 08:16:44 PM
Everybody is different and based on their own unique physiology can hold only so much mass without getting too fat.

The requirement of even natty bodybuilders to be ripped for contests makes natty's drop size until they become scrawny waifs.

Steroids help you build muscle and hold onto more of it when you diet down.

Can you get massive naturally?  Really MASSIVE?  Yes, but you'll gain a lot of fat in the process.

Doug Hepburn is an example.  Massive, strong, and fat.

That's right.

I have been over 200-lb before - my lifetime heaviest weight remains 212.6-lb, which was drug-free. But I was fat.

I have been 200-lb before also, but I had a 35" waist! Meanwhile, I had a 32" waist at 200 on Anadrol.

The differences are subtle - but they are there.

A person can go from 180-lb at 12% body fat naturally to 200-lb at 8% body fat on cycle. While both would be in a sort of "normal" weight range, that's a difference of 25-lb of LBM, and presented at a bigger and leaner appearance.

Beyond that, I think what steroids do is just extend your pump. So you perpetually have that full and 3D look. No amount of natural training and nutrition will produce that effect, IMO.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 08:24:14 PM
From my experience, I'd say that someone who has their diet on point and tired to put on size without anabolics, should have at least 60% of the weight he gains be lean mass.

Also, keep in mind that (over the last 30 years or so) there have been a number OTC supplements that help stimulate lean mass gains without merely jacking up calories: Creatine, HMB, CLA, Glutamine (in high does), etc.

They won't do JACK, if your diet is pitiful. But, they can help from time to time.

And, as others have testified, you can maintain size on modest calories after you jack them up to get to that size. Again, I'm not eating 5000 calories a day anymore (and haven't done so in YEARS).

Yes, this is bang on.

Phantom Spunker didn't think it was possible that I was eating 1,100 calories and weighing 180. But our metabolisms tend to adjust to these things.

I'm assuming it's similar for when you cut body fat - once you get to a certain low body fat percentage, you can probably eat slightly higher calories, and still be lean. Because muscle itself is metabolically active tissue and requires energy to exist. So just being lean and muscular is a sort of self-proliferating quality. But I wouldn't know, as I have never been that lean.

But I am 100% sure that once you gain muscle, you don't need to consume the number of calories it took to build them, to maintain them.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 08:36:04 PM
Your chest is full enough but you look like you are overweight in this photo. If you were to continue training and slimmed down, your pecs would be more defined and therefore look bigger in comparison the rest of your physique.

When guys are overweight it is more difficult to determine if they have gyno because around 10% of breast tissue is fat. Breast tissue is composed of milk glands, milk ducts and supportive tissue (dense breast tissue), and fatty tissue (nondense breast tissue). When you are able to give milk from your tits, you will definitely have gyno.  ;)

Hmm...

Leave it to that moron Walter Sobchak to mess it up. I have asked four people in person, one being my doctor, and they have all confirmed it is not gyno.

However, I have some body fat and water to deal with there.

I think I'm going to do what Kevin Levrone used to do, but on a smaller scale, obviously - I will drop to a light weight, for health reasons, during the winter when we are covered up. Then follow a proper "bro" bodybuilding diet and training program, maybe five months out of the year.

So from September to April, I'll train for strength, and drop to 170-lb. During this time, my lifts will go up, universally.

Then for the five months of April to August, I will follow a bodybuilding program.

But 200 is clearly too heavy. Maybe 190 would be ideal. But, time will tell.

Also, I loathe the sun. I fear getting sunburned. However, my lack of tan is making me look less lean. Being tanned helps this.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 09, 2022, 08:48:55 PM
Matt, you know I respect you and would never step out of line.  You can ask anyone in the neighborhood.   ;D

If you want to better your physique, stop focusing on the strength training.  Especially as pertains to chest.  Use more dumbells and incline work.  Your back appears thick but the lats don't pop.  I'd focus on chins and pulldown movements and do just enough rows and deads to maintain.  Delts are overpowering.  Maybe only train them every other week but with perfect, controlled form and higher reps.  Legs?  Not sure if you squat.  If you do, I'd stop and do lots of hacks, lunges and extensions.  Hams?  Lots of curls and stiff legs with dumbells.  Calves?  I like Palumbo's recommendation.  Train them twice per week.  2-3 exercises per workout and one mega set per exercise.  I'm not an expert by any stretch but I think this would help.  Cycle carbs and do cardio.  Lots of it.  Being that you are a hypochondriac, cardio is great for your overall health.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2022, 09:08:34 PM
Hmm...

Leave it to that moron Walter Sobchak to mess it up. I have asked four people in person, one being my doctor, and they have all confirmed it is not gyno.

However, I have some body fat and water to deal with there.

I think I'm going to do what Kevin Levrone used to do, but on a smaller scale, obviously - I will drop to a light weight, for health reasons, during the winter when we are covered up. Then follow a proper "bro" bodybuilding diet and training program, maybe five months out of the year.

So from September to April, I'll train for strength, and drop to 170-lb. During this time, my lifts will go up, universally.

Then for the five months of April to August, I will follow a bodybuilding program.

But 200 is clearly too heavy. Maybe 190 would be ideal. But, time will tell.

Also, I loathe the sun. I fear getting sunburned. However, my lack of tan is making me look less lean. Being tanned helps this.

You have tits you fatass bag of steroid water bloat. You have the torso of a 60 year old albino Mexican woman. You hide your legs because they are worse than Polio Hanks’ twigs.

If you want to gain 20 lbs you don’t need drugs. Do the fucking work moron. Get in the squat rack and focus on compound movements. Cut the “strongman” shit training out - you’re a weakling and it’s just an excuse to do sloppy, quarter reps.

Ahhhh fuck it - you won’t listen and learn anything. Keep doing what you’re doing and keep ignoring the decent advice you’ve been given. You will always be a 5’-7” and 165 lb loser twink.

You look like shit - and that is 100% your fault. Instead of deflecting the responsibility and accountability for your failure….man the fuck up you crybaby whiner.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 09, 2022, 09:12:02 PM
Matt, you know I respect you and would never step out of line.  You can ask anyone in the neighborhood.   ;D

LOL.

If you want to better your physique, stop focusing on the strength training.  Especially as pertains to chest.  Use more dumbells and incline work.  Your back appears thick but the lats don't pop.  I'd focus on chins and pulldown movements and do just enough rows and deads to maintain.  Delts are overpowering.  Maybe only train them every other week but with perfect, controlled form and higher reps.  Legs?  Not sure if you squat.  If you do, I'd stop and do lots of hacks, lunges and extensions.  Hams?  Lots of curls and stiff legs with dumbells.  Calves?  I like Palumbo's recommendation.  Train them twice per week.  2-3 exercises per workout and one mega set per exercise.  I'm not an expert by any stretch but I think this would help.  Cycle carbs and do cardio.  Lots of it.  Being that you are a hypochondriac, cardio is great for your overall health.

Thank you.

The training adjustments I'm up for doing. But my low appetite is holding me back.

If I could fix up my diet for 3-6 months, people here would be astounded at the transformation.

This gear transformation was pretty good - it was definitely a noticeable improvement. IMO, most people would assume such changes in that time period were assisted by steroids. Which they were.

But I could make even better progress if I could commit to a high protein diet, for a sustained period of time.

Regarding my lats - I don't think I have much lat muscle there.

I just don't have much in the way of muscle fiber density at all. I have very good shoulders genetics. My arms look aesthetic in the relaxed pose, and I have a couple of other ok areas. But I am severely lacking on muscle fiber density for my chest, back, and some other areas.

I think to be a pro, one needs >50% strong parts. Some freaks like Ronnie have basically all strong parts.

But I have, what, pro level shoulders potential? My triceps are ok.

But everything else is low in muscle fiber concentration.

I thought training at 40 would be harder than it is, but it's not. And I don't want to waste this ability to still train hard.

AbrahamG - do you happen to have a diet for me to cut to 175-lb, and be as lean as possible at that weight?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 10, 2022, 01:47:27 AM
Matt has to start bb training real soon starting over from square one to get leaner and more proportionate........... ......forget all you know, and forget all you think that you know.....it hasn`t worked well as far as from a cosmetic standpoint (meaning how you look) though you`re as strong as fuck.

I only charge a very minimal  fee for guaranteed results.   ;D  j/k

When I`m on my cycle.....Anadrol included,. by contest day I will be shredded to the fucking bone.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 10, 2022, 02:12:42 AM
Look you took anadrol this is to be expected you bulked up and now need to lean out your chest will look better if you drop some bodyfat and water it is a process 2 steps forward one step back

I will only use gear again if I eat a proper "bro" diet.

I don't want to waste the gear, and I hate to eat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 10, 2022, 02:16:03 AM
Matt has that nasty estrogen bloat you get from taking Drol alone. Lots of fall cells forming that aren't going away anytime soon.

Should have used some Test.

And it's all going to crash and burn a few weeks after he stops.

Also, you BETTER crush that fat chick's fat pussy or at least send me her info.

I already had a bit of that...whatever it is.

I don't know what it is exactly, but there's no hard lump there. I had if prior to using steroids...unless that came about from the few total times I used gear in the past 18 years.

My friend said it I run an anti-E for a month, if could reduce.

He said sometimes the glands get activated, even if it doesn't become gyno.

Keep in mind, I have no vices. I am a health freak. Otherwise, I'd run gear.

But what if I'm that 1 in 10,000 person who runs a bit of gear and drops dead?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 10, 2022, 02:19:48 AM
That`s why I said he should have used the Sust in conjunction with the A-Bomz.....as you said,having a base of Test is always a good thing when running a cycle of this type.

Why?

How is adding more gear in better?

You're saying it prevents some estrogenic activity or something?

To be clear, whatever that is on my pecs...it was there before starting the the cycle.

Keep in mind I have crap pecs. MAYBE they could get better with some changes in my training, and a significant [5%] reduction in body fat.

Maybe...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 10, 2022, 02:21:11 AM
I already had a bit of that...whatever it is.

I don't know what it is exactly, but there's no hard lump there. I had if prior to using steroids...unless that came about from the few total times I used gear in the past 18 years.

My friend said it I run an anti-E for a month, if could reduce.

He said sometimes the glands get activated, even if it doesn't become gyno.

Keep in mind, I have no vices. I am a health freak. Otherwise, I'd run gear.

But what if I'm that 1 in 10,000 person who runs a bit of gear and drops dead?
CARDIO.............plus eat cleaner and more often with the emphasis on lean protein.

If you walked for a lousy 30 - 45 minutes on an inclined treadmill after you trained 5-6 days a week varying the height of the incline and the speed of the treadmill throughout, but never breaking into a run you`d be a lot leaner in 3-6 months .....in less than a year,you`d literally look like you had a different body by contrast if you did it correctly and were consistant and I would only do the 45 minute cardio sessions once in a while.....not very hard to do.....if you keep doing the same shit expecting different results get ready to be let down........a lifestyle change for the better is well just BETTER!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 10, 2022, 02:25:16 AM
I just don't understand how you just went from skinny to fat where was the jacked in between? You were eating nothing then somehow up your calories to like 2k and now you are fat wtf? And this is from a smidge of anadrol? You look like a guy who has been living on anadrol and pizza for weeks. Not to be mean but time to reevaluate already you need to lean out. Back shots were misleading you are putting on fat and from very little food while working out it doesnt make sense

My body fat stayed the same.

The back shots were not misleading - you can see my body fat stayed the same, but I am bigger now.

I was never lean. I was always 16-18% body fat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 10, 2022, 02:51:16 AM
You were eating nothing then somehow up your calories to like 2k and now you are fat wtf?

I'm overweight by one standard. I'm also more muscular and in better shape than 99% of men. Or at the VERY low end, 95%.

I'm definitely the fittest man in a group of 20 men.

So if being in better shape than at least 95% of men is "fat", let alone at age 40, then I guess I'm fat.

However, this physique is acceptable to me.

I just don't know where to go from here.

I'd like to get to the leanest 175-lb possible now, with being 205-lb in this shape being my starting point:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 10, 2022, 02:58:30 AM
I'm overweight by one standard. I'm also more muscular and in better shape than 99% of men. Or at the VERY low end, 95%.

I'm definitely the fittest man in a group of 20 men.

So if being in better shape than at least 95% of men is "fat", let alone at age 40, then I guess I'm fat.

However, this physique is acceptable to me.

I just don't know where to go from here.

I'd like to get to the leanest 175-lb possible now, with being 205-lb in this shape being my starting point:

You look good arms up and in a tank top but when your arms are down shirt off you have too much extra around your chest and your stomach looks soft. It's not like you need to lose 20lbs but you need to lose 10-15
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 10, 2022, 03:10:54 AM
Agree.

But this is what Drol only cycles do.

There is a reason nobody in their right mind would do this.

People don't do oral-only cycles?

Or specifically Anadrol-only cycles?

No matter how you cut it, you are going to lose everything you gain from steroids if you go off for long enough. And I mean TRULY go off. Go off 100%, and whether it takes three months or three years, you will eventually lose everything.

Of course those debating this are also the same ones who never go off.

Although I should point out, there is evidence that once you do steroids, there will be a slight increase in muscle mass that you will permanently keep.

I'm assuming that permanent muscle is fuck all.

I wasn't planning on CYCLING steroids. I was planning on doing ONE cycle, going up very temporarily in size, going off, losing all size, and never going on again.

Now after doing this cycle...I'm thinking maybe I do want to cycle gear...but time to will tell.

But why is a one-and-done oral only cycle [or Anadrol-only cycle] a bad thing?

My assumption was I would just go back to normal?

As it was, I got the result I wanted from the cycle...and now, my expectation is that I will just go back to normal after this.

Effectively, the cycle ended two weeks ago. I've taken three Anadrol tablets in that time, so...it's basically done.

So far, I've just seen a gradual reduction in muscularity. Just what I expected.

Am I missing something?

I intended to lose what I gained, and that's what happened.

How is adding more steroids a good thing? And keep in mind - I don't care if I lose 100% of the gains in two days. The POINT was to only make temporary gains, and to do this once.

So what would adding test have done, keeping in mind I didn't intend to keep any gains.

Bodybuilding is all drugs. I have no intention to use drugs for the rest of my life. If half the Mr. Olympia lineup trained without drugs, and the other half used drugs but didn't train, and both had the same diet, the drugged half would win.

That's pathetic, but that's reality.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 10, 2022, 03:14:42 AM
You look good arms up and in a tank top but when your arms are down shirt off you have too much extra around your chest and your stomach looks soft. It's not like you need to lose 20lbs but you need to lose 10-15

Unfortunately, even if I lose 40-lb, my body fat does not drop.

However, if I use a fat burning supplement, maybe that would change.

I will probably do this soon. But I won't commit unless I'm certain I have the proper diet to follow.

In the meantime I will train for strength, because I can make more progress in strength training even if I'm not eating enough. It's one area where training alone matters a lot.

For bodybuilding, nutrition matters a lot, and I HATE to eat.

I might just do a cutting diet later. But for now, I will do strength training as a placeholder, basically. Until I figure out a good diet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 10, 2022, 03:46:31 AM
Unfortunately, even if I lose 40-lb, my body fat does not drop.

However, if I use a fat burning supplement, maybe that would change.

I will probably do this soon. But I won't commit unless I'm certain I have the proper diet to follow.

In the meantime I will train for strength, because I can make more progress in strength training even if I'm not eating enough. It's one area where training alone matters a lot.

For bodybuilding, nutrition matters a lot, and I HATE to eat.

I might just do a cutting diet later. But for now, I will do strength training as a placeholder, basically. Until I figure out a good diet.

The fuck are you talking about losing all your “gains” and training for strength you are not strong you use shit form already you will not press more weight without gaining muscle and learning technique and form to do that

If you can’t get lean losing 40lbs you have no fucking idea what you are doing meanwhile you act like getting fat and bloated on anadrol somehow proves you were right about something all along it proves you were wrong. Just adding anadrol did not magically  improve your physique. You are not on the way to 220lbs plus you are on your way to a bra. You have not added 30lbs of lean tissue not sure if you have added 5 and you want to go back to starvation dieting and “strength” training that got you nowhere now. You want to get lean do more reps and volume not less

You have crashed your natural production that is why you don’t do anadrol alone you are going to look worse than ever when you come off not the same as before
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 10, 2022, 04:08:08 AM
You don’t compete in Olympic style weightlifting or amateur powerlifting you did one string man contest years ago in a weight class no one has ever heard about and you are 40 years old so stop pretending you are some kind of world class power lifter and start focusing on getting in better shape. There are nattys in shaoe nattys not in shape and juicers in shape and not in shape right now you are the last abs worst category. You gave up on natural way to early but now if you want assistance you may as well go all the way. Stay clear of anadrol and Dianabol you are already soft. You need Tren Halo and Winstrol and Masteron you need to tighten up reduce the estrogen and water and fat. Increase your volume and reps to lean out more use good form so you can train more often save some for your next workout but you need to be in the 100-200 total rep range to get in shape at this point
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 10, 2022, 04:34:48 AM
Why?

How is adding more gear in better?

You're saying it prevents some estrogenic activity or something?

To be clear, whatever that is on my pecs...it was there before starting the the cycle.

Keep in mind I have crap pecs. MAYBE they could get better with some changes in my training, and a significant [5%] reduction in body fat.

Maybe...
Do you research anything gear related or do you just randomly take anything available......any combo of things or do you know why you`re taking a compound and why you should possibly combine another compound with it to maximize the effect it won`t deliver if used alone.

I`m not saying anything that you`re thinking in your above post ,I`m saying it`s always best to have a base of Test especially with just an oral otherwise used alone.......this is just mine and thousands of others opinion.

Plus as far as your bodyfat and pec developmemt,start over and do things correctly without training with tons of momentum.....I`m surprised you haven`t torn anything yet so far but as you age trust me training like you do just throwing shit around,somethings bound to give sooner than later......you`re not old but you`re certainly no kid either.

If I could,I would put a huge funnell in your ear and pour in an extra large box of this stuff called knowledge cuz for me to explain what I think you should do would take a zillion posts all longer than the longest post you`ve ever posted.

SQUARE ONE......FIND IT......START OVER WITH A DIFFERENT MINDSET AND DIFFERENT GOALS......JUST MY OPINION BUT DO WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.early Hodge Twins referance.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 10, 2022, 04:35:20 AM
LOL.

Thank you.

The training adjustments I'm up for doing. But my low appetite is holding me back.

If I could fix up my diet for 3-6 months, people here would be astounded at the transformation.

This gear transformation was pretty good - it was definitely a noticeable improvement. IMO, most people would assume such changes in that time period were assisted by steroids. Which they were.

But I could make even better progress if I could commit to a high protein diet, for a sustained period of time.

Regarding my lats - I don't think I have much lat muscle there.

I just don't have much in the way of muscle fiber density at all. I have very good shoulders genetics. My arms look aesthetic in the relaxed pose, and I have a couple of other ok areas. But I am severely lacking on muscle fiber density for my chest, back, and some other areas.

I think to be a pro, one needs >50% strong parts. Some freaks like Ronnie have basically all strong parts.

But I have, what, pro level shoulders potential? My triceps are ok.

But everything else is low in muscle fiber concentration.

I thought training at 40 would be harder than it is, but it's not. And I don't want to waste this ability to still train hard.

AbrahamG - do you happen to have a diet for me to cut to 175-lb, and be as lean as possible at that weight?

Why would this be difficult for you? Aren't autistic people supposed to like repetition and familiarity? Just eat bodybuilding foods the same meals each day over and over and don't stray to unhealthy foods. There isn't some special skill, knowledge, or genetics involved with sticking to a diet you just have to actually do it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 10, 2022, 04:41:58 AM
I will only use gear again if I eat a proper "bro" diet.

I don't want to waste the gear, and I hate to eat.
YOU SHOULD BE EATING A PROPER DIET ALL THE TIME AS A SERIOUS WEIGHT TRAINER.

Come on Matt you`re not new to this shit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 10, 2022, 04:50:50 AM
The words "IF" and "CAN`T" should never enter a serious trainees vocabulary or thoughts.

I  know that might sound corny to some people here but the mind dictates what the body will and can do, to an extent of course, but thinking like a defeatist means the battle is already lost,and you`re the one who lost it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 10, 2022, 06:46:32 AM
Matt try this for pecs:

Smith Inclines 1=1/2 reps = one rep

Bring the bar slowly down to the hollow of your throat/clavicles and press back up,then bring it halfway down and press back up....this constitutes one rep.....slow and controlled 6 reps done in this manner should be counted as 12 reps......do 6 sets

DB Flyes....lower slowly to a fully stretched position,hold in this position for a 2 count and bring them back up.....always lower them down and a (bit back towards your head......best way I can explain it without demonstrating)  for a better stretch......6 sets also.....that`s it.....of course your diet must be re-vamped bigtime if you want defined pecs and a defined body in general.

You need to hit that treadmill buddy,and if you are paranoid about the Sustanon and Abomz you should just stay natty......comparing yourself to  an over 300  pound Atwood health wise is just plain old dumb.......his fucking heart probably weighed 75 pounds alone.  :D

I never advocate drug use,as it is a very personal choice, but YOU are using them so if you use them,use them correctly then cycle off the old school way......look at Samir among many others Tony Pearson is another great example.....these guys have used for eons but are still kicking and Tony as well as Richard Baldwin,and Robby Robinson still look fantastic, and are still training hard for their ages.

They may have underlying health issues who knows,I`m sure they are responsible and smart enough to have periodic blood work done but are in their 60`s and 70`s respectively.

If you use gear smart and dont abuse it you should be safe just ask Lee Haney.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 10, 2022, 08:18:27 AM
FATTY MATTY TITTIES - TRAINING BRA REQUIRED!

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 10, 2022, 08:28:06 AM
The fuck are you talking about losing all your “gains” and training for strength you are not strong you use shit form already you will not press more weight without gaining muscle and learning technique and form to do that

If you can’t get lean losing 40lbs you have no fucking idea what you are doing meanwhile you act like getting fat and bloated on anadrol somehow proves you were right about something all along it proves you were wrong. Just adding anadrol did not magically  improve your physique. You are not on the way to 220lbs plus you are on your way to a bra. You have not added 30lbs of lean tissue not sure if you have added 5 and you want to go back to starvation dieting and “strength” training that got you nowhere now. You want to get lean do more reps and volume not less

You have crashed your natural production that is why you don’t do anadrol alone you are going to look worse than ever when you come off not the same as before

Flamingo Legs Hankins telling it like it is.

Do any of you guys wasting your time typing out good advice, really think that thick-headed retard Matt “Titties” Canning is going to actually listen to you?

KING OF KANGZ MANBOOBS!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 10, 2022, 02:15:56 PM
Hmm...

Leave it to that moron Walter Sobchak to mess it up. I have asked four people in person, one being my doctor, and they have all confirmed it is not gyno.

However, I have some body fat and water to deal with there.

I think I'm going to do what Kevin Levrone used to do, but on a smaller scale, obviously - I will drop to a light weight, for health reasons, during the winter when we are covered up. Then follow a proper "bro" bodybuilding diet and training program, maybe five months out of the year.

So from September to April, I'll train for strength, and drop to 170-lb. During this time, my lifts will go up, universally.

Then for the five months of April to August, I will follow a bodybuilding program.

But 200 is clearly too heavy. Maybe 190 would be ideal. But, time will tell.

Also, I loathe the sun. I fear getting sunburned. However, my lack of tan is making me look less lean. Being tanned helps this.

You should not give any credence to most folks on Getbig telling you that you have gyno. They are simply trolling you for a reaction. If you are concerned, asking your doctor makes sense because your doctor knows the difference between breast tissue and fat.

You added a fair amount of weight to your frame in a very short time span. It is expected that you are going to look somewhat bloated. The best way for you to determine if this is healthy or not is by how you feel. Personally, I think you looked better when you were lighter. To me, your chubby face makes you look older than you are. But what I think is not important. What is important is what you think. The only problem with self-assessment is we tend to see ourselves as we want to be rather that who we are. Or worse, there are people see themselves as they imagine they are, like people with eating disorders and those with body dysmorphia. What looks too fat to me may look perfectly fine to you.

When I was your age, I wanted to be big. I succeeded but I felt unhealthy and sluggish. It took me a lifetime to accept that I will never look like the bodybuilder I imagined myself becoming. It simply isn't in my genes. I am very comfortable with my current weight, which hovers around 175 lbs. At 70" tall I am proportional, neither too fat nor too skinny. My clothes fit well, I eat what I want, I feel healthy for an old dude and mostly I don't feel like I am faking it. It is a great place to be. You should give it a try.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 10, 2022, 05:11:05 PM
You should not give any credence to most folks on Getbig telling you that you have gyno. They are simply trolling you for a reaction. If you are concerned, asking your doctor makes sense because your doctor knows the difference between breast tissue and fat.

You added a fair amount of weight to your frame in a very short time span. It is expected that you are going to look somewhat bloated. The best way for you to determine if this is healthy or not is by how you feel. Personally, I think you looked better when you were lighter. To me, your chubby face makes you look older than you are. But what I think is not important. What is important is what you think. The only problem with self-assessment is we tend to see ourselves as we want to be rather that who we are. Or worse, there are people see themselves as they imagine they are, like people with eating disorders and those with body dysmorphia. What looks too fat to me may look perfectly fine to you.

When I was your age, I wanted to be big. I succeeded but I felt unhealthy and sluggish. It took me a lifetime to accept that I will never look like the bodybuilder I imagined myself becoming. It simply isn't in my genes. I am very comfortable with my current weight, which hovers around 175 lbs. At 70" tall I am proportional, neither too fat nor too skinny. My clothes fit well, I eat what I want, I feel healthy for an old dude and mostly I don't feel like I am faking it. It is a great place to be. You should give it a try.

Google pseudogynecomastia you soggy old know-nothing pervert. Stop running your cock-tunnel about shit you don’t know.

For three and a half months all Mat “Titties” Canning did was brag and obsess about his steroid gains, when in reality all he did was get fat.

Jesus Christ his lower back, abdominal, and intercostal areas are literally YEARS away from looking like a real bodybuilder. Let’s be realistic here, Matt “Cock Connoisseur” Canning was given all the advice he needed to optimize his drug cycle. He didn’t listen, didn’t do the work, has absolutely shit genetics, and is weak as fuck…that is why he looks like shit and always will.

Period, end of story.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 10, 2022, 05:25:12 PM
“fake gynecomastia” is fat tissue.  So this changes what?

Gynecomastia, commonly referred to as gyno is an increase in the amount of breast gland tissue in boys or men

Which of these conditions are you suggesting Matt has? Fake gyno or the real deal? I said and continue to say that it is fat and not breast tissue. If he loses weight, the truth will come out.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on September 10, 2022, 07:09:20 PM
Unfortunately that could be gyno from the looks of it.

I had it removed from one side myself.

My advice was to only run orals for a month as the side effects outweigh the results often after that time.

After that, like others, I liked the idea of just doing the Sust and an AI.

You have a misconception about how these drugs work.

Just taking a pill here or there is a terrible idea.

You either come clean or you stay on.

Taking it occasionally will just delay you having to face reality.

If you don’t want to come off run the test and look into AI’s and maybe Masteron for your chest.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 10, 2022, 07:23:43 PM
“fake gynecomastia” is fat tissue.  So this changes what?

Gynecomastia, commonly referred to as gyno is an increase in the amount of breast gland tissue in boys or men

Which of these conditions are you suggesting Matt has? Fake gyno or the real deal? I said and continue to say that it is fat and not breast tissue. If he loses weight, the truth will come out.

It’s TITS you soggy old fucking homo.

Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning did a 3-1/2 month cycle of steroids and grew TITS!

Not muscle, not definition, not mass….TITS!

You brain dead cocksukker.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on September 11, 2022, 09:06:28 AM
Just wondering, what makes prime "soggy", isn't being old usually more associated with being "dried up" maybe  "crusty"  ??? ;D

It’s TITS you soggy old fucking homo.

Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning did a 3-1/2 month cycle of steroids and grew TITS!

Not muscle, not definition, not mass….TITS!

You brain dead cocksukker.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 11, 2022, 06:18:53 PM
People don't do oral-only cycles?

Or specifically Anadrol-only cycles?

No matter how you cut it, you are going to lose everything you gain from steroids if you go off for long enough. And I mean TRULY go off. Go off 100%, and whether it takes three months or three years, you will eventually lose everything.

Only amatuers and people who know very little about steroids do.

There is a reason why all vets say the first cycle should always be Test only.

Taking steroids will create muscle that is permanent, as long as you continue to train, but it's like 5-10% that you keep.

So yes, bodybuilding is all drugs.

I've continued to use AAS since it was part of my TRT program from an Endocrinologist. I came off many times and recovered my natural test values, however my bloodwork and profiles actually look better on 75mg of Test a week.

I'm not interested in getting big again, i used to walk around at 260-270 and was strong as a bull.

No reason for that, i do care about my health and i am in absolutely perfect health.

I still train because i enjoy it and still have a lot of strength. At 210-220 pounds i look amazing. And i have great cardio. I hike 4-5 miles every weekend with 3-4k feet of elevation change. Not a person i know can maintain my pace. And i also do search and rescue for hikers, climbers and skiers. Just because i know the area well and can push the pace.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 11, 2022, 11:21:39 PM
Just wondering, what makes prime "soggy", isn't being old usually more associated with being "dried up" maybe  "crusty"  ??? ;D

He posted a picture of him in underwear where he basically looked like wet packing box cardboard.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 12, 2022, 12:14:23 AM
He posted a picture of him in underwear where he basically looked like wet packing box cardboard.

Yes 'he' did. When I took that selfie, I had recently and purposefully, dropped about 15 to 20 lbs. Geezers like me, who spent far too many years laying in the sun getting a tan, have skin which lost elasticity. When we lose weight, our skin doesn't instantly "shrink wrap" like it once did. Also, I had major surgery about 9 years ago which left me with a scared droopy navel and lopsided abs... one side is worse than the other. That photo was intended to show the reality of what some of us look like when they are get old.

Being called 'soggy' does not bother me in the least because I know from experience that most of you when you get to be my age will look as bad or worse. You can't imagine this when you are middle-aged. Some folks make stupid comment like they will off themselves before that happens... almost all of you will not. And many of you will look far worse than I did in that photo.

Some of you get a kick out of ridiculing seniors. That is unfortunate.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 12, 2022, 01:58:50 AM
Yes 'he' did. When I took that selfie, I had recently and purposefully, dropped about 15 to 20 lbs. Geezers like me, who spent far too many years laying in the sun getting a tan, have skin which lost elasticity. When we lose weight, our skin doesn't instantly "shrink wrap" like it once did. Also, I had major surgery about 9 years ago which left me with a scared droopy navel and lopsided abs... one side is worse than the other. That photo was intended to show the reality of what some of us look like when they are get old.

Being called 'soggy' does not bother me in the least because I know from experience that most of you when you get to be my age will look as bad or worse. You can't imagine this when you are middle-aged. Some folks make stupid comment like they will off themselves before that happens... almost all of you will not. And many of you will look far worse than I did in that photo.

Any of you who get a kick out of ridiculing seniors, need to get a life. If that’s the best you can do with your time, maybe you should end yourselves.

Meltdown
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 12, 2022, 09:08:19 AM
Yes 'he' did. When I took that selfie, I had recently and purposefully, dropped about 15 to 20 lbs. Geezers like me, who spent far too many years laying in the sun getting a tan, have skin which lost elasticity. When we lose weight, our skin doesn't instantly "shrink wrap" like it once did. Also, I had major surgery about 9 years ago which left me with a scared droopy navel and lopsided abs... one side is worse than the other. That photo was intended to show the reality of what some of us look like when they are get old.

Being called 'soggy' does not bother me in the least because I know from experience that most of you when you get to be my age will look as bad or worse. You can't imagine this when you are middle-aged. Some folks make stupid comment like they will off themselves before that happens... almost all of you will not. And many of you will look far worse than I did in that photo.

Any of you who get a kick out of ridiculing seniors, need to get a life. If that’s the best you can do with your time, maybe you should end yourselves.

You’re 78 years old and posting on Getbig.

It’s you that needs to get a life.

Preferably a really short one.

Soggy old phaggot.

MATT “TITTIES” CANNING - MR. LACTATION 2022!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 13, 2022, 12:52:56 PM
Matt,
Follow Wes's advices.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 13, 2022, 01:24:51 PM
Matt,
Follow Wes's advices.
Matt is like a child and I`m his fahzer.........   ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on September 13, 2022, 01:29:38 PM
Google pseudogynecomastia you soggy old know-nothing pervert. Stop running your cock-tunnel about shit you don’t know.

For three and a half months all Mat “Titties” Canning did was brag and obsess about his steroid gains, when in reality all he did was get fat.

Jesus Christ his lower back, abdominal, and intercostal areas are literally YEARS away from looking like a real bodybuilder. Let’s be realistic here, Matt “Cock Connoisseur” Canning was given all the advice he needed to optimize his drug cycle. He didn’t listen, didn’t do the work, has absolutely shit genetics, and is weak as fuck…that is why he looks like shit and always will.

Period, end of story.
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 13, 2022, 04:36:47 PM
Matt is like a child and I`m his fahzer.........   ;D

(https://gif-free.com/uploads/posts/2017-07/1499874700_arnold-schwarzenegger-funny.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 14, 2022, 07:31:05 PM
I'm overweight by one standard. I'm also more muscular and in better shape than 99% of men. Or at the VERY low end, 95%.

I'm definitely the fittest man in a group of 20 men.

So if being in better shape than at least 95% of men is "fat", let alone at age 40, then I guess I'm fat.

However, this physique is acceptable to me.

I just don't know where to go from here.

I'd like to get to the leanest 175-lb possible now, with being 205-lb in this shape being my starting point:


 

What are your week points you're trying to make better?  Your bodybuilding seems very unfocused.  Make your own assessment of yourself.  Decide how you need to improve and the best way of accomplishing it.

 



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 14, 2022, 11:03:36 PM

 

What are your week points you're trying to make better?  Your bodybuilding seems very unfocused.  Make your own assessment of yourself.  Decide how you need to improve and the best way of accomplishing it.

 




He couldn`t possibly do that,he`d have to have a 100 page thread asking everyones opinions.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 14, 2022, 11:47:04 PM

 

What are your week points you're trying to make better?  Your bodybuilding seems very unfocused.  Make your own assessment of yourself.  Decide how you need to improve and the best way of accomplishing it.

Probably his whole life.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 12:38:53 AM

 

What are your week points you're trying to make better?  Your bodybuilding seems very unfocused.  Make your own assessment of yourself.  Decide how you need to improve and the best way of accomplishing it.

My chest - but let's be honest, my chest is going nowhere.

The other day I loaded 350 on the bar to break my previous one rep max of 350. I loaded it up and BOOM - SUCCESS!!!

And then I realized that the plates were 20kg / 44-lb. Haha, so it was only 344...and my lifetime max remains 345.  >:( :(

But let's be honest - if I'm bench pressing 345 and my bench press still sucks, will it EVER get better?

...

Maybe with enough juice, I could have somewhat of a decent chest...but not really.

I just don't see it happening.

Also - you mentioned that my bodybuilding seems very unfocused - you are absolutely BANG ON about this. 100%.

Make no mistake - I train VERY hard, and I'm training 4-6 days a week, week after week. I always work hard in the gym, and my lifts demonstrate this, IMO.

But I simply do not eat enough food, and it's specifically my nutrition which is NOT at a high level. And nutrition is, IMO, far more important than training.

I believe - and I'm just saying this because I have a feeling right now - that my winter nutrition is going to be good.

What I'm going to do is simply my diet by just eating X/Y/Z grams of protein/carbs/fats daily, and only eat roughly 14 different foods.

I will always have a certain amount of water I will need for drink. And I will be then break it down a step further - so that within eight hours of waking [roughly 50% of my day], I must hit 50% of my macros, and 50% of my water.

I will only have those 14 foods in my house.

Right now, I've been getting in 2,400 calories a day, but I've just been eating "whatever". Once I refine my diet...I really think I will get a great result.

But I do want to say one thing in my defense:

I consistently train extremely hard. My training intensity is on point. It may not be the perfect targeted training for my optimal physique development, but I do work hard in the gym.

If I get my nutrition on point...I think I can make very good progress.

Add regular juice to that, and I think the transformation can be epic.

As for whether or not I will juice regularly from now on - that's a quality versus quantity of life thing. I much prefer my new physique...but...I am a hypochondriac, so I may never run any steroids again, once this cycle is over [which it basically has been, for two weeks now].
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 12:52:17 AM
Here is a training video from tonight:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/

I wanted to get the 110's after that set, but couldn't get it!!

I guess I'm not at that level yet.

That gym doesn't have 105-lb dumbbells for some reason...I think I could get the 105's for maybe...4-5, I would say. I wouldn't be shocked if I try next week at my other gym, that I could get the 105's for six good reps. By "good", I mean the form in that video, lol.

Which I tagged B. Hank in on Instagram so that he could review my form!

Here is a posing video from me from last night - this was from just before midnight:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cigz270AuRx/

Some pictures from just a few moments before that video was taken - I think that since dropping the Anadrol to almost zero over the past 15 days, my shoulders have been the first to drop in size. Luckily, my strength has gone up slightly, as I have now transitioned to strength training.

It's honestly a bit funny to be getting stronger as I get smaller, lol. But...that comes down to training.

As I said, my strength training is a placeholder until I get a diet prepared, and commit to it. I don't want to train bodybuilding-style unless my diet follows a bodybuilding model. Why waste hard training on a poor diet / diet too low in protein or overall calories?

What's the expression?:

"You can't outrun a poor diet."

Something like that.

At least if I train for strength, I can presumably get my bench press up to 360-370, even if I'm not eating enough. That's ultimately why I train for strength - there is no dietary discipline required for strength training, lol. It's either "eat everything in sight", and get stronger, or don't eat enough if you are like me - and you can still get stronger!

Bodybuilding is mainly diet, IMO. And steroids. I have no idea why training is emphasized so much, like it is the main component.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 03:57:58 AM
Here is a training video from tonight:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/

I wanted to get the 110's after that set, but couldn't get it!!

I guess I'm not at that level yet.

That gym doesn't have 105-lb dumbbells for some reason...I think I could get the 105's for maybe...4-5, I would say. I wouldn't be shocked if I try next week at my other gym, that I could get the 105's for six good reps. By "good", I mean the form in that video, lol.

Which I tagged B. Hank in on Instagram so that he could review my form!

Here is a posing video from me from last night - this was from just before midnight:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cigz270AuRx/

Some pictures from just a few moments before that video was taken - I think that since dropping the Anadrol to almost zero over the past 15 days, my shoulders have been the first to drop in size. Luckily, my strength has gone up slightly, as I have now transitioned to strength training.

It's honestly a bit funny to be getting stronger as I get smaller, lol. But...that comes down to training.

As I said, my strength training is a placeholder until I get a diet prepared, and commit to it. I don't want to train bodybuilding-style unless my diet follows a bodybuilding model. Why waste hard training on a poor diet / diet too low in protein or overall calories?

What's the expression?:

"You can't outrun a poor diet."

Something like that.

At least if I train for strength, I can presumably get my bench press up to 360-370, even if I'm not eating enough. That's ultimately why I train for strength - there is no dietary discipline required for strength training, lol. It's either "eat everything in sight", and get stronger, or don't eat enough if you are like me - and you can still get stronger!

Bodybuilding is mainly diet, IMO. And steroids. I have no idea why training is emphasized so much, like it is the main component.

Your form looks likes shit those are half range of motion bullshit reps. I told you that last time but you are to much of an ego lifter to make any changes. I am not going to bother to explain it all over as you don’t listen but your elbows are not even getting to 90 degrees and you are still bending your wrist drop it to 70lbs and learn the damn technique
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 15, 2022, 04:37:18 AM
Your form looks likes shit those are half range of motion bullshit reps. I told you that last time but you are to much of an ego lifter to make any changes. I am not going to bother to explain it all over as you don’t listen but your elbows are not even getting to 90 degrees and you are still bending your wrist drop it to 70lbs and learn the damn technique

Try to control your wrists Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 15, 2022, 04:59:32 AM
But I simply do not eat enough food, and it's specifically my nutrition which is NOT at a high level. And nutrition is, IMO, far more important than training.

I believe - and I'm just saying this because I have a feeling right now - that my winter nutrition is going to be good.

What I'm going to do is simply my diet by just eating X/Y/Z grams of protein/carbs/fats daily, and only eat roughly 14 different foods.

I will always have a certain amount of water I will need for drink. And I will be then break it down a step further - so that within eight hours of waking [roughly 50% of my day], I must hit 50% of my macros, and 50% of my water.

I will only have those 14 foods in my house.

Right now, I've been getting in 2,400 calories a day, but I've just been eating "whatever". Once I refine my diet...I really think I will get a great result.

Why don't you just change your diet now instead of talking about it?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 15, 2022, 05:05:54 AM
My chest - but let's be honest, my chest is going nowhere.

The other day I loaded 350 on the bar to break my previous one rep max of 350. I loaded it up and BOOM - SUCCESS!!!

And then I realized that the plates were 20kg / 44-lb. Haha, so it was only 344...and my lifetime max remains 345.  >:( :(

But let's be honest - if I'm bench pressing 345 and my bench press still sucks, will it EVER get better?

...

Maybe with enough juice, I could have somewhat of a decent chest...but not really.

I just don't see it happening.

One-rep maxes don't do JACK for your pecs. And when are you going to cut down the flat-benches and try some other exercises? I've yet to see you mention anything about using inclines or dips in your pec routine.



Also - you mentioned that my bodybuilding seems very unfocused - you are absolutely BANG ON about this. 100%.

Make no mistake - I train VERY hard, and I'm training 4-6 days a week, week after week. I always work hard in the gym, and my lifts demonstrate this, IMO.

But I simply do not eat enough food, and it's specifically my nutrition which is NOT at a high level. And nutrition is, IMO, far more important than training.

I believe - and I'm just saying this because I have a feeling right now - that my winter nutrition is going to be good.

What I'm going to do is simply my diet by just eating X/Y/Z grams of protein/carbs/fats daily, and only eat roughly 14 different foods.

But, it's fall/autumn. So, you're going to eat like garbage for another three months? Plus, why are you training 6 times a week?

That's probably part of the problem. There is no need to train just one bodypart a day. Start training multiple bodyparts a session; I'd say keep it simple and break it down to just upper body and legs.




I will always have a certain amount of water I will need for drink. And I will be then break it down a step further - so that within eight hours of waking [roughly 50% of my day], I must hit 50% of my macros, and 50% of my water.

I will only have those 14 foods in my house.

Right now, I've been getting in 2,400 calories a day, but I've just been eating "whatever". Once I refine my diet...I really think I will get a great result.

But I do want to say one thing in my defense:

I consistently train extremely hard. My training intensity is on point. It may not be the perfect targeted training for my optimal physique development, but I do work hard in the gym.

Hamsters work hard, running on the wheel in their cages, too; but they go NOWHERE!!

Quit worrying about water and concentrate on FOOD! Either eat it or drink it; but get them calories and protein in your belly by any means necessary. This may come as a SURPRISE to you; but, getting your diet right will actually make you......STRONGER!!!

Not to mention......BIGGER!!!



If I get my nutrition on point...I think I can make very good progress.

Add regular juice to that, and I think the transformation can be epic.

As for whether or not I will juice regularly from now on - that's a quality versus quantity of life thing. I much prefer my new physique...but...I am a hypochondriac, so I may never run any steroids again, once this cycle is over [which it basically has been, for two weeks now].

What's the point of your transformation, if you just keep reverting back to what you are now?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 15, 2022, 05:46:22 AM
You keep talking about chest pressing lifts with big numbers......building a good set of pecs is an entirely different animal and constitutes an entirely different way of training.

But I`m out of this retarded thread cuz you my friend ask for advice and ideas then simply dismiss them.

79 pages of nonsensical bullshit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 15, 2022, 05:50:34 AM
You keep talking about chest pressing lifts with big numbers......building a good set of pecs is an entirely different animal and constitutes an entirely different way of training.

But I`m out of this retarded thread cuz you my friend ask for advice and ideas then simply dismiss them.

79 pages of nonsensical bullshit.

(https://giffiles.alphacoders.com/234/23465.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 15, 2022, 07:03:01 AM
You keep talking about chest pressing lifts with big numbers......building a good set of pecs is an entirely different animal and constitutes an entirely different way of training.

And that means lifting heavy weight for MULTIPLE REPS, with the PECS doing the lion's share of the work. It also means other chest exercises (i.e. incline presses, weighted dips).



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 15, 2022, 07:07:09 AM
I would suggest keeping pecs smallish as one ages. Older guys look horrible with tits.
Even little guys like Gaspari has big-ole titties these days. Looks horrendous...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 07:16:10 AM
I would suggest keeping pecs smallish as one ages. Older guys look horrible with tits.
Even little guys like Gaspari has big-ole titties these days. Looks horrendous...

Hm...I strongly suspect MCWAY's pecs look like that, and I imagine mine will too, very soon!

Do you know what causes that, Gym-Rat?

It's not gyno, but is it too much activity in the glands? What's going on exactly?

Also, OneMoreQuestion for you, Gym-Rat - why are people being mean to me on my Instagram page?:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cigz270AuRx/

^ Although I take that as a compliment too, lol. B. Hank is being mean to me in this one:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 15, 2022, 07:22:02 AM
Hm...I strongly suspect MCWAY's pecs look like that, and I imagine mine will too, very soon!



You suspect wrong, but what else is new?

Worse yet, you foolishly think taking pot shots at me is somehow going to improve your chest.



Do you know what causes that, Gym-Rat?

It's not gyno, but is it too much activity in the glands? What's going on exactly?

It's called OLD AGE, genius, plus he doesn't train nearly as frequently as he once did.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 07:26:12 AM
Hm...I strongly suspect MCWAY's pecs look like that, and I imagine mine will too, very soon!

Do you know what causes that, Gym-Rat?

It's not gyno, but is it too much activity in the glands? What's going on exactly?

Also, OneMoreQuestion for you, Gym-Rat - why are people being mean to me on my Instagram page?:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cigz270AuRx/

^ Although I take that as a compliment too, lol. B. Hank is being mean to me in this one:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/

You keep doing quarter half reps bending your wrist to dip the dumbells in vs keep the them straight and bending your elbows to lower the weights horizontal to your body. You then ask what you are doing wrong I tell you this and you post 10 more videoed doing the exact same thing
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 07:27:23 AM
Google pseudogynecomastia you soggy old know-nothing pervert. Stop running your cock-tunnel about shit you don’t know.

For three and a half months all Mat “Titties” Canning did was brag and obsess about his steroid gains, when in reality all he did was get fat.

Jesus Christ his lower back, abdominal, and intercostal areas are literally YEARS away from looking like a real bodybuilder. Let’s be realistic here, Matt “Cock Connoisseur” Canning was given all the advice he needed to optimize his drug cycle. He didn’t listen, didn’t do the work, has absolutely shit genetics, and is weak as fuck…that is why he looks like shit and always will.

Period, end of story.

I don't have gynecomastia, and don't have any level of body fat there that couldn't be melted off in 16 weeks naturally.

The results I got from this cycle are exactly the results one would expect from doing a 2-3 month low-dose Anadrol cycle. I'd say I actually expected to be 10-lb less, at the same body fat percentage.

Do you grasp that there are levels of steroid doses?

I took a very low dose of a strong steroid. I got at least the results I wanted, if not slightly better.

If I got a little braver in my doses, and started consistently eating "bro", the transform would be radical. The latter I may do one day...the former, I almost certainly would not. But time will tell.

Now, I just want to add:

What does it say about you that you had to get another member to lie and say you met up in Chicago, when that didn't happen? You then claimed to be 242-lb, and claimed to have a perfect/petite girlfriend.

Why do you feel the need to lie and claim you have a perfect body weight girlfriend? Why are you so insecure? Do you think it's so impressive to get a woman or to get laid, that you would lie about having a girlfriend? Seriously?

As for your being 242-lb. Let's say you are 242-lb, and as strong as you claim - if so, why would you be making fun of someone who is weaker than you? Wouldn't you just see a guy weaker, know he is lower than you on the strength hierarchy, and not worry about him?

But even if you are 242, and deadlift 600 - let's pretend you do - so what? I deadlift 525. So your lift is nothing special compared to mine, when you take into account body weight.

Say you deadlift 700 - ok, then I'll ask again:

Why would you care about someone weaker than you?

If you posted your lifts, everyone would know I'm stronger than you, and I wouldn't care. What annoys me about you is that you lie [among other things].

But if you are as strong as you claim, why would you care about whay I lift, it i waq clearly weaker, as you say?

Reality: I'm stronger than you and you know it.

No big deal, Water. I'm stronger than most people if you didn't notice.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 07:30:44 AM
I don't have gynecomastia, and don't have any level of body fat there that couldn't be melted off in 16 weeks naturally.

The results I got from this cycle are exactly the results one would expect from doing a 2-3 month low-dose Anadrol cycle. I'd say I actually expected to be 10-lb less, at the same body fat percentage.

Do you grasp that there are levels of steroid doses?

I took a very low dose of a strong steroid. I got at least the results I wanted, if not slightly better.

If I got a little braver in my doses, and started consistently eating "bro", the transform would be radical. The latter I may do one day...the former, I almost certainly would not. But time will tell.

Now, I just want to add:

What does it say about you that you had to get another member to lie and say you met up in Chicago, when that didn't happen? You then claimed to be 242-lb, and claimed to have a perfect/petite girlfriend.

Why do you feel the need to lie and claim you have a perfect body weight girlfriend? Why are you so insecure? Do you think it's so impressive to get a woman or to get laid, that you would lie about having a girlfriend? Seriously?

As for your being 242-lb. Let's say you are 242-lb, and as strong as you claim - if so, why would you be making fun of someone who is weaker than you? Wouldn't you just see a guy weaker, know he is lower than you on the strength hierarchy, and not worry about him?

You will never learn proper  form or technique because you are too much of an ego lifter to drop the weight down and learn you are not doing it right
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 07:40:34 AM
You keep doing quarter half reps bending your wrist to dip the dumbells in vs keep the them straight and bending your elbows to lower the weights horizontal to your body. You then ask what you are doing wrong I tell you this and you post 10 more videoed doing the exact same thing

My dumbbell bench press form the other time surprised me a little. I thought I was a bit lose with form - but it was actually very loose. Regardless, I just bench pressed 120-lb dumbbells for 10 reps the other day with perfect form, so yet again, you claimed I couldn't do a certain lift, but I did.

I just needed to dust the cobwebs off, so to speak.

Keep in mind that gyms were basically closed here for two years with the pandemic, so I had a lot of catching up to do!

As for my form here, I don't think it is that bad. Arguably, it puts strain on the rotator cuff to go lower than this.

Also, B. Hank - I have another question for you:

Do you really think Walter Sobchak comes anywhere close to us on strength or physique? Let's be honest - we BOTH warm up with his workout.

I just find it strange that such a weak man attacks us.

I respect your views, because you have the physique of a Greek statue.

That being said, I really think my form is ok here:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 15, 2022, 07:52:53 AM
What are your goals here? 

I don't have gynecomastia, and don't have any level of body fat there that couldn't be melted off in 16 weeks naturally.

The results I got from this cycle are exactly the results one would expect from doing a 2-3 month low-dose Anadrol cycle. I'd say I actually expected to be 10-lb less, at the same body fat percentage.

Do you grasp that there are levels of steroid doses?

I took a very low dose of a strong steroid. I got at least the results I wanted, if not slightly better.

If I got a little braver in my doses, and started consistently eating "bro", the transform would be radical. The latter I may do one day...the former, I almost certainly would not. But time will tell.

Now, I just want to add:

What does it say about you that you had to get another member to lie and say you met up in Chicago, when that didn't happen? You then claimed to be 242-lb, and claimed to have a perfect/petite girlfriend.

Why do you feel the need to lie and claim you have a perfect body weight girlfriend? Why are you so insecure? Do you think it's so impressive to get a woman or to get laid, that you would lie about having a girlfriend? Seriously?

As for your being 242-lb. Let's say you are 242-lb, and as strong as you claim - if so, why would you be making fun of someone who is weaker than you? Wouldn't you just see a guy weaker, know he is lower than you on the strength hierarchy, and not worry about him?

But even if you are 242, and deadlift 600 - let's pretend you do - so what? I deadlift 525. So your lift is nothing special compared to mine, when you take into account body weight.

Say you deadlift 700 - ok, then I'll ask again:

Why would you care about someone weaker than you?

If you posted your lifts, everyone would know I'm stronger than you, and I wouldn't care. What annoys me about you is that you lie [among other things].

But if you are as strong as you claim, why would you care about whay I lift, it i waq clearly weaker, as you say?

Reality: I'm stronger than you and you know it.

No big deal, Water. I'm stronger than most people if you didn't notice.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 15, 2022, 07:57:15 AM
Here is a training video from tonight:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/

I wanted to get the 110's after that set, but couldn't get it!!

I guess I'm not at that level yet.

That gym doesn't have 105-lb dumbbells for some reason...I think I could get the 105's for maybe...4-5, I would say. I wouldn't be shocked if I try next week at my other gym, that I could get the 105's for six good reps. By "good", I mean the form in that video, lol.

Which I tagged B. Hank in on Instagram so that he could review my form!

Here is a posing video from me from last night - this was from just before midnight:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cigz270AuRx/

Some pictures from just a few moments before that video was taken - I think that since dropping the Anadrol to almost zero over the past 15 days, my shoulders have been the first to drop in size. Luckily, my strength has gone up slightly, as I have now transitioned to strength training.

It's honestly a bit funny to be getting stronger as I get smaller, lol. But...that comes down to training.

As I said, my strength training is a placeholder until I get a diet prepared, and commit to it. I don't want to train bodybuilding-style unless my diet follows a bodybuilding model. Why waste hard training on a poor diet / diet too low in protein or overall calories?

What's the expression?:

"You can't outrun a poor diet."

Something like that.

At least if I train for strength, I can presumably get my bench press up to 360-370, even if I'm not eating enough. That's ultimately why I train for strength - there is no dietary discipline required for strength training, lol. It's either "eat everything in sight", and get stronger, or don't eat enough if you are like me - and you can still get stronger!

Bodybuilding is mainly diet, IMO. And steroids. I have no idea why training is emphasized so much, like it is the main component.

Fucking horrific form.

Actually agree with Half Rep Hankins.

You can barely press the weight up with out your arms shaking like you have Parkinson's.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 15, 2022, 07:59:53 AM


You suspect wrong, but what else is new?

Worse yet, you foolishly think taking pot shots at me is somehow going to improve your chest.

It's called OLD AGE, genius, plus he doesn't train nearly as frequently as he once did.

Im also guessing age, andropause, breast-tissue, fat-stores maybe?  Either way I dont train pecs anymore.
I bench close-grip and do mainly tricep work for pressing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 08:13:53 AM
My dumbbell bench press form the other time surprised me a little. I thought I was a bit lose with form - but it was actually very loose. Regardless, I just bench pressed 120-lb dumbbells for 10 reps the other day with perfect form, so yet again, you claimed I couldn't do a certain lift, but I did.

I just needed to dust the cobwebs off, so to speak.

Keep in mind that gyms were basically closed here for two years with the pandemic, so I had a lot of catching up to do!

As for my form here, I don't think it is that bad. Arguably, it puts strain on the rotator cuff to go lower than this.

Also, B. Hank - I have another question for you:

Do you really think Walter Sobchak comes anywhere close to us on strength or physique? Let's be honest - we BOTH warm up with his workout.

I just find it strange that such a weak man attacks us.

I respect your views, because you have the physique of a Greek statue.

That being said, I really think my form is ok here:

Your form is not ok it is absolute dogshit ans no you never benched pressed 120lb dumbells with perfect form you have never bench or shoulder pressed dumbells properly not once in your life

Look at your wrist they are dipping 45 degrees your elbows are at 90 and you are creating a triangle with the dumbells. The wrist is not supposed to bend those dumbells are supposed to be horizontal to the ground not turned 45 degrees.Dipping the dumbells on one side with a limp wrist is not the same as lowering them to your shoulders on both sides as your elbows come down

the outside top fo those dumbells is above your head not shoulder level you have a foot lower to go deop the damn weight and do it right
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 15, 2022, 09:52:05 AM
And that means lifting heavy weight for MULTIPLE REPS, with the PECS doing the lion's share of the work. It also means other chest exercises (i.e. incline presses, weighted dips).




How many times have we tried to drive that message home?

I`m out,let him start another marathon thread with mega marathons posts along with the dumbest drug "cycle" I`ve ever seen posted here on getbig in over 20 years.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 15, 2022, 09:56:14 AM
My chest is tight,shaped well,and delineated and I`m 67.....Gasparis pecs look flabby and his arms look like they are 12 inches.....can you say Palumboism.

That`s what these guys get when using boatloads of shit for decades like they`re never gonna` age.......well some age underground from said boatloads.......RIP to the fallen.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 15, 2022, 09:58:01 AM
You will never learn proper  form or technique because you are too much of an ego lifter to drop the weight down and learn you are not doing it right

says the man chasing a 400lb squat
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 15, 2022, 10:09:38 AM
says the man chasing a 400lb squat
That he will never be able to do.   :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 15, 2022, 10:57:43 AM
I'm an advocate of "proper" form but proper form is almost never the reason someone has a jacked bodypart. I've seen plenty of bounce pressers with massive tetonas. It's irritating but it comes down to genes as always. That doesn't mean don't hone you technique. Those of as who have been training for decades still make small bodily tweaks that aren't even observable to the naked eye.

As far as this balonie about Matt's supposedly unexistent chest. I don't care who disagrees with me, his chest fits the llrest of the body pretty well. And like he knows, it will only come up if the rest comes up att the same time. There is really very little "sculpting" in bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on September 15, 2022, 11:02:36 AM
That he will never be able to do.   :D


Funny thing is a 400 pound squat, while difficult, isn't that big a deal if you train regularly! I first hit the squat rack at college, in the off season from cycling. I was able to squat 315 within 2 weeks of starting, for sets of 6-8. This was at the age of 20.  I hit 405 after 4-5 months, and that was my goal.


Why Brian can't hit that is beyond me.


My routine, btw, was the old add weight, lower reps method, over 4-6 sets. You know, 12-10-8-8-6, like that, once a week.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on September 15, 2022, 11:08:33 AM
I'm an advocate of "proper" form but proper form is almost never the reason someone has a jacked bodypart. I've seen plenty of bounce pressers with massive tetonas. It's irritating but it comes down to genes as always. That doesn't mean don't hone you technique. Those of as who have been training for decades still make small bodily tweaks that aren't even observable to the naked eye.

As far as this balonie about Matt's supposedly unexistent chest. I don't care who disagrees with me, his chest fits the llrest of the body pretty well. And like he knows, it will only come up if the rest comes up att the same time. There is really very little "sculpting" in bodybuilding.


A lot of truth to that. I don't think anyone will ever prove conclusively that full range of motion, no bounce etc, really is needed to make a muscle grow to its genetic maximum.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 15, 2022, 11:19:04 AM

A lot of truth to that. I don't think anyone will ever prove conclusively that full range of motion, no bounce etc, really is needed to make a muscle grow to its genetic maximum.

Remember Jason Huh? He didn't need full range of motion.  :DIt might be ideal but not needed. A fatty who grew his calves by walking didn't need full range.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 15, 2022, 11:56:15 AM

Funny thing is a 400 pound squat, while difficult, isn't that big a deal if you train regularly! I first hit the squat rack at college, in the off season from cycling. I was able to squat 315 within 2 weeks of starting, for sets of 6-8. This was at the age of 20.  I hit 405 after 4-5 months, and that was my goal.


Why Brian can't hit that is beyond me.


My routine, btw, was the old add weight, lower reps method, over 4-6 sets. You know, 12-10-8-8-6, like that, once a week.
I hear ya`,....that`s a great way to do it.

Bro,I did 405 weighing 165 pounds ass to the grass back in the 80`s.......also numerous sets in succession with 315 for 8-10 reps and I have stork legs.......but not for long.  :)

I never was training for it,me and my cousins had a great leg day going and we all hit 405 for a single......it was never a specific goal.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 01:11:13 PM
Fucking horrific form.

Actually agree with Half Rep Hankins.

You can barely press the weight up with out your arms shaking like you have Parkinson's.

What the does that have to do with anything?  ???

People shake during heavy lifts. That in itself isn't a form error:

https://strengthisfirst.com/training/shaking-while-deadlifting

Exactly how much lower could I possibly go down?

The dumbbells are tilted, but this is more or less a full range of motion. As for "shaking" on the way up - shaking doesn't ever disqualify a full rep from being counted in Strongman.

Anyway, I don't take B. Hank seriously on form comments after he called my previous seated dumbbell press bad form. This is pretty good form - not perfect, but pretty good - and very strong:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

Or *strong for 170. But I'd say strong in general.

The form there is fine - not perfect, but perfectly fine.

The form below is less good, but still almost as low as I would be willing to go on dumbbell press.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 01:34:13 PM
B. Hank - what do you think of Eddie Hall's form?:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 15, 2022, 01:50:13 PM
You would be better off with 50's doing good reps for 10x - 12x.   

What the does that have to do with anything?  ???

People shake during heavy lifts. That in itself isn't a form error:

https://strengthisfirst.com/training/shaking-while-deadlifting

Exactly how much lower could I possibly go down?

The dumbbells are tilted, but this is more or less a full range of motion. As for "shaking" on the way up - shaking doesn't ever disqualify a full rep from being counted in Strongman.

Anyway, I don't take B. Hank seriously on form comments after he called my previous seated dumbbell press bad form. This is pretty good form - not perfect, but pretty good - and very strong:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

Or *strong for 170. But I'd say strong in general.

The form there is fine - not perfect, but perfectly fine.

The form below is less good, but still almost as low as I would be willing to go on dumbbell press.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 01:57:44 PM
You would be better off with 50's doing good reps for 10x - 12x.

Yea, for bodybuilding.

But the Canadian pressing records in my weight class are pretty low.

I have a real chance of breaking the Circus Dumbbell record in Canada at 80-kg.

So I just try to get at least 50% heavy sets in.

If I fix my diet, I will drop the weight. I don't see a point in training perfectly to build muscle if you aren't eating sufficient protein. I did eat enough - but that was for my cycle. A summer only cycle.

Now that it's over, I'm going to train for strength - at least for now.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 01:58:14 PM
Your form is not fine it’s fucking horrible you ask how many inches lower you could possible for and the answer is a godamn foot your are not even close to a full rep and for fuck sake stop bending your wrist
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 01:59:54 PM
What are your goals here?

Just to point out that this piece of shit is lying.

Lying fucks like him aren't contributing to the board when they lie. It gives the wrong impression. People would assume deadlifting 500 is no big deal, listening to that moron talk.

I am in the top 0.1% of human strength. People reading this should know that, because it's reality.

Or conversely, that moron can just shut the fuck up. Saying nothing is also ok.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 02:00:35 PM
Your form is not fine it’s fucking horrible you ask how many inches lower you could possible for and the answer is a godamn foot your are not even close to a full rep and for fuck sake stop bending your wrist

Now review Eddie Hall's form:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 15, 2022, 02:02:15 PM
Now review Eddie Hall's form:


No shaking, constant tension, no lock perfect form.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 02:05:07 PM
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 02:07:28 PM
Now review Eddie Hall's form:



His elbows are below his shoulders yours are not even close
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 02:09:46 PM
No shaking, constant tension, no lock perfect form.

"Shaking" has nothing to do with completing a full rep.

So to be clear here - you don't agree with B. Hank that Eddie Hall should go down an additional foot to make those reps count?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 02:15:02 PM
"Shaking" has nothing to do with completing a full rep.

So to be clear here - you don't agree with B. Hank that Eddie Hall should go down an additional foot to make those reps count?

Eddie Hall is going a foot lower than you notice he doesnt bend his wrist and his elbows are tucked below his shoulders. His wrist a are shoulder level and as are the horizontal dumbells . Your elbows are shoulder level and your wrist  and the dumbells are at the top of your head without a wrist turning dip.

The fuck do you not understand?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 02:15:18 PM
His elbows are below his shoulders yours are not even close

Even on my worst two, my elbows are below my shoulders.

But what I was specifically wondering about is his upper range of motion.

Do you consider a rep to be completed when you haven't come close to locking it out?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 15, 2022, 02:16:30 PM


Agree 100%.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 02:17:53 PM
Even on my worst two, my elbows are below my shoulders.

But what I was specifically wondering about is his upper range of motion.

Do you consider a rep to be completed when you haven't come close to locking it out?

Dude the fuck are you smoking your elbows are at your shoulder level you should bring your godamn wrist to shoulder level and the elbows below you are a full forearm length too high a godamn foot notice the dumbells are at the top of your head not your shoulders
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 02:25:11 PM
Eddie Hall is going a foot lower than you notice he doesnt bend his wrist and his elbows are tucked below his shoulders. His wrist a are shoulder level and as are the horizontal dumbells . Your elbows are shoulder level and your wrist  and the dumbells are at the top of your head without a wrist turning dip.

The fuck do you not understand?

Stop being an asshole. I could easily make fun of you for being bald, but I don't.

I'm respectfully asking questions, despite you being a piece of shit in response to my video, where I'm lifting more than you ever could, or ever have.

On some of my worst reps, yes, the dumbbell is higher up on my head. On about half of my reps, that is about as low as I'd wish to go.

On this one, there isn't a "foot" left to go down:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393234;image)

You could make an argument for a couple more inches there.

As for Eddie Hall - the OBVIOUS thing I was pointing to is that he doesn't come REMOTELY close to locking out.

That's MY issue - and the FUCKING OBVIOUS ISSUE. Eddie is claiming a massive number of reps on a lift where not one single rep was locked out. That's like me bench pressing 225, going 2/3 of the way up, and claiming 40 reps.

My issue is him claiming so many reps, with not one being locked out.

Here is the best one of Eddie's reps I could find versus my first three reps - so you give no regard to lockout when you lift, B. Hank? You just totally ignored Eddue missed that every single time, then claimed 25 reps?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 02:26:39 PM
No shaking, constant tension, no lock perfect form.

Ye mys, in Getbig La La Land, failing to lock out a rep is now perfect form. Then claiming an absurd number of reps that he could maybe get 2/3 of if he locked out.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 15, 2022, 02:35:46 PM


Actually agree with half rap Hankins  here
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 15, 2022, 02:36:54 PM
Hankys correct.....personally I always use a full ROM unless I am intentionally doing partial reps at the end of a set to extend the set and go for more of a burn.....but I always go full ROM.....tons of guys do half reps today and I understand the reasoning {constant tension} but if they slip a bit and go full ROM which they are not used to they could get hurt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 15, 2022, 02:38:20 PM
Stop being an asshole. I could easily make fun of you for being bald, but I don't.

I'm respectfully asking questions, despite you being a piece of shit in response to my video, where I'm lifting more than you ever could, or ever have.

On some of my worst reps, yes, the dumbbell is higher up on my head. On about half of my reps, that is about as low as I'd wish to go.

On this one, there isn't a "foot" left to go down:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393234;image)

You could make an argument for a couple more inches there.

As for Eddie Hall - the OBVIOUS thing I was pointing to is that he doesn't come REMOTELY close to locking out.

That's MY issue - and the FUCKING OBVIOUS ISSUE. Eddie is claiming a massive number of reps on a lift where not one single rep was locked out. That's like me bench pressing 225, going 2/3 of the way up, and claiming 40 reps.

My issue is him claiming so many reps, with not one being locked out.

I am not being an asshole I am being honest you are not even close to a proper rep. You refuse to lighten the weight and learn. You are a foot too high not a couple inches. The lower range of motion is where the work is done. You are not getting a single fucking rep with 100lbs if you do it correctly. That is why you dont listen and keep doing the same bullshit again and again you have to much of an ego to grab the 50lb dumbells learn the technique then train with the 75lbs you just want to say you pressed the 100s when you are not even close to a full range of motion. Nobody gives a fuck how many reps you claim with what weight if you want to develop the muscle you need to use correct form you get a fucking 0 from me on all your dumbells sets because you do not break 90 ever with your elbows in bench or shoulder presses you do them both just wrong. Not like close enough like completely wrong

Can you not see the dumbells are at a 45 degree angle to the floor? Your elbows are at 90 degrees yor hands are the height of the top of your head not your shoulders. Keep your wrist straight and the dumbell horizontal and bring your elbows down until your hands and the horizontol dumbells are shoulder level you have a foot to go use less weight
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 02:54:05 PM


Lol, yes, but it is NOT AS BAD AS YOU PORTRAY IT HERE.

I did the screenshots of the first 3-4 reps above - I would have no interest in going more than a few inches lower.

As for this video:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

That gets my personal pass. You may go lower on your reps, but I do not.

In the video above, all the things you claim are happening, but they don't drastically reduce the range of motion or anything.

In my newest video - yes, they reduce it more, but it's still not as bad as you claim, and it's using weight that most likely no one here can lift more on, so the criticizing is absurd.

To some extent, my wrists are my weak link on that lift, so I may never be able to fully correct that, without addressing my wrist weakness.

Oh - one more thing, B. Hank:

Two weeks or so ago, you complained about my dumbbell bench press video - and rightfully so.

Although I knew I'd improve the next time.

Well, guess what?

I bench pressed the 120-lb dumbbells for 10 clean/full reps last time! And then went on to bench press 344-lb.

EXACTLY what I predicted would happen!

You literally attach to some poor form I have in a video, then within two workouts, whatever silly flaw you address is gone.

The little flaws you point out could literally be removed by next workout - and they usually are.

Also, Eddie Hall's elbows are NOT significantly lower than mine.  ::) If they even are at all.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 03:10:50 PM
B. Hank,

I mean - this is my worst rep, and you can visually see where the dumbbell would be, and I would put that under three inches too high.

But see, that's where we differ - I don't think it's necessary to go ALL the way down.

I think as long as the dumbbell touches your delt, without using too much of that sort of cheat method, as it were [lowering the dumbbell on an angle, so one side touches the delt first, lol], it should be fine.

What you're suggesting is sort of the opposite of that - to go as LOW AS POSSIBLE.

I don't think that's necessary.

However, what I wonder is why you don't think locking out your reps for shoulder press is important.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 03:21:01 PM
B. Hank,

I consider this depth to be acceptable:

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 15, 2022, 03:24:10 PM


 ;D

I agree with you Hanky, but I think you should have demonstrated with your pretty pink dumbbells instead of your pretty blue dumbbells.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 15, 2022, 03:31:44 PM
I would suggest keeping pecs smallish as one ages. Older guys look horrible with tits.
Even little guys like Gaspari has big-ole titties these days. Looks horrendous...

Good point, GR.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 15, 2022, 03:33:27 PM
I would suggest keeping pecs smallish as one ages. Older guys look horrible with tits.
Even little guys like Gaspari has big-ole titties these days. Looks horrendous...

How old is Gaspari?

He looks like sh*t.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 15, 2022, 03:40:49 PM
Matt,
What exercises do you do for your chest?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 15, 2022, 03:54:25 PM
Matt,
What exercises do you do for your chest?

Breast feeding underprivileged immigrants.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 15, 2022, 04:07:05 PM
Here is a training video from tonight:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/

I wanted to get the 110's after that set, but couldn't get it!!

I guess I'm not at that level yet.

That gym doesn't have 105-lb dumbbells for some reason...I think I could get the 105's for maybe...4-5, I would say. I wouldn't be shocked if I try next week at my other gym, that I could get the 105's for six good reps. By "good", I mean the form in that video, lol.

Which I tagged B. Hank in on Instagram so that he could review my form!

Here is a posing video from me from last night - this was from just before midnight:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cigz270AuRx/

Some pictures from just a few moments before that video was taken - I think that since dropping the Anadrol to almost zero over the past 15 days, my shoulders have been the first to drop in size. Luckily, my strength has gone up slightly, as I have now transitioned to strength training.

It's honestly a bit funny to be getting stronger as I get smaller, lol. But...that comes down to training.

As I said, my strength training is a placeholder until I get a diet prepared, and commit to it. I don't want to train bodybuilding-style unless my diet follows a bodybuilding model. Why waste hard training on a poor diet / diet too low in protein or overall calories?

What's the expression?:

"You can't outrun a poor diet."

Something like that.

At least if I train for strength, I can presumably get my bench press up to 360-370, even if I'm not eating enough. That's ultimately why I train for strength - there is no dietary discipline required for strength training, lol. It's either "eat everything in sight", and get stronger, or don't eat enough if you are like me - and you can still get stronger!

Bodybuilding is mainly diet, IMO. And steroids. I have no idea why training is emphasized so much, like it is the main component.

Your shoulders are your strongest body part you don't need to prioritize training them.  In my opinion your legs are your weakest.  I would recommend smith machine squats with a weight you can do twelve reps with and leg presses with a weight you can do twenty reps with.

For chest focus on incline bench not flat.

Also, what are you doing for abs?


Your rear double bicepts pose is fine.  Start showing us all the other mandatory poses which will expose your weaknesses and thereby expose what you need to improve. 

You're actually good at dieting, just make sure to keep protein high when you drop calories and incorporate walking.  It's important to evaluate yourself after you drop the fat from all the poses.  Try to expose your weaknesses.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 15, 2022, 04:43:01 PM
Ye mys, in Getbig La La Land, failing to lock out a rep is now perfect form. Then claiming an absurd number of reps that he could maybe get 2/3 of if he locked out.

No, I said it's perfect form if you are going for constant tension.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 15, 2022, 06:30:27 PM


Is the any particular reason you wear clown pants?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 15, 2022, 08:46:26 PM
Stop being an asshole. I could easily make fun of you for being bald, but I don't.

I'm respectfully asking questions, despite you being a piece of shit in response to my video, where I'm lifting more than you ever could, or ever have.

On some of my worst reps, yes, the dumbbell is higher up on my head. On about half of my reps, that is about as low as I'd wish to go.

On this one, there isn't a "foot" left to go down:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393234;image)

You could make an argument for a couple more inches there.

As for Eddie Hall - the OBVIOUS thing I was pointing to is that he doesn't come REMOTELY close to locking out.

That's MY issue - and the FUCKING OBVIOUS ISSUE. Eddie is claiming a massive number of reps on a lift where not one single rep was locked out. That's like me bench pressing 225, going 2/3 of the way up, and claiming 40 reps.

My issue is him claiming so many reps, with not one being locked out.

Here is the best one of Eddie's reps I could find versus my first three reps - so you give no regard to lockout when you lift, B. Hank? You just totally ignored Eddue missed that every single time, then claimed 25 reps?

Why not just use a barbell and avoid all this silliness? It's a lot safer and you don't have to worry about jacking the weights up to the  press position.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 15, 2022, 09:08:16 PM
Why not just use a barbell and avoid all this silliness? It's a lot safer and you don't have to worry about jacking the weights up to the  press position.

I like your posts but disagree that a barbell is "much safer".

Locking into a linear plane might not be the best option for everyone.

But Matt's reps suck.  It's quintessential using weights that are too heavy.

If he did a program like Wendler 5-3-1 he'd figure it out that the reps never have to get to that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 10:56:39 PM
Matt,
What exercises do you do for your chest?

I was primarily doing:

- Flat barbell bench press.
- Flat dumbbell bench press.
- Flat dumbbell fly.
- Pec deck fly.
- Push-ups.

^ So mainly flat presses, and flat bench work.

That being said, for whatever deficit my bench work may have had, let's be honest - my chest will never grow.

My current max bench press is 344. And from the way I got it, it wouldn't shock me if I get 350+ soon - heck, maybe even next week if I feel up to trying it.

My dumbell bench press is currently at 120-lb per side for 10 proper/clean reps.

I was surprised that my last video had form as bad as it was. Now THAT form was bad. My strength is still ok though.

Also, I really feel the need to point out that gyms were closed here for two years, and I've only been allowed to train again since March 24th. Prior to that, gyms were opened and closed, and threatened, etc.

Although in fairness, I don't really think I need to justify my lifts to B. Hank or anyone else - I can currently do 105-lb dumbbells per hand for a clean 4-5 reps.

A friend of mine who owns a gym here who was once #7 at North America's Strongest Man [2013], did 100-lb dumbbells for 54 reps

So it's safe to say no one here can do that many. My point is, everyone here is going to be between 0 and 54 reps - I did 9 reps, but without great form, but is anyone here soooo much stronger than me to judge?

This is what I consider just a hair off from what I consider perfect form:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

As for my recent video...I could go 2-3" lower, especially on the later reps, but I don't consider that too far off. Once I specifically think about keeping my wrists straight, the form will correct itself.

But, as far as I'm concerned, any time your elbow is lower than your shoulder, you have already gone "below parallel" on this particular movement:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 15, 2022, 11:26:46 PM
I was primarily doing:

- Flat barbell bench press.
- Flat dumbbell bench press.
- Flat dumbbell fly.
- Pec deck fly.
- Push-ups.

^ So mainly flat presses, and flat bench work.

That being said, for whatever deficit my bench work may have had, let's be honest - my chest will never grow.

My current max bench press is 344. And from the way I got it, it wouldn't shock me if I get 350+ soon - heck, maybe even next week if I feel up to trying it.

My dumbell bench press is currently at 120-lb per side for 10 proper/clean reps.

I was surprised that my last video had form as bad as it was. Now THAT form was bad. My strength is still ok though.

Also, I really feel the need to point out that gyms were closed here for two years, and I've only been allowed to train again since March 24th. Prior to that, gyms were opened and closed, and threatened, etc.

Although in fairness, I don't really think I need to justify my lifts to B. Hank or anyone else - I can currently do 105-lb dumbbells per hand for a clean 4-5 reps.

A friend of mine who owns a gym here who was once #7 at North America's Strongest Man [2013], did 100-lb dumbbells for 54 reps

So it's safe to say no one here can do that many. My point is, everyone here is going to be between 0 and 54 reps - I did 9 reps, but without great form, but is anyone here soooo much stronger than me to judge?

This is what I consider just a hair off from what I consider perfect form:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

As for my recent video...I could go 2-3" lower, especially on the later reps, but I don't consider that too far off. Once I specifically think about keeping my wrists straight, the form will correct itself.

But, as far as I'm concerned, any time your elbow is lower than your shoulder, you have already gone "below parallel" on this particular movement:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CihCFnegUJc/

Get your diet in order. 

Stop all flat chest movements.  Mostly incline work with a touch of decline work.

No shoulder pressing.  Focus on side delts and traps.

Lots of chins with controlled form. Bent rows.  If you are gonna deadlift, do them last as a finisher and use good form, higher reps and less weight. 

Hacks, presses, ext.  Curls and dumbell stiff leg deads.

Seated and standing calves. 

Abs. 

Cardio.  I like the treadmill.  Don't run.  Walk briskly and add an incline.  Doing cardio may actually help increase your appetite. 

Masturbate as often as needed.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 15, 2022, 11:43:37 PM
I am not being an asshole I am being honest you are not even close to a proper rep.

Your comments are noted, but I am close to a proper rep. But I can accept criticism for my video from yesterday - but you also said the video that I took the screenshot below from was horrible form. Your threshold to call something horrible is much different than mine - I'd call that form imperfect, to be sure. I would not call if horrible.

I'm currently within 22-lb of breaking the CAASA Canadian Strongman Circus Dumbbell record in the 80-kg class. The current record is 156-lb. I can get 135-lb - and I'm probably closer to 145, if I went to a proper coach for critique my list in person and correct a few things. Sometimes you can miss things doing it alone.

That's why it's annoying reading your comments. Yes, my form is loose - I'M ALSO LIFTING 100-LB+ DUMBBELLS FOR REPS.

Like fuck's sake...if it someone was doing half reps with 405-lb on the bench press, I would maybe point that our, but I'd acknowledge that the dude is strong [and in that case - stronger than me].

The point of those strength videos is to show where I'm at right now.

It's also not necessarily a matter of being sloppy in my reps. Notice in the screenshot below how angled my wrists are. I can honestly say, I just thought of this now - that my wrists are just not as strong as my overall strength would predict.

And that's what seems to be going on, B. Hank. I don't think I'm purposely trying to cheat by angling my wrist [and hence the dumbbell] down like that. It's that my wrist is not as strong on that lift as it should be, so the dumbbell is dipping, and that was my signal to press it up again...and that's more or less how this form issue came about.

Weak wrists - I wasn't purposely trying to cheat.

You refuse to lighten the weight and learn. You are a foot too high not a couple inches.

For my own purposes, I would not have any interest in going more than 2-3 inches lower.

I compete in Strongman contests. Maybe you're confusing me for a bodybuilder. I am a lightweight competitive Strongman competing in the 80-kg class [I'm allowed to weigh in at 179-lb].

You're telling me various techniques for perfect development, when that's no longer what I was doing. Perhaps I failed to mention, I just went back to strength training last week.

I am perfectly fine with my form in the video that I took the screenshot below from. I'm glad as long as I roughly hit that range of motion.

And this is where we disagree, B. Hank - I don't see any need to go lower than the picture below...maybe 2-3" more, to really show you're doing full "below parallel" reps.

The lower range of motion is where the work is done. You are not getting a single fucking rep with 100lbs if you do it correctly.

Do you want to put this to a monetary wager?

How about $200 CAD for two full reps with your form, which - as I said - I consider unnecessarily low.

But first I want to see how unnecessarily low that is - can you post a video who meets your standard, who is using decent weight? Call it 60-lb dumbbells or heavier.

How much do you lift with your "elbow-to-the-grass" reps, B. Hank?

That is why you dont listen and keep doing the same bullshit again and again you have to much of an ego to grab the 50lb dumbells learn the technique then train with the 75lbs you just want to say you pressed the 100s when you are not even close to a full range of motion.

Yes, because I am A LIGHTWEIGHT COMPETITIVE STRONGMAN, NOT A FUCKING BODYBUILDER.

I told one classic Getbigger I was going to run a cycle, and he immediately suggested GH, insulin, and all this other shit. I was like - are you fucking kidding me?

Is that what bodybuilders are? Fucking drug addicts?

I had to explain to this guy that I COMPETE IN STRENGTH CONTESTS.

I was open to doing a cycle, but I was just looking to get a boost.

Like, oh I don't know, GAIN 27-LB TEMPORARILY, THEN GRADUALLY GO BACK TO NORMAL.

Why the FUCK would I do a bunch of GH, only go go back to 170-180-190, with no definite intention to use again?

I don't see the point. GH gains would have only made a more drastic change to my physique. And my intention is to go back to drug-free, so if I'm going to look the same at this time next year, why make radical gains, if the plan is to GO OFF EVERYTHING, and look completely the same one year from today.

To be honest, even the gains I made were a bit much. But I have been mentally coping since I ended the cycle two weeks ago.

Just the idea of making a radical change with GH, then shrinking...I did not want to undergo such a transformation.

Nobody gives a fuck how many reps you claim with what weight if you want to develop the muscle you need to use correct form you get a fucking 0 from me on all your dumbells sets because you do not break 90 ever with your elbows in bench or shoulder presses you do them both just wrong. Not like close enough like completely wrong

You mean my dumbbell bench presses?

Yes, they were half reps. But regardless, I just did the 120's for 10 perfect reps last time.

So now what do you have to say?

Marty Champions also said I would not be able to get more than one rep with the 120's, and that ended up being obvious bullshit.

Maybe you guys are projecting?

Keep in mind I haven't been back at the gym long, and while I was on a minimal quantity of steroids, I was NOT training for strength.

Now that I am training for strength, SURPRISE SURPRISE, I am getting stronger.

Can you not see the dumbells are at a 45 degree angle to the floor? Your elbows are at 90 degrees yor hands are the height of the top of your head not your shoulders. Keep your wrist straight and the dumbell horizontal and bring your elbows down until your hands and the horizontol dumbells are shoulder level you have a foot to go use less weight

I don't have a foot to go. You need to stop with that - it's absolute balderdash.

A few more inches, and those dumbbells would be buried.

Didn't you believe Planet Fitness was giving away unlimited free pizza on Tuesday nights, or something?

Do you realize how completely absurd what a belief that is? Yet you fell for it.

Back to my form - although you made absurd claims such as me needing to lower the weight another foot down, I should point out that thanks to your comments, I now realize that my wrists may be a weak link for me in this movement.

My wrists are not strong. I don't think I can much help that I dip the dumbbell like that.

I'm glad you caught that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 16, 2022, 12:15:39 AM


jeez since you came off to get your bloodwork done you cant even fill a fucking t-shirt
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 02:58:35 AM
Your shoulders are your strongest body part you don't need to prioritize training them.  In my opinion your legs are your weakest.  I would recommend smith machine squats with a weight you can do twelve reps with and leg presses with a weight you can do twenty reps with.

For chest focus on incline bench not flat.

Also, what are you doing for abs?


Your rear double bicepts pose is fine.  Start showing us all the other mandatory poses which will expose your weaknesses and thereby expose what you need to improve. 

You're actually good at dieting, just make sure to keep protein high when you drop calories and incorporate walking.  It's important to evaluate yourself after you drop the fat from all the poses.  Try to expose your weaknesses.

Palumboism - do you know if I have Palumboism?

In the 2005 versus present-day comparison below...is that Palumboism?

At least on this question, all my other mandatory poses would fit d roughly the same picture. What I am saying is: if I have Palumboism, it should be discernible from this comparison.

What do you think?

Regarding my legs, there is some potential for improvement despite my age [which I would think would make some improvements nearly impossible], but with my chest - I just don't see it happening.

Ever.

I mean, how can anyone get to a 345 bench press and not have a chest?

I attribute it to bad genetics.

As you said - I'm already good at dieting. The issue is not keeping my protein high enough.

Out of curiosity, do you have a cutting diet for me, or some guidelines I can follow as I transition off-cycle?

The only possibility for my chest - maybe - is that if I get leaner, perhaps my chest will show a bit better.

I did get my calories way up for this cycle - but I would not commit to another cycle unless I had my diet fully on-point.

I find a respond pretty well to improvements to my diet + adding gear. My deficit was always calories, and not using gear [barely/rarely].

When anyone ever mentions training...well...we can all improve our training. But how will my training help me improve if I'm eating 90g protein daily, like I traditionally have?

Again, my deficit is diet.

Training refinements won't do much if I am deficient in protein or overall calories.

Thank you for the feedback, Palumboism. Great post.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 16, 2022, 03:15:50 AM


Again, my deficit is diet.


No, your deficit is your mong brain.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 03:49:05 AM
I am not being an asshole I am being honest you are not even close to a proper rep. You refuse to lighten the weight and learn. You are a foot too high not a couple inches. The lower range of motion is where the work is done. You are not getting a single fucking rep with 100lbs if you do it correctly. That is why you dont listen and keep doing the same bullshit again and again you have to much of an ego to grab the 50lb dumbells learn the technique then train with the 75lbs you just want to say you pressed the 100s when you are not even close to a full range of motion. Nobody gives a fuck how many reps you claim with what weight if you want to develop the muscle you need to use correct form you get a fucking 0 from me on all your dumbells sets because you do not break 90 ever with your elbows in bench or shoulder presses you do them both just wrong. Not like close enough like completely wrong

Can you not see the dumbells are at a 45 degree angle to the floor? Your elbows are at 90 degrees yor hands are the height of the top of your head not your shoulders. Keep your wrist straight and the dumbell horizontal and bring your elbows down until your hands and the horizontol dumbells are shoulder level you have a foot to go use less weight

And this is where you lost me.

You went from credible post, pointing to a training deficit, to wild exaggeration.

Again - I am training for strength right now. I have contest coming up, and that's my focus right now. I do my reps with a limited range of motion for the same reason why Eddie Hall didn't lock out his reps: he's still getting stronger in the range he is performing the lift.

Consider that in Strongman, all that matters is locking the weight out. So I don't fret too much over refined training. Strongman is not particularly refined, frankly. Powerlifting is refined, and that's why I prefer Strongman. Bodybuilding is refined in other ways.

Also, we disagree on how far we need to lower the weight. As I said, I am sufficient with my range in my Instagram video - screenshot below.

Perhaps you don't think that's enough depth, but I am quite pleased with that. But I still don't have a whole foot to go down, regardless. By my own standards, I'd be fine with 2-3". But even if I went as far as I can physically go down, I don't have a whole foot left to go down.

Attached is my depth from the video from the other day, and finally - Eddie Hall's depth.

I say, the depth in the first picture is fine. I'd take it down another 2-3" from yesterday, but I would not go lower than that. I don't personally think it's necessary. But also keep in mind - I'm trying to get stronger now, which I am. I am no longer training for physique improvement.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 16, 2022, 03:50:48 AM
Lol, yes, but it is NOT AS BAD AS YOU PORTRAY IT HERE.

I did the screenshots of the first 3-4 reps above - I would have no interest in going more than a few inches lower.

As for this video:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CdzEcekASYH/

That gets my personal pass. You may go lower on your reps, but I do not.

In the video above, all the things you claim are happening, but they don't drastically reduce the range of motion or anything.

In my newest video - yes, they reduce it more, but it's still not as bad as you claim, and it's using weight that most likely no one here can lift more on, so the criticizing is absurd.

To some extent, my wrists are my weak link on that lift, so I may never be able to fully correct that, without addressing my wrist weakness.

Oh - one more thing, B. Hank:

Two weeks or so ago, you complained about my dumbbell bench press video - and rightfully so.

Although I knew I'd improve the next time.

Well, guess what?

I bench pressed the 120-lb dumbbells for 10 clean/full reps last time! And then went on to bench press 344-lb.

EXACTLY what I predicted would happen!

You literally attach to some poor form I have in a video, then within two workouts, whatever silly flaw you address is gone.

The little flaws you point out could literally be removed by next workout - and they usually are.

Also, Eddie Hall's elbows are NOT significantly lower than mine.  ::) If they even are at all.

You are doing the exact same thing you are a foot too high
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 16, 2022, 03:51:39 AM
B. Hank,

I mean - this is my worst rep, and you can visually see where the dumbbell would be, and I would put that under three inches too high.

But see, that's where we differ - I don't think it's necessary to go ALL the way down.

I think as long as the dumbbell touches your delt, without using too much of that sort of cheat method, as it were [lowering the dumbbell on an angle, so one side touches the delt first, lol], it should be fine.

What you're suggesting is sort of the opposite of that - to go as LOW AS POSSIBLE.

I don't think that's necessary.

However, what I wonder is why you don't think locking out your reps for shoulder press is important.

You are a foot too high
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 16, 2022, 03:56:20 AM
Your comments are noted, but I am close to a proper rep. But I can accept criticism for my video from yesterday - but you also said the video that I took the screenshot below from was horrible form. Your threshold to call something horrible is much different than mine - I'd call that form imperfect, to be sure. I would not call if horrible.

I'm currently within 22-lb of breaking the CAASA Canadian Strongman Circus Dumbbell record in the 80-kg class. The current record is 156-lb. I can get 135-lb - and I'm probably closer to 145, if I went to a proper coach for critique my list in person and correct a few things. Sometimes you can miss things doing it alone.

That's why it's annoying reading your comments. Yes, my form is loose - I'M ALSO LIFTING 100-LB+ DUMBBELLS FOR REPS.

Like fuck's sake...if it someone was doing half reps with 405-lb on the bench press, I would maybe point that our, but I'd acknowledge that the dude is strong [and in that case - stronger than me].

The point of those strength videos is to show where I'm at right now.

It's also not necessarily a matter of being sloppy in my reps. Notice in the screenshot below how angled my wrists are. I can honestly say, I just thought of this now - that my wrists are just not as strong as my overall strength would predict.

And that's what seems to be going on, B. Hank. I don't think I'm purposely trying to cheat by angling my wrist [and hence the dumbbell] down like that. It's that my wrist is not as strong on that lift as it should be, so the dumbbell is dipping, and that was my signal to press it up again...and that's more or less how this form issue came about.

Weak wrists - I wasn't purposely trying to cheat.

For my own purposes, I would not have any interest in going more than 2-3 inches lower.

I compete in Strongman contests. Maybe you're confusing me for a bodybuilder. I am a lightweight competitive Strongman competing in the 80-kg class [I'm allowed to weigh in at 179-lb].

You're telling me various techniques for perfect development, when that's no longer what I was doing. Perhaps I failed to mention, I just went back to strength training last week.

I am perfectly fine with my form in the video that I took the screenshot below from. I'm glad as long as I roughly hit that range of motion.

And this is where we disagree, B. Hank - I don't see any need to go lower than the picture below...maybe 2-3" more, to really show you're doing full "below parallel" reps.

Do you want to put this to a monetary wager?

How about $200 CAD for two full reps with your form, which - as I said - I consider unnecessarily low.

But first I want to see how unnecessarily low that is - can you post a video who meets your standard, who is using decent weight? Call it 60-lb dumbbells or heavier.

How much do you lift with your "elbow-to-the-grass" reps, B. Hank?

Yes, because I am A LIGHTWEIGHT COMPETITIVE STRONGMAN, NOT A FUCKING BODYBUILDER.

I told one classic Getbigger I was going to run a cycle, and he immediately suggested GH, insulin, and all this other shit. I was like - are you fucking kidding me?

Is that what bodybuilders are? Fucking drug addicts?

I had to explain to this guy that I COMPETE IN STRENGTH CONTESTS.

I was open to doing a cycle, but I was just looking to get a boost.

Like, oh I don't know, GAIN 27-LB TEMPORARILY, THEN GRADUALLY GO BACK TO NORMAL.

Why the FUCK would I do a bunch of GH, only go go back to 170-180-190, with no definite intention to use again?

I don't see the point. GH gains would have only made a more drastic change to my physique. And my intention is to go back to drug-free, so if I'm going to look the same at this time next year, why make radical gains, if the plan is to GO OFF EVERYTHING, and look completely the same one year from today.

To be honest, even the gains I made were a bit much. But I have been mentally coping since I ended the cycle two weeks ago.

Just the idea of making a radical change with GH, then shrinking...I did not want to undergo such a transformation.

You mean my dumbbell bench presses?

Yes, they were half reps. But regardless, I just did the 120's for 10 perfect reps last time.

So now what do you have to say?

Marty Champions also said I would not be able to get more than one rep with the 120's, and that ended up being obvious bullshit.

Maybe you guys are projecting?

Keep in mind I haven't been back at the gym long, and while I was on a minimal quantity of steroids, I was NOT training for strength.

Now that I am training for strength, SURPRISE SURPRISE, I am getting stronger.

I don't have a foot to go. You need to stop with that - it's absolute balderdash.

A few more inches, and those dumbbells would be buried.

Didn't you believe Planet Fitness was giving away unlimited free pizza on Tuesday nights, or something?

Do you realize how completely absurd what a belief that is? Yet you fell for it.

Back to my form - although you made absurd claims such as me needing to lower the weight another foot down, I should point out that thanks to your comments, I now realize that my wrists may be a weak link for me in this movement.

My wrists are not strong. I don't think I can much help that I dip the dumbbell like that.

I'm glad you caught that.

You are a foot too high you are not even close to doing one single decent rep much less 10 just keep lying to yourself instead of listening and learning
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 03:59:34 AM
You are doing the exact same thing you are a foot too high

So you think this depth is a full foot too high?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393302;image)

Upon rewatching the video, I think some of my reps are actually pretty close to my own personal standard.

I agree that I could go down a bit more there, but I'm not particularly concerned about that form.

Also, you are pushing the notion that training matters a lot. It doesn't. Not if I go back to eating 90g protein daily. Look how much progress I made just doubling my calories to 2,400 daily + running minimal gear.

Yes, I did change my training...but I really don't think that was THE factor.

There were three factors:

- Doubling my calories.
- Muscle memory from the pandemic gym closures.
- And of course, steroids.

But training?

Pfft.

Like a man capable of handling 100-lb dumbbells overhead doesn't know how to train properly.

If I want to improve, I will eat more, and consider running more gear.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 04:00:50 AM
No, your deficit is your mong brain.

If you want to engage with me, then engage. If you're just going to attack me for no reason, I'd rather not talk to you. Form an argument if you have a criticism. If you are just going to be rude to me for no reason, I should just as well not read your posts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 04:06:33 AM
You are a foot too high you are not even close to doing one single decent rep much less 10 just keep lying to yourself instead of listening and learning

It's not a foot to high.

It may be 6.45 inches too high max.

Call it 7.

For strength training, I get stronger in that range of motion.

For bodybuilding, it may not be ideal, but I'm focusing on strength until I get a diet to follow.

So if you have a diet for me, post it.

Training is not as important as diet. Yet we all act like it is.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 04:17:51 AM
B. Hank,

Wouldn't this be the length that I am falling short?

Basically, get the dumbbell to touch, with the dumbbell parallel to the floor, rather than get it to touch by dipping the dumbbell to one side?

Or are you suggesting going even lower than that?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 04:28:08 AM
Palumboism:

Would you say I have Palumboism?

2006 versus present-day:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 04:33:00 AM
B. Hank, how about you? Are you familiar with Palumboism?

Is there any way to get it, or will everyone get it, just from natural aging?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 16, 2022, 04:35:54 AM
You are a foot too high

I believe this channel can be great!

"Team Bhank" Merch, etc...

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 04:36:31 AM
Hit just one more double biceps backshot Matt......I double dare dog you.....I`ll leap through my screen and strangle you.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 04:38:16 AM
Hit just one more double biceps backshot Matt......I double dare dog you.....I`ll leap through my screen and strangle you.  :D

It's really my only good shot!

That was thanks for my delts...but my back has actually improved a bit...but I'm sensing Palumboism is setting in.

What do you think, wes?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 04:42:32 AM
Palumboism  ???

Just get on a treadmill and eat right ya` chubby prick !   ;D

There is no mystery,you fucked up that ridiculous so called cycle cuz when you do gear you just don`t eat more like Hanky does,you eat better.

I won`t even go into that so called cycle cuz you`re a raving hypochondriac.

Send me the rest of your gear,I`ll include it into a proper cycle.

12.5 mgs . of Anadrol  ???  WHO DOES THAT ?

What more need be said.... then you did that ridiculously small amount erratically like every other few days or once a week......WHO DOES THAT ?

Ever hear that drugs have this little thing called a HALFLIFE ?

Dude,do yourself a favor and get lean and stay natural.

You look worse instead of better......you gained fat and water with minimal lean tissue.......could have done better or just as good, without the gear like McWay told you for the results you never got.

I hope you dont hate me,not that I give a fuck.....just keeping it real.

Godspeed !
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: beakdoctor on September 16, 2022, 04:57:30 AM
Matt, I think Palumboism is drug induced. Too much gear over the years, body stops responding, also training intensity begins to wane a bit due to lack of progress. So an attempt to overcome the regression by using more / different shit, like oil for example only accelerates the deterioration.

You haven't abused gear enough to have any kind of Palumboism. . You've barely used at all. But you're older now so your body won't respond the same as it would've 10 years ago.

The biggest issue is a lot of guys gave you advice on how to really maximize the cycle you just did and it doesn't sound like you took their advice so it's going to be very difficult to keep those gains.

I read something once : You're body is only going to respond to so many cycles, there is a limit, so if you're going to do it then do it right.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 05:08:24 AM
Doc,his body will respond to 4 CLEAN meals a day and 30-45 minutes on a treadmill 5-6 days a week.....he doesn`t work and hes heading for 50......what`s he got to lose except bodyfat .....this shit don`t get easier as you age.

Re-think your lifestyle Matt as far as training and diet are concerned and do the right thing.....for you and your kids..............you tubby fuck!  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 16, 2022, 05:16:04 AM
There is no such thing as palumboism guys just lose size then try and gain it back and wind up with a big belly and smaller arms and legs.

Matt you have 2 good knees and no job and too high of a bodyfat level. Get more active start walking daily join a sport team get a dog pick up an outdoor hobby that involves exercise swim laps at your gym
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on September 16, 2022, 07:34:04 AM
I believe this channel can be great!

"Team Bhank" Merch, etc...



Yes, we definitely need more "Hankins's Morning Minutes". Perhaps a longer series - The Cocoon with Brian WH Hankins (full name and initials to make it sound more scientific :) ). 

I also appreciate that Brian was in such a hurry to help young Matt, that he couldn't even zip his fly. That's dedication to the craft.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 16, 2022, 07:48:01 AM
I believe this channel can be great!

"Team Bhank" Merch, etc...



Getbig Feuds    :D ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 16, 2022, 08:18:46 AM
All I can say on all this shoulder pressing is that I would come down till dumbbell touches shoulders but most I see only come down to upper arm parallel with floor.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 16, 2022, 09:47:39 AM
So you think this depth is a full foot too high?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393302;image)

Upon rewatching the video, I think some of my reps are actually pretty close to my own personal standard.

I agree that I could go down a bit more there, but I'm not particularly concerned about that form.

Also, you are pushing the notion that training matters a lot. It doesn't. Not if I go back to eating 90g protein daily. Look how much progress I made just doubling my calories to 2,400 daily + running minimal gear.

Yes, I did change my training...but I really don't think that was THE factor.

There were three factors:

- Doubling my calories.
- Muscle memory from the pandemic gym closures.
- And of course, steroids.

But training?

Pfft.

Like a man capable of handling 100-lb dumbbells overhead doesn't know how to train properly.

If I want to improve, I will eat more, and consider running more gear.

THAT DEPTH IS ABSOLUTELY A FOOT TOO HIGH THE DUMBELLS SHOULD BE RESTING ON YOUR GODAMN SHOULDERS AT THE BOTTOM YOU DO NOT APPEAR TO KNOW HOW TO TRAIN AT ALL TOTAL EGO NO CONNECTION

DO YOU NOT SEE YOUR WRIST BENDING 45 DEGREES? DO THOSE DUMBELLLS LOOK HORIZONTOL??? BRING THEM OUT AND DOWN AND KEEP YOUR FOREARM STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 09:51:07 AM
I like your posts but disagree that a barbell is "much safer".

Locking into a linear plane might not be the best option for everyone.

But Matt's reps suck.  It's quintessential using weights that are too heavy.

If he did a program like Wendler 5-3-1 he'd figure it out that the reps never have to get to that.

It may not be. But, some of that can be mitigated by using moderate poundage until you get stronger.

When I first started lifting, people used to swear by the behind-the-neck (BTN) barbell press. But, during the mid-to-late 90s, the BTN press got treated like the plague.

I stopped doing dumbbell presses for shoulders 10 years ago, because they're just a pain (literally) to manipulate after the 120s. When I switched to the barbell, I would initially do laterals first to make sure the medial delts got most of the work.


Now, I have the hang of it and I don't even have to do that anymore. As long as I warm up properly, I can hit my shoulders with the regular barbell shoulder press (or the Smith-Machine) and I feel it mainly in the side delts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 16, 2022, 10:17:00 AM
It may not be. But, some of that can be mitigated by using moderate poundage until you get stronger.

When I first started lifting, people used to swear by the behind-the-neck (BTN) barbell press. But, during the mid-to-late 90s, the BTN press got treated like the plague.

I stopped doing dumbbell presses for shoulders 10 years ago, because they're just a pain (literally) to manipulate after the 120s. When I switched to the barbell, I would initially do laterals first to make sure the medial delts got most of the work.


Now, I have the hang of it and I don't even have to do that anymore. As long as I warm up properly, I can hit my shoulders with the regular barbell shoulder press (or the Smith-Machine) and I feel it mainly in the side debts.

That's cool that it worked.  BTN presses are awful IMO, but I remember doing them all the same.

Probably why I've had two clavicle excision surgeries, lol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 16, 2022, 10:20:42 AM
Your form looks fine to me, Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 16, 2022, 10:58:39 AM
There is no such thing as palumboism guys just lose size then try and gain it back and wind up with a big belly and smaller arms and legs.

Matt you have 2 good knees and no job and too high of a bodyfat level. Get more active start walking daily join a sport team get a dog pick up an outdoor hobby that involves exercise swim laps at your gym
story of your life


and get the guy who has only been working for 4 weeks
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on September 16, 2022, 11:59:56 AM
Palumboism:

Would you say I have Palumboism?

2006 versus present-day:

Matt
No Hate here, Just what i see.

you're just a bigger & fatter version of your 2006 self .
No Change in body proportions - all parts that were lacking are still proportionally lacking in comparison to the others as they were in 2006.

it's your Training that is the issue - your not looking at yourself as a bodybuilder and Clearly not training as one .

If your goal was just to be heavier version of yourself you have achieved that.
If you had trained & added size as a bodybuilder you'd look a lot better
Physically -
Mind all have Different goals
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 16, 2022, 04:51:06 PM
Two of the worst responders (Matt and bhanks) to PEDS to ever Grace this forum, yet given bodybuilding advice to each other.

Only on getbig :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 05:14:13 PM
Two of the worst responders (Matt and bhanks) to PEDS to ever Grace this forum, yet given bodybuilding advice to each other.

Only on getbig :D :D :D :D
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 16, 2022, 05:25:18 PM
Two of the worst responders (Matt and bhanks) to PEDS to ever Grace this forum, yet given bodybuilding advice to each other.

Only on getbig :D :D :D :D

The two most narcissistic know-it-alls we have.

It's funny to watch.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 16, 2022, 05:47:41 PM

This gimpy ass fool is doing lifting videos now? This is going to be classic! ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 05:57:56 PM
That's cool that it worked.  BTN presses are awful IMO, but I remember doing them all the same.

Probably why I've had two clavicle excision surgeries, lol.

Another way I made sure the barbell press hit mainly my side delts is to make sure the seat is STRAIGHT UP, not at a 10o angle. That (and initially doing laterals) was why I stopped doing BTNs. I never really had any shoulder issues from them. Then again, when I mainly did them was in my beginner stage, when all I had was cement weights.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 06:38:09 PM
Another way I made sure the barbell press hit mainly my side delts is to make sure the seat is STRAIGHT UP, not at a 10o angle. That (and initially doing laterals) was why I stopped doing BTNs. I never really had any shoulder issues from them. Then again, when I mainly did them was in my beginner stage, when all I had was cement weights.
McWay,if you haven`t already give Bradford Presses a try.......I swear by them.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 06:47:26 PM
McWay,if you haven`t already give Bradford Presses a try.......I swear by them.

Is that where you do a regular barbell press, followed by a BTN press, which counts as one rep?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 16, 2022, 06:57:52 PM
Two of the worst responders (Matt and bhanks) to PEDS to ever Grace this forum, yet given bodybuilding advice to each other.

Only on getbig :D :D :D :D

Ha-ha!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 06:59:45 PM
No, I said it's perfect form if you are going for constant tension.

None of which should count for full reps.

The amount of energy Eddie Hall is saving  by not locking out EVERY SINGLE REP is energy that I could easily put in to lowering my weight to get it as low as he does - which is not much lower than how low I lower it.

Anyway, I agree that for constant tension, Eddie's form is perfect. I do somewhat take issue with Eddie claiming a record for pressing a particular weight for reps, where he literally doesn't lock out one single rep. However, I can give Eddie the pass because even GIVEN his insufficient form, he is lifting a weight that no one else can likely lift [a few exceptions apply].
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 16, 2022, 07:03:43 PM
None of which should count for full reps.

The amount of energy Eddie Hall is saving  by not locking out EVERY SINGLE REP is energy that I could easily put in to lowering my weight to get it as low as he does - which is not much lower than how low I lower it.

Anyway, I agree that for constant tension, Eddie's form is perfect. I do somewhat take issue with Eddie claiming a record for pressing a particular weight for reps, where he literally doesn't lock out one single rep. However, I can give Eddie the pass because even GIVEN his insufficient form, he is lifting a weight that no one else can likely lift [a few exceptions apply].

No need to lock out every rep. Unless you are focusing on lockout strength.

For strength athletes, it's considered a non-lift if you don't lock it out, typically. But when going for high reps they don't always hold it against you.

For stimulating muscle growth, it's best to not lock out fully.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 07:04:20 PM
I like your posts but disagree that a barbell is "much safer".

Locking into a linear plane might not be the best option for everyone.

But Matt's reps suck.  It's quintessential using weights that are too heavy.

If he did a program like Wendler 5-3-1 he'd figure it out that the reps never have to get to that.

But Eddie Hall going 60% of the way up is "perfect form" to you? Lmao.

With the energy I would save skipping on the top or the rep range doing it Eddie's style, I'd likely get the same or close to the same number of reps as I did my way. And I'd have "perfect form" to you. Yes, perfect form is approaching nowhere near lockout on each rep:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393447;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 07:14:05 PM
No need to lock out every rep. Unless you are focusing on lockout strength.

For strength athletes, it's considered a non-lift if you don't lock it out, typically. But when going for high reps they don't always hold it against you.

For stimulating muscle growth, it's best to not lock out fully.

With the amount of energy Eddie is saving by not bringing the numbers up 4-6", I could put that energy into lowering my reps by that same amount. That would add reps, and then I'd get Getbig's pass for "perfect form" apparently [only on Getbig do half reps count as perfect form and bad form on the same page of the same thread].

Of course in reality, there are flaws in both my form [on the lower end] and on Eddie's form [who doesn't come CLOSE to locking out any single rep].

My expectation was by posting that video of Eddie, that the people trashing my lift would point to that OBVIOUS flaw in Eddie's form.

Why would I take someone as credible who does that? It's now obvious to me that no matter how I improve my form, B. Hank will still trash it.

Hey B. Hank - at least I'm not bald and ugly, you stupid shit.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 16, 2022, 07:25:02 PM
.
Hey B. Hank - at least I'm not bald and ugly, you stupid shit.


That's rather personal don't you think, Matt?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 07:26:13 PM
His elbows are below his shoulders yours are not even close

So you just completely ignored the fact that HE IS ONLY GOING 60% OF THE WAY UP,. you stupid sack of shit??

So you're saying I wouldn't be able to do more reps since I'm saving energy by not going a full range of motion, and then you see a video of Eddie OBVIOUSLY DOING THE SAME THING, and then you ignore it??

Dumb fuck.

The correct response is that Eddie is not doing full reps. OBVIOUSLY.

While you could argue that I save more energy by not going full depth than Eddie saves by not locking out, either way, significant energy is saved.

Furthermore - YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT - you could argue I couldn't handle that much weight if I did the full range of motion IF IT WASN'T A FUCKING WEIGHT I COULD HANDLE FOR TEN FUCKING REPS.

If a person does a one rep max bench press but doesn't go all the way down, you could argue - he can't do that weight. But if he does that for TEN REPS, then he very clearly CAN DO THAT WEIGHT, and the only argument is for how many reps he can do it.

Whether I could only do 8, 6, or even only 4, I CAN PRESS 100-LB DUMBBELLS FOR REPS.

As a matter of fact, you dumb mother fucker, I can literally hold 100-lb dumbbells on my shoulders, wait two seconds, and press it up, completely at rest.

So YES, I can do that weight. Even if I only get five reps with the 100-lb dumbbells, I can still get it.

You critiquing my form is one thing - you claiming I need to go down another foot on what is an obviously lift [and stronger than ANYTHING you have ever done], and saying I couldn't get any reps is another matter entirely.

As I said, a few more inches down would be sufficient by MY standards. Shoulder press is not a lift where most people have a uniform view of what is sufficient depth - and the instructional videos online show that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 16, 2022, 07:32:29 PM
Two of the worst responders (Matt and bhanks) to PEDS to ever Grace this forum, yet given bodybuilding advice to each other.

Only on getbig :D :D :D :D

Too Bhankys credit at least with some of his training/form comments he seems to know what he's talking about.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 07:36:12 PM
That's rather personal don't you think, Matt?

Yes it is. What about it?

The ugly fuck lost credibility with me when he shit on my form, and then ignored Eddie Hall not locking out any of his reps when he did it. B. Hank's claim is that I'm saving energy, and lifting more weight than I could otherwise lift by skimping on the bottom range of motion. Well, WHAT IN THE FUCK do you think happens when you fail to lock out every single fucking rep?

YOU SAVE ENERGY, FUCKING OBVIOUSLY.

So if I used Eddie Hall's supposedly perfect form, I'D GET THE SAME NUMBER OF FUCKING REPS ANYWAY, AND GET B. HANK'S PASS FOR PERFECT FORM.

Scratch that - I'd maybe get two reps less.

But either way - the audacity of this guy saying my form helps me save energy and lift more, while he then gives the pass to another style that saves energy and helps a person lift more...unbelievable.

Do you think skipping out on THIS MUCH of the press wouldn't allow a person to do more reps?!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393447;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393451;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 07:45:19 PM
Two of the worst responders (Matt and bhanks) to PEDS to ever Grace this forum, yet given bodybuilding advice to each other.

Only on getbig :D :D :D :D

Gaining 27-lb on 16mg Anadrol daily for two months is a bad response?

How is that a bad response? It's about the best response a person can possibly ever hope for, and is probably in thx top 1%.

As for B. Hank's response - it really depends on how much gear he uses. If he's using IFBB pro level doses, then his response is pretty bad. If he's using the amount I am, then I'd say his response is excellent.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 16, 2022, 07:49:06 PM
But Eddie Hall going 60% of the way up is "perfect form" to you? Lmao.

With the energy I would save skipping on the top or the rep range doing it Eddie's style, I'd likely get the same or close to the same number of reps as I did my way. And I'd have "perfect form" to you. Yes, perfect form is approaching nowhere near lockout on each rep:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393447;image)

Stop worrying about Eddie Hall, someone who is elite in his field, and at the top tier of what he does.  It has nothing to do with you.  There is literally no comparison.

But once again, his "perfect form" is perfect WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF WHAT HE WAS DOING.

He could have done full lockout as well, albeit not as many reps, yet still full ROM and no shaky shakes.

You're using weights near your 1RM, with broken form.  If you read Wendler 5-3-1, a well renowned STRENGTH program, you'd know you'd never be in a situation doing the epilepsy reps you seem to be bragging about.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SGT BARNES on September 16, 2022, 07:51:22 PM
This is the guy who says he is a monster that people stare at !  Hahahahahahahaa

dude is fucking swimming in a medium shirt looking like hes never been near a gym...hahahaha

19 inch arms! hahahahahah 19 inch neck! more hahahahahahahahahaa

broski even making videos with his fly open! hahahahahahahaha CLOOOOWWWWWN



Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 08:10:37 PM
Palumboism - do you know if I have Palumboism?

In the 2005 versus present-day comparison below...is that Palumboism?

At least on this question, all my other mandatory poses would fit d roughly the same picture. What I am saying is: if I have Palumboism, it should be discernible from this comparison.

What do you think?

Regarding my legs, there is some potential for improvement despite my age [which I would think would make some improvements nearly impossible], but with my chest - I just don't see it happening.

Ever.

I mean, how can anyone get to a 345 bench press and not have a chest?

That's easy!

1. You hump the weight up, to the point where you nearly castrate yourself on the ceiling fan.

2. Your grip is too narrow

3. You bounce the bar off your chest or ribcage

4. You let the delts and triceps take too much of the load.

Quit worrying about 1-rep maxes. When you can hit decent poundages for 7-10 reps, business will pick up. Plus, there are other chest exercises that you simply REFUSE to utilize (i.e. dips and incline presses).



I attribute it to bad genetics.

As you said - I'm already good at dieting. The issue is not keeping my protein high enough.

Out of curiosity, do you have a cutting diet for me, or some guidelines I can follow as I transition off-cycle?

The only possibility for my chest - maybe - is that if I get leaner, perhaps my chest will show a bit better.

No, you're not good at dieting (as in keeping as much muscle as possible, while shedding bodyfat). You simply know how to drop weight, losing almost as much muscle as bodyfat.



I did get my calories way up for this cycle - but I would not commit to another cycle unless I had my diet fully on-point.

I find a respond pretty well to improvements to my diet + adding gear. My deficit was always calories, and not using gear [barely/rarely].

When anyone ever mentions training...well...we can all improve our training. But how will my training help me improve if I'm eating 90g protein daily, like I traditionally have?

Again, my deficit is diet.

Training refinements won't do much if I am deficient in protein or overall calories.


Are you really this daft? How much crack did you smoke to think you could get big on 90g of protein?

I (and others) have been telling you this for WEEKS, if not MONTHS, on thread after thread after thread. Steroids or no steroids, you NEED FOOD (quality and quality) to GROW. What you can't eat in solid food, you drink in liquid food.

You know what to do; you're simply too blasted LAZY to do it, period.

And spare us the excuses of your alleged concern for your health. No one is buying it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 16, 2022, 08:13:55 PM
Eddie Hall perfectly explains his perfect technique.

"Eddie hall 60kg shoulder press. (Constant pressure technique)
40 powerful reps with 60kg dumbells with constant weight kept on the shoulders.
No resting at the top... This method is used to build explosive power off the shoulders. And helps train lactic acid resistance."


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 16, 2022, 08:15:16 PM


You know what to do; you're simply too blasted LAZY to do it, period.



It's not laziness. It's a brain defect.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 08:32:40 PM
Stop worrying about Eddie Hall, someone who is elite in his field, and at the top tier of what he does.  It has nothing to do with you.  There is literally no comparison.

But once again, his "perfect form" is perfect WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF WHAT HE WAS DOING.

He could have done full lockout as well, albeit not as many reps, yet still full ROM and no shaky shakes.

In one of Dave Palumbo Bros vs. Pros events, they bench pressed 225 for reps. Michael Liberatore didn't lock out something like 43 reps, and therefore zero reps were counted. He was wearing headphones at the time, and didn't hear the judge's command to stop. But I agree that we should be completing full reps, if the event in question is a max reps one.

Regarding Eddie:

I would generally take issue with Eddie's form for not locking out, but in his case it's probably a record REGARDLESS, so I'm ok with it.

In other words - handling that much weight for that many reps is pretty impressive, regardless of his form.

Now, on a much smaller scale, relating this to me:

It blows my mind that I post a video of me pressing 100-lb dumbbells for seven reps - which is a good lift by ANY standard - and to have that lift trashed on here.

If the comments were "Strong lift, but you need to go down a few inches more on each rep, so you'd probably get a few less reps if you did that", I'd be like "Ok, cool."

But to shit on a press which is not doubt among the best pressing strength currently on Getbig - that I don't get.

And then to give Eddie a pass despite not locking out, and the subsequent savings of energy that correspond with that...it just makes me wonder if people here are just trashing my reps just to trash them.

Trashing my 120-lb dumbbells bench press is one thing - that was legitimately bad form [keeping in mind gyms JUST opened here again on March 24th, and I haven't been able to get in the groove of properly lifting heavy] - but trashing my dumbbell presses, which were considerably better form, in particular my previous video [below] which really wasn't THAT bad [especially for the weight] is another matter entirely.

My form was slightly off, to be sure, but that's a good weight with ok form.

Even my video bench pressing the 120-lb dumbbells was pretty good, in that it demonstrated good strength.

I mean, I've seen videos of people doing 200-lb dumbbells with bad form, and my response is still - that's strong as hell.

What's more insane about all this is that the Canadian 80kg Circus Dumbbell record is 156-lb, and I am on track to breaking the record.

So to have my presses trashed - my only response is "Seriously??"  ???

My pressing is at a very competitive level for my weight class. Not the best - but just...competitive. And yet I get shit on here. So my response to that is that it makes me question how credible ANY of the criticisms are here.

Walter Sobchak is just some nasty piece of shit, like SquadFatter before him. He criticizes just for the sake of criticizing. Sometimes I don't even want to hear CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM, but at the current time - I do.

But if people are going to make comments like that I need to go a full foot lower, or that I wouldn't be able to get any reps with the 100-lb dumbbells if I improved my form [bullshit], or that I'm saving energy by skimping out on range of motion while giving Eddie Hall the pass for skimping out on his range of motion as well, then I just have to wonder - is this constructive criticism, or people on here trashing me just for the sake of trashing me?

If it's the latter, I would just as well prefer not to take such comments seriously.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393300;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 08:35:08 PM
Is that where you do a regular barbell press, followed by a BTN press, which counts as one rep?
Yes it is but at the top of the front press,you just clear the top of your head......no lockout,then behind the neck as comfortable as you can without undue pain,then back to the front just clearing the top of the head again.....in essence its front to back clearing the head with no lockout which creates constant tension on the deltoids.

I have no problem doing BTNP though I haven`t done them in eons and opted for Bradfords which I feel is far superior due to the constant tension and no strain on the joints due to locking out.

I hope that was clear.....if not I`m sure YouTube has a tutorial.....kind of hard to explain.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 08:39:01 PM
1. You hump the weight up, to the point where you nearly castrate yourself on the ceiling fan.
LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 08:41:35 PM
Eddie Hall perfectly explains his perfect technique.

"Eddie hall 60kg shoulder press. (Constant pressure technique)
40 powerful reps with 60kg dumbells with constant weight kept on the shoulders.
No resting at the top... This method is used to build explosive power off the shoulders. And helps train lactic acid resistance."



So it's ok to avoid 4-6" of pressing by not locking out, and subsequently use that energy for additional reps, with the same limited range of motion?

Then my response to that is:

I got seven reps using my form...and I could do it again next week using Eddie's form. I'd probably get six reps.

So, I mean - what's the difference? There would be a marginal difference, to be sure, but is it really THAT much different?

So it's bad for me to save energy by skimping on the bottom of the range of motion, but it's cool if I save energy by skimping on the lockout?

...

Ok, so how about next week, I use the same weight again and do it Eddie's style, and get six reps?

Would that be acceptable to you, Flexacon? By your got damn standards?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 08:50:44 PM
Yes it is but at the top of the front press,you just clear the top of your head......no lockout,then behind the neck as comfortable as you can without undue pain,then back to the front just clearing the top of the head again.....in essence its front to back clearing the head with no lockout which creates constant tension on the deltoids.

I have no problem doing BTNP though I haven`t done them in eons and opted for Bradfords which I feel is far superior due to the constant tension and no strain on the joints due to locking out.

I hope that was clear.....if not I`m sure YouTube has a tutorial.....kind of hard to explain.

I'll give those another try, probably on my second weekly upper body workouts (Thursdays). But, instead of using the short barbells that are used for curls, I'll use an Olympic bar and put the rubber-coated 10s (the ones that are the same circumference as the 45s but much thinner) on it.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 08:51:43 PM
That's easy!

1. You hump the weight up, to the point where you nearly castrate yourself on the ceiling fan.

2. Your grip is too narrow

3. You bounce the bar off your chest or ribcage

4. You let the delts and triceps take too much of the load.

Quit worrying about 1-rep maxes. When you can hit decent poundages for 7-10 reps, business will pick up. Plus, there are other chest exercises that you simply REFUSE to utilize (i.e. dips and incline presses).

You're mostly all correct there. But just one thing, MCWAY: what makes you think my chest has ANY potential, regardless?

DO YOU SEE ANY POTENTIAL THERE?? [photo below]

I don't!

But MCWAY - I will give you my word, I will try it your way for at least six months. I may even make some progress! But my chest will still suck.

I am 100% certain of that. Maybe that's just a self-fulfilling prophecy, but...it is what it is.

In fairness, my chest does suck. Whether it has more potential than I personally believe it does is one thing, but regardless - my chest genetics suck, MCWAY!!

No, you're not good at dieting (as in keeping as much muscle as possible, while shedding bodyfat). You simply know how to drop weight, losing almost as much muscle as bodyfat.

In fairness, I tolerate an ultra low calorie diet VERY well.

If I could do that while keeping my protein high, and a few other adjustments that I am aware of...I might be able to nail it next time.

But I'm going to wait until I am 100% certain.


Are
you really this daft? How much crack did you smoke to think you could get big on 90g of protein?

I (and others) have been telling you this for WEEKS, if not MONTHS, on thread after thread after thread. Steroids or no steroids, you NEED FOOD (quality and quality) to GROW. What you can't eat in solid food, you drink in liquid food.

You know what to do; you're simply too blasted LAZY to do it, period.

And spare us the excuses of your alleged concern for your health. No one is buying it.

Health reasons aside, I hate to eat, MCWAY.

I fucking hate to eat.

And it's not just eating - it's the cooking, cleaning, pissing, shitting, etc.

I hate all of that.

That's why I don't eat enough.

Seeing my response this summer from doubling my calories...and damn...I sort of want to eat more!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 08:53:44 PM
LOL...is this a joke?  ;D ;D ;D

I always wanted a chest, but oh well...

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393471;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 09:03:19 PM
You're mostly all correct there. But just one thing, MCWAY: what makes you think my chest has ANY potential, regardless?

DO YOU SEE ANY POTENTIAL THERE?? [photo below]

I don't!

But MCWAY - I will give you my word, I will try it your way for at least six months. I may even make some progress! But my chest will still suck.

Potential don't buy the groceries. And ease up your fixation on the flat-bench. If anything, you should do them LAST. Inclines and weighted dips would be the place to start. When you're too tired to do regular dips, use a dip machine (if your gym has one).

Here's another idea. Since you're so strength-obsessed, have you tried the chains on the end of the bar routine? Both powerlifters and bodybuilders use that from time to time. Powerlifters use it to help them EXPLODE through the sticking point of the bench press; while bodybuilders use them to add more resistance as the bar goes up to SQUEEZE the pecs.



I am 100% certain of that. Maybe that's just a self-fulfilling prophecy, but...it is what it is.

In fairness, my chest does suck. Whether it has more potential than I personally believe it does is one thing, but regardless - my chest genetics suck, MCWAY!!

Again, you've yet to exhaust your methods of training your chest. Another recommendation would be quit training 6 times a week. Drop it to four and train your chest and back TOGETHER. It really helped me years ago boost my strength and size for both body parts.

I do it alternate-style. For example, I do a set of incline barbell presses; rest; then, I hit the barbell rows. Chest and back are like peanut butter and jelly; they just go together!! ;D

If, however, you don't quite feel the pecs, use a pre-exhaust superset (flyes IMMEDIATELY followed by bench press). Your poundage for the press will be much lower, because the pecs will be partially worn out.



In fairness, I tolerate an ultra low calorie diet VERY well.

If I could do that while keeping my protein high, and a few other adjustments that I am aware of...I might be able to nail it next time.

But I'm going to wait until I am 100% certain.

You will NEVER BE 100% certain. Do the best with what you have; mitigate the risks; and just go for it.




Are
Health reasons aside, I hate to eat, MCWAY.

I fucking hate to eat.

And it's not just eating - it's the cooking, cleaning, pissing, shitting, etc.

I hate all of that.

That's why I don't eat enough.

Seeing my response this summer from doubling my calories...and damn...I sort of want to eat more!

That is simple laziness which is easy to overcome.

1. Either cook several days worth of food (particularly meats) in advance; or get cheap canned meats like tuna.

2. What you can't eat, you DRINK....either homemade shakes (i.e. eggs and milk/Greek yogurt) or protein powders/"real meal" shakes/weight gainers.

3. As for cleaning up and using the bathroom, simply man up and do it. Digestive enzymes (or lots of pineapple or papaya) will help your protein digest more efficiently.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 09:11:44 PM
Potential don't buy the groceries. And ease up your fixation on the flat-bench. If anything, you should do them LAST. Inclines and weighted dips would be the place to start. When you're too tired to do regular dips, use a dip machine (if your gym has one).

Here's another idea. Since you're so strength-obsessed, have you tried the chains on the end of the bar routine? Both powerlifters and bodybuilders use that from time to time. Powerlifters use it to help them EXPLODE through the sticking point of the bench press; while bodybuilders use them to add more resistance as the bar goes up to SQUEEZE the pecs.

Potential don't buy the groceries is right. But I don't have potential anyway!

Look, MCWAY - my pecs would improve somewhat under your techniques. I'm not denying that. But my chest would still suck.

Do you remember Layne Norton's legs? That dude was probably squatting 500-lb [or at least 400+], and his legs were still bad! It wasn't until he was squatting 550-600+ that his legs became a strength.

You seem to have this mindset that it's just about hard work. IMO, it as not.

I train for strength, because the results come easily for me. Heck, even when I'm not trying, I'm getting decent results. So I choose to focus on where I get the easiest/best results.

Why spend a year focusing as much as possible to improve my pecs, only to get pecs that are 4/10 instead of 2/10 or 3/10?

In the end, my pecs will still SUCK! They will just suck LESS!

Again, you've yet to exhaust your methods of training your chest. Another recommendation would be quit training 6 times a week. Drop it to four and train your chest and back TOGETHER. It really helped me years ago boost my strength and size for both body parts.

I do it alternate-style. For example, I do a set of incline barbell presses; rest; then, I hit the barbell rows. Chest and back are like peanut butter and jelly; they just go together!! ;D

If, however, you don't quite feel the pecs, use a pre-exhaust superset (flyes IMMEDIATELY followed by bench press). Your poundage for the press will be much lower, because the pecs will be partially worn out.

That would help my chest, but it would still suck.  ;D

You will NEVER BE 100% certain. Do the best with what you have; mitigate the risks; and just go for it.

Do the best with what I have?! Have you bothered looking at my chest pictures?? I have nothing.

Horrible chest. Big bench though.

And look - I know your techniques will work. But my chest would still suck.

That is simple laziness which is easy to overcome.

1. Either cook several days worth of food (particularly meats) in advance; or get cheap canned meats like tuna.

2. What you can't eat, you DRINK....either homemade shakes (i.e. eggs and milk/Greek yogurt) or protein powders/"real meal" shakes/weight gainers.

3. As for cleaning up and using the bathroom, simply man up and do it. Digestive enzymes (or lots of pineapple or papaya) will help your protein digest more efficiently.

^ This matters more than the training advice you and others have been giving me.

If I can keep my calories up, I can keep improving.

I am currently 208-lb. That happened simply from adding calories and steroids.

Having said that, my health concerns are not without merit, MCWAY!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 16, 2022, 09:16:00 PM
I'll give those another try, probably on my second weekly upper body workouts (Thursdays). But, instead of using the short barbells that are used for curls, I'll use an Olympic bar and put the rubber-coated 10s (the ones that are the same circumference as the 45s but much thinner) on it.


Good luck,I hope you like them.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 16, 2022, 09:17:09 PM
Let me get this straight:

 - Weakling Canning posts video to try to attention whore and brag about strength.
 - Receives criticism that the reps are complete shit - and they are.
 - Has temper tantrum meltdown because he didn’t get the response he wanted.
 - Compares himself to world class strongman - proving his complete delusion.
 - Receives more decent criticism.
 - Cries, stomps feet, and holds his breath because once again proven to be an idiot.
 - Changes subject to horseshit chest development - posts weakass steroid pic.

What a fucking crybaby moron.

Here’s what you left out of your posts Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning…Walter Sobchak can properly shoulder press 100 lb dumbbells and make you look like the weak little retard you are.

TITS CANNING AND HIS HALF REPS!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 09:18:11 PM
Potential don't buy the groceries is right. But I don't have potential anyway!

Look, MCWAY - my pecs would improve somewhat under your techniques. I'm not denying that. But my chest would still suck.

Do you remember Layne Norton's legs? That dude was probably squatting 500-lb [or at least 400+], and his legs were still bad! It wasn't until he was squatting 550-600+ that his legs became a strength.

You seem to have this mindset that it's just about hard work. IMO, it as not.

It's not just about hard work. You can work hard doing things WRONG and get no results. It's hard and SMART work that gets it done. That's why I said to lay off the flat bench for a while; or do them LAST after inclines and dips.



I train for strength, because the results come easily for me. Heck, even when I'm not trying, I'm getting decent results. So I choose to focus on where I get the easiest/best results.

Why spend a year focusing as much as possible to improve my pecs, only to get pecs that are 4/10 instead of 2/10 or 3/10?

In the end, my pecs will still SUCK! They will just suck LESS!

And that's why you don't improve. Instead of challenging yourself, you revert to the path of least resistance.

Yet again, you have this bug in your head that strength and size are unrelated. Stronger pecs are bigger pecs. Training for strength ain't just one-rep maxes. It's lifting the MOST weight...with the INTENDED BODYPART doing the work.

You're training for stronger PECS, not just moving the weight from point A to point B. That (and sufficient amount of groceries) will plump them pectorals faster than you think.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 09:23:10 PM

Do the best with what I have?! Have you bothered looking at my chest pictures?? I have nothing.

Horrible chest. Big bench though.

And look - I know your techniques will work. But my chest would still suck.

Your "big bench" doesn't mean jack. Dollars to donuts, it involves those four things I listed earlier. When you start lifting heavy weights for multiple reps....with your PECS primarily, you'll get the result you want.



^ This matters more than the training advice you and others have been giving me.

If I can keep my calories up, I can keep improving.

I am currently 208-lb. That happened simply from adding calories and steroids.

Having said that, my health concerns are not without merit, MCWAY!

I said from the jump, many moons and several threads ago, that your diet was lackluster. I even recommended how you can drink more calories. Does the name "Poor Man's Met-Rx" ring a bell?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 09:24:47 PM
Let me get this straight:

 - Weakling Canning posts video to try to attention whore and brag about strength.
 - Receives criticism that the reps are complete shit - and they are.
 - Has temper tantrum meltdown because he didn’t get the response he wanted.
 - Compares himself to world class strongman - proving his complete delusion.
 - Receives more decent criticism.
 - Cries, stomps feet, and holds his breath because once again proven to be an idiot.
 - Changes subject to horseshit chest development - posts weakass steroid pic.

What a fucking crybaby moron.

Here’s what you left out of your posts Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning…Walter Sobchak can properly shoulder press 100 lb dumbbells and make you look like the weak little retard you are.

TITS CANNING AND HIS HALF REPS!

My reps were not perfect, but they weren't horrible. I would say 90% of people in the gym use form that is worse than mine. Full instructional videos on top websites show form that is worse than mine.



With that being said, let's get to the most important point:

You can't get one rep with 100-lb dumbbells for overhead press. If you could, you could easily post a video with your face blocked out.

But you can't.

So what does it say about you that you can't lift as much as someone you are calling a weakling?

So we are both weaklings - but you are the weaker weakling.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 09:30:21 PM
Your "big bench" doesn't mean jack. Dollars to donuts, it involves those four things I listed earlier. When you start lifting heavy weights for multiple reps....with your PECS primarily, you'll get the result you want.

This is where you're wrong, MCWAY - my pecs can improve, to be sure, but they will never be great.

Although...if I wanted to use higher doses of PED's for longer...they might be ok. But IMO, my chest will always be weak. I will always get the least out of it.

I said from the jump, many moons and several threads ago, that your diet was lackluster. I even recommended how you can drink more calories. Does the name "Poor Man's Met-Rx" ring a bell?

Actually, no. Tell me more about this. I'm very interested.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 16, 2022, 09:38:36 PM
My reps were not perfect, but they weren't horrible. I would say 90% of people in the gym use form that is worse than mine. Full instructional videos on top websites show form that is worse than mine.

With that being said, let's get to the most important point:

You can't get one rep with 100-lb dumbbells for overhead press. If you could, you could easily post a video with your face blocked out.

But you can't.

So what does it say about you that you can't lift as much as someone you are calling a weakling?

So we are both weaklings - but you are the weaker weakling.

Bwahahahahahaha….you can’t lift the weights, you won’t take advice, and your steroid cycle only added bloat and water. You’ve hit the loser trifecta!

Even bhankins is calling you out on your bullshit.

I can just see you and Arce Rehaluk sitting around this winter in the pigsty basement of your mommy’s house crying about how the world is unfair to retards.

Bwahahahahahaha!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 16, 2022, 09:39:11 PM
Gaining 27-lb on 16mg Anadrol daily for two months is a bad response?

How is that a bad response? It's about the best response a person can possibly ever hope for, and is probably in thx top 1%.

Uhhh...reality check: weren't you totally detrained after a very long layoff before you started back with the weird hide and seek Anadrol doses thing?

There are FAR too many variables in play for you to spout percentage one, dude, especially given that you seem improved from a couple of angles at best.  To be blunt, your last pics were surprising, and not in a good way.  Your face looked like you were storing a few kilos of acorns for winter, you had a fold of fat on your chest and you just looked puffy and, if not plain fat, definitely waterlogged.

Quote
As for B. Hank's response - it really depends on how much gear he uses. If he's using IFBB pro level doses, then his response is pretty bad. If he's using the amount I am, then I'd say his response is excellent.

Whatever.

We've all given you good advice.  You ignore it outright, argue when your ego is hurt (has anyone in Getbig history flapped his yap more over justifying sloppy fucking DB shoulder press reps?!), then start all over with every excuse imaginable for why you aren't eating properly, why you continue to do this and that because "hey, something must be right in my training know-how, because I just lifted this!"

Begging the Question defined. 

I think you do train hard.  That's good.  But as we've all told you, lots of the sets you've filmed are ugly and not optimal for any purpose, be they for strength or hypertrophy (and there needn't be the implicit dichotomy there between that you constantly harp on, but that's another story). 

I wish you well, but until you manage to get your head into this, we're all wasting our time offering you advice.  You never listen.  You don't even listen to YOURSELF, for God's sake.  If you did, your posts easily would be half again smaller.  All you gotta do to start is stop repeating the same goddamned point two or three times in one message.

That's all.  Be well, Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 16, 2022, 09:42:05 PM
This is where you're wrong, MCWAY - my pecs can improve, to be sure, but they will never be great.

Although...if I wanted to use higher doses of PED's for longer...they might be ok. But IMO, my chest will always be weak. I will always get the least out of it.

Steroids aren't going to make your pecs better. Quit using the needle as a cop-out for doing the work.



Actually, no. Tell me more about this. I'm very interested.

I mentioned it weeks ago. It's simply six eggs and two cups of milk (ice cream or protein powder for flavoring optional).

I did that back in college over 25 years ago. These days, I'd replace milk with Greek yogurt. It's fare more dense and usually has no lactose. One 5-oz cup of Greek yogurt and three eggs will give you at least 30 grams or protein and 350 calories.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 16, 2022, 09:46:31 PM

1. You hump the weight up, to the point where you nearly castrate yourself on the ceiling fan.


Oh that’s fucking gold….🤣
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 11:02:14 PM
Uhhh...reality check: weren't you totally detrained after a very long layoff before you started back with the weird hide and seek Anadrol doses thing?

There are FAR too many variables in play for you to spout percentage one, dude, especially given that you seem improved from a couple of angles at best.  To be blunt, your last pics were surprising, and not in a good way.  Your face looked like you were storing a few kilos of acorns for winter, you had a fold of fat on your chest and you just looked puffy and, if not plain fat, definitely waterlogged.

And this is why I can't take what you are saying seriously - I JUST FUCKING CAN'T.

The results I got from 15mg of Anadrol are EXACTLY THE RESULTS ANYONE WOULD GET.

As for facial bloat - have you bothered looking at the faces of any competitive pro bodybuilders or Strongmen?

They ALWAYS hold water in their face. And this is partially why I oh rarely used gear. It is NOT worth it to me to run gear if the side effects include having a puffy face, having pimples on my back, or LOSING MY HAIR.

I can say this most sincerely: I would rather keep my hairline than to have a perfect body, even if I could snap my fingers and have it, but at the cost of my hair.

Screw that!

Judging by how I look at 170-210, as far as I can tell, I can be as heavy as 210 without suffering too much face bloat. While my face bloat is NOTHING like your extremely exaggerated depiction of it, it is still more than I would personally want.

Which tells me that 190 may be the optimal body weight.

Also, do you think people will take seriously things you tell them when you massively exaggerate the facts? I can accept that I am holding water due to the minimal Anadrol I ran - but to suggest that I have some out of control water issue. I mean, come on.

But that's the thing - whether some people need to take the opportunity to be an asshole to me rather than just point to the areas I need to improve upon, and advise on them doesn't matter to me. I listen to all advice here IF I think it will help me. Even if someone is only doing it to be an asshole. Likewise, if I think the advice is bad, I'll ignore it.

I DO NOT think my form on the dumbbell press needs to be radically changed, so...I'm not going to radically change it. I will take my depth down a few inches, but certainly not a "foot" - which I literally can't go down that far anyway.

Whatever.

We've all given you good advice.  You ignore it outright, argue when your ego is hurt (has anyone in Getbig history flapped his yap more over justifying sloppy fucking DB shoulder press reps?!),

My dumbbell shoulder press reps were NOT that bad, and nothing you say is going to make me say that they were very bad. I could go down a few more inches - maybe - but my reps were ok.

CASE IN POINT - look at these other videos of people pressing similarly heavy weights. Now tell me, Titus - does even ONE of these lifters utilize as much range of motion as me? Even ONE?











^ ALL experienced lifters, with KinoBody having over a MILLION subscribers, and EVERY SINGLE ONE has a more limited range of motion than me.

In fact, I've been searching YouTube all day, and can't find ANY examples of people using a greater range of motion on dumbbells of 100-lb or heavier.

And that's what really grinds my gears here - I have a press which is no doubt on of the strongest on Getbig, and I post a video with form SLIGHTLY off, and all anyone does is shit one when not ONE of those criticizing me can lift the same weight?

I'm sorry, but fuck that. I am receptive to constructive criticism, but when you have B. Hank telling me I need to go down a foot lower on my presses [something PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for me to do], and Walter Sobchak calling me a "weakling" - AGAIN, FOR A LIFT EASILY IN THE TOP 10 ON THIS BOARD RIGHT NOW - I take issue with that!

Polite, constructive criticism, I can handle, no problem. Insults, and exaggerations on my form which was not great, but was certain not bad, is another matter entirely.

then start all over with every excuse imaginable for why you aren't eating properly, why you continue to do this and that because "hey, something must be right in my training know-how, because I just lifted this!"

Begging the Question defined. 

I think you do train hard.  That's good.  But as we've all told you, lots of the sets you've filmed are ugly and not optimal for any purpose, be they for strength or hypertrophy (and there needn't be the implicit dichotomy there between that you constantly harp on, but that's another story). 

I wish you well, but until you manage to get your head into this, we're all wasting our time offering you advice.  You never listen.  You don't even listen to YOURSELF, for God's sake.  If you did, your posts easily would be half again smaller.  All you gotta do to start is stop repeating the same goddamned point two or three times in one message.

That's all.  Be well, Matt.

No, you're not wasting time offering me advice, Titus. Not you, nor anyone else.

But if people are going to be assholes, suggesting I have a full FOOT left to lower the dumbbells, or that I am a weakling, etc, of course I'm not going to listen.

On one hand, people are saying I'm cheating and getting more reps by not going deep enough, but then I post a video of Eddie Hall doing reps, not ONE OF WHICH was locked out...and not one person mentions that HE is saving energy by never locking out, and that his technique is "perfect no lock form".

Huh?  ???

So let me get this straight:

Next week, if I did the same lift again with the same weight, went LOWER for each rep, but didn't lock out, and ended up getting roughly the same number of reps...would people be ok with that?

If I had to guess...I'd say people would NOT be ok with that, and people would be trashing me for not locking out!!!

Also, you said that my form wasn't going to help me get stronger or bigger. I'd argue that my form does indeed make me get stronger - after all, I did get to a 345 bench press [320 in contest form] by doing what I did. How much stronger would I possibly have gotten at my weight, had I done all these refined techniques?

My training is fine. Not perfect - but fine. But WHY THE FUCK would I focus on changing something which is already fine, and which is NOT the deficit?

My lack of calories is, and always has been, my deficit.

But anyway, Titus: I do take advice, INCLUDING training advice, if it's good advice. So despite B. Hank being an asshole and suggesting I have a foot left to go on those shoulder presses [bullshit], I will be taking his advice and lowering it by 2-3 inches next time.

I also now see that I have weak wrists. I will have to figure out how to strengthen them.

I don't mind being told my form is a bit off - but for B. Hank to say I need to go a full FOOT lower, and that I wouldn't even be able to get one rep with the 100-lb dumbbells is BULLSHIT. I can literally do rest/pause sets with the 100's, for probably two reps at two seconds pause between reps.

It's one thing to say "Lower the weight to get full reps - although you will get a few fewer reps if you do that." It's another thing entirely for him to suggest I can't handle pressing 100-lb dumbbells, which I OBVIOUSLY FUCKING CAN DO as clearly shown in the video!

But ONLY ON GETBIG, can a person be in the top 0.05% of pressing strength in the world, and he trashed for it.  ::)

What's more is that I have been nothing but respectful and complimentive to B. Hank, and he responds like an asshole like that, attacking me on my strength level which I have BEYOND proven myself on.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 16, 2022, 11:37:07 PM
Bwahahahahahaha….you can’t lift the weights, you won’t take advice, and your steroid cycle only added bloat and water. You’ve hit the loser trifecta!

Even bhankins is calling you out on your bullshit.

I can just see you and Arce Rehaluk sitting around this winter in the pigsty basement of your mommy’s house crying about how the world is unfair to retards.

Bwahahahahahaha!

Reading your posts, the first thing that comes to mind is that you are delusional. But you are actually lying.

I put on 27-lb from 16mg Anadrol. That's the best that anyone would hope to have put on, and is exactly what I wanted. If you used 16mg of Anadrol daily for two months, you would get the exact same result, in the beat case scenario. Maybe you'd only gain 15-lb.

My response is exactly what I expected.

My current body fat percentage - which is lower than 95% of men of any age - is a healthy weight to be. I'm not willing to run fat-burners and mess up my heart to take that down a shade.

I'm fine being more muscular, leaner, and stronger than 95% of men.

But just one question, Walter - regarding strength:

I can get t he 100-lb dumbbells for 10 reps on the overhead press at my best [on a good day].

How many reps can you do overhead with the 100's, Walter?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 12:35:02 AM
This is my depth on my WORST rep - literally before my last successful rep:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393262;image)

^ That is form you can be critical of, but even then, I don't have a FOOT left to go down there. Even THAT rep MAY be six inches.

Furthermore, NATURALLY the rep range will diminish as you do more reps! Anyone who has done an 8-rep max would know that.

As for the rep being shaky...shaky reps are still completed reps.  As for WHY my reps are shaky - I would assume my stabilizer muscles need to adjust to heavier weight for lower reps. Which they will now that I'll be training heavy week after week.

And here is what my earlier reps looked like:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393449;image)

I don't care what ANYONE says - there is NOTHING wrong with that form, and go watch ANY video of anyone doing an 8-rep max on YouTube, and they ALL have worse form than that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 12:49:46 AM
https://youtu.be/CdF3p8SQ4pU








^ And meanwhile,  IN THE REAL WORLD, and not in Getbig LA LA Land, EVERYONE lifting 100-lb dumbbells or heavier is using a more limited range of motion than me.

Only on Getbig, can a handful of people - NOT ONE OF WHOM IS STRONGER THAN ME - trash my form.

I mean, what the fuck, it's ONLY 100-lb dumbbells overhead for REPS. Because soooo many people can do that, right?

Right?!

 ::)

As for the bodybuilding advice - I'm training for strength now.  And my lifting like I do will make me stronger.

Next week, I'll get 10 reps with the same form. So I will get stronger.

Keep in mind, I'm not on some wussy bodybuilding program like B. Hank - so going very low using 100+ pound dumbbells will put strain on my rotator cuffs.

So I won't risk going much lower.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 01:15:36 AM
THAT DEPTH IS ABSOLUTELY A FOOT TOO HIGH THE DUMBELLS SHOULD BE RESTING ON YOUR GODAMN SHOULDERS AT THE BOTTOM YOU DO NOT APPEAR TO KNOW HOW TO TRAIN AT ALL TOTAL EGO NO CONNECTION

DO YOU NOT SEE YOUR WRIST BENDING 45 DEGREES? DO THOSE DUMBELLLS LOOK HORIZONTOL??? BRING THEM OUT AND DOWN AND KEEP YOUR FOREARM STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN

It literally physically CANNOT be a foot too high.

This is the distance I could go down - anything close to this would be fine:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393306;image)

Do you have ANY idea how much lower a foot is??

My forearm itself is only 10-11" long - are saying I could somehow lower the dumbbell down to where my elbow is?!

The yellow dots represent maybe 11", max - now tell me: HOW THE FUCK COULD I PHYSICALLY LOWER THE DUMBBELL DOWN TO THE TOP OF MY ABS?

Well...if I had abs. 😂

But seriously - HOW COULD I DO THAT? It's physically impossible!!

That's why I maintain - 2-3 more inches lower would have been perfectly fine.

That being said, there is NOTHING significantly off about my form in the first place! And watching instructional videos on YouTube, as well as videos from all sorts of lifters using an even LOWER range of motion proved to me exactly that.

And on top of that - who the fuck are you to criticize my strength? I'M STRONGER THAN YOU, FOR FUCK'S SAKE. And I got to this strength level by not even using ideal form, apparently.

So imagine how much stronger than you I'd be if I cleaned up my form?

Anyway, I had supported you this entire time, and said nothing but positive things about you, B. Hank. But seeing you as a jealous asshole [sucks to see someone lift what you can't...I know...] who felt the need to criticize me for no reason, all I will say is:

Go fuck yourself!

If you don't have anything positive to say, don't address my post.

It's one thing to say "Lower the depth on your presses - but you likely have to use lower weight." It's another thing entirely to say "You're a foot too high on your form. You need to lower the weight, and you won't be able to get that weight at all."

Furthermore - I CAN PRESS 100-LB DUMBBELLS, LITERALLY WITH A 2-5 SECOND PAUSE.

So for you to say I can't get that weight is absolute BALDERDASH.

Here is an photo of my forearm, which offers objective proof that there is NO WAY that I can go down another foot, lol.

2-3 inches is fine. If I wanted to put unnecessary strain on my rotator cuffs, I'd go lower, but that just puts me at risk for injury. A couple inches lower is fine. Like I said, 2-3", max.

B. Hank - so you're saying I'm supposed to lower the dumbbell all the way down to the lower yellow dot?

YOU STUPID FUCK, HOW WOULD THAT EVEN PHYSICALLY BE POSSIBLE?

Fucking moron!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: dj181 on September 17, 2022, 01:35:34 AM
And this is why I can't take what you are saying seriously - I JUST FUCKING CAN'T.

The results I got from 15mg of Anadrol are EXACTLY THE RESULTS ANYONE WOULD GET.

As for facial float - have you bothered looking at the faces of any competitive pro bodybuilders or Strongmen?

They ALWAYS hold water in their face. And this is partially why I oh rarely used gear. It is NOT worth it to me to run gear if the side effects include having a puffy face, having pimples on my back, or LOSING MY HAIR.

I can say this most sincerely: I would rather keep my hairline than to have a perfect body, even if I could snap my fingers and have it, but at the cost of my hair.

Screw that!

Judging by how I look at 170-210, as far as I can tell, I can be as heavy as 210 without suffering too much face bloat. While my face bloat is NOTHING like your extremely exaggerated depiction of it, it is still more than I would personally want.

Which tells me that 190 may be the optimal body weight.

Also, do you think people will take seriously things you tell them when you massively exaggerate the facts? I can accept that I am holding water due to the minimal Anadrol I ran - but to suggest that I have some our of control water issue. I mean, come on.

But that's the thing - you just need to take their opportunity to be an asshole to me rather than just point to the areas I need to improve upon, and advise on them. I listen to all advice here IF I think it will help me.

I DO NOT think my form on the dumbbell press needs to be radically changed, so...I'm not going to radically change it. I will take my depth down a few inches, but certainly not a "foot" - which I literally can't go down that far anyway.

My dumbbell shoulder press reps were NOT that bad, and nothing you say is going to make me say that they were very bad. I could go down a few more inches - maybe - but my reps were ok.

CASE IN POINT - look at these other videos of people pressing similarly heavy weights. Now tell me, Titus - does even ONE of these lifters utilize as much range of motion as me? Even ONE?











^ ALL experienced lifters, with KinoBody having over a MILLION subscribers, and EVERY SINGLE ONE has a more limited range of motion than me.

In fact, I've been searching YouTube all day, and can't find ANY examples of people using a greater range of motion on dumbbells of 100-lb or heavier.

And that's what really grinds my gears here - I have a press which is no doubt on of the strongest on Getbig, and I post a video with form SLIGHTLY off, and all anyone does is shit one when not ONE of those criticizing me can lift the same weight?

I'm sorry, but fuck that. I am receptive to constructive criticism, but when you have B. Hank telling me I need to go down a foot lower on my presses [something PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for me to do], and Walter Sobchak calling me a "weakling" - AGAIN, FOR A LIFT EASILY IN THE TOP 10 ON THIS BOARD RIGHT NOW - I take issue with that!

Polite, constructive criticism, I can handle, no problem. Insults, and exaggerations on my form which was not great, but was certain not bad, is another matter entirely.

No, you're not wasting time offering me advice, Titus. Not you, nor anyone else.

But if people are going to be assholes, suggesting I have a full FOOT left to lower the dumbbells, or that I am a weakling, etc, of course I'm not going to listen.

On one hand, people are saying I'm cheating and getting more reps by not going deep enough, but then I post a video of Eddie Hall doing reps, not ONE OF WHICH was locked out...and not one person mentions that HE is saving energy by never locking out, and that his technique is "perfect no lock form".

Huh?  ???

So let me get this straight:

Next week, if I did the same lift again with the same weight, went LOWER for each rep, but didn't lock out, and ended up getting roughly the same number of reps...would people be ok with that?

If I had to guess...I'd say people would NOT be ok with that, and people would be trashing me for not locking out!!!

Also, you said that my form wasn't going to help me get stronger or bigger. I'd argue that my form does indeed make me get stronger - after all, I did get to a 345 bench press [320 in contest form] by doing what I did. How much stronger would I possibly have gotten at my weight, had I done all these refined techniques?

My training is fine. Not perfect - but fine. But WHY THE FUCK would I focus on changing something which is already fine, and which is NOT the deficit?

My lack of calories is, and always has been, my deficit.

But anyway, Titus: I do take advice, INCLUDING training advice, if it's good advice. So despite B. Hank being an asshole and suggesting I have a foot left to go on those shoulder presses [bullshit], I will be taking his advice and lowering it by 2-3 inches next time.

I also now see that I have weak wrists. I will have to figure out how to strengthen them.

I don't mind being told my form is a bit off - but for B. Hank to say I need to go a full FOOT lower, and that I wouldn't even be able to get one rep with the 100-lb dumbbells is BULLSHIT. I can literally do rest/pause sets with the 100's, for probably two reps at two seconds pause between reps.

It's one thing to say "Lower the weight to get full reps - although you will get a few fewer reps if you do that." It's another thing entirely for him to suggest I can't handle pressing 100-lb dumbbells, which I OBVIOUSLY FUCKING CAN DO as clearly shown in the video!

But ONLY ON GETBIG, can a person be in the top 0.05% of pressing strength in the world, and he trashed for it.  ::)

What's more is that I have been nothing but respectful and complimentive to B. Hank, and he responds like an asshole like that, attacking me on my strength level which I have BEYOND proven myself on.

only the 4th guy did 3/4 reps everyone else did 1/2 reps
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 17, 2022, 01:38:25 AM


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393306;image)




The titties look pretty good here, but your nipples are uneven. The right one sits almost an inch lower than the left.

Would not hit
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 01:50:01 AM
only the 4th guy did 3/4 reps everyone else did 1/2 reps

Thank you, dj181. I agree.

And I must say - the range of motion they used surprised even me. I mean, I knew my range of motion wasn't perfect, and naturally, reps tend to get looser as they go on...but I didn't think my reps were perfect, by any means.

Then I watched those videos, and it's apparent to me that most people pressing dumbbells of 100-lb or more tend to do 1/2 reps or 3/4 reps.

Not to justify it - I know my reps aren't perfect. But all things considered, I think they are ok.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 02:01:58 AM
42% bodyfat and a 15-inch arm.

Maybe steroids don’t work as well as we all thought…

HAHAHAHAHA, you absolute stupid fuck. I was 14.7% on the Dexa Scan, which is THE best body fat measurement device there is.

Whatever I am now, it's between 14-18%.

But why don't you start putting your money where your mouth is?

How much do you want to bet that I'm between 15-20% body fat? It could be lower, but not by much. And NO ONE on this board is under 10% right now, aside from maybe Tommy. Possibly Coach.

So I am in the exact same body fat range as EVERY OTHER PERSON HERE. And no doubt lower than some.

But - would you be willing to send Ron the cash for me to get my body fat tested? I will send him the money too.

Then whoever wins, gets all the money.

You stupid piece of shit. Put your money where your mouth is.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: dj181 on September 17, 2022, 02:10:21 AM
Thank you, dj181. I agree.

And I must say - the range of motion they used surprised even me. I mean, I knew my range of motion wasn't perfect, and naturally, reps tend to get looser as they go on...but I didn't think my reps were perfect, by any means.

Then I watched those videos, and it's apparent to me that most people pressing dumbbells of 100-lb or more tend to do 1/2 reps or 3/4 reps.

Not to justify it - I know my reps aren't perfect. But all things considered, I think they are ok.

this dude knows what's up and this is how you do it

as he says most guys make it a very high incline press and not a true shoulder press

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 02:11:48 AM

The titties look pretty good here, but your nipples are uneven. The right one sits almost an inch lower than the left.

Would not hit

I'm just wondering if there has been some activation of the glands there.

It's not gyno. I've ruled that out.

There's no hard lump there. I'm just wondering if it's body fat or water. Because how to correct it will depend on that.

But none of that matters - the bottom line is that I don't have pecs. As long as that remains the case [which it will], my chest won't look good.

Here is a photo taken 90 seconds ago. I really think that's a body fat issue, which wouldn't be noticeable if my pecs could grow.

But they can't grow. I will bench press 405-lb with the way things are going, and I'll still have no chest. So it's obviously just genetics.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 02:13:40 AM
WORRYWART OF PEACE

 ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 02:32:22 AM
42% bodyfat and a 15-inch arm.

Maybe steroids don’t work as well as we all thought…

Lmao, you absolute FUCKING MORON.

Gee, I wonder if low light and being so pale has anything to do with making a person look softer than they are? You dumb fuck.

In case you didn't notice, I refuse to go in the sun. It ages the skin, and that's why so many people look older than they are.

Anyway, the trade-off is that it makes me look smooth. Fucking idiot. Do you not notice that I DON'T HAVE A TAN?? I would look 5% leaner, literally just getting one.

YES, this is 42% body fat - and the average person must be carrying 84% body fat then!

Photo taken two minutes ago. Anyway, I'm way leaner than you, so WTF are you talking about?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 02:39:15 AM
WORRYWART OF PEACE

 ::)

I am.

But I vividly remember you telling me how frightening it is to be sick. No doubt!

I just don't want to get cancer one day, and say "Damn, I did this to myself!"

You know?

 :(

But damn, I'd love to do another cycle!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 17, 2022, 03:10:13 AM
I am.

But I vividly remember you telling me how frightening it is to be sick. No doubt!

I just don't want to get cancer one day, and say "Damn, I did this to myself!"

You know?

 :(

But damn, I'd love to do another cycle!

most people who get cancer have never taken steroids
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 03:20:34 AM
I am.

But I vividly remember you telling me how frightening it is to be sick. No doubt!

I just don't want to get cancer one day, and say "Damn, I did this to myself!"

You know?

 :(

But damn, I'd love to do another cycle!
What does getting Cancer have to do with dumbell pressing and worrying about a ridiculously and paltry 12.5 mgs. of Anadrol affecting your health.... along with your three cigarettes every ten years.....live on the fucking edge a bit will ya`roll the dice and take some fucking chances,...you are only here for a short while. ???

Anyone that isn`t scared if they contract Cancer is a liar or a dumbass......or a lying dumbass.

You live in a fucking bubble compared to me and yet you are always worried about some malady from your life that more than likely will never even fucking happen for Christs sake.

If I die today,I can say that I died ALWAYS making my own choices and never going with the flow whether the choices were good or bad.,....I`d rather live like that instead of being a choir boy.....especially today with all the gay priests.  LOL ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 03:21:43 AM
But damn, I'd love to do another cycle!
You haven`t even done one yet.....what you talking `bout Willis....you wasted a tiny amount of gear to become heavier in bodyweight/fatter in most areas of your body though you are a strong fucker but no one on the street would know that.

IMO,you should have done a minimum of 250 mgs. of Sust per seek along with 25 mgs. of Anadrol then increase the Anadrol to 50 mgs. about halfway through the total amount of pills you had..... until your gear was gone, or switched to no orals and 500 mgs. of Test perhaps until you tapered off and stopped the cycle but that old Cancer may have reared it`s ugly head......if you knew how to eat clean and included some walking on a treadmill you could have looked great following my advice above and that`s not a lot of gear at all.

You do realize their are idiots out there who do 105 injections per week and take tons of every compound available and don`t ever come off gear.....the comparatively light cycled I outlined above is nothing to worry about but you worry so much your worries may have willed you to get sick and die just by the power of suggestion alone.   ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on September 17, 2022, 04:33:02 AM
Minimum of 20 more pages on db shoulder press form and technique please
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 04:41:57 AM
Minimum of 20 more pages on db shoulder press form and technique please
Come on let`s keep it real.....50 pages or more interspersed with at least 10-15 more double biceps back shots.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on September 17, 2022, 04:59:11 AM
I'm pale too, also don't fancy skin cancer,  my dad had it removed from his head a few years ago from constantly getting caught out in the sun without a hat, he's bald, I'm bald.
Your a strong fucker, i wonder, yea your wrists angle but do your muscles know that,  i mean your shoulders are still holding up that weight and when you press up that weight is still stressing the muscle the same surely..
Lmao, you absolute FUCKING MORON.

Gee, I wonder if low light and being so pale has anything to do with making a person look softer than they are? You dumb fuck.

In case you didn't notice, I refuse to go in the sun. It ages the skin, and that's why so many people look older than they are.

Anyway, the trade-off is that it makes me look smooth. Fucking idiot. Do you not notice that I DON'T HAVE A TAN?? I would look 5% leaner, literally just getting one.

YES, this is 42% body fat - and the average person must be carrying 84% body fat then!

Photo taken two minutes ago. Anyway, I'm way leaner than you, so WTF are you talking about?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 05:15:38 AM
This is my depth on my WORST rep - literally before my last successful rep:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393262;image)

^ That is form you can be critical of, but even then, I don't have a FOOT left to go down there. Even THAT rep MAY be six inches.

Furthermore, NATURALLY the rep range will diminish as you do more reps! Anyone who has done an 8-rep max would know that.

As for the rep being shaky...shaky reps are still completed reps.  As for WHY my reps are shaky - I would assume my stabilizer muscles need to adjust to heavier weight for lower reps. Which they will now that I'll be training heavy week after week.

And here is what my earlier reps looked like:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393449;image)

I don't care what ANYONE says - there is NOTHING wrong with that form, and go watch ANY video of anyone doing an 8-rep max on YouTube, and they ALL have worse form than that.

ITS FUCKING HORRIBLE BUT YOU ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO LISTEN SAME REASAON YOUR CHEST DOESNT RESPOND YOU DONT KNOW HOW TO USE DUMBELLS YOU ARE NOT STRETCHING AND SQEEZING ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT ACTIVATING AND USING THE MUSCLE YOU ARE TRYING TO TRAIN
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 05:17:52 AM
this dude knows what's up and this is how you do it

as he says most guys make it a very high incline press and not a true shoulder press



Yep but Matt will never get it too much ego to think wont back down the weight and do it right

Notice he says pull the dumbells down and his elbows are 45 degrees and his hands are shoulder level at the bottom

Each rep should be like the first when you bring the dumbells up they should start from the shoulder
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 17, 2022, 05:26:27 AM


There is no fckn way ANY normal dude can watch that video and say the cat in the video is “big”. Those arms are 15-16” at best. Narrow. You can be in decent shape and not be big man. It’s just not in the genetics for you Brian.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 17, 2022, 05:28:42 AM
Is the any particular reason you wear clown pants?

Gross!! You desperately want to see him in tight pants don’t you? Nasty fckn pedo strikes again
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 17, 2022, 05:34:54 AM
There is no such thing as palumboism guys just lose size then try and gain it back and wind up with a big belly and smaller arms and legs.

Matt you have 2 good knees and no job and too high of a bodyfat level. Get more active start walking daily join a sport team get a dog pick up an outdoor hobby that involves exercise swim laps at your gym

Your a fckn moron. I know this was way before you even trained but look up Greg Kovaks. What happened to Greg had 100% to do with drug abuse
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 05:35:01 AM
There is no fckn way ANY normal dude can watch that video and say the cat in the video is “big”. Those arms are 15-16” at best. Narrow. You can be in decent shape and not be big man. It’s just not in the genetics for you Brian.

Regardless of how big you think I look in the video I am 225lbs this morning. My left arm is taping just over 18.5 cold and the right is taping 18 cold. The forearms tape 16 and are vascular as all hell. The one quad I taped was 26.5 yesterday and the waist is 33 the calves are 17 and my bodyfat is right around 10%. The neck is 18.5 cold and 19 flexed cold. At 44 years old I think that is damn good. No one and I mean no one sees me in real life and doesn't think I am some kind of bodybuilder/weightlifter whether I am in clothes or not.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 17, 2022, 05:41:23 AM
With the amount of energy Eddie is saving by not bringing the numbers up 4-6", I could put that energy into lowering my reps by that same amount. That would add reps, and then I'd get Getbig's pass for "perfect form" apparently [only on Getbig do half reps count as perfect form and bad form on the same page of the same thread].

Of course in reality, there are flaws in both my form [on the lower end] and on Eddie's form [who doesn't come CLOSE to locking out any single rep].

My expectation was by posting that video of Eddie, that the people trashing my lift would point to that OBVIOUS flaw in Eddie's form.

Why would I take someone as credible who does that? It's now obvious to me that no matter how I improve my form, B. Hank will still trash it.

Hey B. Hank - at least I'm not bald and ugly, you stupid shit.

Those fugly Canuck beaches might not consider you ugly. But you would be fckd trying to pick up a southern Belle smoking ass hottie. The mental retardation would be just as big a hurdle though
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 05:43:07 AM
You havent improved your form at all you do the exact same thing in every lifting video the delts and the chest both engage and stretch on the lower part of the lift which you do not do at all when bench pressing or "shoulder" pressing dumbells you will never develop a chest until you learn to stretch at the bottom and squeeze you are just doing fucking tricep presses

Then instead of watching the video where I carefully explained the issue to you and thinking about it and lowering the weight and trying it then reporting back the difference you just get mad and start ranting about how you are the strongest person on getbig bullshit you are not strong at all. You did one rep with the 100s the first rep where you pressed it off your shoulder and it was a mssive struggle for you which is why you then half repped your set. You need to press it off the shoulder everytime and weight lifting 101 teaches you not to bend your fucking wrist.

Do you compete in powerlifting have you ever once or olympic style lifting? No and you are 40 years old so shut the fuck up about being the strongest ever you are not you are just doing the exercise wrong then complaining you wont grow despite using a lot of weight wrong.

You have to much ego to listen and learn and therefore you will never progress
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 17, 2022, 05:50:51 AM
Regardless of how big you think I look in the video I am 225lbs this morning. My left arm is taping just over 18.5 cold and the right is taping 18 cold. The forearms tape 16 and are vascular as all hell. The one quad I taped was 26.5 yesterday and the waist is 33 the calves are 17 and my bodyfat is right around 10%. The neck is 18.5 cold and 19 flexed cold. At 44 years old I think that is damn good. No one and I mean no one sees me in real life and doesn't think I am some kind of bodybuilder/weightlifter whether I am in clothes or not.

😂 😆 ok dude. You’re fckn small man. But keep thinking you are big and embarrassing yourself by posting the proof that you’re small. I would cut my arms off if they were that small.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 05:56:16 AM
😂 😆 ok dude. You’re fckn small man. But keep thinking you are big and embarrassing yourself by posting the proof that you’re small. I would cut my arms off if they were that small.

Those are my stats if you think that is small whatever but those are my stats. It would be an extreme struggle for me to make light heavy at this point. I plan to add another inch to the quads and then cut to 225lb heavy next July so hoping to add another 5-10lbs over the next 10 months. I also have dropped some water to get to 225lbs as I was holding too much at 230lbs
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stephano on September 17, 2022, 06:15:12 AM


It's literally impossible that those arms are over 15".  Like, there's no fucking way.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on September 17, 2022, 06:28:59 AM
Two of the worst responders (Matt and bhanks) to PEDS to ever Grace this forum, yet given bodybuilding advice to each other.

Only on getbig :D :D :D :D

 :D Arguing for five pages on the correct depth for shoulder pressings.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 17, 2022, 07:08:03 AM
Those are my stats if you think that is small whatever but those are my stats. It would be an extreme struggle for me to make light heavy at this point. I plan to add another inch to the quads and then cut to 225lb heavy next July so hoping to add another 5-10lbs over the next 10 months. I also have dropped some water to get to 225lbs as I was holding too much at 230lbs


Lol more lies. You haven’t measured yourself properly in months.

Your arms don’t even fill out a large T-shirt. Your arms are no bigger than 16 inches on a good day and that’s with shooting IGF.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 07:15:27 AM
Regardless of how big you think I look in the video I am 225lbs this morning. My left arm is taping just over 18.5 cold and the right is taping 18 cold. The forearms tape 16 and are vascular as all hell. The one quad I taped was 26.5 yesterday and the waist is 33 the calves are 17 and my bodyfat is right around 10%. The neck is 18.5 cold and 19 flexed cold. At 44 years old I think that is damn good. No one and I mean no one sees me in real life and doesn't think I am some kind of bodybuilder/weightlifter whether I am in clothes or not.
Dude you always mention your age....44 is not old in fact the forties are great years to make significant progress.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 07:17:35 AM
my neck is 17.5 relaxed at 182 pounds or so......and you laughed at me for training it,as if you didn`t train yours when you wrestled.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 07:19:37 AM
26 inch quads.....highly unlikely.
 ::)

I guarantee that you will not measure them on video.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on September 17, 2022, 07:23:46 AM
Did bhanks ever clarify which university’s wrestling team he was on?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 07:35:19 AM
Did bhanks ever clarify which university’s wrestling team he was on?
The University Of Perversity
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 07:43:34 AM
26 inch quads.....highly unlikely.
 ::)

I guarantee that you will not measure them on video.

It’s an honest to god measurement. Took it for the first time in probably a year was happy with it honestly knew they had grown shorts and pants all fit different. Goal is to add another inch to the legs this next year that’s it don’t care about how much I weigh or how much I bench. Will be happy just to maintain upper body But want to add one more inch to the legs very clear definable measurable goal. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: The Scott on September 17, 2022, 07:57:17 AM
It’s an honest to god measurement. Took it for the first time in probably a year was happy with it honestly knew they had grown shorts and pants all fit different. Goal is to add another inch to the legs this next year that’s it don’t care about how much I weigh or how much I bench. Will be happy just to maintain upper body But want to add one more inch to the legs very clear definable measurable goal.

Well, if it were an honest to upper case "God", it would be more believable. 
Maybe.   Kinda.  Sorta. ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 17, 2022, 07:57:28 AM
It’s an honest to god measurement. Took it for the first time in probably a year was happy with it honestly knew they had grown shorts and pants all fit different. Goal is to add another inch to the legs this next year that’s it don’t care about how much I weigh or how much I bench. Will be happy just to maintain upper body But want to add one more inch to the legs very clear definable measurable goal.

Measurable but not measured, right Bhanky?

26 inches is 3 dozen right?

Your waist has grown significantly. Legs no chance
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 07:57:37 AM
Did bhanks ever clarify which university’s wrestling team he was on?

In 1995/1996 my red shirt freshman year I attended NC State University on a partial scholarship. I was 17 years old. I was 140-45lbs and trained with Kendall Cross an assistant coach local wrestler on a daily basis he was my primary workout partner. We also had the Junior National Freestyle Champ from the previous year on full scholarship the 3 of us were the same size and trained together daily.  Kendall went on to win the 1996 Olympics that summer at 57 kilograms. I had some issues and did not return to University the following year. I had my bilateral knee surgeries the following year after a snowboard injury and by the time I had recovered enough to wrestle again I had no more NCAA eligibility. I never really fully recovered. I did some BJJ wrestled in the Army and did some MMA but it's not the same as NCAA I am still unhappy with it and it's probably one reason I train to this day.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: The Scott on September 17, 2022, 07:59:40 AM
In 1995/1996 my red shirt freshman year I attended NC State University on a partial scholarship. I was 17 years old. I was 140-45lbs and trained with Kendall Cross an assistant coach local wrestler on a daily basis he was my primary workout partner. We also had the Junior National Freestyle Champ from the previous year on full scholarship the 3 of us were the same size and trained together daily.  Kendall went on to win the 1996 Olympics that summer at 57 kilograms. I had some issues and did not return to University the following year.

Was that a "Star Trek" red shirt?  Asking for a Trekkie friend of mine.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 17, 2022, 08:18:16 AM
Regardless of how big you think I look in the video I am 225lbs this morning. My left arm is taping just over 18.5 cold and the right is taping 18 cold. The forearms tape 16 and are vascular as all hell. The one quad I taped was 26.5 yesterday and the waist is 33 the calves are 17 and my bodyfat is right around 10%. The neck is 18.5 cold and 19 flexed cold. At 44 years old I think that is damn good. No one and I mean no one sees me in real life and doesn't think I am some kind of bodybuilder/weightlifter whether I am in clothes or not.
LMFAO!!! You can't tape your quads together and call it one quad. ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 17, 2022, 08:20:00 AM
Matt just bring your hands down to your chin (like a barbell would) and don't worry about the rest.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on September 17, 2022, 08:23:19 AM
Was that a "Star Trek" red shirt?  Asking for a Trekkie friend of mine.

a) Red Shirting allows you to train, but not compete varsity. People generally do it if injured, or getting used to the program. You then have another 4 years to compete varsity.

b) Hankins accidental sitting on his shirt.....

https://twitter.com/cross_kendall?lang=en - Kendall Cross.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 08:53:51 AM
26 inch quads.....highly unlikely.
 ::)

I guarantee that you will not measure them on video.

Can't find the tape now but will do when I find it yeah they were bad before but honestly I don't think they are not bad at all now
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 08:59:25 AM
Can't find the tape now but will do when I find it yeah they were bad before but honestly I don't think they are not bad at all now
I admit your legs have progressed and I give you props for that but no way are they 26 inches,.....I`ll wait for the video................... forever.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: muscle matters on September 17, 2022, 09:26:16 AM
I m really envious of all your superb genetics, here is my puny 17” arm.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 10:19:21 AM
LMFAO!!! You can't tape your quads together and call it one quad. ;D
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 10:19:53 AM
Looking huge MM !!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on September 17, 2022, 10:27:57 AM
Your 17 inch pythons are bigger than hankys 18.5's. Crazy, how does that work  ??? ;)

I m really envious of all your superb genetics, here is my puny 17” arm.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 17, 2022, 10:34:14 AM
In 1995/1996 my red shirt freshman year I attended NC State University on a partial scholarship. I was 17 years old. I was 140-45lbs and trained with Kendall Cross an assistant coach local wrestler on a daily basis he was my primary workout partner. We also had the Junior National Freestyle Champ from the previous year on full scholarship the 3 of us were the same size and trained together daily.  Kendall went on to win the 1996 Olympics that summer at 57 kilograms. I had some issues and did not return to University the following year. I had my bilateral knee surgeries the following year after a snowboard injury and by the time I had recovered enough to wrestle again I had no more NCAA eligibility. I never really fully recovered. I did some BJJ wrestled in the Army and did some MMA but it's not the same as NCAA I am still unhappy with it and it's probably one reason I train to this day.

esfitness level of detail....
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 10:44:32 AM
Your 17 inch pythons are bigger than hankys 18.5's. Crazy, how does that work  ??? ;)
The fuck they are you say and not one visible vein in his forearm
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 17, 2022, 10:55:30 AM
Can't find the tape now but will do when I find it yeah they were bad before but honestly I don't think they are not bad at all now

did it not snap when you tried to measure around your head?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 11:11:54 AM
The fuck they are you say and not one visible vein in his forearm
He actually competes....it`s his off-season why should he be ripped and vascular.

YOU KNOW JACKSHIT ABOUT BODYBUILDING
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: OAK on September 17, 2022, 11:25:07 AM
Matt
No Hate here, Just what i see.

you're just a bigger & fatter version of your 2006 self .
No Change in body proportions - all parts that were lacking are still proportionally lacking in comparison to the others as they were in 2006.

it's your Training that is the issue - your not looking at yourself as a bodybuilder and Clearly not training as one .

If your goal was just to be heavier version of yourself you have achieved that.
If you had trained & added size as a bodybuilder you'd look a lot better
Physically -
Mind all have Different goals

WOW.

I can’t believe you’re HATING on Matt.

He’s there ONLY person on GetBig that likes you.

🙁
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: muscle matters on September 17, 2022, 12:43:35 PM
He actually competes....it`s his off-season why should he be ripped and vascular.

YOU KNOW JACKSHIT ABOUT BODYBUILDING

Dude is hilarious. We are talking about upper arms, and he’s talking about veins on forearms.

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 01:15:46 PM
Dude is hilarious. We are talking about upper arms, and he’s talking about veins on forearms.

 ;D ;D ;D
He knows nothing except drugs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 03:21:03 PM
I just went on YouTube and searched for every video on the platform for dumbbell presses of 100-lb or more, to check form. This is what I found:









Go to the 4 minute mark:



Go to 4:20:



Go to 3:33:



^ Numerous sets they do are done with a limited range of motion.

George Leeman had the best form, and got 38 reps:



^ Meaning that NO ONE on Getbig can do 100-lb dumbbells for 38.

I can do 10 on a good day with my range of motion being SLIGHTLY shorter than George's. I'm curious how many reps the people criticizing me can get.

For people to be trashing my lift, which wasn't that bad - and better than any example I found on YouTube with the same weight - just astounds me.

Polite, constructive criticism, I can handle. But for a group of men, NOT ONE OF WHOM is is as strong as me to talk shit. Seriously?

I literally SCOURED YouTube for videos of men shoulder pressing 100-lb dumbbells or more, and maybe 1 in 5 videos show a range of motion greater than mine.

Meaning: there is NOTHING wrong with my range of motion - nothing! As if every single rep needs to be like an instruction video - that's just not true.

My reps are fine.

Taking them down 2-3", and they'd be perfect.

But after going on YouTube and finding the above videos, I can now no longer take comments about my form seriously.

Why would I? It's clear some of you are criticizing me just for the sake of being critical, and nothing more.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: The Scott on September 17, 2022, 03:35:22 PM
Matt, I can not do 1 rep with a pair of hundreds!  I was never a great presser and my best will seem feeble compared to not only your but everyone here, LOL!

Maybe 16 years ago I was still able to clean an press a pair of 85s with 3 inch handles for three sets of 6 to 8 reps.  I think I weighed about 230 or so.  You are much stronger on the press.  People just like to chide you as we would a younger brother.  Be well.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stephano on September 17, 2022, 03:44:12 PM

But after going on YouTube and finding the above videos, I can now no longer take comments about my form seriously.

Why would I? It's clear some of you are criticizing me just for the same of being critical, and nothing more.

Dude, it's Bhanks.  He's retarded and has an atrocious physique /w serious late-stage Derek Anthony vibezzz. 

Why are you letting him wind you up?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on September 17, 2022, 03:59:13 PM
Matt did you post the pressing videos to show us your strength? Dumbbells angled slightly or not you are still strong as fuck to press them.
If you are posting to check your form for bodybuilding yea come down a bit lower and drop the weight to really feel the burn in the delts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 17, 2022, 04:12:03 PM
ITS FUCKING HORRIBLE BUT YOU ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO LISTEN SAME REASAON YOUR CHEST DOESNT RESPOND YOU DONT KNOW HOW TO USE DUMBELLS YOU ARE NOT STRETCHING AND SQEEZING ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT ACTIVATING AND USING THE MUSCLE YOU ARE TRYING TO TRAIN

 :o
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 17, 2022, 04:15:40 PM
Did bhanks ever clarify which university’s wrestling team he was on?

University of Phoenix.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 17, 2022, 05:59:10 PM
I just went on YouTube and searched for every video on the platform for dumbbell presses of 100-lb or more, to check form. This is what I found:









Go to the 4 minute mark:



Go to 4:20:



Go to 3:33:



^ Numerous sets they do are done with a limited range of motion.

George Leeman had the best form, and got 38 reps:



^ Meaning that NO ONE on Getbig can do 100-lb dumbbells for 38.

I can do 10 on a good day with my range of motion being SLIGHTLY shorter than George's. I'm curious how many reps the people criticizing me can get.

For people to be trashing my lift, which wasn't that bad - and better than any example I found on YouTube with the same weight - just astounds me.

Polite, constructive criticism, I can handle. But for a group of men, NOT ONE OF WHOM is is as strong as me to talk shit. Seriously?

I literally SCOURED YouTube for videos of men shoulder pressing 100-lb dumbbells or more, and maybe 1 in 5 videos show a range of motion greater than mine.

Meaning: there is NOTHING wrong with my range of motion - nothing! As if every single rep needs to be like an instruction video - that's just not true.

My reps are fine.

Taking them down 2-3", and they'd be perfect.

But after going on YouTube and finding the above videos, I can now no longer take comments about my form seriously.

Why would I? It's clear some of you are criticizing me just for the same of being critical, and nothing more.
You see Leeman and the guy with the black shirt and green logo on it? They go hands to their chin, that's the correct depth.
Most of this guys reps are good too.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 06:19:27 PM
Matt, I can not do 1 rep with a pair of hundreds!  I was never a great presser and my best will seem feeble compared to not only your but everyone here, LOL!

Maybe 16 years ago I was still able to clean an press a pair of 85s with 3 inch handles for three sets of 6 to 8 reps.  I think I weighed about 230 or so.  You are much stronger on the press.  People just like to chide you as we would a younger brother.  Be well.

There is NOTHING remotely weak about pressing 100-lb dumbbells for one rep, and if you narrowly missed it, that's nothing to be sad about.

I have not seen one person press dumbbells of 100-lb or more since coming back to the gym post-pandemic...well...other than me.

I will acknowledge my form wasn't perfect, but it wasn't horrible. And for that weight + number of reps, it wasn't bad at all.

I have only found maybe 2-3 videos on YouTube of anyone going my range of motion or lower.

I take no issue with constructive criticism - but people calling me a weakling, or saying I have a foot lower to go, or saying I couldn't get one proper rep with the 100's...that I take issue with.

I would say that I probably have the strength to get a rep with the 110's...but it would be a struggle. But if I had a coach with me by my side to analyze my lift every step of the way, I think I could do it.

As I said, I don't mind constructive criticism, but when I post a video of a heavy set with decent form for reps that I'm proud of, I have to say it's just irritating to have people talk like I was using the worst form in the world when I clearly wasn't
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 06:43:30 PM
Dude, it's Bhanks.  He's retarded and has an atrocious physique /w serious late-stage Derek Anthony vibezzz. 

Why are you letting him wind you up?

You're right. As usual, you are right.

I have spent this entire time complimenting B. Hank's physique, defending him against trash talk from others, and generally being courteous and kind to him. That's why I just don't get why he felt the need to rip into me like he did.

He just really had to make it a point to say I couldn't get one rep with the 100's, which I can literally do with a 2-5 second pause. And saying I have a full foot lower to bring the dumbbells when I PHYSICALLY CANNOT lower the dumbbells a foot more.

That's just him trying to bring me down for the sake of bringing me down, when I've been nothing but supportive of him. But I won't be supportive again - not after that.

If he said "You need to go a few inches lower on your reps. You may get a few fewer reps if you do that", I'd be fine with that.

But to discount entirely a pretty good set just because my form was slightly imperfect - that's bullshit.

Maybe if i did the entire range of motion I'd only get 4-5 reps with the 100-lb dumbbells. If I used Eddie Hall's no lockout reps with proper depth, I'd probably get six reps.

Either way, it was a pretty good lift.

Hopefully I'll be on track to get the 110's for 2-4 reps pretty soon, which would be a personal record for me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on September 17, 2022, 06:46:38 PM
Dude, it's Bhanks.  He's retarded and has an atrocious physique /w serious late-stage Derek Anthony vibezzz. 

Why are you letting him wind you up?
His build blows away Matts though
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 06:53:25 PM
Matt did you post the pressing videos to show us your strength?

Yes.  ;D

I'm happy to say that I should be competitive again in the 80-kg class of Canadian Strongman. Yes, it's the lightest division, but I personally feel my best when I am strong and light.

I do prefer how many physique looks at 200-lb though, but if I can find a good diet for myself, maybe I could be 180 at 12-14% body fat, and be close to my competition weight, and still have the physique of someone in good shape. One thing about heavyweight Strongmen is that they don't necessarily look like they are in shape.

I'm striving for a look where I can be in shape while also being strong, and having mobility and stamina. I'm a work in progress, just seeking to fine tune things over time.

Dumbbells angled slightly or not you are still strong as fuck to press them.
If you are posting to check your form for bodybuilding yea come down a bit lower and drop the weight to really feel the burn in the delts.

Thank you! I mean - right? That is pretty strong, is it not?

I acknowledge my form is not perfect.

I appreciate the constructive criticism, bench.

Next time, I will be going down a few inches lower, even if that eats up a few reps in the process.

Too bad one of my gyms doesn't have the 105's, because I could use them right now. But - maybe one more week practicing with the 100's will serve me well.

I feel that my wrists may need to be strengthened too. Maybe my hands in general are just not very strong. My grip is my weak link for my deadlift, for instance.

Anyway, I will be making the adjustments that you specified, for my next workout, hench. Thank you for the advice! I am always open to apply anything that will help me improve from one workout to the next, and I now see my presses are slightly too high on the bottom range of motion, and I will be adjusting that accordingly.  :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 06:55:36 PM
His build blows away Matts though

No disagreements there!

As much as he was a dick, trashing what was ultimately a decent lift for me, I will grant that he has one of the best physiques on Getbig.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 07:01:21 PM
It's been stated on here that I am 42% body fat.

Is that accurate?

Honestly, I don't even consider myself to be that fat. What is the average North American? Over 50%?

I think 15-18% is a good body fat level to maintain for everyday life.

I'd say anything under 10% requires a practically obsessive level of dieting - as well as, most likely, PED intervention.

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393480;image)

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393482;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 17, 2022, 07:29:45 PM
I just went on YouTube and searched for every video on the platform for dumbbell presses of 100-lb or more, to check form. This is what I found:









Go to the 4 minute mark:



Go to 4:20:



Go to 3:33:



^ Numerous sets they do are done with a limited range of motion.

George Leeman had the best form, and got 38 reps:



^ Meaning that NO ONE on Getbig can do 100-lb dumbbells for 38.

I can do 10 on a good day with my range of motion being SLIGHTLY shorter than George's. I'm curious how many reps the people criticizing me can get.

For people to be trashing my lift, which wasn't that bad - and better than any example I found on YouTube with the same weight - just astounds me.

Polite, constructive criticism, I can handle. But for a group of men, NOT ONE OF WHOM is is as strong as me to talk shit. Seriously?

I literally SCOURED YouTube for videos of men shoulder pressing 100-lb dumbbells or more, and maybe 1 in 5 videos show a range of motion greater than mine.

Meaning: there is NOTHING wrong with my range of motion - nothing! As if every single rep needs to be like an instruction video - that's just not true.

My reps are fine.

Taking them down 2-3", and they'd be perfect.

But after going on YouTube and finding the above videos, I can now no longer take comments about my form seriously.

Why would I? It's clear some of you are criticizing me just for the sake of being critical, and nothing more.

You are a foot to high but you dont want to listen you just want to argue use less weight and learn the movement your hands should be shoulder height the dumbells should rest on the shoulders at the bottom you should be able to hold them and relax at the bottom you are bringing your hands to the top of your head which is a foot higher than your shoulders

Also you keep talking about your set no set where your wrist are bent at 45 degrees and the dumbells are crooked is a good set do you see anyone else doing that in any of the videos you posted?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 17, 2022, 07:53:51 PM
I just went on YouTube and searched for every video on the platform for dumbbell presses of 100-lb or more, to check form. This is what I found:


Serious bidness apparently.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 17, 2022, 09:42:27 PM
Three words:

WHO FUCKING CARES  ???

Is there anyone who still cares,or did at all,besides Matt?

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 17, 2022, 09:52:12 PM
It's been stated on here that I am 42% body fat.

Is that accurate?

Honestly, I don't even consider myself to be that fat. What is the average North American? Over 50%?

I think 15-18% is a good body fat level to maintain for everyday life.

I'd say anything under 10% requires a practically obsessive level of dieting - as well as, most likely, PED intervention.

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1393480;image)


Hey TITTY BOY Canning, take off your mommy’s mall walking tights and show bhank what your “strongman” thighs and calves look like.

You hide your legs because you know they’re shit.

You’re a fucking liar and a joke - you’ll never grow you thick-headed weak little crybaby.

MATT SAGGY TITS CANNING!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 17, 2022, 10:11:07 PM
Hey TITTY BOY Canning, take off your mommy’s mall walking tights and show bhank what your “strongman” thighs and calves look like.

You hide your legs because you know they’re shit.

You’re a fucking liar and a joke - you’ll never grow you thick-headed weak little crybaby.

MATT SAGGY TITS CANNING!

I posted that photo that clearly showed my hamstrings.

My quads are roughly comparable to them, in terms of development.

Here's a video:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

My one-rep max squat is just about 405 [385x2, which is about 405, I would guess].

My legs are my weakest muscle group.

Also, question for you, Walter Sobchak:

How many reps can you do for the overhead dumbbell press using 100-lb dumbbells?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 17, 2022, 10:30:24 PM
I posted that photo that clearly showed my hamstrings.

My quads are roughly comparable to them, in terms of development.

Here's a video:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

My one-rep max squat is just about 405 [385x2, which is about 405, I would guess].

My legs are my weakest muscle group.

Also, question for you, Walter Sobchak:

How many reps can you do for the overhead dumbbell press using 100-lb dumbbells?

Hey TITS…I do full reps. And I sure don’t need steroids to overhead press dumbbells you should be doing flyes or curls with. MATT TITTY BOY CANNING!

I also don’t do quarter reps and then scream, cry, and throw a childish hissy fit when someone calls me out on it, like you do.

You can’t press 100’s or squat 405 for proper reps. You’re more full of bullshit than bhanky.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 17, 2022, 10:53:14 PM
His build blows away Matts though

But….MATTY “TITTIES” CANNING has a wrestling coach.

How many 40 year old manlets do you know, who put on a size medium singlet and roll around on the floor getting hugged and bumped by another man?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 17, 2022, 11:03:44 PM
You are a foot to high but you dont want to listen you just want to argue use less weight and learn the movement your hands should be shoulder height the dumbells should rest on the shoulders at the bottom you should be able to hold them and relax at the bottom you are bringing your hands to the top of your head which is a foot higher than your shoulders

Also you keep talking about your set no set where your wrist are bent at 45 degrees and the dumbells are crooked is a good set do you see anyone else doing that in any of the videos you posted?

Good advice Bhanky. You might be a shit bodybuilder, but you'd make a great coach.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 18, 2022, 04:37:32 AM
Good advice Bhanky. You might be a shit bodybuilder, but you'd make a great coach.

I carefully explained the issue in a video trying to actually help the guy so he can make gains but he just gets defensive starts calling me names and claiming to be the strongest man in the world instead of fixing his form. He has too much ego to back the weight down and do it right. He says it isn't about training just calories and drugs yet his shit diet and shit training with drugs got him fat with tits. He says his chest will never grow but then will argue to the death with if anyone who points out his poor training form being responsible. Now he is pulling the I can't go lower my elbows dont bend that far bullshit. Meanwhile he literally starts rep one with the dumbells resting on his shoulders he can' bring them back down to where they started? Then he wants to argue he is touching his shoulders when one side of the dumbell at a 45 degree angle touches and the other side is above his head wtf???? But I am just being an asshole fucking moron
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 04:45:03 AM
I carefully explained the issue in a video trying to actually help the guy so he can make gains but he just gets defensive starts calling me names and claiming to be the strongest man in the world instead of fixing his form. He has too much ego to back the weight down and do it right. He says it isn't about training just calories and drugs yet his shit diet and shit training with drugs got him fat with tits. He says his chest will never grow but then will argue to the death with if anyone who points out his poor training form being responsible. Now he is pulling the I can't go lower my elbows dont bend that far bullshit. Meanwhile he literally starts rep one with the dumbells resting on his shoulders he can' bring them back down to where they started? Then he wants to argue he is touching his shoulders when one side of the dumbell at a 45 degree angle touches and the other side is above his head wtf???? But I am just being an asshole fucking moron
Jesus Christ he did the most half assed "cycle" I have ever seen posted on this board in over 20 years.......what a waste of gear and time..... of course he took so little he probably has enough left to do a real cycle but then we`d hear the question ad nauseum...."Do you think I`ll die from doing this much"  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 18, 2022, 08:48:30 AM
Can bhank do seated shoulder presses with 100# db's?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 08:56:56 AM
Can bhank do seated shoulder presses with 100# db's?
No problem !  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 18, 2022, 09:41:11 AM
Bhanky,
Please use paragraphs in your future long-winded posts.
Thank you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 18, 2022, 10:43:00 AM
Bhanky,
Please use paragraphs in your future long-winded posts.
Thank you.

I have a sneaking suspicion that BHANKS does not know how to use paragraphs. In fact, I think basic grammar likely escapes him.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 18, 2022, 10:57:34 AM
I have a sneaking suspicion that BHANKS does not know how to use paragraphs. In fact, I think basic grammar likely escapes him.

But he is a Mensa graduate...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 18, 2022, 11:01:33 AM
Can bhank do seated shoulder presses with 100# db's?

Can Matt because I haven’t seen it yet as I carefully explained in my video a shoulder press starts at the shoulder. His hands are above his ears at the bottom of his lift he also doesn’t keep the forearms vertical he needs to come out and down another foot  he does the same dumb shit when bench pressing
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 18, 2022, 11:10:52 AM
But he is a Mensa graduate...

He also has a 19” neck.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 18, 2022, 11:22:50 AM
He also has a 19” neck.

When flexed the 19 is absolutely 19 inches sorry you can’t deal with that I have no desire to get my neck any bigger
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 18, 2022, 11:24:05 AM
When flexed the 19 is absolutely 19 inches sorry you can’t deal with that I have no desire to get my neck any bigger

How do you flex your neck?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 11:43:59 AM
I have a sneaking suspicion that BHANKS does not know how to use paragraphs. In fact, I think basic grammar likely escapes him.
Watch your mouth son,he`s a Mensa member ...........according to him.

Fucker can`t spell worth a damn either !!  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 11:47:19 AM
GH Fingers Of Peace
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 18, 2022, 11:55:44 AM
Watch your mouth son,he`s a Mensa member ...........according to him.

Fucker can`t spell worth a damn either !!  :D

That’s right. He scored off the charts on an IQ test when younger but cannot recall which IQ test he took.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 18, 2022, 12:12:41 PM
Bhanky deleted his neck flexing instructions so now I'll never know how to do it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 12:17:32 PM
That’s right. He scored off the charts on an IQ test when younger but cannot recall which IQ test he took.
Genius types are always plagued with bad memories that`s why he can`t keep his lies stories straight.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 12:19:56 PM
Bhanky deleted his neck flexing instructions so now I'll never know how to do it.
Good cuz it made zero sense anyway.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 18, 2022, 12:22:53 PM
Genius types are always plagued with bad memories that`s why he can`t keep his lies stories straight.

BHANKS is thinking on a whole other level.

He can’t comprehend what non Mensa members talk about.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 12:27:26 PM
BHANKS is thinking on a whole other level.

He can’t comprehend what non Mensa members talk about.
Exactly the conversations are just not intelligent, elaborate, or elite enough for him to comprehend.

For instance,if I said "See Jane chase Spot".....it would be harder than Chinese arithmatic for him to comprehend the simplicity of the sentence.

That`s one smart nikka! .
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: deadz on September 18, 2022, 02:05:07 PM
I have a sneaking suspicion that BHANKS does not know how to use paragraphs. In fact, I think basic grammar likely escapes him.
All you need to know about hank is that he’s a liar!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 18, 2022, 02:51:43 PM
I posted that photo that clearly showed my hamstrings.

My quads are roughly comparable to them, in terms of development.

Here's a video:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

My one-rep max squat is just about 405 [385x2, which is about 405, I would guess].

My legs are my weakest muscle group.

Also, question for you, Walter Sobchak:

How many reps can you do for the overhead dumbbell press using 100-lb dumbbells?

Thank goodness that awful carpet isn't in your house. You posted loads of pictures of yourself posing on it in an area with the fake stone wall where it could have been.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 18, 2022, 02:52:50 PM
I have a sneaking suspicion that BHANKS does not know how to use paragraphs. In fact, I think basic grammar likely escapes him.

Well, he is a numbers guy so...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 18, 2022, 02:55:35 PM
Well, he is a numbers guy so...

guy doesnt know that a quater of an hour is 15 minutes
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: CalvinH on September 18, 2022, 03:45:33 PM
Matt begging bhanks to like him and gets shit on.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 18, 2022, 04:13:08 PM
Matt begging bhanks to like him and gets shit on.

No good deed goes unpunished.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 18, 2022, 04:27:02 PM
Matt begging bhanks to like him and gets shit on.

Matt has a weird penchant for sucking up to people. Whenever someone responds to him, he’s all like “thank you so much for the advice,” “it means so much that you responded to me,” “I’ll take your advice into great consideration.”

Very odd.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 18, 2022, 04:34:19 PM
Matt has a weird penchant for sucking up to people. Whenever someone responds to him, he’s all like “thank you so much for the advice,” “it means so much that you responded to me,” “I’ll take your advice into great consideration.”

Very odd.

Are you saying Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning’s wrestling coach” has a large assortment of ball gags and textured butt plugs?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 18, 2022, 04:40:04 PM
Can Matt because I haven’t seen it yet as I carefully explained in my video a shoulder press starts at the shoulder. His hands are above his ears at the bottom of his lift he also doesn’t keep the forearms vertical he needs to come out and down another foot  he does the same dumb shit when bench pressing

Pocket hanky, do you think these pathetic legs can legitimately squat 405 lbs for full depth reps?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 18, 2022, 04:40:25 PM
Can Matt because I haven’t seen it yet as I carefully explained in my video a shoulder press starts at the shoulder. His hands are above his ears at the bottom of his lift he also doesn’t keep the forearms vertical he needs to come out and down another foot  he does the same dumb shit when bench pressing
The deflection tells me you cannot press the 100# db's. Cool.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 18, 2022, 04:49:53 PM
The deflection tells me you cannot press the 100# db's. Cool.


I have had 3 shoulder surgeries when I do dumbell shoulder presses I train in the 20-25 rep range and rest them on my shoulders a foot lower but yeah I only use like the 75lbers because I do them right and I take it easy. I find that is what pumps the shoulder best. I also don't concentrate on them because my delts overpower my chest and I try to put more emphasis on chest and use my tricep tendons on chest days not shoulder days. I like side laterals best for delts. I used to train in the rep range Matt trains them and do them wrong like Matt I learned. But fuck yes I can press them can Matt? Based on the video No
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 18, 2022, 04:51:08 PM
Pocket hanky, do you think these pathetic legs can legitimately squat 405 lbs for full depth reps?

It was weird Matt talked about his squat then posted a leg press video as proof of his squatting ability
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 18, 2022, 05:02:56 PM
Are you saying Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning’s wrestling coach” has a large assortment of ball gags and textured butt plugs?

After he sent that video to Prime, anything is possible!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 18, 2022, 05:10:01 PM

I have had 3 shoulder surgeries when I do dumbell shoulder presses I train in the 20-25 rep range and rest them on my shoulders a foot lower but yeah I only use like the 75lbers because I do them right and I take it easy. I find that is what pumps the shoulder best. I also don't concentrate on them because my delts overpower my chest and I try to put more emphasis on chest and use my tricep tendons on chest days not shoulder days. I like side laterals best for delts. I used to train in the rep range Matt trains them and do them wrong like Matt I learned. But fuck yes I can press them can Matt? Based on the video No

 :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on September 18, 2022, 05:11:49 PM

I have had 3 shoulder surgeries when I do dumbell shoulder presses I train in the 20-25 rep range and rest them on my shoulders a foot lower but yeah I only use like the 75lbers because I do them right and I take it easy. I find that is what pumps the shoulder best. I also don't concentrate on them because my delts overpower my chest and I try to put more emphasis on chest and use my tricep tendons on chest days not shoulder days. I like side laterals best for delts. I used to train in the rep range Matt trains them and do them wrong like Matt I learned. But fuck yes I can press them can Matt? Based on the video No

Post a video of you doing 25 reps of shoulder press with 75-lb DBs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on September 18, 2022, 05:19:56 PM
Post a video of you doing 25 reps of shoulder press with 75-lb DBs.

Set it up!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 18, 2022, 05:29:53 PM
I`ll wait for the 75 pound presses along with the 26 inch quads video.....I`ll be waiting quite a while cuz neither is true.

My best full FROM on seated db presses was the 80`s for 5-6 reps......I know you are not as strong as I was then {early 90`s and I was older than you are today},or now on most lifts ever invented/devised.

I may be a small guy ,but I`m a strong bastard for my size.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 18, 2022, 06:06:53 PM

I have had 3 shoulder surgeries when I do dumbell shoulder presses I train in the 20-25 rep range and rest them on my shoulders a foot lower but yeah I only use like the 75lbers because I do them right and I take it easy. I find that is what pumps the shoulder best. I also don't concentrate on them because my delts overpower my chest and I try to put more emphasis on chest and use my tricep tendons on chest days not shoulder days. I like side laterals best for delts. I used to train in the rep range Matt trains them and do them wrong like Matt I learned. But fuck yes I can press them can Matt? Based on the video No

More lies, if you had shoulder surgery will be posting x-rays left right and center. Like your knee x-rays.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 18, 2022, 07:20:08 PM
Post a video of you doing 25 reps of shoulder press with 75-lb DBs.

This will happen 6.45 days after the 405 lb squat video drops
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 18, 2022, 07:26:04 PM
Matt has a weird penchant for sucking up to people. Whenever someone responds to him, he’s all like “thank you so much for the advice,” “it means so much that you responded to me,” “I’ll take your advice into great consideration.”

Very odd.

And then, he won't follow through.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 18, 2022, 07:39:27 PM

I have had 3 shoulder surgeries when I do dumbell shoulder presses I train in the 20-25 rep range and rest them on my shoulders a foot lower but yeah I only use like the 75lbers because I do them right and I take it easy. I find that is what pumps the shoulder best. I also don't concentrate on them because my delts overpower my chest and I try to put more emphasis on chest and use my tricep tendons on chest days not shoulder days. I like side laterals best for delts. I used to train in the rep range Matt trains them and do them wrong like Matt I learned. But fuck yes I can press them can Matt? Based on the video No

Lol, 75 pound dumbbell presses for 20 reps. Why not tell more believable lies
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 18, 2022, 07:44:28 PM
It's been stated on here that I am 42% body fat.

Is that accurate?

No :) 
0
To be honest, that bit of folding tissue on the sides of your pecs looks like fat, but part of that could be Drol bloat.

Quote
Honestly, I don't even consider myself to be that fat. What is the average North American? Over 50%?

I think 15-18% is a good body fat level to maintain for everyday life.

Over 50%?!  No, not on average.  But yes, 15% is what I'd call a healthy enough range, provided a man was otherwise active.

Quote
I'd say anything under 10% requires a practically obsessive level of dieting - as well as, most likely, PED intervention.

Ehh...NO.  A meticulous diet and regular cardio for all but the gifted, but NO:  it does NOT take drugs to get under 10% body fat.

What in the blue hell lead you to *that* conclusion? 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 18, 2022, 08:57:50 PM
After he sent that video to Prime, anything is possible!

Primehomosexual actually handled the awkwardness of Matt Canning’s jerkoff video pretty well…for a soggy old queer
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 18, 2022, 10:05:27 PM
Matt is supposedly a grower. Wonder if there were before after shots?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 18, 2022, 10:30:08 PM
Primehomosexual actually handled the awkwardness of Matt Canning’s jerkoff video pretty well…for a soggy old queer

Prime has been building up the mystique of the Mattsturbation video by refusing to confirm details about it. He won't confirm the 6.45 inches except to describe it as tiny and he won't confirm the Peter North ropes.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 03:30:48 AM
August 6th.
 ::)  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 05:54:51 AM
It was weird Matt talked about his squat then posted a leg press video as proof of his squatting ability

Now I see you for what you are, B. Hank - just a jealous person.

I'm stronger than you. Get over it. I'd be stronger than you at 160-lb and drug-free than you would be at 230-lb on all the juice you could lay your hands on.

Just get over it. We all have our strengths and weaknesses. I've personally always gained strength easily. I just don't want to be over 180-185 as a max, typically. What can I say...I'm a hypochondriac. But maybe I will increase that, after seeing how well this cycle went. Depending on how my blood work is, that is.

The reason why I don't squat is because I have bad knee valgus for squats. It's gotten better recently since I noticed it was an issue, and specifically sought to address it...but it's still bad.

It actually reminds me of my wrist weakness for my dumbbell presses. Now that I know my wrists are weak, I will address that, and strengthen my wrists.

I wasn't purposely cheating on those presses - I just have weak wrists.

Back to legs, I primarily leg press, or do high squats:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0rSOUg8EH/

^ So as you can see, my legs are pretty strong, but it just so happens, I don't do full squats, but my legs are in the range of about 360x5 full ATG squats with a belt and knee wraps. Or 385x2.

That's why I suspect I can do 405.

I have no idea why this would even be questioned. A 405 ATG squat with knee wraps is pretty good [IMO], but obviously, it's a weak lift for me

Also, IMO, strong partials are just as impressive.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 05:58:34 AM
Now I see you for what you are, B. Hank - just a jealous person.

I'm stronger than you. Get over it. I'd be stronger than you at 160-lb and drug-free than you would be at 230-lb on all the juice you could lay your hands on.

Just get over it. We all have our strengths and weaknesses. I've personally always gained strength easily. I just don't want to be over 180-185 as a max, typically. What can I say...I'm a hypochondriac. But maybe I will increase that, after seeing how well this cycle went. Depending on how my blood work is, that is.

The reason why I don't squat is because I have bad knee valgus for squats. It's gotten better recently since I noticed it was an issue, and specifically sought to address it...but it's still bad.

It actually reminds me of my wrist weakness for my dumbbell presses. Now that I know my wrists are weak, I will address that, and strengthen my wrists.

I wasn't purposely cheating on those presses - I just have weak wrists.

Back to legs, I primarily leg press, or do high squats:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0rSOUg8EH/

^ So as you can see, my legs are pretty strong, but it just so happens, I don't do ffull

No you are not but even if you were super strong as you like to believe you still are never going to get any better and get any proper development of you dont drop your ego drop the weights and use proper form

You now claim you can’t squat or even hold a dumbells horizontal yet are somehow super strong??

Can you post any lifts with proper form because you just posted some nonsense garbage yet again as proof of your super strength instead of proper form on any lift

405 ATG is a week lift for you now lol let’s see you do it with 315
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 06:02:53 AM
I tell you what let’s do it today. Squat challenge ATG on video today whoever loses leaves the board forever.

or well a month not trying to be a dick but if you really think you can squat 405lbs ATG no problem then this should be easy for you. I will beat whatever you squat ATG on video today but we both know you have never done an ATG squat and you don’t know the mechanics and you can’t do it with 225lbs much less 315 or 405 you have too much ego to ever learn that lift. You will just go too heavy do a half rep then argue for weeks that it was perfect
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 06:08:08 AM
I don’t think you can do a ATG squat with 275lbs much less 315lbs or 405lbs I don’t think you can do an ATG at all. I know I can go over 315lbs ATG today and you can’t but fuck it just keep doing 6 inch squats or whatever the fuck that was supposed to be and pretending you are Hercules. You know what would have been more impressive than that nonsense proper squats with 225lbs
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 06:11:36 AM
No you are not but even if you were super strong as you like to believe you still are never going to get any better and get any proper development of you dont drop your ego drop the weights and use proper form

You now claim you can’t squat or even hold a dumbells horizontal yet are somehow super strong??

Yes, I am stronger than you. If I wasn't, my lifts wouldn't make you so angry. I personally don't give a fuck if someone who is verifiably weaker than me insults me.

It's a bit annoying when someone who is probably weaker than me trashes me, but there is no way to know because they are anonymous. But most likely they are weaker.

Only 21% of the North American population goes to the gym. And if you bench press 225, you are in the top 1-3% strongest of the gym-going population.

That means anyone who bench presses 225 is in the top 0.21% to top 0.63% of the strongest people in the overall population.

Bench pressing 315 would put you in the top 0.1% of people.

So anyone who bench presses 315 is stronger than 99.9% of the population.

But anyway, we can settle it this way:

How about in the first week of January, we post three videos:

Max reps with 250 on bench.
Max reps with 405 on deadlift.
And a max for legs.

You can squat, and I'll do something else - leg press or box squat, etc.

The reason is because full depth squats don't benefit in Strongman competitions, as we don't do full squats in contest, typically. We do car or van squats to parallel or just above parallel, or do events that tax our legs in other ways.

So I just don't squat. But if you squat and I do another exercise, we can leave it to the message board to decide who has stronger legs.

That being said, I'd be the first to admit that my legs are not that strong.

But I'd be more than happy to post any videos comparing our strength.

Furthermore, I am off what very little juice I was using now, so you won't be able to use that as an excuse.

Like that fat fuck SquadFatter
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 06:14:46 AM
Yes, I am stronger than you. If I wasn't, my lifts wouldn't make you so angry. I personally don't give a fuck if someone who is verifiably weaker than me insults me.

It's a bit annoying when someone who is probably weaker than me trashes me, but there is no way to know because they are anonymous. But most likely they are weaker.

Only 21% of the North American population goes to the gym. And if you bench press 225, you are in the top 1-3% strongest of the gym-going population.

That means anyone who bench presses 225 is in the top 0.21% to top 0.63% of the strongest people in the overall population.

Bench pressing 315 would put you in the top 0.1% of people.

So anyone who bench presses 315 is stronger than 99.9% of the population.

But anyway, we can settle it this way:

How about in the first week of January, we post three videos:

Max reps with 250 on bench.
Max reps with 405 on deadlift.
And a max for legs.

You can squat, and I'll do something else - leg press or box squat, etc.

The reason is because full depth squats don't benefit in Strongman competitions, as we don't do full squats in contest, typically. We do car or van squats to parallel or just above parallel, or do events that tax our legs in other ways.

So I just don't squat. But if you squat and I do another exercise, we can leave it to the message board to decide who has stronger legs.

That being said, I'd be the first to admit that my legs are not that strong.

But I'd be more than happy to post any videos comparing our strength.

Furthermore, I am off what very little juice I was using now, so you won't be able to use that as an excuse.

Like that fat fuck SquadFatter

You are not stronger if you are then film your atv squat with 315 today I have posted mine you can’t do it Why the first week of January why not today?? And fuck no you don’t get to do soemthing other than squats you claim you can ATG 405lbs no problem I say you can’t ATG 315lbs no other exercise is going to prove you can ATG squat other than an ATG squat let’s see it I don’t think you can ATG 225lbs

And max reps? I thought you wanted to compare strength is this a cardio competition now??
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on September 19, 2022, 06:17:50 AM
Post a video of you doing 25 reps of shoulder press with 75-lb DBs.


There is no way in hell he can do that after shoulder surgeries, lol. Brian is officially fucking insane.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 06:19:17 AM
Now that I know my wrists are weak, I will address that, and strengthen my wrists.


Sounds like prime's getting more videos.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 06:21:43 AM

There is no way in hell he can do that after shoulder surgeries, lol. Brian is officially fucking insane.

2 slap labrum repairs and the bone socket on the left side is breaking down both sides have been operated on they actually surgically cut a tendon on the left side last time they went in to clean up the debris. I have learned to train smarter
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 06:22:54 AM
Matt
No Hate here, Just what i see.

you're just a bigger & fatter version of your 2006 self .
No Change in body proportions - all parts that were lacking are still proportionally lacking in comparison to the others as they were in 2006.

it's your Training that is the issue - your not looking at yourself as a bodybuilder and Clearly not training as one .

If your goal was just to be heavier version of yourself you have achieved that.
If you had trained & added size as a bodybuilder you'd look a lot better
Physically -
Mind all have Different goals

Hang on - do you mean at age 40, I'm carrying more body fat than I was at age 24?

Tell me more, illuminati? I mean, what man isn't fatter at 40 than at 24? Sheesh.

By the way, I know you have used juice for long time , and you think we just grow and grow and grow, but really - we don't. No man under six feet tall is going to be over 200-lb without holding noticeable body fat. Of course it stands to reason I would plateau. Without juice, there is no way for me to grow without gaining body fat. And I'm simply not willing to juice very hard.  I'm not willing to shorten my life by a decade or more just for the sake of looking better.

Although I think going to 210+ was my mistake. I maxed out my good gains at about 200-205. Beyond that, my body fat got out of hand.

I don't believe in dirty bulking. And given how little gear I was running, it was naive to expect lean gains.

Here is a comparison from 2006 to how I looked earlier in the summer, when I was in the 190's. So probably 175-lb is the ideal weight for me - or 185 with just a wee bit of juice. I could probably be about 180 and still be pretty lean, drug-free.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 06:24:29 AM
2 slap labrum repairs and the bone socket on the left side is breaking down both sides have been operated on they actually surgically cut a tendon on the left side last time they went in to clean up the debris. I have learned to train smarter

Please don't let matt's challenges distract you.  Full ROM sets of 25 with 75lb dumbbells video please.

Would be incredible feat of strength to shut up the haters.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on September 19, 2022, 06:28:44 AM
2 slap labrum repairs and the bone socket on the left side is breaking down both sides have been operated on they actually surgically cut a tendon on the left side last time they went in to clean up the debris. I have learned to train smarter


Ok - then post a vid of you doing 25 reps x 75.


 Dumbbell presses create a shitload of instability and can easily reinjure the tendons of the shoulder in a heartbeat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 06:29:01 AM
So just to be clear Matt you are declining the strength challenge of a 1 rep max ATG squat today? After declaring yourself stronger and talking shit about how easy to would be for you you are in fact declining the lifting challenge? Because you make these ridiculous challenges to everyone who questions your form or strength or diet everyday but not that someone has accepted you claim you can’t squat at all???? You know I have titanium bolts in both knees yet you are the one claiming you can’t squat after telling us all you can get 2 reps with 385lbs ATG? Now you admit you can’t even get 225lbs atg becasue you can’t squat at all? Like I said you have never done an ATG squat and don’t know how you can’t get 225lbs ATG much less 385lbs for 2 reps so shit the fuck up about your bulslhit super human strength when you can’t do real reps with anything as you don’t train proper and don’t know the mechanics
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 06:34:25 AM
B. Hank - I implore you to go on YouTube and find ANY videos of someone dumbbell pressing 100+ pound dumbbells with better form than I did. Maybe one in FIVE videos do it with better form than me.

So once again - I have NO IDEA what you are talking about to shit-talk my form. My form, while obviously not perfect, is really not THAT bad. Not great - but certainly not bad. And my range of motion is above average when compared to videos from YouTube fitness influencers using comparable weight:









Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 06:38:26 AM
And yet again, B. Hank - here are more videos of people shoulder pressing 100+ pound dumbbells, and almost all of them use a shorter range of motion than I do. So AGAIN, I have no idea what you are talking about to say my form I bad. My form is PERFECTLY FINE. In fact - it's above average. I searched for literally every video on YouTube of people pressing 100+ pound dumbbells overhead. And the overwhelming majority of those lifting them had worse form than mine.









Go to the 4 minute mark:



Go to 4:20:



Go to 3:33:



^ Numerous sets they do are done with a limited range of motion.

George Leeman had the best form, and got 38 reps:



But I get it, B. Hank - I'm stronger than you, so you need to talk shit. Well, guess what? This wasn't a competition! I was simply posting an update showing roughly where my strength was at. After all, gyms were closed here for two years.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 06:40:05 AM
Sounds like prime's getting more videos.

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 06:41:07 AM
He couldn`t do 75 full ROM DB presses with the 25 pounders.....never mind reversing the numbers.

I bet he won`t film the above statement^^^^^.....he`s video happy unless it makes him look dumber.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 06:45:25 AM
B. Hank - I implore you to go on YouTube and find ANY videos of someone dumbbell pressing 100+ pound dumbbells with better form than I did. Maybe one in FIVE videos do it with better form than me.

So once again - I have NO IDEA what you are talking about to shit-talk my form. My form, while obviously not perfect, is really not THAT bad. Not great - but certainly not bad. And my range of motion is above average when compared to videos from YouTube fitness influencers using comparable weight:











I made a video that everyone agreed with explaining exactly what you were doing wrong so yeah you do know your ego just can’t admit it. Pretending that is a shoulder press is liek pretending that other video you posted is a squat stop bullshitting and do the exercises correctly or you will never progress it doesn’t matter if you lift 1000lbs sloppy with a half range of motion what can you actually lift correctly??? Nothing nada zilch because you have never learned proper form on anything who the fuck lifts for 20 years with their wrist bent sideways you don’t know basic 101 lifting
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 06:48:45 AM
You are not stronger if you are then film your atv squat with 315 today I have posted mine you can’t do it Why the first week of January why not today?? And fuck no you don’t get to do soemthing other than squats you claim you can ATG 405lbs no problem I say you can’t ATG 315lbs no other exercise is going to prove you can ATG squat other than an ATG squat let’s see it I don’t think you can ATG 225lbs

And max reps? I thought you wanted to compare strength is this a cardio competition now??

Well - I can do a 360 ATG squat no problem.

It's similar to deadlift. Right off couch [I'm on the couch right now watching a movie called "Leatherface", but IMO, the first two Texas Chainsaw movies were much better], I could deadlift 450.

But I can also deadlift 500-525 range. BUT...that's not a lift I just want to jump right into.

Old bones and old bodies don't heal as quickly. Heaven forbid I pull something - not good.

I am glad you are talking about 315 ATG being a good squat. It is a good squat. It's damn good!

My lifetime max is 385x2, and people on here trash me for being weak on the squat. But WTF is so weak about that?

I'll admit, my legs are my personal weak point, but I really see no shame in squatting 385x2.

Also, I should say I can squat ATG 340-360, literally off the couch.

Give me four weeks of training squat each week, and I could do a 405 single.

Question, B. Hank:

Why do you think I can't squat 315, when I can leg press over 1,000?

I mean, 1,000 would convert to about 300-350, would it not?

So I could see why you would disbelieve me claiming a 405 squat, but why 315?

I also said above it would take me a month to get go 405, safely. Maybe not a month...maybe 6 weeks. Possibly more.

However, as I said, I hate squatting.

Why can't you settle for me doing, say, 1,100-lb leg presses, for...say 8-10 reps?

Surely that is roughly equal to 405?

No?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 06:51:00 AM
I made a video that everyone agreed with explaining exactly what you were doing wrong so yeah you do know your ego just can’t admit it. Pretending that is a shoulder press is liek pretending that other video you posted is a squat stop bullshitting and do the exercises correctly or you will never progress it doesn’t matter if you lift 1000lbs sloppy with a half range of motion what can you actually lift correctly??? Nothing nada zilch because you have never learned proper form on anything who the fuck lifts for 20 years with their wrist bent sideways you don’t know basic 101 lifting

I agree my form was off. It wasn't perfect. It wasn't that bad though.

Question, B. Hank:

Why don't you review the form of the other lifters, in the videos above?

So you trash form, but you won't acknowledge that my form is above average compared to most shoulder pressing videos online?

?

Furthermore, would you say a person is strong if they can do half reps with the 110's for overhead presses?

?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 06:59:59 AM
Well - I can do a 360 ATG squat no problem.

It's similar to deadlift. Right off couch [I'm on the couch right now watching a movie called "Leatherface", but IMO, the first two Texas Chainsaw movies were much better], I could deadlift 450.

But I can also deadlift 500-525 range. BUT...that's not a lift I just want to jump right into.

Old bones and old bodies don't heal as quickly. Heaven forbid I pull something - not good.

I am glad you are talking about 315 ATG being a good squat. It is a good squat. It's damn good!

My lifetime max is 385x2, and people on here trash me for being weak on the squat. But WTF is so weak about that?

I'll admit, my legs are my personal weak point, but I really see no shame in squatting 385x2.

Also, I should say I can squat ATG 340-360, literally off the couch.

Give me four weeks of training squat each week, and I could do a 405 single.

Question, B. Hank:

Why do you think I can't squat 315, when I can leg press over 1,000?

I mean, 1,000 would convert to about 300-350, would it not?

So I could see why you would disbelieve me claiming a 405 squat, but why 315?

I also said above it would take me a month to get go 405, safely. Maybe not a month...maybe 6 weeks. Possibly more.

However, as I said, I hate squatting.

Why can't you settle for me doing, say, 1,100-lb leg presses, for...say 8-10 reps?

Surely that is roughly equal to 405?

No?

Ok I will make it easy for you then since you say you can do a 360 ATG squat today no problem how about 345lbs today ATG we both do it and both post a video then let the board vote who did it better?? You want to claim you are stronger prove it. I am giving you my crippled polio legs to compete against being the strongest 170lber in western Ontario it should be no problem for you yes?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 19, 2022, 07:02:11 AM
Matt i don't think those other leg exercises translate well to an ATG squat. It might be hard to estimate what you could do on that exercise without trying it first.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 19, 2022, 07:53:31 AM
Matt is strong.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 08:14:43 AM
Ok I will make it easy for you then since you say you can do a 360 ATG squat today no problem how about 345lbs today ATG we both do it and both post a video then let the board vote who did it better?? You want to claim you are stronger prove it. I am giving you my crippled polio legs to compete against being the strongest 170lber in western Ontario it should be no problem for you yes?

We've seen your squat.

Please post video of 20-25 full ROM overhead presses with the 75s.

Much more impressive.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 08:20:01 AM
We've seen your squat.

Please post video of 20-25 full ROM overhead presses with the 75s.

Much more impressive.


Today is squat day
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 08:21:40 AM

Today is squat day

So we'll get the shoulder press video later this week?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 08:52:21 AM
So we'll get the shoulder press video later this week?

Show me yours and I will show you mine
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 08:52:40 AM
So we'll get the shoulder press video later this week?
Yes why not,right along with the quad measurement lie claim.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 09:00:44 AM
Show me yours and I will show you mine

I have made no such claims.

I too have a slap labrum tear in my right side, and have had two distal clavicle excisions, and subacromial decompressions.

So I tend to limit overhead presses to push presses, but now only neutral grip viking presses and rc work since the slap tear diagnosis.

I can say the only time I tried a 20 reps set was in like 2006 at work when we were talking shit, and I did 20 seated with the 50s, while my challenger did 2.

Since you are claiming to handle 75s with ease and full rom after all your injuries it would be super impressive.  Note I didn't not doubt you.

If I made any claims, I would have no problem being called out.

So, video of it later this week?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 09:02:10 AM
Matt i don't think those other leg exercises translate well to an ATG squat. It might be hard to estimate what you could do on that exercise without trying it first.

I lounged in my pool yesterday and that translates to 405 x 10.

Apparently on Getbig the couch sitters (with TITTIES) can just claim whatever the fuck they want.

385 x 2 high bar, full depth squats would absolutely crush the lying little titty manlet Matt Canning.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on September 19, 2022, 09:26:59 AM
Show me yours and I will show you mine

Hankins, how much do you bench?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 09:44:38 AM
Hankins, how much do you bench?

Prior to the last pec tear 365lbs or 350 for a double on video.  Now no idea I am not training low reps. I have a rather large tear in my pec and it’s not just one tear. Shoulders have had surgeries but no tear I always train in that range now but I rarely do dumbells shoulder presses anymore like maybe once a month
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 19, 2022, 09:50:04 AM
Prior to the last pec tear 365lbs or 350 for a double on video.  Now no idea I am not training low reps. I have a rather large tear in my pec and it’s not just one tear. Shoulders have had surgeries but no tear I always train in that range now but I rarely do dumbells shoulder presses anymore like maybe once a month

Smart...

Strong bench, I saw the video.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 09:51:11 AM
2 slap labrum repairs and the bone socket on the left side is breaking down both sides have been operated on they actually surgically cut a tendon on the left side last time they went in to clean up the debris. I have learned to train smarter

So who are you to criticize my form?

I've been to the hospital five times in my life. Two of which were for stitches. I've never broken a bone, and never had anything remotely close to a training injury.

In any case, my form is fine. You don't need to train with perfect textbook form every time. That's just nonsense to make people think they can do more to get better results, rather than  just acknowledge that their genetics are not good.

Furthermore, almost every shoulder pressing video online has worse form than mine.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 09:56:16 AM
So who are you to criticize my form?

I've been to the hospital five times in my life. Two of which were for stitches. I've never broken a bone, and never had anything remotely close to a training injury.

In any case, my form is fine. You don't need to train with perfect textbook form every time. That's just nonsense to make people think they can do more to get better results, rather than  just acknowledge that their genetics are not good.

Furthermore, almost every shoulder pressing video online has worse form than mine.

Your form sucks I explained why you only don’t get it becasue your ego refuses to accept the idea of using less weight and doing it correctly that is why your build sucks you are missing the stretch and contraction in the muscles as you dont use prior form
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 09:57:24 AM
He couldn`t do 75 full ROM DB presses with the 25 pounders.....never mind reversing the numbers.

I bet he won`t film the above statement^^^^^.....he`s video happy unless it makes him look dumber.

Great post, wes.

B. Hank has no problem posting videos, yet won't post any strength videos. That's because he does not lift what he claims.

Incidentally,  I could press the 75-lb dumbbells for around 15-18 reps using the form in my other video.

I'd be happy to post a video, but not if I have to hear from B. Hank about how i need to go a foot lower.  ::)

While I wouldn't be surprised if I got the 75's for 20...I would be surprised if I got 25.

I'm never going to make a claim that I can't prove.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 10:00:12 AM
So who are you to criticize my form?

I've been to the hospital five times in my life. Two of which were for stitches. I've never broken a bone, and never had anything remotely close to a training injury.

In any case, my form is fine. You don't need to train with perfect textbook form every time. That's just nonsense to make people think they can do more to get better results, rather than  just acknowledge that their genetics are not good.

Furthermore, almost every shoulder pressing video online has worse form than mine.

You think everything is just drugs or genetics maybe training actually matters maybe if you trained correctly instead of just heaving around the heaviest weight possible you might get somewhere and wouldn’t have to blame genetics or a lack of drugs
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 10:02:33 AM
Great post, wes.

B. Hank has no problem posting videos, yet won't post any strength videos. That's because he does not lift what he claims.

Incidentally,  I could press the 75-lb dumbbells for around 15-18 reps using the form in my other video.

I'd be happy to post a video, but not if I have to hear from B. Hank about how i need to go a foot lower.  ::)

While I wouldn't be surprised if I got the 75's for 20...I would be surprised if I got 25.

I'm never going to make a claim that I can't prove.

If you don’t want to be called out use a full range of motion you are not even close to a shoulder press

And I offered to post a strength video from today you backed out after claiming you were stronger and cohld ATG 385lbs for a double now you claim you can’t squat at all. Post a 345lb ATG squat there is absolutely no way you can do it becasue you have never done an ATG squat becasue you are an ego lifter with no form in any lift.

You want to claim you are stronger here is your chance squat ATG today

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 19, 2022, 10:03:33 AM
You think everything is just drugs or genetics maybe training actually matters maybe if you trained correctly instead of just heaving around the heaviest weight possible you might get somewhere and wouldn’t have to blame genetics or a lack of drugs

Matt,

Take it from Hanky, he has mastered the squat.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 10:04:57 AM
Matt,

Take it from Hanky, he has mastered the squat.



You keep posting that video knowing damn well it was like the first month I started squatting again and was going 90 degrees why not post the current video of 315 to the ground? Better yet why don’t all 3 of us post an ATG squat video today? I can ATG 345lbs today can either of you? Fuck no you can’t

eature=share
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 19, 2022, 10:06:03 AM
You keep posting that video knowing damn well it was like the first month I started squatting again and was going 90 degrees why not post the current video of 315 to the ground? Better yet why don’t all 3 of us post an ATG squat video today? I can ATG 345lbs today can either of you? Fuck no you can’t

LOL you can not squat 345 ATG.

You also claimed you could squat 405 for reps.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 10:12:05 AM
Ok I will make it easy for you then since you say you can do a 360 ATG squat today no problem how about 345lbs today ATG we both do it and both post a video then let the board vote who did it better?? You want to claim you are stronger prove it. I am giving you my crippled polio legs to compete against being the strongest 170lber in western Ontario it should be no problem for you yes?

What about previous videos of me squatting that much?

As I've told you - I stopped squatting. Just as some people stop flat pressing because it aggravates their shoulders. Specifically,  I found it to just be an annoying exercise. I found it hard to measure depth, and found myself going too low.

I fail to see how a low box squat with 400-500 is any less impressive than an actual full squat with 315+.

Like this 675 partial squat.  This means nothing to you?:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0rSOUg8EH/

I know a top 10 North America's Strongest Man competitor who only got 6 reps with the same weight!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 19, 2022, 10:17:47 AM
You keep posting that video knowing damn well it was like the first month I started squatting again and was going 90 degrees why not post the current video of 315 to the ground? Better yet why don’t all 3 of us post an ATG squat video today? I can ATG 345lbs today can either of you? Fuck no you can’t

eature=share

Outstanding form Bhanky. So smooth!

No homo, but I'm salivating at the prospect of you filming a shoulder press video. I know it will have the grace of a tchaikovsky ballet combined with the precision movements of a Swiss watch. Basically the complete opposite of Matts vomit inducing lifting form.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 10:18:59 AM
Matt i don't think those other leg exercises translate well to an ATG squat. It might be hard to estimate what you could do on that exercise without trying it first.

Good point.

However, there is something about ATG squatting, or squatting in general, that just doesn't jive with me.

I mean, if I can literally max out the leg press machine with about 1,100-lb [including the weight of the sled], and do reps with my knees touching my chin, basically, I would say my legs strength is sufficient.

I just hate to do actual squats.

I don't think I'm the only person who hates squats, given that I rarely see anyone squat at all, lol. Let alone with heavy weight...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 10:19:24 AM
What about previous videos of me squatting that much?

As I've told you - I stopped squatting. Just as some people stop flat pressing because it aggravates their shoulders. Specifically,  I found it to just be an annoying exercise. I found it hard to measure depth, and found myself going too low.

I fail to see how a low box squat with 400-500 is any less impressive than an actual full squat with 315+.

Like this 675 partial squat.  This means nothing to you?:

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0rSOUg8EH/

I know a top 10 North America's Strongest Man competitor who only got 6 reps with the same weight!

Just admit you don’t know how to squat and you don’t do them because they are hard and when you said you could ATG 385lbs it was a bunch of bullshit. Let’s see an actual legitimate squat let’s see any legitimate lift from you none of your videos have ever shown a good lift that would pass in any kind of competition much less be considered good

You brag about your numbers in lifts you don’t do then show partial lifts and say according to some lifting calculus you can actual do a legitimate lift when you don’t know the form technique or mechanics because you have never done any of them correctly


And your so called partial squat of 675lbs is fucking embarrassing that is what that means to me shows you have no concept of how to lift at all doesn’t make you look strong makes you look like an idiot
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on September 19, 2022, 10:22:17 AM
MattC what is your all-time best squat 1RM?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 10:23:59 AM
Matt is strong.

Thank you, IroNat!

Honestly, it may be a bit out of my league to suggest this - but that 25-rep dumbbell shoulder press challenge using 75-lb dumbbells may be worth a short.

Don't get me wrong - I wouldn't expect to get it. At least not on the first attempt. But I do know I can get at least 15 reps right off the bat.

So who knows...maybe I could hit 20 reps within three attempts?

Either way, it would be a good goal for myself.

I much prefer higher rep goals like that, as they possess less injury risks than one rep max lifts!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 10:31:35 AM
Thank you, IroNat!

Honestly, it may be a bit out of my league to suggest this - but that 25-rep dumbbell shoulder press challenge using 75-lb dumbbells may be worth a short.

Don't get me wrong - I wouldn't expect to get it. At least not on the first attempt. But I do know I can get at least 15 reps right off the bat.

So who knows...maybe I could hit 20 reps within three attempts?

Either way, it would be a good goal for myself.

I much prefer higher rep goals like that, as they possess less injury risks than one rep max lifts!

Looking forward to seeing the video................... ................





















































.....................get posted 1000 times
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 10:35:05 AM
Thank you, IroNat!

Honestly, it may be a bit out of my league to suggest this - but that 25-rep dumbbell shoulder press challenge using 75-lb dumbbells may be worth a short.

Don't get me wrong - I wouldn't expect to get it. At least not on the first attempt. But I do know I can get at least 15 reps right off the bat.

So who knows...maybe I could hit 20 reps within three attempts?

Either way, it would be a good goal for myself.

I much prefer higher rep goals like that, as they possess less injury risks than one rep max lifts!

You don’t get to pretend to be the worlds strongest man if you can’t do a squat
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 10:37:22 AM
I lounged in my pool yesterday and that translates to 405 x 10.

Apparently on Getbig the couch sitters (with TITTIES) can just claim whatever the fuck they want.

385 x 2 high bar, full depth squats would absolutely crush the lying little titty manlet Matt Canning.

Out of curiosity, do you not train?

Are you seriously talking about doubling 385 for an ATG squat like it's wildly out of the ordinary?

Only someone who doesn't train would talk like that.

Gyms here were closed for two years. Otherwise, I'd still be squatting that today.

Considering I have ALREADY POSTED videos of me doing a partial squat with 675-lb, and a 1,050-lb leg press for reps where my knees went to my chin, there should be NO QUESTION that at some point in my history, I have squatted 385x2.

That's a good lift - to be sure - but nothing so spectacular that it should be questioned at all.

If just makes me think you don't lift AT ALL.

It just so happens I hate squatting. That's why I'd rather leg press 1,100 for 8-10 reps. IMO, that is just as impressive as a 405-lb squat.

I don't see anything wrong with submitting such a video in lieu of a squat video.

But here's some perspective on my 385x2 squat:

At the time I was doing it, I was squatting 275 for 12-15.

I considered those to be good lifts - but not spectacular, or impossible, as you claim.

But considering you don't even train, I can understand why you're so impressed by my strength, lol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 10:44:06 AM
Your form sucks I explained why you only don’t get it becasue your ego refuses to accept the idea of using less weight and doing it correctly that is why your build sucks you are missing the stretch and contraction in the muscles as you dont use prior form

As I said, EVERY SINGLE VIDEO online of people shoulder pressing is with worse form than mine! So WHY would I clean up my form, when literally EVERYONE uses that form?

In fact, if anything, I've learned that my range of motion is TOO long.

EVERYONE else uses a shorter range of motion. So that just proves there is NO NEED to go down as long as possible for each rep.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 10:45:38 AM
Out of curiosity, do you not train?

Are you seriously talking about doubling 385 for an ATG squat like it's wildly out of the ordinary?

Only someone who doesn't train would talk like that.

Gyms here were closed for two years. Otherwise, I'd still be squatting that today.

Considering I have ALREADY POSTED videos of me doing a partial squat with 675-lb, and a 1,050-lb leg press for reps where my knees went to my chin, there should be NO QUESTION that at some point in my history, I have squatted 385x2.

That's a good lift - to be sure - but nothing so spectacular that it should be questioned at all.

If just makes me think you don't lift AT ALL.

It just so happens I hate squatting. That's why I'd rather leg press 1,100 for 8-10 reps. IMO, that is just as impressive as a 405-lb squat.

I don't see anything wrong with submitting such a video in lieu of a squat video.

But here's some perspective on my 385x2 squat:

At the time I was doing it, I was squatting 275 for 12-15.

I considered those to be good lifts - but not spectacular, or impossible, as you claim.

But considering you don't even train, I can understand why you're so impressed by my strength, lol.


That was not a partial squat lol gtfo and leg slide who fuck cares how much you can leg slide none of that nonsense means you can squat Jack shit. You claimed you were stronger and could squat now you claim it’s not a big deal at all great so do it then. Let’s see you post a real below parallel squat with today I don’t think you can get 315 clean. But whatver you post I will match let’s see who can actually squat more today my crippled legs against yours the strongest 70kilo 205lb man in Sasquatchia
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 10:46:51 AM
B. Hank - are you saying ALL of these men are using bad form?

So these aren't men who clearly know what they are doing? They need help improving their form?

B. Hank - I implore you to go on YouTube and find ANY videos of someone dumbbell pressing 100+ pound dumbbells with better form than I did. Maybe one in FIVE videos do it with better form than me.

So once again - I have NO IDEA what you are talking about to shit-talk my form. My form, while obviously not perfect, is really not THAT bad. Not great - but certainly not bad. And my range of motion is above average when compared to videos from YouTube fitness influencers using comparable weight:











And yet again, B. Hank - here are more videos of people shoulder pressing 100+ pound dumbbells, and almost all of them use a shorter range of motion than I do. So AGAIN, I have no idea what you are talking about to say my form I bad. My form is PERFECTLY FINE. In fact - it's above average. I searched for literally every video on YouTube of people pressing 100+ pound dumbbells overhead. And the overwhelming majority of those lifting them had worse form than mine.









Go to the 4 minute mark:



Go to 4:20:



Go to 3:33:



^ Numerous sets they do are done with a limited range of motion.

George Leeman had the best form, and got 38 reps:



But I get it, B. Hank - I'm stronger than you, so you need to talk shit. Well, guess what? This wasn't a competition! I was simply posting an update showing roughly where my strength was at. After all, gyms were closed here for two years.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 10:47:08 AM
As I said, EVERY SINGLE VIDEO online of people shoulder pressing is with worse form than mine! So WHY would I clean up my form, when literally EVERYONE uses that form?

In fact, if anything, I've learned that my range of motion is TOO long.

EVERYONE else uses a shorter range of motion. So that just proves there is NO NEED to go down as long as possible for each rep.

Every video has better form than you but fuck it keep living in la la land pretend your hands are shoulder level and the dumbells are horizontal with your elbows tucked down and behind at the bottom of your lift. just ignor your hands are forehead level with your forearms crooked and your wrist even more crooked tilting one side of the dumbells to your shoulder while the other side is above your head oh yeah it’s fucking perfect
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 10:50:06 AM
Out of curiosity, do you not train?

Are you seriously talking about doubling 385 for an ATG squat like it's wildly out of the ordinary?

Only someone who doesn't train would talk like that.

Gyms here were closed for two years. Otherwise, I'd still be squatting that today.

Considering I have ALREADY POSTED videos of me doing a partial squat with 675-lb, and a 1,050-lb leg press for reps where my knees went to my chin, there should be NO QUESTION that at some point in my history, I have squatted 385x2.

That's a good lift - to be sure - but nothing so spectacular that it should be questioned at all.

If just makes me think you don't lift AT ALL.

It just so happens I hate squatting. That's why I'd rather leg press 1,100 for 8-10 reps. IMO, that is just as impressive as a 405-lb squat.

I don't see anything wrong with submitting such a video in lieu of a squat video.

But here's some perspective on my 385x2 squat:

At the time I was doing it, I was squatting 275 for 12-15.

I considered those to be good lifts - but not spectacular, or impossible, as you claim.

But considering you don't even train, I can understand why you're so impressed by my strength, lol.

No TITTY BOY, a 385 x 2 squat is really nothing special, but it would still absolutely crush you. You post lameass videos to try to show off your supposed strength and all they do is expose you for not knowing how to train and for how weak and undeveloped you are…exactly as bhank said.

You’re a weakling, a liar, and bhank has you caught in a lie that you’re trying to deflect your attention away from.

Everything about you is bullshit. You lie about everything you do.

AND YOU HAVE TITS!  MATT “TITTY BOY” CANNING, THUNDER BAY’S LACTACTING LIGHTWEIGHT LIAR!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on September 19, 2022, 10:52:46 AM
Out of curiosity, do you not train?

Are you seriously talking about doubling 385 for an ATG squat like it's wildly out of the ordinary?

Only someone who doesn't train would talk like that.

Gyms here were closed for two years. Otherwise, I'd still be squatting that today.

Considering I have ALREADY POSTED videos of me doing a partial squat with 675-lb, and a 1,050-lb leg press for reps where my knees went to my chin, there should be NO QUESTION that at some point in my history, I have squatted 385x2.

That's a good lift - to be sure - but nothing so spectacular that it should be questioned at all.

If just makes me think you don't lift AT ALL.

It just so happens I hate squatting. That's why I'd rather leg press 1,100 for 8-10 reps. IMO, that is just as impressive as a 405-lb squat.

I don't see anything wrong with submitting such a video in lieu of a squat video.

But here's some perspective on my 385x2 squat:

At the time I was doing it, I was squatting 275 for 12-15.

I considered those to be good lifts - but not spectacular, or impossible, as you claim.

But considering you don't even train, I can understand why you're so impressed by my strength, lol.

Matt - Serious Question ??

Why are you so obsessed with Posting How Much You can & you have Lifted ?

Yes you've got some decent poundages - Only you are well aware that a few of us Have & do lift more & much more in some cases.
You don't see us Going on & on about How Much we have & can lift,
Please stop it Now its getting very Repetitive & Boring.
Surely There's more to you than Posting this Nonsense a 1000
along with selfie pics.
Be happy / Content with what you do.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 10:54:51 AM
You think everything is just drugs or genetics maybe training actually matters maybe if you trained correctly instead of just heaving around the heaviest weight possible you might get somewhere and wouldn’t have to blame genetics or a lack of drugs

Yes, I'd say it's genetics, drugs, and nutrition as the top three.

Training is behind all of those.

Pro training is literally all over the map. When you are on 500mg of anabolics or more, your training doesn't mean squat. For bodybuilding, I mean.

To get stronger, you will have to train.

And to be clear, I'm not saying training doesn't matter. But let me put it this way:

If you're bodybuilding, you can drop your training intensity by 20% if you brought up your nutrition 10%>

Something like that.

So while you NEED both training and nutrition, I am suggesting that if you want to maximize your results, nutrition matters more.

You keep telling me to improve my training, WHEN THAT WON'T DO A FUCKING THING IF I AM EATING 90 GRAMS OF PROTEIN A DAY.

Bottom line: i hate to eat.

That's why I train for strength and not muscle.

You can get stronger even if you don't eat. But you can't build muscle doing that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 10:57:36 AM
You don’t get to pretend to be the worlds strongest man if you can’t do a squat

Every time you call him out on his squat lies, he switches to the shoulder press videos.

When you call him out on his half rep shoulder presses, he deflects the discussion to what random people on YouTube are doing.

Matt Canning is a bullshitter, about lifting, his lifts, his education, his financial situation, about everything. He is a chronic liar.

So Matt Canning, who claims to be a ranked Canadian strongman, and one of the “strongest people on Getbig” is backpedaling like a motherfukker because he is caught in ANOTHER LIE!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 19, 2022, 10:57:40 AM
You keep posting that video knowing damn well it was like the first month I started squatting again and was going 90 degrees why not post the current video of 315 to the ground? Better yet why don’t all 3 of us post an ATG squat video today? I can ATG 345lbs today can either of you? Fuck no you can’t

eature=share

Matt,

take it from Brian,

If you are not using a tampon pad and your 40 inch gut is not touching your thighs you can not squat.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 11:00:31 AM
Matt,

Take it from Hanky, he has mastered the squat.



Good lift. Looks like he had a bit more left.

That's roughly where I was before I converted to leg pressing.

340-360-380...it was all the same to me.

I felt like it was a mental game at that point.

It's weird. But I just find one-rep maxes to be a bit of a mind-f***. So I'd rather bench press 275x10 than attempt 345. IMO, there is less that can go wrong with a higher reps effort.

I wanted to hit 225x30 or 250x20 on the bench, but both will be harder than I thought

But I'm up for a Getbig competition, if anyone is up to it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 11:04:57 AM
You keep posting that video knowing damn well it was like the first month I started squatting again and was going 90 degrees why not post the current video of 315 to the ground? Better yet why don’t all 3 of us post an ATG squat video today? I can ATG 345lbs today can either of you? Fuck no you can’t

eature=share

Unlike you, I don't care if someone misses a lift by 3cm.

YOU CAN DETERMINE A PERSON'S STRENGTH LEVEL EVEN IF THEY USE A LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION.

Like seriously - who gives a fuck?!

Take my 675-lb high pin squat, which was maybe an 8-10 inch range of motion. WHO FUCKING CARES if it wasn't a full squat? It OBVIOUSLY proves that I have some strength!

Just like your 355 squat video.

Even if it was a bit high, it still gives a general idea of your strength.

Can you press 100-lb dumbbells for 10 reps overhead? No?

Then stop trashing my form! It's FINE. It may not be perfect, but it's perfectly fine.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 19, 2022, 11:09:35 AM
Matt,
Follow Coach Hanky's advices and you too can have shoulder surgeries.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 11:10:32 AM
Unlike you, I don't care if someone misses a lift by 3cm.

YOU CAN DETERMINE A PERSON'S STRENGTH LEVEL EVEN IF THEY USE A LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION.

Like seriously - who gives a fuck?!

Take my 675-lb high pin squat, which was maybe an 8-10 inch range of motion. WHO FUCKING CARES if it wasn't a full squat? It OBVIOUSLY proves that I have some strength!

Just like your 355 squat video.

Even if it was a bit high, it still gives a general idea of your strength.

Can you press 100-lb dumbbells for 10 reps overhead? No?

Then stop trashing my form! It's FINE. It may not be perfect, but it's perfectly fine.

You didn’t do a 675 lb “high pin” squat.

You barely stood up 4 - 5” under the weight and as soon as you unlocked your knees the weight crushed you. You couldn’t legitimately squat half that amount to full depth, high bar bodybuilding squats.

What a fucking bullshitter.

I’ll summarize for you….you used steroids to get fat and grow tits. Period, end of story.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 11:10:39 AM
LOL you can not squat 345 ATG.

You also claimed you could squat 405 for reps.

Did he mean ATG...or below parallel?

I guess I was throwing around the term ATG, and conflating it with below parallel.

I could believe B. Hank could break parallel with 345. ATG is obviously another matter.

IMO, a 350-400+ is very respectful. Most people seem to ignore squats, lol. Personally, I hate them!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 11:13:01 AM
Good lift. Looks like he had a bit more left.

That's roughly where I was before I converted to leg pressing.

340-360-380...it was all the same to me.

I felt like it was a mental game at that point.

It's weird. But I just find one-rep maxes to be a bit of a mind-f***. So I'd rather bench press 275x10 than attempt 345. IMO, there is less that can go wrong with a higher reps effort.

I wanted to hit 225x30 or 250x20 on the bench, but both will be harder than I thought

But I'm up for a Getbig competition, if anyone is up to it.

It’s not a good lift look at the 315 lift that is a good lift the difference is night and day. I had the brain to examine my form on video learn lighten the load adjust and then build back up. You don’t which is why you just want to insist your bullshit form is perfect.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 11:14:38 AM
It’s not a good lift look at the 315 lift that is a good lift the difference is night and day. I had the brain to examine my form on video learn lighten the load adjust and then build back up. You don’t which is why you just want to insist your bullshit form is perfect.

Truth…
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 11:19:03 AM
Cliff's notes update on video expectations by poster:

bhank: video of 20-25 seated shoulder presses with 75lb full ROM

matt: none. like, please, don't post any videos ever again. like ever.  or pics.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 11:19:24 AM
Just admit you don’t know how to squat and you don’t do them because they are hard and when you said you could ATG 385lbs it was a bunch of bullshit. Let’s see an actual legitimate squat let’s see any legitimate lift from you none of your videos have ever shown a good lift that would pass in any kind of competition much less be considered good

You brag about your numbers in lifts you don’t do then show partial lifts and say according to some lifting calculus you can actual do a legitimate lift when you don’t know the form technique or mechanics because you have never done any of them correctly


And your so called partial squat of 675lbs is fucking embarrassing that is what that means to me shows you have no concept of how to lift at all doesn’t make you look strong makes you look like an idiot

I DO NOT currently squat.

However, I have squatted before, and that's when I got 385x2.

I would normally max out around there. Say 365 for 2-4.

I'd rather post a video of me leg pressing 1,000-lb for reps, where I basically eat my knees for each rep.

Why isn't that impressive? Why MUST the squat be THE exercise to prove leg strength? What's wrong with leg press?  ???

This isnt a powerlifting contest.  ::) If anything short of perfect form should be disregarded, then I suppose you don't respect any of the World's Strongest Man lifts?

How about when Derek Poundstone used to to hitch 800-lb deadlifts for reps, and literally rest the weight on his thighs? Does that not "count" to you?  ::)

How about ALL the heavy shoulder pressing videos on YouTube, 80% of them have a more limited range of motion than mine? Do they not count?  ::)

Out of curiosity, can you press 100-lb dumbbells for 8-10 reps with the form I used?

Can ANYONE here, and prove it on video?

No?

Then who cares if my form is off? Why are you harping on a good lift, just because the form is slightly off?

So your 355 squat doesn't count just because it wasn't fully ATG?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: muscle matters on September 19, 2022, 11:21:12 AM
I can’t even shoulder press 50 lbs for 25 reps.

What a shame!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 11:22:29 AM
MattC what is your all-time best squat 1RM?

The most I ever did was 385 for a double. In contest, I got 340, but I was being too conservative. I could have gotten 360 that day, for sure. But contests are so strict, and I didn't want to get any red lights.

If I had to guess, my all-time best would have been 405, but I didn't attempt it.

But I feel i have enough videos of other lifts that it shouldn't be shocking for me to make these claims.

Example:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cg0tpG3gyXL/

I'm not sure why anyone would even question me squatting 350+.

If I claimed 450, I could understand why people would doubt me! But my current videos are consistent with my squat claims.

I'm sort of happy people are doubting. It proves to me 385x2 is a GOOD squat. I was worried when I said it, that people would say it is a weak lift!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 11:26:54 AM
I can’t even shoulder press 50 lbs for 25 reps.

What a shame!

Have you tried to?

You look like you can press that much rather easily.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 11:27:37 AM
Two fucking clowns arguing over squatting one rep with baby ass weight............only on getbig!!  LOL ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 19, 2022, 11:34:23 AM
Poor MattC got his ass chewed out on IG too

legacyrestoration_constr uction
@matthew_thunderbay ego lifting at its finest. Anybody can bring the weight down i.e. gravity. You clearly have issues, pressing the weight up. Hence the shaky form Dbs moving all over the place. Drop the weight and focus on form. Or at the very least get off the steroids they’re not doing anything for you clearly.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 19, 2022, 11:36:53 AM
Yes, I'd say it's genetics, drugs, and nutrition as the top three.

Training is behind all of those.

Pro training is literally all over the map. When you are on 500mg of anabolics or more, your training doesn't mean squat. For bodybuilding, I mean.

To get stronger, you will have to train.

And to be clear, I'm not saying training doesn't matter. But let me put it this way:

If you're bodybuilding, you can drop your training intensity by 20% if you brought up your nutrition 10%>

Something like that.

So while you NEED both training and nutrition, I am suggesting that if you want to maximize your results, nutrition matters more.

You keep telling me to improve my training, WHEN THAT WON'T DO A FUCKING THING IF I AM EATING 90 GRAMS OF PROTEIN A DAY.

Bottom line: i hate to eat.

That's why I train for strength and not muscle.

You can get stronger even if you don't eat. But you can't build muscle doing that.

Matt I will say this again and I truly believe it. No man needs more than 100 grams of protein a day. 50 grams is recommended by the fda for an active male so double it and you have plenty to build muscle. 2 per lb of Bodyweight is just flat out bullshit. I’d say natural 100g fully juiced no difference from 150-400. You just puss it out. Natural pissing out anything over 100 I believe.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 11:39:27 AM
Matt`s been hangin` with that dude Moe.....you know him..............Moe Mentum !!    :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 19, 2022, 11:41:30 AM
This thread has delivered. ;D

I'd enjoy seeing a "squat off" with these two studs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 11:44:06 AM
Looking forward to seeing the video................... ................





















































.....................get posted 1000 times

 ;D ;D ;D

Hang on...you almost, sort of...sound like you think I could get it, Grape?

I mean - you're not completely discounting the possibility.

If so, that's a tremendous compliment. Thank you very much for that great compliment, Grape.

I'm actually now a bit motivated to try that lift.

My oy issue is it I short the range of motion by a couple of inches, that B. Hank will say none of the reps count.  ::)

Don't get me wrong, I don't care for half reps as much as the next guy - it's just that I still feel half rep videos give us an idea of a person's strength. E.g., when you do rack pulls above your knees, that's not the same as a full deadlift, but it still gives an idea of your strength.

YES, I admit my 345 bench was bounced, but I can literally do a 275-lb bench press with a 3-second pause. My point is - three quarter reps, half reps, partial squats, rack pulls, etc, all give us some indication of a person's strength.

And none of this matters for my chest since my chest genetics suck. My chest HAS looked sort of ok with a pump at times...that's it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 11:46:04 AM
;D ;D ;D

Hang on...you almost, sort of...sound like you think I could get it, Grape?

I mean - you're not completely discounting the possibility.

If so, that's a tremendous compliment. Thank you very much for that great compliment, Grape.

I'm actually now a bit motivated to try that lift.

My oy issue is it I short the range of motion by a couple of inches, that B. Hank will say none of the reps count.  ::)



For clarity:  While there is no ill will,  I do not care, and do not want you to post about it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 19, 2022, 11:53:14 AM
Prime has been building up the mystique of the Mattsturbation video by refusing to confirm details about it. He won't confirm the 6.45 inches except to describe it as tiny and he won't confirm the Peter North ropes.

Y'all be going on about these little events for the next 20 years.  :)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 19, 2022, 11:58:20 AM
I tell you what let’s do it today. Squat challenge ATG on video today whoever loses leaves the board forever.

or well a month not trying to be a dick but if you really think you can squat 405lbs ATG no problem then this should be easy for you. I will beat whatever you squat ATG on video today but we both know you have never done an ATG squat and you don’t know the mechanics and you can’t do it with 225lbs much less 315 or 405 you have too much ego to ever learn that lift. You will just go too heavy do a half rep then argue for weeks that it was perfect

Not the old 'whoever loses leaves the board forever' nonsense again! Don't you know that nobody ever leaves this board unless they're thrown off it.  ::)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:01:48 PM
You don’t get to pretend to be the worlds strongest man if you can’t do a squat

Do you know most Strongman competitors rarely bench, and when they do, they do it with a wide grip?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:05:20 PM

That was not a partial squat lol gtfo and leg slide who fuck cares how much you can leg slide none of that nonsense means you can squat Jack shit. You claimed you were stronger and could squat now you claim it’s not a big deal at all great so do it then. Let’s see you post a real below parallel squat with today I don’t think you can get 315 clean. But whatver you post I will match let’s see who can actually squat more today my crippled legs against yours the strongest 70kilo 205lb man in Sasquatchia

Would you accept a 1,350-lb leg press?

That's the most my gym's leg press can hold, with one heavyweight man standing on it, lol.

No, but seriously - why is squat so important to you?

What makes leg press not valid?  ::)

IMO, a 1,000-lb leg press is on par with a 315-335 squat.

It just so happens - I prefer the leg press.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:11:58 PM
Every video has better form than you but fuck it keep living in la la land pretend your hands are shoulder level and the dumbells are horizontal with your elbows tucked down and behind at the bottom of your lift. just ignor your hands are forehead level with your forearms crooked and your wrist even more crooked tilting one side of the dumbells to your shoulder while the other side is above your head oh yeah it’s fucking perfect

Unlike you, I don't trash people who are stronger than me, but are you saying this is better form than mine?  ::)

You need to put down your personal grudge/jealousy against me, and think about what it does to your credibility to say something like that.

KinoBody is about 12-15% stronger than me, so I won't trash him, but my reps are better than his:
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 19, 2022, 12:14:04 PM
Would you accept a 1,350-lb leg press?

That's the most my gym's leg press can hold, with one heavyweight man standing on it, lol.

No, but seriously - why is squat so important to you?

What makes leg press not valid?  ::)

IMO, a 1,000-lb leg press is on par with a 315-335 squat.

It just so happens - I prefer the leg press.

I prefer leg presses over squats because they are not as hard on my back, however leg presses are not as complete an exercise as squats which work your whole body.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: muscle matters on September 19, 2022, 12:18:26 PM
Me squatting 365 in my garage in March last year.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:21:42 PM
No TITTY BOY, a 385 x 2 squat is really nothing special, but it would still absolutely crush you. You post lameass videos to try to show off your supposed strength and all they do is expose you for not knowing how to train and for how weak and undeveloped you are…exactly as bhank said.

You’re a weakling, a liar, and bhank has you caught in a lie that you’re trying to deflect your attention away from.

Everything about you is bullshit. You lie about everything you do.

AND YOU HAVE TITS!  MATT “TITTY BOY” CANNING, THUNDER BAY’S LACTACTING LIGHTWEIGHT LIAR!

I squatted 385x2 when I competed in a powerlifting contest once. The refined nature of powerlifting put me off from it. I prefer Strongman contests - lift the weight up, and put it back down.

As you said - 385x2 is not a special lift. But it was a good lift for me for 178-lb, which is what I weighed at the time.

Questions for you:

Do you shoulder press 100-lb dumbbells for over 10 reps?

Do you bench press 265 for over 10 reps?

Out of curiosity, how many reps do you get with each of the above lifts? Say you bench pressed 265 today, how many reps could you get? I'd probably get 10? Maybe 12. How about you? How many reps could you get?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 12:25:11 PM
Me squatting 365 in my garage in March last year.



This thread is about bhank seated pressing the 75 lb DB for 20-25 with perfect form and full ROM.

No other lift matters.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 12:30:10 PM
Would you accept a 1,350-lb leg press?

That's the most my gym's leg press can hold, with one heavyweight man standing on it, lol.

No, but seriously - why is squat so important to you?

What makes leg press not valid?  ::)

IMO, a 1,000-lb leg press is on par with a 315-335 squat.

It just so happens - I prefer the leg press.

Fuck no a leg press is not a squat you claimed you can do 385lbs for 2 reps ATG you said you can do 360 off the couch so fine let’s both do the same weight and see who does it better. 345lbs should be easy for you yes? Today yes? You claim to be so much stronger abs to squat so much more claiming 405 atg would be easy for you let’s find out. Squat strength challenge today 345lbs with the best form you can get let the board decide who does it better do you accept or not??
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 12:31:53 PM
I squatted 385x2 when I competed in a powerlifting contest once. The refined nature of powerlifting put me off from it. I prefer Strongman contests - lift the weight up, and put it back down.

As you said - 385x2 is not a special lift. But it was a good lift for me for 178-lb, which is what I weighed at the time.

Questions for you:

Do you shoulder press 100-lb dumbbells for over 10 reps?

Do you bench press 265 for over 10 reps?

Out of curiosity, how many reps do you get with each of the above lifts? Say you bench pressed 265 today, how many reps could you get? I'd probably get 10? Maybe 12. How about you? How many reps could you get?

You don’t shoulder press 100lbs for 10 reps you performed 0 shoulder presses
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:33:38 PM
Matt - Serious Question ??

Why are you so obsessed with Posting How Much You can & you have Lifted ?

Yes you've got some decent poundages - Only you are well aware that a few of us Have & do lift more & much more in some cases.
You don't see us Going on & on about How Much we have & can lift,
Please stop it Now its getting very Repetitive & Boring.
Surely There's more to you than Posting this Nonsense a 1000
along with selfie pics.
Be happy / Content with what you do.

My lifts are perfectly respectable for a 170-lb almost entirely lifetime natural.

They are good lifts for a person taking an everyday healthy approach to training.

As to why I post the videos...

First off, this is an update thread for me, so I felt it was appropriate.

Second, when assholes like Walter Sobchak - the anonymous piece of shit - trashes me for lifts which are perfectly fine, especially for my body weight - that aggravates me because part of the reason why some perfectly good potential competitors don't compete in strength contests. It's because they hear of people being so strong, and fear that they wouldn't do well.

illuminati - did you know that if you bench press 225, that you are in the top 0.21% to the top 0.63% of people?

Yet some people at that level who would like to compete don't do it because of the various lying assholes making claims, and giving them false impressions about the competition.

You've probably heard of unrealistic media images, right? Well - lies impact people negatively too.

I'm in the top 0.1% of male strength, and I know it. But I was well within the top 1% and didn't even know it because of stupid assholes like SquadFatter [RIP] who would trash everyone and make them feel like shit.

Incidentally, I have NO PROBLEM admitting B. Hank can squat more than me *right now*. Why would I? I haven't squatted in over two years because of the pandemic.

That said, I can probably leg press more than him.

But I have NO PROBLEM being truthful about where I stand on things. I know my place in the hierarchy.

Here's something to consider - look at the fat, disgusting piece of shit in the first picture. He was trashing me around the time the second picture was taken.

HAHAHAHAHA, WHAT A FAT FUCKING LOSER.

Haha, just the thought of that fat, stinking piece of shit trashing me. Haha, you can't make that up! And because he was posting anonymously, I had no idea whether or not he was credible.

It blows my mind when people post attacks behind a computer screen, but likely look like that fat POS SquadFatter in deal life!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:36:23 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1394162;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1394163;image)

HAHAHAHAHA, this fat stinking sack of shit used to trash me. Meanwhile, I was getting women just STANDING BY THE DOOR at my bouncer job at the time.

HAHAHAHAHAHA, WHAT A FAT DISGUSTING LOSER.

RIP.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 12:44:27 PM
Y'all be going on about these little events for the next 20 years.  :)

Hopefully that will be 19-1/2 years after you’re gone.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 12:44:42 PM
For the record, Matt just responded to Matt.

That's where we're at.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:46:06 PM
Every time you call him out on his squat lies, he switches to the shoulder press videos.

When you call him out on his half rep shoulder presses, he deflects the discussion to what random people on YouTube are doing.

Matt Canning is a bullshitter, about lifting, his lifts, his education, his financial situation, about everything. He is a chronic liar.

So Matt Canning, who claims to be a ranked Canadian strongman, and one of the “strongest people on Getbig” is backpedaling like a motherfukker because he is caught in ANOTHER LIE!

I have NO PROBLEM stating B. Hank has a heavier squat than me. If he can squat 355, that probably converts to at least a 1,050-lb leg press. I don't think that's leaps and bounds stronger than me, but it's stronger.

Also, I'd need a week or two to squat again, to get my form down.

Lmao @ you claiming a 350-400 range squat is so spectacular. Considering I BENCH PRESS 315 for 8, why wouldn't I be able to squat it?  ::)

I'm in the top 10 on Getbig currently among people who posted videos, or have proven themselves otherwise.

Name 10 people who can lift more than me?  ::)

Half reps, lmao. Shut the fuck up. As if you could do half reps with that weight. Haha.

As for my education, I claimed to have a 4-year mathematics degree, a 4-year psychology degree, a minor in geography, and a certificate in Environmental Management.

I also claimed to have an Army background.

I fail to see where I lied.

Ok, ok, fine - I ONLY do 85% reps with my dumbbells! So sue me!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 12:52:21 PM
Walter Sobchak - do you think I'm making this up?(http://)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 19, 2022, 12:54:18 PM
For the record, Matt just responded to Matt.

That's where we're at.

At least a dozen pages back Matt also said he doesn't care what anyone thinks about his form/lifts. 50 MattC posts later he's still posting about it
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 19, 2022, 12:54:45 PM
For the record, Matt just responded to Matt.

That's where we're at.

Hahahahahaha.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 12:57:10 PM
I have NO PROBLEM stating B. Hank has a heavier squat than me. If he can squat 355, that probably converts to at least a 1,050-lb leg press. I don't think that's leaps and bounds stronger than me, but it's stronger.

Also, I'd need a week or two to squat again, to get my form down.

Lmao @ you claiming a 350-400 range squat is so spectacular. Considering I BENCH PRESS 315 for 8, why wouldn't I be able to squat it?  ::)

I'm in the top 10 on Getbig currently among people who posted videos, or have proven themselves otherwise.

Name 10 people who can lift more than me?  ::)

Half reps, lmao. Shut the fuck up. As if you could do half reps with that weight. Haha.

As for my education, I claimed to have a 4-year mathematics degree, a 4-year psychology degree, a minor in geography, and a certificate in Environmental Management.

I also claimed to have an Army background.

I fail to see where I lied.

Ok, ok, fine - I ONLY do 85% reps with my dumbbells! So sue me!

I never claimed a 350 - 400 lb squat was spectacular. Especially not for a 40-year old steroid user who runs around the internet claiming to be a “strongman”. You need to step outside your mommy’s basement once in a while and come to the realization - you are NOT strong.

But that is beside the point, because you can’t properly squat anything close to that weight anyway.

TITTY BOY WEAKLING MATT CANNING, your reading comprehension drops off during your crybaby temper tantrums. Maybe if you pay Arce Rehaluk a couple hundred bucks for another flight to London ( 🙄 ) he will call you “strongman”?

So you said you could step off your couch and squat 360 lbs to full-depth today. Bhank called you out on your bullshit claim and now you’re backpedaling like a tiny manlet bitch.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 01:01:44 PM
At least a dozen pages back Matt also said he doesn't care what anyone thinks about his form/lifts. 50 MattC posts later he's still posting about it

And the first 50 pages of this thread are Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning ignoring good advice on his shit diet and his failed steroid cycle. Interspersed with hundreds of really lame back poses.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 01:20:09 PM
For the record, Matt just responded to Matt.

That's where we're at.

I'm just saying - SquadFatter had NO BUSINESS trashing anyone!

Grape - surely you remember that fat man, don't you?

RIP.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 19, 2022, 01:21:50 PM
I don't think the leg press weight translates at all to squat weight. I've seen a non butch woman do 5 plates a side in the leg press machine for 10 reps to good depth, multiple sets. I've also seen lots of guys with unimpressive leg size do this. I don't know if squats are the best way to build leg mass or strength i just don't think you can estimate strength on one to the other Matt
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 01:23:52 PM
At least a dozen pages back Matt also said he doesn't care what anyone thinks about his form/lifts. 50 MattC posts later he's still posting about it

I do care. I find it irritating when people are trashing a decent lift.

I'm pretty close to hitting the 110's for a double - I just struggle to get them into position.

But that's a decent press.

What annoys me is when people are being delusional about it - like Walter Sobchak calling me a weakling.

I'm curious how many reps he gets with the 65's, which is probably around his max.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 19, 2022, 01:33:04 PM
And the first 50 pages of this thread are Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning ignoring good advice on his shit diet and his failed steroid cycle. Interspersed with hundreds of really lame back poses.

Those back poses are hilarious. He thinks he's improved his back and added some back thickness. All he's done is added back fat and formed some roles which in certain lighting adds shadow which can look like definition.

He's also hitting the rear double bi different to what he did in the past and because he looks different in the pose he thinks he's developed acromegaly.

The bathroom pic set is also a joke.
He stretched out/changed the width some of his more recent to make himself look thicker/wider. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that it might not have been intentional, but look at the width of the tiles in the background, they are not the same...

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391744;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 19, 2022, 01:34:46 PM
I do care. I find it irritating when people are trashing a decent lift.

I'm pretty close to hitting the 110's for a double - I just struggle to get them into position.

But that's a decent press.

What annoys me is when people are being delusional about it - like Walter Sobchak calling me a weakling.

I'm curious how many reps he gets with the 65's, which is probably around his max.

Again, why not just use a barbell for your shoulder presses? It would save you a lot of strain, as far getting the weight into position.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 19, 2022, 01:37:15 PM
(https://i.ibb.co/g33VVCH/stretch.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 19, 2022, 01:40:24 PM
I actually agree with half truths Hankins  here.

Lol at Matt trying to convince ppl leg press is the same as squatting.

Polio legs  Brian has a better Squat and that isn’t saying much.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 01:42:52 PM
I don't think the leg press weight translates at all to squat weight. I've seen a non butch woman do 5 plates a side in the leg press machine for 10 reps to good depth, multiple sets. I've also seen lots of guys with unimpressive leg size do this. I don't know if squats are the best way to build leg mass or strength i just don't think you can estimate strength on one to the other Matt

Good point, Gym & Juice.

I can only say from experience, that when I can leg press around 1,100-lb on the leg press, I was in the 350-400 squat range.

I've currently maxed out the leg press machine at both my gyms [they don't fit any more plates], so my goal is to get 8-10 reps.

It's 990-lb in total weight + the weight of the sled, which is about 110-lb. So around 1,100-lb which I can currently get - but it's definitely a hard lift for me.

I don't intend to squat again, because squats are just personally my least favorite lift.  Also, in Strongman contests, they usually have parallel squats using vehicles [mini-van squat for example]. What I hate about squats is judging depth.  So I just strengthen my legs with other lifts.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on September 19, 2022, 01:47:53 PM
My lifts are perfectly respectable for a 170-lb almost entirely lifetime natural.

They are good lifts for a person taking an everyday healthy approach to training.

As to why I post the videos...

First off, this is an update thread for me, so I felt it was appropriate.

Second, when assholes like Walter Sobchak - the anonymous piece of shit - trashes me for lifts which are perfectly fine, especially for my body weight - that aggravates me because part of the reason why some perfectly good potential competitors don't compete in strength contests. It's because they hear of people being so strong, and fear that they wouldn't do well.

illuminati - did you know that if you bench press 225, that you are in the top 0.21% to the top 0.63% of people?

Yet some people at that level who would like to compete don't do it because of the various lying assholes making claims, and giving them false impressions about the competition.

You've probably heard of unrealistic media images, right? Well - lies impact people negatively too.

I'm in the top 0.1% of male strength, and I know it. But I was well within the top 1% and didn't even know it because of stupid assholes like SquadFatter [RIP] who would trash everyone and make them feel like shit.

Incidentally, I have NO PROBLEM admitting B. Hank can squat more than me *right now*. Why would I? I haven't squatted in over two years because of the pandemic.

That said, I can probably leg press more than him.

But I have NO PROBLEM being truthful about where I stand on things. I know my place in the hierarchy.

Here's something to consider - look at the fat, disgusting piece of shit in the first picture. He was trashing me around the time the second picture was taken.

HAHAHAHAHA, WHAT A FAT FUCKING LOSER.

Haha, just the thought of that fat, stinking piece of shit trashing me. Haha, you can't make that up! And because he was posting anonymously, I had no idea whether or not he was credible.

It blows my mind when people post attacks behind a computer screen, but likely look like that fat POS SquadFatter in deal life!



Matt - As I've stated several times your poundages are decent going.
As for Being a Lifetime natty , sorry I don't care 🤷🏼‍♂️
I won 2 British PowerLifting Cahmpionships & was Natural - I wish I'd known better at that time
& I Might've been in with a Shout of winning World Champs.

My lifts at 165lb & at age 21 were well ahead of your lifts at the same weight - And So What ,
Who Cares - I Did at the Time as I was Competing to Win & I Did.
Do I Repeatedly Go on & on & on about what I Lifted ? No, if asked then I'll talk about them.
You should do similar- I'm not impressed by your lifting poundage as I've lifted far more
Natural & at less body weight in competition & You Know What ?? There were others that
Were stronger on some Lifts Than me - That's just Facts - Accept it & Deal with it.

I care Not if anyone on here believes me or wishes to Trash my Lifts / Poundages
I Have the Trophies & Records .

That's their problem Matt if they don't believe you - Why waste so much Time & Energy arguing with
Them about it - They Don't Care & Are Just Winding you up & Poking Fun at You're Expense!!
Let it Go, You're never going to Win / Shut them up, Do you Tommy W posting
Endlessly about his Lifts & How Strong He Is ??
NO you don't as He isn't Remotely Bothered by what others on here want to say or Think.

Be Secure in yourself & Stop seeking Approval from those That will Never Give you It.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 01:53:25 PM
I actually agree with half truths Hankins  here.

Lol at Matt trying to convince ppl leg press is the same as squatting.

Polio legs  Brian has a better Squat and that isn’t saying much.

I'd say any given leg press probably converts to 1/3 as much for a squat.

Didn't Ronnie leg press 2,400 on the same day the same day he squatted 800?

That's why I suspect I'd be in the 350+ range for a squat right now. But sometimes it takes a couple of weeks to readjust to a lift.

For instance,  all my overhead presses lately have been with dumbbells. So while I'm fairly certain I have the power to push press 225 right now, I'd want to start with 185, then do 205 next week, then max out - which I suspect would be 225-240.

The last time I push pressed 230, my dumbbell press was lower.

IMO, it just boils down to central nervous system acclimation to the lifts.

Another way to look at it would be like this: the world's top powerlifters have a higher 3-lift total than any of the World's Strongest Man competitors.  But they would not win WSM, because they don't have events training.

Some of them could be competitive in WSM fairly quickly, if they did some transitional events training though.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 19, 2022, 02:10:12 PM
please.....

Someone lock this fucking thread.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 02:12:20 PM
Those back poses are hilarious. He thinks he's improved his back and added some back thickness. All he's done is added back fat and formed some roles which in certain lighting adds shadow which can look like definition.

He's also hitting the rear double bi different to what he did in the past and because he looks different in the pose he thinks he's developed acromegaly.

The bathroom pic set is also a joke.
He stretched out/changed the width some of his more recent to make himself look thicker/wider. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that it might not have been intentional, but look at the width of the tiles in the background, they are not the same...

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391744;image)

I have no idea why you're being such a dick, Flexacon - especially when I already apologized to you for the comment you made about that cruise ship having a Covid outbreak, and you saying flat was proof that the vaccine was working.

The reason why that cruise ship had the outbreak is in part because the vaccine is crap, but also because if you jack up the PCR test to a cycle threshold of 34+, it can test a banana positive for Covid.

You're from the UK, aren't you?

How do you feel about the UK government not recommending the vaccine to pregnant women as of August 16th, and then quietly prohibiting it for children under five?

Is that because the vaccine is working?

Anyway, if you have a problem with my posts, either stop reading them or stop being an asshole. I've already put forth the effort to apologize to you for the ONE negative comment I made to you about the vaccine, but given the extent of the lockdowns and other illegal measures in Canada naturally, I was upset with anyone promoting the Big Pharma plandemic joke.

In 2-3 years, NO ONE will openly admit that they fell for this sham.

As for my cycle progress - I made roughly the progress/transformation I expected to make.

I mean, what progress will anyone make on a low-dose oral cycle? IMO,  anywhere between 10-25 pounds would be expected.  I gained 25-27, and was fuller, and sort of more "3D" looking.

That's exactly what I expected.

As for the tiles...I haven't adjusted my camera. It's the default setting for the Moto-E burner phone I have. If I had to guess, I'm just closer to the camera in the newer picture.

Even now since coming off, I'm still over 200-lb, but I've lost that sort of "pop" my muscles had.  Something which I don't think is attainable without juice. It's hard to quantify, but juice just creates a different look.

I have a new burner phone now, so maybe my pictures will look different now.

As for your comment that I purposely manipulated my photos...you realize that's a compliment, right?

Thank you very much for that compliment,  Flexacon.

I love the inadvertent compliments,  lol.

I agree with you - I am wider in the second photo. I am also [squad] fatter, but ultimately,  I look better. That was the point of running this cycle - just to look slightly better for the summer, rather than spend 6-8 months following a perfect diet for the same progress.

Maybe next time - if there is one - I'll be a little braver in my doses!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 02:19:01 PM
And the first 50 pages of this thread are Matt “TITTY BOY” Canning ignoring good advice on his shit diet and his failed steroid cycle. Interspersed with hundreds of really lame back poses.

Out of curiosity,  how many reps can you get with 65-lb dumbbells for shoulder press? I'm assuming that's close to your max?

I'm sure you're good for the 65's for 8.

Am I close?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 02:24:01 PM
Again, why not just use a barbell for your shoulder presses? It would save you a lot of strain, as far getting the weight into position.

No real reason.

Maybe availability - at my one gym, the military press is a part of the power rack. So pressing there would hog it from those squatting.

Also, I feel I can focus more on my shoulders doing the work when I'm stabilized in a seated position.

I do switch things up - but I do dumbbells more for shoulders than barbells.

I think dumbbells are slightly safer too...but I guess that's debatable.

Do to answer your question: preference, mainly.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 19, 2022, 02:31:59 PM
I'm just saying - SquadFatter had NO BUSINESS trashing anyone!

Grape - surely you remember that fat man, don't you?

RIP.

We agree on this, for sure. 

He was one of the biggest hypocrites, assholes, and among the lowest of the worthless trolling palm-fuckers I've ever seen.  For a grown man, he had an astonishingly juvenile mentality and sense of humor.  How else could he rack up tens of thousands of posts with each of his many handles?

Pics or it didn't happen!, said the pig who took a blurry picture of himself in the reflection of a sliding glass door.
It revealed a spare tire around his gut and a sorry-looking arm with unremarkable size and nary a cut in sight.

Meltdown!, said the jester with no logical counters.

Bwahaha, monster triceps!, he'd say of anyone brave enough to actually post pics -- well, with a few exceptions.  He rode that ephebophile Abeles' dick pretty hard, which was ironic: Adam is a Jew, and Mirza spoke glowingly of the "great Heinrich Himmler."

(Aside: I know your stance on the Holocaust.  If you want to debate that in an independent thread, we can; for now, let's just say we disagree there.  However, I think you'd probably agree that Herr Himmler was *not* a great man.  He was a failed chicken farmer who was behind the genocide of many innocent people; and when it came to him personally overseeing that genocide, he was too much of a coward to stomach it.

From Quota:  SS-Obergruppenfuhrer Karl Wolff relates to an Einsatzgruppen (Special Action) execution near Minsk in late 1941. Wolff’s narrative is as follows:

“And there an open grave had been dug. And they had jump into this and lie face down. And when a certain number had already been shot, they had lie on the people who had been shot. And Himmler had never seen dead people before, and in his curiosity he was leaning over this pit, a sort of triangular hole, and looking in. While he was looking in, Himmler had the deserved bad luck, from one or another of those that had been shot in the head, that he got a splash of brains on his coat. And I think it also splashed onto his face. And he became very green and pale, he wasn’t actually sick, but he was heaving and swaying and stumbled back from this pit. Then, I lead him away from the pit.”)

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 02:44:11 PM


Matt - As I've stated several times your poundages are decent going.
As for Being a Lifetime natty , sorry I don't care 🤷🏼‍♂️
I won 2 British PowerLifting Cahmpionships & was Natural - I wish I'd known better at that time
& I Might've been in with a Shout of winning World Champs.

My lifts at 165lb & at age 21 were well ahead of your lifts at the same weight - And So What ,
Who Cares - I Did at the Time as I was Competing to Win & I Did.
Do I Repeatedly Go on & on & on about what I Lifted ? No, if asked then I'll talk about them.
You should do similar- I'm not impressed by your lifting poundage as I've lifted far more
Natural & at less body weight in competition & You Know What ?? There were others that
Were stronger on some Lifts Than me - That's just Facts - Accept it & Deal with it.

I care Not if anyone on here believes me or wishes to Trash my Lifts / Poundages
I Have the Trophies & Records .

That's their problem Matt if they don't believe you - Why waste so much Time & Energy arguing with
Them about it - They Don't Care & Are Just Winding you up & Poking Fun at You're Expense!!
Let it Go, You're never going to Win / Shut them up, Do you Tommy W posting
Endlessly about his Lifts & How Strong He Is ??
NO you don't as He isn't Remotely Bothered by what others on here want to say or Think.

Be Secure in yourself & Stop seeking Approval from those That will Never Give you It.

First off, your lifts are amazing.  I had heard about them from someone else before corresponding with you.

Secondly, I would think if someone was trashing your lifts, you would indeed take it personally.

Especially if you had literal video evidence, and you had people question what is visibly right in front of them.

Take my dumbbell press for instance - you have B. Hank claim that KinoBody's form is better than mine, and Grape Ape call Eddie Hall's reps "perfect no lock" reps.

Meanwhile, the YouTube comments were loaded with people calling Eddie out for doing half reps.

Now look - I acknowledge that I was a few inches short on my reps. No argument there. But if we're going to say I saved some energy not going all the way down, HOW is it ok to save energy not going all the way UP?

Either way, you save energy, and get more reps.

So if this week, I do the lift again, and don't lock out any reps, but go an inch or two lower, would that be better?

What would that prove?

And for B. Hank to say that all ~10 videos I posted were better form than me - how am I supposed to take him seriously?

Now I know he's trashing me just for the sake of trashing me.

In other words, some people here are LYING. B. Hank knows full well that my form is better than most people who post videos pressing 100-lb dumbbells or more. The proof is in the videos.

If he just said "Yeah - their form socks too", I would consider him credible. Though anyone nitpicking a heavy lift like that is a bit of a tool.

For example, B. Hank's 355 squat wouldn't pass in contest - BUT - it's still a decent lift showing good strength. It's still in the top 1% of the general public.

Dumbbell pressing 100-lb dumbbells is literally stronger than 99.95% of the population, and people are nitpicking it? Seriously?

Then you have Walter Sobchak whose lifetime max bench is 230, and who needed JustPlaneJane to lie about his body weight on here when he can easily post a photo with his face hidden...it's just bizarre.

I don't need to hear people tell me that I'm in the top 0.1% of strongest men. That's literally just a statistical fact. But when there are people insisting the opposite,  it does get annoying.

Comments trashing my physique,  I can handle. I mean, that's SUBJECTIVE.  My strength level is not.

If you bench press 225, you are among the top 0.5% of strongest men. So there you go - even Walter Sobchak is among the top 0.5%, lol.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 02:48:48 PM
What a huge difference. Gee, it looks like they got me by 6.45cm. OH MY GOD!!!  ::)

At least I lock out each rep.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 02:53:20 PM
(https://iili.io/iOnAKb.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 19, 2022, 02:57:42 PM
No real reason.

Maybe availability - at my one gym, the military press is a part of the power rack. So pressing there would hog it from those squatting.

Also, I feel I can focus more on my shoulders doing the work when I'm stabilized in a seated position.

I do switch things up - but I do dumbbells more for shoulders than barbells.
I think dumbbells are slightly safer too...but I guess that's debatable.

Do to answer your question: preference, mainly.

I'd actually reckon the BB is safer; having to kick the dumbbells into the starting position is easily the most dangerous part of that lift.

That said, the DB press might be a bit better for hypertrophy purposes, though I think the difference is inconsequential.  Moreover:

*You have plenty of front delt development.  Your shoulders in general are your strength.  As long as you're doing chest presses, I'd refocus delts to face pulls, side and rear laterals.

*This goes a way back, but I called both your chest and shoulder presses "sloppy."

Yeah, I've seen far worse :), but your defensive reaction, complete with all those videos of how other chaps perform the exercise, leads me to think I struck a nerve.  No, you don't need to go a full foot lower...but my man, that bending wrist tilt IS robbing you of optimal gains, strength-based and otherwise.  If you can pull 500+, you can hold your wrists straight and lower the weight 4-6" more.

*Slightly off-topic, but please, indulge me: what does your current pec and back workouts look like? 

You're given to details and long posts :)  Don't stop now that I ask you such things, LOL.  I wanna give you another shot.  I bet you'll ignore my advice, but maybe not?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 03:04:11 PM
(https://iili.io/iOnAKb.jpg)

Well four things have been determined here:

(1) Matt “BITCHTITS” Canning lies about his lifts and chickened out on hanky’s challenge.
(2) The steroid cycle made him fat and he grew tits.
(3) The moron won’t take any type of advice.
(4) Titty Boy’s legs are so lame he’s never going to take his mommy’s yoga tights off.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on September 19, 2022, 03:05:58 PM
First off, your lifts are amazing.  I had heard about them from someone else before corresponding with you.

Secondly, I would think if someone was trashing your lifts, you would indeed take it personally.

Especially if you had literal video evidence, and you had people question what is visibly right in front of them.

Take my dumbbell press for instance - you have B. Hank claim that KinoBody's form is better than mine, and Grape Ape call Eddie Hall's reps "perfect no lock" reps.

Meanwhile, the YouTube comments were loaded with people calling Eddie out for doing half reps.

Now look - I acknowledge that I was a few inches short on my reps. No argument there. But if we're going to say I saved some energy not going all the way down, HOW is it ok to save energy not going all the way UP?

Either way, you save energy, and get more reps.

So if this week, I do the lift again, and don't lock out any reps, but go an inch or two lower, would that be better?

What would that prove?

And for B. Hank to say that all ~10 videos I posted were better form than me - how am I supposed to take him seriously?

Now I know he's trashing me just for the sake of trashing me.

In other words, some people here are LYING. B. Hank knows full well that my form is better than most people who post videos pressing 100-lb dumbbells or more. The proof is in the videos.

If he just said "Yeah - their form socks too", I would consider him credible. Though anyone nitpicking a heavy lift like that is a bit of a tool.

For example, B. Hank's 355 squat wouldn't pass in contest - BUT - it's still a decent lift showing good strength. It's still in the top 1% of the general public.

Dumbbell pressing 100-lb dumbbells is literally stronger than 99.95% of the population, and people are nitpicking it? Seriously?

Then you have Walter Sobchak whose lifetime max bench is 230, and who needed JustPlaneJane to lie about his body weight on here when he can easily post a photo with his face hidden...it's just bizarre.

I don't need to hear people tell me that I'm in the top 0.1% of strongest men. That's literally just a statistical fact. But when there are people insisting the opposite,  it does get annoying.

Comments trashing my physique,  I can handle. I mean, that's SUBJECTIVE.  My strength level is not.

If you bench press 225, you are among the top 0.5% of strongest men. So there you go - even Walter Sobchak is among the top 0.5%, lol.


Matt - You're Missing my Point .
Seriously I wouldn't waste my Time & Energy arguing or Trying to Convince anyone on here
About any of My Lifting Achievements- They either Believe or Don't Believe It Makes Not
1 iota of Difference to Me or My Life.

I Suggest that you take the Same attitude- Be Happy & Content with your own Lifts
And if others don't wish to believe or acknowledge them so be it.
It won't affect you or your lifting.

Let it Go. 👍🏻
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 03:10:56 PM

Matt - You're Missing my Point .
Seriously I wouldn't waste my Time & Energy arguing or Trying to Convince anyone on here
About any of My Lifting Achievements- They either Believe or Don't Believe It Makes Not
1 iota of Difference to Me or My Life.

I Suggest that you take the Same attitude- Be Happy & Content with your own Lifts
And if others don't wish to believe or acknowledge them so be it.
It won't affect you or your lifting.

Let it Go. 👍🏻

Bro…..

Matt Canning is PMing people and begging them not to criticize him on here.

Do you really think he can “just let it go?”

The clown will spend 18 hours a day arguing on a message board, while someone else is out there raising his fucking kids. He’s beyond pathetic and defective.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 19, 2022, 03:13:39 PM
Those back poses are hilarious. He thinks he's improved his back and added some back thickness. All he's done is added back fat and formed some roles which in certain lighting adds shadow which can look like definition.

He's also hitting the rear double bi different to what he did in the past and because he looks different in the pose he thinks he's developed acromegaly.

The bathroom pic set is also a joke.
He stretched out/changed the width some of his more recent to make himself look thicker/wider. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that it might not have been intentional, but look at the width of the tiles in the background, they are not the same...

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1391744;image)

Flexacon dealing out some cold, hard truth.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 03:14:43 PM
We agree on this, for sure. 

He was one of the biggest hypocrites, assholes, and among the lowest of the worthless trolling palm-fuckers I've ever seen.  For a grown man, he had an astonishingly juvenile mentality and sense of humor.  How else could he rack up tens of thousands of posts with each of his many handles?

Pics or it didn't happen!, said the pig who took a blurry picture of himself in the reflection of a sliding glass door.
It revealed a spare tire around his gut and a sorry-looking arm with unremarkable size and nary a cut in sight.

Meltdown!, said the jester with no logical counters.

Bwahaha, monster triceps!, he'd say of anyone brave enough to actually post pics -- well, with a few exceptions.  He rode that ephebophile Abeles' dick pretty hard, which was ironic: Adam is a Jew, and Mirza spoke glowingly of the "great Heinrich Himmler."

You're right, Titus Pullo. As usual, you are right.

I just about didn't enter my first strength contest, because he was trashing a video of me bench pressing, because I didn't go all the way down. Honestly, I just didn't have a spotter, and was doing a 4-rep max, and didn't want to risk not getting the press.

But it would be one thing to politely ask me why I wasn't doing full reps, but it was more of the same thing that B. Hank did - by claiming I couldn't even get one rep.

Then I did a proper powerlifting contest under IPF rules, and I benched more than I did in the video.

Incidentally, I wasn't going to enter that contest because Squad had made me feel like I wasn't sufficiently strong - then I ended up placing 4th in my weight class!!!

You know how they talk about unrealistic media images? I think these sorts of negative comments make people question their own reality. That's why I try to use objective measures to determine where I'm at. For example - if you bench press 225, you are between the top 0.21% to 0.63% of the North American population.

As I bench press over 315, I am around the top 0.1% of strength. Yet comments like those of SquadFatter make me question if maybe that's not the case.

If you've ever met hot women who think they are fat or ugly - it's the same thing. These comments do have an effect on people.

Then SquadFatter got outed as being a fat fuck, and then ran off the board.  ::) I guess he wasn't so hot anymore once people saw what he looked like.

In any case, I agree that my reps were slightly off...but that's still a strong lift, and nothing I couldn't get with literally a full pause.

Imagine someone posting a video bench pressing 385 for 12 reps, and people weaker saying it was bounced.  ::) I mean, come on...

There's a way to say it, and a way not to, and my form is on par with any video on YouTube of the same lift. I don't consider it an issue at all.

I sort of wonder if the people anonymously trashing others are themselves in shape.

I admit, I was SHOCKED at how fat SquadFatter was! He was so fat and ugly, he ran off the board!

(Aside: I know your stance on the Holocaust.  If you want to debate that in an independent thread, we can; for now, let's just say we disagree there.  However, I think you'd probably agree that Herr Himmler was *not* a great man.  He was a failed chicken farmer who was behind the genocide of many innocent people; and when it came to him personally overseeing that genocide, he was too much of a coward to stomach it.

From Quota:  SS-Obergruppenfuhrer Karl Wolff relates to an Einsatzgruppen (Special Action) execution near Minsk in late 1941. Wolff’s narrative is as follows:

“And there an open grave had been dug. And they had jump into this and lie face down. And when a certain number had already been shot, they had lie on the people who had been shot. And Himmler had never seen dead people before, and in his curiosity he was leaning over this pit, a sort of triangular hole, and looking in. While he was looking in, Himmler had the deserved bad luck, from one or another of those that had been shot in the head, that he got a splash of brains on his coat. And I think it also splashed onto his face. And he became very green and pale, he wasn’t actually sick, but he was heaving and swaying and stumbled back from this pit. Then, I lead him away from the pit.”)

No disagreement about Himmler being disgusting looking.

But if we want to prevent another Holocaust, going on with a narrative that Germans - literally among the most tolerant people in the world - just up and decided to mass murder Jews for no reason, and it had nothing to do with international banks financially exploiting them with 71 years of crippling reparations...well...I guess we can go and pretend that.

But "Jews are perfect, Gentiles are evil" is not the correct story, and does nothing to determine what causes Jewish and Gentile conflict, or help prevent it again.

What I don't respect, and don't accept, is that we are allowed to even talk about it. That's bullshit! No historical topic should be off-limits.

But NOPE - we aren't allowed to even QUESTION the Holocaust. And that's EXACTLY why I will ALWAYS question.

No one is going to tell me what I can or cannot question. And I question why anyone would be so terrified or a dissenting view, if the alleged truth is sooooo obvious.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 19, 2022, 03:34:02 PM
You're right, Titus Pullo. As usual, you are right.

I just about didn't enter my first strength contest, because he was trashing a video of me bench pressing, because I didn't go all the way down. Honestly, I just didn't have a spotter, and was doing a 4-rep max, and didn't want to risk not getting the press.

But it would be one thing to politely ask me why I wasn't doing full reps, but it was more of the same thing that B. Hank did - by claiming I couldn't even get one rep.

Then I did a proper powerlifting contest under IPF rules, and I benched more than I did in the video.

Incidentally, I wasn't going to enter that contest because Squad had made me feel like I wasn't sufficiently strong - then I ended up placing 4th in my weight class!!!

You know how they talk about unrealistic media images? I think these sorts of negative comments make people question their own reality. That's why I try to use objective measures to determine where I'm at. For example - if you bench press 225, you are between the top 0.21% to 0.63% of the North American population.

As I bench press over 315, I am around the top 0.1% of strength. Yet comments like those of SquadFatter make me question if maybe that's not the case.

If you've ever met hot women who think they are fat or ugly - it's the same thing. These comments do have an effect on people.

Then SquadFatter got outed as being a fat fuck, and then ran off the board.  ::) I guess he wasn't so hot anymore once people saw what he looked like.

In any case, I agree that my reps were slightly off...but that's still a strong lift, and nothing I couldn't get with literally a full pause.

Imagine someone posting a video bench pressing 385 for 12 reps, and people weaker saying it was bounced.  ::) I mean, come on...

There's a way to say it, and a way not to, and my form is on par with any video on YouTube of the same lift. I don't consider it an issue at all.

I sort of wonder if the people anonymously trashing others are themselves in shape.

I admit, I was SHOCKED at how fat SquadFatter was! He was so fat and ugly, he ran off the board!

No disagreement about Himmler being disgusting looking.

But if we want to prevent another Holocaust, going on with a narrative that Germans - literally among the most tolerant people in the world - just up and decided to mass murder Jews for no reason, and it had nothing to do with international banks financially exploiting them with 71 years of crippling reparations...well...I guess we can go and pretend that.

But "Jews are perfect, Gentiles are evil" is not the correct story, and does nothing to determine what causes Jewish and Gentile conflict, or help prevent it again.

What I don't respect, and don't accept, is that we are allowed to even talk about it. That's bullshit! No historical topic should be off-limits.

But NOPE - we aren't allowed to even QUESTION the Holocaust. And that's EXACTLY why I will ALWAYS question.

No one is going to tell me what I can or cannot question. And I question why anyone would be so terrified or a dissenting view, if the alleged truth is sooooo obvious.

Dude,

Your form is shit and you look like a bag of fucking milk.

You can rationalize wtf you want.

 “I’m the strongest in the gym”

You live in bum fuck no where.

Easy to be the strongest in the gym when there’s 3 members.

Go train in NYC, NJ any fucking where.

You would lock yourself up in the basement and hopefully hang yourself.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 19, 2022, 03:35:08 PM
What a huge difference. Gee, it looks like they got me by 6.45cm. OH MY GOD!!!  ::)

At least I lock out each rep.

The one guy is not going low enough eddie is much lower than you but they get a better grade than you for keeping their hands straight and the dumbells horizontal to the ground that is dangerous you are an injury waiting to happen you will never progress doing that nonsense. I said it before and I will say it again you are not off a couple inches you are a FOOT TOO HIGH
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 03:50:24 PM
(https://iili.io/iOnAKb.jpg)

Dammit, I just want an honest assessment of my strength, dammit!  ;D

Regarding my back double biceps - it's my only good pose, and has always been my only good pose.

Not anymore - I've already deflated a bit since stopping the cycle.

Do you know Scott Herman, Grape?

He looked amazing from 2009 up until 2015 or so.  But then suddenly, he has declined. It just makes me wonder - can anyone look good naturally?

Speaking of which - I hesitate to be given training advice, because my training is fine. Not perfect- but fine. I mean, how can you be in the top 10% of results for people who train if my training is so awful?

I'm merely saying - my training is sufficient.

What I need is a diet.

I'm not quite ready to commit JUST yet [although possibly by October,  I will be], so out of curiosity,  do you have a diet template?

If so, I would take it, show it to a few friends who are into health and fitness, and give it a shot.

I think it's silly the way we fixate on training. I feel diet is more important. And even though I hate to eat...I do much prefer how I looked this summer.

I'm willing to ramp up my calories and follow a proper diet, to see what results that brings me.

So if you happen to have a good BB diet, I'd be grateful to check that out.

Thanks Grape.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on September 19, 2022, 03:57:18 PM
1, Dammit, I just want an honest assessment of my strength, dammit!  ;D

2, so out of curiosity,  do you have a diet template?



1, Your Strength level is okay - Better Than average 👍🏻

2, Eat Less - Move More - Either of those 2 or Better Both Together. 👍🏻
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 04:20:26 PM
Walter Sobchak is far from a weakling.....not too long ago Jane sent me a video of her doing repetition squats with 225 and Sobchack was front squatting 315 for reps so I know he`s a legit lifter.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 04:30:23 PM
I can`t believe I read this bullshit thread........ of course I skipped most of Matts regurhgitated repetitive bullshit.

I`m ready to gouge out my fucking eyes with a spoon................GEE ZUS.


I have outsquatted and outbenched both of these cats at an older age.....no brag,just fact.

Haven`t benched in years choosing to concentrate on building ,more upper pecs like most intelligent bodybuilders do after building sufficient chest mass over time....still after not benching for more than 8 years at the time I won first place in a bodyweight for reps contests getting over 20 perfect reps in Rochester NY.....got the trophy to proved it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 04:36:40 PM
I'd actually reckon the BB is safer; having to kick the dumbbells into the starting position is easily the most dangerous part of that lift.

That said, the DB press might be a bit better for hypertrophy purposes, though I think the difference is inconsequential.  Moreover:

*You have plenty of front delt development.  Your shoulders in general are your strength.  As long as you're doing chest presses, I'd refocus delts to face pulls, side and rear laterals.

*This goes a way back, but I called both your chest and shoulder presses "sloppy."

Yeah, I've seen far worse :), but your defensive reaction, complete with all those videos of how other chaps perform the exercise, leads me to think I struck a nerve.  No, you don't need to go a full foot lower...but my man, that bending wrist tilt IS robbing you of optimal gains, strength-based and otherwise.  If you can pull 500+, you can hold your wrists straight and lower the weight 4-6" more.

*Slightly off-topic, but please, indulge me: what does your current pec and back workouts look like? 

You're given to details and long posts :)  Don't stop now that I ask you such things, LOL.  I wanna give you another shot.  I bet you'll ignore my advice, but maybe not?

Slight correction: I can pull 500 *with straps*.

Not sure about at this exact moment- probably 450x3. But generally, my full strength comes back fast when I train exclusively for strength.

That being said, the straps help. Although chalk helps too, I know I can pull 405 without chalk or straps [or a belt for that matter], though I'm not sure where exactly I would land.

My wrists/hands are pretty weak, I think. I should say - they are just not in proportion to my overall strength.

Regarding my pressing form - Titus, there is NOTHING wrong with your comment.  There is a nice way to say something, and a rude way. And for the COUNTLESS times I have come to B. Hank's defense and complimented his physique,  I am FLABBERGASTED he would be such an asshole about it.

B. Hank and I both get trashed on here. But I make it a point to speak to everyone respectfully, and by and large, I am polite and respectful to people.

I have always made it a point to say that B. Hank has one of the best physiques on Getbig, and complimented him numerous times. And had he commented on my reps like you did - no problem.  But to talk about a range of motion short by maybe 6.45cm, and say it's a foot too high, and to say I can't handle 100-lb dumbbells for one rep - that's utter bullshit.

Your post - which essentially says the same thing- is fine.

My reps are a bit off. I'm still pleased with the lift - heck, I've only ever pressed more than that maybe 2-3 times in my life. So I'm pretty happy about it. But I will grant - I'm a few inches shy of a FULL rep.

Even if I did do that, B. Hank would accuse me or bouncing my reps.

I'm fully receptive to constructive criticism, but nitpicking on little form flaws on what is by any standard, a strong lift, is another matter.

But ok, fine - maybe I would only get 5 reps with the 100's, rather than 8-10, if I used full textbook form.

Lastly, Titus- if you have a proper bodybuilding diet for me, I'm all ears. I just wanted to cheat my gains this summer. But now I have all Fall and Winter to follow a proper natural bodybuilding protocol.

So if you have a bodybuilding diet to recommend for me, I'd love to hear it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 04:53:03 PM
Walter Sobchak is far from a weakling.....not too long ago Jane sent me a video of her doing repetition squats with 225 and Sobchack was front squatting 315 for reps so I know he`s a legit lifter.

Until I see proof of any of this, I don't believe it - but:

[1] I trust you. I know who you are, wes. I know what you're capable of, and I would never step out of line. You can ask anyone on the board who knows me.

[2] Those lifts are strong, but believable. Nothing that would merit Walter's level of trash talking though, but...strong and believable to be sure.

I'd like to see his max 8-10" pin squat. My max ever was 700, and it was a dizzying lift.  I'd be shocked if he got over 800]. Heck, a former #2 Ontario's Sterongest Man [friend of mine] got 675 for 6.

But no disrespect here - a 315 front squat for reps is excellent.

If he's lifting 50-lb more than me on every lift while out-weighing me by 70-90 pounds, I don't know why he's bragging.  I find even 20-lb of body weight makes a massive difference in strength.

I'm not feeling great today [since ending the cycle, I've fallen back into my old 1,100 calories per day habit], but I'll try to do those sets again today, and clean up the form.

I fucking HATE to eat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 04:58:37 PM
I have outsquatted and outbenched both of these cats at an older age.....no brag,just fact.

Incredible lifts, wes. You're one of the board members who has paid his dues and proven credible enough not need evidence to back up any claims.

Awesome, wes. Just awesome.

You've also made me realize that you can get stronger at age 40 and beyond.

But how did you manage to avoid injury? I'm glad that thanks to you, I have more confidence in maintaining or even increasing my strength with age - but is it not safe to say that injuries are easier to succumb to as you get older.

I have been warming up a bit more, and opting for 2-6 rep maxes, rather than singles.

Do you have any advice on that?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on September 19, 2022, 05:26:12 PM
At this point I will settle for a video of 25 clean reps with 60-lb DBs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 05:29:12 PM
Incredible lifts, wes. You're one of the board members who has paid his dues and proven credible enough not need evidence to back up any claims.

Awesome, wes. Just awesome.

You've also made me realize that you can get stronger at age 40 and beyond.

But how did you manage to avoid injury? I'm glad that thanks to you, I have more confidence in maintaining or even increasing my strength with age - but is it not safe to say that injuries are easier to succumb to as you get older.

I have been warming up a bit more, and opting for 2-6 rep maxes, rather than singles.

Do you have any advice on that?
I avoid injury,especially at my age these days by doing the exercise I`m going to perform first for approximately 50 or so slow full range reps.

On legs I do a few sets of freehand squats,ans some ham stretching then just add weight pyramid style usually dropping down to a mid range poundage for as many as i can get on the last set.

Important point......always us a full range of motion and always get a good stretch and also a good contraction.

I know you train strongman and you are one strong dude but you will eventually get hurt {I sincerely hope not} because your form is shit.....link the mind to the muscle being trained and lower poundages there are lots of tactics to make a lighter weight feel heavy as fuck.....INTENSITY TECHNIQUES LIKE DROP-SETS,Super-Sets,etc. etc. AND SHORT REST PERIODS BEING THE BEST OF THE TWO IMO.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 05:34:42 PM
At this point I will settle for a video of 25 clean reps with 60-lb DBs.
I would honestly like to see 75 presses full ROM with the 25 pound dumbells....that wouldn`t be easy unless you trained like a girl with very high reps all the time.....the lactic acid build up alone would stop him.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on September 19, 2022, 05:37:41 PM
I like Matt but reading his posts is like talking to Dustin Hoffmann in Rain Man


(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYjc2ZTliZTYtOWI4NS00YmYzLWJhZGMtODg0NmUyZmFhMDZhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzU1NzE3NTg@._V1_QL75_UX500_CR0,47,500,281_.jpg)




Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: SF1900 on September 19, 2022, 05:46:07 PM
My god, Matt kissing the assess of some posters is beyond cringe worthy.

And him whining about flexacon being mean to him haha lol “flexacon, why are you being mean to me?” Haha lol
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 19, 2022, 05:55:04 PM
Any video of this 75# db press for 20 reps yet?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 19, 2022, 06:02:56 PM
Any video of this 75# db press for 20 reps yet?

It’s coming after the 405 squat

Hanky will do both on the same day.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 19, 2022, 06:04:34 PM
Incredible lifts, wes. You're one of the board members who has paid his dues and proven credible enough not need evidence to back up any claims.

Awesome, wes. Just awesome.

You've also made me realize that you can get stronger at age 40 and beyond.

But how did you manage to avoid injury? I'm glad that thanks to you, I have more confidence in maintaining or even increasing my strength with age - but is it not safe to say that injuries are easier to succumb to as you get older.

I have been warming up a bit more, and opting for 2-6 rep maxes, rather than singles.

Do you have any advice on that?

You avoid injury by not lifting like a jackass and dog shit form.

 So you are fucked
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 19, 2022, 06:10:20 PM
My god, Matt kissing the assess of some posters is beyond cringe worthy.

And him whining about flexacon being mean to him haha lol “flexacon, why are you being mean to me?” Haha lol
Yes,I had a parsh reading that post to me !!   :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 19, 2022, 06:40:38 PM
Dig the hairdo here.  Were you up all night posting on Getbig?  :D

Don't make any changes to your training, those wheels are coming along nicely.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 19, 2022, 07:25:42 PM
Any video of this 75# db press for 20 reps yet?

20-25, full ROM.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: JustPlaneJane on September 19, 2022, 07:31:03 PM
Walter Sobchak is far from a weakling.....not too long ago Jane sent me a video of her doing repetition squats with 225 and Sobchack was front squatting 315 for reps so I know he`s a legit lifter.

Hi Wes !   🙋‍♀️

I hope that you’re doing well. I’m doing a little bit better now and I’m going home to see my Mom in October. She’s doing better and thank you for your kind support.

I am now able to do two full depth squats with 225 lbs and I’m still following your program and some of the program Henda sent me.  Hi Henda !   🙋‍♀️

I am hoping to try a double bodyweight squat in November. So if I plan it correctly I will have to squat 255-260 lbs. For the sake of full disclosure I am squatting with my knee wraps on. I won’t be involved with the stupidity of this thread, but I know damn well I never lied about anyone’s weight.

Chaos, I’m hiking the Grand Canyon in a few weeks and will be staying a day or two in Flagstaff. I will select a house for you to buy me !  🙋‍♀️ Take care Hon.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 19, 2022, 08:06:28 PM


Anyway, if you have a problem with my posts, either stop reading them or stop being an asshole. I've already put forth the effort to apologize to you for the ONE negative comment I made to you about the vaccine, but given the extent of the lockdowns and other illegal measures in Canada naturally, I was upset with anyone promoting the Big Pharma plandemic joke.

In 2-3 years, NO ONE will openly admit that they fell for this sham.

As for my cycle progress - I made roughly the progress/transformation I expected to make.

I mean, what progress will anyone make on a low-dose oral cycle? IMO,  anywhere between 10-25 pounds would be expected.  I gained 25-27, and was fuller, and sort of more "3D" looking.

That's exactly what I expected.

As for the tiles...I haven't adjusted my camera. It's the default setting for the Moto-E burner phone I have. If I had to guess, I'm just closer to the camera in the newer picture.

Even now since coming off, I'm still over 200-lb, but I've lost that sort of "pop" my muscles had.  Something which I don't think is attainable without juice. It's hard to quantify, but juice just creates a different look.


Please accept my apologies Matt.

It will be interesting to see your most recent pic at 200lbs. Please do all your favourite poses and confirm 200lbs so we can attempt to quantify. Thank you.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 08:30:07 PM
Dig the hairdo here.  Were you up all night posting on Getbig?  :D

Don't make any changes to your training, those wheels are coming along nicely.  :D

 ;D ;D ;D

Those are good natural pictures of me, including the hair.  :D

It's also proof flat everything I lifted when on steroids, I have lifted naturally before. Which reminds me of some of the inadvertent compliments I've been getting on here. For example: Walter Sobchak stated that my current strength level is simply a function of steroids, and when I go off, I will lose my strength.  He doesn't even realize that statement is a COMPLIMENT.  He's suggesting I have strength worth even addressing at all. If I didn't post some impressive lifts, the concept of losing strength after my cessation of steroids wouldn't even be in the conversation.

But anyway, to address Walter: NO, I will not lose strength, as I will now be adjusting my training for a strength program.

Regarding those pictures you posted above, Palumboism: that's what I suspect I will look like in 1-3 months. More or less just back to my normal self.  I didn't even take enough juice to get a new pimple, so I suspect I will return to normal without issue.

Back to my previous question,  Palumboism: do you think I might have a touch of Palumboism? Is part of the process of Palumboism simply natural aging? Does one necessarily have to be juiced to have Palumboism?

I will need a bit more time back in the gym...but I feel like I'm getting a touch of Palumboism.

Also, is there a name for what happened to Scott Steiner and Markus Ruhl? How come their pecs started deteriorating despite neither ever tearing a pec?

I'll probably tear a pec trying to prove my strength on Getbig to people who don't believe video and photographic evidence directly in front of them.  ::)

Speaking of which - I couldn't get 700-lb on the machine press today!  >:(

Oh wait - that's because the machine can't FIT 700-lb.

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 19, 2022, 08:47:42 PM
My god, Matt kissing the assess of some posters is beyond cringe worthy.

And him whining about flexacon being mean to him haha lol “flexacon, why are you being mean to me?” Haha lol

Why are you being mean to me?

SF1900 - I told you before, I know who you are, I know what you're capable of, and I'd never disrespect you. You can ask anyone on here who knows me.

But this begs the question: why are you being mean to me, and saying mean things to me?

Discuss.

PS - I previously stated that B. Hank had one of the best current physiques among Getbig members.

Put another way:

If we had a bodybuilding contest RIGHT NOW - TODAY - he would probably win, or at least place well.

I have no issue telling it like it is.

If he's running three grams of test a week, that's not so impressive.

But  anyway, it's clear to me now that a big part of his training mentality is to surpass others. He can't easily handle someone outperforming him, and needs to shit on those who do.

I have no issue admitting his legs are stronger than mine. Not by a margin out of hand, IMO [6-16 weeks of training], but I have NO PROBLEM acknowledging it.

It really serves you no good to deny reality.

Just like I admit your arms' strength was better than mine. I don't have any issue admitting that.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on September 19, 2022, 10:30:11 PM
What a huge difference. Gee, it looks like they got me by 6.45cm. OH MY GOD!!!  ::)

At least I lock out each rep.


Matt,
What are you Selling Here.......
Pictures , DVDs ..............DVDs
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 12:25:36 AM
Hi Wes !   🙋‍♀️

I hope that you’re doing well. I’m doing a little bit better now and I’m going home to see my Mom in October. She’s doing better and thank you for your kind support.

I am now able to do two full depth squats with 225 lbs and I’m still following your program and some of the program Henda sent me.  Hi Henda !   🙋‍♀️

I am hoping to try a double bodyweight squat in November. So if I plan it correctly I will have to squat 255-260 lbs. For the sake of full disclosure I am squatting with my knee wraps on. I won’t be involved with the stupidity of this thread, but I know damn well I never lied about anyone’s weight.

Chaos, I’m hiking the Grand Canyon in a few weeks and will be staying a day or two in Flagstaff. I will select a house for you to buy me !  🙋‍♀️ Take care Hon.
Great hearing from you Jane......you  know me I say fucking............ GO FOR IT!!

Have a safe trip and I hope you find your mom in great health.

All the best. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 20, 2022, 01:42:25 AM

Matt,
What are you Selling Here.......
Pictures , DVDs ..............DVDs

I giggled my tits off reading this thread:

https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=679028.0

 :D

Nothing for sale, but...hopefully the link below puts an end to the comments from @bhank103 about my strength.  ::)

Machine Press: 540-lb for 4 reps.
Bench Press: 250 for 14 reps.
Dumbbell Bench Press: 120-lb dumbbells for 3 reps, PAUSED.

https://instagram.com/stories/matthew_thunderbay/2931311788534371313

Now does ANYONE have any other claims about my lifts they wish to see verified.

Would people like to see me do a below parallel squat using 385x2?

MY BAD = I CANNOT DO THAT ASS TO THE GRASS.

I can break parallel though [or used to be able to, and could do so again relatively quickly - within a few months, say].

If anyone wants me to verify any of my claims, let me know.

I hate bullshit artists.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 02:43:26 AM
WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK...........HONESTLY. ....ONLY HANKY AND HE`S FULL OF SHIT IN MOST CASES.

You`re a strong bastard......that`s all you had to say on page 1 for Christs sake and you are strong as anyone would be using that shitty form.


JUST KIDDING.......KIND OF !!  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 20, 2022, 03:04:48 AM
I giggled my tits off reading this thread:

https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=679028.0

 :D

Nothing for sale, but...hopefully the link below puts an end to the comments from @bhank103 about my strength.  ::)

Machine Press: 540-lb for 4 reps.
Bench Press: 250 for 14 reps.
Dumbbell Bench Press: 120-lb dumbbells for 3 reps, PAUSED.

https://instagram.com/stories/matthew_thunderbay/2931311788534371313

Now does ANYONE have any other claims about my lifts they wish to see verified.

Would people like to see me do a below parallel squat using 385x2?

MY BAD = I CANNOT DO THAT ASS TO THE GRASS.

I can break parallel though [or used to be able to, and could do so again relatively quickly - within a few months, say].

If anyone wants me to verify any of my claims, let me know.

I hate bullshit artists.

By all means post a 385lbs squat below parallel you can’t do it the only thing that shows squat strength is a ducking squat your so called pin squat is the biggest bullshit I have ever seen. The fuck are you bragging about machine presses and leg slides. You can not do 385lbs ATG you can’t do 385lbs below parallel. In fact I will do one better I don’t think you can squat 315lbs below parallel by all means post a squat video using proper form I don’t think you can do a proper squat at all with any weight
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 20, 2022, 03:05:47 AM
WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK...........HONESTLY. ....ONLY HANKY AND HE`S FULL OF SHIT IN MOST CASES.

You`re a strong bastard......that`s all you had to say on page 1 for Christs sake and you are strong as anyone would be using that shitty form.


JUST KIDDING.......KIND OF !!  ;D

No he isn’t strong half and quarter reps mean Jack shit a full range of motion isnt a little harder it’s exponentially harder
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 03:12:12 AM
No he isn’t strong half and quarter reps mean Jack shit a full range of motion isnt a little harder it’s exponentially harder
I mentioned his lack of form.....and as far as you go that is not how to pump and measure your neck firstly,you will never press the 75`s for that many reps or the 25 pounders for 75 reps,secondly or squat parallel or below with 405,thirdly.....these are fruitless goals.....your aim should be on hypertrophy so that we van both enter one big masters class and I can give you the comeuppance that you so richly deserve.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on September 20, 2022, 03:27:47 AM
Matt's a strong guy with or without peds; however, he's a weak and impoverished person on the affirmationomic scale.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hulkotron on September 20, 2022, 03:32:21 AM
Sounds like it’s a “no” on the 25x75 video.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 20, 2022, 04:22:18 AM
I can`t believe I read this bullshit thread........ of course I skipped most of Matts regurhgitated repetitive bullshit.

I`m ready to gouge out my fucking eyes with a spoon................GEE ZUS.


I have outsquatted and outbenched both of these cats at an older age.....no brag,just fact.

Haven`t benched in years choosing to concentrate on building ,more upper pecs like most intelligent bodybuilders do after building sufficient chest mass over time....still after not benching for more than 8 years at the time I won first place in a bodyweight for reps contests getting over 20 perfect reps in Rochester NY.....got the trophy to proved it.

(https://giffiles.alphacoders.com/234/23465.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on September 20, 2022, 05:14:09 AM
I also wanted to see a comparison vid to musclematters bicep flex in the gym. No response...

Sounds like it’s a “no” on the 25x75 video.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 20, 2022, 05:40:42 AM
I giggled my tits off reading this thread:

https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=679028.0

 :D

Nothing for sale, but...hopefully the link below puts an end to the comments from @bhank103 about my strength.  ::)

Machine Press: 540-lb for 4 reps.
Bench Press: 250 for 14 reps.
Dumbbell Bench Press: 120-lb dumbbells for 3 reps, PAUSED.

https://instagram.com/stories/matthew_thunderbay/2931311788534371313

Now does ANYONE have any other claims about my lifts they wish to see verified.

Would people like to see me do a below parallel squat using 385x2?

MY BAD = I CANNOT DO THAT ASS TO THE GRASS.

I can break parallel though [or used to be able to, and could do so again relatively quickly - within a few months, say].

If anyone wants me to verify any of my claims, let me know.

I hate bullshit artists.

Nice Heave Hoe Paul Bunion.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 05:45:48 AM
Matt's a strong guy with or without peds; however, he's a weak and impoverished person on the affirmationomic scale.
note to self...look up the word affirmationomic  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 05:52:46 AM
Sounds like it’s a “no” on the 25x75 video.
I honestly don`t think anyone here could do it except for possibly tommywishbone and he`d have to train for it.....that`s a shitload of reps and just another BS lie from Hanky......he didn`t think that one out too long before he posted it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 20, 2022, 06:26:44 AM
Did a couple of sets Matt Canning style Dumbell shoulder presses today. It's actually brutal on the wrists and I'd say Matt has incredibly strong wrists rather than weak ones.

The technique also seems to target the front delts more which might help explain his overpowering front delts.

It was also far easier to get the weight and reps out, surprisingly it was easier than even doing short/pump reps. Whoever said (might have been Bhanky) that it was allowing a "rest" (tension off) was right as it took the tension off the shoulders and put them on the wrists. Seriously Matt must have retardedly strong wrists.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 20, 2022, 06:27:16 AM
I’ve done 70x40-50 full range on shoulder presses weighing about 230 and I’ve done 70 for 60-70 full range when weighing 250. Now if I did shoulder presses for a couple weeks weighing 215-220 I bet I could get 70-25. Just saying.

70lbs was my extremely comfortable weight when doing shoulder presses and I could smoke them.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on September 20, 2022, 06:31:43 AM
Hi Wes !   🙋‍♀️

I hope that you’re doing well. I’m doing a little bit better now and I’m going home to see my Mom in October. She’s doing better and thank you for your kind support.

I am now able to do two full depth squats with 225 lbs and I’m still following your program and some of the program Henda sent me.  Hi Henda !   🙋‍♀️

I am hoping to try a double bodyweight squat in November. So if I plan it correctly I will have to squat 255-260 lbs. For the sake of full disclosure I am squatting with my knee wraps on. I won’t be involved with the stupidity of this thread, but I know damn well I never lied about anyone’s weight.

Chaos, I’m hiking the Grand Canyon in a few weeks and will be staying a day or two in Flagstaff. I will select a house for you to buy me !  🙋‍♀️ Take care Hon.

Too late.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on September 20, 2022, 09:18:16 AM
Did a couple of sets Matt Canning style Dumbell shoulder presses today. It's actually brutal on the wrists and I'd say Matt has incredibly strong wrists rather than weak ones.

The technique also seems to target the front delts more which might help explain his overpowering front delts.

It was also far easier to get the weight and reps out, surprisingly it was easier than even doing short/pump reps. Whoever said (might have been Bhanky) that it was allowing a "rest" (tension off) was right as it took the tension off the shoulders and put them on the wrists. Seriously Matt must have retardedly strong wrists.

Wrist strength is positively correlated to furious masturbation and Peter North loads.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 20, 2022, 09:48:30 AM
;D ;D ;D

Those are good natural pictures of me, including the hair.  :D

It's also proof flat everything I lifted when on steroids, I have lifted naturally before. Which reminds me of some of the inadvertent compliments I've been getting on here. For example: Walter Sobchak stated that my current strength level is simply a function of steroids, and when I go off, I will lose my strength.  He doesn't even realize that statement is a COMPLIMENT.  He's suggesting I have strength worth even addressing at all. If I didn't post some impressive lifts, the concept of losing strength after my cessation of steroids wouldn't even be in the conversation.

But anyway, to address Walter: NO, I will not lose strength, as I will now be adjusting my training for a strength program.

Regarding those pictures you posted above, Palumboism: that's what I suspect I will look like in 1-3 months. More or less just back to my normal self.  I didn't even take enough juice to get a new pimple, so I suspect I will return to normal without issue.

Back to my previous question,  Palumboism: do you think I might have a touch of Palumboism? Is part of the process of Palumboism simply natural aging? Does one necessarily have to be juiced to have Palumboism?

I will need a bit more time back in the gym...but I feel like I'm getting a touch of Palumboism.

Also, is there a name for what happened to Scott Steiner and Markus Ruhl? How come their pecs started deteriorating despite neither ever tearing a pec?

I'll probably tear a pec trying to prove my strength on Getbig to people who don't believe video and photographic evidence directly in front of them.  ::)

Speaking of which - I couldn't get 700-lb on the machine press today!  >:(

Oh wait - that's because the machine can't FIT 700-lb.

 ;D

And you wonder why your pecs aren't to your liking.

Too much weight, not descending it down far enough, and your elbows are too close too your body.

You're using too much delt and tricep and not enough pec. You're on an incline machine but you're doing them just like a flat bench.

Use an actual barbell; bench should be no higher than 30o; use a wider grip; and keep your elbows UP and OUT.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 10:27:55 AM
I’ve done 70x40-50 full range on shoulder presses weighing about 230 and I’ve done 70 for 60-70 full range when weighing 250. Now if I did shoulder presses for a couple weeks weighing 215-220 I bet I could get 70-25. Just saying.

70lbs was my extremely comfortable weight when doing shoulder presses and I could smoke them.
My bad,I forgot about our other resident manimal.......great lifting Rob !!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 10:30:15 AM
Wrist strength is positively correlated to furious masturbation and Peter North loads.
Sometimes ya` gotta` keep in touch with yourself
...FURIOUSLY !!  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 20, 2022, 10:31:50 AM
And you wonder why your pecs aren't to your liking.

Too much weight, not descending it down far enough, and your elbows are too close too your body.

You're using too much delt and tricep and not enough pec. You're on an incline machine but you're doing them just like a flat bench.

Use an actual barbell; bench should be no higher than 30o; use a wider grip; and keep your elbows UP and OUT.
Spot on advice!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on September 20, 2022, 10:40:04 AM
I think Matt needs to decide, is he training for strength or to improve his physique. The strength is there,  undeniable.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 20, 2022, 10:45:20 AM
I think Matt needs to decide, is he training for strength or to improve his physique. The strength is there,  undeniable. if hes coming or going....

fixed
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: robcguns on September 20, 2022, 11:52:31 AM
My bad,I forgot about our other resident manimal.......great lifting Rob !!

Haha no prob Wes, I will try it in a few days and see what I can actually get. I know what I’ve gotten in the past but that don’t matter now. So will update on shoulder day.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 20, 2022, 12:57:21 PM
I honestly don`t think anyone here could do it except for possibly tommywishbone and he`d have to train for it.....that`s a shitload of reps and just another BS lie from Hanky......he didn`t think that one out too long before he posted it.

I know I couldn't.

I didn't like DB shoulder presses much in the beginning (circa late 1992), so I quit doing them.  In muscle activation terms (WTF do they call it?  EMG?), they might be marginally superior to straight bar free weights or Smith presses, but I think you waste too much energy getting them into position.

The closest I came to actual DB pressing was a strict set of Arnold Press in a DC routine.  I think I did 65s for 15 (?), but by that point my front delts were fried after a rest-pause set of inclines and a high-rep "widowmaker" set on some Cybex upright bench press.  I later altered my DC routine to alternate between chest and back exercises. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 20, 2022, 01:02:30 PM
Haha no prob Wes, I will try it in a few days and see what I can actually get. I know what I’ve gotten in the past but that don’t matter now. So will update on shoulder day.

I know you have it in you.  You're a machine.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 20, 2022, 01:03:24 PM
Haha no prob Wes, I will try it in a few days and see what I can actually get. I know what I’ve gotten in the past but that don’t matter now. So will update on shoulder day.

stop listening to hanky....
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 20, 2022, 01:36:11 PM
Fuck no a leg press is not a squat you claimed you can do 385lbs for 2 reps ATG you said you can do 360 off the couch so fine let’s both do the same weight and see who does it better. 345lbs should be easy for you yes? Today yes? You claim to be so much stronger abs to squat so much more claiming 405 atg would be easy for you let’s find out. Squat strength challenge today 345lbs with the best form you can get let the board decide who does it better do you accept or not??

Shouldn't you be working?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 20, 2022, 01:37:06 PM
Shouldn't you be working?

many people work on computers

computers that are connected to the internet
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 20, 2022, 01:42:06 PM
Hopefully that will be 19-1/2 years after you’re gone.

What do you not understand about my commitment to living longer than you just to spite you? Spite is a powerful tool for living a lengthy life.  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 20, 2022, 01:47:17 PM
many people work on computers

computers that are connected to the internet

Absolutely, however when you are posting on Getbig, you are technically not working at that moment. Let's suppose you are in a Zoom meeting with your fellow employees and you tell them you have to take a 5 minute break to post some nonsense on Getbig. How do you suppose that would sit with your supervisor? Folks who do this, wreak it for anyone wanting to work from home.  ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 20, 2022, 01:52:37 PM
What do you not understand about my commitment to living longer than you just to spite you? Spite is a powerful tool for living a lengthy life.  ;D

c*unts live forever

Ever you ever seen an epitaph that read "he was a bit of a c*nt"

Nope, its always nice people who die
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 20, 2022, 01:54:24 PM
Absolutely, however when you are posting on Getbig, you are technically not working at that moment. Let's suppose you are in a Zoom meeting with your fellow employees and you tell them you have to take a 5 minute break to post some nonsense on Getbig. How do you suppose that would sit with your supervisor? Folks who do this, wreak it for anyone wanting to work from home.  ;)

I am currently on a call, on camera, with sr. leadership in my vertical.

I am posting this as I participate in the call.

Dual monitors, keyboard below camera.

No work pauses needed.

Multitasking is the way of the world, for better or for worse.

Easy.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 20, 2022, 02:02:14 PM
I am currently on a call, on camera, with sr. leadership in my vertical.

I am posting this as I participate in the call.

Dual monitors, keyboard below camera.

No work pauses needed.

Multitasking is the way of the world, for better or for worse.

Easy.
I hope you dont get mixed up and end up linking them in to a WYHI thread
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 20, 2022, 02:09:52 PM
I hope you dont get mixed up and end up linking them in to a WYHI thread

Good point.

But no lie, I almost said "Dubai, India" once on a call.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 20, 2022, 02:14:14 PM
No real reason.

Maybe availability - at my one gym, the military press is a part of the power rack. So pressing there would hog it from those squatting.

Also, I feel I can focus more on my shoulders doing the work when I'm stabilized in a seated position.

That's what I meant, seated barbell presses, not standing.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 20, 2022, 02:24:19 PM
Good point.

But no lie, I almost said "Dubai, India" once on a call.
I almost added "of peace" into a conversation
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 20, 2022, 02:28:27 PM
I am currently on a call, on camera, with sr. leadership in my vertical.

I am posting this as I participate in the call.

Dual monitors, keyboard below camera.

No work pauses needed.

Multitasking is the way of the world, for better or for worse.

Easy.

This seems exhausting, but then I am retired, laid back and old so I prefer taking life easy. Do you also multitask for work, meaning handle a couple of work related tasks at the same time? If so, you must be a highly valued employee.

I am gonna take a little break now to check incoming emails.  ;)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 20, 2022, 02:33:30 PM
This seems exhausting, but then I am retired, laid back and old so I prefer taking life easy. Do you also multitask for work, meaning handle a couple of work related tasks at the same time? If so, you must be a highly valued employee.

I am gonna take a little break now to check incoming emails.  ;)

Yes, unfortunately.  It's the norm to be on one call, while working on something else.

I can't say I'm a fan, but it's the culture.

It's worse for kids though, who had to deal with this stuff while their brains were still developing - they can't concentrate on one thing.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 20, 2022, 02:56:29 PM
I work remote it’s the best if I want to take a minute an hour to post on Getbig I can
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 20, 2022, 03:05:27 PM
;D ;D ;D

Those are good natural pictures of me, including the hair.  :D

It's also proof flat everything I lifted when on steroids, I have lifted naturally before. Which reminds me of some of the inadvertent compliments I've been getting on here. For example: Walter Sobchak stated that my current strength level is simply a function of steroids, and when I go off, I will lose my strength.  He doesn't even realize that statement is a COMPLIMENT.  He's suggesting I have strength worth even addressing at all. If I didn't post some impressive lifts, the concept of losing strength after my cessation of steroids wouldn't even be in the conversation.

But anyway, to address Walter: NO, I will not lose strength, as I will now be adjusting my training for a strength program.

Regarding those pictures you posted above, Palumboism: that's what I suspect I will look like in 1-3 months. More or less just back to my normal self.  I didn't even take enough juice to get a new pimple, so I suspect I will return to normal without issue.

Back to my previous question,  Palumboism: do you think I might have a touch of Palumboism? Is part of the process of Palumboism simply natural aging? Does one necessarily have to be juiced to have Palumboism?

I will need a bit more time back in the gym...but I feel like I'm getting a touch of Palumboism.

Also, is there a name for what happened to Scott Steiner and Markus Ruhl? How come their pecs started deteriorating despite neither ever tearing a pec?

I'll probably tear a pec trying to prove my strength on Getbig to people who don't believe video and photographic evidence directly in front of them.  ::)

Speaking of which - I couldn't get 700-lb on the machine press today!  >:(

Oh wait - that's because the machine can't FIT 700-lb.

 ;D

No, you don't have Palumboism.  I do believe are aren't close to your bodybuilding potential. 

Your attitude is completely wrong.  You would rather lift heavy weight than build muscle.  Me, I don't give a damn about lifting heavy weight, or how strong people think I am.  I want to build a great physique, Period. 

You are stronger than me, and there are people in my gym that are stronger than me, but my build is better and that's what I care about. 

You have wasted the last ten years from a bodybuilding perspective.  BOTH your training and your diet were way off.  You lifted heavy weight, but you didn't build the body you could have.  That's your decision.

Strength is an asset for a bodybuilder, but only if you use it the right way.

Train smart and train effectively.  For me, the only thing that matter is what I see in the mirror. 

Your eye should be trained. You should be able to look at anybody including yourself and know what they need to do to improve their physique.   

Like another poster said, make the decision, do you want to just lift heavy weight, or do you want the build a physique.

You should already have the tools and knowledge simply from osmosis on Getbig.







Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 20, 2022, 08:30:18 PM
No, you don't have Palumboism.  I do believe are aren't close to your bodybuilding potential. 

Your attitude is completely wrong.  You would rather lift heavy weight than build muscle.  Me, I don't give a damn about lifting heavy weight, or how strong people think I am.  I want to build a great physique, Period. 

You are stronger than me, and there are people in my gym that are stronger than me, but my build is better and that's what I care about. 

You have wasted the last ten years from a bodybuilding perspective.  BOTH your training and your diet were way off.  You lifted heavy weight, but you didn't build the body you could have.  That's your decision.

Strength is an asset for a bodybuilder, but only if you use it the right way.

Train smart and train effectively.  For me, the only thing that matter is what I see in the mirror. 

Your eye should be trained. You should be able to look at anybody including yourself and know what they need to do to improve their physique.   

Like another poster said, make the decision, do you want to just lift heavy weight, or do you want the build a physique.

You should already have the tools and knowledge simply from osmosis on Getbig.

To me, it isn't an either/or prospect. I'm about getting bigger AND stronger. To do that, it's about lifting the weights with the target muscle getting the stress.

The reason Matt's pecs "suck" (his words) is because he lifts too heavy with too narrow of a grip, a less-than-stellar ROM and his elbows inward. He barely does inclines and when he does, he uses the same haphazard for that he does on the flat bench.

I've had to learn (and am still learning) about lifting heavier weights on curls (particularly with dumbbells) but with my BICEPS getting the stress. If I don't do them correctly, my forearms get sore but my biceps get almost zip.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 21, 2022, 07:39:16 AM
To me, it isn't an either/or prospect. I'm about getting bigger AND stronger. To do that, it's about lifting the weights with the target muscle getting the stress.

The reason Matt's pecs "suck" (his words) is because he lifts too heavy with too narrow of a grip, a less-than-stellar ROM and his elbows inward. He barely does inclines and when he does, he uses the same haphazard for that he does on the flat bench.

I've had to learn (and am still learning) about lifting heavier weights on curls (particularly with dumbbells) but with my BICEPS getting the stress. If I don't do them correctly, my forearms get sore but my biceps get almost zip.

I too have the shoulder dominant issue, but I don't care.

However, I tried your advice using a 30 degree incline, just to see.  I used DBs with a neutral grip since I'm working around a labrum issue.

I can verify that that angle made me feel the squeeze in the chest way more than the shoulders, so I believe you are correct with you adviceS.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 21, 2022, 11:40:49 AM
I too have the shoulder dominant issue, but I don't care.

However, I tried your advice using a 30 degree incline, just to see.  I used DBs with a neutral grip since I'm working around a labrum issue.

I can verify that that angle made me feel the squeeze in the chest way more than the shoulders, so I believe you are correct with you adviceS.

Glad to be of help!

I am going to take Wes' adviceS and try those Bradford Presses tomorrow. ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Hypertrophy on September 21, 2022, 11:45:10 AM
Glad to be of help!

I am going to take Wes' adviceS and try those Bradford Presses tomorrow. ;D


Great advices- benching at an incline hits the pecs like no other (sub 45 degrees)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 21, 2022, 12:17:26 PM
Glad to be of help!

I am going to take Wes' adviceS and try those Bradford Presses tomorrow. ;D

I worked up to 225 for the Bradford press once.  Then I woke up ;)

Speaking of good incline press variations, before I had my intestinal surgeries and subsequent hernia, I fell in love with something I picked up from, of all people, Charles Glass.  I saw a video of him training Gunter, and they did a Smith incline with the little stopper thingies such that the bar came to rest just a couple of inches from Gunter's pecs.  Every rep was initiated from a dead stop pause from the "stoppers," then rocketed up to lockout, followed by a nice, slow 3-4 count negative.

My pecs have always been a strong point, but no movement filled out my upper pecs like that did, and my chest had never been bigger overall.  I did these a few different ways.  Primarily, I preferred them DC style, with a set of an initial 8ish to failure, followed my two mini-rest pause sets and a static hold that turned into a slow as steam off January dogshit (pun intended ;) ) negative.  Occasionally, I would just do a heavy max set of 5-6 and do drop sets until I only had one PPS, or one very heavy set of 4-6 and a second in the 10-12 range.

I alternated that weekly with either Hammer Inclines or a couple of neat Cybex machines at my other gym as my primary pec builder.  All were good, but I swear, that version of inclines was something else.  I was by no means lean -- honest assessment?  Even at 5'7", 225 and taping my waist at 32", I had to be over 15% -- but just before I got sick, I could actually feel the pull of gravity on my pecs.  It was a curious sensation...I can only imagine what that must've been like for Arnold, Ruhl, Ronnie, Atwood et al.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 21, 2022, 12:46:30 PM
And dips.

Full range parallel bar dips, leaning forward, are sorely neglected these days.  Mentzer regarded them as the upper body equivalent of a squat.  In my conversations with him, he spoke glowingly of getting crazy strong on dips.  He said he and Ray would really "psyche themselves up" for sessions which would start with dipping.

Little did I know at the time that he neglected to say they probably amped themselves to the gord with amphetamine pills beforehand ;), but that's neither here nor there.

He said they'd work up to 180 hanging from their waists for a max set of 8-10.  Then, in his calloused voice, he would remind me, in that imitation of Jones' barking, "WILLIAM!  You don't have to just take my word for it!  Look up Marvin Eder, who came along before the drugs!  He was king of dips, and that son of a bitch had a build that would make most of today's pro knuckleheads cry if they gave up steroids for a month.  And WILLIAM!  Don't forget the gymnasts, William!"

:)

Slight kidding aside, dips are the fucking bomb.  You need to find a ROM that's suited to your shoulders, but I don't think most lifters would have trouble with lowering themselves to the point at which the shoulder and elbow are parallel.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 21, 2022, 01:19:30 PM
Yes, unfortunately.  It's the norm to be on one call, while working on something else.

I can't say I'm a fan, but it's the culture.

It's worse for kids though, who had to deal with this stuff while their brains were still developing - they can't concentrate on one thing.

My age is showing. LOL! Not only can I not multitask at the level some folks do, but I also cannot speed task with my thumbs on my smart phone. I'm relatively good at keyboarding/typing at a good clip... which compared to Matt’s speed, mine is a 'snail’s pace'.

I wonder how much is lost when folks try to concentrate on one important topic while their mind is going in several different directions at the same time. The advantage kids and younger people have is that today's technology is second nature to them. For example, when texting they don't need to think about the mechanics of doing this. To them, it is just like talking. Of course, there is also speech to text, which I have not tried yet. How does one proof this before sending it out or do they even bother.

One reason why some folks like me go so long when posting is because we don't think in terms of abbreviated texting, which is today's version of 'shorthand'. I am sure my writing style is boringly detailed. What is funny about this is that I am still often misunderstood, no matter how well I try to explain my thinking.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: residue on September 21, 2022, 01:48:02 PM
My age is showing. LOL! Not only can I not multitask at the level some folks do, but I also cannot speed task with my thumbs on my smart phone. I'm relatively good at keyboarding/typing at a good clip... which compared to Matt’s speed, mine is a 'snail’s pace'.

I wonder how much is lost when folks try to concentrate on one important topic while their mind is going in several different directions at the same time. The advantage kids and younger people have is that today's technology is second nature to them. For example, when texting they don't need to think about the mechanics of doing this. To them, it is just like talking. Of course, there is also speech to text, which I have not tried yet. How does one proof this before sending it out or do they even bother.

One reason why some folks like me go so long when posting is because we don't think in terms of abbreviated texting, which is today's version of 'shorthand'. I am sure my writing style is boringly detailed. What is funny about this is that I am still often misunderstood, no matter how well I try to explain my thinking.
there's are a lot A LOT of new tools tools you can use to keep tabs on things i use are Monday.com, jira, waterfall on top of shared calendars\sheets. A huge change from 10 years ago is now there's incremental delivery, it's not just start to finish anymore
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 21, 2022, 02:39:12 PM
And dips.

Full range parallel bar dips, leaning forward, are sorely neglected these days.  Mentzer regarded them as the upper body equivalent of a squat.  In my conversations with him, he spoke glowingly of getting crazy strong on dips.  He said he and Ray would really "psyche themselves up" for sessions which would start with dipping.

Little did I know at the time that he neglected to say they probably amped themselves to the gord with amphetamine pills beforehand ;), but that's neither here nor there.

He said they'd work up to 180 hanging from their waists for a max set of 8-10.  Then, in his calloused voice, he would remind me, in that imitation of Jones' barking, "WILLIAM!  You don't have to just take my word for it!  Look up Marvin Eder, who came along before the drugs!  He was king of dips, and that son of a bitch had a build that would make most of today's pro knuckleheads cry if they gave up steroids for a month.  And WILLIAM!  Don't forget the gymnasts, William!"

:)

Slight kidding aside, dips are the fucking bomb.  You need to find a ROM that's suited to your shoulders, but I don't think most lifters would have trouble with lowering themselves to the point at which the shoulder and elbow are parallel.

I love dips, too. Either regular dips with a dumbbell or the dipping machine. But, since I can use the entire stack with ease, I add an extra plate to the weight stack.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 21, 2022, 02:47:30 PM

Great advices- benching at an incline hits the pecs like no other (sub 45 degrees)

They have to be exactly 27.425 degrees for maximum stimulation. ;D

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 21, 2022, 08:27:53 PM
They have to be exactly 27.425 degrees for maximum stimulation. ;D

Your numbers are ever so slightly off.  Needs to be 26.45.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 21, 2022, 08:45:07 PM
Your numbers are ever so slightly off.  Needs to be 26.45.

Rounding error...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on September 21, 2022, 09:57:04 PM
Rounding error...

LMFAO. 
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 22, 2022, 05:05:29 PM
So where are the full depth 405 lb off the couch squat reps?

TITTY BOY MATT CANNING is a bigger liar than Brian Wood Healy Hankins!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on September 22, 2022, 06:49:14 PM
I love dips, too. Either regular dips with a dumbbell or the dipping machine. But, since I can use the entire stack with ease, I add an extra plate to the weight stack.

What brand of dip machine are you using?

My old Gold's had one with an incredible stack.  I was routinely doing three plates from a belt weighing 230+ for probably *too* deep reps of 8-12, but our dip machine was a guy!  I could barely get a rep with the stack.

You made another great point: there needn't be a dichotomy between training for strength and hypertrophy.  Maximizing either certainly entails some mods, but generally, the two can go hand in hand.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 22, 2022, 07:42:57 PM
What brand of dip machine are you using?

My old Gold's had one with an incredible stack.  I was routinely doing three plates from a belt weighing 230+ for probably *too* deep reps of 8-12, but our dip machine was a guy!  I could barely get a rep with the stack.

You made another great point: there needn't be a dichotomy between training for strength and hypertrophy.  Maximizing either certainly entails some mods, but generally, the two can go hand in hand.

It's the Cyber Prestige VRS Tricep Press.

(https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/shopping?q=tbn:ANd9GcRn0YLnmvMZtY1-jzgojUoTl1sMfPobpdTvyjSgK-_z_Zgjk1fc&usqp=CAY)

I use a chain to hang a 35-lb plate to the weight stack; and I can really SQUEEZE the inner pecs that way.

Unfortunately, that has become 24-Hour Fitness' favorite lounge chair; so, if I can't get to that, I do weighted dips.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 22, 2022, 07:47:36 PM
What brand of dip machine are you using?

My old Gold's had one with an incredible stack.  I was routinely doing three plates from a belt weighing 230+ for probably *too* deep reps of 8-12, but our dip machine was a guy!  I could barely get a rep with the stack.

You made another great point: there needn't be a dichotomy between training for strength and hypertrophy.  Maximizing either certainly entails some mods, but generally, the two can go hand in hand.

Hi Titus,

I'm back to a strength training program now.

It's amazing to me how bodybuilding-style hypertrophy training will make your muscles bigger, but ultimately not make you as strong.

The general public would think bodybuilders would be the strongest, but that's not the case at all.

I was surprised at how much of a weakling I was with respect to my body weight.

Walter Sobchak was 100% right.

So I'm doing a 20-week strength building program right now to get my deadlift back to the 505-525 range.

It shouldn't be too much of a problem, as muscle memory alone will get me over 80% of the way there - but I want to try to hit a personal record. A 550 deadlift would be nice, but I'll be satisfied with 500+. In fact, 495x5 will be fine. Anything beyond that would be a bonus.

Thank you for the support, Titus. If you have a bodybuilding "bro" diet for me, I'm all ears. I'm no longer in a hurry to make gains anymore. I can take my time and do it naturally. I just wanted a little boost for the summer.  :)

I know I'll get back to the 500-lb range for deadlifts, but 550-lb at <185-lb would be amazing. I think anything around triple body weight for deadlift is a very high standard to hold.

Also Titus - if you happen to have a strength program for me, let me know. Due to the pandemic gym closures, and having spent the past few months training bodybuilding-style for my cycle, I'm a fresh template right to gain my old strength back. If I could get 10% beyond that, I'd be thrilled. But how difficult that will be will depend on whether or not I want to keep my body weight higher. At 170, deadlifting anything over 525 would be hard.

Here is a little deadlift workout I did last night, just to see where I was at. I'll start a refined strength program next week. If you have any advice or tips, let me know.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CizRSFrO82N/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: michael arvilla on September 22, 2022, 07:59:17 PM
This guy Belongs in this thread!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 22, 2022, 08:00:11 PM
Check the third picture.

Should I get breast reduction surgery?  ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 22, 2022, 08:30:23 PM

Here is a little deadlift workout I did last night, just to see where I was at. I'll start a refined strength program next week. If you have any advice or tips, let me know.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CizRSFrO82N/

You have a rounded back and are doing bounce reps and no hip hinge.

Why not watch a few videos and get the form right?

If you did things correctly you'd hit personal bests.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 22, 2022, 08:53:29 PM
You have a rounded back and are doing bounce reps and no hip hinge.

Why not watch a few videos and get the form right?

If you did things correctly you'd hit personal bests.

He's going to end up in a wheelchair lifting like that.

Hitching is allowed in strongman, but i don't think bouncing deadlifts off the floor is.

You can build more power and strength by resetting each lift at the bottom. Reset the hips down, shoulders back and leaning on the heels.

I've pulled over 700 pounds, training with absolute strict form got me there.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 22, 2022, 08:58:26 PM
Hi Titus,

I'm back to a strength training program now.

It's amazing to me how bodybuilding-style hypertrophy training will make your muscles bigger, but ultimately not make you as strong.

The general public would think bodybuilders would be the strongest, but that's not the case at all.

I beg to differ. Ronnie Coleman, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and the late Franco Columbu were BOTH world-class bodybuilders and powerlifters.

Lou Ferrigno was a World's Strongest Man competitor (as was Columbu). The recently-departed Bill Pearl made more money as a professional strongman (bending iron bars, tearing phone books, blowing up hot-water bottles, etc.) than he did winning the NABBA Mr. Universe 4 times.

Sergio Oliva was on Cuba's Olympic weight lifting team, before defecting to the United States. And more recent examples of strength and size include that Larry Wheels fellow. Not to mention, Johnnie Jackson, who frequently did both powerlifting and bodybuilding shows during his career. He won a deadlifting contest, just weeks before turning pro at the NPC Nationals.



I was surprised at how much of a weakling I was with respect to my body weight.

Walter Sobchak was 100% right.

So I'm doing a 20-week strength building program right now to get my deadlift back to the 505-525 range.

It shouldn't be too much of a problem, as muscle memory alone will get me over 80% of the way there - but I want to try to hit a personal record. A 550 deadlift would be nice, but I'll be satisfied with 500+. In fact, 495x5 will be fine. Anything beyond that would be a bonus.

Thank you for the support, Titus. If you have a bodybuilding "bro" diet for me, I'm all ears. I'm no longer in a hurry to make gains anymore. I can take my time and do it naturally. I just wanted a little boost for the summer.  :)

I know I'll get back to the 500-lb range for deadlifts, but 550-lb at <185-lb would be amazing. I think anything around triple body weight for deadlift is a very high standard to hold.

Also Titus - if you happen to have a strength program for me, let me know. Due to the pandemic gym closures, and having spent the past few months training bodybuilding-style for my cycle, I'm a fresh template right to gain my old strength back. If I could get 10% beyond that, I'd be thrilled. But how difficult that will be will depend on whether or not I want to keep my body weight higher. At 170, deadlifting anything over 525 would be hard.

Here is a little deadlift workout I did last night, just to see where I was at. I'll start a refined strength program next week. If you have any advice or tips, let me know.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CizRSFrO82N/

You don't weigh 170 lbs anymore. So why are you worried about that? Bodybuilders and powerlifters, as they improve, they usually go UP a weight class. It's not as if you're going head up with 300 pounders.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 08:53:35 AM
You have a rounded back and are doing bounce reps and no hip hinge.

Why not watch a few videos and get the form right?

If you did things correctly you'd hit personal bests.
I already told his form was atrocious and he started hitching the weight almost from the beginning of the set.....he`s bound to get hurt sooner or later but says "strongman" allows this BS.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 23, 2022, 08:55:22 AM
I already told his form was atrocious and he started hitching the weight almost from the beginning of the set.....he`s bound to get hurt sooner or later but say "strongman" allows this BS.

Can’t lift for shit, but the wee phaggot has a spiffy wrestling singlet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 08:57:02 AM
Can’t lift for shit, but the wee phaggot has a spiffy wrestling singlet.
LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 23, 2022, 09:00:44 AM
LOL  ;D

A month off the drugs and he will look like a cross between Darren Avey and Justin Trudeau.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym-Rat on September 23, 2022, 09:29:06 AM
I never just stick to one style of training, mixing Strength and Hypertrophy always worked best for me. (And many).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 23, 2022, 09:31:51 AM
I never just stick to one style of training, mixing Strength and Hypertrophy always worked best for me. (And many).

Agree 100
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 23, 2022, 09:33:34 AM
Can’t lift for shit, but the wee phaggot has a spiffy wrestling singlet.

This is not a flattering angle for him legs don't look great speaking of outfits did anyone notice the ridiculous low cut tank top in his new deadlift videos where do you even buy those
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 23, 2022, 09:37:06 AM
This is not a flattering angle for him legs don't look great speaking of outfits did anyone notice the ridiculous low cut tank top in his new deadlift videos where do you even buy those

Stop….there is no situation where you should be criticizing anyone’s legs.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 23, 2022, 09:43:16 AM
Check the third picture.
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1394956;image)
Should I get breast reduction surgery?  ???

You are developing "wrap around tits"

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 09:46:11 AM
This is not a flattering angle for him legs don't look great speaking of outfits did anyone notice the ridiculous low cut tank top in his new deadlift videos where do you even buy those
CORRECTION:

WHY would you even buy those ???
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 09:47:08 AM
You are developing "wrap around tits"


Dude....legit LOL  ;D

Fucking hilarious!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 23, 2022, 09:47:19 AM
You are developing "wrap around tits"

For a guy who was going to hop off the couch and squat 405 for reps the wee little phaggot is sure struggling with that warm-up deadlift.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 09:49:01 AM
I never just stick to one style of training, mixing Strength and Hypertrophy always worked best for me. (And many).
I used to until I got older.....I use good weights but nothing structured like I used to......fucking great way to train though if you are so inclined.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on September 23, 2022, 09:51:53 AM
This is not a flattering angle for him legs don't look great speaking of outfits did anyone notice the ridiculous low cut tank top in his new deadlift videos where do you even buy those

Jesus

Matt have you thought about using a sports bra?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 09:57:35 AM
Jesus

Matt have you thought about using a sports bra?
If he took some of the advice he always asks for then immediately discards it he could look great cuz it`s clear he has no clue why and how he does most of the movements he does.

We won`t even go into his form or lack thereof................G EEZUS!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 23, 2022, 09:57:50 AM
Dude....legit LOL  ;D

Fucking hilarious!!

Credit must go to Henda. I was quoting him from the Basile thread
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 23, 2022, 09:59:36 AM
Credit must go to Henda. I was quoting him from the Basile thread

“Wrap-around tits”

Pure Henda gold.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 10:02:29 AM
Credit must go to Henda. I was quoting him from the Basile thread
That funny fucker!   LOL  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 23, 2022, 11:35:36 AM
Why the fuck is this wee little TITTY BOY lifting in his socks?

For fuck’s sake what the fuck is wrong with this weakling?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: michael arvilla on September 23, 2022, 11:46:35 AM
This is not a flattering angle for him legs don't look great speaking of outfits did anyone notice the ridiculous low cut tank top in his new deadlift videos where do you even buy those
https://www.fashionnova.com/products/dinner-dates-cowl-neck-top-mocha?syte-stories=enabled&variant=34767292235900&flow_enabled=false&gclid=Cj0KCQjwsrWZBhC4ARIsAGGUJuoaWWHO46YCkuG-6QJcKey0r-N20Lqw20W1bknSbwVOLa897Gd8w90aAjJ9EALw_wcB (https://www.fashionnova.com/products/dinner-dates-cowl-neck-top-mocha?syte-stories=enabled&variant=34767292235900&flow_enabled=false&gclid=Cj0KCQjwsrWZBhC4ARIsAGGUJuoaWWHO46YCkuG-6QJcKey0r-N20Lqw20W1bknSbwVOLa897Gd8w90aAjJ9EALw_wcB)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 23, 2022, 12:34:35 PM
He's going to end up in a wheelchair lifting like that.

Hitching is allowed in strongman, but i don't think bouncing deadlifts off the floor is.

You can build more power and strength by resetting each lift at the bottom. Reset the hips down, shoulders back and leaning on the heels.

I've pulled over 700 pounds, training with absolute strict form got me there.

The reset at the bottom makes a huge difference in terms of reps, but it keep the true nature of the lift intact.  If it was a comp for reps in time, sure, bounce, but to build strength, no way.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on September 23, 2022, 01:09:28 PM
Check the third picture.

Should I get breast reduction surgery?  ???

Liposuction or Cool Sculpting would help reduce the spare tire above your weight belt. A decent diet should help with that and reduce your 'breasts' as well. The diet might get rid of the balloon face, (not referring to you puffing up your cheeks while exercising and breathing). Compare current photos with those when you were thinner, and you'll see what I mean. You can ignore my advice and end up looking like 'Squadfatter' in that photo you often post.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 23, 2022, 01:09:54 PM
The reset at the bottom makes a huge difference in terms of reps, but it keep the true nature of the lift intact.  If it was a comp for reps in time, sure, bounce, but to build strength, no way.
And at the start of the pull where lets say you have the plates about 5 inches off the floor then you struggle and strain hitching with the weight even though it takes about a year and the lift is never completed............... ......DANGEROUSLY DUMB!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 23, 2022, 05:21:31 PM
And at the start of the pull where lets say you have the plates about 5 inches off the floor then you struggle and strain hitching with the weight even though it takes about a year and the lift is never completed............... ......DANGEROUSLY DUMB!!

There's nothing wrong with Matt's form.  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 24, 2022, 12:32:14 AM

That was not a partial squat lol gtfo and leg slide who fuck cares how much you can leg slide none of that nonsense means you can squat Jack shit. You claimed you were stronger and could squat now you claim it’s not a big deal at all great so do it then. Let’s see you post a real below parallel squat with today I don’t think you can get 315 clean. But whatver you post I will match let’s see who can actually squat more today my crippled legs against yours the strongest 70kilo 205lb man in Sasquatchia

Dude - load 700-lb on a bar, and try to stand with it.

I can squat much better in the upper ranges of motion. If you saw my parallel box squat [or slightly above parallel], you'd think I could squat 450.

I'm just much better in the upper range of motion.  I get bad knee valgus. Who knows why - I can say this has been the case since I started training.

But I'm back to strength training now. I claimed I could ATG squat 385x2 before.

That was wrong.

Not ATG.

But I could previously break parallel with that weight.

So I should be able to get to 405-lb, because my strength is muscle memory, and I'm strength training again.

But I'd rather post a video of me leg pressing 1,100 for 8-10 reps. And not half reps like most people do on the leg press. I mean full reps, where my knees are just about at my face.

IMO, a leg press of 1,000-lb for reps is on par with a squat of at least 350 for reps.

The leg press at my gym is the heaviest leg press I've ever used.  I'd say 1,100 on that machine is over 350 for squat.

I currently bench press 345 with a bounce, and can do at least 315 in contest condition. My deadlift with straps right now is over 450, but will be 500+ in the new year.

I just specifically don't like squatting. So sue me.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on September 24, 2022, 12:55:43 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/fL4gtt35/36j5je5jejytkage4.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 24, 2022, 01:16:40 AM
Every video has better form than you but fuck it keep living in la la land pretend your hands are shoulder level and the dumbells are horizontal with your elbows tucked down and behind at the bottom of your lift.

My hands virtually can't even get as low as shoulder level. Likely because forearms aren't long enough. Or just my flexibility in general is poor.

Either way, the first picture below shows as low as I can literally get my hand.

The second picture is about about as low as I'd personally go on shoulder presses. That's maybe one hand length lower than I did go, which is about 4". Beyond that, I feel the lift is putting strain on my rotator cuffs - pain, but not pain in a good way [like muscle workout pain; good pain].

Hey B. Hank - did you like that video of me doing 120-lb dumbbells, on my LAST SET of my workout? Those were full rest/pause.

It's one thing for you to say that my form is slightly off, and I might get 2-4 fewer reps if I went all the way down. But it's another thing entirely to say I can't even get the weight at all.  ::)

Obviously I can! Hence my full rest/pause sets.

Furthermore, my max bench press under IPF rules was 320. I currently bench 345, but could maybe get 355 with a heftier bounce, or a feather touch from a spotter.

When people lift that much, it's ridiculous to suggest the form is getting them the lift, and they aren't strong. NO ONE bench presses 355 who isn't strong. Heck, even getting a 3/4 rep with 355 would strong.

Sure, maybe I could only get the 100-lb dumbbells for five reps if we're talking about perfect workout instructional book form - but for starters, maybe 20% of lifters on YouTube shoulder pressing 100+ pound dumbbells are doing that. Most are either not going low enough, or not locking out. I obviously fully lock out - generally touching the dumbbells at the to of every rep while doing that - and I am 2-3" high from what would be perfectly fine. Not perfect - but perfectly fine.

Heck, I think my current depth is perfectly fine.

just ignor your hands are forehead level with your forearms crooked and your wrist even more crooked tilting one side of the dumbells to your shoulder while the other side is above your head oh yeah it’s fucking perfect

My hands are lower than 80% of the people on YouTube pressing comparable weight - so what are you complaining about?

I don't think our firearms being a bit crooked makes a big difference.

My hands ARE crooked. You identified a weak link for me. I have no idea why that is. I guess I have weak wrists, or weak hands. For example, with deadlift, my grip is my weak point. I'm glad you identified it even though your post was so dick.

Have you ever thought maybe you're being too dick in how you talk to people on here?

As for the dumbbell being above my head - the picture below shows where the dumbbell is.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on September 24, 2022, 01:36:25 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1395286;image)

To explain this photo, the red lines are around where my hands/wrists are. And the green lines are about where the top of the dumbbells would be if they are straight.

You seem to be suggesting that the top of the dumbbell would remain the top of where it is in the photo.

Do you understand that when the dumbbell gets straightened, that the lower side of the dumbbell goes up, while the higher side comes down?  You understand that's what happens when you tilt something right?

So the actual dumbbell placement given good form would be somewhere mid-range between the two.

Now compare that to KinoBody - my form is not far off. He's also not completely incline here:

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1394154;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: BB on September 24, 2022, 01:49:52 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1395286;image)

(https://y.yarn.co/8bf3bfb3-2207-4387-92aa-14f3eb1d95ac_text.gif).

These fucking presses are getting the Warren Commission treatment ;D ;D.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 24, 2022, 01:59:05 AM
First tits and now hips. Look at those child bearing hips! Is MattC feminizing?

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1395283;image)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 24, 2022, 03:55:49 AM
Dude - load 700-lb on a bar, and try to stand with it.

I can squat much better in the upper ranges of motion. If you saw my parallel box squat [or slightly above parallel], you'd think I could squat 450.

I'm just much better in the upper range of motion.  I get bad knee valgus. Who knows why - I can say this has been the case since I started training.

But I'm back to strength training now. I claimed I could ATG squat 385x2 before.

That was wrong.

Not ATG.

But I could previously break parallel with that weight.

So I should be able to get to 405-lb, because my strength is muscle memory, and I'm strength training again.

But I'd rather post a video of me leg pressing 1,100 for 8-10 reps. And not half reps like most people do on the leg press. I mean full reps, where my knees are just about at my face.

IMO, a leg press of 1,000-lb for reps is on par with a squat of at least 350 for reps.

The leg press at my gym is the heaviest leg press I've ever used.  I'd say 1,100 on that machine is over 350 for squat.

I currently bench press 345 with a bounce, and can do at least 315 in contest condition. My deadlift with straps right now is over 450, but will be 500+ in the new year.

I just specifically don't like squatting. So sue me.

No one likes squatting because it is hard. You don't get knee valgus your knee just comes in because you are using too much weight same thing happens to everyone. Everyone is better in the upper range because the upper range is easier. No idea how you think you can get 405lbs when you don't squat. No amount of leg pressing on a slide proves you can squat a damn thing. The only thing that proves you can squat is a godamn squat.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 24, 2022, 03:57:55 AM
My hands virtually can't even get as low as shoulder level. Likely because forearms aren't long enough. Or just my flexibility in general is poor.

Either way, the first picture below shows as low as I can literally get my hand.

The second picture is about about as low as I'd personally go on shoulder presses. That's maybe one hand length lower than I did go, which is about 4". Beyond that, I feel the lift is putting strain on my rotator cuffs - pain, but not pain in a good way [like muscle workout pain; good pain].

Hey B. Hank - did you like that video of me doing 120-lb dumbbells, on my LAST SET of my workout? Those were full rest/pause.

It's one thing for you to say that my form is slightly off, and I might get 2-4 fewer reps if I went all the way down. But it's another thing entirely to say I can't even get the weight at all.  ::)

Obviously I can! Hence my full rest/pause sets.

Furthermore, my max bench press under IPF rules was 320. I currently bench 345, but could maybe get 355 with a heftier bounce, or a feather touch from a spotter.

When people lift that much, it's ridiculous to suggest the form is getting them the lift, and they aren't strong. NO ONE bench presses 355 who isn't strong. Heck, even getting a 3/4 rep with 355 would strong.

Sure, maybe I could only get the 100-lb dumbbells for five reps if we're talking about perfect workout instructional book form - but for starters, maybe 20% of lifters on YouTube shoulder pressing 100+ pound dumbbells are doing that. Most are either not going low enough, or not locking out. I obviously fully lock out - generally touching the dumbbells at the to of every rep while doing that - and I am 2-3" high from what would be perfectly fine. Not perfect - but perfectly fine.

Heck, I think my current depth is perfectly fine.

My hands are lower than 80% of the people on YouTube pressing comparable weight - so what are you complaining about?

I don't think our firearms being a bit crooked makes a big difference.

My hands ARE crooked. You identified a weak link for me. I have no idea why that is. I guess I have weak wrists, or weak hands. For example, with deadlift, my grip is my weak point. I'm glad you identified it even though your post was so dick.

Have you ever thought maybe you're being too dick in how you talk to people on here?

As for the dumbbell being above my head - the picture below shows where the dumbbell is.

First off let's not pretend you don't have the same range of motion as everyone else the old I don't have that range of motion is the biggest nonsense excuse in the gym. 2nd having your forearms crooked instead of vertical makes a huge difference as does having your hands bent you are making a triangle to support the weight. You know you are not supposed to do both of those things but keep insisting it's a good lift. Some other jackass on youtube also doing it poorly doesn't change anything. But not one person on youtube is bending their wrist in and forearms and making a triangle support that takes the weight off the shoulders and just makes it a tricep press. Instead of arguing it's good when you know 2 things you are clearly doing wrong stop fucking doing those things and arguing it's fine and do it right.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on September 24, 2022, 04:04:06 AM
There's nothing wrong with Matt's form.  :D

Is that real? That looks really bad like herniated disc never going to walk again bad
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 24, 2022, 05:35:43 AM
Is that real? That looks really bad like herniated disc never going to walk again bad

pot, kettle, black
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Taffin on September 24, 2022, 06:37:44 AM
There's nothing wrong with Matt's form.  :D

Hmmm...🤔  Now what does that remind me of..? ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 24, 2022, 07:41:11 AM
Is that real? That looks really bad like herniated disc never going to walk again bad

It was a screen shot from his Instagram.

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0uA9uANB-/?hl=en (https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca0uA9uANB-/?hl=en)






Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 24, 2022, 07:44:06 AM
99 pages of fuckery !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: chaos on September 24, 2022, 08:31:21 AM
Matt, can you do a seated barbell press and bring the bar down to your chin?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 24, 2022, 12:33:48 PM
Is this the “Wrap-Around Tits” manlet who claims he warms up with my maximum lifts?

What a fucking retard, people in that gym must despise the dumb little weakling.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on September 24, 2022, 01:55:38 PM


My hands ARE crooked. You identified a weak link for me. I have no idea why that is. I guess I have weak wrists, or weak hands. For example, with deadlift, my grip is my weak point. I'm glad you identified it even though your post was so dick.


You don't have weak wrists. Stop looking for excuses and sort your form out.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 24, 2022, 03:02:34 PM
Matt,

Are you still on the gas?

What are your plans for coming off?

Please update your cycle.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: joswift on September 24, 2022, 03:16:19 PM
Matt,

Are you still on the gas?

What are your plans for coming off?

Please update your cycle.

Thanks!

Hes upgraded the rusty fenders...
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Rambone on September 24, 2022, 04:12:29 PM
100 pages easily….

Hes upgraded the rusty fenders...

 :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 24, 2022, 05:58:14 PM
IMO, a leg press of 1,000-lb for reps is on par with a squat of at least 350 for reps.

I just specifically don't like squatting. So sue me.


We know, we know.  It's self evident by looking at your legs. 

Your comments about equating leg pressing 1000 lbs being on par to squatting 350 also make this evident. 
ANYONE who's done both exercises knows this isn't true.


What's your plan now?  None of us can figure out what you're doing.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Stan Diego on September 24, 2022, 06:08:40 PM
(https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/img-20180430-213218-1525291839.jpg?crop=1xw:1xh;center,top&resize=980:*)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on September 24, 2022, 06:35:19 PM
To me, it isn't an either/or prospect. I'm about getting bigger AND stronger. To do that, it's about lifting the weights with the target muscle getting the stress.

The reason Matt's pecs "suck" (his words) is because he lifts too heavy with too narrow of a grip, a less-than-stellar ROM and his elbows inward. He barely does inclines and when he does, he uses the same haphazard for that he does on the flat bench.

I've had to learn (and am still learning) about lifting heavier weights on curls (particularly with dumbbells) but with my BICEPS getting the stress. If I don't do them correctly, my forearms get sore but my biceps get almost zip.

It's not either or, but Matt has spent his entire life training for strength with bodybuilding taking a back seat.  According to him, this time he wanted to focus on bodybuilding.

I've never see someone who cares so much about what others think about how much he's lifting, but now he's going back to strength training.


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on September 24, 2022, 06:36:31 PM
Hes upgraded the rusty fenders...

 ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on September 24, 2022, 09:19:47 PM
No one likes squatting because it is hard. You don't get knee valgus your knee just comes in because you are using too much weight same thing happens to everyone. Everyone is better in the upper range because the upper range is easier. No idea how you think you can get 405lbs when you don't squat. No amount of leg pressing on a slide proves you can squat a damn thing. The only thing that proves you can squat is a godamn squat.

There you have it.

Trying to translate leg presses into squat weight makes no sense. There are different types of sleds. Most af 45o; a handful are vertical.

Plus, with the squat, your midsection (especially your lower back) had better be in good shape; or you are a GONER.

I stopped squatting because the amount of weight I was using was simply too much for my lumbars to take. And I got tired of waking up with stiff knees and a sore lower back.

I loved squatting during my younger years, which is amazing to me considering I started lifting in an era where squats were labeled as poison (just like behind-the-neck presses).

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Never1AShow on September 24, 2022, 10:06:42 PM
99 pages of fuckery !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111

Let's make it 100!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 25, 2022, 02:19:57 AM
Let's make it 100!
Oh they`ll go well beyond that trust me.


If you were to have a proofreader read this bullshit all you`d need to read is about 1 page to get the gist of it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 25, 2022, 08:43:08 AM
Oh they`ll go well beyond thast trust me.


If you were to hsave a proofreader read this n/bullshit all you`d need to read is about 1
Or just ask, why brag about doing a cycle and pretend to ask for advice, if you’re not going to follow the advice or lift the weight properly anyway?

Fucking pathetic…
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 25, 2022, 09:19:24 AM
Very true.....ask for advice,receive great advice..........shitcan it,then keep complaining and posting double biceps backshots in tights.  ;D

This cat needs to hardcore a USA east coast gym.....he`d be laughed out the door.
               
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 25, 2022, 09:30:27 AM
Very true.....ask for advice,receive great advice..........shitcan it,then keep complaining and posting double biceps backshots in tights.  ;D

This cat needs to hardcore a USA east coast gym.....he`d be laughed out the door.
               

Posing in his Garanimals….
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 25, 2022, 09:32:49 AM
Garanimals !!  LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Marvin Martian on September 25, 2022, 09:38:38 AM
Garanimals !!  LOL  ;D

Hey man - don’t knock Garanimals. I still have my wife sew little animals inside of my pants and shirts so I can match! She could really fck me up if she packed a suitcase of elephants and mice (I ain’t a genius but I KNOW elephants are scared of meeses)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on September 25, 2022, 09:39:31 AM
Hey man - don’t knock Garanimals. I still have my wife sew little animals inside of my pants and shirts so I can match! She could really fck me up if she packed a suitcase of elephants and mice (I ain’t a genius but I KNOW elephants are scared of meeses)
You nut !!  ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 25, 2022, 10:47:25 AM
Hey man - don’t knock Garanimals. I still have my wife sew little animals inside of my pants and shirts so I can match! She could really fck me up if she packed a suitcase of elephants and mice (I ain’t a genius but I KNOW elephants are scared of meeses)
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on October 01, 2022, 08:23:59 PM
First tits and now hips. Look at those child bearing hips! Is MattC feminizing?

(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1395283;image)

Any updates on Matt's boobs and child bearing hips?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ThisisOverload on October 01, 2022, 10:28:05 PM
Matt,

Where is your update?

This thread made it 100 pages.

Did you stop taking the drugs and lose all your gains in a week or two?

Please advise of your status.

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on October 02, 2022, 06:17:41 AM
He won’t peel!!!!in a Lonnie teper voice,
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: illuminati on December 01, 2022, 11:49:08 AM
Looks can be deceiving it's almost a pheromone type of thing people absolutely know not to mess with me in real life online it is different in real life no one does they can sense it

DELUSIONAL MISSFIT - CAN'T SEE THAT EVERYONE ON HERE RIDICULES HIM & ISN'T THE LEAST BIT "SCARED OR BOTHERED" BY HIM - IN FACT JUST THE OPPOSITE - GETBIG'S WHIPPING BOY & LAUGHING STOCK


HA HA HA HA HA
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on December 01, 2022, 01:36:42 PM
Matt,

Where is your update?

This thread made it 100 pages.

Did you stop taking the drugs and lose all your gains in a week or two?

Please advise of your status.

Regarding my hips, that's my wallet in in my pocket, lol.

But to answer your question:

Yes, I'm back to normal now.

I hate eating. I have been keeping up with training. Everything is good. Bench press = around 225 for 22.

My one-arm dumbbell press is 140.

I'm training for strength now.

But I've lost all my muscle, yes.

I'd like to do a cycle against for next summer. But NOT Anadrol...it's too damn strong. Scary strong.

Maybe next time, 500mg Test only, per week, for 14 weeks.

?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on December 01, 2022, 01:44:36 PM
Regarding my hips, that's my wallet in in my pocket, lol.

But to answer your question:

Yes, I'm back to normal now.

I hate eating. I have been keeping up with training. Everything is good. Bench press = around 225 for 22.

My one-arm dumbbell press is 140.

I'm training for strength now.

But I've lost all my muscle, yes.

I'd like to do a cycle against for next summer. But NOT Anadrol...it's too damn strong. Scary strong.

Maybe next time, 500mg Test only, per week, for 14 weeks.

?

Any videos of your lifts?

Have you tried working out in a bounce castle as your form is similar.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 01, 2022, 02:01:58 PM
Regarding my hips, that's my wallet in in my pocket, lol.

But to answer your question:

Yes, I'm back to normal now.

I hate eating. I have been keeping up with training. Everything is good. Bench press = around 225 for 22.

My one-arm dumbbell press is 140.

I'm training for strength now.

But I've lost all my muscle, yes.

I'd like to do a cycle against for next summer. But NOT Anadrol...it's too damn strong. Scary strong.

Maybe next time, 500mg Test only, per week, for 14 weeks.

?

What do you mean you have lost all your muscle? What do you weigh? What are current stats pics? Lets see the end results you are probably leaner than you were before at a lower bodyweight I bet.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on December 01, 2022, 02:04:14 PM
What do you mean you have lost all your muscle? What do you weigh? What are current stats pics? Lets see the end results you are probably leaner than you were before at a lower bodyweight I bet.

If you ever came off gear you would realize you loose some weight.

Since you haven’t come off in 24 years you wouldn’t know.

Drug abusing idiot.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 01, 2022, 02:06:53 PM
If you ever came off gear you would realize you loose some weight.

Since you haven’t come off in 24 years you wouldn’t know.

Drug abusing idiot.

Just want to see Matts end results. Myself and others feel like we went on the journey with him. We were there the entire movie we read the first 13 chapters we saw 4 seasons want to know how it ended.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on December 01, 2022, 02:08:45 PM
NEED pre pics/his cycle pics and now pic  to compare,,lets go matt!!!!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on December 01, 2022, 02:08:50 PM
Just want to see Matts end results. Myself and others feel like we went on the journey with him. We were there the entire movie we read the first 13 chapters we saw 4 seasons want to know how it ended.

My guess, this idiot added water weight with his circus training and high school diet.

Stopped the drugs, lost everything while eating one subway sub a day.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Primemuscle on December 01, 2022, 02:14:22 PM
Regarding my hips, that's my wallet in in my pocket, lol.

But to answer your question:

Yes, I'm back to normal now.

I hate eating. I have been keeping up with training. Everything is good. Bench press = around 225 for 22.

My one-arm dumbbell press is 140.

I'm training for strength now.

But I've lost all my muscle, yes.

I'd like to do a cycle against for next summer. But NOT Anadrol...it's too damn strong. Scary strong.

Maybe next time, 500mg Test only, per week, for 14 weeks.

?

You best add HCG to your weekly regime or say goodbye to your nuts and Arimidex once a week to avoid getting bigger boobs. Testosterone works but not without issues for some people.

One more thing. When you take a selfie, try smiling or at least not frowning. Didn't your mother ever tell you your facial expression will freeze that way? Do you want to walk around perpetually looking angry and sad? LOL!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Darren Avey on December 01, 2022, 02:32:12 PM
I've never tried anadrol.  What makes it "scary?"
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on December 01, 2022, 02:52:36 PM
Just want to see Matts end results. Myself and others feel like we went on the journey with him. We were there the entire movie we read the first 13 chapters we saw 4 seasons want to know how it ended.
You just want to ridicule him.....keep it real.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on December 01, 2022, 02:53:36 PM
Any videos of your lifts?

Have you tried working out in a bounce castle as your form is similar.
;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on December 01, 2022, 03:16:05 PM
You just want to ridicule him.....keep it real.

Sitting here with my fingers poised above my keyboard….
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on December 01, 2022, 03:23:50 PM
My guess, this idiot added water weight with his circus training and high school diet.

Stopped the drugs, lost everything while eating one subway sub a day.

Correct. 

I'm not trying to run down Matt, but the weight he added with Drol was almost entirely water weight, with maybe a pound or so of additional, actual, dry muscle mass.  We tried to tell Matt that "cementing" all weight gains -- and certainly including things AAS induced -- into true muscle growth takes time and lots of food (sorry to talk about you in the third person, Matt; such is considered very rude in my circles, but I AM also writing to Webstar, so I think I get a pass ;) ).

But let's set aside most of that momentarily, because I am curious:  Matt, how do you make a living? 

We'll take it from there, mate.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on December 01, 2022, 03:38:04 PM
.

But let's set aside most of that momentarily, because I am curious:  Matt, how do you make a living? 

We'll take it from there, mate.

I believe Matt does g4p, mostly videos of him jerking off and shooting ropes. Primemuscle can confirm.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 01, 2022, 03:43:47 PM
Correct. 

I'm not trying to run down Matt, but the weight he added with Drol was almost entirely water weight, with maybe a pound or so of additional, actual, dry muscle mass.  We tried to tell Matt that "cementing" all weight gains -- and certainly including things AAS induced -- into true muscle growth takes time and lots of food (sorry to talk about you in the third person, Matt; such is considered very rude in my circles, but I AM also writing to Webstar, so I think I get a pass ;) ).

But let's set aside most of that momentarily, because I am curious:  Matt, how do you make a living? 

We'll take it from there, mate.

If his strength is good and he has lost weight it should be bloat he lost and not muscle he should be smaller but leaner
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on December 01, 2022, 05:08:52 PM
Correct. 

I'm not trying to run down Matt, but the weight he added with Drol was almost entirely water weight, with maybe a pound or so of additional, actual, dry muscle mass.  We tried to tell Matt that "cementing" all weight gains -- and certainly including things AAS induced -- into true muscle growth takes time and lots of food (sorry to talk about you in the third person, Matt; such is considered very rude in my circles, but I AM also writing to Webstar, so I think I get a pass ;) ).

But let's set aside most of that momentarily, because I am curious:  Matt, how do you make a living? 

We'll take it from there, mate.

I personally dislike eating, but in addition to that, the studies on caloric restriction are very clear - it is much healthier to be lighter.

I could dig up my blood work from before my cycle. Everything wasn't just good - it was optimal.

That's not by accident.

Say what you want about Brian Shaw - the man will be dead in 10 years time.

There is nothing "healthy" about bodybuilding - even natural bodybuilding. While I do like the physical look of more muscle, it requires more shopping, more cooking, more eating, more cleaning, more passing, more shitting, and it all ultimately makes you less healthy.

Now that I know that I can bulk up to 205 and full in the span of a month, I have no reason to maintain that size year-round in the frigid Canadian winters here while we're covered up anyway.

I'll go back on cycle and go back to whatever physique I prefer to get, next summer.

I think 190 and leaner would be a better look.

It's the optimal look for me, for how I want to look. If others want to be 250+, that's their preference. It's not mine. Its also not healthy. It it didn't come at a biological cost and reduction to lifespan, I would stay on gear.

The only major benefit to gear to me is that you are perpetually full and pumped up.

It's one thing to be, e.g., 220-lb - it is NOT the same 220 when natural vs. juiced.

My ideal look would be somewhere between 175 and 205. I can't justify being 220 at me height, even if I do it naturally. That's carrying around 50-lb of extra mass. I can't fathom maining a 50 resting heart rate at that weight.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on December 01, 2022, 05:15:44 PM
Just get stronger, Matt.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on December 01, 2022, 05:19:24 PM
Just get stronger, Matt.

Thanks, IroNat.

I was absolutely prepared to take that one-arm dumbbell record in Canada's 80-kg class.

It was only 154.6...and I'm within 10-lb of that.

Then it went up to 180 last month.  ;D

And I don't intend to be hitting 185 any time soon - if I'm even genetically capable of doing that at that body weight!
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: GymnJuice on December 01, 2022, 05:24:52 PM
Matt have you ever trained for a power lifting curling competition?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Matt on December 01, 2022, 06:23:30 PM
Matt have you ever trained for a power lifting curling competition?

As in, a one-rep max barbell curl contest?

If yes, I personally have not. I believe Denis Cyplrnkov holds the strict curl record at 259-lb, of something around there.

There was a contest at the Gaspari booth one year with 90-lb or something. I got about 20 reps.

My barbell curl has remained around the same over the years. I personally don't think our biceps have much strength potential, and they don't matter too much for strength contests, IMO.

I would expect if I'm really training arms hard, I'd be curling about 120 for 8 with ok form.

I've never tried a strict one rep max though.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Lartinos on December 01, 2022, 07:11:07 PM
One of the reasons I stayed away from ever trying Anadrol was that I remember (back in the 2000’s) not finding sufficient info on how it/if it aromatizes and what to take to prevent gyno.

The idea of losing a bunch of water weight didn’t sound like fun either.

The strength gains would have been glorious though I’m sure.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on December 01, 2022, 07:19:49 PM
Just want to see Matts end results. Myself and others feel like we went on the journey with him. We were there the entire movie we read the first 13 chapters we saw 4 seasons want to know how it ended.
He's still using your max weights as warm-ups. And no he doesn't give a fuck about strict curl. No one does. He's still got a full head of hair too
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: wes on December 01, 2022, 07:25:16 PM
He's still using your max weights as warm-ups. And no he doesn't give a fuck about strict curl. No one does. He's still.got a full head of hair too
LOL  :D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 01, 2022, 09:09:28 PM
Matt is avoiding the question what is his current weight he shared all the progress pics let’s see the end result
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Mothballs on December 01, 2022, 10:23:38 PM
Matt is avoiding the question what is his current weight he shared all the progress pics let’s see the end result
Also avoided what he does for a living.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: AbrahamG on December 01, 2022, 10:26:11 PM
Also avoided what he does for a living.

He's a real estate tycoon and crypto pioneer.  Pay attention, Sparky.   ;D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 01, 2022, 11:20:54 PM
I personally dislike eating, but in addition to that, the studies on caloric restriction are very clear - it is much healthier to be lighter.

I could dig up my blood work from before my cycle. Everything wasn't just good - it was optimal.

That's not by accident.

Say what you want about Brian Shaw - the man will be dead in 10 years time.

There is nothing "healthy" about bodybuilding - even natural bodybuilding. While I do like the physical look of more muscle, it requires more shopping, more cooking, more eating, more cleaning, more passing, more shitting, and it all ultimately makes you less healthy.

Now that I know that I can bulk up to 205 and full in the span of a month, I have no reason to maintain that size year-round in the frigid Canadian winters here while we're covered up anyway.

I'll go back on cycle and go back to whatever physique I prefer to get, next summer.

I think 190 and leaner would be a better look.


It's the optimal look for me, for how I want to look. If others want to be 250+, that's their preference. It's not mine. Its also not healthy. It it didn't come at a biological cost and reduction to lifespan, I would stay on gear.

The only major benefit to gear to me is that you are perpetually full and pumped up.

It's one thing to be, e.g., 220-lb - it is NOT the same 220 when natural vs. juiced.

My ideal look would be somewhere between 175 and 205. I can't justify being 220 at me height, even if I do it naturally. That's carrying around 50-lb of extra mass. I can't fathom maining a 50 resting heart rate at that weight.

You say you got up to about 205lbs bloated on anadrol then dropped the anadrol but kept training maintaining your strength you should be 190lbs and leaner now. You were 187lbs before you started the anadrol

You can't just go from nothing to any physique you want in a summer. You say you dont want to carry extra weight in the winter when no one sees you but that is exactly the time to bulk if you want ot be big and lean next summer. You cant just start at 0 and get to jacked and lean you have to bulk first then lean out. You should be bulking in the winter and cutting in the summer not vice versa.

Where are you at now make a plan to get to where you want to be don't just think it doesnt matter because in a month you can get any physique you want that is nonsense. Consistency  year round is the key not drastic changes for a month in the summer. You were not full at 205lbs you were fat if you want to be a better leaner 205lbs next summer you have to keep at it this winter not go back to square one and start over.

And what the fuck is with all the "more cooking, more eating, more cleaning, more passing, more shitting" eating a normal amount of food is not going to cause you to be on the shitter 24/7 you act like you bulked up to 400lbs and were constantly shopping and preparing your meals to eat 10k a day when you just started eating the average calories of a teenage girl instead of starving yourself. You have money buy some fucking prepared food it's not that difficult to order delivery is it?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Gym Rat on December 02, 2022, 01:18:12 AM
You have money buy some fucking prepared food it's not that difficult to order delivery is it?

Tons of delivery companies now these days, many look decent.
If I didnt have a live-in cook (wife) I'd just be ordering meals weekly.
I despise cooking / food-prep nowadays... (The times that I do, do it, which is rare).
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Van_Bilderass on December 02, 2022, 01:48:03 AM
One of the reasons I stayed away from ever trying Anadrol was that I remember (back in the 2000’s) not finding sufficient info on how it/if it aromatizes and what to take to prevent gyno.

The idea of losing a bunch of water weight didn’t sound like fun either.

The strength gains would have been glorious though I’m sure.

It doesn't aromatize but it's probably directly estrogenic. All steroids can "cause" gyno, some more than others sure. I personally think you can catch gyno early in the most cases. Just pop a single AI and a few SERMs at the first hint of sore nipples, which is usually the first sign. Adjust the steroids you are taking. I think most all could stop gyno dead in its tracks doing that. And if you did get gyno it's not the end of the world, it's usually not even perceptible in most cases but I do get it, you'd rather not have it. Getting Titty Boy Craig Golias type of gyno only comes from not giving a shit and pumping tons of hormones after the signs are there. Many pros don't take antiestrogens for a reason, gyno be damned. It is thought that estrogen is important for growth. Chad Nicholls claimed Ronnie didn't explode until he stopped his Nolvadex. I recently got quite the titties from MENT. Adjusted some things and it mostly went away.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on December 02, 2022, 04:46:15 AM
Matt's known great strength has inflamed Bhanky's fragile ego.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/szU7m4hKn2jsc/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on December 02, 2022, 04:52:15 AM
I personally dislike eating, but in addition to that, the studies on caloric restriction are very clear - it is much healthier to be lighter.

I could dig up my blood work from before my cycle. Everything wasn't just good - it was optimal.

That's not by accident.

Say what you want about Brian Shaw - the man will be dead in 10 years time.

There is nothing "healthy" about bodybuilding - even natural bodybuilding. While I do like the physical look of more muscle, it requires more shopping, more cooking, more eating, more cleaning, more passing, more shitting, and it all ultimately makes you less healthy.

Says who? That's just your excuse for not applying and maintaining a decent diet.


Now that I know that I can bulk up to 205 and full in the span of a month, I have no reason to maintain that size year-round in the frigid Canadian winters here while we're covered up anyway.

I'll go back on cycle and go back to whatever physique I prefer to get, next summer.

I think 190 and leaner would be a better look.

It's the optimal look for me, for how I want to look. If others want to be 250+, that's their preference. It's not mine. Its also not healthy. It it didn't come at a biological cost and reduction to lifespan, I would stay on gear.

The only major benefit to gear to me is that you are perpetually full and pumped up.

It's one thing to be, e.g., 220-lb - it is NOT the same 220 when natural vs. juiced.

My ideal look would be somewhere between 175 and 205. I can't justify being 220 at me height, even if I do it naturally. That's carrying around 50-lb of extra mass. I can't fathom maining a 50 resting heart rate at that weight.

Quit with the health excuse. Using steroids and repeatedly and rapidly fluctuating bodyweight aren't healthy habits, no matter how much you try to convince yourself otherwise.

Yet again, to torpedo this notion that you have to choose between strongman stuff and bodybuilding, I give you Kenya's and Qatar's Strongest Man, 2017 Mr. Kenya, and 2019 PNBA World Champion, Christopher Oketch.





Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: MCWAY on December 02, 2022, 04:57:45 AM
You say you got up to about 205lbs bloated on anadrol then dropped the anadrol but kept training maintaining your strength you should be 190lbs and leaner now. You were 187lbs before you started the anadrol

You can't just go from nothing to any physique you want in a summer. You say you dont want to carry extra weight in the winter when no one sees you but that is exactly the time to bulk if you want ot be big and lean next summer. You cant just start at 0 and get to jacked and lean you have to bulk first then lean out. You should be bulking in the winter and cutting in the summer not vice versa.

Where are you at now make a plan to get to where you want to be don't just think it doesnt matter because in a month you can get any physique you want that is nonsense. Consistency  year round is the key not drastic changes for a month in the summer. You were not full at 205lbs you were fat if you want to be a better leaner 205lbs next summer you have to keep at it this winter not go back to square one and start over.

And what the fuck is with all the "more cooking, more eating, more cleaning, more passing, more shitting" eating a normal amount of food is not going to cause you to be on the shitter 24/7 you act like you bulked up to 400lbs and were constantly shopping and preparing your meals to eat 10k a day when you just started eating the average calories of a teenage girl instead of starving yourself. You have money buy some fucking prepared food it's not that difficult to order delivery is it?

Or you can cook your food, in advance. You can bake 5 potatoes just as easily as you can bake just one. Same goes for cooking chicken or beef. Cook at least three days' worth of meals (particularly your meats) in advance and you're good to go.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: NoPEDsNoBB on December 02, 2022, 07:28:21 AM
Is Matt still claiming to have put on 50lbs of muscle off just 0.01mg of drol every other month while consuming 600 calories a week?
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on December 02, 2022, 08:15:13 AM
Is Matt still claiming to have put on 50lbs of muscle off just 0.01mg of drol every other month while consuming 600 calories a week?

Yes.

And his one arm dumbbell press improved from 65.347 lbs to 68.66667 lbs.

But teenage boys did ogle him at the gym pool, so that’s always a big plus.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: NoPEDsNoBB on December 02, 2022, 08:44:21 AM
Yes.

And his one arm dumbbell press improved from 65.347 lbs to 68.66667 lbs.

But teenage boys did ogle him at the gym pool, so that’s always a big plus.

Living the his dream.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 02, 2022, 01:31:33 PM
So no updated pics found this last lifting video solid 575lb deadlift with near perfect form

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkJ3XD6t4ke/
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on December 02, 2022, 01:43:01 PM
So no updated pics found this last lifting video solid 575lb deadlift with near perfect form

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkJ3XD6t4ke/

Wow, his form is awful on rack pulls too.

Can't understand how someone who is so into this stuff never learned technique.  That deadlift form of his was like someone who never heard of it before and just tried to lift it.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: IroNat on December 02, 2022, 02:26:56 PM
Wow, his form is awful on rack pulls too.

Can't understand how someone who is so into this stuff never learned technique.  That deadlift form of his was like someone who never heard of it before and just tried to lift it.

Form generally doesn't matter in strongman.  Just get the weight up is all that counts
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on December 02, 2022, 04:51:06 PM
1)So Matt at 180 or so pounds clean  lifts much more than Hanky at 225 gased, and Hanky just can't handle it. Acts like Matt's filmed lifts don't matter due to form, range of motion. GTFO, under the same form and ROM Hanky can't come close.

2) Hanky has the better physique.

3) Matt put down your copy of Mein Kampf , and hit the max curl hard. Go head to head with Hanky on a strict curling contest on Getbig. Contest date Jan. 28, 2023.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: keanu on December 02, 2022, 05:01:43 PM
NEED pre pics/his cycle pics and now pic  to compare,,lets go matt!!!!
  If the man says he wants to keep his weight around 180 lbs for health and longevity 9 months a year, why not. Makes sense for a guy in his 40s. In the old days even competitors would be clean most of the year then gear up and gain going into a contest, only to come off after.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: residue on December 02, 2022, 05:17:35 PM
Wow, his form is awful on rack pulls too.

Can't understand how someone who is so into this stuff never learned technique.  That deadlift form of his was like someone who never heard of it before and just tried to lift it.
jesus that's so bad, he doesnt turn on his lats, doesnt brace, and did he at one point try to pull off his toes omg hhahahah
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on December 02, 2022, 06:19:40 PM
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on December 02, 2022, 06:23:56 PM
Form generally doesn't matter in strongman.  Just get the weight up is all that counts

I know it doesn't matter from a judging standpoint, but better technique would, in theory, help you lift more weight.

And from an "injury waiting to happen" standpoint, it's inevitable.

Of course he's strong, but could be even stronger.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Zillotch on December 02, 2022, 07:59:45 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679848.0;attach=1410296;image)

looks like he's dying... in tights
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: njflex on December 02, 2022, 08:12:08 PM
looks like he's dying... in tights
Men in tights
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on December 02, 2022, 09:11:22 PM
Unparalleled phaggotry.
14-inch arms and 16-inch thighs on a “strongman”.
Unprecedented delusion.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: webstar on December 02, 2022, 09:14:46 PM
So no updated pics found this last lifting video solid 575lb deadlift with near perfect form

https://www.instagram.com/p/CkJ3XD6t4ke/

My goodness fucking atrocious. Reading the comment barring any  injuries. With that form, you are asking for an injury
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on December 03, 2022, 02:47:24 AM
A man with views that fall to the right
An autist with a passion for the fight
Bodybuilding is his favorite pastime
And he follows a low calorie diet that's just fine

He loves to make videos and share his views
On topics that often spark internet blues
From long debates on politics and more
To conversations with an old man named Primemuscle, for sure

But one thing that he can't stand
Is the filth that's found in pornography land
And though he may be somewhat misogynistic
He's still a man with a heart that's consistent

At Lakehead University, he's known to clash
But deep down, he's just a man with a passion to last
Through his autism and right wing views
He remains true to himself, and that's something to choose.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 03, 2022, 04:48:50 AM
Reading the last 100 pages was a waste of time without final current end result pics I feel cheated
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Flexacon on December 03, 2022, 05:17:04 AM
Reading the last 100 pages was a waste of time without final current end result pics I feel cheated

He lost all the muscle he gained on the cycle and kept all the fat gains.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Titus Pullo on December 03, 2022, 05:02:19 PM
If his strength is good and he has lost weight it should be bloat he lost and not muscle he should be smaller but leaner

Is that not what I said?


Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on December 03, 2022, 05:09:46 PM
He lost all the muscle he gained on the cycle and kept all the fat gains.

But….

(1) He got to date Bast From the Past.
(2) He got to exchange pornographic videos with Primehomosexual.
(3) He got to loan Josh Rehaluk money he will never see again.
(4) He got Josh Rehaluk as a “roommate” for the winter
(5) He’s going to get to fund a business start-up with Josh Rehaluk, where he will never see his money again.

So Matt “Titty Boy” Canning didn’t gain any muscle, but he’s definitely going to get the fucking over he was looking for! 

LOL
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: ChristopherA on December 03, 2022, 05:15:45 PM
1)So Matt at 180 or so pounds clean  lifts much more than Hanky at 225 gased, and Hanky just can't handle it. Acts like Matt's filmed lifts don't matter due to form, range of motion. GTFO, under the same form and ROM Hanky can't come close.

2) Hanky has the better physique.

3) Matt put down your copy of Mein Kampf , and hit the max curl hard. Go head to head with Hanky on a strict curling contest on Getbig. Contest date Jan. 28, 2023.
He critiques Matt's form and says he uses too much weight. Then proceeds to post up his squat vids with 100lbs more than he can handle. Shaking like a leaf, doing max rep squats with his matchstick legs getting buried by 335lbs
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: bhank on December 03, 2022, 08:20:53 PM
He critiques Matt's form and says he uses too much weight. Then proceeds to post up his squat vids with 100lbs more than he can handle. Shaking like a leaf, doing max rep squats with his matchstick legs getting buried by 335lbs

By all means post your best current squat video and I will gladly beat it excuses coming in 3,2,1
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on December 03, 2022, 08:40:44 PM
By all means post your best current squat video and I will gladly beat it excuses coming in 3,2,1

I’m just gonna leave this here, for reference as to who is running his mouth…

Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Humble Narcissist on December 04, 2022, 12:52:36 AM
I’m just gonna leave this here, for reference as to who is running his mouth…
:D
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on December 04, 2022, 03:45:14 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/268cxQj5/Matt-C2eg34hg34hb54.jpg)
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Palumboism on December 04, 2022, 06:24:17 PM
.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: hench on December 05, 2022, 05:23:24 AM
Has Hanky got the better physique really,  1000 ailments, tears muscles and dislocates shoulders as easy as taking a crap. Is that really in great shape or a better physique?

1)So Matt at 180 or so pounds clean  lifts much more than Hanky at 225 gased, and Hanky just can't handle it. Acts like Matt's filmed lifts don't matter due to form, range of motion. GTFO, under the same form and ROM Hanky can't come close.

2) Hanky has the better physique.

3) Matt put down your copy of Mein Kampf , and hit the max curl hard. Go head to head with Hanky on a strict curling contest on Getbig. Contest date Jan. 28, 2023.
Title: Re: Matt C. Cycle Update.
Post by: Grape Ape on December 05, 2022, 05:34:18 AM
Never realized Matt has done so many cycles.