I'm not going to explain it any more plainly than I already have.
ME believes:
TAKING OF HUMAN LIFE = TAKING OF HUMAN LIFE
YOU believes:
SOME TAKING OF HUMAN LIFE > OTHER TAKING OF HUMAN LIFE
If you ask me again, then you're just being obstinate.
So I'm being obstinate? (I'll need to look that up.) Doesn't matter. So long as you don't want to beat me up, like Hugo.
You are all over the place. I made the following statement:
"I don't think you view life as any more valuable than me. We just have different opinions on whether the right to life is conditional. I think it is. You don't. In some states, a majority of the people agree with me. In others (including Hawaii), they agree with you."
You responded by saying:
"Your own statement is a contradiction."
What statement is a contradiction? Saying there is an absolute right to life, but that people can forfeit that right, would be a contradiction. Saying there is a conditional right to life is not a contradiction. Not sure what you're talking about.