Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Straw Man on October 17, 2020, 10:00:47 AM
-
-
(https://i2.wp.com/gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Tony-Soprano-No-One-Wants-to-Hear-You-Talk-The-Sopranos.gif?fit=395%2C218&ssl=1)
-
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQZQ8jsj5Nx_tS-STKzLfk6dd45zt3DMNPF6g&usqp=CAU)
-
As Antifa SS X-Box fighter, Ziruolo knows everything about Russian military secrets.
;D
-
Wrong again you liberal fagget.
-
Hey 333 - good try but Republicans have no problem taking action based on intel with "low to moderate" confidence
It was the Republican Bush Administration that got us until war based on Cheney's 1% doctrine
Let me refresh your memory
If there's a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response. It's not about our analysis ... It's about our response.
Of course we also know that Russian interfered in the 2016 and 2020 elections and perpetrated a huge hack our government computer infrastructure which went unnoticed for months by THE TRAITORS administration so I'm thinking bounties on our soldiers doesn't seem implausible even if it's only of a low to moderate confidence to be correct
-
Hey 333 - good try but Republicans have no problem taking action based on intel with "low to moderate" confidence
It was the Republican Bush Administration that got us until war based on Cheney's 1% doctrine
Let me refresh your memory
Of course we also know that Russian interfered in the 2016 and 2020 elections and perpetrated a huge hack our government computer infrastructure which went unnoticed for months by THE TRAITORS administration so I'm thinking bounties on our soldiers doesn't seem implausible even if it's only of a low to moderate confidence to be correct
Uh huh - just admit you were wrong and move on
-
Hey 333 - good try but Republicans have no problem taking action based on intel with "low to moderate" confidence
It was the Republican Bush Administration that got us until war based on Cheney's 1% doctrine
Let me refresh your memory
Of course we also know that Russian interfered in the 2016 and 2020 elections and perpetrated a huge hack our government computer infrastructure which went unnoticed for months by THE TRAITORS administration so I'm thinking bounties on our soldiers doesn't seem implausible even if it's only of a low to moderate confidence to be correct
YOU EQUALS OWNED YET AGAIN
https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-intel-walks-back-claim-russians-put-bounties-on-american-troops?ref=home?ref=home
-
Uh huh - just admit you were wrong and move on
it's not my story and there is still no proof that it's not accurate
they are just less confident about the intel
so what
Putin is our enemy and has literally attacked our country and I think cyber attack is still ongoing
I'll take Cheney's 1% doctrine in this circumstance
How about you comrade?
-
it's not my story and there is still no proof that it's not accurate
they are just less confident about the intel
so what
Putin is our enemy and has literally attacked our country and I think cyber attack is still ongoing
I'll take Cheney's 1% doctrine in this circumstance
How about you comrade?
You are a FNG moron.
Read the story - the Biden admn is stating this is probably false. But liberal twinks and fags still hold on to their fairy tails.
-
You are a FNG moron.
Read the story - the Biden admn is stating this is probably false. But liberal twinks and fags still hold on to their fairy tails.
Straw is kinda slow. Remember what the Scarecrow (Strawman) was missing in The Wizard of Oz?
-
You are a FNG moron.
Read the story - the Biden admn is stating this is probably false. But liberal twinks and fags still hold on to their fairy tails.
Republican went to war and wasted TRILLIONS based on Cheney's 1% doctrine
I'm willing to err on the side of assuming this is true and give the benefit of the doubt to OUR TROOPS.
You can take Putins side over our country if you want to
After all, all he did was interfere in two of our elections and perpetrated the largest (and likely ongoing) cyber attack on this country.
-
Republican went to war and wasted TRILLIONS based on Cheney's 1% doctrine
I'm willing to err on the side of assuming this is true and give the benefit of the doubt to OUR TROOPS.
You can take Putins side over our country if you want to
After all, all he did was interfere in two of our elections and perpetrated the largest (and likely ongoing) cyber attack on this country.
Biden Admn said its likely false.
:-*
-
Biden Admn said its likely false.
:-*
Next time try reading the link that you posted
Again, I'm taking the side of OUR COUNTRY over Putin
But on Thursday, the Biden administration announced that U.S. intelligence only had “low to moderate” confidence in the story after all. Translated from the jargon of spyworld, that means the intelligence agencies have found the story is, at best, unproven—and possibly untrue.
“The United States intelligence community assesses with low to moderate confidence that Russian intelligence officers sought to encourage Taliban attacks U.S. and coalition personnel in Afghanistan in 2019 and perhaps earlier,” a senior administration official said.
“This information puts a burden on the Russian government to explain its actions and take steps to address this disturbing pattern of behavior,” the official said, indicating that Biden is unprepared to walk the story back fully.
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-intel-back-pedals-russian-bounty-story