Author Topic: Village Idiots indeed  (Read 501 times)

Colossus_500

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Psalm 139
Village Idiots indeed
« on: October 29, 2008, 09:01:02 AM »
Verbal gymnastics: “What the critics are missing is that the term ‘redistribution’ didn’t mean in the constitutional context equalized wealth or anything like that. It meant some positive rights, most prominently the right to education, and also the right to a lawyer. What he’s saying—this is the irony of it—he’s basically taking the side of the conservatives then and now against the liberals.” —Harvard Law Professor and Obama advisor Cass Sunstein misconstruing Obama’s “redistribution of wealth” comments

Don’t worry?: “I see some people say, ‘Don’t let them get 60 votes because then they’ll get everything they want.’ In my experience, don’t worry about that.” —former vice president Walter Mondale **Coming from the fox to the hen, that’s small comfort.

Unhinged: “He’s a terrorist. Rush Limbaugh is a terrorist.” —Joy Behar on “The View”

We agree in principle; practice is another matter: “We have to make sure there is no voting fraud here and there is no impediments to voting. I think people across party lines should stand together for the integrity of voting.” —race baiter Al Sharpton

Who will do the stealing?: “I am very cautious right now. I don’t think this thing is over. I do think there is a chance of another stolen election, so don’t get too confident, folks.” —actor Tim Robbins, who has no problem with the illegal practices of ACORN and the Democrats

Obama worship: “You have B.B.: Before Barack and A.B.: After Barack... What he’s done is historic. This coalition which he’s gotten: black, white, Hispanic, Asian, gay, straight, whatever, it’s come together, and this has never been done before. And I think this thing is, predeortained [sic] or whatever you want to call it. I’m not gonna say that it’s God, but this is not a mistake this is happening now.” —director Spike Lee

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Village Idiots indeed
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2008, 09:03:19 AM »
Great Post dude.....


1. The Los Angeles Times and the suppressed Obama/Jew-bash videotape.

In April, L.A. Times reporter Peter Wallsten reported on a 2003 farewell party for Rashid Khalidi, a radical Palestinian Liberation Organization spokesman/adviser turned Ivy League professor. The anti-Israel Arab American Action Network sponsored the gala. In attendance: good neighbors Barack Obama and Weather Underground terrorist duo Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Wallsten reported that the “event was videotaped, and a copy of the tape was obtained by The Times.” But the news organization refuses to let readers watch the video of Obama and his left-wing terrorist friends and will not release the tape. It’s “old news” now.

The paper had no problem, however, embedding a video clip of Sarah Palin’s 1984 swimsuit pageant on its gossip blog and deeming it newsworthy.

2. Ogling Obama.
In May, CNN posted “breaking news video” of female journalists on Obama’s press plane fawning over the Democratic presidential candidate as he talked on his cell phone. The caption listed on the network’s website: “Obama in jeans: Sen. Barack Obama surprises the press corps by wearing jeans.”

In the clip, several members of the press corps yell at a Secret Service agent to “sit down” because she’s obstructing the view of their beloved Obama. They giggle and sigh as Obama straddles over a row of seats and they furiously click away on their cameras. “You’re killing us,” one of them says breathlessly.

No, you’re killing yourselves.

Runners-up for Most Drool-Covered Groupies: The journalist who squealed “He touched me!” at the UNITY minority journalists’ convention in July; the MSNBC producer who broke down and shed tears of joy upon learning that The One had clinched the Democratic presidential nomination; MSNBC host Chris Matthews, who proclaimed that he “felt a thrill up his leg” after an Obama speech in February; Oprah Winfrey, who confessed she did a “happy dance” for Obama; and the writer for the German publication Bild, who worked out with Obama at the Ritz-Carlton in Berlin and reported: “I put my arm around his hip — wow, he didn’t even sweat! WHAT A MAN!”

3. The Atlantic Monthly’s deranged photographer.
Publisher David Bradley’s once-esteemed magazine hired celebrity lens-woman Jill Greenberg to snap portraits of John McCain. Greenberg, an outspoken left-winger who goaded children into crying on film and captioned the images with anti-Bush slogans, sabotaged the photo shoot and gloated about it on a photo industry website.

After tricking McCain into standing over a strobe light to create ugly shadows on his face, she then posted vandalized versions of the imagery on her personal website with crude, vulgar labels. One featured McCain with fangs and blood dripping from his mouth — with the Greenberg-added words, “I am a bloodthirsty warmongerer (sic).” Another piece of her “art” showed an ape (a favorite Greenberg subject) defecating on McCain’s head. The highly respected editors at Atlantic professed shock despite Greenberg’s notoriety. The name of her blog: “Manipulator.”

4. The quote doctors and math-manglers at CNN.

In a botched attack on Sarah Palin, CNN reporter Drew Griffin cited National Review writer Byron York allegedly questioning Palin’s abilities and character: “The National Review had a story saying that, you know, I can’t tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, or all of the above.” York, however, was characterizing the press coverage of Palin.

In a botched tally, CNN anchor Soledad O’Brien proclaimed that an audience poll showed “overwhelming” preference for Joe Biden after the vice-presidential debate. A freeze frame of the show of hands, however, showed the audience split. The mathematically challenged O’Brien also claimed that Palin slashed Alaska’s special-needs budget by 62 percent (which she recycled from the liberal Daily Kos blog), despite the fact that the governor increased special needs funding by 12 percent. Facts, schmacts.

5. Us magazine publisher Jann Wenner’s Obama apparatchiks.
The gossip mag’s partisan slime job on Palin and her family (“Babies, lies, and scandal”) last September opened the floodgates of Palin-bashing across the mainstream media and was the nadir of the year. Wenner — a prominent Obama backer who ran countless hagiographies of him in sister publication Rolling Stone and featured the Obamas with the slavering headline “Why Barack Loves Her” on Us nagazine’s June cover — had his media flack e-mail the anti-Palin hit piece to all media in St. Paul for the Republican National Convention: “Might be useful as an illustration of how the news is playing out,” the flack wrote.

Indeed, the side-by-side covers of the Palin smears and the Obamas’ deification perfectly illustrate the year in Obamedia.
L

Decker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5782
Re: Village Idiots indeed
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2008, 09:54:59 AM »
That's the liberal media for you.

Why can't we make any progress with the liberal stranglehold on media in this country?

Most of the think tanks are rightwing.  Most of the country is not liberal.  How do they do it?

Don't tell me that these effete, wishy-washy liberals are kicking the ass of our rightwing brethren when it comes to media domination?

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Village Idiots indeed
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2008, 09:58:50 AM »
Journalism is a profession that attracts lazy people who hate America

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Village Idiots indeed
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2008, 10:03:24 AM »
The media cannot be trusted.

FOX news sat on that John Edwards story for 9 months.
They won't talk about all the evil things my 'cousin' knows about Obama.

FOX actually donated more $ to the Obama campaign than MSNBC did.

Dan-O

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9729
Re: Village Idiots indeed
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2008, 10:47:12 AM »
"Obamedia," I love it, LOL.

Make no mistake...  the liberal media have an agenda and they are obviously going to do their damndest to subtly influence people's perceptions while appearing to be unbiased and objective.

It's funny...  50 or so years ago, it was the Republicans that were the party of the rich elitist snobs...  now the snob pendulum has swung to the left...  I wish the intentions of the liberal media could be exposed to the masses for what they are--they spoon-feed their agenda to us and can scarcely hide their disdain for Joe Average.  Off the air, Oprah refers to her audience, her bread-and-butter, as "cattle."  I have no doubts that any of your network news anchors have similar off-the-record opinions.