Author Topic: Tito/Forrest  (Read 26852 times)

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22062
  • #EarlToo
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #50 on: March 20, 2006, 08:49:40 PM »
I hope tito wins

you need guys like him to keep things interesting

E
E

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #51 on: March 20, 2006, 09:07:56 PM »
in much the same way as getbig needs fags like you ;D

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22062
  • #EarlToo
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #52 on: March 20, 2006, 09:58:53 PM »
in much the same way as getbig needs fags like you ;D

what's wrong jimmy did you get your feelings hurt when I said you weren't the funniest guy here :'( :'( :'( :'(

E
E

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #53 on: March 20, 2006, 10:06:49 PM »
actually


















i just think you're an annoying fag and im not shy about telling you!

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22062
  • #EarlToo
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #54 on: March 20, 2006, 10:22:37 PM »
I think there is more to it than that james ;D

you've been following me tonight the same way your buddy goatboy follows me on a daily basis :-*

E
 
E

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #55 on: March 20, 2006, 10:29:55 PM »
you got me earl









not only do i actually remember you saying im not funny

















but it bothers me so much to this day that i waited for the right moment to spring my trap, a devious ploy to trick the getbig community into thinking one of its most notorious heterosexuals is actually a muscle worshipping fag














i mean, its not as i stumbled upon 2 threads i had previously posted on and noticed your immense gayness

























not at all ::)

Geo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3782
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #56 on: March 20, 2006, 10:34:56 PM »
last I heard he told us the steeler were gonna win the superbowl............


















so subtract 25 % gayness because football's a contact sport !

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22062
  • #EarlToo
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #57 on: March 20, 2006, 10:57:30 PM »
you got me earl









not only do i actually remember you saying im not funny

















but it bothers me so much to this day that i waited for the right moment to spring my trap, a devious ploy to trick the getbig community into thinking one of its most notorious heterosexuals is actually a muscle worshipping fag














i mean, its not as i stumbled upon 2 threads i had previously posted on and noticed your immense gayness

























not at all ::)

I also told you to quit spacing out each sentence like that assclown >:(

E
E

*ChuteBoxe*

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #58 on: March 20, 2006, 11:29:29 PM »
After the full three rounds with Stephan Bonner I'd say Forrest has the endurance....maybe even BETTER THAN Tito. Hmmm.....

You are basing your argument around a sloppy B-level slugfest. Both Forrest and Bonnar looked stupidly tired in the last round of that fight, so I wouldn't even count the third round as full round.  Tito on the other hand went five full rounds with Randy couture (in a losing effort).  My point is, since Tito's fight with Frank Shamrock, he has not even shown a sliver of endurance problems.  Tito definately has the edge in conditioning, beyond the shadow of a doubt.  Normally I would wish a beating on Tito, but I want to see Forrest exposed already, I am tired of watching him have wars with B and C level fighters.
Predictions
 40/61

Nicole Weeks

  • Pros
  • Getbig II
  • *****
  • Posts: 155
  • All natural except for the 34D's
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #59 on: March 21, 2006, 10:12:19 AM »
I'm startin to think this "weeks account" is some kind of gimmick.....

but I think a pic of her butthole may set things straight

I think it's time to pony up girlfriend !!!!!!!!!!

Only fags pony up, so go ask your boyfriend.

Geo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3782
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #60 on: March 21, 2006, 10:15:46 AM »
Only fags pony up, so go ask your boyfriend.

I thought I told you to beat it !!!

Nicole Weeks

  • Pros
  • Getbig II
  • *****
  • Posts: 155
  • All natural except for the 34D's
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #61 on: March 21, 2006, 10:19:12 AM »
thats "loopy" right

please ... just try "thinking" before you post!

Such a tard. He throws both loopy lefts and rights. You just want to be right and me to be wrong. But this is supposed to be fun, not right or wrong. Just opinons.

No wonder you can't get any. You act like such a jackass.

Jaded

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 269
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #62 on: March 21, 2006, 10:19:27 AM »
whoa! dont mess with her she takes pictures with Arlovski and Sherk


Jaded

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 269
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #63 on: March 21, 2006, 10:20:37 AM »
and Bonnar and Couture (i think her and Couture graduated high school the same year)


slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #64 on: March 21, 2006, 10:22:39 AM »
Such a tard. He throws both loopy lefts and rights. You just want to be right and me to be wrong. But this is supposed to be fun, not right or wrong. Just opinons.

No wonder you can't get any. You act like such a jackass.

no ... chuck is known for his left hook and big loopy right hand


with every post you make yourself look even more fucking retarded

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #65 on: March 21, 2006, 10:23:44 AM »
Couture (i think her and Couture graduated high school the same year)


she looks more beat up than he does ;D

Geo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3782
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #66 on: March 21, 2006, 10:24:18 AM »
big deal,so she whored herself out for some pics in las vegas






and congratulations on your horrendously bad boob job

Nicole Weeks

  • Pros
  • Getbig II
  • *****
  • Posts: 155
  • All natural except for the 34D's
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #67 on: March 21, 2006, 10:25:30 AM »
that wasn't my point, you NOOB! my point is that he went the distance all 5 rounds .. he didn't run out of gas, he was outsmarted by the better fighter, not "out-cardio-ed."

and why are you bringing up age? we're talking about Tito and Forrest .. not another Tito vs Couture

you are doing nothing but Tito Bashing!

we get the point, you dont like him as a person, now stfu .. but its ok i still wont kick you out of bed  ;D

Even though I'm bashing Tito, I still think he'll win. So it's not like I'm saying he won't win. But cardio isn't everything (cuz he still lost).

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #68 on: March 21, 2006, 10:26:05 AM »
what i want to know is why shes go for the boobjob before getting any work on her grill


















thats a GROSS misappropriation of resources!

Geo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3782
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #69 on: March 21, 2006, 10:29:25 AM »


next time pull your pants up ya lil slut

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #70 on: March 21, 2006, 10:38:04 AM »
at her age do u really think they would let her endorse anything if she wasnt whoring it up ;D

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #71 on: March 21, 2006, 10:52:32 AM »
or maybe they hired her cause shes a dead ringer for the dad form wonder years ;D

Nicole Weeks

  • Pros
  • Getbig II
  • *****
  • Posts: 155
  • All natural except for the 34D's
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #72 on: March 21, 2006, 10:53:25 AM »
You are basing your argument around a sloppy B-level slugfest. Both Forrest and Bonnar looked stupidly tired in the last round of that fight, so I wouldn't even count the third round as full round.  Tito on the other hand went five full rounds with Randy couture (in a losing effort).  My point is, since Tito's fight with Frank Shamrock, he has not even shown a sliver of endurance problems.  Tito definately has the edge in conditioning, beyond the shadow of a doubt.  Normally I would wish a beating on Tito, but I want to see Forrest exposed already, I am tired of watching him have wars with B and C level fighters.

Point taken there re: 3 rounds versus 5. And given that I have to rework my opinion of each fighters level of endurance. Griffen/Bonner still ranked as one of THEE best in UFC ever. But you say you want Forrest "exposed" like it's a bad thing, though I can't "hear" your tone of voice. I think this is a great CHALLENGE for Griffen because he does need to fight someone who's big time and not B level. So I'm with you on that. He needs to EARN that contract money.

Nicole Weeks

  • Pros
  • Getbig II
  • *****
  • Posts: 155
  • All natural except for the 34D's
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #73 on: March 21, 2006, 10:56:25 AM »
no ... chuck is known for his left hook and big loopy right hand


with every post you make yourself look even more fucking retarded

I can't believe you are basing this on our opinions of fighters. This thread has gone to shit and now I'm not really learning anything because you are hijacking this thread with your drivel. Instead of basing your opinion in fact you just resort to name calling like a 6 year old.

I would think a chick who likes MMA would be something cool. I'm eager to learn more but I'm just not getting it here with you.

slippediskmountian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1484
  • absolute power corrupts absolutely
Re: Tito/Forrest
« Reply #74 on: March 21, 2006, 10:59:13 AM »
I can't believe you are basing this on our opinions of fighters. This thread has gone to shit and now I'm not really learning anything because you are hijacking this thread with your drivel. Instead of basing your opinion in fact you just resort to name calling like a 6 year old.

I would think a chick who likes MMA would be something cool. I'm eager to learn more but I'm just not getting it here with you.

i could give a shit if a "chick" likes mma ... youre stupid, id say the exact same shit to a guy that comes here and posts nonsense

stop being retarded and ill stop calling u one ... cut and dry :)