Author Topic: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped  (Read 4693 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« on: April 10, 2007, 08:37:02 PM »
Good decision.  What took so long? 

Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
Three Players Were Facing Charges of First Degree Kidnapping, First Degree Forcible Sexual Offense
Rutgers Team Wants Personal Apology

By LARA SETRAKIAN
ABC News Law & Justice Unit

April 10, 2007 — The office of Attorney General Roy Cooper will announce that he is dismissing all charges against three Duke Lacrosse players, ABC News has learned from sources close to the case. The reasons that will be cited for the dismissal are not yet known.

The three players, Reade Seligmann, David Evans and Collin Finnerty were facing charges of first degree kidnapping and first degree forcible sexual offense. The charges stem from an off-campus party on the night of March 13, 2006. In the hours after the party, one of two dancers hired to perform for the players claimed she had been violently raped in a bathroom by members of the lacrosse team.

The players had also been indicted for first degree rape, but that charge was dismissed on Dec. 22, 2006.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3028515&page=1

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2007, 05:14:55 PM »
The accuser (below).  I want to hear what man-hater Wendy Murphy has to say about this.

Crystal Gail Mangum: Profile of the Duke Rape Accuser
Wednesday, April 11, 2007

By Michael Y. Park

Yearbook photo of Crystal Mangum, who graduated from Hillside High School, Durham, N.C., in 1996.
Some of the details of the Duke University rape case may never be solved, but one thing is startlingly clear: Crystal Gail Mangum, the woman who accused three college lacrosse players of locking her in a bathroom and raping her, has had a very troubled life.

Mangum has been identified by name publicly several times, including by lawyers during press conferences on the case.

According to North Carolina Department of Corrections records, she was born on July 18, 1978, to a truck driver. She grew up the youngest of three children, not far from the house where she claimed she was assaulted in 2006. Durham is a slow-paced Southern town with equally large populations of black and white residents and a history of racial tensions — including those between a wealthy, predominantly white university community and its poorer black neighbors.

In 1993, when she was 14 years old, Mangum claimed to have been kidnapped by three men, driven to a house in Creedmoor, N.C., 15 miles away from Durham, and raped. She said one of the men was her boyfriend at the time, and was a physically and emotionally abusive man seven years older than she was. Creedmoor Police Chief Ted Pollard said Mangum filed a report on the incident in Aug. 18, 1996, three years after the rapes allegedly took place. The case, however, was not pursued, because the accuser backed away from the charges out of fear for her life, according to her relatives.
 
Family members still disagree on what really happened in 1993. The accuser's father has said he believes his daughter was not raped or injured in that incident, while her mother has said a rape involving three men in Creedmoor did occur, but said it happened when her daughter was 17 or 18; Mangum's ex-husband, Kenneth Nathanial McNeill, has said he believes the 1993 rape accusations are true.

According to her father, the year after the alleged Creedmoor rape, Mangum saw a psychiatrist and took prescription medication for a year because trauma from the assault had left her suicidal.

After Mangum graduated from high school in 1996, McNeill, then her fiance, encouraged her to join the Navy because she wanted to "see the world," he told various news outlets. She began her two-year active duty in the summer of 1997, marrying McNeill, who is 14 years her senior, in the fall of that year. She was trained to operate radios in Virginia, then the couple drove out to California where she was stationed on an ammunition ship. But she was frequently at sea, leading to ruptures in the marriage. On June 16, 1998, she accused her husband of taking her into a wooded area and threatening to kill her, which he has denied doing. When she failed to appear at a court hearing, the complaint was dismissed. The two separated after 17 months of marriage, and that same year, Mangum was discharged from the Navy, pregnant by a sailor she has begun a relationship with. That man would have another child with her as well, but that relationship wouldn't last.

By 2002, Mangum seems to have given up her dreams of seeing the world. She was back in her hometown, trying to get a job as a stripper. In June 2002, she was arrested on a multitude of charges while working at a topless dance club called Diamond Girls. According to police, she removed a customer's keys to his taxicab while giving him a lap dance, then stole the taxi while he was in the bathroom. Police chased her at speeds up to 70 miles per hour — frequently in the wrong lane — and when an officer tried to approach her, she barely missed running him over, and struck his patrol car instead. She tried to escape again, but a flat tire ended the second leg of her getaway. Finally in custody, she was found to have a blood-alcohol content of 0.19 (the state limit is 0.08). While being questioned, Mangum passed out and was taken to a hospital.

In the end, Mangum had racked up 10 charges, including driving while impaired, driving with a revoked license (her license has been suspended three times), eluding police, reckless driving, failure to heed a siren and lights, assault on an officer and larceny of a motor vehicle. In 2003, she pleaded guilty to four misdemeanors: larceny, speeding to elude arrest, assault on a government official and DWI. She served three weekends in jail, was placed on two years' probation and paid $4,200 in restitution and court fees.

But the portrait of an out-of-control, unstable woman with a drinking problem isn't accurate, according to relatives, who have described Mangum as a hardworking single mom running herself ragged trying to support her children and improve her life. In 2004, she earned an associate's degree from Durham Technical Community College. At the time of the Duke lacrosse rape allegations, she was in her second year as a full-time student at North Carolina Central University, studying police psychology and maintaining a 3.0 average. She had at some point held jobs working at a nursing facility and at a $10.50-an-hour assembly-line job making catalytic reducers.

But it wasn't a happy life.

Sometime in the last two years, according to her parents, Mangum suffered a mental breakdown and was taken to a hospital in Raleigh. They said they didn't know what caused the breakdown but said she felt burdened by mounting debts. In 2003, she went to court to force the father of her children to pay child support (the court sided with her and ordered $400 from his monthly paycheck to go to child support). In 2006, Mangum was working as a stripper in at least one club and for one service. She was adamant that she never worked as a prostitute, and told police that in only one instance did she have sex with a customer, a man she thought was "nice." According to employees of clubs she worked at, she was known as a problem dancer, frequently clashing with customers and other dancers and often passing out. At least one of the club workers, however, said he never saw Mangum drink while working.

As time went on, her romantic life didn't get more stable, either. According to reports, Mangum said she'd had sex with at least three men in the days leading up to the Duke lacrosse incident, including her boyfriend and two of the men who drove her to dancing gigs. Somewhere around this time, she again became pregnant. She gave birth to a premature girl in January 2007.

But the greatest upheaval in Mangum's life was to come on March 13, 2006. That's when she and 31-year-old Kim Roberts were hired to perform a striptease at the off-campus lacrosse house on North Buchanan Blvd. near Duke.

Now that all charges against the three players she accused have been dropped, it remains to be seen whether Mangum herself will be the target of any legal retribution on behalf of the players' families.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265374,00.html

kh300

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4360
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2007, 05:20:45 PM »
they should still be arrested.. your a fucking duke lacrosse player..so you hire the nastiest, skankiest stripper you can find to strip for you.. how pathetic, they cant get their own girls?

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2007, 08:49:32 PM »
they should still be arrested.. your a fucking duke lacrosse player..so you hire the nastiest, skankiest stripper you can find to strip for you.. how pathetic, they cant get their own girls?

that bitch that accused them should be arrested!

body88

  • Guest
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2007, 10:32:54 PM »
I loved all the tards in the media ranting about how anyone who thought this girl was lying was a RACIST!!!! All those media clowns making these kids out to be guilty based on some third rate skunts lies need to insert there foot into there mouth. I hope Mike Dickfong gets what is coming to him.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2007, 10:34:03 PM »
Remember those 28 Duke professors who called for those kids to be expelled?

egg, meet face.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2007, 01:51:42 PM »
This is bad.  This guy should turn in his prosecutor card. 

D.A. apologizes to Duke lacrosse players
POSTED: 4:43 p.m. EDT, April 12, 2007
Story Highlights• Mike Nifong acknowledges dismissal of charges was correct
• Nifong also recognizes damage to reputations not easily undone
• Attorney general criticized "rush to accuse" early in case
• Player's attorney rejects apology

Adjust font size:
DURHAM, North Carolina (AP) -- The local prosecutor who charged three Duke lacrosse players with raping a stripper apologized to the athletes Thursday, acknowledging that the North Carolina attorney general's decision to drop the case was correct.

"To the extent that I made judgments that ultimately proved to be incorrect, I apologize to the three students that were wrongly accused," Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong said in a statement.

On Wednesday, Attorney General Roy Cooper not only dropped all remaining charges against the players Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans, but also pronounced the men innocent and said they were the victims of Nifong's "tragic rush to accuse." Cooper branded Nifong a "rogue" prosecutor who was guilty of "overreaching."

"I also understand that whenever someone has been wrongly accused, the harm caused by the accusations might not be immediately undone merely by dismissing them," Nifong said.

"It is my sincere desire that the actions of Attorney General Cooper will serve to remedy any remaining injury that has resulted from these cases."

Nifong refused to answer any questions after handing the statement to an Associated Press reporter outside his office in Durham.

Seligmann's attorney, Jim Cooney, responded bitterly to the apology.

"You can accept an apology from someone who knows all the facts and simply makes an error," Cooney said. "If a person refuses to know all the facts and then makes a judgment, that's far worse -- particularly when that judgment destroys lives."

Nifong faces ethics charges with the North Carolina state bar and could be disbarred if found guilty.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/12/lacrosse.nifong.ap/index.html

Colossus_500

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Psalm 139
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2007, 01:56:42 PM »
This is bad.  This guy should turn in his prosecutor card. 

D.A. apologizes to Duke lacrosse players
POSTED: 4:43 p.m. EDT, April 12, 2007
Story Highlights• Mike Nifong acknowledges dismissal of charges was correct
• Nifong also recognizes damage to reputations not easily undone
• Attorney general criticized "rush to accuse" early in case
• Player's attorney rejects apology

Adjust font size:
DURHAM, North Carolina (AP) -- The local prosecutor who charged three Duke lacrosse players with raping a stripper apologized to the athletes Thursday, acknowledging that the North Carolina attorney general's decision to drop the case was correct.

"To the extent that I made judgments that ultimately proved to be incorrect, I apologize to the three students that were wrongly accused," Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong said in a statement.

On Wednesday, Attorney General Roy Cooper not only dropped all remaining charges against the players Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans, but also pronounced the men innocent and said they were the victims of Nifong's "tragic rush to accuse." Cooper branded Nifong a "rogue" prosecutor who was guilty of "overreaching."

"I also understand that whenever someone has been wrongly accused, the harm caused by the accusations might not be immediately undone merely by dismissing them," Nifong said.

"It is my sincere desire that the actions of Attorney General Cooper will serve to remedy any remaining injury that has resulted from these cases."

Nifong refused to answer any questions after handing the statement to an Associated Press reporter outside his office in Durham.

Seligmann's attorney, Jim Cooney, responded bitterly to the apology.

"You can accept an apology from someone who knows all the facts and simply makes an error," Cooney said. "If a person refuses to know all the facts and then makes a judgment, that's far worse -- particularly when that judgment destroys lives."

Nifong faces ethics charges with the North Carolina state bar and could be disbarred if found guilty.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/12/lacrosse.nifong.ap/index.html
What gets me about this whole ordeal is that the woman who brought about these false claims is walking scott-free!!!!   >:( >:( >:( >:(  She needs to be held accountable for this.  Are there not laws against false charges/claims?  Were it not for her, none of these events would have transpired. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2007, 01:59:06 PM »
What gets me about this whole ordeal is that the woman who brought about these false claims is walking scott-free!!!!   >:( >:( >:( >:(  She needs to be held accountable for this.  Are there not laws against false charges/claims?  Were it not for her, none of these events would have transpired. 

I agree.  I don't know if they can bring any charges against her.  The prosecutor probably has some kind of immunity.  Where do these players go to get their names and reputations back?  At least she is being outed in some of the media. 

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2007, 03:06:28 PM »
The prosecutor and that stripper bitch need to be thrown into prison.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2007, 04:17:52 PM »
Article talking about possible legal action:

Apr 12, 6:46 PM EDT
Cleared Duke Players Could Sue

By STEVE HARTSOE
Associated Press Writer
 
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) -- The disgraced district attorney in the Duke lacrosse rape case apologized to the three athletes in a carefully worded statement Thursday as their lawyers weighed whether to sue him - and some legal experts say they have a case.

While prosecutors generally have immunity for what they do inside the courtroom, experts said that protection probably doesn't cover some of Mike Nifong's more questionable actions in his handling of the case - such as calling the lacrosse players "a bunch of hooligans" in one of several interviews deemed unethical by the state bar.

"I think their chances of success suing Mr. Nifong are reasonably good, despite what we call prosecutorial immunity," said John Banzhaf, a professor at the George Washington University School of Law.

On Wednesday, North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper threw out the case against the three young men, pronounced them innocent and delivered a withering attack on Nifong, portraying him as a "rogue" prosecutor guilty of "overreaching." Cooper said Nifong rushed the case, failed to verify the accuser's allegations and pressed on despite the warning signs.

In his first comment on that decision, Nifong said in a statement Thursday: "To the extent that I made judgments that ultimately proved to be incorrect, I apologize to the three students that were wrongly accused."

He issued what appeared to be a plea to the students not to take any further action, saying, "It is my sincere desire that the actions of Attorney General Cooper will serve to remedy any remaining injury that has resulted from these cases."

So far, attorneys for David Evans, Reade Seligmann, and Collin Finnerty have not said whether they plan a civil action against Nifong. But they have not ruled it out.

"We're certainly going to be advising him and the Seligmann family of all of their options. But nobody is racing to file any kind of a lawsuit at this point," said Jim Cooney, Seligmann's attorney.

Separately, the North Carolina bar charged Nifong months ago with several violations of professional conduct that could lead to his disbarment. The case is set for trial before a bar committee in June.

Among other things, the bar said Nifong made misleading and inflammatory comments about the athletes, even before they were charged. In the early days of the case, for example, Nifong said several times that members of the lacrosse team were not cooperating with investigators. Not true, according to court documents.

Experts said the ethics charges could form the basis for a lawsuit seeking damages from Nifong.

"Ordinarily, a prosecutor has absolute immunity for the actions he takes in preparation for a case, but there are some caveats to that, and one of them is he does not have absolute immunity for misleading statements he gives at press conferences," said Shannon Gilreath, an adjunct professor at the Wake Forest University School of Law.

Other actions Nifong took outside of the courtroom could open him up to a lawsuit, Banzhaf said. Nifong, among other things, directed the police lineup at which the accuser identified the three players; the lineup has been criticized as faulty. The bar has also accused Nifong of lying in court about having turned over all DNA test results to the defense.

"When he acts as an investigator and advises police, or makes representations to court which may be false, in all these situations he does not have absolute immunity," Banzhaf said.

But Norm Early, a former Denver district attorney who has worked for the National District Attorneys Association, said Nifong's actions alone are not enough to win a lawsuit. Nifong's intent is crucial.

"The protection of immunity is pretty broad unless it's ruled he had malicious intent or that it was something close to that," Early said. "It would be very difficult to prove a case against him."

Other potential targets for a lawsuit include the accuser herself. Cooper said his investigators concluded no attack took place.

"There's no question they've got a lawsuit against her if she's brought false charges against them, which may be even more easily provable than actions against Nifong," said Stan Goldman, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

In October, months before the bar filed its ethics complaint, Evans' mother warned in an interview: "Mr. Nifong, you've picked on the wrong families ... and you will pay every day for the rest of your life."

How much money they could get out of Nifong is unclear.

Nifong is a career civil servant, and his financial disclosure statement filed with the state suggests he is not especially wealthy. His only listed income is his salary of about $110,000, and aside from his home in Durham and some unspecified real estate in western North Carolina, he appears to have no significant assets outside of any mutual funds and retirement accounts.

"I think it's fair to say they're angry," Cooney, Seligmann's attorney, said of the families. "It's an anger of, 'What part of innocent don't you understand?' It's not, `We're going to go take your house and pension plan.' There's no plan to seek revenge against anybody."

That has left some to suggest the players and their families might sue Duke University, which has been heavily criticized in some quarters for suspending the players and canceling the lacrosse team's season before the young men were even tried.

But Banzhaf said such a lawsuit is not likely to succeed, since university administrators did not have access to the facts of the case and were basing their actions on what they learned from Nifong.

A Duke spokesman declined to comment on the prospect of a lawsuit.

Goldman said the real aim of a lawsuit against Duke, an elite private school with a multibillion-dollar endowment, might be to win an out-of-court settlement and recoup what are sure to be staggering legal bills.

"I can see Duke University just settling with these guys, even if there isn't a tremendous basis" for a suit, Goldman said. "Duke's got a lot of money and been around a long time."
 
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DUKE_LEGAL?SITE=HIHAD&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10957
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2007, 08:52:07 PM »
Well of course here is what Rhyme Master Reverend Al Sharpton had to say on that case
"I think that there are certainly a lot of racial factors. Whether it is directly in the case, we'll see, because some reports said that there was racial language used."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192277,00.html

Colossus_500

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Psalm 139
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2007, 09:31:17 AM »
This pic is hilarious!   :D

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6366
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2007, 09:36:15 AM »
What do you know a woman lying about rape. Wow, there is a stretch.  Add in that she was a stripper and black, it would have been a great pay day for her if she brought a civil suit against the rich boys and their families.  Gotta love bitches.
Squishy face retard

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2007, 11:06:15 AM »

body88

  • Guest
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #15 on: April 13, 2007, 11:44:22 AM »
Well of course here is what Rhyme Master Reverend Al Sharpton had to say on that case
"I think that there are certainly a lot of racial factors. Whether it is directly in the case, we'll see, because some reports said that there was racial language used."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192277,00.html

The African American community would be A LOT better of if they did not let retards like Al Sharpton claim they speak for the entire" black community" Remember when he called the jogger who was assaulted in central park a whore. Both Jackson and Sharpton a racist buffoons.

I love how Sharpton speaks out against Imus, yet has had several similar incidents himself. The hypocrisy is hilarious in this country. How about those anti semitic comments Jackson made? Please que the token caucasion person to speak  out against the disgusting comments made by Imus ( they where out of line) yet ignore/make excuses for the same type of shit when a person of color does it. I am not racist by the way. Just real. Fair and equality for ALL. Not just minorities when a white person screws up. Same shit should apply to every race. if that where the case, Sharpton would have been out of a job long ago.


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #16 on: April 13, 2007, 12:47:54 PM »
The African American community would be A LOT better of if they did not let retards like Al Sharpton claim they speak for the entire" black community"


Who said Sharpton speaks for them?   

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10957
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #17 on: April 13, 2007, 12:54:36 PM »
Who said Sharpton speaks for them?   

What Black person has said he does not?

Colossus_500

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Psalm 139
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #18 on: April 13, 2007, 12:57:09 PM »

body88

  • Guest
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #19 on: April 13, 2007, 01:07:53 PM »
Who said Sharpton speaks for them?   

Sharpton says the " the black community feels" all the time. I don't see many prominent African American leaders stepping out to let people know Al Sharpton does no speak for the "black community" like he claims to. Imus took the time to appear on Sharptons radio show. That kinda makes me think people see Sharpton as some kind of spokesperson. The cold hard truth is that Sharpton is a loud mouthed, racist, radio show host with an agenda. The guy is a total joke and embarrasses his race constantly.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #20 on: April 13, 2007, 01:09:30 PM »
What Black person has said he does not?

What difference does that make?  David Duke claims to speak for white people. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63833
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #21 on: April 13, 2007, 01:10:59 PM »
Sharpton says the " the black community feels" all the time.... He thinks he speaks for them. Imus took the time to appear on his dhow like he was some type of representative of the black community. The man is a radio show host.

Sharpton speaks for himself (as Colossus just essentially pointed out). 

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #22 on: April 13, 2007, 01:11:12 PM »
What Black person has said he does not?

Me.
w

CQ

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7018
  • TGT
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #23 on: April 13, 2007, 01:11:42 PM »
Sharpton says the " the black community feels" all the time....

The same way the Bush says he speaks for all Americans, and some white nationalist leaders will say they speak for all whites, feminist leaders say they speak for all women etc.. one person never speaks for all.

body88

  • Guest
Re: Duke Lacrosse Case Charges to Be Dropped
« Reply #24 on: April 13, 2007, 01:12:21 PM »
The same way the Bush says he speaks for all Americans, and some white nationalist leaders will say they speak for all whites, feminist leaders say they speak for all women etc.. one person never speaks for all.

Americans speak out against Bush. They make there opinions known if they disagree with what he says. Don't see many African Americans speaking out against Sharpton.

That argument is not valid anyway. Although Bush is an idiot, he was voted into office by the American people. Sharpton is a radio host, who claims to speak for an entire community.