Next frontier? Polygamists demand multi-sex marriage

[whork]

he's absolutely right. 

So i guess you are not married anymore?

[bears]

So i guess you are not married anymore?

not sure you even read the article. 

what i'm saying is that i agree the government shouldn't be involved in marriage in the first place. marriage should be between the people getting married and whatever religious or spiritual affiliation they attach themselves to.  it shouldn't have anything to do with government, taxes, home ownership, etc. 

Do you agree? 

Because pretty soon polygamous marriages ARE going to have to be recognized as marriages as well, which is going to create a huge issue with regards to taxes, health care, financial aid, etc. 

Unless you don't think that polygamous marriages deserve the same rights as gay and heterosexual couples? 

[whork]

My bad i thought it was a response to the post above by Beach:

Marriage died in 2013
By Dr. Keith Ablow
Published December 31, 2013
FoxNews.com



My opimion:

I think same sex couples should be alloved to marry but at city hall.

Not that i give a fuck about the church by would you even try to get married by an institution that feels its wrong?

Polygami should not be okay. If you want to live in polygami you dont get married.

[bears]

you do agree that the polygamists are going to create a large mess with regards to taxes, health care, and financial aid, if their marriages are accepted as valid by the federal government right?

[whork]

you do agree that the polygamists are going to create a large mess with regards to taxes, health care, and financial aid, if their marriages are accepted as valid by the federal government right?

No i didnt but thanks for the info though.

I was already against it though look at my post above.

I dont mind people having more partners at all and how people live is their business but its so far removed from marriage that it shouldnt fly IMO

[bears]

No i didnt but thanks for the info though.

I was already against it though look at my post above.

I dont mind people having more partners at all and how people live is their business but its so far removed from marriage that it shouldnt fly IMO

so you don't think polygamist families deserve all the rights and privileges that a gay or heterosexual couple do because their definition of marriage doesn't fit your definition of marriage?  interesting.  I can't help but feel like I've seen this conversation before......hmm.

[whork]

so you don't think polygamist families deserve all the rights and privileges that a gay or heterosexual couple do because their definition of marriage doesn't fit your definition of marriage?  interesting.  I can't help but feel like I've seen this conversation before......hmm.

I could care less to be honest but imagine you end up at some hot womans bed one night and her 5 husbands come home. It could end badly.

[bears]

My bad i thought it was a response to the post above by Beach:

Marriage died in 2013
By Dr. Keith Ablow
Published December 31, 2013
FoxNews.com



My opimion:

I think same sex couples should be alloved to marry but at city hall.

Not that i give a fuck about the church by would you even try to get married by an institution that feels its wrong?

Polygami should not be okay. If you want to live in polygami you dont get married.

no matter how you slice it you're no less bigoted then the Duck Dynasty guy all the libs on this board despise.  and if you think what the Duck Dynasty guy said is hate speech, then what you just posted is also hate speech. 

[bears]

I could care less to be honest but imagine you end up at some hot womans bed one night and her 5 husbands come home. It could end badly.

dude she has 5 husbands.  just hide inside her vagina.  that thing would be taking a serious beating.

[whork]

no matter how you slice it you're no less bigoted then the Duck Dynasty guy all the libs on this board despise.  and if you think what the Duck Dynasty guy said is hate speech, then what you just posted is also hate speech. 

I dont despise the Duck Dynasty guy.

Im not against same-sex marriage but thats doesnt mean he should not be alloved to have and express another opinion than mine.

I think it was BS he was fired.

[tonymctones]

I dont despise the Duck Dynasty guy.

Im not against same-sex marriage but thats doesnt mean he should not be alloved to have and express another opinion than mine.

I think it was BS he was fired.

LMFAO do you not see the obvious hypocrisy youre demonstrating?

by your own moronic libtard ideology youre a fucking bigot, congrats

[whork]

LMFAO do you not see the obvious hypocrisy youre demonstrating?

by your own moronic libtard ideology youre a fucking bigot, congrats

Well thank you.

Explain my hypocrisy please.

[whork]

dude she has 5 husbands.  just hide inside her vagina.  that thing would be taking a serious beating.

Good point

[tonymctones]

Well thank you.

Explain my hypocrisy please.

explain why you are ok with gay marriage but against polygamy and see if you can figure it out yourself

[bears]

I dont despise the Duck Dynasty guy.

Im not against same-sex marriage but thats doesnt mean he should not be alloved to have and express another opinion than mine.

I think it was BS he was fired.

my bad then.  i feel the same way actually. 

but what mctones is saying is that liberals can't fight for the rights of gays to marry each other and redefine the definition of marriage and then in the same breath point the finger at a polygamist and outright reject their definition of marriage without being ridiculously hypocritical.   

[whork]

my bad then.  i feel the same way actually. 

but what mctones is saying is that liberals can't fight for the rights of gays to marry each other and redefine the definition of marriage and then in the same breath point the finger at a polygamist and outright reject their definition of marriage without being ridiculously hypocritical.   

Well i never said i was a liberal but thats was your assumption so..

[bears]

Well i never said i was a liberal but thats was your assumption so..

you lean left.  nothing wrong with that.  I lean right.  i'm not a republican though. 

[bears]

and answer tonymctones question.  "explain why you are ok with gay marriage but against polygamy"

[tonymctones]

and answer tonymctones question.  "explain why you are ok with gay marriage but against polygamy"

please do

[whork]

and answer tonymctones question.  "explain why you are ok with gay marriage but against polygamy"

Gay marrige is one-on-one the only thing different from a traditional marrige is the sex of one of the persons involved. And it enables them to the same benefits as traditionally married couples.


Polygami would be a mess. How do you decide who inherit's who?

Its would be a mess not at least legally.

Now why are you guys against gay marrige and not gay polygami? 

[tonymctones]

Gay marrige is one-on-one the only thing different from a traditional marrige is the sex of one of the persons involved. And it enables them to the same benefits as traditionally married couples.


Polygami would be a mess. How do you decide who inherit's who?

Its would be a mess not at least legally.

Now why are you guys against gay marrige and not gay polygami? 

so what if its more than two people?

if youre ok with changing the definition of marriage to include same sex couples which by the way has caused nothing but legal issues why then are you against polygamy b/c of legal issues?

[George Whorewell]

Up next: Child marriage, bestiality and state sanctioned necrophilia= Constitutional 

[bears]

Gay marrige is one-on-one the only thing different from a traditional marrige is the sex of one of the persons involved. And it enables them to the same benefits as traditionally married couples.


Polygami would be a mess. How do you decide who inherit's who?

Its would be a mess not at least legally.
Now why are you guys against gay marrige and not gay polygami? 

not against either.  what i'm against is blatant hypocrisy.

and also that's what the article is about.  how marriage WILL become meaningless once you allow polygamists to be married for the exact reasons you just said.  that's why the author is saying that the government should no longer have anything to do with it at all.  it will be a mess.  and I agree.

unless you think that we should have government impose their definition of marriage and define it to only include 2 people?  which a lot of people will claim is bigoted and wrong.  and you won't be able to argue around the fact that your stance is very hypocritical. 

[whork]

I thought i was being practical here.

Same-sex marriage is practical. If they get divorced, someone dies etc its still 2 people.

If a man has 5 wifes and gets a divorce with one or more who gets what then? = A mess.

[tonymctones]

I thought i was being practical here.

Same-sex marriage is practical. If they get divorced, someone dies etc its still 2 people.

If a man has 5 wifes and gets a divorce with one or more who gets what then? = A mess.

pragmatic maybe, hypocritical? EXTREMELY!!!