Since 1940 DEMOCRATS have created MORE JOBS than Republicans

[The True Adonis]

Since 1940, Republicans have controlled the White House for thirty-six years; Democrats for thirty-three. Yet Bureau of Labor Statistics data show that almost two-thirds of new jobs were created during Democratic administrations. What about the years since Reagan was elected, promising prosperity through lower taxes, balanced budgets and less regulation? The Clinton years resulted in 21 million jobs, more than two decades of Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. One last detail: these numbers reflect only private-sector jobs; including the public sector would widen the gap in the Democrats' favor.

[headhuntersix]

This can't even remotely be proven. Gimme a break. Congress was controled by Repubs under most of the Clinton years. OH and great and powerful cut and paste expert....expanding Gov is a friggen disaster...so more gov jobs isn't a good thing.

[blacken700]

did you ever notice that if you post something thats bad about their repubs it can't be proven or it can't be right ,oh but if its something bad about dems it must be true or as mcway would say it's Gospel. Gimme a break

[MM2K]

Headhunter is right.  Here is how it breaks down:

America has created the most amount of wealth under a Democrat President and Republican Congress. A Republican president and Republican Congress have created the second most amount of wealth, a Republican President and Democrat Congress have created the thrid  most amount of wealth, and a Democrat Congress and Democrat President have created the least amount of wealth!!

[George Whorewell]

TA demonstrates irrefutably that he is a fucking moron yet again.

Being president doesn't mean jack shit if you can't pass any legislation. Because it is obvious you never took any history classes in elementary school, let me clue you in. This country has a series of checks and balances, a constitution and three distinct branches of government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial).

Hope this helps.

[Soul Crusher]

TA demonstrates irrefutably that he is a fucking moron yet again.

Being president doesn't mean jack shit if you can't pass any legislation. Because it is obvious you never took any history classes in elementary school, let me clue you in. This country has a series of checks and balances, a constitution and three distinct branches of government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial).

Hope this helps.

Political parties and the government dont create jobs, they destroy them.  The only issue is whether a climate is fostered where private sector jobs are easier or harder to create by private business. 

 

[The True Adonis]

TA demonstrates irrefutably that he is a fucking moron yet again.

Being president doesn't mean jack shit if you can't pass any legislation. Because it is obvious you never took any history classes in elementary school, let me clue you in. This country has a series of checks and balances, a constitution and three distinct branches of government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial).

Hope this helps.

Really?  Isn`t that weird?  Who would have thunk it? And here I thought all this time the President was a Marxist, Socialist, Fascist Dictator who had the power to take my guns away at any moment.  Weird.

[George Whorewell]

First of all dumbass, you're confusing me with someone else. I have never posted anything on this website that said Obama was a fascist dictator and I have never said a thing about gun control one way or the other.

Secondly, Obama's policies are enabled and perpatrated by the socialist scumbags at the helm of the radical left wing of the party ( Reid, Pelosi). If we had a republican majority in both houses, none of this would even be an issue.

Third, and most obvious, the President CAN pass legislation precisely because the dems have a majority in both houses.

Nice half baked attempt to deflect the fundamental flaw in your idiotic chart.

You get an E for effort.

[The True Adonis]

First of all dumbass, you're confusing me with someone else. I have never posted anything on this website that said Obama was a fascist dictator and I have never said a thing about gun control one way or the other.

Secondly, Obama's policies are enabled and perpatrated by the socialist scumbags at the helm of the radical left wing of the party ( Reid, Pelosi). If we had a republican majority in both houses, none of this would even be an issue.

Third, and most obvious, the President CAN pass legislation precisely because the dems have a majority in both houses.

Nice half baked attempt to deflect the fundamental flaw in your idiotic chart.

You get an E for effort.

Wait a second.  Obama ain`t gonna to take away my guns and he isn`t a Marxist, Socialist?  Are you sure about this?  Should you tell 333333666?

Side Note: LOL if you think Reid and Pelosi are the "radical left".  Have you any idea of Mrs. Pelosi`s Stock Portfolio?  You might want to take a look at that before you cry like a baby an grant a false label to someone who does not fit it. Mrs. Pelosi is also against Single Payer and has been from the start.   She is further to the right than you know, but then again, you don`t know really all that much.

[GigantorX]

Wait a second.  Obama ain`t gonna to take away my guns and he isn`t a Marxist, Socialist?  Are you sure about this?  Should you tell 333333666?

Side Note: LOL if you think Reid and Pelosi are the "radical left".  Have you any idea of Mrs. Pelosi`s Stock Portfolio?  You might want to take a look at that before you cry like a baby an grant a false label to someone who does not fit it. Mrs. Pelosi is also against Single Payer and has been from the start.   She is further to the right than you know, but then again, you don`t know really all that much.

Terrible retort.

Because of her stock portfolio she is more to the right than anyone of us think? And she isn't "radical Left" because she doesn't support a single payer system? And what are you trying to weasel out with "more to the right than you know...?" She isn't to the right, she is very far left. Her views on a single form of health care providing and her stock portfolio don't totally disprove that.

Seems a pretty shaky platform to base ones argument on...

[The True Adonis]

Terrible retort.

Because of her stock portfolio she is more to the right than anyone of us think? And she isn't "radical Left" because she doesn't support a single payer system? And what are you trying to weasel out with "more to the right than you know...?" She isn't to the right, she is very far left. Her views on a single form of health care providing and her stock portfolio don't totally disprove that.

Seems a pretty shaky platform to base ones argument on...

Sorry, but Pelosi does not represent what I believe in.

[Soul Crusher]

Sorry, but Pelosi does not represent what I believe in.

Anyone to the right of Stalin & Mao is too conservative for you. 

BTW TA - I started my business with $700 in 2002.  Does the GOP get credit for that? 

The government does not create jobs, get that idiotic DU talking point out of your head. 

However, the government can create a climate where job creation in the private sector becomes easier or more difficult.  And its not just the president, its the congress, state govts, etc. 

 

[BM OUT]

Reagan created 20,000,000 jobs.Under Bush there were 52 consecutive months of job creation,under Obama we have lost 4 million jobs.You do the math.

[MCWAY]

did you ever notice that if you post something thats bad about their repubs it can't be proven or it can't be right ,oh but if its something bad about dems it must be true or as mcway would say it's Gospel. Gimme a break

You mean like the fact that unemployment is over 10%, in the year that Obama's been president, something that NEVER happened during the Bush adminstration (even in its worst year)?

[loco]

Democrats create more jobs?

Is that why unemployment in the US is over 10% under a Democrat President and Democrat Congress?   

[shootfighter1]

I think George is one of the smartest guys on this board.

This is a good example of what can happen with a liberal president and a democratic controlled congress...they spend like drunken sailors. 
Some of our best periods were when we have more balance...Clinton/Gingrich.

[drkaje]

Headhunter is right.  Here is how it breaks down:

America has created the most amount of wealth under a Democrat President and Republican Congress. A Republican president and Republican Congress have created the second most amount of wealth, a Republican President and Democrat Congress have created the thrid  most amount of wealth, and a Democrat Congress and Democrat President have created the least amount of wealth!!

Why do you guys even bother?

We all know this is what happens when people who don't understand statistics try using them. Remember the old saying "There are three kinds of lies:...".