last year the Mr O was impressive I think.
97 was so-so (maybe it was the lighting, or the pics I saw, maybe they were retouched.. I dunno), 98? eh.. 99 was ok for the top 4-5, after that? eh.
Yes last year was good.
As you say a lot depends on the lighting
& the quality of the photo's.
Over here in the uk a lot of the dry, grainy
type look is in the Men's classic class's
And the 80's 90's & some in 100kg
that look is very rare in the superheavy weight class.