how is phil better than chris?
I don't see flaws in cormier, other than maybe smallish calves
i look at phil and see oversized arms, thin chest, narrow shoulders, funky abs
presentation? why does he force those goofy faces while posing? seems unprofessional to me
he deserves to be mr. o today but i think he is very flawed compared to the 90's
E
For all of the reasons I just posted before hand , his only real flaw is narrow clavicles
He meets all of the criteria better than his contemporaries and that's how they judge contests everything not at the expense of one thing .
Chris had a strong advantage in structure and balance & proportion , I always called him the black Bob Paris , but when he was competing he didn't have the muscular bulk , the density & dryness and the stage presence to go along with it , and that's how judges view things