OWS = Rape, Pimps, Masturbation, TB, Defecation, Rats, Robbery, and Murder

[Soul Crusher]

I don't think it will ever happen without riots. 

and what comes after riots? 

Tell me - after these communist pieces of garbage shut down the city - then what? 

   

[OzmO]

and what comes after riots? 

Tell me - after these communist pieces of garbage shut down the city - then what? 

Most people are unaware.  Riots will change that.  It will spur a national debate and awareness of whats going on.

Riots will preempt American idol.   

[Soul Crusher]

Most people are unaware.  Riots will change that.  It will spur a national debate and awareness of whats going on.

Riots will preempt American idol.   

Wrong - there will be a massive counter revolution against these communist thugs - and i for one will be part of that. 

These dirtbags are communists and socialists - not free market capitalists looking for a better economy. 

[OzmO]

Wrong - there will be a massive counter revolution against these communist thugs - and i for one will be part of that. 

These dirtbags are communists and socialists - not free market capitalists looking for a better economy. 

First off their message isn't clear.  Which makes them easy targets for tools like yourself.  You are a great example of that. (no offense) However, most people in this country aren't like you. 

What ever form a public outcry takes is good.  Because the blame game between conservatives and liberals that people like you sucker everyone into gets nothing done.

[Soul Crusher]

First off their message isn't clear.  Which makes them easy targets for tools like yourself.  You are a great example of that. (no offense) However, most people in this country aren't like you. 

What ever form a public outcry takes is good.  Because the blame game between conservatives and liberals that people like you sucker everyone into gets nothing done.

I live here and most people are revulsed by these hippie commies.   Ask GW. 

They are a disgrace.     

[OzmO]

I live here and most people are revulsed by these hippie commies.   Ask GW. 

They are a disgrace.     

They aren't all hippie commies.  Of course many people want them to be.  So you'll all kinds of slanted articles saying they are.  You'll also find ones saying they are not. 

Even then.  i could care less who they are. 

[Soul Crusher]

They aren't all hippie commies.  Of course many people want them to be.  So you'll all kinds of slanted articles saying they are.  You'll also find ones saying they are not. 

Even then.  i could care less who they are. 

Well you should care who is behind this.   

Sorry - collapsing the economy is not something I am in favor of.     

[OzmO]

Well you should care who is behind this.   

Sorry - collapsing the economy is not something I am in favor of.     

Collapsing economy?   where do you get that idea?

[Soul Crusher]

Collapsing economy?   where do you get that idea?

The Demands these morons have put forth are an obscenity to reality and freedom. 

[Soul Crusher]

Occupy Wall Street Supporters Turn On Each Other on their Website
Pundit Press ^ | 10/5/11 | Aurelius



Putting the fact that the people calling for the occupation of Wall Street have a website, which means they can afford a computer and an internet connection, aside, it appears that this gang of nitwits is not too fond of how their "revolt" is being handled. The most evident example of this is on their imbecilic "demands" page, which allows comments.

Even though these people stress that their "front" is unified, it is clearly not. There is in-fighting and anger towards one another. Enjoy:

"A freakshow:"



...Plain "stupid:"




(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


These fools are a rag tag bunch of marxists, hippies, dopers, and drunks. 

This is going to back fire MASSIVELY. 

Occupy Wall Street?   Ok - and?   

[OzmO]

The Demands these morons have put forth are an obscenity to reality and freedom. 

Are you talking about the "Demands" BF provided?

[Soul Crusher]

Are you talking about the "Demands" BF provided?

Yes

[OzmO]

Did you take the time to click beyond the link, to the actual website where they were mis-titled from a forum?

[Soul Crusher]

99% what? ‘Occupy Wall Street’ organizers look for minorities (but can't find them)
Yahoo ^ | 10/04/11 | By Matthew Boyle



99% what? ‘Occupy Wall Street’ organizers look for minorities
By Matthew Boyle
The Daily Caller – 22 hrs ago


**SNIP**


One minority activist has appeared to speak to the Wall Street protesters: socialist and Princeton professor Cornel West.


Malkin and Gainor also told TheDC that while news organizations have failed to report on these protesters’ lack of minority representation, tea party rallies attracted accusations of racism for what some reporters perceived was a similar lack of racial diversity.


“The liberal media will only engage in racial bean-counting of protest crowds when it serves their political ends: Namely, painting the Right as homogenous and non-inclusive,” Malkin said. “We heard endless derision about the tea party’s lack of skin-color diversity from Hollywood and the national press. But not a peep about the Abercrombie & Fitch-meets-Apple central casting mob swamping lower Manhattan.”


Gainor added that mainstream media representatives “only see what they want to see.” He said reporters scoured tea party rallies for evidence of racism, while failing to notice how “white” the left-wing crowds are.


(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LMFAO! ! !  !

[OzmO]

Did you take the time to click beyond the link, to the actual website where they were mis-titled from a forum?

Guess not  lol

[The True Adonis]

Don`t worry, these morons will be gone when the weather starts to get colder.  Hopefully Bindare Dundat and the rest of the Ron Poop Paul asshats will remain out there.  These Wall Street protests are the Pooptards wet dream.

[Soul Crusher]

Labor Unions Join Wall Street "Occupiers" for Mass Rally

Wall Street Protester Seeks Missed ConnectionAuto Start: On | OffShare148 Comments Print
Text Size- / +By GREGORY J. KRIEG
Oct. 5, 2011



The cavalry has arrived in Lower Manhattan. Representatives from no fewer than 15 of the country's largest labor unions will join the Occupy Wall Street protesters for a mass rally and march today in New York City.

The AFL-CIO, United Auto Workers, and Transit Workers' Union are among the groups expected to stand in solidarity with the hundreds of mostly young men and women who have spent the better part of three weeks sleeping, eating, and organizing from Zuccotti Square.

Their arrival is being touted as a watershed moment for the "Occupy" movement, which has now seen copycat protests spring up across the country. And while the specific demands of the "occupiers" remain wide-ranging, the presence of the unions – implicitly inclined to making more direct demands – may sharpen their focus.

Today's action is scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. ET, when the protesters in Zuccotti Square march approximately one mile north to Foley Square, where they will be met by community and labor leaders. Then, at 4:30 p.m., they plan to march together back down toward Wall Street. They do not yet have a city-issued permit for the gathering, but are now pursuing one.

The "Union March" is expected to be the movement's largest yet and there is the potential for a significant number of arrests. The New York Police Department booked an estimated 700 protesters Saturday as they attempted to cross the Brooklyn Bridge, bringing the total number arrested to over 1,000 in less than three weeks.


Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, speaking at a retirement community in Florida yesterday, denounced the movement. "I think it's dangerous, this class warfare," he said.

While some on the ground welcome the concept of a showdown with the "one percent," organizers (who claim to represent "the 99 percent" of Americans they say are being trampled on by the financial elite), say they remain committed to "non-violent" protest.

The question for today, though, is what affect the presence of labor unions will have on the tenor of the demonstrations. To date, Occupy Wall Street has set their agenda during twice-daily "general assemblies" with large-scale votes and directly elected "working groups."

The unions do not operate this way. They are top-down organizations. Their leaders, though elected, make most decisions autonomously. They are well-versed in fashioning specific appeals, the very concept of which runs counter to Occupy Wall Street's purposefully abstract message.

"Think Facebook or Twitter: These protesters have adopted that same decentralized structure, Columbia University political science Professor Dorian Warren told ABC News yesterday. "There's no one leader. It's not top-down. It's much more democratic, much more 'open-source.'"

"One of the beautiful things about [Occupy Wall Street]," says Professor Yochai Benkler, co-director of Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society, "is that it is a movement defining itself as it 'becomes.'"

While the concept of "becoming" or "creating space" for dissent, as organizers preach, might seem a bit far off to grizzled union vets, it's a bedrock of the "Occupy movement." But to the hundreds who've made their beds on Zuccotti Park's stone encampment the meta-narrative probably seems a little bit beside the point. Whatever the risks entailed in opening up their action to different groups, with different acting ethics, they're happy for the new support.

But as history reminds, there's no such thing as "free love."


________________________ _____________________


This movement just got buried. 

[Bindare_Dundat]

I am sure many of these people are lazy lefties.  But some or many of them are people just in a fucked up situation and they see Wall Street getting bailed out, they see corruption at the highest levels, they see our true constitutional system fading away.

The problem with this "movement" is that it doesn't have clear demands.  Which makes it pray to all sorts of negative press while attracting all kinds of socialistic types. 

For me, If that what it takes for the American Public to wake up to the fact that Representative government no longer exists in the country and that we are instead a bought government of elected representatives accountable not to us. 

So i support this, i hope it gets real bad, real riots, etc.    I hope our public wakes up to things like rigged trade (2-4% tariffs on Chinese goods coming into the USA while they tariff 25% to our goods)  I hope people wake up to the Banks bending our government over and doing its bidding virtually unrestricted with out accountability.   

I really hope in the end they see Obama for he is, a puppet lame leader and that BUSH was no different in the end.

But its all probably just a pipe dream.   

Totally agree you man.

[Soul Crusher]

The people behind this mess like Trumka, AFL, Transit Unions are socialists for fucks sake! 


Sorry - I want ZERO part of that.   

[tu_holmes]

I am sure many of these people are lazy lefties.  But some or many of them are people just in a fucked up situation and they see Wall Street getting bailed out, they see corruption at the highest levels, they see our true constitutional system fading away.

The problem with this "movement" is that it doesn't have clear demands.  Which makes it pray to all sorts of negative press while attracting all kinds of socialistic types. 

For me, If that what it takes for the American Public to wake up to the fact that Representative government no longer exists in the country and that we are instead a bought government of elected representatives accountable not to us. 

So i support this, i hope it gets real bad, real riots, etc.    I hope our public wakes up to things like rigged trade (2-4% tariffs on Chinese goods coming into the USA while they tariff 25% to our goods)  I hope people wake up to the Banks bending our government over and doing its bidding virtually unrestricted with out accountability.   

I really hope in the end they see Obama for he is, a puppet lame leader and that BUSH was no different in the end.

But its all probably just a pipe dream.   

See items in bold.

[Soul Crusher]

 

[Soul Crusher]

Occupy Wall Street ‘Stands In Solidarity’ With Obama Front Group
         
Why is the official OWS website in league with lobbying fronts for the Wall Street-backed Obama White House?

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, October 5, 2011



Fears expressed by some that the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement is being hijacked by the Democratic Party establishment have intensified after the official OWS website announced that it “stands in solidarity” with MoveOn.org, a lobbying group for the Wall Street-backed Obama administration.


The front page of the http://occupywallst.org/ proudly announces that numerous union groups will be present in New York today to join demonstrators in marches taking place this afternoon.

“Together we will protest this great injustice. We stand in solidarity with the honest workers of….MoveOn.org,” states the website, as well as listing numerous other organizations.

What is MoveOn.org?

MoveOn.org is a lobbying organization that routinely backs Democratic candidates. The group aggressively supported Barack Obama’s 2008 election campaign and is now “Perhaps the lead lobby organization for his policies….apart from Obama’s own Organizing for America,” reports Source Watch.

When MoveOn organized an online donation drive for Obama which raised $320,000, the Obama campaign responded in kind with the legally dubious action of paying MoveOn $18,000 in “credit card processing fees”.

The group also received a $5 million dollar donation from George Soros, who is a keen supporter.

Back in 2007, many leftists spoke of their betrayal by MoveOn.org after the group advocated Nancy Pelosi’s funding bill that actually prolonged the war in Iraq and prevented the troops being brought home.

“Join us on Wednesday to create a huge show of support for anti-Wall Street actions nationwide. Together, we’ll add hundreds of thousands of voices expressing our solidarity with the protests at Occupy Wall Street and across the country targeting the bankers who wrecked our economy,” states MoveOn.org’s website.

Yes – the very same bankers – Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup prime amongst them – who financed the Obama campaign, the same campaign vehemently supported by MoveOn.org.

Why does Occupy Wall Street’s support for MoveOn.org represent a problem? Because MoveOn.org is little more than a lobbying front for the Obama administration, which itself is a creature of Wall Street.

Another group that OWS website expresses its “solidarity” with, AFL-CIO, has also announced that it will likely back Wall Street puppet Obama in 2012.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t
The OWS website also stands in solidarity with SEIU (Service Employees International Union), a group that spent $28 million dollars supporting Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, making it the “organization that spent the most to help Barack Obama get elected president.”

Why is the website that has positioned itself as the central hub for Occupy Wall Street activists announcing its support for groups which are little more than Barack Obama lobbying fronts? Wall Street spent millions financing Obama’s path to the White House and are supporting him to an even greater extent in 2012.

Why is a website that claims to represent anti-Wall Street demonstrators siding with groups that have aggressively supported the Wall Street-backed Obama administration?

Some have argued that it is not fair to cite postings on OccupyWallst.org as representative of the movement’s character or goals. However, this is not a forum posting by an individual, it is prominently displayed on the front page of the website claiming it represents OWS.

Either the Occupy Wall Street website represents an accurate reflection of the sentiments of the protesters, that is supportive of the Wall Street-financed Obama administration and its lobbying front groups such as MoveOn.org, or the message has been hijacked by these very groups.

Either way it represents a threat to the promise made by other OWS activists to remain non-partisan.

Who is running this website and why are they ‘standing in solidarity’ with organizations like MoveOn.org that have aggressively supported the Wall-Street backed Obama administration?

I am going to submit this question to the forum users on the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ website and write a follow up piece on their response. That way we can move a lot closer to understanding whether what is posing as the official website for this “leaderless” group is really representative of the OWS demonstrators or not.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.


 






OZMO - DO YOU SEE WHY THIS MESS IS A FARCE?

[OzmO]

I already said there will be a bunch of negative press.  i also said many of these people have no idea how neck deep Obama is with these bastards.

this will get spun like cheap top.

[Soul Crusher]

I already said there will be a bunch of negative press.  i also said many of these people have no idea how neck deep Obama is with these bastards.

this will get spun like cheap top.

Where were these people when the tea party were protesting the bailouts?  Where were these people w shiff and paul end the fed rallies? 

[OzmO]

Where were these people when the tea party were protesting the bailouts?  Where were these people w shiff and paul end the fed rallies? 

Those were good too.  The problem is they need to do it again. 

I am fed up.  So when a group goes a protesting against WS it really doesn't bother me who is protesting.  I realize that much of what is reported will be negative press and a spin job.  But in the heart of that movement, is a dissatisfaction with our government and fact that it is bought and paid for.  whether you are a conservative or liberal i hope you can at least agree on that.