Author Topic: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers  (Read 5077 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39476
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #75 on: October 09, 2012, 12:09:37 PM »
The democrats did not have a supermajority in the senate for two years.  ::) It was more like two months, if that. As usual, your facts are wrong. You must enjoy lying as much as your man Romney.

Passing health care reform was something that needed to be done, since presidents had been trying (and failing) for at least fifty years. The stimulus was intended to get people working again after the Bush disaster-years, only it should have been much bigger, and it should not have been 1/3 tax cuts to appease the republican morons.


No wonder the empty chair got demolished in the debate.   You idiots, like the supreme idiot himself, believe in so many false narratives.

Hawk

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 180
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #76 on: October 09, 2012, 12:13:54 PM »

No wonder the empty chair got demolished in the debate.   You idiots, like the supreme idiot himself, believe in so many false narratives.
What false narrative, chief?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39476
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #77 on: October 09, 2012, 12:17:39 PM »
What false narrative, chief?


"Passing health care reform was something that needed to be done, since presidents had been trying (and failing) for at least fifty years"


FALSE

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #78 on: October 09, 2012, 12:24:39 PM »

"Passing health care reform was something that needed to be done, since presidents had been trying (and failing) for at least fifty years"


FALSE

What about the first 2 lines he wrote?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39476
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #79 on: October 09, 2012, 12:27:40 PM »
What about the first 2 lines he wrote?

The democrats had the largest majories in anyones' lifetimes and could have done almost anything they wanted.  They blew everything on african ball washing, ThugCare, and an energy tax grab 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #80 on: October 09, 2012, 01:46:02 PM »
Fortune magazine just let Jack Welch go for making this baseless accusation against a sitting US President, after condemning his statement immediately.

Hawk

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 180
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #81 on: October 09, 2012, 06:47:42 PM »
The democrats had the largest majories in anyones' lifetimes and could have done almost anything they wanted.  They blew everything on african ball washing, ThugCare, and an energy tax grab 
So...you no longer stand by your LIE that the democrats had a supermajority for two years?  ::)

A simple YES or NO will suffice.  :)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39476
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #82 on: October 09, 2012, 06:48:56 PM »
So...you no longer stand by your LIE that the democrats had a supermajority for two years?  ::)

A simple YES or NO will suffice.  :)

They had the largest majorities in anyones lifetimes and spent it all on GhettoCare, African ball washing, and an energy tax 

Hawk

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 180
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #83 on: October 10, 2012, 07:23:34 AM »
They had the largest majorities in anyones lifetimes and spent it all on GhettoCare, African ball washing, and an energy tax 
Since you have a problem admitting when you are wrong and/or LYING, I will accept this post as a grudging admission that you were completely wrong in stating that the democrats had a supermajority for two years.  ;)

And as we all know, virtually NOTHING can be accomplished without a supermajority, as without sixty votes the republicans will block EVERYTHING that democrats propose. The republicans have blocked things that they previous supported...they were for it before they were against it.  ::)


Now that I've shut down your "supermajority" nonsense, shall we move on to your last couple of statements regarding healthcare reform?

Hawk

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 180
Re: Obama can't debate -- time to fudge job numbers
« Reply #84 on: October 10, 2012, 11:09:26 AM »
Since you have a problem admitting when you are wrong and/or LYING, I will accept this post as a grudging admission that you were completely wrong in stating that the democrats had a supermajority for two years.  ;)

And as we all know, virtually NOTHING can be accomplished without a supermajority, as without sixty votes the republicans will block EVERYTHING that democrats propose. The republicans have blocked things that they previous supported...they were for it before they were against it.  ::)


Now that I've shut down your "supermajority" nonsense, shall we move on to your last couple of statements regarding healthcare reform?
 
*BUMP*