these three are up there for best in one show
If these three are the best, and I will add Francois '95, then should Arnold stipulate that at his show, that the judging should follow the Rulebook to emphasize these physiques? Because let's face it---Flex 93, Levrone 96, Francois 95, Ronnie 2001, all exemplify what the IFBB Rulebook dictates.
Ronnie's gut in 01 DQs him.
They are not going to admit they are not following the rules, every judge thinks he is, hello lol
and Flex's bee-stung delts in 2000 don't?Who'd win, Arnold or the judges and Manion?It is because of Arnold that prize money at the O was jacked up, and it is because of Arnold that almost everybody competing and judging are in bodybuilding---due to him influencing them. And every magazine trots out their Arnold specials, because they get bought the most.I think time is ticking for many of these judges and The Manions. Time to clean house.
^i get what you saying, I guess I am just thinking out loud...But, I don't want to derail the thread (detailing one's own thread).Mike Francois was in better condition than Flex.
Flex by a mile is way better symmetrical and shape , Probably is the best ASC winner of all time , Branch is bottom of the barrel
Meaning who had the best shape, size, conditioning? Was it Coleman 2001, Flex 1993 or 98? Levrone 94 or 96, Francois in 95, Shawn Ray or Ashley? Dex, Vic, Kai, Cutler, or even Nasser?No mention of Branch.
Flex 98, sorry don't have a picture!
its either ronnie 01 or Nasser 99no one has displayed such ripped conditioning, mass and symmetry as Nasser in 99 and ronnie in 01Flex's condition 93 (his best condition ever) was also up there but he just didnt have the size that year