Mysterious Mena: CIA Discloses, Leach DisposesBy MICAH MORRISONWALL STREET JOURAL January 29, 1997The word on Capitol Hill is that Rep. Jim Leach will soonwrap up his inquiry into the spooky goings-on at remoteMena in western Arkansas. For more than a decade, stateand federal probes of supposedly government-related drugsmuggling, gun running and money laundering at MenaIntermountain Regional Airport have hit a stone wall. But Mr.Leach already can claim some success: He kept thepressure on the Central Intelligence Agency until itcompleted a still-classified internal probe of theallegations; in a declassifed summary released inNovember, the CIA for the first time admitted that it had apresence in Arkansas.The agency was not "associated with money laundering,narcotics trafficking, arms smuggling, or other illegalactivities" at Mena, the report concludes. But the CIA didengage in "authorized and lawful activities" at the airfield: aclassified "joint-training operation with another federalagency" and contracting for "routine aviation-relatedservices."At the center of the web of speculation spun around Menaare a few undisputed facts: One of the most successful druginformants in U.S. history, smuggler Barry Seal, based hisair operation at Mena. At the height of his career he wasimporting as much as 1,000 pounds of cocaine per month,and had a personal fortune estimated at more than $50million. After becoming an informant for the DrugEnforcement Administration, he worked at least once withthe CIA, in a Sandinista drug sting. He was gunned down byColombian hit men in Baton Rogue, La., in 1986; eightmonths later, one of his planes--with an Arkansas pilot atthe wheel and Eugene Hasenfus in the cargo bay--was shotdown over Nicaragua with a load of Contra supplies.What had then-Gov. Bill Clinton known about CIA activities atMena? Asked at an October 1994 press conference,President Clinton said, "They didn't tell me anything aboutit." Events at Mena, Mr. Clinton continued, "were primarily amatter for federal jurisdiction. The state really had next tonothing to do with it. The local prosecutor did conduct aninvestigation based on what was in the jurisdiction of statelaw. The rest of it was under the jurisdiction of the UnitedStates Attorneys who were appointed successively byprevious administrations. We had nothing--zero--to do withit."Mr. Clinton was right about federal jurisdiction, but wrongabout Arkansas involvement. As reported on this page, localattempts to investigate Mena were tanked twice by the Mr.Clinton's administration in Little Rock, which refused toallocate funds. And in July 1995, a former member of Gov.Clinton's security staff, Arkansas State Trooper L.D. Brown,suddenly stepped forward claiming he had worked with theCIA and Seal running guns to the Contras--and cocaine backto the U.S. Mr. Brown says that when he informed thegovernor about the drug flights, Mr. Clinton replied, "that'sLasater's deal"--a reference to Little Rock bond daddy DanLasater, a Clinton crony later convicted on an apparentlyunrelated cocaine distribution charge.The CIA report does not directly address the Lasaterallegation. It says trooper Brown applied to the agency butwas not offered employment and was not "otherwiseassociated with CIA." Barry Seal was associated with CIA,but only for "a two-day period" while his plane was beingoutfitted for the DEA's Sandinista sting. The CIA also says itfound no evidence of tampering in earlier money-launderingprosecutions, as several Arkansas investigators havecharged.And what does the CIA say about Mr. Clinotn's knowledge ofCIA activities at Mena? It gives its boss wiggle room thatparses nicely with his statement that " they didn't tell meanything." In response to Mr. Leach's question aboutwhether information was conveyed to Arkansas officials inthe 1980s, the report states that "interface with localofficials was handled by the other federal agency" involvedin the joint Mena exercise, side-stepping the issue of whatMr. Clinton knew.The Clinton White House has gone to great lengths todiscredit the Mena story. It figures in the notorious WhiteHouse conspiracy report and was denounced by formerWhitewater damage-control counsel Mark Fabiani as "thedarkest backwater of right-wing conspiracy theories."Beltway pundits tend to dismiss Mena as an excess of theClinton critics. But in Arkansas the campaign is morevicious. With a passive press having long ago abandonedthe field, Mena investigators such as former Arkansas StatePolice investigator Russell Welch and former IRS agent BillDuncan were stripped of their careers after refusing to backaway from the case. Mr. Leach's CIA report provides somevindication for the two Arkansans.Mr. Leach's full report is not likely to resolve all thequestions surrounding Mena, but it might provide importantdetails about that "other agency" and related mysteries. InArkansas, meanwhile, the Little Rock FBI office is followingleads in a sensitive drug-corruption probe involvingthe Linda Ives "train deaths" case and allegations ofMena-related drug drops. The big drug-corruption questionis what network encompassed the Barry Seal operation. Theanswer could come by following the money on someof the smaller questions, such as whether those CIAcontracts for "aviation-related services" went to one ofSeal's front companies at Mena. But in forcing an admissionfrom the U.S. intelligence community, Mr. Leach already hasperformed an important service: He's demolished the notionthat nothing happened at Mena.Mr. Morrison is a Journal editorial page writer.