Author Topic: California = Liberal Failed State  (Read 21544 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #75 on: July 13, 2011, 11:17:05 AM »
Funny how leftists who collapsed California think they know how to fix what is wrong with the nation.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #76 on: July 14, 2011, 09:34:32 AM »
California Runs Out Of Money Again, Comes Begging To Wall Street As Moody's Threatens To Go Nuclear


 http://www.zerohedge.com/article/california-runs-out-mo...







First New Jersey, now California. The cash-strapped state, which begged for, and got, a "bridge" loan from JP Morgan as recently as October 2010 (the same bank that recently bailed out Chris Christie), is asking for another bridge to the old bridge loan, ergo a "bridge bridge" loan. The excuse: the potential upcoming government shutdown, which would lock California out of the muni market.

Surely the fact that it already has little to no cash left was not a part of the equation. BusinessWeek reports: "California is considering seeking a bridge loan from Wall Street ahead of an Aug. 2 deadline for raising the federal debt ceiling, in case talks fail and send the bond market into turmoil, Treasurer Bill Lockyer said. Proceeds from the loan would be used to help pay the state’s bills until Lockyer can sell an estimated $5 billion of so-called revenue-anticipation notes, or RANs, scheduled for late August.

Without those notes, the state could run out of cash as it did in 2009, when it issued $2.6 billion of IOUs." Of course if the US is downgraded, Meredith Whitney's prediction will come true with a bang: as part of its warning yesterday, Moody's also threatened to downgrade 7000 municipal ratings http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-07-14/moody-s-wil... which would halt RAN, and any other, issuance for an indefinite period of time. And while this is merely more M.A.D. posturing to help the debt ceiling dispute come to a speedy resolution, the fact that California is now forced to issue new bridge loans to "bridge" old ones is oddly troubling.

snip


more



http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-07-14/california-...

“We are hoping to get our borrowing done before Aug. 2,” Lockyer told reporters following a speech yesterday in Sacramento.

A failure to raise the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt limit would lead to a “major crisis” and throw “shock waves” through the financial system, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said yesterday at a House Financial Services Committee hearing.

Moody’s Investors Service put the U.S. under review yesterday for a credit rating downgrade, adding to concern that political gridlock will lead to a default. The company warned it may lower 7,000 ratings on $130 billion in municipal debt backed by U.S. Treasury or other federal securities or repaid with federal money such as Medicaid grants and economic-stimulus aid if the U.S. loses its top rating.

Lockyer said he’s concerned about the possibility of federal delays in Medicare subsidies and other payments to California and about long-term reductions in U.S. aid to states. A default, he said, could prompt the federal government to prioritize payments to states that would affect California’s cash flow.

“The ripple effect on state and local finances is very substantial,” he said. “Depending on how long the delay was, you might have a cash-flow hit. Of course, the budget negotiations might result in reduced payments to the states. There’s two kinds of worry.”

snip


________________________ ________________


God forbid they let 200k a year lifeguards go without.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #77 on: July 15, 2011, 08:45:23 AM »
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2011/07/15/MNL61KAHVQ.DTL

Sacramento --

Public schools in California will be required to teach students about the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans starting Jan. 1 after Gov. Jerry Brown on Thursday signed a controversial bill to add the topic to the social sciences curriculum.

Textbooks now must include information on the role of LGBT Americans, as well as Americans with disabilities, though California's budget crisis has delayed the purchasing of new books until at least 2015.

"History should be honest," Brown, a Democrat, said in a statement. "This bill revises existing laws that prohibit discrimination in education and ensures that the important contributions of Americans from all backgrounds and walks of life are included in our history books."

The governor called the legislation, SB48, introduced by Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, "historic."

The law - the first of its kind in the nation - adds the two groups to an existing list of minority and other groups that are required to be part of the social sciences curriculum.
Safer schools

Gay rights supporters heralded Brown's action as a major victory. They said the law will help make public schools a safer place for LGBT students as well as give those students, and their classmates, examples of accomplished and important LGBT people.

Throughout the debate on the measure, backers noted the recent spate of suicides among young LGBT people and said it would help to combat bullying that typically occurs beforehand.

Opponents, however, fiercely opposed the measure, citing religious objections to homosexuality and questioning whether such instruction is necessary. They expressed dismay with Brown's signing of the bill.

"If children in other countries are learning math and science, and American children are learning about the private lives of historical figures, how will our students compete for jobs in the global economy?" said Sen. Sharon Runner, R-Lancaster (Los Angeles County), the vice chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Education.
Beyond California

The provision on inclusion in textbooks could reach beyond California, too, as many book publishers tailor their texts to California's standards because of the state's large population. The bill does not prescribe how schools will teach the subject, and Leno said that decision will be made by local school officials and teachers.

"What the bill calls for is for the contributions of LGBT people to be included," Leno said, adding, "We wrote it broadly for a reason. We would be subject to more criticism than we've already been getting if we were more dictatorial."

Leno said the mandates apply broadly, though, telling reporters it would affect kindergarten through high school curriculum, "and, of course, in an age-appropriate way."

Gay rights advocates said they will be vigilant about making sure schools across California comply.

Carolyn Laub, the founder and executive director of the Gay-Straight Alliance Network, which works to establish gay-straight clubs in schools, said such clubs exist in 55 percent of California's high schools.

"We'll certainly be letting all of our constituents know about this bill, and when it goes into effect I can assure you there will be thousands of students" watching to see how it is implemented, she said.

Proponents have cited slain San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk as a person with historical significance, along with events such as the Stonewall Riots in New York City that helped launch the LGBT rights movement as examples of topics that could be taught.

Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, a Democrat, praised Brown's move, saying, "Our history is more complete when we recognize the contributions of people from all backgrounds and walks of life."
Cutting into class time

Still, opponents questioned the effect the bill would have and the need for explicit instruction for all students about a relatively small group.

The bill "does absolutely nothing to reduce bullying, improve the poor state of our education system, ensure students graduate or prepare them for global competitiveness," said Paulo Sibaja, legislative director of the Capitol Resource Institute, a socially conservative organization in Sacramento. "Instead it diverts precious classroom time away from science, math, reading and writing, and focuses on the agenda of a small group of people."

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #78 on: July 18, 2011, 02:21:29 PM »
SF To Shutter Courtrooms; Lay Off 200 Workers
KTVU ^ | 07/18/11 | Staff




The San Francisco Superior Court is laying off more than 40 percent of its staff and shuttering 25 courtrooms because of budget cuts.

Presiding Judge Katherine Feinstein said Monday that the cuts mean it will take many more hours to pay a traffic ticket in person, up to 18 months to finalize a divorce and five years for a lawsuit to go to trial. The cuts go into effect on Sept. 30 and are needed to close a $13.75 million deficit.

Some 200 of the court's 480 workers will be let go, including 11 of 12 commissioners who preside over a variety of cases.

Feinstein said the deficit was caused by the $350 million budget cut that Sacramento lawmakers made to the courts to approve the state's annual budget.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #79 on: July 18, 2011, 03:35:20 PM »
Electric Car Maker Folds, Salinas (CA) Loses $500,000
KSBW Channel 8 ^ | July 18, 2011 | Amy Larson




A Salinas car manufacturing company that was expected to build environmentally friendly electric cars and create new jobs folded before almost any cars could run off the assembly line.

The city of Salinas had invested more than half a million dollars in Green Vehicles, an electric car start-up company.

All of that money is now gone, according to Green Vehicles President and Co-Founder Mike Ryan.

The start-up company set up shop in Salinas in the summer of 2009 after the city gave Ryan a $300,000 community development grant.

When the company still ran into financial trouble last year, the city of Salinas handed to Ryan an additional $240,000 in investment money.

Salinas Mayor Dennis Donohue said he was "surprised and disappointed" by the news. City officials were equally irked that Ryan notified them through an email that his company had crashed and burned.

Salinas Redevelopment Director Jeff Weir said Green Vehicles folded because of a "lack of investors," and a $2.7 million grant from California Energy Commission that never materialized.

Donohue said he will work with the state to try to get at least $240,000 back from the now-defunct company.

Mike Ryan YouTube Green Vehicles President and Co-Founder Mike Ryan

Last year, Salinas city officials said they were excited about Green Vehicles moving from San Jose to Salinas because they wanted to turn Salinas into a hub for alternative energy production.

City leaders wooed Green Vehicles to jump-start the sputtering local company and turn Salinas into an "electric valley." Donohue and Weir both voiced their high hopes for Green Vehicles.

The start-up company promised city leaders that it would create 70 new jobs and pay $700,000 in taxes a year to Salinas.

Green Vehicles was supposed to be up and running by March 2010 inside their 80,000 square-foot space at Firestone Business Park off of Abbot Street.

Ryan had lofty goals, listing his company's mission as: "To make the best clean commuter vehicles in the world; To manufacture with a radical sense of responsibility; To engage in deep transparency as an inspiration for new ways of doing business."

Green Vehicles designed two vehicles, the TRIAC 2.0 and the MOOSE, which it planned to manufacture.

On July 12, Ryan wrote a blog post announcing that his company was closing.

"The truth is that not realizing the vision for this company is a huge disappointment," Ryan wrote.

Ryan outlined three mistakes he made while steering his company into a brick wall. All three reasons boiled down failing to generate enough capital.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #80 on: July 19, 2011, 12:11:24 PM »
Court says cities can ban layoffs by new owners
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 7/19/11 | Bob Egelko




California cities can protect workers from being fired immediately when their company changes owners, the state Supreme Court ruled Monday.The 6-1 decision reinstated a Los Angeles ordinance, struck down by lower courts, that required supermarkets to keep their workforce for 90 days after a new owner takes over. Similar laws covering different industries are in effect in other cities - including Oakland, San Jose, Berkeley and Emeryville - and the state also has a law protecting janitors who work for building contractors. "When you're keeping a business open and all you're doing is changing the name


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #81 on: August 04, 2011, 06:50:13 PM »
California Law - Hotels Must Use 'Fitted Sheets'? Costs $15 Million...
cbs47 ^ | 8-4-11 | cakid1
Posted on August 4, 2011 6:09:36 PM EDT by cakid1

Its not a done deal yet, but lawmakers in Sacramento want a new law that would force all California hotels to start using 'fitted sheets.'

The law, is designed to cut back on hotel health problems for maids.

Supporters of the law - claim many of the injuries are preventable - if hotels started using fitted sheets and made other changes in the work load for hotel maids.

The California State Senate has passed a bill proposed by Sen. Kevin de Leόn (D-Los Angeles) that would help prevent or reduce housekeeper injuries.

"A representative of the hotel industry, led by the California Hotel and Lodging Assn., told a Senate Committee that if SB 432 passes, California hotels will have to spend an additional $15 million or more to buy fitted sheets to replace the sheets for 550,000 beds at $25 per sheet. "



OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #82 on: August 04, 2011, 06:51:59 PM »
?

How does not having a fitted sheet make it dangerous?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #83 on: August 04, 2011, 06:53:52 PM »
?

How does not having a fitted sheet make it dangerous?

Don't know, but it's an added cost to business.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #84 on: August 04, 2011, 06:57:07 PM »
Don't know, but it's an added cost to business.

That's if it passes.  But would I say most hotels like Hilton, Marriot, double tree etc. Already. Use fitted sheets.  But, hotels like Red Roof, Super 8 etc. Dont.

Either way.  Fucking stupid proposal. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #85 on: August 04, 2011, 06:58:34 PM »
That's if it passes.  But would I say most hotels like Hilton, Marriot, double tree etc. Already. Use fitted sheets.  But, hotels like Red Roof, Super 8 etc. Dont.

Either way.  Fucking stupid proposal. 

I guess when you want to bang a chic at days inn it might cost a bit more now.   ;D

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #86 on: August 04, 2011, 06:59:57 PM »
I guess when you want to bang a chic at days inn it might cost a bit more now.   ;D
If she's the kind of chic you would bring to the Days Inn you Might as well just go to Motel 6.   ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #88 on: February 01, 2012, 12:08:33 PM »
Good news for Californians: State to run out of cash by March
American Thinker ^ | 02/01/2012 | Rick Moran





It's good news in the sense that a state going broke is one way to stop the spending. A better way, of course, is to cut the budget.

Alas, Governor Moonbeam doesn't appear to have it in him:

California will run out of cash by early March if the state does not take swift action to find $3.3 billion through payment delays and borrowing, according to a letter state Controller John Chiang sent to state lawmakers today.

The announcement is surprising since lawmakers previously believed the state had enough cash to last through the fiscal year that ends in June.

But Chiang said additional cash management solutions are needed because state tax revenues are $2.6 billion less than what Gov. Jerry Brown and state lawmakers assumed in their optimistic budget last year. Meanwhile, Chiang said, the state is spending $2.6 billion more than state leaders planned on.

The Assembly budget committee approved a bill today that would enable $865 million of borrowing from existing state accounts, Senate Bill 95. Chiang, after consultation with the Department of Finance and state Treasurer Bill Lockyer, is also seeking about $2.4 billion in delayed payments to universities, counties and Medi-Cal, as well as additional borrowing from outside investors.

Absent these actions, the state would fall below its prudent $2.5 billion cash cushion on Feb. 29, Chiang estimated. On March 8, the state would actually end up $730 million in the red. The state would be below the safe cash cushion for several weeks ending April 13, save for several days at the end of March.

With such actions, Chiang believes the state would not have to use IOUs or delay tax refunds, maneuvers that have been relied upon in previous years.




(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #89 on: February 15, 2012, 07:37:41 AM »
Missing Californians (The Number of Top-Income Californians Have Declined by a Third)
American Thinker ^ | 02/15/2012 | Russ Vaugh




The Sacramento Bee website is reporting that the number of top-income taxpayers in California has declined by a third. In an article in its Capitol Alert section, the Bee says that those Californians with $500,000 and up taxable incomes have declined from almost 150,000 in 2007 to slightly under 100,000 in 2009. The article also notes that the 100,000, representing just over a half percent of the 14.6 million returns, accounted for 18.8 percent of total income reported, but paid 32 percent of all income taxes in 2009.

If Governor Jerry Brown wonders where a whole bunch of those making up that sizable segment of his top taxpayers disappeared to, he might want to call their new governor, Rick Perry, who may have lost in the primary, but who's the surefire winner in the contest to snag rich Californians fleeing the tax tyranny and liberal insanity of the guy glittering Golden State.


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #90 on: February 26, 2012, 10:14:38 AM »
California households owe an average $30,500 for public employee pension debt
Contra Costa Times ^ | 2/26/12 | Daniel Borenstein - Staff columnist





The average California household's share of the debt for underfunded state and local government employee pensions comes to about $30,500.

Stanford University studies released last week and in December for the first time aggregate public pension shortfalls statewide. Using moderate assumptions about future investment returns, the unfunded liability is about $379 billion.

Hard-core pension reformers will maintain that the number is much more. Defenders of the status quo will insist it's significantly less. Before sorting out that dispute, let's understand what the numbers mean.

Each year public employees work, they increase their future pensions. So, as they work, they and their employers jointly should set aside enough money to cover the additional benefits.

To calculate the contributions, actuaries and pension boards make assumptions about future investment returns and pension costs. Unfortunately, they've been wrong.

They have overestimated investment earnings, underestimated pension costs and retroactively added benefits without proper funding. As a result, pension systems across California have huge unfunded liabilities.

Keep in mind that the shortfall is for pension benefits employees already earned. Like salary and health care benefits, it's a cost that should be paid when labor is performed.

Instead, the shortfall has been converted into debt to be paid off over time, up to 30 years. Government agencies make those payments, diverting money that would otherwise go for government services. So we're depriving current and future generations to pay off past labor costs.

How much is the debt? It depends on how much pension systems project they can earn on investments. The greater the assumed rate of return, the less money pension systems need now and, hence, the smaller the shortfall. The converse is also true.

Most California public pension systems anticipate they can earn about 7.75 percent annually. Every year they fall short of that target ...


(Excerpt) Read more at contracostatimes.com ...


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #91 on: March 04, 2012, 03:24:07 PM »
San Jose faces $3.5 billion debt for employee retirement programs
Contra Costa Times ^ | 3/3/12 | Daniel Borenstein - Staff columnist
Posted on March 4, 2012 4:37:34 PM EST by SmithL

Recent San Jose actuarial reports show $3.5 billion of city debt for underfunded pension and retiree health benefits -- a shortfall that works out to about $11,000 for every household in the city.

Yet, as Mayor Chuck Reed proposes substantive pension reform, workers and a local television reporter are hyperventilating about irrelevant numbers that distract from the ballooning problem.

If not for major layoffs and salary cuts last year, the shortfall would be much worse. It would also be much larger if the city used more realistic investment earnings assumptions rather than relying on overly optimistic forecasts.

Nevertheless, the calculations show the city's retirement programs combined have only 56 percent of the funds they should. Put another way, the unfunded liability equals about eight years of city payroll.

To understand what's going on here, keep in mind that employees earn additional future retirement benefits for each year that they work along with their salaries. So the city and its workers should invest enough money annually to cover the future costs of those newly earned benefits.

The city has three problems: First, the amount that should be set aside for those newly earned benefits has increased.

Second, even that greater amount isn't enough because the payment calculation relies on those optimistic investment assumptions.

Third, past reliance on unrealistic assumptions, retroactive benefit increases and actuarial changes have caught up with the city, leaving it with huge unfunded liabilities for pensions. As for retiree health benefits, only small amounts have been set aside for future benefits.

The resulting debts are treated like mortgages, with annual payments spread over as much as 30 years, thereby passing costs to the next generation.

The city must pay off the entire pension shortfall; workers have no obligation. For retiree health, workers make a small contribution...

(Excerpt) Read more at contracostatimes.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #92 on: March 04, 2012, 03:46:52 PM »
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

As Stockton struggles, so does California
Sacramento Bee ^ | 3/4/12 | Dan Walters
Posted on March 4, 2012 4:31:38 PM EST by SmithL

So Stockton has suspended payments to its bondholders and is seeking to renegotiate its debts in hopes of averting a formal bankruptcy.

Sound familiar? It's what Greece, which also is head-over-heels in debt, is doing.

The parallels are uncanny. Stockton and Greece spent heavily to keep money flowing to those with political pull, and borrowed heavily, all in the name of societal improvement.

Stockton wanted to improve its poor municipal image – crime-ridden and corrupt. So it borrowed to build a new sports arena, a baseball park, a hotel and a marina – the latter so over the top that boaters visit just to gawk at its grandiosity – while giving extravagant benefits to its employees.

In doing so, it acquired a new nationwide image – one of profligacy.

Stockton assumed that a surge of revenues from the housing boom would go on forever – not unlike Vallejo, which did file for bankruptcy protection. When the housing bubble burst, it could not cover its debts and all the promises of wages and fringe benefits that it had promised to its politically powerful unions.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #93 on: March 05, 2012, 03:50:54 AM »
California slipping toward bankruptcy, again

byConn Carroll Senior Editorial Writer
posted12 hours ago at6:26pmwith21 Comments

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, at center. Also seen from left: Oakland Mayor Jean Quan, San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)
California is going broke. Again. The state controller has estimated that the state will run out of money sometime this month. California will need to find $3 billion in cuts or revenues to keep the state in the black through the rest of this fiscal year.

And next year looks even worse. California's Legislative Analyst Office projects that, even with billions in one-time revenues from Facebook's impending IPO, Gov. Jerry Brown's budget will run a $6.5 billion deficit.

Democrats in state government are desperate for cash. And they are beginning to cannibalize their local government brethren for revenues to make up the difference. The state's more than 400 redevelopment agencies have become one of the first targets.

Created in the 1940s, RDAs empower a city or county to identify almost any parcel of land as a "redevelopment area." When that is done, state property tax revenues from that area are frozen and any subsequent increase in property tax revenue beyond the frozen level goes directly to the RDAs.

RDAs are also empowered to borrow money without any voter approval. They can then buy property with that borrowed money and pay it off with the expected revenue stream from their take of the property taxes. All told, RDAs skim $5 billion from Sacramento every year.

Intended for "economic development," RDAs quickly became the bread-and-butter of almost every pay-to-play construction project in the state. Developers would give money to local politicians, and those politicians would use the RDAs, and their powers of eminent domain, to obtain land for their campaign contributors on the cheap.

Developers then made millions building upscale shopping malls like Victoria Gardens in Rancho Cucamonga. Everybody won ... except the free market and taxpayers.

In 2010, then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tried to close his multi-billion dollar budget gap by raiding the RDA. Developers didn't like that. They fought back with Proposition 22, which passed in November 2010. The measure forbids the state from siphoning off RDA money.

Fast forward to 2011, when Brown hatched a new plan to get that $5 billion. Being a Democrat, he had no philosophical problem with governments picking winners and losers through crony capitalism. But he did want, to steal a phrase from the Godfather, to wet his beak a little.

So Brown passed two laws. The first outlawed the RDAs entirely. That was the stick. The second allowed the RDAs to exist, but only if they gave a certain percentage of revenues to the state every year. That was the carrot.

Some RDAs were happy to play Brown's extortion game. But others took him to court ... and they blew up the system for everybody. The State Supreme Court threw out the second law, ruling that it conflicted with Proposition 22.

But the justices kept the first law banning the agencies. As of February 1st, all 400 plus RDAs suddenly became extinct

But while Brown now gets his RDA cash (which still isn't enough to close next year's budget gap), California local and city governments are stuck holding the bag for all their liabilities.

Cumulatively, RDAs own about $2 billion in assets statewide. Problem is, they also owe around $4 billion in debt. Local governments across the state are scrambling to figure out how to pay off this new burden.

Already crushed under the weight of unionized government employee pensions they can't afford, Brown's RDA money grab is driving many localities to the brink of bankruptcy.

The city of Stockton began the bankruptcy process last week. The cities of Hercules and Lincoln are not far behind.

So have California Democrats learned that government-funded crony capitalist development isn't good for their constituents' bottom line? Not at all. State Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, is looking to "recreate a new set of economic development tools for cities."

That will end well, too, I'm sure.

Conn Carroll is a senior editorial writer for The Washington Examiner. He can be reached at ccarroll@washingtonexaminer.com.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #94 on: March 05, 2012, 07:42:09 AM »
Yet, they continue to vote Democrat.

HEHEHEHEHEH!! Piglosi dares to claim that she knows what is best for the USA.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #95 on: March 05, 2012, 09:49:59 AM »
We are always slipping towards bank Bankruptcy here, our doom is always imminent.  blah blah blah

I don't care.   Beautiful day here. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #96 on: March 06, 2012, 05:27:20 AM »
Print page   It’s taxpayers who need a ‘Bill of Rights’
By U-T San Diego Editorial Staff

Monday, March 5, 2012

If it used to be possible to look at California politics with only a modicum of cynicism, the reaction of local and state governments to the revenue crisis produced by our struggling economy now makes this impossible. That’s because an argument can be made that elected officials have spent more time trying to figure out ways to help public employees weather the revenue crisis than to helping the private sector rebound and create jobs and badly needed tax revenue.

The latest example is the Public Employees’ Bill of Rights, introduced by Assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento. It would put up major obstacles to any privatization of state government programs and make it much more difficult to discipline incompetent or insubordinate state employees. When AB 1655 first was introduced a month ago, it was met with such universal hostility from the pundit class that it seemed destined to die a deserved death. At a time when millions of California families are struggling, giving more protections to a category of government workers who are already under fire for their generous pension benefits couldn’t seem more tone-deaf.

But such an assumption presumes members of the Legislature’s Democratic majority share the same values and sense of propriety as the rest of us. They do not. The word from Sacramento is that Dickinson expects quick approval of AB 1655 from the Assembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security, and that a measure that seemed more like a satirical comment on the Legislature’s priorities than serious legislation is alive and well.

This comes on top of many other developments that should leave California taxpayers feeling like they are the ones who need a bill of rights. Attorney General Kamala Harris killed ambitious pension-reform measures with ballot descriptions that could have been written by public employee unions. The state Public Employment Relations Board has taken extraordinary, unprecedented steps that make plain its intention to kill San Diego’s ambitious pension-reform ballot measure if it is approved in June. In Stockton, desperate city leaders contemplating filing for bankruptcy must first overcome a new state law that essentially requires them to get permission from the state Debt and Investment Advisory Commission, a little-known board whose members consist almost entirely of politicians whose futures depend on union support. (One of the two exceptions, obscurely enough, is Jay Goldstone, the city of San Diego’s chief operating officer.)

No wonder Dickinson is confident AB 1655 will get through. In his milieu, it not only isn’t extreme; it’s what is expected.

We hear from many hardworking public employees who feel they’ve been unfairly targeted for decisions they didn’t make. But while they have our sympathies, we hope they acknowledge what’s behind their mixed image: the vast extent of union power in Sacramento – and the appalling ways that power is used to maul taxpayers.


Print page © Copyright 2012 The San Diego Union-Tribune, LLC. An MLIM LLC Company. All rights reserved.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #97 on: March 06, 2012, 09:32:15 AM »
Things are so bad here.

I will be going on a hike tomorrow, eating some good food for dinner.  I will get there driving on roads in my truck through wine country.  It will be during the week, so every one will be at school or work.  It should be sunny and in the low 70's.

JUST LIKE ANY OTHER DAY HERE.

boy this place sucks as a failed liberal state. 

wah wah wah wah wah

 ;D

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #98 on: March 19, 2012, 10:01:26 AM »
California Cities Scramble to Avert Insolvency 

CREDIT, MARKET, CALIFORNIA, BOND PAYMENTS, MUNICIPAL DEBT

Reuters | 19 Mar 2012 | 11:21 AM ET



When the city of Stockton, Calif., announced last month it would skip some bond payments and enter talks with its creditors, the municipal debt world shuddered.


If Stockton were to file for bankruptcy protection, it would be the largest U.S. city ever to do so. Other troubled Californian municipalities might be tempted to follow suit. Predictions of mass defaults on municipal bonds might start to look a little more realistic.

But a close look at the municipal finance situation across California suggests mass bankruptcies are unlikely.

Most troubled local governments in the state have taken drastic steps to cut spending, with city managers asserting they have their arms around the problems. A new, state-mandated mediation process may also help municipalities avoid the worst — though it could force bondholders to accept losses outside the bankruptcy process.

The new law, passed after the San Francisco Bay area city of Vallejo filed for bankruptcy in 2008, requires Stockton to try to corral its major bondholders, bond insurers, city employees and retirees into mediation for up to 90 days.

"City negotiators will surely hold the bankruptcy gun to stakeholders' heads, including employees and their unions and bondholders represented by the insurers," wrote Alan Schankel, an analyst with Janney Capital Markets, in a recent note.

The city's credit ratings have been slashed. Moody's Investors Service lowered Stockton's general fund-supported debt ratings to below investment grade, a move affecting about $341 million in debt, while Standard & Poor's has taken Stockton's issuer credit rating down to one notch above 'D,' the bottom speculative-grade level.

As in other troubled cities around the state, the depth of Stockton's problems is a mirror image of the heights the city of 292,000 appeared to reach during the housing boom. An inland port and agricultural hub for Central Valley farms, Stockton was abruptly — and briefly — transformed into a distant bedroom community for the Bay area in those prosperous times.


According to online foreclosure marketplace RealtyTrac, Stockton last year had the second-highest foreclosure rate of all large U.S. metro areas, with 5.43 percent of its housing units receiving foreclosure filings. Las Vegas had the highest rate: 7.38 percent, compared with a nationwide 1.45 percent.

Stockton's financial problems were worsened by two decades of profligate spending on items including rich public employee contracts, a downtown sports arena and other urban revitalization projects, according to its city manager, Bob Deis.

The city faces a deficit of as much as $38 million on its general fund budget of $165 million.

In Stockton, as in Vallejo and other cities, the root of the problem is a dramatic fall in revenues. Developer fees have largely vanished with the near-halt of home building, and property taxes have followed housing values south. In Stockton, general fund revenue fell to an estimated $161.8 million for its current fiscal year, from $217.5 million in 2007-2008.

With unemployment at 10.9 percent across California — and above 16 percent in hard-hit places such as Stockton and Fresno — raising revenue with new taxes and fees is difficult. State law also puts firm limits on property tax increases and makes any type of tax rise difficult.

Still, many local officials say bankruptcy and default concerns are exaggerated.

Hercules, a town about 10 miles (16 km) south of Vallejo, recently defaulted on a debt payment amid a lawsuit with its bond insurer, prompting Standard & Poor's last month to drop its ratings on some city debt by five notches to a speculative grade 'BB.'

Since then, though, Hercules and Ambac Assurance, a subsidiary of Ambac Financial Group , have reached a settlement; together with union concessions, that will keep the city from having to consider pre-bankruptcy mediation.

"For the most part, the unions have been willing to come to the table," said Steve Duran, city manager of Hercules.

The only other California municipality currently seeking pre-bankruptcy talks is Mammoth Lakes. But the issue in the 7,400-person ski resort town is not the economy but rather a $42 million legal judgment against it over a property development dispute. Assistant City Manager Marianna Marysheva-Martinez said the town would not default on its roughly $2 million in debt.

A more typical case might be the town of Lincoln, a bedroom community outside Sacramento that has also suffered severely from the housing bust.

Over the course of a decade, Lincoln was transformed from a sleepy rural community of 8,000 into a bustling suburb of 42,000 and city services were expanded accordingly, including a full-time fire department put in place in 2001.


Beyond Bare Bones

When the housing market went bust, Lincoln's revenue shrank. City leaders responded by tapping reserves and slashing spending on public safety, which accounts for most of the budget. The city reduced the number of its police officers to 20 from 40 and closed two of three fire houses. Increased contributions by city employees to their retirement accounts also helped.

Bankruptcy isn't an option, said Mayor Spencer Short, adding that more cuts are coming: "I'm looking at the possibility of introducing a budget that's beyond bare bones."


Antioch, a city of 100,000 on the eastern fringe of the San Francisco Bay area, is another municipality clobbered by the housing slump. Unlike in Vallejo and Stockton, though, relations between Antioch's city leaders and labor units were not contentious, allowing quick action to cut costs when the scale of its financial troubles became clear, City Manager Jim Jakel said.

Jakel ticked off Antioch's moves to keep its books balanced: a hiring freeze; furloughs; employees waiving pay increases; and a city workforce reduced to 245 from 401 through attrition and layoffs.

Costa Mesa, a city of 110,000 south of Los Angeles, has slashed its payroll from 611 to 450. It is selling its police helicopters and has hired a neighboring city for air patrols. It's also pursuing a controversial effort to convert to a charter city from a general law city, which would give City Hall more power to outsource more work, said councilman Jim Righeimer.

Cost Cuts

In a similar vein, nearby Santa Ana, population 325,000, recently folded its fire department and turned fire protection over to the county, saving $10 million a year. Consolidating fire districts has become a popular cost-saving move across the state.

In San Diego, Mayor Jerry Sanders wants to hire private firms for some services — unless city employees undercut them. Last month, city workers won a bid for street sweeping that will cut the city's expenses by $560,000 a year. Similar city-worker bidding last year resulted in $5.5 million in savings.

Sanders, who said cost-cutting and a revenue uptick would help San Diego post a $16.6 million surplus this year, has a more dramatic plan to pare expenses over the long term: a ballot measure that would put nearly all new city employees into 401(k)-style retirement accounts instead of traditional pensions.

Voters in San Jose, California's third-largest city, will vote in June on a pension measure to reduce retirement expenses that Mayor Chuck Reed blames for consuming an increasing share of funds for city services. Reed has said San Jose faces "service-level insolvency" if it fails to control pension costs.

While political battles over pensions in those two big cities have been contentious, public employees across California have been quietly agreeing to pension concessions in recent years and local officials are seen pressing for more, according to the League of California Cities.


They'll keep clamping down on other costs too as property tax revenue remains tight. "Those of us who look at government economics just don't see a near-term turnaround," said Stewart Gary of Citygate Associates, a government consulting firm in Folsom, Calif.

The new California law mandating mediation came after the Vallejo situation exposed the weaknesses of bankruptcy as a means to address municipal finance problems. City services there have been eviscerated, many employees lost much of their healthcare and other benefits, and legal bills have topped $10 million.

Yet many of Vallejo's largest long-term costs, namely pension liabilities, remain in place, and the hit to the city's reputation has further depressed its housing market and discouraged businesses from opening.

Mediation could enable cities to get some debt relief without the stigma and costs of bankruptcy.

But some in the municipal bond world worry that the process will create moral hazard.

"I'm just wondering if Stockton's actions are going to prompt some people to say 'Hey, we've got a quick fix here'," said Dick Larkin, director of credit analysis at HJ Sims.

Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.
URL: http://www.cnbc.com/id/46783384/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.
© 2012 CNBC.com

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39544
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: California = Liberal Failed State
« Reply #99 on: March 24, 2012, 04:26:12 AM »
LAPD to Ignore California’s Car Impound Law Because It’s “Unfair” to Illegal Aliens
Stand With Arizona ^ | 03-24-2012 | John Hill
Posted on March 23, 2012 11:53:05 PM EDT by montag813



by John Hill
Stand With Arizona

We have become sadly accustomed to California - America's Sanctuary State - sinking lower and lower into utter lawlessness for the sake of naked racial politics. But whatever they do in Sacramento doesn't even come close to the utter madness that is Los Angeles - which makes the rest of the state look conservative by comparison.

This week saw the Los Angeles Police Department announcing that it will soon start ignoring California state law, which requires police to impound the vehicles of unlicensed drivers for 30 days - because it is "unfair" to illegal aliens!

That's right. The LAPD's Chief Charlie Beck actually said "It's about fairness" to illegals. Beck says that the majority of unlicensed motorists in L.A. are "immigrants" who are in the country illegally and have low-income jobs. Therefore, according to Beck, the state's impound law is unfair because it limits their ability to get to their jobs and imposes a steep fine to get their car

Their "jobs"? Does Beck not realize that it is against Federal law for illegal aliens to obtain employment in any state? Does he not understand that these laws are there to punish existing law-breakers and also deter potential illegals from seeking employment?

Does he also not realize that a a 2011 AAA study titled "Unlicensed to Kill" found that unlicensed drivers are five times more likely to be involved in fatal crashes and more likely to flee the scene of a crime.

Sorry - you are confusing the LAPD Chief with an actual law enforcement officer concerned with protecting the public. Beck is serving his true constituency - illegal aliens and their La Raza protector Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

So while citizen drivers without a license elsewhere in California will lose their cars, illegal aliens in L.A. will have nothing to worry about - if the state and Feds do nothing about it.

For the full story on this latest L.A., insanity, and the thoughts of a victim's father, see the video report below. Pay particular attention to former L.A. Archbishop Cardinal Mahony - a radical left imigration activist - who has never shown the slightest compassion for the victims of illegal alien criminals - only for the lawbreakers themselves who make up the majority of his parishioners. He truly has no shame.