Author Topic: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon  (Read 12083 times)

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31388
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #25 on: July 01, 2015, 09:05:16 AM »
Bingo! You nailed it Big Cyp.

Anyone who knows bodybuilding, already knows the best guys train hard and diet properly.
They also have the genetic talent to look impressive when flexing under the lights, on stage.
Thus, as Big Cyp already posted: genetics, training and diet ARE A GIVEN.

For me, it all comes down to one simple question:
" Can a bodybuilder compete successfully in the IFBB without drugs?"

Obviously, the answer is No !
It would be like trying to compete in modern bench contest without a bench shirt.
* A 650 lb raw bench is over 900lbs with a modern shirt.

So, it's 100% true, that you can't compete at the top levels without drugs regardless of your genetic talent and work ethic.



that's why 80 's natural sensations jean paul gilaume and mike Ashley were top guys then and swore they were but couldn't be..

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20489
  • Biscuit
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #26 on: July 01, 2015, 09:10:43 AM »
This guy is cited in the Solomon article as a Board certified Cosmetic Surgeon and an IFBB Professional. I'll let the surgeon remark stand but how the fuck is this guy an IFBB pro bodybuilder?
a

SuperTed

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6701
  • Rebirth
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #27 on: July 01, 2015, 09:15:54 AM »
Genetics + Drugs = IFBB pro.

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #28 on: July 01, 2015, 09:20:24 AM »
that's why 80 's natural sensations jean paul gilaume and mike Ashley were top guys then and swore they were but couldn't be..

Hmmm, good point, but their physiques are not relevant for bodybuilding success today.

Natural, drugged or low dose, they competed at under 200 lbs, around 5'7-8".
It's possible to build an impressive physique without drugs, BUT at a much lighter body wt.
A gifted avg ht guy doesn't need to be on a boatload of drugs to compete ripped at 195lbs.
BUT ,it's IMPOSSIBLE to compete ripped at 5'9" 240 (or more) lbs without a lot drugs.
Thus, you can't even compete with the top pros today at a body wt from the 1990's.

Change the judging standard to the best overall physique and you effectively end a lot of drug advantage.
Modern, hardcore fans don't want Zane or Ashley .
They want massive freaks like Phil, Kai or big Ronnie.

The more freaky mass required to win = more drugs required to compete.




njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31388
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #29 on: July 01, 2015, 09:28:31 AM »
Hmmm, good point, but their physiques are not relevant for bodybuilding success today.

Natural, drugged or low dose, they competed at under 200 lbs, around 5'7-8".
It's possible to build an impressive physique without drugs, BUT at a much lighter body wt.
A gifted avg ht guy doesn't need to be on a boatload of drugs to compete ripped at 195lbs.
BUT ,it's IMPOSSIBLE to compete ripped at 5'9" 240 (or more) lbs without a lot drugs.
Thus, you can't even compete with the top pros today at a body wt from the 1990's.

Change the judging standard to the best overall physique and you effectively end a lot of drug advantage.
Modern, hardcore fans don't want Zane or Ashley .
They want massive freaks like Phil, Kai or big Ronnie.

The more freaky mass required to win = more drugs required to compete.




HOWIE i hear you but heralded frank zane stood 5'9 185/205 depending on yrs or as he got older 82/83 yrs he was on what he had to be on ,dude was big enough but his leaness /hardness at that weight is what can't be done one iota without some or a lot of chemicals,we are talking peeled condition ,zane was peeled...

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #30 on: July 01, 2015, 10:31:39 AM »
HOWIE i hear you but heralded frank zane stood 5'9 185/205 depending on yrs or as he got older 82/83 yrs he was on what he had to be on ,dude was big enough but his leaness /hardness at that weight is what can't be done one iota without some or a lot of chemicals,we are talking peeled condition ,zane was peeled...

I'm not sayng Zane was natural. I am saying it's possible to get an impressive physique without drugs at much lighter body wts.
BUT, it's impossible to build a winning IFBB pro body of 240 + ripped lbs without a lo of drugs.

Once again, the more freaky size is required to win, the more role drugs play in bodybuilding.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31388
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #31 on: July 01, 2015, 11:04:06 AM »
I'm not sayng Zane was natural. I am saying it's possible to get an impressive physique without drugs at much lighter body wts.
BUT, it's impossible to build a winning IFBB pro body of 240 + ripped lbs without a lo of drugs.

Once again, the more freaky size is required to win, the more role drugs play in bodybuilding.
OK POINT TAKEN,,BUT ....someone here mentioned on a thread that ken jones who turned pro as a batam/lightweight and competed in open for yrs then 202's weighed in 160/170's and took as much as some heavyweights...

muscleman-2017

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2151
Why does the US gov allow this drug addict sport to even exist
« Reply #32 on: November 20, 2017, 10:18:43 PM »
With the war against drugs, you'd think those hypocrites would want to take down pro bodybuilding with it's flagrant glorification of the drug lifestyle.

And before someone says "oh steroids are good for you blah blah blah" we all know they are into rec drugs big time.

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12946
  • What you!
Re: Why does the US gov allow this drug addict sport to even exist
« Reply #33 on: November 20, 2017, 10:24:25 PM »
With the war against drugs, you'd think those hypocrites would want to take down pro bodybuilding with it's flagrant glorification of the drug lifestyle.

And before someone says "oh steroids are good for you blah blah blah" we all know they are into rec drugs big time.

And to think they let a former governor runs such contests. Ditto in Australia and elsewhere.

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20489
  • Biscuit
Re: Why does the US gov allow this drug addict sport to even exist
« Reply #34 on: November 20, 2017, 10:31:52 PM »
Pharmaceutical companies along with insurance companies and banks own the US government. They have since the 1970's. Bodybuilders use drugs. They are good for business. The end.
a

sceagacros

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
  • Happy holidays, have you considered suicide?
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #35 on: November 20, 2017, 11:05:09 PM »
Well, if you take the drugs and sit on your ass - nothing spectacular will happen. The drugs not only enable harder effort but mandate it - else you are wasting money, drugs, and potential (which most happily do - go figure), so in a sense the case could be made that if one is working to the absolute fullest of their ability then the drug user is in fact working harder than the natural, at least in strength sports. Not necessarily what John and Suzy Q. Public wants to hear but...............

phreak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5084
  • Food is amazing
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #36 on: November 20, 2017, 11:51:33 PM »
Well, if you take the drugs and sit on your ass - nothing spectacular will happen. The drugs not only enable harder effort but mandate it - else you are wasting money, drugs, and potential (which most happily do - go figure), so in a sense the case could be made that if one is working to the absolute fullest of their ability then the drug user is in fact working harder than the natural, at least in strength sports. Not necessarily what John and Suzy Q. Public wants to hear but...............
Read up on the large body of work from Bhasin et al.

IRON CROSS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8901
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #37 on: November 21, 2017, 12:14:26 AM »
Just the finishing touch.

Who give a shit , regarding to you Nabiru would destroy our World so ................... ???

oldgolds

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #38 on: November 22, 2017, 06:48:55 AM »
Here you are Getbig, have fun...



“All drugs”— two of the most disrespectful words a dedicated gym warrior can hear. It happens every day, at gyms in all neighborhoods. The bodybuilder walks through the club, arms busting through his shirt, lats flaring, traps to his ears, legs like tree trunks, trains twice a day, never misses a meal, and always forces the extra rep. He’s the envy of most, with the exception of a few cynics who prefer to diminish his hard work by whispering those two dismissive, recycled words … “All drugs.”
 
Bodybuilding, as a lifestyle, is among those rare journeys that lack a defined destination. It’s an arduous process, both grueling and gratifying. It’s the ultimate act of redundancy, a toilsome, relentless labor of love. Building an Olympia-caliber physique requires years of sacrifice, the blessings of genetics, and a work ethic unrelatable to most. To minimize it as “all drugs” is both insulting and ignorant. Unfortunately, drugs do play a role in the bodybuilding culture, so the skeptics will continue to cast their shadow.
 
But a world-class physique requires sustained physical and mental fortitude unrivaled by any sport, a reality misunderstood by anyone who tries to diminish the achievement of a bodybuilder— and a viewpoint shared by MD Senior Editor Peter McGough, who has covered many of the greatest bodybuilding champions of all time. “Some people said six-time Mr. Olympia Dorian Yates won all those Olympia titles because he had a secret drug that no one else had. Rubbish!” McGough continues, “Hard work, supreme tenacity, the right genetics and a warrior mentality, not something found in a needle or bottle, made Yates the champion he is.”
 
When pressed to discuss those who point the “all drugs” finger at Ronnie Coleman, McGough responds, “Ronnie won eight Mr. Olympia contests because he had the best body in the world, not because he had the best drugs. That’s an inescapable fact. To assert otherwise contradicts reality and common sense. If drugs really do make the bodybuilder, then only drug gurus would win Mr. Olympia contests.”
 
Unfortunately, not everyone agrees. Some find it easier to dismiss the notion that hard work is the primary catalyst for extreme muscle gain. Do performance drugs aid in a bodybuilder’s recovery? Of course they do. Can drugs allow a bodybuilder to get more out of a workout? Absolutely! But regardless of the drug, the bodybuilder still has to enter a squat rack, rest a steel bar across the back of his neck and shoulders, and suffer through the burn of lowering and raising a massive amount of weight for as many reps as he can endure. He still has to march across the gym, doing lunges, carrying 50-pound dumbbells in each hand while the lactic acid buildup forces him to his knees. He still has to spend most days eating flavorless grilled chicken, fish, dried bake potatoes, and broccoli … while his neighbors enjoy burgers, French fries and cheesecake.
 
Former Arnold Classic champ and Mr. Olympia runner-up Shawn Ray cautions anyone who dares to minimize what it takes to be an elite bodybuilder: “I dare anyone to walk a day in the shoes of an IFBB Olympian. You’ll quickly realize the sport is much more physical and mental than it is CHEMICAL!”
 
But Seriously, Is Bodybuilding Really “All Drugs”?
In search of answers and perspective, we reached out to a few leading experts in nutrition, science and bodybuilding. Here’s what they had to say when asked if there’s any truth to the notion that bodybuilding is “all drugs.”
 
Victor Prisk, M.D. – Board Certified Orthopaedic Surgeon, IFBB Pro Bodybuilder
With all the media hype surrounding performance-enhancing drugs, bodybuilders clearly take the brunt of the criticism. One look at a Mr. Olympia and most people wonder, “What’s going on there?” However, if a lifter approaches me in the gym and asks, “Do you have to do ‘roids to be a bodybuilder?” I roll my eyes. This question often comes from the guy who doesn’t fully understand what the bodybuilding lifestyle truly demands. I typically respond by asking, “What did you have for breakfast today?” When they say a bagel and a Yoplait, I set them straight. Without the right fuel, meaning high-quality protein, fats, carbohydrates and supplements or even the right training stimulus, steroids would be useless. Even worse, there are bodybuilders who believe that steroids need to be the center of their universe. These are the misguided souls who end up destroying their livers and their physiques. They try all sorts of dangerous combinations of orals, injectables, peptides, anti-estrogens and bathtub soups. They end up with abscesses, lumpy muscles, disfiguring acne, bald heads, small balls, diabetes and heart disease. In the bodybuilder who has maximized their potential with scientific training methods and nutritional supplementation, only then should they consider a physician-monitored trial of hormone replacement.
 
Doug Kalman, Ph.D., Dietitian
To achieve a high level of muscularity plus ultra-low levels of body fat takes dedication beyond the normal. We are fortunate to live in a time when training equipment is phenomenal, and good-tasting, smart nutritionals are available to optimize training. If wanting to discuss if certain drugs can create an elite athlete, the answer for some is yes. For others, the drugs make no difference, as they didn’t have the right genetics or training ethics to get there anyway. For others, yes, drugs do make a difference that is undeniable, even to them. But, it would be unfair to say that the success of a top bodybuilder is only as a result of potential drug use.
 
Shawn Ray – Hall of Fame Bodybuilder
As with any extreme sport, the average observer never takes the time to actually calculate the amount of hours, weeks, months and years that goes into the final product. The criticism is fair because most people can’t quantify the amount of sacrifice and commitment to dieting, training, rest and recovery that goes into the bodybuilding lifestyle, not to mention genetics. Some bodybuilders are simply unworldly to the general public, almost barbaric in appearance, but for the most part we professionals, whom I consider artists, take these descriptions as compliments because it validates how far apart we have set ourselves from the general public. Simply put, if everyone could take a drug and wind up on a Mr. Olympia stage, we’d have a lot more athletes participating. Unfortunately, that’s not reality. However, there is truth to the fact that certain drugs work when used properly, but their shelf life is short as it relates to appearance, which in the end is the sum of our sport and its champions.
 
Ron Harris – MD Senior Writer, National Level Bodybuilder
Because steroids do play a significant role in the physiques of the best bodybuilders today, it’s all too easy to leap to the conclusion that drugs are entirely responsible for this freakish look. And, it’s all too convenient a belief for those delusional types who aspire to join their ranks despite lacking the genetic gifts that separate elite bodybuilders from the herds of wannabes. Here is the truth, based on the many thousands of bodybuilders I have known over the last quarter century. First, the right genetics have to be in place in terms of bone structure, muscle bellies, and the unique ability to add extreme amounts of muscle while staying lean. Then, you add drugs on top of that, and you start seeing something exceptional. But since all the top athletes have great genetics and access to the same drugs, it’s the ones who work harder in the gym and are more dedicated to their rest and nutrition who rise to the top of the heap.
Now, take someone with average human genetics, and load them up on the same drug regimen. Those who train harder and are more diligent about eating and resting will look better than the others who don’t, but nobody with average genetics is ever going to step foot on the Mr. Olympia stage, unless it’s to mop up the floor when the contest is over. Drugs don’t make the physiques you see in the pages of MD. If they did, there would be far more of them around because plenty of guys these days are taking exactly what the pros are— and in some cases far more. But higher doses of drugs can’t compensate for a lack of genetic blessings, and neither can they make up for laziness in the gym and at the dinner table. Many either can’t comprehend that drugs are not the magical transformation potion they thought it to be, or refuse to accept that inconvenient reality because it crushes their dreams of being a top pro bodybuilder.
 
Peter McGough – MD Senior Editor
Bodybuilding has long been the mainstream whipping boy for accusations of “It’s all drugs.” But the main qualities a champion bodybuilder brings to the table are superior genetics for responding to any form of muscle-building stimulus, plus a super drive to take advantage of those genetics. That being said, if a champion has those genetics and drive he will respond better than a mere mortal to a traditional drug cycle, which in turn leads lesser bodybuilders, who have tried a traditional cycle and don’t make spectacular gains, to believe, A) The champion bodybuilder has a “secret drug” and/or B) The champion is using an insane amount of drugs. Given that skeptical scenario, the truth is the “drugs are everything” stance is a view peddled by quite a few in the sport. Some gym drug dealers perpetuate the myth that the type of development we see at the Olympia level is all due to drugs. They act out of their own “step into my Aladdin’s Cave” self-interest, of course. The late Dan Duchaine, the first and most famous of the so-called steroid gurus, once told me that he had tried every steroid combo he could think of, and he still never got to be more than 180 pounds.

oldgolds

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #39 on: November 22, 2017, 06:51:21 AM »
Here you are Getbig, have fun...



“All drugs”— two of the most disrespectful words a dedicated gym warrior can hear. It happens every day, at gyms in all neighborhoods. The bodybuilder walks through the club, arms busting through his shirt, lats flaring, traps to his ears, legs like tree trunks, trains twice a day, never misses a meal, and always forces the extra rep. He’s the envy of most, with the exception of a few cynics who prefer to diminish his hard work by whispering those two dismissive, recycled words … “All drugs.”
 
Bodybuilding, as a lifestyle, is among those rare journeys that lack a defined destination. It’s an arduous process, both grueling and gratifying. It’s the ultimate act of redundancy, a toilsome, relentless labor of love. Building an Olympia-caliber physique requires years of sacrifice, the blessings of genetics, and a work ethic unrelatable to most. To minimize it as “all drugs” is both insulting and ignorant. Unfortunately, drugs do play a role in the bodybuilding culture, so the skeptics will continue to cast their shadow.


After 50 years in the game I must say that you are full of crap....Drugs ARE the biggest factor in building muscle...By far....
 
But a world-class physique requires sustained physical and mental fortitude unrivaled by any sport, a reality misunderstood by anyone who tries to diminish the achievement of a bodybuilder— and a viewpoint shared by MD Senior Editor Peter McGough, who has covered many of the greatest bodybuilding champions of all time. “Some people said six-time Mr. Olympia Dorian Yates won all those Olympia titles because he had a secret drug that no one else had. Rubbish!” McGough continues, “Hard work, supreme tenacity, the right genetics and a warrior mentality, not something found in a needle or bottle, made Yates the champion he is.”
 
When pressed to discuss those who point the “all drugs” finger at Ronnie Coleman, McGough responds, “Ronnie won eight Mr. Olympia contests because he had the best body in the world, not because he had the best drugs. That’s an inescapable fact. To assert otherwise contradicts reality and common sense. If drugs really do make the bodybuilder, then only drug gurus would win Mr. Olympia contests.”
 
Unfortunately, not everyone agrees. Some find it easier to dismiss the notion that hard work is the primary catalyst for extreme muscle gain. Do performance drugs aid in a bodybuilder’s recovery? Of course they do. Can drugs allow a bodybuilder to get more out of a workout? Absolutely! But regardless of the drug, the bodybuilder still has to enter a squat rack, rest a steel bar across the back of his neck and shoulders, and suffer through the burn of lowering and raising a massive amount of weight for as many reps as he can endure. He still has to march across the gym, doing lunges, carrying 50-pound dumbbells in each hand while the lactic acid buildup forces him to his knees. He still has to spend most days eating flavorless grilled chicken, fish, dried bake potatoes, and broccoli … while his neighbors enjoy burgers, French fries and cheesecake.
 
Former Arnold Classic champ and Mr. Olympia runner-up Shawn Ray cautions anyone who dares to minimize what it takes to be an elite bodybuilder: “I dare anyone to walk a day in the shoes of an IFBB Olympian. You’ll quickly realize the sport is much more physical and mental than it is CHEMICAL!”
 
But Seriously, Is Bodybuilding Really “All Drugs”?
In search of answers and perspective, we reached out to a few leading experts in nutrition, science and bodybuilding. Here’s what they had to say when asked if there’s any truth to the notion that bodybuilding is “all drugs.”
 
Victor Prisk, M.D. – Board Certified Orthopaedic Surgeon, IFBB Pro Bodybuilder
With all the media hype surrounding performance-enhancing drugs, bodybuilders clearly take the brunt of the criticism. One look at a Mr. Olympia and most people wonder, “What’s going on there?” However, if a lifter approaches me in the gym and asks, “Do you have to do ‘roids to be a bodybuilder?” I roll my eyes. This question often comes from the guy who doesn’t fully understand what the bodybuilding lifestyle truly demands. I typically respond by asking, “What did you have for breakfast today?” When they say a bagel and a Yoplait, I set them straight. Without the right fuel, meaning high-quality protein, fats, carbohydrates and supplements or even the right training stimulus, steroids would be useless. Even worse, there are bodybuilders who believe that steroids need to be the center of their universe. These are the misguided souls who end up destroying their livers and their physiques. They try all sorts of dangerous combinations of orals, injectables, peptides, anti-estrogens and bathtub soups. They end up with abscesses, lumpy muscles, disfiguring acne, bald heads, small balls, diabetes and heart disease. In the bodybuilder who has maximized their potential with scientific training methods and nutritional supplementation, only then should they consider a physician-monitored trial of hormone replacement.
 
Doug Kalman, Ph.D., Dietitian
To achieve a high level of muscularity plus ultra-low levels of body fat takes dedication beyond the normal. We are fortunate to live in a time when training equipment is phenomenal, and good-tasting, smart nutritionals are available to optimize training. If wanting to discuss if certain drugs can create an elite athlete, the answer for some is yes. For others, the drugs make no difference, as they didn’t have the right genetics or training ethics to get there anyway. For others, yes, drugs do make a difference that is undeniable, even to them. But, it would be unfair to say that the success of a top bodybuilder is only as a result of potential drug use.
 
Shawn Ray – Hall of Fame Bodybuilder
As with any extreme sport, the average observer never takes the time to actually calculate the amount of hours, weeks, months and years that goes into the final product. The criticism is fair because most people can’t quantify the amount of sacrifice and commitment to dieting, training, rest and recovery that goes into the bodybuilding lifestyle, not to mention genetics. Some bodybuilders are simply unworldly to the general public, almost barbaric in appearance, but for the most part we professionals, whom I consider artists, take these descriptions as compliments because it validates how far apart we have set ourselves from the general public. Simply put, if everyone could take a drug and wind up on a Mr. Olympia stage, we’d have a lot more athletes participating. Unfortunately, that’s not reality. However, there is truth to the fact that certain drugs work when used properly, but their shelf life is short as it relates to appearance, which in the end is the sum of our sport and its champions.
 
Ron Harris – MD Senior Writer, National Level Bodybuilder
Because steroids do play a significant role in the physiques of the best bodybuilders today, it’s all too easy to leap to the conclusion that drugs are entirely responsible for this freakish look. And, it’s all too convenient a belief for those delusional types who aspire to join their ranks despite lacking the genetic gifts that separate elite bodybuilders from the herds of wannabes. Here is the truth, based on the many thousands of bodybuilders I have known over the last quarter century. First, the right genetics have to be in place in terms of bone structure, muscle bellies, and the unique ability to add extreme amounts of muscle while staying lean. Then, you add drugs on top of that, and you start seeing something exceptional. But since all the top athletes have great genetics and access to the same drugs, it’s the ones who work harder in the gym and are more dedicated to their rest and nutrition who rise to the top of the heap.
Now, take someone with average human genetics, and load them up on the same drug regimen. Those who train harder and are more diligent about eating and resting will look better than the others who don’t, but nobody with average genetics is ever going to step foot on the Mr. Olympia stage, unless it’s to mop up the floor when the contest is over. Drugs don’t make the physiques you see in the pages of MD. If they did, there would be far more of them around because plenty of guys these days are taking exactly what the pros are— and in some cases far more. But higher doses of drugs can’t compensate for a lack of genetic blessings, and neither can they make up for laziness in the gym and at the dinner table. Many either can’t comprehend that drugs are not the magical transformation potion they thought it to be, or refuse to accept that inconvenient reality because it crushes their dreams of being a top pro bodybuilder.
 
Peter McGough – MD Senior Editor
Bodybuilding has long been the mainstream whipping boy for accusations of “It’s all drugs.” But the main qualities a champion bodybuilder brings to the table are superior genetics for responding to any form of muscle-building stimulus, plus a super drive to take advantage of those genetics. That being said, if a champion has those genetics and drive he will respond better than a mere mortal to a traditional drug cycle, which in turn leads lesser bodybuilders, who have tried a traditional cycle and don’t make spectacular gains, to believe, A) The champion bodybuilder has a “secret drug” and/or B) The champion is using an insane amount of drugs. Given that skeptical scenario, the truth is the “drugs are everything” stance is a view peddled by quite a few in the sport. Some gym drug dealers perpetuate the myth that the type of development we see at the Olympia level is all due to drugs. They act out of their own “step into my Aladdin’s Cave” self-interest, of course. The late Dan Duchaine, the first and most famous of the so-called steroid gurus, once told me that he had tried every steroid combo he could think of, and he still never got to be more than 180 pounds.

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8777
  • .......
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #40 on: November 22, 2017, 09:53:54 AM »
Good post Howard. Almost all professional BB are training and eating exactly as they should. Doing an extra rep and "pushing the limits" in the gym will not win them shows.

What separates the top competitors in BB, is two fold: 1. Their genetic shape (muscle bellies, insertions, balances physique etc) and 2: Their bodies response to HIGHER levels of drugs - including diuretics - including their organs having the ability to cope with HIGHER levels of drugs.

All top pros are on a boatload of GH/anabolics/insulin etc, but not all can take the extra drugs you need to hang on the O stage.

On the opposit side of the spectrum, you will have guys who can take it the the HIGHEST level drug-wise, but because they fall short in point 1, they will never win at the highest level.

Exactly.

oldgolds

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Bodybuilding: It's Not All About Drugs by Dan Solomon
« Reply #41 on: November 23, 2017, 06:47:53 AM »
Single biggest factor BY FAR is drugs......The sport is based on drugs....