Matt you're a vacuous, dimwitted, moron, but a harmless one. Let me dunk that test with Dr. Umar Johnson. That test is garbage and it's been known for a long time.
That was the only bullet in your chamber. You should be ashamed. You're a terrible critical thinker to not have understood this and or just a plain ol' insecure racist.
As a military man, you of all people should know that the US military does not think that there is *any* position available to a person with an IQ below 85, which is incidentally, the African American average, putting 50% of African Americans below that figure.
The best predictor of life success/results is an IQ test at the age of six.
In 1972, Richard Lewontin claimed that human beings couldn't be classified into taxonomically identifiable racial groups. In 2003, this became known as Lewontin's fallacy - it is the nonsense that there is more within-group differences than between-group differences. This fallacy is hilarious to me and requires the stupidity of it's audience to be taken seriously.
For example, Jyoti Amge was the shortest woman ever at 24", and Yao Defen is said to be the tallest woman ever at 7'8. That means that there is 68" [5'8"] of within-group differences when you consider all women in human evolutionary history.
Meanwhile, the between group differences between men [5'9" average], and women [5'4" average] is only 5".
So I guess according to Lewontin, men and women are all the same height because of this fact - after all, the difference
within female heights on the bell curve is 68" vs. only 5"
between females and males.
Again. Lewontin's fallacy [race-denialism] depends on the ignorance of its audience to be taken seriously.
Of course the bulk of the bell curve for most Blacks and most Whites take up the majority of the bulk of combined bell curves/Gaussian distributions. The same can be said making a comparison between the DNA of human beings and the DNA of mice, which is 97% similar - it is the 3% that is different that makes up all of the difference in morphology and overall phenotype - as well as every other difference between mice and human beings. This must mean that White men can run as fast as the top Black sprinters, and that Blacks will be winning the World's Strongest Man contest any time soon.
Sheer nonsense, obvious to anyone who has watched ESPN on any given Sunday.
So yeah Wiggs - despite what you say, the IQ difference between Blacks and Whites [and indeed, all racial groups] is real, and just as
www.23andme.com has thrown Lewontin's fallacy into the trash bin of history, at some point, what I am saying about race and intelligence will be completely impossible to deny.
And I will be right here to rub it in when that happens.
Wiggs - how much of Vince Good Guy's Bitcoin do you want to bet that Black males will dominate the Nobel Prizes in the hard sciences this year, and that Whites will dominate sprinting?
I didn't think so.
Here is more on Lewontin's Fallacy, in case anyone is interested, from Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genetic_Diversity:_Lewontin%27s_FallacyD. student in Lewontin's lab.
Work on human genetic diversity Edit
In a landmark paper, in 1972 Lewontin identified that most of the variation (80–85%) within human populations is found within local geographic groups and differences attributable to traditional "race" groups are a minor part of human genetic variability (1–15%). In a 2003 paper, A.W.F. Edwards criticized Lewontin's conclusion that race is an invalid taxonomic construct, terming it Lewontin's fallacy. He argued that the probability of racial misclassification of an individual based on variation in a single genetic locus is approximately 30% and the misclassification probability becomes close to zero if enough loci are studied.
