you cannot be serious the only thing you have done in these 9 pages is reveal how little you know about the science of nutrition, and made yourself look more and more ridiculous with every post.not only that but you have not said one thing about your theories, not a description, comment, and valid argument.i have asked various times, yet you have avoided my direct questions at every opportunity.are you Vince Basil in disguise ?
healthy individuals rarely experience blood sugar "crash", even after the ingestion of large amounts of sugar(s).did you know about this jim:Acheson KJ, Schutz Y, Bessards T, Anantharaman K, Flatt JP, Jeguier E. Glycogen synthesis versus lipogenesis after a 500g carbohydrate meal in man. Metabolism 1982;31:1234–40.[Medline]
So I'll take that as a no.
i don't mind taking time out of my day to own the living shit out of you live on radio.i assume you will actually talk about science, and not simply argue with me the entire time, ignoring and avoiding all direct questions like you have done througout this entire thread
Don't worry about me and what my reponses will be, I'm certainly not worried about you. OK so if Derek has any interest in the debate let's get it on.
why wait - tell me your thoughts and theories here and now - let getbig decide. you have had 9 pages to tell us your thoughts and ideas.you are wasting my time i believe.
hahahahaha
Cliff notes please. Is this study saying that people who consume large amounts of table sugar on a daily basis do not experience highs and lows when it comes to blood sugar levels?
no it says that people can eat huge amounts of the most potent type of sugar and not experience any fat gains.
Oh, well I can't disagree with that. I know a lot of skinny people who eat tons of sugar.
lol. im no even sure what your trying to argue with these guys dude. are you saying that carbohydrates provide zero benefit for building muscle and/or losing fat/retaining muscle..
I honestly don't know. As far as carbs go I wouldn't say that no, but I personally can gain muscle on little carbs if I chose to and no, I do not recommend people eat like that in the off season.
yeah. diet is over estimated anyways. your wrong about carbs not being very effective compared to fats, if thats your argument. but your also very right that it just doesnt matter too much the most important elements are training and gear(s), without a doubt. the diet really doesnt matter so much so long as protein is decent and calories are about where they should be for the task at hand alot of people do seem to be able to stay lean easier without carbs in the diet. so for them it does make sense to go low carb
I started dieting last Wednesday and I am down from 210 to 199 already on a 2500 calorie diet with 100 to 130 grams of protein with the remainder basically "Junk" . My arms measure the same, I'm happy.
That's it, I'm going with 400 cals of whey protein and 2100 cals worth of Reese Cups starting tomorrow. I'll be shredded by Christmas.
Why do you have to be all or nothing with it?
Any pics ? (no homo)
I know it's hard to believe, hell, I myself was a "purist" if you will for years before realising how unnecessarily hard I was taking it dieting. Physiologically speaking, a healthy average Joe is best off eating a more well rounded diet than a bodybuilding "cutting" diet as it is variety that gives us the trace minerals and nutrients that create a well oiled machine.
Agreed on all except I don't think that fats are more effective than carbs per say. In fact, I "use" carbs at certain times during the precontest phase and they are beneficial for a lot of reasons.
