Please, I know naturals with bigger arms. Show me Doring and iŽll give you arms. Boom!
(http://www.ergogenics.org/images/137.jpg)
Please, I know naturals with bigger arms. Show me Doring and iŽll give you arms. Boom!
(http://www.ergogenics.org/images/137.jpg)
hahahahaha, the clowns who claim Ronnie's triceps are a weak point need to look at that pic.
at his best, ronnie has the best overall arms in the sport's history.
Overall arms include forearms and triceps two areas Ronnie is not that spectacular in , slick don't type overall because ..........overall he's still behind Lee Priest ;) Ronnie may have the biggest arms overall in the sport's history but not the best .Agree. Lee has better arms than Ronnie.
Sorry Priest has much better forearms and balance through out his whole arms.
epic selective choice of photos to make lee look better.
discuss.........BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMM :oWhat's with all the "boooom" stuff, fat man? ::)
What's with all the "boooom" stuff, fat man? ::)
except now one only has half a tricep :'(
Thats a crock of shit. I know lots of guys who tore a triceps muscle and fully recovered with killer arms.im not sure,but i think Levrone was one of them...
Good god, priest's forearms litterally overpower the whole rest of his body in that arms over head pose. Pretty fucking wild.
discuss.........BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMM :o
That pic gets me everytime......just sick! Freak of freaks!!hahahhaa, he's a beast isn't he? your arms are pretty fucckin' huge as well.
hahahhaa, he's a beast isn't he? your arms are pretty fucckin' huge as well.
hahahahaha, the clowns who claim Ronnie's triceps are a weak point need to look at that pic.
Ronnie's arms are awesome but I think I gotta lean toward Lee Priest on in the arm department. Freakish size, cut, separation and vascularity.
i have the worst arms in history of bodybuilding.
discuss.........BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMM :o(http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=26832&d=1073685712)(http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=26828&d=1073685494)(http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=26827&d=1073685486) 60cm biceps of another Great Finn ;D
60cm biceps of another Great Finn ;D
maybe i dont know how to train arms?
a face only a mother could love.
Yet our resident experts Narcisstistwhathisface insists Dorian's arms were better overall.. ::) Despite them having weak peak, being torn and shorter.
Ronnie's biceps are out of this world. His triceps aren't as defined, but they're huge beyond belief and have a decent amount of detail. His forearms are long, but beefy.
Well, let's pray that you get one too, because that monkeys ass which you use as a face makes even a pile of dog shit look good. When you were younger, did you ever wonder why you always woke up with a diaper on your face? That's called a human error, your mother didn't mean it, but with a face like that it is just too difficult...looks like someone struck a nerve with this guy.
Well, let's pray that you get one too, because that monkeys ass which you use as a face makes even a pile of dog shit look good. When you were younger, did you ever wonder why you always woke up with a diaper on your face? That's called a human error, your mother didn't mean it, but with a face like that it is just too difficult...
Well, let's pray that you get one too, because that monkeys ass which you use as a face makes even a pile of dog shit look good. When you were younger, did you ever wonder why you always woke up with a diaper on your face? That's called a human error, your mother didn't mean it, but with a face like that it is just too difficult...
Yet our resident experts Narcisstistwhathisface insists Dorian's arms were better overall.. ::) Despite them having weak peak, being torn and shorter.
Ronnie's biceps are out of this world. His triceps aren't as defined, but they're huge beyond belief and have a decent amount of detail. His forearms are long, but beefy.
I think Dillet needs to be included in this argument.
at his best, ronnie has the best overall arms in the sport's history.
nope, tricpes are part of the arm and ronnie's arent even near the top.
nope, tricpes are part of the arm and ronnie's arent even near the top.
discuss.........BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMM :o
learn to read retard.
I said overall arms.
sure, if you single out triceps, there are those with better tris than ronnie.
but when you look at the WHOLE arm, (including the delts), no one is better than this: (to date)
Ronnie's arms have superior definition compared to Priest's, and that makes a big difference in my opinion.
learn to read retard.
I said overall arms.
sure, if you single out triceps, there are those with better tris than ronnie.
but when you look at the WHOLE arm, (including the delts), no one is better than this: (to date)
Ronnie's arms have superior definition compared to Priest's, and that makes a big difference in my opinion.
i have the worst arms in history of bodybuilding.maybe you dont like to train arms mars?
Yawn I said Yates had better triceps than Ronnie and forearms of and his arms ( at his best ) have better balance , never said nothing about the biceps , nice try though , maybe next time ;)
short list of better ARMS (not just biceps) with than ronnie - all have great triceps
bertil
priest
flex
paul
vince taylor
Should best arms be the whole thing? Forearms, Bis/Tris. I think lb for lb in terms of a complete arm Lee gets the win.Lee has the best bicep/tricep/forearm combo and IF that is what one looks at then he wins hands down every time.
how can he have the best arms with lacking triceps, dumbass.
Lee has the best bicep/tricep/forearm combo and IF that is what one looks at then he wins hands down every time.
Perenially beffudled ND AKA "easy reader" trying to digest the anatomy i've just explained to him for the 100th time hahaahahahahah
Get it right this time jackass: Coleman had good tris. He and Schwarzenegger didn't get to that arm size just on biceps that are 1/3 of arm size you idiot.
well since none of them had your guidance or access to power rod technology like the amazing equipment you have at the Dumspter Gym you just know that they never reached their full potential
Is there a punchline somewhere? LOL
Perenially beffudled ND AKA "easy reader" trying to digest the anatomy i've just explained to him for the 100th time hahaahahahahah
Get it right this time jackass: Coleman had good tris. He and Schwarzenegger didn't get to that arm size just on biceps that are 1/3 of arm size you idiot.
U R IT....
::)
lees are easilly better, ronnies forearms suck!
but arnie is on another planet compared to anyone else!
Oh he had GOOD triceps certainly NOT great triceps ! so now looking fucking stupid as usual you've accomplished nothing ;)
It's hard to beat these arms. As great as Coleman's arms are they're just not quite as insane as Priest's arms.
BTW, Hulkster and that blowflex clown that lives in the roach motel ruin every comparison thread on this board when they start spewing their Coleman manlove all over the place.
learn to read retard.
I said overall arms.
sure, if you single out triceps, there are those with better tris than ronnie.
but when you look at the WHOLE arm, (including the delts), no one is better than this: (to date)
Ronnie's arms have superior definition compared to Priest's, and that makes a big difference in my opinion.
Coleman's are more insane actually; there are *no* shots of Priest with this kind of definition, vascularity or peak.
Except that i'm 100% correct re: both Scwarzenegger AND Coleman and you didn't know it. ;DOWNED
::)
Coleman's are more insane actually; there are *no* shots of Priest with this kind of definition, vascularity or peak.
Oh boy you're a sorry human being , your mom should have been pro-choice ;)
Coleman has better peaks , Priest has better forearms , triceps , proportion , learn this . ;)
You don't understand anatomy or BB otherwise i wouldn't have to explain this over and over again. Novices like you are the ones making assumptions about Arnold and Coleman's triceps deficiencies until taught better. ;Dlike i said anyone saying that Coleman's triceps are weak is high as a kite.
You don't understand anatomy or BB otherwise i wouldn't have to explain this over and over again. Novices like you are the ones making assumptions about Arnold and Coleman's triceps deficiencies until taught better. ;D
like i said anyone saying that Coleman's triceps are weak is high as a kite.
Coleman's are more insane actually; there are *no* shots of Priest with this kind of definition, vascularity or peak.
Thats because that level of vascularity and dryness I believe is somewhat genetic. For example, Jay Cutler diets his ass off and comes in ripped all the time but Ronnie not only gets ripped he gets granite like. Pure genetics determines having that thin skin.
Coleman has better peaks , Priest has better forearms , triceps , proportion , learn this . ;)
like i said anyone saying that Coleman's triceps are weak is high as a kite.
Coleman's are more insane actually; there are *no* shots of Priest with this kind of definition, vascularity or peak.
To idiots like ND & Icecold: tris are 2/3s of arm size, on Arnold AND Coleman.i'm sorry but these are the biggest and best arms in the history of humanity, meaning size, shape, thickness, vascularity, balance between muscle groups and sheer shock value.
There are a few guys out of balance like Ruhl but those are exceptions.
What's funny is that all those Priest shots confirm what i've said; he has nowhere near the definition or thin skin of some of other greats, aside from average peaks.
Thanks for confirming that for us. ;)
To idiots like ND & Icecold: tris are 2/3s of arm size, on Arnold AND Coleman.
There are a few guys out of balance like Ruhl but those are exceptions.
like i said anyone saying that Coleman's triceps are weak is high as a kite.
The great thing about all these debates Mr. Blowflex is that it's all subjective. I like many others think Priest's arms are a little more freaky huge than Coleman's. Your opinion is different, of course you work out with a blowflex machine and you live in a roach motel so your opinion isn't given the greatest weight.here's the way i look at it, look at that racing shot of Lee where he's offseason and where he's wearing the light blue t shirt, that's the biggest i've ever seen his arms but they have no cuts or veins, Ronnies are the same size if not a little bigger plus they have all the above mentiones qualities.
BTW, how do you pay for groceries when you're spending so much money on ultra-high end exercise and electronic equipment. I mean honestly, that large screen tv and surround sound system were fantastic. Dumpster diving seems to have worked wonders for you.
I don't understand how coleman nuthuggers consider someone
with a missing triceps as having "the best overall arms"
i'm sorry but these are the biggest and best arms in the history of humanity, meaning size, shape, thickness, vascularity, balance between muscle groups and sheer shock value.
I don't understand how someone this stupid is allowed to post.
Size perhaps , shape NO QUITE the shape of his biceps thats a matter of preference , the shape of his triceps side head triceps leave a lot to be desired , they're oddly shaped like Boyer Coe and his side head is very thin , thickness Priest is comparable ( pound for pound ) vascularity again Priest is comparable , balance you're dead wrong on Ronnie's forearms are NOT in proportion with his biceps/triceps and they're shaped like bowling pins , Priest has forearms in the same vain as Viator , Mentzer and Yates that insert near the wrist and are full , Lee Priest enjoys advantages Coleman doesn't , end of discussion .
Priest showing Ronnie how its done.
detail man detail!
lee needs detail to be at Ronnie's level!
this is something that ND and Icecold cannot and will probably never understand:
At that 97 Olympia almost anyone could have beaten Yates.
This picture is an excellent comparison of Coleman and Priest. I'm not sure when it was taken as I think Coleman has added muscle to his arms since then but at least in this picture I think Priest is far more impressive. His arms are just ridiculous. Look at how thick those things are.
I really am starting to think that Ronnie has a big advantage in the arm department.
just look at all these comparisons.
now Ronnie just doesn't have an advantage he has a BIG advantage
by the time Ronnie became Mr. Olympia, his arms made lee's look small:
1997, well, he improved a whole lot since then..despite what ND and Icecold say.
1996 or 1997 was NOWHERE near the best of Ronnie Coleman.
yes, yes he does.
Bwaaahhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Look at how upset these tools get when you dare say that Priest's arms are a little more insane than Coleman's, as if their world is going to come crashing down. LOL
BTW, this picture is beyond insane. Priest looks like a cartoon character, his arms are so big they almost look fake.
where is the big forearm advantage? where is the big triceps advantage?? where is the proportion advantage , care to explain that slick?
see how desperate ND is?
we are talking about ARMS and he has to try and throw in bitch tits in a deseperate attempt to make ronnie look bad compared to Priest.
its unbelievably pathetic.
::)
um, I can't explain it.
so I'll just post pics.. ::)
Bottom of the heap..welcome to the tier-B club alongside Dickerson & Columbu. :-[ :-[ :-[
Yawn ...see strawman ;) come back when you have something of substance
Fixed ;)
At that 97 Olympia almost anyone could have beaten Yates.almost is the key word there.
almost is the key word there."Great post"
AKA i have no more excuses left for that pic LOL
AKA stick to the topic ;) nice try .....you set up a strawman ( Yates 1996 ) as proof of your point but it only probes you're biased ( asshole ) try another pic jackass ;) see the forearms that Ronnie lacks
Honestly though, as much as I think ronnie is a great bodybuilder and has fantastic arms, lee's are better...Lee's bicep peak isn't the same as ronnies, but strictly mass alone lee wins...as far as all around development goes, lee wins again, ronnies tris and forearms cant hang with lee's...
Honestly though, as much as I think ronnie is a great bodybuilder and has fantastic arms, lee's are better...Lee's bicep peak isn't the same as ronnies, but strictly mass alone lee wins...as far as all around development goes, lee wins again, ronnies tris and forearms cant hang with lee's...
leave dorian out of this thread. :(
this thread is about the greatest arms in the world.
not the worst. lol
Honestly though, as much as I think ronnie is a great bodybuilder and has fantastic arms, lee's are better...Lee's bicep peak isn't the same as ronnies, but strictly mass alone lee wins...as far as all around development goes, lee wins again, ronnies tris and forearms cant hang with lee's...
Sergio with some of the best ever tris and Coleman's blowing him and ND out of the waterhahahahahahahah
yawn talk to pumpy he dragged him in ::)ND has standards now LOL
ok pumpster I'm not trying to be a douche dude, but do you really use a bowflex?try to stay on topic queef.
ok pumpster I'm not trying to be a douche dude, but do you really use a bowflex?Why, do you want to buy one?
Great post !
ND has standards now LOL
Being the typical hypocrite you are , you complain when others don't stick to the topic and you do it yourself , you're so desperate for some retribution after being the laughing stock of many threads you'll try to get it any way you can lol in the end you're just as big a joke as the BowFlex you use , stick to the topic .
Bowflex argument = 100% desperationhahahhaa exactly, WTF does that have to do with the discussion?
hahahhaa exactly, WTF does that have to do with the discussion?
Bowflex argument & thread hijack = 100% desperation
We're waiting for your experienced views on this thread.seriously that's all these clowns have to fall back on when you present them with a well thought out argument.
squad, wasn't asking you man, so hows bout you let him answer the question...ok and to stay on topic, i always thought this was a great shot of how good sergio's arms wereSergio was incredible but if you think those arms compare to this beast i have some land to sell you.
hahahhaa exactly, WTF does that have to do with the discussion?
seriously that's all these clowns have to fall back on when you present them with a well thought out argument.
Curiously you didn't ask that question when those two shitstains were posting pictures of Yates in the middle of a debate about Priest and Coleman. Nice to see you only selectively apply logic.yeah but he at least was still comparing pro bb'ers instead of bringing up lifting on a Bowflex as if that has anything to do with the discussion.
What well thought out argument? none have you have counter the fact that Priest has better shaped triceps , forearms and proportion , you post the same pic and drool over it its nonsense , this picture is from the same showing as the one you guys love its sucks period lolcome on man you can find a picture of ANY bodybuilder where he's off his best, the really scary thing about that pic is that Ronnie's tri's still look ungodly big and he's off by a lot.
yeah but he at least was still comparing pro bb'ers instead of bringing up lifting on a Bowflex as if that has anything to do with the discussion.
come on man you can find a picture of ANY bodybuilder where he's off his best, the really scary thing about that pic is that Ronnie's tri's still look ungodly big and he's off by a lot.
One of those Coleman fanboys posted a picture saying he felt bad for Levrone because he was getting beaten badly when comparing arms.i say Kevin is honesly, Ronnie's arm is just as big but far more ripped.
These are the right arms of Levrone and Coleman from that picture.
Who was it again that's getting beaten badly?
i say Kevin is honesly, Ronnie's arm is just as big but far more ripped.
You can honestly look at those two pictures and say Levrone's arm is getting beaten badly by Coleman's?
Coleman's arm is more detailed but it doesn't look quite as big, Levrone's right arm looks HUGE in that picture.
You can honestly look at those two pictures and say Levrone's arm is getting beaten badly by Coleman's?i didn't say that Kevin was getting beaten badly there, only that Coleman wasn't getting beaten badly, i think they're equal there.
Coleman's arm is more detailed but it doesn't look quite as big, Levrone's right arm looks HUGE in that picture.
i didn't say that Kevin was getting beaten badly there, only that Coleman wasn't getting beaten badly, i think they're equal there.
One of those Coleman fanboys posted a picture saying he felt bad for Levrone because he was getting beaten badly when comparing arms.
These are the right arms of Levrone and Coleman from that picture.
Who was it again that's getting beaten badly?
i say Kevin is honesly, Ronnie's arm is just as big but far more ripped.
I dont know man, kevins tris are much better than colemans, colemans bicep tho...To be honest, I dont think anyone will ever match colemans biceps...the sheer size of his bi's are ridiculous...plus there so damn cut and vascular...
One of those Coleman fanboys posted a picture saying he felt bad for Levrone because he was getting beaten badly when comparing arms.
These are the right arms of Levrone and Coleman from that picture.
Who was it again that's getting beaten badly?
LOL what about the OTHER arm.. ::)
overall, Kevin is being owned in that particular pose.
LOL what about the OTHER arm.. ::)
overall, Kevin is being owned in that particular pose.
Levrone's tris aren't really that much bigger than Coleman's, they're just more noticable. And he didn't have the overall size of Dillet or Coleman, clearly seen here:
And I like how you added "Overall Kevin is getting owned in that shot", LOL.
What the hell does that have to do with it, the comparison is arms.
yes. armS. plural. not singular.
you showed that on one arm they are close, only ronnie has better vascularity.
on the other arm, kevin is getting murdered.
thus, overall = both arms taken into consideration.
its not rocket science..
I also like how you and the other fanboy use the funny angles excuse for Coleman but won't apply that same logic to Levrone. LOL
As you said, it's not rocket science. The picture shows Levrone's right arm is better than Coleman's right arm so then by your own logic it's the angle that's detracting from Levrone's left arm.
Of course you won't apply such logic to Levrone because you're not a disgusting Levrone fanboy, you're a disgusting Coleman fanboy.
The sad part of all this is that I'm actually a fan of Coleman's but you and Mr. Blowflex Roach Motel are so ridiculous that it makes me want to root for whoever is debating you.
Thats from the same contest as the one he's holding the cell phone , NO ONE is questioning his size , his biceps/triceps are insanely huge , just the greatness of his triceps and forearms and the proportion between his whole arm and I think its commonsense that his forearms just don't measure up to Lees and neither does his triceps and proportion between all the muscle groups , Ronnie has outstanding biceps , so are Lees just in a different way , but I think its clear Ronnie has the better biceps but arms , not quite .
this has nothing to do with funny angels.
it has to do with Ronnie having better arms than Kevin.
Kevin had some freaky ass arms, but they were not better than a peak ronnie coleman's:
even when kevin was at his best:
nut hugger,yeah his triceps and forearms are terrible here. ::)
let me make it easy for you
best overall arms - biceps, TRICEPS and FOREARMS.
ronnie forearms have always sucked, and he has been missing a tricpes the last few years.
yet more flaws in the 8 time "flawless" olympian physique.
yeah his triceps and forearms are terrible here. ::)
ND's lack of specificity's a dead giveaway that he's basically going on personal preference only.
Priests' tris aren't more detailed or bigger than Coleman's, and his bis lack Coleman's peak and shape. That's in addition to Priest's relative overall lack of detail, refinement and aesthetics in comparison. On aesthetics Priest's arms are stubby even for his own torso and look cramped and odd, don't have the room to flow like other BBs who are taller.
Forearms to Lee but as i said most great arms meant upper arms; forearms aren't equal or as important. Same stubbiness there BTW.
Wheeler, Coleman, Schwarzenegger, Padilla all had arms that look more impressive to me than Priest.
Wheeler, Coleman, Schwarzenegger, Padilla all had arms that look more impressive to me than Priest.
Great comeback LOL
Is that why U R fascinated to the point of squadfather annoiting you stalker?
bwhaahahahahaahahahahaha ah
BTW your avatar speaks volumes.
Priests' tris aren't more detailed or bigger than Coleman's, and his bis lack Coleman's peak and shape. That's in addition to Priest's relative overall lack of detail, refinement and aesthetics in comparison. On aesthetics Priest's arms are stubby even for his own torso and look cramped and odd, don't have the room to flow like other BBs who are taller.
well said.
the differences that are described here is easily shown by simply looking at ronnie vs lee:
Lee has incredibly thick arms.
but they do not have detail and refinement that Ronnie's has.
they always look puffy with not so much detail.
squakfather,
do you jerk off to that photo ?
it seems you can't help but post the same lame pic of your idol
Watching pumpster, ND and hulkster endlessly babble about Yates vs whomever is like watching 3 retarded fatgirls have a pillow fight.
my avatar has alexxx in it, please post a pic so i can update it
SF is cool... at least he knows what an olympic plate looks like
christ you're an old loser... sad
lmfao at puffy with no so much detail lol I'll let that stand on its own
you don't have to.
there are already tons of pics on this thread showing exactly what I said.
Can you even SEE your screen? I really doubt it..
::)
show me some pics of lee matching this level of detail, vascularity and refinement and then and ONLY then, might you have a case.
until then, you don't.
PS I am not bashing lee's arms. They are UNREAL.
I just stated and showed why I personally prefer ronnie's arms and famously stupid ND mocks me despite not having anything to show that I am not correct.
you might want to OPEN your eyes, ND:
The poster child for IGF puffiness.
In order to get bigger he sacrificed all remaining detail. Arms are bigger but still too small even there.
LOL complete?
where is the detail?
you can't have complete arms without ripped detail...
Another contest shot , nice try Hulkster complete arms ! vascular , detailed , massive , dense , balanced and outstanding shape .
Lee's arms are the best tricep/bicep/forearm combo, period. He extremely vascular in many of the above shots.
He has the the best balanced arms ever and they are more detailed than others in that category (Oliva, Scott, Viator).
Each of the muscle groups is thick and dense and separated, maybe not as much as Coleman but still great. All three heads of triceps are better than Coleman (compare videos of them working triceps) and his biceps are thick and freaky, just different than Coleman's...similar to Levrone but his are awesome too.
what is really strange about all your shots ND is that NONE of them are from an actual competition.
most of my shots of Ronnie are. As are the shots I posed of Lee.
we are talking about dieted down and ripped condition here. Ontstage where physiques are judged.
not off season shape where your arms are going to be much thicker...
actually, wait, I posted a shot of Ronnie and Lee onstage..and we know what happened there.. ;)
Lee's arms were noticably smaller than Ronnie's..
but size is not the issue here.
its refinement, detail vascularity etc.
and sorry to say, but Lee takes a back seat to Ronnie in the arm department because of this:
agreed. when he is flexing his forearms in the victory pose from that angle.
one problem with Lee is that is arms look AMAZING from the front, but lose a lot of their impact from the back:
having the sport's best arms means looking good at all angles, not just some of them.
Each of the muscle groups is thick and dense and separated, maybe not as much as Coleman but still great.
Hulkster Ronnie's arms don't look so hot from this angle ;)
agreed. I just prefer the detailed super ripped vascular look.
too bad ND feels the need to insist that Lee's arms are more vascular ripped and detailed than they actually are..
Lee's claim to fame is crazy thickness in all three groups.
detail is not.
and his delts are not up to the level of Ronnie, which hurts his look in comparison..
Thats because he's not really that dry in that particular pose its not a matter of looking good from all angles its a matter of conditioning .
um. ronnie's whole fuckin body did not look so hot that year.
;)
ah yes, conditioning.
an area where ronnie takes lee to school and back. 8)
Again you post strawmen and attempt to knock them down in verification of your analysis and its pathetically easy to correct you , out standing detail vascularity , shape , size and detail , please stop making generalzations
lmfao with the 99 pics where he's obviously holding water , should have stuck to 01 ASC or 1998 kid
LOL its amazing how stupid you are, trying to say that I am making 'generalizations' when I am in fact comparing all kinds of different contest pics of both of them.
its painfully obvious that, like in the truce thread, you have no clue in the world how to support an opinion in this sport. :-\
and all you can do to try and defend your self is post shots of lee with his arms extended showing his veins..that disappear in every other pose..
lol then please explain why his arms are way more ripped that lee's. even the triceps are shredded... ::)
Once and for all, STOP LIVING IN THE PAST YOU MORON POSTING 10 YEAR OLD PICS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS IS HOW RONNIES ARMS LOOK NOWADAYS:
owns lee even in 2006 form notice the seperation...
ronnie owns lee in all forms IMO, mainly due to the seperation.
but ND always has to put down ronnie.
I could start a thread about how Gary Strydom has better arms than Ronnie and I promise you he would be right there claiming otherwise.. ::)
:)
:)
:)Poster boy for IGF+Slin abuse....second only to Fux IMO. That's just bad whether controlling the gut or not.
huckster,
show me a pic of ronnies superior (to Lee's) forearm development?
huckster,
show me a pic of ronnies superior (to Lee's) forearm development?
Ronnies forearms are definetly a weak point on his body, this is well known. The muscle just ties in far too low on the forearm for him to hold any signifigant amount of mass compared to someone like lee or frank...
right here:
one from 98/9 and one from 2003, just for starters.
::)
Ronnie's forearms are not nearly as bad as ND would like us to believe.
in terms of size, lee wins
remember what I said about ronnie's arms making lee's look soft and puffy?
well, no one has shown a single pic to disprove this opinion:
if lee is the 'overall winner' (on paper if you split up the arm into 'catagories') why do his arms not equal ronnie's?
answer: condition and detail make all the difference:
8)
Hulkster, damn, your starting to get stupid on me here...bodybuilding is about proportion...for how tall lee is, his are are proportionately bigger than ronnies, so in terms of size, ie appearance of size, lee wins...
Hulkster, damn, your starting to get stupid on me here...bodybuilding is about proportion...for how tall lee is, his are are proportionately bigger than ronnies, so in terms of size, ie appearance of size, lee wins...
of course they are.
but you need to be clear whether or not you are speaking in relative or absolute terms ;)
He's not that sophisticated , it takes a really , really , really long time for things to sink into his little brain , and sometimes he never gets it lolokay Mr. Ad I don't Understand It but I will Say it Anyway Populum..
okay Mr. Ad I don't Understand It but I will Say it Anyway Populum..You've yet to back up your claim its valid in your case ( it can't be done ) hell you've yet to back anything up lol back on topic kid ;)
:P
Even size Lee is damn close he's about 50 pounds lighter than Ronnie here and his arms appear the same size and maybe a tad bigger
I would ask you to post more recent pics of them being compared to each other but Lee probably can't remember the last time he's been compared to Ronnie. Probably 10 years ago...
Even size Lee is damn close he's about 50 pounds lighter than Ronnie here and his arms appear the same size and maybe a tad bigger
right here:
one from 98/9 and one from 2003, just for starters.
::)
Ronnie's forearms are not nearly as bad as ND would like us to believe.
Even size Lee is damn close he's about 50 pounds lighter than Ronnie here and his arms appear the same size and maybe a tad bigger
And Hulkster: STOP POSTING 10 YEAR OLD PICS AND SAY COLEMAN IS THE BEST YOU DOUCHEBAG!!!!!!!!!! He maybe was one of the best, but start livin in the present buddy. THE COLEMAN OF 99 DOESN'T EXIST ANYMORE!!!!!!!!
This from an idiot who uses an appropriate avatar that says "stupid" hahahahahahah
so why do you ONLY show shots of the most muscular where ronnie's triceps arent even visible?
lol triceps not visible?
::)
I think bodybuilding is just too intellectually challenging for IceCold.. :-\
Another pic in the same vain
hulkster, the issue of ronnie is his triceps, so why do you ONLY show shots of the most muscular where ronnie's triceps arent even visible?
you're nuthugging is trully pathetic and you only post 1 pose.
and your ace card of the fake pics from 99 still dont even matter.
lol.
lee is short. its extremely easy for short guys to look muscular.
Self-ownage by the racist skinhead once again. So much for the lame triceps theory LOL
Agreed. Lee doesn't have more size than Coleman and has nowhere near the same detail or aesthetics.
your race card has expired.
According to these knuckleheads, this is all biceps bwahahahahahaahahahahahfunny thing is that you could almost argue that Ronnie's tri's overwhelm his biceps there, they look that huge.
There is no Priest shot to compare with this size & detail.
You're going down with your great white hope. :D
actuall, you are buddy.
we all know ron has given 1 more last chance before you are no longer a mod.
what a pathetic loser you are - have fun with the bowfelx.
do you need some more phone books to adjust the benches.
lol.
(http://www.philbodybuilders.com/pix/leepriest.jpg)Ronnie's arm is at least as big as Lee's in this pic if not bigger and is wayyyyyy more conditioned.
Same detail as Ronnie here and if brought in closer like the pic SF posted, the size would be even more noticeable.
Same detail as Ronnie here and if brought in closer like the pic SF posted, the size would be even more noticeable.
Same detail as Ronnie here and if brought in closer like the pic SF posted, the size would be even more noticeable.problem with Lee is that his chest and traps look tiny beyond belief in that shot.
More self-ownage from the genius who was 100% certain i was black. And therefore lived in a ghetto LOL
Epic racial stereotyping from someone who needs to get out more.
Same detail but way smaller there actually.20 3/4 inch arms in contest shape for Lee P.
Ronnie's arm is at least as big as Lee's in this pic if not bigger and is wayyyyyy more conditioned.
nope, i know you're black from all your racists comments towards whites - esp. the white bbers.
you living in the ghetto in that dump just proves how much of a loser you are - regardless of race.
nice try to avoid your last shot before ron dumps you.
lol.
So far you've been 100% wrong on everything, since i'm not black you dufus LOL
my point was that ronine triceps are not on par with his biceps or even having the best ARMS of all time.
.
You really are clueless when it comes to BB. It's impossible for you to continue whining about Coleman's triceps after this shot but you continue to ignore it because let's face it you're 100% wrong (again).
really?
(http://www.flexonline.com/06contests/06austria/menpre2/images/FDBE0075.jpg)
wrong as always - back to the bowflex - or the threads bashing you, yet you claim not read them, but have more posts on them than anyone.
lol.
haha, pumpster, you posted one shitty ass shot of colemans tricep when he's not onstage and you expect everyone to agree that ronnie has good tri's? Dude you just got super desperate...
haha, pumpster, you posted one shitty ass shot of colemans tricep when he's not onstage and you expect everyone to agree that ronnie has good tri's? Dude you just got super desperate...
hulkster will you at least concede the fact that ronnie's tris aren't as good as lee's?
So far you've been 100% wrong on everything, and for the last time i'm not black you dufus LOL
Here is pumpster bragging about how he could have banged a few HOT transexuals LMFAO thats code for they banged him .
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=129234.0
Bump for bowflex-obsessed dweebs LOL
I'll do my best to keep this important thread alive bwahahahahaha
Badell even called Coleman out on triceps.
After looking at Hulkster's pics, Ronnie can't pose his triceps very well and the smaller (in reference to his upper arms) forearms makes the pose look odd.
dillet was not the prettiest
wooo you freakin crack me up
being the laughing stock of many threads you'll try to get it any way you can lol in the end you're just as big a joke as the BowFlex you use , stick to the topic .
Why, do you want to buy one?
AKA the jackass can't refute the evidence bwahahahahahahahahahahah
Here is pumpster bragging about how he could have banged a few HOT transexuals LMFAO thats code for they banged him .
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=129234.0
Bump for bowflex-obsessed dweebs LOL
I'll do my best to keep this important thread alive bwahahahahaha