In politics it is always relevant to question what the alternative party would have done after the fact. If this were not the case, the opposing party would never have grounds to argue that they would have done things differently when 'x' occurred, and therefore not be able to earn our trust and in turn, our vote.
A question was asked:
Where are the weapons ? lol
That question was quoted, and a response was given - but it didn't answer the question:
Where's the Liberals plan? They voted too!
Then, again not answering the question again, he tries it again, since no one bites his redirect:
Hello....anyone?
So in this case, BRUCE, the "what would the alternative party have done" question is irrelevant, as that answer had nothing to do with the question. It was another dodge, which we see often here, as people continue to try to defend the altruistic reasons for the war so they can sleep at night and still support that party. In reality, we all know Afghan/iraq is nothing but resource manegement. The honest people face this.
