Of course, they're dwarves.
imo paris is I agree, it just blows my mind that the other two are regarded as "legends," and clearly here Bob is making a mockery of them.
Quote from: Jeffro on June 06, 2008, 02:44:47 PMimo paris is I agree, it just blows my mind that the other two are regarded as "legends," and clearly here Bob is making a mockery of them.hi boblolexplain how your assessing the physiques if you feel so strongly that paris is the best bodybuilder on the stage
He couldn't touch Gaspari when they turned to do their back shots
hi boblolexplain how your assessing the physiques if you feel so strongly that paris is the best bodybuilder on the stage
Labrada was definitely better than Paris, but I'm not so sure about Gaspari - I think overall Paris had him beat. There's nothing too appealing about Gaspari's physique for me.
Wider shoulders than both, better capped shoulders than Gaspari, better arms and forearms than both, better cuts in legs than both....
Hi Labrada.
i see where you are getting that from. im sure paris's actual shoulder width is greater than both. but hes also taller. he needs to have a greater actual measurement of shoulder width. but what really determines should width is the shoulder to waist ration... because it does not matter if a guy has a 60 inch shoulders if he has a 50 inch waist. see what i mean? i kind see what you mean about his shoulder caps (side delts), and i wouldnt argue that paris has slightly better development there. i dont see his arms and forearms as being any better than labradas or gaspari's i think in actual measurement they are very similar... but on a smaller frame with smaller bones labarada's arms would win that comparison. paris has cuts in his legs, but they are very narrow... no much "X" to his frame.. more like a "V" on top of a " l "
Someone throw up some some decent shots of Gaspari and own this little pillow biter.
....
