Wow you totally show your biases in posts such as this. So Francois was far from his best at the 95 Olympia because he did a spring show, even though Nasser did the Houston and NOC shows the same year? lol. If Francois couldn't peak again it just adds to the list of reasons why he was an inferior bodybuilder to Nasser. And you're pointing out that he beat Flex at the 95 AC even though its previously been argued to death that Flex was still recovering in 95 (btw Nasser beat Flex decisively at the 95 Olympia as well), again, irrelevent to the discussion here.
And lol at the fact that you've challenged me to find a link to scorecards to say that Nasser and Francois were close at the 94 NOC even though you did not provide any link to the scores of Francois' two placings behind Nasser at the 97 Arnold and San Jose pro shows. Why the double standard?
But again that's all irrelevent, fact is Francois never beat Nasser at his best. Any further arguments to Francois' favour are always filled with if's - if his career didn't end early, if he kept continuing to improve, if he could have peakd twice in 95, etc.
Wow you totally show your biases in posts such as this. So Francois was far from his best at the 95 Olympia because he did a spring show, even though Nasser did the Houston and NOC shows the same year? lol. If Francois couldn't peak again it just adds to the list of reasons why he was an inferior bodybuilder to Nasser. And you're pointing out that he beat Flex at the 95 AC even though its previously been argued to death that Flex was still recovering in 95 (btw Nasser beat Flex decisively at the 95 Olympia as well), again, irrelevent to the discussion here.
What bias? where did I say Mike was better? where? furthermore none of this has anything to do with your ignorant statement but I will address it
You claimed ignorantly that they were their best at the 1995 Olympia which is a lie , it doesn't matter is Nasser competed in the spring shows and still maintained a good shape at the Olympia , that has NOTHING to do with them both being their best at the same show.
And lol at the fact that you've challenged me to find a link to scorecards to say that Nasser and Francois were close at the 94 NOC even though you did not provide any link to the scores of Francois' two placings behind Nasser at the 97 Arnold and San Jose pro shows. Why the double standard?
The difference between you and I is , I can back up my claims and you don't ever , you just make shit up , examples are present in Kevin vs Nasser debates
http://musclememory.com/show.php?c=Arnold+Classic+-+IFBB&y=1997http://musclememory.com/show.php?c=San+Jose+Pro+Invitational+-+IFBB&y=1997consider it back-up and your bullshit about Mike never coming close to Nasser after 95 corrected
now I will NOT be waiting for your other bullshit claim to be backed up , about the judges just giving Mike a close 1st over Nasser at the 95 NOC because you made that shit up and we both know it and please don't tell me Nasser told you it was a close contest because he's a horrible source for information and anything he ' confirms ' will be dismissed
But again that's all irrelevent, fact is Francois never beat Nasser at his best. Any further arguments to Francois' favour are always filled with if's - if his career didn't end early, if he kept continuing to improve, if he could have peakd twice in 95, etc.
Nasser never beat Mike at his best , and I don't think we ever really saw Mike at his best , but 1995 Arnold Classic was pretty damn impressive and he wasn't missing much compared to Nasser